Progress: Procedure completed
Role | Committee | Rapporteur | Shadows |
---|---|---|---|
Lead | CONT | CZARNECKI Ryszard ( ECR) | CHRISTOFOROU Lefteris ( EPP), RÓNAI Sándor ( S&D), CSEH Katalin ( Renew), EICKHOUT Bas ( Verts/ALE), OMARJEE Younous ( GUE/NGL) |
Committee Opinion | ENVI | CANFIN Pascal ( Renew) |
Lead committee dossier:
Subjects
Events
The European Parliament decided by 568 votes to 100, with 30 abstentions, to grant discharge to the Executive Director of the European Food Safety Authority (EFSA) for the financial year 2019 and to approve the closure of the accounts for that year.
Noting that the Court of Auditors had stated that it had obtained reasonable assurance that the Authority's annual accounts for the financial year 2019 were reliable and that the underlying transactions were legal and regular, Parliament adopted, by 605 votes to 58 with 28 abstentions, a resolution containing a series of recommendations which form an integral part of the discharge decision and which complement the general recommendations set out in the resolution on the performance, financial management and control of EU agencies.
Authority’s financial statements
The Authority's final budget for the financial year 2019 was EUR 80 736 785.59, which represents an increase of 1.96% compared to 2018.
Budgetary and financial management
Members welcomed the budget monitoring efforts during the financial year 2019 which resulted in a budget implementation rate of 99.99%, which represents a slight decrease of 0.01% compared to the financial year 2018. The execution rate for payment appropriations was 91.45%, which represents a slight increase of 0.15% compared to 2018.
The Commission is invited to grant the Authority, in duly justified cases, a set of means to use their budget in the most impactful way which would, inter alia, include the option of hiring contract agents in excess of the establishment plans, for a limited period of time and without exceeding the Authority’s agreed annual budget envelope.
Other comments
Members also made a number of observations concerning performance, staff policy, procurement, conflicts of interest and internal controls.
In particular, they noted that:
- the Authority contributes to the safety of the food and feed chain in the EU and makes considerable efforts to provide risk managers with comprehensive, independent and up-to-date scientific advice on issues related to the food chain, clearly communicating its findings and the information on which they are based to the public, and cooperating with stakeholders and institutional partners to enhance coherence and confidence in the food safety system;
- in 2019, the Authority finalised 838 issues through scientific opinions, technical reports and related publications;
- the Authority shares resources and activities with the European Chemicals Agency, the European Environment Agency, the European Medicines Agency and the European Centre for Disease Prevention and Control within the same policy cluster;
- the Authority, which is one of the EU's regulatory agencies responsible for the risk assessment of regulated products, is not given sufficient resources to carry out its responsibilities effectively;
- Parliament adopted 16 objections to the import of GM food and feed crops;
- on 31 December 2019, the establishment plan was 97.81 % implemented, with five officials and 308 temporary agents appointed out of 320 posts authorised under the Union budget;
- the Authority has taken measures to ensure transparency, prevention and management of conflicts of interest and protection of whistleblowers;
- as regards the two-year cooling-off period, the Authority's independence policy still requires it to monitor the interests of experts only in relation to the mandate of the scientific panel to which the expert is applying. Members called for the policy to be updated without delay to ensure that the interests of experts are considered in the context of the Authority's overall remit;
- the Authority should update its anti-fraud strategy and focus on disseminating the results of its research to the general public.
