Next event: Results of vote in Parliament 2020/06/18 more...
- Decision by Parliament 2020/06/18
- End of procedure in Parliament 2020/06/18
- Debate in Parliament 2020/06/17
- Committee report tabled for plenary, single reading 2020/06/13
- Committee report tabled for plenary 2020/06/13
- Vote in committee 2020/06/12
- Committee opinion 2020/05/29
- Committee opinion 2020/05/28
- Committee opinion 2020/05/27
- Committee opinion 2020/05/27
- Specific opinion 2020/05/27
- Committee opinion 2020/05/26
- Specific opinion 2020/05/26
- Committee opinion 2020/05/25
- Committee opinion 2020/05/13
- Specific opinion 2020/05/12
- Specific opinion 2020/05/11
- Specific opinion 2020/05/08
- Committee opinion 2020/05/05
- Committee opinion 2020/05/05
- Specific opinion 2020/05/05
- Specific opinion 2020/04/24
- MCGUINNESS Mairead (EPP) appointed as rapporteur in AGRI 2020/04/21
Progress: Procedure completed
Lead committee dossier:
Legal Basis:
RoP 114, RoP 58
Legal Basis:
RoP 114, RoP 58Subjects
Events
The European Parliament adopted by 572 votes to 34, with 91 abstentions, a European Parliament recommendation for negotiations on a new partnership with the United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland.
Members regretted the lack of progress in reaching an agreement on future relations between the EU and the UK despite four rounds of negotiations and noted that significant divergences remained. They expressed concern about the limited scope of the future partnership envisaged by the UK government and its fragmented approach to negotiations, which aims to limit them to areas that are in the UK's interest. They reiterated that such a “cherry-picking” approach is unacceptable for the EU.
Parliament considered that the UK’s proposals fall short of its commitments under the Withdrawal Agreement and the Political Declaration, to which the UK agreed, including its refusal to negotiate an agreement on security and defence matters.
General principles
Parliament reiterated that tangible progress must be achieved in all areas of negotiation and that the Union shall not accept an agreement at any cost, in particular not to a free trade agreement (FTA), without solid guarantees of a level playing field and a satisfactory fisheries agreement. It therefore supported the Commission in its defence of a comprehensive draft treaty, rather than separate agreements as proposed by the UK.
Members stressed that any agreement on the new relationship between the EU and the UK should be coherent and tailored to the geographical proximity of both parties and to the high level of interconnectedness of their economies. Any future association agreement concluded must be in strict concordance with the following principles:
- a third country must not have the same rights and benefits and does not comply with the same obligations as a Member State of the EU, or a member of the European Free Trade Association (EFTA) or European Economic Area (EEA);
- protection of the full integrity and proper functioning of the internal market and customs union, the indivisibility of the four freedoms;
- the preservation of the autonomy of the EU’s decision-making;
- the safeguarding of the EU legal order and the role of the CJEU as the ultimate body responsible for interpreting EU law in that respect;
- continued adherence to democratic principles, human rights and fundamental freedoms;
- a level playing field, including for business, ensuring high equivalent standards in social, labour, environmental and consumer protection, the fight against climate change as well as taxation, competition and State aid policies;
- the precautionary principle, the principle that environmental damage should as a priority be rectified at source, and the polluter pays principle;
- the safeguarding of EU agreements with third countries and international organisations, including the EEA Agreement, and maintaining the overall balance of those relationships;
- the safeguarding of the financial stability of the EU and compliance with its regulatory and supervisory regime and standards and their application.
Members stressed that the EU's chief negotiator had Parliament's full support in insisting that guarantees of a level playing field are a crucial element of any agreement with the UK.
Furthermore, they called on the EU to maintain its commitment to negotiate an agreement in the following areas: trade and economic cooperation, law enforcement and judicial cooperation in criminal matters, foreign policy, security and defence, and thematic cooperation, such as cooperation on sustainable development.
Lastly, stressing the importance of being fully prepared for the United Kingdom's withdrawal from the internal market and the customs union at the end of the transitional period, whatever the outcome of the negotiations, Parliament stressed the importance of fully informing EU citizens and businesses of the risk of the transitional period expiring before an agreement is concluded.
Implementation of the Withdrawal Agreement
Parliament insisted on the need for strong guarantees that the United Kingdom shall effectively and fully implement the withdrawal agreement before the end of the transitional period.
Members expressed their determination to ensure that citizens' rights are guaranteed under the withdrawal agreement for both Union and UK citizens and their families. They urged the EU and the UK to work towards a high level of rights for the movement of people in the future agreement.
Parliament also called on the parties to ensure the strict implementation of the Protocol on Ireland and Northern Ireland, as this is a precondition for the successful conclusion of the future agreement. It stressed the importance of the free movement of citizens of the Union and the free movement of services on the island of Ireland in order to limit damage caused to the island's economy as a whole, and called on the British authorities to ensure that there is no diminution of rights for citizens in Northern Ireland.
Other recommendations
In addition to the general principles and implementation of the Withdrawal Agreement, the recommendations comprehensively cover a range of important topics such as economic partnership, trade and a level playing field, sector-specific issues, foreign affairs and security, as well as key aspects of governance.
Parliament urged the Commission to ensure, in this respect, public consultation and constant dialogue with the social partners and civil society, as well as with national parliaments. It welcomed the fact that the Commission provides Parliament with regular and timely information on the negotiations.
Members also stressed that monitoring the implementation of the withdrawal agreement is an integral part of Parliament's work, recalling that Parliament should be fully and immediately informed of all discussions held and decisions taken by the EU-United Kingdom Joint Committee responsible for overseeing its implementation.
