BETA


2022/2013(INI) AccessibleEU Centre in support of accessibility policies in the EU internal market

Progress: Procedure completed

RoleCommitteeRapporteurShadows
Lead IMCO LANGENSIEPEN Katrin (icon: Verts/ALE Verts/ALE) DE MEO Salvatore (icon: EPP EPP), PENKOVA Tsvetelina (icon: S&D S&D), LØKKEGAARD Morten (icon: Renew Renew), BIELAN Adam (icon: ECR ECR), PELLETIER Anne-Sophie (icon: GUE/NGL GUE/NGL)
Lead committee dossier:
Legal Basis:
RoP 54

Events

2022/12/07
   EC - Commission response to text adopted in plenary
Documents
2022/10/04
   EP - Results of vote in Parliament
2022/10/04
   EP - Debate in Parliament
2022/10/04
   EP - Decision by Parliament
Details

The European Parliament adopted by 611 votes to 3, with 9 abstentions, a resolution on the AccessibleEU Centre in support of accessibility policies in the EU internal market.

Parliament recalled that accessibility is an essential precondition for persons with disabilities to fully enjoy human rights and fundamental freedoms. It is one of the general principles of the Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities, which is legally binding on the EU and its Member States.

More than 87 million people in the EU have some form of disability. Member States must ensure that the principle of accessibility is mainstreamed at all levels, not only in buildings, spaces and public transport, but also in health and education, and to increase the mobility and integration of people with disabilities.

Improving the implementation of legislation

Parliament welcomed the Commission's communication ‘Union of Equality: European Strategy for the Rights of Persons with Disabilities 2021-2030’ and the Commission's initiative, announced in the strategy, to create the AccessibleEU Centre (the Centre).

The EU has put in place a comprehensive legal framework for accessibility in the single market, which includes, inter alia , the European Accessibility Act, the Web Accessibility Directive, the Audiovisual Media Services Directive and the Electronic Communications Directive, as well as technical specifications for stations and vehicles. However, Members regretted that the implementation of this legislation varies considerably from one Member State to another and is not satisfactory to date, mainly due to the lack of qualified accessibility experts .

The resolution therefore stressed the need to improve overall knowledge , as well as practical and theoretical expertise, of accessibility policies among public administrations, economic operators and society in general. In this context, the Centre should be an important resource for providing knowledge and support to Member States during the implementation phase.

Members called on the Commission to ensure that the Centre is provided with the necessary funding and staffing for its establishment and operation and on Member States to ensure the necessary resources for the implementation and enforcement of accessibility policies, including through the use of EU funds.

Structure

Parliament called on the Commission to establish a secretariat and a forum to steer and direct the work of the Centre. It considered it necessary to have a balanced participation in the forum of relevant stakeholders from the private and public sectors and of right-holders with relevant experience in accessibility. The participation of organisations representing people with disabilities should be guaranteed as an essential part of the Centre's work.

Members believe that sub-groups of subject matter experts are needed for certain areas, such as the built environment, public procurement, digital accessibility, media and culture, and assistive technologies. These groups should cooperate closely with the Centre, Member States, people with disabilities and organisations representing people with disabilities.

Member States should establish national accessibility hubs , including contact points, and mirror groups of specialists who will work closely with the Centre to ensure the implementation, monitoring and enforcement of accessibility legislation and to facilitate exchange and coordination between relevant stakeholders and right-holders.

Mandate

Members considered that the Centre should function as a hub for exchange , providing regular support and expertise on accessibility policies and technical requirements to relevant EU institutions and bodies, as well as to Member States when implementing EU law.

The Centre should in particular:

- establish and coordinate a cooperation framework that would bring together the relevant national and Union bodies with all user groups, to support harmonised implementation and enforcement across the EU, provide guidance and training, and to inspire policy developments and innovation at national and EU level, including through the identification and sharing of best practices across sectors;

- encourage collaboration between relevant bodies and organisations with highly innovative stakeholders to promote the development of assistive technologies , and provide advice to the relevant EU institutions and bodies and its Member States on their internal accessibility policies and practices;

- identify and assist in addressing gaps and inconsistencies in existing legislation, to make policy recommendations for the updating and development of accessibility legislation, mainstreaming accessibility into all relevant policies under the responsibility of different Commission Directorates-General;

- generate knowledge on accessibility through research and studies and make it available to both the Commission and the Member States, and collect specialised, comparable and fully accessible information and data, including feedback on the implementation of accessibility legislation;

- provide the Commission and the Member States, stakeholders and right holders with knowledge and support for the implementation, monitoring and enforcement of accessibility policies , including through training and guidance material in all official EU languages and in accessible, understandable and easy-to-read language;

- support Member States in developing specific educational programmes on accessibility issues and provide training to professionals, EU and national officials, as well as relevant stakeholders and right-holders, in order to raise awareness of these issues.

