BETA


2019/2135(INI) Implementation of the common security and defence policy - annual report 2018

Progress: Procedure completed

RoleCommitteeRapporteurShadows
Lead AFET DANJEAN Arnaud (icon: EPP EPP) ARA-KOVÁCS Attila (icon: S&D S&D), PAET Urmas (icon: Renew Renew), NEUMANN Hannah (icon: Verts/ALE Verts/ALE), RIVIÈRE Jérôme (icon: ID ID), VAN ORDEN Geoffrey (icon: ECR ECR), WALLACE Mick (icon: GUE/NGL GUE/NGL)
Committee Opinion AFCO GONZÁLEZ PONS Esteban (icon: EPP EPP) Giuliano PISAPIA (icon: S&D S&D)
Lead committee dossier:
Legal Basis:
RoP 54

Events

2020/01/15
   EP - Results of vote in Parliament
2020/01/15
   EP - Decision by Parliament
Details

The European Parliament adopted by 496 votes to 113 with 103 abstentions a resolution on the implementation of the Common Security and Defence Policy - annual report.

Deterioration in the EU’s security situation

Parliament took note of the continuing deterioration of the security situation in the European Union, which faces a multitude of challenges affecting the security of its Member States and citizens.

Members stressed the EU's interest in being actively engaged in its neighbourhood, considering that instability at the Union's borders and in its immediate neighbourhood (North Africa, Middle East, Caucasus, Balkans, Eastern Mediterranean, Russian aggression against Ukraine and Georgia, etc.) as well as in its more distant neighbourhood (Sahel, Horn of Africa, etc.) represented a direct and indirect threat to the security of the continent.

Moreover, some global players (United States, China, Russia) but also a growing number of regional players (Turkey, Iran, Saudi Arabia, etc.) are seeking to assert power through a combination of unilateral diplomatic posturing, shifts in alliances, destabilising activities of a primarily hybrid nature and increasing military build-ups. Members deplored the fact that some of these actors deliberately circumvent, or even attempt to destroy, multilateral mechanisms, the principles of the UN Charter and the relevant provisions of international law, which are essential for peacekeeping.

Parliament took the view that the EU has been slow to react, politically, diplomatically and militarily, to new crises and to this new international situation. In the specific area of defence, insufficient investment, lack of capabilities and interoperability, as well as political reluctance to implement the provisions laid down in the European Treaties, have prevented the EU from playing a decisive role in external crises and from making full use of its potential.

Stressing that no country is in a position to face the security challenges facing the European continent and its immediate environment alone, Parliament called on the European Council to make the use of qualified majority voting in the Council in the field of the Common Security and Defence Policy (CSDP) a political priority, where the Treaty on European Union (EU Treaty) so permits.

Need to develop and strengthen European strategic autonomy

Members reaffirmed that European strategic autonomy is a legitimate and necessary ambition and that it must remain a priority objective of the CFSP and European defence policy. The affirmation of European strategic autonomy depends on the establishment of a comprehensive CFSP supported by European defence cooperation in the technological, capability, industrial and operational fields.

According to Members, European strategic autonomy:

- is based first and foremost on the EU’s ability to assess a crisis situation and take a decision autonomously, which necessarily implies an independent and effective decision-making process, means of assessment and freedom of analysis and action;

- is based on the Europe's capacity to act alone when its interests are at stake (theatres of operations regarded as priorities by the Member States of the Union) or within the framework of existing cooperation arrangements;

- forms part of a multilateral framework which respects commitments within the United Nations and complements and strengthens the alliances and partnerships to which most Member States have subscribed;

- does not mean that the Union will systematically act alone, everywhere and always.

In order to increase the EU’s strategic autonomy, Member States should increase defence spending and aim for a target of 2% of GDP, invest more urgently in security and defence, and ensure that solidarity and cooperation in defence matters become the norm.

CSDP missions and operations

Members believe that the EU must become a more robust player in crisis management, conflict resolution and peacekeeping, if possible together with other regional and international organisations, such as the United Nations and the African Union, but also alone where necessary.

