BETA


2021/2162(INI) The revision of the Financial Regulation in view of the entry into force of the 2021-2027 multiannual financial framework

Progress: Procedure completed

RoleCommitteeRapporteurShadows
Joint Responsible Committee ['BUDG', 'CONT'] HOHLMEIER Monika (icon: EPP EPP), UŠAKOVS Nils (icon: S&D S&D) WINZIG Angelika (icon: EPP EPP), MANDA Claudiu (icon: S&D S&D), DURAND Pascal (icon: Renew Renew), ŞTEFĂNUȚĂ Nicolae (icon: Renew Renew), ANDRESEN Rasmus (icon: Verts/ALE Verts/ALE), FREUND Daniel (icon: Verts/ALE Verts/ALE), LAPORTE Hélène (icon: ID ID), CZARNECKI Ryszard (icon: ECR ECR), RZOŃCA Bogdan (icon: ECR ECR), OMARJEE Younous (icon: GUE/NGL GUE/NGL)
Committee Opinion AGRI LINS Norbert (icon: EPP EPP)
Lead committee dossier:
Legal Basis:
RoP 54, RoP 58

Events

2022/03/03
   EC - Commission response to text adopted in plenary
Documents
2021/11/24
   EP - Decision by Parliament
Details

The European Parliament adopted by 534 votes to 98, with 57 abstentions, a resolution on the revision of the Financial Regulation in view of the entry into force of the 2021-2027 multiannual financial framework (MFF).

The upcoming revision of the Financial Regulation is necessary following the entry into force of the MFF 2021-2027, including the NextGenerationEU instrument. It is also necessary for the proper implementation of the Interinstitutional Agreement on budgetary discipline, cooperation in budgetary matters and sound financial management and on new own resources (IIA).

Members believe that the revision should aim to modernise the rules applicable to the EU budget in line with its latest developments and in accordance with budgetary principles and the Union's values, as well as to improve parliamentary scrutiny, democratic accountability, transparency, civic engagement and the ability to respond to citizens' needs quickly and effectively, especially in times of crisis.

According to Members, the main objectives of the revision of the EU's financial rules should include:

- strengthening the protection of the Union's financial interests;

- aligning the regulation with the rule of law conditionality;

- strengthening public procurement rules to avoid potential conflicts of interest and improve transparency;

- reducing administrative burdens for beneficiaries;

- increasing the efficiency of spending to achieve higher European added value and;

-improving access to EU funding for citizens, SMEs and local and regional authorities.

Democratic accountability for a modern budget

Parliament noted that the NextGenerationEU instrument has taken off-budget instruments into a new dimension by significantly increasing, albeit temporarily, the volume of the Union's budget in the form of external assigned revenue by creating liabilities until 2058 through borrowing for lending and borrowing for direct EU expenditure.

As a branch of the budgetary authority, Parliament considered that it must be able to scrutinise and, where appropriate, authorise the Commission's use and management of external assigned revenue and its borrowing and lending operations. It proposed that the Financial Regulation be revised to specify that external assigned revenue and the assets and liabilities relating to borrowing and lending operations are included in the EU budget so that they are subject to audit and reporting by the European Court of Auditors and that the budgetary authority and the discharge authority can be duly informed of any suspected cases of misappropriation, corruption, fraud or breach of the rule of law.

Rule of law

Parliament called on the Commission to present a proposal to include the content of the Conditionality Regulation in the Financial Regulation upon its next revision and to examine opportunities to further improve the alignment of all EU instruments that aim to ensure sound financial management and the protection of the Union’s financial interests, including the Commission’s annual rule of law report.

The Commission should ensure that the Union budget is spent on projects or organisations that respect the Union values and to evaluate whether the relevant provisions of the Financial Regulation are sufficiently effective in preventing and addressing conflicts of interest in the implementation and control of the EU budget.

Digital tools

In the light of the Pandora Papers, there is an urgent need to ensure transparency for beneficial owners. Members believe that compulsory centralisation of information in a single, interoperable reporting and monitoring system and in a public EU database, including information on direct and final beneficiaries of EU funds, would address the lack of transparency and increase public scrutiny and confidence in EU public spending.

