Progress: Awaiting Parliament's position in 1st reading
Role | Committee | Rapporteur | Shadows |
---|---|---|---|
Lead | ENVI |
SPYRAKI Maria (![]() |
ALBUQUERQUE João (![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Committee Opinion | IMCO | ||
Committee Opinion | ITRE |
Lead committee dossier:
Legal Basis:
TFEU 114-p1
Legal Basis:
TFEU 114-p1Subjects
Events
The European Parliament adopted by 519 votes to 99, with 8 abstentions, amendments to the proposal for a regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council amending Regulation (EC) No 1272/2008 of the European Parliament and of the Council on classification, labelling and packaging of substances and mixtures.
The matter was referred back to the committee responsible for interinstitutional negotiations.
Subject
The purpose of the regulation is to ensure a high level of protection for human health and the environment, including the promotion of alternative methods for assessing the hazards of substances and mixtures.
Hazardous substances and mixtures and specification of hazard classes
Members specified that gender differences with regard to the susceptibility to chemicals will be taken into consideration, where relevant.
For the evaluation of substances containing more than one constituent in relation to the ‘germ cell mutagenicity’, ‘carcinogenicity’, ‘reproductive toxicity’, ‘ endocrine disruption for human health’ and ‘endocrine disruption for the environment’ hazard classes, the manufacturer, importer or downstream user should use the relevant available information for each of the known individual constituents, impurities and additives in the substance.
Identification and examination of available information on mixtures
An amendment specifies that where the available test data on the mixture itself demonstrate a lack of biodegradation, persistency, mobility and bioaccumulation properties that have not been identified from the relevant available information on the individual substance, such data should also be taken into account for the purpose of evaluating the mixture.
Product identifiers
The product identifier of a mixture should include the identity of all substances in the mixture that contribute to the classification of the mixture as regards acute toxicity, skin corrosion or serious eye damage, germ cell mutagenicity, carcinogenicity, reproductive toxicity, endocrine disruption for human health, endocrine disruption for the environment, respiratory or skin sensitisation, specific target organ toxicity (STOT) or aspiration hazard, persistent, bioaccumulative and toxic (PBT), very persistent, very bioaccumulative (vPvB), persistent, mobile and toxic (PMT), very persistent, very mobile (vPvM) properties.
General rules for the application of labels
Labels should be firmly affixed to one or more surfaces of the packaging immediately containing the substance or mixture and will be readable horizontally when the package is set down normally the label may also be presented in a form of a fold out label . Where the label elements are provided by means of a fold-out label, the front page should contain at least certain information provided in all official languages of the Member State where the product is put on the market along with a reference to the additional information provided on the inside page or pages.
Procedure for harmonising the classification and labelling of substances
The Commission may ask the Agency or the European Food Safety Authority to prepare a proposal for harmonised classification and labelling of a substance or a group of substances . The Agency and the Authority may, on their own initiative, provide scientific advice to the Commission and Member States on substances or a group of substances where a harmonised classification could be necessary to protect human and animal health and the environment.
Whenever considered scientifically justified and possible by a competent authority or the Commission, proposals for harmonised classification and labelling should prioritise groups of substances rather than individual substances . In the event of a proposal for harmonised classification and labelling of a group of substances, those substances should be grouped together based on clear scientific criteria, including structural similarity and similar evidence-based hazard profiles.
Right to request action by the competent authorities and the Commission
Any natural or legal person, individually or in association, would be entitled to present substantiated evidence to the competent authorities or the Commission on the hazardous properties of a substance or mixture, or of several substances in several mixtures, indicating that these properties may not have been sufficiently taken into account in the classification or labelling process. Where the evaluation indicates that the substance does not meet the criteria for classification in any of the hazard classes referred to in the Regulation, the competent authority or the Commission will initiate a harmonised classification and labelling process.
Access to justic e
Natural or legal persons who have submitted a substantiated report of concern should have access to an administrative or judicial procedure to review the procedural and substantive legality of decisions, acts or omissions of the relevant competent authority under the Regulation.
Advertising
Any advertisement for a mixture classified as hazardous should indicate the hazard pictogram, the signal word, the hazard class and the hazard statements. Any advertisement for sale of mixtures to the general public should, in addition, indicate “ always read and follow the information on the product label ”.
The use of environmental claims should be prohibited for substances and mixtures which are classified as hazardous due to their germ cell mutagenic, carcinogenic, toxic to reproduction, endocrine disruption for human health or the environment, persistent, bioaccumulative and toxic (PBT), very persistent, very bioaccumulative (vPvB), persistent, mobile and toxic (PMT), or very persistent, very mobile (vPvM) properties.
