BETA


2020/2087(INI) Review of the European Union Solidarity Fund

Progress: Procedure completed

RoleCommitteeRapporteurShadows
Lead REGI OMARJEE Younous (icon: GUE/NGL GUE/NGL) SCHMIEDTBAUER Simone (icon: EPP EPP), CARVALHAIS Isabel (icon: S&D S&D), PEKKARINEN Mauri (icon: Renew Renew), D'AMATO Rosa (icon: Verts/ALE Verts/ALE), KRAH Maximilian (icon: ID ID), KRUK Elżbieta (icon: ECR ECR)
Committee Opinion BUDG RESSLER Karlo (icon: EPP EPP) Henrike HAHN (icon: Verts/ALE Verts/ALE), Mauri PEKKARINEN (icon: RE RE), Silvia MODIG (icon: GUE/NGL GUE/NGL), Hélène LAPORTE (icon: ID ID)
Lead committee dossier:
Legal Basis:
RoP 54

Events

2021/09/22
   EC - Commission response to text adopted in plenary
Documents
2021/05/18
   EP - Results of vote in Parliament
2021/05/18
   EP - Decision by Parliament
Details

The European Parliament adopted by 668 votes to 10, with 18 abstentions, a resolution on the review of the European Union Solidarity Fund.

The European Union Solidarity Fund (EUSF), set up following the major floods in Central Europe in 2002, provides financial assistance to Member States and acceding countries hit by major natural or regional disasters or public health emergencies.

Parliament expressed its concern that extreme weather events and natural disasters will only multiply and intensify with climate change. Major and regional natural disasters and major public health emergencies (such as the COVID-19 pandemic) are now a common occurrence.

Members believe it is essential to channel aid and funds to the affected regions as quickly, easily and flexibly as possible. They stressed that synergies between the EUSF and the EU Civil Protection Mechanism, the ERDF climate change adaptation component and territorial cooperation programmes are essential for building a comprehensive response and resilience package.

Disaster management, damage assessment and simplification of procedures

In the context of a future reform of the EUSF, the Commission is called on to continue its work to simplify and speed up the application procedure for Member States, for example by paying particular attention to simplifying applications for activation of the EUSF across several regions in the context of cross-border disasters.

Members also considered it essential to invest in disaster risk prevention and management in the EU by building preventative infrastructure. In this respect, they recommended that Member States, together with the Commission, put in place disaster prevention and management plans that allow for accurate and rapid damage assessment.

Given that climate change and the increase in natural disasters are making territories and regions increasingly vulnerable, Members called on the Commission to consider revising the EUSF so as to take better account of regional disasters. They also stressed the role of ERDF programmes, in synergy with rural development programmes, in risk prevention and mitigation.

The resolution stressed the need for increased capacity building through technical and administrative support to beneficiary countries to help them develop long-term management strategies to reduce the impact of major and regional natural disasters and major public health emergencies.

The Commission is invited to devote particular attention in a future revision of the EUSF to the outermost regions, islands, mountainous or sparsely populated regions, and all territories particularly prone to the risks of natural disasters.

Financial resources and speed of allocation

Members expressed concern about the merger between the EUSF and the Emergency Aid Reserve (EAR), as it makes the funding possibilities from the EUSF, which are now linked to the needs of the EAR, uncertain, for a joint annual budget of EUR 1.2 billion (only slightly higher than the one proposed by the Commission in May 2020 for the Fund alone).

Parliament suggested that the management of the new reserve should be closely monitored to see whether the funding amount and allocation key provided for in this new financial instrument meet the needs of the EUSF, in view of the extension of its scope and the scale and proliferation of emergencies resulting, in particular from major and regional natural disasters and major public health emergencies.

Members welcomed the fact that the revised EUSF adopted in March 2020 increased the value of advance payments from 10 % to 25 % of the anticipated financial contribution and the upper limit from EUR 30 million to EUR 100 million. They pointed out, in this context, the importance of advance payments for increasing the effectiveness of aid programmes.