The Financial Regulation should include provisions obliging the responsible actors to establish uniform records of economic operators and beneficial owners to allow their identification in all EU programmes, regardless of who implements them and regardless of the management mode (direct, indirect or shared management).

Public procurement

Parliament called on the Commission to provide for a more explicit definition of ‘ professional conflict of interest ’ and to ensure that its implementation rules on public procurement do not permit the awarding of policy-related service contracts to undertakings that are under the economic control of a parent company or a group that owns shares related to activities that are not in line with the EU’s environmental, social and Green Deal objectives.

The Commission is also called on to strengthen the Financial Regulation in order to take account of ‘ professional conflicting interests ’ and to further increase the accuracy and completeness of the voluntary notification thereof by applicants submitting tenders, such as developing adequate sanctions if voluntarily notifications are not complied with, including a temporary ban from public tendering in case of severe breaches.

The upcoming revision of the Financial Regulation should take account of the EU’s autonomous strategic interests and ensure that ambitious awarding criteria are set, taking into account the European added value of projects as well as the principle of ‘the most economically advantageous tender’. Public procurement rules should include safeguards to evaluate the activities of companies that contradict the social and environmental objectives of the Union in the award decision.

Members also insisted that the budget should be gender-sensitive, that climate and biodiversity should be considered and that the Financial Regulation should allow for the proper implementation of the European Pillar of Social Rights.

Documents
2021/11/23
   EP - Results of vote in Parliament
2021/11/22
   EP - Debate in Parliament
2021/10/28
   EP - Committee report tabled for plenary
Details

The Committee on Budgets and the Committee on Budgetary Control adopted the own-initiative report by Monika HOHLMEIER (EPP, DE) and Nils UŠAKOVS (S&D, LV) on the revision of the Financial Regulation in view of the entry into force of the 2021-2027 multiannual financial framework (MFF).

The upcoming revision of the Financial Regulation is necessary following the entry into force of the MFF 2021-2027, including the NextGenerationEU instrument. It is also necessary for the proper implementation of the Interinstitutional Agreement on budgetary discipline, cooperation in budgetary matters and sound financial management and on new own resources (IIA).

Members believe that the revision should aim to modernise the rules applicable to the EU budget in line with its latest developments and in accordance with budgetary principles and the Union's values, as well as to improve parliamentary scrutiny, democratic accountability, transparency, civic engagement and the ability to respond to citizens' needs quickly and effectively, especially in times of crisis.

According to Members, the main objectives of the revision of the EU's financial rules should include:

- strengthening the protection of the Union's financial interests;

- aligning the regulation with the rule of law conditionality;

- strengthening public procurement rules to avoid potential conflicts of interest and improve transparency;

- reducing administrative burdens for beneficiaries;

- increasing the efficiency of spending to achieve higher European added value and;

-improving access to EU funding for citizens, SMEs and local and regional authorities.

Democratic accountability

The number and scope of off-budget instruments have grown considerably over the last decade. The NextGenerationEU instrument has taken them into a new dimension by significantly increasing the volume of the EU's budget in the form of external assigned revenue and by creating liabilities until 2058 through borrowing for lending and borrowing for direct EU expenditure.

As a branch of the budgetary authority, Parliament considers that it must be able to scrutinise and, where appropriate, authorise the Commission's use and management of external assigned revenue and its borrowing and lending operations. It proposes that the Financial Regulation be revised to specify that external assigned revenue and the assets and liabilities relating to borrowing and lending operations are included in the EU budget so that they are subject to audit and reporting by the European Court of Auditors and that the budgetary authority and the discharge authority can be duly informed of any suspected cases of misappropriation, corruption, fraud or breach of the rule of law.

Rule of law

Members recalled that when adopting the Conditionality Regulation , Parliament, the Council and the Commission agreed to consider including the content of the Conditionality Regulation in the Financial Regulation upon its next revision. Therefore, they called on the Commission therefore to make that proposal. The Commission should ensure that expenditure from the EU budget is allocated to projects or organisations that respect the values of the Union as set out in Article 2 of the Treaty on European Union.