- help overcome inconsistencies between the UN Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities and EU policies, and to help Member States achieve the primary objective of increasing the employment rate of people with disabilities.

Standardisation system

Members regretted that the standardisation system does not sufficiently allow people with disabilities and their representative organisations to participate on an equal footing with other stakeholders in the activities of European and national standardisation bodies when they develop accessibility standards. They therefore called for a better representation in the standardisation system and a balanced representation among the appointed experts, to ensure that EU accessibility legislation and standards are fair.

Documents
2022/07/19
   EP - Committee report tabled for plenary
Details

The Committee on the Internal Market and Consumer Protection adopted an own-initiative report by Katrin LANGENSIEPEN (Greens/EFA, DE) on AccessibleEU Centre in support of accessibility policies in the EU internal market.

The report welcomed the Commission's communication ‘Union of Equality: European Strategy for the Rights of Persons with Disabilities 2021-2030’ and the Commission's initiative, announced in the strategy, to create the AccessibleEU Centre (the Centre).

Members argued that greater accessibility outcomes in society can only be achieved if the Centre adopts the holistic approach of ‘ universal design ’, particularly with regard to the physical environment, transport, information, communication and services, but also in public procurement and tendering.

Insufficient implementation

In recent years, the European Union has approved several pieces of legislation and technical standards that have created a new accessibility ecosystem, such as the European Accessibility Act, the Web Accessibility Directive, the Audiovisual Media Services Directive and the Electronic Communications Directive, as well as technical specifications for railway stations and vehicles. In addition, accessibility requirements must be considered when allocating EU funds and awarding public contracts.

However, the implementation of this essential body of legislation at national level has not been satisfactory to date, mainly due to the lack of qualified accessibility specialists.

The report stressed the need to improve the overall knowledge, as well as practical and theoretical specialist knowledge , of accessibility policies within public administrations, economic operators and society in general, in order to help develop relevant, sustainable and affordable solutions in each Member State, and thus improve the implementation of current and future accessibility requirements.

Members called on the Commission to ensure that the Centre is provided with the necessary funding and staffing for its establishment and operation, and on Member States to guarantee the necessary resources for the implementation and enforcement of accessibility policies, including through EU funds.

Structure

The report called on the Commission to establish a secretariat and a forum to steer and direct the work of the Centre. They considered it necessary to have a balanced participation in the forum of relevant stakeholders from the private and public sectors and of right-holders with relevant experience in accessibility. The participation of organisations representing people with disabilities should be guaranteed as an essential part of the Centre's work.

Members believe that sub-groups of subject matter experts are needed for certain areas, such as the built environment, public procurement, digital accessibility, media and culture, and assistive technologies. These groups should cooperate closely with the Centre, Member States, people with disabilities and organisations representing people with disabilities.

Member States should establish national accessibility hubs , including contact points, and mirror groups of specialists who will work closely with the Centre to ensure the implementation, monitoring and enforcement of accessibility legislation and to facilitate exchange and coordination between relevant stakeholders and right-holders.

Mandate

Members considered that the Centre should function as a hub for exchange , providing regular support and expertise on accessibility policies and technical requirements to relevant EU institutions and bodies, as well as to Member States when implementing EU law.

The Centre should in particular:

- establish and coordinate a cooperation framework that would bring together the relevant national and Union bodies with all user groups, to support harmonised implementation and enforcement across the EU, provide guidance and training, and to inspire policy developments and innovation at national and EU level, including through the identification and sharing of best practices across sectors, as well as through the creation of tools aiming to facilitate the implementation of Union law;

- encourage collaboration between relevant bodies and organisations with highly innovative stakeholders to promote the development of assistive technologies, and provide advice to the relevant EU institutions and bodies and its Member States on their internal accessibility policies and practices;

- generate knowledge on accessibility through research and studies and make it available to both the Commission and the Member States, and collect specialised, comparable and fully accessible information and data, including feedback on the implementation of accessibility legislation;

- play a key role in providing the Commission and the Member States, stakeholders and right holders with knowledge and support for the implementation, monitoring and enforcement of accessibility policies , including through training and guidance material in all official EU languages and in accessible, understandable and easy-to-read language;

- support Member States in developing specific educational programmes on accessibility issues and provide training to professionals, EU and national officials, as well as relevant stakeholders and right-holders, in order to raise awareness of these issues.