The EU is currently present on three continents, with 16 civilian and military missions deployed. While recognising the contribution of these missions to international peace, security and stability, Parliament wished to promote the objective of achieving a higher level of effectiveness of CSDP missions and called on the Member States to increase their contributions. It encouraged the European External Action Service (EEAS) to introduce a more forward-looking approach to capability planning and development and to anticipate future needs so that the Union can provide a strong response to crises and conflicts.

Member States and European bodies have been encouraged to maintain a high priority and commitment in Africa, in particular in the Sahel and the Horn of Africa through the commitment of six civilian and military missions. The strategic importance of Eastern Europe and the Western Balkans for the security and stability of the Union was reaffirmed.

Capability and industrial field

The resolution stressed that the realisation of European strategic autonomy was based on increasing Member States' capabilities and their defence budgets and on strengthening a European defence technological and industrial base.

Members welcomed the Commission's June 2017 proposal to create a European Defence Fund (EDF). They supported the effective implementation of permanent structured cooperation (PSC) as an essential step towards enhanced security and defence cooperation between Member States. They also underlined the strategic dimension of the space sector for Europe.

Defence cooperation and CSDP partnerships

Members considered that the EU and the United Kingdom will still share the same strategic environment and the same threats to their peace and security after Brexit.

Furthermore, recalling NATO's fundamental role in collective defence, Members are convinced that the EU-NATO strategic partnership is essential for addressing the security challenges facing Europe and its neighbourhood. EU-NATO cooperation should take full account of each of the two institutions’ specific features and roles and continue with full respect for the principles of inclusiveness and reciprocity and the decision-making autonomy of both organisations.

Institutional framework

Parliament called for progressive steps towards a common defence policy and, ultimately, the establishment of a common defence. It also undertook to ensure close parliamentary scrutiny and control of European defence missions, instruments and initiatives. It called for the drafting of a European Defence Strategy and for the elaboration of a European Union White Paper on Security and Defence as an essential strategic tool to reinforce the governance of the Union's defence policy.

Documents
2020/01/15
   EP - End of procedure in Parliament
2020/01/14
   EP - Debate in Parliament
2019/12/11
   EP - Committee report tabled for plenary
Details

The Committee on Foreign Affairs adopted the own-initiative report by Arnaud DANJEAN (EPP, FR) on the implementation of the common security and defence policy - annual report.

In a persistently uncertain and unpredictable security context, Members reaffirmed that European strategic autonomy is a legitimate and necessary ambition and must remain a priority objective of the CFSP and European defence policy.

Need to develop and strengthen European strategic autonomy

The report stressed that European strategic autonomy is based on the EU's ability to enhance its freedom to assess its autonomous operational capacity, including credible military forces, its industrial capacity to produce the equipment needed by its forces and its political capacity to take decisions where circumstances so require. Such autonomy reflects the objective of assuming greater responsibility for European security, in order to defend its common interests and values, with its partners as far as possible, and alone when necessary. It presupposes the EU's capacity to assess a crisis situation and take a decision autonomously, which necessarily implies an independent and effective decision-making process, means of evaluation and freedom of analysis and action.

Members are of the opinion that the affirmation of European strategic autonomy depends on the establishment of a comprehensive CFSP supported by European defence cooperation in the technological, capability, industrial and operational fields. Only concrete and flexible cooperation based on pragmatic initiatives will make it possible to gradually overcome difficulties, forge a genuine common strategic culture and shape common responses tailored to the main security and defence challenges facing the Union.

In order to increase the EU’s strategic autonomy, Member States should increase defence spending and aim for a target of 2% of GDP, invest more urgently in security and defence, and ensure that solidarity and cooperation on defence becomes the norm.

Members considered it appropriate to pursue a restrictive arms export policy for all types of weapons, including for dual-use goods. They urged the Member States to comply with the EU Code of Conduct on Arms Exports.

CSDP missions and operations

Members considered that the Union must become a more robust player in crisis management, conflict resolution and peacekeeping, if possible together with other regional and international organisations, such as the United Nations and the African Union, in line with its commitment to multilateralism, but also alone when the situation requires it. They encourage the European External Action Service (EEAS) and Member States to introduce a more forward-looking approach to planning and capability development and to anticipate future needs so that the Union can provide a strong response to crises and conflicts.

