2022/2081(DEC) 2021 discharge: General budget of the EU - Commission
Next event: Vote scheduled in committee 2023/03/23
Lead committee dossier:
Next event: Vote scheduled in committee 2023/03/23
Progress: Awaiting committee decision
Lead committee dossier:
Subjects
Events
2023/03/23
Vote scheduled in committee
2022/10/26
EP - GOERENS Charles (Renew) appointed as rapporteur in DEVE
2022/10/24
EP - OMARJEE Younous (GUE/NGL) appointed as rapporteur in REGI
2022/10/10
EP - BRICMONT Saskia (Verts/ALE) appointed as rapporteur in LIBE
2022/10/07
EP - FALCĂ Gheorghe (EPP) appointed as rapporteur in TRAN
2022/09/19
EP - TOMC Romana (EPP) appointed as rapporteur in EMPL
2022/09/13
EP - Committee referral announced in Parliament
2022/09/12
EP - CANFIN Pascal (Renew) appointed as rapporteur in ENVI
2022/09/08
EP - OHLSSON Carina (S&D) appointed as rapporteur in AFET
2022/07/14
EP - HOHLMEIER Monika (EPP) appointed as rapporteur in CONT
2022/07/14
EP - LENAERS Jeroen (EPP) appointed as rapporteur in CONT
2022/07/13
EP - FRANZ Romeo (Verts/ALE) appointed as rapporteur in CULT
2022/06/23
EC - Non-legislative basic document
Documents
2022/06/23
EC - Non-legislative basic document published
Documents
2022/04/21
EP - VANA Monika (Verts/ALE) appointed as rapporteur in FEMM
Documents
- Non-legislative basic document: COM(2022)0323
- Non-legislative basic document: EUR-Lex
- Non-legislative basic document published: COM(2022)0323
- Non-legislative basic document published: EUR-Lex
- Non-legislative basic document: COM(2022)0323 EUR-Lex
Amendments | Dossier |
139 |
2022/2081(DEC)
2022/11/25
FEMM
28 amendments...
Amendment 1 #
Draft opinion Recital A A. whereas, gender equality and the elimination of inequalities are core values upon which the Union is founded, and the commitment to promote
Amendment 10 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 1 1. Stresses that a gender equality perspective should be integrated and ensured into all policy areas, particularly in light of the multiple gendered impacts of various ongoing climate, energy and social crises; reiterates therefore its call for the implementation of gender budgeting
Amendment 11 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 1 a (new) 1a. Stresses with concern that work on women's rights within the European institutions neglects the issue of security; calls for funds to be earmarked for an ambitious process of reflection on the rise in insecurity among women in the European Union and its link with the arrival on European soil of vast numbers of people whose value system differs from ours and sometimes does not recognise that men and women are equal in dignity.
Amendment 12 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 1 b (new) 1b. Calls on the Commission and the Council to channel funding towards support for families; calls on the Commission to initiate a debate on the issue of the rise in medical deserts and the question of childcare facilities for young children, while respecting the powers of the Member States.
Amendment 13 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 2 2. Notes
Amendment 14 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 2 2.
Amendment 15 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 2 a (new) 2 a. Repeats its concern at the interrelation between the attacks on the rule of law and the backlash on gender equality and women’s rights; calls on the Commission to continue its efforts to strengthen the rule of law in the Union, in particular those legal proposals aimed at protecting the EU budget in case of generalised deficiencies as regards the rule of law, breaches of human rights, including women’s rights and violations of the fundamental values of the European Union; as such, calls on the Commission to explore the core mission of those to whom EU funds are granted and to withhold funding from actors who seek to use EU funds for the purposes of backsliding human rights, particularly women’s rights and gender equality;
Amendment 16 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 3 3. Welcomes the position of gender equality and mainstreaming as one of the horizontal principles for Union funds in the Multiannual Financial Framework for 2021-2027 and in the Recovery and Resilience Facility and calls for gender impact assessments, objectives and monitoring to be deployed as outlined in the ECA report;
Amendment 17 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 3 3. Welcomes the
Amendment 18 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 4 4. Welcomes the Commission's work
Amendment 19 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 4 4. Welcomes the Commission's work on a new classification to measure the
Amendment 2 #
Draft opinion Recital A A. whereas, gender equality and the elimination of inequalities are core values upon which the Union is founded, and the commitment to promote
Amendment 20 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 4 4. Welcomes the Commission's work on a new classification
Amendment 21 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 4 a (new) 4 a. Recalls that the COVID-19 pandemic in 2021 exacerbated existing structural gender inequalities and affected women’s employment disproportionally, in particular women working in the informal economy and in precarious working conditions;
Amendment 22 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 4 b (new) 4 b. Stresses the importance of using European Structural and Investment Funds such as the European Social Fund Plus (ESF+) to promote gender equality, women’s employment and access to the labour market, childcare and long-term care facilities;
Amendment 23 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 4 c (new) 4 c. Stresses the importance of strengthening the specifically dedicated Daphne initiative by increasing its resources, in particular measures that aim to combat all levels and all forms of gender-based violence against women and girls and domestic violence in line with Article7(6) of Regulation (EU) 2021/692 and to properly support victims;
Amendment 24 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 5 Amendment 25 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 5 5. Re
Amendment 26 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 5 a (new) 5 a. Calls on the Commission to strengthen the rule of law in the Union, and thus protect fundamental rights and gender equality, via the rule of law conditionality mechanism for access to EU funds;
Amendment 27 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 5 a (new) 5 a. Welcomes the Commission's continuous efforts and dedication to enhance and promote the principle of equality between men and women through the Union's policies and legislative proposals;
Amendment 28 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 5 b (new) 5 b. Is deeply concerned about revelations regarding the Commission’s reaction to a rape which occurred in the institution in 2015 in which the Commission suspended the convicted and sentenced official but continued to pay his salary throughout the lengthy legal proceedings; calls on the Commission to strengthen the protocol to ensure that in such cases, the Commission should remove entirely the salary; calls on the Commission to add to its protocol the right to access to psychological and other support for victims; urges the Commission to ensure that all rules in place guarantee a zero-tolerance to any forms of misconduct and a full support for all victims; recalls the Commission’s duty to put in place all necessary policies to prevent and address all forms of harassment and violence.