Digital tools

In the light of the Pandora Papers, there is an urgent need to ensure transparency for beneficial owners. Members believe that compulsory centralisation of information in a single, interoperable reporting and monitoring system and in a public EU database , including information on direct and final beneficiaries of EU funds, would address the lack of transparency and increase public scrutiny and confidence in EU public spending.

The Financial Regulation should include provisions obliging the responsible actors to establish uniform records of economic operators and beneficial owners to allow their identification in all EU programmes, regardless of who implements them and regardless of the management mode (direct, indirect or shared management).

Public procurement

Members proposed to amend the financial regulation to include a definition of ‘ professional conflict of interest ’ so that EU institutions can adopt mitigating measures against bidders with a financial interest in a policy-related service contract.

The revision of the Financial Regulation should take into account the EU's autonomous strategic interests , including fair competition, as well as the need to stimulate EU job creation in a range of industries that are key to achieving the Union's future policy goals while ensuring a level playing field.

The Commission is called on to ensure that ambitious awarding criteria are set, particularly taking into account the Union added value of projects and the principle of the ‘most economically advantageous tender’. Safeguards should be included in public procurement rules to evaluate the activities of companies that contradict the social and environmental objectives of the Union in the award decision.

Members also insisted that the budget should be gender-sensitive, that climate and biodiversity should be considered and that the Financial Regulation should allow for the proper implementation of the European Pillar of Social Rights.

Documents
2021/10/25
   EP - Vote in committee
2021/10/19
   EP - Specific opinion
Documents
2021/10/07
   EP - Committee referral announced in Parliament
2021/10/07
   EP - Referral to joint committee announced in Parliament
2021/10/06
   EP - Amendments tabled in committee
Documents
2021/09/13
   EP - Committee draft report
Documents
2021/09/10
   EP - HOHLMEIER Monika (EPP) appointed as rapporteur in ['BUDG', 'CONT']
2021/09/10
   EP - UŠAKOVS Nils (S&D) appointed as rapporteur in ['BUDG', 'CONT']
2021/09/02
   EP - LINS Norbert (EPP) appointed as rapporteur in AGRI

Documents

Votes

Révision du règlement financier en vue de l'entrée en vigueur du cadre financier pluriannuel 2021-2027 - The revision of the Financial Regulation in view of the entry into force of the 2021-2027 multiannual financial framework - Überarbeitung der Haushaltsordnung in Anbetracht des Inkrafttretens des Mehrjährigen Finanzrahmens 2021–2027 - A9-0295/2021 - Nils Ušakovs, Monika Hohlmeier - Proposition de résolution de remplacement - Am 1 #

2021/11/23 Outcome: -: 532, +: 82, 0: 72
EE MT CY LU LV HU SI SK HR FI LT BE CZ AT EL IE DK SE IT BG PT NL PL RO FR ES DE
Total
7
6
6
6
8
21
8
14
12
14
11
20
21
19
16
13
14
21
75
17
18
28
52
33
79
54
93
icon: ID ID
68

Estonia ID

For (1)

1

Finland ID

2

Czechia ID

2
3

Denmark ID

Abstain (1)

1
icon: ECR ECR
63

Latvia ECR

Against (1)

Abstain (1)

2

Slovakia ECR

Abstain (1)

1

Croatia ECR

Abstain (1)

1

Lithuania ECR

Abstain (1)

1

Greece ECR

Abstain (1)

1

Bulgaria ECR

2

Netherlands ECR

4

Romania ECR

Abstain (1)

1

Germany ECR

Abstain (1)

1
icon: NI NI
34

Slovakia NI

2

Croatia NI

2

Lithuania NI

Against (1)

1

Greece NI

For (1)

1

Netherlands NI

1

Germany NI

2
icon: The Left The Left
38

Cyprus The Left

2

Finland The Left

Against (1)

1

Belgium The Left

Against (1)

1

Czechia The Left

Abstain (1)

1

Ireland The Left

4

Denmark The Left

Against (1)

1

Sweden The Left

Against (1)

1

Netherlands The Left

Against (1)

1
icon: Verts/ALE Verts/ALE
72

Luxembourg Verts/ALE

Against (1)

