BETA


2021/2232(INI) The EU and the security challenges in the Indo-Pacific

Progress: Procedure completed

RoleCommitteeRapporteurShadows
Lead AFET MCALLISTER David (icon: EPP EPP) ARA-KOVÁCS Attila (icon: S&D S&D), TUDORACHE Dragoş (icon: Renew Renew), ALAMETSÄ Alviina (icon: Verts/ALE Verts/ALE), BONFRISCO Anna (icon: ID ID), FOTYGA Anna (icon: ECR ECR), DEMIREL Özlem (icon: GUE/NGL GUE/NGL), WALLACE Mick (icon: GUE/NGL GUE/NGL)
Lead committee dossier:
Legal Basis:
RoP 54

Events

2022/06/07
   EP - Decision by Parliament
Details

The European Parliament adopted by 474 votes 60, with 80 abstentions, a resolution on the EU and security challenges in the Indo-Pacific region.

The EU defines the Indo-Pacific region as an area spanning from the east coast of Africa to the Pacific Island states. The region has 60% of the world's population and seven G20 members and is a key player in the international order.

EU response to security challenges in the Indo-Pacific region

Welcoming the joint communication on an EU strategy for cooperation in the Indo-Pacific region, the report called on the EU to use the strategy as a tool to effectively increase its presence and influence in the region through furthering strategic ties and deepening all-inclusive dialogue and cooperation on security and defence-related matters with like-minded countries and organisations in the region.

Parliament stressed that Russia's illegal and unprovoked war of aggression against Ukraine will have profound and lasting consequences on international relations and that the Union must therefore further consolidate its international commitments, as foreseen in the strategic compass, including in the Indo-Pacific region, which is a key strategic area.

Members welcomed the overwhelming support expressed by the countries of the Indo-Pacific region in the UN General Assembly votes of 2 March on the resolution deploring Russia's aggression against Ukraine. While recalling that no country in the region voted against the resolution, Parliament nevertheless regretted that, in addition to China, India, Madagascar, Mozambique, Laos, South Africa, Sri Lanka, Tanzania and Vietnam abstained on the final text.

Chinese leaders are urged to live up to their responsibilities as a permanent member of the UN Security Council and not only condemn Russia's flagrant violation, but also use their close contacts with the Russian President to urge him to put an immediate end to this violent war of aggression.

The resolution stressed the need to ensure the EU’s unity as a precondition for achieving the Union's ambition of open strategic sovereignty in the context of the recent Russian aggression against Ukraine. It called on the Council of the European Union to show greater unity in taking action to respond to China's undemocratic policy and aggressive behaviour, which endangers the sovereignty of its neighbours and the stability of the Indo-Pacific region. Noting that the growing US involvement in the Indo-Pacific region has implications for European security, Members reaffirmed the need for a capable European Defence Union.

Strategic sovereignty based on multilateralism and the rules-based international order

Members are concerned about the threat posed by the current tensions in the region to global security, peace and stability, as well as to free and open communication in the maritime, air, space and IT fields. They encouraged the relevant services of the European External Action Service to analyse the impact of Russia's aggression against Ukraine and to consider how the Union could respond to a deterioration of the security situation in the Indo-Pacific region, reaffirming that the Union could play a stabilising role in the region.

Concerned about the rapid build-up of military forces in China, as well as its attitude to defend its territorial claims in the East and South China Seas, Parliament stressed that the EU's approach to China must be unified, pragmatic, multidimensional and principled . It should be based on cooperation on issues of common interest and global concern, such as the fight against climate change, and compete with China in offering alternative economic, political and strategic options to third countries and oppose or even sanction it on issues such as respect for democracy and human rights.

Noting the recent conclusion of the AUKUS trilateral security pact, Parliament regretted the lack of prior consultation in this process and reiterates its solidarity with France. It expressed its conviction that strong relations between the EU and Australia are important for the stability of the region. Stressing the importance of cooperation on connectivity between the EU and the Indo-Pacific region to meet new security challenges, Members also called for concrete and visible projects in the areas of cybersecurity, digital connectivity and critical infrastructure, security of the global internet infrastructure including undersea cables, climate security and sustainable development.