Amendment 3 #
Draft opinion Recital A A. whereas,
Amendment 4 #
Draft opinion Recital A a (new) Aa. whereas budgeting should always be based on objective and technical criteria; and whereas the Union's resources should not be used to promote an ideological line of reasoning;
Amendment 5 #
Draft opinion Recital B B. whereas Parliament has repeatedly asked the Commission to promote and implement the use of gender mainstreaming, gender budgeting and gender impact assessments in all
Amendment 6 #
Draft opinion Recital B a (new) B a. whereas the use of gender mainstreaming, gender budgeting and gender impact assessments shall be promoted and eventually implemented in the adequate areas or aspects of European Union's policy, so as to avoid excessive complications in the legislative process and administrative difficulties at the level of the Union and the Member States;
Amendment 7 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 1 1. Stresses that a gender equality perspective should be integrated and ensured into all policy areas, particularly in light of the multiple gendered impacts of various ongoing climate, energy and social crises, including the backlashes against gender equality and women’s rights, especially sexual and reproductive health and rights (SRHR), in several Member States and worldwide; reiterates therefore its call for the implementation of gender budgeting at all stages of the budgetary process;
Amendment 8 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 1 1. Stresses that a gender equality perspective should be integrated and ensured into all policy areas, particularly in light of the multiple gendered impacts of various ongoing climate, energy and social crises; reiterates therefore its call for the implementation of gender budgeting at all stages of the budgetary process; stresses the importance of gender budgeting in all recovery and alleviation measures to make use of EU programmes for mitigating gendered impacts of various crises;
Amendment 9 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 1 1. Stresses that a
source: 739.542
2022/12/06
EMPL
13 amendments...
Amendment 1 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 2 2. Takes note that the implementation of the 2021 budget was significantly impacted by the delays in the adoption of new legal bases and the new rules for structural funds, as well as the ongoing Covid-19 crisis and its social consequences, and their impact on the budget in the social area that was adopted before the crisis;
Amendment 10 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 9 9. Notes that, in 2021, nearly EUR 14.6 billion have been paid to the 2014- 2020 ESF programmes as well as nearly EUR 320 million for REACT-EU, lifting the absorption rate to 61% (total payments made compared to allocation, including REACT-EU);
Amendment 11 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 11 a (new) 11 a. Stresses the importance of the ESF and the ESF+ to encourage high level of employment, the creation of quality jobs and fight against poverty and social exclusion; expresses the need to provide them with the continued financial and political support of the EU, national and regional institutions in the delivery of their targets in the years to come, in particular to reflect the particular needs in the current crises and contribute to the implementation of the principles of the European Pillar of Social Rights and the achievements of the Porto targets;
Amendment 12 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 11 b (new) 11 b. Notes that, on average, more than one out of five persons and one out of four children are still at risk of poverty or social exclusion in the European Union; recalls the EU commitment to the support for the most deprived through FEAD and the ESF+, alleviating the worst forms of poverty in the Union, such as food deprivation, homelessness, and child poverty; notes that about 13 million people, including approximately 4 million children under the age of 15 are supported by FEAD annually;
Amendment 13 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 12 a (new) 12 a. Urgently calls on the Commission to take the catering staff in-house in order to ensure good working conditions and avoid layoffs;
Amendment 2 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 3 3. Takes note that by the end of 2021, total outstanding commitments totalled EUR 341.6 billion; highlights, however, that outstanding commitments from the EU budget decreased significantly from a historic high of EUR 303.2 billion at the end of 2020, mainly due to delays to the start of the implementation of shared management under the 2021-2027 MFF; notes that outstanding commitments for Heading 2a ‘Cohesion policy’ amounted to EUR 120.4 billion;
Amendment 3 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 3 a (new) 3 a. Recalls that spending under this subheading is aimed at strengthening competitiveness and reducing development disparities between the different Member States and regions of the EU; stresses the importance of EU cohesion policy in supporting the implementation of the European Pillar of Social Rights and assisting Member States and regions to harness new opportunities and address challenges, such as globalisation, unemployment, industrial change, digitalisation and supporting up and re-skilling and lifelong learning;
Amendment 4 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 4 4. Expresses satisfaction that the biggest part of the Union budget went to the policy objective ‘cohesion, resilience and values’
Amendment 5 #
5. Notes with concern that the estimated overall level of error in subheading 2a ‘Economic, social and territorial cohesion’ stood at 4.1% in 2021; underlines that despite a slight decrease this figure is still largely above the 2 % materiality threshold; recognises that the majority of spending in this area is deemed high-risk expenditure as mainly reimbursement-based and often subject to complex rules; notes that the most common errors under the Cohesion heading were ineligible projects and infringements of internal market rules, in particular non-compliance with public procurement and state aid rules;
Amendment 6 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 5 5.
Amendment 7 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 7 7.
Amendment 8 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 8 8. Notes with satisfaction that EaSI Financial Instruments (encompassing the EaSI Microfinance and Social Entrepreneurship Guarantee, the Capacity Building Investments Window and the Funded Instrument) continued in 2021 to support microenterprises and social enterprises, and that from its launch until 30 September 2021, guarantee agreements worth of EUR 401 million were signed which resulted in a total of 154 137 loans to micro- and social enterprises worth of EUR 2.5 billion; regrets, however, the late start of EaSI in 2021 as a result of the COVID-19 pandemic and other issues;
Amendment 9 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 9 9.
source: 739.661
2022/12/07
CULT
23 amendments...
