BETA


2021/2202(INI) EU Border Regions: Living labs of European integration

Progress: Procedure completed

RoleCommitteeRapporteurShadows
Lead REGI OMARJEE Younous (icon: GUE/NGL GUE/NGL) DOLESCHAL Christian (icon: EPP EPP), PICULA Tonino (icon: S&D S&D), GOZI Sandro (icon: Renew Renew), ALFONSI François (icon: Verts/ALE Verts/ALE), ANDROUËT Mathilde (icon: ID ID), FITTO Raffaele (icon: ECR ECR)
Lead committee dossier:
Legal Basis:
RoP 54

Events

2022/12/16
   EC - Commission response to text adopted in plenary
Documents
2022/09/15
   EP - Results of vote in Parliament
2022/09/15
   EP - Decision by Parliament
Details

The European Parliament has adopted by 522 votes to 49, with 11 abstentions, a resolution on EU border regions: living labs of European integration.

The EU and its immediate neighbours in the European Free Trade Association have 40 internal land borders and internal border regions . These regions cover 40% of the EU's territory, account for 30% of the EU's population, produce almost a third of the EU's GDP and have a strong potential to boost its economies.

Specific characteristics of border regions

Recalling that Article 174 TFEU recognises the difficulties faced by border regions, Parliament called for the Union to pay particular attention to these regions in its efforts to strengthen its economic, social and territorial cohesion. It stressed the need for effective use and better coordination of EU funds to ensure a more comprehensive approach to the challenges facing border regions. It called for the involvement of local authorities and communities and for tailor-made, integrated and region-specific approaches within a multi-level governance framework.

Members suggested that the structural disadvantages faced by all border regions should be compensated for by a separate regional aid scheme specifically designed for these regions. They called for 0.26% of the EU's cohesion policy budget to be reserved exclusively for the development of border regions at the beginning of each new programming period, starting in 2028-2034 (‘ borderland billion ’). This amount should be given to European groupings of territorial cooperation (EGTCs) or to border regions where comparable structures exist.

Resilience through closer institutional cooperation

Parliament called on the EU institutions and Member States to raise awareness of the possibility for cross-border regions to receive support from the Commission under the ‘ b-solutions ’ initiative, which has provided legal and administrative support to authorities in border regions and resolved 90 cases involving barriers to interaction.

The Commission and the Member States are invited to maximise their efforts to remove the legal and administrative obstacles that often hinder access to public services, notably in the areas of health services, transport, education, labour mobility and the environment.

The European cross-border mechanism (ECBM) as proposed by the Commission would have contributed to removing more than 50 % of the barriers concerned, including those resulting from the lack of cross-border public transport and limited access to employment, education, cultural and leisure services. However, Members deeply regret the fact that the legislative procedure relating to the ECBM has been blocked by the Council .

The Commission is called on to:

- amend the current proposal with a view to striking a balance between the co-legislators’ respective positions;

- ensure that the proposal takes into account the strengthening of cross-border regions, anticipating the foreseeable damage in the regions that will be most affected by the consequences of the Russian aggression against Ukraine;

- resume negotiations with the Member States with a view to rapidly adopting a system for clearing legal or administrative border hurdles in an effort to make life easier for the inhabitants of cross-border regions.

Parliament welcomed the agreement reached on the Brexit adjustment reserve to provide financial and legal support to Member States and regions affected by Brexit.

Dynamic cross-border labour markets

The resolution pointed out that according to the Commission's eighth cohesion report, Interreg indicators show that only 68% of the 2023 targets for cross-border labour mobility had been met by the end of 2020, while in other areas the targets had been met by up to 495% . Member States are encouraged to continue on this path in order to reach the 2023 targets.

In the absence of an adequate supply of jobs or other economic opportunities and in view of the low level of salaries, the well-educated workforce tends to migrate to regions where such opportunities are in adequate supply, thus making the situation in remote border areas even more challenging. Therefore, Members called for investments in innovation, human capital, good governance and institutional capacity to boost these regions.