Risk prevention and quality of reconstruction

Parliament called for the criteria for determining the ‘eligibility’ of projects for support from the Fund to take greater account of the latest risk prevention principles and for the principle of ‘ build back better ’ to be fully integrated into Article 3 of the EUSF Regulation.

Members also believe that extending the scope of the EUSF to tackle the consequences of the COVID-19 pandemic requires an increase in its budget.

Visibility of the Fund's financial assistance

Parliament stressed the importance of informing the public about the tangible benefits brought about by the EUSF in order to increase citizens’ trust in EU tools and programmes. It called on the Commission and the Member States to improve the visibility of the fund’s assistance through ad hoc, targeted communication activities, in parallel to making the rapid response and delivery of aid a priority.

Documents
2021/05/17
   EP - Debate in Parliament
2021/03/24
   EP - Committee report tabled for plenary
Details

The Committee on Regional Development adopted an own-initiative report by Younous OMARJEE (GUE/NGL, FR) on the review of the European Union Solidarity Fund (EUSF).

The European Union Solidarity Fund (EUSF), created in 2002, reflects the desire to show solidarity with people living in regions of the Union affected by major natural or regional disasters or major public health emergencies.

The regulatory framework of the EUSF was revised in 2014 to simplify procedures, shorten the response time after applications are submitted, clarify the eligibility criteria for applications for assistance in regional disasters, extend the implementation period and introduce advance payments, as requested by Parliament on various occasions. Further progress was made in March 2020, notably in increasing the level of advance payments and simplifying the EUSF allocation process.

Disaster management, damage assessment and simplification of procedures

Although the reform of the regulation in 2014 contributed to the extension of the time frame for preparing and submitting an application for an EUSF financial contribution from 10 to 12 weeks, a substantial proportion of cases still require updates, resulting in delays in accessing the grants. For this reason, Members considered that the Commission should provide simplified guidance on application requirements and, in so doing, reduce the administrative burden.

Members also considered it essential to invest in disaster risk prevention and management in the EU by building preventative infrastructure. In this respect, they recommended that Member States, together with the Commission, put in place disaster prevention and management plans that allow for accurate and rapid damage assessment.

Given that climate change and the increase in natural disasters are making territories and regions increasingly vulnerable, Members called on the Commission to consider revising the EUSF so as to take better account of regional disasters. They also stressed the role of ERDF programmes, in synergy with rural development programmes, in risk prevention and mitigation.

The report stressed the need for increased capacity building through technical and administrative support to beneficiary countries to help them develop long-term management strategies to reduce the impact of major and regional natural disasters and major public health emergencies.

The Commission is invited to devote particular attention in a future revision of the EUSF to the outermost regions, islands, mountainous or sparsely populated regions, and all territories particularly prone to the risks of natural disasters.

Financial resources and speed of allocation

Members expressed concern about the merger between the EUSF and the Emergency Aid Reserve (EAR), as it makes the funding possibilities from the EUSF, which are now linked to the needs of the EAR, uncertain, for a joint annual budget of EUR 1.2 billion (only slightly higher than the one proposed by the Commission in May 2020 for the Fund alone).

The report suggested that the management of the new reserve should be closely monitored to see whether the funding amount and allocation key provided for in this new financial instrument meet the needs of the EUSF, in view of the extension of its scope and the scale and proliferation of emergencies resulting, in particular, from major and regional natural disasters and major public health emergencies.

Risk prevention and quality of reconstruction

Members called for the criteria for determining projects that are ‘eligible’ for assistance from the fund to take greater account of the latest risk prevention principles and asks for the ‘Build Back Better’ principle to be fully integrated in Article 3 of the EUSF Regulation.

The Commission is called on to strengthen and simplify the synergies between the EUSF and the cohesion policy funds, as well as the Union Civil Protection Mechanism, with a view to ensuring effective and structured risk management for reconstruction projects in the short, medium and long term, not only through the construction of sustainable, energy-efficient and resource-efficient infrastructure, but also through the deployment of preventive measures.

