Next event: Approval in committee of the text agreed at 1st reading interinstitutional negotiations 2024/02/22 more...
- Coreper letter confirming interinstitutional agreement 2024/02/16
- Text agreed during interinstitutional negotiations 2024/02/16
- Results of vote in Parliament 2023/09/13
- Decision by Parliament, 1st reading 2023/09/13
- Matter referred back to the committee responsible 2023/09/13
- Debate in Parliament 2023/09/12
- Committee report tabled for plenary, 1st reading 2023/07/25
- Vote in committee, 1st reading 2023/07/18
- Committee opinion 2023/07/03
- Committee opinion 2023/06/15
- Referral to associated committees announced in Parliament 2023/04/20
- Amendments tabled in committee 2023/03/31
- Amendments tabled in committee 2023/03/31
- Committee draft report 2023/03/10
- Committee of the Regions: opinion 2023/02/08
- Contribution 2023/02/08
- Specific opinion 2023/01/16
- Contribution 2022/12/20
- SCHWAB Andreas (EPP) appointed as rapporteur in IMCO 2022/12/16
- MAYDELL Eva (EPP) appointed as rapporteur in ITRE 2022/12/15
- Economic and Social Committee: opinion, report 2022/12/14
- Contribution 2022/12/01
Progress: Awaiting Parliament's position in 1st reading
Role | Committee | Rapporteur | Shadows |
---|---|---|---|
Lead | IMCO | SCHWAB Andreas ( EPP) | REPASI René ( S&D), CHARANZOVÁ Dita ( Renew), CAVAZZINI Anna ( Verts/ALE), CAMPOMENOSI Marco ( ID), BIELAN Adam ( ECR), PELLETIER Anne-Sophie ( GUE/NGL) |
Committee Opinion | BUDG | VAN OVERTVELDT Johan ( ECR) | |
Committee Opinion | ECON | ||
Committee Opinion | EMPL | ANGEL Marc ( S&D) | Anders VISTISEN ( ID), Marc BOTENGA ( GUE/NGL), Abir AL-SAHLANI ( RE), Elżbieta RAFALSKA ( ECR), Kim VAN SPARRENTAK ( Verts/ALE), Miriam LEXMANN ( PPE) |
Committee Opinion | ITRE | MAYDELL Eva ( EPP) | Marc BOTENGA ( GUE/NGL), Ville NIINISTÖ ( Verts/ALE), Robert ROOS ( ECR), Alex AGIUS SALIBA ( S&D), Nicola BEER ( RE) |
Committee Opinion | TRAN | ||
Committee Opinion | LIBE |
Lead committee dossier:
Legal Basis:
RoP 57
Legal Basis:
RoP 57Subjects
Events
The European Parliament adopted by 476 votes to 121, with 51 abstentions, amendments to the proposal for a regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council establishing a Single Market emergency instrument and repealing Council Regulation No (EC) 2679/98.
The matter was referred back to the committee responsible for inter-institutional negotiations.
Subject matter
The aim of this regulation is to contribute to the proper functioning of the internal market by setting out a framework of harmonised rules to strengthen its resilience, to effectively anticipate and prevent crises, to ensure an effective response to crises, and to facilitate the free movement of goods, services and persons.
The measures set out in this regulation apply in relation to significant impacts of a crisis on the functioning of the internal market, without prejudice to fundamental rights.
Internal Market Emergency and Resilience Board
This regulation should set up an Internal Market Emergency and Resilience Board to advise the Commission on the appropriate measures for anticipating, preventing or responding to the impact of a crisis. The European Parliament should be able to appoint an expert as a member of the Board. The Commission should invite representatives of other crisis-relevant bodies at Union level as observers to the relevant meetings of the Board, including, where appropriate, representatives of Committee of the Regions and of the European Economic and Social Committee. The Commission should ensure that the European Parliament receives all documents at the same time as Member States’ representatives. The European Parliament should also systematically have access to the meetings of the Board to which Member States' experts are invited.
