2020/2142(DEC) 2019 discharge: General budget of the EU - Council and European Council
Lead committee dossier:
Progress: Awaiting committee decision
| Role | Committee | Rapporteur | Shadows |
|---|---|---|---|
| Lead | CONT |
DURAND Pascal ( Renew)
|
LENAERS Jeroen ( EPP),
GARCÍA MUÑOZ Isabel ( S&D),
PEKSA Mikuláš ( Verts/ALE),
CZARNECKI Ryszard ( ECR),
FLANAGAN Luke Ming ( Confederal Group of the European United Left)
|
| Committee Opinion | AFET | ||
| Committee Opinion | DEVE | ||
| Committee Opinion | INTA | ||
| Committee Opinion | BUDG | ||
| Committee Opinion | ECON | ||
| Committee Opinion | EMPL | ||
| Committee Opinion | ENVI | ||
| Committee Opinion | ITRE | ||
| Committee Opinion | IMCO | ||
| Committee Opinion | TRAN | ||
| Committee Opinion | REGI | ||
| Committee Opinion | AGRI | ||
| Committee Opinion | PECH | ||
| Committee Opinion | CULT | ||
| Committee Opinion | JURI | ||
| Committee Opinion | LIBE | ||
| Committee Opinion | AFCO |
TAJANI Antonio ( EPP)
|
Charles GOERENS ( RE),
Nikolaj VILLUMSEN ( GUE/NGL),
Domènec RUIZ DEVESA ( S&D),
Daniel FREUND ( Verts/ALE)
|
| Committee Opinion | FEMM | ||
| Committee Opinion | PETI |
Lead committee dossier:
Subjects
Events
2021/03/01
EP - Vote in committee, 1st reading/single reading
2021/02/08
EP - Amendments tabled in committee
Documents
2021/02/05
CSL - Supplementary non-legislative basic document
Documents
2021/01/28
EP - Committee opinion
Documents
2020/12/16
EP - Committee draft report
Documents
2020/09/24
EP - TAJANI Antonio (EPP) appointed as rapporteur in AFCO
2020/09/15
EP - Committee referral announced in Parliament, 1st reading/single reading
2020/09/01
EP - DURAND Pascal (Renew) appointed as rapporteur in CONT
2020/07/29
EC - Non-legislative basic document
Documents
2020/07/29
EC - Non-legislative basic document published
Documents
Documents
- Amendments tabled in committee: PE680.750
- Supplementary non-legislative basic document: 05792/2021
- Committee opinion: PE660.215
- Committee draft report: PE655.987
- Non-legislative basic document: COM(2020)0288
- Non-legislative basic document: EUR-Lex
- Non-legislative basic document published: COM(2020)0288
- Non-legislative basic document published: EUR-Lex
- Non-legislative basic document: COM(2020)0288 EUR-Lex
- Committee draft report: PE655.987
- Committee opinion: PE660.215
- Supplementary non-legislative basic document: 05792/2021
- Amendments tabled in committee: PE680.750
| Amendments | Dossier |
| 76 |
2020/2142(DEC)
2020/12/21
AFCO
19 amendments...
Amendment 1 #
Draft opinion Recital A A. whereas, under the terms of Article 319 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union (TFEU), the European Parliament shall give a discharge to the Commission in respect of the implementation of the general budget of the European Union; whereas the Council’s budget is a section of the Union budget;
Amendment 10 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 2 2.
