Progress: Procedure completed
Role | Committee | Rapporteur | Shadows |
---|---|---|---|
Lead | ENVI |
BUŞOI Cristian-Silviu (![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Lead committee dossier:
Legal Basis:
RoP 136-p5
Legal Basis:
RoP 136-p5Events
The European Parliament adopted by 671 votes to 15, with 10 abstentions, a resolution on a strategic approach to pharmaceuticals in the environment.
The resolution was tabled by the Committee on the Environment, Public Health and Food Safety.
Improving pharmaceutical pollution control
Members pointed out that pharmaceuticals harm ecosystems when released into the environment and reduce the future effectiveness of medicines, in particular by causing antibiotic resistance. Pharmaceuticals and their residues are particularly present in waterbodies and are not completely removed by conventional treatment plants.
Parliament insisted on the need for a holistic approach, including all relevant stakeholders, to combat pharmaceutical pollution, taking into account the entire life cycle of drugs. It asked the Commission to consider the use of extended producer responsibility to reduce the adverse environmental impact of pharmaceuticals.
Raising awareness, prevention and rational use of pharmaceutical products
Parliament called on Member States to share best practices on the preventive use of antibiotics and to promote training for health professionals and awareness campaigns for patients on the prudent use of medicines, such as antimicrobials, antidepressants or contrast fluids. Patients and farmers shall be clearly informed about the negative environmental impacts that can result from medicines that are not disposed of properly.
Concerned about the steady growth in overall per capita consumption of medicines in the EU, Members suggested organising campaigns to raise public awareness of the dangers of over-consumption of non-prescription medicines. They drew attention to the growing number of supermarket and online sales without a medical recommendation and to the dangers of media advertising for such points of sale outside of pharmacies or suitably accredited establishments.
Promoting greener manufacturing
Members called for more ambitious measures to reduce the risks posed by pharmaceutical pollution. They stressed the need to support research and development of ‘greener pharmaceuticals’, while taking into account that greater biodegradability could potentially impair the efficacy.
According to Members, the environmental impact of pharmaceuticals shall be included in the risk-benefit assessment of human medicines, provided that marketing authorisations are not delayed nor refused solely on the grounds of adverse environmental impacts.
The Commission shall take all necessary measures to ensure that the production of imported medicinal products meets the same environmental standards as those applicable to medicinal products produced in the Union.
Reducing waste and improving waste management
Members considered it is necessary to reduce the overall consumption of medicines per person, without complicating access to medicines or reducing the effectiveness of treatments. Overall consumption of veterinary medicines per animal should also be reduced, without compromising animal health and welfare, and better solutions should be found.
The resolution supported the Commission's intention to reduce waste by allowing medicines to be dispensed in quantities better matching patients' needs and to explore the possibility of extending the expiry dates of medicines to prevent medicines so that they can still be used and are not unnecessarily discarded.
Members called on the Commission to present a proposal to review Directive 86/278/EEC by the end of 2021 at the latest, in order to update the quality standards in line with the latest scientific data to promote a real circular economy. Member States are invited to fully implement the provisions on take-back schemes for unused medicines.
Expand environmental monitoring
Concerned that the monitoring of pharmaceuticals in the environment, particularly in soils, remains very limited, Members stressed the need to strengthen post-market monitoring mechanisms, including environmental impacts.
The Commission is invited to: (i) add pharmaceuticals posing a high risk to the environment to the list of priority substances under the Water Framework Directive; (ii) develop a monitoring system for antibiotics for human use.
Improving environmental risk assessment and increasing transparency
Parliament stressed the importance of:
- setting out a clear roadmap for carrying out environmental risk assessments;
- filling knowledge gaps regarding the entry and persistence of pharmaceuticals in the environment, in particular in aquatic and marine ecosystems;
- supporting research on the direct impact of exposure to pharmaceuticals and their residues in the environment on human health and ecology;
- improving analytical methods to quantify the presence of pharmaceuticals in the environment;
- establishing a centralised and secure database enabling all relevant stakeholders to have access to the results of environmental risk assessments of products.
Documents
- Commission response to text adopted in plenary: SP(2020)597
- Motion for a resolution: B9-0242/2020
- Results of vote in Parliament: Results of vote in Parliament
- Decision by Parliament: T9-0226/2020
- Oral question/interpellation by Parliament: B9-0015/2020
- Oral question/interpellation by Parliament: B9-0016/2020
- Debate in Parliament: Debate in Parliament
- Amendments tabled in committee: PE646.955
- Amendments tabled in committee: PE646.955
- Oral question/interpellation by Parliament: B9-0015/2020
- Oral question/interpellation by Parliament: B9-0016/2020
- Motion for a resolution: B9-0242/2020
- Commission response to text adopted in plenary: SP(2020)597
Activities
- Othmar KARAS
Plenary Speeches (3)
- Joanna KOPCIŃSKA
Plenary Speeches (1)Institutional Motions (1)
- Günther SIDL
Plenary Speeches (1)Institutional Motions (1)
- Cristian-Silviu BUŞOI
Institutional Motions (1)
- Jan HUITEMA
Institutional Motions (1)
- Kateřina KONEČNÁ
Institutional Motions (1)
- Michèle RIVASI
Institutional Motions (1)
- Simona BALDASSARRE
Institutional Motions (1)
Votes
B9-0242/2020 - § 15/1 #
B9-0242/2020 - § 15/2 #
B9-0242/2020 - § 15/3 #
B9-0242/2020 - Am 1 #
B9-0242/2020 - Résolution #
Amendments | Dossier |
258 |
2019/2816(RSP)
2020/01/30
ENVI
258 amendments...
