Progress: Procedure completed, awaiting publication in Official Journal
Role | Committee | Rapporteur | Shadows |
---|---|---|---|
Lead | ECON | SANT Alfred ( S&D) | VAIDERE Inese ( EPP), POPTCHEVA Eva-Maria Alexandrova ( Renew), GRUFFAT Claude ( Verts/ALE), VAN OVERTVELDT Johan ( ECR), GRANT Valentino ( ID), PAPADIMOULIS Dimitrios ( GUE/NGL) |
Committee Opinion | ITRE | ||
Committee Opinion | JURI | REPASI René ( S&D) |
Lead committee dossier:
Legal Basis:
RoP 57_o, TFEU 050, TFEU 114
Legal Basis:
RoP 57_o, TFEU 050, TFEU 114Subjects
Events
The European Parliament adopted by 353 votes to 118, with 114 abstentions, a legislative resolution on the proposal for a directive of the European Parliament and of the Council on multiple-vote share structures in companies that seek the admission to trading of their shares on an SME growth market.
The European Parliament’s position adopted at first reading under the ordinary legislative procedure amends the proposal as follows:
Subject matter and scope
This Directive lays down common rules on multiple-vote share (MVS) structures in companies that seek admission to trading of their shares on multilateral trading facilities (MTFs), which include SME growth markets , and whose shares are not already admitted to trading on an MTF or a regulated market.
Adoption or modification of an MVS structure before admission to trading
Member States should that a company whose shares are not already admitted to trading on a regulated market or an MTF has the right to adopt an MVS structure for the admission to trading of its shares on an MTF. The decision of the company to adopt an MVS structure is taken by the general meeting by at least a qualified majority as specified in national law.
Safeguards
Companies with an MVS structure whose shares are to be traded or are traded on an MTF should appropriate safeguards in place to provide for adequate protection of the interests of shareholders who do not hold MVSs.
Member States should limit the impact of the MVSs on the decision-making process at the general meeting by introducing at least one of the following:
- a maximum ratio of the number of votes attached to MVSs to the number of votes attached to shares with the least voting rights;
- a requirement that decisions by the general meeting subject to qualified majority of the votes cast as specified in national law, excluding decisions regarding the appointment and dismissal of members of the administrative, management and supervisory bodies of the company, and also excluding operational decisions to be taken by such bodies which are submitted to the general meeting for approval, are to be adopted by: (i) a qualified majority, as specified in national law, both of the votes cast and either of the share capital represented at the meeting or of the number of shares represented at the meeting; or (ii) a qualified majority, as specified in national law, of the votes cast, and subject to a separate vote in each class of shares the rights of which are affected.
Transparency
The disclosure of accurate and comprehensive information about companies is the basis for investor confidence and is necessary for informed investment decision-making. Such informed investment decision-making is needed for both investor protection and market efficiency. Member States should therefore require companies exercising their right under this Directive to adopt or modify an MVS structure:
- to publish information concerning their share structure at the moment of admission to trading on an MTF in a prospectus or in an admission document , where the company publishes such a prospectus or document in accordance with relevant law;
- to publish that information concerning their share structure in any annual financial report required by law once their shares are admitted to trading in cases where that information has not previously been published or has changed since it was last published.
Member States should require investment firms and market operators operating an MTF to ensure that the shares of companies with MVS structures admitted to trading on that MTF are clearly identified as such by those investment firms and market operators.
The European Securities and Markets Authority (ESMA) should develop draft regulatory technical standards to specify how the investment firms and market operators should identify shares of companies with MVS structures.
The Committee on Economic and Monetary Affairs adopted the report by Alfred SANT (S&D, MT) on the proposal for a directive of the European Parliament and of the Council on multiple-vote share structures in companies that seek the admission to trading of their shares on an SME growth market.
The committee responsible recommended that the European Parliament's position adopted at first reading under the ordinary legislative procedure should amend the proposal as follows:
Transparency
The report highlighted that the disclosure of accurate, comprehensive and timely information about issuers strengthens investor confidence and allows for informed investment decision-making. Such informed investment decision-making enhances both investor protection and market efficiency. Member States should therefore require companies with multiple-vote share structures to have a stock name that ends with the marker ‘WVR’ (weighted voting rights) in order to clearly indicate to the public that their shareholder structure and liquidity profile is different from that of traditional companies.
Member States should also require companies with multiple-vote share structures to publish detailed information on their share structure and corporate governance system at the moment of the admission to trading, as well as periodically in the annual financial report.
Furthermore, those companies should in accordance with existing transparency law, disclose the identity of holders of multiple-vote shares as well as of the natural persons entitled to exercise voting rights on their behalf and of persons exercising special control rights to provide investors, as members of general public, with transparency on ultimate ownership and de facto influence on the company. This would allow investors to make informed decisions and thereby strengthen their confidence in well-functioning capital markets.
National competent authorities, regulated markets, SME growth markets and MTFs, should promote investor understanding and awareness concerning the WVR marker and the impact on voting rights associated with investing in companies with multiple-vote share structures.
Review
To assess the implementation and impact of this Directive, in particular any negative impact on stakeholders, and to take account of market developments and developments in other areas of Union law or Member States’ experiences with the implementation of this Directive, the Commission should review this Directive three years following the date of transposition and every three years thereafter.
PURPOSE: to lay down common rules on multiple-vote share structures in companies that seek the admission to trading of their shares on an SME growth market in one or more Member States and that do not have shares already admitted to trading on any trading venue.
PROPOSED ACT: Directive of the European Parliament and of the Council.
ROLE OF THE EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT: the European Parliament decides in accordance with the ordinary legislative procedure and on an equal footing with the Council.
BACKGROUND: to reinforce the attractiveness of SME growth markets and to reduce inequalities for companies seeking admission to trading in the single market, it is necessary to address obstacles to the access to such markets that stem from regulatory barriers. Companies should be able to choose governance structures that suit best their development stage, including by enabling controlling shareholders of those companies to retain control of the business after accessing SME growth markets, while enjoying the benefits associated to trading on those markets, as long as the rights of minority shareholders continue to be safeguarded.
Multiple-vote share structures , which are currently exclusively regulated at national level, are an effective mechanism to enable controlling shareholders to retain decision-making power in a company, while raising funds from the public.
There is currently fragmentation in the EU as regards multiple-vote share structures, which leads to unequal opportunities for EU companies when deciding to list. The existing differences in national regimes on multiple-vote share structures create an uneven playing field for companies in different Member States.
This proposal seeks to achieve a minimum harmonisation of national laws on multiple-vote share structures of companies listing on SME growth markets, while leaving sufficient flexibility to Member States for its implementation.
This proposal is part of the Listing Act package, a set of measures to make public capital markets more attractive for EU companies and facilitate access to capital for small and medium-sized companies (SMEs).
CONTENT: this Commission proposal lays down common rules on multiple-vote share structures in companies that seek the admission to trading of their shares on an SME growth market in one or more Member States and that do not have shares already admitted to trading on any trading venue.
Its specific provisions concern the following:
- the introduction or maintenance of national provisions on multiple-vote shares: Member States may introduce or maintain in force national provisions that allow companies to adopt multiple-vote share structures in situations not covered by this Directive;
- the adoption of multiple-vote share structures: Member States should ensure that companies that do not have shares that are admitted to trading on a trading venue have the right to adopt multiple-vote share structures for the admission to trading of shares on an SME growth market in one or more Member States. Member States will not prevent the admission to trading of shares of a company on an SME growth market on the ground that the company has adopted a multiple-vote share structure.
Safeguards
This proposal provides for safeguards to ensure protection of minority shareholders and the interests of the company. Those safeguards require all Member States to ensure that any decision to adopt a multiple-vote share structure, or to modify that structure where there is an impact on voting rights, is taken by a qualified majority at the general shareholders’ meeting. The safeguards set out in this proposal also introduce a limitation on the voting weight of multiple-vote shares by introducing restrictions either on the design of the multiple-vote share structure or on the exercise of voting rights attached to multiple vote shares for the adoption of certain decisions. These safeguards are designed to protect the interest of minority shareholders and the interests of the company, while at the same time allowing sufficient flexibility to controlling shareholders so as to not disincentivise the use of multiple-vote share structures. Furthermore, these safeguards are largely in line with those already in existence in the legal systems of the Member States with well-functioning multiple-vote share structure regimes. Thus, those Member States would require minimum adjustments to their current legal systems.
Transparency
Member States will ensure that companies with multiple-vote share structures whose shares are traded or are to be traded on an SME growth market make publicly available detailed information on all of the following:
- the structure of their capital, including securities which are not admitted to trading on an SME growth market in a Member State, with an indication of the different classes of shares and, for each class of shares, the rights and obligations attached to that class and the percentage of total share capital and total voting rights that such class represents;
- any restrictions on the transfer of securities, including any agreements between shareholders which are known to the company that could result in restrictions on the transfer of securities;
- the identity of holders of any securities with special control rights and a description of those rights;
- any restrictions on voting rights, including any agreements between shareholders which are known to the company that could result in restrictions on voting rights;
- the identity of the shareholders holding multiple-vote shares and of the natural person or legal entity entitled to exercise voting rights on behalf of such shareholders, where applicable.
Where the holders of multiple-vote shares or the persons entitled to exercise voting rights on their behalf or the holders of securities with special control rights are natural persons, the disclosure of their identity shall require only the disclosure of their names.
