BETA


Events

2024/04/10
   EP - Decision by Parliament, 1st reading
Details

The European Parliament adopted by 441 votes to 139, with 41 abstentions, a legislative resolution on the proposal for a regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council establishing a Union certification framework for carbon removals.

The position adopted by the European Parliament at first reading under the ordinary legislative procedure is as follows:

Subject matter

The aim of this Regulation is to develop a voluntary Union certification framework for permanent carbon removals, carbon farming and carbon storage in products, with a view to facilitating and encouraging the uptake of high-quality carbon removals and soil emission reductions, in full respect of the biodiversity and the zero-pollution objectives, as a complement to sustained emission reductions across all sectors.

To that end, this Regulation establishes a voluntary Union framework for the certification of carbon removals and soil emission reductions by laying down:

- quality criteria for activities that take place in the Union;

- rules for the verification and certification of carbon removals and soil emission reductions generated by activities;

- rules for the functioning and recognition by the Commission of certification schemes;

- rules on the issuance and use of certified units .

Definitions

The amended Regulation modifies several definitions:

- ‘ permanent carbon removal ’ means any practice or process that, under normal circumstances and using appropriate management practices, captures and stores atmospheric or biogenic carbon for several centuries, including permanently chemically bound carbon in products, and which is not combined with enhanced hydrocarbon recovery;

- ‘ carbon farming ’ means any practice or process, carried out over an activity period of at least five years, related to terrestrial or coastal management and resulting in capture and temporary storage of atmospheric and biogenic carbon into biogenic carbon pools or the reduction of soil emissions;

- ‘ carbon storage in products ’ means any practice or process that captures and stores atmospheric or biogenic carbon for at least 35 years in long-lasting products and which allows on-site monitoring of the carbon stored and certified throughout the monitoring period.

There will be different units for these different categories due to their differences and environmental impact. The amended Regulation tasked the Commission to develop different certification methodologies for these categories.

To promote the sustainable and efficient use of limited biomass resources, the certification methodologies should ensure consistency with the application of the principle of the cascading use of biomass as laid down in the amended Renewable Energy Directive.

For any activity to qualify for certification it must go beyond both EU and national requirements for individual operators and the incentive effect of the certification must be needed for the activity to become financially viable.

Sustainability requirements

An activity should not significantly harm and may generate co-benefits for one or more of, the following sustainability objectives:

- climate change mitigation beyond the net carbon removal benefit and net soil emission reduction benefit;

- climate change adaptation;

- sustainable use and protection of water and marine resources;

- transition to a circular economy, including the efficient use of sustainably sourced bio-based materials;

- pollution prevention and control;

- protection and restoration of biodiversity and ecosystems including soil health, as well as avoidance of land degradation.

A carbon farming activity should at least generate co-benefits for the sustainability objective. The minimum sustainability requirements should promote the sustainability of forest and agriculture biomass raw material in accordance with the sustainability and GHG saving criteria for biofuels, bioliquids and biomass fuel.

Union wide register

By 4 years from the entry into force of this Regulation, the Commission should establish and duly maintain a Union wide registry for permanent carbon removals, carbon farming and carbon storage in products, to make publicly available the information related to the certification process, in an accessible way, containing, as a minimum, the information concerning the certification procedure. The Union registry should be financed by annual fixed fees payable by users, proportionate to the use of the registry.

Certified units should be issued by certification registries or, by 4 years from the entry into force of this Regulation, by the Union registry, only after the generation of a net carbon removal benefit or net soil emission reduction benefit, based on a valid certificate of compliance resulting from a re-certification audit.

Review

No later than 31 July 2026, the Commission should review the application of the Regulation to the reduction of emissions from enteric fermentation and manure management and present a report to the European Parliament and the Council, if appropriate, accompanied by a legislative proposal.

Documents
2024/03/11
   EP - Approval in committee of the text agreed at 1st reading interinstitutional negotiations
Documents
2024/03/08
   CSL - Coreper letter confirming interinstitutional agreement
2024/03/08
   EP - Text agreed during interinstitutional negotiations
Documents
2023/11/21
   EP - Results of vote in Parliament
2023/11/21
   EP - Decision by Parliament, 1st reading
Details

The European Parliament adopted by 448 votes to 65, with 114 abstentions, amendments to the proposal for a regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council establishing a Union certification framework for carbon removals.

The matter was referred back to the committee responsible for interinstitutional negotiations.

