Progress: Procedure completed
Role | Committee | Rapporteur | Shadows |
---|---|---|---|
Lead | CONT | BRUDZIŃSKI Joachim Stanisław ( ECR) | MARINESCU Marian-Jean ( EPP), CREȚU Corina ( S&D), WIEZIK Michal ( Renew), RIVASI Michèle ( Verts/ALE), KUHS Joachim ( ID), OMARJEE Younous ( GUE/NGL) |
Committee Opinion | ENVI | ||
Committee Opinion | TRAN | FALCĂ Gheorghe ( EPP) | Tomasz Piotr PORĘBA ( ECR), José Ramón BAUZÁ DÍAZ ( RE), Alviina ALAMETSÄ ( Verts/ALE) |
Committee Opinion | ITRE |
Lead committee dossier:
Subjects
Events
The European Parliament decided to grant discharge to the Executive Director of the Clean Sky 2 Joint Undertaking (now the Clean Aviation Joint Undertaking) in respect of the implementation of the budget of the Joint Undertaking for the financial year 2020 and approve the closure of the Joint Undertaking’s accounts.
Noting that the Court of Auditors found that the annual accounts of the Joint Undertaking for the financial year 2020 present fairly the financial situation of the Joint Undertaking on 31 December 2020 and the results of its operations, Parliament adopted, by 572 votes to 53 with 14 abstentions, a resolution containing a series of observations which form an integral part of the discharge decision.
Budgetary and financial management
The Joint Undertaking’s final available budget for 2020 (including re-entered unused appropriations of previous years, assigned revenues, and reallocations to the next year) comprised commitment appropriations of EUR 346 723 559 and payment appropriations of EUR 356 604 910. The utilisation rate was 71.66 % for commitment appropriations and 78.41 % for payment appropriations.
By the end of 2020, out of the maximum amount of EUR 1 755 000 000 of Union contribution from Horizon 2020, the EU contributed a total of EUR 1 451 082 877 to the Horizon 2020 operational activities and running costs. The total in-kind contribution from private members to operational activities was EUR 581 335 882, while the total in-kind contribution from private members to additional activities was EUR 1 144 170 000.
Parliament noted that the COVID-19 pandemic resulted in a slowdown of the grant agreements for partners and adversely affected the implementation rate of the operational payment budget, which was 82.6 % at the end of 2020 (compared to 2019: 97.2 %). It also noted that the Joint Undertaking more than doubled the payment budget of its infrastructure and communication expenditure (representing around 1.5 % of the Joint Undertaking’s total available payment budget) for the financial year 2020 and that this doubling of the payment budget, together with the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on planned costs for IT, communication, event and other external services, resulted in the low implementation rate of 42.7 % at the end of 2020 (compared to 2019: 98.7 %).
Once again, Parliament called for a harmonisation of the calculation of in-kind contributions to the Joint Undertaking.
Other comments
The resolution also contains a series of observations on calls for proposals, performance, staff, procurement and internal controls.
In particular, it noted the following:
- the eleventh call for proposals was launched in January 2020 comprising 35 topics, four of which were thematic topics, and that they involved 128 participations from 17 different countries. 188 eligible proposals were submitted and 36 were retained of which 25 proposals for thematic topics;
- at 31 December 2020, 36 temporary agents’ and 6 contract agents’ positions were filled out as per establishment plan, and, in addition, 1 seconded national expert out of the two under the establishment plan;
- corrective action was taken by the Undertaking to address the systemic errors related to declared personnel costs;
- the Joint Undertaking established its specific Clean Sky 2 Antifraud Strategy and an action plan has been developed to further strengthen the controls to prevent and detect fraud;
- the Internal Audit Service (IAS) finalised an audit, planned in the Strategic Audit Plan 2019-2021, of the implementation phase of grants under the Horizon 2020 programme and that recommendations were issued in regard to the Joint Undertaking’s fraud risk assessment and the anti-fraud controls, a risk-based approach for the ex-ante evaluation of grant payments and reports, and the monitoring of project dissemination, exploitation and communications.