Amendment 1 #
Citation 1 a (new) - having regard to Article 191 (2) of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union, on the polluter pays principle, the precautionary principle and control at source principle,
Amendment 10 #
Citation 9 a (new) - having regard to Directive 2008/56/ CE on the Marine Strategic Framework,
Amendment 100 #
Paragraph 7 7. Recalls that studies have shown that residue from pharmaceutical products
Amendment 101 #
Paragraph 7 7. Recalls that studies have shown that pharmaceutical products are especially present in water bodies, and that they are ineffectively
Amendment 102 #
Paragraph 7 7. Recalls that studies have shown that pharmaceutical products are especially present in water bodies, and that they are ineffectively
Amendment 103 #
Paragraph 8 8. Notes that due to generally low concentrations
Amendment 104 #
Paragraph 8 8. Notes that due to generally low
Amendment 105 #
Paragraph 8 8. Notes that due to generally low concentrations, risks are more related to possible cumulative effects of long-term low-dose exposure than to acute or immediate health effects; is particularly concerned by the endocrine disrupting properties of
Amendment 106 #
Paragraph 9 9. Points to the need to regulate pharmaceuticals under water legislation; recalls that interinstitutional negotiations are on-going on a review of the Directive on the quality of water intended for human consumption and on a regulation on minimum requirements for water reuse; Believes that pharmaceuticals should be regulated also in relation to soil. On this regard, it is appropriate that the Commission proposes an overview Directive on soil protection in the EU with specific actions on ways to address soil pollution from pharmaceuticals;
Amendment 107 #
Paragraph 9 9. Points to the
Amendment 108 #
Paragraph 9 9. Points to the need to regulate pharmaceuticals under water legislation through setting limits for concentration of antibiotic active pharmaceutical ingredients discharged in water; recalls that interinstitutional negotiations are on- going on a review of the Directive on the quality of water intended for human consumption and on a regulation on minimum requirements for water reuse;
Amendment 109 #
Paragraph 9 9.
Amendment 11 #
Citation 10 a (new) - having regard to the Council conclusions of 24 June 2019 on the next steps towards making the EU a best practice region in combatting antimicrobial resistance,
Amendment 110 #
Paragraph 9 9. Points to the need to regulate pharmaceuticals under water legislation and notes that specific pharmaceuticals are regulated under the Water Framework Directive; recalls that interinstitutional negotiations are on-going on a review of the Directive on the quality of water intended for human consumption and on a regulation on minimum requirements for water reuse;
Amendment 111 #
Paragraph 9 9. Points to the need to regulate pharmaceuticals under water legislation; recalls that interinstitutional negotiations are on-going on a review of the Directive on the quality of water intended for human consumption and on a regulation on minimum requirements for water reuse; asks that regulation for other compartments such as soils be implemented as well;
Amendment 112 #
Paragraph 9 9. Points to the need to regulate pharmaceuticals under water legislation; recalls that interinstitutional negotiations are on-going on a review of the Directive on the quality of water intended for human consumption and on a regulation on minimum requirements for water reuse; asks that regulation for other compartments such as soils be implement as well;
Amendment 113 #
Paragraph 9 9.
Amendment 114 #
Paragraph 9 9. Points to t
Amendment 115 #
Paragraph 10 10. Asks for a special focus to be put on emission hot spots, such as hospitals and pharmaceutical production plants, in accordance with the control at source principle, and additional hot spots such as certain wastewater treatment plants;
Amendment 116 #
Paragraph 10 10. Asks for a special focus to be put on emission hot spots, such as hospitals and pharmaceutical production plants in accordance with the control at source principle, and additional hot spots such as certain waste water treatment plants;
Amendment 117 #
Paragraph 10 10.