Subject matter

The objective of this Regulation is to facilitate and encourage the deployment and enhancement of carbon removals, carbon farming and carbon storage in products by operators or groups of operators as a complement to the irreversible and gradual reduction of anthropogenic greenhouse gas emissions across all sectors. To that end, this Regulation establishes a voluntary Union framework for the certification of carbon removals, carbon farming and carbon storage in products .

Rules on the issuance and use of units

A new article has been included on the rules on the issuance and use of units. It stated that carbon farming sequestration and emission reduction units should be issued by 31 December each year, provided that an annual monitoring check does not show any non-compliance with the requirements set out in this Regulation and does not show a reversal. The certification body should be responsible for the annual monitoring check based on reliable real-world data.

Sustainability

A carbon storage in product activity should at least have a neutral impact on each of, and should generate co-benefits for at least one of, the following sustainability objectives:

- the avoidance of the risk of carbon leakage in third countries;

- climate change adaptation;

- sustainable use and protection or improvement of water quality and marine resources;

- transition to a circular economy, including the efficient use of sustainably sourced bio-based materials;

- pollution prevention and control;

- protection and restoration of biodiversity and ecosystems.

Innovative carbon removal technologies

Under the EU certification framework, activities that, under normal circumstances, ensure the permanent storage of atmospheric or biogenic carbon for several centuries through geological storage of CO2, such as bioenergy with carbon capture and storage and direct air carbon capture and storage, or through permanently bound carbon mineralisation, should be considered permanent carbon removals .

Carbon farming and carbon storage in products

Members amended the definition of ‘carbon farming’ to mean an activity related to land management, coastal management or animal husbandry, that results in carbon farming sequestration or carbon farming emission reductions for a period of at least five years .

Members also stated that carbon farming activities should not negatively affect the Union’s food security and shall not lead to land grabbing or land speculation.

In light of the uncertainties in the measuring and monitoring methodologies related to many potential applications of carbon storage in products in early development stages, the certification of carbon storage in products should initially be limited to harvested wood products or materials for construction storing atmospheric and biogenic carbon stored for at least five decades .

Platform on Carbon Removal, Carbon Farming and Carbon Storage in Product Activities

Members called for the establishment of a Platform on Carbon removal and Carbon farming Activities which should, inter alia :

- advise the Commission on the technical certification methodologies, including on the minimum sustainability requirements, as well as on the possible need to update those certification methodologies;

- analyse the impact of the technical certification methodologies in terms of the potential costs and benefits of their application;

- monitor and regularly report to the Commission on trends at Union and Member State level regarding carbon removal and carbon farming.

Certification of compliance

The amended text stressed that the certification scheme should appoint a certification body which should conduct a certification audit to verify that the requested information is accurate and reliable. When multiple different carbon farming activities take place at farm level, the certification audits may be conducted on a single occasion.

Periodic re-certification audits should take place at least every 5 years for carbon farming activities, and at least every 10 years for other activities, following a risk-based approach.

Union registry

The Commission should establish and maintain an interoperable and public Union registry in order to ensure transparency, trustworthiness and full traceability of certificates, and to avoid the risk of fraud and double counting. All information in the Union registry should be easy to navigate and search.

Review

The Commission should assess the possible benefits and trade-offs of the inclusion of other long-lived carbon storage products based on the latest scientific evidence. By 12 months from the date of entry into force of this Regulation, the Commission should report to the European Parliament and to the Council on the establishment of Union targets for permanent carbon removals and for land-based sequestration as an integral part of the post-2030 Union climate framework.

Documents
2023/11/21
   EP - Matter referred back to the committee responsible
2023/11/20
   EP - Referral to associated committees announced in Parliament
2023/11/20
   EP - Debate in Parliament
2023/11/17
   IT_CHAMBER - Contribution
Documents
2023/11/03
   EP - Committee report tabled for plenary, 1st reading
Details

The Committee on the Environment, Public Health and Food Safety adopted the report by Lídia PEREIRA (EPP, PT) on the proposal for a regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council establishing a Union certification framework for carbon removals.

The committee responsible recommended that the European Parliament's position adopted at first reading under the ordinary legislative procedure should amend the proposal as follows:

Subject matter

The objective of this Regulation is to facilitate and encourage the deployment and enhancement of carbon removals, carbon farming and carbon storage in products by operators or groups of operators as a complement to the irreversible and gradual reduction of anthropogenic greenhouse gas emissions across all sectors to meet the objectives and targets laid down in Regulation (EU) 2021/1119 and the goals of the Paris Agreement.