1

Latvia Verts/ALE

Against (1)

1

Finland Verts/ALE

3

Lithuania Verts/ALE

2

Belgium Verts/ALE

3

Czechia Verts/ALE

3

Austria Verts/ALE

3

Ireland Verts/ALE

2

Denmark Verts/ALE

2

Sweden Verts/ALE

3

Portugal Verts/ALE

Against (1)

1

Netherlands Verts/ALE

3

Poland Verts/ALE

Against (1)

1

Spain Verts/ALE

3
icon: Renew Renew
97

Estonia Renew

3

Luxembourg Renew

2

Latvia Renew

Against (1)

1

Hungary Renew

2

Slovenia Renew

2

Croatia Renew

Against (1)

1

Finland Renew

3

Lithuania Renew

Against (1)

1

Austria Renew

Against (1)

1

Ireland Renew

2

Sweden Renew

3

Italy Renew

3

Bulgaria Renew

3

Poland Renew

1
icon: S&D S&D
138

Estonia S&D

2

Cyprus S&D

2

Luxembourg S&D

Against (1)

1

Latvia S&D

2

Slovenia S&D

Against (2)

2

Slovakia S&D

3

Finland S&D

2

Lithuania S&D

2

Belgium S&D

3

Czechia S&D

Against (1)

1

Greece S&D

Against (1)

1
icon: PPE PPE
176

Estonia PPE

Against (1)

1

Malta PPE

2

Cyprus PPE

2

Luxembourg PPE

2

Latvia PPE

2

Hungary PPE

Abstain (1)

1

Slovenia PPE

4

Denmark PPE

Against (1)

1

Révision du règlement financier en vue de l'entrée en vigueur du cadre financier pluriannuel 2021-2027 - The revision of the Financial Regulation in view of the entry into force of the 2021-2027 multiannual financial framework - Überarbeitung der Haushaltsordnung in Anbetracht des Inkrafttretens des Mehrjährigen Finanzrahmens 2021–2027 - A9-0295/2021 - Nils Ušakovs, Monika Hohlmeier - Proposition de résolution (commissions BUDG/CONT) (ensemble du texte) #

2021/11/24 Outcome: +: 534, -: 98, 0: 57
DE ES RO FR PL NL IT BG PT SE AT IE CZ EL DK BE LT FI SK HR SI MT CY LU LV EE HU
Total
93
54
33
78
52
28
75
17
19
21
19
13
20
20
14
20
11
14
14
12
8
6
6
6
8
7
21
icon: PPE PPE
177

Denmark PPE

For (1)

1

Malta PPE

2
2

Luxembourg PPE

2

Latvia PPE

2

Estonia PPE

For (1)

1

Hungary PPE

Against (1)

1
icon: S&D S&D
141

Czechia S&D

For (1)

1

Greece S&D

2

Lithuania S&D

2

Slovenia S&D

2

Cyprus S&D

2

Luxembourg S&D

For (1)

1

Latvia S&D

2

Estonia S&D

2
icon: Renew Renew
97

Poland Renew

1

Italy Renew

3
3

Austria Renew

For (1)

1

Ireland Renew

2

Lithuania Renew

1

Finland Renew

3

Croatia Renew

For (1)

1

Slovenia Renew

2

Luxembourg Renew

2

Latvia Renew

For (1)

1

Estonia Renew

3

Hungary Renew

2
icon: Verts/ALE Verts/ALE
70

Spain Verts/ALE

3

Poland Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Netherlands Verts/ALE

3

Portugal Verts/ALE

1

Sweden Verts/ALE

3

Austria Verts/ALE

3

Ireland Verts/ALE

2

Czechia Verts/ALE

3

Denmark Verts/ALE

2

Belgium Verts/ALE

3

Lithuania Verts/ALE

2

Finland Verts/ALE

3

Luxembourg Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Latvia Verts/ALE

1
icon: The Left The Left
37

Netherlands The Left

For (1)

1

Portugal The Left

4

Sweden The Left

For (1)

1

Czechia The Left

Abstain (1)

1

Denmark The Left

1

Belgium The Left

For (1)

