Progress: Procedure completed
Role | Committee | Rapporteur | Shadows |
---|---|---|---|
Lead | CONT | PEKSA Mikuláš ( Verts/ALE) | HOHLMEIER Monika ( EPP), MANDA Claudiu ( S&D), STRUGARIU Ramona ( Renew), KUHS Joachim ( ID), CZARNECKI Ryszard ( ECR), FLANAGAN Luke Ming ( GUE/NGL) |
Committee Opinion | JURI | ||
Committee Opinion | LIBE | BRICMONT Saskia ( Verts/ALE) | José GUSMÃO ( GUE/NGL), Ramona STRUGARIU ( RE) |
Lead committee dossier:
Subjects
Events
The European Parliament decided by 523 votes to 104, with 11 abstentions, to grant discharge to the Administrative Director in respect of the implementation of the budget of the European Public Prosecutor's Office for the financial year 2021.
In its resolution, adopted by 505 votes to 111 with 9 abstentions, Parliament made the following observations:
Budgetary and financial management
The overall budget allocated to the European Public Prosecutor's Office for 2021 was EUR 26.3 million , a decrease of EUR 45 million compared to the initial allocation. EUR 9.2 million was allocated and used while the European Public Prosecutor's Office was not yet financially autonomous but still dependent on the Commission. EUR 9.5 million of the original amount was returned to the EU budget.
In 2021, the budget of the European Public Prosecutor's Office increased substantially compared to 2020 (EUR 11.6 million) as a consequence of a correction of the underestimation of the caseload provided in 2017 when adopting Regulation (EU) 2017/1939. It is important to adapt the human and financial resources to the increasing workload and to increase the budget of the European Public Prosecutor's Office accordingly.
Parliament noted the budget implementation rate of 97% for commitment appropriations and 71% for payment appropriations.
Overall, the COVID-19 pandemic has not had any specific impact on the European Public Prosecutor's Office's activities relating to mopping-up, transfers or necessary investments or on the market costs of goods and services. However, Members noted that the COVID-19 pandemic may have contributed to the delay in the timely appointment of Deputy European Public Prosecutors, thereby delaying the start of prosecution and investigation operations.
The implementation of the provisions of Regulation (EU) 2017/1939, which define the situations in which a financial contribution from the European Public Prosecutor's Office budget may be required to cover investigation costs at decentralised level and exceptionally costly investigative measures carried out at national level, requires the adaptation of the applicable financial rules, which currently do not allow for the reimbursement of expenses incurred by national judicial systems
Internal management, performance and control
In 2021, the European Public Prosecutor's Office received 2 832 alerts of potential infringements – 1 351 from national authorities, 190 from EU institutions, bodies, offices and agencies, 1 282 from private parties and 9 ex officio. The European Public Prosecutor's Office concluded that there were grounds for exercising its jurisdiction and for raising or opening investigations in 576 cases, 31 of which were referred to national authorities after the European Public Prosecutor's Office exercised its jurisdiction.
Five indictments were issued by the European Public Prosecutor's Office in 2021 and one final conviction was ordered by the courts in European Public Prosecutor's Office cases, while in three additional cases simplified prosecution procedures were applied.
Parliament called on the Commission and participating Member States to consider extending the mandate and powers of the European Public Prosecutor's Office to include the investigation, prosecution and trial of violations of EU restrictive measures.
Human resources, equality and staff well-being
Parliament welcomed the efforts of the European Public Prosecutor's Office to carry out an intensive recruitment and onboarding process, with the aim of ensuring full operational capacity as soon as possible.
By the end of 2021, out of a total of 217 staff, the central office had 122 statutory staff (91 temporary staff and 31 contract staff), while the national offices currently have 95 special advisers, and there is gender balance at both levels.
Members regret the selection procedures of European Delegated Prosecutors in several Member States have been repeatedly unsuccessful in filling the positions initially budgeted for various reasons, amongst them the remuneration level, the lack of a clear career perspective, as well as uncertainty as to their social security and health insurance coverage.
They recalled that the European Public Prosecutor's Office is the only Union institution employing prosecutors and that their independence is paramount to the good functioning of the prosecution office. They called on the Commission to address this issue and to ensure the necessary flexibility within the legal framework in order to fully accommodate the special status of prosecutors as EPPO staff.
Based on the experience earned in the first year of operational activity and administrative management of the EPPO, Parliament called on the Commission to engage in an active dialogue with the EPPO and to submit, without delay, an adequately comprehensive proposal for the revision of Regulation (EU) 2017/1939 , aiming to resolve existing shortcomings, particularly in internal processes related to of financial and human resources.
Ethical framework and transparency
The European Public Prosecutor's Office is in the process of developing the essential features of its ethical framework.
