Progress: Procedure completed
Role | Committee | Rapporteur | Shadows |
---|---|---|---|
Lead | CONT | VALLI Marco ( EFDD) | ZELLER Joachim ( PPE), HOFFMANN Iris ( S&D), CZARNECKI Ryszard ( ECR), GERBRANDY Gerben-Jan ( ALDE), TARAND Indrek ( Verts/ALE), KAPPEL Barbara ( ENF) |
Committee Opinion | DEVE | DEVA Nirj ( ECR) | Arne LIETZ ( S&D), Lola SÁNCHEZ CALDENTEY ( GUE/NGL) |
Committee Opinion | BUDG |
Lead committee dossier:
Subjects
Events
The European Parliament decided by 504 votes to 119, with 14 abstentions, to grant discharge to the Commission in respect of the implementation of the budget of the eighth, ninth, tenth and eleventh European Development Funds for the financial year 2017.
On the basis of the statement of assurance as to the reliability of the accounts and the legality and regularity of the underlying transactions provided by the Court of Auditors, Members called on the European Parliament to grant the Commission discharge in respect of implementation of the budget of the eighth, ninth, tenth and eleventh European Development Funds for the financial year 2017.
Parliament made a series of observations which form an integral part of the discharge decision:
Statement of Assurance
It noted that EDF commitments reached EUR 6 218 million by end 2017, representing 95 % of the annual target. Payments amounted to EUR 4 256 million on 31 December 2017, corresponding to an execution rate of 98.89 %. In addition to the aforementioned EDF commitments and payments, that the total European Investment Bank (EIB) commitments reached EUR 667 million and EUR 456 million in payments for 2017.
Members noted that the share of the United Kingdom represents 14.82 % of the tenth EDF and 14.68 % of the eleventh EDF. They stressed the importance of keeping close ties between the European Union and the United Kingdom after its withdrawal from the European Union in relation to the EDF and development aid.
They also took note of the Commission proposal to increase heading VI (covering former heading IV and EDF) by 26 % for the upcoming programming period.
Reliability of the accounts
The resolution welcomed the Court’s opinion that the final annual accounts of the EDFs for the year 2017 present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of the EDF as of 31 December 2017, and that the results of their operations, their cash flows and the changes in net assets for the year-end, are in accordance with the provisions of the EDF Financial Regulation and with internationally accepted accounting standards for the public sector.
Parliament expressed concern on the adverse opinion stated by the Court on the legality and regularity of payments wherein payments underlying the accounts are materially affected by error. It regretted that in every annual activity report since 2012, DG DEVCO had to issue a reservation on the regularity of underlying transactions which points to serious internal management deficiencies.
Errors concerned, as in previous years, programme estimates, grants, contributions agreements managed both with international organisations and Member States’ cooperation agencies.
Evaluation and reporting component
DG DEVCO is invited to improve significantly its monitoring, evaluation and performance reporting arrangements to ensure that key indicators established in the different performance systems are systematically monitored and that reliable and comprehensive information is provided to policy makers on a timely basis.
Members called for a long-term evaluation including data gathering, researches and analysis in order to improve the key indicators. Undermining performance monitoring and results evaluation is detrimental to public accountability. They stressed the indispensability of providing Parliament and the budgetary control authority with a clear view of the real extent to which the Union’s main development objectives have been achieved.
Implementation of the EDF development aid
DG DEVCO is called on to consider the following points for EDF management to ensure its effectiveness, efficiency and added value:
- illustrate better the complementarity of EDF funding, the coherence of the Union toolbox and synergies with other external aid instruments;
- ensure the highest level of regularity and accountability for results for actions funded by the EDF;
- invites the Commission in that context to better explain the logical framework underlying its interventions, especially to get a better visibility of the expected long term impacts or sustainability of EDF-financed operations;
- include in the next annual activity report a structured assessment of the impact of the activities of the eleventh EDF, with a particular focus on human rights and environmental results achieved;
- considers there is still a need for a more systematic approach to the communication of Union´s grant-funded activities to enhance Union´s visibility, and to strengthen transparency and accountability along the chain of funding;
- improve the spirit of partnership through the establishment of democratic ownership of the programme and its implementation while ensuring respect for the fundamental values and principles of the EDF.
The EDF and the management of new nexus
Members acknowledged that the EDF is facing great pressure to respond to a growing number of political demands, such as security, migration and borders management, which are difficult to align with the EDF’s core values and the principles of the Union’s development and cooperation policy, namely poverty eradication as set out in Article 208 TFEU. They observed that the management of new nexus put at risk the overall balance of the development policy.
Trust funds
The total pledges under the Union trust funds amounted so far to EUR 4.09 billion, the main contribution originating from the EDF with EUR 3 billion and EUR 442.7 million from Member States and other donors. Members took note of pledges of nearly EUR 240 million for the Bekou trust fund in 2017 with EUR 113 million from the EDF and EUR 65.9 million from Member States and other donors.
Budget support to partner countries
Members observed that budget support financed by the EDF in 2017 corresponded to EUR 860.2 million of which EUR 703.1 million were new commitments (covering 54 countries and representing 102 budget support contracts).
