Progress: Procedure completed
Role | Committee | Rapporteur | Shadows |
---|---|---|---|
Lead | CONT | KOHN Arndt ( S&D) | SALAFRANCA SÁNCHEZ-NEYRA José Ignacio ( PPE), MACOVEI Monica ( ECR), KLINZ Wolf ( ALDE), JÁVOR Benedek ( Verts/ALE), VALLI Marco ( EFDD), JALKH Jean-François ( ENF) |
Committee Opinion | PETI | ||
Committee Opinion | REGI | ||
Committee Opinion | AFCO | ||
Committee Opinion | DEVE | ||
Committee Opinion | CULT | ||
Committee Opinion | AFET | ||
Committee Opinion | PECH | ||
Committee Opinion | AGRI | ||
Committee Opinion | ENVI | ||
Committee Opinion | EMPL | ||
Committee Opinion | BUDG | ||
Committee Opinion | ITRE | ||
Committee Opinion | JURI | ||
Committee Opinion | ECON | ||
Committee Opinion | LIBE | ||
Committee Opinion | INTA | ||
Committee Opinion | IMCO | ||
Committee Opinion | TRAN | ||
Committee Opinion | FEMM |
Lead committee dossier:
Subjects
Events
The European Parliament decided by 519 votes to 94, with 24 abstentions, to grant discharge to the Secretary-General of the Court of Auditors of the European Union with regard to the implementation of the Court’s budget for the 2017 financial year, Section V – Court of Auditors.
It took note of the opinion of the external auditor that the financial statements of the Court give a true and fair view of the financial position of the Court.
Budgetary and financial management
In 2017, the Court’s final appropriations amounted to a total of EUR 141 240 000 (compared to EUR 137 557 000 in 2016) and that the overall rate of implementation for the budget was 97.73 % (compared to 99 % in 2016). Parliament stressed that the Court’s budget is purely administrative, with a large amount being used for expenditure in relation to persons working within the institution and in relation to buildings, movable property, equipment and miscellaneous operating expenditure.
The Court is called on to continue improving payment execution rates.
Staff
Members noted that the reduction of 5 % in staff numbers over the period 2013-2017 has been achieved. However, they are concerned by the increase in sick leave taken by staff from 8 636 days in total (for 687 members of staff) in 2015 to 10 327 days (for 677 members of staff) in 2017. They welcomed the transparency of the Court regarding the number of cases of staff burnout which occurred in 2017. The Court is called on to acknowledge this worrying trend and to prepare an action plan on improving the well-being of the staff, thus strengthening its efforts to improve staff well-being and work-life balance.
Brexit
The resolution noted that the United Kingdom’s decision to withdraw from the European Union will not have a major impact on the structure and human resources of the Court. Members welcomed the fact that the Court has decided to follow a case-by-case approach to deciding on the extension of contracts for British temporary and contract agents and not to dismiss them on the sole ground that they are no longer nationals of a Member State.
Moreover, they noted that the member of the Court from the United Kingdom will not be in service as of 1 April 2019 and that the budgetary impact of his departure, eight months earlier than the termination of the mandate, will amount to about EUR 108 000.
The Committee on Budgetary Control adopted the report by Arndt KOHN (S&D, DE) calling on the European Parliament to give discharge to the Secretary-General of the European Court of Auditors in respect of the implementation of the budget of the Court for the financial year 2017, Section V – Court of Auditor.
Members took note of the opinion of the external auditor that the financial statements of the Court give a true and fair view of the financial position of the Court.
Budgetary and financial management
In 2017, the Court’s final appropriations amounted to a total of EUR 141 240 000 (compared to EUR 137 557 000 in 2016) and that the overall rate of implementation for the budget was 97.73 % (compared to 99 % in 2016).
Staff
Members noted that the reduction of 5 % in staff numbers over the period 2013-2017 has been achieved. However, they are concerned by the increase in sick leave taken by staff from 8 636 days in total (for 687 members of staff) in 2015 to 10 327 days (for 677 members of staff) in 2017. They welcomed the transparency of the Court regarding the number of cases of staff burnout which occurred in 2017. The Court is called on to acknowledge this worrying trend and to prepare an action plan on improving the well-being of the staff, thus strengthening its efforts to improve staff well-being and work-life balance.
