Progress: Procedure completed
Lead committee dossier:
Legal Basis:
RoP 57, TFEU 114-p1
Legal Basis:
RoP 57, TFEU 114-p1Subjects
- 1.20.09 Protection of privacy and data protection
- 2.40 Free movement of services, freedom to provide
- 3.30.06 Information and communication technologies, digital technologies
- 3.30.25 International information networks and society, internet
- 3.45.05 Business policy, e-commerce, after-sales service, commercial distribution
- 4.60.06 Consumers' economic and legal interests
Events
PURPOSE: to ensure contestability and fairness in the digital sector in general, and in essential platform services in particular, with a view to fostering innovation, quality of digital products and services, fairness and price competitiveness, and a high level of quality and choice for end-users in the digital sector.
LEGISLATIVE ACT: Regulation (EU) 2022/1925 of the European Parliament and of the Council on contestable and fair markets in the digital sector and amending Directives (EU) 2019/1937 and (EU) 2020/1828 (Digital Markets Act).
CONTENT: the digital markets act aims to ensure that the digital sector is competitive and fair. It defines clear rules for large platforms . It aims to make sure that no large online platform acts as a ‘gatekeeper’, a private rule-maker in digital markets by controlling at least one so-called ‘core platform services’.
Core platform services include: (i) online intermediation services (i.e. marketplaces, app stores); (ii) online search engines; (iii) social networking; (iv) cloud services; (v) number-independent interpersonal communication services; (vi) operating systems; (vii) web browsers; (viii) virtual assistants; (ix) cloud services; (x) online advertising services.
Designation of gatekeepers
To be considered a gatekeeper a platform must either have had an annual turnover of at least EUR 7.5 billion within the European Union (EU) in the past three years or have a market valuation of at least EUR 75 billion , and secondly it must have at least 45 million monthly end users and at least 10 000 business users established in the EU.
The platform must also control one or more core platform services in at least three Member States .
The Commission may conduct a market investigation to examine whether a company providing core platform services should be designated as a gatekeeper.
Obligations for gatekeepers
New obligations and prohibitions directly applicable to market ‘gatekeepers’ have been introduced.
A gatekeeper should in particular:
- allow third parties to inter-operate with the gatekeeper’s own services in certain specific situations;
- allow their business users to access the data that they generate in their use of the gatekeeper’s platform;
- provide companies advertising on their platform with the tools and information necessary for advertisers and publishers to carry out their own independent verification of their advertisements hosted by the gatekeeper;
- allow their business users to promote their offer and conclude contracts with their customers outside the gatekeeper’s platform;
- ensure that unsubscribing from core platform services is as easy as subscribing;
- provide information on the number of users that visit their platforms to determine whether the platform can be identified as a gatekeeper;
- give business users access to their marketing or advertising performance data on the platform;
- inform the European Commission of their acquisitions and mergers;
- ensure that the basic functionalities of instant messaging services are interoperable.
On the other hand, the gatekeeper platforms may no longer :
- treat services and products offered by the gatekeeper itself more favourably in ranking than similar services or products offered by third parties on the gatekeeper's platform;
- track end users outside of the gatekeepers' core platform service for the purpose of targeted advertising, without effective consent having been granted;
- prevent consumers from linking up to businesses outside their platforms;
- pre-install certain software applications or prevent users from easily un-installing them;
- restrict business users of platforms;
- prevent or restrict business users or end users from raising any issue of non-compliance with the relevant Union or national law by the gatekeeper with any relevant public authority, including national courts, related to any practice of the gatekeeper.
Governance
The Commission will be the only authority empowered to enforce the Regulation. An Advisory Committee and a High Level Group will be set up to assist the European Commission and facilitate its work. The Commission may decide to initiate a dialogue on regulatory measures to ensure that access controllers have a clear understanding of the rules. It may also develop guidelines to provide further guidance on different aspects of the Regulation.
Sanctions
The Commission will have powers of investigation, control and enforcement . In order to carry out its tasks, it may require undertakings and associations of undertakings to provide all necessary information, conduct hearings and take statements, carry out inspections or adopt an implementing act ordering interim measures against a gatekeeper.
If a gatekeeper breaches the rules set out in the legislation, the Commission may impose fines of up to 10% of its total worldwide turnover in the previous financial year, or up to 20% in the case of repeated breaches.
If an access controller engages in systematic non-compliance (i.e. breaches the rules at least three times in eight years), the Commission may open a market investigation and, if necessary, impose behavioural or structural remedies.
ENTRY INTO FORCE: 1.11.2022.
APPLICATION: from 2.5.2023.
The European Parliament adopted by 588 votes to 11, with 31 abstentions, a legislative resolution on the proposal for a regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council on contestable and fair markets in the digital sector (Digital Markets Act).
The European Parliament's position adopted at first reading under the ordinary legislative procedure amends the Commission's proposal as follows:
Purpose and scope
The purpose of this Regulation is to contribute to the proper functioning of the internal market by laying down harmonised rules ensuring for all businesses, contestable and fair markets in the digital sector across the Union where gatekeepers are present, to the benefit of business users and end users.
Designation of gatekeepers
This Regulation should apply to core platform services which are most prone to unfair practices. These include online intermediation services, online social networks, search engines, video sharing platform services, number independent interpersonal communication services, operating systems, web browsers, virtual assistants, cloud computing services and online advertising services that meet the minimum criteria for designation as ‘gatekeepers’.
Quantitative thresholds
An undertaking will fall within the scope of the digital markets legislation if:
- it has had an annual turnover in the Union of EUR 7.5 billion or more in each of the last three financial years, or if its average market capitalisation or fair market value equivalent was at least EUR 75 billion in the last financial year, and it provides the same core platform service in at least three Member States;
- it provides a core platform service which, in the last financial year, had at least 45 million active end-users per month established or located in the Union and at least 10 000 yearly active business users established in the Union.
The Commission should designate as gatekeepers any undertaking providing core platform services that has significant weight in the internal market but does not meet each of the thresholds. For this purpose, the Commission should take into account elements such as (i) the size, including turnover and market capitalisation, activities and position of that undertaking, (ii) the number of business users using the core platform service to reach end-users and the number of end-users (iii) network effects and data driven advantages, (iv) any scale and scope effects from which the undertaking benefits, (v) business user and end user lock-in; and (v) a conglomerate corporate structure or vertical integration of that undertaking.
Obligations for gatekeepers
Parliament introduced new obligations and prohibitions directly applicable to market ‘gatekeepers’.
Under the amended Regulation, a gatekeeper should not , unless this specific choice has been presented to the end-user and the end-user has given his or her consent within the meaning of the General Data Protection Regulation:
- process, for the purpose of providing online advertising services, personal data of end users using services of third parties that make use of core platform services of the gatekeeper;
- combine personal data from the relevant core platform service with personal data from any further core platform services or from any other services provided by the gatekeeper or with personal data from third-party services;
- cross-use personal data from the relevant core platform service in other services provided separately by the gatekeeper, including other core platform services, and vice-versa; and
- sign in end users to other services of the gatekeeper in order to combine personal data.
Gatekeepers should not be allowed to ask end-users for consent more than once a year for the same processing purpose for which they initially did not give consent or withdrew their consent.
In addition, the gatekeeper should not :
- prevent or restrict business users or end users from raising any issue of non-compliance with the relevant Union or national law by the gatekeeper with any relevant public authority, including national courts, related to any practice of the gatekeeper;
- require end users to use, or business users to use, to offer, or to interoperate with, an identification service, a web browser engine or a payment service, or technical services that support the provision of payment services, such as payment systems for in-app purchases, of that gatekeeper in the context of services provided by the business users using that gatekeeper’s core platform services;
- require business users or end users to subscribe to, or register with, any further core platform services listed in the designation decision, as a condition for being able to use, access, sign up for or registering with any of that gatekeeper’s core platform services;
- prevent users from easily uninstalling pre-installed software or applications or from using third party applications or application shops.
The gatekeeper should technically enable end users to easily change default settings on the operating system, virtual assistant and web browser of the gatekeeper that direct or steer end users to products or services provided by the gatekeeper.
Obligation for gatekeepers on interoperability of number-independent interpersonal communications services
A new provision stipulates that gatekeepers should therefore ensure, free of charge and upon request, interoperability with certain basic functionalities of their number-independent interpersonal communications services that they provide to their own end users, to third-party providers of such services.
Gatekeepers should ensure interoperability for third-party providers of number ‑ independent interpersonal communications services that offer or intend to offer their number ‑ independent interpersonal communications services to end users and business users in the Union.
Enforcement of the legislation
The Commission is the sole authority empowered to enforce this Regulation. In order to support the Commission, it should be possible for Member States to empower their national competent authorities enforcing competition rules to conduct investigations into possible non-compliance by gatekeepers with certain obligations under this Regulation.
In order to ensure coherence and effective complementarity in the implementation of this Regulation and of other sectoral regulations applicable to gatekeepers, the Commission should benefit from the expertise of a dedicated high-level group . It should be possible for that high-level group to also assist the Commission by means of advice, expertise and recommendations, when relevant, in general matters relating to the implementation or enforcement of this Regulation.
The Commission may also develop guidelines to provide further guidance on different aspects of the Regulation or to assist undertakings providing core platform services in implementing the obligations under the Regulation.
Fines
In order to ensure that the new rules relating to the legislation are properly implemented, the Commission should be able to conduct market investigations. If a gatekeeper fails to comply with the rules, the Commission may impose fines of up to 10% of its total worldwide turnover in the previous financial year, or even 20% in the case of repeated breaches.
Whistleblowers should be able to bring new information to the attention of the competent authorities which may help them to detect infringements of this Regulation and enable them to impose penalties.
The European Parliament adopted by 642 votes to 8, with 46 abstentions, amendments to the proposal for a regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council on contestable and fair markets in the digital sector (Digital Markets Act).
The matter was referred back to the committee responsible for inter-institutional negotiations.
The main amendments adopted in plenary concern the following points:
Subject matter and scope
This purpose of the proposed regulation is to contribute to the proper functioning of the internal market by laying down harmonised rules ensuring contestable and fair markets for all businesses to the benefit of both business users and end users in the digital sector across the Union where gatekeepers are present so as to foster innovation and increase consumer welfare.
Designation of gatekeepers
The proposed regulation will apply to the major companies providing so-called ‘ core platform services ’ most prone to unfair practices. These include online intermediation services, social networks, search engines, operating systems such as on smart devices, internet of things or embedded digital services in vehicles, online social networking, video sharing platform services and number-independent interpersonal communication services, cloud computing services.
Members also included in the scope of the digital market act web browsers, virtual assistants and connected TV.
Quantitative thresholds
Members also amended the Commission’s proposal to increase the quantitative thresholds for a company to fall under the scope of the digital markets act to EUR 8 billion in the last three financial year (as opposed to EUR 6.5 billion) in annual turnover in the European Economic Area (EEA) and a market capitalisation of EUR 80 billion in the last financial year (as opposed to 65 billion as proposed by the Commission).
To qualify as a gatekeeper, companies would also need to provide a core platform service in at least three EU countries and have at least 45 million monthly end users , as well as more than 10 000 business users . A list of indicators to be used by the providers of core platforms services when measuring monthly end users and yearly business users should be provided in an Annex to the proposed Regulation.
The Commission should designate as gatekeeper any undertaking providing core platform services, excluding micro, small and medium-sized enterprises, meeting each of the requirements. In conducting its assessment, the Commission should take into account foreseeable developments of these elements including any planned concentrations involving another provider of core platform services or of any other services provided in the digital sector.
Obligations for gatekeepers
Parliament introduced new obligations and prohibitions directly applicable to market ‘gatekeepers’.
In respect of each of its core platform services, a gatekeeper should refrain from imposing unfair conditions on businesses and consumers. Members included additional requirements on the use of data for targeted or micro-targeted advertising and the interoperability of services , e.g. number-independent interpersonal communication services and social network services.
An amendment stipulates that a gatekeeper should, for its own commercial purposes, and the placement of third-party advertising in its own services, refrain from combining personal data for the purpose of delivering targeted or micro-targeted advertising , except if there is a clear, explicit, renewed, informed consent, in line with the General Data Protection Regulation. Moreover, according to Members, personal data of minors should not be processed for commercial purposes, such as direct marketing, profiling and behaviourally targeted advertising.
The proposal would give users the ability to un-install pre-installed software applications, such as apps, at any time on a basic platform service.
Killer acquisitions
The Commission might prohibit gatekeepers from engaging on acquisitions (including ‘killer-acquisitions’) in the areas relevant to this regulation such as digital or to the use of data related sectors e.g. gaming, research institutes, consumer goods, fitness devices, health tracking financial services, and for a limited period of time where this is necessary and proportionate to undue the damage caused by repeated infringements or to prevent further damage to the contestability and fairness of the internal market.
An amendment stipulates that adequate mechanisms should be put in place to enable whistleblowers to alert the competent authorities of potential or actual breaches of the Regulation and to protect them against retaliation.
EU level cooperation and fines
Members introduced the creation of a ‘European High-Level Group of Digital Regulators’ to facilitate cooperation and coordination between the Commission and Member States in their enforcement decisions. Establishing that group of regulators should enable the exchange of information and best practices among the Members States and enhance better monitoring and thus strengthen the implementation of this Regulation.
Regarding fines, Members proposed that Commission may impose on a gatekeeper fines not less than 4% and not exceeding 20% of its total worldwide turnover in the preceding financial year where it finds that the gatekeeper, intentionally or negligently, fails to comply with the obligation to provide within a time-limit, which shall not be less than three months, information that is required for assessing an undertaking’s designation as a gatekeeper or supplies incorrect, or misleading information.
The Committee on the Internal Market and Consumer Protection adopted the by Andreas SCHWAB (EPP, DE) on the proposal for a regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council on contestable and fair markets in the digital sector (Digital Markets Act).
The committee recommended that the European Parliament's position adopted at first reading under the ordinary legislative procedure be amended as follows.
Firstly, as a reminder, digital services in general and online platforms in particular play an increasingly important role in the economy, in particular in the internal market, by providing business users with gateways to reach end users throughout the Union and beyond, by facilitating cross-border trade and by opening entirely new business opportunities to a large number of companies in the Union to the benefit of Union’s consumers.
Scope
This purpose of the proposed regulation is to contribute to the proper functioning of the internal market by laying down harmonised rules ensuring contestable and fair markets for all businesses to the benefit of both business users and end users in the digital sector across the Union where gatekeepers are present so as to foster innovation and increase consumer welfare.
Designation of gatekeepers
The proposed regulation will apply to the major companies providing so-called ‘core platform services’ most prone to unfair practices. These include online intermediation services, social networks, search engines, operating systems, online advertising services, cloud computing, and video-sharing services, which meet the relevant criteria to be designated as ‘gatekeepers’. Members also included in the scope of the digital market act web browsers, virtual assistants and connected TV.
Members also amended the Commission’s proposal to increase the quantitative thresholds for a company to fall under the scope of the digital markets act to EUR 8 billion (as opposed to EUR 6.5 billion) in annual turnover in the European Economic Area (EEA) and a market capitalisation of EUR 80 billion (as opposed to 65 billion as proposed by the Commission).
To qualify as a gatekeeper, companies would also need to provide a core platform service in at least three EU countries and have at least 45 million monthly end users , as well as more than 10 000 business users . A list of indicators to be used by the providers of core platforms services when measuring monthly end users and yearly business users should be provided in an Annex to the proposed Regulation.
Obligations for gatekeepers
In respect of each of its core platform services, a gatekeeper should refrain from imposing unfair conditions on businesses and consumers. Members included additional requirements on the use of data for targeted or micro-targeted advertising and the interoperability of services, e.g. number-independent interpersonal communication services and social network services.
The proposal stipulates that a gatekeeper should, for its own commercial purposes, and the placement of third-party advertising in its own services, refrain from combining personal data for the purpose of delivering targeted or micro-targeted advertising, except if there is a clear, explicit, renewed, informed consent, in line with the General Data Protection Regulation. Moreover, according to Members, personal data of minors should not be processed for commercial purposes, such as direct marketing, profiling and behaviourally targeted advertising.
EU level cooperation and fines
Members introduced the creation of a ‘European High-Level Group of Digital Regulators’ to facilitate cooperation and coordination between the Commission and Member States in their enforcement decisions. Establishing that group of regulators should enable the exchange of information and best practices among the Members States and enhance better monitoring and thus strengthen the implementation of this Regulation.
Regarding fines , Members proposed that Commission may impose on a gatekeeper fines not less than 4% and not exceeding 20% of its total worldwide turnover in the preceding financial year where it finds that the gatekeeper, intentionally or negligently, fails to comply
with the obligation to provide within a time-limit, which shall not be less than three months, information that is required for assessing an undertaking’s designation as a gatekeeper or supplies incorrect, or misleading information.
PURPOSE: to ensure the proper functioning of the internal market by promoting effective competition in digital markets and in particular a fair and contestable online platform environment (Digital Markets Act).
PROPOSED ACT: Regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council.
ROLE OF THE EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT: the European Parliament decides in accordance with the ordinary legislative procedure and on an equal footing with the Council.
BACKGROUND: digital services cover a wide range of daily activities including online intermediation services, such as online marketplaces, online social networking services, online search engines, operating systems or software application stores. They increase consumer choice, improve efficiency and competitiveness of industry and can enhance civil participation in society. However, whereas over 10 000 online platforms operate in Europe’s digital economy, most of which are SMEs, a small number of large online platforms capture the biggest share of the overall value generated.
These large platforms increasingly act as gateways or gatekeepers between business users and end users and enjoy an entrenched and durable position. The proposed Digital Markets Act aims at preventing gatekeepers from imposing unfair conditions on businesses and consumers and at ensuring the openness of important digital services.
Common rules across the single market are needed to foster innovation, growth and competitiveness, and facilitate the scaling up of smaller platforms, small and medium-sized enterprises and start-ups who will have a single, clear framework at EU level.
The proposed Digital Services Act and Digital Markets Act encompass a single set of new rules applicable across the whole EU. They will create a safer and more open digital space, with European values at its centre.
CONTENT: the aim of the proposed regulation is to lay down harmonised rules ensuring contestable and fair markets in the digital sector across the EU where gatekeepers are present. It should apply to core platform services provided or offered by gatekeepers to business users established in the EU or end users established or located in the Union, irrespective of the place of establishment or residence of the gatekeepers and irrespective of the law otherwise applicable to the provision of service.
Its main objectives are:
- to address market failures to ensure contestable and competitive digital markets for increased innovation and consumer choice;
- to address gatekeepers’ unfair conduct;
- to enhance coherence and legal certainty to preserve the internal market.
Specific provisions of the proposal
The proposal:
- should only apply to large companies that would be designated as ‘gatekeepers’. For this purpose, it contains the provisions concerning the designation of gatekeepers. More specifically, it establishes the conditions under which providers of core platform services should be designated as gatekeepers either based on the quantitative criteria (through a presumption subject to counter-demonstration) or following a case-by-case assessment during a market investigation;
- sets out the practices of gatekeepers that limit contestability and that are unfair;
- provides rules for carrying out market investigations: (i) designation of a gatekeeper; (ii) investigation of systematic non-compliance and (iii) investigation of new core platform services and new practices;
- contains the provisions concerning the implementation and enforcement of this Regulation. These include the Commission's ability to request information, to conduct interviews and make statements and on-site inspections, to adopt interim measures and to make voluntary measures binding on the gate-keepers. In case of non-compliance, the Commission can issue non-compliance decisions, as well as impose fines and periodic penalty payments for breaches of the Regulation.
Budgetary implications
The total financial resources necessary for the implementation of the proposal in the 2021-2027 period should amount to EUR 81.090 million, including EUR 50.640 million of administrative costs and EUR 30.450 million entirely covered by the allocations foreseen in the multiannual financial framework 2021-2027 under the financial envelopes of the Single Market Programme and the Digital Europe Programme. The financing should support inter alia activities such as carrying out the designation of providers of core platform services, carrying out market investigations and performing any other investigative actions, enforcement actions and monitoring activities.