Members also considered that extending the scope of the EUSF to combat the consequences of the COVID-19 pandemic requires an increase in its budget.

Visibility of the Fund's financial assistance

The report stressed the importance of informing the public about the tangible benefits brought about by the EUSF in order to increase citizens’ trust in EU tools and programmes. It called on the Commission and the Member States to improve the visibility of the fund’s assistance through ad hoc, targeted communication activities, in parallel to making the rapid response and delivery of aid a priority.

Documents
2021/03/16
   EP - Vote in committee
2021/02/03
   EP - Amendments tabled in committee
Documents
2020/12/17
   EP - Committee draft report
Documents
2020/07/15
   EP - Committee opinion
Documents
2020/05/27
   EP - Committee referral announced in Parliament
2020/05/11
   EP - RESSLER Karlo (EPP) appointed as rapporteur in BUDG
2020/02/20
   EP - OMARJEE Younous (GUE/NGL) appointed as rapporteur in REGI

Documents

AmendmentsDossier
173 2020/2087(INI)
2020/06/26 BUDG 21 amendments...
source: 653.968
2021/02/03 REGI 152 amendments...
source: 663.294

History

(these mark the time of scraping, not the official date of the change)

docs/3
date
2021-09-22T00:00:00
docs
url: /oeil/spdoc.do?i=56212&j=0&l=en title: SP(2021)507
type
Commission response to text adopted in plenary
body
EC
docs/3
date
2021-05-18T00:00:00
docs
url: https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/TA-9-2021-0220_EN.html title: T9-0220/2021
type
Text adopted by Parliament, single reading
body
EP
events/3/docs
  • url: https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/CRE-9-2021-05-17-TOC_EN.html title: Debate in Parliament
events/4
date
2021-05-18T00:00:00
type
Decision by Parliament
body
EP
docs
url: https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/TA-9-2021-0220_EN.html title: T9-0220/2021
events/4
date
2021-05-18T00:00:00
type
Results of vote in Parliament
body
EP
docs
url: https://oeil.secure.europarl.europa.eu/oeil/popups/sda.do?id=56212&l=en title: Results of vote in Parliament
events/5
date
2021-05-18T00:00:00
type
Decision by Parliament
body
EP
docs
url: https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/TA-9-2021-0220_EN.html title: T9-0220/2021
events/5/summary
  • The European Parliament adopted by 668 votes to 10, with 18 abstentions, a resolution on the review of the European Union Solidarity Fund.
  • The European Union Solidarity Fund (EUSF), set up following the major floods in Central Europe in 2002, provides financial assistance to Member States and acceding countries hit by major natural or regional disasters or public health emergencies.
  • Parliament expressed its concern that extreme weather events and natural disasters will only multiply and intensify with climate change. Major and regional natural disasters and major public health emergencies (such as the COVID-19 pandemic) are now a common occurrence.
  • Members believe it is essential to channel aid and funds to the affected regions as quickly, easily and flexibly as possible. They stressed that synergies between the EUSF and the EU Civil Protection Mechanism, the ERDF climate change adaptation component and territorial cooperation programmes are essential for building a comprehensive response and resilience package.
  • Disaster management, damage assessment and simplification of procedures
  • In the context of a future reform of the EUSF, the Commission is called on to continue its work to simplify and speed up the application procedure for Member States, for example by paying particular attention to simplifying applications for activation of the EUSF across several regions in the context of cross-border disasters.
  • Members also considered it essential to invest in disaster risk prevention and management in the EU by building preventative infrastructure. In this respect, they recommended that Member States, together with the Commission, put in place disaster prevention and management plans that allow for accurate and rapid damage assessment.
  • Given that climate change and the increase in natural disasters are making territories and regions increasingly vulnerable, Members called on the Commission to consider revising the EUSF so as to take better account of regional disasters. They also stressed the role of ERDF programmes, in synergy with rural development programmes, in risk prevention and mitigation.