In particular, the Committee should assist and advise the Commission on measures affecting the free movement of goods, services and persons, including workers, paying particular attention to mobile workers, including frontier and cross-border workers.
Crisis protocols
The Commission, taking into account the opinion of the Board, may initiate, encourage and facilitate the drawing up of voluntary crisis protocols by economic operators in order to address internal market emergencies, strictly limited to extraordinary circumstances. The Commission should invite staff from the central liaison offices of all Member States to develop scenarios and parameters that capture the specific risks associated with internal market emergencies.
The Commission should develop and manage a training programme derived from lessons learnt from previous crises.
Stress tests
To ensure the free movement and the availability of goods and services of critical importance and to anticipate, and prepare for disruptions to the internal market, the Commission should all conduct and coordinate stress tests, including simulations and peer reviews, in particular for critical sectors identified by the Commission.
The Commission is empowered to adopt a delegated act to supplement this Regulation by laying down a methodology for a mapping exercise for determining critical sectors. The Commission should publish the results of this mapping exercise.
Prohibited restrictions to free movement during an internal market emergency
Restrictions on the free movement of goods, services and persons imposed by Member States in response to an internal market emergency should be prohibited, unless they are justified on grounds of legitimate public interest objectives, such as public policy, public security or public health, and are in compliance with the principles of non-discrimination and proportionality. Any such restriction should be limited in time and immediately removed as soon as the internal market emergency mode is deactivated or earlier, in the event that the restriction is no longer justified or proportionate. Any restriction should take into account the situation of border regions and outermost regions, especially for cross-border workers.
Strategic reserves
Member States should make best efforts to build up strategic reserves of goods of critical importance. The Commission should provide support to Member States in order to assist them in coordinating and streamlining their efforts. In particular, the Commission should ensure coordination and information exchange, and should promote solidarity between national competent authorities in relation to shortages of crisis-relevant goods or services, or building strategic reserves for goods of critical importance.
Coordinated distribution of strategic reserves
In the event of a shortage of crisis relevant goods and services affecting one or more Member States, the Member States concerned may notify the Commission thereof and indicate the quantities needed and any other relevant information. The Commission should transmit the information to all competent authorities and streamline the coordination of Member States’ responses.
Action of the emergency mode
Where the Commission, taking into due consideration the opinion of the Board, considers that there is an internal market emergency, it should adopt a legislative proposal to activate the internal market emergency mode. The internal market emergency mode may be activated by means of a legislative act adopted on the basis of the said legislative proposal. The duration of the activation should be specified in that legislative act, and should be restricted to a maximum of six months . As soon as the internal market emergency mode is activated by means of the legislative act, the Commission shall, without delay, adopt such a list by means of an implementing act. That list may be amended by means of implementing acts.
Fast lanes
Members proposed the setting up, by the Commissions, of fast lanes that aim to facilitate the free movement of goods, services and workers, especially crisis-relevant goods and services. In particular, the Commission should provide relevant templates or single digital declaration, registration or authorisation forms for cross-border activities, in particular for professional services in the areas of healthcare, installation, maintenance and repair, construction and food and agriculture in order to accelerate declaration, registration or authorisation procedures, including recognition of professional qualifications or posting of workers.
Emergency and resilience stakeholder platform
Lastly, the creation of a stakeholder platform was proposed to facilitate sector-specific dialogue and partnerships by bringing together key stakeholders, namely representatives of economic operators, social partners, researchers and civil society. That platform should aim to encourage economic operators to draw up voluntary roadmaps in response to an internal market emergency.
The Committee on the Internal Market and Consumer Protection adopted the report by Andreas SCHWAB (EPP, DE) on the proposal for a regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council establishing a Single Market emergency instrument and repealing Council Regulation No (EC) 2679/98.
As a reminder, the proposed Single market Emergency Instrument (SMEI) is intended to anticipate, prepare for and respond to the impacts of crises. It builds on lessons learnt from recent emergencies by continuously monitoring potential future crises, by entering vigilance or emergency modes whenever a threat becomes clear and by putting in place a governance architecture that enables Member States to coordinate decision-making.