Enhancing partnerships with regional organisations and democratic countries

Members called for existing partnerships with regional actors to be strengthened and for new ones to be established. They also called on the EU to anchor and extend its presence in the region by deepening cooperation with ASEAN and its members. They welcomed the close coordination with Australia, Japan, the Republic of Korea and New Zealand in response to Russia's war on Ukraine and called on the EU to improve its strategic cooperation with India.

Members strongly refuted any attempt by Chinese propaganda to draw similarities between the Russian war in Ukraine and Taiwan's overall security situation. They stressed the need for closer co-ordination with like-minded partners in order to preserve peace and stability in the Taiwan Strait, reiterating that China and Taiwan should adopt a constructive attitude based on dialogue in their relations.

Freedom of the global commons: the fundamental basis for EU-Indo-Pacific relations

Parliament called on the EU to step up its external action, in particular its diplomatic efforts, to enhance the rule of law offshore and also to improve maritime cooperation with the countries in the Indo-Pacific. The EU should ensure a permanent and credible European naval presence in the Indian Ocean.

Members also called on the EU and NATO to align their respective strategies to provide adequate responses to cyber-attacks and disinformation from the region. They proposed the creation of an independent EU strategic communications centre for the Indo-Pacific region. They also asked the EU to develop regional and global partnerships with democratic regional producers of critical technologies.

Lastly, the EU and like-minded partner countries are urged to strengthen their cooperation on nuclear security and non-proliferation of nuclear, chemical and biological weapons and to support the implementation and universalisation of the Arms Trade Treaty in the Indo-Pacific region.

Documents
2022/06/06
   EP - Debate in Parliament
2022/04/04
   EP - Committee report tabled for plenary
Details

The Committee on Foreign Affairs adopted an own-initiative report by David McALLISTER (EPP, DE) on the EU and security challenges in the Indo-Pacific region.

The EU defines the Indo-Pacific region as an area spanning from the east coast of Africa to the Pacific Island states. The region has 60% of the world's population and seven G20 members and is a key player in the international order.

The recently adopted Joint Communication on an EU strategy for cooperation in the Indo-Pacific region reflects a deep and necessary shift in the way the EU views its interests, opportunities and challenges in the Indo-Pacific region and its ambition to play a more decisive role in this region of growing geopolitical and economic importance.

EU response to security challenges in the Indo-Pacific region

Welcoming the joint communication on an EU strategy for cooperation in the Indo-Pacific region, the report called on the EU to use the strategy as a tool to effectively increase its presence and influence in the region through furthering strategic ties and deepening all-inclusive dialogue and cooperation on security and defence-related matters with like-minded countries and organisations in the region.

Members are concerned that Chinese leaders have not clearly condemned Russia's illegal aggression against Ukraine. They called on the Chinese leadership to live up to its responsibilities as a permanent member of the UN Security Council and not only condemn Russia's blatant violation, but also use its contacts with the Russian President to urge him to put an immediate end to this violent aggression.

Members welcomed the overwhelming support expressed by the countries of the Indo-Pacific region for the UN General Assembly's vote on 2 March on the resolution deploring Russia's aggression against Ukraine. However, they regretted that, in addition to China, India, Madagascar, Mozambique, Laos, South Africa, Sri Lanka, Tanzania and Vietnam abstained on the final text and encouraged these countries to reconsider their position.

The report stressed the need to ensure the EU’s unity as a precondition for achieving the Union's ambition of open strategic sovereignty in the context of the recent Russian aggression against Ukraine. It called on the Council of the European Union to show greater unity in taking action to respond to China's undemocratic policy and aggressive behaviour , which endangers the sovereignty of its neighbours and the stability of the Indo-Pacific region. Noting that the growing US involvement in the Indo-Pacific region has implications for European security, Members reaffirmed the need for a capable European Defence Union.

Strategic sovereignty based on multilateralism and the rules-based international order

Members are concerned about the threat posed by the current tensions in the region to global security, peace and stability, as well as to free and open communication in the maritime, air, space and IT fields. They encouraged the relevant services of the European External Action Service to analyse the impact of Russia's aggression against Ukraine and to consider how the Union could respond to a deterioration of the security situation in the Indo-Pacific region, reaffirming that the Union could play a stabilising role in the region.

Concerned about the rapid build-up of military forces in China, Members stressed that the EU's approach to China must be unified, pragmatic, multidimensional and principled . It should be based on cooperation on issues of common interest and global concern, such as the fight against climate change, and compete with China in offering alternative economic, political and strategic options to third countries and oppose or even sanction it on issues such as respect for democracy and human rights.

