2020/2143(DEC) 2019 discharge: General budget of the EU - Court of Justice
Next event: Vote in committee, 1st reading/single reading 2021/03/01 more...
Lead committee dossier:
Next event: Vote in committee, 1st reading/single reading 2021/03/01 more...
- Committee draft report 2021/02/22
- Amendments tabled in committee 2021/02/08
- Supplementary non-legislative basic document 2021/02/05
- Committee opinion 2020/12/15
Progress: Awaiting committee decision
Role | Committee | Rapporteur | Shadows |
---|---|---|---|
Lead | CONT | STRUGARIU Ramona ( Renew) | LENAERS Jeroen ( EPP), GARCÍA MUÑOZ Isabel ( S&D), PEKSA Mikuláš ( Verts/ALE), CZARNECKI Ryszard ( ECR), FLANAGAN Luke Ming ( Confederal Group of the European United Left) |
Committee Opinion | PETI | ||
Committee Opinion | REGI | ||
Committee Opinion | AFCO | ||
Committee Opinion | DEVE | ||
Committee Opinion | CULT | ||
Committee Opinion | AFET | ||
Committee Opinion | PECH | ||
Committee Opinion | AGRI | ||
Committee Opinion | ENVI | ||
Committee Opinion | EMPL | ||
Committee Opinion | BUDG | ||
Committee Opinion | ITRE | ||
Committee Opinion | JURI | LEBRETON Gilles ( ID) | Emmanuel MAUREL ( GUE/NGL), Emil RADEV ( PPE), Tiemo WÖLKEN ( S&D), Jorge BUXADÉ VILLALBA ( ECR) |
Committee Opinion | ECON | ||
Committee Opinion | LIBE | ||
Committee Opinion | INTA | ||
Committee Opinion | IMCO | ||
Committee Opinion | TRAN | ||
Committee Opinion | FEMM |
Lead committee dossier:
Subjects
Events
2021/03/01
EP - Vote in committee, 1st reading/single reading
2021/02/22
EP - Committee draft report
Documents
2021/02/08
EP - Amendments tabled in committee
Documents
2021/02/05
CSL - Supplementary non-legislative basic document
Documents
2020/12/15
EP - Committee opinion
Documents
2020/09/15
EP - Committee referral announced in Parliament, 1st reading/single reading
2020/09/02
EP - LEBRETON Gilles (ID) appointed as rapporteur in JURI
2020/07/29
EC - Non-legislative basic document
Documents
2020/07/29
EC - Non-legislative basic document published
Documents
2020/07/10
EP - STRUGARIU Ramona (Renew) appointed as rapporteur in CONT
Documents
- Committee draft report: PE657.240
- Amendments tabled in committee: PE680.751
- Supplementary non-legislative basic document: 05792/2021
- Committee opinion: PE657.430
- Non-legislative basic document: COM(2020)0288
- Non-legislative basic document: EUR-Lex
- Non-legislative basic document published: COM(2020)0288
- Non-legislative basic document published: EUR-Lex
- Non-legislative basic document: COM(2020)0288 EUR-Lex
- Committee opinion: PE657.430
- Supplementary non-legislative basic document: 05792/2021
- Amendments tabled in committee: PE680.751
- Committee draft report: PE657.240
Amendments | Dossier |
16 |
2020/2143(DEC)
2020/11/11
JURI
16 amendments...
Amendment 1 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 1 a (new) 1a. Welcomes the change in the structure of this year’s Management report of the Court of Justice, which presents the information in a clearer and more comprehensible manner;
Amendment 10 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 9 9. Points out that, in 2019, five members left the Court of Justice, with four arriving, and eight members left the General Court, with 14 arriving; notes that, in line with the decision to gradually double the number of judges, there are now 52 judges at the General Court; points out that the
Amendment 11 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 10 10.
Amendment 12 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 10 10. Welcomes the fact that the
Amendment 13 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 10 10. Welcomes the fact that the proportion of women in managerial posts – 39
Amendment 14 #
10a. Considers it worrying that judgments of the Court have been misinterpreted by other Community bodies, especially as regards the scope of their application beyond the individual concerned;
Amendment 15 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 10 b (new) 10b. Regrets that the Court has not seen fit to take the initiative in clarifying its own judgments and the implementation thereof, especially in cases where this has made it possible to alter the composition of the EU institutions; believes that the Court should assess the consequences of misinterpretations of its judgments by third parties and even consider clarifying them in order to avoid dubious interpretations that could undermine the prestige of an institution such as the European Parliament;
Amendment 16 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 10 c (new) Amendment 2 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 3 3. Welcomes the fact that the average length of proceedings before the Court of Justice decreased in 2019 (14.4 months as against 15.7 months in 2018) and that the average length of proceedings before the General Court fell markedly (16.9 months as against 20 months in 2018); observes, however, that the figure for the General Court is still higher than in 2017 (16.4 months) and considers that it should give priority to the most important cases and reach its judgments more rapidly;
Amendment 3 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 4 4. Welcomes the fact that the two courts comprising the Court of Justice of the European Union closed a combined total of 1739 cases in 2019, which represents a high level of productivity in spite of a slight reduction over 2018 (1 769 cases); notes furthermore that there was a record total number of cases brought before the two courts – 1 905 as against 1 683 in 2018 – and
Amendment 4 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 4 a (new) 4a. Highlights the development of collaboration with national magistrates, 2 824 of whom were received at the Court for seminars, training, visits or internships in 2019, as opposed to 2 292 in 2018;
Amendment 5 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 5 5. Points out that the Court of Justice registered a large number of new cases in 2019 – 966, or a 13.78 % increase over 2018; points out that a large number of new cases were also referred to the Court in 2019, that is to say 939, compared with 834 to 2018; welcomes the record number of closed cases at the Court – 865, or a 13.8 % increase on the previous year; notes with concern that the number of cases settled before the General Court in 2019 (874) is significantly down from 2018 (1009);
Amendment 6 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 6 6.