The Commission and the Member States are called on to:

- ensure, as a matter of urgency, the proper implementation and enforcement of relevant EU legislation as regards the rights of cross-border and frontier workers , to improve their employment, working and health and safety conditions;

- address the need to revise the existing legislative framework including Regulation (EC) No 883/2004 on the coordination of social security systems to strengthen the portability of rights and ensure adequate social security coordination;

- acknowledge the reality of and the difficulties associated with the increase in teleworking , to guarantee that those teleworking from their country of residence have access to social security rights, labour rights and tax regimes, and certainty as regards the authority responsible for their coverage.

Members stressed the need to ensure faster and fuller recognition of diplomas and other qualifications obtained after training and called on the Commission, in close cooperation with the European Labour Authority, to present a legislative proposal for a European social security pass for all mobile workers and third-country nationals who are covered by EU rules on intra-EU mobility.

Members stressed that more and better cross-border public services would not only improve the quality of life of border citizens, but also the cost-benefit ratio of these services.

Lastly, Parliament called on the Commission to closely monitor the cross-border component of national and regional climate change adaptation strategies, with specific measures to promote appropriate responses.

Documents
2022/09/14
   EP - Debate in Parliament
2022/07/27
   EP - Committee report tabled for plenary
Details

The Committee on Regional Development adopted the own-initiative report by Younous OMARJEE (SUE/NGL, FR) on EU border regions: living labs of European integration.

Specific characteristics of border regions

The EU and its immediate neighbours in the European Free Trade Association have 40 internal land borders and internal border regions, and whereas those regions cover 40 % of the EU’s territory, account for 30 % of the EU’s population, produce almost one third of EU GDP and have significant potential to boost its economies even further.

Border regions, especially those with a low population density and, in particular, rural areas, tend to experience less favourable development conditions and are generally less economically successful than other regions within Member States. Administrative, linguistic and legal barriers are still hampering sustainable growth, socio-economic development and cohesion among and within border regions. Moreover, the COVID-19 pandemic as well as Russia’s ongoing military aggression in Ukraine has made those barriers more difficult to overcome.

The report emphasised the need for EU policies to take more account of the specific characteristics of cross-border regions and for effective use and greater coordination of EU funds to ensure a more comprehensive approach to the afore-mentioned challenges.

Resilience through closer institutional cooperation

While welcoming the progress the Commission has made thus far in implementing its 2017 action plan, in particular via the ‘b-solutions’ initiative – which has made it possible to provide legal and administrative support to authorities in border regions and to resolve 90 cases involving barriers to interaction – and via the support provided to improve access to employment, promote multilingualism in border areas and pool healthcare facilities, Members called on the EU institutions and on Member States to raise awareness among cross-border regions about the possibility of receiving support from the Commission under the b-solutions initiative .

European cross-border mechanism (ECBM)

The report noted that most barriers hindering cross-border cooperation are legal in nature, arising from diverging national laws or general EU laws. The 2018 Commission proposal for a regulation on European cross-border mechanism would have contributed to removing more than 50 % of the barriers concerned, including those resulting from the lack of cross-border public transport and limited access to employment, education, cultural and leisure services. However, Members deeply regret the fact that the legislative procedure relating to the ECBM has been blocked by the Council .

The committee called on the Commission to:

- amend the current proposal with a view to striking a balance between the co-legislators’ respective positions;

- ensure that the proposal takes into account the strengthening of cross-border regions, anticipating the foreseeable damage in the regions that will be most affected by the consequences of the Russian aggression against Ukraine;

- resume negotiations with the Member States with a view to rapidly adopting a system for clearing legal or administrative border hurdles in an effort to make life easier for the inhabitants of cross-border regions.

The report also stressed that border regions are also confronted with the consequences of Brexit, which are creating new barriers to free trade and causing serious disruption to cross-border trade between the EU and the UK, making life more difficult for businesses and citizens in border regions.

Dynamic cross-border labour markets

Many important measures have been taken to address the socio-economic asymmetries in border areas. However, the report noted the lack of specific assessments and comparative statistics that would provide an overview of the socio-economic circumstances of cross-border SMEs, something all the more regrettable given that SMEs account for 67 % of total employment and almost 60 % of EU added value.

In the absence of an adequate supply of jobs or other economic opportunities and in view of the low level of salaries, the well-educated workforce tends to migrate to regions where such opportunities are in adequate supply, thus making the situation in remote border areas even more challenging. Therefore, Members called for investments in innovation, human capital, good governance and institutional capacity to boost these regions.