The committee responsible recommended that the European Parliament's position adopted at first reading under the ordinary legislative procedure should amend the proposal as follows:
Title change
Members suggested changing the name of the instrument from the Single Market emergency instrument (SMEI) to the Internal Market Emergency and Resilience Act (IMERA) and introducing additional changes to strengthen the Union’s resilience.
Internal Market Emergency and Resilience Board
Contrary to the Commission’s proposal to establish an advisory board, Members proposed setting up an internal market emergency and resilience board to be composed of one representative from each Member State and one expert appointed by the European Parliament. The Commission should chair the Board and provide its secretariat. The Board may adopt opinions, recommendations or reports, which should be made publicly available, without prejudice to personal data or trade secrets.
Members also proposed that the Commission should ensure the participation of the European Parliament and of all bodies at Union level that are relevant to the respective crisis. In addition, the Commission should, in particular, ensure equal access to all information, so that the European Parliament and Council receive all documents at the same time.
Crisis protocols
The report noted that the Commission, taking into account the opinion of the Board, may initiate, encourage and facilitate the drawing up of voluntary crisis protocols by economic operators in order to address internal market emergencies, strictly limited to extraordinary circumstances.
Stress tests
To ensure the free movement and the availability of goods and services of critical importance and to anticipate, and prepare for disruptions to the internal market, the Commission should all conduct and coordinate stress tests, including simulations and peer reviews, in particular for critical sectors identified by the Commission.
Prohibited restrictions to free movement during an internal market emergency
Restrictions on the free movement of goods, services and persons imposed by Member States in response to an internal market emergency should be prohibited, unless they are justified on grounds of legitimate public interest objectives, such as public policy, public security or public health, and are in compliance with the principles of non-discrimination and proportionality. Any such restriction should be limited in time and immediately removed as soon as the internal market emergency mode is deactivated or earlier, in the event that the restriction is no longer justified or proportionate. Any restriction should take into account the situation of border regions and outermost regions, especially for cross-border workers.
Strategic reserves
Member States should make best efforts to build up strategic reserves of goods of critical importance. The Commission should provide support to Member States in order to assist them in coordinating and streamlining their efforts. In particular, the Commission should ensure coordination and information exchange, and should promote solidarity between national competent authorities in relation to shortages of crisis-relevant goods or services, or building strategic reserves for goods of critical importance.
Coordinated distribution of strategic reserves
In the event of a shortage of crisis relevant goods and services affecting one or more Member States, the Member States concerned may notify the Commission thereof and indicate the quantities needed and any other relevant information. The Commission should transmit the information to all competent authorities and streamline the coordination of Member States’ responses.
Action of the emergency mode
Where the Commission, taking into due consideration the opinion of the Board, considers that there is an internal market emergency, it should adopt a legislative proposal to activate the internal market emergency mode. The internal market emergency mode may be activated by means of a legislative act adopted on the basis of the said legislative proposal. As soon as the internal market emergency mode is activated by means of the legislative act, the Commission shall, without delay, adopt such a list by means of an implementing act. That list may be amended by means of implementing acts.
Fast lanes
Members proposed the setting up, by the Commissions, of fast lanes that aim to facilitate the free movement of goods, services and workers, especially crisis-relevant goods and services. In particular, the Commission should provide relevant templates or single digital declaration, registration or authorisation forms for cross-border activities, in particular for professional services in the areas of healthcare, installation, maintenance and repair, construction and food and agriculture in order to accelerate declaration, registration or authorisation procedures, including recognition of professional qualifications or posting of workers.
Emergency and resilience stakeholder platform
Lastly, the creation of a stakeholder platform was proposed to facilitate sector-specific dialogue and partnerships by bringing together key stakeholders, namely representatives of economic operators, social partners, researchers and civil society. That platform should aim to encourage economic operators to draw up voluntary roadmaps in response to an internal market emergency.