Member States and European bodies are encouraged to maintain a high level of commitment in Africa. The report highlighted the Union's overall commitment to the Sahel and the Horn of Africa through six civilian and military missions and welcomed the effort made to regionalise the operation of civilian missions in the Sahel in the face of security challenges which go beyond the framework of the States where European missions are deployed. It reaffirmed the strategic importance of Eastern Europe and the Western Balkans for the security and stability of the Union and stressed the need to focus and strengthen the Union's political commitment to this region.

Noting, however, that the effectiveness of CSDP missions and operations in general is hampered by persistent structural weaknesses and the growing reluctance of Member States and European institutions to make them more robust, Members called for a common European solution to remedy this. They stressed the need to regularly evaluate missions and operations in order to improve their effectiveness and the importance of joint training and exercises between European armed forces as well as parallel and coordinated exercises between the EU and NATO. They stressed the importance of reviewing the Athena mechanism with a view to increasing the effectiveness of the funding mechanism for CSDP military operations and missions.

Capability and industry

The report stressed that achieving European strategic autonomy will necessarily be based on increasing the Member States’ capabilities and defence budgets, and on strengthening the European defence technological and industrial base.

Members welcomed the Commission's proposal of June 2017 to create a European Defence Fund (EDF) that would coordinate, complement and amplify national defence investment, encourage cooperation between Member States in the development of ultra-modern and interoperable defence technologies and equipment, and support an innovative and competitive defence industry throughout the Union, including cross-border SMEs. They also welcomed the Commission's proposal to allocate EUR 6.5 billion to military mobility projects in the next MFF.

Members supported the effective implementation of Permanent Structured Cooperation (PESCO) as an essential step towards closer security and defence cooperation between Member States. They also stressed the strategic dimension of the space sector for Europe, highlighting the need to make progress in developing technologies with both civilian and military uses which are capable of ensuring European strategic autonomy.

Defence cooperation and CSDP partnerships

The EU and the United Kingdom will still share the same strategic environment and the same threats to their peace and security after Brexit. Members consider it essential to maintain strong, close and special defence and security cooperation between the Union and the United Kingdom after Brexit.

Furthermore, recalling NATO's fundamental role in collective defence, Members are convinced that the EU-NATO strategic partnership is essential for addressing the security challenges facing Europe and its neighbourhood. EU-NATO cooperation should take full account of each of the two institutions’ specific features and roles and continue with full respect for the principles of inclusiveness and reciprocity and the decision-making autonomy of both organisations.

Institutional framework

Members welcomed the announcement of the creation of a Directorate-General for the Defence and Space Industries within the European Commission, under the responsibility of the Internal Market Commissioner. They also undertook to ensure close parliamentary monitoring and scrutiny of European defence missions, instruments and initiatives.

They called for progressive steps towards a common defence policy and, ultimately, the establishment of a common defence. They called for the drafting of a European Defence Strategy and for the elaboration of a European Union White Paper on Security and Defence as an essential strategic tool to reinforce the governance of the Union's defence policy.

Documents
2019/12/04
   EP - Vote in committee
2019/11/27
   EP - Committee opinion
Documents
2019/11/12
   EP - GONZÁLEZ PONS Esteban (EPP) appointed as rapporteur in AFCO
2019/11/11
   EP - Amendments tabled in committee
Documents
2019/11/11
   EP - Amendments tabled in committee
Documents
2019/10/24
   EP - Committee referral announced in Parliament
2019/10/21
   EP - Committee draft report
Documents
2019/07/15
   EP - DANJEAN Arnaud (EPP) appointed as rapporteur in AFET

Documents

Activities

Votes

A9-0052/2019 - Arnaud Danjean - Am 21 #

2020/01/15 Outcome: -: 558, +: 114, 0: 35
IT EE CZ CY MT LU AT SI BE LT FI LV HR DK SK IE SE EL BG NL GB PT HU FR RO PL ES DE
Total
66
5
21
5
6
5
17
8
20
10
12
8
11
13
12
10
19
18
16
24
67
21
19
70
31
48
53
92
icon: ID ID
68

Estonia ID

For (1)

1

Czechia ID

2
3

Finland ID

2

Denmark ID

For (1)

1
icon: NI NI
45

Croatia NI

2

Slovakia NI

For (1)

1

Germany NI

Against (1)