Amendment 1 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 1 1. Notes that 2021 was the first implementation year of the 2021-2027 MFF and that the legal bases of the new Erasmus+, Creative Europe and European Solidarity Corps programmes were formally adopted in May 2021; recalls that these initiatives are meant to be for all, regardless of age, gender, employment or education level and reiterates the need to make sure that all programmes are accessible across Europe, in particular by small organizations, disadvantaged and vulnerable people and people from remote, rural and isolated areas;
Amendment 10 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 4 4. Underlines that the COVID-19 pandemic continued to have a heavy impact on learners, teachers, young people, cultural professionals and athletes in 2021; therefore, it is instrumental to keep investing in people, developing their social and digital skills, creating education and mobility opportunities, promoting EU values and active citizenship;
Amendment 11 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 4 4. Underlines that the COVID-19 pandemic continued to have a heavy impact on learners, teachers, young people, cultural professionals and athletes in 2021 and requests additional financial resources for them to better address the challenges arising from the inflation and price hikes;
Amendment 12 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 5 5. Notes that the first year of the new MFF saw the launch or further development of several major policy initiatives; considers there to be a structural lack of EU funding for education, youth, solidarity and culture in the face of new priorities and requests that this be addressed when deciding on any programme adjustments in the MFF revision;
Amendment 13 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 5 5. Notes that the first year of the new MFF saw the launch or further development of several major policy initiatives, such as the European Education Area and the new Digital Education Action Plan 2021-2027;
Amendment 14 #
5 a. Regrets that, following Commission President Von der Leyen’s announcement in September 2021, only three months were available to prepare for the 2022 European Year of Youth and that this fast-tracked legislative procedure not only undermined Parliament’s democratic prerogative but also jeopardised the Year’s level of ambition, the depth of the youth sector’s involvement and project quality;
Amendment 15 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 5 b (new) 5 b. Welcomes the launch in 2021 of CultureEU, an innovative web-based guide to EU funding for culture across programmes, and the revamped EU Youth Portal; hopes that these portals will contribute to better information and easier access to information on EU programmes and funding opportunities;
Amendment 16 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 6 Amendment 17 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 6 6. Encourages DG Connect to implement as soon as possible the European Court of Auditors’s open recommendation to adopt a media literacy strategy with clear indicators to systematically measure the impact of literacy actions and underlines the need to continue the fight against disinformation;
Amendment 18 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 7 a (new) 7 a. Notes the positive developments in the HR strategy of DG EAC in 2021; is deeply concerned about the staffing situation at the European Institute of Innovation and Technology (EIT) with a high turnover due to work pressure; highlights that the EIT requested additional staff, in particular to handle new initiatives like the pilot action to increase the innovative capacities of Higher Education Institutions; calls on DG EAC to ensure that the EIT is sufficiently staffed to deliver on all its responsibilities, particularly the higher education priorities;
Amendment 19 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 8 8. Notes the progress made regarding personal data protection for beneficiaries of and participants in Erasmus+ and the European Solidarity Corps, in particular as regards third country personal data transfers, specifically through the roll-out of a ‘transfer tool’ in the form of a legally binding agreement with entrusted bodies in third countries;
Amendment 2 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 1 1. Notes that 2021 was the first implementation year of the 2021-2027 MFF and that the legal bases of the new Erasmus+, Creative Europe and European Solidarity Corps programmes were formally adopted in May 2021; recalls Parliament’s insistence during the negotiations on a stronger focus on inclusion and diversity, notably gender balance, greening measures and sustainable digitalisation;
Amendment 20 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 8 8. Notes the progress made regarding personal data protection for beneficiaries of and participants in Erasmus+ and the European Solidarity Corps, however noting the need to further reduce bureaucracy in project implementation;
Amendment 21 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 9 9. Welcomes DG Education, Youth, Sport and Culture’s introduction in 2021 of a new internal reporting tool that allows National Agencies to detect more easily double submission, double funding and accreditation plagiarism
Amendment 22 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 9 a (new) 9 a. Calls on the Commission to support the co-legislators’ commitment to ensuring that the 2022 European Year of Youth leaves a lasting legacy by evaluating its outcomes thoroughly, mainstreaming youth across all related EU policies by means of a youth test and providing adequate financing for follow- up activities, including through a mapping exercise to identify additional funding sources beyond 2022;
Amendment 23 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 9 b (new) 9 b. Stresses that common minimum standards should be developed for digital education with a focus on digital infrastructure, teacher training, connectivity and digital education methods; underlines the need for the rapid implementation of the Digital Education Action Plan, which is key for the development of digital skills and the transformation of our educational systems in enabling them to integrate digital technologies;
Amendment 3 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 1 1. Notes that 2021 was the first implementation year of the 2021-2027 MFF and that the legal bases of the new Erasmus+, Creative Europe and European Solidarity Corps programmes were formally adopted in May 2021; welcomes the various measures taken in those programmes in favour of inclusion as well as to support Ukrainian refugees, especially young people;
Amendment 4 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 1 1. Notes that 2021 was the first implementation year of the 2021-2027 MFF and that the legal bases of the new Erasmus+, Creative Europe and European Solidarity Corps programmes were formally adopted in May 2021;underlines the crucial role of the these programs in times of crisis at EU and global level giving long-term perspectives to their beneficiaries.
Amendment 5 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 2 a (new) 2 a. Reiterates the call for enhanced transparency and a comprehensive review of EU spending on cultural and creative actions in order to ensure stability, predictability and the scrutiny of those actions;
Amendment 6 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 2 b (new) 2 b. Calls for more transparency, less bureaucracy related to project implementation and the constructive use of digital instruments when this can be helpful for beneficiaries and the projects;
Amendment 7 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 3 Amendment 8 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 3 3. Acknowledges the mitigating measures taken by the Commission and EACEA to safeguard programme implementation, in particular EACEA’s efforts to deliver calls for proposals and tailored support for applicants at a high pace in the second half of the year; calls on the EACEA to continue its efforts to help applicants and beneficiaries of programmes in the context of the current crisis;
Amendment 9 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 4 4. Underlines that the COVID-19 pandemic continued to have a heavy impact on learners, teachers, young people, cultural professionals and athletes in 2021; acknowledges the Commission’s adoption in June 2021 of a Communication on EU guidelines on the safe resumption of activities in the cultural and creative sectors, which aimed to support the coordinated reopening of the cultural sector in Europe;
source: 739.694
2022/12/08
REGI
75 amendments...
Amendment 1 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 1 1. Notes that the Court of Auditors, in its Annual report for 20211, estimated a level of error for the EU budget spending on ‘Cohesion, resilience and values’ of 3.6 % in 2021, up from 3.5 % in 2020; underlines that, for subheading ‘Economic, social and territorial cohesion’ alone, the estimated level of error is 4.1 %; regrets that the downward trend of the previous years could not be maintained; believes that it would be appropriate, therefore, to include in the procedures the need for greater scrutiny and careful analysis of errors, with a view to making it easier to avoid or prevent errors in future; calls on the Commission and the Member States to pay careful attention to the increase in the error rate and the consequent increased level of risk, and the possibility of a subsequent loss of funding; _________________ 1 European Court of Auditors, Annual
Amendment 1 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 1 1. Welcomes the findings of the European Court of Auditors (‘the Court’) that the consolidated accounts of the European Union for 2021 present fairly, in all material respects, the Union’s financial position; regrets that the estimated level of error in expenditure has increased up to 3%, up from 2,7% last year, which was already noted and described as material and pervasive;
Amendment 10 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 5 5. Warns however that certain
Amendment 10 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 2 a (new) 2 a. Notes that almost three quarters of Recovery and Resilience Financing, related to mitigating and addressing climate change, is focused on the energy transition and building sustainable transport in order to reach carbon neutrality by 2050;