1

Finland The Left

For (1)

1

Cyprus The Left

2
icon: NI NI
37

Germany NI

2

Netherlands NI

Against (1)

1

Lithuania NI

1

Slovakia NI

2

Croatia NI

2
icon: ECR ECR
63

Germany ECR

Abstain (1)

1

Romania ECR

Abstain (1)

1

Netherlands ECR

Against (1)

4

Bulgaria ECR

2
3

Greece ECR

Against (1)

1

Lithuania ECR

Abstain (1)

1

Slovakia ECR

Abstain (1)

1

Croatia ECR

Abstain (1)

1

Latvia ECR

2
icon: ID ID
67

Austria ID

3

Czechia ID

Against (1)

1

Denmark ID

Against (1)

1

Finland ID

2

Estonia ID

Against (1)

1
AmendmentsDossier
152 2021/2162(INI)
2021/10/06 BUDG, CONT 152 amendments...
source: 697.826

History

(these mark the time of scraping, not the official date of the change)

docs/0/docs/0/url
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/CJ13-PR-696550_EN.html
docs/1
date
2021-10-06T00:00:00
docs
url: https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/CJ13-AM-697826_EN.html title: PE697.826
type
Amendments tabled in committee
body
EP
docs/3
date
2022-03-03T00:00:00
docs
url: /oeil/spdoc.do?i=57361&j=0&l=en title: SP(2022)12
type
Commission response to text adopted in plenary
body
EC
events/5
date
2021-11-23T00:00:00
type
Results of vote in Parliament
body
EP
docs
url: https://oeil.secure.europarl.europa.eu/oeil/popups/sda.do?id=57361&l=en title: Results of vote in Parliament
committees/0
type
Joint Responsible Committee
body
EP
committee_full
committee
associated
False
rapporteur
shadows
committees/0
type
Joint Responsible Committee
body
EP
committee_full
committee
associated
False
rapporteur
shadows
docs/2
date
2021-11-24T00:00:00
docs
url: https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/TA-9-2021-0469_EN.html title: T9-0469/2021
type
Text adopted by Parliament, single reading
body
EP
events/5/summary
  • The European Parliament adopted by 534 votes to 98, with 57 abstentions, a resolution on the revision of the Financial Regulation in view of the entry into force of the 2021-2027 multiannual financial framework (MFF).
  • The upcoming revision of the Financial Regulation is necessary following the entry into force of the MFF 2021-2027, including the NextGenerationEU instrument. It is also necessary for the proper implementation of the Interinstitutional Agreement on budgetary discipline, cooperation in budgetary matters and sound financial management and on new own resources (IIA).
  • Members believe that the revision should aim to modernise the rules applicable to the EU budget in line with its latest developments and in accordance with budgetary principles and the Union's values, as well as to improve parliamentary scrutiny, democratic accountability, transparency, civic engagement and the ability to respond to citizens' needs quickly and effectively, especially in times of crisis.
  • According to Members, the main objectives of the revision of the EU's financial rules should include:
  • - strengthening the protection of the Union's financial interests;
  • - aligning the regulation with the rule of law conditionality;
  • - strengthening public procurement rules to avoid potential conflicts of interest and improve transparency;
  • - reducing administrative burdens for beneficiaries;
  • - increasing the efficiency of spending to achieve higher European added value and;
  • -improving access to EU funding for citizens, SMEs and local and regional authorities.
  • Democratic accountability for a modern budget
  • Parliament noted that the NextGenerationEU instrument has taken off-budget instruments into a new dimension by significantly increasing, albeit temporarily, the volume of the Union's budget in the form of external assigned revenue by creating liabilities until 2058 through borrowing for lending and borrowing for direct EU expenditure.
  • As a branch of the budgetary authority, Parliament considered that it must be able to scrutinise and, where appropriate, authorise the Commission's use and management of external assigned revenue and its borrowing and lending operations. It proposed that the Financial Regulation be revised to specify that external assigned revenue and the assets and liabilities relating to borrowing and lending operations are included in the EU budget so that they are subject to audit and reporting by the European Court of Auditors and that the budgetary authority and the discharge authority can be duly informed of any suspected cases of misappropriation, corruption, fraud or breach of the rule of law.
  • Rule of law
  • Parliament called on the Commission to present a proposal to include the content of the Conditionality Regulation in the Financial Regulation upon its next revision and to examine opportunities to further improve the alignment of all EU instruments that aim to ensure sound financial management and the protection of the Union’s financial interests, including the Commission’s annual rule of law report.