1
icon: GUE/NGL GUE/NGL
40

Czechia GUE/NGL

1

Cyprus GUE/NGL

2

Belgium GUE/NGL

Against (1)

1

Finland GUE/NGL

Against (1)

1

Denmark GUE/NGL

Against (1)

1

Ireland GUE/NGL

3

Sweden GUE/NGL

Against (1)

1

Netherlands GUE/NGL

For (1)

1

United Kingdom GUE/NGL

1

Portugal GUE/NGL

4
icon: ECR ECR
63

Lithuania ECR

1

Latvia ECR

2

Croatia ECR

Against (1)

1

Slovakia ECR

2

Greece ECR

1

Bulgaria ECR

Against (1)

2

Netherlands ECR

Against (1)

4

Spain ECR

For (1)

3

Germany ECR

Against (1)

1
icon: Verts/ALE Verts/ALE
73

Czechia Verts/ALE

3

Luxembourg Verts/ALE

Against (1)

1

Austria Verts/ALE

Against (2)

2

Belgium Verts/ALE

3

Lithuania Verts/ALE

2

Finland Verts/ALE

2

Latvia Verts/ALE

Against (1)

1

Denmark Verts/ALE

2

Ireland Verts/ALE

2

Sweden Verts/ALE

2

Netherlands Verts/ALE

3

Portugal Verts/ALE

Against (1)

1

Spain Verts/ALE

2
icon: Renew Renew
104

Estonia Renew

3

Luxembourg Renew

Against (1)

1

Austria Renew

Against (1)

1

Slovenia Renew

2

Lithuania Renew

Against (1)

1

Finland Renew

3

Latvia Renew

Against (1)

1

Croatia Renew

Against (1)

1

Slovakia Renew

2

Ireland Renew

Against (1)

1

Sweden Renew

2

Bulgaria Renew

3

Hungary Renew

2
icon: S&D S&D
145

Estonia S&D

Against (1)

1

Cyprus S&D

Against (1)

1

Malta S&D

Abstain (1)

4

Luxembourg S&D

Against (1)

1

Slovenia S&D

Against (2)

2

Belgium S&D

2

Lithuania S&D

2

Finland S&D

2

Latvia S&D

2
3

Slovakia S&D

3

Greece S&D

Against (1)

1
icon: PPE PPE
169

Cyprus PPE

2

Malta PPE

2

Luxembourg PPE

2

Slovenia PPE

Abstain (2)

4

Belgium PPE

4

Finland PPE

2

Latvia PPE

2

Croatia PPE

Abstain (1)

4

Denmark PPE

For (1)

1

A9-0052/2019 - Arnaud Danjean - § 10 #

2020/01/15 Outcome: +: 555, -: 98, 0: 52
GB DE PL ES RO NL SE HU BE CZ FR AT DK FI BG PT HR LT SI SK EL LV LU EE MT IE CY IT
Total
67
93
47
53
31
24
19
19
20
21
70
17
13
12
15
20
11
11
8
11
20
7
5
4
5
10
5
67
icon: PPE PPE
169

Denmark PPE

For (1)

1

Finland PPE

2

Latvia PPE

2

Luxembourg PPE

2

Malta PPE

2
2
icon: S&D S&D
141

Belgium S&D

2

Lithuania S&D

2

Slovenia S&D

2

Slovakia S&D

For (1)

1

Greece S&D

1

Latvia S&D

2

Luxembourg S&D

For (1)

1

Estonia S&D

For (1)

1

Malta S&D

For (1)

3

Cyprus S&D

1
icon: Renew Renew
104

Sweden Renew

2

Hungary Renew

2

Austria Renew

For (1)

1

Finland Renew

3

Croatia Renew

For (1)

1

Lithuania Renew

Abstain (1)

2

Slovenia Renew

2

Slovakia Renew

2

Latvia Renew

For (1)

1

Luxembourg Renew

For (1)

1

Estonia Renew

2

Ireland Renew

For (1)

1
icon: Verts/ALE Verts/ALE
73

Spain Verts/ALE

2

Netherlands Verts/ALE

3

Sweden Verts/ALE

2

Belgium Verts/ALE

3

Czechia Verts/ALE

3

Austria Verts/ALE

2

Denmark Verts/ALE

2

Finland Verts/ALE

2

Portugal Verts/ALE

1

Lithuania Verts/ALE

2

Latvia Verts/ALE

Against (1)