Documents
- Results of vote in Parliament: Results of vote in Parliament
- Decision by Parliament: T9-0152/2020
- Debate in Parliament: Debate in Parliament
- Committee report tabled for plenary, single reading: A9-0117/2020
- Committee report tabled for plenary: A9-0117/2020
- Committee opinion: PE648.584
- Committee opinion: PE648.346
- Committee opinion: PE648.463
- Committee opinion: PE650.591
- Specific opinion: PE652.406
- Committee opinion: PE648.399
- Specific opinion: PE650.569
- Committee opinion: PE648.489
- Committee opinion: PE648.359
- Specific opinion: PE650.453
- Specific opinion: PE650.377
- Specific opinion: PE650.555
- Committee opinion: PE648.428
- Committee opinion: PE648.469
- Specific opinion: PE650.458
- Specific opinion: PE650.471
- Committee draft report: PE650.385
- Committee draft report: PE650.385
- Specific opinion: PE650.471
- Committee opinion: PE648.428
- Committee opinion: PE648.469
- Specific opinion: PE650.458
- Specific opinion: PE650.555
- Specific opinion: PE650.377
- Specific opinion: PE650.453
- Committee opinion: PE648.359
- Committee opinion: PE648.489
- Committee opinion: PE648.399
- Specific opinion: PE650.569
- Committee opinion: PE648.463
- Committee opinion: PE650.591
- Specific opinion: PE652.406
- Committee opinion: PE648.346
- Committee opinion: PE648.584
- Committee report tabled for plenary, single reading: A9-0117/2020
Activities
- Pascal ARIMONT
Plenary Speeches (0)
- Tiziana BEGHIN
Plenary Speeches (0)
- Simona BONAFÈ
Plenary Speeches (0)
- Lefteris CHRISTOFOROU
Plenary Speeches (0)
- Peter van DALEN
Plenary Speeches (0)
- Derk Jan EPPINK
Plenary Speeches (0)
- Carlo FIDANZA
Plenary Speeches (0)
- José Manuel GARCÍA-MARGALLO Y MARFIL
Plenary Speeches (0)
- Iratxe GARCÍA PÉREZ
Plenary Speeches (0)
- Enikő GYŐRI
Plenary Speeches (0)
- Christophe HANSEN
Plenary Speeches (0)
- Heidi HAUTALA
Plenary Speeches (0)
- Danuta Maria HÜBNER
Plenary Speeches (0)
- Ska KELLER
Plenary Speeches (0)
- Zbigniew KUŹMIUK
Plenary Speeches (0)
- Bernd LANGE
Plenary Speeches (0)
- Jeroen LENAERS
Plenary Speeches (0)
- David McALLISTER
Plenary Speeches (0)
- Mairead McGUINNESS
Plenary Speeches (0)
- Javier MORENO SÁNCHEZ
Plenary Speeches (0)
- Kati PIRI
Plenary Speeches (0)
- Paulo RANGEL
Plenary Speeches (0)
- Alfred SANT
Plenary Speeches (0)
- David Maria SASSOLI
Plenary Speeches (0)
- Martin SCHIRDEWAN
Plenary Speeches (0)
- Helmut SCHOLZ
Plenary Speeches (0)
- Pedro SILVA PEREIRA
Plenary Speeches (0)
- Maria SPYRAKI
Plenary Speeches (0)
- József SZÁJER
Plenary Speeches (0)
- Waldemar TOMASZEWSKI
Plenary Speeches (0)
- Henna VIRKKUNEN
Plenary Speeches (0)
- Marco ZANNI
Plenary Speeches (0)
- Carlos ZORRINHO
Plenary Speeches (0)
- Sergey LAGODINSKY
Plenary Speeches (0)
- Nathalie LOISEAU
Plenary Speeches (0)
- Nicolae ŞTEFĂNUȚĂ
Plenary Speeches (0)
- Dacian CIOLOŞ
Plenary Speeches (0)
- Traian BĂSESCU
Plenary Speeches (0)
- Gunnar BECK
Plenary Speeches (0)
- François-Xavier BELLAMY
Plenary Speeches (0)
- Dolors MONTSERRAT
Plenary Speeches (0)
- Jérôme RIVIÈRE
Plenary Speeches (0)
- Tomas TOBÉ
Plenary Speeches (0)
- Idoia VILLANUEVA RUIZ
Plenary Speeches (0)
- Loránt VINCZE
Plenary Speeches (0)
- Gheorghe FALCĂ
Plenary Speeches (0)
- Laura HUHTASAARI
Plenary Speeches (0)
- Margarida MARQUES
Plenary Speeches (0)
- Johan DANIELSSON
Plenary Speeches (0)
- Kris PEETERS
Plenary Speeches (0)
- Christine SCHNEIDER
Plenary Speeches (0)
- Radosław SIKORSKI
Plenary Speeches (0)
- Jörgen WARBORN
Plenary Speeches (0)
- Petar VITANOV
Plenary Speeches (0)
- Jessica STEGRUD
Plenary Speeches (0)
- Clara PONSATÍ OBIOLS
Plenary Speeches (0)
- Dorien ROOKMAKER
Plenary Speeches (0)
Amendments | Dossier |
179 |
2020/2023(INI)
2020/04/02
PETI
28 amendments...
Amendment 1 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 1 1. Recalls the fundamental principle of protection of citizens’ rights; stresses, furthermore, that our aim should be to maintain the closest possible links between British and European citizens;
Amendment 10 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 7 Amendment 11 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 7 7. Considers that the system proposed by the UK Home Office (‘the registration procedure’) for EU-27 nationals to apply for residence status is not as transparent and simple as it should be; considers that it creates unnecessary and
Amendment 12 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 7 7. Considers that the system proposed by the UK Home Office (‘the registration procedure’) for EU-27 nationals to apply for residence status is not as transparent and simple as it should be; considers that it creates unnecessary and unfair administrative burdens on citizens of the EU-27; considers that the system should be changed to an automatic registration procedure, which is the only way of reducing the administrative burden and of guaranteeing that EU citizens' status and rights are recognised;
Amendment 13 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 7 7. Considers that the system proposed by the UK Home Office (‘the registration procedure’) for EU-27 nationals to apply for residence status is not as transparent and simple as it should be; considers that it creates unnecessary and unfair administrative burdens on citizens of the EU-27; reiterates the need for the Commission and the Council to guarantee that the registration procedure proposed by the UK Home Office follows the EU standards for guaranteeing reciprocity and equal treatment between citizens in UK and EU;
Amendment 14 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 8 8. Insists on the need for an independent monitoring authority (IMA) to oversee how the Agreement is applied, to ensure that commitments are respected, and to create legal certainty in the lives of EU-27/EEA citizens and their families in the UK as well as of UK citizens and their families within the EU-27/EEA;
Amendment 15 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 8 8. Insists on the need for an independent monitoring authority (IMA) consisting of representatives of all Member States to oversee how the Agreement is applied, to ensure that commitments are respected, and to create legal certainty in the lives of EU-27/EEA citizens and their families in the UK;
Amendment 16 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 9 Amendment 17 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 9 9. Expresses concern over the current implementation of the EU Settlement Scheme and the potential consequences for those who fail to apply before the deadline;
Amendment 18 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 9 9. Expresses concern over the current implementation of the EU Settlement Scheme and the potential consequences for those who fail to apply before the deadline; expresses its concern over the language
Amendment 19 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 9 a (new) 9a. Stresses the need to pay particular attention to the needs of children from mixed families where only one of the parents is an EU citizen; stresses the need to provide appropriate legal mechanisms for resolving disputes between parents, for instance in the case of divorce, in a way that does not discriminate against citizens of Member States by restricting their right to access to the child;
Amendment 2 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 2 2. Stresses that the withdrawal of the United Kingdom from the European Union does not exempt the United Kingdom from its responsibilities to safeguard EU citizens’ rights as guaranteed by the EU- UK Withdrawal Agreement (‘the Agreement’); notes that the Agreement lays down provisions for safeguarding the status and rights stemming from Union law for EU and UK citizens and families affected; calls on the Commission to ensure that these provisions are included in the future partnership between the EU and the United Kingdom;
Amendment 20 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 10 10. Notes that the United Kingdom has decided that the principle of free movement of persons between the Union and the United Kingdom will no longer apply after the transition period; insists on the need for the future partnership to
Amendment 21 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 10 10. Notes that the United Kingdom has decided that the principle of free movement of persons between the Union and the United Kingdom will no longer apply after the transition period; insists on the need for the future partnership to include ambitious provisions on the movement of persons, based on full reciprocity and non-discrimination among Member States; wishes to emphasise that rights with regard to the free movement of persons go hand in hand with the other three freedoms; reiterates the fact that access by the United Kingdom to the Single Market must be conditional on its compliance with the principle of free movement of persons;
Amendment 22 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 10 10. Notes that the United Kingdom has decided that the principle of free
Amendment 23 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 10 10. Notes with regret that the United Kingdom has decided that the principle of free movement of persons between the Union and the United Kingdom will no longer apply after the transition period; insists on the need for the future partnership to include ambitious provisions on the movement of persons, based on full reciprocity and non-discrimination among Member States;
Amendment 24 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 11 11. Considers that mobility agreements,
Amendment 25 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 11 a (new) 11a. Recalls that maintaining seamless air, rail, maritime and road transport between the United Kingdom and the EU is essential to maintaining jobs in sectors such as passenger and goods transport and tourism; stresses the need to find effective mechanisms to protect passengers’ rights in cross-border traffic, particularly in the event of transport cancellations or delays, irrespective of the means of transport;
Amendment 26 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 12 12.