Amendment 11 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 5 a (new) 5a. Recognises that the COVID-19 crisis posed a new and unexpected challenge, and that the consequences of Russian aggression in Ukraine will similarly pose a major challenge; emphasises that the EU and its Member States need to respond decisively and provide solutions at EU and national level; stresses that cohesion policy has already proven its added value and will be even more indispensable in the aftermath of the COVID-19 crisis and the war in Ukraine; welcomes the increasing financial flexibility in connection with the use of cohesion funds, which enables Member States to use the funds to finance crisis-related projects; stresses the need to promote continuity and deeper cooperation among all cohesion policy stakeholders, particularly SMEs, municipalities and regions, which in the coming months will be dealing with an energy crisis, rising unemployment, migration, high inflation, a food crisis and healthcare; stresses that eliminating the root causes of irregularities by streamlining and strengthening administrative capacities would help beneficiaries and authorities to focus on results and contribute to reducing the error rate; notes that the urgent flexibility measures adopted in response to the COVID-19 crisis had an immediate impact and that many of these measures, which yielded remarkable results, should be continued, especially now in the context of the war in Ukraine, and strongly believes that rule-of-law conditionality will also contribute to increasing the regularity of EU funding;
Amendment 11 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 2 a (new) 2 a. Regrets that the MFF do not give a strong signal towards infrastructure investments nor priority to the completion of the TEN-T (no increase of CEF Transport envelope, no explicit dedicated financing under the Recovery Plan to transport);
Amendment 12 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 5 b (new) 5b. Calls on the Commission to develop measures to simplify procedures that, in the circumstances set out above, would contribute to responsible and appropriate spending of funds and the ensuing recovery in the Member States, bearing in mind that Member States’ objectives for the 2021-2027 programming period must be much more ambitious in response to the current wide- ranging economic and social consequences of both the COVID-19 crisis and the war in Ukraine, in order to protect citizens, preserve jobs and strengthen the investment climate; calls, in this context, also on the Commission to ensure the involvement of all stakeholders and all levels of government and local government in the development and implementation of economic recovery plans;
Amendment 12 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 3 3. Notes that the last call for proposals of the CEF programme 2014-2020 was completed in 2021, selecting 77 actions, with a total CEF contribution of more than EUR 280 million, triggering an overall investment of more than EUR 500 million, nevertheless, regrets that the 1st CEF 2021- 2027 call for proposals was published only in September 2021 and the first commitments came in mid-2022 due to the delayed negotiations on the MFF 2021- 2027;
Amendment 13 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 6 6. Takes note that, from 2021, the Commission manages the Brexit Adjustment Reserve, which provides support to the regions most affected by the withdrawal of the United Kingdom from the EU; takes note that two pre-financing payments under the BAR were made in 2021; stresses that a clear overview of the situation should be prepared and that affected countries should be helped to improve their absorption through technical assistance programmes for cooperation with administrative authorities and technical guidance and training programmes;
Amendment 13 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 3 a (new) 3 a. Notes that for CEF transport sector, the 2021commitment appropriations were allocated to the first set of 13 calls for proposals and more than 400 proposals submitted. The evaluation of these proposals is currently ongoing. Consequently, no payment appropriations were used in 2021 in relation to calls;
Amendment 14 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 7 7. Deplores the delays in the implementation of the Just Transition Fund (JTF) and stresses the need to identify what exactly is the reason for the delay, and consequently to adapt procedures or simplify rules and reduce administrative burdens that potentially hinder absorption; stresses that, particularly in the case of new funds, all stakeholders need to be better connected in the procedures so as to avoid bottlenecks and payment backlogs in the absorption process;
Amendment 14 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 3 b (new) 3 b. The selection concerned studies addressing the preparatory steps for forth coming works under the CEF 2021-2027 programme, focusing on the construction of sustainable transport modes infrastructures along the Core Network Corridors. Furthermore the last cut-off date of the Blending Facility was completed, reaching 45 projects co-funded under the two priorities (ERTM and Alternative Fuels), for an overall CEF contribution of more than EUR 305 million, supporting total eligible costs for more than € 1,2 billion;
Amendment 15 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 7 7. Deplores the worrying delays in the implementation of the Just Transition Fund (JTF), urgently needed to support the people and EU regions in the green transition;
Amendment 15 #
3 c. Notices that as of 31 December 2020, the European Fund for Strategic Investments had supported transport infrastructure investment amounting to approximately EUR 9.3 billion to promote transport networks and cleaner fleet and to reduce congestion and bottlenecks;
Amendment 16 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 7 7. Deplores the delays in the implementation of the Just Transition Fund (JTF)
Amendment 16 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 3 d (new) 3 d. Rejoices the resounding success of the 2021 European Year of Rail, which included a series of events, campaigns and initiatives promoting rail as a sustainable, innovative and safe mode of transport, highlighting its benefits for people, the economy and the climate and focusing on the remaining challenges to create a true Single European Rail Area without borders;
Amendment 17 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 8 8. Regrets the delays in the launch of new programmes for the funds under the CPR; acknowledges that this delay is the
Amendment 17 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 3 e (new) Amendment 18 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 8 a (new) 8 a. Regrets the fact that the Court of Auditors in its Special report on Climate spending in the 2014-2020 EU budget considers that the overall reporting by the Commission on climate spending was unreliable and that the Commission overstated climate spending by at least 72 billion EUR, over 80% of which was from agricultural funding, meaning that around 13% of the 2014-2020 EU budget was spent on climate action, therefore, expresses concerns regarding the reliability of 2021-2027 climate reporting as well and calls the Commission to reassess its climate tracking methodology;
Amendment 18 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 3 f (new) 3 f. Commends the proposals of DG MOVE Fuel Maritime, Refuel Aviation and AFIR and other Fit for 55 proposals on which DG MOVE collaborated. Stresses that implementation of AFIR is crucial to deliver on majority of all the proposals;
Amendment 19 #
8 b. Stresses the importance of cohesion policy in promoting gender equality, as highlighted by the European Parliament's own-initiative report on the gender dimension in cohesion policy and by the “European Court of Auditors’ Special Report 10/2021: Gender mainstreaming in the EU budget: time to turn words into action”; points out the Court’s assessment that the EU’s budget cycle did not take gender equality adequately into account and the Commission had not yet lived up to its commitment to gender mainstreaming in the EU budget; on the other hand welcomes the Commission's work on a new classification to measure the gender impact of Union spending; calls on the Commission to ensure that this classification focuses on accurate and comprehensive representation of the impact of programmes on gender equality;
Amendment 19 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 3 g (new) 3 g. Welcomes the launch a new NAIADES III action plan “Boosting future-proof European inland waterway transport”, aligned with the new multiannual financial framework (2021- 2027) and focused on shifting more freight transport to inland waterways; Stresses that European harmonisation and standardisation for both quality navigability and equipment, as well as proper funding, are crucial in this regard;
Amendment 2 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 1 1. Notes that the Court of Auditors, in its Annual report for 20211 , estimated a
Amendment 2 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 1 1. Welcomes the findings of the European Court of Auditors (‘the Court’) that the consolidated accounts of the European Union for 2021 present fairly, in all material respects, the Union’s financial position; regrets that the estimated level of error in expenditure has increased up to 3% and recommends the European Commission to improve the monitoring of expenditures;
Amendment 20 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 9 9. Takes note that the Court reported 15 cases to OLAF in 2021, in contrast to the 6 cases it reported in 2020; notes as well that only one of these cases was in parallel reported to the EPPO; regrets the lack of transparency on the number of cases reported by the Commission to the EPPO; regrets also the controversy that has arisen concerning the competence adjudication over particular cases in certain Member
Amendment 20 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 3 h (new) 3 h. Welcomes proactivity of DG MOVE in 2021 to promote the best progress at International Maritime Organisation on GHG emissions reduction as the global approach is the key element how achieve the goal set in Paris Agreement;
Amendment 21 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 9 a (new) 9 a. Stresses the importance of the role of the European Public Prosecutor’s Office (EPPO) in investigating, prosecuting and bringing to judgment crimes against the financial interests of the EU, with a special focus on their cross-border dimension; regrets that all Member States are not currently participating in this enhanced cooperation and deplores any irregularities or partisan interventions in the appointment of the prosecutors in the participating Member States; furthermore, calls for more efforts in the fight against frauds at EU level and in the Member States.
