2021/2167(INI) Activities of the European Ombudsman - annual report 2020
Next event: Indicative plenary sitting date 2022/01/17
Lead committee dossier:
Next event: Indicative plenary sitting date 2022/01/17
Progress: Awaiting Parliament's vote
| Role | Committee | Rapporteur | Shadows |
|---|---|---|---|
| Lead | PETI |
EVI Eleonora ( Verts/ALE)
|
JAHR Peter ( EPP),
AGIUS SALIBA Alex ( S&D),
STRUGARIU Ramona ( Renew),
DZHAMBAZKI Angel ( ECR),
PELLETIER Anne-Sophie ( GUE/NGL)
|
Lead committee dossier:
Legal Basis:
RoP 54
Legal Basis:
RoP 54Subjects
Events
2022/01/17
Indicative plenary sitting date
2021/12/09
EP - Committee report tabled for plenary
2021/12/02
EP - Vote in committee
2021/10/12
EP - Amendments tabled in committee
Documents
2021/10/07
EP - Committee referral announced in Parliament
2021/09/14
EP - Committee draft report
Documents
2021/07/15
EP - EVI Eleonora (Verts/ALE) appointed as rapporteur in PETI
Documents
| Amendments | Dossier |
| 115 |
2021/2167(INI)
2021/10/12
PETI
115 amendments...
Amendment 1 #
Motion for a resolution Recital B B. whereas Articles 20, 24 and 228 TFEU and Article 43 of the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union empower the European Ombudsman to receive complaints concerning instances of maladministration in the activities of the Union institutions, bodies, offices or agencies, with the exception of the Court of Justice of the European Union (CJEU) acting in its judicial role;
Amendment 10 #
Motion for a resolution Recital D D. whereas the Ombudsman receives a large number of complaints from individuals and organisations about the EU administration every year, and whereas the top three concerns in the inquiries closed by the Ombudsman in 2020 were transparency, accountability (access to information and documents) (25 %), culture of service (24 %) and proper use of discretionary powers, including in infringement procedures (17 %); whereas other concerns include ethical issues, respect for fundamental rights, sound financial management, whistleblowing, respect for procedural rights, recruitment and good management of EU personnel issues;
Amendment 100 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 20 c (new) 20 c. Notes with satisfaction that 57% of the cases were closed in 2020 in less than 3 months and the cases for which it takes up to 18 months to be solved represented only 1% , while it was 10% in the previous year and 27% in 2013; appreciates therefore the efforts to solve the issues raised by the citizens and calls on all concerned institutions to respond to requests from the Office of the European Ombudsman in a timely manner;
Amendment 101 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 20 d (new) 20 d. Notes that the number of complaints that are outside the European Ombudsman’s mandate has remained relatively stable throughout the years (1420 in 2020, 1330 cases in 2019, 1300 cases in 2018); notes that, according to the 2020 Report, most of these complaints do not concern the EU administration; welcomes the efforts of the Office to better inform citizens about the European Ombudsman’s mandate; points out at the same time the need to improve communication and awareness about the various forms of complaints citizens can use at national and European level; stresses the role the Parliament and its Members should also play in this regard;
Amendment 102 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 20 e (new) 20 e. Takes note that pandemic also affected the work of European Network of Ombudsmen(ENO); appreciates the initiative of the European Ombudsman to organise online meetings with a view to sharing experiences and promoting best practices in the crisis response; encourages further cooperation between the members of EON, including in the area of promoting future parallel inquiries;
Amendment 103 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 21 – point a (new) (a) Commends Ombudsman’s activities on digital platforms raising awareness to EU citizens about her work; notes that the fastest-growing channel in 2020 was Instagram, where the audience grew by71% during the year (1 068 new followers); on LinkedIn, the number of followers increased by 34% (+ 1 237), while on Twitter, where the Ombudsman has the largest audience, the number of followers reached 29 200 in December 2020,which represents an 11% increase (+ 2 870);