Amendment 27 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 12 12. Stresses that better regulation of the conditions of entry and residence for purposes such as research, study, training and youth exchanges should be taken into account; regrets, for this reason, the statements made by the British authorities that the United Kingdom wishes to pull out of mobility programmes such as Erasmus+; calls on the Commission to continue to allow the United Kingdom to participate in European programmes for the benefit of European and British citizens, fulfilling the necessary financial commitments in return.
Amendment 28 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 12 12. Stresses that better regulation of the conditions of entry and residence for purposes such as business, research, study, training and youth exchanges should be taken into account.
Amendment 3 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 3 3. Recalls that the Agreement
Amendment 4 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 3 3. Recalls that the Agreement protects the rights of those Union citizens and their family members who exercised their right of free movement in the UK in accordance with European Union law before the end of the transition period and who continue to reside there thereafter, as well as those UK citizens who exercise the same right in a Member State of the EU-27; reiterates the need for the public authorities in both the United Kingdom and the Union to give effect to this principle;
Amendment 5 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 4 4. Recalls that any EU citizen residing in the UK has the right to petition the European Parliament pursuant to Article 227 of the TFEU, and has the right to participate in the European Citizens’ Initiative (ECI), and the right to apply to the Ombudsman after the expected end of the transition period (31 December 2020);
Amendment 6 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 4 a (new) 4a. calls on the Ombudsman to continue her work, which began at the time of the negotiations on the withdrawal agreement, to ensure that the negotiations concerning a future partnership between the EU and the United Kingdom are transparent;
Amendment 7 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 5 5. Recalls that UK citizens residing in
Amendment 8 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 6 6. Highlights the importance that the host state plays in ensuring that any administrative procedure for applications for residence status is smooth, transparent and simple
Amendment 9 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 6 a (new) 6 a. It considers that the COVID-19 pandemic marks a turning point in the political, economic and social reality of the European Union and the United Kingdom, causing a global recession and a restructuring of our way of life that makes it difficult to make a progress in the negotiation on the future relationship between the two parties; observes that due to this fact it is advisable to lengthen the transition period until December 2022;
source: 650.354
2020/04/06
PECH
55 amendments...
Amendment 1 #
Draft opinion Recital A A. whereas the current negotiation will be of decisive importance for the future of the Member States and the United Kingdom (UK) and, in that context, fishing and the management of living marine resources are essential issues; whereas the fisheries sector directly and indirectly represents hundreds of thousands of jobs, provides a livelihood for many coastal areas and coastal communities, contributes to fix population thus fighting demographic decline, contributes to safe and healthy food for millions of consumers, and promotes a strong environmental model;
Amendment 10 #
Draft opinion Recital C C. whereas the existing historical and geographical links between the EU and the UK create a strong interdependence between the parties, both in terms of fishing and aquaculture activities, and in the sectors of processing of and trade in
Amendment 11 #
Draft opinion Recital C C. whereas the existing historical
Amendment 12 #
Draft opinion Recital C C. whereas the existing historical and geographical links between the EU and the UK create a strong interdependence between the parties, both in terms of fishing and aquaculture activities, and in the sectors of processing of and
Amendment 13 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 1 1. Reaffirms th
Amendment 14 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 1 1. Reaffirms that no comprehensive agreement can be concluded between the EU and the UK if it does not include a complete, balanced and long-term
Amendment 15 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 1 1. Reaffirms that no comprehensive agreement can be concluded between the EU and the UK if it does not include a complete, balanced and long-term fisheries agreement,
Amendment 16 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 1 1. Reaffirms that no comprehensive trade agreement can be concluded between the
Amendment 17 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 1 1. Reaffirms that no comprehensive agreement can be concluded between the EU and the UK if it does not include a complete, balanced and long-term fisheries agreement,
Amendment 18 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 1 a (new) 1 a. Reaffirms that the fisheries agreement must have a direct link with the ongoing negotiations on an economic partnership, in particular on trade, and can therefore not be disconnected; stresses that the issue of free access to waters and ports cannot be separated from the issue of free trade and access of UK fisheries products to the EU market;
Amendment 19 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 1 a (new) 1 a. Reminds that both fish and pollution do not know political borders and will continue spreading throughout all sea basins, emphasises that ecosystems are interlinked;
Amendment 2 #
Draft opinion Recital A A. whereas the current negotiation will be of decisive importance for the future of the Member States and the United Kingdom (UK) and, in that context, fishing
Amendment 20 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 2 2. Recalls that the greatest mutual benefit will be obtained by
Amendment 21 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 2 2. Recalls that the greatest mutual benefit will be obtained by
Amendment 22 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 2 2. Recalls that the greatest mutual benefit will be obtained by maintaining reciprocal access to water and resources, by defining common, coherent and stable principles and rules, enabling
Amendment 23 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 2 2. Recalls that the greatest mutual benefit will be obtained by maintaining reciprocal a
Amendment 24 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 2 2. Recalls that the greatest mutual benefit will be obtained by maintaining existing reciprocal access to water and resources, by defining common, coherent and stable principles and rules, enabling mutual open access of fishing and aquaculture products to markets without causing economic or social tensions through unbalanced competition;
Amendment 25 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 2 2. Recalls that the greatest mutual benefit will be obtained by protecting and restoring all shared ecosystems, by maintaining reciprocal access to water and resources, by defining common, coherent and stable principles and rules, enabling open access of fishing and aquaculture products to markets without causing economic or social tensions through unbalanced competition;
Amendment 26 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 2 a (new) 2 a. Notes the importance of the UK national fisheries legislation for UK territorial waters that is being discussed concurrently, with respect to its impact on the shared stocks;
Amendment 27 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 2 a (new) 2 a. States that any agreement regarding the future relations between the EU and the UK, must not exclude the possibility for bilateral agreements between Member States and the UK;
Amendment 28 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 2 a (new) 2 a. Stresses the need to include in the draft agreement proposal, the distribution percentages that are currently applied for the stocks to be shared between both parties in Annex FISH-2 (Allocation of fishing opportunities) in accordance with the principle of relative stability in force. The fact that the percentages of the stocks to be shared between both parties have been left empty might be seen as an initial concession to the United Kingdom, lowering the objectives of the current mandate;
Amendment 29 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 3 3. Calls for the maintenance of a stable and constant distribution of fishing rights; and stresses the importance of long- term management of resources based on best available scientific advice and compliance with CFP principles such as a legal objective to ensure that exploitation of living marine biological resources restores and maintains populations of harvested species above levels which can produce the maximum sustainable yield (MSY) and the technical measures which have so far contributed to the improvement of the state of fish stocks for the benefit of the fleets of both EU Member States and the UK;