Amendment 118 #
Paragraph 10 10. Asks, with regard to the effectiveness of the measures being adopted, for a special focus to be put on emission hot spots, such as hospitals and pharmaceutical production plants;
Amendment 119 #
Paragraph 10 10. Asks for a special focus to be put on emission hot spots, such as hospitals
Amendment 12 #
Citation 12 a (new) - having regard to the Council Conclusions of 26 June 2019 on the next steps towards making the EU a best practice region in combatting antimicrobial resistance,
Amendment 120 #
Paragraph 10 10. Asks for a special focus to be put on emission hot spots, such as hospitals and pharmaceutical production plants, and waste water treatment plants;
Amendment 121 #
Paragraph 10 10. Asks for a special focus to be put on emission hot spots, such as hospitals
Amendment 122 #
Paragraph 10 a (new) 10 a. Calls on the Commission to also consider the impact of pharmaceuticals in the context of the zero-pollution action plan for air, water and soil announced by the Commission for 2021;
Amendment 123 #
Paragraph 10 a (new) Amendment 124 #
Paragraph 10 a (new) 10 a. Calls on the Commission to develop Extended Producer Responsibility (EPR) schemes, in order to finance depollution measures in line with the polluter pays principle;
Amendment 125 #
Paragraph 10 a (new) 10 a. Calls on the Commission to develop Extended Producer Responsibility (EPR) schemes, in order to finance depollution measures in line with the polluter pays principle;
Amendment 126 #
Paragraph 10 b (new) 10 b. Calls on the Commission to develop Extended Producer Responsibility schemes to help finance necessary measures in line with the polluter pays principle;
Amendment 127 #
Paragraph 11 11. Calls on the Commission to facilitate the exchange of existing best practices and to take clear legislative action on tackling pharmaceuticals in the environment, both as a result of the manufacturing process and of the use and disposal of pharmaceuticals;
Amendment 128 #
Paragraph 11 11. Calls on the Commission to facilitate the exchange of existing best practices, including those developed by stakeholders, such as iPiE, the Eco- Pharmaco-Stewardship(EPS), the AMR Alliance manufacturing framework and the #MedsDisposal campaign;
Amendment 129 #
Paragraph 11 11. Calls on the Commission to facilitate the exchange of existing best practices among Member States and stakeholders, including initiatives such as iPiE, the Eco-pharmaco-Stewardship (EPS) and the #MedsDisposal campaign;
Amendment 13 #
Citation 26 a (new) - having regard to the Council conclusions of 24 June 2019 on the next steps towards making the EU a best practice region in combatting antimicrobial resistance,
Amendment 130 #
Paragraph 11 11. Calls on the Commission to facilitate the exchange of existing best practices, including through raising awareness and promoting the re-use of medicine packaging;
Amendment 131 #
Paragraph 11 11. Calls on the Commission to
Amendment 132 #
Paragraph 11 a (new) 11 a. Encourages that those existing and self-regulated initiatives should be analysed and, where appropriate, considered as models in future EU initiatives on pharmaceuticals in the environment;
Amendment 133 #
Subheading 2 Increase awareness and promote prevention measures and prudent use of pharmaceuticals;
Amendment 134 #
Paragraph 12 12. Calls on the Member States to share best practices in the preventive use of antibiotics and to apply in full and, if necessary, reinforce the ‘One Health Action Plan Against Antimicrobial Resistance’; reaffirms the positions expressed in its resolution of 13 September 2018 on a European One Health Action Plan against Antimicrobial Resistance;
Amendment 135 #
Paragraph 12 12. Calls on the Member States to share best practices in the preventive use of antibiotics and to
Amendment 136 #
Paragraph 13 13. Calls on the Member States and on the Commission to promote awareness- raising campaigns and training among veterinaries
Amendment 137 #
Paragraph 13 13. Calls on the Member States and on the Commission to promote awareness- raising campaigns a
Amendment 138 #
Draft motion for a resolution Paragraph 13 13. Calls on the Member States and on the Commission to promote awareness- raising campaigns and trainings among veterinaries
Amendment 139 #
Paragraph 13 13. Calls on the Member States and on the Commission to promote awareness- raising campaigns and training courses among veterinaries and
Amendment 14 #
Citation 12 a (new) - having regard to the Council conclusions of 24 June 2019 on the next steps towards making the EU a best practice region in combatting antimicrobial resistance,
Amendment 140 #
Paragraph 13 13. Calls on the Member States and on the Commission to promote awareness- raising campaigns and training among veterinaries
Amendment 141 #
Paragraph 13 13. Calls on the Member States and on the Commission to promote awareness- raising campaigns a
Amendment 142 #
Paragraph 13 13. Calls on the Member States and on the Commission to promote awareness- raising campaigns among veterinaries and physicians on the prudent use of pharmaceuticals, particularly of antimicrobials; calls on actors in the pharmaceutical supply chain to contribute to providing to patients and stockbreeders with sufficient information on how incorrectly disposed medicines may negatively impact the environment; calls for on-pack labelling in the form of an appropriate pictogramme to inform consumers how to properly dispose of unused medicines;
Amendment 143 #
Paragraph 13 a (new) 13a. Stresses that health professionals must be kept continuously up to date regarding the latest developments in research and good practices when it comes to preventing the spread of AMR;
Amendment 144 #
