2020/2170(DEC) 2019 discharge: European Chemicals Agency (ECHA)
Lead committee dossier:
Progress: Awaiting Parliament's vote
Role | Committee | Rapporteur | Shadows |
---|---|---|---|
Lead | CONT | CZARNECKI Ryszard ( ECR) | CHRISTOFOROU Lefteris ( EPP), RÓNAI Sándor ( S&D), CSEH Katalin ( Renew), EICKHOUT Bas ( Verts/ALE), OMARJEE Younous ( GUE/NGL) |
Committee Opinion | ENVI | CANFIN Pascal ( Renew) |
Lead committee dossier:
Subjects
Events
2021/04/27
EP - Debate in Parliament
2021/03/30
EP - Committee report tabled for plenary, single reading
Documents
2021/03/30
Committee report tabled for plenary
Documents
2021/03/22
Vote in committee
2021/03/05
EP - Amendments tabled in committee
Documents
2021/02/05
CSL - Supplementary non-legislative basic document
Documents
2021/02/01
EP - Committee opinion
Documents
2021/01/08
EP - Committee draft report
Documents
2020/09/15
Committee referral announced in Parliament
2020/09/10
EP - CANFIN Pascal (Renew) appointed as rapporteur in ENVI
2020/09/08
EP - CZARNECKI Ryszard (ECR) appointed as rapporteur in CONT
2020/06/29
EC - Non-legislative basic document
Documents
2020/06/29
EC - Non-legislative basic document published
Documents
Documents
- Committee report tabled for plenary, single reading: A9-0075/2021
- Committee report tabled for plenary: A9-0075/2021
- Amendments tabled in committee: PE680.780
- Supplementary non-legislative basic document: 05793/2021
- Committee opinion: PE660.254
- Committee draft report: PE657.217
- Non-legislative basic document: COM(2020)0288
- Non-legislative basic document: EUR-Lex
- Non-legislative basic document published: COM(2020)0288
- Non-legislative basic document published: EUR-Lex
- Non-legislative basic document: COM(2020)0288 EUR-Lex
- Committee draft report: PE657.217
- Committee opinion: PE660.254
- Supplementary non-legislative basic document: 05793/2021
- Amendments tabled in committee: PE680.780
- Committee report tabled for plenary, single reading: A9-0075/2021
Votes
Décharge 2019 : Agence européenne des produits chimiques - 2019 discharge: European Chemicals Agency - Entlastung 2019: Europäische Chemikalienagentur - A9-0075/2021 - Ryszard Czarnecki - Propositions de décision #
2021/04/27 Outcome: +: 607, -: 85, 0: 6
Décharge 2019 : Agence européenne des produits chimiques - 2019 discharge: European Chemicals Agency - Entlastung 2019: Europäische Chemikalienagentur - A9-0075/2021 - Ryszard Czarnecki - Am 1/1 #
2021/04/28 Outcome: +: 614, 0: 53, -: 27
A9-0075/2021 - Ryszard Czarnecki - Am 1/2 #
2021/04/28 Outcome: -: 417, +: 235, 0: 42
Décharge 2019 : Agence européenne des produits chimiques - 2019 discharge: European Chemicals Agency - Entlastung 2019: Europäische Chemikalienagentur - A9-0075/2021 - Ryszard Czarnecki - Proposition de résolution #
2021/04/29 Outcome: +: 603, -: 84, 0: 3
Amendments | Dossier |
51 |
2020/2170(DEC)
2020/12/17
ENVI
13 amendments...
Amendment 1 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 1 1. Recalls that the European Chemicals Agency ('ECHA') is the driving force among regulatory authorities in implementing the Union's chemicals legislation for the benefit of human health and the environment as well as for innovation and competitiveness; notes that it provides information on chemicals, helps companies comply with legislation and advances the safe use of chemicals; underlines that Regulation (EC) No 1907/20061a (REACH Regulation) specifies that this should be done in a way that ensures that animal testing is only ever a last resort and that the use of non- animal methods is promoted; __________________ 1aRegulation (EC) No 1907/2006 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 18 December 2006 concerning the Registration, Evaluation, Authorisation and Restriction of Chemicals (REACH), establishing a European Chemicals Agency, amending Directive 1999/45/EC and repealing Council Regulation (EEC) No 793/93 and Commission Regulation (EC) No 1488/94 as well as Council Directive 76/769/EEC and Commission Directives 91/155/EEC, 93/67/EEC, 93/105/EC and 2000/21/EC (OJ L 396, 30.12.2006, p. 1).