Amendment 104 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 22 22. Congratulates the Ombudsman on the 25th anniversary of the establishment of the post, underlining that, since 1995, the Office has handled over 57 000 complaints and conducted more than 7 300 inquiries, which has greatly contributed to improving the ethical and accountability standards of the EU institutions across a wide range of areas; endorses the Ombudsman’s strategy ‘Towards 2024’ aimed at increasing the impact, visibility and relevance of the Ombudsman’s Office, setting out its objectives and priorities, which include raising citizen awareness of the Ombudsman's work, for the current term;
Amendment 105 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 22 a (new) 22 a. Stresses the importance of the European Network of Ombudsmen (ENO) and annual meetings hosted with national and regional ombudsmen through the European Network of Ombudsmen to further raise awareness of what the Ombudsman’s Office can do for European citizens;
Amendment 106 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 22 b (new) 22 b. Welcomes the Ombudsman’s actions during the pandemic to keep regular contact with her fellow national colleagues from the European Network of Ombudsmen (ENO) and to organise and host webinars throughout 2020 on topics such as implications of the pandemic, sharing experiences and promoting best practices in the crisis response, and on the impact of Artificial Intelligence;
Amendment 107 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 22 c (new) 22 c. Welcomes the Ombudsman’s initiative on fast track procedure related to access to documents cases, aiming to have a decision on the requested documents within 40 working days; notes that in 2020 the average time to handle public access complaints is one third what is was before2018 when this procedure was introduced;
Amendment 108 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 23 23. Welcomes the adoption of the new Statute of the Ombudsman, whose provisions reinforce the Ombudsman’s role, adding further competences on areas related to whistleblowing, harassment and conflicts of interest;
Amendment 109 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 23 23. Welcomes the adoption of the new Statute of the Ombudsman, whose provisions reinforce the Ombudsman’s role, adding further competences on areas related to whistleblowing, harassment and conflicts of interest; considers
Amendment 11 #
Motion for a resolution Recital D D. whereas the top three concerns in the inquiries closed by the Ombudsman in 2020 were transparency in environmental decision making, , accountability (access to information and documents) (25 %), culture of service (24 %) and proper use of discretionary powers, including in infringement procedures (17 %); whereas other concerns include ethical issues, respect for fundamental rights, sound financial management, whistleblowing, respect for procedural rights, recruitment and good management of EU personnel issues;
Amendment 110 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 23 23. Welcomes the adoption of the new Statute of the Ombudsman, whose provisions
Amendment 111 #
23. Welcomes the adoption of the new Statute of the Ombudsman, whose provisions reinforce the Ombudsman’s role, adding further competences on areas related to whistleblowing, harassment and conflicts of interest; considers it of the utmost importance to allocate an
Amendment 112 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 23 a (new) 23a. Calls on the EU public administration to make every effort to ensure that citizens are able to communicate effectively with it in the 24 official languages of the EU; Welcomes the recommendations to the EU administration published by the Ombudsman on the use of official EU languages when communicating with the public; stresses that these recommendations are vital to the preservation of rich linguistic diversity in Europe; notes that the websites of the EU institutions should better demonstrate the equality of all 24 official EU languages;
Amendment 113 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 23 b (new) 23b. Acknowledges the important contribution made by the European Network of Ombudsmen to the exchange of best practices and in providing information on the responsibilities and competences of its members and the proper implementation of European law; calls on this network to consider the role that national and regional ombudsmen could play in getting EU citizens more involved in the EU decision-making process;
Amendment 114 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 23 c (new) 23c. Welcomes the Ombudsman's efforts to improve public participation in the EU decision-making process;
Amendment 115 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 23 d (new) Amendment 12 #