Documents
- Final act published in Official Journal: Regulation 2022/1925
- Final act published in Official Journal: OJ L 265 12.10.2022, p. 0001
- Commission response to text adopted in plenary: SP(2022)483
- Draft final act: 00017/2022/LEX
- Results of vote in Parliament: Results of vote in Parliament
- Decision by Parliament, 1st reading: T9-0270/2022
- Debate in Parliament: Debate in Parliament
- Approval in committee of the text agreed at 1st reading interinstitutional negotiations: PE732.531
- Coreper letter confirming interinstitutional agreement: GEDA/A/(2022)003821
- Text agreed during interinstitutional negotiations: PE732.531
- Decision by Parliament, 1st reading: T9-0499/2021
- Debate in Parliament: Debate in Parliament
- Committee report tabled for plenary, 1st reading: A9-0332/2021
- Committee opinion: PE693.907
- Committee opinion: PE693.727
- Committee opinion: PE693.930
- Committee opinion: PE693.946
- Contribution: COM(2020)0842
- Committee opinion: PE693.640
- Committee opinion: PE691.253
- Amendments tabled in committee: PE695.143
- Amendments tabled in committee: PE695.196
- Amendments tabled in committee: PE695.197
- Amendments tabled in committee: PE695.198
- Contribution: COM(2020)0842
- Committee of the Regions: opinion: CDR5356/2020
- Committee draft report: PE692.792
- Contribution: COM(2020)0842
- Contribution: COM(2020)0842
- Contribution: SWD(2020)0363
- Contribution: SWD(2020)0364
- Contribution: COM(2020)0842
- Contribution: COM(2020)0842
- Document attached to the procedure: OJ C 147 26.04.2021, p. 0004
- Document attached to the procedure: N9-0019/2021
- Document attached to the procedure: SEC(2020)0437
- Document attached to the procedure: SWD(2020)0363
- Document attached to the procedure: EUR-Lex
- Document attached to the procedure: SWD(2020)0364
- Legislative proposal published: COM(2020)0842
- Legislative proposal published: EUR-Lex
- Document attached to the procedure: SEC(2020)0437
- Document attached to the procedure: SWD(2020)0363
- Document attached to the procedure: EUR-Lex SWD(2020)0364
- Document attached to the procedure: OJ C 147 26.04.2021, p. 0004 N9-0019/2021
- Committee draft report: PE692.792
- Committee of the Regions: opinion: CDR5356/2020
- Amendments tabled in committee: PE695.143
- Amendments tabled in committee: PE695.196
- Amendments tabled in committee: PE695.197
- Amendments tabled in committee: PE695.198
- Committee opinion: PE691.253
- Committee opinion: PE693.640
- Committee opinion: PE693.946
- Committee opinion: PE693.930
- Committee opinion: PE693.727
- Committee opinion: PE693.907
- Coreper letter confirming interinstitutional agreement: GEDA/A/(2022)003821
- Text agreed during interinstitutional negotiations: PE732.531
- Draft final act: 00017/2022/LEX
- Commission response to text adopted in plenary: SP(2022)483
- Contribution: COM(2020)0842
- Contribution: COM(2020)0842
- Contribution: COM(2020)0842
- Contribution: COM(2020)0842
- Contribution: COM(2020)0842
- Contribution: SWD(2020)0363
- Contribution: SWD(2020)0364
- Contribution: COM(2020)0842
Activities
- Christel SCHALDEMOSE
Plenary Speeches (3)
- 2021/12/14 Digital Markets Act (debate)
- 2022/07/04 Digital Services Act - Digital Markets Act (debate)
- 2022/07/04 Digital Services Act - Digital Markets Act (debate)
- Andreas SCHWAB
Plenary Speeches (3)
- 2021/12/14 Digital Markets Act (debate)
- 2022/07/04 Digital Services Act - Digital Markets Act (debate)
- 2022/07/04 Digital Services Act - Digital Markets Act (debate)
- Pablo ARIAS ECHEVERRÍA
Plenary Speeches (2)
- 2021/12/14 Digital Markets Act (debate)
- 2022/07/04 Digital Services Act - Digital Markets Act (debate)
- Adam BIELAN
Plenary Speeches (2)
- 2021/12/14 Digital Markets Act (debate)
- 2022/07/04 Digital Services Act - Digital Markets Act (debate)
- Biljana BORZAN
Plenary Speeches (2)
- 2021/12/14 Digital Markets Act (debate)
- 2022/07/04 Digital Services Act - Digital Markets Act (debate)
- Dita CHARANZOVÁ
Plenary Speeches (2)
- 2021/12/14 Digital Markets Act (debate)
- 2022/07/04 Digital Services Act - Digital Markets Act (debate)
- Markus FERBER
Plenary Speeches (2)
- 2021/12/14 Digital Markets Act (debate)
- 2022/07/04 Digital Services Act - Digital Markets Act (debate)
- Petra KAMMEREVERT
Plenary Speeches (2)
- 2021/12/14 Digital Markets Act (debate)
- 2022/07/04 Digital Services Act - Digital Markets Act (debate)
- Eva MAYDELL
Plenary Speeches (2)
- 2021/12/14 Digital Markets Act (debate)
- 2022/07/04 Digital Services Act - Digital Markets Act (debate)
- Roberta METSOLA
Plenary Speeches (2)
- 2021/12/14 Digital Markets Act (debate)
- 2021/12/14 Digital Markets Act (debate)
- Paul TANG
Plenary Speeches (2)
- 2021/12/14 Digital Markets Act (debate)
- 2022/07/04 Digital Services Act - Digital Markets Act (debate)
- Tom VANDENKENDELAERE
Plenary Speeches (2)
- 2021/12/14 Digital Markets Act (debate)
- 2022/07/04 Digital Services Act - Digital Markets Act (debate)
- Tiemo WÖLKEN
Plenary Speeches (2)
- 2021/12/14 Digital Markets Act (debate)
- 2022/07/04 Digital Services Act - Digital Markets Act (debate)
- Carlos ZORRINHO
Plenary Speeches (2)
- 2021/12/14 Digital Markets Act (debate)
- 2022/07/04 Digital Services Act - Digital Markets Act (debate)
- Alexandra GEESE
Plenary Speeches (2)
- 2021/12/14 Digital Markets Act (debate)
- 2022/07/04 Digital Services Act - Digital Markets Act (debate)
- Marcel KOLAJA
Plenary Speeches (2)
- 2021/12/14 Digital Markets Act (debate)
- 2022/07/04 Digital Services Act - Digital Markets Act (debate)
- Ondřej KOVAŘÍK
Plenary Speeches (2)
- 2021/12/14 Digital Markets Act (debate)
- 2022/07/04 Digital Services Act - Digital Markets Act (debate)
- Edina TÓTH
Plenary Speeches (2)
- 2021/12/14 Digital Markets Act (debate)
- 2022/07/04 Digital Services Act - Digital Markets Act (debate)
- Alex AGIUS SALIBA
Plenary Speeches (2)
- 2021/12/14 Digital Markets Act (debate)
- 2022/07/04 Digital Services Act - Digital Markets Act (debate)
- Virginie JORON
Plenary Speeches (2)
- 2021/12/14 Digital Markets Act (debate)
- 2022/07/04 Digital Services Act - Digital Markets Act (debate)
- Beata MAZUREK
Plenary Speeches (2)
- 2021/12/14 Digital Markets Act (debate)
- 2022/07/04 Digital Services Act - Digital Markets Act (debate)
- Kim VAN SPARRENTAK
Plenary Speeches (2)
- 2021/12/14 Digital Markets Act (debate)
- 2022/07/04 Digital Services Act - Digital Markets Act (debate)
- Alessandra BASSO
Plenary Speeches (2)
- 2021/12/14 Digital Markets Act (debate)
- 2022/07/04 Digital Services Act - Digital Markets Act (debate)
- Geert BOURGEOIS
Plenary Speeches (2)
- 2021/12/14 Digital Markets Act (debate)
- 2022/07/04 Digital Services Act - Digital Markets Act (debate)
- Stéphanie YON-COURTIN
Plenary Speeches (2)
- 2021/12/14 Digital Markets Act (debate)
- 2022/07/04 Digital Services Act - Digital Markets Act (debate)
- Maria-Manuel LEITÃO-MARQUES
Plenary Speeches (2)
- 2021/12/14 Digital Markets Act (debate)
- 2022/07/04 Digital Services Act - Digital Markets Act (debate)
- Sandro GOZI
Plenary Speeches (2)
- 2021/12/14 Digital Markets Act (debate)
- 2022/07/04 Digital Services Act - Digital Markets Act (debate)
- Andrus ANSIP
Plenary Speeches (1)
- 2021/12/14 Digital Markets Act (debate)
- Pilar del CASTILLO VERA
Plenary Speeches (1)
- 2021/12/14 Digital Markets Act (debate)
- Deirdre CLUNE
Plenary Speeches (1)
- 2021/12/14 Digital Markets Act (debate)
- Evelyne GEBHARDT
Plenary Speeches (1)
- 2021/12/14 Digital Markets Act (debate)
- Krzysztof HETMAN
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Othmar KARAS
Plenary Speeches (1)
- 2021/12/14 Digital Markets Act (debate)
- Marisa MATIAS
Plenary Speeches (1)
- 2021/12/14 Digital Markets Act (debate)
- Emmanuel MAUREL
Plenary Speeches (1)
- 2021/12/14 Digital Markets Act (debate)
- Angelika NIEBLER
Plenary Speeches (1)
- 2021/12/14 Digital Markets Act (debate)
- Martin SCHIRDEWAN
Plenary Speeches (1)
- 2021/12/14 Digital Markets Act (debate)
- Ivan ŠTEFANEC
Plenary Speeches (1)
- 2021/12/14 Digital Markets Act (debate)
- Sabine VERHEYEN
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Henna VIRKKUNEN
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Jadwiga WIŚNIEWSKA
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Josianne CUTAJAR
Plenary Speeches (1)
- 2021/12/14 Digital Markets Act (debate)
- Clare DALY
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Rasmus ANDRESEN
Plenary Speeches (1)
- 2021/12/14 Digital Markets Act (debate)
- Anna CAVAZZINI
Plenary Speeches (1)
- 2021/12/14 Digital Markets Act (debate)
- Gwendoline DELBOS-CORFIELD
Plenary Speeches (1)
- 2021/12/14 Digital Markets Act (debate)
- Claudia GAMON
Plenary Speeches (1)
- 2021/12/14 Digital Markets Act (debate)
- Luis GARICANO
Plenary Speeches (1)
- 2021/12/14 Digital Markets Act (debate)
- Andrzej HALICKI
Plenary Speeches (1)
- 2021/12/14 Digital Markets Act (debate)
- Adam JARUBAS
Plenary Speeches (1)
- 2021/12/14 Digital Markets Act (debate)
- Arba KOKALARI
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Anne-Sophie PELLETIER
Plenary Speeches (1)
- 2021/12/14 Digital Markets Act (debate)
- Michal ŠIMEČKA
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Valérie HAYER
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Karen MELCHIOR
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Moritz KÖRNER
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Markus BUCHHEIT
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Eugen JURZYCA
Plenary Speeches (1)
- 2021/12/14 Digital Markets Act (debate)
- Roman HAIDER
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Svenja HAHN
Plenary Speeches (1)
- 2021/12/14 Digital Markets Act (debate)
- Adriana MALDONADO LÓPEZ
Plenary Speeches (1)
- 2021/12/14 Digital Markets Act (debate)
- Tom VANDENDRIESSCHE
Plenary Speeches (1)
- 2021/12/14 Digital Markets Act (debate)
- Vlad-Marius BOTOŞ
Plenary Speeches (1)
- 2021/12/14 Digital Markets Act (debate)
- Liesje SCHREINEMACHER
Plenary Speeches (1)
- 2021/12/14 Digital Markets Act (debate)
- Miroslav RADAČOVSKÝ
Plenary Speeches (1)
- 2021/12/14 Digital Markets Act (debate)
- Katarina BARLEY
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Nicola BEER
Plenary Speeches (1)
- 2021/12/14 Digital Markets Act (debate)
- Mikuláš PEKSA
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Patrick BREYER
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Jessica STEGRUD
Plenary Speeches (1)
- 2021/12/14 Digital Markets Act (debate)
- Clara PONSATÍ OBIOLS
Plenary Speeches (1)
- 2021/12/14 Digital Markets Act (debate)
- Salvatore DE MEO
Plenary Speeches (1)
- René REPASI
Plenary Speeches (1)
Votes
Législation sur les marchés numériques - Digital Markets Act - Gesetz über digitale Märkte - A9-0332/2021 - Andreas Schwab - Accord provisoire - Am 256 #
Amendments | Dossier |
3261 |
2020/0374(COD)
2021/06/02
TRAN
147 amendments...
Amendment 100 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 3 – paragraph 6 – subparagraph 4 Where the provider of a core platform
Amendment 101 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 3 – paragraph 7 7. For each gatekeeper identified pursuant to paragraph 4 or paragraph 6, the Commission shall, within 60 days, identify the relevant undertaking to which it belongs and list the relevant core platform services that are provided within that same undertaking and which individually serve as an important gateway for business users to reach end users as referred to in paragraph 1(b).
Amendment 102 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 3 – paragraph 8 8. The gatekeeper shall comply with the obligations laid down in Articles 5 and 6 within
Amendment 103 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 3 – paragraph 8 a (new) 8 a. The Commission shall exercise its supervisory powers and carry out the process of designating gatekeepers in cooperation with the Member States and after consulting the Digital Markets Advisory Committee;
Amendment 104 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 3 – paragraph 8 a (new) 8 a. The Commission shall, without undue delay and at the latest within six months, open proceedings pursuant to Article 18 where a gatekeeper does not comply with the obligation set in paragraph 8.
Amendment 105 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 5 – paragraph 1 – introductory part In respect of each of its core platform services
Amendment 106 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 5 – paragraph 1 – introductory part In respect of each of its core platform services identified pursuant to Article 3(7), and ancillary services, a gatekeeper shall:
Amendment 107 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 5 – paragraph 1 – introductory part In respect of each of its core platform services identified pursuant to Article 3(7), and ancillary services, a gatekeeper shall:
Amendment 108 #
(b) allow business users to offer the same products or services to end users through third party online intermediation services or through their own direct sales channels at prices or conditions that are different from those offered through the online intermediation services of the gatekeeper;
Amendment 109 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 5 – paragraph 1 – point b (b) allow business users to offer the same products or services to end users through third party online intermediation services or through their own direct sales channels at prices or conditions that are different from those offered through the online intermediation services of the gatekeeper;
Amendment 110 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 5 – paragraph 1 – point c a (new) Amendment 111 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 5 – paragraph 1 – point e (e) refrain from requiring business users to use, offer or interoperate with an identification service o
Amendment 112 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 5 – paragraph 1 – point e (e) refrain from requiring business users to use, offer or interoperate with an identification service
Amendment 113 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 5 – paragraph 1 – point e (e) refrain from requiring business users to use, offer or interoperate with an identification service
Amendment 114 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 5 – paragraph 1 – point e (e) refrain from requiring business users or end users to use, offer or interoperate with an identification service of the gatekeeper in the context of services offered by the business users using the core platform services of that gatekeeper;
Amendment 115 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 5 – paragraph 1 – point g a (new) Amendment 116 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 5 – paragraph 1 – point g a (new) (g a) refrain from using, in competition with business users and with ancillary services providers, any data not publicly available, which is generated through activities by those business users, including by the end users of these business users, of its core platform services or provided by those business users of its core platform services or by the end users of these business users;
Amendment 117 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 5 – paragraph 1 – point g a (new) (g a) ensure that business users have the possibility to opt-out of new, modified or updated terms and conditions requested by the core platform service provider if such modifications to the terms and conditions are not the result of an existing or new legal requirement, and remain listed on the core platform service without experiencing a reduced or downgraded level of service.
Amendment 118 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 5 – paragraph 1 – point g a (new) (g a) refrain from anti-competitive behaviour, especially against local retail;
Amendment 119 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 5 – paragraph 1 – point g b (new) Amendment 120 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 5 – paragraph 1 – point g c (new) (g c) allow business users and providers of ancillary services access to and interoperability with the same operating system, hardware or software features that are available or used in the provision by the gatekeeper of any ancillary services;
Amendment 122 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 6 – paragraph 1 – introductory part 1. In respect of each of its core
Amendment 123 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 6 – paragraph 1 – introductory part 1. In respect of each of its core platform services identified pursuant to Article 3(7), and ancillary services, a gatekeeper shall:
Amendment 124 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 6 – paragraph 1 – point a Amendment 125 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 6 – paragraph 1 – point a (a) refrain from using,
Amendment 126 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 6 – paragraph 1 – point a (a) refrain from using,
Amendment 127 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 6 – paragraph 1 – point d Amendment 128 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 6 – paragraph 1 – point d Amendment 129 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 6 – paragraph 1 – point d (d) refrain from treating more favourably in ranking services - core platform and ancillary services - and products offered by the gatekeeper itself or by any third party belonging to the same undertaking compared to similar services or products of third party and apply fair and non-discriminatory conditions to such ranking;
Amendment 130 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 6 – paragraph 1 – point d (d) refrain from treating more favourably, including in ranking services - core platform and ancillary services - and products offered by the gatekeeper itself or by any third party belonging to the same undertaking compared to similar services or products of third party and apply fair and non-discriminatory conditions to such ranking;
Amendment 131 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 6 – paragraph 1 – point e (e) refrain from technically restricting, or restricting in any other way, the ability of end users to switch between and subscribe to different software applications and services to be accessed using the operating system of the gatekeeper, including as regards the choice of Internet access provider for end users;
Amendment 132 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 6 – paragraph 1 – point f Amendment 133 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 6 – paragraph 1 – point i (i) provide business users, or third parties authorised by a business user, free of charge, with effective, user-friendly, interoperable, high-quality, continuous and real-time access and use of aggregated or non-aggregated data, that is provided for or generated in the context of the use of the relevant core platform services by those business users and the end users engaging with the products or services provided by those business users; for personal data, provide access and use only where directly connected with the use effectuated by the end user in respect of the products or services offered by the relevant business user through the relevant core platform service, and when the end user opts in to such sharing with a consent in the sense of the Regulation (EU) 2016/679;
Amendment 134 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 6 – paragraph 1 – point i (i) provide business users, or third parties authorised by a business user, free of charge, with effective, high-quality, continuous and real-time access and use of aggregated
Amendment 135 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 6 – paragraph 1 – point k a (new) (k a) ensure their services, including user interfaces, are accessible to persons with disabilities in accordance with Article 13 of Directive (EU)2019/882. They shall also ensure that business users which rely on their core platform service to reach consumers for offering services and products in the scope of Directive (EU) 2019/882,comply with the requirements of Directive (EU) 2019/882.
Amendment 136 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 7 – paragraph 1 1. The measures implemented by the gatekeeper to ensure compliance with the obligations laid down in Articles 5 and 6 shall be effective in achieving the objective of the relevant obligation. The gatekeeper
Amendment 137 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 7 – paragraph 2 2. Where the Commission finds that the measures that the gatekeeper intends to implement pursuant to paragraph 1, or has implemented, do not ensure effective compliance with the relevant obligations laid down in Article 6, it may by decision, provided that consultations with gatekeepers as part of the regulatory dialogue do not result in an agreement, specify the measures that the gatekeeper concerned shall implement. The Commission shall adopt such a decision within six months from the opening of proceedings pursuant to Article 18.
Amendment 138 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 7 – paragraph 2 2. Where the Commission finds that the measures that the gatekeeper intends to
Amendment 139 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 7 – paragraph 3 3. Paragraph 2 of this Article is without prejudice to the powers of the Commission under Articles 25, 26 and 27. Following a decision under paragraph 2 of this Article, if the Commission finds the gatekeeper in non-compliance under Article 25 and a decision under article 26 is taken, the non-compliance period is considered to have commenced from the implementation deadline in Article 3(8).
Amendment 140 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 7 – paragraph 7 7. A gatekeeper may, within the deadline set in Article 3(8), request the opening of proceedings pursuant to Article 18 for the Commission to determine whether the measures that the gatekeeper intends to implement or has implemented
Amendment 141 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 7 – paragraph 7 a (new) 7a. The Commission shall ensure that no barriers are created to entry to the digital market for gatekeepers, while gatekeepers shall ensure that they update their business models and enhance their innovation capacities to meet the requirements of the market.
Amendment 142 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 7 – paragraph 7 b (new) 7b. The Commission shall ensure that no barriers are created to entry to the digital market for SMEs.
Amendment 143 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 8 – paragraph 1 1. The Commission may, on a reasoned request by the gatekeeper, exceptionally suspend, in whole or in part, a specific obligation laid down in Articles 5 and 6 for a core platform service by decision adopted in accordance with the advisory procedure referred to in Article 32(4), where the gatekeeper demonstrates that compliance with that specific obligation would endanger, due to exceptional circumstances beyond the control of the gatekeeper, the economic viability of the operation of the gatekeeper in the Union, and only to the extent necessary to address such threat to its viability. The Commission shall aim to adopt the suspension decision without delay and at the latest 3 months following receipt of a complete reasoned request. A report stating the reasons and motivations for the suspension decision shall accompany the decision itself.
Amendment 144 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 9 – paragraph 1 1. The Commission may, acting on a reasoned request by a gatekeeper or on its own initiative, by decision adopted in accordance with the advisory procedure referred to in Article 32(4), exempt it, in whole or in part, from a specific obligation laid down in Articles 5 and 6 in relation to an individual core platform service identified pursuant to Article 3(7), where such exemption is justified on the grounds set out in paragraph 2 of this Article. The Commission shall adopt the exemption decision at the latest 3 months after receiving a complete reasoned request. A report stating the reasons and motivations for the exemption decision shall accompany the decision itself.
Amendment 145 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 9 – paragraph 1 1. The Commission, in cooperation with the Member States and after consulting the Advisory Committee, may, acting on a reasoned request by a gatekeeper or on its own initiative, by decision adopted in accordance with the advisory procedure referred to in Article 32(4), exempt it, in whole or in part, from a specific obligation laid down in Articles 5 and 6 in relation to an individual core platform service identified pursuant to Article 3(7), where such exemption is justified on the grounds set out in paragraph 2 of this Article. The Commission shall adopt the exemption decision at the latest 3 months after receiving a complete reasoned request.
Amendment 146 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 9 – paragraph 2 – point a Amendment 147 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 9 – paragraph 3 – introductory part 3. The Commission, in cooperation with the Member States and after consulting the Advisory Committee, may, acting on a reasoned request by a gatekeeper or on its own initiative, provisionally suspend the application of the relevant obligation to one or more individual core platform services already prior to the decision pursuant to paragraph 1.
Amendment 148 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 10 Amendment 149 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 10 – paragraph 1 1. The Commission is empowered to adopt delegated acts in accordance with Article 34 to update and strengthen the obligations laid down in Articles 5 and 6 where, based on a market investigation pursuant to Article 17, it has identified the need for new obligations addressing practices that limit the contestability of core platform services or are unfair in the same way as the
Amendment 150 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 10 – paragraph 2 – point a (a) there is an imbalance of rights and obligations on business users and end users and the gatekeeper is obtaining an advantage from business users that is disproportionate to the service provided by the gatekeeper to business users; or
Amendment 151 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 11 – paragraph 1 1. A gatekeeper shall ensure that the obligations of Articles 5 and 6 are fully and effectively complied with. While the obligations of Articles 5 and 6 apply in respect of core platform services designated pursuant to Article 3, their implementation shall not be undermined by any behaviour of the undertaking to which the gatekeeper belongs, regardless of whether this behaviour is of a contractual, commercial, technical or any other nature. The end-user’s rights or choices laid down in Articles 5 and 6 must be presented in a neutral manner and must not be undermined through product design or by impairing user autonomy, decision-making, or choice via the structure, function or manner of operation of a user interface or a part thereof.
Amendment 152 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 11 – paragraph 3 3. A gatekeeper shall not degrade the conditions or quality of any of the core platform services provided to business users or end users who avail themselves of the rights or choices laid down in Articles 5 and 6, or make the exercise of those rights or choices unduly difficult. The end- user’s rights or choices laid down in Articles 5 and 6 must be presented in a neutral manner and must not be undermined through product design or by impairing user autonomy, decision- making, or choice via the structure, function or manner of operation of a user interface or a part thereof.
Amendment 153 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 13 – paragraph 1 Within
Amendment 154 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 14 – paragraph 2 – point c (c) the purpose of the investigation and the specific aim sought to be achieved.
Amendment 155 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 15 – paragraph 1 1. The Commission may conduct a market investigation for the purpose of examining whether a provider of core platform services should be designated as a gatekeeper pursuant to Article 3(6), or in order to identify core platform services for a gatekeeper pursuant to Article 3(7). It shall endeavour to conclude its investigation by adopting a decision in accordance with the advisory procedure referred to in Article 32(4) within
Amendment 156 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 15 – paragraph 2 2. In the course of a market investigation pursuant to paragraph 1, the Commission shall endeavour to communicate its preliminary findings to the provider of core platform services concerned within
Amendment 157 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 15 – paragraph 4 4. When the Commission pursuant to Article 3(6) designates as a gatekeeper a provider of core platform services that does not yet enjoy an entrenched and durable position in its operations, but it is foreseeable that it will enjoy such a position
Amendment 158 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 16 – paragraph 3 3. A gatekeeper shall be deemed to have engaged in a systematic non- compliance with the obligations laid down in Articles 5 and 6, where the Commission has issued at least t
Amendment 159 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 17 – paragraph 1 The Commission may conduct a market investigation with the purpose of examining whether one or more services within the digital sector should be added to the list of core platform services or to detect types of practices that may limit the contestability of core platform services or
Amendment 160 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 17 – paragraph 2 – point b Amendment 161 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 21 – paragraph 1 1.
Amendment 162 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 21 – paragraph 3 3. During on-site inspections the
Amendment 163 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 21 – paragraph 4 4. Undertakings or associations of undertakings are required to submit to an on-site inspection ordered
Amendment 164 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 24 – paragraph 1 1. The Commission
Amendment 165 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 24 – paragraph 2 a (new) 2 a. The Commission shall implement and manage a publicly accessible and user-friendly website with information on the number of non- compliance decisions adopted, the number of fines imposed, and the names of the companies subject to the non-compliance decisions and fines. The Board set out in Regulation […] on a Single Market for Digital Services shall make recommendations if the Commission shall require it to do so.
Amendment 166 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 25 – paragraph 1 – introductory part 1. The Commission shall
Amendment 167 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 25 – paragraph 3 3. In the non-compliance decision adopted pursuant to paragraph 1, the Commission shall order the gatekeeper to cease and desist with the non-compliance within an appropriate deadline and
Amendment 168 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 26 – paragraph 1 – introductory part 1. In the decision pursuant to Article 25, the Commission may impose on a gatekeeper fines not exceeding
Amendment 169 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 26 – paragraph 2 – introductory part 2. The Commission may by decision impose on undertakings and associations of undertakings fines not exceeding
Amendment 170 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 27 – paragraph 1 – introductory part 1. The Commission may by decision impose on undertakings, including gatekeepers where applicable, periodic penalty payments not exceeding
Amendment 171 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 28 – paragraph 1 1. The powers conferred on the Commission by Articles 26 and 27 shall be subject to a
Amendment 172 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 30 – paragraph 1 – introductory part 1. Before adopting a decision pursuant to Article 7, Article 8(1), Article 9(1), Articles 15, 16, 22, 23, 25 and 26 and Article 27(2), the Commission shall give the gatekeeper or undertaking or association of undertakings, together with other relevant stakeholders, including consumer organisations and business users, concerned the opportunity of being heard on:
Amendment 173 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 30 – paragraph 1 – point b – indent 1 (new) - Before taking decisions under Article 1, the Commission may, if it deems it necessary, hear and grant applications from third parties where they demonstrate sufficient interest. Applications to be heard on the part of such third parties shall, where sufficient interest is demonstrated, be granted. Member State authorities may also ask the Commission to hear third parties with sufficient interest.
Amendment 174 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 30 – paragraph 3 3. The Commission shall base its decisions only on objections on which gatekeepers, undertakings and associations of undertakings concerned and interested third parties have been able to comment.