Members welcomed the fact that the EPPO has adopted an anti-fraud strategy as part of its risk-based management, that all staff provide a conflict of interest declaration, that all staff involved in operational activities are subject to a personal security clearance requirement, and that those who hold the position of Prosecutor or Administrative Director are required to submit declarations of interest, which are then screened.
Parliament also commented on the digital transition, cybersecurity and data protection, buildings and security, the environment and sustainability, interinstitutional cooperation and communication.
The resolution made the following observations, inter alia :
- as regards the case management system, broad interoperability is ensured through the use of concepts and components developed and made available by the Commission. Members welcome the attention given to the use of automated translation services and the development of the ‘translation portal’ for prosecutors, Central Office staff and other staff to improve the efficiency of case processing. The Prosecution Service is invited to further develop its own cyber security capacity;
- no lease agreement has yet been signed with the authorities of the host Member State providing the office space free of charge, despite the provisions of the headquarters agreement. The Luxembourg administration is invited to speed up the process and complete the procedure without further delay;
- the European Public Prosecutor's Office has concluded a cooperation agreement with the Commission and working agreements with the European Investment Bank Group, OLAF, the European Court of Auditors, Europol and Eurojust;
- a dialogue with non-participating Member States must be established. The lack of cooperation from non-participating Member States since the European Public Prosecutor's Office started its activities in June 2021 is a matter of concern, in particular with regard to the gathering of evidence. The Commission is invited to encourage the widening of the participation of the other Member States that do not yet participate in the European Public Prosecutor's Office;
- the European Public Prosecutor's Office should include in its strategic actions, focused activities aiming to increase its visibility and to endorse the knowledge and understanding of the Union’s vision and approach in the protection of the Union’s and taxpayers’ interests.
The Committee on Budgetary Control adopted the report by Mikuláš PEKSA (Greens/EFA, CZ) on the discharge for the implementation of the budget of the European Public Prosecutor's Office for the financial year 2021.
The committee recommended that the European Parliament give discharge to the Administrative Director of the European Public Prosecutor's Office in respect of the implementation of the budget of the European Public Prosecutor's Office for the financial year 2021.
Budgetary and financial management
The report notes that the overall budget allocated to the European Public Prosecutor's Office for 2021 was EUR 26.3 million , a decrease of EUR 45 million compared to the initial allocation. EUR 9.2 million was allocated and used while the European Public Prosecutor's Office was not yet financially autonomous but still dependent on the Commission. EUR 9.5 million of the original amount was returned to the EU budget.
In 2021, the budget of the European Public Prosecutor's Office increased substantially compared to 2020 (EUR 11.6 million) as a consequence of a correction of the underestimation of the caseload provided in 2017 when adopting Regulation (EU) 2017/1939. It is important to adapt the human and financial resources to the increasing workload and to increase the budget of the European Public Prosecutor's Office accordingly.
The report notes the budget implementation rate of 97% for commitment appropriations and 71% for payment appropriations.
Overall, the COVID-19 pandemic has not had any specific impact on the European Public Prosecutor's Office's activities relating to mopping-up, transfers or necessary investments or on the market costs of goods and services. However, Members note that the COVID-19 pandemic may have contributed to the delay in the timely appointment of Deputy European Public Prosecutors, thereby delaying the start of prosecution and investigation operations.
Internal management, performance and control
The report encourages the European Public Prosecutor's Office to periodically review its set of performance indicators.
In 2021, the European Public Prosecutor's Office received 2 832 alerts of potential infringements – 1 351 from national authorities, 190 from EU institutions, bodies, offices and agencies, 1 282 from private parties and 9 ex officio. The European Public Prosecutor's Office concluded that there were grounds for exercising its jurisdiction and for raising or opening investigations in 576 cases, 31 of which were referred to national authorities after the European Public Prosecutor's Office exercised its jurisdiction.
Five indictments were issued by the European Public Prosecutor's Office in 2021 and one final conviction was ordered by the courts in European Public Prosecutor's Office cases, while in three additional cases simplified prosecution procedures were applied.
The report calls on the Commission and participating Member States to consider extending the mandate and powers of the European Public Prosecutor's Office to include the investigation, prosecution and trial of violations of EU restrictive measures.
Human resources, equality and staff well-being
The report welcomes the efforts of the European Public Prosecutor's Office to carry out an intensive recruitment and onboarding process, with the aim of ensuring full operational capacity as soon as possible.
By the end of 2021, out of a total of 217 staff, the central office had 122 statutory staff (91 temporary staff and 31 contract staff), while the national offices currently have 95 special advisers, and there is gender balance at both levels.
