BETA


2019/2195(INI) Effective measures to 'green' Erasmus+, Creative Europe and the European Solidarity Corps

Progress: Procedure completed

RoleCommitteeRapporteurShadows
Lead CULT FARRENG Laurence (icon: Renew Renew) ZOVKO Željana (icon: EPP EPP), SMERIGLIO Massimiliano (icon: S&D S&D), YENBOU Salima (icon: Verts/ALE Verts/ALE), ANDERSON Christine (icon: ID ID), SLABAKOV Andrey (icon: ECR ECR), BARRENA ARZA Pernando (icon: GUE/NGL GUE/NGL)
Lead committee dossier:
Legal Basis:
RoP 54

Events

2021/02/11
   EC - Commission response to text adopted in plenary
Documents
2020/09/17
   EP - End of procedure in Parliament
2020/09/15
   EP - Decision by Parliament
Details

The European Parliament adopted by 566 votes to 52, with 69 abstentions, a resolution on effective measures to ‘green’ Erasmus+, Creative Europe and the European Solidarity Corps.

Parliament considers that the European Green Deal, by putting the climate emergency at the heart of EU policies, should be an opportunity to rethink education, training, culture and youth programmes. Environmental protection, sustainability and the fight against climate change should therefore be mainstreamed across youth programmes and promoted as transversal skills.

Stressing the importance of the three programmes in promoting cooperation and innovation in European education, culture and youth policy, Members called on the Commission and national agencies and desks to show maximum flexibility and to provide support to participants and project developers so as to enable them to resume their activities post-pandemic in a sustainable way.

Objectives common to the three programmes

Parliament stressed the need for a baseline assessment of the programmes’ contribution to and impact on environmental and climate goals to inform the design of their future implementation. It deplored the lack of existing data on the environmental footprint of the three programmes, regretting that no indicators were included in the draft regulations for the period 2021-2027.

The Commission is therefore invited to:

- propose specific indicators to the co-legislators that are intended to be included in the regulations governing the new generation of programmes;

- record and calculate systematically participants’ individual transport-related carbon footprint.

- work with stakeholders to develop a list of recommendations based on the analysis of good environmental practice.

- propose specific indicators to be included in the regulations governing the new generation of programmes; these indicators should provide an in-depth analysis of the contribution of the programmes to environmental and climate objectives and an annual report with the data collected should be presented to Parliament;

- record and calculate systematically participants’ individual transport-related carbon footprint and make this data publicly available;

- work with stakeholders to develop a list of recommendations based on the analysis of good practices already applied by national agencies and desks and by project developers.

Parliament recommended developing a label to certify and give visibility to environmentally friendly and responsible practices and to reward innovative and environmentally promising projects in each of the programmes. It noted the lack of information on the funding available within the three programmes for projects on the environment, climate and sustainability.

The Commission is also invited to:

- encourage national agencies, national desks and project developers to register with the EU Eco-Management and Audit Scheme (EMAS) in order to evaluate, communicate and improve their environmental performance;

- establish criteria for taking into account the environmental aspects of projects in project appraisal;

- encourage the use of virtual formats to complement physical mobility, while ensuring that participants, when unable to travel, can nevertheless benefit from the programmes;

- enable participants to choose the least polluting means of transport, such as trains, and to this end, establish partnerships with European rail operators to provide participants with discounted fares;

- explore ways to reduce the environmental footprint of digital tools, including websites and software, used in the implementation of the programmes.

The new measures must not further erode the already extremely limited budgets of the programmes. In this respect, Members stressed the importance of promoting effective synergies and complementarity with other relevant funding programmes.

Erasmus +

Parliament called on the Commission to include respect for the environment, sound environmental practices and environmental protection among the principles of the Erasmus + Higher Education Charter. In particular, it called for:

- speeding up the implementation of the European student card, which can be a significant step in making participation in the Erasmus+ programme more environmentally friendly,

- the introduction of an e-learning platform of support, advanced learning and training opportunities (SALTO) for greening within the programme;

- measures to support the development of school curricula on climate change and sustainability in both primary and secondary education;

- the younger generation to take an active and informed approach to sustainability and improve the knowledge of young workers on climate change and environmental issues;

- support, under the Sport section, joint projects with sports associations on the subject of the environment and nature protection, healthy and sustainable lifestyles.