1

Luxembourg Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Ireland Verts/ALE

Against (1)

2
icon: ECR ECR
61

Germany ECR

For (1)

1

Netherlands ECR

4

Bulgaria ECR

2

Croatia ECR

For (1)

1

Lithuania ECR

Abstain (1)

1

Greece ECR

Abstain (1)

1

Latvia ECR

For (1)

1
icon: NI NI
49

Germany NI

Against (1)

1

Croatia NI

Abstain (1)

2

Slovakia NI

2
icon: GUE/NGL GUE/NGL
40

United Kingdom GUE/NGL

1

Netherlands GUE/NGL

For (1)

1

Sweden GUE/NGL

For (1)

1

Belgium GUE/NGL

Against (1)

1

Czechia GUE/NGL

Against (1)

1

Denmark GUE/NGL

1

Finland GUE/NGL

For (1)

1

Portugal GUE/NGL

4

Ireland GUE/NGL

3

Cyprus GUE/NGL

2
icon: ID ID
68

Czechia ID

Against (1)

Abstain (1)

2

Austria ID

3

Denmark ID

For (1)

1

Finland ID

2

Estonia ID

For (1)

1

A9-0052/2019 - Arnaud Danjean - § 12/2 #

2020/01/15 Outcome: +: 441, -: 239, 0: 22
DE ES RO IT NL AT BE LT BG HR SK LU FI LV DK FR GB CZ SI EE CY SE PT PL EL HU MT IE
Total
89
52
31
67
24
17
20
11
15
10
13
5
11
8
13
70
65
21
8
5
5
19
20
48
20
19
6
10
icon: S&D S&D
144

Belgium S&D

2

Lithuania S&D

2

Bulgaria S&D

Against (1)

5

Luxembourg S&D

For (1)

1

Finland S&D

Abstain (1)

2

Latvia S&D

2

Denmark S&D

Abstain (1)

3

Slovenia S&D

2

Estonia S&D

Abstain (1)

1

Cyprus S&D

1

Greece S&D

1

Malta S&D

Abstain (1)

4
icon: Renew Renew
105

Austria Renew

For (1)

1

Lithuania Renew

Abstain (1)

2

Croatia Renew

For (1)

1

Slovakia Renew

2

Luxembourg Renew

For (1)

1

Finland Renew

3

Latvia Renew

For (1)

1

Slovenia Renew

2

Estonia Renew

3

Sweden Renew

2

Hungary Renew

2

Ireland Renew

Against (1)

1
icon: PPE PPE
164

Netherlands PPE

Against (1)

4

Croatia PPE

Against (1)

4

Luxembourg PPE

2

Finland PPE

For (1)

1

Latvia PPE

2

Denmark PPE

For (1)

1

Slovenia PPE

For (1)

4
2

Malta PPE

2

Ireland PPE

Abstain (1)

4
icon: Verts/ALE Verts/ALE
71

Spain Verts/ALE

2

Netherlands Verts/ALE

3

Austria Verts/ALE

2

Belgium Verts/ALE

3

Lithuania Verts/ALE

2

Luxembourg Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Finland Verts/ALE

2

Latvia Verts/ALE

1

Denmark Verts/ALE

2

Czechia Verts/ALE

3

Sweden Verts/ALE

2

Portugal Verts/ALE

1

Ireland Verts/ALE

For (1)

Against (1)

2
icon: NI NI
47

Germany NI

Against (1)

1

Croatia NI

1

Slovakia NI

2
icon: GUE/NGL GUE/NGL
40

Netherlands GUE/NGL

Against (1)

1

Belgium GUE/NGL

Against (1)

1

Finland GUE/NGL

Abstain (1)

1

Denmark GUE/NGL

Against (1)

1

United Kingdom GUE/NGL

Against (1)

1

Czechia GUE/NGL

Against (1)

1

Cyprus GUE/NGL

2

Sweden GUE/NGL

Against (1)

1

Portugal GUE/NGL

4

Ireland GUE/NGL

3
icon: ECR ECR
63

Germany ECR

Abstain (1)