Amendment 3 #
Draft opinion Recital A A. whereas the current negotiation will be
Amendment 30 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 3 3. Calls for the maintenance of a stable and constant distribution of fishing rights that respect the principle of relative stability; and stresses the importance of long-
Amendment 31 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 3 3. Calls for the maintenance of a stable and constant distribution of fishing
Amendment 32 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 3 3. Calls
Amendment 33 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 3 3. Calls for the
Amendment 34 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 3 3. Calls for the maintenance of a stable and constant distribution of fishing rights; and stresses the importance of long- term management of resources based on compliance with CFP principles such as maximum sustainable yield (MSY)
Amendment 35 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 3 3. Calls for the maintenance of a stable and constant distribution of fishing
Amendment 36 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 3 a (new) 3 a. Recalls that the UK was involved in the preparation and implementation of the Multiannual Plans for each sea basin, in particular for North Sea and Western Waters. These Multiannual Plans were drawn up considering the Member-States at the time, including the UK, and that the objectives set follow the best available scientific knowledge and the CFP;
Amendment 37 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 3 b (new) 3 b. Reiterates that the full implementation of the CFP has given important positive results, either in increasing the number of stocks exploited within the MSY or in the way that Multiannual Plans have contributed to biological and economic sustainability with benefits for the fishing communities concerned;
Amendment 38 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 3 a (new) 3 a. Stresses that the agreement must ensure that technical measures or Marine protected areas are reciprocal, non- discriminatory and proportionate and do not constitute a de facto way of excluding EU vessels from UK waters ; stresses that when Marine protected areas are established, all stakeholders including European fishers shall be involved in the governance and in the monitoring of such areas in compliance with the International Union for the Conservation of Nature recommendations; insists that the agreement cannot lead to a levelling down of EU environmental and social standards;
Amendment 39 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 3 a (new) 3 a. Urges the Commission to include provisions on the prevention and combat of illegal, unreported and unregulated (IUU) fishing activities within Union and United Kingdom waters;
Amendment 4 #
Draft opinion Recital B B. whereas
Amendment 40 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 3 a (new) 3 a. Stresses the need for a public database of both EU and UK vessels that will be fishing under a future agreement;
Amendment 41 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 3 b (new) 3 b. Insists that UK fisheries and aquaculture products that enter the Internal Market must comply with the same environmental, social, sanitary and phyto-sanitary standards than the EU fisheries and aquaculture products so as to ensure a level playing field between the UK and the EU fisheries and aquaculture products as well as to ensure European consumer protection ;
Amendment 42 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 4 4. Stresses the need for adequate consultation mechanisms, a common scientific approach and guarantees that
Amendment 43 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 4 4. Stresses the need for adequate consultation mechanisms, a common scientific approach as basis for future decisions for fishing opportunities in all shared sea basins, and guarantees that the UK will continue to contribute to data collection and the scientific assessment of stocks; and urges the parties to continue their active and loyal cooperation in matters of fishing control and the fight against illegal, unreported and unregulated (IUU) fishing;
Amendment 44 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 4 4. Stresses the need for adequate consultation mechanisms, a common scientific approach and guarantees that the UK will continue to contribute to data collection and the scientific assessment of stocks as part of a common framework for joint fisheries management; and urges the parties to continue their active and loyal cooperation in matters of fishing control and the fight against illegal, unreported and unregulated (IUU) fishing;
Amendment 45 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 4 4. Stresses the need for adequate cooperation and consultation mechanisms, a common scientific approach and guarantees that the UK will continue to contribute to data collection and the scientific assessment of stocks; and urges the parties to continue their active and loyal cooperation in matters of fishing control and the fight against illegal, unreported and unregulated (IUU) fishing;
Amendment 46 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 4 a (new) 4 a. Takes note of the UK’s intention to be negotiating a separate fisheries framework agreement with Norway; reminds that Norway is a member of the European Economic Area(EEA) and the European Free Trade Agreement (EFTA), which entails rights and obligations concerning the fisheries sector and products when it comes to access among others to the EU market;
Amendment 47 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 4 a (new) 4 a. Underlines the importance of including a reference in the agreement on the obligation of cooperation within the framework of coastal States, as provided by International Law, which is essential for fisheries management measures and the sustainability of shared stocks;
Amendment 48 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 4 b (new) Amendment 49 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 5 5. Believes
Amendment 5 #
Draft opinion Recital B B. whereas the common fisheries policy (CFP) has for almost 50 years enabled, in all the Member States concerned, the establishment of optimal conditions for the development of fishing and the sustainable management of resources; whereas, therefore, following the UK’s withdrawal from the European Union (EU), an agreement is necessary to guarantee the economic vitality of the fisheries sector, the continuation of existing fishing activities and the preservation of species and the protection of biodiversity;
Amendment 50 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 5 5. Believes, finally, that the provisions of any fisheries agreement should be supported by dispute settlement mechanisms as part of a general management of the governance of the future relationship between the EU Member States and the UK.
Amendment 51 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 5 a (new) 5 a. Notes with regret that the coronavirus crisis, or COVID-19 outbreak, has disrupted the normal course of negotiations between the UK and the EU; under these circumstances, urges the Joint Committee to decide as soon as possible to extend the transition period in accordance with Article 132 of the Withdrawal Agreement.
Amendment 52 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 5 a (new) 5 a. Believes that the current context of crisis resulting from the COVID-19 outbreak does not facilitate the negotiations for an agreement within the demanding timetable established; calls, therefore, on the parties to be flexible so that the transitional period can be extended if necessary and to provide certainty for the sector;
Amendment 53 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 5 a (new) 5 a. Believes that in case the extension of the transitional period is agreed, the current distribution of TACs and quotas should be extended accordingly in order to provide legal certainty to the fisheries sector;
Amendment 54 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 5 b (new) 5 b. However, urges the Commission and the Member States to prepare for all scenarios, both the extension of the transitional period and the no-deal, and to devise the necessary measures to support the sector as well as the regulatory frameworks appropriate to either scenario;
Amendment 55 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 5 b (new) 5 b. Finally, calls on the negotiating parties to use their best endeavours to agree as soon as possible on the provisions on fisheries of any agreement between the UK and the EU, in order for them to be in place in time to be used for determining fishing opportunities for the first year after the transition period.