Motion for a resolution Recital D D. whereas the top three concerns in the inquiries closed by the Ombudsman in 2020 were transparency, accountability (access to information and documents) (25 %), culture of service (24 %) and proper use of discretionary powers, including in infringement procedures (17 %); whereas other concerns include ethical issues in the EU administration, respect for fundamental rights, sound financial management, whistleblowing, respect for procedural rights, recruitment and good management of EU personnel issues;
Amendment 13 #
E. whereas the Ombudsman plays a key role in ensuring
Amendment 14 #
Motion for a resolution Recital E E. whereas the Ombudsman plays a key role in ensuring
Amendment 15 #
Motion for a resolution Recital E a (new) E a. whereas the main priority of the European Ombudsman is to ensure that citizens’ rights are fully respected and the right to good administration of EU institutions, bodies, offices or agencies reflects the highest standards;
Amendment 16 #
Motion for a resolution Recital H H. whereas following an inquiry into the performance of the European Centre for Disease Prevention and Control (ECDC) during the COVID-19 crisis, the Ombudsman found
Amendment 17 #
Motion for a resolution Recital I I. whereas publicity and transparency are the main principles underlying the EU legislative process, as confirmed by the case law of the CJEU, which provided clear legal guidance on the way to ensure their full and consistent respect; whereas the CJEU stated that the lack of transparency and information weakens citizens’ trust in the legitimacy of the EU legislative process as a whole; whereas, contrary to these principles, the Commission was not transparent in the negotiation, purchase and distribution of COVID-19 vaccines;
Amendment 18 #
Motion for a resolution Recital I a (new) I a. whereas the right to know of the EU citizens and the obligation to full transparency of the EU institutions, especially when it comes to COVID-19 vaccine contracts between the EU institution and the pharmaceutical companies, prevail over any alleged right of the pharmaceutical companies or the EU institution to hide or not to fully disclose any or some information related to these contracts or COVID-19 vaccines;
Amendment 19 #
Motion for a resolution Recital J J. whereas the EU has planned a period of unprecedented levels of spending and investment under NextGenerationEU
Amendment 2 #
Motion for a resolution Recital B a (new) B a. whereas article 10(3) TEU establishes that 'every citizen shall have the right to participate in the democratic life of the Union' and that 'decisions shall be taken as openly and as closely as possible to the citizen';
Amendment 20 #
Motion for a resolution Recital J J. whereas the EU has planned a period of unprecedented levels of spending and investment under NextGenerationEU, which will also create significant links with the private sector, therefore making it even more crucial for the EU institutions to have a decision-making process founded on
Amendment 21 #
Motion for a resolution Recital J J. whereas the EU has planned a period of unprecedented levels of spending and investment under NextGenerationEU, which will also create significant links with the private sector, therefore making it even more crucial for the EU institutions to have a decision-making process founded on
Amendment 22 #
J. whereas the EU has planned a period of unprecedented levels of spending and investment under NextGenerationEU, which will also create significant links with the private sector, therefore making it even more crucial for the EU institutions to have a decision-making process founded on full transparency and on the most stringent ethical rules in order to prevent conflicts of interest and corruption
Amendment 23 #
Motion for a resolution Recital L L. whereas the Ombudsman launched an inquiry into the refusal by the Council to address the issue of corporate sponsorships of the Presidency of the Council of the EU; whereas the
Amendment 24 #
Motion for a resolution Recital N N. whereas the Ombudsman found that the Commission should have carried out a more
Amendment 25 #
Motion for a resolution Recital N a (new) N a. whereas the former European Investment Bank (EIB) Vice-President left the EIB Management Committee in November 2020 and after less than 3 months joined the board of the Spanish multinational utility company Iberdrola; whereas the former EIB Vice-President was in charge of overseeing the EIB’s lending operations in Spain, including Iberdrola; whereas from 2019 onward Iberdrola benefited from massive loans worth 1,39 billion EUR in total, making it one of the top clients of the EIB in recent years; whereas this case demonstrates the unsolved controversial practice at the EIB to allow its Vice-Presidents, nominated by the Member States, to be in charge of overseeing lending into their countries of origin, risking to give rise to conflicts of interest;