Stressing the importance of connectivity cooperation for the EU and the Indo-Pacific region to meet new security challenges, the report called for concrete and visible projects in the areas of cybersecurity, digital connectivity and critical infrastructure, security of the global internet infrastructure including undersea cables, climate security and sustainable development. Members recommended defining the Indo-Pacific region as a region of key strategic interest for the EU when developing the EU's Strategic Compass.

Enhancing partnerships with regional organisations and democratic countries

Members called for existing partnerships with regional actors to be strengthened and for new ones to be established. They called on the EU to anchor and extend its presence in the region by deepening cooperation with ASEAN and its members. They welcomed the close coordination with Australia, Japan, the Republic of Korea and New Zealand in response to Russia's war on Ukraine. They called on the EU to improve its strategic cooperation with India.

Members strongly refuted any attempt by Chinese propaganda to draw similarities between the Russian war in Ukraine and Taiwan's overall security situation. They stressed the need for closer co-ordination with like-minded partners in order to preserve peace and stability in the Taiwan Strait, reiterating that China and Taiwan should adopt a constructive attitude based on dialogue in their relations.

Freedom of the global commons: the fundamental basis for EU-Indo-Pacific relations

The report called on the EU to step up its external action, in particular its diplomatic efforts, to enhance the rule of law offshore and also to improve maritime cooperation with the countries in the Indo-Pacific. The EU should ensure a permanent and credible European naval presence in the Indian Ocean.

Members also called on the EU and NATO to align their respective strategies to provide adequate responses to cyber-attacks and disinformation from the region . They proposed the creation of an independent EU strategic communications centre for the Indo-Pacific region. They also asked the EU to develop regional and global partnerships with democratic regional producers of critical technologies.

Lastly, the EU and like-minded partner countries are urged to strengthen their cooperation on nuclear security and non-proliferation of nuclear, chemical and biological weapons and to support the implementation and universalisation of the Arms Trade Treaty in the Indo-Pacific region.

Documents
2022/03/22
   EP - Vote in committee
2021/12/20
   EP - Amendments tabled in committee
Documents
2021/12/16
   EP - Committee referral announced in Parliament
2021/11/29
   EP - Committee draft report
Documents
2021/06/15
   EP - MCALLISTER David (EPP) appointed as rapporteur in AFET

Documents

Votes

L’Union européenne et les défis en matière de sécurité dans la région indo-pacifique - The EU and the security challenges in the Indo-Pacific - Die EU und die sicherheitspolitischen Herausforderungen im indopazifischen Raum - A9-0085/2022 - David McAllister - Proposition de résolution (ensemble du texte) #

2022/06/07 Outcome: +: 474, 0: 80, -: 60
IT DE ES RO FR PL NL AT SE CZ BG PT SK FI BE LT SI HR HU LU EE DK MT IE EL LV CY
Total
67
78
50
32
65
46
25
18
19
20
15
21
13
13
17
9
8
10
16
6
7
11
5
13
16
8
6
icon: PPE PPE
156

Finland PPE

2

Belgium PPE

2

Hungary PPE

1

Luxembourg PPE

2

Estonia PPE

For (1)

1

Denmark PPE

For (1)

1

Malta PPE

For (1)

1

Latvia PPE

2
2
icon: S&D S&D
128

Czechia S&D

For (1)

1

Slovakia S&D

2

Lithuania S&D

2

Slovenia S&D

2

Luxembourg S&D

For (1)

1

Estonia S&D

2

Denmark S&D

Against (1)

2

Greece S&D

1

Latvia S&D

2

Cyprus S&D

2
icon: Renew Renew
89

Italy Renew

3

Austria Renew

For (1)

1

Sweden Renew

2

Finland Renew

3

Lithuania Renew

1

Slovenia Renew

2

Croatia Renew

For (1)

1

Hungary Renew

1

Luxembourg Renew

2

Estonia Renew

3

Ireland Renew

2

Latvia Renew

For (1)

1
icon: Verts/ALE Verts/ALE
65

Italy Verts/ALE

Abstain (1)