1

Spain ECR

For (1)

3

Netherlands ECR

4

Lithuania ECR

Against (1)

1

Bulgaria ECR

2

Croatia ECR

Against (1)

1

Slovakia ECR

2

Latvia ECR

2
3

Greece ECR

Against (1)

1
icon: ID ID
68

Austria ID

3

Finland ID

2

Denmark ID

Against (1)

1

Czechia ID

Against (2)

2

Estonia ID

Against (1)

1

A9-0052/2019 - Arnaud Danjean - Am 2/1 #

2020/01/15 Outcome: -: 507, +: 175, 0: 18
BE MT IE EE AT LU CY SI LV LT EL FI HR DK SK NL PT IT CZ BG SE HU ES DE PL FR RO GB
Total
19
6
10
5
17
5
5
8
8
11
19
11
11
12
12
24
21
67
21
15
19
19
52
90
47
70
30
66
icon: Verts/ALE Verts/ALE
72

Belgium Verts/ALE

3

Ireland Verts/ALE

Against (1)

2

Austria Verts/ALE

2

Luxembourg Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Latvia Verts/ALE

1

Lithuania Verts/ALE

2

Finland Verts/ALE

2

Denmark Verts/ALE

2

Netherlands Verts/ALE

3

Portugal Verts/ALE

1

Czechia Verts/ALE

3

Sweden Verts/ALE

2

Spain Verts/ALE

2
icon: GUE/NGL GUE/NGL
38

Belgium GUE/NGL

Against (1)

1

Ireland GUE/NGL

3

Cyprus GUE/NGL

2

Denmark GUE/NGL

Against (1)

1

Netherlands GUE/NGL

Against (1)

1

Portugal GUE/NGL

4

Czechia GUE/NGL

Abstain (1)

1

Sweden GUE/NGL

Against (1)

1

United Kingdom GUE/NGL

Against (1)

1
icon: NI NI
47

Croatia NI

Abstain (1)

2

Slovakia NI

Against (1)

1

Germany NI

1
icon: ECR ECR
63

Latvia ECR

Against (1)

Abstain (1)

2

Lithuania ECR

Against (1)

1

Greece ECR

Against (1)

1

Croatia ECR

Against (1)

1

Slovakia ECR

2

Netherlands ECR

Against (1)

4

Bulgaria ECR

2
3

Germany ECR

Against (1)

1
icon: S&D S&D
143

Belgium S&D

Against (1)

2
4

Estonia S&D

Against (1)

1

Luxembourg S&D

Against (1)

1

Cyprus S&D

Against (1)

1

Slovenia S&D

2

Latvia S&D

2

Lithuania S&D

2

Greece S&D

1

Finland S&D

2
3

Slovakia S&D

For (1)

3
icon: ID ID
67

Belgium ID

2

Estonia ID

Against (1)

1

Austria ID

3

Finland ID

2

Denmark ID

Against (1)

1

Czechia ID

Against (1)

Abstain (1)

2
icon: Renew Renew
104

Belgium Renew

For (1)

4

Ireland Renew

Against (1)

1

Estonia Renew

For (1)

Against (2)

3

Austria Renew

Against (1)

1

Luxembourg Renew

Against (1)

1

Slovenia Renew

2

Latvia Renew

Against (1)

1

Lithuania Renew

Against (1)

Abstain (1)

2

Finland Renew

3

Croatia Renew

Against (1)

1

Slovakia Renew

2

Bulgaria Renew

3

Sweden Renew

2

Hungary Renew

2
icon: PPE PPE
166

Belgium PPE

4

Malta PPE

2

Luxembourg PPE

2

Cyprus PPE

2

Slovenia PPE

4

Latvia PPE

2

Finland PPE

2

Denmark PPE

Against (1)

1

A9-0052/2019 - Arnaud Danjean - § 16/1 #

2020/01/15 Outcome: +: 582, -: 80, 0: 45
IT DE PL FR ES RO NL HU BE GB SE CZ BG PT DK SK LT HR LV FI SI LU EE EL AT MT CY IE
Total
67
91
48
69
53
31
24
19
20
67
19
20
16
21
13
11
11
11
8
12
8
5
5
20
17
6
5
10
icon: PPE PPE
169