Documents
- Decision by Parliament: T9-0186/2021
- Debate in Parliament: Debate in Parliament
- Committee report tabled for plenary, single reading: A9-0097/2021
- Committee report tabled for plenary: A9-0097/2021
- Amendments tabled in committee: PE680.783
- Supplementary non-legislative basic document: 05793/2021
- Committee opinion: PE660.252
- Committee draft report: PE657.225
- Non-legislative basic document: COM(2020)0288
- Non-legislative basic document: EUR-Lex
- Non-legislative basic document published: COM(2020)0288
- Non-legislative basic document published: EUR-Lex
- Non-legislative basic document: COM(2020)0288 EUR-Lex
- Committee draft report: PE657.225
- Committee opinion: PE660.252
- Supplementary non-legislative basic document: 05793/2021
- Amendments tabled in committee: PE680.783
- Committee report tabled for plenary, single reading: A9-0097/2021
Votes
Décharge 2019 : Autorité européenne de sécurité des aliments - 2019 discharge: European Food Safety Authority - Entlastung 2019: Europäische Behörde für Lebensmittelsicherheit - A9-0097/2021 - Ryszard Czarnecki - Propositions de décision #
Décharge 2019 : Autorité européenne de sécurité des aliments - 2019 discharge: European Food Safety Authority - Entlastung 2019: Europäische Behörde für Lebensmittelsicherheit - A9-0097/2021 - Ryszard Czarnecki - § 9/1 #
A9-0097/2021 - Ryszard Czarnecki - § 9/2 #
A9-0097/2021 - Ryszard Czarnecki - Am 1 #
A9-0097/2021 - Ryszard Czarnecki - § 31 #
Décharge 2019 : Autorité européenne de sécurité des aliments - 2019 discharge: European Food Safety Authority - Entlastung 2019: Europäische Behörde für Lebensmittelsicherheit - A9-0097/2021 - Ryszard Czarnecki - Proposition de résolution #
Amendments | Dossier |
11 |
2020/2162(DEC)
2020/12/18
ENVI
11 amendments...
Amendment 1 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 1 1. Welcomes the European Food Safety Authority's ('EFSA's') contribution to the safety of the Union food and feed chain, and
Amendment 10 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 6 a (new) 6 a. Regrets that the research funding from companies in EFSA's remit is not considered relevant to the cooling off period as long as amounts at stake do not rise above 25 % of the total research budget managed by the expert and/or their research team, and that the threshold is applied to individual sources as opposed to all private sources combined; calls again for the funding threshold to be removed from EFSA's independence policy, in line with the Parliament's repeated requests on the matter; stresses that EFSA’s outright dismissal1a of the European Parliament’s concerns regarding this weakness in EFSA's independence policy is not acceptable; _________________ 1aEFSA Follow-up report on European Parliament’s recommendations concerning 2018 EFSA Discharge - 28 August 2020
Amendment 11 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 7 7. Notes th
Amendment 2 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 2 2. Notes that EFSA's final budget of for 2019 was EUR 79 986 785, representing an increase of 1 % compared to 2018; notes that the entire sum derives from the Union budget; notes with satisfaction that the budget monitoring efforts during 2019 resulted in an implementation rate of 100 % for commitment appropriations and 91 % for payment appropriations; notes with concern that EFSA, as one of the Union regulatory agencies responsible for risk assessment of regulated products, does not receive sufficient resources to carry out its responsibilities effectively; insists that EFSA is granted sufficient resources to carry out its tasks;
Amendment 3 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 2 2. Notes that EFSA's final budget of for 2019 was EUR 79 986 785, representing an increase of 1 % compared to 2018;
Amendment 4 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 4 a (new) 4 a. Reiterates its regrets that the research funding from companies falling under EFSA's remit is not considered relevant to the cooling-off period, as long as amounts at stake do not rise above 25 % of the total research budget managed by the expert and/or their research team, and that the threshold is applied to individual sources as opposed to all private sources combined; calls again for this policy to be updated without delay to order to remove the funding threshold from EFSA's independence policy and ensure experts' interests are considered within the context of EFSA's overall remit, in line with the Parliament's repeated requests on the matter;
Amendment 5 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 4 a (new) 4 a. Notes with satisfaction that EFSA is actively moving towards cutting edge technologies, incorporating new approach methodologies (NAMs) and artificial intelligence to avoid animal testing methods; welcomes, in particular, the use of in vitro battery testing regarding neurodevelopment disorders in children;