Rules on the issuance and use of units

A new article has been included on the rules on the issuance and use of units. It stated that carbon farming sequestration and emission reduction units should be issued by 31 December each year, provided that an annual monitoring check does not show any non-compliance with the requirements set out in this Regulation and does not show a reversal. The certification body should be responsible for the annual monitoring check based on reliable real-world data.

Sustainability

A carbon storage in product activity should at least have a neutral impact on each of, and should generate co-benefits for at least one of, the following sustainability objectives:

- the avoidance of the risk of carbon leakage in third countries;

- climate change adaptation;

- sustainable use and protection or improvement of water quality and marine resources;

- transition to a circular economy, including the efficient use of sustainably sourced bio-based materials;

- pollution prevention and control;

- protection and restoration of biodiversity and ecosystems.

Platform on Carbon Removal, Carbon Farming and Carbon Storage in Product Activities

Members called for the establishment of a Platform on Carbon removal and Carbon farming Activities which should, inter alia:

- advise the Commission on the technical certification methodologies, including on the minimum sustainability requirements, as well as on the possible need to update those certification methodologies;

- analyse the impact of the technical certification methodologies in terms of the potential costs and benefits of their application;

- monitor and regularly report to the Commission on trends at Union and Member State level regarding carbon removal and carbon farming.

Certification of compliance

The amended text stressed that the certification scheme should appoint a certification body which should conduct a certification audit to verify that the requested information is accurate and reliable. When multiple different carbon farming activities take place at farm level, the certification audits may be conducted on a single occasion.

Re-certification audits should take place at least every 5 years for carbon farming activities, and at least every 10 years for other activities, following a risk-based approach.

Certification bodies

Concerning the certification bodies, the report stated that these should be remunerated by the certification scheme in order to ensure the independence of the certification or re-certification audits. The list of accredited certification bodies shall be made publicly available in the Union registry.

Operation of certification schemes

For the purpose of handling complaints and appeals, certification schemes should put in place easily accessible complaint and appeal procedures. Those procedures should be made publicly available in the Union registry. Members suggested that a certification scheme should submit all relevant data and reporting that are required to be included in the Union registry.

Review

The Commission should assess the possible benefits and trade-offs of the inclusion of other long-lived carbon storage products based on the latest scientific evidence. By 12 months from the date of entry into force of this Regulation, the Commission should report to the European Parliament and to the Council on the establishment of Union targets for permanent carbon removals and for land-based sequestration as an integral part of the post-2030 Union climate framework.

Documents
2023/10/24
   EP - Vote in committee, 1st reading
2023/09/15
   PT_PARLIAMENT - Contribution
Documents
2023/09/13
   EP - Committee opinion
Documents
2023/06/29
   EP - Amendments tabled in committee
Documents
2023/06/29
   EP - Specific opinion
Documents
2023/06/02
   EP - Amendments tabled in committee
Documents
2023/06/02
   EP - Amendments tabled in committee
Documents
2023/05/15
   RO_SENATE - Contribution
Documents
2023/05/11
   EP - Referral to associated committees announced in Parliament
2023/05/10
   EP - Committee draft report
Documents
2023/04/26
   ES_PARLIAMENT - Contribution
Documents
2023/04/11
   DE_BUNDESRAT - Contribution
Documents
2023/04/03
   NL_SENATE - Contribution
Documents
2023/03/29
   EP - HLAVÁČEK Martin (Renew) appointed as rapporteur in AGRI
2023/03/28
   EP - BUŞOI Cristian-Silviu (EPP) appointed as rapporteur in ITRE
2023/03/22
   ESC - Economic and Social Committee: opinion, report
Documents
2023/02/08
   CofR - Committee of the Regions: opinion
Documents
2023/02/01
   EP - Committee referral announced in Parliament, 1st reading
2023/01/10
   EP - PEREIRA Lídia (EPP) appointed as rapporteur in ENVI
2022/12/01
   EC - Document attached to the procedure
2022/12/01
   EC - Document attached to the procedure
Documents
2022/12/01
   EC - Document attached to the procedure
2022/11/30
   EC - Legislative proposal published
Details

PURPOSE: to establish a new EU-wide certification framework for carbon removals.

PROPOSED ACT: Regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council.