Review
By five years after the entry into force, the Commission will submit a report to the European Parliament and the Council on the implementation and effects of this Directive. To that effect by four years after the entry into force, Member States will provide the Commission with information in particular on the following:
- the number of companies admitted to trading with multiple-vote shares;
- the sector in which the companies are active and the respective capitalisation at the moment of issuance;
- the investor protection safeguard applied by the companies with respect to multiple-vote share structures.
Documents
- Draft final act: 00023/2024/LEX
- Commission response to text adopted in plenary: SP(2024)394
- Results of vote in Parliament: Results of vote in Parliament
- Decision by Parliament, 1st reading: T9-0352/2024
- Approval in committee of the text agreed at 1st reading interinstitutional negotiations: PE759.030
- Coreper letter confirming interinstitutional agreement: GEDA/A/(2024)000984
- Text agreed during interinstitutional negotiations: PE759.030
- Committee report tabled for plenary, 1st reading: A9-0300/2023
- Committee opinion: PE750.107
- Amendments tabled in committee: PE751.684
- Committee draft report: PE749.139
- Contribution: COM(2022)0761
- Economic and Social Committee: opinion, report: CES5409/2022
- Document attached to the procedure: OJ C 065 22.02.2023, p. 0002
- Document attached to the procedure: N9-0016/2023
- Legislative proposal published: COM(2022)0761
- Legislative proposal published: EUR-Lex
- Document attached to the procedure: OJ C 065 22.02.2023, p. 0002 N9-0016/2023
- Economic and Social Committee: opinion, report: CES5409/2022
- Committee draft report: PE749.139
- Amendments tabled in committee: PE751.684
- Committee opinion: PE750.107
- Coreper letter confirming interinstitutional agreement: GEDA/A/(2024)000984
- Text agreed during interinstitutional negotiations: PE759.030
- Commission response to text adopted in plenary: SP(2024)394
- Draft final act: 00023/2024/LEX
- Contribution: COM(2022)0761
Votes
A9-0300/2023 – Alfred Sant – Provisional agreement – Am 2 #
Amendments | Dossier |
228 |
2022/0406(COD)
2023/07/11
ECON
143 amendments...
Amendment 100 #
Proposal for a directive Article 5 – paragraph 1 – introductory part 1. Member States shall ensure
Amendment 101 #
Proposal for a directive Article 5 – paragraph 1 – introductory part 1. Member States shall ensure fair and non-discriminatory treatment of shareholders, as well as adequate protection of the interests of the shareholders who do not hold multiple-vote shares, the workers and of the company through appropriate safeguards. To that effect, Member States shall do all of the following:
Amendment 102 #
Proposal for a directive Article 5 – paragraph 1 – point a – subparagraph 1 (a) ensure that a company’s decision to
Amendment 103 #
Proposal for a directive Article 5 – paragraph 1 – point a – subparagraph 1 ensure that a company’s decision, at its own discretion and in accordance with national law, to adopt a multiple-vote share structure and any subsequent decision to modify a multiple-
Amendment 104 #
Proposal for a directive Article 5 – paragraph 1 – point a – subparagraph 2 For the purposes of this point,
Amendment 105 #
Proposal for a directive Article 5 – paragraph 1 – point a – subparagraph 2 For the purposes of this point, where there are several classes of shares, such decisions shall also be subject to a separate vote
Amendment 106 #
Proposal for a directive Article 5 – paragraph 1 – point a a (new) (a a) ensure that companies issuing multiple-vote shares publish a justification outlining how the share structure will help guarantee the long- term interests of the company, its stakeholders including employees, and help the company contribute to environmental objectives as defined in Regulation (EU) 2020/852.
Amendment 107 #
Proposal for a directive Article 5 – paragraph 1 – point b – introductory part (b) limit the
Amendment 108 #
Proposal for a directive Article 5 – paragraph 1 – point b – introductory part (b) limit the
Amendment 109 #
Proposal for a directive Article 5 – paragraph 1 – point b – introductory part (b) limit the
Amendment 110 #
Proposal for a directive Article 5 – paragraph 1 – point b – introductory part (b) limit the
Amendment 111 #
Proposal for a directive Article 5 – paragraph 1 – point b – introductory part (b) limit the voting weight of multiple- vote shares on the exercise of other shareholders’ rights
Amendment 112 #
Proposal for a directive Article 5 – paragraph 1 – point b – introductory part (b) limit the voting weight of multiple- vote shares on the exercise of other shareholders’ rights, in particular during general meetings, by introducing
Amendment 113 #
Proposal for a directive Article 5 – paragraph 1 – point b – point i (i) a maximum weighted voting ratio
Amendment 114 #
Proposal for a directive Article 5 – paragraph 1 – point b – point i (i) a maximum weighted voting ratio a
Amendment 115 #
Proposal for a directive Article 5 – paragraph 1 – point b – point i (i) a maximum
Amendment 116 #
Proposal for a directive Article 5 – paragraph 1 – point b – point i (i) a maximum weighted voting ratio
Amendment 117 #
Proposal for a directive Article 5 – paragraph 1 – point b – point i (i) a maximum weighted voting ratio
Amendment 118 #
Proposal for a directive Article 5 – paragraph 1 – point b – point i (i) a maximum weighted voting ratio
Amendment 119 #
Proposal for a directive Article 5 – paragraph 1 – point b – point i (i) a maximum weighted voting ratio of 10:1 and a requirement on the maximum percentage of the outstanding share capital that the total amount of multiple-vote shares can represent;
Amendment 120 #
Proposal for a directive Article 5 – paragraph 1 – point b – point i a (new) (i a) a provision to avoid that the enhanced voting rights attached to multiple-vote shares continue to exist after a designated period of time up to 5 years (time-based sunset clause);
Amendment 121 #
Proposal for a directive Article 5 – paragraph 1 – point b – point i a (new) (i a) a requirement on the maximum percentage of the outstanding share capital that the total amount of multiple- vote shares can represent;
Amendment 122 #
Proposal for a directive Article 5 – paragraph 1 – point b – point i b (new) (i b) a provision to avoid that the enhanced voting rights attached to multiple-vote shares are transferred to third parties or continue to exist upon the death, incapacitation or retirement of the original holder of multiple-vote shares (transfer-based sunset clause);
Amendment 123 #
Proposal for a directive Article 5 – paragraph 1 – point b – point i c (new) (i c) a restriction on the exercise of the enhanced voting rights attached to multiple-vote shares for voting on matters related to executive remuneration and dividend policy as well as for the approval of related party transactions;
Amendment 124 #
Proposal for a directive Article 5 – paragraph 1 – point b – point i d (new) (i d) a requirement to ensure that the enhanced voting rights cannot be used to block the adoption or implementation of decisions by the general shareholders’ meeting aiming at preventing, reducing or eliminating adverse impacts on human rights, the environment and the climate related to the company’s operations and those carried out by entities in their value chain;
Amendment 125 #
Proposal for a directive Article 5 – paragraph 1 – point b – point i e (new) (i e) a requirement to ensure that the enhanced voting rights cannot be used to block the adoption or implementation of decisions by the general shareholders’ meeting aiming at improving corporate governance, including decisions to enhance corporate transparency and accountability.
Amendment 126 #
Proposal for a directive Article 5 – paragraph 1 – point b – point i f (new) (i f) a requirement to ensure that enhanced voting rights are not used to block the adoption or implementation of decisions by the general shareholders’ meeting aimed at or contributing to aligning business models and strategies with the transition to a sustainable economy, limiting global warming to 1.5°C in line with the Paris Agreement, or achieving climate neutrality as established in Regulation (EU) 2021/1119 as regards its operations in the Union;
Amendment 127 #
Proposal for a directive Article 5 – paragraph 1 – point b – point ii (ii) a re
Amendment 128 #
Proposal for a directive Article 5 – paragraph 1 – point b – point ii (ii) a re
Amendment 129 #
Proposal for a directive Article 5 – paragraph 1 – point b – point ii (ii) a
Amendment 130 #
Proposal for a directive Article 5 – paragraph 1 – point b – point ii – point a (new) a) a qualified majority, in accordance with national law, both of the votes cast and either of the share capital represented at the meeting or of the number of shares represented at the meeting; or
Amendment 131 #
Proposal for a directive Article 5 – paragraph 1 – point b – point ii – point b (new) b) a qualified majority, in accordance with national law, of the votes cast, and are subject to a separate vote within each class of shares the rights of which are affected.
Amendment 132 #
Proposal for a directive Article 5 – paragraph 1 – point b a (new) (b a) ensure that the enhanced voting rights cannot be used to block the adoption of decisions by the general shareholders’ meeting aiming at preventing, reducing or eliminating adverse impacts on human rights and the environment related to the company’s operations.
Amendment 133 #
Proposal for a directive Article 5 – paragraph 1 a (new) 1 a. Member States shall ensure that employees’ rights to information, consultation and participation are respected in relation to the decision on and use of multiple vote shares, and that these rights are exercised in accordance with existing provisions or practices in force, including the legal framework provided for in Directive 2002/14/EC.
Amendment 134 #
Proposal for a directive Article 5 – paragraph 2 – introductory part 2. Member States may provide for further safeguards to ensure adequate protection
Amendment 135 #
Proposal for a directive Article 5 – paragraph 2 – introductory part 2. Member
Amendment 136 #
Proposal for a directive Article 5 – paragraph 2 – introductory part 2. Member States may provide for further safeguards to ensure adequate protection of shareholders
Amendment 137 #
Proposal for a directive Article 5 – paragraph 2 – introductory part 2. Member States may provide for further safeguards to ensure adequate protection of shareholders not possessing multiple-vote shares and
Amendment 138 #
Proposal for a directive Article 5 – paragraph 2 – introductory part 2. Member States may provide for further safeguards to ensure adequate protection of shareholders
Amendment 139 #
Proposal for a directive Article 5 – paragraph 2 – introductory part 2. Member States may provide for further safeguards to ensure adequate protection of shareholders and of the interests of the company.
