BETA


2022/2020(INI) Possibilities to increase the reliability of audits and controls by national authorities in shared management

Progress: Procedure completed

RoleCommitteeRapporteurShadows
Lead CONT HOHLMEIER Monika (icon: EPP EPP) NEGRESCU Victor (icon: S&D S&D), WIEZIK Michal (icon: Renew Renew), KUHS Joachim (icon: ID ID), FLANAGAN Luke Ming (icon: GUE/NGL GUE/NGL)
Committee Opinion AGRI FLANAGAN Luke Ming (icon: GUE/NGL GUE/NGL) Peter JAHR (icon: PPE PPE), Atidzhe ALIEVA-VELI (icon: RE RE)
Lead committee dossier:
Legal Basis:
RoP 54

Events

2023/11/21
   EP - Text adopted by Parliament, single reading
Documents
2023/11/21
   EP - Decision by Parliament
Documents
2023/10/23
   EP - Committee report tabled for plenary
Details

The Committee on Budgetary Control adopted a report by Monika HOHLMEIER (EPP, DE) on possibilities to increase the reliability of audits and controls by national authorities in shared management.

Root causes affecting the management, control and audit of EU expenditure under shared management

The report points out that the complexity of the rules governing EU funds, combined with frequent changes to regulations between programming periods, can lead to problems of legal ambiguity or compliance, as well as misinterpretation and gaps in implementation, resulting in a higher risk of error. Members deplore the fact that the Commission's guidelines are often highly technocratic and open to differing interpretations . This can lead to over-regulation, increased red tape and ongoing changes to implementation standards by Member States.

Members also pointed out that, under shared management, Member States are responsible for setting up a system for managing and control of payments, and for ensuring that it is capable of detecting and correcting irregularities. They stress that it is advantageous for Member States to opt for preventive rather than punitive measures for management and control purposes, to ensure that the system is managed as efficiently as possible in the interests of the right recipients, while preventing fraud and misallocation of public funds.

The report stresses that effective management control is essential to guarantee both the performance of operations and their compliance with the legal framework. In addition to protecting the Union's financial interests, the detection of errors must be used to implement the necessary corrective measures and to make improvements to legislation in order to prevent such errors in the future.

Members insist that Member States' audit bodies must comply with the international standards of supreme audit institutions. Non-compliance with these standards creates a risk of undermining the reliability and quality of audit work, and also poses a threat to the single audit approach.

The report also deplores the fact that the lack of sufficient resources , including the lack of training of the workforce dedicated to control functions, is a factor affecting the ability of managing authorities (under cohesion policy) and paying agencies (under the CAP) to carry out effective checks and verifications of expenditure. It also stresses that the independence of audit bodies and other bodies managing funds in the Member States is an essential requirement for the reliability and quality of audit results.

Members reiterate their concern about the difference between the error calculation method applied by the Court of Auditors and that applied by the Commission, which creates confusion and makes it difficult to address the root causes of errors. These discrepancies are present in cohesion expenditure, one of the largest parts of the Union's budget, for the fourth year running. A relevant and reliable estimate of the error rate in cohesion spending is therefore a key element in the Commission's disclosure and control of the compliance of spending in this policy area with legislation.

Recommendations on possible ways to increase the reliability of audits and controls under shared management

The Commission is invited, inter alia , to:

- contribute to improving the common understanding of the single audit approach in order to achieve a more uniform interpretation and implementation of this model across Member States;

- continue to simplify the rules and requirements applicable to EU funds and programmes, while ensuring a balance with the necessary audits and controls and continuity between programming periods, as well as providing the competent authorities in the Member States with further clarification on their implementation;

- continue to identify ways of helping Member States to transpose directives, issue guidelines and implement EU funds;

- reduce over-regulation , and closely monitor delayed, fragmented or incomplete implementation or transposition of EU legislation;

- strengthen cooperation with Member States, in particular to avoid problems of incorrect translation which could hinder the uniform interpretation of Union law, and to avoid imposing an additional administrative burden on national authorities when interpreting and applying the relevant provisions;

- encourage and facilitate the exchange of best practice between Member States and their audit and control authorities in terms of implementation and audit methods;

- develop support mechanisms for local authorities in need;

- proactively promote good communication and the exchange of good audit practice between Member State audit authorities at European, national and regional levels;

- reduce the CAP administrative burden on farmers, which is often at the root of unintentional errors, which should be clearly distinguished from cases of intentional fraud, thus ensuring more efficient use of CAP funds;

- promote the use of satellite images and new imaging technologies to monitor the CAP.