Paragraph 13 a (new) 13 a. Calls on Member States to include the issue of pharmaceuticals in the environment in their cross-border cooperation in river basins, and to coordinate measures where they are deemed useful;
Amendment 145 #
Paragraph 13 a (new) 13 a. Calls on the Commission and Member States to promote vaccination as a disease prevention measure, to minimise the need of pharmaceuticals;
Amendment 146 #
Paragraph 14 14. Highlights the importance of
Amendment 147 #
Paragraph 14 14. Highlights the importance of the design, development and manufacturing phases to minimise the environmental impact of pharmaceuticals; has the opinion that the Good Manufacturing Practice (GMP) legislation should be revised to include requirements for environmental protection;
Amendment 148 #
Paragraph 14 14. Highlights the importance of the design, development and manufacturing phases to minimise the environmental
Amendment 149 #
Paragraph 14 a (new) 14 a. Notes that, in relation to the healthcare sector, addressing any excessive workforce pressures on physicians is a necessary condition for healthcare professionals to ensure appropriate prescribing of antimicrobials; further notes that healthcare professionals could be further assisted via the provision of clear, evidence-based prescribing guidance that provides consistent advice across different clinical indications;
Amendment 15 #
Citation 17 a (new) - having regard to the Commission Communication of the 11 December 2019 entitled ‘European Green Deal’ (COM(2019) 640) and the Resolution of the Parliament of 15 January 2020 in response,
Amendment 150 #
Paragraph 15 15. Calls on Member States and the Commission to support the development of pharmaceuticals intrinsically less harmful for the environment (‘greener pharmaceuticals’), which degrade more readily, into harmless substances, in wastewater treatment plants and the environment; taking into account that greater biodegradability could potentially impair the efficacy and shelf life of medicines, and make it harder to administer precise dosages;
Amendment 151 #
Paragraph 15 15. Calls on Member States and the Commission to support
Amendment 152 #
Paragraph 15 15. Calls on Member States and the Commission to support the research and development of pharmaceuticals intrinsically less harmful for the
Amendment 153 #
Paragraph 15 15. Calls on Member States and the Commission to support
Amendment 154 #
Paragraph 15 15. Calls on Member States and the Commission to support
Amendment 155 #
Paragraph 15 15. Calls on Member States and the Commission to support the development of pharmaceuticals
Amendment 156 #
Paragraph 15 a (new) 15a. Calls on the Member States and all stakeholders concerned to make use of EU programmes to invest in technology aimed at improving the effectiveness of the disposal of pharmaceutical products and antimicrobial-resistant genes whilst ensuring that such products are just as effective in terms of meeting patients' needs;
Amendment 157 #
Paragraph 16 Amendment 158 #
Paragraph 16 Amendment 159 #
Paragraph 16 16. Considers that the environmental impacts of pharmaceuticals could be included into the benefit-risk assessment of human medicines, as is already the case for veterinary medicines, while making sure that no delay occurs in the marketing authorization procedure of drugs deemed suitable in accordance with the current criteria of the assessment itself, so as to guarantee prompt access to safe and effective pharmacological treatments for patients;
Amendment 16 #
Citation 12 a (new) - having regard to the Commission Communication of the 11 December 2019 entitled “European Green Deal” (COM(2019)640),
Amendment 160 #
Paragraph 16 16. Considers that the environmental impacts of
Amendment 161 #
Paragraph 16 16. Considers that the environmental impacts of pharmaceuticals could be included into the benefit-risk assessment of human medicines
Amendment 162 #
Paragraph 16 16. Considers that the environmental impacts of pharmaceuticals
Amendment 163 #
Paragraph 16 16. Considers that the environmental impacts of pharmaceuticals
Amendment 164 #
Paragraph 16 16. C
Amendment 165 #
Paragraph 16 16. C
Amendment 166 #
Paragraph 16 16. Considers
Amendment 167 #
Paragraph 16 16. Considers that the environmental impacts of pharmaceuticals could be an option to include
Amendment 168 #
Paragraph 16 a (new) 16 a. Considers that the environmental assessment of pharmaceuticals should encompass their degradation products and metabolites;
Amendment 169 #
Paragraph 16 b (new) 16 b. Considers that pharmaceuticals that are harmful to the environment should only be available upon prescription;
Amendment 17 #
Citation 17 a (new) - having regard to the Commission Communication of the 11 December 2019 entitled ‘European Green Deal’ (COM(2019) 640),
Amendment 170 #
Paragraph 17 17. Calls the Commission to take into account, where appropriate, ongoing existing efforts by stakeholders for future initiatives to reduce environmental risks
Amendment 171 #
Paragraph 18 18. Calls for monitoring data from the Water Framework Directive to include suitable parameters regarding the impact of pharmaceuticals that must be used for post-market evaluation;
Amendment 172 #
Paragraph 19 19. Calls on the Commission to ensure that the emission of pharmaceuticals to water is considered as a
Amendment 173 #
Paragraph 19 a (new) 19 a. Furthermore calls on the Commission to include intensive farming into the next review of the Industrial Emissions Directive;
Amendment 174 #
Paragraph 20 20. Points to the important role of procurement policy in promoting
Amendment 175 #
Paragraph 20 20. Points to the important role of procurement policy in promoting
Amendment 176 #
Paragraph 20 20. Points to the important role of procurement policy in promoting