Amendment 140 #
Proposal for a directive Article 5 – paragraph 2 – introductory part 2. Member States
Amendment 141 #
Proposal for a directive Article 5 – paragraph 2 – point a Amendment 142 #
Proposal for a directive Article 5 – paragraph 2 – point a Amendment 143 #
Proposal for a directive Article 5 – paragraph 2 – point a Amendment 144 #
Proposal for a directive Article 5 – paragraph 2 – point a Amendment 145 #
Proposal for a directive Article 5 – paragraph 2 – point a Amendment 146 #
Proposal for a directive Article 5 – paragraph 2 – point a Amendment 147 #
Proposal for a directive Article 5 – paragraph 2 – point a (a) a provision to avoid that the enhanced voting rights attached to multiple-vote shares are transferred to third parties or continue to exist upon the death, incapacitation or retirement of the original holder of multiple-vote shares
Amendment 148 #
Proposal for a directive Article 5 – paragraph 2 – point b Amendment 149 #
Proposal for a directive Article 5 – paragraph 2 – point b Amendment 150 #
Proposal for a directive Article 5 – paragraph 2 – point b Amendment 151 #
Proposal for a directive Article 5 – paragraph 2 – point b Amendment 152 #
Proposal for a directive Article 5 – paragraph 2 – point b Amendment 153 #
Proposal for a directive Article 5 – paragraph 2 – point b Amendment 154 #
Proposal for a directive Article 5 – paragraph 2 – point b (b) a provision to avoid that the enhanced voting rights attached to multiple-vote shares continue to exist after a
Amendment 155 #
Proposal for a directive Article 5 – paragraph 2 – point c Amendment 156 #
Proposal for a directive Article 5 – paragraph 2 – point c Amendment 157 #
Proposal for a directive Article 5 – paragraph 2 – point c Amendment 158 #
Proposal for a directive Article 5 – paragraph 2 – point c Amendment 159 #
Proposal for a directive Article 5 – paragraph 2 – point c Amendment 160 #
Proposal for a directive Article 5 – paragraph 2 – point c Amendment 161 #
Proposal for a directive Article 5 – paragraph 2 – point c (c) a provision to avoid that the enhanced voting rights attached to multiple-vote shares continue to exist upon the occurrence of a specified event
Amendment 162 #
Proposal for a directive Article 5 – paragraph 2 – point d Amendment 163 #
Proposal for a directive Article 5 – paragraph 2 – point d Amendment 164 #
Proposal for a directive Article 5 – paragraph 2 – point d Amendment 165 #
Proposal for a directive Article 5 – paragraph 2 – point d Amendment 166 #
Proposal for a directive Article 5 – paragraph 2 – point d Amendment 167 #
Proposal for a directive Article 5 – paragraph 2 – point d Amendment 168 #
Proposal for a directive Article 6 – paragraph 1 – introductory part 1. Member States shall ensure that companies with multiple-vote share structures whose shares are traded or are to be traded on an SME growth market make publicly available, in the [EU Growth issuance document referred to in Article 15a] of Regulation (EU) 2017/1129 of the European Parliament and of the Council43
Amendment 169 #
Proposal for a directive Article 6 – paragraph 1 – introductory part 1. Member States shall ensure that companies with multiple-vote share structures whose shares are traded or are to be traded on a
Amendment 170 #
Proposal for a directive Article 6 – paragraph 1 – introductory part 1. Member States shall ensure that companies with multiple-vote share structures whose shares are traded or are to be traded on a regulated market or an SME growth market make publicly available,
Amendment 171 #
Proposal for a directive Article 6 – paragraph 1 – point a (a) the structure of their capital, including securities which are not admitted to trading on
Amendment 172 #
Proposal for a directive Article 6 – paragraph 1 – point a (a) the structure of their capital, including securities which are not admitted to trading on a regulated market or an SME growth market in a Member State, with an indication of the different classes of shares and, for each class of shares, the rights and obligations attached to that class and the percentage of total share capital and total voting rights that such class represents;
Amendment 173 #
Proposal for a directive Article 6 – paragraph 1 – point a (a) the structure of their capital, including securities which are not admitted to trading on a regulated market or an SME growth market in a Member State, with an indication of the different classes of shares and, for each class of shares, the rights and obligations attached to that class and the percentage of total share capital and total voting rights that such class represents;
Amendment 174 #
Proposal for a directive Article 6 – paragraph 1 – point c Amendment 175 #
Proposal for a directive Article 6 – paragraph 1 – point e (e) the identity
Amendment 176 #
Proposal for a directive Article 6 – paragraph 1 – point e (e) if known by the company, the identity of the shareholders holding multiple-vote shares, representing more than 5 % of the voting rights of all shares in the company, and of the natural person or legal entity entitled to exercise voting rights on behalf of such shareholders, where applicable.
Amendment 177 #
Proposal for a directive Article 7 – paragraph 1 – introductory part By [
Amendment 178 #
Proposal for a directive Article 8 – paragraph 1 1. Member States shall bring into force the law, regulations and administrative provisions necessary to comply with this Directive by 12
Amendment 36 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 1 (1) To reinforce the attractiveness of
Amendment 37 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 1 (1) To reinforce the attractiveness of
Amendment 38 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 1 (1) To reinforce the attractiveness of SME growth markets and to reduce inequalities for companies seeking admission to trading in the single market, it is necessary to address obstacles to the access to such markets that stem from regulatory barriers. Companies should be able to choose governance structures that suit best their development stage, including by enabling controlling shareholders of those companies to retain control of the business after accessing SME growth markets, while enjoying the benefits associated to trading on those markets, as long as the rights of
Amendment 39 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 1 (1) To reinforce the attractiveness of SME growth markets and to reduce inequalities for companies seeking admission to trading in the single market, it is necessary to address obstacles to the access to such markets that stem from regulatory barriers. Companies should be able to, at their own discretion and in accordance with national law, choose governance structures that suit best their development stage, including by enabling controlling shareholders of those companies to retain control of the business after accessing SME growth markets, while enjoying the benefits associated to trading on those markets, such as financing and support, as long as the rights of minority shareholders continue to be safeguarded.
Amendment 40 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 1 (1) To reinforce the attractiveness of SME growth markets and to reduce inequalities for companies seeking admission to trading in the single market, it is necessary to address obstacles to the access to such markets that stem from regulatory barriers. Companies should be able, subject to strong appropriate safeguards, to choose governance structures that
Amendment 41 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 1 a (new) (1 a) Having an untapped potential for assisting SMEs in getting access to finance, SME growth markets should therefore be the focus of this Directive, with a view to make them more attractive.
Amendment 42 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 2 (2) Fear of losing control over a company constitutes
Amendment 43 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 2 (2) Fear of losing control over a company constitutes one of the main deterrents for controlling shareholders to
Amendment 44 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 2 (2) Fear of losing control over a company constitutes one of the main deterrents for controlling shareholders to access
Amendment 45 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 2 (2) Fear of losing control over a company constitutes one of the main deterrents for controlling shareholders to access
Amendment 46 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 2 (2) Fear of losing control over a company constitutes one of the main deterrents for controlling shareholders to access SME growth markets. Admission to trading usually entails dilution of ownership for controlling shareholders, thus reducing their influence over important investment and operating decisions in the company. Maintaining control of the company may in particular be important for start-ups and companies with long-term projects that require significant upfront costs, because they may wish to pursue their vision without becoming too exposed to market fluctuations. Given that for family-owned companies in particular, loosing control in the long-term could be a deterrent, long-term predictability and control should be given particular attention in this proposal.
Amendment 47 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 3 (3) Multiple-vote share structures are a
Amendment 48 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 3 (3) Multiple-vote share structures are an effective mechanism to enable controlling shareholders to retain decision- making power in a company, while raising funds from the public. Multiple-vote share structures are a form of a control enhancement mechanism involving at least two distinct classes of shares with a different number of voting rights. Under such structures, at least one of the classes of shares has a lower
Amendment 49 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 4 (4) There are other control enhancing mechanisms that allow leveraging voting power, apart from multiple-vote share structures. Such mechanisms may include non-voting shares, non-voting preference shares and voting right ceilings. However, those alternative control enhancing mechanisms, being more rigid in their set- up, are liable to constrain the amount of capital that a company can raise at the point of admission to trading
Amendment 50 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 4 (4) There are other control enhancing mechanisms that allow leveraging voting power, apart from multiple-vote share structures. Such mechanisms may include non-voting shares, non-voting preference shares and voting right ceilings. However, those alternative control enhancing
Amendment 51 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 5 (5) Loyalty shares
Amendment 52 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 7 (7) Member States should provide
Amendment 53 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 7 (7) Member States should provide companies with the possibility to adopt multiple-vote share structures to allow them to seek admission to trading
Amendment 54 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 7 (7) Member States should provide companies with the possibility to adopt multiple-vote share structures to allow them to seek admission to trading on a regulated market or an SME growth market without their controlling shareholders having to relinquish control. While admission to trading on regulated markets is more suitable for larger and more mature companies, SME growth markets are generally more appropriate for SMEs. SME growth markets were originally designed as SME dedicated trading venues with a regulatory treatment that takes the particularities of SMEs into account. Not all companies with securities listed on SME growth markets are, however, SMEs. Directive 2014/65/EU of the European Parliament and of the Council39 requires that SMEs constitute at least 50 % of the issuers of financial instruments admitted to trading on SME growth markets. Companies other than SMEs generally have more liquid securities and hence their admission to SME growth markets enables
Amendment 55 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 8 (8) Member States should be able to introduce, or maintain in force, national provisions that allow companies to adopt these structures for purposes other than the first time admission to trading of shares on a
Amendment 56 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 8 (8) Member States should be able to introduce, or maintain in force, national provisions that allow companies to adopt these structures for purposes other than the first time admission to trading of shares on a
Amendment 57 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 8 (8) Member States should be able to
Amendment 58 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 8 (8) Member States should, at their own discretion, be able to introduce, or maintain in force, national provisions that allow companies to adopt these structures for purposes other than the first time admission to trading of shares on a SME growth market.