European Solidarity Corps (ESC)

Recalling that environmental protection is one of the important solidarity activities carried out within the ESC, Parliament called on the national agencies involved in the ESC to actively support and advise organisations responsible for sending and receiving participants. It also encouraged the creation of digital tools to facilitate the dissemination and exchange of good practices and of experiences among participants.

Creative Europe

Parliament invited the Commission to:

- develop a strategy specific to the cultural sector and a guide to good environmental practice in audiovisual and cultural production, dissemination and event organisation, to make it standard for projects funded by the programme;

- define common criteria for green public procurement for the cultural sector and to develop a tool to evaluate the environmental impact of cultural events;

- authorise, as a trans-sectoral measure, the establishment of a European network of environmental, climate and sustainability consultants to advise project developers and Creative Europe Desks.

Documents
2020/09/14
   EP - Results of vote in Parliament
2020/07/22
   EP - Committee report tabled for plenary
Details

The Committee on Culture and Education adopted an own-initiative report by Laurence FARRENG (Renew, FR) on effective measures to ‘green’ Erasmus+, Creative Europe and the European Solidarity Corps.

The European Green Deal sets the target of a climate-neutral European Union by 2050, thereby putting the climate emergency at the centre of all the Union’s programmes and policies. In this context, Members believe that environmental protection, sustainability and fighting climate change should be mainstreamed across the programmes and promoted as transversal skills.

Stressing the importance of the three programmes in promoting cooperation and innovation in European education, culture and youth policy, Members called on the Commission and national agencies and desks to show maximum flexibility and to provide support to participants and project developers so as to enable them to resume their activities post-pandemic in a sustainable way.

Objectives common to the three programmes

The report stressed the need for a baseline assessment of the programmes’ contribution to and impact on environmental and climate goals to inform the design of their future implementation. Members deplored the lack of existing data on the environmental footprint of the three programmes, regretting that no indicators were included in the draft regulations for the period 2021-2027. The Commission is therefore invited to: (i) propose specific indicators to the co-legislators that are intended to be included in the regulations governing the new generation of programmes; and (ii) record and calculate systematically participants’ individual transport-related carbon footprint.

The report invited the Commission to work with stakeholders to develop a list of recommendations based on the analysis of good environmental practice. It recommended developing a label to certify and give visibility to environmentally friendly and responsible practices and to reward innovative and environmentally promising projects in each of the programmes.

The Commission is also invited to:

- establish criteria for taking into account the environmental aspects of projects in project appraisal;

- encourage and coordinate initiatives by national agencies and offices to reduce their environmental footprint;

- encourage the use of virtual formats to complement physical mobility, while ensuring that participants, when unable to travel, can nevertheless benefit from the programmes;

- enable participants to choose the least polluting means of transport, such as trains, and to this end, establish partnerships with European rail operators to provide participants with discounted fares;

- explore ways to reduce the environmental footprint of digital tools, including websites and software, used in the implementation of the programmes.

The new measures must not further erode the already extremely limited budgets of the programmes. In this respect, Members stressed the importance of promoting effective synergies and complementarity with other relevant funding programmes.

Erasmus +

The report called on the Commission to include respect for the environment, sound environmental practices and environmental protection among the principles of the Erasmus + Higher Education Charter. In particular, it called for:

- speeding up the implementation of the European student card, which can be a significant step in making participation in the Erasmus+ programme more environmentally friendly,

- the introduction of an e-learning platform of support, advanced learning and training opportunities (SALTO) for greening within the programme;

- measures to support the development of school curricula on climate change and sustainability in both primary and secondary education;

- the younger generation to take an active and informed approach to sustainability and improve the knowledge of young workers on climate change and environmental issues;

- support, under the Sport section, joint projects with sports associations on the subject of the environment and nature protection, healthy and sustainable lifestyles.

European Solidarity Corps (ESC)

Recalling that environmental protection is one of the important solidarity activities carried out within the ESC, the report called on the national agencies involved in the ESC to actively support and advise organisations responsible for sending and receiving participants. It also encouraged the creation of digital tools to facilitate the dissemination and exchange of good practices and of experiences among participants.

Creative Europe

The report invited the Commission to:

- undertake research and consult stakeholders to develop a strategy specific to the cultural sector and a guide to good environmental practice in audiovisual and cultural production, dissemination and event organisation, to make it standard for projects funded by the programme;

- define common criteria for green public procurement for the cultural sector and to develop a tool to evaluate the environmental impact of cultural events;

- authorise, as a trans-sectoral measure, the establishment of a European network of environmental, climate and sustainability consultants to advise project developers and Creative Europe Desks.