Amendment 177 #
Paragraph 20 20. Points to the important role of procurement policy in promoting greener pharmaceuticals in design and manufacturing; calls on the Commission to develop clear guidance on this issue;
Amendment 178 #
Paragraph 20 20. Points to the important role of procurement policy in promoting greener pharmaceuticals in design and manufacturing; calls on the Commission to develop clear guidance on this issue;
Amendment 179 #
Paragraph 20 20. Points to the important role of procurement policy in promoting greener pharmaceuticals in design and manufacturing; calls on the Commission to develop clear guidance on this issue;
Amendment 18 #
Citation 17 a (new) - having regard to the Commission Communication of the 11 December 2019 entitled ‘European Green Deal’ (COM(2019) 640),
Amendment 180 #
Paragraph 21 a (new) 21 a. Calls on the Commission to include compulsory environmental criteria in the Good Manufacturing Practice (GMP) framework to give EU inspectors the ability to control manufacturing discharges at overseas pharmaceutical factories supplying the EU market;
Amendment 181 #
Paragraph 21 a (new) 21 a. Calls on the Commission to include compulsory environmental criteria in the Good Manufacturing Practice (GMP) framework to give EU inspectors the ability to control manufacturing discharges at overseas pharmaceutical factories supplying the EU market;
Amendment 182 #
Paragraph 21 a (new) 21 a. Calls on the Commission to take all necessary action so that compulsory environmental criteria are included in the Good Manufacturing Practice (GMP) framework;
Amendment 183 #
Paragraph 21 a (new) 21 a. Calls on the European Medicines Agency to facilitate joint inspections of manufacturing discharges at overseas pharmaceuticals factories supplying the EU;
Amendment 184 #
Paragraph 22 22. Considers that a clear road map for completing environmental risk assessments is needed, where those are not available, in particular for those medicinal products which were authorised before 2006 and were not subject to an Environmental Risk assessment in their market authorisation process;
Amendment 185 #
Paragraph 22 22. Considers that a clear road map for completing environmental risk assessments on pharmaceuticals placed on the EU market is needed, where
Amendment 186 #
Paragraph 22 22. C
Amendment 187 #
Paragraph 22 22. C
Amendment 188 #
Paragraph 22 a (new) 22 a. Calls on the Commission to include compulsory environmental criteria in the Good Manufacturing Practice (GMP) framework to give the possibility to EU inspectors to control discharges of third countries pharmaceutical factories supplying the EU;
Amendment 189 #
Paragraph 22 a (new) 22 a. Calls on the Commission to include compulsory environmental criteria in the Good Manufacturing Practice (GMP) framework to give EU inspectors the ability to control manufacturing discharges at overseas pharmaceutical factories supplying the EU market;
Amendment 19 #
Citation 17 a (new) - having regard to the Commission Communication of the 11 December 2019 entitled ‘European Green Deal’ (COM(2019) 640),
Amendment 190 #
Paragraph 24 24. Considers it appropriate that pharmaceutical companies submit a joint environmental risk assessment per active substance, including the time necessary for the disappearance of these substances from the environment, based on half-life calculations for radioactive substances, so as to have coherent information, avoid duplication of work and reduce animal testing;
Amendment 191 #
Paragraph 24 24. Considers it appropriate that pharmaceutical companies
Amendment 192 #
Paragraph 24 24. Considers it appropriate that pharmaceutical companies submit a joint environmental risk assessment per active substance so as to have coherent information, avoid duplication of work and
Amendment 193 #
Paragraph 24 a (new) 24 a. Calls for an update of the requirements with regard to the environmental risk assessment to ensure a proper environmental risk assessment of all relevant pharmaceuticals based on latest available science, to ensure a proper assessment of persistent, bioaccummulative and toxic substances, that additive effects as well as mixture effects are fully taken into consideration, as well as the risk of development of antibiotic resistance;
Amendment 194 #
Paragraph 24 a (new) 24a. Asks the Commission and the Member States quickly to address the lack of studies on the mutual potentiation of the different molecules and the interaction of natural metabolic degradation products;
Amendment 195 #
Paragraph 25 a (new) 25 a. Calls on the Commission to support research on the assessment of mixture effects, chronic exposition on low dose and antimicrobial resistance development, especially in relation to vulnerable groups of population;
Amendment 196 #
Paragraph 26 26. Stresses that measures must be based on scientific evidence and calls on all relevant players to ensure that actions taken do not jeopardise access to safe and effective pharmaceutical treatments for human patients and animals; in this regard, supports the Commission’s intention to reduce waste by allowing that medicines be dispensed in quantities better matching
Amendment 197 #
Paragraph 26 26. Stresses that measures must be based on scientific evidence and calls on all relevant players to ensure that actions taken do not jeopardise access to safe and effective pharmaceutical treatments for human patients and animals; in this regard, supports the Commission’s intention to reduce waste by allowing that medicines be dispensed in quantities better matching needs, including by optimising the package size, and to explore the possibility to safely extend expiry dates for medicines to avoid that medicines that can still be safely used are unnecessarily thrown away;