For the OCTs, EDF disbursements in 2017 amounted to EUR 57.7 million (for 11 countries and 15 budget support contracts). DG DEVCO stopped budget support in two ACP countries respectively due to a lack of progress in the implementation of public finance management and lack of stability-oriented macroeconomic policy and transparency.
The Committee on Budgetary Control adopted the report by Marco VALLI (EFDD, IT) on discharge in respect of the implementation of the budget of the eighth, ninth, tenth and eleventh European Development Funds for the financial year 2017.
On the basis of the statement of assurance as to the reliability of the accounts and the legality and regularity of the underlying transactions provided by the Court of Auditors, the committee called on the European Parliament to grant the Commission discharge in respect of implementation of the budget of the eighth, ninth, tenth and eleventh European Development Funds for the financial year 2017.
Members made a series of observations which form an integral part of the discharge decision:
Statement of Assurance
They noted that EDF commitments reached EUR 6 218 million by end 2017, representing 95 % of the annual target. Payments amounted to EUR 4 256 million on 31 December 2017, corresponding to an execution rate of 98.89 %. In addition to the aforementioned EDF commitments and payments, that the total European Investment Bank (EIB) commitments reached EUR 667 million and EUR 456 million in payments for 2017.
Members noted that the share of the United Kingdom represents 14.82 % of the tenth EDF and 14.68 % of the eleventh EDF. They stressed the importance of keeping close ties between the European Union and the United Kingdom after its withdrawal from the European Union in relation to the EDF and development aid.
They also took note of the Commission proposal to increase heading VI (covering former heading IV and EDF) by 26 % for the upcoming programming period.
Reliability of the accounts
Members welcomed the Court’s opinion that the final annual accounts of the EDFs for the year 2017 present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of the EDF as of 31 December 2017, and that the results of their operations, their cash flows and the changes in net assets for the year-end, are in accordance with the provisions of the EDF Financial Regulation and with internationally accepted accounting standards for the public sector.
They expressed concern on the adverse opinion stated by the Court on the legality and regularity of payments wherein payments underlying the accounts are materially affected by error. They regretted that in every annual activity report since 2012, DG DEVCO had to issue a reservation on the regularity of underlying transactions which points to serious internal management deficiencies.
Errors concerned, as in previous years, programme estimates, grants, contributions agreements managed both with international organisations and Member States’ cooperation agencies.
Evaluation and reporting component
DG DEVCO is invited to improve significantly its monitoring, evaluation and performance reporting arrangements to ensure that key indicators established in the different performance systems are systematically monitored and that reliable and comprehensive information is provided to policy makers on a timely basis.
Members called for a long-term evaluation including data gathering, researches and analysis in order to improve the key indicators. Undermining performance monitoring and results evaluation is detrimental to public accountability. They stressed the indispensability of providing Parliament and the budgetary control authority with a clear view of the real extent to which the Union’s main development objectives have been achieved.
Implementation of the EDF development aid
DG DEVCO is called on to consider the following points for EDF management to ensure its effectiveness, efficiency and added value:
- illustrate better the complementarity of EDF funding, the coherence of the Union toolbox and synergies with other external aid instruments;
- ensure the highest level of regularity and accountability for results for actions funded by the EDF;
- invites the Commission in that context to better explain the logical framework underlying its interventions, especially to get a better visibility of the expected long term impacts or sustainability of EDF-financed operations;
- include in the next annual activity report a structured assessment of the impact of the activities of the eleventh EDF, with a particular focus on human rights and environmental results achieved;
- considers there is still a need for a more systematic approach to the communication of Union´s grant-funded activities to enhance Union´s visibility, and to strengthen transparency and accountability along the chain of funding;
- improve the spirit of partnership through the establishment of democratic ownership of the programme and its implementation while ensuring respect for the fundamental values and principles of the EDF.
The EDF and the management of new nexus
Members acknowledged that the EDF is facing great pressure to respond to a growing number of political demands, such as security, migration and borders management, which are difficult to align with the EDF’s core values and the principles of the Union’s development and cooperation policy, namely poverty eradication as set out in Article 208 TFEU. They observed that the management of new nexus put at risk the overall balance of the development policy.
Trust funds
The total pledges under the Union trust funds amounted so far to EUR 4.09 billion, the main contribution originating from the EDF with EUR 3 billion and EUR 442.7 million from Member States and other donors. Members took note of pledges of nearly EUR 240 million for the Bekou trust fund in 2017 with EUR 113 million from the EDF and EUR 65.9 million from Member States and other donors.
Budget support to partner countries
Members observed that budget support financed by the EDF in 2017 corresponded to EUR 860.2 million of which EUR 703.1 million were new commitments (covering 54 countries and representing 102 budget support contracts).
For the OCTs, EDF disbursements in 2017 amounted to EUR 57.7 million (for 11 countries and 15 budget support contracts). DG DEVCO stopped budget support in two ACP countries respectively due to a lack of progress in the implementation of public finance management and lack of stability-oriented macroeconomic policy and transparency.
Council Recommendation : 8th EDF
Having examined the revenue and expenditure account and the balance sheet relating to the operations of the eighth EDF as at 31 December 2017 and the annual report of the Court of Auditors on the activities funded by the 8th, 9th, 10th and 11th European Development Funds (EDFs) for the financial year 2017, together with the Commission's replies contained in that annual report, the Council recommended that the European Parliament give the Commission a discharge in respect of the implementation of the operations of the eighth EDF for the financial year 2017.