Amendment 59 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 9 (9)
Amendment 60 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 9 (9) Companies may adopt multiple- vote share structures through a new issuance of shares or through another type of corporate transaction, such as the conversion of already issued shares. Companies should have the flexibility to choose the most appropriate type of corporate transaction to adopt multiple vote share structures in compliance with national law. Furthermore, companies should also have the flexibility as to the timing of the adoption of multiple-vote share structures
Amendment 61 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 9 (9) Companies
Amendment 62 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 9 (9) Companies may adopt multiple- vote share structures through a new issuance of shares or through another type of corporate transaction, such as the conversion of already issued shares. Companies should have the flexibility to choose the most appropriate type of corporate transaction to adopt multiple vote share structures in compliance with national law. Furthermore, companies should also have the flexibility as to the timing of the adoption of multiple-vote share structures, provided they do so to seek a first time admission of shares to trading on a regulated market or SME growth market. Member States should not prevent companies from adopting multiple- vote share structures at a point prior to the moment of the admission of shares to trading. Member States should, however, be allowed to lay down that the exercise of the enhanced voting rights, which represent additional voting rights attached to multiple-vote shares compared to voting rights of shares of other classes, is conditional upon the admission to trading of shares on an SME growth market in one or more Member States. In that case and until the admission to trading, multiple- vote shares should have the same voting rights as other classes of shares in the company. That would ensure that multiple vote shares specifically promote a first- time admission to trading on regulated markets or SME growth markets.
Amendment 63 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 10 (10) Due to a diminished voting power of non-controlling shareholders in the company relative to their investments, multiple-vote share structures may provide controlling shareholders of that company with perpetual control and thereby lead to controlling shareholder entrenchment. That may increase the risk that controlling shareholders extract private benefits from control. To address those risks, the adoption of multiple-vote share structures should be subject to harmonised safeguards to protect minority shareholders.
Amendment 64 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 11 (11) Member States that allow multiple- vote shares provide for safeguards to protect minority shareholders and the interests of the company.
Amendment 65 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 11 (11) Member States that allow multiple- vote shares provide for safeguards to protect minority shareholders and the
Amendment 66 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 11 (11) Member States that allow multiple- vote shares provide for safeguards to protect minority shareholders and the interests of the company. However, the existing safeguards vary between Member States due to national specificities and diverging company law systems. Having regard to the objectives of the internal market as set out in particular in Article 50(2), point (g) of the Treaty on the functioning of the European Union, Member States should ensure a coordinated approach in their national laws on multiple-vote share structures with respect to the protection of the interests of minority shareholders and of the company. This includes protection against decisions creating risks for or resulting in adverse human rights, climate change, and environmental consequences.
Amendment 67 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 11 (11) Member States that allow multiple- vote shares provide for safeguards to protect minority shareholders and the interests of the company. However, the existing safeguards vary between Member States due to national specificities and diverging company law systems. Having regard to the objectives of the internal market as set out in particular in Article 50(2), point (g) of the Treaty on the functioning of the European Union, Member States should ensure a coordinated approach in their national laws on multiple-vote share structures with respect to the protection of the interests of minority shareholders and of the company. This may include
Amendment 68 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 11 (11) Member States that allow multiple- vote shares provide for safeguards to protect minority shareholders and the interests of the company. However, the existing safeguards vary between Member States due to national specificities and diverging company law systems. Having regard to the objectives of the internal market as set out in particular in Article 50(2), point (g) of the Treaty on the functioning of the European Union, Member States should ensure a coordinated approach in their national laws on multiple-vote share structures with respect to the protection of the interests of minority shareholders and of the company. This includes protection against decisions creating risks for or resulting in adverse human rights, climate change, and environmental consequences, or against decisions aimed at improving corporate transparency and corporate governance, including executive remuneration and dividend policy. Under that coordinated approach, all Member States should ensure that any decision to adopt a multiple-vote share structure, or to modify that structure where there is an impact on voting rights, is taken by a qualified majority at the general shareholders’ meeting. Furthermore, Member States should limit the voting weight of multiple-
Amendment 69 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 11 a (new) (11 a) Even though multiple-vote shares can create risks for stakeholders of a company, by giving a stronger voice to founders and long-term shareholders, multiple-vote shares can also protect a company from an excessive focus on short-term interests and thereby help stimulate its long-term sustainable growth in line with the interests of stakeholders and the environment. To ensure multiple- vote shares are used in this positive way, companies issuing multiple-vote shares should publish a report detailing how their share structure helps promote the interests of all their stakeholders as well as the environment.
Amendment 70 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 12 (12) Member States should
Amendment 71 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 12 (12) Member States should be
Amendment 72 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 13 (13) The disclosure of accurate, comprehensive and timely information about issuers strengthens investor confidence and allows for informed investment decision-making. Such informed investment decision-making enhances both investor protection and market efficiency. Member States should therefore require companies with multiple- vote share structures to publish detailed information on their share structure and corporate governance system at the moment of the admission to trading, as well as periodically in the annual financial report. Such information should mention whether there are any limitations on the holding of securities, including whether any transfer of securities requires the approval either of the company, or of other holders of securities. It should also mention whether there are any restrictions on voting rights, including limitations of the voting rights of holders of a given percentage or number of votes, deadlines for exercising voting rights, or systems whereby the financial rights attached to securities are separated from the holding of securities. Furthermore, those companies should, in accordance with existing transparency legislation, disclose the identity of holders of multiple-
Amendment 73 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 13 (13) The disclosure of accurate, comprehensive and timely information about issuers strengthens investor confidence and allows for informed investment decision-making. Such informed investment decision-making enhances both investor protection and market efficiency. Member States should therefore require companies with multiple- vote share structures to publish detailed information on their share structure and corporate governance system at the moment of the admission to trading, as well as periodically in the annual financial report. Such information should mention whether there are any limitations on the holding of securities, including whether any transfer of securities requires the approval either of the company, or of other holders of securities. It should also mention whether there are any restrictions on voting rights, including limitations of the voting rights of holders of a given percentage or number of votes, deadlines for exercising voting rights, or systems whereby the financial rights attached to securities are
Amendment 74 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 13 (13) The disclosure of accurate, comprehensive and timely information about issuers strengthens investor confidence and allows for informed investment decision-making. Such informed investment decision-making enhances both investor protection and market efficiency. Member States should therefore require companies with multiple- vote share structures to publish detailed information on their share structure and corporate governance system at the moment of the admission to trading, as well as periodically in the annual financial report. Such information should mention whether there are any limitations on the holding of securities, including whether any transfer of securities requires the
Amendment 75 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 15 (15) To assess the implementation and impact of this Directive, in particular any negative impacts on all actors concerned, and to take account of market developments and developments in other areas of Union law or Member States’ experiences with the implementation of this Directive, the Commission should review this Directive
Amendment 76 #
Proposal for a directive Article 1 – paragraph 1 This Directive lays down common rules on multiple-vote share structures, including for loyalty shares, in companies that seek the admission to trading of their shares on a EU based regulated market or an SME growth market in one or more Member States and that do not have shares already admitted to trading on any trading venue.
Amendment 77 #
Proposal for a directive Article 1 – paragraph 1 This Directive lays down common rules on multiple-vote share structures in companies that seek the admission to trading of their shares on a
Amendment 78 #
Proposal for a directive Article 1 – paragraph 1 This Directive lays down common rules on multiple-vote share structures in companies that seek the admission to trading of their shares on a regulated market or on an SME growth market in one or more Member States and that do not have shares already admitted to trading on any trading venue.
Amendment 79 #
Proposal for a directive Article 1 – paragraph 1 This Directive lays down common rules on multiple-vote share structures in companies that seek the admission to trading of their shares on a regulated market or an SME growth market in one or more Member States and that do not have shares already admitted to trading on any trading venue.