Members regretted that the standardisation system does not sufficiently allow people with disabilities and their representative organisations to participate on an equal footing with other stakeholders in the activities of European and national standardisation bodies when they develop accessibility standards. They therefore called for a better representation in the standardisation system and a balanced representation among the appointed experts, to ensure that EU accessibility legislation and standards are fair.

Documents
2022/07/12
   EP - Vote in committee
2022/05/02
   EP - Amendments tabled in committee
Documents
2022/03/24
   EP - Committee draft report
Documents
2022/02/17
   EP - Committee referral announced in Parliament
2022/02/01
   EP - LANGENSIEPEN Katrin (Verts/ALE) appointed as rapporteur in IMCO

Documents

Activities

Votes

Centre AccessibleEU à l’appui des politiques d’accessibilité dans le marché intérieur de l’Union - AccessibleEU Centre in support of accessibility policies in the EU internal market - Zentrum „AccessibleEU“ zur Unterstützung der Strategien für Barrierefreiheit im Binnenmarkt der EU - A9-0209/2022 - Katrin Langensiepen - Proposition de résolution #

2022/10/04 Outcome: +: 611, 0: 9, -: 3
DE FR IT ES PL RO NL BE CZ PT EL SE AT HU DK IE FI BG LT HR SK SI LV EE CY MT LU
Total
86
74
65
49
48
29
25
20
20
19
19
19
17
15
12
12
14
11
11
11
12
7
6
6
6
5
5
icon: PPE PPE
161

Hungary PPE

1

Denmark PPE

For (1)

1

Latvia PPE

2

Estonia PPE

For (1)

1
2

Malta PPE

For (1)

1

Luxembourg PPE

2
icon: S&D S&D
127

Czechia S&D

For (1)

1

Greece S&D

2

Bulgaria S&D

2

Lithuania S&D

2

Slovakia S&D

For (1)

1

Slovenia S&D

For (1)

1

Latvia S&D

2

Estonia S&D

2

Cyprus S&D

2

Luxembourg S&D

For (1)

1
icon: Renew Renew
90

Italy Renew

2

Poland Renew

1

Greece Renew

1

Sweden Renew

2

Austria Renew

For (1)

1

Ireland Renew

For (1)

1

Finland Renew

3

Bulgaria Renew

2

Lithuania Renew

1

Croatia Renew

For (1)

1

Slovenia Renew

2

Estonia Renew

2

Luxembourg Renew

For (1)

1
icon: Verts/ALE Verts/ALE
66

Italy Verts/ALE

3

Spain Verts/ALE

3

Poland Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Netherlands Verts/ALE

3

Belgium Verts/ALE

3

Czechia Verts/ALE

3

Portugal Verts/ALE

1

Sweden Verts/ALE

3

Austria Verts/ALE

3

Denmark Verts/ALE

2

Ireland Verts/ALE

2

Finland Verts/ALE

3

Lithuania Verts/ALE

2

Luxembourg Verts/ALE

For (1)

1
icon: ID ID
54

Czechia ID

For (1)

Abstain (1)

2
3

Denmark ID

For (1)

1

Finland ID

2

Estonia ID

For (1)

1
icon: ECR ECR
56

Germany ECR

1

Romania ECR

Abstain (1)

1

Netherlands ECR

Against (1)

Abstain (1)

3

Greece ECR

1

Sweden ECR

For (1)

Against (1)

2

Bulgaria ECR

2

Lithuania ECR

1

Croatia ECR

1

Slovakia ECR

Abstain (1)

1

Latvia ECR

For (1)

1
icon: The Left The Left
34

Netherlands The Left

For (1)

1

Belgium The Left

For (1)

1

Czechia The Left

1

Portugal The Left

2

Sweden The Left

For (1)

1

Finland The Left

For (1)

1

Cyprus The Left

2
icon: NI NI
35

France NI

2

Lithuania NI

1

Croatia NI

Abstain (1)