Amendment 175 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 30 – paragraph 4 – indent 1 (new) - Other parties who can demonstrate sufficient interest shall be entitled to lodge complaints with regard to the non- designation of gatekeepers and non- compliance and systematic non- compliance by gatekeepers with their obligations under this Regulation.
Amendment 176 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 32 – paragraph 1 1. The Commission shall
Amendment 177 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 33 – paragraph 1 1. When three or more Member States request the Commission to open an investigation pursuant to Article 15 because they consider that there are reasonable grounds to suspect that a provider of core platform services should be designated as a gatekeeper, the Commission shall within four months examine whether there are reasonable grounds to open such an investigation. The result of any such investigation shall be made publicly available.
Amendment 178 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 33 – paragraph 1 1. When t
Amendment 179 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 33 a (new) Article 33 a Amendment to Directive (EU) 2020/1818 1. In the Annex I to Directive (EU) 2020/1828 of the European Parliament and of the Council1a, the following point is added: ‘(67) Regulation (EU) 20XX/XXXX of the European Parliament and of the Council of DD MMM YYYY on contestable and fair markets in the digital sector.’ _________________ 1aDirective (EU) 2020/1828 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 25 November 2020 on representative actions for the protection of the collective interests of consumers and repealing Directive 2009/22/EC
Amendment 180 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 37 – paragraph 2 2. The power to adopt delegated acts referred to in Article
Amendment 181 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 37 – paragraph 3 3. The delegation of power referred to in Article
Amendment 182 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 37 – paragraph 6 6. A delegated act adopted pursuant to Article
Amendment 183 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 38 – paragraph 1 a (new) 1 a. The Commission’s and the Parliament's annual reports on Competition Policy shall include a chapter on the implementation of this Regulation.
Amendment 37 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 2 (2) Core platform services, at the same time, feature a number of characteristics that can be exploited by their providers. These characteristics of core platform services include among others extreme scale economies, which often result from nearly zero marginal costs to add business users, active users or end users. Other characteristics of core platform services are very strong network effects, an ability to connect many business users with many active users and end users through the multi-sidedness of these services, a significant degree of dependence of both business users and end users, lock-in effects, a lack of multi-
Amendment 38 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 2 a (new) (2 a) Acknowledges that the digital economy, particularly platforms, can have a significant impact on long-established regulated business models in many strategic sectors such as transportation and hospitality. Stresses the need to foster a level-playing field between gatekeepers and traditional enterprises operating in the transport and tourism sectors. Furthermore, emphasises the need for transparency, for the sake of consumers, in transport and tourism platforms, specifically of algorithms affecting service, pricing, advertising and digital trust building mechanisms such as ratings and reviews.
Amendment 39 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 2 b (new) (2 b) Considers that in defining gatekeepers and core platform services it is important to distinguish between two types of end user, the active end user and the passive end user. An active end user would in principle share their personal data with the gatekeeper or platform in the form of a profile or storing personal data with the gatekeeper in a similar way. Believes, therefore, that it is important to distinguish this type of user from an end user who browses a platform or page but does not share any personal data directly with the gatekeeper or platform.
Amendment 40 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 3 (3) A small number of large providers of core platform services have emerged with considerable economic power. Typically, they feature an ability to connect many business users with many active users and end users through their services which, in turn, allows them to leverage their advantages, such as their access to large amounts of data, from one area of their activity to new ones. Some of these providers exercise control over whole platform ecosystems in the digital economy and are structurally extremely difficult to challenge or contest by existing or new market operators, irrespective of how innovative and efficient these may be. Contestability is particularly reduced due to the existence of very high barriers to entry or exit, including high investment costs, which cannot, or not easily, be recuperated in case of exit, and absence of (or reduced access to) some key inputs in the digital economy, such as data. As a result, the likelihood increases that the underlying markets do not function well – or will soon fail to function well.
Amendment 41 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 4 (4) The combination of those features of gatekeepers is likely to lead in many cases to serious imbalances in bargaining
Amendment 42 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 6 (6) Gatekeepers have a significant impact on the internal market, providing gateways for a large number of business users, to reach active and end users, everywhere in the Union and on different markets. The adverse impact of unfair practices on the internal market and particularly weak contestability of core platform services, including their negative societal and economic implications, have led national legislators and sectoral regulators to act. A number of national regulatory solutions have already been adopted or proposed to address unfair practices and the contestability of digital services or at least with regard to some of them. This has created a risk of divergent regulatory solutions and thereby fragmentation of the internal market, thus raising the risk of increased compliance costs due to different sets of national regulatory requirements.
Amendment 43 #
(7) Therefore, business users, active users and end-
Amendment 44 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 8 (8) By approximating diverging national laws, obstacles to the freedom to provide and receive services, including retail services, within the internal market should be eliminated. A targeted set of
Amendment 45 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 8 a (new) (8 a) Very large online platforms tend to disrupt also local retail markets, with a negative externality in the lack of diversification due to the inability of local producers to present their products in the digital markets. Therefore, this Regulation should take into account the principles set out by the Farm to Fork Strategy.
Amendment 46 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 12 (12) Weak contestability and unfair practices in the digital sector are more frequent and pronounced for certain digital services than for others. This is the case in particular for widespread and commonly used digital services that mostly directly intermediate between business users and
Amendment 47 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 12 (12) Weak contestability and unfair practices in the digital sector are more frequent and pronounced for certain digital services than for others. This is the case in particular for widespread and commonly used digital services that mostly directly intermediate between business users and end users and where features such as extreme scale economies, very strong network effects, an ability to connect many business users with many end users through the multi-sidedness of these services, lock-in effects, a lack of multi- homing or vertical integration are the most prevalent. Often, there is only one or very few large providers of those digital services. This situation produces disruptions and restrictions, in particular on SMEs in the transport, tourism and hospitality sector, where intermediaries have a dominant market position. These providers of core platform services have emerged most frequently as gatekeepers for business users and end users with far- reaching impacts, gaining the ability to easily set commercial conditions and terms in a unilateral and detrimental manner for their business users and end users. Accordingly, it is necessary to focus only on those digital services that are most broadly used by business users and end users and where, based on current market conditions, concerns about weak contestability and unfair practices by gatekeepers are more apparent and pressing from an internal market perspective.
Amendment 48 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 12 a (new) (12 a) There are serious negative externalities posed by home-sharing digital services, transport applications such as car sharing or bike or scooter sharing, or delivery digital services, that disrupt the market, especially in urban areas or in densely inhabited territories. In order to find the best solutions to these problems, authorities should inform the Digital Services Coordinator set out in Regulation […] on a Single Market for Digital Services (Digital Services Act), as well as their national or regional competent authority and the European Digital Services Board -also set out in the Digital Services Act-, of the legal measures or policies they wish to implement and enforce. Finally, through the Digital Services Data Space, local or regional authorities could also share their information as well as retrieve information from their peers and other stakeholders using this Data Space with the final aim to better solve the negative externalities posed by some digital services.
Amendment 49 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 17 (17) A very significant turnover in the Union and the provision of a core platform service in at least t
Amendment 50 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 20 (20) A
Amendment 51 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 21 (21) An entrenched and durable position in its operations or the foreseeability of achieving such a position future occurs notably where the contestability of the position of the provider of the core platform service is limited. This is likely to be the case where that provider has provided a core platform service in at least
Amendment 52 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 22 (22) Such thresholds can be impacted by market and technical developments. The Commission should therefore be empowered
Amendment 53 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 22 (22) Such thresholds can be impacted by market and technical developments and innovations on the market. The Commission should therefore be empowered to adopt delegated acts to specify the methodology for determining whether the quantitative thresholds are
Amendment 54 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 25 (25) Such an assessment can only be done in light of a market investigation, while taking into account the quantitative thresholds. In its assessment the Commission should pursue the objectives of preserving and fostering the level of innovation, the quality of digital products and services, the degree to which prices are fair and competitive, and the degree to which quality or choice for business users and for end users is or remains high, and whether or not fair competition is ensured. Elements that are specific to the providers of core platform services concerned, such as extreme scale economies, very strong network effects, an ability to connect many business users with many end users through the multi- sidedness of these services, lock-in effects, a lack of multi-
Amendment 55 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 25 (25) Such an assessment can only be done in light of a market investigation, while taking into account the quantitative thresholds. In its assessment the Commission should pursue the objectives of preserving and fostering the level of innovation, the quality of digital products and services, the degree to which prices are fair and competitive, and the degree to which quality, availability or choice for business users and for end users is or remains high. Elements that are specific to the providers of core platform services concerned, such as extreme scale economies, very strong network effects, an ability to connect many business users with many end users through the multi- sidedness of these services, lock-in effects, a lack of multi-
Amendment 56 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 26 (26) A particular subset of rules should apply to those providers of core platform services that are foreseen to enjoy an entrenched and durable position in the near future. The same specific features of core platform services make them prone to tipping: once a service provider has obtained a certain advantage over rivals or potential challengers in terms of scale or intermediation power, its position may become unassailable and the situation may evolve to the point that it is likely to become durable and entrenched in the near future. Undertakings can try to induce this tipping and emerge as gatekeeper by using some of the unfair conditions and practices regulated in this Regulation. In such a situation, i
Amendment 57 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 27 (27) However, such an early intervention should be strictly limited to imposing only those obligations that are necessary, justified and appropriate to ensure that the services in question remain contestable and allow to avoid the qualified risk of unfair conditions and practices. Obligations that prevent the provider of core platform services concerned from achieving an entrenched and durable position in its operations, such as those preventing unfair leveraging, and those that facilitate switching and multi-
Amendment 58 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 28 (28) This should allow the Commission to intervene in time and effectively, while fully respecting the proportionality of the considered measures. It should also reassure actual or potential market participants about the fairness and contestability of the services concerned. In this regard, calls on the Commission to undertake further steps by initiating a more comprehensive data sharing framework for online platforms dedicated to short-term rentals, following consultations with all relevant stakeholders, and to establish an obligation for platforms to hare their data accordingly, in full compliance with Regulation (EU) 2016/679, with Eurostat and the national statistics office of the country where the service providers operate.
Amendment 59 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 28 (28) This should allow the Commission to intervene in time and effectively, while fully respecting the proportionality of the considered measures. It should also reassure actual or potential market participants about the fairness, efficiency and contestability of the services concerned.
Amendment 60 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 30 (30) The very rapidly changing and complex technological nature of core platform services requires a regular review of the status of gatekeepers, including
Amendment 61 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 31 (31)
Amendment 62 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 32 (32) To safeguard the fairness and contestability of core platform services provided by gatekeepers, it is necessary to provide in a clear and unambiguous manner for a set of harmonised obligations with regard to those services. Such rules are needed to address the risk of harmful effects of unfair practices imposed by gatekeepers, to the benefit of the business environment in the services concerned, to the benefit of users and ultimately to the benefit of society as a whole. Given the fast-moving and dynamic nature of digital markets, and the substantial economic power of gatekeepers, it is important that these obligations are effectively applied without being circumvented. To that end, the obligations in question should apply to any practices by a gatekeeper, irrespective of its form and irrespective of whether it is of a contractual, commercial, technical or any other nature, including through product design or by presenting end-user choices in a non-neutral manner, or by otherwise subverting or impairing user autonomy, decision-making, or choice via the structure, function or manner of operation of a user interface or a part thereof, insofar as a practice corresponds to the type of practice that is the subject of one of the obligations of this Regulation.
Amendment 63 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 33 (33) The obligations laid down in this Regulation are limited to what is necessary, proportionate and justified to address the unfairness of the identified practices by gatekeepers and to ensure contestability in relation to core platform services provided by gatekeepers. Therefore, the obligations should correspond to those practices that are considered unfair by taking into account the features of the digital sector and where experience gained, for example in the enforcement of the EU competition rules, shows that they have a particularly negative direct impact on the business users and end users. In addition, it is necessary to provide for the possibility of a regulatory dialogue with gatekeepers to tailor those obligations that are likely to require specific implementing measures in order to ensure their effectiveness and proportionality. The obligations should only be updated after a thorough investigation on the nature and impact of specific practices that may be newly identified, following an in-depth investigation, as unfair or limiting contestability in the same manner as the unfair practices laid down in this Regulation while potentially escaping the scope of the current set of obligations.
Amendment 64 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 33 a (new) (33 a) This Regulation should not pose a legal or administrative problem to the capacity of digital services in transport to design or develop interoperable digital services or applications, providing inter- ticketing across all modes. Moreover, this Regulation should be designed not to hamper the development of automation solutions, data storage, or artificial intelligence, or any other digital development, in transport services. Finally, all serious negative externalities appearing because of these developments should be assessed, measured and solved by the authorities, either national, regional, or local, following the principle of subsidiarity.
Amendment 65 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 37 (37) Because of their position, gatekeepers might in certain cases restrict the ability of business users of their online intermediation services to offer their goods or services to end users under more favourable conditions, including price, through other online intermediation services or alternative distribution channels. Such restrictions have a significant deterrent effect on the business users of gatekeepers in terms of their use of alternative online intermediation services or alternative distribution channels, limiting inter-platform contestability, which in turn limits choice of alternative online intermediation or distribution channels for end users. To ensure that business users of online intermediation services of gatekeepers can freely choose among alternative online
Amendment 66 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 37 (37) Because of their position, gatekeepers might in certain cases restrict the ability of business users of their online intermediation services to offer their goods or services to end users under more favourable conditions, including price, through other online
Amendment 67 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 39 (39) To safeguard a fair commercial environment and protect the contestability of the digital sector it is important to safeguard the right of business users to raise concerns about unfair behaviour by gatekeepers with any relevant administrative or other public authorities. For example, business users may want to complain about different types of unfair practices, such as discriminatory access conditions, unjustified closing of business user accounts or unclear grounds for product de-listings. Any practice that would in any way inhibit such a possibility of raising concerns or seeking available redress, for instance by means of confidentiality clauses in agreements or other written terms, should therefore be prohibited. This should be without prejudice to the right of business users and gatekeepers to lay down in their agreements the terms of use including the use of lawful complaints-handling mechanisms, including any use of alternative dispute resolution mechanisms or of the jurisdiction of specific courts in compliance with respective Union and national law, and where applicable regional law. This should therefore also be without prejudice to the role gatekeepers play in the fight against illegal content online.
Amendment 68 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 39 (39) To safeguard a fair commercial environment
Amendment 69 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 40 (40) Identification services are crucial for business users to conduct their business, as these can allow them not only to optimise services, to the extent allowed under Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Directive 2002/58/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council33 , but also to inject trust in online transactions, in compliance with Union or national law, or where applicable regional law. Gatekeepers should therefore not use their position as provider of core platform services to require their dependent business users to include any identification services provided by the gatekeeper itself as part of the provision of services or products by these business users to their end users, where other identification services are available to such business users. _________________ 33Directive 2002/58/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 12 July 2002 concerning the processing of personal data and the protection of privacy in the electronic communications sector (Directive on privacy and electronic communications) (OJ L 201, 31.7.2002, p. 37).
Amendment 70 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 41 (41) Gatekeepers should not restrict the free choice of end users by technically
Amendment 71 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 58 (58) To ensure the effectiveness of the obligations laid down by this Regulation, while also making certain that these obligations are limited to what is necessary to ensure contestability and tackling the harmful effects of the unfair behaviour by gatekeepers, it is important to clearly define and circumscribe them so as to allow the gatekeeper to immediately comply with them, in full respect of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Directive 2002/58/EC, consumer protection, cyber security and product safety. Moreover, when necessary, gatekeepers should assess whether it is relevant to use decentralised applications or distributed ledger technology to increase safety. The gatekeepers should ensure the compliance with this Regulation by design. The necessary measures should therefore be as much as possible and where relevant integrated into the technological design used by the gatekeepers. However, it may in certain cases be appropriate for the
Amendment 72 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 62 (62) In order to ensure the full and lasting achievement of the objectives of this Regulation, the Commission should be able to assess whether a provider of core platform services should be designated as a gatekeeper without meeting the quantitative thresholds laid down in this Regulation; whether systematic non- compliance by a gatekeeper warrants imposing additional remedies; and whether the list of obligations addressing unfair practices by gatekeepers should be reviewed and additional practices that are similarly unfair and limiting the contestability of digital markets should be identified. Such assessment should be based on market investigations to be run in an appropriate timeframe, by using clear procedures and legally binding deadlines, in order to support the ex ante effect of this Regulation on contestability and fairness in the digital sector, and to provide the
Amendment 73 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 65 (65) The services and practices in core platform services and markets in which these intervene can change quickly and to a significant extent. To ensure that this Regulation remains up to date and constitutes an effective and holistic regulatory response to the problems posed by gatekeepers, it is important to provide for a regular review of the lists of core platform services as well as of the obligations provided for in this Regulation. This is particularly important to ensure that behaviour that may limit the contestability of core platform services or is unfair is identified. While it is important to conduct a review on a regular basis, given the dynamically changing nature of the digital sector, in order to ensure legal certainty as to the regulatory conditions, any reviews should be conducted within a reasonable and appropriate time-frame. Market investigations should also ensure that the Commission has a solid evidentiary basis on which it can assess whether it should propose to amend this Regulation in order to expand, or further detail, the lists of core platform services. They should equally ensure that the Commission has a solid evidentiary basis on which it can assess whether it should propose to amend the obligations laid down in this Regulation
Amendment 74 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 66 (66) In the event that gatekeepers engage in behaviour that is unfair or that limits the contestability of the core platform services that are already designated under this Regulation but without these behaviours being explicitly covered by the obligations, the Commission should be able to update this Regulation
Amendment 75 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 71 Amendment 76 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 72 (72) The Commission should be able to take the necessary actions to monitor the effective implementation and compliance with the obligations laid down in this Regulation. Such actions should include the ability of the Commission to
Amendment 77 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 75 (75) In the context of proceedings carried out under this Regulation, the undertakings concerned should be accorded the right to be heard by the Commission and the decisions taken should be widely publicised. While ensuring the rights to good administration and the rights of defence of the undertakings concerned, in particular, the right of access to the file and the right to be heard, it is essential that confidential information be protected. Furthermore, while respecting the confidentiality of the information, the Commission should
Amendment 78 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 75 (75) In the context of proceedings carried out under this Regulation, the undertakings concerned should be accorded the right to be heard by the Commission and the decisions taken should be widely publicised. While ensuring the rights to good administration and the rights of defence of the undertakings concerned, in particular, the right of access to the file and the right to be heard, it is essential that confidential
Amendment 79 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 77 (77) The advisory committee established in accordance with Regulation (EU) No 182//2011 should also deliver opinions on certain individual decisions of the Commission issued under this Regulation.
Amendment 80 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 77 (77) The advisory committee established in accordance with Regulation (EU) No 182//2011 should also deliver opinions on certain individual decisions of the Commission issued under this Regulation. When composing the advisory committee, Member States shall also consider including their regions, in case they have devolved digital competences, and the opinions of stakeholders such as small and medium-sized enterprises(SMEs), consumer protection experts and associations. In order to ensure contestable and fair markets in the digital sector across the Union where gatekeepers are present, the power to adopt acts in accordance with Article 290 of the Treaty should be delegated to the Commission to supplement this Regulation. In particular, delegated acts should be adopted in respect of the methodology for determining the quantitative thresholds for designation of gatekeepers under this Regulation and in respect of the update of the obligations laid down in this Regulation where, based on a market investigation the Commission has identified the need for updating the obligations addressing practices that limit
Amendment 81 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 77 (77) The advisory committee established in accordance with Regulation (EU) No 182//2011 should also deliver opinions on certain individual decisions of the Commission issued under this Regulation. The Commission should involve third parties in this committee, representing both affected business users and end- users, such as consumer rights organisations. In order to ensure contestable and fair
Amendment 82 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 78 (78) The Commission should periodically evaluate this Regulation and closely monitor its effects on the contestability and fairness of commercial relationships in the online platform economy, in particular with a view to determining the need for amendments in light of relevant technological or commercial developments. This evaluation should include the regular review of the list of core platform services and the obligations addressed to gatekeepers as well as enforcement of these, in view of ensuring that digital markets across the Union are contestable and fair. In order to obtain a broad view of developments in the sector, the evaluation should take into account the experiences of Member States and relevant stakeholders. The Commission may in this regard also consider the opinions and reports presented to it by the Observatory on the Online Platform Economy that was first established by Commission Decision C(2018)2393 of 26 April 2018, by Eurostat, and by the national statistics offices of the countries where the service providers operate. Following the evaluation, the Commission should take appropriate measures. The Commission should to maintain a high level of protection and respect for the common EU rights and values, particularly equality and non-discrimination, as an objective when conducting the assessments and reviews of the practices and obligations provided in this Regulation.
Amendment 83 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 1 – paragraph 7 7.
Amendment 84 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point 14 (14) ‘Ancillary service’ means services provided in the context of or together with core platform services, including payment services as defined in point 3 of Article 4 and technical services which support the provision of payment services as defined in Article 3(j) of Directive (EU) 2015/2366, fulfilment
Amendment 85 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point 14 (14) ‘Ancillary service’ means services provided in the context of or together with core platform services, including payment services as defined in point 3 of Article 4 and technical services which support the provision of payment services as defined in Article 3(j) of Directive (EU) 2015/2366, fulfilment
Amendment 86 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point 14 (14) ‘Ancillary service’ means services provided in the context of or together with core platform services, including payment services as defined in point 3 of Article 4 and technical services which support the
Amendment 87 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point 16 a (new) (16 a) 'Active user' means any natural or legal person using core platform services, and having saved personal data in the form of a profile of that user or similar, on a platform on a long-term basis;
Amendment 88 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point 23 (23) ‘Control’ means the possibility of exercising decisive influence on an undertaking, as understood in Article 12 of Regulation (EU) No 139/2004.
Amendment 89 #
(b) it operates a core platform service which serves as an important gateway for business users to reach both active and end users; and
Amendment 90 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 3 – paragraph 1 – point c (c) it enjoys an entrenched and durable position in its operations or it is foreseeable, on the basis of available quantitative and qualitative data, that it will enjoy such a position
Amendment 91 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 3 – paragraph 2 – point a (a) the requirement in paragraph 1 point (a) where the undertaking to which it belongs achieves an annual EEA turnover equal to or above EUR 6.5 billion in the last three financial years, or where the average market capitalisation or the equivalent fair market value of the undertaking to which it belongs amounted to at least EUR 65 billion in the last financial year, and it provides a core
Amendment 92 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 3 – paragraph 2 – point b – introductory part (b) the requirement in paragraph 1 point (b) where it provides a core platform service that, has a demonstrable EU market share of more than 60% in a given digital sector or has more than 45 million monthly active end users established or located in the Union and more than 10 000 yearly active business users established in the Union in the last financial year;
Amendment 93 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 3 – paragraph 2 – point b – introductory part (b) the requirement in paragraph 1 point (b) where it provides a core platform service that has more than
Amendment 94 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 3 – paragraph 3 – introductory part 3. Where a provider of core platform services meets all the thresholds in paragraph 2, it shall notify the Commission thereof within three months after those thresholds are satisfied and provide it with the relevant information identified in paragraph 2.. That notification shall include the relevant information identified in paragraph 2 for each of the core platform services of the provider that meets the thresholds in paragraph 2 point (b). The notification shall be updated whenever other core platform services individually meet the thresholds in paragraph 2 point (b). Following notification by a provider of core platform services, the Commission shall take the decision to conduct a market investigation under Article 15 within 60 days.
Amendment 95 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 3 – paragraph 3 – subparagraph 1 A failure by a relevant provider of core platform services to notify the required information pursuant to this paragraph shall not prevent the Commission from designating these providers as gatekeepers pursuant to paragraph 4 at any time. The possibility for the Commission to conduct a market investigation in the event of a failed notification by a provider of a core platform service shall not be subject to time limitation.
Amendment 96 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 3 – paragraph 5 5. The Commission is empowered to adopt delegated acts in accordance with Article 37 to specify the methodology for determining whether the quantitative thresholds laid down in paragraph 2 are met
Amendment 97 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 3 – paragraph 6 – introductory part 6. The Commission
Amendment 98 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 3 – paragraph 6 – subparagraph 1 – point f (f) other structural market characteristics, such as the consistent growth of the platform’s core service market share in a given digital sector leading to a dominant market position over a three year timeframe.