Documents
- Debate in Parliament: Debate in Parliament
- Decision by Parliament: T9-0188/2022
- Committee report tabled for plenary, single reading: A9-0070/2022
- Committee report tabled for plenary: A9-0070/2022
- Supplementary non-legislative basic document: 06005/2022
- Amendments tabled in committee: PE703.124
- Committee opinion: PE699.171
- Committee draft report: PE698.992
- Court of Auditors: opinion, report: OJ C 458 12.11.2021, p. 0020
- Court of Auditors: opinion, report: N9-0045/2022
- Non-legislative basic document: COM(2021)0381
- Non-legislative basic document: EUR-Lex
- Non-legislative basic document published: COM(2021)0381
- Non-legislative basic document published: EUR-Lex
- Non-legislative basic document: COM(2021)0381 EUR-Lex
- Court of Auditors: opinion, report: OJ C 458 12.11.2021, p. 0020 N9-0045/2022
- Committee draft report: PE698.992
- Committee opinion: PE699.171
- Amendments tabled in committee: PE703.124
- Supplementary non-legislative basic document: 06005/2022
- Committee report tabled for plenary, single reading: A9-0070/2022
Votes
Décharge 2020: entreprise commune Clean Sky 2 - Discharge 2020: Clean Sky 2 Joint Undertaking - Entlastung 2020: Gemeinsames Unternehmen Clean Sky 2 - A9-0070/2022 - Joachim Stanisław Brudziński - Proposition de résolution #
Amendments | Dossier |
25 |
2021/2149(DEC)
2021/11/26
TRAN
14 amendments...
Amendment 1 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 3 3. Welcomes the fact that the Undertaking attained a rate of implementation of 97.4 % for the commitment appropriations and 88.1 % for the payment appropriations; regrets the decreases in the implementation rate of the operational payment budget and the payment budget of the infrastructure and communication expenditure compared to the previous year with implementation rates of 82.6 % (compared to 97.2% in 2019) and 42.7 % (compared to 98.7 % in 2019) respectively at the end of 2020;
Amendment 10 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 7 a (new) 7 a. Recognises that the aviation industry is fully committed to climate neutrality by 2050 and recalls the essential role played by the Undertaking to ensure net accelerations in green technologies aiming at reducing CO2 gas emissions and noise levels produced by aircrafts; believes that its successor, Clean Aviation, will play important role ensuring aviation sector's involvement in the European Green Deal;
Amendment 11 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 7 a (new) 7 a. Regrets that, contrary to its financial rules, the Undertaking did not fully use the previous years' appropriation of EUR 13.3 million re-entered into its operational budget 2020, before using the payment appropriations of the year;
Amendment 12 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 7 b (new) Amendment 13 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 7 c (new) 7 c. Welcomes the Undertaking's implementation of the Commission’s internal control framework (ICF) based on 17 internal control principles in 2020;
Amendment 14 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 7 d (new) 7 d. Welcomes the corrective action taken by the Undertaking to address the systemic errors related to declared personnel costs observed by the European Court of Auditors in the previous year;
Amendment 2 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 5 a (new) 5 a. Welcomes the fact that the Undertaking participates in a total of 1887 funded projects including 29 % SMEs (555 participations), 22 % IND (411 participations), 24 % UNI (459 participations), 25 % RES (461 participations);
Amendment 3 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 5 b (new) 5 b. Salutes the Undertaking’s continuous contribution to improving the environmental impact of aeronautical technologies as well as to developing a strong and globally competitive aeronautical industry and supply chain in Europe;
Amendment 4 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 5 c (new) 5 c. Notes that the Internal Audit Officer (IAO) confirmed to the Governing Board its organisational independence according to the IIA standards although it highlighted a potential lack of objectivity for some specific activities and processes of the Undertaking, for which the IAO took over direct operational responsibility; notes however that these processes of the Undertaking were fully covered by other auditors through assurance audits or through risk assessment;
Amendment 5 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 5 d (new) 5 d. Welcomes that the Undertaking established its specific Clean Sky 2 Antifraud Strategy and action plan in 2020; takes note that two alleged fraud cases, which had been notified to OLAF in 2018, and on which OLAF opened investigations, are still on-going; notes with satisfaction that no new case has been reported to OLAF by Clean Sky 2 during 2020;
Amendment 6 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 6 6. Welcomes the fact that, despite the Covid-crisis, more than 80 % of Clean Sky’s key demonstrators will achieve their objectives by the end of the programme as planned;
Amendment 7 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 6 a (new) 6 a. Welcomes the fact that despite the Covid-19 crisis in 2020, the Undertaking is continuing the implementation of the action plan on synergies with Member States and regions that are interested in investing ESIF (European Structural and Investment Funds) or regional funds into the aeronautics area and other related technologies in this domain;
Amendment 8 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 6 a (new) 6 a. Reminds that the Undertaking opens new opportunities for small and medium-sized companies which become new potential supply chains for established industry players; it represents as well a new research possibilities for businesses with a non-aerospace focus;
Amendment 9 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 6 b (new) 6 b. Stresses that the successful Public Private Partnerships depends on the sound, effective financial management and adequate value for money;
source: 700.605
2022/02/03
CONT
11 amendments...