Amendment 26 #
Motion for a resolution Recital O O. whereas according to the Ombudsman, the Commission’s failure to finalise a ‘sustainability impact assessment’ (SIA) before concluding the negotiations on a trade agreement between the EU and Mercosur constituted maladministration; whereas the
Amendment 27 #
Motion for a resolution Recital O O. whereas according to the Ombudsman, the Commission’s failure to finalise a ‘sustainability impact assessment’ (SIA) before concluding the negotiations on a trade agreement between the EU and Mercosur constituted maladministration; whereas the Ombudsman’s findings
Amendment 28 #
Motion for a resolution Recital P P. whereas the Ombudsman found instances of maladministration in the decision by the European Banking Authority (EBA) to approve the job move of its then Executive Director as Chief Executive Officer (CEO) of the Association for Financial Markets in Europe (AFME), a lobby organisation for the financial industry, failing to mitigate the risks of conflicts of interest, as well as continuing to give him access to confidential information; whereas the EBA took the requisite measures, enabling the Ombudsman to close the inquiry;
Amendment 29 #
Motion for a resolution Recital P P. whereas the Ombudsman found instances of maladministration in the decision by the European Banking Authority (EBA) to approve the job move of its then Executive Director as Chief Executive Officer (CEO) of the Association for Financial Markets in Europe (AFME), a lobby organisation for the financial industry, failing to mitigate the risks of conflicts of interest, as well as continuing to give him access to
Amendment 3 #
Motion for a resolution Recital B a (new) B a. whereas Article 15 of the TFEU states that ‘in order to promote good governance and ensure the participation of civil society, the Union's institutions, bodies, offices and agencies shall conduct their work as openly as possible’ and that ‘any citizen of the Union, and any natural or legal person residing or having its registered office in a Member State, shall have a right of access to documents of the Union's institutions, bodies, offices and agencies’; whereas ensuring that high- quality services are provided to EU citizens and that the EU administration is responsive to their needs and concerns is crucial in protecting citizens' rights and fundamental freedoms;
Amendment 30 #
Motion for a resolution Recital Q Q. whereas the Commission’s strategy in dealing with petitions refers to its 2016 Communication entitled ‘EU law: Better results through better application’
Amendment 31 #
Motion for a resolution Recital Q Q. whereas the Commission’s strategy in dealing with petitions refers to its 2016 Communication entitled ‘EU law: Better results through better application’, whose rules establish no administrative procedure or practice concerning petitions;
Amendment 32 #
Motion for a resolution Recital Q Q. whereas the Commission’s strategy in dealing with petitions refers to its 2016 Communication entitled ‘EU law: Better results through better application’, whose rules establish no administrative procedure or practice concerning petitions; whereas the Commission’s approach, resulting in its systematic refusal to take action on individual petition issues and on petitions concerning areas under Article 6 TFEU
Amendment 33 #
Motion for a resolution Recital Q a (new) Q a. whereas many petitions received by the PETI Committee are related to the lack of transparency of the European Commission and request that full details of the COVID-19 vaccine contracts signed between the Commission, the Member States and the pharmaceutical industry, as well as patient-level clinical trials data will be published;
Amendment 34 #
Motion for a resolution Recital R R. whereas the Ombudsman is a potential redress mechanism for citizens facing problems in gaining access to documents held by the EU institutions; whereas a significant number of the Ombudsman’s inquiries in 2020 resulted in access being granted to documents of wider public interest
Amendment 35 #
Motion for a resolution Recital S a (new) S a. whereas the Ombudsman launched an inquiry on how the Commission ensures that Hungary and Portugal’s use of ESI funds for care facilities for persons with disabilities is in line with the legal obligations stemming from the EU Charter of Fundamental Rights, the ESI funds Regulation and the UNCRPD
Amendment 36 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 1 1.