  • The resolution stressed the need for increased capacity building through technical and administrative support to beneficiary countries to help them develop long-term management strategies to reduce the impact of major and regional natural disasters and major public health emergencies.
  • The Commission is invited to devote particular attention in a future revision of the EUSF to the outermost regions, islands, mountainous or sparsely populated regions, and all territories particularly prone to the risks of natural disasters.
  • Financial resources and speed of allocation
  • Members expressed concern about the merger between the EUSF and the Emergency Aid Reserve (EAR), as it makes the funding possibilities from the EUSF, which are now linked to the needs of the EAR, uncertain, for a joint annual budget of EUR 1.2 billion (only slightly higher than the one proposed by the Commission in May 2020 for the Fund alone).
  • Parliament suggested that the management of the new reserve should be closely monitored to see whether the funding amount and allocation key provided for in this new financial instrument meet the needs of the EUSF, in view of the extension of its scope and the scale and proliferation of emergencies resulting, in particular from major and regional natural disasters and major public health emergencies.
  • Members welcomed the fact that the revised EUSF adopted in March 2020 increased the value of advance payments from 10 % to 25 % of the anticipated financial contribution and the upper limit from EUR 30 million to EUR 100 million. They pointed out, in this context, the importance of advance payments for increasing the effectiveness of aid programmes.
  • Risk prevention and quality of reconstruction
  • Parliament called for the criteria for determining the ‘eligibility’ of projects for support from the Fund to take greater account of the latest risk prevention principles and for the principle of ‘ build back better ’ to be fully integrated into Article 3 of the EUSF Regulation.
  • Members also believe that extending the scope of the EUSF to tackle the consequences of the COVID-19 pandemic requires an increase in its budget.
  • Visibility of the Fund's financial assistance
  • Parliament stressed the importance of informing the public about the tangible benefits brought about by the EUSF in order to increase citizens’ trust in EU tools and programmes. It called on the Commission and the Member States to improve the visibility of the fund’s assistance through ad hoc, targeted communication activities, in parallel to making the rapid response and delivery of aid a priority.
docs/3
date
2021-05-18T00:00:00
docs
url: https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/TA-9-2021-0220_EN.html title: T9-0220/2021
type
Text adopted by Parliament, single reading
body
EP
events/3
date
2021-05-17T00:00:00
type
Debate in Parliament
body
EP
events/4
date
2021-05-18T00:00:00
type
Decision by Parliament
body
EP
docs
url: https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/TA-9-2021-0220_EN.html title: T9-0220/2021
forecasts
  • date: 2021-05-18T00:00:00 title: Vote in plenary scheduled
procedure/stage_reached
Old
Awaiting Parliament's vote
New
Procedure completed
forecasts/0
date
2021-05-18T00:00:00
title
Vote in plenary scheduled
forecasts/0
date
2021-05-17T00:00:00
title
Debate in plenary scheduled
commission
  • body: EC dg: Regional and Urban Policy commissioner: FERREIRA Elisa
forecasts/0/title
Old
Indicative plenary sitting date
New
Debate in plenary scheduled
events/0/body
EP
events/1/body
EP
events/2/body
EP
events/2/docs
  • url: https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/A-9-2021-0052_EN.html title: A9-0052/2021
events/0
date
2020-05-27T00:00:00
type
Committee referral announced in Parliament
events/0
date
2020-05-27T00:00:00
type
Committee referral announced in Parliament, 1st reading/single reading
body
EP
events/1
date
2021-03-16T00:00:00
type
Vote in committee
events/1
date
2021-03-16T00:00:00
type
Vote in committee, 1st reading/single reading
body
EP
events/2/summary
  • The Committee on Regional Development adopted an own-initiative report by Younous OMARJEE (GUE/NGL, FR) on the review of the European Union Solidarity Fund (EUSF).