ROLE OF THE EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT: the European Parliament decides in accordance with the ordinary legislative procedure and on an equal footing with the Council.

BACKGROUND: the EU has committed to reaching climate neutrality by 2050. The first and most urgent priority is the reduction of EU greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions. At the same time, the EU needs to compensate for residual emissions that cannot be eliminated, by scaling up carbon removals , or in other words by removing carbon dioxide (CO2) from the atmosphere. This proposal for a carbon removals certification scheme is an important tool to achieve this goal.

Carbon can be removed and stored in three broad ways:

1) permanent storage : industrial technologies such as BECCS (bio-energy with carbon capture and storage) or DACCS (Direct Air Capture with Capture and Storage), capture carbon from the air either indirectly (through the processing of biomass in the case of BECCS) or directly (in the case of DACCS) and store it in a stable form;

2) carbon farming : carbon can be naturally stored on land through activities that enhance carbon capture in soils and forests (e.g. agro-forestry, forest restoration, better soil management), and/or reduce the release of carbon from soils to the atmosphere (e.g. restoration of peatland);

3) carbon storage in products: atmospheric carbon captured by trees or industrial technologies can also be used and stored in long-lasting products and materials, such as wood-based or carbonate-bonded construction materials.

The Commission's proposal does not cover the capture of fossil carbon for Storage (CCS) or Utilisation (CCU). These technologies help recycle or store fossil CO2 emissions but they do not remove carbon from the atmosphere.

CONTENT: this proposed Regulation seeks to develop a voluntary Union certification framework for carbon removals , with the view to incentivise the uptake of high-quality carbon removals, in full respect of the biodiversity and the zero-pollution objectives.

Its main objectives are to:

- ensure the high quality of carbon removals in the EU;

- establish an EU governance certification system to avoid greenwashing by correctly applying and enforcing the EU quality framework criteria in a reliable and harmonised way across the Union.

To ensure the transparency and credibility of the certification process, the proposal sets out rules for the independent third-party verification of carbon removals, as well as rules to recognise certification schemes that can be used to demonstrate compliance with the EU framework. To ensure the quality and comparability of carbon removals, the proposed regulation establishes four QU.A.L.ITY criteria :

1) Quantification : carbon removal activities need to be measured accurately and deliver unambiguous benefits for the climate;

2) Additionality : carbon removal activities need to go beyond existing practices and what is required by law;

3) Long-term storage : certificates are linked to the duration of carbon storage so as to ensure permanent storage;

4) Sustainability : carbon removal activities must preserve or contribute to sustainability objectives such as climate change adaptation, circular economy, water and marine resources, and biodiversity.

The proposal also aims to:

- develop certification methodologies that are tailored to each type of carbon removal activity, in order to promote a harmonised and correct implementation of the QU.A.L.ITY criteria;

- increase the public trust in carbon removals by ensuring the transparency and robustness of the certification process, including the certification schemes recognised by the Commission and the public registries of carbon removals.

The proposal also imposes the obligation for certification schemes to set up and maintain public registries for evidence of carbon removal activities and carbon removal units. It is of key importance that registries use automated systems and are interoperable in order to prevent fraud and avoid double counting.

The proposed Regulation affects economic operators such as farmers, foresters but also industrial companies that will develop carbon removal activities on the ground; private organisations and Member States authorities, who may develop private or public certification schemes to implement and control the certification process.

Budgetary implications

Major budgetary implications for the EU concern the preparation of the non-legislative acts and operation of the Expert Group on Carbon Removals which includes approximately 70 members. Budgetary implications for the Commission are associated to the recognition process of public or private certification schemes that would be responsible to implement the certification framework in one or more Member States. Budgetary implications are also foreseen for those Member States that intend to establish and operate a national certification scheme, including the supervision of independent certification bodies and the establishment and operation of a national registry.