Amendment 37 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 2 2. Congratulates Emily O’Reilly on her remarkable work to enhance the openness, accountability and integrity of the EU institutions, bodies, offices and agencies, thereby safeguarding citizens’ fundamental rights, in particular in a tragic year marked by the devastating consequences of the outbreak of the COVID-19 pandemic; recalls that transparency is enshrined in rule of law and represents a key principle for a participative democracy;
Amendment 38 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 2 a (new) 2a. Recalls that the European Ombudsman can make recommendations, proposals for solutions and suggestions for improvement with a view to solving a problem in cases of maladministration; notes that where a complaint falls outside the Ombudsman's mandate, the Ombudsman may advise the complainant to refer it to another authority or to the Committee on Petitions; notes that in 2020 the Ombudsman received more than 1 400 complaints which did not fall within her mandate, mainly because they did not concern activities related to the EU administration;
Amendment 39 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 2 a (new) 2 a. Congratulates the Ombudsman for monitoring how the EU’s frontline institutions are carrying out their work during the pandemic and for underlining their obligation for transparency; welcomes the question addressed by the Ombudsman to the Commission about the transparency of the scientific advice it receives, its meetings with interest representatives, and its decisions related to emergency public procurement;
Amendment 4 #
Motion for a resolution Recital B b (new) B b. whereas Article 15 TFEU states that ‘in order to promote good governance and ensure the participation of civil society, the Union's institutions, bodies, offices and agencies shall conduct their work as openly as possible’ and that ‘any citizen of the Union, and any natural or legal person residing or having its registered office in a Member State, shall have a right of access to documents of the Union's institutions, bodies, offices and agencies’;
Amendment 40 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 3 a (new) 3a. Notes that the Ombudsman's work has led to positive changes in the EU institutions and bodies;
Amendment 41 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 4 4. Regrets the fact that the Commission did not provide adequate explanations to the Ombudsman’s requests on key elements of its work during the COVID-19 crisis; c
Amendment 42 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 4 4.
Amendment 43 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 4 – point a (new) (a) Emphasises the essential role of transparency, good administration and institutional checks and balances in the work of the EU institutions;
Amendment 44 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 5 5. Urges the Commission to ensure
Amendment 45 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 5 5. Urges the Commission to ensure full transparency on all details of the
Amendment 46 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 5 5. Urges the Commission to ensure full transparency on all details of the research into, and the development, purchase and distribution of COVID-19 vaccines, by publishing non-redacted versions of the Advance Purchase Agreements and the Purchase Agreement and by making the disclosure of all details in future contracts concerning COVID-19 vaccines and COVID-19 technologies mandatory; acknowledges the competitive nature of the market for vaccines, as well as the request of the manufacturers to introduce non-disclosure clauses; points out that these realities must be weighed against the interest of the European citizens to have clarity and transparency concerning these agreements; emphasises that any lack of transparency in the framework of the COVID-19 pandemic is at odds with citizens’ right to information and fuels disinformation and distrust;
Amendment 47 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 5 – point a (new) (a) Stresses that trust between citizens and the institutions is of paramount importance, especially in the context of the COVID-19 crisis;
Amendment 48 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 6 a (new) 6 a. Calls on the Commission to publish non-redacted versions of the Advance Purchase Agreements and the Purchase Agreement, as well as to make the disclosure of all details of future COVID-19 vaccine contracts a precondition for any future negotiations with the pharmaceutical companies;
Amendment 49 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 7 7.
Amendment 5 #
Motion for a resolution Recital B c (new) B c. whereas Article 41 of the Charter of Fundamental Rights, focused on the right to good administration, states inter alia that ‘every person has the right to have his or her affairs handled impartially, fairly and within a reasonable time by the institutions, bodies, offices and agencies of the Union’;
Amendment 50 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 7 7. Encourages the Ombudsman to
Amendment 51 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 7 a (new) 7 a. Encourages the Ombudsman to continue its inquiries and to ask the Commission to publish non-redacted versions of the Advance Purchase Agreements and the Purchase Agreement and to disclose: the advance payments by the Commission, the cost sharing between public and private investments in the vaccines, the prices per dose, the liability and compensation regimes for any harm that might be caused by the vaccines, the sanctions in case of breach of contract;
Amendment 52 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 8 Amendment 53 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 8 8. Calls on the Ombudsman to
Amendment 54 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 8 8.