PURPOSE: to establish a Single Market emergency instrument (SMEI).
PROPOSED ACT: Regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council.
ROLE OF THE EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT: the European Parliament decides in accordance with the ordinary legislative procedure and on an equal footing with the Council.
BACKGROUND: the Single Market is one of the EU’s greatest assets and provides the backbone for the EU’s economic growth and wellbeing. Recent crises, such as the COVID-19 pandemic or Russia’s invasion of Ukraine, have demonstrated some vulnerability of the Single Market and its supply chains in case of unforeseen disruptions.
The EU was not sufficiently prepared to ensure efficient manufacturing, procurement and distribution of crisis-relevant non-medical goods such as personal protective equipment, especially in the early phase of the COVID-19 pandemic and the ad-hoc measures taken by the Commission in order to re-establish the functioning of the Single Market and to ensure the availability of crisis-relevant non-medical goods during the COVID-19 pandemic were necessarily reactive. The pandemic also revealed insufficient overview of manufacturing capacities across the Union.
Actions by the Commission were delayed by several weeks due to the lack of any Union wide contingency planning measures and of clarity as to which part of the national administration to contact to find rapid solutions to the impact on the Single Market being cause by the crisis.
In addition, it became clear that uncoordinated restrictive actions taken by the Member States would further aggravate the impacts of the crisis on the Single market. It emerged that there is a need for arrangements between the Member States and Union authorities as regards contingency planning, technical level coordination and cooperation and information exchange.
The proposal therefore aims to address two separate but interrelated problems: obstacles to free movement of goods, services and persons in times of crisis and shortages of crisis-relevant goods and services .
The Single Market Emergency Instrument complements other EU legislative measures for crisis management like the Union Civil Protection Mechanism, as well as EU rules for specific sectors, supply chains or products like health, semiconductors or food security, which already foresee targeted crisis response measures.
CONTENT: the Commission seeks to establish a framework of measures to anticipate, prepare for and respond to impacts of crises on the Single Market, with the purpose of safeguarding the free movement of goods, services and persons and of ensuring the availability of goods and services of strategic importance and crisis-relevant goods and services in the Single Market.
The Single Market Emergency Instrument (SMEI) includes the following components:
- an advisory group to advise the Commission on the appropriate measures for preventing or addressing the impact of the crisis on the Single Market;
- a framework for contingency planning which includes: (i) arrangements for crisis protocols and crisis communication and training and emergency simulations in view of ensuring timely cooperation and exchange of information between the Commission, Member States and relevant Union level bodies and; (ii) ad-hoc alerts for early warning system for any incidents that significantly/seriously disrupt or have the potential to significantly/seriously disrupt the functioning of the Single Market and in its supply chains of goods and services;
- a framework for Single Market vigilance which will be the framework for impacts of significant incidents that have not yet escalated into a full-blown Single Market emergency. It requires activation when an incident that has occurred has the potential to significantly disrupt the supply chains of goods and services of strategic importance or which causes firsts signs of severe shortages of such goods and services. Monitoring the supply chain of goods and services as well as building up strategic reserves of such goods;
- a framework for Single Market emergencies which includes measures to improve transparency and facilitate free movement . Under extraordinary circumstances, and only when the emergency mode has already been activated, the Commission may also make use of tools which will require a separate activation step . In this case, the Commission may issue targeted information requests to economic operators, which can be made binding . It may also ask them to accept priority rated orders for crisis-relevant products, in response to which firms must either comply or explain the grave reasons justifying refusal. Furthermore, the accelerated placing on the market of certain products through quicker testing and accreditation , including through conformity assessment, will ensure their availability during emergencies.