Amendment 80 #
Proposal for a directive Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point a (a) ‘company’ means a legal entity incorporated as one of the types of companies listed in Annex II to Directive (EU) 2017/1132 which may under national law issue shares and seek admission to trading of the shares on an SME growth market;
Amendment 81 #
Proposal for a directive Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point a (a) ‘company’ means a legal entity incorporated as one of the types of companies listed in Annex II to Directive (EU) 2017/1132;
Amendment 82 #
Proposal for a directive Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point b (b) ‘multiple-vote shares’ means shares belonging to a distinct and separate class and that carry a higher
Amendment 83 #
Proposal for a directive Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point f a (new) (f a) 'multilateral trading facility' means a multilateral trading facility as defined in Article 4(1), point (22), of Directive 2014/65/EU
Amendment 84 #
Proposal for a directive Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point f a (new) (f a) ‘EU based regulated market’ means a market defined as per Article 4(1), point (21), of Directive 2014/65/EU;
Amendment 85 #
Proposal for a directive Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point f a (new) (f a) ‘regulated market’ means a regulated market as defined in Article 4(1), point (21), of Directive 2014/65/EU;
Amendment 86 #
Proposal for a directive Article 3 – title Amendment 87 #
Proposal for a directive Article 3 – paragraph 1 Member States
Amendment 88 #
Proposal for a directive Article 3 – paragraph 1 Member States may introduce or maintain in force national provisions that allow companies to adopt multiple-vote share structures
Amendment 89 #
Proposal for a directive Article 4 – paragraph 1 1. Member States shall ensure that
Amendment 90 #
Proposal for a directive Article 4 – paragraph 1 1. Member States shall ensure that companies that do not have shares that are
Amendment 91 #
Proposal for a directive Article 4 – paragraph 1 1. Member States shall ensure that companies that do not have shares that are admitted to trading on a trading venue have the right to adopt multiple-vote share structures for the admission to trading of shares on a regulated market or an SME growth market in one or more Member States. Member States shall not prevent the admission to trading of shares of a company on a regulated market or on an SME growth market on the ground that the company has adopted a multiple-vote share structure.
Amendment 92 #
Proposal for a directive Article 4 – paragraph 1 1. Member States shall ensure that companies that do not have shares that are admitted to trading on a trading venue have the right to adopt multiple-vote share structures for the admission to trading of shares on a regulated market or an SME growth market in one or more Member States. Member States shall not prevent the admission to trading of shares of a company on a regulated market or an SME growth market on the ground that the company has adopted a multiple-vote share structure.
Amendment 93 #
Proposal for a directive Article 4 – paragraph 2 2. The right referred to in paragraph 1 encompasses the right to adopt multiple- vote share structures in time prior to seeking the admission to trading of shares on a
Amendment 94 #
Proposal for a directive Article 4 – paragraph 2 2. The right referred to in paragraph 1 encompasses the right to adopt multiple- vote share structures in time prior to seeking the admission to trading of shares on a regulated market or on an SME growth market.
Amendment 95 #
Proposal for a directive Article 4 – paragraph 2 2. The right referred to in paragraph 1 encompasses the right to adopt multiple- vote share structures in time prior to seeking the admission to trading of shares on a regulated market or an SME growth market.
Amendment 96 #
Proposal for a directive Article 4 – paragraph 3 3. Member States may make the exercise of the enhanced voting rights attached to the multiple-vote shares conditional upon the admission to trading of shares on a
Amendment 97 #
Proposal for a directive Article 4 – paragraph 3 3. Member States may make the exercise of the enhanced voting rights attached to the multiple-vote shares conditional upon the admission to trading of shares on a regulated market or an SME growth market in one or more Member States.
Amendment 98 #
Proposal for a directive Article 5 – title Safeguards
Amendment 99 #
Proposal for a directive Article 5 – paragraph 1 – introductory part 1. Member States shall ensure
source: 751.684
2023/07/14
JURI
85 amendments...
Amendment 100 #
Proposal for a directive Article 7 – paragraph 1 – introductory part By [
Amendment 101 #
Proposal for a directive Article 7 – paragraph 1 – point c a (new) (c a) the convergences and divergences between the multiple-vote share structures existing in Member States following the implementation of this Directive.
Amendment 102 #
Proposal for a directive Article 7 – paragraph 1 a (new) Prior to the drafting of the report, the Commission shall also make use of information provided by and regular exchanges with relevant stakeholders, in particular European and national representatives of SMEs, shareholders and workers.
Amendment 103 #
Proposal for a directive Article 8 – paragraph 1 1. Member States shall bring into force the law, regulations and administrative provisions necessary to comply with this Directive by 12
Amendment 19 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 1 (1) To reinforce the attractiveness of SME growth markets and to reduce inequalities for companies seeking admission to trading in the single market, it is necessary to address obstacles to the access to such markets that stem from regulatory barriers. Companies should be able to choose governance structures that suit best their development stage, including by enabling controlling shareholders of those companies to retain control of the business after accessing SME growth markets, while enjoying the benefits associated to trading on those markets, as long as the rights of
Amendment 20 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 2 (2) Fear of losing control over a company constitutes one of the main deterrents for controlling shareholders to access capital and equtiy markets, such as SME growth markets. Admission to trading usually entails dilution of ownership for controlling shareholders, thus reducing their influence over important investment and operating decisions in the company. Maintaining control of the company may in particular be important for start-ups and companies
Amendment 21 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 2 (2) Fear of losing control over a company constitutes one of the main deterrents for controlling shareholders to access
Amendment 22 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 3 (3) Multiple-vote share structures are
Amendment 23 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 3 (3) Multiple-vote share structures are an effective mechanism to enable controlling shareholders to retain decision- making power in a company, while raising funds from the public. Multiple-vote share structures are a form of a control
Amendment 24 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 4 Amendment 25 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 4 (4) There are other control enhancing mechanisms that allow leveraging voting power, apart from multiple-vote share structures. Such mechanisms may include non-voting shares, non-voting preference shares and voting right ceilings. However, those alternative control enhancing mechanisms, being more rigid in their set- up, are liable to constrain the amount of capital that a company can raise at the point of admission to trading
Amendment 26 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 5 (5) Loyalty shares, like the basic type of multiple-vote shares, confer superior voting rights to a shareholder. A shareholder may obtain additional voting rights attached to loyalty shares, holding the share for the designated time and complying with certain conditions. Loyalty shares are control-
Amendment 27 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 5 (5) Loyalty shares,
Amendment 28 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 5 (5) Loyalty shares
Amendment 29 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 5 a (new) (5 a) Like multiple-vote share structures, employee participation schemes can also increase funding options, bring stability, development and growth to SMEs, and serve as an important addition to sustainable corporate governance, with benefits for both employees and companies. EFP schemes can also help companies, especially SMEs, with respect to restructuring and business continuity by addressing company succession and generational renewal problems. Favouring the development of employee participation schemes can thus contribute to the overall objectives of this Directive. Where an SME has established an employee participation schemes, the introduction of a multiple-vote share structure shall not reduce the voting and participation rights attached to the employee participation scheme in place.
Amendment 30 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 5 b (new) (5 b) There are other control enhancing mechanisms that allow leveraging voting power, apart from multiple-vote share structures. Such mechanisms may include non-voting shares, non-voting preference shares and voting right ceilings. However, those alternative control enhancing mechanisms, being more rigid in their set- up, are liable to constrain the amount of capital that a company can raise at the point of admission to trading on SME growth markets due to the lower disassociation between economic and voting rights.
Amendment 31 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 7 (7) Member States should provide companies with the possibility to adopt multiple-vote share structures to allow them to seek admission to trading on a regulated market or an SME growth market without their controlling shareholders having to relinquish control. While admission to trading on regulated markets is more suitable for larger and more mature companies, SME growth markets are generally more appropriate for SMEs. SME growth markets were originally designed as SME dedicated trading venues with a regulatory treatment that takes the
Amendment 32 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 7 a (new) (7 a) While admission to trading on regulated markets is more suitable for larger and more mature companies, SME growth markets are generally more appropriate for SMEs. SME growth markets were originally designed as SME dedicated trading venues with a regulatory treatment that takes the particularities of SMEs into account. Not all companies with securities listed on SME growth markets are, however, SMEs. Directive 2014/65/EU of the European Parliament and of the Council2 requires that SMEs constitute at least 50 % of the issuers of financial instruments admitted to trading on SME growth markets. Companies other than SMEs generally have more liquid securities and hence their admission to SME growth markets enables those markets to generate higher trading fees to maintain profitability of their business model. Nevertheless, to ensure clarity for investors, all issuers on SME growth markets, irrespective of their size, are currently subject to the same rules. It is therefore appropriate that the introduction of the right to adopt multiple-vote share structures applies to all types of companies listed in Annex II to Directive (EU) 2017/1132 of the European Parliament and of the Council3 to the extent that they can, under national law, issue shares and seek admission to trading of the shares on an SME growth market.
Amendment 33 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 8 (8) Member States should be able to
Amendment 34 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 9 (9) Companies may adopt multiple- vote share structures through a new issuance of shares or through another type of corporate transaction, such as the conversion of already issued shares. Companies should have the flexibility to choose the most appropriate type of corporate transaction to adopt multiple vote share structures in compliance with national law. Furthermore, companies should also have the flexibility as to the timing of the adoption of multiple-vote share structures, provided they do so to seek a first time admission of shares to
Amendment 35 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 9 a (new) (9 a) Adopting a multiple-vote share structure normally requires an amendment of the articles of association. To provide for fair treatment of the shareholders, Member States should require that a decision to adopt, as well as a decision later on to modify such a structure in a way that affects the voting rights, should be subject to a decision by the general meeting by at least a qualified majority. Where there are several classes of shares, such decisions should also be subject to a separate vote in each class of shares the rights of which are affected.