Amendment 11 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 2 a (new) 2 a. Is of the opinion that, if no interinstitutional solution is found, Parliament should grant discharge to the Commission only, while continuing with the practice of adopting accompanying resolutions with observations addressed to each of the Union’s institutions and bodies, so as to ensure that no section of the EU budget is implemented without proper scrutiny;
Amendment 12 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 3 3. Believes that increased transparency, and a proactive approach to sharing information, on the side of the Council would be conducive to a better- informed discharge procedure from the outset; proposes, for this purpose new instruments such as a memorandum of understanding between Parliament and Council on the information necessary for the European Parliament to take a decision on discharge;
Amendment 13 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 3 a (new) 3a. Reiterates that discharge is first of all a procedure to certify that expenditure has been carried out correctly and that financial control systems are functioning; recalls that the EU budget is funded ultimately by EU citizens and that full transparency and reliability has to be ensured on their behalf; states that the continued failure, without any real repercussions, to grant discharge to the Council undermines performance of the procedure from both an ethical point of view and one of respect for the principles contained in the Treaties; calls therefore on the Council and the Commission to resume negotiations immediately to find a solution which places respect for citizens to the fore;
Amendment 14 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 3 a (new) 3 a. Is of the opinion that Parliament should address its decisions on discharge in respect of the implementation of the budget to the Commission alone, while continuing the practice of adopting accompanying resolutions with observations addressed to each of the Union’s institutions and bodies, so as to ensure that no section of the EU budget is implemented without proper scrutiny;
Amendment 15 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 3 a (new) 3 a. Takes the view that, while the current situation can be solved through sincere and loyal cooperation between Union institutions, the possibility of a revision of the Treaties could ultimately be considered in order to task the Parliament with the explicit competence to grant discharge to all institutions and bodies individually;
Amendment 16 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 3 b (new) 3 b. Reiterates its full endorsement of the Ombudsman’s recommendations following the strategic inquiry on the transparency of the legislative discussions in the preparatory bodies of the Council of the EU; urges the Council to take all necessary measures to implement them without undue delay;
Amendment 17 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 4 4.
Amendment 18 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 4 4. Considers that the Conference on the future of Europe provides an opportunity to discuss proposals to enhance transparency and democratic accountability with regard to the protection of the Union’s financial interests, such as the possibility of a Treaty change giving the Parliament the explicit competence to grant discharge to all institutions and bodies individually; underlines that the impact of such changes on the inter-institutional balance as provided for in the Treaties should be thoroughly examined by Parliament's competent committee.
Amendment 19 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 4 4.
Amendment 2 #
Draft opinion Recital A a (new) A a. whereas the procedure of giving discharge separately to the individual Union institutions and bodies is a long- standing practice to guarantee transparency and democratic accountability towards Union citizens and is accepted by all institutions and bodies except the Council;
Amendment 3 #
Draft opinion Recital A a (new) A a. whereas, under the terms of Article 319 (2) TFEU, the Commission must submit to the European Parliament, at the latter’s request, any necessary information concerning the execution of expenditure and the operation of financial control systems;
Amendment 4 #
Draft opinion Recital B B. whereas the persistent difficulties in receiving answers from the Council due to a lack of cooperation have resulted in Parliament’s refusal to grant discharge to the Council for the implementation of its section of the budget for more than 10 years; whereas this situation has an important impact on the functioning of the institutions and diminishes citizens' trust in the procedure for political scrutiny;
Amendment 5 #
Draft opinion Recital B a (new) B a. whereas, as an additional sign of those difficulties, in respect of Articles 263 and 265 TFEU, Section I(2), second subparagraph, point c), of the European Council’s conclusions of 10 and 11 December 2020 does not comply with Articles 15 and 17 TEU;
Amendment 6 #
Draft opinion Recital B a (new) B a. whereas the impossibility to grant discharge to the Council has resulted, since 2009, in more than EUR 6 billion in public funds being spent without democratic scrutiny;
Amendment 7 #
Draft opinion Recital B a (new) B a. whereas the European Court of Justice’s case-law supports the right of taxpayers and public opinion to be kept informed on the use of public revenues;
Amendment 8 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 1 1.
Amendment 9 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 1 1. Regrets that, despite the letter sent by Parliament's Committee on Budgetary Control on 25 May 2020 to the
source: 662.174
2021/02/10
CONT
57 amendments...
Amendment 1 #
Proposal for a decision 1 Paragraph 1 1.