Amendment 198 #
Paragraph 26 26. Stresses that measures must be based
Amendment 199 #
Paragraph 26 a (new) 26 a. Calls for an update of the requirements with regard to the environmental risk assessment to ensure a proper assessment of mixture effects and take into account the risk for the development of antimicrobial resistance in the environment;
Amendment 2 #
Citation 1 a (new) - having regard to Article 191 (2) of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union,
Amendment 20 #
Citation 17 a (new) - having regard to the Commission Communication 'European Green Deal' (COM(2019) 640) of the 11 December 2019,
Amendment 200 #
Paragraph 27 27. Considers that the overall per capita drug consumption should be reduced, without
Amendment 201 #
Paragraph 27 27. Considers that the overall per capita drug consumption should be reduced, without jeopardising patients’ health; is of the opinion that the number of animals on stock farms and the overall per animal veterinary medicines consumption should also decrease and that intensive stockbreeding should be run down;
Amendment 202 #
Paragraph 27 27. Considers that
Amendment 203 #
Paragraph 27 27. Considers that the overall per capita drug consumption should be reduced, without jeopardising patients’ health; is of the opinion that the overall per animal veterinary medicines consumption should also decrease without compromising animal health and welfare;
Amendment 204 #
Paragraph 27 27. Considers that the overall per capita drug consumption should be reduced, without jeopardising patients’ health; is of the opinion that the overall per animal veterinary medicines consumption should also decrease without compromising animal health and welfare;
Amendment 205 #
Paragraph 27 27. Considers that the overall per capita drug consumption should be reduced, without jeopardising patients’ health; is of the opinion that the overall per animal veterinary medicines consumption should also decrease without compromising animal health and welfare;
Amendment 206 #
Paragraph 27 27. Considers that
Amendment 207 #
Paragraph 27 a (new) 27 a. Calls for measurable targets to be put into place with the aim of reducing overall prescription and consumption of pharmaceuticals both in human and animal veterinary;
Amendment 208 #
Paragraph 27 a (new) 27 a. Is of the opinion that further efforts are needed to decrease the overall per animal veterinary medicines consumption;
Amendment 209 #
Paragraph 28 28. Considers that a review of Directive 86/278/EEC on sewage sludge is long overdue; calls on the Commission to make a legislative proposal to review and update Directive 86/278/EEC no later than by the end of 2020,
Amendment 21 #
Citation 26 a (new) - having regard to the Commission Communication of 11 December 2019 entitled ‘The European Green Deal’ (COM(2019)0640),
Amendment 210 #
Paragraph 28 28. Considers that a review of Directive 86/278/EEC on sewage sludge is long overdue; calls on the Commission to
Amendment 211 #
Paragraph 28 28. Considers that a review of Directive 86/278/EEC on sewage sludge is long overdue; calls on the Commission to evaluate and, if necessary given the results obtained, to make a legislative proposal to review and update Directive 86/278/EEC no later than by the end of 202
Amendment 212 #
Paragraph 28 a (new) 28 a. Emphasises that the affordability of water has to be maintained and costly treatment plant upgrades should not be shifted to consumers; therefore takes the view that financing depollution via wastewater charges would only burden citizens and would not provide any incentive to reduce the input of pollutants during the manufacturing procedure;
Amendment 213 #
Paragraph 29 29. Considers that pharmaceutical production plants should pre-treat their wastewater; request in this context that the relevant authorities set monitoring requirements to the industry as well as stricter limits to the concentrations of pharmaceuticals in the wastewater ending up to the municipal WWTPs;
Amendment 214 #
Paragraph 29 29. Considers that pharmaceutical production plants should pre-treat their wastewater in accordance with the principle of preventing environmental threats, especially at source;
Amendment 215 #
Paragraph 29 29. Considers that pharmaceutical production plants should pre-treat their wastewater, according to the Best Available Techniques;
Amendment 216 #
Paragraph 29 29. Considers that pharmaceutical production plants should pre-treat their wastewater, applying Best Available Techniques;
Amendment 217 #
Paragraph 29 29. Considers that pharmaceutical production plants should pre-treat their wastewater applying Best Available Techniques;
Amendment 218 #
Paragraph 29 29. Considers that pharmaceutical production plants should pre-treat their wastewater applying best available techniques;
Amendment 219 #
Paragraph 30 30. Calls for full enforcement of the existing provisions with regard to take- back schemes for unused medicines and calls on Member States which have not yet set up these provisions to do so;
Amendment 22 #
Citation 12 b (new) - having regard to its resolution of 15 January 2020 on the European Green Deal (2019/2956(RSP)),
Amendment 220 #
Paragraph 30 30. Calls for the Member States to implement and fully enforce
Amendment 221 #
Paragraph 30 30. Calls for full enforcement of the existing provisions with regard to take- back schemes for unused medicines and for the widest possible promotion of this type of solution;
Amendment 222 #
Paragraph 30 30. Calls
Amendment 223 #
Paragraph 30 30. Calls
Amendment 224 #
Paragraph 30 30. Calls
Amendment 225 #
Paragraph 30 30. Calls
Amendment 226 #
Paragraph 30 30. Calls
Amendment 227 #