Amendment 21 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 4 4. Welcomes new research and innovation projects launched in 2021 from both Horizon 2020 and Horizon Europe, including landmark projects on
Amendment 22 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 4 a (new) 4 a. Welcomes the fact that the Commission launched in 2021 the Zero- Emission Waterborne Transport Partnership from Horizon Europe, stresses the need to support renewable propulsion technologies for European maritime transport such as renewable fuels of non-biological origin, shore-side electricity, wind assisted propulsion systems and any other zero-emission innovation technologies;
Amendment 23 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 4 a (new) 4 a. Stresses the need to circumscribe EU funding to transport projects that fulfil the requirements of a future-proof, sustainable European transport network, in accordance with the EU taxonomy, and consequently to prioritise projects that significantly contribute to improving climate-friendliness in the transport sector;
Amendment 24 #
4 b. Welcomes the ambition to strive for carbon neutrality in European youth programmes, for instance through extra economic support for travel undertaken with low-carbon means of transport in the Erasmus+ and European Solidarity Corps programmes, as well as advanced carbon footprint tracking1a; _________________ 1a https://www.europarl.europa.eu/cmsdata/ 258050/Detailed%20replies_EP%2027.10. 2022.pdf
Amendment 25 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 5 5. Welcomes the Court’s Review No 05/2021 on the Union framework for large transport infrastructure projects and regrets their findings related to major cost- overruns and time delays of the projects; requests the Commission, together with the Court, OLAF and EPPO, to further closely monitor the Union transport projects, improve the process and to submit an annual implementation report to the Parliament and national parliaments specifying the measures taken to guarantee the completion of the TEN-T network; highlights that the conclusions of the European Court of Auditors Review 05/2021 on “The EU framework for large transport infrastructure projects: an international comparison” align with its previous concerns; recalls that the Special Report10/2020 on “EU transport infrastructures: more speed needed in megaproject implementation to deliver network effects on time” already raised diverse serious socioeconomic and environmental concerns over different transport flagship mega-infrastructure projects across the Union, such as inaccurate estimations regarding traffic forecasts or the cumulative delays, remarkably impacting the related cost- benefit analysis as well as the life-cycle emissions calculations within the 2030 and 2050 horizons; considers that EU transport funding would be more effectively spent, also in terms of climate neutrality contribution, by considerably supporting smaller-scale regional cross- border rail missing links;
Amendment 26 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 5 a (new) 5 a. Requests that the Commission, together with the Court and OLAF, closely monitor the EU transport projects, as public investment in infrastructure is particularly sensitive to fraud; considers this essential not only to ensure transparency that prevents corruption and misuse of taxpayers' money, but also to ensure that the highest safety standards for the users are not compromised;
Amendment 27 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 5 b (new) 5 b. Calls attention to the renewed expression of concern by the European Court of Auditors regarding the climate reporting methodology used in the MFF 2021-2027, which is believed to overestimate the climate contribution of certain EU funding1a; urges the Commission to review this expenditure tracking system in order to obtain more reliable estimates of the climate contribution of EU policies; _________________ 1a https://www.eca.europa.eu/Lists/ECADoc uments/annualreport-Performance- 2021/annualreport-Performance- 2021_EN.pdf
Amendment 28 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 5 c (new) Amendment 29 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 6 6. Underlines that the funding of the TEN-T network revision shall well reflect and further focus on the extension of connection towards the Eastern Neighbourhood as well as revising priorities of the Eastern Member States towards cross-border missing links. Requests also the Commission to propose an 'EU-Eastern Europe' or 'Eastern Partnership' Transport Community, including an Eastern Europe Investment Framework; in this regard insists to not further delay the acceptation of Bulgaria and Romania to the Schengen Area to ensure seamless transport connection to the East;
Amendment 3 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 2 2. Acknowledges that the record high level of payments under cohesion in 2021, together with the complex rules that govern spending in this area, might partly explain the increased error rate; expresses its concern, however, at the Court’s conclusion that controls in place do not offset the high inherent risk error in this area; underlines the need for improvements in the control and assurance framework for cohesion; stresses that a better and broader exchange of good practice between countries is essential for increasing efficiency and reducing the error rate; stresses that further simplification of the rules and procedures governing absorption in this area could also significantly contribute to a more efficient and, at the same time, more targeted use of funds and reduce errors in application procedures; recalls in this respect the Court’s previous position on VAT reimbursement errors and the need to simplify the rules in this area to help Member States comply with obligations to pay beneficiaries;
Amendment 3 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 1 a (new) 1 a. Recalls that the European Court of Auditors has once again found the level of error related to EU expenditure to be substantially higher for high risk expenditures, which are usually reimbursement based and subject to complicated rules (estimated level of error 4.7%), as opposed to low-risk expenditures, which are subject to simpler rules (estimated free from material error)1a; notes that both ERDF and CEF expenditures fall under the category of high risk expenditure; encourages clarification of rules and procedures for funding mechanisms, as well as improvement of monitoring mechanisms wherever possible, in order to minimise the risks entailed in high risk expenditure; _________________ 1a https://www.eca.europa.eu/Lists/ECADoc uments/auditinbrief-2021/auditinbrief- 2021_EN.pdf
Amendment 30 #
6. Underlines that the funding of the TEN-T network revision shall well reflect and further focus on the extension of connection towards the Eastern Neighbourhood, as well as means of connecting the outermost regions to the European continent; in this regard insists to not further delay the acceptation of Bulgaria and Romania to the Schengen Area to ensure seamless transport connection to the East; urges that specific calls be issued for transport links serving the outermost regions and, in the digital sector, for the modernisation of submarine cables;
