Next event: Amendments tabled in committee 2022/09/06 more...
- Committee draft report 2022/07/18
- GARCÍA MUÑOZ Isabel (S&D) appointed as rapporteur in CONT 2022/06/30
- Debate in Parliament 2022/05/04
- Decision by Parliament 2022/05/04
- Report referred back to committee 2022/05/04
- Committee report tabled for plenary, single reading 2022/03/28
- Committee report tabled for plenary 2022/03/28
- Supplementary non-legislative basic document 2022/03/03
- Vote in committee 2022/02/28
- Amendments tabled in committee 2022/02/01
- Committee draft report 2021/12/17
- Committee opinion 2021/12/13
Progress: Awaiting committee decision
Role | Committee | Rapporteur | Shadows |
---|---|---|---|
Lead | CONT | GARCÍA MUÑOZ Isabel ( S&D) | LENAERS Jeroen ( EPP), IN 'T VELD Sophia ( Renew), PEKSA Mikuláš ( Verts/ALE), KUHS Joachim ( ID), CZARNECKI Ryszard ( ECR), FLANAGAN Luke Ming ( GUE/NGL) |
Committee Opinion | FEMM | ||
Committee Opinion | REGI | ||
Committee Opinion | DEVE | ||
Committee Opinion | CULT | ||
Committee Opinion | AFET | ||
Committee Opinion | PECH | ||
Committee Opinion | AGRI | ||
Committee Opinion | ENVI | ||
Committee Opinion | EMPL | ||
Committee Opinion | BUDG | ||
Committee Opinion | ITRE | ||
Committee Opinion | JURI | ||
Committee Opinion | ECON | ||
Committee Opinion | LIBE | ||
Committee Opinion | INTA | ||
Committee Opinion | IMCO | ||
Committee Opinion | TRAN | ||
Committee Opinion | AFCO | Pascal DURAND ( RE), Domènec RUIZ DEVESA ( S&D), Damian BOESELAGER ( Verts/ALE) |
Lead committee dossier:
Subjects
Events
The European Parliament decided by 555 votes to 60, with 13 abstentions, to postpone its decision on the discharge to the Secretary-General of the Council in respect of the implementation of the budget of the European Council and the Council for the financial year 2020.
Parliament deplored the fact that the Council has shown for more than a decade that it has no political will to cooperate with Parliament in the annual discharge procedure, which does not allow Parliament to take informed decisions on granting discharge. It stressed that this attitude discredits the management and democratic control of the Union's budget and undermines citizens' confidence in the Union as a transparent entity.
Furthermore, Members consider it unacceptable that the COVID-19 pandemic and the exceptional situation experienced have been used as an excuse not to resume negotiations on the discharge procedure. Convinced that an agreement on this issue is still possible, they called on the Council to resume negotiations with Parliament without delay to find a solution within the current framework of the discharge procedure.
In its resolution, adopted by 584 votes to 37 with 22 abstentions, Parliament made the following observations.
Budgetary and financial management
In 2020, the Council had an overall budget of EUR 590 633 000 (compared to EUR 581 895 459 in 2019). Members noted an increase in the budget of 1.5% compared to 2019, which confirms a downward trend in the annual budget increase (1.6% in 2019, 2% in 2018 and 3% in 2017). They noted that the Council's share of heading 5 of the multiannual financial framework has fallen from 6.3% in 2015 to 5.8% in 2020. They noted an overall implementation rate of 93.15% (compared with 92.3% in 2019).
Parliament noted that the Court of Auditors found no significant weaknesses in the Council's audit of the areas of human resources and public procurement. On the basis of its audit work, the Court concluded that the payments for administrative expenditure of the EU institutions, including the Council for the financial year 2020, were, taken as a whole, free from material error . In addition, the Court did not identify any particular problems with the regularity of the transactions or following its examination of the Council's supervisory and control system.
Once again, Parliament reiterated its call for the separation of the budgets of the European Council and the Council to improve transparency, accountability and efficiency of spending for both institutions.
Internal management, performance, internal control
Members noted with satisfaction that the Council's timely and effective response to the COVID-19 crisis had resulted in a number of structured measures in several areas to protect staff and ensure business continuity. They welcomed the improvements in the GSC's internal organisation, focusing in particular on the need to address the operational limitations arising from the COVID-19 situation. They also noted that in 2020 the Council maintained its legislative activity at the same level as in 2019 despite the difficult working conditions.