As a reminder, pursuant to the internal agreement between the Representatives of the Governments of the Member States of the European Union, meeting within the Council, on the financing of European Union aid under the multiannual financial framework for the period 2014 to 2020, in accordance with the ACP-EU Partnership Agreement, and on the allocation of financial assistance for the Overseas Countries and Territories to which Part Four of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union, the discharge for the financial management of the eighth EDF must be given to the Commission by the European Parliament on a recommendation from the Council.
The Council's recommendation is not accompanied by any particular comments, as the Council considers that the implementation of the operations of the 8th EDF by the Commission has been satisfactory.
Council Recommendation : 9th EDF
Having examined the revenue and expenditure account and the balance sheet relating to the operations of the ninth EDF as at 31 December 2017 and the annual report of the Court of Auditors on the activities funded by the 8th, 9th, 10th and 11th European Development Funds (EDFs) for the financial year 2017, together with the Commission's replies contained in that annual report, the Council recommended that the European Parliament give the Commission a discharge in respect of the implementation of the operations of the ninth EDF for the financial year 2017.
As a reminder, pursuant to the internal agreement between the Representatives of the Governments of the Member States of the European Union, meeting within the Council, on the financing of European Union aid under the multiannual financial framework for the period 2014 to 2020, in accordance with the ACP-EU Partnership Agreement, and on the allocation of financial assistance for the Overseas Countries and Territories to which Part Four of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union, the discharge for the financial management of the ninth EDF must be given to the Commission by the European Parliament on a recommendation from the Council.
The Council's recommendation is not accompanied by any particular comments, as the Council considers that the implementation of the operations of the 9th EDF by the Commission has been satisfactory.
Council Recommendation : 10th EDF
Having examined the revenue and expenditure account and the balance sheet relating to the operations of the tenth EDF as at 31 December 2017 and the annual report of the Court of Auditors on the activities funded by the 8th, 9th, 10th and 11th European Development Funds (EDFs) for the financial year 2017, together with the Commission's replies contained in that annual report, the Council recommended that the European Parliament give the Commission a discharge in respect of the implementation of the operations of the tenth EDF for the financial year 2017.
As a reminder, pursuant to the internal agreement between the Representatives of the Governments of the Member States of the European Union, meeting within the Council, on the financing of European Union aid under the multiannual financial framework for the period 2014 to 2020, in accordance with the ACP-EU Partnership Agreement, and on the allocation of financial assistance for the Overseas Countries and Territories to which Part Four of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union, the discharge for the financial management of the tenth EDF must be given to the Commission by the European Parliament on a recommendation from the Council.
The Council's recommendation is not accompanied by any particular comments, as the Council considers that the implementation of the operations of the 10th EDF by the Commission has been satisfactory.
Council Recommendation : 11th EDF
Having examined the revenue and expenditure account and the balance sheet relating to the operations of the eleventh EDF as at 31 December 2017 and the annual report of the Court of Auditors on the activities funded by the 8th, 9th, 10th and 11th European Development Funds (EDFs) for the financial year 2017, together with the Commission's replies contained in that annual report, the Council recommended that the European Parliament give the Commission a discharge in respect of the implementation of the operations of the eleventh EDF for the financial year 2017.
As a reminder, pursuant to the internal agreement between the Representatives of the Governments of the Member States of the European Union, meeting within the Council, on the financing of European Union aid under the multiannual financial framework for the period 2014 to 2020, in accordance with the ACP-EU Partnership Agreement, and on the allocation of financial assistance for the Overseas Countries and Territories to which Part Four of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union, the discharge for the financial management of the eleventh EDF must be given to the Commission by the European Parliament on a recommendation from the Council.
The Council's recommendation is not accompanied by any particular comments, as the Council considers that the implementation of the operations of the 11 th EDF by the Commission has been satisfactory.
PURPOSE: presentation of the annual report from the Court of Auditors of the European Union on the activities funded by the 8th, 9th, 10th and 11th European Development Funds (EDFs) concerning the financial year 2017.
CONTENT: the European Development Funds (EDFs) provide EU assistance for development cooperation to the African, Caribbean and Pacific (ACP) countries and overseas countries and territories (OCTs). EDF spending and cooperation instruments aim to overcome poverty, and to promote sustainable development and the integration of the ACP countries and OCTs in the world economy.
The EDFs are funded by the EU Member States and are implemented either through individual projects or through budget support (a contribution to a country’s general or sector budget). Each EDF is governed by its own financial regulation.
The EDFs are managed outside the framework of the EU budget by the European Commission (which manages the biggest part) and the European Investment Bank.
For 2017, EUR 3.5 billion of expenditure was subject to audit in this area.
EDF discharge procedure
Due to the intergovernmental nature of the EDFs, the European Parliament exercises a more limited role in their functioning than it does for the development cooperation instruments financed by the EU general budget; notably, it is not involved in establishing and allocating EDF resources. However, the European Parliament is still the discharge authority, except for the Investment Facility, which is managed by the EIB and therefore outside the scope of the audit.