Amendment 31 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 6 6. Underlines that the funding of the TEN-T network revision shall well reflect and further focus on the extension of connection towards
Amendment 32 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 6 6. Underlines that the funding of the TEN-T network revision shall well reflect and further focus on the extension of connection towards the Eastern Neighbourhood; in this regard insists to not further delay the acceptation of Bulgaria
Amendment 33 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 6 a (new) 6 a. points out that the TEN-T makes a vital contribution to the achievement of the EU's political objectives in the accession and neighborhood policies, in particular through cross-border projects, and whereas the maintenance and strengthening of close transport links with third countries within the TEN-T and the further integration of the countries of the Western Balkans and the Eastern Partnership is therefore of significant importance for the EU;
Amendment 34 #
6 a. Welcomes Action Plan on Military Mobility 2.0 and the Joint Communication on an EU cyber defence policy put forward by the European Commission and the High Representative in order to address the deteriorating security environment following illegal, unjustified Russia's aggression against Ukraine and to boost the EU's capacity to protect its citizens and infrastructure;
Amendment 35 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 6 a (new) 6 a. Calls for the creation, in the next Multiannual Financial Framework, of a budget envelope dedicated to “external transport ” in the CEF III, in order to increase cooperation with third countries in terms of cross-border projects and infrastructure deployment;
Amendment 36 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 6 b (new) Amendment 37 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 6 b (new) 6 b. Calls for better connected and protected infrastructure and streamlining of regulatory issues; calls for a reinforced cooperation with NATO and to promote connectivity and dialogue with key partners;
Amendment 38 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 6 c (new) 6 c. welcomes the fact that the CEF Digital Programme contains new very high-capacity network connections for socio-economic factors and very high- quality connections for local communities to ensure the digital transition, and that the CEF Digital Programme contributed EUR 4 284 billion to the budget in 2022 for climate 2021;
Amendment 39 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 6 c (new) 6 c. Calls for the identification of possible gaps in the infrastructure, informing future actions to prioritise improvements and integrate fuel supply chain requirements, to support short- notice large-scale movements of military forces;
Amendment 4 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 2 a (new) 2 a. Points out the worrying conclusions of the “European Court of Auditors’ Special Report 26/2021: Regularity of spending in EU Cohesion policy”, which highlight that the European Commission’s own control system does not sufficiently compensate for the weaknesses in the work of Member State audit authorities when they check Cohesion spending; calls on the Commission to improve its audit work, audit documentation and review process, as well as to strengthen the main elements of the regularity information provided in the Annual Activity Reports by its Directorates-General;
Amendment 4 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 1 a (new) 1 a. Welcomes the Court of Auditor’s special report on EU co-funded investments in tourism, which assesses the effectiveness of the ERDF/CF funding for public investments in tourism as well as the Commission progress in Transition Pathway for Tourism; Reiterates the Parliament’s request for the creation of a new budgetary line for Tourism, to support this sector severely hit by the Covid-19 and now suffering from energy crisis and inflation;
Amendment 40 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 6 d (new) 6 d. Calls for the a reinforced cooperation with NATO and key strategic partners, such as the US, Canada and Norway, while promoting connectivity and dialogue with regional partners and enlargement countries, such as Ukraine, Moldova and the Western Balkans;
Amendment 41 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 6 e (new) 6 e. Calls on the Commission to provide the necessary funding in the EU Member States for developing of the dual use infrastructure with strategic role required in meeting present and future needs; emphasises the necessity to improve the EU capacity to assess and control the ownership and the investments in the field of strategic infrastructure, as a key aspect for guaranteeing the security of the EU and our citizens;
Amendment 42 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 6 f (new) 6 f. Calls for the digitalisation of administrative processes related to customs logistics and military mobility systems; stresses that it is crucial to invest in measures to protect transport infrastructure from cyber-attacks and other hybrid threats;
Amendment 43 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 7 Amendment 44 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 7 7.
Amendment 45 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 7 7. Notes the low amount of payment appropriations of 2 million of military mobility which operates with regrettable low financial envelope, therefore considers that it is necessary to provide a bigger budget for this field to meet the needs;
Amendment 46 #
7 a. Recalls that railway is the only transport sector which has decreased its GHG emissions; recalls outstanding environmental performance of railway transport which the Commission established as one of its priorities with the Action plan to boost long distance and cross-border passenger rail, calls for actions to intensify investments in railway transport and in the harmonisation and standardisation of the system, but also to improve funding opportunities to incentivise investments in ERTMS, calls for actions to intensify investments in multimodal logistics platforms;
Amendment 47 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 7 a (new) 7a. Underlines the importance of Special Report 27/2021 by the Court of Auditors entitled 'EU Support to tourism - Need for a fresh strategic orientation and a better funding approach' and calls on the Commission to implement the recommendations set out therein, including assistance for Member States in implementing procedures for the selection of ERDF-funded projects in the tourism sector, the aim being to promote Union priorities in this field and the use of a common output indicator;
Amendment 48 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 7 a (new) 7 a. Taking into consideration current unjustified and illegal Russian war in Ukraine, appreciates the Commission Implementing Regulation, defining transport infrastructure requirements necessary for dual civilian and military mobility; Welcomes the decision to extend the flexibilities of the remaining 2014- 2020 cohesion policy funds, including REACT-EU;
Amendment 49 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 7 b (new) 7 b. Requests the Commission to monitor the increasing risk of contingent liabilities to the EU budget being triggered in connection with illegal and unjustified Russia’s war of aggression against Ukraine, and take action as necessary to ensure that risk mitigation tools maintain sufficient capacity;