Amendment 36 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 9 b (new) (9 b) Companies should have flexibility as to the timing of the adoption of multiple-vote share structures, provided they do so to seek admission to trading on an SME growth market. Member States should not prevent companies from adopting multiple-vote share structures before the moment of the admission of the shares to trading. Member States should, however, be able to lay down that the exercise of the enhanced voting rights, which represent additional votes attached to multiple-vote shares compared to votes of shares of other classes, is conditional upon shares of the company being admitted to trading on an SME growth market. In that case and until the admission to trading, multiple-vote shares should have the same voting rights as other classes of shares in the company. That would ensure that multiple-vote shares specifically promote an admission to trading on an SME growth market.
Amendment 37 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 10 Amendment 38 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 11 (11) A multiple-vote share structure might increase the risk that controlling shareholders extract private benefits from the company. Member States that already allow multiple-
Amendment 39 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 11 (11) Member States that allow multiple- vote shares provide for safeguards to protect minority shareholders and the interests of the company. However, the existing safeguards vary between Member States due to national specificities and diverging company law systems. Having regard to the objectives of the internal market as set out in particular in Article
Amendment 40 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 11 (11) Member States that allow multiple-
Amendment 41 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 11 a (new) (11 a) Under that coordinated approach, Member States should provide for fair treatment of the shareholders by introducing a restriction on the design of the multiple-vote share structure which sets a maximum ratio of the number of votes attached to multiple-vote shares to votes attached to shares with the least voting rights, or, without prejudice to Directive (EU) 2017/1132 of the European Parliament and of the Council, a restriction for qualified majority on the requirement on decisions by the general meeting excluding appointment and dismissal of directors as well as operational decisions to be taken by directors and that are submitted to the general meeting for approval requiring that the majority is calculated on the basis of the total number of votes cast and on either the share capital represented at the general meeting or the number of shares represented at the general meeting, or on the basis of the total number of votes cast and on votes cast in each class of shares affected by the decision. For the purposes of this Directive, a class of shares should be considered to be affected by the decision if the decision has a negative impact on the rights of that specific class of shares.
Amendment 42 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 12 (12) Member States should be
Amendment 43 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 12 (12) Member States should
Amendment 44 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 13 (13) The disclosure of accurate, comprehensive and timely information about issuers strengthens investor confidence and allows for informed investment decision-making. Such informed investment decision-making enhances both investor protection and market efficiency. Member States should therefore require companies with multiple- vote share structures to publish detailed information on their share structure and corporate governance system at the moment of the admission to trading, as well as periodically in the annual financial report. Such information should mention whether there are any limitations on the holding of securities, including whether any transfer of securities requires the approval either of the company, or of other holders of securities. It should also mention whether there are any restrictions on voting rights, including limitations of the voting rights of holders of a given percentage or number of votes, deadlines for exercising voting rights, or systems whereby the financial rights attached to securities are separated from the holding of securities. Furthermore, those companies should disclose the identity of holders of multiple- vote shares as well as of the natural persons entitled to exercise voting rights on their behalf and of persons exercising special control rights to provide investors, as members of general public, with transparency on ultimate ownership and de facto influence on the company. This
Amendment 45 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 13 a (new) (13 a) This Directive is without prejudice to the protection of personal data, in particular Regulation (EU) 2016/679 of the European Parliament and of the Council.
Amendment 46 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 15 (15) To assess the implementation and impact of this Directive, in particular any negative impacts on all actors concerned, and to take account of market developments and developments in other areas of Union law or Member States’ experiences with the implementation of this Directive, the Commission should review this Directive
Amendment 47 #
Proposal for a directive Article 1 – paragraph 1 This Directive lays down common rules on multiple-vote share structures, including for loyalty shares, in companies that seek the admission to trading of their shares on a EU based regulated market or an SME growth market in one or more Member States and that do not have shares already admitted to trading on any trading venue.
Amendment 48 #
Proposal for a directive Article 1 – paragraph 1 This Directive lays down common rules on multiple-vote share structures in companies that seek the admission to trading of their shares on a regulated market or on an SME growth market in one or more Member States and that do not have shares already admitted to trading on any trading venue.
Amendment 49 #
Proposal for a directive Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point a (a) ‘company’ means a legal entity incorporated as one of the types of companies listed in Annex I or Annex II to Directive (EU) 2017/1132, which may under national law issue shares and seek admission to trading of the shares on an SME growth market;;
Amendment 50 #
Proposal for a directive Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point a (a) ‘company’ means a legal entity incorporated as one of the types of companies listed in Annex I to Directive (EU) 2017/1132 and Annex II to Directive (EU) 2017/1132 which may under national law seek admission to trading of shares;
Amendment 51 #
Proposal for a directive Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point b (b) ‘multiple-vote shares’ means shares belonging to a distinct and separate class
Amendment 52 #
Proposal for a directive Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point b (b) ‘multiple-vote shares’ means shares belonging to a distinct and separate class and that carry
Amendment 53 #
Proposal for a directive Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point d a (new) (d a) ‘regulated market’ means a regulated market as defined in Article 4(1), point (21), of Directive 2014/65/EU;
Amendment 54 #
Proposal for a directive Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point d b (new) (d b) ‘Multilateral Trading Facility’ or ‘MTF’ means an MTF as defined in Article 4(1), point (22) of Directive 2014/65/EU;
Amendment 55 #
Proposal for a directive Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point f a (new) (f a) ‘EU based regulated market’ means a market defined as per Article 4(1), point (21), of Directive 2014/65/EU;
Amendment 56 #
Proposal for a directive Article 3 Amendment 57 #
Proposal for a directive Article 3 – title Amendment 58 #
Proposal for a directive Article 3 – paragraph 1 Member States
Amendment 59 #
Proposal for a directive Article 4 – paragraph 1 1. Member States shall ensure that companies that do not have shares that are admitted to trading on a trading venue have the right to adopt multiple-vote share structures for the admission to trading of shares on an SME growth market in one or more Member States. Member States shall ensure that the company’s decision to adopt a multiple-vote share structure is taken by the general meeting by at least a qualified majority as specified in national law. Member States shall not make the adoption of such a structure conditional upon the provision of enhanced economic rights for shares without enhanced voting rights. Where there are several classes of shares, the decision to adopt a multiple- vote share structure shall also be subject to a separate vote within each class of shares whose rights are affected. Member States shall not prevent the admission to trading of shares of a company on an SME growth market on the ground that the company has adopted a multiple-vote share structure.
Amendment 60 #
Proposal for a directive Article 4 – paragraph 1 1. Member States shall ensure that companies that do not have shares that are admitted to trading on a trading venue have the right to adopt multiple-vote share structures for the admission to trading of shares on a regulated market or an SME growth market in one or more Member States. Member States shall not prevent the admission to trading of shares of a company on a regulated market or on an SME growth market on the ground that the company has adopted a multiple-vote share structure.
Amendment 61 #
Proposal for a directive Article 4 – paragraph 2 2. The right referred to in paragraph 1 encompasses the right to adopt multiple- vote share structures in time prior to seeking the admission to trading of shares on a regulated market or on an SME growth market.
Amendment 62 #
Proposal for a directive Article 4 – paragraph 2 a (new) 2 a. Member States may make the adoption of a multiple-vote share structure conditional upon an exclusion or substantial limitation of the distribution rights attached to a share that carries higher voting rights.
Amendment 63 #
Proposal for a directive Article 5 – title Safeguards
Amendment 64 #
Proposal for a directive Article 5 – paragraph 1 – introductory part 1. Member States shall ensure
Amendment 65 #
Proposal for a directive Article 5 – paragraph 1 – introductory part 1. Member States shall ensure fair and non-discriminatory treatment of shareholders, as well as adequate protection of the interests of the shareholders who do not hold multiple-vote shares, the workers and of the company through appropriate safeguards. To that effect, Member States shall do all of the following:
Amendment 66 #
Proposal for a directive Article 5 – paragraph 1 – point a – paragraph 2 For the purposes of this point,
Amendment 67 #
Proposal for a directive Article 5 – paragraph 1 – point a a (new) (a a) ensure that, where a company has an employee participation scheme in place, the adoption of a multiple-vote share structure does not reduce the voting and participation rights attached to the employee participation scheme;
Amendment 68 #
Proposal for a directive Article 5 – paragraph 1 – point b – introductory part (b) limit the voting weight of multiple- vote shares on the exercise of other shareholders’ rights
Amendment 69 #
Proposal for a directive Article 5 – paragraph 1 – point b – introductory part (b) limit the
Amendment 70 #
Proposal for a directive Article 5 – paragraph 1 – point b – introductory part (b) limit the voting weight of multiple- vote shares on the exercise of other shareholders’ rights
Amendment 71 #
Proposal for a directive Article 5 – paragraph 1 – point b – point i (i) a maximum weighted voting ratio of 10:1 and a requirement on the maximum percentage of the outstanding share capital that the total amount of multiple-vote shares can represent;
Amendment 72 #
Proposal for a directive Article 5 – paragraph 1 – point b – point i Amendment 73 #
Proposal for a directive Article 5 – paragraph 1 – point b – point i a (new) (i a) a provision to avoid that the enhanced voting rights attached to multiple-vote shares continue to exist after a designated period of time up to 5 years (time-based sunset clause);
Amendment 74 #
Proposal for a directive Article 5 – paragraph 1 – point b – point i a (new) (i a) a maximum weighted voting ratio of the number of votes attached to multiple-vote shares to the votes attached to shares with the least voting rights
Amendment 75 #
Proposal for a directive Article 5 – paragraph 1 – point b – point i b (new) (i b) a provision to avoid that the enhanced voting rights attached to multiple-vote shares are transferred to third parties or continue to exist upon the death, incapacitation or retirement of the original holder of multiple-vote shares (transfer-based sunset clause);
Amendment 76 #
Proposal for a directive Article 5 – paragraph 1 – point b – point i c (new) (i c) a restriction on the exercise of the enhanced voting rights attached to multiple-vote shares for voting on matters related to executive remuneration and dividend policy as well as for the approval of related party transactions;
Amendment 77 #
Proposal for a directive Article 5 – paragraph 1 – point b – point i d (new) (i d) a requirement to ensure that the enhanced voting rights cannot be used to block the adoption or implementation of decisions by the general shareholders’ meeting aiming at preventing, reducing or eliminating adverse impacts on human rights, the environment and the climate related to the company’s operations and those carried out by entities in their value chain;
Amendment 78 #
Proposal for a directive Article 5 – paragraph 1 – point b – point i e (new) (i e) a requirement to ensure that the enhanced voting rights cannot be used to block the adoption or implementation of decisions by the general shareholders’ meeting aiming at improving corporate governance, including decisions to enhance corporate transparency and accountability,
Amendment 79 #
Proposal for a directive Article 5 – paragraph 1 – point b – point i f (new) (i f) a requirement to ensure that enhanced voting rights are not used to block the adoption or implementation of decisions by the general shareholders’ meeting aimed at or contributing to aligning business models and strategies with the transition to a sustainable economy, limiting global warming to 1.5°C in line with the Paris Agreement, or achieving climate neutrality as established in Regulation (EU) 2021/1119 as regards its operations in the Union;
Amendment 80 #
Proposal for a directive Article 5 – paragraph 1 – point b – point ii (ii) a re
Amendment 81 #
Proposal for a directive Article 5 – paragraph 1 – point b – point ii – point 1 (new) 1) a qualified majority, as specified in national law, both of the votes cast and either of the share capital represented at the meeting or of the number of shares represented at the meeting; or
Amendment 82 #
Proposal for a directive Article 5 – paragraph 1 – point b – point ii – point 2 (new) 2) a qualified majority, as specified in national law, of the votes cast, and are subject to a separate vote within each class of shares the rights of which are affected.