Amendment 6 #
Draft opinion Recital B B. whereas the common fisheries policy (CFP) has for almost 50 years enabled, in all the Member States concerned, the establishment of optimal
Amendment 7 #
Draft opinion Recital B B. whereas the common fisheries policy (CFP) has for almost 50 years enabled, in all the Member States concerned, the establishment of
Amendment 8 #
Draft opinion Recital B a (new) B a. whereas Regulation EU 2017/2403 on the Sustainable Management of the External Fishing Fleet marked a major step forward for transparency and accountability in global fisheries which should be reflected in the future agreement;
Amendment 9 #
Draft opinion Recital C C. whereas the existing historical and geographical links between the EU Member States and the UK create a strong interdependence between the parties, both in terms of fishing and aquaculture activities, and in the sectors of processing of and trade in those products;
source: 650.357
2020/04/07
BUDG
96 amendments...
Amendment 1 #
Draft opinion Recital A A. whereas a third country cannot have the same rights and enjoy the same benefits as a member; whereas the Union should consider UK participation in Union and Euratom programmes having the Union’s interest first in mind; whereas any decision on UK participation in such programmes should take account of all relevant aspects of the envisaged partnership, since that partnership should form a coherent structure; whereas the participation of UK at certain programs of special interest for the EU and member states and has to correspond to specific criteria;
Amendment 1 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 1 1. Stresses that the envisaged partnership should provide continued connectivity for all modes of transport subject to reciprocity and should ensure a level playing field, in particular with regard to social, employment, safety, security, passengers’rights and environmental standards;
Amendment 10 #
Draft opinion Recital D D. whereas in its mandate the UK states that it will consider participation in elements of Erasmus+ on a time-limited basis; recommends the participation of UK a the Erasmus+ program under similar conditions as during membership;
Amendment 10 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 4 4.
Amendment 11 #
Draft opinion Recital D a (new) D a. Whereas the outbreak of COVID- 19 virus led to the disruption in negotiation between the EU and the UK of the future partnership agreement and the necessity to allocate extra time for the full negotiation round;
Amendment 11 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 4 4. Raises concern about the UK’s position on the future partnership with the EU, and thus emphasises that rights and privileges entail obligations and that the level of access to the EU single market should fully correspond to the extent of regulatory convergence and commitments agreed with respect to observing a level playing field for open and fair competition
Amendment 12 #
Draft opinion Recital D a (new) D a. whereas the UK should fulfil all financial commitments agreed in the Withdrawal Agreement;
Amendment 12 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 4 4. Raises concern about the UK’s position on the future partnership with the
Amendment 13 #
Draft opinion Recital D b (new) D b. Whereas in the absence of an agreement on future EU-UK partnership, the request of the UK to extend the transition period after01.01.2021 would mitigate the negative financial impact born by both partners asa result of the lack of agreement;
Amendment 13 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 4 4. Raises concern about the UK’s position on the future partnership with the EU, and thus emphasises that rights and privileges entail obligations and that the level of access to the EU single market should fully correspond to the extent of regulatory convergence and commitments agreed with respect to observing a level playing field for open and fair competition
Amendment 14 #
Draft opinion Recital D c (new) D c. Whereas in case the negotiation of the next MFF 2021-2027 is not concluded in due time, continency budgetary plan will be applied in the EU as from 01.01.2021;
Amendment 14 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 4 a (new) 4 a. Stresses the importance to Ireland’s economy of the UK market, the land bridge to continental Europe, and cross-border travel with Northern Ireland; while direct sea routes to the continent should be promoted, access to the UK market and transit through the UK should not be dependent on a limited number of permits under ECMT as this would disproportionately affect Ireland’s all-island economy;
Amendment 15 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 1 – point a (a) take the necessary action to ensure that the general principles, terms and conditions to be established as part of the envisaged partnership in relation to participation in Union and Euratom programmes include the requirement for the UK to make a fair and appropriate financial contribution to any programmes in which it takes part conditioned that the UK respects the financial commitments for the current financial framework and the N+3 rule;
Amendment 15 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 4 a (new) 4 a. Believes that UK participation in cross-border and research and development EU programmes related to transport is beneficial and should be supported
Amendment 16 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 1 – point a (a) take the necessary action to ensure that the general principles, terms and conditions to be established as part of the envisaged partnership in relation to participation in Union and Euratom programmes include the requirement for the UK to make a fair and appropriate financial contribution, both in terms of Participation Fee and Operational Contribution, to any programmes in which it takes part;
Amendment 16 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 5 a (new) 5 a. Welcomes the ongoing negotiations on the future partnership between UK and EASA and stresses the importance of a close and fruitful cooperation with UK in the field of civil aviation safety
Amendment 17 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 1 – point a a (new) (a a) Believes that the UK should continue to contribute to the cohesion funds if it considers taking part of the internal market, in line with the model of EEA countries; further, suggests that the Interreg programmes should be accessible to the UK, as long as a financial contribution is made;
Amendment 17 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 6 6. Considers that the envisaged partnership should include an ambitious Comprehensive Air Transport Agreement which ensures the EU’s strategic interests; containing appropriate provisions related to the access to the market and investment included in the most ambitious Union bilateral agreements, provided that it is in the Union's interest and respects a balance of rights and obligations;
Amendment 18 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 1 – point a a (new) (a a) ensures that EU businesses, especially in sectors like agriculture, IT and the machinery and equipment industry, will be provided with all the information, the level playing field and the support necessary to access the UK market;
Amendment 18 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 6 6. Considers that the envisaged partnership should include a
Amendment 19 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 1 – point a a (new) Amendment 19 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 6 6. Considers that the envisaged partnership should include an ambitious Comprehensive Air Transport Agreement which ensures the EU’s strategic interests, including market access and aviation investment as well as operational and commercial flexibility provisions (e.g.code sharing);
Amendment 2 #
Draft opinion Recital A A. whereas a third country cannot have the same rights and enjoy the same benefits as a member; whereas the Union should consider UK participation in Union and Euratom programmes
Amendment 2 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 1 1. Stresses that the envisaged partnership should provide continued connectivity for all modes of transport subject to reciprocity and should ensure a level playing field, in particular with regard to social, employment
Amendment 20 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 1 – point a a (new) (a a) ensures adequate funding at EU and UK level for the information and the needs of European and British citizens residing in each of the sides;
Amendment 20 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 6 a (new) 6 a. Stresses that any Air Transport Agreement and the resulting EU regulation must be adopted without prejudice to the legal position of the Kingdom of Spain with regard to the sovereignty over the territory in which the airport of Gibraltar is situated; and reiterates that the territorial scope of this regulation and any reference to the United Kingdom therein must not include Gibraltar;
Amendment 21 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 1 – point a b (new) (a b) provide maximum clarity on the degree of the UK participation in the EU programmes to ensure predictability for the European programme partners and stability in terms of budgetary allocations;
Amendment 21 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 6 a (new) 6 a. Stresses that UK should cooperate with the Union, Member States and entrusted bodies by the Union with the management of the European air traffic management network in such a way as to enhance the safe and efficient functioning of air traffic in the European regions. Interoperability with EU providers should be sought by UK.
Amendment 22 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 1 – point a b (new) (a b) studies the possibility of identifying an alternative solution of EU citizenship for the EU citizens living in UK and for British citizens living in the EU;
Amendment 22 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 7 7. Considers that the envisaged partnership should include a level playing field in the areas of, in particular, state aid, passengers’ rights, social rights and environmental protection; Considers that the level playing field in the area of environmental protection should not prohibit taxation on a non-discrimination basis of aircraft fuel supplied to aircraft.