Amendment 10 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 6 6. Recognises a slight reduction in the carry-over rate, amounting to 9,8 %, from 2019 to 2020 (as compared to a carry-over of 10,7 % from 2018 to 2019 and 11,5 % from 2017 to 2018); reminds the Council of the need to strengthen its efforts to avoid budget over-estimates, reminding that carry-overs are exceptions to the principle of annuality and should reflect actual needs;
Amendment 11 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 7 7. Congratulates the Council on the successful commitment and payment rate
Amendment 12 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 10 a (new) 10 a. Reminds the Council that conducting impact assessments is one of the key factors set out in the Interinstitutional Agreement of 13 April 2016 on Better Law-Making, together with the promise of the Council to carry out impact assessments in relation to its substantial amendments to the Commission’s proposals; regrets that the Council has so far not carried out any impact assessment on one of its amendments;
Amendment 13 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 11 11.
Amendment 14 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 11 11. Notes, in the context of modernisation, the creation of a flatter management structure, by removing layers of hierarchy, with the aim of improving communication, making decision-making easier and empowering staff by allowing greater ownership of files; notes the introduction of a well-tested HR IT tool (SYSPER) and other IT tools used for managing the mission lifecycle; appreciates these steps and invites the Council to continue such efforts;
Amendment 15 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 12 12. Acknowledges that an internal control framework is in place to provide reasonable assurance of achievement of the objectives;
Amendment 16 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 17 a (new) 17 a. Welcomes the positive action programme of the General Secretariat of the Council for trainees with disability, which facilitates 4-6 paid traineeships a year to Union citizens with a recognised disability, as well as the reasonable accommodation policy of the Council which enables people with disabilities to perform a job on an equal basis with others;
Amendment 17 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 18 18. Calls on the Council to report on its
Amendment 18 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 18 18. Calls on the Council to report on its gender action plan, the related procedures put in place and the actions taken to achieve a balance between women and men on all hierarchical levels; calls further on the Council to be provided with information on the geographical balance among its staff and the measures taken in order to ensure such balance;
Amendment 19 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 18 a (new) 18 a. recalls Parliament's resolution of 17 December 2020 on the need for a dedicated Council configuration on gender equality, requesting ministers and secretaries of state in charge of gender equality to have a dedicated institutional forum to ensure stronger integration of gender equality into Union strategies and policy processes, a coordination of all related policies, as well as the harmonisation of the protection of women’s rights and gender equality in the Union via an intersectional approach; underlines that this specific configuration would represent a key element in unblocking the negotiations on the main files related to gender equality;
Amendment 2 #
Proposal for a decision 1 Paragraph 1 1.
Amendment 20 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 18 a (new) 18 a. Calls on the Council to tackle gender and geographical imbalances in order to establish a proper representation of nationals from all Member States, including at management level;
Amendment 21 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 19 19. Regrets not having
Amendment 22 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 19 a (new) 19 a. Is aware of the key role of the Council in nominations and appointments procedures for the Union institutions and bodies, in particular the European Council, the Commission, the Court and the consultative Committees (the Committee of the Regions and the European Economic and Social Committees); strongly recommends a review of these prerogatives in the view of ethical principles adopted by the Union, such as integrity and dignity; recalls the Court's statement that ethical conduct 'contributes to sounder financial management and increased public trust, which is indispensable if public policies are to succeed' and, in particular, that 'any unethical behaviour by staff and Members of the EU institutions attracts high levels of public interest and reduces trust in the EU'; considers it thus necessary to avoid the appointment as Members of Union institutions and bodies candidates who represent a reputational risk for the entire Union, such as candidates with unethical behaviour confirmed by OLAF or with legal proceedings underway against them;
Amendment 23 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 20 20. Is concerned not to find any chapter on an ethical framework on the official website of the Council consisting of rules to prevent, identify and avoid potential conflict of interests; calls on the Council to align with other Union institutions in this respect such as with the European Court of Justice’s website which has a dedicated section on transparency; calls on the Council to present a plan to introduce such measures with clearly set deadlines;
Amendment 24 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 20 a (new) 20 a. Shares the Court's concern about the absence of a common Union ethical framework governing the work of Member States’ representatives in the Council; emphasises the importance for the Council, including the Member States’ representatives working in the Council, to join a future interinstitutional agreement setting up the Independent Ethics Body (IEB) in view of the Court's and the European Ombudsman’s repeated requests to enhance the ethics and transparency of the Council; recalls the Council’s obligation to deal with high- level conflicts of interest, revolving doors and lobbying transparency rules;
Amendment 25 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 21 21.