Human resources, equality and staff welfare
The establishment plan for 2020 was set at 3 029 posts (compared to 3 033 in 2019), of which 2 905 were filled by 31 December 2020. The occupancy rate is close to 96%.
Parliament deplored the lack of information on the implementation of the Council's action plan on gender equality and on the measures taken to ensure that people with disabilities enjoy the same professional opportunities as others in the Council. It also regretted that the Council has so far ignored Parliament's call for a Council formation on gender equality , which could serve as a specific institutional discussion forum to ensure a strengthened integration of gender equality in the Union's strategies.
Ethical framework and transparency
Members welcomed the political agreement on the transparency register for interest representatives reached by Parliament, the Council and the Commission on 15 December 2020. However, they regretted the limitations mentioned in Article 5 of Parliament's decision of 27 April 2021 on the conclusion of an interinstitutional agreement on a mandatory transparency register, in particular the fact that the transparency register applies to Member States’ permanent representatives only under voluntary schemes.
The Council, including the Member States' representatives, is invited to harmonise, improve and enforce existing rules on ethics, in particular as regards conflicts of interest, revolving doors and lobby transparency rules.
Parliament deplored the use of corporate sponsorship by Member States to cover part of the costs they incur in financing their Council presidency. It reiterated its call on the Council to examine the budgeting of the Council Presidency in order to ensure continuity and efficiency.
Stressing the Council's key role in the nomination and appointment procedures within the Union's institutions and bodies, Members deplored the fact that the Council had repeatedly failed to take into account Parliament's recommendations in its advisory role regarding the appointment of members of the Court.
Parliament also reaffirmed its full support for the European Ombudsman's recommendations on the transparency of the legislative process in the Council, including making Member States' positions more accessible. Regretting that the decision-making process in the Council is still far from being fully transparent, Members called on the Council to take all necessary measures to implement the Ombudsman's recommendations and the relevant rulings of the European Court of Justice.
Lastly, Parliament reiterated its deep concern about the confirmed conflict of interest situations of a number of Member States' representatives involved in the political and budgetary decision-making processes.
Digital transformation, cybersecurity, data protection
The final budgetary appropriations made available to the Directorate-General for Digital Services increased substantially (EUR 10.6 million) at the mid-term and end-of-year reviews, reaching a final amount of EUR 54 675 000, with an implementation rate of 99.99%.
Parliament called on the Council to use open-source technology in order to prevent vendor lock-in, to retain control over its own technical systems, to provide stronger safeguards for the privacy and data protection of its users, and to increase security and transparency for the public.
Lastly, Parliament called on the Council to respect the obligations set out in the Interinstitutional Agreement of 16 December 2020 between the European Parliament, the Council of the European Union and the European Commission on budgetary discipline, cooperation in budgetary matters and sound financial management and on new own resources.
PURPOSE: presentation by the Commission of the consolidated annual accounts of the European Union for the financial year 2020, as part of the 2020 discharge procedure.
Analysis of the accounts of the EU Institutions: European Council and Council
The consolidated annual accounts of the EU provide financial information on the activities of the institutions, agencies and other bodies of the EU from an accrual accounting and budgetary perspective. They are prepared according to the highest available international public sector standards.
The discharge is a Parliament decision that reflects its conclusions at the end of a process, the discharge procedure, on the way the Commission (and other institutions and bodies) has carried out its task of implementing the EU budget.
The decision is based in particular on the European Court of Auditors reports, in particular its annual report, in which the Court provides a Statement of Assurance (DAS) on the legality and regularity of transactions (payments and commitments).
Implementation of the European Council/Council’s appropriations for the financial year 2020
The total commitment appropriations amounted to EUR 649 million .
The Council’s activities in 2020 were marked by:
- the COVID-19 pandemic which has had an impact on the accounting outturn for the year. Fewer physical meetings led to lower spending on delegates travel expenses and interpretation costs. This underspend has been compensated, at budgetary level, by increased spending on IT in order to develop capacity for virtual meetings and remote working so that Council business could continue. Expenditure covered, inter alia , new software acquisitions, external assistance and provision of hardware to facilitate home working;
- Brexit: on 1 February 2020, the United Kingdom ceased to be a Member State of the EU. Following the conclusion of the Withdrawal Agreement, the UK committed to pay all its obligations under the current MFF and previous financial perspectives following from its membership of the Union. The United Kingdom has paid into the 2020 EU Budget during the year, and received payments, as if it were a Member State. At the date of transmission of these accounts and based on the Withdrawal Agreement concluded and already in operation, there is no financial impact to be reported in these accounts.