Members considered that digitalisation and the adoption of more sophisticated IT tools at national and EU levels would improve the management, control and auditing of EU funds, and could contribute to preventing irregularities, increasing the quality of checks and audits, and substantially reducing bureaucracy, assuming interoperability of IT tools between Member States and the Commission.

Documents
2023/10/05
   EP - Vote in committee
2023/09/11
   EP - Amendments tabled in committee
Documents
2023/06/26
   EP - Committee draft report
Documents
2022/10/26
   EP - Committee opinion
Documents
2022/04/07
   EP - HOHLMEIER Monika (EPP) appointed as rapporteur in CONT
2022/03/28
   EP - FLANAGAN Luke Ming (GUE/NGL) appointed as rapporteur in AGRI
2022/03/10
   EP - Committee referral announced in Parliament

Documents

Votes

Possibilities to increase the reliability of audits and controls by national authorities in shared management – A9-0297/2023 – Monika Hohlmeier – Motion for a resolution #

2023/11/21 Outcome: +: 616, 0: 6, -: 5
DE FR IT PL ES RO NL BE PT CZ HU SE BG AT EL FI SK DK IE LT HR SI EE LV CY LU MT
Total
83
72
67
47
46
32
28
20
20
20
18
17
15
15
16
14
13
13
13
11
11
8
7
6
6
5
4
icon: PPE PPE
160

Hungary PPE

1

Denmark PPE

For (1)

1

Estonia PPE

For (1)

1

Latvia PPE

For (1)

1

Cyprus PPE

2

Luxembourg PPE

For (1)

1

Malta PPE

For (1)

1
icon: S&D S&D
122

Belgium S&D

2

Czechia S&D

For (1)

1

Sweden S&D

2

Greece S&D

1

Lithuania S&D

2

Slovenia S&D

2

Estonia S&D

2

Latvia S&D

2

Cyprus S&D

2

Luxembourg S&D

For (1)

1
icon: Renew Renew
91

Poland Renew

1

Hungary Renew

For (1)

1
3

Greece Renew

1

Finland Renew

3

Ireland Renew

2

Lithuania Renew

1

Croatia Renew

For (1)

1

Slovenia Renew

2

Estonia Renew

3

Latvia Renew

For (1)

1

Luxembourg Renew

2
icon: Verts/ALE Verts/ALE
68

Italy Verts/ALE

3

Poland Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Spain Verts/ALE

3

Romania Verts/ALE

1

Netherlands Verts/ALE

3

Belgium Verts/ALE

3

Portugal Verts/ALE

1

Czechia Verts/ALE

3

Sweden Verts/ALE

3

Austria Verts/ALE

3

Finland Verts/ALE

3

Denmark Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Ireland Verts/ALE

2

Lithuania Verts/ALE

2

Luxembourg Verts/ALE

For (1)

1
icon: ECR ECR
62

Romania ECR

1

Bulgaria ECR

2

Greece ECR

1

Slovakia ECR

For (1)

1

Lithuania ECR

1

Croatia ECR

1

Latvia ECR

For (1)

1
icon: ID ID
52

Czechia ID

For (1)

Abstain (1)

2
3

Denmark ID

For (1)

1

Estonia ID

For (1)

1
icon: NI NI
41

France NI

Against (1)

3

Netherlands NI

Against (1)

1

Belgium NI

For (1)

1

Lithuania NI

1

Croatia NI

Abstain (1)

2

Latvia NI

1
icon: The Left The Left
31

Spain The Left

2

Netherlands The Left

For (1)