The Commission and the Member States are called on to ensure, as a matter of urgency, the proper implementation and enforcement of relevant EU legislation as regards the rights of cross-border and frontier workers , to improve their employment, working and health and safety conditions. They should also address the need to revise the existing legislative framework including Regulation (EC) No 883/2004 on the coordination of social security systems in order to strengthen the portability of rights and ensure adequate social security coordination, and to acknowledge the reality of and the difficulties associated with the increase in teleworking , to guarantee that those teleworking from their country of residence have access to social security rights, labour rights and tax regimes, and certainty as regards the authority responsible for their coverage.

Lastly, Members called on the Commission, in close cooperation with the European Labour Authority, to put forward a legislative proposal for a European social security pass for all mobile workers and non-EU nationals who are covered by EU rules on intra-EU mobility without further delay.

Documents
2022/07/12
   EP - Vote in committee
2022/05/05
   EP - Amendments tabled in committee
Documents
2022/02/10
   EP - Committee draft report
Documents
2021/11/25
   EP - Committee referral announced in Parliament
2021/09/06
   EP - OMARJEE Younous (GUE/NGL) appointed as rapporteur in REGI

Documents

Votes

Régions frontalières de l’UE: des laboratoires vivants de l’intégration européenne - EU border regions: living labs of European integration - Grenzregionen in der EU: Reallabors der europäischen Integration - A9-0222/2022 - Younous Omarjee - Proposition de résolution #

2022/09/15 Outcome: +: 522, -: 49, 0: 11
DE IT PL ES FR PT RO HU NL SE CZ AT IE FI HR BE LT BG SK LV EL SI LU CY EE MT DK
Total
91
47
47
47
70
21
20
18
25
19
17
18
11
13
11
19
9
9
11
7
12
7
6
5
7
4
11
icon: PPE PPE
141

Hungary PPE

1

Netherlands PPE

3

Latvia PPE

2

Luxembourg PPE

2
2

Estonia PPE

For (1)

1

Malta PPE

For (1)

1

Denmark PPE

For (1)

1
icon: S&D S&D
122

Romania S&D

3

Czechia S&D

For (1)

1

Lithuania S&D

2

Bulgaria S&D

2

Slovakia S&D

2

Latvia S&D

2

Greece S&D

For (1)

1

Slovenia S&D

2

Luxembourg S&D

For (1)

1

Cyprus S&D

1

Estonia S&D

2
icon: Renew Renew
87

Italy Renew

For (1)

1

Poland Renew

1

Hungary Renew

For (1)

1
3

Austria Renew

For (1)

1

Ireland Renew

2

Finland Renew

3

Croatia Renew

For (1)

1

Lithuania Renew

1

Bulgaria Renew

2

Slovakia Renew

3

Latvia Renew

For (1)

1

Greece Renew

1

Slovenia Renew

For (1)

1

Luxembourg Renew

2

Estonia Renew

3
icon: Verts/ALE Verts/ALE
66

Italy Verts/ALE

2

Poland Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Portugal Verts/ALE

1

Netherlands Verts/ALE

3

Sweden Verts/ALE

3

Czechia Verts/ALE

3

Austria Verts/ALE

3

Ireland Verts/ALE

2

Finland Verts/ALE

3

Belgium Verts/ALE

2

Lithuania Verts/ALE

2

Luxembourg Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Denmark Verts/ALE

2
icon: The Left The Left
31

Netherlands The Left

For (1)

1

Sweden The Left

For (1)

1

Ireland The Left

3

Finland The Left

For (1)

1

Belgium The Left

For (1)

1

Cyprus The Left

2
icon: ECR ECR
49

Germany ECR

1

Netherlands ECR

Abstain (1)

5

Sweden ECR

2

Croatia ECR

1

Slovakia ECR

Against (1)

1
icon: NI NI
36

France NI

Against (1)

1

Croatia NI

Abstain (1)

2

Lithuania NI

1

Slovakia NI

Abstain (1)

2

Latvia NI

2
icon: ID ID
50

Netherlands ID

Against (1)

1

Czechia ID

Against (2)

2

Austria ID

3

Finland ID

Against (1)

1

Estonia ID

Against (1)

1

Denmark ID

Against (1)