Documents
- Amendments tabled in committee: PE736.353
- Committee draft report: PE734.318
- Decision by Parliament: T9-0146/2022
- Committee report tabled for plenary, single reading: A9-0067/2022
- Committee report tabled for plenary: A9-0067/2022
- Supplementary non-legislative basic document: 06001/2022
- Amendments tabled in committee: PE703.192
- Committee draft report: PE699.021
- Committee opinion: PE699.205
- Court of Auditors: opinion, report: OJ C 430 25.10.2021, p. 0007
- Court of Auditors: opinion, report: N9-0043/2022
- Non-legislative basic document published: COM(2021)0381
- Non-legislative basic document published: EUR-Lex
- Court of Auditors: opinion, report: OJ C 430 25.10.2021, p. 0007 N9-0043/2022
- Committee opinion: PE699.205
- Committee draft report: PE699.021
- Amendments tabled in committee: PE703.192
- Supplementary non-legislative basic document: 06001/2022
- Committee report tabled for plenary, single reading: A9-0067/2022
- Committee draft report: PE734.318
- Amendments tabled in committee: PE736.353
Amendments | Dossier |
29 |
2021/2108(DEC)
2021/11/29
AFCO
29 amendments...
Amendment 1 #
Draft opinion Recital B a (new) B a. Whereas the applicable provisions of the Financial Regulation and Parliament's Rules of Procedure establish the power to grant discharge in order to maintain transparency and to ensure democratic accountability towards Union taxpayers;
Amendment 10 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 1 1. Regrets the Council’s continuing refusal to engage in loyal cooperation in the framework of the discharge procedure for more than a decade, which prevents Parliament making an informed decision, and its lack of respect for Parliament’s role as guarantor of the democratic accountability of the Union budget;
Amendment 11 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 1 a (new) 1 a. Recalls the role of Parliament and of other institutions in the discharge procedure, as provided for by TFEU, in particular Article 319 thereof, and by the Financial Regulation, in particular Articles 260 to 263 thereof; underlines that Parliament's role is reinforced by a well-established and respected practice;
Amendment 12 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 2 2. Calls on the Council to implement the recommendations adopted by the European Parliament on the budget discharge procedure and to resume negotiations on the memorandum of understanding on the
Amendment 13 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 2 2. Calls on the Council to resume negotiations on the memorandum of understanding on the cooperation during the budget discharge procedure; reiterates that, if those negotiations do not succeed, they should be extended to the Commission to ensure that Parliament is provided with necessary information on how the Council is implementing its budget, either directly or via the Commission; considers that the Conference on the Future of Europe provides an opportunity to come forward with proposals to improve the transparency and readability of the Council’s budget for citizens;
Amendment 14 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 2 a (new) 2a. Calls on the Council to comply fully with the obligations deriving from the Interinstitutional Agreement on budgetary discipline, on cooperation in budgetary matters and on sound financial management in order to guarantee democratic scrutiny by Parliament and strengthen the democratic legitimacy of the work of the Council and transparency;
Amendment 15 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 2 a (new) 2 a. Reiterates that the budget of the European Council and of the Council should be divided into two separate budgets to increase transparency, and to improve expenditure efficiency and accountability;
Amendment 16 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 2 b (new) 2b. Recalls to mind the European Ombudsman's inquiry (OI/2/2017) and recommendations on the transparency of the Council's legislative work; considers complying with the Ombudsman's recommendations to be an important step that would enable citizens to be involved in the legislative process of the European Union and better understand it, and that this would enable the Council to comply with Parliament's requests made during discharge; calls therefore for the Council to improve legislative transparency by making a greater number of documents, including those on interinstitutional negotiations, available;
Amendment 17 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 3 3. Considers that the Conference on the Future of Europe provides an opportunity to discuss proposals to enhance transparency and democratic accountability with regard to the protection of the Union’s financial interests and the Union’s accountability vis-à-vis citizens;
Amendment 18 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 3 3. Considers that the Conference on the Future of Europe provides an opportunity to discuss proposals to enhance transparency and democratic accountability with regard to the protection of the Union’s financial interests within the boundaries that are clearly and strictly determined by the Treaties;
Amendment 19 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 3 3. Considers that the Conference on the Future of Europe
Amendment 2 #
Draft opinion Recital B b (new) B b. Whereas over the course of almost twenty years Parliament has implemented the well-established and respected practice of granting discharge to all Union institutions, bodies, offices and agencies;
Amendment 20 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 3 a (new) 3 a. Believes that increased transparency and a proactive approach to sharing information on the part of the Council would be conducive to a better- informed discharge procedure from the outset;
Amendment 21 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 3 b (new) 3 b. Reiterates its full endorsement of the European Ombudsman’s recommendation in Case OI/2/2017/TE on the transparency of the Council legislative process, following its strategic inquiry; urges the Council to take all necessary measures to implement that recommendation without undue delay;
Amendment 22 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 4 4. Underlines that
Amendment 23 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 4 4. Underlines that while the current situation could be improved through better interinstitutional cooperation within the
Amendment 24 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 4 4. Underlines that while the current situation could be improved through better interinstitutional cooperation within the
Amendment 25 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 4 a (new) 4 a. Regrets that the budget of the European Council and of the Council has not been divided into two separate budgets, as recommended by Parliament in its recent discharge resolutions, in order to improve transparency and accountability of each institution.