4

Spain Verts/ALE

3

Poland Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Netherlands Verts/ALE

3

Austria Verts/ALE

3

Sweden Verts/ALE

3

Czechia Verts/ALE

3

Portugal Verts/ALE

1

Finland Verts/ALE

3

Belgium Verts/ALE

2

Lithuania Verts/ALE

2

Luxembourg Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Denmark Verts/ALE

1

Ireland Verts/ALE

2
icon: ECR ECR
56

Romania ECR

Abstain (1)

1
3

Bulgaria ECR

2

Slovakia ECR

For (1)

1

Croatia ECR

Abstain (1)

1

Greece ECR

Abstain (1)

1

Latvia ECR

2
icon: NI NI
31

Germany NI

Against (1)

Abstain (1)

2

France NI

2

Slovakia NI

Against (1)

Abstain (1)

2

Croatia NI

Abstain (1)

1

Latvia NI

Against (1)

1
icon: ID ID
56

Netherlands ID

Against (1)

1

Austria ID

3

Czechia ID

Against (2)

2

Finland ID

2

Estonia ID

Abstain (1)

1

Denmark ID

Abstain (1)

1
icon: The Left The Left
33

Netherlands The Left

Abstain (1)

1

Sweden The Left

Abstain (1)

1

Czechia The Left

Against (1)

1

Finland The Left

Abstain (1)

1

Belgium The Left

Against (1)

1

Denmark The Left

Abstain (1)

1

Ireland The Left

4

Cyprus The Left

2
AmendmentsDossier
320 2021/2232(INI)
2021/12/21 AFET 320 amendments...
source: 703.088

History

(these mark the time of scraping, not the official date of the change)

docs/2
date
2022-06-07T00:00:00
docs
title: T9-0224/2022
type
Text adopted by Parliament, single reading
body
EP
events/3/docs
  • url: https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/CRE-9-2022-06-06-TOC_EN.html title: Debate in Parliament
events/4
date
2022-06-07T00:00:00
type
Decision by Parliament
body
EP
docs
url: https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/TA-9-2022-0224_EN.html title: T9-0224/2022
summary
events/4
date
2022-06-07T00:00:00
type
Decision by Parliament
body
EP
docs
title: T9-0224/2022
docs/2
date
2022-06-07T00:00:00
docs
title: T9-0224/2022
type
Text adopted by Parliament, single reading
body
EP
events/3
date
2022-06-06T00:00:00
type
Debate in Parliament
body
EP
events/4
date
2022-06-07T00:00:00
type
Decision by Parliament
body
EP
docs
title: T9-0224/2022
forecasts
  • date: 2022-06-06T00:00:00 title: Debate in plenary scheduled
  • date: 2022-06-07T00:00:00 title: Vote in plenary scheduled
procedure/stage_reached
Old
Awaiting Parliament's vote
New
Procedure completed
events/2
date
2022-04-04T00:00:00
type
Committee report tabled for plenary
body
EP
docs
url: https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/A-9-2022-0085_EN.html title: A9-0085/2022
summary
events/2
date
2022-04-04T00:00:00
type
Committee report tabled for plenary
body
EP
forecasts/0
date
2022-06-06T00:00:00
title
Debate in plenary scheduled
forecasts/0
date
2022-05-18T00:00:00
title
Indicative plenary sitting date
forecasts/1
date
2022-06-07T00:00:00
title
Vote in plenary scheduled
forecasts/0/date
Old
2022-05-02T00:00:00
New
2022-05-18T00:00:00
events/2
date
2022-04-04T00:00:00
type
Committee report tabled for plenary
body
EP
procedure/stage_reached
Old
Awaiting committee decision
New
Awaiting Parliament's vote
events/1
date
2022-03-22T00:00:00
type
Vote in committee
body
EP
forecasts/0
date
2022-03-22T00:00:00
title
Vote scheduled in committee
forecasts/1/date
Old
2022-04-04T00:00:00
New
2022-05-02T00:00:00
docs/1/docs/0/url
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/AFET-AM-703088_EN.html
forecasts/0
date
2022-03-22T00:00:00
title
Vote scheduled in committee
events
  • date: 2021-12-16T00:00:00 type: Committee referral announced in Parliament body: EP
procedure/dossier_of_the_committee
  • AFET/9/07671
procedure/stage_reached
Old
Preparatory phase in Parliament
New
Awaiting committee decision