The main conclusions of the Court are included in a ‘Statement of Assurance’, the main elements of which may be summarised as follows:
Reliability of the EDF accounts
The Court concludes that the 2017 accounts present fairly the financial situation of the EDFs, the results of their operations, their cash flows, as well as the change in net assets.
Overall, the information collected indicates that for the year ended 31 December, 2017:
- EDF revenue transactions did not contain a material level of error;
- EDF payments were affected by a significant level of error estimated at 4.5 % (compared to 3.3 % in 2016). The Court therefore gave an adverse opinion on the legality and regularity of payments underlying the accounts.
Expenditure not incurred accounted for 42 % of the overall rate of error in the EDFs. Other significant types of error include missing essential supporting documents, and non-compliance with procurement rules.
DG International Cooperation and Development (DEVCO)’s efforts to improve the implementation of its control system
In 2017 DG DEVCO carried out its sixth RER study to estimate the level of error which had evaded all management checks to prevent, detect and correct errors across its entire area of responsibility. No substantive testing was carried out for 67 % of the transactions because full reliance was placed, incorrectly or without proper justification, on previous control work. Due to this, combined with the errors detected, it was concluded that the 2017 results cannot be compared to those from previous years. This has an impact on the residual error rate. The Commission did not properly monitor the work carried out by the RER contractor and therefore was unable to prevent the problems from occurring
Conclusions
Currently, there is an inconsistency between the budgetary process (EP is not involved) and the accountability process (EP is partly involved in the discharge). The possible future integration of the EDFs within the EU general budget could mitigate the risks associated with this inconsistency (artificial annual budgetary discharge and absence of budgetary power of the EP).
Recommendations of the Court
In order to address the shortcomings noted above, the Court recommends that the Commission:
- closely monitor the implementation of the residual error rate study, in particular to ensure that, where full reliance is placed on previous control work, this is in line with the applicable methodology and properly justified;
- again disclose in the annual activity report the limitations of the residual error rate study, which assumes that the untested population is free from error;
- take decisive steps to enforce the guidance on accepting expenditure to avoid excess clearings;
- adopt measures to ensure that only incurred costs are certified as expenditure for Africa Infrastructure Trust Fund transactions;
- add an indicator to monitor the age of advance contributions to trust funds;
- propose a relevant solution to the EDFs’ budgetary and accountability inconsistencies as part of the current post-Cotonou studies.
PURPOSE: presentation by the Commission of the annual accounts of the European Development Funds (EDF) for the financial year 2017.
CONTENT: this communication presents the final accounts of the EDFs which have been prepared in accordance with Title IX of the Financial Regulation of the 11th European Development Fund and which must be presented to the European Parliament, the Council and the Court of Auditors.
The document also includes a note accompanying the accounts in which the accounting officer in charge of the EFD audit certifies that the accounts present a true and fair view of the financial position of the European Development Funds in all material aspects (signed declaration of assurance).
Objectives and financing of the EDF : the EDF is the EU's main instrument for providing development cooperation assistance to African, Caribbean and Pacific ("ACP") States and Overseas Countries and Territories (OCTs).
The EDF is not financed by the EU budget . It is established by an internal agreement between the representatives of the Member States, sitting within the Council, and directed by a specific committee. Responsibility for the financial implementation of operations carried out with EDF resources lies with the European Commission, while the Investment Facility is managed by the European Investment Bank (EIB).
Unlike the EU budget, the EDF operates on a multi-annual basis. For each EDF, a global fund is established for the implementation of development cooperation for a period which is generally five years. The funds allocated may be used throughout the EDF period.
EDF resources are ‘ad hoc’ contributions from EU Member States . At intervals of about five years, representatives of the Member States meet at intergovernmental level to decide on an overall amount allocated to the Fund and supervise its implementation. The Commission then manages the Fund in accordance with the Union's development cooperation policy.
Audit and discharge : the EDF annual accounts and resource management are overseen by its external auditor, the European Court of Auditors (hereinafter referred to as the ECA), which draws up an annual report for the European Parliament and the Council. The final control is the discharge of the financial implementation of the EDF resources for a given financial year.
The European Parliament is the discharge authority of the EDF . This means that following the audit and finalisation of the annual accounts it falls to the Council to recommend and then to the European Parliament to decide whether to grant discharge to the Commission for the financial implementation of the EDF resources for a given financial year.
The annual accounts are presented as follows:
Part I: Funds managed by the Commission , comprising: (i) EDF financial statements and notes thereto; (ii) financial statements of EU trust funds consolidated in the EDF; (iii) consolidated financial statements of the EDF and EU trust funds; (iv) the report on the financial implementation of the EDF. Part II: Annual Implementation Report - Funds managed by the European Investment Bank , including the financial statements of the Investment Facility.
Trust Funds : the document includes the financial statements of the two trust funds created under the EDF: (i) the Bêkou EU Trust Fund and (ii) the EU Trust Fund for Africa. The trust funds individual financial statements are prepared under the responsibility of the EC Accounting Officer and subject to external audit.