Amendment 26 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 4 b (new) Amendment 27 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 4 c (new) 4 c. Regrets the use of corporate sponsorship to cover some of the expenses incurred by Member States to finance their Council Presidency; is highly concerned by the possible reputational damage that this practice might cause to the Council and to the Union; urges for the adoption of clear guidelines aimed at preventing situations of conflicts of interest and for the definition of transparent and binding rules on sponsorship;
Amendment 28 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 4 d (new) 4 d. Regrets that reporting by the Council on measures taken to improve legislative transparency remains less than satisfactory and reiterates its call on the Council to step up its transparency efforts by, inter alia, publishing Council working documents in a machine-readable format, by recording and publishing Member States’ positions and making available more trilogue documents;
Amendment 29 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 4 e (new) 4 e. Considers that the lack of cooperation from the European Council and from the Council with the discharge authority sends a negative signal to citizens of the Union;
Amendment 3 #
Draft opinion Recital C a (new) Ca. whereas the Interinstitutional Agreement on budgetary discipline, on cooperation in budgetary matters and on sound financial management concluded in December 2020 between the Commission, the European Parliament and the Council provides for rules on cooperation between the institutions on the budget, in line with the principles of budget discipline and sound financial management; whereas the aforesaid agreement is binding on the institutions that signed it and entails budget cooperation and transparency obligations;
Amendment 4 #
Draft opinion Recital C a (new) C a. Whereas the European Council and the Council, as Union institutions, should be democratically accountable towards the citizens of the Union, in so far as they are beneficiaries of the general budget of the Union;
Amendment 5 #
Draft opinion Recital C a (new) C a. Whereas democratic scrutiny of the spending of public funds is vital if citizens are to have confidence in the functioning of the institutions;
Amendment 6 #
Draft opinion Recital C b (new) Cb. whereas the 2018 recommendations of the European Ombudsman in case OI/2/2017/TE found that the Council's practices in regard to transparency in the legislative process constituted maladministration; whereas the Council did not comply with these recommendations which would have enabled citizens to follow the EU's legislative process;
Amendment 7 #
Draft opinion Recital C b (new) C b. Whereas the case-law of the Court of Justice of the European Union confirms the right of taxpayers and of the public to be kept informed about the use of public revenues;
Amendment 8 #
Draft opinion Recital C c (new) C c. Whereas, pursuant to Article 15(1) of the Treaty on the European Union, the European Council is not to exercise legislative functions;
Amendment 9 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 1 1.