  • The Commission should ensure that the Union budget is spent on projects or organisations that respect the Union values and to evaluate whether the relevant provisions of the Financial Regulation are sufficiently effective in preventing and addressing conflicts of interest in the implementation and control of the EU budget.
  • Digital tools
  • In the light of the Pandora Papers, there is an urgent need to ensure transparency for beneficial owners. Members believe that compulsory centralisation of information in a single, interoperable reporting and monitoring system and in a public EU database, including information on direct and final beneficiaries of EU funds, would address the lack of transparency and increase public scrutiny and confidence in EU public spending.
  • The Financial Regulation should include provisions obliging the responsible actors to establish uniform records of economic operators and beneficial owners to allow their identification in all EU programmes, regardless of who implements them and regardless of the management mode (direct, indirect or shared management).
  • Public procurement
  • Parliament called on the Commission to provide for a more explicit definition of ‘ professional conflict of interest ’ and to ensure that its implementation rules on public procurement do not permit the awarding of policy-related service contracts to undertakings that are under the economic control of a parent company or a group that owns shares related to activities that are not in line with the EU’s environmental, social and Green Deal objectives.
  • The Commission is also called on to strengthen the Financial Regulation in order to take account of ‘ professional conflicting interests ’ and to further increase the accuracy and completeness of the voluntary notification thereof by applicants submitting tenders, such as developing adequate sanctions if voluntarily notifications are not complied with, including a temporary ban from public tendering in case of severe breaches.
  • The upcoming revision of the Financial Regulation should take account of the EU’s autonomous strategic interests and ensure that ambitious awarding criteria are set, taking into account the European added value of projects as well as the principle of ‘the most economically advantageous tender’. Public procurement rules should include safeguards to evaluate the activities of companies that contradict the social and environmental objectives of the Union in the award decision.
  • Members also insisted that the budget should be gender-sensitive, that climate and biodiversity should be considered and that the Financial Regulation should allow for the proper implementation of the European Pillar of Social Rights.
docs/2
date
2021-11-24T00:00:00
docs
url: https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/TA-9-2021-0469_EN.html title: T9-0469/2021
type
Text adopted by Parliament, single reading
body
EP
events/4
date
2021-11-22T00:00:00
type
Debate in Parliament
body
EP
docs
url: https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/CRE-9-2021-11-22-TOC_EN.html title: Debate in Parliament
events/5
date
2021-11-24T00:00:00
type
Decision by Parliament
body
EP
docs
url: https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/TA-9-2021-0469_EN.html title: T9-0469/2021
forecasts
  • date: 2021-11-24T00:00:00 title: Vote in plenary scheduled
procedure/stage_reached
Old
Awaiting Parliament's vote
New
Procedure completed
forecasts/0
date
2021-11-22T00:00:00
title
Debate in plenary scheduled
forecasts/0/title
Old
Indicative plenary sitting date
New
Debate in plenary scheduled
forecasts/1
date
2021-11-24T00:00:00
title
Vote in plenary scheduled
docs/2
date
2021-10-28T00:00:00
docs
url: https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/A-9-2021-0295_EN.html title: A9-0295/2021
type
Committee report tabled for plenary, single reading
body
EP
events/3/summary
  • The Committee on Budgets and the Committee on Budgetary Control adopted the own-initiative report by Monika HOHLMEIER (EPP, DE) and Nils UŠAKOVS (S&D, LV) on the revision of the Financial Regulation in view of the entry into force of the 2021-2027 multiannual financial framework (MFF).
  • The upcoming revision of the Financial Regulation is necessary following the entry into force of the MFF 2021-2027, including the NextGenerationEU instrument. It is also necessary for the proper implementation of the Interinstitutional Agreement on budgetary discipline, cooperation in budgetary matters and sound financial management and on new own resources (IIA).
  • Members believe that the revision should aim to modernise the rules applicable to the EU budget in line with its latest developments and in accordance with budgetary principles and the Union's values, as well as to improve parliamentary scrutiny, democratic accountability, transparency, civic engagement and the ability to respond to citizens' needs quickly and effectively, especially in times of crisis.