- The European Bêkou multi-donor fund was created on 15 July 2014 by the EU, Germany, France and the Netherlands, with the aim of promoting the stabilisation and reconstruction of the Central African Republic. In 2017, the Bêkou EUTF has adopted actions for a total amount of EUR 52.3 million in the sectors of rural resilience and job creation, health, support to the return of internally displaced people (IDPs) and refugees, light infrastructure, water and sanitation.
Pledges by its contributors amounted to more than EUR 236 million by the end of 2017. This is an increase of EUR 63 million compared to year 2016. Furthermore, more than EUR 18 million was paid on top of payments made during previous years; total disbursements have reached over EUR 61 million since the creation of Bêkou EUTF.
- The EU Trust Fund for Africa was established on 12 November 2015. It is an emergency trust fund for stability and addressing the root causes of irregular migration and displaced persons in Africa. It operates in three main geographical areas, namely the Sahel and Lake Chad regions, the Horn of Africa and North Africa.
As of 31 December 2017, resources allocated to the EU Trust Fund for Africa amount to approximately EUR 3 330 million : over EUR 2 900 million from the European Development Fund (EDF) and EU financial instruments including DCI, ENI, HOME and ECHO funding, and EUR 378.8 million from EU Member States and other donors (Switzerland and Norway), of which EUR 340.9 million have been paid as of 31 December 2017.
In the course of 2017, resources from the EDF and the EU budget have increased by approximately EUR 525 million (EUR 245 million from EDF, EUR 230 million from DCI and EUR 50 million from DG HOME funding) which represents an increase of almost 22 %.
Previous EDFs : as the sixth EDF was closed in 2006 and the seventh EDF was closed in 2008, the annual accounts no longer contain implementation tables for these EDFs. However, implementation of the transferred balances can be found in the ninth EDF.
Under the Cotonou Agreement, (i) the second period (2008-2013) of Community aid to the ACP States and OCTs is to be funded by the 10th EDF for an amount of EUR 22 682 million; (ii) the third period (2014-2020) of Union aid to the ACP States and OCTs is to be funded by the 11th EDF for an amount of EUR 30 506 million .
The amounts decommitted from projects under the ninth and previous EDFs are transferred to the performance reserve of the 10th EDF, with the exception of Stabex funds. The decommited funds from projects under the 10th EDF are transferred to the performance reserve of the 11th EDF.
As at 31.12.2017, the EDF's net assets amounted to EUR 1 389 million (compared with EUR 1 357 million as at 31.12.2016).
Documents
- Results of vote in Parliament: Results of vote in Parliament
- Debate in Parliament: Debate in Parliament
- Decision by Parliament: T8-0244/2019
- Committee report tabled for plenary: A8-0107/2019
- Amendments tabled in committee: PE634.541
- Supplementary non-legislative basic document: 05368/2019
- Supplementary non-legislative basic document: 05369/2019
- Supplementary non-legislative basic document: 05370/2019
- Supplementary non-legislative basic document: 05371/2019
- Committee opinion: PE631.880
- Committee draft report: PE626.825
- Court of Auditors: opinion, report: OJ C 357 04.10.2018, p. 0315
- Court of Auditors: opinion, report: N8-0126/2018
- Non-legislative basic document published: COM(2018)0519
- Non-legislative basic document published: EUR-Lex
- Court of Auditors: opinion, report: OJ C 357 04.10.2018, p. 0315 N8-0126/2018
- Committee draft report: PE626.825
- Committee opinion: PE631.880
- Supplementary non-legislative basic document: 05368/2019
- Supplementary non-legislative basic document: 05369/2019
- Supplementary non-legislative basic document: 05370/2019
- Supplementary non-legislative basic document: 05371/2019
- Amendments tabled in committee: PE634.541
Activities
Votes
A8-0107/2019 - Marco Valli - Résolution 26/03/2019 17:18:44.000 #
A8-0107/2019 - Marco Valli - Résolution #
Amendments | Dossier |
46 |
2018/2177(DEC)
2019/01/03
DEVE
22 amendments...
Amendment 1 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 1 1.