Amendment 10 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 8 b (new) 8b. Asks ECHA to improve the transparency and the user-friendliness of its database, and the interface between evaluation and follow-up risk management, including, for example, a short note on the ECHA’s registered substances in the database with regard to the compliance and evaluation status of the dossiers adding outcome of substance evaluation (further risk management needed or not), stating explicitly if the dossier was found non-compliant and on what ground and adding the outcome of Board of Appeal decisions as well as the follow up delivered or intended by ECHA;
Amendment 11 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 8 c (new) 8c. Asks ECHA to develop guidance on the minimum information requirements needed to justify granting derogations to restrictions and to ensure that no derogation is accepted when registration dossiers are not compliant or updated;
Amendment 12 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 9 9. Notes that ECHA collaborates closely with other agencies, such as the European Food Safety Authority, the European Centre for Disease Prevention and Control and the European Medicines Agency, through memoranda of understanding; underlines the importance of such an approach, in order to ensure consistency between the work of those agencies and to meet the requirements of sound financial management; welcomes the sharing of services and encourages cooperation among the agencies where and when possible;
Amendment 13 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 9 9. Notes that ECHA collaborates closely with other agencies, such as the European Food Safety Authority, the European Centre for Disease Prevention and Control and the European Medicines Agency,
Amendment 2 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 3 3. Recognises that, since the final registration deadline under Regulation (EC) No 1907/20061 ('REACH Regulation') in 2018, ECHA's fee income has significantly reduced, requiring it to rely increasingly on the Union to finance its operations; recognizes that the fee income is projected to continue declining without a sufficient level of certainty; stresses that ECHA should be governed by a sustainable and predictable financing model; highlights that persistence of budgetary uncertainty can have negative consequences on the exercise of ECHA's mandate; __________________ 1Regulation (EC) No 1907/2006 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 18 December 2006 concerning the Registration, Evaluation, Authorisation and Restriction of Chemicals (REACH), establishing a European Chemicals Agency, amending Directive 1999/45/EC and repealing Council Regulation (EEC) No 793/93 and Commission Regulation (EC) No 1488/94 as well as Council Directive 76/769/EEC and Commission Directives 91/155/EEC, 93/67/EEC, 93/105/EC and 2000/21/EC (OJ L 396, 30.12.2006, p. 1).
Amendment 3 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 3 a (new) Amendment 4 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 6 a (new) 6a. Calls on ECHA to enforce more strictly the removal from the market of chemicals with incomplete registration dossiers in accordance with the REACH principal of ‘no data, no market’; notes ECHA’s commitment to reviewing all registration dossiers by 2027 and its publication in December 2019 of a list of more than 21 000 registered substances mapped in its chemical universe and assigned to pools that indicate the regulatory actions in place, initiated, ongoing, or under consideration; expresses concern that the majority of REACH-registered substances have not yet been assigned one of these pools, meaning they have not gone through any evaluation or prioritisation procedure to decide on the need for further regulatory action; recognises that fully and strictly enforcing the ‘no data, no market’ principle would require a full review of all dossiers and therefore significantly increase the programme’s costs;
Amendment 5 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 6 a (new) Amendment 6 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 6 a (new) 6a. Regrets the lack of resources in the ECHA budget dedicated specifically to ensuring knowledge and promotion of non-animal testing methods; reiterates its call to provide resources for staff within ECHA exclusively dedicated to animal protection and the promotion of non- animal methods across all ECHA activities1a; __________________ 1aEuropean Parliament resolution of 10 July 2020 on the Chemicals Strategy for Sustainability, P9 TA(2020)0201
Amendment 7 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 6 b (new) 6b. Calls on the Commission to immediately recognise and restrict substances on the ECHA's Candidate List of Substances of Very High Concern by including them in Annex XIV of the REACH Regulation, the so-called 'Authorisation List'; expresses serious concern that while ECHA has so far recommended 92 substances for the Annex XIV authorisation list, the Commission has only taken action on 54 of them, with no decision yet made on the remaining 38;
Amendment 8 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 8 8. Recognises that the new organisational structure, introduced at the start of 2019, was designed to increase ECHA's interconnectivity and facilitate more collaborative ways of working; welcomes the 50 % increase in full compliance checks of substances compared to 2018, achieved as a result of an increased focus on compliance checks through internal staff redeployment and without additional resources allocated to ECHA;
Amendment 9 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 8 a (new) 8a. Encourages ECHA to pursue its efforts to perform its REACH dossier evaluation checks and to make the process more effective; recalls that dossiers evaluation checks on over 2 000 dossiers covering 700 substances revealed that 70 % of the dossiers were not compliant with the legal information requirements of REACH or did not contain sufficient information to ensure a safe use for Union citizens and the environment;
source: 660.422
2021/03/08
CONT
38 amendments...