Amendment 1 #
Proposal for a decision 1 Paragraph 1 1. Grants the Executive Director of the Clean Aviation Joint Undertaking discharge in respect of the implementation of the Joint Undertaking’s budget for the financial year
Amendment 10 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 18 18.
Amendment 11 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 22 a (new) Amendment 2 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 6 a (new) 6 a. Notes that the ECA Annual Report on Joint Undertakings for 2020 did not have all data for the validated in-kind contributions. Asks the Joint Undertaking to shorten delays for reporting in-kind contributions;
Amendment 3 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 6 b (new) 6 b. Notes that there are different procedures across the Joint Undertakings regarding the calculation for the in-kind contributions and calls for their harmonisation;
Amendment 4 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 7 7. Notes that the eleventh call for proposals (CfP11) was launched in January 2020 comprising 35 topics, of which four thematic topics, and involved 128 participations from 17 different countries, 188 eligible proposals were submitted and 36 were retained of which 25 proposals for thematic topics, and that it was successfully processed entirely remotely; notes that the Joint Undertaking’s global portfolio over its lifetime comprises eleven calls for proposals engaging more than 726 partners from 28 different countries with a strong small and medium enterprises’ involvement in terms of participation and grants awarded, and a total of 610 projects; notes, moreover that the Joint Undertaking completed the implementation of the tenth call for proposals (CfP10) in April 2020; notes the evaluation of the last call of the Programme was completed in 2020, namely the CFP11, and that the Joint Undertaking reported that it was continuing its efforts to improve the gender balance of the group of experts; regrets that, despite those efforts, the percentage of female experts was just 20 %;
Amendment 5 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 16 16. Notes from the Court’s report that although the Joint Undertaking’s statutory staff remained static at 42 from 2017 to 2020, during the same period, the Joint Undertaking significantly increased its use of interim staff from three to ten full-time equivalents, that is, from 8 % to 24 % of the Joint Undertaking’s statutory staff, that the tasks performed by the interim staff are however, not of a one-off or temporary nature, arising from an exceptional increase in workload or the performance of a one-off activity, but rather are permanent in nature (e.g. legal service assistant, secretarial support, communication assistant, and project officer assistant), and the Joint Undertaking’s practice creates de- facto permanent posts, in excess of those; notes the Joint Undertaking’s reply that it has been obliged to constantly enlarge the use of interim staff during the past years due to the limitations of the rigid staff establishment plan under the condition of increasing tasks and workload, and that this trend is expected to continue with the two programmes – the Clean Sky 2 and the new Clean Aviation programme running in parallel, and, moreover, that the Joint Undertaking has put in place mitigation measures (such as appropriate supervision mechanisms, limiting tasks for interims to non-core tasks and ensuring appropriate training and mentoring support), and that however, this situation is not optimal on a medium and long-term perspective and that the Joint Undertaking considers that the solution would be to provide more flexibility with regard to number of contract agents posts in the staff
Amendment 6 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 16 16. Notes with concern from the Court’s report that although the Joint Undertaking’s statutory staff remained static at 42 from 2017 to 2020, during the same period, the Joint Undertaking significantly increased its use of interim staff from three to ten full-time equivalents, that is, from 8 % to 24 % of the Joint Undertaking’s statutory staff, that the tasks performed by the interim staff are however, not of a one-off or temporary nature, arising from an exceptional increase in workload or the performance of a one-off activity, but rather are permanent in nature (e.g. legal service assistant, secretarial support, communication assistant, and project officer assistant), and the Joint Undertaking’s practice creates de- facto permanent posts, in excess of those; underlines that the high level of contractual staff tends to increase significantly the Joint Undertaking’s staff turnover rate and further destabilises the staffing situation. Emphasises, moreover, that the use of interim staff should remain a temporary solution, otherwise it could negatively affect the Joint Undertaking’s overall performance, leading to, for example, difficulties in retaining staff necessary in order for the Joint Undertaking to exercise key competences, unclear accountability channels, and lower staff efficiency; notes the Joint Undertaking’s reply that it has been obliged to constantly enlarge the use of interim staff during the past years due to the limitations of the rigid staff establishment plan under the condition of