Documents
- Approval in committee of the text agreed at 1st reading interinstitutional negotiations: PE759.087
- Coreper letter confirming interinstitutional agreement: GEDA/A/(2024)001181
- Text agreed during interinstitutional negotiations: PE759.087
- Results of vote in Parliament: Results of vote in Parliament
- Decision by Parliament, 1st reading: T9-0317/2023
- Debate in Parliament: Debate in Parliament
- Committee report tabled for plenary, 1st reading: A9-0246/2023
- Committee opinion: PE745.211
- Committee opinion: PE745.415
- Amendments tabled in committee: PE742.649
- Amendments tabled in committee: PE746.643
- Committee draft report: PE742.468
- Committee of the Regions: opinion: CDR4234/2022
- Contribution: COM(2022)0459
- Specific opinion: PE739.591
- Contribution: COM(2022)0459
- Economic and Social Committee: opinion, report: CES4098/2022
- Contribution: COM(2022)0459
- Document attached to the procedure: EUR-Lex
- Document attached to the procedure: SEC(2022)0323
- Document attached to the procedure: EUR-Lex
- Document attached to the procedure: SWD(2022)0288
- Document attached to the procedure: SWD(2022)0289
- Document attached to the procedure: EUR-Lex
- Document attached to the procedure: SWD(2022)0290
- Legislative proposal published: COM(2022)0459
- Legislative proposal published: EUR-Lex
- Document attached to the procedure: EUR-Lex SEC(2022)0323
- Document attached to the procedure: EUR-Lex SWD(2022)0288
- Document attached to the procedure: SWD(2022)0289
- Document attached to the procedure: EUR-Lex SWD(2022)0290
- Economic and Social Committee: opinion, report: CES4098/2022
- Specific opinion: PE739.591
- Committee of the Regions: opinion: CDR4234/2022
- Committee draft report: PE742.468
- Amendments tabled in committee: PE742.649
- Amendments tabled in committee: PE746.643
- Committee opinion: PE745.415
- Committee opinion: PE745.211
- Coreper letter confirming interinstitutional agreement: GEDA/A/(2024)001181
- Text agreed during interinstitutional negotiations: PE759.087
- Contribution: COM(2022)0459
- Contribution: COM(2022)0459
- Contribution: COM(2022)0459
Activities
- Pablo ARIAS ECHEVERRÍA
Plenary Speeches (0)
- Adam BIELAN
Plenary Speeches (0)
- Dita CHARANZOVÁ
Plenary Speeches (0)
- Deirdre CLUNE
Plenary Speeches (0)
- Marcel de GRAAFF
Plenary Speeches (0)
- Heidi HAUTALA
Plenary Speeches (0)
- Agnes JONGERIUS
Plenary Speeches (0)
- Morten LØKKEGAARD
Plenary Speeches (0)
- Antonius MANDERS
Plenary Speeches (0)
- Eva MAYDELL
Plenary Speeches (0)
- Andreas SCHWAB
Plenary Speeches (0)
- Tom VANDENKENDELAERE
Plenary Speeches (0)
- Marc BOTENGA
Plenary Speeches (0)
- Anna CAVAZZINI
Plenary Speeches (0)
- Arba KOKALARI
Plenary Speeches (0)
- Mislav KOLAKUŠIĆ
Plenary Speeches (0)
- Sylvia LIMMER
Plenary Speeches (0)
- Edina TÓTH
Plenary Speeches (0)
- Eugen JURZYCA
Plenary Speeches (0)
- Alex AGIUS SALIBA
Plenary Speeches (0)
- Virginie JORON
Plenary Speeches (0)