Amendment 5 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 2 b (new) 2 b. Urges the Commission to ensure the sound financial management in the use of funds, including the respect for the rule of law and the fundamental rights, through the use of already existing instruments-such as the European Rule of Law Mechanism-to their full extent, not shying away from its prerogatives and duties as guardian of the EU Treaties;
Amendment 5 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 1 a (new) 1 a. Stresses that financial regulation and high management standards has to be respected by all the EU’s institutions;
Amendment 50 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 7 b (new) 7 b. Recalls for further actions and investments in inland waterway transport in order to achieve a more climate- resilient transport system;
Amendment 51 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 7 c (new) 7 c. Draw attention to the Court of Auditors Special Report 15/2021 which points out that, during the COVID- 19crisis, despite Commission’s acts, air passenger rights were not fully protected; Calls the Commission to better inform on air passenger rights, to create a stronger linking between State aid, airlines and the reimbursement of air passenger; Asks the Commission to ameliorate the coordination between National measures;
Amendment 52 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 7 d (new) 7 d. Welcomes the development of the Transition Pathway for Tourism in order to achieve the digital and green transition of the sector; calls the Commission to develop a new strategy for the tourism sector and a roadmap for sustainable tourism; Recalls the Parliament’s request to create a new budgetary line for sustainable tourism;
Amendment 53 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 8 a (new) 8 a. Welcomes the establishment of European Climate Infrastructure and Environment Executive Agency (CINEA) which will take over activities of Innovation and Networks Executive Agency (INEA) and looks forward to publication of its 2021 annual activity report;
Amendment 54 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 8 b (new) 8 b. Notes that at the end of December 2021, DG MOVE had 420 staff, including external staff (contract agents and SNEs). Calls on EPSO to adjust the selection procedure in line with recommendations of the ECA Special Report 23/2020 in order to directly employ specialists for permanent positions or to leave the EPSO system for specialists completely and develop a new targeted hiring procedure similar to the one of ECB;
Amendment 6 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 3 3. Welcomes the fact that the absorption rate of the 2014-2020 European Structural and Investment (ESI) Funds has increased in 2021; points out that this was largely due to programme amendments linked to CRII/CRII+, which allowed to quickly mobilise unspent cohesion resources towards health actions, support for businesses and workers and vulnerable groups; stresses that similar, harmonised programme amendments would make sense in the context of other programmes too, if they can lead to greater efficiency and faster and simplified absorption at the same times as a reduction in errors;
Amendment 6 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 1 b (new) Amendment 7 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 4 4. Welcomes the quick roll-out of the additional funding provided under REACT-EU; highlights that, by the end of 2021, EUR 39.4 billion (99% of the overall amount available for the year) had been programmed and that the first payments to Member States were made as early as in June 2021; stresses that any increase in funding requires more attention and that if errors are made the institutions risk losing credibility; stresses, therefore, the need to closely monitor further payments and to ensure that the intensity of payments is not reduced, with appropriate transparency and safeguards to prevent misuse of funds;
Amendment 7 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 1 b (new) 1 b. Welcomes the Court’s Special Report 05/2021: Infrastructure for charging electric vehicles, commending the Commission success in promoting a common EU plug standard for charging electric vehicles, pointing out remaining obstacles to travel across the EU in electric vehicles and presenting recommendations;
Amendment 8 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 5 5. Warns however that certain Member States present very low absorption rates for the ESI Funds and will be under significant pressure to absorb all the available funds before the closure of the programmes; regrets that the RRF may have led to delays in the implementation of ESI funds; stresses the need to develop integrated, cohesive, stimulative, effective and reliable mechanisms and, in particular, recommendations and technical guidance on promoting the absorption of European funds in the Member States, so that they can be increasingly effective in their use European funds; stresses the need to identify Member States which have very low absorption and to establish and analyse the reason why that lower absorption is actually happening, and that appropriate measures should then be taken to improve the absorption rate, including through the exchange of best practices between countries and administrative training; calls on the Commission, in a structured dialogue with the Member States, to analyse administrative practices and procedures for the elimination of inefficiencies, and to disseminate examples of effective administrative practices and procedures to all competent authorities;
Amendment 8 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 1 c (new) 1 c. Notes that the pandemic is not over, new variants are emerging, and continued vigilance is essential. Inflation has reached levels not seen in decades, reducing the effective financial capacity of the EU budget, which is updated by a fixed deflator of 2% – well below the actual level of inflation. Supply-chain tensions are contributing to high inflationary pressures and are affecting the EU’s open strategic autonomy;
Amendment 9 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 5 5. Warns however that certain Member States present very low absorption rates for the ESI Funds and will be under significant pressure to absorb all the available funds before the closure of the programmes; regrets that the RRF may have led to delays in the implementation of ESI funds; urges to take adequate measures to eliminate the obstacles
Amendment 9 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 1 c (new) 1 c. Welcomes the finding by the Commission Annual report on internal audits carried out in 20211a that the Directorate-General of Mobility and Transport has an effective system of internal control in place to help ensure the support, monitoring, and enforcement of EU law in Member States; _________________ 1a https://www.europarl.europa.eu/cmsdata/ 252903/annual_internal_audit_report_we b-10.06.pdf
source: 739.687
|
History
(these mark the time of scraping, not the official date of the change)
2022-12-09Show (20) Changes | Timetravel
committees/1 |
Old
New
|
committees/2 |
Old
New
|
committees/3 |
Old
New
|
committees/4 |
Old
New
|
committees/5 |
Old
New
|
committees/6 |
Old
New
|
committees/7 |
Old
New