source: 700.546
|
History
(these mark the time of scraping, not the official date of the change)
committees/1 |
|
committees/1/opinion |
False
|
committees/5 |
|
committees/5 |
Old
New
|
committees/6 |
Old
New
|
committees/7 |
Old
New
|
committees/8 |
Old
New
|
committees/9 |
Old
New
|
committees/10 |
Old
New
|
committees/11 |
Old
New
|
committees/17/opinion |
False
|
committees/1 |
Old
New
|
committees/2 |
Old
New
|
committees/3 |
Old
New
|
committees/4 |
Old
New
|
committees/5 |
Old
New
|
committees/6/opinion |
False
|
committees/1 |
Old
New
|
committees/2 |
Old
New
|
committees/3 |
|
committees/3/opinion |
False
|
committees/4 |
|
committees/4/opinion |
False
|
committees/5 |
|
committees/5 |
Old
New
|
committees/6 |
Old
New
|
committees/7 |
Old
New
|
committees/8 |
|
committees/8 |
Old
New
|
committees/9 |
|
committees/9 |
Old
New
|
committees/10 |
Old
New
|
committees/11 |
|
committees/11/opinion |
False
|
committees/12 |
Old
New
|
committees/13 |
Old
New
|
committees/14 |
Old
New
|
committees/15 |
Old
New
|
committees/16 |
|
committees/16 |
Old
New
|
committees/17 |
Old
New
|
committees/18 |
|
committees/18/opinion |
False
|
committees/1 |
Old
New
|
committees/2 |
Old
New
|
committees/3 |
Old
New
|
committees/4 |
Old
New
|
committees/5 |
Old
New
|
committees/6 |
Old
New
|
committees/7 |
Old
New
|
committees/8 |
|
committees/8 |
Old
New
|
committees/9 |
|
committees/9 |
Old
New
|
committees/10 |
Old
New
|
committees/11 |
Old
New
|
committees/12 |
Old
New
|
committees/13 |
|
committees/13/opinion |
False
|
committees/14 |
|
committees/14/opinion |
False
|
committees/15 |
Old
New
|
committees/16 |
Old
New
|
committees/17 |
Old
New
|
committees/18 |
Old
New
|
docs/7/docs/0/url |
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/CONT-AM-736353_EN.html
|
docs/7 |
|
committees/4 |
Old
New
|
committees/5 |
Old
New
|
committees/6 |
Old
New
|
committees/7 |
Old
New
|
committees/8 |
Old
New
|
committees/9 |
Old
New
|
committees/10 |
Old
New
|
committees/11 |
Old
New
|
committees/12 |
|
committees/12 |
Old
New
|
committees/13 |
Old
New
|
committees/14 |
Old
New
|
committees/15 |
Old
New
|
committees/16 |
Old
New
|
committees/17 |
|
committees/17/opinion |
False
|
committees/18 |
Old
New
|
docs/0 |
|
committees/1 |
|
committees/1/opinion |
False
|
committees/2 |
Old
New
|
committees/3 |
Old
New
|
committees/4 |
Old
New
|
committees/5 |
Old
New
|
committees/6 |
Old
New
|
committees/7 |
Old
New
|
committees/8 |
Old
New
|
committees/9 |
|
committees/9 |
Old
New
|
committees/10 |
Old
New
|
committees/11 |
Old
New
|
committees/12 |
Old
New
|
committees/13 |
Old
New
|
committees/14 |
Old
New
|
committees/15 |
Old
New
|
committees/16 |
Old
New
|
committees/17 |
Old
New
|
committees/18 |
Old
New
|
committees/0 |
|
committees/1 |
|
committees/2 |
|
committees/3 |
|
committees/4 |
|
committees/5 |
|
committees/6 |
|
committees/7 |
|
committees/8 |
|
committees/9 |
Old
New
|
committees/10 |
Old
New
|
committees/11 |
Old
New
|
committees/12 |
Old
New
|
committees/13 |
Old
New
|
committees/14 |
Old
New
|
committees/15 |
|
committees/16 |
|
committees/17 |
|
committees/18 |
|
docs/2 |
|
docs/4 |
|
docs/5 |
|
docs/5/docs/0/url |
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/CONT-PR-734318_EN.html
|
committees/0 |
|
committees/0 |
Old
New
|
committees/1 |
Old
New
|
committees/2 |
Old
New
|
committees/3 |
Old
New
|
committees/4 |
Old
New
|
committees/5 |
Old
New
|
committees/7 |
|
committees/8 |
|
committees/9 |
|
committees/10 |
|
committees/11 |
|
committees/12 |
|
committees/13 |
|
committees/14 |
|
committees/15 |
|