Amendment 99 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 3 – paragraph 6 – subparagraph 3 Where the provider of a core platform service that satisfies the quantitative thresholds of paragraph 2 fails to comply with the investigative measures ordered by the Commission in a significant manner and the failure persists after the provider has been invited to comply, within a
source: 693.662
2021/06/29
CULT
155 amendments...
Amendment 100 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 57 (57) In particular gatekeepers which provide access to software application stores online search engine and online social networking service serve as an important gateway for business users that seek to reach end users, which can result in an adverse effect on end users right to receive and impart information and ideas, and ultimately affect media pluralism, diversity of opinion as well as competition.
Amendment 101 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 57 (57)
Amendment 102 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 60 (60) In exceptional circumstances justified on the limited grounds of public
Amendment 103 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 61 (61) The data protection and privacy interests of end users are relevant to any assessment of potential negative effects of the observed practice of gatekeepers to collect and accumulate large amounts of data from end users. Ensuring an adequate level of transparency of profiling practices employed by gatekeepers facilitates contestability of core platform services, by putting external pressure on gatekeepers to prevent making deep consumer profiling the industry standard, given that potential entrants or start-up providers cannot access data to the same extent and depth, and at a similar scale. Enhanced transparency should allow other providers of core platform services to differentiate themselves better through the use of superior privacy guaranteeing facilities. To
Amendment 104 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 61 (61) The data protection and privacy interests of end users are relevant to any assessment of potential negative effects of the observed practice of gatekeepers to collect and accumulate large amounts of data from end users. Ensuring an adequate level of transparency of profiling practices employed by gatekeepers facilitates contestability of core platform services, by putting external pressure on gatekeepers to prevent making
Amendment 105 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 62 (62) In order to ensure the full and lasting achievement of the objectives of this Regulation, the Commission should be able to assess whether a provider of core platform services should be designated as a gatekeeper without meeting the quantitative thresholds laid down in this Regulation; whether systematic non- compliance by a gatekeeper warrants imposing additional remedies; and whether the list of obligations addressing unfair practices by gatekeepers should be reviewed and additional practices that are similarly unfair and limiting the contestability of digital markets should be identified. Such assessment should be based on market investigations to be run in an appropriate timeframe, by using clear procedures and deadlines, in order to support the ex ante effect of this Regulation on contestability and fairness in the digital sector, and to provide the
Amendment 106 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 75 (75) In the context of proceedings carried out under this Regulation, the undertakings concerned should be accorded the right to be heard by the Commission and the decisions taken should be widely publicised. While ensuring the rights to good administration and the rights of defence of the undertakings concerned, in particular, the right of access to the file and the right to be heard, it is essential that confidential and commercially sensitive information be protected. Furthermore, while respecting the confidentiality of the information, the Commission should ensure that any information relied on for the purpose of the decision is disclosed to an extent that allows the addressee of the decision to understand the facts and considerations that led up to the decision. Finally, under certain conditions certain business records, such as communication between lawyers and their clients, may be
Amendment 107 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 79 – introductory part (79) The objective of this Regulation is to ensure a contestable and fair digital sector in general and core platform services in particular, with a view to promoting and ensuring innovation, high quality of digital products and services, fair and competitive prices, as well as a high quality and choice for end users in the digital sector. This cannot be sufficiently achieved by the Member States, but can only, by reason of the business model and operations of the gatekeepers and the scale and effects of their operations, be fully achieved at Union level. The Union may adopt measures, in accordance with the principle of subsidiarity as set out in Article 5 of the Treaty on European Union. In accordance with the principle of proportionality, as set out in that Article, this Regulation does not go beyond what is necessary in order to achieve that objective.
Amendment 108 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 79 – point 1 Amendment 109 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 79 – point 1 This Regulation fully respects the fundamental rights and observes the principles recognised in particular by the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union, in particular Articles 16, 47 and 50 thereof. Accordingly, this Regulation should be interpreted and applied with respect to those rights and principles.
Amendment 110 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 1 – paragraph 1 1. This Regulation lays down harmonised rules ensuring co
Amendment 111 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 1 – paragraph 2 2. This Regulation shall apply to core platform services provided or offered by gatekeepers to business users established in the Union or end users established or located in the Union, irrespective of the place of establishment or residence of the gatekeepers and irrespective of the law otherwise applicable to the provision of service. This Regulation respects the fundamental rights and observes the principles recognised in particular by the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union, in particular Articles 11, 13, 16, 47 and 50 thereof. Accordingly, this Regulation should be interpreted and applied with respect to those rights and principles.
Amendment 112 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 1 – paragraph 5 5. Member States shall not impose on gatekeepers further obligations by way of laws, regulations or administrative action for the purpose of ensuring contestable and fair markets. This is without prejudice to rules pursuing other legitimate public interests, in compliance with Union law. In particular, nothing in this Regulation
Amendment 113 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 1 – paragraph 5 5. Member States shall not impose on gatekeepers any further obligations by way of laws, regulations or administrative action for the purpose of ensuring contestable and fair markets. This is without prejudice to rules pursuing other legitimate public interests, in compliance with Union law. In particular,
Amendment 114 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 1 – paragraph 6 6. This Regulation is without prejudice to the application of Articles 101 and 102 TFEU. It is also without prejudice to the application of: national rules prohibiting anticompetitive agreements, decisions by associations of undertakings, concerted practices and abuses of dominant positions; national competition rules prohibiting other forms of unilateral conduct insofar as they are applied to undertakings other than gatekeepers or amount to imposing additional obligations on gatekeepers; Council Regulation (EC) No 139/200438 and national rules concerning merger control; Regulation (EU) 2019/1150 and Regulation (EU) …./.. of the European Parliament and of the Council39 . In particular, this Regulation does not preclude Member States from monitoring compliance with obligations laid down in the Regulation and to report regularly to the Commission on compliance with this Regulation in accordance with Article 24. _________________ 38Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 of 20 January 2004 on the control of concentrations between undertakings (the EC Merger Regulation) (OJ L 24, 29.1.2004, p. 1). 39Regulation (EU) …/.. of the European Parliament and of the Council – proposal on a Single Market For Digital Services (Digital Services Act) and amending Directive 2000/31/EC.
Amendment 115 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point 2 – point b a (new) (b a) web browsers;
Amendment 116 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point 2 – point f a (new) (f a) web browsers;
Amendment 117 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point 2 – point g a (new) (g a) profiling;
Amendment 118 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point 2 – point g b (new) (g b) consent;
Amendment 119 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point 2 – point g c (new) (g c) active end user;
Amendment 120 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point 2 – point h a (new) (h a) voice assistants;
Amendment 121 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point 2 – point h a (new) (h a) web browsers;
Amendment 122 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point 2 – point h b (new) (h b) connected TVs;
Amendment 123 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point 2 – point h c (new) (h c) Non-commercial, not-for profit, collaborative projects, organised on a voluntary basis should not be considered as core services.
Amendment 124 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point 6 a (new) (6 a) 'Web browser' means independent or embedded software application that permits to access and interact with content hosted on servers that are connected to the internet;
Amendment 125 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point 10 a (new) (10 a) ‘Web browser’ means a type of software application that permits the retrieval and presentation of information, mediates what occurs between the end- user and the website and enables a user to navigate in the World Wide Web to access and display data or to interact with content hosted on servers that are connected to this network;
Amendment 126 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point 11 a (new) (11 a) 'Web browser’ means a client software programme that enables a user to navigate in the World Wide Web to access and display data or to interact with content hosted on servers that are connected to this network, including standalone web browsers, as well as web browsers integrated or embedded in software;
Amendment 127 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point 11 b (new) (11 b) `voice assistant` means a software application that provides capabilities for oral dialogue with a user in natural language and which intermediates between end users and business users offering voice-based apps;
Amendment 128 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point 11 c (new) (11 c) 'connected TV` means a television set connected to the Internet that allows user to perform online activities including music and video streaming, or viewing of pictures;
Amendment 129 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point 14 (14)
Amendment 130 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point 17 a (new) (17 a) 'Business users of small press publications’ means any natural or legal person acting in a commercial or professional capacity using core platform services for the purpose of or in the course of providing press publications that qualify as micro or small enterprises within the meaning of the Annex to Recommendation2003/361/EC;
Amendment 131 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point 18 (18) ‘Ranking’ means the relative prominence given to goods or services offered through online intermediation services, video sharing platforms, search engines, web browsers or online social networking services, or the relevance given to search results by online search engines, as presented, organised or communicated by the providers of online intermediation services or of online social networking services or by providers of online search engines, respectively, whatever the technological means used for such presentation, organisation or communication;
Amendment 132 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point 21 a (new) (21 a) ‘Profiling’ means any form of automated processing of personal data as defined in point 4 of Article 4 of Regulation (EU) 2016/697;
Amendment 133 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point 21 b (new) (21 b) 'Consent' of the data subject means any freely given, specific, informed and unambiguous indication of the data subject’s wishes by which he or she, by a statement or by a clear affirmative action, signifies agreement to the processing of personal data relating to him or her;
Amendment 134 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point 21 c (new) (21 c) ‘Active end user’ means any natural or legal person using core platform services, and having saved personal data on the platform in the form of a profile of that user or in similar for, on a long-term basis;
Amendment 135 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point 23 a (new) (23 a) ‘interoperability’ means the ability of the digital content or digital service, legally acquired, within a given ecosystem, to function with hardware or software ecosystems different from the one in which the digital content or digital service was originally provided, including the ability to access the digital content or digital service without having to use an application software or other technologies for conversion.
Amendment 136 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point 23 a (new) (23 a) ‘consent’ of the data subject means any freely given, specific, informed and unambiguous indication of the data subject's wishes as defined in point 11 of Article 4 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679;
Amendment 137 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point 23 b (new) (23 b) ‘profiling’ means any form of automated processing of personal data as defined in point 4 of Article 4 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679;
Amendment 138 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 3 – paragraph 1 – point b (b) it operates a core platform service which serves as an important gateway for business users or end users to reach other end users; and
Amendment 139 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 3 – paragraph 2 – point b – introductory part (b) the requirement in paragraph 1 point (b) where it provides
Amendment 140 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 3 – paragraph 2 – point b – paragraph 1 for the purpose of the first subparagraph, monthly active end users shall refer to the average number of monthly active end users throughout
Amendment 141 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 3 – paragraph 3 – introductory part 3. Where a provider of core platform services meets all the thresholds in paragraph 2, it shall notify the Commission without undue delay and at the latest 30 days thereof within three months after those thresholds are satisfied and provide it with the relevant information identified in paragraph 2.
Amendment 142 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 3 – paragraph 3 – introductory part 3. Where a provider of core platform services meets all the thresholds in paragraph 2, it shall notify the Commission thereof with
Amendment 143 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 3 – paragraph 6 – subparagraph 1 – point e a (new) (e a) access to receive public information, dissemination to the public, notably as concerns the modalities of the transmission of the relevant information;
Amendment 144 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 3 – paragraph 6 – subparagraph 1 – point f (f) other structural systemic market characteristics.
Amendment 145 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 3 – paragraph 7 7. For each gatekeeper identified pursuant to paragraph 4 or paragraph 6, the Commission shall within 3 months identify the relevant undertaking to which it belongs and list the relevant core platform services that are provided within that same undertaking and which individually serve as an important gateway for business users to reach end users as referred to in paragraph 1(b).
Amendment 146 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 3 – paragraph 8 8. The gatekeeper shall comply with the obligations laid down in Articles 5 and 6 within
Amendment 147 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 4 – paragraph 3 3. The Commission shall publish and update the list of gatekeepers and the list of the core platform services for which they need to comply with the obligations laid down in Articles 5 and 6 on an on-going basis. The Commission shall publish an annual report setting out the findings of its monitoring activities and present it to the European Parliament and the Council.
Amendment 148 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 5 – paragraph 1 – introductory part In respect of each of its core platform services identified pursuant to Article 3(7) and its ancillary services, a gatekeeper shall:
Amendment 149 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 5 – paragraph 1 – point a (a) refrain from combining and accumulating of personal data sourced from these core platform services with personal data from any other services offered by the gatekeeper or with
Amendment 150 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 5 – paragraph 1 – point a (a) refrain from combining personal data sourced from these core platform services with personal data from any other services offered by the gatekeeper or with personal data from third-party services
Amendment 151 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 5 – paragraph 1 – point a (a) refrain from combining personal data sourced from these core platform services with personal data from any other services offered by the gatekeeper or with personal data from third-party services, and from signing in end users to other services of the gatekeeper in order to combine personal data
Amendment 152 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 5 – paragraph 1 – point b (b) allow business users and supplier to the gatekeeper’s ancillary service to offer the same products or services to end users through third party online intermediation services at prices or conditions that are different from those offered through the online intermediation services of the gatekeeper;
Amendment 153 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 5 – paragraph 1 – point b (b) allow business users to offer the same products or services to end users through third party online intermediation services or through direct business channels at prices or conditions that are different from those offered through the
Amendment 154 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 5 – paragraph 1 – point c (c) allow business users to promote different offers to end users acquired via the core platform service, and to conclude contracts with these end users regardless of whether for that purpose they use the core platform services of the gatekeeper or not, and allow end users to access and use, through the core platform services of the gatekeeper, content, subscriptions, features or other items by using the software application of a business user, where these items have been acquired by the end users from the relevant business user without using the core platform services of the gatekeeper;
Amendment 155 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 5 – paragraph 1 – point d (d) refrain from directly or indirectly preventing or restricting business users or supplier to the gatekeeper’s ancillary service from raising issues with any relevant public authority relating to any practice of gatekeepers;
Amendment 156 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 5 – paragraph 1 – point d (d) refrain from preventing or restricting business users or end user from raising issues with any relevant public authority or in front of national judicial authority relating to any practice of gatekeepers;
Amendment 157 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 5 – paragraph 1 – point e (e) refrain from requiring business users or end users to use, offer or interoperate with an
Amendment 158 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 5 – paragraph 1 – point f (f) refrain from requiring business
Amendment 159 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 5 – paragraph 1 – point f a (new) (f a) refrain from requiring to use only one specific payment method or payment processor as a condition in order to make use of or allow access to any of its core platform services for business users;
Amendment 160 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 5 – paragraph 1 – point g (g) provide advertisers and publishers to which it supplies targeted digital advertising services based on contextual information, upon their request, with information concerning the price paid by the advertiser and publisher, as well as the amount or remuneration paid to the publisher, for the publishing of a given ad and for each of the relevant advertising services provided by the gatekeeper.
Amendment 161 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 5 – paragraph 1 – point g (g) provide advertisers and publishers to which it supplies advertising services, upon their request and free of charge, with information concerning the price paid by the advertiser and publisher, as well as the amount or remuneration paid to the publisher, for the publishing of a given ad and for each of the relevant advertising services provided by the gatekeeper.
Amendment 162 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 5 – paragraph 1 – point g a (new) (g a) allow end users to un-install any pre-installed software applications on its operating system;
Amendment 163 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 5 – paragraph 1 – point g b (new) (g b) allow end users, and business users of number independent interpersonal communication services and social network services to access to and interoperate with the gatekeepers services by providing open standards, open protocols including Application Programming Interface;
Amendment 164 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 6 – paragraph 1 – introductory part 1. In respect of each of its core platform services identified
Amendment 165 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 6 – paragraph 1 – point a (a) refrain from using, in competition with business users and ancillary service (notably distribution) suppliers, any data no
Amendment 166 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 6 – paragraph 1 – point a (a) refrain from using, in competition with business users, any data
Amendment 167 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 6 – paragraph 1 – point b (b) allow end users to un-install any pre-installed software applications on its core platform service
Amendment 168 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 6 – paragraph 1 – point b (b) allow end users to un-install any pre-installed software applications and provide users an option to change to a default see tings in regards and without any pre-installed software on anon- discriminatory basis on its core platform service without prejudice to the possibility for a gatekeeper to restrict such un- installation or pre-installment of software in relation to software applications that are essential for the functioning of the operating system or of the device and which cannot technically be offered on a standalone basis by third-
Amendment 169 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 6 – paragraph 1 – point c (c) allow the installation and effective use of third party software applications or software application stores using, or interoperating with, operating systems of that gatekeeper and allow these software applications or software application stores to be accessed by means other than the core platform services of that gatekeeper, and the ability of end users to choose between different software applications from different distribution channels . The gatekeeper shall not be prevented from taking proportionate measures to ensure that third party software applications or software application stores do not endanger the integrity of the hardware or operating system provided by the gatekeeper;
Amendment 170 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 6 – paragraph 1 – point c (c) allow the installation and effective use of third party software applications or software application stores using, or interoperating with, operating systems of that gatekeeper and allow these software applications or software application stores to be accessed by means other than the core platform services of that gatekeeper. The gatekeeper shall not be prevented from taking proportionate measures to ensure that third party software applications or software application stores do not endanger the integrity of the hardware or operating system provided by the gatekeeper
Amendment 171 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 6 – paragraph 1 – point c (c) allow the installation and effective use of third party software applications or software application stores using, or interoperating with, operating systems of that gatekeeper and allow these software applications or software application stores to be accessed by means other than the core platform services of that gatekeeper.
Amendment 172 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 6 – paragraph 1 – point d (d) refrain from user profiling and using exclusive data for treating more favourably in ranking services and products offered by the gatekeeper itself or by any third party belonging to the same undertaking compared to similar services or products of third party and apply fair and non-discriminatory conditions to such ranking; refrain from favouring it’s additional services or products offered by the gatekeeper or by an third party belonging to the same undertaking compared to similar services or products of third party and apply fair and non- discriminatory conditions to such offerings, and avoid the use of behavioural techniques and interface design with lack of transparency, inadequate information and lack of valid consent mechanisms in its ads personalisation tool;
Amendment 173 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 6 – paragraph 1 – point d (d) refrain from embedding or treating more favourably in ranking and other settings, as well as in access to and conditions for the use of services, functionalities or technical interfaces, services and products offered by the gatekeeper itself or by any third party
Amendment 174 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 6 – paragraph 1 – point d (d) refrain from treating more favourably in ranking and other settings services and products offered by the gatekeeper itself or by any third party belonging to the same undertaking compared to similar services or products of third party and apply fair and non- discriminatory conditions to such ranking and other settings;
Amendment 175 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 6 – paragraph 1 – point d (d) refrain from treating more favourably in ranking services and products offered by the gatekeeper itself or by any third party
Amendment 176 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 6 – paragraph 1 – point d a (new) (d a) ensure that algorithms that determine the ranking of products and services are fair and transparent, and that the ranking of any content in online platforms incorporating voice assistant technologies must accurately and impartially reflect users’ voice requests;
Amendment 177 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 6 – paragraph 1 – point e (e) refrain from technically restricting the ability of end users to install, effectively use, switch between and subscribe to different software applications and services from third parties to be accessed using the operating system of the gatekeeper, including as regards the choice of Internet access provider for end users;
Amendment 178 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 6 – paragraph 1 – point e (e) refrain from technically restricting the ability of end users to switch between and subscribe to different software applications and services
Amendment 179 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 6 – paragraph 1 – point f (f) allow business users, end users and providers of
Amendment 180 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 6 – paragraph 1 – point f a (new) (f a) Allow end users of technologically protected digital content or digital service, legally acquired through third party services, access to and interoperability with the hardware or software features that are used by that gatekeeper when providing a similar technologically protected digital content or digital service; and allow end users of technologically protected digital content or digital service acquired through that gatekeeper access to and interoperability with the hardware or software features that are used by third party when providing a similar technologically protected digital content or digital service. Gatekeepers’ suppliers, as well as third-party hardware providers should have the possibility to require gatekeepers to provide the necessary interoperability information to comply with the purpose of this Regulation.
Amendment 181 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 6 – paragraph 1 – point g (g) provide advertisers and publishers, upon their request and free of charge, with access to the performance measuring tools of the gatekeeper for the purpose of targeted digital advertising based on contextual information and the information necessary for advertisers and publishers to carry out their own independent verification of the ad inventory;
Amendment 182 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 6 – paragraph 1 – point h (h) provide effective portability of data generated through the activity of a business user or generated by goods and services provided by a supplier of ancillary services notably distribution or an end user and shall, in particular, provide tools for end users to facilitate the exercise of data portability, in line with Regulation EU 2016/679, including by the provision of continuous and real-time access
Amendment 183 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 6 – paragraph 1 – point h (h) provide effective portability of data generated through the activity of a business user or end user and shall, in particular, provide user-friendly tools for end users to facilitate the exercise of data portability, including personal data generated by his or her activity, in line with Regulation EU 2016/679, including by the provision of continuous and real-time access
Amendment 184 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 6 – paragraph 1 – point i (i) provide business users, or third parties authorised by a business user, free of charge, with effective, high-quality, continuous and real-time access and use of aggregated or non-aggregated non- personal data, that is provided for or generated in the context of the use of the relevant core platform services by those business users and the end users engaging with the products or services provided by those business users;
Amendment 185 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 6 – paragraph 1 – point i (i) provide business users, or third parties authorised by a business user, free of charge, with effective, high-quality, continuous and real-time access and use of aggregated or non-aggregated data, that is provided for or generated in the context of the use of the relevant core platform services by those business users and the end users engaging with the products or services provided by those business users; for personal data, provide access and use only where directly connected with the use effectuated by the end user in respect of the
Amendment 186 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 6 – paragraph 1 – point i (i) provide business users, or third parties authorised by a business user, free of charge, with effective, high-quality, continuous and real-time access and use of aggregated or non-aggregated data
Amendment 187 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 6 – paragraph 1 – point j (j) provide to any third party providers of online search engines, upon their request, with access on fair, reasonable and non-discriminatory terms to ranking, query, click and view data in relation to free and paid search generated by end users on online search engines of the gatekeeper, subject to effective anonymisation
Amendment 188 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 6 – paragraph 1 – point k (k) apply transparent fair and non- discriminatory general conditions of access for business users to its software application store and for business users SMEs on a given sectorial market to its online search engine and online social networking service designated pursuant to Article 3 of this Regulation.
Amendment 189 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 6 – paragraph 1 – point k (k) apply fair and non-discriminatory general conditions of access and usage for business users to its
Amendment 190 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 6 – paragraph 1 – point k a (new) (k a) ensure their services, including user interfaces, are accessible to persons with disabilities in accordance with Article 13 of Directive (EU)2019/882. They shall also ensure that business users which rely on their core platform service to reach consumers for offering services and products in the scope of Directive (EU) 2019/882, comply with the requirements of Directive (EU) 2019/882.
Amendment 191 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 6 – paragraph 1 – point k b (new) Amendment 192 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 6 – paragraph 2 2. For the purposes of point (a)
Amendment 193 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 6 – paragraph 2 2. For the purposes of point (a) of paragraph 1 data
Amendment 194 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 7 – paragraph 6 a (new) 6 a. For the purposes of specifying the obligations under Article 6(1) point (f),the Commission shall in cooperation with the Gatekeeper, business users and end user representatives define the open technologies, open standards and open protocols, including the technical interface (Application Programming Interface), that allows end users of competing software and services and business users to dock on to the gate keepers core service and to interoperate with it. Any processing of personal data by gatekeepers should comply with Regulation (EU) 2016/679, in particular Articles 6(1)(a) and 5(1)(c). Interoperability obligations shall not limit, hinder or delay the ability of intermediaries to address vulnerabilities in order to comply with an obligation under Article 18 of COM(2020) 823 final or Article 32(1)(c) of Regulation(EU) 2016/679.
Amendment 196 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 11 – paragraph 2 2. Where consent for collecting and processing of personal data is required to ensure compliance with this Regulation, a gatekeeper shall take the necessary steps to either enable business users to directly obtain the required consent to their processing, where required under Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Directive 2002/58/EC, or to comply with Union data protection and privacy rules and principles in other ways including by providing business users with duly anonymised data where appropriate. The gatekeeper shall not make the obtaining of this consent by the business user more burdensome than for its own services, including product design, structure, function or manner of operation capable of influencing user choice and autonomy.