Amendment 23 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 1 – point b (b) not accept piecemeal UK participation in Erasmus+ or any other EU programme, and ensure full compliance with applicable EU legislation and principles such as the free movement for people and to not accept participation for a period shorter than the full length of
Amendment 23 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 7 7. Considers that the envisaged partnership should include a level playing field in the areas of, in particular, state aid, passengers’ rights, social rights, safety, security and environmental protection;
Amendment 24 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 1 – point b (b)
Amendment 24 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 7 a (new) 7 a. Highlights that nothing in the agreement should prevent a Party from imposing taxes, levies, duties, fees or charges on fuel supplied in its territory for use in aircraft that operate between two points within and between the territories
Amendment 25 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 1 – point b a (new) (b a) make proposals for arrangements to implement cooperation between UK authorities and EU agencies, taking into account that the UK, as a third country, will not have any decision-making power over EU agencies;
Amendment 25 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 7 a (new) 7 a. Stresses that in the context of Covid-19, the future subsidy control agreement between the two parties shall guarantee public support for the protection of jobs and wages and will accompany the decarbonisation of the industry.
Amendment 26 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 1 – point b a (new) (b a) (ba) encourage the participation of the UK in other programmes in which cooperation might be in the interest of both the EU and the UK, such as research and innovation, environment and development policy;
Amendment 26 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 7 b (new) 7 b. Stresses that any legislation concerning UK and EU airlines to wet- lease from each other without restriction and time limits must guarantee reciprocal rights and obligations for the parties in accordance with Regulation 1008/2008.
Amendment 27 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 1 – point b b (new) (b b) take in due account the strategic partnership that should frame EU-UK relations with regard to foreign policy and cooperation in the field of defence;
Amendment 27 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 8 8. Stresses that any possible granting of some elements of the so-called ‘fifth freedom’ (freedom of the air) should be
Amendment 28 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 1 – point b c (new) (b c) take in due account the possible impacts of the new partnership that should frame EU-UK relations on EU consumers and producers and on the EU budget in the field of agriculture and fisheries;
Amendment 28 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 8 a (new) 8 a. Believes that any possible progressive liberalisation of ownership and control of European airlines should remain under the scrutiny of the European Parliament;
Amendment 29 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 1 – point b d (new) (b d) ensure that the participation of the UK in EU programmes will not entail net transfers or benefits from the EU budget to the UK;
Amendment 29 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 9 a (new) 9 a. Considers that the envisaged partnership should facilitate ongoing collaboration in Air Traffic Management, including activities related to the overall through SESAR programme, and its potential successor, in order to support the smooth and efficient functioning of Europe’s aviation network
Amendment 3 #
Draft opinion Recital A A. whereas a third country cannot have the same rights and enjoy the same benefits as a member; whereas the Union should consider UK participation in Union
Amendment 3 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 1 1. Stresses that the envisaged partnership should provide continued and unhindered connectivity for all modes of transport subject to reciprocity and should ensure a level playing field, in particular with regard to social, employment and environmental standards;
Amendment 30 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 1 – point b e (new) (b e) propose the necessary provisions to protect the financial interests of the Union with regard to the programmes in which the UK would participate, including audits as well as anti-fraud and anti-money laundering investigations conducted by Commission services, the European Anti-Fraud Office (OLAF), the European Public Prosecutor’s Office (EPPO), the European Court of Auditors and the European Parliament, through its right of scrutiny;
Amendment 30 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 9 b (new) 9 b. Considers that UK could continue to be an important partner in the EU space policy. Underlines that the future access of UK to EU Space Programme needs to be addressed in the negotiations;
Amendment 31 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 1 – point b f (new) (b f) ensure that the Union may unilaterally suspend or terminate the participation of the United Kingdom in the Union programmes, if conditions for participation are not fulfilled or if the United Kingdom does not pay its fair financial contribution;
Amendment 31 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 10 a (new) 10 a. Notes that the current ECMT framework that is applicable for third country freight transport operators is not suitable for the EU-UK relations taking into account the extent of freight trade transported on road between the European Union and the United Kingdom;
Amendment 32 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 1 – point c (c) assess and prepare for all possible scenarios, including the extension of the transition period, in order to ensure the
Amendment 32 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 11 Amendment 33 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 1 – point c a (new) (c a) stand ready to limit, and possibly suspend, the UK participation in EU programmes in case the agreed pre- conditions as laid down in the withdrawal agreement and in any relevant legal base or treaty, especially the part on the financial settlement, are not fulfilled by the UK
Amendment 33 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 11 11. Emphasises that UK freight transport operators cannot be granted the same rights and benefits as Union freight transport operators in respect to road freight transport operations, while invites to explore the possibility to have a closer relation with UK, with inclusion of certain rights that may enable a more efficient use of journey, from operational, environmental and economical perspectives;
Amendment 34 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 1 – point c a (new) (c a) present budgetary estimation of the financial obligations expected from the UK during transition period, should the transition be extended after 01.01.2021;
Amendment 34 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 11 11. Emphasises that UK freight transport operators cannot be granted the same level of rights and benefits as Union freight transport operators in respect to road freight transport operations;
Amendment 35 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 1 – point c a (new) (c a) ensure transparency during the whole process until a political consensus will be reached;
Amendment 35 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 11 a (new) 11 a. The Agreement should avoid introduction of any additional unnecessary administrative burden.
Amendment 36 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 1 – point c b (new) (c b) take necessary measures to protect from misusing and fraud the EU budget allocated to the programmes where the UK is one of beneficiaries.
Amendment 36 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 12 12. Considers that the envisaged partnership should include the right of transit of laden journeys from the territory of one party to the territory of the same party through the territory of the other party
Amendment 37 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 12 12. Considers that the envisaged partnership should include the right of transit of laden journeys from the territory of one party to the territory of the same party through the territory of the other party and unladen journeys in conjunction with these journeys;
Amendment 38 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 12 12. Considers that the envisaged partnership should include the right of transit of laden and unladen journeys from the territory of one party to the territory of the same party through the territory of the other party;
Amendment 39 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 12 12. Considers that the envisaged partnership should include the right of transit
Amendment 4 #
Draft opinion Recital A a (new) A a. having regard to the part four of the Draft text of the Agreement on the New Partnership with the United Kingdom on participation in union programmes, sound financial management and financial provisions, presented by the European Commission on 18.03.2020;
Amendment 4 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 2 a (new) 2 a. Underlines the close economic ties and mutual dependence between the UK and the EU and therefore calls for an agreement maintaining, to the greatest extent possible, current transport connectivity.