Amendment 6 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 4 b (new) 4 b. Welcomes EFSA's efforts to increase the use of new approach methodologies (NAMs) in the agency's human health risk assessment to reduce and replace the need for animal-based verification studies, so that by 2027 the large majority of EFSA requests for additional data will be based on NAMs;
Amendment 7 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 5 a (new) 5 a. Highlights that, in 2019, the Parliament adopted 16 objectionsto the import of genetically modified (GM) crops for food and feed; highlights that one reason for these objections are gaps in the risk assessment undertaken by EFSA's Panel on Genetically Modified Organisms; urges EFSA to address and close these gaps as a matter of urgency; whereas these gaps include, inter alia, lack of testing of cocktail effects stemming from herbicide residues, Bacillus thuringiensis ('Bt') toxins and plant constituents, the impact of increased rate of sprayings of the complementary herbicides on the overall safety of the GM plant as well as a lack of adequate toxicity testing of Bt proteins;
Amendment 8 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 5 a (new) 5 a. Invites the European Commission to grant EFSA, in duly justified cases, a set of means to use their budget in the most impactful way which would, inter alia, include the option of hiring contract agents in excess of the establishment plans, for a limited period of time and without exceeding EFSA’s agreed annual budget envelope; considers that such flexibility would allow an acceleration of the recovery of the cumulated backlog of increased work in different areas, mainly due to a big gap in human resource capacity;
Amendment 9 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 6 6. Believes that EFSA should pay special attention to public opinion and commit itself to openness and transparency; regrets that EFSA, in relation to the two-year cooling off period, still includes in its independence policy the obligation to screen experts' interests only in relation to the mandate of the scientific group to which the expert is applying; disagrees with the agency’s claims that the current policy is a "robust and sophisticated way to avoid potential conflicts"; calls again for the policy to be updated without delay in order to ensure that experts' interests are viewed within the context of EFSA's overall remit, as repeatedly called for by Parliament; reminds EFSA that, in order to maintain the independence of the EFSA panels, the agency can access any expertise it needs by inviting experts to participate in hearings without giving them the right to participate in the panel’s deliberations and drafting conclusions;
source: 660.424
|
History
(these mark the time of scraping, not the official date of the change)
events/0/date |
Old
2020-06-29T00:00:00New
2020-06-28T00:00:00 |
events/6 |
|
procedure/final |
|
procedure/stage_reached |
Old
Procedure completed, awaiting publication in Official JournalNew
Procedure completed |
events/4/docs |
|
docs/6 |
|
events/5/summary |
|
docs/6 |
|
events/5 |
|
procedure/stage_reached |
Old
Awaiting Parliament's voteNew
Procedure completed, awaiting publication in Official Journal |
events/1/body |
EP
|
events/2/body |
EP
|
events/3/body |
EP
|
docs/5 |
|
events/1 |
|
events/1 |
|
events/2 |
|
events/2 |
|
events/3/docs |
|
events/4 |
|
forecasts |
|
docs/1/docs/0/url |
Old
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE657.225New
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/CONT-PR-657225_EN.html |
docs/2/docs/0/url |
Old
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE660.252&secondRef=02New
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/ENVI-AD-660252_EN.html |
docs/4/docs/0/url |
Old
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE680.783New
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/CONT-AM-680783_EN.html |
events/3 |
|
procedure/stage_reached |
Old
Awaiting committee decisionNew
Awaiting Parliament's vote |
committees/0 |
|
committees/0 |
|
events/2 |
|
forecasts |
|
docs/4/docs/0/url |
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE680.783
|
docs/4/date |
Old
2021-03-03T00:00:00New
2021-03-04T00:00:00 |
docs/2/docs/0/url |
Old
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE660.252New
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE660.252&secondRef=02 |
docs/4/date |
Old
2021-03-01T00:00:00New
2021-03-03T00:00:00 |
committees/0 |
|
committees/0 |
|
commission |
|
docs/2/docs/0/url |
Old
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE660.252&secondRef=02New
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE660.252 |
docs/4 |
|
committees/0 |
|
committees/0 |
|
docs/3 |
|
committees/0 |
|
committees/0 |
|
committees/0 |
|
committees/0 |
|
committees/1/rapporteur/0/mepref |
96711
|
docs/1 |
|
docs/2 |
|
committees/0 |
|
committees/0 |
|
committees/1/rapporteur/0/mepref |
96711
|
committees/1/rapporteur |
|
events/1 |
|
procedure/dossier_of_the_committee |
|
procedure/stage_reached |
Old
Preparatory phase in ParliamentNew
Awaiting committee decision |
committees/0/rapporteur |
|
committees/0 |
|
committees/0 |
|
committees/0/shadows |
|