Denmark PPE

For (1)

1

Latvia PPE

2

Finland PPE

2

Luxembourg PPE

2

Malta PPE

2
2
icon: S&D S&D
145

Belgium S&D

2

Slovakia S&D

Abstain (1)

3

Lithuania S&D

2

Latvia S&D

2

Slovenia S&D

Abstain (2)

2

Luxembourg S&D

For (1)

1

Estonia S&D

For (1)

1

Greece S&D

1

Cyprus S&D

Against (1)

1
icon: Renew Renew
105

Hungary Renew

2

Sweden Renew

2

Slovakia Renew

2

Lithuania Renew

Abstain (1)

2

Croatia Renew

For (1)

1

Latvia Renew

For (1)

1

Finland Renew

3

Slovenia Renew

2

Luxembourg Renew

For (1)

1

Estonia Renew

3

Austria Renew

For (1)

1

Ireland Renew

For (1)

1
icon: Verts/ALE Verts/ALE
72

Spain Verts/ALE

2

Netherlands Verts/ALE

3

Belgium Verts/ALE

3

Sweden Verts/ALE

2

Czechia Verts/ALE

3

Portugal Verts/ALE

1

Denmark Verts/ALE

2

Lithuania Verts/ALE

2

Latvia Verts/ALE

Against (1)

1

Finland Verts/ALE

2

Luxembourg Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Austria Verts/ALE

2

Ireland Verts/ALE

2
icon: ECR ECR
63

Germany ECR

For (1)

1

Bulgaria ECR

2

Lithuania ECR

1

Croatia ECR

For (1)

1

Latvia ECR

2

Greece ECR

1
icon: ID ID
66

Czechia ID

Abstain (1)

1

Denmark ID

For (1)

1

Finland ID

2

Estonia ID

Abstain (1)

1

Austria ID

Against (2)

Abstain (1)

3
icon: NI NI
47

Germany NI

Against (1)

1

Croatia NI

Against (1)

Abstain (1)

2
icon: GUE/NGL GUE/NGL
40

Netherlands GUE/NGL

Against (1)

1

Belgium GUE/NGL

Against (1)

1

United Kingdom GUE/NGL

Against (1)

1

Sweden GUE/NGL

Against (1)

1

Czechia GUE/NGL

Against (1)

1

Portugal GUE/NGL

4

Denmark GUE/NGL

Against (1)

1

Finland GUE/NGL

Against (1)

1

Cyprus GUE/NGL

2

Ireland GUE/NGL

3

A9-0052/2019 - Arnaud Danjean - Am 4 #

2020/01/15 Outcome: -: 349, +: 296, 0: 63
IT IE ES PT CY BE DE NL FI MT AT DK LV LU FR HR LT SE EE EL SI SK BG RO HU CZ GB PL
Total
67
10
51
21
5
20
93
24
12
6
17
13
8
5
69
10
11
19
5
20
8
13
16
30
19
21
67
48
icon: S&D S&D
144

Cyprus S&D

1

Belgium S&D

2
4

Latvia S&D

2

Luxembourg S&D

For (1)

1

Lithuania S&D

2

Estonia S&D

For (1)

1

Greece S&D

1

Slovenia S&D

2
icon: Verts/ALE Verts/ALE
73

Ireland Verts/ALE

2

Spain Verts/ALE

2

Portugal Verts/ALE

1

Belgium Verts/ALE

3

Netherlands Verts/ALE

3

Finland Verts/ALE

2

Austria Verts/ALE

2

Denmark Verts/ALE

2

Latvia Verts/ALE

1

Luxembourg Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Lithuania Verts/ALE

2

Sweden Verts/ALE

2

Czechia Verts/ALE

3
icon: GUE/NGL GUE/NGL
40

Ireland GUE/NGL

3

Cyprus GUE/NGL

2

Belgium GUE/NGL

For (1)

1

Netherlands GUE/NGL

For (1)

1

Finland GUE/NGL

For (1)

1

Denmark GUE/NGL

1

Sweden GUE/NGL

For (1)

1

Czechia GUE/NGL

1

United Kingdom GUE/NGL

1
icon: NI NI
48

Germany NI

1

Croatia NI

1

Slovakia NI

2
icon: ID ID
67