Documents

Activities

Votes

Union certification framework for carbon removals – A9-0329/2023 – Lídia Pereira – After Annex I – Am 155 #

2023/11/21 Outcome: -: 383, +: 217, 0: 29
IT HU CZ RO PL MT BG FI SI LU LV LT AT SE IE DK SK EE CY BE HR NL EL ES PT DE FR
Total
72
17
20
32
47
4
14
14
8
5
6
11
15
17
13
13
13
7
6
20
11
28
16
48
19
83
70
icon: ECR ECR
63

Romania ECR

1

Bulgaria ECR

2

Latvia ECR

For (1)

1

Lithuania ECR

1

Sweden ECR

3

Slovakia ECR

Against (1)

1

Croatia ECR

1

Greece ECR

1
icon: ID ID
54

Czechia ID

For (1)

Against (1)

2

Austria ID

3

Denmark ID

For (1)

1

Estonia ID

Against (1)

1

Belgium ID

Against (1)

3
icon: NI NI
39

Latvia NI

Against (1)

1

Lithuania NI

1

Slovakia NI

Against (1)

3

Belgium NI

Against (1)

1

Croatia NI

Against (1)

Abstain (1)

2

Netherlands NI

Against (1)

1

Germany NI

For (1)

3

France NI

2
icon: PPE PPE
160

Hungary PPE

1

Malta PPE

Against (1)

1

Finland PPE

Against (1)

3

Slovenia PPE

4

Luxembourg PPE

Against (1)

1

Latvia PPE

Against (1)

1

Denmark PPE

For (1)

1

Slovakia PPE

For (1)

4

Estonia PPE

Abstain (1)

1

Cyprus PPE

2

Belgium PPE

Against (1)

Abstain (1)

4
icon: The Left The Left
31

Czechia The Left

1

Finland The Left

Against (1)

1

Ireland The Left

For (1)

4

Denmark The Left

Against (1)

1

Cyprus The Left

2

Belgium The Left

Against (1)

1

Netherlands The Left

Against (1)

1

Spain The Left

2
icon: Renew Renew
91

Italy Renew

3

Hungary Renew

Against (1)

1

Poland Renew

1

Finland Renew

3

Slovenia Renew

Against (1)

Abstain (1)

2

Luxembourg Renew

2

Latvia Renew

Against (1)

1

Lithuania Renew

Against (1)

1

Sweden Renew

3

Ireland Renew

2

Estonia Renew

3

Belgium Renew

3

Croatia Renew

Against (1)

1

Greece Renew

Against (1)

1
icon: Verts/ALE Verts/ALE
68

Italy Verts/ALE

3

Czechia Verts/ALE

3

Romania Verts/ALE

Against (1)

1

Poland Verts/ALE

Against (1)

1

Finland Verts/ALE

3

Luxembourg Verts/ALE

Against (1)

1

Lithuania Verts/ALE

2

Austria Verts/ALE

3

Sweden Verts/ALE

3

Ireland Verts/ALE

2

Denmark Verts/ALE

Against (1)

1

Belgium Verts/ALE

3

Netherlands Verts/ALE

3

Spain Verts/ALE

Abstain (1)

3

Portugal Verts/ALE

Against (1)

1
icon: S&D S&D
123

Czechia S&D

Abstain (1)

1

Malta S&D

3

Bulgaria S&D

3

Finland S&D

2

Slovenia S&D

2

Luxembourg S&D

For (1)

1

Latvia S&D

2

Lithuania S&D

For (1)

2

Sweden S&D

2

Slovakia S&D

Abstain (1)

1

Estonia S&D

2

Cyprus S&D

2

Belgium S&D

2
3

Greece S&D

Against (1)

1

A9-0329/2023 – Lídia Pereira – Commission proposal #

2023/11/21 Outcome: +: 448, 0: 114, -: 65
DE ES IT FR PL NL RO PT DK BG SE FI LT CZ BE AT IE HU SK SI HR EL EE MT LU LV CY
Total
83
48
71
71
46
28
32
20
13
14
17
14
11
20
20
15
13
17
14
8
11
15
7
4
4
6
5
icon: PPE PPE
160

Denmark PPE

For (1)

1

Hungary PPE

1

Slovenia PPE

Abstain (1)

4

Estonia PPE

For (1)

1

Malta PPE

For (1)

1

Luxembourg PPE

For (1)

1

Latvia PPE

For (1)

1

Cyprus PPE

2
icon: S&D S&D
122

Sweden S&D

2

Lithuania S&D

2

Czechia S&D

For (1)

1

Belgium S&D

2

Slovakia S&D

Abstain (1)

1

Slovenia S&D

2

Greece S&D

1

Estonia S&D

2

Latvia S&D

2

Cyprus S&D

2
icon: Renew Renew
92

Poland Renew

1
3

Finland Renew

3

Lithuania Renew

1

Ireland Renew

2

Hungary Renew

For (1)

1

Slovakia Renew

Against (1)