Amendment 10 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 2 f (new) 2f. Considers in this context the ever increasing EU focus on the security- development nexus as raising serious sound financial management issues and calls on the Commission and the EEAS to apply a much more prudent approach to EU support for African security;
Amendment 11 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 4 a (new) 4a. Insists, given the important role played by the United Kingdom in development, that close ties are retained between the Union and the United Kingdom after its departure in order to minimise ensuing losses;
Amendment 12 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 5 a (new) 5a. Urges the Commission to better define and clearly assess the development outcomes to be achieved in each case and above all to enhance control mechanism concerning recipient State´s conduct in the fields of corruption, respect of human rights, rule of law and democracy; expresses deep concern about the potential use of budget support in countries lacking democratic oversight, either due to the lack of functioning parliamentary democracy or freedoms for civil society and the media, or due to a lack of capacity of oversight bodies;
Amendment 13 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 5 b (new) 5b. Given the shift in aid modalities from direct grants to trust funds and blended finance, including through the European Fund for Sustainable Development, invites the Council, Commission and European Investment Bank to adopt an inter-institutional agreement with the European Parliament on transparency, accountability and parliamentary scrutiny on the basis of the policy principles set out in the New European Consensus on Development;
Amendment 14 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 5 c (new) 5c. Welcomes the process of the post- Cotonou agreement in order to maintain the ACP-EU framework;
Amendment 15 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 5 d (new) 5d. Underlines the high importance of supporting micro-, small- and medium- sized enterprises and calls in particular for the establishment of local solutions for a better access to finance with a further strengthening of micro-finance loan and guarantee system;
Amendment 16 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 5 e (new) 5e. Calls for an enlargement of the “Erasmus for Young Entrepreneuers” programme beyond Europe in particular developing countries while providing the necessary financial mean;
Amendment 17 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 5 f (new) 5f. Welcomes the European Court of Auditors recommendations for improving the transparency of EU funds implemented by NGOs published in the special report 2018/ 35, where it, amongst other things, recommends that the Commission improve the reliability of the information on NGOs in its accounting system, and that the Commission improve the information collected on funds implemented by NGOs; calls therefore on the Commission to implement these proposals before the end of the current mandate;
Amendment 18 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 5 g (new) 5g. Calls for an incentive-based approach to development by introducing the more-for-more principle, taking as an example the European Neighbouring Policy; believes that the more and the faster a country progresses in its internal reforms in relation to the building and consolidation of democratic institutions, the respect for human rights and the rule of law, the more support it should receive from the Union;
Amendment 19 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 5 h (new) 5h. Recognise that no country has ever developed without engaging in further trade relations with their neighbours and the rest of the world; further encourages the financing of aid for trade activities, in order to allow developing countries to participate to a much greater degree in global value chains in the future; stresses in this context the increasing importance of digital connectivity in order to achieve a more balanced distribution of the globalisation benefits in favour if developing countries;
Amendment 2 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 1 a (new) 1a. Welcomes the budgetisation of the EDF included in the EC proposal of the future EU Neighbourhood, Development and International Cooperation Instrument (NDICI);
Amendment 20 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 5 i (new) 5i. Underlines the importance of increasing the attribution of funds aiming at supporting good governance, democracy and the rule of law in developing countries in order to promote accountable and transparent institutions, support capacity building and foster a participatory decision-making and public access to information;
Amendment 21 #
5j. Emphasises the importance of the provision of clean water and of the building of additional wastewater disposal facilities;
Amendment 22 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 5 k (new) 5k. Draws attention to the scale and implication of energy poverty in developing countries and to the Union´s strong involvement in efforts to reduce such poverty; underlines the need for strong and concerted efforts by governments and stakeholders in affected countries to reduce energy poverty;
Amendment 3 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 1 a (new) 1a. Highlights the highly negative findings by the European Court of Auditors on Public-Private Partnerships1a (PPPs) and the Court’s recommendation “not to promote a more intensive and widespread use of PPPs” inside the EU; calls on the Commission to take this recommendation fully into account when dealing with PPPs in developing countries where the environment for successful implementation of PPPs is even more difficult than inside the Union; ____________________ 1a Special report Nr 9/2018: Public Private Partnerships in the EU: Widespread shortcomings and limited benefits
Amendment 4 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 1 b (new) 1b. Is worried by the findings of the mid-term evaluation on EDF 11 which states that "there is a real threat that EDF will be pushed into responding to agendas that distance it from its primary objective of poverty alleviation, which are difficult to reconcile with the EDF’s core values and compromise what it does well", that "despite consultations, government and CSOs’ views (with some notable exceptions such as in the Pacific region), have rarely been taken account of in programming choices" and that "the EDF11 programming thus used a top- down approach to apply the concentration principle but at the cost of the Cotonou Agreement’s central principle of partnership"; regrets that the Commission has until now completely ignored these findings;
Amendment 5 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 2 a (new) 2a. Takes note of the achievements of the European Union Emergency Trust Fund for Africa (EUTF); recalls, however, that EUTF funding coming from development budget lines must not be used for security measures jeopardising migrants’ rights; recalls, that EU development cooperation must have the eradication of poverty and sustainable development as the main objectives; stresses, that EUTF projects must integrate human rights at the core of programming and contribute to the realisation of human rights in the countries concerned; strongly recommends to promote gender equality and women’s empowerment in EUTF programmes as well as the protection of those most vulnerable, including children and persons with disabilities;
Amendment 6 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 2 b (new) 2b. Notes the numerous concerns the European Court of Auditors1a and the authors of the EDF 11 mid-evaluation have expressed on the implementation of the EUTF: In terms of project implementa- tion, the EUTF had only limited impact in speeding up the process compared to traditional development aid; Concerns over the likely effectiveness and sustainability of EUTF projects and over the ability of the Union to closely monitor their implementation; The Northern Africa and Horn of Africa windows have no documented criteria for selecting project proposals; Serious flaws in the measurement of performance; • No specific risk assessment framework. Considers that given such findings, the added value of the EUTF is highly questionable; ___________________ 1a Special report 32/2018
Amendment 7 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 2 c (new) 2c. Regrets that the expenditure recorded in 2017 under the eighth, ninth, tenth and eleventh EDF is materially affected by error and that the error rate is on the rise on the contrary to EU general budget expenditure; highlights that errors occur predominantly in transactions related to projects implemented by international organisations and Member States’ cooperation agencies and that in the examined transactions of this type, 36 % contained quantifiable errors, which is enormous; urges the Commission to produce detailed explanations in response to these findings and to submit a clear plan to the European Parliament outlining the necessary steps in order to correct this seriously worrying situation;
Amendment 8 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 2 d (new) 2d. Regrets that in every annual activity report since 2012, DG DEVCO had to issue a reservation on the regularity of underlying transactions which points to serious internal management deficiencies;
Amendment 9 #
2e. Highlights the negative findings from the Court of Auditors in the area of EU support to African security, which is often financed through the EDF: Strengthening the capacity of the internal security forces in Niger and Mali has been slow and there are serious concerns on ownership and sustainability1a The EU’s support for the African Peace and Security Architecture (APSA) has had a poor effect2a. Highlights as well the serious risk that EU support through the African Peace Facility to Burundian soldiers participating in the AMISOM mission indirectly finances a Burundian regime exposed to EU sanctions; recalls that for years, DG DEVCO expressed reservations on its expenditure on the support to the African Peace Facility; ____________________ 1a Special report 15/2018, Strengthening the capacity of the internal security forces in Niger and Mali: only limited and slow progress 2a Special report No 20/2018: The African Peace and Security Architecture: need to refocus EU support
source: 632.764
2019/02/12
CONT
24 amendments...