  • The European Union Solidarity Fund (EUSF), created in 2002, reflects the desire to show solidarity with people living in regions of the Union affected by major natural or regional disasters or major public health emergencies.
  • The regulatory framework of the EUSF was revised in 2014 to simplify procedures, shorten the response time after applications are submitted, clarify the eligibility criteria for applications for assistance in regional disasters, extend the implementation period and introduce advance payments, as requested by Parliament on various occasions. Further progress was made in March 2020, notably in increasing the level of advance payments and simplifying the EUSF allocation process.
  • Disaster management, damage assessment and simplification of procedures
  • Although the reform of the regulation in 2014 contributed to the extension of the time frame for preparing and submitting an application for an EUSF financial contribution from 10 to 12 weeks, a substantial proportion of cases still require updates, resulting in delays in accessing the grants. For this reason, Members considered that the Commission should provide simplified guidance on application requirements and, in so doing, reduce the administrative burden.
  • Members also considered it essential to invest in disaster risk prevention and management in the EU by building preventative infrastructure. In this respect, they recommended that Member States, together with the Commission, put in place disaster prevention and management plans that allow for accurate and rapid damage assessment.
  • Given that climate change and the increase in natural disasters are making territories and regions increasingly vulnerable, Members called on the Commission to consider revising the EUSF so as to take better account of regional disasters. They also stressed the role of ERDF programmes, in synergy with rural development programmes, in risk prevention and mitigation.
  • The report stressed the need for increased capacity building through technical and administrative support to beneficiary countries to help them develop long-term management strategies to reduce the impact of major and regional natural disasters and major public health emergencies.
  • The Commission is invited to devote particular attention in a future revision of the EUSF to the outermost regions, islands, mountainous or sparsely populated regions, and all territories particularly prone to the risks of natural disasters.
  • Financial resources and speed of allocation
  • Members expressed concern about the merger between the EUSF and the Emergency Aid Reserve (EAR), as it makes the funding possibilities from the EUSF, which are now linked to the needs of the EAR, uncertain, for a joint annual budget of EUR 1.2 billion (only slightly higher than the one proposed by the Commission in May 2020 for the Fund alone).
  • The report suggested that the management of the new reserve should be closely monitored to see whether the funding amount and allocation key provided for in this new financial instrument meet the needs of the EUSF, in view of the extension of its scope and the scale and proliferation of emergencies resulting, in particular, from major and regional natural disasters and major public health emergencies.
  • Risk prevention and quality of reconstruction
  • Members called for the criteria for determining projects that are ‘eligible’ for assistance from the fund to take greater account of the latest risk prevention principles and asks for the ‘Build Back Better’ principle to be fully integrated in Article 3 of the EUSF Regulation.
  • The Commission is called on to strengthen and simplify the synergies between the EUSF and the cohesion policy funds, as well as the Union Civil Protection Mechanism, with a view to ensuring effective and structured risk management for reconstruction projects in the short, medium and long term, not only through the construction of sustainable, energy-efficient and resource-efficient infrastructure, but also through the deployment of preventive measures.
  • Members also considered that extending the scope of the EUSF to combat the consequences of the COVID-19 pandemic requires an increase in its budget.
  • Visibility of the Fund's financial assistance