Amendment 40 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 13 13. Considers that the envisaged partnership should include a level playing field in the areas of, in particular, work and rest time, tachographs, weights and dimensions; as well as specific provisions to ensure a common level of protection in relation to operators and drivers, including social rules;
Amendment 41 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 13 13. Considers that the envisaged partnership should include a level playing field in the areas of, in particular, cabotage, work and rest time, posting of drivers, tachographs, weights and dimensions and combined transport;
Amendment 42 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 13 13. Considers that the envisaged partnership should include a level playing field in the areas of, in particular, cabotage, work and rest time, posting of drivers, tachographs, weights and dimensions and combined transport;
Amendment 43 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 13 13. Considers that the envisaged partnership should include a level playing field in the areas of, in particular, work, driving, break and rest time, tachographs, vehicle weights and dimensions;
Amendment 44 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 13 13. Considers that the envisaged partnership should include a level playing field in the areas of, in particular, work and rest time, tachographs, weights
Amendment 45 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 13 a (new) Amendment 46 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 13 a (new) 13 a. Stresses that the common level of protection in relation to operators and drivers (including social rules) should not be reduced below the level provided by the common standards applicable in the EU and the UK at the end of the transition period.
Amendment 47 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 14 a (new) 14 a. Urges the parties to cooperate closely on the deployment of alternative fuels and charging infrastructure.
Amendment 48 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 15 15. Stresses that the envisaged partnership should include the specific situation of the Channel tunnel, especially with regard to the aspects of safety regime and authorisation and passengers’rights;
Amendment 5 #
Draft opinion Recital A a (new) A a. Considering that the areas of research, technology and industry, both civil and military, are strategic and represent an opportunity for economic growth for the Parties due to their longstanding and shared history, interests, values and challenges
Amendment 5 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 2 b (new) Amendment 50 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 16 16. Stresses that the envisaged partnership should ensure free and equal market access for the international maritime transport sector
Amendment 51 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 16 16. Stresses that the envisaged partnership should ensure free and equal market access for the international maritime transport sector with an appropriate level playing field in the fiscal, environmental, social and other regulatory domains. The partnership should include continued reciprocal market access to the offshore sector and domestic trade. If the EU decides to open access to intra-EU cabotage, the UK must also allow EU Member States to allow short sea shipping between two UK ports.
Amendment 52 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 16 16. Stresses that the envisaged partnership should ensure access for the international maritime transport sector with an appropriate level playing field
Amendment 53 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 16 16. Stresses that the envisaged partnership should ensure access for the international maritime transport sector, including ports and the shipping industry, with an appropriate level playing field.
Amendment 54 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 16 a (new) Amendment 55 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 16 a (new) 16 a. Stresses that the envisaged partnership should ensure proper border- and customs systems are in place in order to prevent disruption and delays in ports when carrying out cargo inspections and customs clearance checks.
Amendment 56 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 16 a (new) 16 a. Emphasises that the envisaged partnership should aim for alignment in legislation relating to maritime affairs without compromising the high environmental and social standards of the EU.
Amendment 57 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 16 a (new) 16 a. Highlights the importance of paying particular attention to maintaining a regulatory and fiscal level playing field between EU and British ports
Amendment 58 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 16 a (new) 16 a. Considers that if the EU decides to open access to intra-EU cabotage, short sea shipping between two UK ports should be allowed
Amendment 59 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 16 a (new) 16 a. Considers that the envisaged partnership should ensure a continuous level playing field between EU and UK ports.
Amendment 6 #
Draft opinion Recital A a (new) A a. whereas The Withdrawal Agreement provides European and British citizens who are lawfully residents will continue to enjoy the same rights to live, work and travel as before;
Amendment 6 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 2 c (new) 2 c. Asks for a “think small first” approach, to ensure that measures in the future agreement are designed to facilitate the conducting of business for SMEs.
Amendment 60 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 16 b (new) 16 b. Stresses that the envisaged partnership should ensure the the fluidity of cross border trade and the free movement of seafarers, on- and offshore staff and passengers.
Amendment 7 #
Draft opinion Recital B B. whereas any UK participation in Union and Euratom programmes should respect all relevant rules and mechanisms and conditions of participation, as laid down in the corresponding legal bases; whereas, as a consequence and among
Amendment 7 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 3 3. Recalls the importance of the Commission being the sole EU negotiator during the negotiations and that Member States shall not undertake any bilateral negotiations, however it should be ensured that the interests of each Member State are equally and fully represented by the Commission during the negotiations and implemented in the final comprehensive agreement;
Amendment 8 #
Draft opinion Recital B B. whereas any UK participation in Union and Euratom programmes should respect all relevant rules and mechanisms and conditions of participation, as laid down in the corresponding legal bases; whereas, as a consequence and among other aspects, a fair balance as regards UK contributions and benefits should be ensured and the UK, as a third country, cannot enjoy decisional power on any programme;
Amendment 8 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 3 3. Recalls the importance of the Commission being the sole EU negotiator during the negotiations and that Member States shall not undertake any bilateral negotiations; urges, however, the Commission to fully protect and defend the interest and sovereignty of Members States as well as their territorial integrity;
Amendment 9 #
Draft opinion Recital B B. whereas any UK participation in Union
Amendment 9 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 3 a (new) 3 a. This agreement should not, subject to necessary terms and conditions, exclude future cooperation with the UK to support projects of common interest in the transport sector
source: 650.345
|
History
(these mark the time of scraping, not the official date of the change)
committees/0 |
|
committees/0 |
|
committees/1 |
|
committees/5 |
Old
New
|
committees/17 |
Old
New
|
docs/0/docs/0/url |
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE650.385
|
docs/1/docs/0/url |
Old
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE650.471&secondRef=02New
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/DEVE-AL-650471_EN.html |
docs/2/docs/0/url |
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE648.428&secondRef=03
|
docs/3/docs/0/url |
Old
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE648.469&secondRef=03New
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PETI-AD-648469_EN.html |
docs/4/docs/0/url |
Old
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE650.458&secondRef=01New
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/ENVI-AL-650458_EN.html |
docs/5/docs/0/url |
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE650.555
|
docs/6/docs/0/url |
Old
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE650.377&secondRef=01New
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/CONT-AL-650377_EN.html |
docs/7/docs/0/url |
Old
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE650.453&secondRef=02New
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/CULT-AL-650453_EN.html |
docs/8/docs/0/url |
Old
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE648.359&secondRef=02New
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/REGI-AD-648359_EN.html |
docs/9/docs/0/url |
Old
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE648.489New
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/ECON-AD-648489_EN.html |
docs/10/docs/0/url |
Old
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE648.399&secondRef=03New
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PECH-AD-648399_EN.html |
docs/11/docs/0/url |
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE650.569&secondRef=01
|
docs/12/docs/0/url |
Old
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE648.463&secondRef=02New
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/AFCO-AD-648463_EN.html |
docs/13/docs/0/url |
Old
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE650.591New
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/LIBE-AD-650591_EN.html |