Paragraph 31 a (new) 31 a. Calls on the Commission and Member States to fund research and innovation in more advanced water treatment technologies that can improve the removal of pharmaceutical residues and other substances;
Amendment 228 #
Paragraph 31 a (new) 31 a. Recalls that the Commission is due to evaluate the feasibility of setting up an EU-wide active substance-based review system by 28 January 2022 and calls on the Commission to make a legislative proposal to adopt such a review system;
Amendment 229 #
Paragraph 31 a (new) 31 a. Calls on the Commission and Member States to support research, innovation and development of more advanced waste water treatment technologies that can detect and improve the removal of pharmaceutical residues;
Amendment 23 #
Citation 18 a (new) - having regard to several Member States' programmes such as the Netherlands Chain approach to reduce pharmaceutical residues in water;
Amendment 230 #
Paragraph 32 32. Is concerned that monitoring of pharmaceuticals in the environment is still very limited; stresses the need to strengthen post-marketing control mechanisms
Amendment 231 #
Paragraph 32 32. Is concerned that monitoring of pharmaceuticals in the environment is still very limited; stresses the need to strengthen post-marketing control mechanisms
Amendment 232 #
Paragraph 32 32. Is concerned that monitoring of pharmaceuticals in the environment is still very limited; stresses the need to strengthen post-marketing control mechanisms
Amendment 233 #
Paragraph 32 32. Is concerned that monitoring of pharmaceuticals in the environment is still
Amendment 234 #
Paragraph 32 32. Is concerned that monitoring of pharmaceuticals in the environment, in particular in soil, is still very limited; stresses the need to strengthen post- marketing control mechanisms into comprehensive monitoring, also with regard to environmental effects, as the current surveillance system (pharmacovigilance) is not adequately and systematically covering the environmental data deficit;
Amendment 235 #
Paragraph 32 32. Is concerned that monitoring of pharmaceuticals in the environment, notably in soil, is still very limited; stresses the need to strengthen post-marketing control
Amendment 236 #
Paragraph 32 32. Is concerned that monitoring of pharmaceuticals in the environment, notably in soil, is still very limited; stresses the need to strengthen post-marketing control mechanisms into comprehensive monitoring, also with regard to environmental effects, as the current surveillance system (pharmacovigilance) is not adequately and systematically covering the environmental data deficit;
Amendment 237 #
Paragraph 33 33. Calls on the Commission to address the possible impact of pharmaceuticals on the watchlist pursuant to the Water Framework Directive and to assess whether the list should be updated, in particular by including all pharmaceuticals for which an environmental risk has been identified during the authorisation process and by monitoring data in relation to Predicted No Effect Concentration (PNEC) to identify where mitigation measures would be necessary;
Amendment 238 #
Paragraph 33 33. Calls on the Commission to address the possible impact of pharmaceuticals on the watchlist pursuant to the Water Framework Directive and to assess whether the list should be updated; calls on the Commission to propose a soil framework directive, focusing in particular on the concentration of antibiotics in the soil;
Amendment 239 #
Paragraph 33 a (new) 33 a. Calls on the Commission to include pharmaceuticals that pose a significant risk to the environment in the list of priority substances under the Water Framework Directive and set environmental quality standards and concentration limits under the Environmental Quality Standards (EQS) Directive;
Amendment 24 #
Citation 21 a (new) - having regard to the Registration, Evaluation, Authorisation and Restriction of Chemicals (REACH) Regulation (EC) No 1907/2006,
Amendment 240 #
Paragraph 33 a (new) 33 a. Calls on the Commission to include pharmaceuticals that pose a significant risk to the environment in the list of priority substances under the Water Framework Directive and set environmental quality standards and concentration limits under the Environmental Quality Standards (EQS) Directive;
Amendment 241 #
Paragraph 33 a (new) 33 a. Calls on the Commission to include pharmaceuticals that pose a significant risk to the environment in the list of priority substances under the Water Framework Directive and set environmental quality standards and concentration limits under the Environmental Quality Standards Directive;
Amendment 242 #
Paragraph 34 34. Highlights that comprehensive monitoring of antibiotics has been developed in farming; calls on the Commission to also develop a monitoring system in relation to human antibiotics; calls on the Commission to propose a pharmaceuticals monitoring programme, focusing in particular on the concentration of antibiotics in the soil;
Amendment 243 #
Paragraph 35 35. Emphasises the need to support further research, particularly under the next multi-annual financial framework, on the direct impact on human health of exposure to pharmaceuticals and their residues in the environment and on better understanding how pharmaceuticals enter and persist in the environment, including in aquatic and marine ecosystems;
Amendment 244 #
Paragraph 35 35. Emphasises the need to support further research, particularly under the next multi-annual financial framework, on the direct impact on human health of exposure to pharmaceuticals and their residues in the environment and on better understanding how pharmaceuticals enter
Amendment 245 #