|
committees/8 |
Old
New
|
committees/9 |
Old
New
|
committees/10 |
Old
New
|
committees/11 |
Old
New
|
committees/12 |
|
committees/12/opinion |
False
|
committees/13 |
Old
New
|
committees/14 |
Old
New
|
committees/15 |
|
committees/15 |
Old
New
|
committees/16 |
Old
New
|
committees/17 |
Old
New
|
committees/18 |
Old
New
|
2022-11-12Show (19) Changes | Timetravel
committees/1 |
Old
New
|
committees/2 |
Old
New
|
committees/3 |
Old
New
|
committees/4 |
|
committees/4 |
Old
New
|
committees/5 |
Old
New
|
committees/6 |
Old
New
|
committees/8 |
Old
New
|
committees/9 |
Old
New
|
committees/10 |
Old
New
|
committees/11 |
|
committees/11/rapporteur |
|
committees/12 |
Old
New
|
committees/13 |
Old
New
|
committees/14 |
Old
New
|
committees/15 |
Old
New
|
committees/16 |
Old
New
|
committees/17 |
Old
New
|
committees/18 |
Old
New
|
2022-11-10Show (8) Changes | Timetravel
committees/1 |
Old
New
|
committees/2 |
Old
New
|
committees/3 |
Old
New
|
committees/4 |
Old
New
|
committees/5 |
Old
New
|
committees/6 |
Old
New
|
committees/7 |
Old
New
|
committees/18/opinion |
False
|
2022-10-27Show (9) Changes | Timetravel
committees/1 |
Old
New
|
committees/2 |
|
committees/2/rapporteur |
|
committees/3 |
|
committees/3 |
Old
New
|
committees/4 |
Old
New
|
committees/5 |
Old
New
|
committees/6 |
Old
New
|
committees/7 |
Old
New
|
2022-10-22Show (21) Changes | Timetravel
committees/1 |
Old
New
|
committees/2 |
|
committees/2 |
Old
New
|
committees/3 |
Old
New
|
committees/4 |
Old
New
|
committees/5 |
|
committees/6 |
Old
New
|
committees/7 |
Old
New
|
committees/8 |
Old
New
|
committees/9 |
Old
New
|
committees/10 |
Old
New
|
committees/11 |
|
committees/11 |
Old
New
|
committees/12 |
Old
New
|
committees/13 |
Old
New
|
committees/14 |
|
committees/14/rapporteur |
|
committees/15 |
Old
New
|
committees/16 |
Old
New
|
committees/17 |
Old
New
|
committees/18 |
Old
New
|
2022-10-15Show (20) Changes | Timetravel
commission |
|
committees/1 |
Old
New
|
committees/2 |
|
committees/3 |
Old
New
|
committees/4 |
Old
New
|
committees/5 |
|
committees/5 |
Old
New
|
committees/6 |
Old
New
|
committees/7 |
Old
New
|
committees/8 |
Old
New
|
committees/9 |
Old
New
|
committees/10 |
Old
New
|
committees/11 |
Old
New
|
committees/12 |
Old
New
|
committees/13 |
Old
New
|
committees/14 |
Old
New
|
committees/15 |
Old
New
|
committees/16 |
Old
New
|
committees/17 |
Old
New
|
committees/18 |
Old
New
|
2022-10-12Show (1) Changes | Timetravel
committees/6/opinion |
False
|
2022-10-11Show (15) Changes | Timetravel
committees/1 |
Old
New
|
committees/2 |
Old
New
|
committees/3 |
Old
New
|
committees/4 |
Old
New
|
committees/5 |
Old
New
|
committees/6 |
Old
New
|
committees/7 |
Old
New
|
committees/8 |
Old
New
|
committees/9 |
Old
New
|
committees/10 |
Old
New
|
committees/11 |
Old
New
|
committees/12 |
Old
New
|
committees/13 |
Old
New
|
committees/14 |
Old
New
|
committees/17/rapporteur |
|
2022-10-01Show (20) Changes | Timetravel
committees/1 |
Old
New
|
committees/2 |
Old
New
|
committees/3 |
Old
New
|
committees/4 |
Old
New
|
committees/5 |
Old
New
|
committees/6 |
Old
New
|
committees/7 |
Old
New
|
committees/8 |
|
committees/8 |
Old
New
|
committees/9 |
|
committees/9/opinion |
False
|
committees/10 |
Old
New
|
committees/11 |
Old
New
|
committees/12 |
Old
New
|
committees/13 |
Old
New
|
committees/14 |
Old
New
|
committees/15 |
Old
New
|
committees/16 |
Old
New
|
committees/17 |
Old
New
|
committees/18 |
Old
New
|
2022-09-21Show (19) Changes | Timetravel
committees/2 |
Old
New
|
committees/3 |
Old
New
|
committees/4 |
Old
New
|
committees/5 |
Old
New
|
committees/6 |
|
committees/6/rapporteur |
|
committees/7 |
Old
New
|
committees/8 |
Old
New
|
committees/9 |
|
committees/9 |
Old
New
|
committees/10 |
Old
New
|
committees/11 |
Old
New
|
committees/12 |
Old
New
|
committees/13 |
Old
New
|
committees/14 |
Old
New
|
committees/15 |
Old
New
|
committees/16 |
Old
New
|
committees/17 |
Old
New
|
committees/18 |
Old
New
|
2022-09-17Show (16) Changes | Timetravel
committees/5 |
Old
New
|
committees/6 |
|
committees/6 |
Old
New
|
committees/7 |
Old
New
|
committees/8 |
|
committees/8/rapporteur |
|
committees/9 |
Old
New
|
committees/10 |
Old
New
|
committees/11 |
Old
New
|
committees/12 |
Old
New
|
committees/13 |
Old
New
|
committees/14 |
Old
New
|
committees/15 |
Old
New
|
committees/16 |
Old
New
|
committees/17 |
Old
New
|
committees/18 |
Old
New
|
2022-09-16Show (3) Changes | Timetravel
events/1 |
|
procedure/dossier_of_the_committee |
|
procedure/stage_reached |
Old
Preparatory phase in ParliamentNew
Awaiting committee decision |
2022-09-15Show (22) Changes | Timetravel
committees/1 |
|
committees/1/opinion |
False
|
committees/2 |
Old
New
|
committees/3 |
Old
New
|
committees/4 |
|
committees/4/opinion |
False
|
committees/5 |
Old
New
|
committees/6 |
Old
New
|
committees/7 |
Old
New
|
committees/8 |
Old
New
|
committees/9 |
Old
New
|
committees/10 |
Old
New
|
committees/11 |
Old
New
|
committees/12 |
Old
New
|
committees/13 |
|
committees/13 |
Old
New
|
committees/14 |
Old
New
|
committees/15 |
Old
New
|
committees/16 |
|
committees/16 |
Old
New
|
committees/17 |
Old
New
|
committees/18 |
Old
New
|
2022-09-14Show (1) Changes | Timetravel
committees/5/rapporteur |
|
2022-09-06Show (20) Changes | Timetravel
committees/1 |
Old
New
|
committees/2 |
Old
New
|
committees/3 |
Old
New
|
committees/4 |
|
committees/4/rapporteur |
|
committees/5 |
Old
New
|
committees/6 |
Old
New
|
committees/7 |
Old
New
|
committees/8 |
Old
New
|
committees/9 |
|
committees/9 |
Old
New
|
committees/10 |
Old
New
|
committees/11 |
Old
New
|
committees/12 |
Old
New
|
committees/13 |
Old
New
|
committees/14 |
Old
New
|
committees/15 |
Old
New
|
committees/16 |
Old
New
|
committees/17 |
Old
New
|
committees/18 |
Old
New
|
2022-09-03Show (20) Changes | Timetravel
committees/1 |
|
committees/1/opinion |
False
|
committees/2 |
Old
New
|
committees/3 |
Old
New
|
committees/4 |
Old
New
|
committees/5 |
Old
New
|
committees/6 |
Old
New
|
committees/7 |
Old
New
|
committees/8 |
Old
New
|
committees/9 |
Old
New
|
committees/10 |
Old
New
|
committees/11 |
Old
New
|
committees/12 |
Old
New
|
committees/13 |
Old
New
|
committees/14 |
Old
New
|
committees/15 |
|
committees/15 |
Old
New
|
committees/16 |
Old
New
|
committees/17 |
Old
New
|
committees/18 |
Old
New
|
2022-09-02Show (1) Changes | Timetravel
committees/10/opinion |
False
|
2022-08-28Show (21) Changes | Timetravel
committees/0 |
|
committees/0 |
|
committees/1 |
Old
New
|
committees/2 |
Old
New
|
committees/3 |
Old
New
|
committees/4 |
Old
New
|
committees/5 |
Old
New
|
committees/6 |
Old
New
|
committees/7 |
Old
New
|
committees/8 |
Old
New
|
committees/9 |
Old
New
|
committees/10 |
Old
New
|
committees/11 |
Old
New
|
committees/12 |
Old
New
|
committees/13 |
Old
New
|
committees/14 |
Old
New
|
committees/15 |
Old
New
|
committees/16 |
Old
New
|
committees/17 |
Old
New
|
committees/18 |
Old
New
|
forecasts |
|
2022-08-09Show (20) Changes
committees/1 |
|
committees/1 |
Old
New
|
committees/2 |
Old
New
|
committees/3 |
Old
New
|
committees/4 |
Old
New
|
committees/5 |
Old
New
|
committees/6 |
Old
New
|
committees/7 |
Old
New
|
committees/8 |
Old
New
|
committees/9 |
Old
New
|
committees/10 |
Old
New
|
committees/11 |
Old
New
|
committees/12 |
Old
New
|
committees/13 |
Old
New
|
committees/14 |
Old
New
|
committees/15 |
Old
New
|
committees/16 |
Old
New
|
committees/17 |
|
committees/17/rapporteur |
|
committees/18 |
Old
New
|