2019/2074(DEC) 2018 discharge: Eurojust, European Union's Judicial Cooperation Unit
Lead committee dossier:
Progress: Awaiting committee decision
Role | Committee | Rapporteur | Shadows |
---|---|---|---|
Lead | CONT | CZARNECKI Ryszard ( ECR) | NOVAKOV Andrey ( EPP), WOLTERS Lara ( S&D), STRUGARIU Ramona ( Renew), KUHS Joachim ( ID), EICKHOUT Bas ( Verts/ALE), OMARJEE Younous ( GUE/NGL) |
Committee Opinion | LIBE | METSOLA Roberta ( EPP) |
Lead committee dossier:
Subjects
Events
2019/11/06
EP - METSOLA Roberta (EPP) appointed as rapporteur in LIBE
2019/10/07
EP - CZARNECKI Ryszard (ECR) appointed as rapporteur in CONT
2019/09/18
EP - Committee referral announced in Parliament, 1st reading/single reading
2019/06/27
EC - Non-legislative basic document
Documents
2019/06/27
EC - Non-legislative basic document published
Documents
Documents
- Non-legislative basic document: COM(2019)0316
- Non-legislative basic document: EUR-Lex
- Non-legislative basic document published: COM(2019)0316
- Non-legislative basic document published: EUR-Lex
- Non-legislative basic document: COM(2019)0316 EUR-Lex
Amendments | Dossier |
11 |
2019/2074(DEC)
2019/12/12
LIBE
11 amendments...
Amendment 1 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 1 1. Stresses the
Amendment 10 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 7 7. Notes that the Court has identified a horizontal trend across agencies in the use of external staff hired in IT consultancy roles; calls for this dependency on external recruitment in this important area to be addressed; encourages Eurojust to act upon the single outstanding recommendation of the Court regarding the publication of vacancy notices on the European Personnel Selection Office website
Amendment 11 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 7 – subparagraph 1 (new) Notes the under-representation of men among the staff and recalls the importance of gender balance within the staff of Eurojust; therefore encourages Eurojust to put in place the necessary measures to achieve the balance and the objectives set by the Commission i.e. at least 40% of the under- represented sex as indicated in the 'Strategic engagement for gender equality 2016-2019'.
Amendment 2 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 2 a (new) 2 a. Welcomes also the fact that the Court recognized that all the recommendations from previous years were correctly implemented by Eurojust;
Amendment 3 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 3 Amendment 4 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 3 3. Deplores that Eurojust was faced with a significant budget decrease from EUR 48 to 38 million (-21%) and a reduction in staff from 242 to 238 (-1.6%) despite a 19% increase in the workload compared to 2017; reminds that the
Amendment 5 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 3 3. Deplores that Eurojust was faced with a significant budget decrease from EUR 48 to 38 million (-21%) and a reduction in staff from 242 to 238 (-1.6%) despite a 19% increase in the workload compared to 2017; reminds that the workload is expected to increase further with the new mandate which will enter into force at the end of 2019 and that some cases concerning complex investigations can last several years; underlines that not just arrests, but also successful prosecutions in serious cross-border crime areas are essential for the security of the citizens of the Union; further reminds that the number of coordination centres held in 2018 was 17, just as in 2017, demonstrating the popularity of this
Amendment 6 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 3 3. Deplores that Eurojust was faced with a significant budget decrease from EUR 48 to 38 million (-21%) and a reduction in staff from 242 to 238 (-1.6%) despite a 19% increase in the workload compared to 2017; reminds that the workload is expected to increase further with the new mandate which will enter into force at the end of 2019 and that some cases concerning complex investigations can last several years; further reminds that the number of coordination centres held in 2018 was 17, just as in 2017, demonstrating the popularity of this operational tool and its utility; stresses that the budget of Eurojust should match its tasks and priorities in order to enable it to fulfil its mandate; calls on Parliament’s competent committees to invite the Administrative Director of Eurojust to present the forecasted long-term funding needs of Eurojust, including the efficiency
Amendment 7 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 4 4. Takes note of the Court’s finding that all payments pertaining to a three-year IT framework contract as well as related specific contracts (EUR 40,821 in 2018) are irregular since the contract worth EUR 450,000 with a company that had provided the same services under a previous framework contract was signed following a negotiated procedure but without prior publication of a contract notice; reminds that the Financial Regulation only allows for the use of a simplified procedure under specific circumstances which were not substantiated here;
Amendment 8 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 5 a (new) 5 a. Strongly encourages Eurojust to further develop cooperation projects with the other Union institutions, bodies, offices and agencies in the field of justice and home affairs;
Amendment 9 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 6 6. Highlights the reorganisation of Eurojust’s governance structure, including a clear separation of executive and operational matters, initiated at the end of 2018 with a view to comply with Regulation (EU) 2018/1727 of the European Parliament and of the Council1 (the new Eurojust Regulation), when it enters into force in December 2019; notes that the proposal for the implementation of the revised Internal Control Framework should be adopted by the end of 2019 and implemented by the end of 2020; welcomes the efforts of Eurojust in promoting gender balance; _________________ 1Regulation (EU) 2018/1727 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 14 November 2018 on the European Union Agency for Criminal Justice Cooperation (Eurojust), and replacing and repealing Council Decision 2002/187/JHA (OJ L 295, 21.11.2018, p. 138).
source: 644.911
|
History
(these mark the time of scraping, not the official date of the change)
2020-01-07Show (2) Changes | Timetravel
docs/1 |
|
forecasts |
|
2019-11-01Show (1) Changes | Timetravel
committees/1/rapporteur |
|
2019-10-15Show (1) Changes | Timetravel
committees/0/shadows/4 |
|
2019-10-07Show (2) Changes | Timetravel
committees/0 |
|
committees/0 |
|
2019-09-19Show (3) Changes | Timetravel
events/1 |
|
procedure/dossier_of_the_committee |
|
procedure/stage_reached |
Old
Preparatory phase in ParliamentNew
Awaiting committee decision |
2019-09-12Show (1) Changes | Timetravel
commission |
|
2019-08-07Show (2) Changes
committees/0/date |
|
committees/1/date |
|