1
AmendmentsDossier
102 2021/2202(INI)
2022/05/05 REGI 102 amendments...
source: 731.717

History

(these mark the time of scraping, not the official date of the change)

docs/2
date
2022-12-16T00:00:00
docs
url: /oeil/spdoc.do?i=58662&j=0&l=en title: SP(2022)624
type
Commission response to text adopted in plenary
body
EC
docs/2
date
2022-09-15T00:00:00
docs
url: https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/TA-9-2022-0327_EN.html title: T9-0327/2022
type
Text adopted by Parliament, single reading
body
EP
events/4
date
2022-09-15T00:00:00
type
Decision by Parliament
body
EP
docs
url: https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/TA-9-2022-0327_EN.html title: T9-0327/2022
events/4
date
2022-09-15T00:00:00
type
Results of vote in Parliament
body
EP
docs
url: https://oeil.secure.europarl.europa.eu/oeil/popups/sda.do?id=58662&l=en title: Results of vote in Parliament
events/5
date
2022-09-15T00:00:00
type
Decision by Parliament
body
EP
docs
url: https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/TA-9-2022-0327_EN.html title: T9-0327/2022
events/5/summary
  • The European Parliament has adopted by 522 votes to 49, with 11 abstentions, a resolution on EU border regions: living labs of European integration.
  • The EU and its immediate neighbours in the European Free Trade Association have 40 internal land borders and internal border regions . These regions cover 40% of the EU's territory, account for 30% of the EU's population, produce almost a third of the EU's GDP and have a strong potential to boost its economies.
  • Specific characteristics of border regions
  • Recalling that Article 174 TFEU recognises the difficulties faced by border regions, Parliament called for the Union to pay particular attention to these regions in its efforts to strengthen its economic, social and territorial cohesion. It stressed the need for effective use and better coordination of EU funds to ensure a more comprehensive approach to the challenges facing border regions. It called for the involvement of local authorities and communities and for tailor-made, integrated and region-specific approaches within a multi-level governance framework.
  • Members suggested that the structural disadvantages faced by all border regions should be compensated for by a separate regional aid scheme specifically designed for these regions. They called for 0.26% of the EU's cohesion policy budget to be reserved exclusively for the development of border regions at the beginning of each new programming period, starting in 2028-2034 (‘ borderland billion ’). This amount should be given to European groupings of territorial cooperation (EGTCs) or to border regions where comparable structures exist.
  • Resilience through closer institutional cooperation
  • Parliament called on the EU institutions and Member States to raise awareness of the possibility for cross-border regions to receive support from the Commission under the ‘ b-solutions ’ initiative, which has provided legal and administrative support to authorities in border regions and resolved 90 cases involving barriers to interaction.
  • The Commission and the Member States are invited to maximise their efforts to remove the legal and administrative obstacles that often hinder access to public services, notably in the areas of health services, transport, education, labour mobility and the environment.
  • The European cross-border mechanism (ECBM) as proposed by the Commission would have contributed to removing more than 50 % of the barriers concerned, including those resulting from the lack of cross-border public transport and limited access to employment, education, cultural and leisure services. However, Members deeply regret the fact that the legislative procedure relating to the ECBM has been blocked by the Council .
  • The Commission is called on to:
  • - amend the current proposal with a view to striking a balance between the co-legislators’ respective positions;
  • - ensure that the proposal takes into account the strengthening of cross-border regions, anticipating the foreseeable damage in the regions that will be most affected by the consequences of the Russian aggression against Ukraine;
  • - resume negotiations with the Member States with a view to rapidly adopting a system for clearing legal or administrative border hurdles in an effort to make life easier for the inhabitants of cross-border regions.
  • Parliament welcomed the agreement reached on the Brexit adjustment reserve to provide financial and legal support to Member States and regions affected by Brexit.
  • Dynamic cross-border labour markets
  • The resolution pointed out that according to the Commission's eighth cohesion report, Interreg indicators show that only 68% of the 2023 targets for cross-border labour mobility had been met by the end of 2020, while in other areas the targets had been met by up to 495% . Member States are encouraged to continue on this path in order to reach the 2023 targets.