Amendment 1 #
Proposal for a decision 1 Paragraph 1 1.
Amendment 10 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 10 10. Regrets that further errors concerned, as in previous years, programme estimates, grants, contributions agreements managed both with international organisations and Member States’ cooperation agencies; recalls its concern in relation to the fact that the notional approach applied in multi-donor projects implemented by international organisations and budget support activities limit the Court’s audit scope; welcomes however the improvements made by the Commission in 2018 including the adoption of the "Terms of Reference for Expenditure Verifications" and the "Roadmap for Reinforcements of Controls under Programme Estimates"; invites the Commission to further reflect on its assumption that Union eligibility criteria have been complied with as long as the pooled amount includes sufficient eligible expenditure to cover the Union’s contribution; recalls on the Commission to efficiently address shortcomings in contract management, selection procedures, document management and the procurement system;
Amendment 11 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 13 13.
Amendment 12 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 13 13. Recalls the Commission to pay stricter attention to the recurrent weaknesses of its ex ante checks system and to implement measures to avoid the accounted failure of certain ex ante controls, while noting that the Court underlined that in some error cases the Commission had sufficient information from its information systems to prevent, detect and correct before making the expenditure, the estimated level of error would have been consequently 1,8 percentage points lower;
Amendment 13 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 15 15. Recalls that the regular monitoring of high risk factors (external, financial and operational) and their adequate quantification, is a key-prerequisite for a
Amendment 14 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 18 18. Believes that the ROM instrument should be used proactively and more rapidly when critical situations occur or persist; emphasises that corrective measures should be taken without delay and the nature of deficiencies at the design level should be structurally assessed; stresses the indispensability of providing Parliament and the budgetary control authority with a clear view of the real extent to which the Union’s main development objectives have been achieved;
Amendment 15 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 20 20. Takes note of the statement of the evaluation of the eleventh EDF that (i) ‘there is a real threat that EDF will be pushed into responding to agendas that distance it from its primary objective of poverty alleviation, which are difficult to reconcile with the EDF’s core values and compromise what it does well’ and (ii) that ‘despite consultations, government and [civil society organisation] views (with some notable exceptions such as in the Pacific region), have rarely been taken account of in programming choices’; considers however that peace building and addressing root causes of migration are fundamental aspects of sustainable development;
Amendment 16 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 23 23.
Amendment 17 #
– considers there is still a need for a more systematic approach to the communication of EU grant-funded activities to enhance EU visibility, and to strengthen transparency and accountability along the chain of funding;
Amendment 18 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 26 26. Considers that for infrastructure- related projects financed through the EDF, an independent ex-ante assessment that takes into account the social and environmental impact of the projects, as well as their added value , is essential; considers that funding decisions ought to be correlated to a proper cost-benefit analysis, with projects funded if their implementation is
Amendment 19 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 26 a (new) 26a. Welcomes the Commission's proposal for the budgetisation of the EDF in the general budget of the European Union; reiterates the European Parliament's call for the inclusion of the EDF in the European budget; encourages the Commission to grant Parliament's request without further delay;
Amendment 2 #
Proposal for a decision 1 Paragraph 1 1.