2

Slovakia NI

For (1)

Against (1)

2

Latvia NI

1
AmendmentsDossier
89 2022/2013(INI)
2022/05/02 IMCO 89 amendments...
source: 731.598

History

(these mark the time of scraping, not the official date of the change)

docs/2
date
2022-12-07T00:00:00
docs
url: /oeil/spdoc.do?i=58649&j=0&l=en title: SP(2022)656
type
Commission response to text adopted in plenary
body
EC
docs/2
date
2022-10-04T00:00:00
docs
url: https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/TA-9-2022-0339_EN.html title: T9-0339/2022
type
Text adopted by Parliament, single reading
body
EP
events/3
date
2022-10-04T00:00:00
type
Debate in Parliament
body
EP
events/3
date
2022-10-04T00:00:00
type
Results of vote in Parliament
body
EP
docs
url: https://oeil.secure.europarl.europa.eu/oeil/popups/sda.do?id=58649&l=en title: Results of vote in Parliament
events/4
date
2022-10-04T00:00:00
type
Debate in Parliament
body
EP
events/4
date
2022-10-04T00:00:00
type
Decision by Parliament
body
EP
docs
url: https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/TA-9-2022-0339_EN.html title: T9-0339/2022
events/4/docs
  • url: https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/CRE-9-2022-10-04-TOC_EN.html title: Debate in Parliament
events/5
date
2022-10-04T00:00:00
type
Decision by Parliament
body
EP
docs
url: https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/TA-9-2022-0339_EN.html title: T9-0339/2022
events/5/summary
  • The European Parliament adopted by 611 votes to 3, with 9 abstentions, a resolution on the AccessibleEU Centre in support of accessibility policies in the EU internal market.
  • Parliament recalled that accessibility is an essential precondition for persons with disabilities to fully enjoy human rights and fundamental freedoms. It is one of the general principles of the Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities, which is legally binding on the EU and its Member States.
  • More than 87 million people in the EU have some form of disability. Member States must ensure that the principle of accessibility is mainstreamed at all levels, not only in buildings, spaces and public transport, but also in health and education, and to increase the mobility and integration of people with disabilities.
  • Improving the implementation of legislation
  • Parliament welcomed the Commission's communication ‘Union of Equality: European Strategy for the Rights of Persons with Disabilities 2021-2030’ and the Commission's initiative, announced in the strategy, to create the AccessibleEU Centre (the Centre).
  • The EU has put in place a comprehensive legal framework for accessibility in the single market, which includes, inter alia , the European Accessibility Act, the Web Accessibility Directive, the Audiovisual Media Services Directive and the Electronic Communications Directive, as well as technical specifications for stations and vehicles. However, Members regretted that the implementation of this legislation varies considerably from one Member State to another and is not satisfactory to date, mainly due to the lack of qualified accessibility experts .
  • The resolution therefore stressed the need to improve overall knowledge , as well as practical and theoretical expertise, of accessibility policies among public administrations, economic operators and society in general. In this context, the Centre should be an important resource for providing knowledge and support to Member States during the implementation phase.
  • Members called on the Commission to ensure that the Centre is provided with the necessary funding and staffing for its establishment and operation and on Member States to ensure the necessary resources for the implementation and enforcement of accessibility policies, including through the use of EU funds.
  • Structure
  • Parliament called on the Commission to establish a secretariat and a forum to steer and direct the work of the Centre. It considered it necessary to have a balanced participation in the forum of relevant stakeholders from the private and public sectors and of right-holders with relevant experience in accessibility. The participation of organisations representing people with disabilities should be guaranteed as an essential part of the Centre's work.
  • Members believe that sub-groups of subject matter experts are needed for certain areas, such as the built environment, public procurement, digital accessibility, media and culture, and assistive technologies. These groups should cooperate closely with the Centre, Member States, people with disabilities and organisations representing people with disabilities.
  • Member States should establish national accessibility hubs , including contact points, and mirror groups of specialists who will work closely with the Centre to ensure the implementation, monitoring and enforcement of accessibility legislation and to facilitate exchange and coordination between relevant stakeholders and right-holders.
  • Mandate
  • Members considered that the Centre should function as a hub for exchange , providing regular support and expertise on accessibility policies and technical requirements to relevant EU institutions and bodies, as well as to Member States when implementing EU law.
  • The Centre should in particular:
  • - establish and coordinate a cooperation framework that would bring together the relevant national and Union bodies with all user groups, to support harmonised implementation and enforcement across the EU, provide guidance and training, and to inspire policy developments and innovation at national and EU level, including through the identification and sharing of best practices across sectors;
  • - encourage collaboration between relevant bodies and organisations with highly innovative stakeholders to promote the development of assistive technologies , and provide advice to the relevant EU institutions and bodies and its Member States on their internal accessibility policies and practices;
  • - identify and assist in addressing gaps and inconsistencies in existing legislation, to make policy recommendations for the updating and development of accessibility legislation, mainstreaming accessibility into all relevant policies under the responsibility of different Commission Directorates-General;
  • - generate knowledge on accessibility through research and studies and make it available to both the Commission and the Member States, and collect specialised, comparable and fully accessible information and data, including feedback on the implementation of accessibility legislation;
  • - provide the Commission and the Member States, stakeholders and right holders with knowledge and support for the implementation, monitoring and enforcement of accessibility policies , including through training and guidance material in all official EU languages and in accessible, understandable and easy-to-read language;
  • - support Member States in developing specific educational programmes on accessibility issues and provide training to professionals, EU and national officials, as well as relevant stakeholders and right-holders, in order to raise awareness of these issues.
  • - help overcome inconsistencies between the UN Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities and EU policies, and to help Member States achieve the primary objective of increasing the employment rate of people with disabilities.
  • Standardisation system
  • Members regretted that the standardisation system does not sufficiently allow people with disabilities and their representative organisations to participate on an equal footing with other stakeholders in the activities of European and national standardisation bodies when they develop accessibility standards. They therefore called for a better representation in the standardisation system and a balanced representation among the appointed experts, to ensure that EU accessibility legislation and standards are fair.
docs/2
date
2022-10-04T00:00:00
docs
url: https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/TA-9-2022-0339_EN.html title: T9-0339/2022
type
Text adopted by Parliament, single reading
body
EP
events/3
date
2022-10-04T00:00:00
type
Debate in Parliament
body
EP
events/4
date
2022-10-04T00:00:00
type
Decision by Parliament
body
EP
docs
url: https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/TA-9-2022-0339_EN.html title: T9-0339/2022
forecasts
  • date: 2022-10-04T00:00:00 title: Debate in plenary scheduled
  • date: 2022-10-04T00:00:00 title: Vote in plenary scheduled
procedure/stage_reached
Old
Awaiting Parliament's vote
New
Procedure completed
forecasts/1
date
2022-10-04T00:00:00
title
Vote in plenary scheduled
forecasts/0
date
2022-10-04T00:00:00
title
Debate in plenary scheduled
forecasts/0
date
2022-10-03T00:00:00
title
Indicative plenary sitting date
docs/2
date
2022-07-19T00:00:00
docs
url: https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/A-9-2022-0209_EN.html title: A9-0209/2022
type
Committee report tabled for plenary, single reading
body
EP
events/2/summary
  • The Committee on the Internal Market and Consumer Protection adopted an own-initiative report by Katrin LANGENSIEPEN (Greens/EFA, DE) on AccessibleEU Centre in support of accessibility policies in the EU internal market.
  • The report welcomed the Commission's communication ‘Union of Equality: European Strategy for the Rights of Persons with Disabilities 2021-2030’ and the Commission's initiative, announced in the strategy, to create the AccessibleEU Centre (the Centre).
  • Members argued that greater accessibility outcomes in society can only be achieved if the Centre adopts the holistic approach of ‘ universal design ’, particularly with regard to the physical environment, transport, information, communication and services, but also in public procurement and tendering.
  • Insufficient implementation
  • In recent years, the European Union has approved several pieces of legislation and technical standards that have created a new accessibility ecosystem, such as the European Accessibility Act, the Web Accessibility Directive, the Audiovisual Media Services Directive and the Electronic Communications Directive, as well as technical specifications for railway stations and vehicles. In addition, accessibility requirements must be considered when allocating EU funds and awarding public contracts.
  • However, the implementation of this essential body of legislation at national level has not been satisfactory to date, mainly due to the lack of qualified accessibility specialists.
  • The report stressed the need to improve the overall knowledge, as well as practical and theoretical specialist knowledge , of accessibility policies within public administrations, economic operators and society in general, in order to help develop relevant, sustainable and affordable solutions in each Member State, and thus improve the implementation of current and future accessibility requirements.