docs/14/docs/0/url |
Old
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE652.406&secondRef=01New
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/ITRE-AL-652406_EN.html |
docs/15 |
|
docs/15 |
|
docs/15/docs/0/url |
Old
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE648.346&secondRef=04New
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/IMCO-AD-648346_EN.html |
docs/16 |
|
docs/16 |
|
docs/17 |
|
docs/18 |
|
docs/18/docs/0/url |
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE648.584&secondRef=02
|
docs/20 |
|
events/0/type |
Old
Committee referral announced in Parliament, 1st reading/single readingNew
Committee referral announced in Parliament |
events/2/type |
Old
Vote in committee, 1st reading/single readingNew
Vote in committee |
events/3/type |
Old
Committee report tabled for plenary, single readingNew
Committee report tabled for plenary |
events/4/docs |
|
events/5 |
|
events/5 |
|
events/6 |
|
events/7 |
|
docs/2/docs/0/url |
Old
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE648.428New
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE648.428&secondRef=03 |
docs/4/docs/0/url |
Old
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE650.458New
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE650.458&secondRef=01 |
docs/7/docs/0/url |
Old
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE650.453New
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE650.453&secondRef=02 |
docs/11/docs/0/url |
Old
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE650.569New
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE650.569&secondRef=01 |
docs/14/docs/0/url |
Old
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE652.406New
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE652.406&secondRef=01 |
docs/18/docs/0/url |
Old
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE648.584New
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE648.584&secondRef=02 |
docs/20 |
|
events/4 |
|
events/5 |
|
forecasts |
|
procedure/stage_reached |
Old
Awaiting Parliament's voteNew
Procedure completed |
docs/1/docs/0/url |
Old
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE650.471New
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE650.471&secondRef=02 |
docs/2/docs/0/url |
Old
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE648.428&secondRef=03New
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE648.428 |
docs/5/docs/0/url |
Old
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE650.555&secondRef=02New
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE650.555 |
docs/9 |
|
docs/10 |
|
docs/10/docs/0/url |
Old
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE648.399New
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE648.399&secondRef=03 |
docs/11 |
|
docs/11 |
|
docs/12 |
|
docs/12 |
|
docs/13 |
|
docs/14 |
|
docs/15 |
|
docs/16 |
|
docs/17 |
|
docs/18 |
|
docs/18/date |
Old
2020-05-18T00:00:00New
2020-05-29T00:00:00 |
docs/19 |
|
events/2 |
|
events/3 |
|
forecasts/0/title |
Old
Indicative plenary sitting date, 1st reading/single readingNew
Debate in plenary scheduled |
forecasts/1 |
|
procedure/stage_reached |
Old
Awaiting committee decisionNew
Awaiting Parliament's vote |
docs/2/docs/0/url |
Old
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE648.428New
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE648.428&secondRef=03 |
docs/4/docs/0/url |
Old
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE650.458&secondRef=01New
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE650.458 |
docs/5/docs/0/url |
Old
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE650.555New
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE650.555&secondRef=02 |
docs/8/docs/0/url |
Old
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE648.359New
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE648.359&secondRef=02 |
docs/9/docs/0/url |
Old
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE648.584&secondRef=02New
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE648.584 |
docs/11 |
|
docs/12 |
|
forecasts/0/date |
Old
2020-06-10T00:00:00New
2020-06-17T00:00:00 |
docs/3/docs/0/url |
Old
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE648.469New
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE648.469&secondRef=03 |
docs/4/docs/0/url |
Old
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE650.458New
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE650.458&secondRef=01 |
docs/6/docs/0/url |
Old
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE650.377New
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE650.377&secondRef=01 |
docs/7/docs/0/url |
Old
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE650.453&secondRef=02New
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE650.453 |
docs/9/docs/0/url |
Old
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE648.584New
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE648.584&secondRef=02 |
docs/10 |
|
forecasts |
|
docs/2/docs/0/url |
Old
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE648.428&secondRef=03New
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE648.428 |
docs/3/docs/0/url |
Old
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE648.469&secondRef=03New
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE648.469 |
docs/4/docs/0/url |
Old
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE650.458&secondRef=01New
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE650.458 |
docs/5/docs/0/url |
Old
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE650.555&secondRef=02New
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE650.555 |
docs/6/docs/0/url |
Old
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE650.377&secondRef=01New
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE650.377 |
docs/9 |
|
forecasts |
|
docs/1/docs/0/url |
Old
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE650.471&secondRef=02New
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE650.471 |
docs/2/docs/0/url |
Old
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE648.428New
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE648.428&secondRef=03 |
docs/6/docs/0/url |
Old
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE650.377New
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE650.377&secondRef=01 |
docs/7/docs/0/url |
Old
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE650.453New
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE650.453&secondRef=02 |
committees/0 |
|
committees/0 |
|
committees/1 |
|
committees/1 |
|
docs/6/docs/0/url |
Old
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE650.377&secondRef=01New
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE650.377 |
docs/7/docs/0/url |
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE650.453
|
docs/8 |
|
docs/0 |
|
docs/2 |
|
docs/3 |
|
docs/3/docs/0/url |
Old
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE648.469New
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE648.469&secondRef=03 |
docs/6 |
|
docs/7 |
|
forecasts |
|
docs/0/docs/0/url |
Old
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE650.471New
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE650.471&secondRef=02 |
docs/4/docs/0/url |
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE650.555&secondRef=02
|
committees/15/rapporteur |
|
docs/1/docs/0/url |
Old
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE648.428&secondRef=03New
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE648.428 |
docs/3/docs/0/url |
Old
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE650.458New
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE650.458&secondRef=01 |
docs/4 |
|
docs/1/docs/0/url |
Old
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE648.428New
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE648.428&secondRef=03 |
docs/3/docs/0/url |
Old
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE650.458&secondRef=01New
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE650.458 |
docs/0/docs/0/url |
Old
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE650.471&secondRef=02New
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE650.471 |
docs/1 |
|
docs/1 |
|
docs/2 |
|
docs/3 |
|
docs/0/docs/0/url |
Old
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE650.471New
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE650.471&secondRef=02 |
docs/1 |
|
docs/0/docs/0/url |
Old
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE650.471&secondRef=02New
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE650.471 |
docs/0/docs/0/url |
Old
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE650.471New
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE650.471&secondRef=02 |
committees/0/shadows/1 |
|
committees/1/shadows/1 |
|
docs/0/docs/0/url |
Old
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE650.471&secondRef=02New
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE650.471 |
committees/7/rapporteur |
|
committees/12/rapporteur |
|
docs |
|
procedure/title |
Old
Report on the proposed mandate for negotiations with the United KingdomNew
Recommendations on the negotiations for a new partnership with the United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland |
committees/18/opinion |
False
|
committees/16/rapporteur/0/date |
Old
2020-02-06T00:00:00New
2020-02-19T00:00:00 |
committees/0 |
|
committees/0 |
|
committees/1 |
|
committees/1 |
|
committees/0 |
|
committees/0 |
|
committees/1 |
|
committees/1 |
|
committees/2/rapporteur |
|
committees/18/opinion |
False
|
committees/3 |
|
committees/3 |
|
committees/4/rapporteur |
|
committees/17/rapporteur |
|
committees/19/rapporteur |
|
committees/9/rapporteur |
|
committees/13/rapporteur |
|
committees/11/rapporteur |
|
committees/14/rapporteur |
|
committees/6/rapporteur |
|
committees/8/rapporteur |
|
committees/10 |
|
committees/10 |
|
committees/17/opinion |
False
|
committees/6/opinion |
False
|
committees/17 |
|
committees/17 |
|
committees/18/opinion |
False
|
committees/3/opinion |
False
|
committees/6/opinion |
False
|