Brexit
The report noted that the United Kingdom’s decision to withdraw from the European Union will not have a major impact on the structure and human resources of the Court. Members welcomed the fact that the Court has decided to follow a case-by-case approach to deciding on the extension of contracts for British temporary and contract agents and not to dismiss them on the sole ground that they are no longer nationals of a Member State.
Moreover, they noted that the member of the Court from the United Kingdom will not be in service as of 1 April 2019 and that the budgetary impact of his departure, eight months earlier than the termination of the mandate, will amount to about EUR 108 000.
Based on the observations contained in the report by the Court of Auditors, the Council called on the European Parliament to grant discharge to all of the EU institutions in respect of the implementation of their respective budgets for the financial year 2017.
However, it considered that budget implementation required a series of comments from the Council which should be fully taken into account by the Commission.
The Council welcomed the fact that the administrative and related expenditure of the EU institutions remained, as in previous years, free from material error with an estimated level of error of 0.5 %, which while being well below the materiality threshold is higher by 0.3 % compared to the Court's findings for 2016 (0.2 %). It noted with satisfaction that no serious weaknesses were identified by the Court in the supervisory and control systems and in the examined annual activity reports.
The Council took note that, as in previous years, there was a small number of errors relating to staff costs and some weaknesses in the Office for Administration and Payment of individual entitlements' (PMO) management of family allowances. It called on the Commission to improve its procedures to avoid errors related to staff expenditure.
The Court did not identify any specific problems concerning the Court of Auditors of the European Union.
PURPOSE: presentation of the Annual report of the Court of Auditors on the implementation of the budget concerning the financial year 2017.
CONTENT: the Court of Auditors published its 41th annual report on the implementation of the general budget of the Union for the year 2017. This report follows a five-part structure:
- the statement of assurance (DAS) and a summary of the results of the audit on the reliability of accounts and the regularity of transactions;
- the analysis of budgetary and financial management;
- the Commission’s performance reporting framework;
- the findings on EU revenue;
- the presentation of the main headings of the current multiannual financial framework (MFF), the results of the testing of the regularity of transactions.
The Court concludes that payments for 2017 are legal and regular, with the expenditure recorded in 2017 covering spending on a reimbursement basis. It believes that the EU accounts present a true and fair view of the EU’s financial position.
The report also assessed the potential impact on the 2017 accounts of the United Kingdom’s withdrawal from the European Union. On 29 March 2017, the United Kingdom (UK) formally notified the European Council of its intention to leave the European Union (EU). On 22 May 2017, the negotiations started for the withdrawal agreement between the EU and the UK.
Part Five (Financial Provisions) of the draft withdrawal agreement of 19 March 2018 concerning the financial settlement states that the UK will pay all its obligations under the current and previous Multiannual Financial Frameworks as if it were still a Member State.
Based on this, the Court concluded that the accounts as at 31 December 2017 correctly reflect the withdrawal process.
The audit also focuses on the budget implementation of the Committee of the European Court of Auditors .
The overall audit evidence indicates that the level of error in spending on ‘Administration’ was not material. For this MFF heading, the testing of transactions produced an estimated overall level of error of 0.5 %
According to the external auditor’s report, the financial statements give a true and fair view of the financial position of the European Court of Auditors as of 31 December 2017, and of the results of its operations, its cash flows and the changes in net assets for the year then ended.
PURPOSE: presentation by the Commission of the consolidated annual accounts of the European Union for the financial year 2017, as part of the 2017 discharge procedure.
Analysis of the accounts of the EU Institutions: European Court of Auditors .
CONTENT: the organisational governance of the EU consists of institutions, agencies and other EU bodies whose expenditure is included in the general budget of the Union.