Amendment 26 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 22 a (new) 22 a. Reiterates its deep concern over the conflict of interests of a number of Member State representatives involved in policy and budget decision-making processes; repeats Parliament’s strong call on the Council to ensure that Member State representatives who are subject to benefit directly from Union subsidies through the businesses they own do not participate in the related policy or budgetary discussions and votes; requests the Council to provide Parliament with information on the necessary measures put in place to avoid any conflict of interests;
Amendment 27 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 23 a (new) 23 a. Reiterates its concerns about the alarming information reported by the media regarding the construction of the new Europa building; calls on the Council to thoroughly research the main contractor and the whole chain of subcontractors (up to 12 according to the media), as well as the working conditions of the workers employed, and to provide Parliament’s Committee on Budgetary Control with all its findings;
Amendment 28 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 23 a (new) 23 a. Welcomes the efforts done by the Council to reduce its environmental footprint across its buildings, which are registered under the European eco- management and audit scheme (EMAS) since 2016; welcomes the publishing of a detailed environmental statement in October 2020 based on 2019 data;
Amendment 29 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 24 a (new) 24 a. Encourages the Council to use open-source technology in order to prevent vendor lock-in, retain control over its own technical systems, provide stronger safeguards for the privacy and data protection of the users, as well as increase security and transparency for the public;
Amendment 3 #
Proposal for a decision 1 Paragraph 1 1.
Amendment 30 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 24 b (new) 24 b. Encourages the Council to follow the EDPS recommendations to renegotiate the Inter-Institutional Licensing Agreement and implementation contract, signed between the EU institutions and Microsoft in 2018, with the objective of achieving digital sovereignty, avoiding vendor lock-in and lack of control and ensuring the protection of personal data;
Amendment 31 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 25 25.
Amendment 32 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 26 26.
Amendment 33 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 26 26. Encourages the Council to advise the presidencies properly in establishing clear and transparent rules on sponsorship
Amendment 34 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 28 28. Recalls that Parliament in its resolution of 17 January 2019 on the Ombudsman’s strategic inquiry OI/2/2017 on the transparency of legislative
Amendment 35 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 28 28. Recalls that Parliament in its resolution of 17 January 2019 on the Ombudsman’s strategic inquiry OI/2/2017 on the transparency of legislative discussions in the preparatory bodies of the Council of the EU overwhelmingly supported the Ombudsman’s proposals on legislative transparency and encourages the Council to continue its efforts to improve legislative transparency, particularly by recording and publishing member state positions and making available more trilogue documents; invites the Council to report on other measures taken in order to improve legislative transparency;
Amendment 36 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 29 29. Draws attention to a complaint- based inquiry in which the Ombudsman asked the General Secretariat of the Council to keep a full record of any meetings held between lobbyists and the President of the European Council or members of his cabinet;
Amendment 37 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 29 29. Draws attention to a complaint- based inquiry in which the Ombudsman asked the General Secretariat of the Council to keep a full record of any meetings held between lobbyists and the President of the European Council or members of his cabinet; echoes the Ombudsman’s statement that members of the President’s cabinet should only meet with, or attend events organised by, interest representatives that are registered in the transparency register; is concerned that this statement goes unnoticed and calls for a reply to the Ombudsman;
Amendment 38 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 30 30. Is pleased that the three institutions (Parliament, Council and Commission) reiterated their common ambition to reach an agreement on a tri-institutional transparency register to boost the transparency of interactions with interest representatives; congratulates the Council on the positive steps and further achievements under the German Presidency, expressed in the fifth inter- institutional negotiation meeting of 6 October 2020, and encourages all actors involved to agree on the reforms, so that the registry will become mandatory by including the Council; urges the Council to expand the scope of the agreement in making it mandatory for lobbyists to register in order to meet with the ambassador of the current or forthcoming presidency as well as their deputies in the Committee of the Permanent Representatives (Coreper), the Council’s secretary-general and directors-general;
Amendment 39 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 31 31. Notes however that seven complaints were lodged with the Ombudsman and that one strategic inquiry took place, all concerning transparency;
Amendment 4 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 1 1.