Amendment 7 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 16 16. Notes from the Court’s report that although the Joint Undertaking’s statutory staff remained static at 42 from 2017 to 2020, during the same period, the Joint Undertaking significantly increased its use
Amendment 8 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 16 16. Notes from the Court’s report that although the Joint Undertaking’s statutory staff remained static at 42 from 2017 to 2020, during the same period, the Joint Undertaking significantly increased its use of interim staff from three to ten full-time equivalents, that is, from 8 % to 24 % of the Joint Undertaking’s statutory staff, that the tasks performed by the interim staff are however, not of a one-off or temporary nature, arising from an exceptional increase in workload or the performance of a one-off activity, but rather are permanent in nature (e.g. legal service assistant, secretarial support, communication assistant, and project officer assistant), and the Joint Undertaking’s practice creates de- facto permanent posts, in excess of those; is concerned that short term contracts cause uncertainty for staff and can lead to high staff turnover; notes the Joint Undertaking’s reply that it has been obliged to constantly enlarge the use of interim staff during the past years due to the limitations of the rigid staff establishment plan under the condition of increasing tasks and workload, and regrets that this trend is expected to continue with the two programmes – the Clean Sky 2 and the new Clean Aviation programme running in parallel, and, moreover, welcomes that the Joint Undertaking has put in place mitigation measures (such as appropriate supervision mechanisms, limiting tasks for interims to non-core tasks and ensuring appropriate training and mentoring support), and that however, this situation is not optimal on a medium and long-term perspective and that the Joint Undertaking considers that the solution would be to provide more flexibility with regard to number of contract agents posts in the staff establishment plan;
Amendment 9 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 17 a (new) 17 a. Notes with concern the challenges associated with the COVID-19 pandemic for employees, especially taking into account different living situations, lack of access to office space and possible effects of isolation; asks the Joint Undertaking to focus on employee wellbeing, stress management and work life balance; Asks management to ensure that appropriate support structures are in place to ensure the psychological wellbeing of staff;
source: 703.124
|
History
(these mark the time of scraping, not the official date of the change)
events/4/docs |
|
events/6 |
|
procedure/final |
|
procedure/stage_reached |
Old
Procedure completed, awaiting publication in Official JournalNew
Procedure completed |
docs/1 |
|
events/5/docs/0/url |
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/TA-9-2022-0188_EN.html
|
docs/6 |
|
events/5/summary |
|
procedure/subject/8.70.03.10 |
2020 discharge
|
docs/0 |
|
docs/0 |
|
docs/5 |
|
docs/6 |
|
events/0 |
|
events/0 |
|
events/3/docs |
|
events/4 |
|
events/5 |
|
forecasts |
|
procedure/stage_reached |
Old
Awaiting Parliament's voteNew
Procedure completed, awaiting publication in Official Journal |
procedure/subject/8.70.03.10 |
2020 discharge
|
forecasts |
|
forecasts |
|
events/3 |
|
procedure/stage_reached |
Old
Awaiting committee decisionNew
Awaiting Parliament's vote |
docs/4 |
|
events/2 |
|
procedure/Other legal basis |
Rules of Procedure EP 159
|
docs/3/docs/0/url |
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/CONT-AM-703124_EN.html
|
docs/3 |
|
forecasts |
|
docs/2/docs/0/url |
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/TRAN-AD-699171_EN.html
|
docs/2 |
|
docs/1/docs/0/url |
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/CONT-PR-698992_EN.html
|
docs/1 |
|
committees/0 |
|
committees/0 |
|
committees/3/rapporteur |
|
committees/1/opinion |
False
|
events/1 |
|
procedure/dossier_of_the_committee |
|
procedure/stage_reached |
Old
Preparatory phase in ParliamentNew
Awaiting committee decision |
commission |
|
committees/0 |
|
committees/0 |
|
committees/2/opinion |
False
|