This Commission document concerns the EU's consolidated accounts for the year 2017 and details how spending by the EU institutions and bodies was carried out. The consolidated annual accounts of the EU provide financial information on the activities of the institutions, agencies and other bodies of the EU from an accrual accounting and budgetary perspective.
It is the responsibility of the Commission's Accounting Officer to prepare the EU's consolidated annual accounts and ensure that they present fairly, in all material aspects, the financial position, the result of the operations and the cash flows of the EU institutions and bodies with a view to granting discharge.
Discharge procedure : the final step of a budget lifecycle is the discharge . It is the decision by which the European Parliament ‘ releases ’ the Commission from its responsibility for management of a given budget by marking the end of that budget's existence. It is granted by the European Parliament on the recommendation of the Council.
The decision is based in particular on the European Court of Auditors reports, in particular its annual report, in which the Court provides a Statement of Assurance (DAS) on the legality and regularity of transactions (payments and commitments).
The procedure results in the granting, postponement or refusal of discharge.
The final discharge report including specific recommendations to the Commission for action is adopted in plenary by the European Parliament and are subject to an annual follow up report in which the Commission outlines the concrete actions it has taken to implement the recommendations made.
All EU institutions and other agencies, bodies and joint undertakings are subject to their own discharge procedures.
(2) Implementation of Court of Auditors’ appropriations for the financial year 2017 : the CoA’s budget amounted to around EUR 141 million . This represents less than 0.1 % of total EU spending or around 1.5 % of EU’s total administrative spending. The proportion of the 2017 budget used was 98 %.
As regards the Court of Auditor’s expenditure, the information is drawn from the Court of Auditors 2017 Annual Activity Report and highlighted that 2017 was marked by:
the official celebration of the Court’s 40 th anniversary ; a landscape review of EU action on energy and climate change and a rapid case review of the EU institutions’ staff reduction; the production of 55 specific annual reports on the accounts of the EU’s various agencies, bodies and joint undertakings located across the Union; 28 special reports examining the effectiveness and added value of EU policies and programmes in areas such as youth unemployment, environment, migration and the banking union; five opinions on proposed new or updated EU laws with significant financial management implications, including one on the Financial Regulation for the EU budget and one on the funding of European political parties.
External audit of the ECA : the ECA’s annual accounts are audited by an independent external auditor (PricewaterhouseCoopers Sàrl).
PURPOSE: presentation by the Commission of the consolidated annual accounts of the European Union for the financial year 2017, as part of the 2017 discharge procedure.
Analysis of the accounts of the EU Institutions: European Court of Auditors .
CONTENT: the organisational governance of the EU consists of institutions, agencies and other EU bodies whose expenditure is included in the general budget of the Union.
This Commission document concerns the EU's consolidated accounts for the year 2017 and details how spending by the EU institutions and bodies was carried out. The consolidated annual accounts of the EU provide financial information on the activities of the institutions, agencies and other bodies of the EU from an accrual accounting and budgetary perspective.
It is the responsibility of the Commission's Accounting Officer to prepare the EU's consolidated annual accounts and ensure that they present fairly, in all material aspects, the financial position, the result of the operations and the cash flows of the EU institutions and bodies with a view to granting discharge.
Discharge procedure : the final step of a budget lifecycle is the discharge . It is the decision by which the European Parliament ‘ releases ’ the Commission from its responsibility for management of a given budget by marking the end of that budget's existence. It is granted by the European Parliament on the recommendation of the Council.
The decision is based in particular on the European Court of Auditors reports, in particular its annual report, in which the Court provides a Statement of Assurance (DAS) on the legality and regularity of transactions (payments and commitments).
The procedure results in the granting, postponement or refusal of discharge.
The final discharge report including specific recommendations to the Commission for action is adopted in plenary by the European Parliament and are subject to an annual follow up report in which the Commission outlines the concrete actions it has taken to implement the recommendations made.
All EU institutions and other agencies, bodies and joint undertakings are subject to their own discharge procedures.