Amendment 55 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 8 8. Calls on the Ombudsman to adopt strengthened oversight of the implementation of the rules and procedures concerning the allocation and use of EU funds under NextGenerationEU to protect Union citizens’ rights against possible conflicts of interest and corruption cases, as well as if the requirements for violations of the rule of law are being followed, contributing to ensuring the integrity, full transparency and democratic accountability of the EU institutions;
Amendment 56 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 9 9. Deeply regrets the fact that the Council’s current practices with regard to its decision-making process are still marred by a lack of transparency;
Amendment 57 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 9 9. Deeply regrets the fact that the Council’s current practices with regard to its decision-making process are still marred by a lack of transparency; deplores the fact that the Council is persisting in preventing citizens from having
Amendment 58 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 9 9.
Amendment 59 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 9 a (new) 9a. Regrets the recent emergence of discrimination based on vaccination status, with certain Member States denying access to catering and a wide range of other services to citizens who have not been vaccinated against COVID- 19, even if they are not ill, while a negative PCR test is sufficient for all those seeking to avail themselves of such services in other Member States;
Amendment 6 #
Motion for a resolution Recital B b (new) B b. whereas Article 41(1) of the Charter of Fundamental Rights states that ‘every person has the right to have his or her affairs handled impartially, fairly and within a reasonable time by the institutions, bodies, offices and agencies of the Union’;
Amendment 60 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 10 10. Reiterates its call for the publication of all trialogue documents once they have been finalized in order to uphold citizens’ democratic rights, as full transparency
Amendment 61 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 10 10. Reiterates its call for the publication of
Amendment 62 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 10 10. Re
Amendment 63 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 10 10. Commends the Ombudsman’s determination to achieve the highest level of transparency in the EU decision- making process; stresses the need to monitor the implementation of the Ombudsman’s recommendations for transparency in trilogues; Reiterates its call for the publication of all trilogue documents in order to uphold citizens’ democratic rights, as full transparency at all stages of the legislative process, including in the informal negotiations between the three main EU institutions, is crucial to enabling citizens to hold their elected representatives and governments accountable;
Amendment 64 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 10 a (new) Amendment 65 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 11 11. Urges the Commission to
Amendment 66 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 11 11. Urges the Commission to refrain from approving ‘active substances’ used in pesticides in cases where critical areas of concern or no safe use have been identified,
Amendment 67 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 12 12. Calls on the Commission to ensure an approval process for ‘active substances’ in pesticides, which is
Amendment 68 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 12 12. Calls on the Commission to ensure an approval process for ‘active substances’ in pesticides, which is fully transparent and free from conflicts of interest
Amendment 69 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 12 12. Calls on the Commission to ensure an approval process for ‘active substances’ in pesticides, which is fully transparent and free from conflicts of interest,
Amendment 7 #
Motion for a resolution Recital B c (new) B c. whereas Article 43 of the Charter states that ‘any citizen of the Union and any natural or legal person residing or having its registered office in a Member State has the right to refer to the European Ombudsman cases of maladministration in the activities of the institutions, bodies, offices or agencies of the Union, with the exception of the Court of Justice of the European Union acting in its judicial role’;
Amendment 70 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 13 13. Recalls that in March 2020, the Ombudsman closed her inquiry into how the Commission ensures that scientific experts who advise it have no conflicts of interest; stresses that the Ombudsman found these systems to be adequate; Calls on the Commission to improve its assessment processes of the independence of the scientific experts who advise it, including by fully implementing the Ombudsman’s suggestions following her inquiry on this matter, ensuring that the experts concerned do not have any conflict of interest;
Amendment 71 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 14 Amendment 72 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 14 Amendment 73 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 14 14. Calls on the Ombudsman to launch an inquiry on the Commission’s strategic approach in dealing with petitions, as its action is only limited to issues it considers of strategic importance or which reflect structural problems,
Amendment 74 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 15 15.