Amendment 40 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 33 33. Welcomes the fact that the improvements resulted in a better web user experience including for persons with disabilities, which has risen from 47 % at the end of 2018 to 67 % in December 2019; notes that the remaining audit recommendations, which are primarily related to user experience and content creation standards, will be implemented in 2020; asks the Council to further report to the discharge authority on the results and achievements of the audit recommendations particularly regarding access of persons with disabilities;
Amendment 41 #
34 a. Notes that the Council makes use of the following proprietary social media channels: LinkedIn, Facebook, Instagram and Twitter; encourages the Council to establish a presence on free and open- source social media networks, such as Mastodon, to achieve further transparency and broader outreach;
Amendment 42 #
Motion for a resolution Subheading 8 a (new) Council’s role in appointing the European prosecutors to the EPPO
Amendment 43 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 34 a (new) Amendment 44 #
Motion for a resolution Subheading 8 b (new) Recalls that Council implementing decision 14830/19 of 22 July 2020 on appointing the European prosecutors of the European Public Prosecutor's Office states that regarding the 'candidates nominated by Belgium, Bulgaria and Portugal, the Council did not follow the non-binding order of preference of the selection panel, on the basis of a different assessment of the merits of those candidates which was carried out in the relevant preparatory bodies of the Council';
Amendment 45 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 34 b (new) 34 b. Recalls that on 27 July 2020, Austria, Estonia, Luxembourg and the Netherlands published a statement that 'a competition between rankings of national selection panels and the ranking of the European selection panel must be avoided, at the risk of eroding the European component of the appointment procedure';
Amendment 46 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 34 c (new) 34 c. Regrets that Council did not properly reply to several parliamentary written questions between July and September 2020 asking Council to explain why it decided not to follow there commendations by the European selection panel and asking for elaborations on the assessment for arriving at the decision not to follow the recommendations of the European selection panel;
Amendment 47 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 34 d (new) 34 d. Is very concerned about media revelations that the Portuguese government provided Council with wrongful information about the title and experience of the candidate ranked second by the European selection panel leading to his appointment as Portuguese European prosecutor;
Amendment 48 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 34 e (new) 34 e. Recalls that the European prosecutors must be independent and any suspicion of an intervention by a national government in favour of a candidate against the recommendation of the European selection panel would have a severe negative impact on the reputation, integrity and independence of the EPPO as an institution;
Amendment 49 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 35 35. Emphasises Parliament's prerogative to grant discharge pursuant to Article 319 of the Treaty of the Functioning of the European Union
Amendment 5 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 2 a (new) 2 a. Regrets, as an overall remark, that chapter 9 ‘Administration’ of the Annual Report of the Court has a rather limited scope and conclusions, even if Heading 5 'Administration' of the Multiannual Financial Framework is considered low risk; requests that the audit work for that chapter be more focused on issues of high relevance or even critical importance for the Council;
Amendment 50 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 35 a (new) 35 a. Notes that over the course of almost twenty years Parliament has developed the practice of granting discharge to all Union institutions, bodies, offices and agencies;
Amendment 51 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 38 38. Stresses that the current situation, where Parliament can only check the reports of the Court and of the European Ombudsman as well as the information on the Council’s web page but does not receive written or oral answers from the Council during the annual discharge procedure, makes it impossible for Parliament to take an informed decision on granting discharge, which has a lasting negative effect for both institutions and discredits the procedure for political scrutiny of budget management;
Amendment 52 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 39 39. Underlines the need to re-start negotiations with the Council with a view to reach a mutually satisfactory agreement to overcome finally this situation of deadlock;
Amendment 53 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 41 41.
Amendment 54 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 41 a (new) Amendment 55 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 42 42. Advises that the positive trend of this process has been interrupted by the COVID-19-epidemic;
Amendment 56 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 42 42.