(2) Implementation of Court of Auditors’ appropriations for the financial year 2017 : the CoA’s budget amounted to around EUR 141 million . This represents less than 0.1 % of total EU spending or around 1.5 % of EU’s total administrative spending. The proportion of the 2017 budget used was 98 %.
As regards the Court of Auditor’s expenditure, the information is drawn from the Court of Auditors 2017 Annual Activity Report and highlighted that 2017 was marked by:
the official celebration of the Court’s 40 th anniversary ; a landscape review of EU action on energy and climate change and a rapid case review of the EU institutions’ staff reduction; the production of 55 specific annual reports on the accounts of the EU’s various agencies, bodies and joint undertakings located across the Union; 28 special reports examining the effectiveness and added value of EU policies and programmes in areas such as youth unemployment, environment, migration and the banking union; five opinions on proposed new or updated EU laws with significant financial management implications, including one on the Financial Regulation for the EU budget and one on the funding of European political parties.
External audit of the ECA : the ECA’s annual accounts are audited by an independent external auditor (PricewaterhouseCoopers Sàrl).
Documents
- Results of vote in Parliament: Results of vote in Parliament
- Debate in Parliament: Debate in Parliament
- Decision by Parliament: T8-0248/2019
- Committee report tabled for plenary: A8-0097/2019
- Supplementary non-legislative basic document: 05824/2019
- Amendments tabled in committee: PE634.531
- Committee draft report: PE626.820
- Court of Auditors: opinion, report: N8-0013/2019
- Court of Auditors: opinion, report: OJ C 357 04.10.2018, p. 0001
- Non-legislative basic document: COM(2018)0521
- Non-legislative basic document: EUR-Lex
- Non-legislative basic document published: COM(2018)0521
- Non-legislative basic document published: EUR-Lex
- Non-legislative basic document: COM(2018)0521 EUR-Lex
- Court of Auditors: opinion, report: N8-0013/2019 OJ C 357 04.10.2018, p. 0001
- Committee draft report: PE626.820
- Amendments tabled in committee: PE634.531
- Supplementary non-legislative basic document: 05824/2019
Votes
A8-0097/2019 - Arndt Kohn - Résolution 26/03/2019 17:39:14.000 #
A8-0097/2019 - Arndt Kohn - Résolution #
Amendments | Dossier |
38 |
2018/2171(DEC)
2019/01/30
CONT
38 amendments...
Amendment 1 #
Proposal for a decision 1 Paragraph 1 1. Grants the Secretary-General of the Court of Auditors discharge in respect of the implementation of the budget of the Court of Auditors for the financial year
Amendment 10 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 12 12.
Amendment 11 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 12 12. Welcomes the fact that in 2017 it took an average of 14,6 months from the commencement of an audit task to adoption of the special report; notes that this was the shortest average duration since the start of the 2013-2017 period; regrets, however, that only eight of the reports (29 %) published during the year complied with the 13 months target timeframe set out in the Financial Regulation; observes that the time until publication was 16 months on average which was around 2 months less than in 2016 and, in that light, calls on the Court to continue improving its performance in this regard, while not compromising the quality of the reports and the targeted nature of its recommendations;
Amendment 12 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 14 14. Welcomes the
Amendment 13 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 15 15. Welcomes the detailed review of the use of official cars by members of the Court and the Secretary General broken down by user, distance travelled and cost paid, provided by the Court in the framework of the discharge procedure 2017; observes that different regimes apply to journeys covered by a mission order and other journeys undertaken in the course of performance of official duties, up to a limit for reimbursement of 10 000 km per year; notes, moreover, that for all other journeys
Amendment 14 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 16 16. Welcomes the fact that Decision 81-2016, which decreased the annual limit for reimbursement for journeys undertaken in the performance of official duties from 15 000 to 10 000 km, resulted in savings of approximately 15%; is concerned, however, that the current regime still results in a disproportionate burden in terms of administration and documentation; calls on the Court to make further simplifications while improving the reliability of the system for settlements;