Amendment 75 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 15 15. Strongly criticises the Commission for its failure to finalise the SIA before concluding the EU-Mercosur trade negotiations;
Amendment 76 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 15 15. Strongly criticises the Commission for its failure to finalise the SIA before concluding the EU-Mercosur trade negotiations; underlines that this
Amendment 77 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 15 15. Strongly criticises the Commission for its failure to finalise the SIA before concluding the EU-Mercosur trade negotiations; underlines that this meant that the Commission concluded the negotiations without appropriate and updated information about the potential social, environmental and economic impacts of the proposed agreement and without properly taking into account the views of all stakeholders, which must
Amendment 78 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 16 16. C
Amendment 79 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 16 16. Criticises the decision of those Member States, which held the Presidency of the Council, to use corporate sponsorship, as it
Amendment 8 #
Motion for a resolution Recital B d (new) B d. whereas Article 43 of the Charter states that ‘any citizen of the Union and any natural or legal person residing or having its registered office in a Member State has the right to refer to the European Ombudsman cases of maladministration in the activities of the institutions, bodies, offices or agencies of the Union, with the exception of the Court of Justice of the European Union acting in its judicial role’;
Amendment 80 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 16 16. Criticises the decision of those Member States, which held the Presidency of the Council, to use corporate sponsorship, as it caused serious damages to the EU’s image, stressing the importance for the future to refrain from any sponsorship; considers paramount the adoption of the most stringent rules preventing such practices from taking place with a view to safeguarding the reputation and integrity of the Council and of the EU as a whole; calls on the Member States to fully comply their obligation to collaborate with the Ombudsman
Amendment 81 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 16 a (new) 16 a. Applauds the Ombudsman for opening an own-initiative inquiry into the extraordinary decision-making procedures put in place by the Council of the EU in the context of the COVID-19 crisis;
Amendment 82 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 17 17. Commends the Ombudsman’s work to protect EU citizens’ right to access documents held by the EU institutions; considers it paramount to guarantee
Amendment 83 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 17 17. Commends the Ombudsman’s work to protect EU citizens’ right to access documents held by the EU institutions; considers it paramount to guarantee
Amendment 84 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 17 17. Commends the Ombudsman’s work to protect EU citizens’ right to access documents held by the EU institutions; considers it paramount to guarantee full transparency and full public access to the documents held by the EU institutions in order to ensure the highest levels of protection of the democratic rights of citizens and their trust in EU institutions; believes that revision of Regulation (EC) No 1049/20012 must take place as a matter of priority; regrets the fact that EU legislation on access to documents is very much obsolete, thereby also hampering the Ombudsman’s activities on this matter;
Amendment 85 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 17 17. Commends the Ombudsman’s work to protect EU citizens’ right to access documents held by the EU institutions; and to provide citizens with documents in all EU official languages ; considers it paramount to guarantee full transparency and full public access to the documents held by the EU institutions
Amendment 86 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 18 18. App
Amendment 87 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 18 – point a (new) (a) Calls on the Ombudsman to continue her work to ensure the timely publication of the names of all EU officials involved in ‘revolving door’ cases and to guarantee full transparency with regard to all related information;
Amendment 88 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 18 a (new) 18 a. Welcomes the inquiry launched by the Ombudsman on how the EIB handled its former Vice-President’s post- employment application to take a senior position at the Spanish company Iberdrola that had received a massive amount of loans by the EIB; criticises the failure of the EIB to act on Parliament’s request to include in the Code of Conduct of the EIB Management Committee provisions preventing their Members from overseeing lending and the implementation of projects in their countries of origin; calls on the EIB to fully and consistently comply with the Parliament’s demand and strengthen its integrity rules and their enforcement in order to prevent conflicts of interest and reputational damages;
Amendment 89 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 18 a (new) 18 a. welcomes the Ombudsman's investigations concerning the protection of refugees' fundamental rights, including the handling of fundamental rights violations by Frontex and the extension of its mandate. highlights that this is accompanied by an important investigation into how the Commission ensures that the Croatian authorities respect fundamental rights in border management operations.