- Svenja HAHN
Plenary Speeches (0)
- Vlad-Marius BOTOŞ
Plenary Speeches (0)
- Beata MAZUREK
Plenary Speeches (0)
- Tomislav SOKOL
Plenary Speeches (0)
- Geert BOURGEOIS
Plenary Speeches (0)
- Stéphanie YON-COURTIN
Plenary Speeches (0)
- Maria-Manuel LEITÃO-MARQUES
Plenary Speeches (0)
- Marc ANGEL
Plenary Speeches (0)
- Miriam LEXMANN
Plenary Speeches (0)
- Jean-Lin LACAPELLE
Plenary Speeches (0)
- René REPASI
Plenary Speeches (0)
History
(these mark the time of scraping, not the official date of the change)
docs/14 |
|
events/10 |
|
procedure/stage_reached |
Old
Awaiting Parliament's position in 1st readingNew
Awaiting Council's 1st reading position |
forecasts |
|
forecasts |
|
forecasts |
|
forecasts |
|
forecasts |
|
forecasts |
|
docs/12/docs/0/title |
Old
EP(2024)001181New
GEDA/A/(2024)001181 |
docs/12/docs/0/title |
Old
EP(2024)001181New
GEDA/A/(2024)001181 |
docs/12 |
|
docs/12 |
|
docs/12 |
|
docs/12 |
|
docs/12 |
|
docs/13 |
|
events/9/docs |
|
docs/12 |
|
events/9/docs |
|
events/9 |
|
links |
|
events/6 |
|
docs/12/date |
Old
2023-02-07T00:00:00New
2023-02-08T00:00:00 |
docs/13/date |
Old
2022-12-19T00:00:00New
2022-12-20T00:00:00 |
docs/14/date |
Old
2022-11-30T00:00:00New
2022-12-01T00:00:00 |
docs/12 |
|
events/6/summary |
|
events/5 |
|
docs/12 |
|
events/5 |
|
events/6 |
|
forecasts |
|
forecasts/0 |
|
forecasts/0 |
|
forecasts/0 |
|
forecasts/0 |
|
forecasts/1 |
|
docs/12/date |
Old
2023-02-08T00:00:00New
2023-02-07T00:00:00 |
docs/13/date |
Old
2022-12-20T00:00:00New
2022-12-19T00:00:00 |
docs/14/date |
Old
2022-12-01T00:00:00New
2022-11-30T00:00:00 |
docs/12/date |
Old
2023-02-07T00:00:00New
2023-02-08T00:00:00 |
docs/13/date |
Old
2022-12-19T00:00:00New
2022-12-20T00:00:00 |
docs/14/date |
Old
2022-11-30T00:00:00New
2022-12-01T00:00:00 |
docs/12 |
|
events/4/summary |
|
docs/12 |
|
events/4/docs |
|
events/4 |
|
procedure/stage_reached |
Old
Awaiting committee decisionNew
Awaiting Parliament's position in 1st reading |
events/3 |
|
docs/11 |
|
docs/11/date |
Old
2023-02-08T00:00:00New
2023-02-07T00:00:00 |
docs/12/date |
Old
2022-12-20T00:00:00New
2022-12-19T00:00:00 |
docs/13/date |
Old
2022-12-01T00:00:00New
2022-11-30T00:00:00 |
docs/11/date |
Old
2023-02-07T00:00:00New
2023-02-08T00:00:00 |
docs/12/date |
Old
2022-12-19T00:00:00New
2022-12-20T00:00:00 |
docs/13/date |
Old
2022-11-30T00:00:00New
2022-12-01T00:00:00 |
docs/10 |
|
committees/1 |
Old
New
|
committees/2 |
|
committees/2 |
Old
New
|
committees/3 |
Old
New
|
committees/4 |
|
committees/4/opinion |
False
|
committees/5 |
Old
New
|
committees/6 |
Old
New
|
forecasts |
|
docs/10/date |
Old
2023-02-08T00:00:00New
2023-02-07T00:00:00 |
docs/11/date |
Old
2022-12-20T00:00:00New
2022-12-19T00:00:00 |
docs/12/date |
Old
2022-12-01T00:00:00New
2022-11-30T00:00:00 |
docs/10/date |
Old
2023-02-07T00:00:00New
2023-02-08T00:00:00 |
docs/11/date |
Old
2022-12-19T00:00:00New
2022-12-20T00:00:00 |
docs/12/date |
Old
2022-11-30T00:00:00New