committees/16 |
|
committees/17 |
|
committees/18 |
|
docs/2 |
|
committees/1 |
Old
New
|
committees/2 |
Old
New
|
committees/3 |
Old
New
|
committees/4 |
Old
New
|
committees/5 |
|
committees/5 |
Old
New
|
committees/6 |
Old
New
|
committees/7 |
Old
New
|
committees/8 |
Old
New
|
committees/9 |
|
committees/9 |
Old
New
|
committees/10 |
Old
New
|
committees/11 |
Old
New
|
committees/12 |
Old
New
|
committees/13 |
|
committees/13/opinion |
False
|
committees/14 |
Old
New
|
committees/15 |
Old
New
|
committees/16 |
|
committees/16/opinion |
False
|
committees/17 |
Old
New
|
committees/18 |
Old
New
|
committees/1 |
Old
New
|
committees/2 |
Old
New
|
committees/3 |
|
committees/3/opinion |
False
|
committees/4 |
Old
New
|
committees/5 |
Old
New
|
committees/6 |
Old
New
|
committees/7 |
Old
New
|
committees/8 |
Old
New
|
committees/9 |
Old
New
|
committees/10 |
Old
New
|
committees/11 |
Old
New
|
committees/12 |
Old
New
|
committees/13 |
Old
New
|
committees/14 |
Old
New
|
committees/15 |
|
committees/15 |
Old
New
|
committees/16 |
Old
New
|
committees/17 |
Old
New
|
committees/18 |
Old
New
|
docs/5 |
|
committees/5/opinion |
False
|
committees/7/opinion |
False
|
committees/1 |
Old
New
|
committees/2 |
Old
New
|
committees/3 |
Old
New
|
committees/4 |
Old
New
|
committees/5 |
Old
New
|
committees/6 |
Old
New
|
committees/7 |
Old
New
|
committees/8 |
Old
New
|
committees/9 |
Old
New
|
committees/10 |
Old
New
|
committees/11 |
Old
New
|
committees/12 |
Old
New
|
committees/13 |
Old
New
|
committees/14 |
|
committees/14/opinion |
False
|
committees/15 |
Old
New
|
committees/16 |
Old
New
|
committees/17 |
|
committees/17 |
Old
New
|
committees/18 |
Old
New
|
committees/1 |
Old
New
|
committees/2 |
Old
New
|
committees/3 |
Old
New
|
committees/4 |
Old
New
|
committees/5 |
Old
New
|
committees/6 |
|
committees/6 |
Old
New
|
committees/7 |
Old
New
|
committees/8 |
Old
New
|
committees/9 |
Old
New
|
committees/10 |
Old
New
|
committees/11 |
Old
New
|
committees/12 |
Old
New
|
committees/13 |
|
committees/13/opinion |
False
|
committees/14 |
Old
New
|
committees/15 |
Old
New
|
committees/16 |
Old
New
|
committees/17 |
Old
New
|
committees/18 |
Old
New
|
committees/1 |
Old
New
|
committees/2 |
|
committees/2 |
Old
New
|
committees/2/opinion |
False
|
committees/3 |
|
committees/4 |
Old
New
|
committees/5 |
|
committees/5 |
Old
New
|
committees/5/opinion |
False
|
committees/6 |
|
committees/7 |
Old
New
|
committees/8 |
Old
New
|
committees/9 |
Old
New
|
committees/10 |
Old
New
|
committees/11 |
Old
New
|
committees/12 |
Old
New
|
committees/13 |
Old
New
|
committees/14 |
Old
New
|
committees/15 |
Old
New
|
committees/16 |
Old
New
|
committees/17 |
Old
New
|
committees/18 |
Old
New
|
committees/0 |
|
committees/0 |
|
committees/1 |
Old
New
|
committees/2 |
Old
New
|
committees/3 |
Old
New
|
committees/4 |
Old
New
|
committees/5 |
|
committees/5/opinion |
False
|
committees/6 |
Old
New
|
committees/7 |
Old
New
|
committees/8 |
Old
New
|
committees/9 |
Old
New
|
committees/10 |
|
committees/10 |
Old
New
|
committees/11 |
Old
New
|
committees/12 |
Old
New
|
committees/13 |
Old
New
|
committees/14 |
Old
New
|
committees/15 |
Old
New
|
committees/16 |
Old
New
|
committees/17 |
Old
New
|
committees/18 |
Old
New
|
docs/5 |
|
events/5/summary |
|
committees/1 |
Old
New
|
committees/2 |
Old
New
|
committees/3 |
Old
New
|
committees/4 |
Old
New
|
committees/5 |
Old
New
|
committees/6 |
Old
New
|
committees/7 |
|
committees/7/opinion |
False
|
committees/8 |
Old
New
|
committees/9 |
Old
New
|
committees/10 |
Old
New
|
committees/11 |
Old
New
|