Members regret the selection procedures of European Delegated Prosecutors in several Member States have been repeatedly unsuccessful in filling the positions initially budgeted for various reasons, amongst them the remuneration level, the lack of a clear career perspective, as well as uncertainty as to their social security and health insurance coverage.
They recall that the European Public Prosecutor's Office is the only Union institution employing prosecutors and that their independence is paramount to the good functioning of the prosecution office; calls on the Commission to address this issue and to ensure the necessary flexibility within the legal framework in order to fully accommodate the special status of prosecutors as EPPO staff.
Ethical framework and transparency
The report notes that the European Public Prosecutor's Office is in the process of developing the essential features of its ethical framework.
Members welcome the fact that the EPPO has adopted an anti-fraud strategy as part of its risk-based management, that all staff provide a conflict of interest declaration, that all staff involved in operational activities are subject to a personal security clearance requirement, and that those who hold the position of Prosecutor or Administrative Director are required to submit declarations of interest, which are then screened.
The report makes the following observations, inter alia :
- as regards the case management system, broad interoperability is ensured through the use of concepts and components developed and made available by the Commission. Members welcome the attention given to the use of automated translation services and the development of the ‘translation portal’ for prosecutors, Central Office staff and other staff to improve the efficiency of case processing. The Prosecution Service is invited to further develop its own cyber security capacity;
- the European Public Prosecutor's Office has concluded a cooperation agreement with the Commission and working agreements with the European Investment Bank Group, OLAF, the European Court of Auditors, Europol and Eurojust;
- the lack of cooperation from non-participating Member States since the European Public Prosecutor's Office started its activities in June 2021 is a matter of concern, in particular with regard to the gathering of evidence. The Commission is invited to encourage the widening of the participation of the other Member States that do not yet participate in the European Public Prosecutor's Office;
- the European Public Prosecutor's Office should include in its strategic actions, focused activities aiming to increase its visibility and to endorse the knowledge and understanding of the Union’s vision and approach in the protection of the Union’s and taxpayers’ interests;
- the report invites the Commission to engage in an active dialogue with the EPPO and to submit, without delay, an adequately comprehensive proposal for the revision of Regulation (EU) 2017/1939, aiming to resolve existing shortcomings, particularly in internal processes related to of financial and human resources.
Documents
- Results of vote in Parliament: Results of vote in Parliament
- Decision by Parliament: T9-0147/2023
- Debate in Parliament: Debate in Parliament
- Committee report tabled for plenary: A9-0079/2023
- Supplementary non-legislative basic document: 06247/2023
- Amendments tabled in committee: PE742.347
- Committee opinion: PE738.489
- Committee draft report: PE738.393
- Court of Auditors: opinion, report: OJ C 412 27.10.2022, p. 0012
- Court of Auditors: opinion, report: N9-0002/2023
- Non-legislative basic document: COM(2022)0323
- Non-legislative basic document: EUR-Lex
- Non-legislative basic document published: COM(2022)0323
- Non-legislative basic document published: EUR-Lex
- Non-legislative basic document: COM(2022)0323 EUR-Lex
- Court of Auditors: opinion, report: OJ C 412 27.10.2022, p. 0012 N9-0002/2023
- Committee draft report: PE738.393
- Committee opinion: PE738.489
- Amendments tabled in committee: PE742.347
- Supplementary non-legislative basic document: 06247/2023
Activities
- Ivan Vilibor SINČIĆ
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Nicola BEER
Plenary Speeches (1)
Votes
Décharge 2021: Parquet européen (EPPO) - Discharge 2021: European Public Prosecutors Office (the ‘EPPO’) - A9-0079/2023 - Mikuláš Peksa - Propositions de décision #
A9-0079/2023 - Mikuláš Peksa - Proposition de résolution #
Amendments | Dossier |
20 |
2022/2091(DEC)
2022/12/08
LIBE
20 amendments...
Amendment 1 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 1 – point 1 (new) (1) Stresses that financial regulations and high management standards have to be observed by all Union institutions;
Amendment 10 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 5 a (new) 5 a. Notes EPPO's announcement from the 14 October 2022 with respect to the ongoing EPPO investigation into the acquisition of COVID-19 vaccines in the Union and to the fact that the exceptional confirmation comes after the extremely high public interest into the matter;
Amendment 11 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 5 a (new) 5 a. Emphasises that the number of EPPO investigations involving Poland is the highest of any non-participating country; regrets that Poland made the amendment of its criminal procedure code a condition for the signature of the working arrangement with EPPO;
Amendment 12 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 6 Amendment 13 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 6 6.