Amendment 57 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 44 44. Recalls the statements by Vice- President Věra Jourová and Commissioner Johannes Hahn in their hearings before Parliament in 2019 that they are willing to engage in this matter so as to help achieve more transparency on the implementation of the Council’s budget; considers that the negotiations could be extended to include the Commission so as to ensure that Parliament is provided with the necessary information on how the Council is implementing its budget
Amendment 6 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 2 b (new) 2 b. Reminds the longstanding request to separate the budget of the European Council and the Council into one budget for each of the two institutions for transparency reasons and to improve accountability for both institutions;
Amendment 7 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 3 3. Observes that the Council’s budget is mostly administrative with a large amount being used for expenditure concerning persons, buildings, furniture, equipment and miscellaneous running costs;
Amendment 8 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 3 3. Observes that the Council’s budget is mostly administrative with a large
Amendment 9 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 6 6. Recognises a slight reduction in the carry-over rate, amounting to 9,8 %, from 2019 to 2020 (as compared to a carry-over of 10,7 % from 2018 to 2019 and 11,5 % from 2017 to 2018); reminds the Council
source: 680.750
|
History
(these mark the time of scraping, not the official date of the change)
2021-03-27Show (6) Changes | Timetravel
| committees/0 |
|
| committees/0 |
|
| docs/2/docs/0/url |
Old
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE660.215New
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE660.215&secondRef=02 |
| events/3 |
|
| forecasts |
|
| procedure/stage_reached |
Old
Awaiting committee decisionNew
Awaiting Parliament's vote |
2021-03-03Show (6) Changes | Timetravel
| committees/0 |
|
| committees/0 |
|
| committees/17 |
|
| committees/17 |
|
| events/2 |
|
| procedure/Other legal basis |
Rules of Procedure EP 159
|
2021-02-24Show (4) Changes | Timetravel
| committees/0 |
|
| committees/0 |
|
| committees/17 |
|
| committees/17 |
|
2021-02-23Show (2) Changes | Timetravel
| docs/2/docs/0/url |
Old
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE660.215&secondRef=02New
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE660.215 |
| docs/3 |
|
2021-02-17Show (4) Changes | Timetravel
| committees/0 |
|
| committees/0 |
|
| committees/17 |
|
| committees/17 |
|
2021-02-16Show (9) Changes | Timetravel
| commission |
|
| committees/0 |
|
| committees/0 |
|
| committees/13/opinion |
False
|
| committees/17 |
|
| committees/17 |
|
| docs/1 |
|
| docs/2 |
|
| docs/3 |
|
2020-12-09Show (3) Changes | Timetravel
| committees/0 |
|
| committees/0 |
|
| committees/17/rapporteur/0/mepref |
2187
|
2020-11-01Show (1) Changes | Timetravel
| committees/2/opinion |
False
|
2020-10-22Show (2) Changes | Timetravel
| committees/12/opinion |
False
|
| committees/14/opinion |
False
|
2020-10-06Show (1) Changes | Timetravel
| committees/19/opinion |
False
|
2020-09-29Show (1) Changes | Timetravel
| committees/0/shadows/3 |
|
2020-09-28Show (4) Changes | Timetravel
| committees/3/opinion |
False
|
| committees/7/opinion |
False
|
| committees/10/opinion |
False
|
| committees/17/rapporteur |
|
2020-09-27Show (10) Changes | Timetravel
| committees/0 |
|
| committees/0 |
|
| committees/1/opinion |
False
|
| committees/6/opinion |
False
|
| committees/8/opinion |
False
|
| committees/15/opinion |
False
|
| committees/18/opinion |
False
|
| events/1 |
|
| procedure/dossier_of_the_committee |
|
| procedure/stage_reached |
Old
Preparatory phase in ParliamentNew
Awaiting committee decision |
2020-09-11Show (1) Changes | Timetravel
| committees/9/opinion |
False
|
2020-09-08Show (2) Changes | Timetravel
| committees/5/opinion |
False
|
| committees/16/opinion |
False
|
2020-09-04Show (1) Changes | Timetravel
| committees/4/opinion |
False
|
2020-08-31Show (1) Changes
| committees/11/opinion |
False
|