Amendment 1 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 2 2. Emphasises that the Agency is partly financed from the fees it receives from companies that request the registration of chemicals as required under Regulation (EC) No 1907/2006; notes that the applicable fees depend on the size of the companies and the volume of chemicals registered (different thresholds); notes that, according to the Court’s report, since the first registrations in 2009, some 26 % of the companies claimed to be micro, small or medium sized; notes with concern, however, that thanks to the Agency’s effective system of ex-post verifications, the Agency has identified that some 50 % of the companies had incorrectly declared their size, resulting in lower fees; stresses that this finding demonstrates the limitations of a system that relies excessively on self-declarations made by applicants; notes that, in order to mitigate this situation, the Agency has, over the years, invoiced fee corrections and administrative charges amounting to EUR 32,2 million, and that the Agency has made considerable progress in recovering undue fee reductions and collecting overdue administrative charges; notes, however, that there is still a considerable verification workload ahead and that the remaining amount of necessary fee corrections was unknown at the end of 2019; calls on the Agency to report to the discharge authority on its efforts, and on the results achieved, to continue to reduce the considerable verification backlog and to implement the fee corrections; asks the Commission to propose measures to solve this situation, avoiding fraud in declaring the size of the applicants and granting a more stable budget planning for the Agency;
Amendment 10 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 5 a (new) 5 a. Regrets the absence in the 2019- 2023 strategic plan of any pro-active measures and resourcing for speeding up, improving and quantifying reductions in the number of animal tests and their replacement by new approach methodologies;
Amendment 11 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 5 b (new) 5 b. Notes the recommendation made by the European Parliament in its resolution of 6 July 2020 on the Chemicals Strategy for Sustainability1a that there should be a team established within the Agency exclusively dedicated to animal protection and the promotion of non-animal methods; this should be regarded as complimentary to and supportive of the embedding of the promotion of non-animal methods within the practices of client-facing agency staff; _________________ 1aNot yet published in the Official Journal.
Amendment 12 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 5 a (new) Amendment 13 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 6 a (new) 6 a. Calls on the Agency to continue to develop its synergies, increase cooperation and exchange of good practices with other European agencies with a view to improve efficiency (human resources, buildingmanagement, IT services and security);
Amendment 14 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 6 a (new) 6 a. Asks the Agency to develop guidance on the minimum information requirements needed to justify granting derogations to restrictions and to ensure that no derogation is accepted when registration dossiers are not compliant or updated;
Amendment 15 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 6 b (new) 6 b. Stresses the importance to increase the digitalisation of the Agency in terms of internal operations and management procedures; stresses the need for the Agency to continue to be proactive in this regard in order to avoid a digital gap between the agencies at all costs; draws attention, however, to the need to take all the necessary security measures to avoid any risk to the online security of the information processed;
Amendment 16 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 6 a (new) 6 a. Encourages the Agency to pursue the digitalisation of its services, as a way to reduce bureaucracy;
Amendment 17 #
6 c. Recalls the importance for the Agency to develop greater visibility in the media, internet, and social media in order to make its work known;
Amendment 18 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 7 a (new) 7 a. Notes gender imbalance in 2019 with regard to the senior management positions (71 % male and 29 % female) and with regard to the management board (69 % male and 31 % female); asks the Agency to ensure gender balance at the senior management level in the future; asks the Commission and the Member States to take into account the importance of ensuring gender balance when nominating their members to the Agency’s management board;