Amendment 14 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 6 a (new) Amendment 15 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 6 b (new) 6 b. Awaits with interest the findings and conclusions of EPPO's investigation into the acquisition of COVID-19 vaccines in the Union;
Amendment 16 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 6 c (new) 6 c. Warns that in the current crisis context, identifying new budgetary resources for the Union risks to become EPPO's sole reason of existence, with clear and serious impact on citizens rights and freedoms;
Amendment 17 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 7 Amendment 18 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 7 Amendment 19 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 7 7. Notes that the EPPO’s caseload has been significantly underestimated; stresses the importance to adapt human and financial resources to the growing workload and to
Amendment 2 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 1 a (new) 1 a. Considering Article 14(2)(c) and Article 14(5) of Council Regulation (EU) 2017/1939 regarding the appointment and dismissal of the European Chief Prosecutor, points to the Decision of 11 November 2021 of Romania's High Court of Cassation and Justice according to which Laura Kövesi does not have the highest prosecutorial or judicial grade in Romania;
Amendment 20 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 7 a (new) 7 a. Calls on the Commission to consider the extension of the mandate and competences of the EPPO to include the investigation, prosecution and bringing to judgment of environmental crimes and violations of Union restrictive measures.
Amendment 3 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 2 2. Welcomes the EPPO 2021 Annual Report; notes that the EPPO has started its operations on 1 June 2021 and has been
Amendment 4 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 2 2.
Amendment 5 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 3 a (new) 3 a. Notes the Court's observation concerning the use of interim staff for processing payments, not in line with EPPO's financial rules; acknowledges EPPO's explanations that the limited and transparently disclosed use of interim staff was caused by the necessity to adapt its control framework as activities grew and staff was made available, while initiating as early as possible its prosecution and investigative roles; notes as well that, despite the health crisis still ongoing, the EPPO continued to recruit staff during 2021 to strengthen its operational and administrative capacities;
Amendment 6 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 4 4. Welcomes the EPPO’s agreement with the Commission, and working arrangements with OLAF, Eurojust, Europol and non-participating countries; encourages EPPO to further engage in a closer relationship with Union bodies involved in the protection of the financial interests of the Union, in particular OLAF, based on mutual cooperation within their respective mandates;
Amendment 7 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 4 4. Welcomes the EPPO’s agreement with the Commission, and working arrangements with OLAF, Eurojust, Europol
Amendment 8 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 4 a (new) 4 a. Recognizes EPPO as a novel actor equipped with the competence to prosecute criminal offenses against the Union's financial interests, which are often linked to other serious crimes with a cross-border dimension, such as organized crime or terrorism; recalls that EPPO's capacities should allow for the proper performance of its mandate;
Amendment 9 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 5 5. Notes that from the non- participating Member States, the EPPO cooperates with Denmark, Hungary and Sweden, but regrets that the work of the EPPO, in particular the evidence gathering, is affected by a lack of cooperation from Ireland and Poland; welcomes the commitment by the Irish authorities to review their working arrangement with the EPPO in 2023;
source: 739.652
|
History
(these mark the time of scraping, not the official date of the change)
events/7 |
|
procedure/final |
|
procedure/stage_reached |
Old
Procedure completed, awaiting publication in Official JournalNew
Procedure completed |
events/5 |
|
docs/6 |
|
events/5/summary |
|
docs/6 |
|
events/4/docs |
|
events/5 |
|
forecasts |
|
procedure/stage_reached |
Old
Awaiting Parliament's voteNew
Procedure completed, awaiting publication in Official Journal |
events/4 |
|
forecasts/0 |
|
docs/6 |
|
events/3/summary |
|
docs/6/docs/0/url |
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/A-9-2023-0079_EN.html
|
events/3/docs/0/url |
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/A-9-2023-0079_EN.html
|
docs/6 |
|
events/3/docs |
|
forecasts/0 |
|
forecasts/0 |
|
forecasts/1 |
|
events/3 |
|
procedure/stage_reached |
Old
Awaiting committee decisionNew
Awaiting Parliament's vote |
docs/5 |
|
events/2 |
|
forecasts/0 |
|
docs/4/docs/0/url |
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/CONT-AM-742347_EN.html
|
docs/4 |
|
docs/3 |
|
docs/3 |
|
docs/3 |
|
forecasts/1 |
|
docs/1 |
|
docs/1/docs/0/url |
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/CONT-PR-738393_EN.html
|
docs/1 |
|
committees/1/opinion |
False
|
committees/2/rapporteur |
|
commission |
|
events/1 |
|
procedure/dossier_of_the_committee |
|
procedure/stage_reached |
Old
Preparatory phase in ParliamentNew
Awaiting committee decision |
committees/0/shadows/2 |
|
forecasts |
|
committees/0 |
|
committees/0 |
|