  • The report stressed the importance of informing the public about the tangible benefits brought about by the EUSF in order to increase citizens’ trust in EU tools and programmes. It called on the Commission and the Member States to improve the visibility of the fund’s assistance through ad hoc, targeted communication activities, in parallel to making the rapid response and delivery of aid a priority.
forecasts/0/title
Old
Indicative plenary sitting date, 1st reading/single reading
New
Indicative plenary sitting date
docs/0/docs/0/url
Old
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE652.609&secondRef=02
New
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/BUDG-AD-652609_EN.html
docs/1/docs/0/url
Old
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE661.876
New
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/REGI-PR-661876_EN.html
docs/2/docs/0/url
Old
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE663.294
New
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/REGI-AM-663294_EN.html
events/2
date
2021-03-24T00:00:00
type
Committee report tabled for plenary
events/2
date
2021-03-24T00:00:00
type
Committee report tabled for plenary, single reading
body
EP
committees/0
type
Responsible Committee
body
EP
committee_full
Regional Development
committee
REGI
associated
False
rapporteur
name: OMARJEE Younous date: 2020-02-20T00:00:00 group: The Left group in the European Parliament - GUE/NGL abbr: GUE/NGL
shadows
committees/0
type
Responsible Committee
body
EP
committee_full
Regional Development
committee
REGI
associated
False
rapporteur
name: OMARJEE Younous date: 2020-02-20T00:00:00 group: GUE/NGL abbr: Confederal Group of the European United Left
shadows
docs/0/docs/0/url
Old
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE652.609
New
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE652.609&secondRef=02
events/1
date
2021-03-16T00:00:00
type
Vote in committee, 1st reading/single reading
body
EP
events/2
date
2021-03-24T00:00:00
type
Committee report tabled for plenary, single reading
body
EP
procedure/Other legal basis
Rules of Procedure EP 159
procedure/stage_reached
Old
Awaiting committee decision
New
Awaiting Parliament's vote
docs/0/docs/0/url
Old
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE652.609&secondRef=02
New
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE652.609
forecasts/0/date
Old
2021-04-26T00:00:00
New
2021-05-17T00:00:00
committees/0
type
Responsible Committee
body
EP
committee_full
Regional Development
committee
REGI
associated
False
rapporteur
name: OMARJEE Younous date: 2020-02-20T00:00:00 group: GUE/NGL abbr: Confederal Group of the European United Left
shadows
committees/0
type
Responsible Committee
body
EP
committee_full
Regional Development
committee
REGI
associated
False
rapporteur
name: OMARJEE Younous date: 2020-02-20T00:00:00 group: GUE/NGL abbr: Confederal Group of the European United Left
shadows
committees/1
type
Committee Opinion
body
EP
committee_full
Budgets
committee
BUDG
associated
False
rapporteur
name: RESSLER Karlo date: 2020-05-11T00:00:00 group: Group of European People's Party abbr: EPP
committees/1
type
Committee Opinion
body
EP
committee_full
Budgets
committee
BUDG
associated
False
rapporteur
name: RESSLER Karlo date: 2020-05-11T00:00:00 group: ??? abbr: Unknown Group
committees/0
type
Responsible Committee
body
EP
committee_full
Regional Development
committee
REGI
associated
False
rapporteur
name: OMARJEE Younous date: 2020-02-20T00:00:00 group: GUE/NGL abbr: Confederal Group of the European United Left
shadows
committees/0
type
Responsible Committee
body
EP
committee_full
Regional Development
committee
REGI
associated
False
rapporteur
name: OMARJEE Younous date: 2020-02-20T00:00:00 group: GUE/NGL abbr: GUE/NGL - European United Left - Nordic Green Left
shadows
committees/1
type
Committee Opinion
body
EP
committee_full
Budgets
committee
BUDG
associated
False
rapporteur
name: RESSLER Karlo date: 2020-05-11T00:00:00 group: ??? abbr: Unknown Group
committees/1
type
Committee Opinion
body
EP
committee_full
Budgets
committee
BUDG
associated
False
rapporteur
name: RESSLER Karlo date: 2020-05-11T00:00:00 group: EPP - Group of European People's Party abbr: EPP
committees/0
type
Responsible Committee
body
EP
committee_full
Regional Development
committee
REGI
associated
False
rapporteur
name: OMARJEE Younous date: 2020-02-20T00:00:00 group: GUE/NGL abbr: GUE/NGL - European United Left - Nordic Green Left
shadows
committees/0
type
Responsible Committee
body
EP
committee_full
Regional Development
committee
REGI
associated
False
rapporteur