Amendment 19 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 7 a (new) Amendment 2 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 2 2. Emphasises that the Agency is partly financed from the fees it receives from companies that request the registration of chemicals as required under Regulation (EC) No 1907/2006; notes that the applicable fees depend on the size of the companies and the volume of chemicals registered (different thresholds); notes that, according to the Court’s report, since the first registrations in 2009, some 26 % of the companies claimed to be micro, small or medium sized; notes with concern, however, that thanks to the Agency’s effective system of ex-post verifications, the Agency has identified that some 50 % of the companies had incorrectly declared their size, resulting in lower fees; stresses that this finding demonstrates the limitations of a system that relies excessively on self-declarations made by applicants; notes that, in order to mitigate this situation, the Agency has, over the years, invoiced and cashed fee corrections and administrative charges amounting to EUR 32,2 million, and that the Agency has made considerable progress in recovering undue fee reductions and collecting overdue administrative charges; notes, however, that there is still a considerable verification workload ahead and that the remaining amount of necessary fee corrections was unknown at the end of 2019; calls on the Agency to report to the discharge authority on its efforts, and on the results achieved, to continue to reduce the considerable verification
Amendment 20 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 7 a (new) 7 a. Is concerned by the lack of gender balance at the senior management and board management level; invites the Agency to increase its effort to achieve a better gender balance;
Amendment 21 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 7 a (new) 7 a. Calls on the Agency to reduce its gender imbalance in the managerial positions;
Amendment 22 #
8. Notes that the Agency has an anti- harassment policy and related guidelines in place; acknowledges that it organised training sessions and made confidential counselling available, furthermore, notes that a pilot project with mediation in teams that have experienced conflicts was started in 2019; notes that the Agency had one informal harassment procedure in 2019;
Amendment 23 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 9 9. Notes the publication of the Agency’s vacancy notices on its website, on social media and on the EU Agencies Network’s dedicated site, in order to publicise such notices more; notes the Agency’s reply that it has started to review processes to be able to post vacancy notices on the website of the European Personnel Selection Office; calls on the Agency to publish vacancy notices on the website of the European Personnel Selection Office; calls on the Agency to explore further possibilities of attracting highly-qualifies staff by broadening the reach out of the vacancy publications;
Amendment 24 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 9 9. Notes the publication of the Agency’s vacancy notices on its website, on social media and on the EU Agencies Network’s dedicated site, in order to publicise such notices more; notes the Agency’s reply that it has started to review processes to be able to post vacancy notices on the website of the European Personnel Selection Office; calls on the Agency to publish vacancy notices on the website of the European Personnel Selection Office; calls upon the Agency to aim its focus on disseminating the results of its research to the general public;
Amendment 25 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 9 a (new) 9 a. Welcomes the Agency's efforts to build a more diverse and inclusive work environment and culture by taking actions in favour of people with disabilities, asks the institution to assess the possibilities of further strengthening and integrating the principles of equal opportunities in recruitment, training, career development, working conditions as well as to raise staff awareness of these aspects; and on the possible reasonable improvements and modifications of the institutions' buildings (access, adequate office equipment) for people with reduced mobility or other disabilities;
Amendment 26 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 9 a (new) 9 a. Encourages the Agency to pursue the development ofa long term Human Resources policy framework which addresses the work-life balance, the lifelong guidance and career development, the gender balance, the teleworking, the geographical balance and the recruitment and integration of people with disabilities;
Amendment 27 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 10 10. Welcomes the fact that the Agency publishes on its website the CVs of all members of the Management Board and its Committees, including those of its chairs who are the Agency’s members of staff, the Executive Director and all members of the Board of Appeal; welcomes that the Agency publishes the declarations of interest of all members of the Management Board, the senior management and the Committee Chairs on its website;
Amendment 28 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 10 a (new) 10 a. Calls on the Agency to align its practices with the recommendations of the European Ombudsman of 7 May 2020 in case 2168/2019/KR in particular by ensuring, where necessary, that the option of forbidding its senior staff from taking up certain positions after their term-of- office is invoked, by setting out criteria for when it will forbid moves from staff to the private sector; by informing applicants for senior posts of the Agency of the criteria when they apply and by putting in place internal procedures so that once that a member of its staff moves to another job, their access to confidential information is cut off with immediate effect;
Amendment 29 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 11 11.