1

Belgium The Left

For (1)

1

Czechia The Left

1

Finland The Left

For (1)

1

Denmark The Left

1

Cyprus The Left

2
AmendmentsDossier
115 2022/2020(INI)
2022/06/16 AGRI 66 amendments...
source: 734.079
2023/09/11 CONT 49 amendments...
source: 752.911

History

(these mark the time of scraping, not the official date of the change)

docs/3
date
2023-11-21T00:00:00
docs
url: https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/TA-9-2023-0404_EN.html title: T9-0404/2023
type
Text adopted by Parliament, single reading
body
EP
events/3
date
2023-11-21T00:00:00
type
Decision by Parliament
body
EP
docs
url: https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/TA-9-2023-0404_EN.html title: T9-0404/2023
procedure/stage_reached
Old
Awaiting Parliament's vote
New
Procedure completed
forecasts
  • date: 2023-11-21T00:00:00 title: Vote in plenary scheduled
forecasts/0
date
2023-11-21T00:00:00
title
Vote in plenary scheduled
forecasts/0
date
2023-11-20T00:00:00
title
Indicative plenary sitting date
docs/3
date
2023-10-23T00:00:00
docs
url: https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/A-9-2023-0297_EN.html title: A9-0297/2023
type
Committee report tabled for plenary, single reading
body
EP
events/2/summary
  • The Committee on Budgetary Control adopted a report by Monika HOHLMEIER (EPP, DE) on possibilities to increase the reliability of audits and controls by national authorities in shared management.
  • Root causes affecting the management, control and audit of EU expenditure under shared management
  • The report points out that the complexity of the rules governing EU funds, combined with frequent changes to regulations between programming periods, can lead to problems of legal ambiguity or compliance, as well as misinterpretation and gaps in implementation, resulting in a higher risk of error. Members deplore the fact that the Commission's guidelines are often highly technocratic and open to differing interpretations . This can lead to over-regulation, increased red tape and ongoing changes to implementation standards by Member States.
  • Members also pointed out that, under shared management, Member States are responsible for setting up a system for managing and control of payments, and for ensuring that it is capable of detecting and correcting irregularities. They stress that it is advantageous for Member States to opt for preventive rather than punitive measures for management and control purposes, to ensure that the system is managed as efficiently as possible in the interests of the right recipients, while preventing fraud and misallocation of public funds.
  • The report stresses that effective management control is essential to guarantee both the performance of operations and their compliance with the legal framework. In addition to protecting the Union's financial interests, the detection of errors must be used to implement the necessary corrective measures and to make improvements to legislation in order to prevent such errors in the future.
  • Members insist that Member States' audit bodies must comply with the international standards of supreme audit institutions. Non-compliance with these standards creates a risk of undermining the reliability and quality of audit work, and also poses a threat to the single audit approach.
  • The report also deplores the fact that the lack of sufficient resources , including the lack of training of the workforce dedicated to control functions, is a factor affecting the ability of managing authorities (under cohesion policy) and paying agencies (under the CAP) to carry out effective checks and verifications of expenditure. It also stresses that the independence of audit bodies and other bodies managing funds in the Member States is an essential requirement for the reliability and quality of audit results.
  • Members reiterate their concern about the difference between the error calculation method applied by the Court of Auditors and that applied by the Commission, which creates confusion and makes it difficult to address the root causes of errors. These discrepancies are present in cohesion expenditure, one of the largest parts of the Union's budget, for the fourth year running. A relevant and reliable estimate of the error rate in cohesion spending is therefore a key element in the Commission's disclosure and control of the compliance of spending in this policy area with legislation.
  • Recommendations on possible ways to increase the reliability of audits and controls under shared management
  • The Commission is invited, inter alia , to:
  • - contribute to improving the common understanding of the single audit approach in order to achieve a more uniform interpretation and implementation of this model across Member States;
  • - continue to simplify the rules and requirements applicable to EU funds and programmes, while ensuring a balance with the necessary audits and controls and continuity between programming periods, as well as providing the competent authorities in the Member States with further clarification on their implementation;
  • - continue to identify ways of helping Member States to transpose directives, issue guidelines and implement EU funds;
  • - reduce over-regulation , and closely monitor delayed, fragmented or incomplete implementation or transposition of EU legislation;
  • - strengthen cooperation with Member States, in particular to avoid problems of incorrect translation which could hinder the uniform interpretation of Union law, and to avoid imposing an additional administrative burden on national authorities when interpreting and applying the relevant provisions;
  • - encourage and facilitate the exchange of best practice between Member States and their audit and control authorities in terms of implementation and audit methods;
  • - develop support mechanisms for local authorities in need;
  • - proactively promote good communication and the exchange of good audit practice between Member State audit authorities at European, national and regional levels;
  • - reduce the CAP administrative burden on farmers, which is often at the root of unintentional errors, which should be clearly distinguished from cases of intentional fraud, thus ensuring more efficient use of CAP funds;
  • - promote the use of satellite images and new imaging technologies to monitor the CAP.
  • Members considered that digitalisation and the adoption of more sophisticated IT tools at national and EU levels would improve the management, control and auditing of EU funds, and could contribute to preventing irregularities, increasing the quality of checks and audits, and substantially reducing bureaucracy, assuming interoperability of IT tools between Member States and the Commission.
docs/3
date
2023-10-23T00:00:00
docs
url: https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/A-9-2023-0297_EN.html title: A9-0297/2023
type
Committee report tabled for plenary, single reading
body
EP
events/2/docs
  • url: https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/A-9-2023-0297_EN.html title: A9-0297/2023
events/2
date
2023-10-23T00:00:00
type
Committee report tabled for plenary
body
EP
procedure/stage_reached
Old
Awaiting committee decision
New
Awaiting Parliament's vote
events/1
date
2023-10-05T00:00:00
type
Vote in committee
body
EP
procedure/Other legal basis
Rules of Procedure EP 159
docs/2
date
2023-09-11T00:00:00
docs
url: https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/CONT-AM-752911_EN.html title: PE752.911
type
Amendments tabled in committee
body
EP
forecasts
  • date: 2023-11-20T00:00:00 title: Indicative plenary sitting date
committees/0
type
Responsible Committee
body
EP
committee_full
Budgetary Control
committee
CONT
associated
False
rapporteur
name: HOHLMEIER Monika date: 2022-04-07T00:00:00 group: Group of European People's Party abbr: EPP
shadows
committees/0
type
Responsible Committee
body
EP
committee_full
Budgetary Control
committee
CONT
associated
False
rapporteur
name: HOHLMEIER Monika date: 2022-04-07T00:00:00 group: Group of European People's Party abbr: EPP
shadows
docs/1
date
2023-06-26T00:00:00
docs
url: https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/CONT-PR-731616_EN.html title: PE731.616
type
Committee draft report
body
EP
committees/0/shadows/2
name
KUHS Joachim
group
Identity and Democracy
abbr
ID
docs/0/docs/0/url
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/AGRI-AD-731787_EN.html
docs
  • date: 2022-10-26T00:00:00 docs: title: PE731.787 committee: AGRI type: Committee opinion body: EP
committees/0
type
Responsible Committee
body
EP
committee_full
Budgetary Control
committee
CONT
associated
False
rapporteur
name: HOHLMEIER Monika date: 2022-04-07T00:00:00 group: Group of European People's Party abbr: EPP
shadows
committees/0
type
Responsible Committee
body
EP
committee_full
Budgetary Control
committee
CONT
associated
False
shadows
name: MANDA Claudiu group: Group of Progressive Alliance of Socialists and Democrats abbr: S&D
committees/0/shadows
  • name: MANDA Claudiu group: Group of Progressive Alliance of Socialists and Democrats abbr: S&D
commission
  • body: EC dg: Secretariat-General commissioner: REYNDERS Didier
committees/1/rapporteur
  • name: FLANAGAN Luke Ming date: 2022-03-28T00:00:00 group: The Left group in the European Parliament - GUE/NGL abbr: GUE/NGL