  • In the absence of an adequate supply of jobs or other economic opportunities and in view of the low level of salaries, the well-educated workforce tends to migrate to regions where such opportunities are in adequate supply, thus making the situation in remote border areas even more challenging. Therefore, Members called for investments in innovation, human capital, good governance and institutional capacity to boost these regions.
  • The Commission and the Member States are called on to:
  • - ensure, as a matter of urgency, the proper implementation and enforcement of relevant EU legislation as regards the rights of cross-border and frontier workers , to improve their employment, working and health and safety conditions;
  • - address the need to revise the existing legislative framework including Regulation (EC) No 883/2004 on the coordination of social security systems to strengthen the portability of rights and ensure adequate social security coordination;
  • - acknowledge the reality of and the difficulties associated with the increase in teleworking , to guarantee that those teleworking from their country of residence have access to social security rights, labour rights and tax regimes, and certainty as regards the authority responsible for their coverage.
  • Members stressed the need to ensure faster and fuller recognition of diplomas and other qualifications obtained after training and called on the Commission, in close cooperation with the European Labour Authority, to present a legislative proposal for a European social security pass for all mobile workers and third-country nationals who are covered by EU rules on intra-EU mobility.
  • Members stressed that more and better cross-border public services would not only improve the quality of life of border citizens, but also the cost-benefit ratio of these services.
  • Lastly, Parliament called on the Commission to closely monitor the cross-border component of national and regional climate change adaptation strategies, with specific measures to promote appropriate responses.
docs/2
date
2022-09-15T00:00:00
docs
url: https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/TA-9-2022-0327_EN.html title: T9-0327/2022
type
Text adopted by Parliament, single reading
body
EP
events/3
date
2022-09-14T00:00:00
type
Debate in Parliament
body
EP
docs
url: https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/CRE-9-2021-09-14-TOC_EN.html title: Debate in Parliament
events/4
date
2022-09-15T00:00:00
type
Decision by Parliament
body
EP
docs
url: https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/TA-9-2022-0327_EN.html title: T9-0327/2022
forecasts
  • date: 2022-09-15T00:00:00 title: Vote in plenary scheduled
procedure/stage_reached
Old
Awaiting Parliament's vote
New
Procedure completed
forecasts/0
date
2022-09-14T00:00:00
title
Debate in plenary scheduled
docs/2
date
2022-07-27T00:00:00
docs
url: https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/A-9-2022-0222_EN.html title: A9-0222/2022
type
Committee report tabled for plenary, single reading
body
EP
events/2/summary
  • The Committee on Regional Development adopted the own-initiative report by Younous OMARJEE (SUE/NGL, FR) on EU border regions: living labs of European integration.
  • Specific characteristics of border regions
  • The EU and its immediate neighbours in the European Free Trade Association have 40 internal land borders and internal border regions, and whereas those regions cover 40 % of the EU’s territory, account for 30 % of the EU’s population, produce almost one third of EU GDP and have significant potential to boost its economies even further.
  • Border regions, especially those with a low population density and, in particular, rural areas, tend to experience less favourable development conditions and are generally less economically successful than other regions within Member States. Administrative, linguistic and legal barriers are still hampering sustainable growth, socio-economic development and cohesion among and within border regions. Moreover, the COVID-19 pandemic as well as Russia’s ongoing military aggression in Ukraine has made those barriers more difficult to overcome.
  • The report emphasised the need for EU policies to take more account of the specific characteristics of cross-border regions and for effective use and greater coordination of EU funds to ensure a more comprehensive approach to the afore-mentioned challenges.
  • Resilience through closer institutional cooperation
  • While welcoming the progress the Commission has made thus far in implementing its 2017 action plan, in particular via the ‘b-solutions’ initiative – which has made it possible to provide legal and administrative support to authorities in border regions and to resolve 90 cases involving barriers to interaction – and via the support provided to improve access to employment, promote multilingualism in border areas and pool healthcare facilities, Members called on the EU institutions and on Member States to raise awareness among cross-border regions about the possibility of receiving support from the Commission under the b-solutions initiative .
  • European cross-border mechanism (ECBM)