Amendment 3 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 2 2. Emphasises that the Agency is partly financed from the fees it receives from companies that request the registration of chemicals as required under Regulation (EC) No 1907/2006; notes that the applicable fees depend on the size of the companies and the volume of chemicals registered (different thresholds); notes that, according to the Court’s report, since the first registrations in 2009, some 26 % of the companies claimed to be micro, small or medium sized; notes with concern, however, that thanks to the Agency’s effective system of ex-post verifications, the Agency has identified that some 50 % of the companies had incorrectly declared their size, resulting in lower fees; stresses that this finding demonstrates the limitations of a system that relies excessively on self-declarations made by applicants; notes that, in order to mitigate this situation, the Agency has, over the years, invoiced and cashed fee corrections and administrative charges amounting to EUR 32,2 million, and that the Agency has made considerable progress in recovering undue fee reductions and collecting overdue administrative charges; notes, however, that there is still a considerable verification workload ahead and that the remaining amount of necessary fee corrections was unknown at the end of 2019; calls on the Agency to report to the discharge authority on its efforts, and on the results achieved, to continue to reduce the considerable verification
Amendment 30 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 12 12. According to the Agency, its budgeted fee income for 2019 represents circa 39,5 % of its total income; acknowledges that the Agency has an exemplary system of monitoring and for preventing any conflicts of interest, and its view that there is limited danger of such conflicts arising, due to the cost-covering purpose of the fees and the regular assessment of the Agency’s staff involved in opinion-making to ensure there is independence; notes that the Agency would welcome a solution whereby the Commission would collect the fees on behalf of the Agency, thereby facilitating the Agency’s financial management and helping to mitigate the risks of shortfalls; notes that the fees paid by industry vary substantially year by year, and that it is therefore not possible for the Agency to estimate the need for a balancing subsidy from the Union budget at a reasonable margin, which complicates budgetary planning; calls for a dialogue on how to reform the financing mechanism of the Agency, with the aim of putting it on a sustainable basis;
Amendment 31 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 12 a (new) 12 a. Underlines the fact that the current ethical framework applying to Union institutions and agencies suffers from considerable drawbacks due to its fragmentation and lack of coordination between existing provisions; highlights that these issues should be addressed by setting up a common ethical framework, ensuring the application of high ethical standards for all Union institutions and agencies; considers that public officials are not in a position to conduct self- assessments regarding ethical situations or in instances of conflicts of interest; believes that this should fall under the competences of an independent specialised third party; calls under these circumstances, for the creation of an Union independent ethics body, responsible for the implementation of the common ethical framework for all Union institutions and agencies;
Amendment 32 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 14 14. Notes from the Court’s report, that the decision making process in recruitment procedures was not sufficiently structured and exhaustive to provide for a clear, chronological trail showing when the documents had been approved and by whom; notes the Agency’s reply that it has altered its procedures to ensure that standard emails are sent to selection committee members after each meeting to record the meeting minutes and decisions
Amendment 33 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 16 a (new) 16 a. Asks the Agency to improve the transparency and the user-friendliness of its database, and the interface between evaluation and follow-up risk management, including, for example, a short note on the Agency’s registered substances in the database with regard to the compliance and evaluation status of the dossiers adding outcome of substance evaluation (further risk management needed or not), stating explicitly if the dossier was found non-compliant and on what ground and adding the outcome of Board of Appeal decisions as well as the follow up delivered or intended by the Agency;
Amendment 34 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 17 a (new) 17 a. Encourages the Agency to pursue its efforts to perform its dossier evaluation checks under Regulation (EU) No 1907/2006 and to make the process more effective; recalls that dossiers evaluation checks on over 2 000 dossiers covering 700 substances revealed that 70 % of the dossiers were not compliant with the legal information requirements of Regulation (EU) No 1907/2006 or did not contain sufficient information to ensure a safe use for Union citizens and the environment;
Amendment 35 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 18 18. Notes that the process of moving to the Agency’s new premises in Helsinki began on 21 December 2019 and the new building was open and operational for the Agency’s staff at the beginning of January 2020, concluding four years of preparations for relocating staff;
Amendment 36 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 18 18. Notes that the process of moving to the Agency’s new premises in Helsinki began on 21 December 2019 and the new building was open and operational for the Agency’s staff at the beginning of January 2020, concluding four years of preparations for relocating staff; notes that the move is due to the