Adaptation to technical progress
The Commission should promote and evaluate the development of alternative test methods for classification of substances and mixtures, including new approach methods and in particular non-animal test methods , at least every three years, and adopt delegated acts to update Annex I to this Regulation.
PURPOSE: to amend Regulation (EC) No 1272/2008 on the classification, labelling and packaging of substances and mixtures to improve the single market for chemicals.
PROPOSED ACT: Regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council.
ROLE OF THE EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT: the European Parliament decides in accordance with the ordinary legislative procedure and on an equal footing with the Council.
BACKGROUND: the EU has overall been successful in creating an efficient single market for chemicals. However, some weaknesses or gaps in Regulation (EC) No 1272/2008 on the classification, labelling and packaging of substances and mixtures (‘CLP Regulation’) prevent consumers, companies, and authorities from fully benefiting from protection against the dangers posed by hazardous chemicals.
In order to keep pace with globalisation, technological development and new means of sale, such as online sales, it is necessary to adapt Regulation (EC) No 1272/2008 of the European Parliament and of the Council.
As part of the CLP Regulation revision package, a delegated act will add definitions and scientific and technical criteria to enable substances and mixtures that have endocrine disrupting (‘ED’), persistent, bioaccumulative and toxic (‘PBT’), very persistent and very bioaccumulative (‘vPvB’), persistent, mobile and toxic (‘PMT’), or very persistent and very mobile (‘vPvM’) properties to be classified into established hazard classes.
CONTENT: the Commission proposes to adapt Regulation (EC) No 1272/2008 on the classification, labelling and packaging (CLP) of substances and mixtures as follows:
Comprehensive identification and classification of chemical hazards
The first set of amendments aim at ensuring the comprehensive identification and classification of chemical hazards. They aim to:
- boost the efficiency and effectiveness of the harmonised classification process. The proposal states that harmonised classification for the new hazard classes to be introduced by delegated act will be prioritised . This includes the development of prioritisation criteria to guide the submission of harmonised classification and labelling proposals;
- boost the development of harmonised classifications which enables the Commission to initiate and fund more harmonised classification and labelling dossiers, with the possibility to mandate the Agency or the European Food Safety Authority (the Authority) to develop a dossier;
- improve companies’ classification of substances. Notifiers should be required to provide reasons for divergence from the most severe classification. To address divergences between more recent and obsolete classifications, notifiers should be required to update their notifications;
- improve companies’ classification of substances by introducing three measures to strengthen incentives and provisions for companies to appropriately classify substances. One of them involves making available the reasons for diverging notified classifications in the Agency’s inventory, another one in making the names of notifiers public, while the last measure requires updates of notifications of classifications within a certain early stage deadline.
Improving hazard communication
The proposal lays down measures to:
- strengthen minimum requirements for hazard communication by introducing obligatory formatting rules, such as minimum font size and colour, to increase the readability of labels. The broader use of fold-out labels should be allowed;
- establish a specific framework to ensure that the sale of chemicals in refillable containers does not lead to an increased risk. This sales method would be limited to chemicals with less serious hazards;
- allow for the voluntary digital labelling of chemicals. The proposal provides that some information can be provided only on the digital label and no longer needs to be indicated on the on-pack label. As a rule, only information that is not instrumental in the protection of health and the environment should be moved to the digital label without it being on the on-pack label. Simplified labelling rules will also lead to a highly positive cost-benefit ratio for companies.
- introduce additional derogations for chemicals sold to consumers in bulk, such as fuel, and in very small packaging, such as various writing instruments.
Addressing legal gaps and ambiguities of CLP provisions
Measures to address legal gaps and ambiguities include:
- provisions for distance sales, including online sales , and clear responsibilities for all relevant actors. All online sales will require a supplier to ensure that a substance or a mixture placed on the EU market through distance sales meets the requirements of CLP, in particular on classification, labelling and packaging;
- provisions for notifications to poison centres will be clarified. All relevant actors, including distributors placing chemicals on the market across borders or rebranding/relabelling mixtures, will have to make sure that they notify poison centres across the EU about the relevant information, where necessary.
The Commission estimated that the set of measures enhancing the effectiveness of the Regulation enable direct and indirect savings, of EUR 57.5 million per year for the next 10 years. Amongst the quantified savings, the simplification of the labelling rules would generate more than EUR 39.5 million of savings per year for the chemical industry.