Amendment 15 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 16 16. Welcomes the fact that Decision 81-2016, which decreased the annual limit for reimbursement for journeys undertaken in the performance of official duties from 15 000 to 10 000 km, resulted in savings of approximately 15%; is concerned, however, that the current regime still results in a disproportionate burden in terms of administration and documentation; calls on the Court to make further simplifications while improving the reliability of the system for settlements;
Amendment 16 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 18 18. Notes the fact that the Court’s ongoing project to reinforce the security of the institution and staff progressed according to plan; notes that the new security control centre, the external accreditation centre and the access control centre for staff and visitors
Amendment 17 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 19 19. Welcomes that the Court obtained certification under the Eco-Management and Audit Scheme (EMAS); welcomes the Court’s measures to improve its waste management, increase its energy efficiency and reduce its carbon footprint and encourages it to continue with its efforts in this direction; welcomes the remarkable reduction in energy costs;
Amendment 18 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 20 20. Notes that the reduction of 5 % in staff numbers over the period 2013-2017 has been achieved in compliance with the Interinstitutional Agreement of 2 December 2013 between the European Parliament, the Council and the Commission on budgetary discipline, on cooperation in budgetary matters and on sound financial management7 with an overall contribution of 45 posts; notes that the Court cut one post more than the target for the period 2013-2017; notes that the number of contractual agents increased from 59 to 73 over the same period, which is mainly due to the reinforcement of security measures at the Court premises; notes that the Court streamlined procedures by using IT tools and digitalisation and by outsourcing various tasks to the Pay Master Office of the Commission in order to implement staff reduction objectives; _________________ 7 OJ C 373, 20.12.2013, p. 1 OJ C 373, 20.12.2013, p. 1
Amendment 19 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 20 20. Notes that the reduction of 5 % in staff numbers over the period 2013-2017 has been achieved in compliance with the Interinstitutional Agreement of 2 December 2013 between the European Parliament, the Council and the Commission on budgetary discipline, on cooperation in budgetary matters and on sound financial management7 with an overall contribution of 45 posts; notes that the number of contractual agents increased from 59 to 73 over the same period, which is mainly due to the reinforcement of security measures at the Court premises; notes, however, that the Court streamlined procedures by using IT tools and digitalisation and by outsourcing various tasks to the Pay Master Office of the Commission in order to implement staff reduction objectives; _________________ 7 OJ C 373, 20.12.2013, p. 1
Amendment 2 #
Proposal for a decision 1 Paragraph 1 1.
Amendment 20 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 20 a (new) 20a. Takes note that the Court in order to be aligned with the recommendations issued by the International Federation of Accountants aims to provide an annual average of 40 hours (5 days) of professional training to its auditors; observes that in 2017 the target was exceeded with 6.7 days of professional training per auditor;
Amendment 21 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 21 21. Is concerned by the increase in sick leave taken by staff from 8 636 days in total (for 687 members of staff) in 2015 to 10 327 days (for 677 members of staff) in 2017; welcomes the transparency of the Court regarding the number of cases of staff burnout which occurred in 2017; calls on the Court to acknowledge this worrying trend and to prepare an action plan on improving the well-being of the staff, thus strengthening its efforts to improve staff well-being and work-life balance;
Amendment 22 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 25 25.
Amendment 23 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 26 26. Notes that there were no cases of whistle-blowing in 2017; notes that the Legal Service of the Court acts as a disclosure, advice and referral body for internal and external whistle-blowers; notes, furthermore, that a network of ethics advisors is in place to advise on the provision of information in cases of
Amendment 24 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 27 27. Notes that in 2017 the Court communicated 13 cases of suspected fraud to the European Anti-Fraud Office (OLAF), compared to 11 in 2016, which have been identified during the statement- of-assurance work for the financial years 2016 and 2017 and within the other audit tasks; welcomes the ongoing negotiations between the Court and the OLAF
Amendment 25 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 28 28.
Amendment 26 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 28 28. Regrets that members of the Court
Amendment 27 #
28.