Amendment 37 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 18 18. Notes that the process of moving to the Agency’s new premises in Helsinki began on 21 December 2019 and the new building was open and operational for the Agency’s staff at the beginning of January 2020, concluding four years of preparations for relocating staff; notes that the move is due to the partial malfunctioning of its previous building, particularly as regards air quality; invites the Agency to ensure its employees well- being by proving a sustainable and environment-friendly working conditions;
Amendment 38 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 20 20. Notes with concern that the Agency has several litigation, appeal and complaint cases that have been sent to European Court of Justice, Board of Appeal and European Ombudsman and most of these cases have been dismissed (20 of 37 cases);
Amendment 4 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 3 3. Notes, regarding follow-up of the Court’s previous years’ findings, that the Agency has revenues coming both from fees and charges payable by industry and a balancing subsidy from the Union budget; notes that, as the third registration deadline under Regulation (EC) No 1907/2006 expired in May 2018, income from fees and charges
Amendment 6 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 3 a (new) 3 a. Welcomes the efforts made by the Agency to create an environment-friendly working frame and all the measures taken by the Agency to reduce its carbon footprint, its energy consumption and to develop a paperless workflow and particularly the Director’s pledge to reach carbon neutrality by 2030;
Amendment 7 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 3 a (new) 3 a. Welcomes the Agency’s efforts to provide a cost-effective and environmentally-friendly workplace and to reduce and offset its CO2 emissions; notes with satisfaction that the Executive Director of the Agency has pledged the Agency to be carbon neutral by 2030;
Amendment 8 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 4 4. Acknowledges, that the Agency reworked its performance management model for the Work Programme 2019, with a view to better indicating the impact and outcome of its work
Amendment 9 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 5 a (new) source: 680.780
|
History
(these mark the time of scraping, not the official date of the change)
2021-05-03Show (3) Changes | Timetravel
events/1/body |
EP
|
events/2/body |
EP
|
events/3/body |
EP
|
2021-04-30Show (2) Changes | Timetravel
events/4 |
|
forecasts |
|
2021-04-16Show (6) Changes | Timetravel
docs/5 |
|
events/1 |
|
events/1 |
|
events/2 |
|
events/2 |
|
events/3/docs |
|
2021-04-13Show (3) Changes | Timetravel
docs/1/docs/0/url |
Old
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE657.217New
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/CONT-PR-657217_EN.html |
docs/2/docs/0/url |
Old
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE660.254&secondRef=02New
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/ENVI-AD-660254_EN.html |
docs/4/docs/0/url |
Old
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE680.780New
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/CONT-AM-680780_EN.html |
2021-03-31Show (2) Changes | Timetravel
events/3 |
|
procedure/stage_reached |
Old
Awaiting committee decisionNew
Awaiting Parliament's vote |
2021-03-27Show (4) Changes | Timetravel
committees/0 |
|
committees/0 |
|
events/2 |
|
forecasts |
|
2021-03-16Show (2) Changes | Timetravel
docs/2/docs/0/url |
Old
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE660.254New
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE660.254&secondRef=02 |
docs/4/docs/0/url |
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE680.780
|
2021-03-08Show (1) Changes | Timetravel
docs/2/docs/0/url |
Old
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE660.254&secondRef=02New
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE660.254 |
2021-03-06Show (1) Changes | Timetravel
docs/4/date |
Old
2021-03-03T00:00:00New
2021-03-05T00:00:00 |
2021-03-04Show (2) Changes | Timetravel
docs/2/docs/0/url |
Old
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE660.254New
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE660.254&secondRef=02 |
docs/4/date |
Old
2021-03-01T00:00:00New
2021-03-03T00:00:00 |
2021-03-03Show (2) Changes | Timetravel
committees/0 |
|
committees/0 |
|
2021-03-02Show (3) Changes | Timetravel
commission |
|
docs/2/docs/0/url |
Old
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE660.254&secondRef=02New
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE660.254 |
docs/4 |
|
2021-02-24Show (2) Changes | Timetravel
committees/0 |
|
committees/0 |
|
2021-02-23Show (2) Changes | Timetravel
docs/2/docs/0/url |
Old
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE660.254New
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE660.254&secondRef=02 |
docs/3 |
|
2021-02-17Show (2) Changes | Timetravel
committees/0 |
|
committees/0 |
|
2021-02-16Show (5) Changes | Timetravel
committees/0 |
|
committees/0 |
|
committees/1/rapporteur/0/mepref |
96711
|
docs/1 |
|
docs/2 |
|
2020-12-09Show (3) Changes | Timetravel
committees/0 |
|
committees/0 |
|
committees/1/rapporteur/0/mepref |
96711
|
2020-09-28Show (1) Changes | Timetravel
committees/1/rapporteur |
|
2020-09-27Show (3) Changes | Timetravel
events/1 |
|
procedure/dossier_of_the_committee |
|
procedure/stage_reached |
Old
Preparatory phase in ParliamentNew
Awaiting committee decision |
2020-09-08Show (1) Changes | Timetravel
committees/0/rapporteur |
|
2020-09-03Show (2) Changes | Timetravel
committees/0 |
|
committees/0 |
|
2020-09-02Show (1) Changes
committees/0/shadows |
|