  • Members called on the Commission to ensure that the Centre is provided with the necessary funding and staffing for its establishment and operation, and on Member States to guarantee the necessary resources for the implementation and enforcement of accessibility policies, including through EU funds.
  • Structure
  • The report called on the Commission to establish a secretariat and a forum to steer and direct the work of the Centre. They considered it necessary to have a balanced participation in the forum of relevant stakeholders from the private and public sectors and of right-holders with relevant experience in accessibility. The participation of organisations representing people with disabilities should be guaranteed as an essential part of the Centre's work.
  • Members believe that sub-groups of subject matter experts are needed for certain areas, such as the built environment, public procurement, digital accessibility, media and culture, and assistive technologies. These groups should cooperate closely with the Centre, Member States, people with disabilities and organisations representing people with disabilities.
  • Member States should establish national accessibility hubs , including contact points, and mirror groups of specialists who will work closely with the Centre to ensure the implementation, monitoring and enforcement of accessibility legislation and to facilitate exchange and coordination between relevant stakeholders and right-holders.
  • Mandate
  • Members considered that the Centre should function as a hub for exchange , providing regular support and expertise on accessibility policies and technical requirements to relevant EU institutions and bodies, as well as to Member States when implementing EU law.
  • The Centre should in particular:
  • - establish and coordinate a cooperation framework that would bring together the relevant national and Union bodies with all user groups, to support harmonised implementation and enforcement across the EU, provide guidance and training, and to inspire policy developments and innovation at national and EU level, including through the identification and sharing of best practices across sectors, as well as through the creation of tools aiming to facilitate the implementation of Union law;
  • - encourage collaboration between relevant bodies and organisations with highly innovative stakeholders to promote the development of assistive technologies, and provide advice to the relevant EU institutions and bodies and its Member States on their internal accessibility policies and practices;
  • - generate knowledge on accessibility through research and studies and make it available to both the Commission and the Member States, and collect specialised, comparable and fully accessible information and data, including feedback on the implementation of accessibility legislation;
  • - play a key role in providing the Commission and the Member States, stakeholders and right holders with knowledge and support for the implementation, monitoring and enforcement of accessibility policies , including through training and guidance material in all official EU languages and in accessible, understandable and easy-to-read language;
  • - support Member States in developing specific educational programmes on accessibility issues and provide training to professionals, EU and national officials, as well as relevant stakeholders and right-holders, in order to raise awareness of these issues.
  • Members regretted that the standardisation system does not sufficiently allow people with disabilities and their representative organisations to participate on an equal footing with other stakeholders in the activities of European and national standardisation bodies when they develop accessibility standards. They therefore called for a better representation in the standardisation system and a balanced representation among the appointed experts, to ensure that EU accessibility legislation and standards are fair.
docs/2/docs/0/url
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/A-9-2022-0209_EN.html
events/2/docs/0/url
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/A-9-2022-0209_EN.html
forecasts/0/date
Old
2022-09-12T00:00:00
New
2022-10-03T00:00:00
docs/2
date
2022-07-19T00:00:00
docs
title: A9-0209/2022
type
Committee report tabled for plenary, single reading
body
EP
events/2/docs
  • title: A9-0209/2022
events/2
date
2022-07-19T00:00:00
type
Committee report tabled for plenary
body
EP
procedure/stage_reached
Old
Awaiting committee decision
New
Awaiting Parliament's vote
events/1
date
2022-07-12T00:00:00
type
Vote in committee
body
EP
procedure/Other legal basis
Rules of Procedure EP 159
docs/1/docs/0/url
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/IMCO-AM-731598_EN.html
docs/1
date
2022-05-02T00:00:00
docs
title: PE731.598
type
Amendments tabled in committee
body
EP
forecasts
  • date: 2022-09-12T00:00:00 title: Indicative plenary sitting date
docs/0/docs/0/url
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/IMCO-PR-730040_EN.html
docs
  • date: 2022-03-24T00:00:00 docs: title: PE730.040 type: Committee draft report body: EP
committees/0/shadows/4
name
PELLETIER Anne-Sophie
group
The Left group in the European Parliament - GUE/NGL
abbr
GUE/NGL
committees/0/shadows/3
name
BIELAN Adam
group
European Conservatives and Reformists Group
abbr
ECR