Paragraph 35 35. Emphasises the need to support further research, particularly under the next multi-annual financial framework, on the
Amendment 246 #
Paragraph 35 35. Emphasises the need to support further research, particularly under the next
Amendment 247 #
Paragraph 35 35. Emphasises the need to support further research, particularly under the next multi-annual financial framework, on the direct impact on human health and ecology of exposure to pharmaceuticals and their residues in the environment and on better understanding how pharmaceuticals enter and persist in the environment;
Amendment 248 #
Paragraph 35 a (new) 35 a. Calls on the Commission to include pharmaceuticals that pose a significant risk to the environment in the list of priority substances under the Water Framework Directive and set environmental quality standards and concentration limits under the Environmental Quality Standards (EQS) Directive;
Amendment 249 #
Paragraph 36 36. Considers that the methods of analysis to quantify the presence of pharmaceuticals in the environment should be improved and that analytical detection methods should be made publicly available;
Amendment 25 #
Citation 22 a (new) - having regard to the OECD study of November 2019 "Pharmaceutical Residues in Freshwater - Hazards and Policy Responses"7a, _________________ 7a https://www.oecd.org/publications/pharm aceutical-residues-in-freshwater- c936f42d-en.htm
Amendment 250 #
Paragraph 36 36. Considers that the methods of analysis to quantify the presence of pharmaceuticals in the environment should be improved, as should the development of technologies for this purpose;
Amendment 251 #
Paragraph 36 a (new) 36 a. Considers that, in order to rectify these knowledge gaps, the European Commission should introduce legally binding measures, such as an international treaty on AMR, to stimulate global knowledge sharing and surveillance;
Amendment 252 #
Paragraph 37 37. Recalls that pharmaceutical environmental information plays a key role for risk management and that this type of information should be made available to relevant stakeholders; therefore calls on the Commission and the relevant authorities to set up a secure, centralised database enabling all the actors concerned to have access to the results of the environmental risk assessments of products;
Amendment 253 #
Paragraph 37 37. Recalls that pharmaceutical environmental information such as the impact on water, environmental behaviour, degradability and possible cocktail effects plays a key role
Amendment 254 #
Paragraph 37 37. Recalls that pharmaceutical environmental information such as the impact on water, environmental behaviour, degradability and possible cocktail effects plays a key role for risk management and that this type of information should be transparent and made available to relevant stakeholders;
Amendment 255 #
Paragraph 37 37. Recalls that pharmaceutical environmental information such as the impact on water, environmental behaviour, degradability and possible cocktail effects plays a key role for risk management and that this type of information should be transparent and made available to relevant stakeholders;
Amendment 256 #
Paragraph 37 37. Recalls that pharmaceutical environmental information plays a key role for risk management and th
Amendment 257 #
Paragraph 37 37. Recalls that pharmaceutical environmental information plays a key role for risk management and that this type of information should be transparent and made available to relevant stakeholders;
Amendment 258 #
Paragraph 39 a (new) 39 a. Calls for the pharmaceutical industry to provide more transparency in supply chains by disclosing origin of drugs and active pharmaceutical ingredients (API) at raw material production stage, to ensure total traceability of all pharmaceutical products;
Amendment 26 #
Citation 22 a (new) - having regard to the OECD study of November 2019 Pharmaceutical Residues in Freshwater - Hazards and Policy Responses,
Amendment 27 #
Citation 22 a (new) - having regard to the OECD study of November 2019 Pharmaceutical Residues in Freshwater - Hazards and Policy Responses,
Amendment 28 #
Citation 22 a (new) - having regard to the OECD study of November 2019 Pharmaceutical Residues in Freshwater - Hazards and Policy Responses,
Amendment 29 #
Citation 23 a (new) - having regard to the OECD study 'Pharmaceutical Residues in Freshwater - Hazards and Policy Responses' of November 2019,
Amendment 3 #
Citation 1 a (new) - having regard to Article 191 (2) of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union,
Amendment 30 #
Citation 23 a (new) - having regard to the OECD study of November 2019 Pharmaceutical Residues in Freshwater - Hazards and Policy Responses,
Amendment 31 #
Citation 12 a (new) - having regard to the OECD study of November 2019 Pharmaceutical Residues in Freshwater - Hazards and Policy Responses,
Amendment 32 #
Citation 24 a (new) – having regard to the Commission document entitled 'Towards a sustainable Europe by 2030',
Amendment 33 #
Recital A A. whereas pharmaceuticals play an essential role in ensuring a high level of
Amendment 34 #
Recital B B. whereas the wide use of pharmaceuticals in human and veterinary medicines, including antimicrobial agents, has increased their concentrations in many environmental reservoirs such as soils, sediments and waterbodies in the past 20 years; whereas the population grows and ages and the environmental concentrations are likely to increase, and the impact of climate change will affect both the quantity and the quality of water resources as at times of drought concentrations will be higher; whereas there is a need for more widespread gathering to measure this problem around the world; whereas the largest source of
Amendment 35 #
|