Amendment 28 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 29 29. Recalls that, in accordance with Article 285 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union, members of the Court shall be completely independent in the performance of their duties and shall act solely in the Union’s general interest;
Amendment 29 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 29 29. Recalls that in accordance with Article 285 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union, members of the Court shall be completely independent in the performance of their duties and shall act solely in the Union’s general interest; is concerned by the current self-declaratory nature of compliance with this criteria and urges the Court to develop stronger controls on the external activities of members to ensure that they complete declarations of interests and attest to the absence of conflicts of interest; welcomes the ongoing external peer review of the Court’s ethical framework and asks to be kept informed about the outcome;
Amendment 3 #
1.
Amendment 30 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 30 30. Regrets that the information
Amendment 31 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 30 30. Regrets that the information currently requested in mission orders is insufficient and does not allow the Court to assess whether the activity planned by members of the Court falls within the area of interest of the Court; calls on the Court to increase the amount of information required accordingly in order to prevent possible abuses and report back to the discharge authority on the applied changes;
Amendment 32 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 30 30. Regrets that the information
Amendment 33 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 31 31. Observes with interest, however, that the Court has, since
Amendment 34 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 32 32. Urges the Court, in relation to irregularities in mission expenses, claims and undocumented absence from work by one of the members of the Court in the period 20
Amendment 35 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 32 32.
Amendment 36 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 32 32. Urges the Court, in relation to the period 2011-2017, to complete a comprehensive audit of mission expenses by members of the Court in order to identify potential irregularities and to recover the amounts affected by such irregularities; furthermore, calls on the Court to provide a list with the missions undertaken, including, for each mission, the dates, the full cost and a cost-benefit analysis;
Amendment 37 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 33 33. Recalls the recommended criteria for appointment of members to the Court by Member States and the Council as endorsed by Parliament in Parliament’s resolution of 4 February 2014; underlines that high standards of integrity and morality were an important criterion and that candidates should not hold any elected office or have any responsibilities in relation to a political party as of the date of their appointment; is of the opinion that the selection procedure should be further adapted to ensure that candidates hold the relevant qualifications and fulfil the relevant conditions; suggests that the pre- selection procedure for judges at the European Court of Justice could serve as a model for an independent pre-selection procedure for members at the Court of Auditors;
Amendment 38 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 34 34. Notes that the United Kingdom’s decision to withdraw from the European Union will not have a major impact on the structure and human resources of the Court; welcomes the fact that the Court has decided to follow a case-by-case approach to deciding on the extension of contracts for British temporary and contract agents and not to dismiss them on the sole ground that they are no longer nationals of a Member State; calls on the Court to swiftly develop a coherent strategy to provide certainty for the persons concerned; notes, moreover, that the member of the Court from the United Kindom will not be in service as of 1 April 2019 and that the budgetary impact of his departure, eight months earlier than the termination of the mandate, will amount to about EUR 108 000.
Amendment 4 #
Proposal for a decision 1 Paragraph 1 1.
Amendment 5 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 3 3.