Abstain (1)

4

Slovenia Renew

2

Croatia Renew

For (1)

1

Greece Renew

1

Estonia Renew

3

Luxembourg Renew

2

Latvia Renew

For (1)

1
icon: Verts/ALE Verts/ALE
67

Spain Verts/ALE

3

Italy Verts/ALE

3

Poland Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Netherlands Verts/ALE

3

Romania Verts/ALE

1

Portugal Verts/ALE

1

Denmark Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Sweden Verts/ALE

3

Finland Verts/ALE

3

Lithuania Verts/ALE

2

Czechia Verts/ALE

3

Belgium Verts/ALE

3

Austria Verts/ALE

3

Ireland Verts/ALE

2

Luxembourg Verts/ALE

For (1)

1
icon: NI NI
41

Germany NI

3

France NI

Against (2)

3

Netherlands NI

Against (1)

1

Lithuania NI

1

Belgium NI

For (1)

1

Slovakia NI

Against (1)

Abstain (1)

4

Croatia NI

Against (1)

Abstain (1)

2

Latvia NI

Abstain (1)

1
icon: The Left The Left
28

Germany The Left

Against (1)

4

Spain The Left

2

Netherlands The Left

Abstain (1)

1

Portugal The Left

4

Denmark The Left

Abstain (1)

1

Finland The Left

Abstain (1)

1

Czechia The Left

Abstain (1)

1

Belgium The Left

Against (1)

1

Ireland The Left

4

Greece The Left

2

Cyprus The Left

Against (1)

1
icon: ECR ECR
62

Romania ECR

Against (1)

1

Bulgaria ECR

2

Sweden ECR

3

Finland ECR

2

Lithuania ECR

Abstain (1)

1
4

Slovakia ECR

For (1)

1

Croatia ECR

Against (1)

1

Greece ECR

Abstain (1)

1

Latvia ECR

Abstain (1)

1
icon: ID ID
55

Denmark ID

For (1)

1

Czechia ID

Against (2)

2

Austria ID

3

Estonia ID

Against (1)

1

Wednesday’s agenda – Request by the ECR Group (A9-0329/2023, postponement of vote) #

2024/04/10 Outcome: -: 277, +: 70, 0: 27
PL HU EE MT CY SK LV EL HR RO SI IE LU BG LT DK IT CZ PT FI NL SE BE AT FR ES DE
Total
24
13
2
1
2
4
3
8
4
7
5
7
5
10
6
8
38
12
11
9
15
13
14
14
51
34
54
icon: ECR ECR
28

Greece ECR

1

Bulgaria ECR

1

Czechia ECR

1

Netherlands ECR

2

Sweden ECR

For (1)

1

Belgium ECR

2

Germany ECR

1
icon: ID ID
26

Austria ID

3
icon: NI NI
19

Slovakia NI

1

Latvia NI

Against (1)

1

France NI

For (1)

1
icon: The Left The Left
22

Greece The Left

2

Ireland The Left

Abstain (2)

2

Denmark The Left

Abstain (1)

1

Czechia The Left

1

Portugal The Left

3

Finland The Left

Against (1)

1

Netherlands The Left

Abstain (1)

1

Sweden The Left

Against (1)

1

Belgium The Left

Abstain (1)

1

France The Left

3

Spain The Left

2
4
icon: Verts/ALE Verts/ALE
49

Poland Verts/ALE

Against (1)

1

Ireland Verts/ALE

Against (1)

1

Luxembourg Verts/ALE

Against (1)

1

Lithuania Verts/ALE

Against (1)

1

Denmark Verts/ALE

Against (1)

1

Italy Verts/ALE

Against (1)

1

Czechia Verts/ALE

3

Portugal Verts/ALE

Against (1)

1

Finland Verts/ALE

2

Netherlands Verts/ALE

3

Sweden Verts/ALE

Against (1)

1

Belgium Verts/ALE

3

Austria Verts/ALE

3

Spain Verts/ALE

Against (2)

2
icon: Renew Renew
58

Hungary Renew

2

Estonia Renew

Against (1)

1

Slovakia Renew

Against (1)

1

Croatia Renew

Against (1)

1

Romania Renew

2

Slovenia Renew

2

Luxembourg Renew

Against (1)

1

Bulgaria Renew

For (1)

3

Italy Renew

2

Finland Renew

3

Netherlands Renew

3

Sweden Renew

2

Belgium Renew

3

Austria Renew

Against (1)