Amendment 20 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 28 28. Notes that the management of the new nexus brings into play the overall balance of development policy; is of the opinion that emergency responses to successive crisis situations should follow an holistic approach; recalls that respecting the coherence principle of its policy is of paramount importance for the stability of the countries benefiting from European development aid;
Amendment 21 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 31 31. Believes that enough local ownership and partners involvement should be ensured in the operational governance and policy design to avoid a too centralised modus operandi with a prominent role for donors while consistently respecting the principle of management by results;
Amendment 22 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 35 35. Invites the Commission to further elaborate on, and clarify, the exact scope and meaning of its margin of flexibility or of interpretation in assessing whether the general eligibility conditions for the making of disbursements to a partner country have been met, with respect to the so called ‘differentiation and dynamic approach to eligibility’; is concerned by the final use of the funds transferred and the lack of traceability when the Union’s funds are merged within the partner country’s budget resources;
Amendment 23 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 37 a (new) 37a. Welcomes the Commission's reactive and consistent approach to suspend budget support in two countries in 2017 and 2018 since the eligibility criteria were no longer met; believes that the Commission shall maintain a constructive dialogue with these countries and offer a possibility to resume budget support, should the countries implement the necessary reforms laid down in the budget support programme;
Amendment 24 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 41 41. Reiterates the necessity to ensure full transparency and access to data, in accordance with existing EU legislation, on projects implemented by international organisations and civil society organisations, as well as providing clear rules on governing control and monitoring;
Amendment 3 #
1. Grants the Commission discharge in respect of the implementation of the budget of the eighth, ninth,
Amendment 4 #
Proposal for a decision 2 Paragraph 1 1. Approves the closure of the accounts of the eighth, ninth,
Amendment 5 #
Motion for a resolution Recital B B. whereas EDF development aid is effectually implemented in 79 countries
Amendment 6 #
Motion for a resolution Recital D D. whereas several Union policies that are implemented in
Amendment 7 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 1 a (new) 1a. Strongly reiterates Parliament's call on the Council and Member States to proceed to the integration of the EDF in the Union's budget for the purpose of strengthening democratic scrutiny; welcomes the Commission's commitment to complying with the Parliament's recurrent request to integrate the EDF in the Union's Budget; requests that the Commission, inform Parliament of the state of play of discussions related to the replacement of the Cotonou agreement after 2020;
Amendment 8 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 2 2. Notes that the share of the United Kingdom represents 14, 82 % of the tenth EDF and 14,68 % of the eleventh EDF; nevertheless, welcomes the Commission proposal to increase heading VI (covering former heading IV and EDF) by 26% for the upcoming programming period;
Amendment 9 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 2 2. Notes that the share of the United Kingdom represents 14, 82 % of the tenth EDF and 14,68 % of the eleventh EDF; underlines the importance of keeping close ties between the European Union and the UK after its withdrawal in relation to the EDF and development aid;
source: 634.541
|
History
(these mark the time of scraping, not the official date of the change)
events/5/docs |
|
committees/0/shadows/4 |
|
docs/1/docs/0/url |
Old
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE626.825New
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/CONT-PR-626825_EN.html |
docs/2/docs/0/url |
Old
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE631.880&secondRef=03New
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/DEVE-AD-631880_EN.html |
docs/7/docs/0/url |
Old
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE634.541New
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/CONT-AM-634541_EN.html |
events/1/type |
Old
Committee referral announced in Parliament, 1st reading/single readingNew
Committee referral announced in Parliament |
events/2/type |
Old
Vote in committee, 1st reading/single readingNew
Vote in committee |
events/3/type |
Old
Committee report tabled for plenary, single readingNew
Committee report tabled for plenary |
events/4 |
|
events/4 |
|
events/4/docs |
|
events/5 |
|
events/5 |
|
events/6 |
|
events/6/type |
Old
Decision by Parliament, 1st reading/single readingNew
Decision by Parliament |
docs/1/docs/0/url |
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE626.825New
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE626.825 |
docs/2/docs/0/url |
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE631.880&secondRef=03New
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE631.880&secondRef=03 |
docs/7/docs/0/url |
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE634.541New
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE634.541 |
events/3/docs/0/url |
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/A-8-2019-0107_EN.htmlNew
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/A-8-2019-0107_EN.html |
events/4/docs/0/url |
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?secondRef=TOC&language=EN&reference=20190326&type=CRENew
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?secondRef=TOC&language=EN&reference=20190326&type=CRE |
events/5/docs/0/url |
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/TA-8-2019-0244_EN.htmlNew
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/TA-8-2019-0244_EN.html |
events/7 |
|
procedure/final |
|
procedure/stage_reached |
Old
Procedure completed, awaiting publication in Official JournalNew
Procedure completed |
events/3/docs/0/url |
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=REPORT&mode=XML&reference=A8-2019-0107&language=ENNew
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/A-8-2019-0107_EN.html |
events/5/docs/0/url |
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=TA&language=EN&reference=P8-TA-2019-0244New
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/TA-8-2019-0244_EN.html |
committees/0 |
|
committees/0 |
|
committees/1 |
|
committees/1 |
|
committees/0 |
|
committees/0 |
|
activities |
|
commission |
|
committees/0 |
|
committees/0 |
|
committees/1 |
|
committees/1 |
|
committees/2 |
|
committees/2 |
|
docs |
|
events |
|
links |
|
other |
|
procedure/dossier_of_the_committee |
Old
CONT/8/14268New
|
procedure/stage_reached |
Old
Awaiting committee decisionNew
Procedure completed, awaiting publication in Official Journal |
procedure/subject |
Old
New
|
activities/0/commission/0 |
|
activities/1 |
|
other/0 |
|
procedure/dossier_of_the_committee |
CONT/8/14268
|
procedure/stage_reached |
Old
Preparatory phase in ParliamentNew
Awaiting committee decision |
committees/1/date |
2018-07-27T00:00:00
|
committees/1/rapporteur |
|
committees/1/shadows |
|
activities |
|
committees |
|
links |
|
other |
|
procedure |
|