  • According to Members, the main objectives of the revision of the EU's financial rules should include:
  • - strengthening the protection of the Union's financial interests;
  • - aligning the regulation with the rule of law conditionality;
  • - strengthening public procurement rules to avoid potential conflicts of interest and improve transparency;
  • - reducing administrative burdens for beneficiaries;
  • - increasing the efficiency of spending to achieve higher European added value and;
  • -improving access to EU funding for citizens, SMEs and local and regional authorities.
  • Democratic accountability
  • The number and scope of off-budget instruments have grown considerably over the last decade. The NextGenerationEU instrument has taken them into a new dimension by significantly increasing the volume of the EU's budget in the form of external assigned revenue and by creating liabilities until 2058 through borrowing for lending and borrowing for direct EU expenditure.
  • As a branch of the budgetary authority, Parliament considers that it must be able to scrutinise and, where appropriate, authorise the Commission's use and management of external assigned revenue and its borrowing and lending operations. It proposes that the Financial Regulation be revised to specify that external assigned revenue and the assets and liabilities relating to borrowing and lending operations are included in the EU budget so that they are subject to audit and reporting by the European Court of Auditors and that the budgetary authority and the discharge authority can be duly informed of any suspected cases of misappropriation, corruption, fraud or breach of the rule of law.
  • Rule of law
  • Members recalled that when adopting the Conditionality Regulation , Parliament, the Council and the Commission agreed to consider including the content of the Conditionality Regulation in the Financial Regulation upon its next revision. Therefore, they called on the Commission therefore to make that proposal. The Commission should ensure that expenditure from the EU budget is allocated to projects or organisations that respect the values of the Union as set out in Article 2 of the Treaty on European Union.
  • Digital tools
  • In the light of the Pandora Papers, there is an urgent need to ensure transparency for beneficial owners. Members believe that compulsory centralisation of information in a single, interoperable reporting and monitoring system and in a public EU database , including information on direct and final beneficiaries of EU funds, would address the lack of transparency and increase public scrutiny and confidence in EU public spending.
  • The Financial Regulation should include provisions obliging the responsible actors to establish uniform records of economic operators and beneficial owners to allow their identification in all EU programmes, regardless of who implements them and regardless of the management mode (direct, indirect or shared management).
  • Public procurement
  • Members proposed to amend the financial regulation to include a definition of ‘ professional conflict of interest ’ so that EU institutions can adopt mitigating measures against bidders with a financial interest in a policy-related service contract.
  • The revision of the Financial Regulation should take into account the EU's autonomous strategic interests , including fair competition, as well as the need to stimulate EU job creation in a range of industries that are key to achieving the Union's future policy goals while ensuring a level playing field.
  • The Commission is called on to ensure that ambitious awarding criteria are set, particularly taking into account the Union added value of projects and the principle of the ‘most economically advantageous tender’. Safeguards should be included in public procurement rules to evaluate the activities of companies that contradict the social and environmental objectives of the Union in the award decision.
  • Members also insisted that the budget should be gender-sensitive, that climate and biodiversity should be considered and that the Financial Regulation should allow for the proper implementation of the European Pillar of Social Rights.
docs/2
date
2021-10-28T00:00:00
docs
url: https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/A-9-2021-0295_EN.html title: A9-0295/2021
type
Committee report tabled for plenary, single reading
body
EP
events/3/docs
  • url: https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/A-9-2021-0295_EN.html title: A9-0295/2021
events/3
date
2021-10-28T00:00:00
type
Committee report tabled for plenary
body
EP
procedure/stage_reached
Old
Awaiting committee decision
New
Awaiting Parliament's vote
events/2
date
2021-10-25T00:00:00
type
Vote in committee
body
EP