Documents
2020/07/13
   EP - Vote in committee
2020/05/07
   EP - Amendments tabled in committee
Documents
2020/03/30
   EP - Committee draft report
Documents
2020/01/07
   EP - FARRENG Laurence (Renew) appointed as rapporteur in CULT
2019/12/19
   EP - Committee referral announced in Parliament

Documents

Votes

A9-0141/2020 - Laurence Farreng - Vote unique #

2020/09/14 Outcome: +: 566, 0: 69, -: 52
DE FR ES IT RO PT HU NL BG EL SE BE IE AT HR CZ FI LT DK SK SI CY MT LU LV EE PL
Total
89
78
58
74
32
21
21
28
16
20
21
21
13
19
12
21
14
11
14
14
7
6
6
6
8
7
50
icon: PPE PPE
185

Denmark PPE

For (1)

1
2

Malta PPE

2

Luxembourg PPE

2

Latvia PPE

2

Estonia PPE

For (1)

1
icon: S&D S&D
140

Greece S&D

2

Lithuania S&D

2

Slovenia S&D

For (1)

1

Cyprus S&D

2

Luxembourg S&D

For (1)

1

Latvia S&D

2

Estonia S&D

2
icon: Renew Renew
97

Italy Renew

For (1)

1

Hungary Renew

2

Bulgaria Renew

2

Ireland Renew

2

Austria Renew

For (1)

1

Croatia Renew

For (1)

1

Finland Renew

3

Lithuania Renew

2

Slovakia Renew

2

Slovenia Renew

2

Luxembourg Renew

2

Latvia Renew

For (1)

1

Estonia Renew

3
icon: Verts/ALE Verts/ALE
65

Spain Verts/ALE

2

Portugal Verts/ALE

1

Netherlands Verts/ALE

2

Sweden Verts/ALE

3

Belgium Verts/ALE

3

Ireland Verts/ALE

2

Austria Verts/ALE

3

Czechia Verts/ALE

3

Finland Verts/ALE

3

Lithuania Verts/ALE

2

Denmark Verts/ALE

2

Luxembourg Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Latvia Verts/ALE

1
icon: GUE/NGL GUE/NGL
38

Netherlands GUE/NGL

For (1)

1

Sweden GUE/NGL

For (1)

1

Belgium GUE/NGL

For (1)

1

Czechia GUE/NGL

1

Finland GUE/NGL

For (1)

1

Denmark GUE/NGL

1

Cyprus GUE/NGL

2
icon: NI NI
28

Germany NI

2

Hungary NI

1

Netherlands NI

Against (1)

1

Slovakia NI

Abstain (1)

2
icon: ID ID
74

Netherlands ID

Against (1)

1

Belgium ID

Abstain (1)

3

Austria ID

3

Czechia ID

Against (1)

Abstain (1)

2

Finland ID

2

Denmark ID

Abstain (1)

1

Estonia ID

Against (1)

1
icon: ECR ECR
60

Germany ECR

For (1)

1

Netherlands ECR

4

Bulgaria ECR

2

Greece ECR

Abstain (1)

1
3

Croatia ECR

Abstain (1)

1

Lithuania ECR

Abstain (1)

1

Slovakia ECR

Against (1)

2

Latvia ECR

2
AmendmentsDossier
163 2019/2195(INI)
2020/05/07 CULT 163 amendments...
source: 650.688

History

(these mark the time of scraping, not the official date of the change)