Documents
- Decision by Parliament, 1st reading: T9-0340/2023
- Debate in Parliament: Debate in Parliament
- Committee report tabled for plenary, 1st reading/single reading: A9-0271/2023
- Committee report tabled for plenary, 1st reading: A9-0271/2023
- Amendments tabled in committee: PE749.004
- Amendments tabled in committee: PE749.005
- Economic and Social Committee: opinion, report: CES0182/2023
- Contribution: COM(2022)0748
- Committee draft report: PE745.493
- Document attached to the procedure: SEC(2022)0452
- Document attached to the procedure: EUR-Lex
- Document attached to the procedure: SWD(2022)0434
- Document attached to the procedure: SWD(2022)0435
- Document attached to the procedure: EUR-Lex
- Document attached to the procedure: SWD(2022)0436
- Legislative proposal published: COM(2022)0748
- Legislative proposal published: EUR-Lex
- Document attached to the procedure: SEC(2022)0452
- Document attached to the procedure: EUR-Lex SWD(2022)0434
- Document attached to the procedure: SWD(2022)0435
- Document attached to the procedure: EUR-Lex SWD(2022)0436
- Committee draft report: PE745.493
- Economic and Social Committee: opinion, report: CES0182/2023
- Amendments tabled in committee: PE749.004
- Amendments tabled in committee: PE749.005
- Committee report tabled for plenary, 1st reading/single reading: A9-0271/2023
- Contribution: COM(2022)0748
Activities
- Maria SPYRAKI
Plenary Speeches (3)
- Marc ANGEL
Plenary Speeches (2)
- Anja HAZEKAMP
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Danilo Oscar LANCINI
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Stanislav POLČÁK
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Dennis RADTKE
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Michaela ŠOJDROVÁ
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Jutta PAULUS
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Irène TOLLERET
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Radan KANEV
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Pietro FIOCCHI
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Atidzhe ALIEVA-VELI
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Tsvetelina PENKOVA
Plenary Speeches (1)
- João ALBUQUERQUE
Plenary Speeches (1)
Votes
Classification, étiquetage et emballage des substances et des mélanges - Classification, labelling and packaging of substances and mixtures - Einstufung, Kennzeichnung und Verpackung von Stoffen und Gemischen - A9-0271/2023 - Maria Spyraki - Article premier, alinéa 1, point 4, Règlement (CE) nº 1272/2008, Article 5, § 3 - Am 111S #
A9-0271/2023 - Maria Spyraki - Article premier, alinéa 1, point 4, Règlement (CE) nº 1272/2008 Article 5, § 3 - Am 115 #
IT | ES | BG | HU | PL | RO | LU | SI | MT | CZ | LV | HR | CY | SK | SE | EE | LT | FI | FR | IE | DK | BE | AT | EL | NL | PT | DE | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Total |
66
|
51
|
12
|
19
|
43
|
29
|
5
|
8
|
5
|
20
|
6
|
11
|
6
|
11
|
21
|
7
|
10
|
14
|
67
|
12
|
13
|
21
|
15
|
16
|
27
|
20
|
82
|
|
![]() |
59
|
Italy ECRFor (9) |
3
|
1
|