Amendment 197 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 11 – paragraph 2 2. Where consent for collecting and processing of personal data is required to ensure compliance with this Regulation, a gatekeeper shall take the necessary steps to either enable business users to directly obtain the required consent to their
Amendment 198 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 11 – paragraph 3 3. A gatekeeper shall not degrade the conditions or quality of any of the core platform services provided to business users or end users who avail themselves of the rights
Amendment 199 #
1. The Commission may conduct a market investigation for the purpose of examining whether a provider of core platform services should be designated as a gatekeeper pursuant to Article 3(6), or in order to identify core platform services for a gatekeeper pursuant to Article 3(7). It shall endeavour to conclude its investigation by adopting a decision in accordance with the advisory procedure referred to in Article 32(4) within
Amendment 200 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 15 – paragraph 2 2. In the course of a market investigation pursuant to paragraph 1, the Commission shall endeavour to communicate its preliminary findings to the provider of core platform services concerned within
Amendment 201 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 15 – paragraph 4 4. When the Commission pursuant to Article 3(6) designates as a gatekeeper a provider of core platform services that does not yet enjoy an entrenched and durable position in its operations, but it is foreseeable that it will enjoy such a position in the near future, it shall declare applicable to that gatekeeper
Amendment 202 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 30 – paragraph 1 a (new) 1 a. If the Commission considers it necessary, it may also hear other natural or legal persons before taking the decisions as provided for in paragraph 1. Applications to be heard on the part of such persons shall, where they show a sufficient interest, be granted.
Amendment 203 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 30 – paragraph 2 2. Gatekeepers, undertakings and associations of undertakings concerned and interested third-parties may submit their observations to the Commission’s preliminary findings within a time limit which shall be fixed by the Commission in its preliminary findings and which may not be less than 14 days.
Amendment 204 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 30 – paragraph 3 3. The Commission shall base its decisions only on objections on which gatekeepers, undertakings and associations of undertakings concerned and interested third-parties have been able to comment.
Amendment 205 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 32 a (new) Amendment 206 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 33 – paragraph 1 1. When
Amendment 207 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 33 – paragraph 1 1. When three or more Member States request the Commission to open an investigation pursuant to Article 15 because they consider that there are reasonable grounds to suspect that a provider of core platform services should be designated as a gatekeeper, the Commission shall within four months examine whether there are reasonable grounds to open such an investigation and justify its decision to open or refuse to open an investigation.
Amendment 208 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 33 – paragraph 2 a (new) 2 a. Third parties with a legitimate interest in representing business users or end users may provide the Commission with evidence with respect to any of the investigations triggered by paragraphs 1 to 3 of this article. On that basis, the Commission shall within four months examine whether there are reasonable grounds to open such an investigation pursuant to Articles 15, 16 and 17.
Amendment 209 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 33 a (new) Article 33 a Right to lodge complaints 1. Third parties representing business users or end users shall be entitled to lodge complaints with regard to the non- designation of gatekeepers, non- compliance and systematic non- compliance by gatekeepers with their obligations in accordance with Article 3, 5and 6 and request the opening of a market investigation. They shall submit evidence in support of their request. 2. The Commission shall examine whether there are reasonable grounds to open such an investigation and inform the interested third parties of its decision within three months.
Amendment 210 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 38 – paragraph 3 3. Member States shall provide any
Amendment 56 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 1 (1) Digital services in general and online platforms in particular play an increasingly important role in the economy
Amendment 57 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 1 a (new) (1 a) Digital services also shape changing forms of work and communication in public services and can facilitate European cultural exchange and the global availability of media content. Bodies providing public services are, to a degree, public economic entities operating on a non-profit basis. Accordingly, these bodies can be commercial users of digital services as well as end users or intermediaries providing access to services for other individual end users;
Amendment 58 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 2 (2) Core platform services,
Amendment 59 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 10 (10) Articles 101 and 102 TFEU and the
Amendment 60 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 10 a (new) (10 a) Systematic mergers and acquisitions should have a clear and legal threshold to put an end to killer acquisitions where big companies buy start-ups and growing companies in order to supress any possible competition. A special attention should be given to takeovers in important sectors such as health, education, defence and financial services.
Amendment 61 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 12 (12) Weak contestability and unfair practices in the digital sector are more frequent and pronounced for certain digital services than for others. This is the case in particular for widespread and commonly used digital services that mostly directly intermediate between business users and end users and where features such as extreme scale economies, very strong network effects, an ability to connect many business users with many end users through the multi-sidedness of these services, lock-in effects, a lack of multi- homing or vertical integration are the most prevalent. Often, there is only one or very few large providers of those digital services. These providers of core platform services have emerged most frequently as gatekeepers for business users and end users with far-reaching impacts, gaining the ability to easily set commercial conditions and terms in a unilateral and detrimental manner for their business users and end users. Accordingly, it is necessary to focus on all
Amendment 62 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 13 (13) In particular, online intermediation services, online search engines, operating systems (including those for smart TVs, digital voice assistants and alike), web browsers, online social networking, video sharing platform services, number- independent interpersonal communication services, cloud computing services and online advertising services all have the capacity to affect a large number of end users and businesses alike, which entails a risk of unfair business practices. They therefore should be included in the definition of core platform services and fall into the scope of this Regulation. Online intermediation services may also be active in the field of financial services, and they may intermediate or be used to provide such services as listed non-exhaustively in Annex II to Directive (EU) 2015/1535 of the European Parliament and of the Council32 . In certain circumstances, the notion of end users should encompass users that are traditionally considered business users, but in a given situation do not use the core platform services to provide goods or services to other end users, such as for example businesses relying on cloud computing services for their own purposes. _________________ 32Directive (EU) 2015/1535 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 9 September 2015 laying down a procedure for the provision of information in the field of technical regulations and of rules on Information Society services, OJ L 241, 17.9.2015, p. 1.
Amendment 63 #
(14 a) Gatekeepers may also provide other ancillary services, for instance retailing or distribution activities, that are targeted at end users alongside their core platform services and in a manner that is indistinguishable for the average user. Such ancillary services can compete with business users of the core platform service and contribute significantly to the imbalance in a given market and ultimately increase unfairly the gatekeeper’s power, including in relation to the gatekeeper’s business partners, such as suppliers of goods or services, relying on such ancillary service. To prevent gatekeepers from unfairly benefiting from the leverage provided by provision of parallel services, such ancillary services should also be subject to the obligations applicable to core platform services.
Amendment 64 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 14 b (new) (14 b) The impact of gatekeepers on the market makes their business partners, whether business users or suppliers of ancillary services, highly vulnerable to unfair terms and conditions of the gatekeepers they rely on. As such, gatekeeper should ensure that their terms and conditions are transparent and fair. While appropriate and proportionate sanctions in case of in breach of such terms and conditions should be allowed, they should be formally justified and allow for the sanctioned party to contest them. For this purpose, gatekeepers should provide for an internal system for handling swiftly the complaints of their business users and suppliers of ancillary services, including in their national language if the gatekeeper’s service actively targets the Member State concerned.
Amendment 65 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 25 (25) Such an assessment can only be done in light of a market investigation, while taking into account the quantitative thresholds. In its assessment the Commission should pursue the objectives of preserving and fostering the level of innovation, access to public information entailing the making available of information non-discriminatory to a potentially unlimited number of persons or users in general, the quality of digital products and services, the degree to which prices are fair and competitive, and the degree to which quality or choice for business users and for end users is or remains high. Elements that are specific to the providers of core platform services concerned, such as extreme scale economies, very strong network effects, an ability to connect many business users with many end users through the multi- sidedness of these services, lock-in effects, a lack of multi-
Amendment 66 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 33 (33) The obligations laid down in this Regulation are limited to what is necessary, proportionate and justified to address the unfairness of the identified practices by gatekeepers and to ensure contestability in relation to core platform services provided by gatekeepers. Therefore, the obligations should correspond to those practices that are considered unfair by taking into account the features of the digital sector and where experience gained, for example in the enforcement of the EU competition rules, shows that they have a particularly negative direct impact on the business users and end users. In addition, it is necessary to provide for the possibility of a regulatory dialogue with gatekeepers to tailor those obligations that are likely to require specific implementing measures in order to ensure their effectiveness and proportionality. The obligations should only be updated after a thorough
Amendment 67 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 36 (36) The conduct of combining end user data from different sources or signing in users to different services of gatekeepers gives them potential advantages in terms of accumulation of data, thereby raising barriers to entry.
Amendment 68 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 36 (36) The conduct of combining end user data from different sources or signing in users to different services of gatekeepers in order to combine personal data gives them potential advantages in terms of accumulation of data, thereby raising barriers to entry. To ensure that gatekeepers do not unfairly undermine the contestability of core platform services, they should
Amendment 69 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 36 (36) The conduct of combining end user data from different sources or signing in users to different services of gatekeepers gives them potential advantages in terms of accumulation of data, thereby raising barriers to entry. To ensure that gatekeepers do not unfairly undermine the contestability of core platform services, they should
Amendment 70 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 36 a (new) (36 a) Article 5(a) of this Regulation should not be understood as suggesting that platforms that are not designated as gatekeepers may freely combine personal data across services without the individual’s consent.
Amendment 71 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 37 (37) Because of their position, gatekeepers might in certain cases restrict the ability of business users of their online intermediation services to offer their goods or services to end users under more favourable conditions, including price, through other online intermediation services or through direct business channels. Such restrictions have a significant deterrent effect on the business users of gatekeepers in terms of their use of alternative online intermediation services or direct business channels, limiting inter- platform contestability, which in turn limits choice of alternative online intermediation channels for end users. To ensure that business users of online intermediation services of
Amendment 72 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 37 (37) Because of their position, gatekeepers might, in certain cases, through the imposition of contractual terms and conditions, restrict the ability of business users of their online intermediation services to offer their goods or services to end users under more favourable conditions, including price, through other online intermediation services or the direct online sales channels they own. Such restrictions have a significant deterrent effect on the business users of gatekeepers in terms of their use of alternative online intermediation services, limiting inter- platform contestability, which in turn limits choice of alternative online intermediation channels for end users. To ensure that business users of online intermediation services of gatekeepers can freely choose alternative online intermediation services and differentiate the conditions under which they offer their products or services to their end users, it should not be accepted that gatekeepers limit business users from
Amendment 73 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 38 (38) To prevent further reinforcing their dependence on the core platform services of gatekeepers, the business users of these gatekeepers should be free in promoting and choosing the distribution channel they consider most appropriate to interact with any end users that these business users have already acquired through core platform services provided by the gatekeeper. Conversely, end users should also be free to choose offers of such business users and to enter into contracts with them either through core platform services of the gatekeeper, if applicable, or from a direct distribution channel of the business user or another indirect distribution channel such business user may use. This should apply to the promotion of offers and conclusion of contracts between business users and end users. Moreover, the ability of end users to freely acquire
Amendment 74 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 39 (39) To safeguard a fair commercial environment and protect the contestability of the digital sector it is important to safeguard the right of business users to raise concerns about unfair behaviour by gatekeepers with any relevant administrative or other public authorities. For example, business users may want to complain about different types of unfair practices, such as discriminatory access conditions, unjustified closing of business user accounts or unclear grounds for product de-listings. Any practice that would in any way inhibit such a possibility of raising concerns or seeking available redress, for instance by means of confidentiality clauses in agreements or other written terms, should therefore be prohibited. This should be without prejudice to the right of business users and gatekeepers to lay down in their agreements the terms of use, drafted in plain and intelligible language, including the use of lawful complaints-handling mechanisms, including any use of alternative dispute resolution mechanisms
Amendment 75 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 42 (42) The conditions under which gatekeepers provide online advertising services to business users including both advertisers and publishers are often non- transparent and opaque. This opacity is partly linked to the practices of a few platforms, but is also due to the sheer complexity of modern day programmatic advertising. The sector is considered to have become more non-transparent after the introduction of new privacy legislation, and is expected to become even more opaque with the announced removal of third-party cookies. This often leads to a lack of information and knowledge for advertisers and publishers about the conditions of the advertising services they purchased and undermines their ability to switch to alternative providers of online advertising services. Furthermore, the costs of online advertising are likely to be higher than they would be in a fairer, more transparent and contestable platform environment. These higher costs are likely to be reflected in the prices that end users pay for many daily products and services relying on the use of online advertising. Transparency obligations should therefore require gatekeepers to provide advertisers and publishers to whom they supply online
Amendment 76 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 42 (42) The conditions under which gatekeepers provide targeted online advertising based on contextual information services to business users including both advertisers and publishers are often non-
Amendment 77 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 42 (42) The conditions under which gatekeepers provide online advertising services to business users including both advertisers and publishers are often non- transparent and opaque. This opacity is partly linked to the practices of a few platforms, but is also due to the sheer complexity of modern day programmatic advertising. The sector is considered to have become more non-transparent after the introduction of new privacy legislation, and is expected to become even more opaque with the announced removal of third-party cookies. This often leads to a lack of information and knowledge for advertisers and publishers about the conditions of the advertising services they purchased and undermines their ability to switch to alternative providers of online advertising services. Furthermore, the costs of online advertising are likely to be higher than they would be in a fairer, more transparent and contestable platform environment. These higher costs are likely to be reflected in the prices that end users
Amendment 78 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 43 (43)
Amendment 79 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 43 (43) A gatekeeper may in certain circumstances have a dual role as a provider of core platform services whereby it provides a core platform service to its business users, while also competing with those same business users in the provision of the same or similar services or products to the same end users. In these circumstances, a gatekeeper may take advantage of its dual role to use data, generated from transactions by its business users on the core platform, for the purpose of its own services that offer similar services to that of its business users. This may be the case, for instance, where a gatekeeper provides an online marketplace or app store to business users, and at the same time offer services as an online retailer or provider of application software against those business users. To prevent gatekeepers from unfairly benefitting from their dual role, it should be ensured that they refrain from using any aggregated or non-aggregated data, which may include anonymised and personal data
Amendment 80 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 46 (46) A gatekeeper may use different means to favour its own services or products on its core platform service, to the detriment of the same or similar services that end users could obtain through third parties. This may for instance be the case where certain software applications or services are pre-installed by a gatekeeper. To enable end user choice, gatekeepers should not prevent end users from un- installing any pre-installed software applications on its core platform service and thereby favour their own software applications, and should offer end users the opportunity to choose the software applications on its core platforms including an option to settings without any pre-installed software that is not required for the basic functionality of their platform.
Amendment 81 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 47 (47) The rules that the gatekeepers set for the distribution of software applications may in certain circumstances restrict the ability of end users to install and effectively use third party software applications or software application stores on operating systems or hardware of the relevant gatekeeper and restrict the ability of end users to access these software applications or software application stores outside the core platform services of that gatekeeper. Such restrictions may limit the ability of developers of software applications to use alternative distribution channels and the ability of end users to choose between different software applications from different distribution channels and should be prohibited as unfair and liable to weaken the contestability of core platform services. In order to ensure that third party software applications or software application stores do not endanger the integrity of the hardware or operating system provided by the gatekeeper the gatekeeper concerned may implement proportionate technical or contractual measures to achieve that goal if the gatekeeper demonstrates that such measures are necessary and justified and that there are no less restrictive means to safeguard the integrity of the hardware or operating system. This prohibition on restricting the ability of end users to install and use, or access, third-party software applications or application stores should therefore also be without prejudice to the ability of gatekeepers to take the required responsibility in the fight against illegal content online.
Amendment 82 #
(47) The rules that the gatekeepers set for the distribution of software applications may in certain circumstances restrict the ability of end users to install and effectively use third party software applications or software application stores on operating systems or hardware of the relevant gatekeeper and restrict the ability of end users to access these software applications or software application stores outside the core platform services of that gatekeeper. Such restrictions may limit the ability of developers of software applications to use alternative distribution channels and the ability of end users to choose for different reasons between different software applications to run on platforms from different distribution channels and should be prohibited as unfair and liable to weaken the contestability of core platform services. In order to ensure that third party software applications or software application stores do not endanger the integrity of the hardware or operating system provided by the gatekeeper the gatekeeper concerned may implement proportionate technical or contractual measures to achieve that goal if the gatekeeper demonstrates that such measures are necessary and justified and that there are no less restrictive means to safeguard the integrity of the hardware or operating system.
Amendment 83 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 48 (48) Gatekeepers are often vertically integrated and offer certain products or services to end users through their own core platform services, or through
Amendment 84 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 48 (48) Gatekeepers are often vertically integrated and offer certain products or services to end users through their own core platform services, or through a business user over which they exercise control which frequently leads to conflicts of interest. This can include the situation whereby a gatekeeper offers its own online intermediation services through an online search engine. When offering those products or services on the core platform service, gatekeepers can reserve a better position to their own offering, in terms of ranking, as opposed to the products of third parties also
Amendment 85 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 48 (48) Gatekeepers are often vertically integrated and offer certain products or services to end users through their own core platform services, or through a business user over which they exercise control which frequently leads to conflicts of interest. This can include the situation whereby a gatekeeper offers its own online intermediation services through an online
Amendment 86 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 49 (49) In such situations of a conflict of interest, the gatekeeper should not partly or entirely embed such distinct product or service in online search engines results or groups of results. However, it may rank its products or services, provided that it doesn’t engage in any form of differentiated or preferential treatment in ranking on the core platform service, whether through legal, commercial or technical means, in favour of products or services it offers itself or through a business user which it either controls
Amendment 87 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 49 (49) In such situations, the gatekeeper should not engage in any form of differentiated or preferential treatment in ranking, display, or making embedded results on the core platform service, whether through legal, commercial or technical means, in favour of products or services it offers itself or through a business user which it controls. The gatekeeper should refrain from imposing mechanisms or conditions that make the gathering and the combination of relevant data from end users or the obtaining of consent for the use of such data by a business user for the purpose of serving interest-based advertising within a core platform service more burdensome or difficult where the business user complies with all statutory requirements for such advertising, in particular under Regulation(EU) 2016/679. Provide for entire disclosure and transparency of the parameters and data used for decision making, execution and measurement of the performance measuring tools, in particular with regard to ad inventory and services owned by the gatekeeper in relation to ad inventory and intermediation services owned by other publishers or service providers connected with the gatekeeper´s platform; To ensure that this obligation is effective, it should also be ensured that the conditions that apply to such ranking
Amendment 88 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 49 (49) In such situations, the gatekeeper should not engage in any form of differentiated or preferential treatment in ranking on the core platform service, whether through legal, commercial or technical means, in favour of products or services it offers itself or through a business user which it co
Amendment 89 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 49 (49) In such situations, the gatekeeper should not engage in any form of differentiated or preferential treatment in ranking or through other settings on the core platform service, whether through legal, commercial or technical means, in favour of products or services it offers itself or through a business user which it controls. To ensure that this obligation is effective, it should also be ensured that the conditions that apply to such ranking a
Amendment 90 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 50 (50) Gatekeepers should not restrict or prevent the free choice of end users by technically preventing switching between, installment, effective use or subscription to different, including third party software applications and services. This would allow more providers to offer their services, thereby ultimately providing greater choice to the end user. Gatekeepers should ensure a free choice irrespective of whether they are the manufacturer of any hardware by means of which such software applications or services are accessed and shall not raise artificial technical barriers so as to make switching, installing or using impossible or ineffective
Amendment 91 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 51 (51) Gatekeepers can hamper the ability of end users to access online content and services including software applications. Therefore, rules should be established to ensure that the rights of end users to access an open internet are not compromised by the conduct of gatekeepers. Gatekeepers can also technically limit the ability of end users to effectively switch between different Internet access service providers,
Amendment 92 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 52 a (new) (52 a) Interoperability needs to also be ensured for messaging and social media services, providing the users with the possibility to migrate from one platform to another without losing their data and contacts.
Amendment 93 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 53 (53) The conditions under which gatekeepers provide online advertising services to business users including both advertisers and publishers are often non- transparent and opaque. This often leads to a lack of information for advertisers and
Amendment 94 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 53 (53) The conditions under which gatekeepers provide targeted online advertising services based on contextual information to business users including both advertisers and publishers are often non-
Amendment 95 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 53 (53) The conditions under which gatekeepers provide online advertising services to business users including both advertisers and publishers are often non- transparent and opaque. This often leads to a lack of information for advertisers and publishers about the effect of a given ad. To further enhance fairness, transparency and contestability of online advertising services designated under this Regulation as well as those that are fully integrated with other core platform services of the same provider, the designated gatekeepers should therefore provide advertisers and publishers, when requested, with free of charge access to the performance measuring tools of the gatekeeper and
Amendment 96 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 54 (54) Gatekeepers benefit from access to vast amounts of data that they collect while providing the core platform services as well as other digital services. To ensure that gatekeepers do not undermine the contestability of core platform services as well as the innovation potential of the dynamic digital sector by restricting the ability of business users to effectively port their data, business users and end users should be granted effective and immediate access to the data they provided or generated in the context of their use of the relevant core platform services of the gatekeeper, in a structured, commonly used and machine-readable format. This should apply also to any other data at different levels of aggregation that may be necessary to effectively enable such portability. It should also be ensured that business users and end users can port that data in real time effectively, such as for example through high quality application programming interfaces. Facilitating switching or multi- homing should lead, in turn, to an increased choice for business users and end users and an incentive for gatekeepers and business users to innovate. These portability rights will provide users with the right to access and transfer their data from the platforms that hold it.
Amendment 97 #
(54) Gatekeepers benefit from access to vast amounts of data that they collect while providing the core platform services as well as other digital services. To ensure that gatekeepers do not undermine the contestability of core platform services as well as the innovation potential of the dynamic digital sector by restricting the ability of business users to effectively port their data, business users and end users should be granted effective, free of charge and immediate access to the data they provided or generated in the context of their use of the relevant core platform services of the gatekeeper, in a structured, commonly used and machine-readable format. This should apply also to any other data at different levels of aggregation that may be necessary to effectively enable such portability. It should also be ensured that business users and end users can port that data in real time effectively, such as for example through high quality application programming interfaces. Facilitating switching or multi-
Amendment 98 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 55 (55) Business users that use large core platform services provided by gatekeepers and end users of such business users provide and generate a vast amount of data
Amendment 99 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 56 (56) The value of online search engines to their respective business users and end users increases as the total number of such users increases. Providers of online search engines collect and store aggregated datasets containing information about what users searched for, and how they interacted with, the results that they were served.
source: 695.082
2021/06/30
JURI
324 amendments...
Amendment 100 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 26 (26) A particular subset of rules should apply to those providers of core platform services that are foreseen to enjoy an entrenched and durable position in the near future. The same specific features of core platform services make them prone to tipping, both from the perspective of market conditions and from that of user behaviour: once a service provider has obtained a certain advantage over rivals or potential challengers in terms of scale or
Amendment 101 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 27 (27) However, such an early intervention should be limited to imposing only those obligations that are necessary and appropriate to ensure that the services in question remain contestable and allow to avoid the qualified risk of unfair conditions and practices. Obligations that prevent the provider of core platform services concerned from achieving an entrenched and durable position in its operations, such as those preventing unfair leveraging, and those that facilitate switching and multi- homing are more directly geared towards this purpose. To ensure proportionality, the Commission should moreover apply from that subset of obligations only those that are necessary and proportionate to achieve the objectives of this Regulation and should regularly review whether such obligations should be maintained, suppressed or adapted, bearing in mind the basic objective of guaranteeing a framework for developing and encouraging innovation.
Amendment 102 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 29 (29) Designated gatekeepers should comply with the obligations laid down in this Regulation in respect of each of the core platform services listed in the relevant designation decision. The mandatory rules should apply taking into account the conglomerate position of gatekeepers and their ecosystem orchestrator power, where applicable. Furthermore, implementing measures based on Article 36 that the Commission may by decision impose on the gatekeeper following a regulatory dialogue should be designed in an effective manner, having regard to the features of core platform services as well as possible circumvention risks and in compliance with the principle of proportionality and the fundamental rights of the undertakings concerned as well as those of third parties.