committees/0
type
Responsible Committee
body
EP
committee_full
Culture and Education
committee
CULT
associated
False
rapporteur
name: FARRENG Laurence date: 2020-01-07T00:00:00 group: Renew Europe group abbr: Renew
shadows
committees/0
type
Responsible Committee
body
EP
committee_full
Culture and Education
committee
CULT
associated
False
rapporteur
name: FARRENG Laurence date: 2020-01-07T00:00:00 group: Renew Europe group abbr: Renew
shadows
docs/0/docs/0/url
Old
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE648.431
New
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/CULT-PR-648431_EN.html
docs/1/docs/0/url
Old
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE650.688
New
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/CULT-AM-650688_EN.html
docs/2
date
2021-02-11T00:00:00
docs
url: /oeil/spdoc.do?i=53579&j=0&l=en title: SP(2020)597
type
Commission response to text adopted in plenary
body
EC
docs/2
date
2020-09-15T00:00:00
docs
url: https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/TA-9-2020-0211_EN.html title: T9-0211/2020
type
Text adopted by Parliament, single reading
body
EP
events/0/type
Old
Committee referral announced in Parliament, 1st reading/single reading
New
Committee referral announced in Parliament
events/1/type
Old
Vote in committee, 1st reading/single reading
New
Vote in committee
events/2/type
Old
Committee report tabled for plenary, single reading
New
Committee report tabled for plenary
events/3
date
2020-09-14T00:00:00
type
Results of vote in Parliament
body
EP
docs
url: https://oeil.secure.europarl.europa.eu/oeil/popups/sda.do?id=53579&l=en title: Results of vote in Parliament
events/3
date
2020-09-15T00:00:00
type
Decision by Parliament, 1st reading/single reading
body
EP
docs
url: https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/TA-9-2020-0211_EN.html title: T9-0211/2020
events/4
date
2020-09-15T00:00:00
type
Decision by Parliament
body
EP
docs
url: https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/TA-9-2020-0211_EN.html title: T9-0211/2020
summary
procedure/Modified legal basis
Rules of Procedure EP 159
procedure/Other legal basis
Rules of Procedure EP 159
docs/2
date
2020-09-15T00:00:00
docs
url: https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/TA-9-2020-0211_EN.html title: T9-0211/2020
type
Text adopted by Parliament, single reading
body
EP
events/3
date
2020-09-15T00:00:00
type
Decision by Parliament, 1st reading/single reading
body
EP
docs
url: https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/TA-9-2020-0211_EN.html title: T9-0211/2020
events/4
date
2020-09-17T00:00:00
type
End of procedure in Parliament
body
EP
forecasts
  • date: 2020-09-14T00:00:00 title: Vote in plenary scheduled
procedure/stage_reached
Old
Awaiting Parliament's vote
New
Procedure completed
forecasts/0/title
Old
Indicative plenary sitting date, 1st reading/single reading
New
Vote in plenary scheduled
docs/2
date
2020-07-22T00:00:00
docs
url: https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/A-9-2020-0141_EN.html title: A9-0141/2020
type
Committee report tabled for plenary, single reading
body
EP
events/2/summary
  • The Committee on Culture and Education adopted an own-initiative report by Laurence FARRENG (Renew, FR) on effective measures to ‘green’ Erasmus+, Creative Europe and the European Solidarity Corps.
  • The European Green Deal sets the target of a climate-neutral European Union by 2050, thereby putting the climate emergency at the centre of all the Union’s programmes and policies. In this context, Members believe that environmental protection, sustainability and fighting climate change should be mainstreamed across the programmes and promoted as transversal skills.
  • Stressing the importance of the three programmes in promoting cooperation and innovation in European education, culture and youth policy, Members called on the Commission and national agencies and desks to show maximum flexibility and to provide support to participants and project developers so as to enable them to resume their activities post-pandemic in a sustainable way.
  • Objectives common to the three programmes
  • The report stressed the need for a baseline assessment of the programmes’ contribution to and impact on environmental and climate goals to inform the design of their future implementation. Members deplored the lack of existing data on the environmental footprint of the three programmes, regretting that no indicators were included in the draft regulations for the period 2021-2027. The Commission is therefore invited to: (i) propose specific indicators to the co-legislators that are intended to be included in the regulations governing the new generation of programmes; and (ii) record and calculate systematically participants’ individual transport-related carbon footprint.
  • The report invited the Commission to work with stakeholders to develop a list of recommendations based on the analysis of good environmental practice. It recommended developing a label to certify and give visibility to environmentally friendly and responsible practices and to reward innovative and environmentally promising projects in each of the programmes.
  • The Commission is also invited to:
  • - establish criteria for taking into account the environmental aspects of projects in project appraisal;
  • - encourage and coordinate initiatives by national agencies and offices to reduce their environmental footprint;