Amendment 7 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 6 a (new) 6a. Points out that, in 2019, the issues dealt with in the Court of Justice and the General Court related, in the former, mainly to competition and state aid and the area of freedom, security and justice, while, in the latter, they concerned mainly state aid and intellectual and industrial property; notes that, in the General Court, the main issues remained unchanged from 2018 to 2019 , whereas, in 2018 the main issues dealt with by the Court of Justice included freedom of movement and establishment, the internal market and intellectual and industrial property , in addition to those in the area of freedom, security and justice;
Amendment 8 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 7 7. Welcomes the steady increase in the number of accounts for accessing the e- Curia application (6588 in 2019 as against 4865 in 2018) and the fact that it is used in all Member States, evidence that the platform works efficiently and that effective action has been taken to raise public awareness of the existence, efficiency, speed and advantages of the application; also welcomes the fact that
Amendment 9 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 8 8. Points up the positive turn that has been taken by the Judicial Network of the EU (RJUE) and congratulates the Court of Justice for fostering transparency by making procedural and doctrinal documents from the RJUE platform freely accessible on its website in 2019, as recommended by the Committee on Legal Affairs1 ; assesses positively the progress made in the digital field, including in the form of the new ‘Judicial Documentation’ tool, which facilitates access to relevant documentation and information for the handling of certain cases brought before the Court; _________________ 1 Opinion of the Committee on Legal Affairs for the Committee on Budgetary Control on discharge in respect of the implementation of the general budget of the European Union for the financial year 2018, Section IV – Court of Justice (2019/2058(DEC)), paragraph 12.
source: 660.208
|
History
(these mark the time of scraping, not the official date of the change)
2021-03-03Show (5) Changes | Timetravel
committees/0 |
|
committees/0 |
|
committees/15 |
|
committees/15 |
|
events/2 |
|
2021-02-24Show (4) Changes | Timetravel
committees/0 |
|
committees/0 |
|
committees/15 |
|
committees/15 |
|
2021-02-23Show (4) Changes | Timetravel
docs/2 |
|
docs/2 |
|
docs/4 |
|
docs/4/date |
Old
2021-01-27T00:00:00New
2021-02-22T00:00:00 |
2021-02-17Show (4) Changes | Timetravel
committees/0 |
|
committees/0 |
|
committees/15 |
|
committees/15 |
|
2021-02-16Show (9) Changes | Timetravel
commission |
|
committees/0 |
|
committees/0 |
|
committees/13/opinion |
False
|
committees/15 |
|
committees/15 |
|
docs/1 |
|
docs/2 |
|
docs/3 |
|
2020-12-09Show (3) Changes | Timetravel
committees/0 |
|
committees/0 |
|
committees/15/rapporteur/0/mepref |
124738
|
2020-11-01Show (1) Changes | Timetravel
committees/2/opinion |
False
|
2020-10-22Show (2) Changes | Timetravel
committees/12/opinion |
False
|
committees/14/opinion |
False
|
2020-10-06Show (1) Changes | Timetravel
committees/19/opinion |
False
|
2020-09-29Show (1) Changes | Timetravel
committees/0/shadows/3 |
|
2020-09-28Show (4) Changes | Timetravel
committees/3/opinion |
False
|
committees/7/opinion |
False
|
committees/10/opinion |
False
|
committees/17/opinion |
False
|
2020-09-27Show (9) Changes | Timetravel
committees/0 |
|
committees/0 |
|
committees/1/opinion |
False
|
committees/6/opinion |
False
|
committees/8/opinion |
False
|
committees/18/opinion |
False
|
events/1 |
|
procedure/dossier_of_the_committee |
|
procedure/stage_reached |
Old
Preparatory phase in ParliamentNew
Awaiting committee decision |
2020-09-11Show (1) Changes | Timetravel
committees/9/opinion |
False
|
2020-09-08Show (2) Changes | Timetravel
committees/5/opinion |
False
|
committees/16/opinion |
False
|
2020-09-04Show (1) Changes | Timetravel
committees/4/opinion |
False
|
2020-09-03Show (1) Changes | Timetravel
committees/15/rapporteur |
|
2020-08-31Show (1) Changes
committees/11/opinion |
False
|