Amendment 103 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 29 (29)
Amendment 104 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 30 (30) The very rapidly changing and complex technological nature of core platform services requires a regular review of the status of gatekeepers, including those that are foreseen to enjoy a durable and entrenched position in their operations in the near future. To provide all of the market participants, including the gatekeepers, with the required certainty as to the applicable legal obligations, a time limit for such regular reviews is necessary. It is also important to conduct such reviews on a regular basis and at least every t
Amendment 105 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 31 (31) To ensure the effectiveness of the review of gatekeeper status as well as the possibility to adjust the list of core platform services provided by a gatekeeper, the gatekeepers should inform the Commission and other competent national authorities of all of their intended and concluded acquisitions of other providers of core platform services or any other services provided within the digital sector. Such information should not only serve the review process mentioned above, regarding the status of individual gatekeepers, but will also provide information that is crucial to monitoring broader contestability trends in the digital sector and can therefore be a useful factor for consideration in the context of the market investigations foreseen by this Regulation.
Amendment 106 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 31 (31) To ensure the effectiveness of the review of gatekeeper status as well as the possibility to adjust the list of core platform services provided by a gatekeeper, the gatekeepers should inform the Commission of all of their intended and concluded acquisitions
Amendment 107 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 32 (32) To safeguard the fairness and contestability of core platform services provided by gatekeepers, it is necessary to provide in a clear and unambiguous manner for a set of harmonised obligations with regard to those services. Such rules are needed to address the risk of harmful effects of unfair practices imposed by gatekeepers, to the benefit of the business environment in the services concerned, to the benefit of users and ultimately to the benefit of society as a whole. Given the fast-moving and dynamic nature of digital markets, and the substantial economic power of gatekeepers, it is important that these obligations are effectively applied without being circumvented. To that end, the obligations in question should apply to any
Amendment 108 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 33 (33) The obligations laid down in this Regulation are limited to what is necessary and justified to address the unfairness of the identified practices by gatekeepers and to ensure contestability in relation to core platform services provided by gatekeepers. Therefore, the obligations should correspond to those practices that are considered unfair by taking into account the features of the digital sector and where experience gained, for example in the enforcement of the EU competition rules, shows that they have a particularly negative direct impact on the business users and end users. The obligations laid down in the Regulation may specifically take into account the nature of the core platform services provided. In addition, it is necessary to provide for the possibility of a regulatory dialogue with gatekeepers to tailor those obligations that are likely to require specific implementing measures in order to ensure their effectiveness and proportionality. The obligations should only be updated after a thorough investigation on the nature and impact of specific practices that may be newly identified, following an in-depth investigation, as unfair or limiting contestability in the same manner as the unfair practices laid down in this Regulation while potentially escaping the scope of the current set of obligations. In order to enhance the effectiveness of the updating process, the Commission should also use the reporting mechanism involving competitors, business users, end-users and competent national authorities, that would inform the Commission in the event of any of those detected practices.
Amendment 109 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 36 (36) The conduct of combining end user data from different sources or signing in users to different services of gatekeepers gives them potential advantages in terms of accumulation of data, thereby raising barriers to entry. To ensure that gatekeepers do not unfairly undermine the contestability of core platform services, they should
Amendment 110 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 36 (36) The conduct of combining end user data from different sources or signing in users to different services of gatekeepers
Amendment 111 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 36 a (new) (36a) Article 5(a) of this Regulation should not be understood as suggesting that platforms that are not designated as gatekeepers may freely combine personal data across services without the individual’s consent.
Amendment 112 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 37 (37) Because of their position, gatekeepers might in certain cases restrict
Amendment 113 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 37 (37) Because of their position, gatekeepers might in certain cases restrict the ability of business users of their online intermediation services to offer their goods or services to end users under more favourable conditions, including price, through other online intermediation services or their own websites or other distribution channels. Such restrictions have a
Amendment 114 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 37 (37) Because of their position, gatekeepers might in certain cases restrict the ability of business users of their online intermediation services to offer their goods or services to end users under more favourable conditions, including price, through other online intermediation services or online direct sales channels belonging to them. Such restrictions have a significant deterrent effect on the business users of gatekeepers in terms of their use of alternative online intermediation services, limiting inter-platform contestability, which in turn limits choice of alternative online intermediation channels for end
Amendment 115 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 38 (38) To prevent further reinforcing their dependence on the core platform services of gatekeepers, the business users of these gatekeepers should be free in promoting and choosing the distribution channel they consider most appropriate to interact with any end users that these business users have already acquired through core platform services provided by the gatekeeper. Conversely, end users should also be free to choose offers of such business users and to enter into contracts with them either through core platform services of the gatekeeper, if applicable, or from a direct distribution channel of the business user or another indirect distribution channel such business user may use. This should apply to the promotion of offers and conclusion of contracts between business users and end users. Moreover, the ability of end users to
Amendment 116 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 38 (38) To prevent further reinforcing their dependence on the core platform services of gatekeepers, the business users of these gatekeepers should be free in promoting and choosing the distribution channel they consider most appropriate to interact with any end users that these business users have already acquired through core platform services provided by the gatekeeper. Conversely, end users should also be free to choose offers of such business users and to enter into contracts with them either through core platform services of the gatekeeper, if applicable, or from a direct distribution channel of the
Amendment 117 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 39 (39) To safeguard a fair commercial environment and protect the contestability of the digital sector it is important to safeguard the right of business users, end users and third parties having a legitimate interest to raise concerns about unfair behaviour by gatekeepers with any relevant administrative, judicial or other public authorities. For example, business users, end users and third parties having a legitimate interest may want to complain about different types of unfair practices, such as discriminatory access
Amendment 118 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 39 (39) To safeguard a fair commercial environment and protect the contestability of the digital sector it is important to safeguard the right of business users to raise concerns about unfair behaviour by gatekeepers with any relevant administrative or other public authorities. For example, business users may want to complain about different types of unfair practices, such as discriminatory access conditions, unjustified closing of business
Amendment 119 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 39 (39) To safeguard a fair commercial environment and protect the contestability of the digital sector it is important to safeguard the right of business users and end users to raise concerns about unfair behaviour by gatekeepers with any relevant administrative or other public authorities. For example, business users and end users may want to complain about different types of unfair practices, such as discriminatory access conditions, unjustified closing of business user and end users accounts or unclear grounds for product de-listings. Any practice that would in any way inhibit such a possibility
Amendment 120 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 39 (39) To safeguard a fair commercial environment and protect the contestability of the digital sector it is important to safeguard the right of business users to raise concerns about unfair behaviour by gatekeepers with any relevant administrative or other public authorities, including national courts. For example, business users may want to complain about different types of unfair practices, such as discriminatory access conditions, unjustified closing of business user accounts or unclear grounds for product de-listings. Any practice that would in any way inhibit or impede such a possibility of raising concerns or seeking available redress, for instance by means of confidentiality clauses in agreements or other written terms, should therefore be prohibited. This should be without
Amendment 121 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 40 (40) Identification and ancillary services are crucial for the economic development of business users to conduct their business, as these can allow them not only to optimise services, to the extent allowed under Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Directive 2002/58/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council33 , but also to inject trust in online transactions, in compliance with Union or national law. Gatekeepers should therefore not use their position as provider of core platform services to require their dependent business users to include any identification or ancillary services provided by the gatekeeper itself as part of the provision of services or products by these business users to their end users, where other identification services are available to such business users. __________________ 33 Directive 2002/58/EC of the European
Amendment 122 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 41 (41) Gatekeepers should not restrict the free choice of end users by technically preventing switching between or subscription to different software applications and services. Gatekeepers should therefore ensure a free choice irrespective of whether they are the manufacturer of any hardware by means of which such software applications or services are accessed and should not raise
Amendment 123 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 41 (41) Gatekeepers should not restrict the free choice of end users by technically preventing switching between or subscription to different software applications and services. Gatekeepers should therefore ensure a free choice irrespective of whether they are the manufacturer of any hardware by means of which such software applications or services are accessed and should not raise artificial technical barriers so as to make switching
Amendment 124 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 42 (42) The conditions under which gatekeepers provide targeted online advertising services based on contextual information to business users including both advertisers and publishers are often non-
Amendment 125 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 42 (42) The conditions under which gatekeepers provide online advertising services to business users including both advertisers and publishers are often non- transparent, complex and opaque. This opacity is partly linked to the practices of a few platforms, but is also due to the sheer complexity of modern day programmatic
Amendment 126 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 42 (42) The conditions under which gatekeepers provide online advertising services to business users including both advertisers and publishers are often non- transparent and opaque. This opacity is partly linked to the practices of a few
Amendment 127 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 43 (43) A gatekeeper may in certain circumstances have a dual role as a provider of core platform services whereby it provides a core platform service to its business users, while also competing with
Amendment 128 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 43 (43) A gatekeeper may in certain circumstances have a dual role as a provider of core platform services whereby it provides a core platform service to its business users, while also competing with those same business users in the provision
Amendment 129 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 46 (46) A gatekeeper may use different means to favour its own services or products on its core platform service, to the detriment of the same or similar services that end users could obtain through third parties. This may for instance be the case where certain software applications or ancillary services are pre-installed by a gatekeeper. To enable end user choice, gatekeepers should not prevent end users from un-
Amendment 130 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 47 (47) The rules that the gatekeepers set for the distribution of software applications may in certain circumstances restrict the ability of end users to install and effectively use third party software applications or software application stores on operating systems or hardware of the relevant gatekeeper and restrict the ability of end users to access these software applications or software application stores outside the core platform services of that gatekeeper. Such restrictions may limit the ability of developers of software applications to use alternative distribution channels and the ability of end users to choose between different software applications from different distribution channels and should be prohibited as unfair and liable to weaken the contestability of core platform services. In order to ensure that third party software applications or software application stores do not endanger the integrity of the hardware or operating system provided by the gatekeeper the gatekeeper concerned may implement proportionate technical or contractual measures to achieve that goal if the gatekeeper demonstrates that such measures are necessary and justified and
Amendment 131 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 47 (47) The rules that the gatekeepers set for the distribution of software applications may in certain circumstances restrict the ability of end users to install and effectively use third party software applications or software application stores or repositories on operating systems or hardware of the relevant gatekeeper and restrict the ability of end users to access these software applications or software application stores or repositories outside the core platform services of that gatekeeper. Such restrictions may limit the ability of developers of software applications to use alternative distribution channels and the ability of end users to choose between different software applications from different distribution channels and should be prohibited as unfair and liable to weaken the contestability of core platform services. In order to ensure that third party software applications or software application stores do not endanger the integrity of the hardware or operating system provided by the gatekeeper the gatekeeper concerned may implement proportionate technical or contractual measures to achieve that goal if the
Amendment 132 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 47 a (new) (47a) Gatekeepers should be able to implement proportionate technical or contractual measures to restrict end users’ ability to access any content that is illegal or does not respect intellectual property in the software applications or software application stores of third parties.
Amendment 133 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 48 (48) Gatekeepers are often vertically integrated and offer certain products or services to end users through their own core platform services, or through a business user over which they exercise control which frequently leads to conflicts of interest. This can include the situation whereby a gatekeeper offers its own online intermediation services through an online
Amendment 134 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 48 (48) Gatekeepers are often vertically integrated and offer certain products or services to end users through their own core platform services, or through a business user over which they exercise control which frequently leads to conflicts of interest. This can include the situation whereby a gatekeeper offers its own online intermediation services through an online search engine. When offering those products or services on the core platform service, gatekeepers can reserve a better position to their own offering, in terms of ranking, as opposed to the products of third parties also operating on that core platform service. This can occur for instance with products or services, including other core platform services, which are ranked in the results communicated by online search engines, or which are partly or entirely embedded in online search engines results, groups of results specialised in a certain topic, displayed along with the results of an online search engine, which are considered or used by certain end users as a service distinct or additional to the online search engine. Other instances are those of software applications which are distributed through software application stores, or products or services that are given prominence and display in the newsfeed of a social network, or products or services ranked in search results or displayed on an online marketplace, or products or services to which users are directed following a voice request by the end user to a digital voice assistant. In those circumstances, the gatekeeper is in a dual-
Amendment 135 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 48 (48) Gatekeepers are often vertically integrated and offer certain products or services to end users through their own core platform services, or through a business user over which they exercise control which frequently leads to conflicts of interest. This can include the situation whereby a gatekeeper offers its own online intermediation services through an online search engine. When offering those products or services on the core platform service, gatekeepers can reserve a better position or a differentiated treatment to their own offering, in terms of ranking, as opposed to the products of third parties also operating on that core platform service. This can occur for instance with products or services, including other core platform services, which are ranked in the results communicated by online search engines, or which are partly or entirely embedded in online search engines results, groups of results specialised in a certain topic, displayed along with the results of an online search engine, which are considered or used by certain end users as a service distinct or additional to the online search engine. Other instances are those of software applications which are distributed through software application stores, or products or services that are given prominence and display in the newsfeed of
Amendment 136 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 49 (49) In such situations, the gatekeeper should not engage in any form of differentiated or preferential treatment in ranking on the core platform service, whether through legal, commercial or technical means, in favour of products or services it offers itself or through a business user which it co
Amendment 137 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 50 (50) Gatekeepers should not restrict or prevent the free choice of end users by technically preventing switching between or subscription to different software applications and services. This would allow more providers to offer their services, thereby ultimately providing greater choice to the end user. Gatekeepers should ensure a free choice irrespective of whether they are the manufacturer of any hardware by means of which such software applications or services are accessed and shall not raise
Amendment 138 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 52 (52) Gatekeepers may also have a dual role as developers of operating systems and device manufacturers, including any technical functionality that such a device may have. For example, a gatekeeper that is a manufacturer of a device may restrict access to some of the functionalities in this device, such as near-field-communication technology and the software used to operate that technology, which may be required for the effective provision of an ancillary service by the gatekeeper as well as by any potential third party provider of such an ancillary service. Such access may equally be required by software applications related to the relevant ancillary services in order to effectively provide similar functionalities as those offered by gatekeepers. If such a dual role is used in a manner that prevents end users or alternative providers of ancillary services or of software applications to have access under equal conditions to the same operating system, hardware or software features that are available or used in the provision by the gatekeeper of any ancillary services, this could significantly undermine innovation by providers of such ancillary services as well as choice for end users of such ancillary services. The gatekeepers should therefore be obliged to ensure access under equal conditions to, and interoperability with, the same operating system, hardware or software features that are available or used in the provision of any ancillary services by the gatekeeper.
Amendment 139 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 53 (53) The conditions under which gatekeepers provide online advertising services to business users including both advertisers and publishers are often non- transparent and opaque. This often leads to a lack of information for advertisers and publishers about the effect of a given ad. To further enhance fairness, transparency and contestability of online advertising services designated under this Regulation as well as those that are fully integrated with other core platform services of the same provider, the designated gatekeepers should therefore provide advertisers
Amendment 140 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 53 (53) The conditions under which gatekeepers provide targeted online advertising services based on contextual information to business users including both advertisers and publishers are often non-
Amendment 141 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 54 (54) Gatekeepers benefit from access to vast amounts of data that they collect while providing the core platform services as well as other digital services. To ensure
Amendment 142 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 54 (54) Gatekeepers benefit from access to vast amounts of data that they collect while providing the core platform services as well as other digital services. To ensure that gatekeepers do not undermine the contestability of core platform services as well as the innovation potential of the dynamic digital sector by restricting the ability of business users to effectively port their data, business users and end users should be granted effective and immediate
Amendment 143 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 55 (55) Business users that use large core platform services provided by gatekeepers and end users of such business users provide and generate a vast amount of data
Amendment 144 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 56 Amendment 145 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 57 (57) In particular gatekeepers which provide access to software application stores, online search engine and online social networking service serve as an important gateway for business users that seek to reach end users, which can have an adverse effect on the end users' right to receive and impart information and ideas, and ultimately adversely affect media pluralism, diversity of opinion as well as competition. In view of the imbalance in bargaining power between those gatekeepers on the one hand, and business users of their software application stores, especially those being in a minority position on a given sectorial market, such as small press publishers, particularly when accessing their online search engine and online social networks, on the other hand, those gatekeepers should not be allowed to impose general conditions, including pricing conditions, that would be unfair or lead to unjustified differentiation. Pricing or other general access conditions should be considered unfair if they lead to an imbalance of rights and obligations imposed on business users or confer an advantage on the gatekeeper which is disproportionate to the service provided by the gatekeeper to business users or lead to
Amendment 146 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 57 (57)
Amendment 147 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 58 a (new) (58a) During the implementation period of three months, designated gatekeepers should inform the Commission about what they intend to implement and how, in order to ensure effective compliance with their obligations. Such information should be made available to concerned third parties of undertakings, taking into account the protection of trade secrets of designated gatekeepers.
Amendment 148 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 60 (60) In exceptional circumstances justified on the limited grounds of public
Amendment 149 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 62 (62) In order to ensure the full and lasting achievement of the objectives of this Regulation, the Commission should be able to assess whether a provider of core platform services should be designated as a gatekeeper without meeting the quantitative thresholds laid down in this Regulation; whether systematic non-
Amendment 150 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 64 (64) The Commission should investigate and assess whether additional behavioural, or, where appropriate, structural remedies are justified, in order to ensure that the gatekeeper cannot frustrate the objectives of this Regulation by systematically no
Amendment 151 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 64 (64) The Commission should investigate and assess whether additional behavioural, or, where appropriate, structural remedies are justified, in order to ensure that the gatekeeper cannot frustrate the objectives of this Regulation by systematic non- compliance with one or several of the obligations laid down in this Regulation
Amendment 152 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 65 a (new) (65a) In case of urgency where a risk of serious and immediate damage for business users or end-users of gatekeepers could result from new practices that may undermine contestability of core platform services or may be unfair, it is also important to ensure that the Commission can implement interim measures and thus temporarily impose obligations to the gatekeeper concerned. These interim measures should be proportionate and limited to what is necessary and justified. They should apply pending the conclusion of the market investigation and the corresponding final decision of the Commission.
Amendment 153 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 67 (67) Where, in the course of a proceeding into non-compliance or an investigation into systemic non- compliance, a gatekeeper offers commitments to the Commission, the latter should be able to adopt a decision making these commitments binding on the gatekeeper concerned, where it finds that the commitments ensure effective compliance with the obligations of this Regulation. Th
Amendment 154 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 70 (70) The Commission should be able to directly request that undertakings or association of undertakings provide any relevant evidence, data and information. In addition, the Commission should be able to request any relevant information from any public authority, body or agency within the Member State, or from any natural person or legal person for the purpose of this Regulation. Those public authorities, bodies or agencies within Member States should have the possibility, on their own initiative, to provide the Commission with relevant information. When complying with a decision of the Commission, undertakings are obliged to answer factual questions and to provide documents.
Amendment 155 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 72 (72) The Commission should be able to take the necessary actions to monitor the effective implementation and compliance with the obligations laid down in this Regulation. Such actions should include the ability of the Commission to appoint independent external experts, such as and auditors to assist the Commission in this process, including where applicable from competent independent authorities, such as data or consumer protection authorities. The Commission may require gatekeepers to provide independent experts with continuous access to data and algorithms in order to enforce the obligations laid down in Articles 5 and 6 of this Regulation.
Amendment 156 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 75 (75) In the context of proceedings carried out under this Regulation, the undertakings concerned should be accorded the right to be heard by the Commission and the decisions taken should be widely publicised. While ensuring the rights to good administration and the rights of defence of the undertakings concerned, in particular, the right of access to the file and the right to be heard, it is essential that confidential information be protected. Furthermore, while respecting the confidentiality of the information, the Commission should ensure that any information relied on for the purpose of the decision is disclosed to an extent that allows the addressee of the decision to understand the facts and considerations that led up to the decision. Finally, under certain conditions certain business records, such as communication between lawyers and their clients, may be considered confidential if the relevant conditions are met. Parties directly concerned by the obligations laid down in Articles 5 and 6 should be considered to have an interest and should therefore be able to be heard. Where a procedure concerns products or services used by end consumers, the consumer associations should be considered to have a sufficient interest.
Amendment 157 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 77 (77) The advisory committee established in accordance with Regulation (EU) No 182//2011 should also deliver opinions on certain individual decisions of the Commission issued under this Regulation. The Commission should involve in this advisory committee third parties representing affected end users. In order to ensure contestable and fair markets in the digital sector across the Union where gatekeepers are present, the power to adopt acts in accordance with Article 290 of the Treaty should be delegated to the Commission to supplement this Regulation. In particular, delegated acts should be adopted in respect of the methodology for determining the quantitative thresholds for designation of gatekeepers under this Regulation and in respect of the update of the obligations laid down in this Regulation where, based on a market investigation the Commission has identified the need for updating the obligations addressing practices that limit the contestability of core platform services or are unfair. It is of particular importance that the Commission carries out appropriate consultations and that those consultations be conducted in accordance with the principles laid down in the Interinstitutional Agreement on Better Law-Making of 13 April 201636. In particular, to ensure equal participation in the preparation of delegated acts, the European Parliament and the Council receive all documents at the same time as Member States' experts, and their experts systematically have access to meetings of Commission expert groups dealing with the preparation of delegated acts.
Amendment 158 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 78 a (new) (78a) Gatekeepers often highlight sponsored search results, or elements promoting their own products and services, and limit the display of organic results.
Amendment 159 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 79 – introductory part (79) The objective of this Regulation is to ensure a contestable and fair digital sector in general and accessible core platform services in particular, with a view to promoting and stimulating innovation, high quality of digital products and services, fair and competitive prices, as well as a high quality and choice for end users in the digital sector, within a harmonised digital market. This cannot be sufficiently achieved by the Member States, but can only, by reason of the
Amendment 160 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 79 – point 1 This Regulation respects the fundamental rights and observes the principles recognised in particular by the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union, in particular Articles 11, 16, 47 and 50 thereof. Accordingly, this Regulation should be interpreted and applied with respect to those rights and principles
Amendment 161 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 1 – paragraph 1 1. This Regulation lays down harmonised rules ensuring contestable and fair markets in the digital sector across the Union where gatekeepers for large platforms are present.
Amendment 162 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 1 – paragraph 1 a (new) 1a. This Regulation respects the fundamental rights and observes the principles recognised in particular by the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union, in particular Articles 11, 16, 47 and 50 thereof. Accordingly, this Regulation is interpreted and applied with respect to those rights and principles.
Amendment 163 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 1 – paragraph 5 5.
Amendment 164 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 1 – paragraph 5 5. Member States shall not impose on gatekeepers further obligations by way of laws, regulations or administrative action for the purpose of ensuring contestable and fair markets. This is without prejudice to rules pursuing other legitimate public interests, in compliance with Union law. In particular, nothing in this Regulation precludes Member States from imposing obligations, which are compatible with Union law, on undertakings, including providers of core platform services where these obligations are unrelated to the relevant undertakings having a status of gatekeeper within the meaning of this Regulation in order to protect consumers or to fight against acts of unfair competition and unfair trading practices in business- to-business relationships.
Amendment 165 #
Proposal for a regulation Article premier – paragraph 5 5. Member States shall not impose on gatekeepers further obligations by way of laws, regulations or administrative action for the purpose of ensuring contestable and fair markets. This
Amendment 166 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 1 – paragraph 6 6. This Regulation is without prejudice to the application of Articles 101 and 102 TFEU. It is also without prejudice to the application of: national rules prohibiting anticompetitive agreements, decisions by associations of undertakings,
Amendment 167 #
Proposal for a regulation Article premier – paragraph 6 6. This Regulation is without prejudice to the application of Articles 101 and 102 TFEU. It
Amendment 168 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 1 – paragraph 6 6. This Regulation is without prejudice to the application of Articles 101 and 102 TFEU. It is also without prejudice to the application of: national rules prohibiting anticompetitive agreements, decisions by associations of undertakings, concerted practices and abuses of dominant positions; national competition rules prohibiting other forms of unilateral conduct insofar as they are applied to
Amendment 169 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 1 – paragraph 6 6. This Regulation complements and is without prejudice to the application of Articles 101 and 102 TFEU. It is also without prejudice to the application of: national rules prohibiting anticompetitive agreements, decisions by associations of undertakings, concerted practices and abuses of dominant positions; national competition rules prohibiting other forms of unilateral conduct insofar as they are applied to undertakings other than gatekeepers or amount to imposing additional obligations on gatekeepers; Council Regulation (EC) No 139/200438 and national rules
Amendment 170 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 1 – paragraph 7 7. National authorities shall not take decisions which would run counter to a decision adopted by the Commission under this Regulation. The Commission and Member States shall work in close cooperation and coordination in their enforcement actions, providing close assistance to Member States who request this.