  • - encourage the use of virtual formats to complement physical mobility, while ensuring that participants, when unable to travel, can nevertheless benefit from the programmes;
  • - enable participants to choose the least polluting means of transport, such as trains, and to this end, establish partnerships with European rail operators to provide participants with discounted fares;
  • - explore ways to reduce the environmental footprint of digital tools, including websites and software, used in the implementation of the programmes.
  • The new measures must not further erode the already extremely limited budgets of the programmes. In this respect, Members stressed the importance of promoting effective synergies and complementarity with other relevant funding programmes.
  • Erasmus +
  • The report called on the Commission to include respect for the environment, sound environmental practices and environmental protection among the principles of the Erasmus + Higher Education Charter. In particular, it called for:
  • - speeding up the implementation of the European student card, which can be a significant step in making participation in the Erasmus+ programme more environmentally friendly,
  • - the introduction of an e-learning platform of support, advanced learning and training opportunities (SALTO) for greening within the programme;
  • - measures to support the development of school curricula on climate change and sustainability in both primary and secondary education;
  • - the younger generation to take an active and informed approach to sustainability and improve the knowledge of young workers on climate change and environmental issues;
  • - support, under the Sport section, joint projects with sports associations on the subject of the environment and nature protection, healthy and sustainable lifestyles.
  • European Solidarity Corps (ESC)
  • Recalling that environmental protection is one of the important solidarity activities carried out within the ESC, the report called on the national agencies involved in the ESC to actively support and advise organisations responsible for sending and receiving participants. It also encouraged the creation of digital tools to facilitate the dissemination and exchange of good practices and of experiences among participants.
  • Creative Europe
  • The report invited the Commission to:
  • - undertake research and consult stakeholders to develop a strategy specific to the cultural sector and a guide to good environmental practice in audiovisual and cultural production, dissemination and event organisation, to make it standard for projects funded by the programme;
  • - define common criteria for green public procurement for the cultural sector and to develop a tool to evaluate the environmental impact of cultural events;
  • - authorise, as a trans-sectoral measure, the establishment of a European network of environmental, climate and sustainability consultants to advise project developers and Creative Europe Desks.
docs/2
date
2020-07-22T00:00:00
docs
url: https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/A-9-2020-0141_EN.html title: A9-0141/2020
type
Committee report tabled for plenary, single reading
body
EP
events/2/docs
  • url: https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/A-9-2020-0141_EN.html title: A9-0141/2020
events/2
date
2020-07-22T00:00:00
type
Committee report tabled for plenary, single reading
body
EP
procedure/stage_reached
Old
Awaiting committee decision
New
Awaiting Parliament's vote
events/1
date
2020-07-13T00:00:00
type
Vote in committee, 1st reading/single reading
body
EP
forecasts/0
date
2020-07-13T00:00:00
title
Vote scheduled in committee, 1st reading/single reading
procedure/Modified legal basis
Rules of Procedure EP 159
forecasts/0/date
Old
2020-07-15T00:00:00
New
2020-07-13T00:00:00
docs/1/docs/0/url
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE650.688
forecasts/0/date
Old
2020-06-23T00:00:00
New
2020-07-15T00:00:00
docs/1
date
2020-05-07T00:00:00
docs
title: PE650.688
type
Amendments tabled in committee
body
EP
docs/0/docs/0/url
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE648.431
docs/0/date
Old
2020-03-25T00:00:00
New
2020-03-30T00:00:00
docs
  • date: 2020-03-25T00:00:00 docs: title: PE648.431 type: Committee draft report body: EP
committees/0
type
Responsible Committee
body
EP
committee_full
Culture and Education
committee
CULT
associated
False
rapporteur
name: FARRENG Laurence date: 2020-01-07T00:00:00 group: Renew Europe group abbr: Renew
shadows
committees/0
type
Responsible Committee
body
EP
committee_full
Culture and Education
committee
CULT
associated
False
rapporteur
name: FARRENG Laurence date: 2020-01-07T00:00:00 group: Renew Europe group abbr: Renew
shadows
committees/0/rapporteur
  • name: FARRENG Laurence date: 2020-01-07T00:00:00 group: Renew Europe group abbr: Renew
forecasts/1
date
2020-09-14T00:00:00
title
Indicative plenary sitting date, 1st reading/single reading
committees/0/shadows/3
name
SLABAKOV Andrey
group
European Conservatives and Reformists Group
abbr
ECR
forecasts
  • date: 2020-06-23T00:00:00 title: Vote scheduled in committee, 1st reading/single reading
events
  • date: 2019-12-19T00:00:00 type: Committee referral announced in Parliament, 1st reading/single reading body: EP
procedure/dossier_of_the_committee
  • CULT/9/02087
procedure/stage_reached
Old
Preparatory phase in Parliament
New
Awaiting committee decision