name: OMARJEE Younous date: 2020-02-20T00:00:00 group: GUE/NGL abbr: Confederal Group of the European United Left
shadows
committees/1
type
Committee Opinion
body
EP
committee_full
Budgets
committee
BUDG
associated
False
rapporteur
name: RESSLER Karlo date: 2020-05-11T00:00:00 group: EPP - Group of European People's Party abbr: EPP
committees/1
type
Committee Opinion
body
EP
committee_full
Budgets
committee
BUDG
associated
False
rapporteur
name: RESSLER Karlo date: 2020-05-11T00:00:00 group: ??? abbr: Unknown Group
committees/0
type
Responsible Committee
body
EP
committee_full
Regional Development
committee
REGI
associated
False
rapporteur
name: OMARJEE Younous date: 2020-02-20T00:00:00 group: GUE/NGL abbr: Confederal Group of the European United Left
shadows
committees/0
type
Responsible Committee
body
EP
committee_full
Regional Development
committee
REGI
associated
False
rapporteur
name: OMARJEE Younous date: 2020-02-20T00:00:00 group: Confederal Group of the European United Left - Nordic Green Left abbr: GUE/NGL
shadows
committees/1
type
Committee Opinion
body
EP
committee_full
Budgets
committee
BUDG
associated
False
rapporteur
name: RESSLER Karlo date: 2020-05-11T00:00:00 group: ??? abbr: Unknown Group
committees/1
type
Committee Opinion
body
EP
committee_full
Budgets
committee
BUDG
associated
False
rapporteur
name: RESSLER Karlo date: 2020-05-11T00:00:00 group: Group of European People's Party abbr: EPP
docs/1
date
2020-12-17T00:00:00
docs
url: https://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE661.876 title: PE661.876
type
Committee draft report
body
EP
docs/2
date
2021-02-03T00:00:00
docs
url: https://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE663.294 title: PE663.294
type
Amendments tabled in committee
body
EP
forecasts/0/date
Old
2021-03-08T00:00:00
New
2021-04-26T00:00:00
committees/0
type
Responsible Committee
body
EP
committee_full
Regional Development
committee
REGI
associated
False
rapporteur
name: OMARJEE Younous date: 2020-02-20T00:00:00 group: Confederal Group of the European United Left - Nordic Green Left abbr: GUE/NGL
shadows
committees/0
type
Responsible Committee
body
EP
committee_full
Regional Development
committee
REGI
associated
False
rapporteur
name: OMARJEE Younous date: 2020-02-20T00:00:00 group: Confederal Group of the European United Left - Nordic Green Left abbr: GUE/NGL
shadows
committees/1/rapporteur/0/mepref
197413
forecasts/0/date
Old
2021-02-08T00:00:00
New
2021-03-08T00:00:00
docs/0/docs/0/url
Old
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE652.609
New
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE652.609&secondRef=02
committees/0/rapporteur/0/date
Old
2020-05-08T00:00:00
New
2020-02-20T00:00:00
docs/0/docs/0/url
Old
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE652.609&secondRef=02
New
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE652.609
committees/0/shadows/1
name
PEKKARINEN Mauri
group
Renew Europe group
abbr
Renew
forecasts
  • date: 2021-02-08T00:00:00 title: Indicative plenary sitting date, 1st reading/single reading
docs/0/docs/0/url
Old
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE652.609
New
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE652.609&secondRef=02
docs/0/docs/0/url
Old
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE652.609&secondRef=02
New
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE652.609
docs
  • date: 2020-07-15T00:00:00 docs: url: https://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE652.609&secondRef=02 title: PE652.609 committee: BUDG type: Committee opinion body: EP
committees/0/shadows/0
name
CARVALHAIS Isabel
group
Group of Progressive Alliance of Socialists and Democrats
abbr
S&D
committees/0
type
Responsible Committee
body
EP
committee_full
Regional Development
committee
REGI
associated
False
rapporteur
name: OMARJEE Younous date: 2020-05-08T00:00:00 group: Confederal Group of the European United Left - Nordic Green Left abbr: GUE/NGL
shadows
name: KRAH Maximilian group: Identity and Democracy abbr: ID
committees/0
type
Responsible Committee
body
EP
committee_full
Regional Development
committee
REGI
associated
False
events
  • date: 2020-05-27T00:00:00 type: Committee referral announced in Parliament, 1st reading/single reading body: EP
procedure/dossier_of_the_committee
  • REGI/9/02980
procedure/stage_reached
Old
Preparatory phase in Parliament
New
Awaiting committee decision