Amendment 171 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point 2 – point a (a) online intermediation services, including digital voice assistants, marketplaces and application stores;
Amendment 172 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point 2 – point c a (new) (ca) web browsers;
Amendment 173 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point 2 – point g a (new) (ga) Payment aggregation services;
Amendment 174 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point 2 – point h (h) advertising services, including any advertising networks, advertising
Amendment 175 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point 2 – point h (h) online advertising services, including any advertising networks, advertising exchanges and any other advertising intermediation services, provided by a provider of any of the core platform services listed in points (a) to (g);
Amendment 176 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point 2 – point h a (new) (ha) embedded digital services in vehicles;
Amendment 177 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point 2 – point h a (new) (ha) internet browsers;
Amendment 178 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point 2 – point h a (new) (ha) web browsers;
Amendment 179 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point 2 – point h a (new) (ha) web browsers;
Amendment 180 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point 2 – point h b (new) (hb) digital voice assistants;
Amendment 181 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point 2 – point h b (new) (hb) connected TV;
Amendment 182 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point 2 – point h c (new) (hc) marketplaces;
Amendment 183 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point 2 – point h d (new) (hd) application stores;
Amendment 184 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point 2 a (new) (2a) Non-commercial, not-for profit, collaborative projects, organised on a voluntary basis should not be considered as core services;
Amendment 185 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point 3 a (new) (3a) ‘Virtual assistant’ means software that responds to oral or written commands expressed in a non-technical language by end-users and perform tasks or services by itself or mediates with IT systems if needed and on behalf of the end user;
Amendment 186 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point 7 a (new) (7a) ‘Web browser’ means independent or embedded software applications to access and interact with information hosted on web servers and networks such as the internet;
Amendment 187 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point 10 a (new) (10a) ‘Web browsers’ are software used by users of client PCs, smart mobile devices and other devices to access and interact with web content hosted on servers that are connected to networks such as the Internet, including standalone web browsers as well as web browsers integrated or embedded in software or similar;
Amendment 188 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point 10 a (new) (10a) ‘Digital voice assistant’ means a software application enabling an oral dialogue with an end user in a natural language. It serves as an intermediary between end users and business users by means of voice applications;
Amendment 189 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point 11 a (new) (11a) ‘Payment aggregation services’ means technical services as defined in Article 3(j) of Directive (EU) 2015/2366 of the European Parliament and of the Council, which enable any business activity set out in annex I of Directive (EU) 2015/2366 of the European Parliament and of the Council within the framework of contracts between payment aggregation services providers and third- party providers.
Amendment 190 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point 12 (12) ‘Software application stores’ means a
Amendment 191 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point 13 a (new) (13a) ‘embedded digital services in vehicles’ means software embedded in vehicles including for the purpose of gaining insights into vehicle performance and driver behaviour, or for the purpose of accessing audiovisual media content;
Amendment 192 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point 13 b (new) (13b) ‘connected TV’ means a television set connected to the internet that allows user to perform online activities including music and video streaming, or viewing of pictures;
Amendment 193 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point 13 c (new) (13c) ‘collaborative economy’ refers to business models where activities are facilitated by collaborative platforms that create an open marketplace for the temporary usage of goods or services often provided by private individual;
Amendment 194 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point 14 (14) ‘Ancillary service’ means services provided in the context of or together with core platform services, including retailing or distribution services, payment services as defined in point 3 of Article 4 and technical services which support the provision of payment services as defined in Article 3(j) of Directive (EU) 2015/2366, fulfilment, identification or advertising services;
Amendment 195 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point 14 (14) ‘Ancillary service’ means services provided in the context of or together with core platform services, including retail activities and payment services as defined in point 3 of Article 4 and technical services which support the provision of payment services as defined in Article 3(j) of Directive (EU) 2015/2366, fulfilment, identification or advertising services;
Amendment 196 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point 17 a (new) (17a) ‘Competitor to the gatekeeper’s core platform service’ means any natural or legal person acting in a commercial or professional capacity providing a core platform service in the same category as the one of the gatekeeper;
Amendment 197 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point 18 (18) ‘Ranking’ means the relative prominence given to goods or
Amendment 198 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point 18 (18) ‘Ranking’ means the relative prominence given to goods or services offered through online intermediation services including software application stores and virtual assistants or online social networking
Amendment 199 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point 18 a (new) (18a) ‘Search results’: the range of products or services which the end-user or professional user finds online ordered according to the demand for those products or services and which may not, under any circumstances, be altered by the gatekeepers for their own benefit;
Amendment 200 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point 23 a (new) (23a) ‘Interoperability’ means the ability of the legally acquired digital content or digital service to function with software or hardware different from those for which it was originally supplied. Interoperability is part of an open ecosystem which makes it possible to access acquired digital content and services easily;
Amendment 201 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point 23 a (new) (23a) ‘National competent authority’ means any national authority that has been designated by a Member State as such within the meaning and for the purpose of this Regulation, notably in respect of Article 17;
Amendment 202 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point 23 a (new) (23a) ‘consent’ of the data subject means any freely given, specific, informed and unambiguous indication of the data subject’s wishes as defined in point 11 of Article 4 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679;
Amendment 203 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point 23 b (new) (23b) ‘internet browser’ means software for accessing, displaying and interacting with content hosted on servers connected to the internet;
Amendment 204 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point 23 b (new) (23b) ‘profiling’ means any form of automated processing of personal data as defined in point 4 of Article 4 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679;
Amendment 205 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point 23 c (new) (23c) ‘organic results’ means the results of a search based solely on the relevance of the information;
Amendment 206 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 3 – paragraph 1 – introductory part 1. An undertaking that provide
Amendment 207 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 3 – paragraph 1 – point b (b) it operates a core platform service which serves as an important gateway for business users
Amendment 208 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 3 – paragraph 1 – point b (b) it operates a core platform service which serves as an important gateway for business users to reach end users
Amendment 209 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 3 – paragraph 1 – point b (b) it
Amendment 210 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 3 – paragraph 1 – point c (c) it enjoys an entrenched and durable position in its operations or it is foreseeable that it will enjoy such a position, based on an objective assessment by the competent authority taking into account past and predicted rates of growth and market concentration, in the near future
Amendment 211 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 3 – paragraph 1 – point c (c) it enjoys an entrenched and durable position in its operations or it is foreseeable that it will enjoy such a position in the
Amendment 212 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 3 – paragraph 1 – point c a (new) (ca) it has the ability to transfer its own core competencies to other areas.
Amendment 213 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 3 – paragraph 2 – point a (a) the requirement in paragraph 1 point (a) where the undertaking to which it belongs achieves an annual EEA turnover equal to or above EUR
Amendment 214 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 3 – paragraph 2 – point b – introductory part (b) the requirement in paragraph 1 point (b) where it provides
Amendment 215 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 3 – paragraph 2 – point c a (new) (ca) the requirement in paragraph 1 point (d) where the provider either offers a multi-platform integration with at least two core platform services or has a dual role.
Amendment 216 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 3 – paragraph 3 – introductory part 3. Where a provider of core platform services meets all the thresholds in paragraph 2, it shall notify the Commission
Amendment 217 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 3 – paragraph 4 – subparagraph 1 Amendment 218 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 3 – paragraph 4 a (new) 4a. Where the provider of the core platform service fails to provide within the deadline set by the Commission all the relevant information that is required to assess its designation as gatekeeper pursuant to Article 3 (2), the Commission shall be entitled to designate that provider as a gatekeeper based on the facts available.
Amendment 219 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 3 – paragraph 5 Amendment 220 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 3 – paragraph 6 – subparagraph 1 – point d a (new) (da) the ability of the undertaking to implement conglomerate strategies, in particular through its vertical integration or its significant leverage in related markets;
Amendment 221 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 3 – paragraph 6 – subparagraph 1 – point e (e) business user or end user lock-in, including in terms of the limiting of option rights;
Amendment 222 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 3 – paragraph 6 – subparagraph 1 – point f (f) other structural market characteristics such as the degree of multi- homing among business and end-users of the core platform services provided.
Amendment 223 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 3 – paragraph 6 – subparagraph 2 In conducting its assessment, the Commission shall take into account foreseeable developments, as evaluated at least in the short term, of these elements.
Amendment 224 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 3 – paragraph 6 – subparagraph 3 Where the provider of a core platform service that satisfies the quantitative thresholds of paragraph 2 fails to comply with the investigative measures ordered by the Commission pursuant to Chapter V of this Regulation in a significant manner and the failure persists after the provider has been invited to comply within a reasonable time-limit and to submit observations, the Commission shall be entitled to designate that provider as a gatekeeper.
Amendment 225 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 3 – paragraph 6 – subparagraph 3 Where the provider of a core platform service that satisfies the quantitative thresholds of paragraph 2 fails to comply with the investigative measures ordered by the Commission in a significant manner and the failure persists after the provider has been invited to comply within a reasonable time-limit and to submit observations, the Commission, at the request of the Member States, shall be entitled to designate that provider as a gatekeeper.
Amendment 226 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 3 – paragraph 6 – subparagraph 4 Where the provider of a core platform service that does not satisfy the quantitative thresholds of paragraph 2 fails to comply with the investigative measures ordered by the Commission pursuant to Chapter V of this Regulation in a significant manner and the failure persists after the provider has been invited to comply within a reasonable time-limit and to submit observations, the Commission shall be entitled to designate that provider as a gatekeeper based on facts available.
Amendment 227 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 3 – paragraph 6 – subparagraph 4 Where the provider of a core platform service that does not satisfy the quantitative thresholds of paragraph 2 fails to comply with the investigative measures ordered by the Commission in a significant manner and the failure persists after the provider has been invited to comply within a reasonable time-limit and to submit observations, the Commission, at the request of the Member States, shall be entitled to designate that provider as a gatekeeper based on facts available.
Amendment 228 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 3 – paragraph 7 7. For each gatekeeper identified pursuant to paragraph 4 or paragraph 6, the Commission shall identify the relevant undertaking to which it belongs and list the relevant core platform services that are provided within that same undertaking and which individually serve as an important gateway for business users
Amendment 229 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 3 – paragraph 8 8. The gatekeeper shall comply with the obligations laid down in Articles 5 and 6
Amendment 230 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 4 – paragraph 1 – introductory part 1. The Commission may upon request
Amendment 231 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 4 – paragraph 1 – point b a (new) (ba) there is new relevant information that was not examined before the adoption of the decision;
Amendment 232 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 4 – paragraph 2 – introductory part 2. The Commission shall regularly, and at least every
Amendment 233 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 4 – paragraph 3 3. The Commission shall, on a quarterly basis and whenever the Member States so request, publish and update the list of gatekeepers and the list of the core platform services for which they need to comply with the obligations laid down in Articles 5 and 6 on an on-going basis.
Amendment 234 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 4 – paragraph 3 3. The Commission shall publish and update the list of gatekeepers and the list of the core platform services for which they need to comply with the obligations laid down in Articles 5 and 6 on an on-going basis and send it to the European Parliament.
Amendment 235 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 5 – paragraph 1 – point a (a) refrain from combining personal data sourced from these core platform services with personal data from any other services offered by the gatekeeper or with personal data from third-party services, and from signing in end users to other services of the gatekeeper in order to combine personal data
Amendment 236 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 5 – paragraph 1 – point a (a) refrain from combining personal data sourced from these core platform services with personal data from any other services offered by the gatekeeper or with personal data from third-party services, and from signing in end users to other services of the gatekeeper in order to combine personal data
Amendment 237 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 5 – paragraph 1 – point a (a) refrain from combining personal data sourced from these core platform services with personal data from any other services offered by the gatekeeper or with personal data from third-party services, and from signing in business users or end users to other services of the gatekeeper in order to combine personal data
Amendment 238 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 5 – paragraph 1 – point a (a) refrain from combining personal data sourced from these core platform services with personal data from any other services offered by the gatekeeper or with personal data from third-party services, and from signing in business users or end users to other services of the gatekeeper in order to combine personal data
Amendment 239 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 5 – paragraph 1 – point b (b)
Amendment 240 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 5 – paragraph 1 – point b (b)
Amendment 241 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 5 – paragraph 1 – point b (b) allow business users to offer the same products or services to end users
Amendment 242 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 5 – paragraph 1 – point b a (new) (ba) refrain from requiring business users to inform the gatekeeper of the differentiated prices or conditions they choose to apply on their own channel of distribution or through any other means;
Amendment 243 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 5 – paragraph 1 – point c (c) allow business users to promote offers to end users acquired via the core platform service, and to conclude contracts with these end users or receive payments for services provided regardless of whether for that purpose they use the core platform services of the gatekeeper or not, and allow
Amendment 244 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 5 – paragraph 1 – point c (c) allow business users to promote different offers to end users acquired via the core platform service, and to conclude contracts with these end users regardless of whether for that purpose they use the core platform services of the gatekeeper or not, and allow end users to access and use, through the core platform services of the gatekeeper, content, subscriptions, features or other items by using the software application of a business user, where these items have been acquired by the end users from the relevant business user without using the core platform services of the gatekeeper;
Amendment 245 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 5 – paragraph 1 – point d (d) refrain from preventing or restricting business users, providers of ancillary services of the gatekeeper, end users or third parties having a legitimate interest from raising issues with any relevant public authority relating to any practice of gatekeepers;
Amendment 246 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 5 – paragraph 1 – point d (d) refrain from preventing or restricting business users and end-users from raising issues with any relevant public authority relating to any practice of gatekeepers including through the reporting mechanism for business users and end-users pursuant to Article 21a;
Amendment 247 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 5 – paragraph 1 – point d (d) refrain from directly or indirectly preventing or restricting business users or supplier to the gatekeeper’s ancillary service from raising issues with any relevant public authority relating to any practice of gatekeepers;
Amendment 248 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 5 – paragraph 1 – point d (d) refrain from preventing or restricting business users or end users from raising issues with any relevant public authority or competent judicial authority relating to any practice of gatekeepers
Amendment 249 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 5 – paragraph 1 – point e (e) refrain from requiring business users to use, offer or interoperate with an
Amendment 250 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 5 – paragraph 1 – point e (e) refrain from requiring business users to use, offer or interoperate with an
Amendment 251 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 5 – paragraph 1 – point e a (new) (ea) refrain from requiring business users to use the ancillary services of gatekeepers;
Amendment 252 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 5 – paragraph 1 – point f (f) refrain from requiring business users or end users to use, to subscribe to or register with any other core platform services identified pursuant to Article 3 or which meets the thresholds in Article 3(2)(b) as a condition to access, sign up or register to any of their core platform services identified pursuant to that Article;
Amendment 253 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 5 – paragraph 1 – point f (f) refrain from requiring business users or end users to subscribe to or register with any other core platform services
Amendment 254 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 5 – paragraph 1 – point g (g) provide advertisers and publishers, or third parties authorised by advertisers and publishers, to which it supplies advertising services, upon their request
Amendment 255 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 5 – paragraph 1 – point g (g) provide advertisers and publishers to which it supplies targeted digital advertising services based on contextual information, upon their request, with information concerning the price paid by the advertiser and publisher, as well as the amount or remuneration paid to the publisher, for the publishing of a given ad and for each of the relevant advertising services provided by the gatekeeper, and refrain from collecting or processing personal data as defined by Regulation (EU) 2016/679 for the purpose of determining the end users to whom advertisements are displayed.
Amendment 256 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 5 – paragraph 1 – point g (g) provide individual advertisers and publishers to which it supplies advertising services
Amendment 257 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 5 – paragraph 1 – point g (g) provide advertisers
Amendment 258 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 5 – paragraph 1 – point g a (new) (ga) refrain from imposing on business users or end users software applications or services, which are used in the context of or together with core platform services, or contractual licensing agreements, which would limit end users' ability or economic incentive to use third party software applications or service and/or give preferential treatment to the gatekeeper’s own products or services;
Amendment 259 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 5 – paragraph 1 – point g a (new) (ga) allow end users, and business users of number independent interpersonal communication services and social networking services to access and interoperate with the main functionalities of the gatekeepers’ services for the purpose of enabling cross-platform exchange of information by providing open standards, and open protocols including Application Programming Interfaces;
Amendment 260 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 5 – paragraph 1 – point g a (new) (ga) refrain from imposing the use of a single payment method as a condition for business users to use or allow access to one of its core platform services;
Amendment 261 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 5 – paragraph 1 – point g a (new) (ga) ban on ‘auctioning insider knowledge’ in the digital advertising market in order to avoid any knowledge advantage on the part of gatekeepers.
Amendment 262 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 6 – paragraph 1 – introductory part 1. In respect of each of its core platform services identified pursuant to Article 3(7) and its ancillary services, including distribution services, a gatekeeper shall:
Amendment 263 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 6 – paragraph 1 – point a (a) refrain from using, in competition with business users of its core platform services and providers of ancillary services, including distribution services, any data not publicly available
Amendment 264 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 6 – paragraph 1 – point a (a) refrain from using, in competition with business users, any data not publicly available, which is generated through or in connection with activities by those business users, including by the end users of these business users, of its core platform services or of its ancillary services or which is provided by those business users of its core platform services or its ancillary services or by the end users of these business users;
Amendment 265 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 6 – paragraph 1 – point a (a) refrain from using, in competition with business users, any data not publicly available, which is generated through activities by those business users and end users, including by the end users of these business users, of its core platform services or provided by those business users of its core platform services or by the end users of these
Amendment 266 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 6 – paragraph 1 – point b a (new) (ba) refrain from exclusively enabling its own core platform services as default services when equivalent alternative services which perform the same function can be proposed in non-discriminatory manner;
Amendment 267 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 6 – paragraph 1 – point c (c) allow the installation and effective use of third party software applications or software application stores using, or interoperating with, operating systems of that gatekeeper and allow these software applications or software application stores to be accessed by means other than the core platform services of that gatekeeper. The gatekeeper shall not be prevented from taking proportionate measures to ensure that third party software applications or software application stores do not endanger the integrity of the hardware or operating system provided by the gatekeeper
Amendment 268 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 6 – paragraph 1 – point c (c) allow and technically enable the installation and effective use and interoperability of third party software applications or software application stores using, or interoperating with, operating systems of that gatekeeper and allow and enable these software applications or software application stores to be accessed by means other than the core platform services of that gatekeeper. The gatekeeper shall not be prevented from taking proportionate measures to ensure that third party software applications or software application stores do not endanger the integrity of the hardware or operating system provided by the gatekeeper , provided that such proportionate measures are duly justified;
Amendment 269 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 6 – paragraph 1 – point c (c) allow the installation and effective
Amendment 270 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 6 – paragraph 1 – point c (c) allow and technically enable the installation and effective use of third party software applications or software application stores using, or interoperating with, operating systems of that gatekeeper and allow these software applications or software application stores to be accessed by means other than the core platform services of that gatekeeper. The gatekeeper shall not be prevented from taking proportionate measures to ensure that third party software applications or software application stores do not endanger the integrity of the hardware or operating system provided by the gatekeeper;
Amendment 271 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 6 – paragraph 1 – point d (d) refrain from treating more favourably in ranking, display and other parameters and in access to and conditions of use of services, services and products offered by the gatekeeper itself or by any third party, whether or not they belong
Amendment 272 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 6 – paragraph 1 – point d (d) refrain from treating differently or more favourably in ranking, display, installation, activation, or default settings, services and products offered by the gatekeeper itself or by any third party belonging to the same undertaking compared to similar services or products of third party and apply fair and non- discriminatory conditions to such ranking, display, installation, activation and default settings;
Amendment 273 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 6 – paragraph 1 – point d (d) refrain from treating in a preferential or more favourabl
Amendment 274 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 6 – paragraph 1 – point d (d) refrain from treating more favourably in ranking services and products offered by the gatekeeper itself or by any third party
Amendment 275 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 6 – paragraph 1 – point e (e) refrain from technically restricting the ability of end users to switch between
Amendment 276 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 6 – paragraph 1 – point f (f) allow business users, end users and providers of ancillary services access to and interoperability with the same operating system, hardware or software features, including near-field communication antennas or technology related to these antennas, that are available or used in the provision by the gatekeeper of any ancillary services or industry-standard features of its core platform services; in such cases, access and interoperability conditions shall be fair, reasonable and non-discriminatory;
Amendment 277 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 6 – paragraph 1 – point f (f) allow business users, end users and providers of ancillary services access to and interoperability with the same operating
Amendment 278 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 6 – paragraph 1 – point f a (new) (fa) allow effective interoperability for end users of a legally acquired digital content or service. They must be able to access such content without any technical restriction;
Amendment 279 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 6 – paragraph 1 – point g (g) provide advertisers and publishers,
Amendment 280 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 6 – paragraph 1 – point g (g) provide advertisers and publishers, upon their request and free of charge, with access to the performance measuring tools of the gatekeeper for the purpose of targeted digital advertising based on contextual information and the information necessary for advertisers and publishers to carry out their own independent verification of the ad inventory;
Amendment 281 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 6 – paragraph 1 – point h (h) provide effective portability of data provided for or generated through or in the context of the activity of a business user or end user and shall, in particular, provide
Amendment 282 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 6 – paragraph 1 – point h (h) provide effective portability of data generated through the activity of a business user or by goods and services provided by a provider of ancillary services of a gatekeeper or end user and shall, in particular, provide tools for end users to facilitate the exercise of data portability, in line with Regulation EU 2016/679, including by the provision of continuous and real-time access
Amendment 283 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 6 – paragraph 1 – point i (i) provide business users and providers of ancillary services, including distribution services, or third parties authorised by a business user, free of charge, with effective, high-quality, continuous and real-time access and use of aggregated or non-aggregated data, that is provided for or generated in the context of the use of the relevant core platform services and ancillary services by those business users and the end users engaging with the products or services provided by those business users; for personal data, provide access and use only where directly connected with the use
Amendment 284 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 6 – paragraph 1 – point i (i) provide business users, or third parties authorised by a business user, free of charge, with effective, high-quality, continuous and real-time access and use of aggregated or non-aggregated non- personal data, that is provided for or generated in the context of the use of the relevant core platform services by those business users and the end users engaging with the products or services provided by those business users; for personal data, provide, with the consent of the data subject, access to and use of those data only where directly connected with the use effectuated by the end user in respect of the products or services offered by the relevant business user through the relevant core platform service, and when the end user opts in to such sharing with a consent in the sense of the Regulation (EU) 2016/679;
Amendment 285 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 6 – paragraph 1 – point i (i) provide business users, or third parties authorised by a business user, free of charge, with effective, high-quality, continuous and real-time access and use of aggregated or non-aggregated data, that is provided for or generated in the context of the use of the relevant core platform services or of ancillary services offered by the gatekeeper by those business users and the end users engaging with the products or services provided by those business users; for personal data, provide access and use only where directly connected with the use effectuated by the end user in respect of the products or services offered by the relevant business user through the relevant core platform service, and when the end user opts in to such sharing with a consent in the sense of the Regulation (EU) 2016/679;
Amendment 286 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 6 – paragraph 1 – point j Amendment 287 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 6 – paragraph 1 – point j Amendment 288 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 6 – paragraph 1 – point k (k) apply fair and non-discriminatory general conditions of access for business users to its
Amendment 289 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 6 – paragraph 1 – point k (k) apply fair and non-discriminatory general conditions of access and treatment for business users to its
Amendment 290 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 6 – paragraph 1 – point k (k) apply fair and non-discriminatory general conditions of access for business users
Amendment 291 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 6 – paragraph 1 – point k (k) apply fair and non-discriminatory
Amendment 292 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 6 – paragraph 1 – point k a (new) (ka) provide business users of online intermediation services with access to communication channels without supervision, interference or access by the gatekeeper for the purpose of sharing concerns among business users about discriminatory or unfair business practices by the gatekeeper within the meaning of this Regulation and in view of taking action in accordance with Article 33 paragraph 2a, notwithstanding their obligations under national or Union legislation;
Amendment 293 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 6 – paragraph 1 – point k a (new) (ka) provide its business users and end users with clear, fair and non- discriminatory licensing conditions, including in terms of charges and fees, preventing material changes limiting the use of software applications or services in conjunction with a core platform service, and safeguarding the reasonably expected use of the software application or service, including after its transfer to another end user, where applicable.