committees/12 |
Old
New
|
committees/13 |
Old
New
|
committees/14 |
Old
New
|
committees/15 |
|
committees/15 |
Old
New
|
committees/16 |
Old
New
|
committees/17 |
Old
New
|
committees/18 |
Old
New
|
docs/5/docs/0/url |
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/TA-9-2022-0146_EN.html
|
events/5/docs/0/url |
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/TA-9-2022-0146_EN.html
|
committees/0 |
|
committees/0 |
|
committees/1 |
|
committees/1 |
|
committees/2 |
|
committees/2 |
|
committees/2/opinion |
False
|
committees/3 |
|
committees/3 |
|
committees/3/opinion |
False
|
committees/4 |
|
committees/4 |
|
committees/4/opinion |
False
|
committees/5 |
|
committees/5 |
|
committees/5/opinion |
False
|
committees/6 |
|
committees/6 |
|
committees/6/opinion |
False
|
committees/7 |
|
committees/7 |
|
committees/7/opinion |
False
|
committees/8/rapporteur |
|
committees/9 |
|
committees/9 |
|
committees/9/opinion |
False
|
committees/10 |
|
committees/10 |
|
committees/10/opinion |
False
|
committees/11 |
|
committees/11 |
|
committees/11/opinion |
False
|
committees/12 |
|
committees/12 |
|
committees/12/opinion |
False
|
committees/13 |
|
committees/13 |
|
committees/13/opinion |
False
|
committees/14 |
|
committees/14 |
|
committees/14/opinion |
False
|
committees/15 |
|
committees/15 |
|
committees/15/opinion |
False
|
committees/16 |
|
committees/16 |
|
committees/16/opinion |
False
|
committees/17 |
|
committees/17 |
|
committees/17/opinion |
False
|
committees/18 |
|
committees/18 |
|
committees/18/opinion |
False
|
committees/19 |
|
committees/19/opinion |
False
|
docs/2 |
|
procedure/dossier_of_the_committee/1 |
CONT/9/09320
|
docs/2 |
|
events/6 |
|
procedure/stage_reached |
Old
Awaiting Parliament's voteNew
Awaiting committee decision |
procedure/subject/8.70.03.10 |
2020 discharge
|
docs/4 |
|
docs/5 |
|
events/0 |
|
events/0 |
|
events/3/docs |
|
events/4 |
|
events/5 |
|
forecasts |
|
procedure/subject/8.70.03.10 |
2020 discharge
|
forecasts |
|
forecasts |
|
events/3 |
|
procedure/stage_reached |
Old
Awaiting committee decisionNew
Awaiting Parliament's vote |
docs/3 |
|
procedure/Other legal basis |
Rules of Procedure EP 159
|
events/2 |
|
docs/2/docs/0/url |
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/CONT-AM-703192_EN.html
|
docs/2/date |
Old
2022-01-31T00:00:00New
2022-02-01T00:00:00 |
docs/2 |
|
forecasts |
|
committees/0 |
|
committees/0 |
|
docs/1/docs/0/url |
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/CONT-PR-699021_EN.html
|
docs/1 |
|
docs/0/docs/0/url |
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/AFCO-AD-699205_EN.html
|
docs/0 |
|
docs/0 |
|
committees/11/opinion |
False
|
committees/17/rapporteur |
|
committees/16/opinion |
False
|
committees/2/opinion |
False
|
committees/7/opinion |
False
|
committees/19/opinion |
False
|
committees/10/opinion |
False
|
committees/13/opinion |
False
|
events/1 |
|
procedure/dossier_of_the_committee |
|
procedure/stage_reached |
Old
Preparatory phase in ParliamentNew
Awaiting committee decision |
committees/12/opinion |
False
|
committees/15/opinion |
False
|
committees/0/shadows/4 |
|
committees/9/opinion |
False
|
committees/14/opinion |
False
|
committees/5/opinion |
False
|
committees/18/opinion |
False
|
commission |
|
committees/3/opinion |
False
|
events/0/summary |
|
committees/0/rapporteur/0/date |
Old
2021-07-29T00:00:00New
2021-07-12T00:00:00 |
committees/0 |
|
committees/0 |
|
committees/1/opinion |
False
|
committees/8/opinion |
False
|
committees/4/opinion |
False
|
committees/6/opinion |
False
|