Amendment 9 #
Motion for a resolution Recital B e (new) B e. whereas Article 298(1) TFEU establishes that 'in carrying out their missions, the institutions, bodies, offices and agencies of the Union shall have the support of an open, efficient and independent European administration';
Amendment 90 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 19 19.
Amendment 91 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 19 – point a (new) (a) Welcomes the Ombudsman’s inquiries following complaints by persons with disabilities, and encourages her work as an active participant in the EU Framework for the UN Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities;
Amendment 92 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 19 a (new) 19a. Welcomes the continuation of the Award for Good Administration, which aims to recognise actions by the EU public service that have a positive impact on the lives of European citizens; takes the view that the award should be better publicised to show European citizens that the EU institutions are taking practical action;
Amendment 93 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 20 20. Supports the Ombudsman’s activities aimed at guaranteeing the full and consistent implementation of the UNCRPD by the EU administration, including the list of best practices set out to promote a consistent approach across the EU administration in accommodating the special needs of staff members with disabilities in the context of the COVID-19 emergency; recalls, in this regard, that the Ombudsman chaired the EU Framework for the UNCRPD in 2020;
Amendment 94 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 20 – point a (new) (a) Urges the Commission to investigate the use of European Structural and Investment Funds (ESI funds), which were allocated for the construction of institutional care facilities for persons with disabilities in Hungary and Portugal;
Amendment 95 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 20 – point b (new) (b) stresses that ESI related funds have been allocated to promote the rights of persons with disabilities to live independently and to be included in the community; stresses that it is essential to monitor the allocated EU funds, which should be used to support deinstitutionalisation in Member States;
Amendment 96 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 20 – point c (new) (c) Stresses that while Member States’ obligations as regards the principle of non-discrimination, including giving particular attention to accessibility to persons with disabilities throughout the preparation and implementation of projects should be respected;
Amendment 97 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 20 – point d (new) (d) Emphasises the Ombudsman’s inquiry on how the European Border and Coast Guard Agency (Frontex) deals with alleged breaches of fundamental rights, in particular on their transparency and effectiveness of their complaint mechanism and the role and the independence of their Fundamental Rights Officer; calls on the Ombudsman to follow up with the Commission’s future actions on how its established monitoring mechanism will control the effectiveness of border management operations that are funded by the EU;
Amendment 98 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 20 a (new) 20 a. Notes that there was a slight increase of the number of complaints addressed to the European Ombudsman during the past years, which shows that more citizens are now aware of the existence of the institution and the very useful work it does to defend public interest;
Amendment 99 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 20 b (new) 20 b. Welcomes the fact that in 2020, the average length of the inquiries of cases closed by EU Ombudsman was 5 months, an improvement compared to the previous year where it stood at 7 months;
source: 699.010
|
History
(these mark the time of scraping, not the official date of the change)
2022-01-06Show (2) Changes | Timetravel
| docs/2 |
|
| events/2/docs |
|
2021-12-10Show (2) Changes | Timetravel
| events/2 |
|
| procedure/stage_reached |
Old
Awaiting committee decisionNew
Awaiting Parliament's vote |
2021-12-03Show (1) Changes | Timetravel
| events/1 |
|
2021-10-30Show (1) Changes | Timetravel
| forecasts/0/date |
Old
2021-12-13T00:00:00New
2022-01-17T00:00:00 |
2021-10-27Show (1) Changes
| docs/1/docs/0/url |
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PETI-AM-699010_EN.html
|