Amendment 294 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 6 – paragraph 1 – point k a (new) (ka) allow gatekeepers to participate in binding procedures so that they can set a fair price for the services offered, as is the case with publisher’s right licenses.
Amendment 295 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 6 – paragraph 1 – point k a (new) (ka) refrain from displaying a preferential ranking following a search. Preference should be given to displaying organic results;
Amendment 296 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 6 – paragraph 1 – point k b (new) (kb) in the event of a dispute concerning the fairness of a price or remuneration as a condition for access by professional users to each of the core services of its platform identified in accordance with Article 3(7), the gatekeeper shall participate in a binding procedure for the setting of an equitable price or remuneration and adhere to its results. The procedure regarding the issue of remuneration and price shall start if the parties have not reached an agreement about terms for resolving the issue of remuneration and pricing within 3 months of the request by one party to start a negotiation or of one party’s refusal to negotiate.
Amendment 297 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 6 – paragraph 1 – point k b (new) (kb) provide business users of online intermediation services and third parties with legitimate interest in representing business users or end users with information regarding the function of its algorithms, ratings and interactions, pricing and fees, changes of terms and algorithms, tracking of business or end users, and deactivation procedures in a clear, comprehensive and easily accessible way;
Amendment 298 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 6 – paragraph 2 2. For the purposes of point (a) of paragraph 1 data that is not publicly available shall include any aggregated and non-aggregated data generated by business users or generated by goods and services produced, by a provider of ancillary services, for the account of the gatekeeper, that can be inferred from, or collected through, the commercial activities of business users or their customers on the core platform service, distribution, payment or any other ancillary service of the gatekeeper.
Amendment 299 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 6 – paragraph 2 2. For the purposes of point (a) of paragraph 1 data that is not publicly available shall include any aggregated and non-aggregated data generated by business users or generated by goods and services provided by a supplier to the gatekeeper’s ancillary services notably distribution, that can be inferred from, or collected through, the commercial activities of business users or their customers on the core platform, distribution or other ancillary service of the gatekeeper.
Amendment 300 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 6 – paragraph 2 a (new) 2a. Before implementing any change to fees or fee structures charged to business users and which follow from the gatekeeper’s obligations pursuant to paragraph 1, the gatekeeper shall notify the Commission and the affected business users at least one month in advance of such changes;
Amendment 301 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 7 – paragraph 1 1. The measures implemented by the gatekeeper to ensure compliance with the obligations laid down in Articles 5 and 6 shall be effective in achieving the objective of the relevant obligation. The gatekeeper must demonstrate compliance with the obligations laid down in Articles 5 and 6 shall ensure that these measures are implemented in compliance with Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Directive 2002/58/EC, and with legislation on cyber security, consumer protection and product safety.
Amendment 302 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 7 – paragraph 1 1. The measures implemented by the gatekeeper to ensure compliance with the obligations laid down in Articles 5 and 6 shall be fully effective in achieving the objective of the relevant obligation and lead towards this. The gatekeeper shall ensure that these measures are implemented in compliance with Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Directive 2002/58/EC, and with legislation on cyber security, consumer protection and product safety.
Amendment 303 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 7 – paragraph 1 a (new) 1a. Within six months after its designation pursuant to paragraph 8 of Article 3, the gatekeeper shall provide the Commission with detailed information on the measures to be taken in order to ensure compliance with its obligations laid down in Articles 5 and 6. This information shall be provided in the form of a report and shall be updated on an annual basis, whereby a summary of this report shall be published on the Commission’s website without undue delay.
Amendment 304 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 7 – paragraph 2 2. Where the Commission finds that the measures that the gatekeeper intends to implement pursuant to paragraph 1, or has implemented, do not ensure effective compliance with the relevant obligations laid down in Article 6, it may by decision specify the measures that the gatekeeper concerned shall implement in order to comply with the obligations laid down in Article 6. In view of adopting the decision, the Commission shall take into account the information provided by all relevant stakeholders, such as interested third parties, governments or national authorities. The Commission shall adopt such a decision within six months from the opening of proceedings pursuant to Article 18.
Amendment 305 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 7 – paragraph 2 2. Where the Commission finds that the measures that the gatekeeper intends to implement pursuant to paragraph 1, or has implemented, do not ensure effective compliance with the relevant obligations laid down in Article 6, it
Amendment 306 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 7 – paragraph 4 4. In view of adopting the decision under paragraph 2, the Commission shall communicate its preliminary findings within three months from the opening of the proceedings. In the preliminary
Amendment 307 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 7 – paragraph 6 6. For the purposes of specifying the obligations under Article 6(1) points (j) and (k), the Commission shall also assess whether the intended or implemented measures ensure that there is no remaining imbalance of rights and obligations on business users and end users and that the measures do not themselves confer an advantage on the gatekeeper which is disproportionate to the service provided by the gatekeeper to business users.
Amendment 308 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 7 – paragraph 6 a (new) 6a. For the purposes of specifying the obligations under Article 6(1) point (f), the Commission shall, in cooperation with the Gatekeeper, business users and end user representatives define the open technologies, open standards and open protocols, including the technical interface (Application Programming Interface), that allows end users of competing software and services and business users to dock on to the gate keepers core service and to interoperate with it. Interoperation between end users shall require their informed consent. Providers of online platforms shall not process information obtained for the purpose of interoperating for other purposes. Interoperability obligations shall not limit, hinder or delay the ability of intermediaries to address vulnerabilities in order to comply with an obligation under article 18 of COM(2020) 823 final or article 32(1)(c) of Regulation (EU) 2016/679.
Amendment 309 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 7 – paragraph 7 7. A gatekeeper may request the opening of proceedings pursuant to Article 18 for the Commission to determine whether the measures that the gatekeeper intends to implement or has implemented under Article 6 are effective in achieving the objective of the relevant obligation in the specific circumstances.
Amendment 310 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 7 – paragraph 7 7. A gatekeeper may request the opening of proceedings pursuant to Article 18 for the Commission to determine whether the measures that the gatekeeper intends to implement or has implemented under Article 6 are effective in achieving the objective of the relevant obligation in the specific circumstances. A gatekeeper
Amendment 311 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 8 – paragraph 1 1. The Commission may, on a reasoned request by the gatekeeper, or acting by court order, exceptionally suspend, in whole or in part, a specific obligation laid down in Articles
Amendment 312 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 8 – paragraph 2 2. Where the suspension is granted pursuant to paragraph 1, the Commission shall review its suspension decision every year. Following such a review the Commission shall either wholly or partly lift the suspension or decide that the conditions of paragraph 1 continue to be met.
Amendment 313 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 8 – paragraph 3 – introductory part 3. The Commission may, acting on a reasoned request by a gatekeeper or on a court order, provisionally suspend the application of the relevant obligation to one or more individual core platform services already prior to the decision pursuant to paragraph 1.
Amendment 314 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 9 – paragraph 1 1. The Commission may, acting on a reasoned request by a gatekeeper or on
Amendment 315 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 9 – paragraph 2 – point a Amendment 316 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 9 – paragraph 3 – introductory part 3. The Commission may, acting on a reasoned request by a gatekeeper or on
Amendment 317 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 9 – paragraph 3 – subparagraph 1 In assessing the request, the Commission shall take into account, in particular, the impact of the compliance with the specific obligation on the grounds in paragraph 2 as well as the effects on the gatekeeper concerned and on third parties. The suspension may be made subject to conditions and obligations to be defined by the Commission in order to ensure a fair balance between the goals pursued by the grounds in paragraph 2 and the objectives
Amendment 318 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 10 – paragraph 1 Amendment 319 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 10 – paragraph 1 1. The Commission is empowered to adopt delegated acts in accordance with Article 3
Amendment 320 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 10 – paragraph 2 – point a (a) there is an imbalance of rights and obligations on business users or end users and the gatekeeper is obtaining an advantage from business users that is disproportionate to the service provided by the gatekeeper to business users or end users; or
Amendment 321 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 10 – paragraph 2 – point a (a) there is an imbalance of rights and obligations on business users or end users and the gatekeeper is obtaining an advantage from business users that is disproportionate to the service provided by the gatekeeper to business users
Amendment 322 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 11 – paragraph 3 3. A gatekeeper shall not degrade the conditions, accessibility or quality of any of the core platform services provided to business users or end users who avail themselves of the rights or choices laid down in Articles 5 and 6, or
Amendment 323 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 12 – paragraph 1 – introductory part 1. A gatekeeper shall inform the Commission of any intended concentration within the meaning of Article 3 of Regulation (EC) No 139/2004
Amendment 324 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 12 – paragraph 1 – introductory part 1. A gatekeeper shall inform the Commission and competent national authorities of any intended concentration within the meaning of Article 3 of Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 involving another provider of core platform services or of any other services provided in the digital sector irrespective of whether it is notifiable to a Union competition authority under Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 or to a competent national competition authority under national merger rules.
Amendment 325 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 12 – paragraph 1 – introductory part 1. A gatekeeper shall inform the Commission and the national authorities of any intended concentration within the meaning of Article 3 of Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 involving another provider of core platform services or of any other services provided in the digital sector irrespective of whether it is notifiable to a Union competition authority under Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 or to a competent national competition authority under national merger rules.
Amendment 326 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 12 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 1 A gatekeeper shall inform the Commission of such a concentration within at least 2 months prior to its implementation and following the conclusion of the agreement, the announcement of the public bid, or the acquisition of a controlling interest. The Commission shall make this information available to relevant national authorities.
Amendment 327 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 12 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 1 A gatekeeper shall inform the Commission and the national authorities of such a concentration prior to its implementation and following the conclusion of the agreement, the announcement of the public bid, or the acquisition of a controlling interest.
Amendment 328 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 12 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 1 A gatekeeper shall
Amendment 329 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 12 – paragraph 2 2. The notification of information pursuant to paragraph 1 shall at least describe for the acquisition targets their EEA and worldwide annual turnover, for any relevant core platform services their respective EEA annual turnover, their number of yearly active business users and the number of monthly active end users, as well as the rationale of the intended concentration.
Amendment 330 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 12 – paragraph 3 a (new) 3a. The Commission shall inform the competent national authorities of any information received pursuant to paragraphs 1 and 2. With due respect to the protection of trade secrets, the Commission shall publish annually the list of acquisitions of which it has been informed by gatekeepers which have fallen below the notification thresholds of Council Regulation No 139/2004.
Amendment 331 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 13 – paragraph 1 Within six months after its designation pursuant to Article 3, a gatekeeper shall submit to the Commission an independently audited description of any techniques for profiling of consumers that the gatekeeper applies to or across its core platform services identified pursuant to Article 3.
Amendment 332 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 13 – paragraph 1 Within six months after its designation pursuant to Article 3, a gatekeeper shall submit to the Commission an independently audited description of any techniques for profiling of consumers that the gatekeeper applies to or across its core platform services identified pursuant to Article 3. This description shall be updated
Amendment 333 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 13 – paragraph 1 Within six months after its designation pursuant to Article 3, a gatekeeper shall submit to the Commission an independently audited description of any techniques for profiling of business users and end users or consumers that the gatekeeper applies to or across its core platform services identified pursuant to Article 3. This description shall be updated at least annually.
Amendment 334 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 13 – paragraph 1 a (new) The audited description, as well as any relevant materials that is collected in the context of supervising the gatekeepers that relate to the processing of personal data, shall be shared by the Commission with any competent supervisory authority represented in the European Data Protection Board, upon its request.
Amendment 335 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 14 – paragraph 3 – point a a (new) (aa) a national authority responsible so requests
Amendment 336 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 14 – paragraph 3 – point b a (new) (ba) a significant number of unfair practices alerts have been raised by national authorities pursuant the reporting mechanism or other relevant stakeholders.
Amendment 337 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 14 – paragraph 3 – point b b (new) (bb) there is new relevant information that was not examined before the adoption of the decision;
Amendment 338 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 15 – paragraph 1 1. The Commission may, solely upon request of at least 3 Member States’ national authorities, conduct a market investigation for the purpose of examining whether a provider of core platform services should be designated as a gatekeeper pursuant to Article 3(6), or in order to identify core platform services for a gatekeeper pursuant to Article 3(7). It shall endeavour to conclude its investigation by adopting a decision in accordance with the advisory procedure referred to in Article 32(4) within twelve months from the opening of the market investigation.
Amendment 339 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 15 – paragraph 1 1. The Commission and national competition authorities may conduct a market investigation for the purpose of examining whether a provider of core platform services should be designated as a gatekeeper pursuant to Article 3(6), or in order to identify core platform services for a gatekeeper pursuant to Article 3(7) and Article 3 (8). It
Amendment 340 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 15 – paragraph 2 2. In the course of a market investigation pursuant to paragraph 1, the Commission shall endeavour to communicate its preliminary findings to the provider of core platform services concerned within
Amendment 341 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 15 – paragraph 3 3. Where the provider of core platform services satisfies the thresholds set out in Article 3(2), but has presented significantly substantiated arguments in
Amendment 342 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 15 – paragraph 4 4. When the Commission pursuant to Article 3(6) designates as a gatekeeper a provider of core platform services that does not yet enjoy an entrenched and durable position in its operations, but it is foreseeable that it will enjoy such a position in the near future, it shall declare applicable to that gatekeeper
Amendment 343 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 15 – paragraph 4 4. When the Commission pursuant to Article 3(6) designates as a gatekeeper a provider of core platform services that does not yet enjoy an entrenched and durable position in its operations, but it is foreseeable that it will enjoy such a position
Amendment 344 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 16 – paragraph 1 1. Where the market investigation shows that a gatekeeper has systematically infringed
Amendment 345 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 16 – paragraph 1 1. Where the market investigation shows that a gatekeeper has systematically infringed the obligations laid down in Articles 5 and 6 and has further strengthened or extended its gatekeeper position in relation to the characteristics under Article 3(1), the Commission may by decision adopted in accordance with the advisory procedure referred to in Article 32(4) impose on such gatekeeper any behavioural or structural remedies which are proportionate to the infringement committed and necessary to ensure compliance with this Regulation. The Commission shall conclude its investigation by adopting a decision within
Amendment 346 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 16 – paragraph 3 3. A gatekeeper shall be deemed to have engaged in a systematic non- compliance with the obligations laid down in Articles 5 and 6, where the Commission has issued at least t
Amendment 347 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 16 – paragraph 3 3. A gatekeeper shall be deemed to have engaged in a systematic non- compliance with the obligations laid down in Articles 5 and 6, where the Commission has issued at least t
Amendment 348 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 16 – paragraph 5 5. The Commission shall communicate its objections to the gatekeeper concerned within
Amendment 349 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 17 – paragraph 1 The Commission and competent national authorities may conduct a market investigation with the purpose of examining whether one or more services within the digital sector should be added to the list of core platform services or to detect types of practices that may limit the contestability of core platform services or may be unfair and which are not effectively addressed by this Regulation. It shall issue a public report at the latest within 24 months from the opening of the market investigation.
Amendment 350 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 17 – paragraph 1 The Commission may conduct a market investigation with the purpose of examining whether one or more services within the digital sector should be added to the list of core platform services or to detect types of practices that may limit the contestability of core platform services or may be unfair and which are not effectively addressed by this Regulation. It shall issue a public report at the latest within
Amendment 351 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 17 – paragraph 2 – point b Amendment 352 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 17 – paragraph 2 – point b a (new) (ba) be circulated prior to its publication to the relevant national authorities so that they may include amendments and specific recommendations;
Amendment 353 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 19 – paragraph 1 1. The Commission
Amendment 354 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 19 – paragraph 3 3. When sending a simple request for information to an undertaking or association of undertakings, the Commission shall state the legal basis, the purpose of the request, specify what information is required and fix
Amendment 355 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 19 – paragraph 4 4. Where the Commission requires undertakings and associations of undertakings to supply information by decision, it shall always respect confidentiality and the provisions of Directive 2016/943 on trade secrets, state the purpose of the request, specify what information is required and fix the time- limit within which it is to be provided. Where the Commission requires undertakings to provide access to its data- bases and algorithms, it shall state the legal basis and the purpose of the request, and fix the time-
Amendment 356 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 19 – paragraph 4 4. Where the Commission requires undertakings and associations of undertakings to supply information by decision, it shall state the purpose of the request, specify what information is required and fix the time-limit within which it is to be provided. Where the Commission requires undertakings to provide access to its data-bases and algorithms, it shall state the legal basis and the purpose of the request, and fix the time- limit within which it is to be provided.
Amendment 357 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 19 – paragraph 6 6. At the request of the Commission
Amendment 358 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 19 – paragraph 6 6. At the request of the Commission, the governments and authorities of the Member States
Amendment 359 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 20 – paragraph 1 The Commission may interview any natural or legal person which consents to being interviewed for the purpose of collecting information, relating to the subject-matter of an investigation, including in relation to the monitoring, implementing and enforcing of the rules
Amendment 360 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 20 – paragraph 1 The Commission, and competent national authorities, may interview any natural or legal person which consents to being interviewed for the purpose of collecting information, relating to the subject-matter of an investigation, pursuant to Articles 7, 16, 17, 25 and 26, including in relation to the monitoring, implementing and enforcing of the rules laid down in this Regulation.
Amendment 361 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 21 – paragraph 1 a (new) 1a. The Commission shall inform the competent national authorities of the records and visits and shall share with those authorities any information obtained therefrom.
Amendment 362 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 21 – paragraph 2 2. On-site inspections may also be carried out with the assistance of auditors or experts appointed by the Commission pursuant to Article 24(2) as well as competent national authorities in the territory of that Member State, where the gatekeeper has its premises.
Amendment 363 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 21 a (new) Article 21a Reporting mechanism for business users, end-users and relevant stakeholders 1. Business users, competitors and end- users of the core platform services as defined in Article 2(2) may notify to the Commission as well as to the competent national authority any malpractice or behaviour by gatekeepers, which could possibly undermine the contestability of a core platform service, may be unfair pursuant to Article 10 (2) , or give rise to concerns with regard to non-compliance pursuant to Article 25. 2. The Commission shall share the information received pursuant to paragraph 1 with the competent national authorities through the European Competition Network. 3. The Commission may be able to prioritise investigations and may decide to not undertake investigations at all. 4. Without prejudice to Article 33, the competent national authority may request the Digital Markets Advisory Committee to adopt a reasoned opinion in this regard within one month after having received the request. 5. If the reasoned opinion states that the circumstances would justify an enforcement priority, the Commission shall within a further delay of four months examine whether there are reasonable grounds to open such investigation. Where the Commission does not follow the reasoned opinion of the Advisory Committee, it shall give its reasons.
Amendment 364 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 22 – paragraph 1 1. In case of urgency due to the risk of serious and irreparable damage for business users or end users of gatekeepers, the Commission may, by decision adopt in accordance with the advisory procedure referred to in Article 32(4), order interim measures against a gatekeeper on the basis of a prima facie finding of an infringement of Articles 5 or 6. The Commission’s decision shall not encompass national competences and shall be strictly in line with the principle of subsidiarity.
Amendment 365 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 22 – paragraph 1 1. In case of urgency due to the risk of serious and i
Amendment 366 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 22 – paragraph 2 a (new) 2a. In case of urgency due to the risk of serious and immediate damage for business users or end-users of gatekeepers, resulting from new practices implemented by one or several gatekeepers that may undermine contestability of core platform services or may be unfair pursuant to Article 10 (2), the Commission may, by decision adopted in accordance with the advisory procedure referred to in Article 32(4), order interim measures on the concerned gatekeepers in order to avoid the materialization of the said risk.
Amendment 367 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 22 – paragraph 2 b (new) 2b. A decision pursuant to paragraph 3 may only be adopted in the context of a market investigation pursuant to Article 17 and within 6 months of the opening of such an investigation. The interim measures shall apply for a specified period of time and, in any case, shall be replaced by the new obligations that may arise under the final decision resulting from the market investigation pursuant to Article 17.
Amendment 368 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 23 – paragraph 1 1. If during proceedings under Articles 16 or 25 the gatekeeper concerned offers commitments for the relevant core platform services to ensure compliance with the obligations laid down in Articles 5 and 6, the Commission may by decision adopted in accordance with the advisory procedure referred to in Article 32(4) make those commitments binding on that gatekeeper and declare that there are no further grounds for action. The Commission shall, where appropriate, be entitled to require the commitments to be tested to optimise their effectiveness.
Amendment 369 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 23 – paragraph 1 a (new) 1a. The Commission shall regularly review the commitments with regard to their purpose and where, following investigation, it finds that they are not effective, shall be entitled to require amendments to the commitments or revoke them where appropriate;
Amendment 370 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 23 – paragraph 2 – point c a (new) (ca) there is new relevant information that was not examined before the adoption of the decision;
Amendment 371 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 24 – paragraph 1 1. The Commission
Amendment 372 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 24 – paragraph 2 2. The actions pursuant to paragraph 1 may include the appointment of independent external experts and auditors to assist the Commission, including ones from competent national authorities, to monitor the obligations and measures and to provide specific expertise or knowledge to the Commission.
Amendment 373 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 25 – paragraph 2 2. Before adopting the decision pursuant to paragraph 1, the Commission shall communicate its preliminary findings to the gatekeeper concerned. In the preliminary findings, the Commission shall explain the measures it considers to take or it considers that the gatekeeper should take in order to effectively address the preliminary findings. The Commission shall take into account the views of relevant third parties such as end-users or business users before adopting a decision.
Amendment 374 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 26 – paragraph 1 – point e a (new) (ea) the obligation to provide within the time-limit information that is required for assessing their designation as gatekeepers pursuant to Article 3(2) or supply incorrect, or misleading information;
Amendment 375 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 26 – paragraph 2 – introductory part 2. The Commission may by decision impose on undertakings and associations of undertakings fines not exceeding 1% of the total turnover of the undertakings or association of undertakings concerned in the preceding financial year where they intentionally or negligently:
Amendment 377 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 28 – paragraph 1 1. The powers conferred on the Commission by Articles 26 and 27 shall be subject to a
Amendment 378 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 30 – paragraph 1 – introductory part 1. Before adopting a decision pursuant to Article 7, Article 8(1), Article 9(1), Articles 15, 16, 22, 23, 25 and 26 and Article 27(2), the Commission shall give the gatekeeper or undertaking or association of undertakings concerned and third parties having a legitimate interest the opportunity of being heard on:
Amendment 379 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 30 – paragraph 1 a (new) 1a. If the Commission considers it necessary, it may also hear other natural or legal persons before taking the decisions as provided for in paragraph 1. Applications to be heard on the part of such persons shall, where they show a sufficient interest, be granted. The national competent authorities designated under Article 21(a) may also ask the Commission to hear other natural or legal persons with sufficient interest.
Amendment 380 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 30 – paragraph 1 a (new) 1a. If the Commission considers it necessary, it may also hear other natural or legal persons before taking the decision as provided in paragraph 1.
Amendment 381 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 30 – paragraph 2 2. Gatekeepers, undertakings and associations of undertakings concerned and third parties having a legitimate interest may submit their observations to the Commission’s preliminary findings within a time limit which shall be fixed by the Commission in its preliminary findings and which may not be less than 14 days.
Amendment 382 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 31 a (new) Amendment 383 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 33 – paragraph 1 1. Whe
Amendment 384 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 33 – paragraph 1 1. When three or more Member States request the Commission to open an investigation pursuant to Articles 15, 16 and 17 or to institute proceedings in respect of possible non-compliance pursuant to Article 25 because they consider that there are reasonable grounds to suspect that a provider of core platform services should be designated as a gatekeeper, that new services or practices should be included within the scope of this Regulation or that a gatekeeper is not complying with its obligations, the Commission shall within four months examine whether there are reasonable grounds to open such an investigation.
Amendment 385 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 33 – paragraph 2 2. The Member State
Amendment 386 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 33 a (new) Article 33a Right to lodge complaints 1. Third parties representing business users or end users shall be entitled to lodge complaints, with regard to the non- designation of gatekeepers, non- compliance and systematic non- compliance by gatekeepers with their obligations in accordance with Article 3, 5 and 6 and request the opening of a market investigation. They shall submit evidence in support of their request. 2. The Commission shall examine whether there are reasonable grounds to open such an investigation and inform the interested third parties of its decision within three months.
Amendment 387 #
|