2022-12-01T00:00:00 |
events/2 |
|
procedure/legal_basis |
|
docs/8 |
|
docs/9 |
|
docs/7 |
|
docs/6 |
|
docs/5 |
|
committees/1 |
Old
New
|
committees/2 |
Old
New
|
committees/3 |
Old
New
|
committees/4 |
Old
New
|
committees/6/opinion |
False
|
committees/0/shadows/4 |
|
committees/1 |
Old
New
|
committees/2 |
Old
New
|
committees/3 |
Old
New
|
committees/4 |
Old
New
|
committees/0/shadows/3 |
|
committees/1 |
Old
New
|
committees/2 |
Old
New
|
committees/3 |
Old
New
|
committees/4 |
Old
New
|
committees/5 |
Old
New
|
committees/6 |
Old
New
|
procedure/Legislative priorities/0 |
|
procedure/Legislative priorities/0/title |
Old
Joint Declaration on EU legislative priorities for 2023 and 2024New
Joint Declaration 2023-24 |
procedure/Legislative priorities/1 |
|
procedure/Legislative priorities/1 |
|
docs/4 |
|
docs/6 |
|
committees/6/opinion |
False
|
committees/0/shadows/2 |
|
committees/6/opinion |
False
|
committees/0/shadows/2 |
|
committees/1 |
Old
New
|
committees/2 |
Old
New
|
committees/6 |
Old
New
|
docs/0 |
|
docs/6 |
|
docs/6/date |
Old
2022-12-20T00:00:00New
2022-12-19T00:00:00 |
docs/7 |
|
docs/7 |
|
docs/7/date |
Old
2022-12-01T00:00:00New
2022-11-30T00:00:00 |
docs/8 |
|
events/0 |
|
docs/0 |
|
docs/6 |
|
docs/7 |
|
docs/7 |
|
docs/7/date |
Old
2022-12-19T00:00:00New
2022-12-20T00:00:00 |
docs/8 |
|
docs/8/date |
Old
2022-11-30T00:00:00New
2022-12-01T00:00:00 |
events/0 |
|
committees/3/rapporteur |
|
committees/1 |
Old
New
|
committees/2 |
|
committees/2 |
Old
New
|
committees/3 |
Old
New
|
committees/4 |
Old
New
|
committees/5 |
|
committees/5/opinion |
False
|
committees/6 |
Old
New
|
docs/4 |
|
docs/5 |
|
docs/5/date |
Old
2022-12-19T00:00:00New
2023-01-16T00:00:00 |
docs/5 |
|
docs/5 |
|
committees/1 |
Old
New
|
committees/2 |
|
committees/3 |
Old
New
|
committees/4 |
Old
New
|
committees/5 |
Old
New
|
committees/6 |
Old
New
|
docs/0 |
|
docs/5 |
|
docs/5/date |
Old
2022-12-01T00:00:00New
2022-11-30T00:00:00 |
docs/6 |
|
events/0 |
|
committees/0 |
|
committees/0 |
|
docs/5 |
|
docs/0 |
|
docs/4 |
|
docs/5 |
|
docs/5/date |
Old
2022-11-30T00:00:00New
2022-12-01T00:00:00 |
events/0 |
|
committees/0/shadows |
|
committees/0/rapporteur |
|
committees/0/rapporteur |
|
committees/1 |
Old
New
|
committees/2 |
Old
New
|
committees/3 |
Old
New
|
committees/5 |
|
committees/1 |
Old
New
|
committees/2 |
|
committees/2 |
Old
New
|
committees/3 |
|
committees/3/rapporteur |
|
committees/4 |
Old
New
|
docs/4 |
|
committees/1/rapporteur |
|
events/1 |
|
procedure/dossier_of_the_committee |
|
procedure/stage_reached |
Old
Preparatory phase in ParliamentNew
Awaiting committee decision |
commission |
|
otherinst |
|
procedure/other_consulted_institutions |
European Economic and Social Committee
|
procedure/Legislative priorities |
|
procedure/title |
Old
Single Market emergency instrument (SMEI)New
Single Market emergency instrument |
docs/0/docs/0 |
|
docs/0 |
|
events/0/summary |
|