Amendment 6 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 3 a (new) 3a. Notes with concern that investment in buildings, plant and equipment has doubled; stresses that those costs must be justified;
Amendment 7 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 5 a (new) 5a. Welcomes the launch of the online portal ‘Public Audit in the European Union’ containing information on the work and role of the 29 Union Supreme Audit Institutions and the Member States; calls on the Court to publish short activity reports on the online portal, containing concrete data on the analyses performed by the Court and the Supreme Audit Institutions and the concrete results, including cost-benefits analyses and the amounts recovered;
Amendment 8 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 7 a (new) 7a. Deplores that since 2012 the Court failed to publish any special report on the management of conflict of interest in selected Union agencies; urges the Court to publish annual special report on the management of conflict of interest in Union agencies working with industries, namely the European Aviation Safety Agency (EASA), the European Chemicals Agency (ECHA), the European Chemicals Agency (EFSA) and the European Medicines Agency (EMA); notes that for Union agencies working with industries the risk of conflict of interest is higher than in other Union agencies;
Amendment 9 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 9 9. Notes that
source: 634.531
|
History
(these mark the time of scraping, not the official date of the change)
docs/0 |
|
events/0/date |
Old
2018-06-28T00:00:00New
2018-06-27T00:00:00 |
events/5/docs |
|
committees/0/shadows/3 |
|
docs/1/docs/0/url |
Old
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE626.820New
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/CONT-PR-626820_EN.html |
docs/2/docs/0/url |
Old
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE634.531New
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/CONT-AM-634531_EN.html |
events/1/type |
Old
Committee referral announced in Parliament, 1st reading/single readingNew
Committee referral announced in Parliament |
events/2/type |
Old
Vote in committee, 1st reading/single readingNew
Vote in committee |
events/3/type |
Old
Committee report tabled for plenary, single readingNew
Committee report tabled for plenary |
events/4 |
|
events/4 |
|
events/4/docs |
|
events/5 |
|
events/5 |
|
events/6 |
|
events/6/type |
Old
Decision by Parliament, 1st reading/single readingNew
Decision by Parliament |
procedure/Modified legal basis |
Rules of Procedure EP 159
|
procedure/Other legal basis |
Rules of Procedure EP 159
|
docs/1/docs/0/url |
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE626.820New
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE626.820 |
docs/2/docs/0/url |
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE634.531New
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE634.531 |
events/3/docs/0/url |
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/A-8-2019-0097_EN.htmlNew
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/A-8-2019-0097_EN.html |
events/4/docs/0/url |
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?secondRef=TOC&language=EN&reference=20190326&type=CRENew
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?secondRef=TOC&language=EN&reference=20190326&type=CRE |
events/5/docs/0/url |
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/TA-8-2019-0248_EN.htmlNew
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/TA-8-2019-0248_EN.html |
events/7 |
|
procedure/final |
|
procedure/stage_reached |
Old
Procedure completed, awaiting publication in Official JournalNew
Procedure completed |
docs/0 |
|
docs/0 |
|
events/3/docs/0/url |
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=REPORT&mode=XML&reference=A8-2019-0097&language=ENNew
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/A-8-2019-0097_EN.html |
events/5/docs/0/url |
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=TA&language=EN&reference=P8-TA-2019-0248New
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/TA-8-2019-0248_EN.html |
committees/0 |
|
committees/0 |
|
committees/0 |
|
committees/0 |
|
activities |
|
commission |
|
committees/0 |
|
committees/0 |
|
committees/1 |
|
committees/1 |
|
committees/2 |
|
committees/2 |
|
committees/3 |
|
committees/3 |
|
committees/4 |
|
committees/4 |
|
committees/5 |
|
committees/5 |
|
committees/6 |
|
committees/6 |
|
committees/7 |
|
committees/7 |
|
committees/8 |
|
committees/8 |
|
committees/9 |
|
committees/9 |
|
committees/10 |
|
committees/10 |
|
committees/11 |
|
committees/11 |
|
committees/12 |
|
committees/12 |
|
committees/13 |
|
committees/13 |
|
committees/14 |
|
committees/14 |
|
committees/15 |
|
committees/15 |
|
committees/16 |
|
committees/16 |
|
committees/17 |
|
committees/17 |
|
committees/18 |
|
committees/18 |
|
committees/19 |
|
committees/19 |
|
docs |
|
events |
|
links |
|
other |
|
procedure/Modified legal basis |
Rules of Procedure EP 159
|
procedure/dossier_of_the_committee |
Old
CONT/8/14163New
|
procedure/stage_reached |
Old
Awaiting committee decisionNew
Procedure completed, awaiting publication in Official Journal |
procedure/subject |
Old
New
|
activities/0/commission/0 |
|
activities/1 |
|
other/0 |
|
procedure/dossier_of_the_committee |
CONT/8/14163
|
procedure/stage_reached |
Old
Preparatory phase in ParliamentNew
Awaiting committee decision |
committees/4/date |
2018-07-27T00:00:00
|
committees/4/rapporteur |
|
committees/4/shadows |
|
activities |
|
committees |
|
links |
|
other |
|
procedure |
|