  • The report noted that most barriers hindering cross-border cooperation are legal in nature, arising from diverging national laws or general EU laws. The 2018 Commission proposal for a regulation on European cross-border mechanism would have contributed to removing more than 50 % of the barriers concerned, including those resulting from the lack of cross-border public transport and limited access to employment, education, cultural and leisure services. However, Members deeply regret the fact that the legislative procedure relating to the ECBM has been blocked by the Council .
  • The committee called on the Commission to:
  • - amend the current proposal with a view to striking a balance between the co-legislators’ respective positions;
  • - ensure that the proposal takes into account the strengthening of cross-border regions, anticipating the foreseeable damage in the regions that will be most affected by the consequences of the Russian aggression against Ukraine;
  • - resume negotiations with the Member States with a view to rapidly adopting a system for clearing legal or administrative border hurdles in an effort to make life easier for the inhabitants of cross-border regions.
  • The report also stressed that border regions are also confronted with the consequences of Brexit, which are creating new barriers to free trade and causing serious disruption to cross-border trade between the EU and the UK, making life more difficult for businesses and citizens in border regions.
  • Dynamic cross-border labour markets
  • Many important measures have been taken to address the socio-economic asymmetries in border areas. However, the report noted the lack of specific assessments and comparative statistics that would provide an overview of the socio-economic circumstances of cross-border SMEs, something all the more regrettable given that SMEs account for 67 % of total employment and almost 60 % of EU added value.
  • In the absence of an adequate supply of jobs or other economic opportunities and in view of the low level of salaries, the well-educated workforce tends to migrate to regions where such opportunities are in adequate supply, thus making the situation in remote border areas even more challenging. Therefore, Members called for investments in innovation, human capital, good governance and institutional capacity to boost these regions.
  • The Commission and the Member States are called on to ensure, as a matter of urgency, the proper implementation and enforcement of relevant EU legislation as regards the rights of cross-border and frontier workers , to improve their employment, working and health and safety conditions. They should also address the need to revise the existing legislative framework including Regulation (EC) No 883/2004 on the coordination of social security systems in order to strengthen the portability of rights and ensure adequate social security coordination, and to acknowledge the reality of and the difficulties associated with the increase in teleworking , to guarantee that those teleworking from their country of residence have access to social security rights, labour rights and tax regimes, and certainty as regards the authority responsible for their coverage.
  • Lastly, Members called on the Commission, in close cooperation with the European Labour Authority, to put forward a legislative proposal for a European social security pass for all mobile workers and non-EU nationals who are covered by EU rules on intra-EU mobility without further delay.
docs/2/docs/0/url
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/A-9-2022-0222_EN.html
events/2/docs/0/url
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/A-9-2022-0222_EN.html
forecasts/1
date
2022-09-15T00:00:00
title
Vote in plenary scheduled
docs/2
date
2022-07-27T00:00:00
docs
title: A9-0222/2022
type
Committee report tabled for plenary, single reading
body
EP
events/2/docs
  • title: A9-0222/2022
events/2
date
2022-07-27T00:00:00
type
Committee report tabled for plenary
body
EP
procedure/stage_reached
Old
Awaiting committee decision
New
Awaiting Parliament's vote
events/1
date
2022-07-12T00:00:00
type
Vote in committee
body
EP
forecasts/0
date
2022-09-14T00:00:00
title
Debate in plenary scheduled
forecasts/0
date
2022-09-12T00:00:00
title
Indicative plenary sitting date
procedure/Other legal basis
Rules of Procedure EP 159
forecasts
  • date: 2022-09-12T00:00:00 title: Indicative plenary sitting date
docs/1/docs/0/url
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/REGI-AM-731717_EN.html
procedure/subject/4.70.05
Regional cooperation, cross-border cooperation
docs/1
date
2022-05-05T00:00:00
docs
title: PE731.717
type
Amendments tabled in committee
body
EP
procedure/subject/4.70.05
Regional cooperation, cross-border cooperation
docs/0/docs/0/url
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/REGI-PR-704605_EN.html
docs/0/date
Old
2022-01-21T00:00:00
New
2022-02-10T00:00:00
committees/0
type
Responsible Committee
body
EP
committee_full
Regional Development
committee
REGI
associated
False
rapporteur
name: OMARJEE Younous date: 2021-09-06T00:00:00 group: The Left group in the European Parliament - GUE/NGL abbr: GUE/NGL
shadows
committees/0
type
Responsible Committee
body
EP
committee_full
Regional Development
committee
REGI
associated
False
docs
  • date: 2022-01-21T00:00:00 docs: title: PE704.605 type: Committee draft report body: EP