Poland ECRFor (24)Adam BIELAN, Andżelika Anna MOŻDŻANOWSKA, Anna FOTYGA, Anna ZALEWSKA, Beata KEMPA, Beata MAZUREK, Beata SZYDŁO, Bogdan RZOŃCA, Elżbieta KRUK, Elżbieta RAFALSKA, Grzegorz TOBISZOWSKI, Izabela-Helena KLOC, Jacek SARYUSZ-WOLSKI, Jadwiga WIŚNIEWSKA, Joachim Stanisław BRUDZIŃSKI, Joanna KOPCIŃSKA, Kosma ZŁOTOWSKI, Krzysztof JURGIEL, Patryk JAKI, Ryszard CZARNECKI, Tomasz Piotr PORĘBA, Witold Jan WASZCZYKOWSKI, Zbigniew KUŹMIUK, Zdzisław KRASNODĘBSKI
|
1
|
4
|
1
|
1
|
1
|
3
|
2
|
3
|
Netherlands ECRFor (3)Against (1)Abstain (1) |
1
|
|||||||||||||
![]() |
54
|
Italy IDFor (21)Alessandra BASSO, Alessandro PANZA, Angelo CIOCCA, Anna BONFRISCO, Annalisa TARDINO, Danilo Oscar LANCINI, Elena LIZZI, Gianantonio DA RE, Gianna GANCIA, Isabella TOVAGLIERI, Marco CAMPOMENOSI, Marco ZANNI, Maria Veronica ROSSI, Massimo CASANOVA, Matteo ADINOLFI, Matteo GAZZINI, Paola GHIDONI, Paolo BORCHIA, Rosanna CONTE, Silvia SARDONE, Susanna CECCARDI
|
2
|
1
|
France IDFor (17) |
1
|
3
|
3
|
Germany ID |
|||||||||||||||||||
![]() |
39
|
Italy NIFor (6)Abstain (2) |
2
|
Hungary NIFor (12)Against (1) |
1
|
2
|
1
|
1
|
3
|
1
|
Greece NI |
1
|
2
|
|||||||||||||||
![]() |
33
|
4
|
1
|
2
|
1
|
1
|
France The LeftFor (1)Against (4) |
3
|
1
|
1
|
Greece The LeftAgainst (4) |
1
|
4
|
Germany The LeftAgainst (5) |
||||||||||||||
![]() |
89
|
2
|
3
|
1
|
1
|
Romania RenewAgainst (7) |
1
|
2
|
4
|
1
|
1
|
3
|
3
|
3
|
1
|
3
|
France RenewAgainst (19)
Bernard GUETTA,
Catherine AMALRIC,
Catherine CHABAUD,
Christophe GRUDLER,
Dominique RIQUET,
Fabienne KELLER,
Gilles BOYER,
Ilana CICUREL,
Jérémy DECERLE,
Laurence FARRENG,
Marie-Pierre VEDRENNE,
Max ORVILLE,
Nathalie LOISEAU,
Pascal CANFIN,
Pierre KARLESKIND,
Sandro GOZI,
Stéphane BIJOUX,
Stéphane SÉJOURNÉ,
Valérie HAYER
|
2
|
Denmark RenewAgainst (5) |
4
|
1
|
Netherlands RenewAgainst (7) |
Germany RenewAgainst (6) |
|||||
![]() |
123
|
Italy S&DFor (1)Against (4) |
Spain S&DFor (13)Against (5) |
3
|
4
|
Poland S&DAgainst (6) |
Romania S&DFor (8) |
1
|
2
|
Malta S&DFor (1)Against (2)Abstain (1) |
1
|
1
|
3
|
2
|
2
|
5
|
2
|
2
|
2
|
France S&DAgainst (6) |
3
|
2
|
3
|
1
|
5
|
Portugal S&DAgainst (8) |
Germany S&DAgainst (14) |
|
![]() |
155
|
Italy PPEAgainst (3) |
Bulgaria PPE |
1
|
Romania PPEFor (6)Against (6) |
2
|
4
|
1
|
Czechia PPEAgainst (5) |
2
|
4
|
2
|
4
|
Sweden PPE |
1
|
4
|
3
|
France PPEFor (7) |
5
|
1
|
4
|
Austria PPEAgainst (6) |
Greece PPEAgainst (6) |
Netherlands PPEAgainst (5) |
Portugal PPEAgainst (7) |
Germany PPEFor (1)Against (27)
Axel VOSS,
Christian DOLESCHAL,
Christian EHLER,
Christine SCHNEIDER,
Daniel CASPARY,
David McALLISTER,
Dennis RADTKE,
Helmut GEUKING,
Hildegard BENTELE,
Jens GIESEKE,
Karolin BRAUNSBERGER-REINHOLD,
Lena DÜPONT,
Manfred WEBER,
Marion WALSMANN,
Markus FERBER,
Markus PIEPER,
Marlene MORTLER,
Michael GAHLER,
Monika HOHLMEIER,
Norbert LINS,
Peter JAHR,
Peter LIESE,
Rainer WIELAND,
Ralf SEEKATZ,
Sabine VERHEYEN,
Stefan BERGER,
Sven SIMON
|
||
![]() |
65
|
3
|
4
|
1
|
1
|
1
|
3
|
3
|
2
|
3
|
France Verts/ALEAgainst (10) |
2
|
2
|
3
|
3
|
3
|
1
|
Germany Verts/ALEAgainst (20)
Alexandra GEESE,
Anna CAVAZZINI,
Anna DEPARNAY-GRUNENBERG,
Damian BOESELAGER,
Daniel FREUND,
Erik MARQUARDT,
Hannah NEUMANN,
Jutta PAULUS,
Malte GALLÉE,
Manuela RIPA,
Martin HÄUSLING,
Michael BLOSS,
Nico SEMSROTT,
Patrick BREYER,
Pierrette HERZBERGER-FOFANA,
Rasmus ANDRESEN,
Romeo FRANZ,
Sergey LAGODINSKY,
Ska KELLER,
Viola VON CRAMON-TAUBADEL
|