1

Spain Renew

1

Germany Renew

Abstain (1)

5
icon: PPE PPE
92

Estonia PPE

For (1)

1

Cyprus PPE

2

Slovakia PPE

Against (1)

1

Latvia PPE

Against (1)

1

Croatia PPE

Against (1)

1

Slovenia PPE

2

Luxembourg PPE

2

Denmark PPE

Against (1)

1

Portugal PPE

Against (1)

1

Finland PPE

2

Sweden PPE

3

Austria PPE

2

France PPE

3
icon: S&D S&D
80

Hungary S&D

2

Malta S&D

Against (1)

1

Slovakia S&D

Abstain (1)

1

Latvia S&D

Against (1)

1

Croatia S&D

2

Romania S&D

For (1)

Against (1)

2

Slovenia S&D

Against (1)

1

Luxembourg S&D

Against (1)

1

Lithuania S&D

2

Denmark S&D

2

Finland S&D

1

Netherlands S&D

2

Belgium S&D

2

A9-0329/2023 – Lídia Pereira – Provisional agreement – Am 158 #

2024/04/10 Outcome: +: 441, -: 139, 0: 41
DE ES IT RO NL SE BE PT SK BG FR LT DK HU FI SI HR EL IE LU CZ EE MT CY LV AT PL
Total
91
55
60
18
28
21
21
20
14
14
71
9
13
18
14
7
6
15
12
6
20
7
4
5
7
18
47
icon: PPE PPE
155

Denmark PPE

For (1)

1

Hungary PPE

1

Slovenia PPE

Abstain (1)

4

Croatia PPE

2

Luxembourg PPE

2

Estonia PPE

For (1)

1

Malta PPE

For (1)

1

Cyprus PPE

2
icon: S&D S&D
124

Belgium S&D

2

Slovakia S&D

For (1)

1

Lithuania S&D

2

Denmark S&D

2

Slovenia S&D

For (1)

1

Greece S&D

1

Luxembourg S&D

For (1)

1

Czechia S&D

Abstain (1)

1

Estonia S&D

2

Cyprus S&D

2

Latvia S&D

For (1)

1
icon: Renew Renew
94
3

Lithuania Renew

1

Hungary Renew

2

Finland Renew

3

Slovenia Renew

2

Croatia Renew

For (1)

1

Greece Renew

1

Ireland Renew

2

Luxembourg Renew

2

Estonia Renew

3

Latvia Renew

For (1)

1

Austria Renew

For (1)

1

Poland Renew

1
icon: Verts/ALE Verts/ALE
68

Spain Verts/ALE

3

Italy Verts/ALE

3

Netherlands Verts/ALE

3

Sweden Verts/ALE

3

Belgium Verts/ALE

Abstain (1)

3

Portugal Verts/ALE

1

Lithuania Verts/ALE

2

Denmark Verts/ALE

2

Finland Verts/ALE

3

Greece Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Ireland Verts/ALE

1

Luxembourg Verts/ALE

Abstain (1)

1

Czechia Verts/ALE

3

Austria Verts/ALE

3

Poland Verts/ALE

For (1)

1
icon: NI NI
40

Germany NI

2

Romania NI

Against (1)

1

Netherlands NI

Against (1)

1

Belgium NI

For (1)

1

France NI

Against (1)

1

Czechia NI

Against (1)

1

Latvia NI

Against (1)

1
icon: The Left The Left
33

Netherlands The Left

Against (1)

1

Sweden The Left

Against (1)

1

Belgium The Left

Against (1)

1

Denmark The Left

Against (1)

1

Finland The Left

Against (1)

1

Greece The Left

2

Ireland The Left

Abstain (1)

4

Czechia The Left

1

Cyprus The Left

Against (1)

1
icon: ID ID
48

Denmark ID

Against (1)

1

Czechia ID

Against (1)

1

Estonia ID

Against (1)

1

Austria ID

3
icon: ECR ECR
59

Germany ECR

Against (1)

1

Netherlands ECR

Abstain (1)

5

Sweden ECR

3

Slovakia ECR

For (1)

1

Bulgaria ECR

2

France ECR

Against (1)

1

Finland ECR

2

Greece ECR

Against (1)

1

Latvia ECR

Against (1)

1
AmendmentsDossier
1319 2022/0394(COD)
2023/05/30 AGRI 474 amendments...