Amendment 83 #
Proposal for a directive Article 5 – paragraph 1 a (new) 1 a. Member States shall ensure that employees’ rights to information, consultation and participation are respected in relation to the decision on and use of multiple vote shares, and that these rights are exercised in accordance with existing provisions or practices in force, including the legal framework provided for in Directive 2002/14/EC.
Amendment 84 #
Proposal for a directive Article 5 – paragraph 2 – introductory part 2. Member States may provide for further safeguards to ensure adequate protection
Amendment 85 #
Proposal for a directive Article 5 – paragraph 2 – introductory part 2. Member States may provide for further safeguards to ensure adequate protection of shareholders
Amendment 86 #
Proposal for a directive Article 5 – paragraph 2 – introductory part 2. Member
Amendment 87 #
Proposal for a directive Article 5 – paragraph 2 – point a Amendment 88 #
Proposal for a directive Article 5 – paragraph 2 – point a Amendment 89 #
Proposal for a directive Article 5 – paragraph 2 – point a Amendment 90 #
Proposal for a directive Article 5 – paragraph 2 – point b Amendment 91 #
Proposal for a directive Article 5 – paragraph 2 – point b Amendment 92 #
Proposal for a directive Article 5 – paragraph 2 – point b Amendment 93 #
Proposal for a directive Article 5 – paragraph 2 – point c Amendment 94 #
Proposal for a directive Article 5 – paragraph 2 – point c Amendment 95 #
Proposal for a directive Article 5 – paragraph 2 – point c Amendment 96 #
Proposal for a directive Article 5 – paragraph 2 – point d Amendment 97 #
Proposal for a directive Article 5 – paragraph 2 – point d Amendment 98 #
Proposal for a directive Article 5 – paragraph 2 – point d Amendment 99 #
Proposal for a directive Article 6 – paragraph 1 – point a (a) the structure of their capital, including securities which are not admitted to trading on a regulated market or an SME growth market in a Member State, with an indication of the different classes of shares and, for each class of shares, the rights and obligations attached to that class and the percentage of total share capital and total voting rights that such class represents;
source: 751.808
|
History
(these mark the time of scraping, not the official date of the change)
committees/0/shadows/1/mepref |
237320
|
docs/7/docs/0/url |
Old
/oeil/spdoc.do?i=60648&j=0&l=enNew
https://data.europarl.europa.eu/distribution/doc/SP-2024-394-TA-9-2024-0352_en.docx |
docs/8 |
|
events/12 |
|
procedure/stage_reached |
Old
Awaiting signature of actNew
Procedure completed, awaiting publication in Official Journal |
docs/7/docs/0/url |
Old
/oeil/spdoc.do?i=60648&j=0&l=enNew
https://data.europarl.europa.eu/distribution/doc/SP-2024-394-TA-9-2024-0352_en.docx |
docs/8 |
|
events/12 |
|
procedure/stage_reached |
Old
Awaiting signature of actNew
Procedure completed, awaiting publication in Official Journal |
docs/7/docs/0/url |
Old
/oeil/spdoc.do?i=60648&j=0&l=enNew
https://data.europarl.europa.eu/distribution/doc/SP-2024-394-TA-9-2024-0352_en.docx |
docs/8 |
|
events/12 |
|
procedure/stage_reached |
Old
Awaiting signature of actNew
Procedure completed, awaiting publication in Official Journal |
docs/7/docs/0/url |
Old
/oeil/spdoc.do?i=60648&j=0&l=enNew
https://data.europarl.europa.eu/distribution/doc/SP-2024-394-TA-9-2024-0352_en.docx |
docs/8 |
|
events/12 |
|
procedure/stage_reached |
Old
Awaiting signature of actNew
Procedure completed, awaiting publication in Official Journal |
docs/7/docs/0/url |
Old
/oeil/spdoc.do?i=60648&j=0&l=enNew
https://data.europarl.europa.eu/distribution/doc/SP-2024-394-TA-9-2024-0352_en.docx |
docs/8 |
|
events/12 |
|
procedure/stage_reached |
Old
Awaiting signature of actNew
Procedure completed, awaiting publication in Official Journal |
docs/7/docs/0/url |
Old
/oeil/spdoc.do?i=60648&j=0&l=enNew
https://data.europarl.europa.eu/distribution/doc/SP-2024-394-TA-9-2024-0352_en.docx |
docs/8 |
|
events/12 |
|
procedure/stage_reached |
Old
Awaiting signature of actNew
Procedure completed, awaiting publication in Official Journal |
docs/7/docs/0/url |
Old
/oeil/spdoc.do?i=60648&j=0&l=enNew
https://data.europarl.europa.eu/distribution/doc/SP-2024-394-TA-9-2024-0352_en.docx |
docs/8 |
|
docs/7/docs/0/url |
Old
/oeil/spdoc.do?i=60648&j=0&l=enNew
https://data.europarl.europa.eu/distribution/doc/SP-2024-394-TA-9-2024-0352_en.docx |
docs/8 |
|
docs/7/docs/0/url |
Old
/oeil/spdoc.do?i=60648&j=0&l=enNew
https://data.europarl.europa.eu/distribution/doc/SP-2024-394-TA-9-2024-0352_en.docx |
docs/8 |
|
docs/7/docs/0/url |
Old
/oeil/spdoc.do?i=60648&j=0&l=enNew
https://data.europarl.europa.eu/distribution/doc/SP-2024-394-TA-9-2024-0352_en.docx |
docs/8 |
|
docs/7/docs/0/url |
Old
/oeil/spdoc.do?i=60648&j=0&l=enNew
https://data.europarl.europa.eu/distribution/doc/SP-2024-394-TA-9-2024-0352_en.docx |
docs/8 |
|
docs/7/docs/0/url |
Old
/oeil/spdoc.do?i=60648&j=0&l=enNew
https://data.europarl.europa.eu/distribution/doc/SP-2024-394-TA-9-2024-0352_en.docx |
docs/8 |
|
docs/7/docs/0/url |
Old
/oeil/spdoc.do?i=60648&j=0&l=enNew
https://data.europarl.europa.eu/distribution/doc/SP-2024-394-TA-9-2024-0352_en.docx |
docs/8 |
|
docs/7/docs/0/url |
Old
/oeil/spdoc.do?i=60648&j=0&l=enNew
nulldistribution/doc/SP-2024-394-TA-9-2024-0352_en.docx |
docs/8 |
|
docs/8 |
|
docs/8 |
|
committees/0 |
|
committees/0 |
|
events/11 |
|
procedure/stage_reached |
Old
Awaiting Council's 1st reading positionNew
Awaiting signature of act |
committees/0 |
|
committees/0 |
|
events/11 |
|
procedure/stage_reached |
Old
Awaiting Council's 1st reading positionNew
Awaiting signature of act |
committees/0 |
|
committees/0 |
|
events/11 |
|
procedure/stage_reached |
Old
Awaiting Council's 1st reading positionNew
Awaiting signature of act |
committees/0 |
|
committees/0 |
|
events/11 |
|
procedure/stage_reached |
Old
Awaiting Council's 1st reading positionNew
Awaiting signature of act |
docs/0/docs/0/url |
Old
https://eur-lex.europa.eu/oj/daily-view/L-series/EN/TXT/?uri=OJ:C:2023:065:TOCNew
https://eur-lex.europa.eu/oj/daily-view/L-series/default.html?&ojDate=22020202 |
docs/7 |
|
events/9 |
|
docs/0/docs/0/url |
Old
https://eur-lex.europa.eu/oj/daily-view/L-series/EN/TXT/?uri=OJ:C:2023:065:TOCNew
https://eur-lex.europa.eu/oj/daily-view/L-series/default.html?&ojDate=22020202 |
docs/7 |
|
events/9 |
|
docs/0/docs/0/url |
Old
https://eur-lex.europa.eu/oj/daily-view/L-series/EN/TXT/?uri=OJ:C:2023:065:TOCNew
https://eur-lex.europa.eu/oj/daily-view/L-series/default.html?&ojDate=22020202 |
docs/7 |
|
events/9 |
|
docs/0/docs/0/url |
Old
https://eur-lex.europa.eu/oj/daily-view/L-series/EN/TXT/?uri=OJ:C:2023:065:TOCNew
https://eur-lex.europa.eu/oj/daily-view/L-series/default.html?&ojDate=22020202 |
docs/7 |
|
events/9 |
|
docs/0/docs/0/url |
Old
https://eur-lex.europa.eu/oj/daily-view/L-series/EN/TXT/?uri=OJ:C:2023:065:TOCNew
https://eur-lex.europa.eu/oj/daily-view/L-series/default.html?&ojDate=22020202 |
docs/7 |
|
events/9 |
|
docs/0/docs/0/url |
Old
https://eur-lex.europa.eu/oj/daily-view/L-series/EN/TXT/?uri=OJ:C:2023:065:TOCNew
https://eur-lex.europa.eu/oj/daily-view/L-series/default.html?&ojDate=22020202 |
docs/7 |
|
events/9 |
|
docs/0/docs/0/url |
Old
https://eur-lex.europa.eu/oj/daily-view/L-series/EN/TXT/?uri=OJ:C:2023:065:TOCNew
https://eur-lex.europa.eu/oj/daily-view/L-series/default.html?&ojDate=22020202 |
docs/7 |
|
events/9 |
|
docs/0/docs/0/url |
Old
https://eur-lex.europa.eu/oj/daily-view/L-series/EN/TXT/?uri=OJ:C:2023:065:TOCNew
https://eur-lex.europa.eu/oj/daily-view/L-series/default.html?&ojDate=22020202 |
docs/7 |
|
events/9 |
|
docs/0/docs/0/url |
Old
https://eur-lex.europa.eu/oj/daily-view/L-series/EN/TXT/?uri=OJ:C:2023:065:TOCNew
https://eur-lex.europa.eu/oj/daily-view/L-series/default.html?&ojDate=22020202 |
docs/7 |
|
events/9 |
|
docs/0/docs/0/url |
Old
https://eur-lex.europa.eu/oj/daily-view/L-series/EN/TXT/?uri=OJ:C:2023:065:TOCNew
https://eur-lex.europa.eu/oj/daily-view/L-series/default.html?&ojDate=22020202 |
docs/7 |
|
events/9 |
|
docs/0/docs/0/url |
Old
https://eur-lex.europa.eu/oj/daily-view/L-series/EN/TXT/?uri=OJ:C:2023:065:TOCNew
https://eur-lex.europa.eu/oj/daily-view/L-series/default.html?&ojDate=22020202 |
docs/7 |
|
events/9 |
|
docs/0 |
|
docs/0 |
|
docs/7 |
|
events/9 |
|
docs/0 |
|
docs/0 |
|
docs/7 |
|
events/9 |
|
docs/0 |
|
docs/0 |
|
docs/7 |
|
events/9 |
|
docs/0 |
|
docs/0 |
|
docs/7 |
|
events/9 |
|
docs/7 |
|
events/9 |
|
docs/7 |
|
events/9 |
|
docs/7 |
|
events/9 |
|
docs/7 |
|
events/9 |
|
docs/7 |
|
events/9 |
|
docs/7 |
|
events/9 |
|
docs/7 |
|
events/9 |
|
docs/7 |
|
events/9 |
|
docs/7 |
|
events/9 |
|
docs/7 |
|
events/9 |
|
docs/7 |
|
events/9 |
|
events/9 |
|
events/9 |
|
events/9 |
|
events/9 |
|
events/9 |
|
events/9 |
|
events/9 |
|
events/9 |
|
events/9 |
|
events/9 |
|
events/9 |
|
events/9 |
|
events/9 |
|
events/9 |
|
procedure/Other legal basis |
Old
Rules of Procedure EP 159New
Rules of Procedure EP 165 |
procedure/legal_basis/0 |
Rules of Procedure EP 57_o
|
procedure/legal_basis/0 |
Rules of Procedure EP 57
|
procedure/Other legal basis |
Old
Rules of Procedure EP 159New
Rules of Procedure EP 165 |
procedure/legal_basis/0 |
Rules of Procedure EP 57_o
|
procedure/legal_basis/0 |
Rules of Procedure EP 57
|
procedure/Other legal basis |
Old
Rules of Procedure EP 159New
Rules of Procedure EP 165 |
procedure/legal_basis/0 |
Rules of Procedure EP 57_o
|
procedure/legal_basis/0 |
Rules of Procedure EP 57
|
procedure/Other legal basis |
Old
Rules of Procedure EP 159New
Rules of Procedure EP 165 |
procedure/legal_basis/0 |
Rules of Procedure EP 57_o
|
procedure/legal_basis/0 |
Rules of Procedure EP 57
|
procedure/Other legal basis |
Old
Rules of Procedure EP 159New
Rules of Procedure EP 165 |
procedure/legal_basis/0 |
Rules of Procedure EP 57_o
|
procedure/legal_basis/0 |
Rules of Procedure EP 57
|
procedure/Other legal basis |
Old
Rules of Procedure EP 159New
Rules of Procedure EP 165 |
procedure/legal_basis/0 |
Rules of Procedure EP 57_o
|
procedure/legal_basis/0 |
Rules of Procedure EP 57
|
docs/7 |
|
events/9/summary |
|
docs/7 |
|
events/9/summary |
|
docs/7 |
|
events/9/summary |
|
docs/7 |
|
events/9/summary |
|
docs/7 |
|
events/9/summary |
|
docs/7 |
|
events/9/summary |
|
docs/7 |
|
events/9/summary |
|
docs/7 |
|
events/9/summary |
|
docs/7 |
|
events/9/summary |
|
docs/7 |
|
events/9 |
|
forecasts |
|
procedure/stage_reached |
Old
Awaiting Parliament's position in 1st readingNew
Awaiting Council's 1st reading position |
docs/7 |
|
events/9 |
|
forecasts |
|
procedure/stage_reached |
Old
Awaiting Parliament's position in 1st readingNew
Awaiting Council's 1st reading position |
forecasts/0/title |
Old
Vote in plenary scheduledNew
Vote scheduled |
forecasts/0 |
|
forecasts/0 |
|
events/9 |
|
docs/6 |
|
events/8/docs |
|
events/9/docs |
|
events/8 |
|
events/9 |
|
docs/5 |
|
forecasts |
|
links |
|
docs/5 |
|
events/5/summary |
|
events/7 |
|
events/6 |
|
docs/0/docs/0/url |
Old
https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/?uri=OJ:C:2023:065:TOCNew
https://eur-lex.europa.eu/oj/daily-view/L-series/EN/TXT/?uri=OJ:C:2023:065:TOC |
docs/6/date |
Old
2023-03-22T00:00:00New
2023-03-23T00:00:00 |
docs/5 |
|
events/5 |
|
procedure/stage_reached |
Old
Awaiting committee decisionNew
Awaiting Parliament's position in 1st reading |
events/3 |
|
events/4 |
|
forecasts |
|
procedure/Other legal basis |
Rules of Procedure EP 159
|
forecasts/0/date |
Old
2023-10-23T00:00:00New
2023-10-24T00:00:00 |
forecasts/0/date |
Old
2023-10-24T00:00:00New
2023-10-23T00:00:00 |
docs/4 |
|
docs/3 |
|
committees/1 |
|
committees/1/opinion |
False
|
committees/2 |
|
committees/0/shadows/5 |
|
docs/3/date |
Old
2023-03-23T00:00:00New
2023-03-22T00:00:00 |
docs/2 |
|
docs/2 |
|
docs/3 |
|
docs/3/date |
Old
2023-03-22T00:00:00New
2023-03-23T00:00:00 |
events/2 |
|
procedure/legal_basis/0 |
Rules of Procedure EP 57
|
commission |
|
committees/1 |
|
committees/1/rapporteur |
|
committees/2 |
|
forecasts |
|
docs/1 |
|
procedure/title |
Old
Multiple-vote share structures in companies that seek the admission to trading of their shares on an SME growth marketNew
Multiple-vote share structures |
docs/1 |
|
committees/0/shadows/4 |
|
committees/0/rapporteur |
|
committees/1 |
Old
New
|
committees/2 |
Old
New
|
docs/0 |
|
docs/0 |
|
procedure/Legislative priorities/0/title |
Old
Joint Declaration on EU legislative priorities for 2023 and 2024New
Joint Declaration 2023-24 |
committees/0/shadows/1 |
|
procedure/Legislative priorities |
|
committees/0/shadows/1 |
|
committees/0/shadows |
|
events/1 |
|
procedure/dossier_of_the_committee |
|
procedure/stage_reached |
Old
Preparatory phase in ParliamentNew
Awaiting committee decision |
events/0/summary |
|
docs/0/summary |
|