BETA


2022/2146(INI) Further reform of corporate taxation rules

Progress: Procedure completed

RoleCommitteeRapporteurShadows
Lead ECON BENJUMEA BENJUMEA Isabel (icon: EPP EPP) MARQUES Pedro (icon: S&D S&D), HLAVÁČEK Martin (icon: Renew Renew), GRUFFAT Claude (icon: Verts/ALE Verts/ALE), MOŻDŻANOWSKA Andżelika Anna (icon: ECR ECR), AUBRY Manon (icon: GUE/NGL GUE/NGL)
Committee Opinion BUDG VAN OVERTVELDT Johan (icon: ECR ECR) Eider GARDIAZABAL RUBIAL (icon: S&D S&D), Dimitrios PAPADIMOULIS (icon: GUE/NGL GUE/NGL), Joachim KUHS (icon: ID ID)
Lead committee dossier:
Legal Basis:
RoP 54

Events

2023/12/12
   EP - Text adopted by Parliament, single reading
Documents
2023/12/12
   EP - Decision by Parliament
Documents
2023/11/14
   EP - Committee report tabled for plenary
Details

The Committee on Economic and Monetary Affairs adopted an own-initiative report by Isabel BENJUMEA BENJUMEA (PPE, ES) on further reform of corporate taxation rules.

Members recalled that although tax policy remains a Member State responsibility, the single market requires a certain level of tax cooperation and harmonisation complete, improve and further develop it. It is crucial to adopt a common approach on tax policies is crucial for addressing harmful tax competition and profit shifting, fighting against tax avoidance and evasion.

The report took note of the package put forward by the Commission on tax simplification for SMEs and BEFIT and the need to adopt solutions at EU level that are well designed, taking into account existing systems in the Member States and do not impose additional, disproportionate and unnecessary burdens on businesses, in particular SMEs.

Members deplored the fact that national tax systems, tax administrations and, in general, differences in the broader public administration of the countries have an impact on the burden of compliance, particularly for SMEs, as they have to cope with up to 27 different tax systems. The Commission is called on to make the best use of the EU’s existing forums to ensure a coherent implementation of EU tax legislation across Member States.

Reducing the burden of compliance on EU companies, particularly SMEs

The report revealed that, according to the Commission, the estimated tax compliance costs for large multinational enterprises (MNEs) amount to about 2 % of taxes paid, while for SMEs the estimate is about 30 % of taxes paid. The Commission is called on to design tax policies in a way that makes them easy to implement for smaller companies, lowering the costs that they bear and reducing their administrative obligations under tax legislation.

The Commission should present an overall evaluation of previous actions taken on corporate taxation since 2011 and to publish a thorough impact assessment on the best options to ease the administrative burden on businesses, particularly SMEs, to map all differences in transposition in the EU, and identify areas for simplification and to ensure that businesses already under strain have a reasonable timeframe to implement policies.

Member States are called on to:

- consider engaging in policies of full expensing for capital investments and to make capital allowance provisions permanent in order to improve real investments, in particular investments in research and development and to reach the climate targets, as well as to assist Europe’s competitiveness;

- relieve the burden on companies, especially SMEs, for instance through temporary tax measures to mitigate the increase in energy costs and to use the additional revenues based on higher energy prices to provide direct and targeted relief to help the most vulnerable citizens and the middle class.

The Pillar Two Agreement

The report welcomed the fact that the two-pillar solution was agreed at the OECD/G20 Inclusive Framework on the allocation of taxing rights and the application of a minimum effective tax rate of 15 % on the global profits of MNEs and the adoption of the Pillar Two Directive implementing the international agreement in EU law.

Members noted that Pillar One and Pillar Two rules are only applicable to MNEs with a turnover above the thresholds and most companies, notably SMEs, are therefore exempt from this agreement. They took noted of the Commission’s efforts to build BEFIT on the international pillar 2 agreement and the EU’s Pillar Two Directive.

The Commission took noted note that the Commission reiterated its acknowledgment that BEFIT is also relevant from an own resource perspective. Members recalled that Parliament has expressed support for new own resources linked to corporate taxation such as the common consolidated corporate tax base (CCCTB), digital services tax and, most recently, for the ‘Pillar One’-based own resource in the context of the OECD inclusive framework on Base Erosion and Profit Shifting (BEPS). Members recalled furthermore its call for a EU-wide Financial Transaction Tax (FTT) and to evaluate, as further options an excise duty on the repurchase of shares by corporations as proposed in the US Inflation Reduction Act and a common and standardised withholding tax framework.

Towards a coordinated and simplified company taxation regime (BEFIT)

The report noted that the BEFIT initiative and the SME support package on taxation are complementary and both aim to improve simplification for businesses. The Commission is invited to propose measures to help all Member States move towards a simplified, efficient and competitive tax system in order to reduce the administrative burden on businesses, especially SMEs. Members noted that simplifying refund procedures, deductions and disputes are other ways of reducing the administrative burden, particularly for SMEs.

The report noted the Commission's intention to work on a BEFIT proposal, with a view to designing a new single EU corporate tax rulebook and a common tax base of income taxation for businesses. It called on the Commission to ensure that the new proposal provides clarity and predictability for businesses and facilitates cross-border economic activity.

Members consider that the implementation of a single tax rulebook may help reduce the scope for harmful tax competition and tax avoidance between Member States while simplifying corporate tax rules in the EU.

Given that companies doing business across the EU have to deal with different tax laws and tax authorities, Members highlighted the idea of a one-stop-shop allowing for the filing of one consolidated tax return as a possible way of reducing administrative burdens and minimising tax obstacles to the Single Market.

According to Members, all the very large firms operating in the EU should come within the scope of the future BEFIT proposal. They called on Commission to make sure that the specific demands of SMEs are met, by keeping BEFIT optional for SMEs, especially those not doing cross-border business.

Members recalled that corporate spending on research and development was equal to only 1.5 % of EU GDP in 2020, compared to 2.6 % in the United States and Japan, according to the European Investment Bank’s 2022/2023 investment report. This shortfall could reduce the EU’s long-term competitiveness. The Commission is called on to conduct an impact assessment on the use of new technologies to improve the speed, efficiency, reliability, transparency and resilience of tax-related administrative procedures.

Documents
2023/10/24
   EP - Vote in committee
2023/07/06
   EP - Amendments tabled in committee
Documents
2023/06/29
   EP - Specific opinion
Documents
2023/06/19
   EP - VAN OVERTVELDT Johan (ECR) appointed as rapporteur in BUDG
2023/05/16
   EP - Committee draft report
Documents
2023/02/07
   EP - BENJUMEA BENJUMEA Isabel (EPP) appointed as rapporteur in ECON
2022/10/20
   EP - Committee referral announced in Parliament

Documents

Votes

Further reform of corporate taxation rules – A9-0359/2023 – Isabel Benjumea Benjumea – Motion for a resolution #

2023/12/12 Outcome: +: 495, -: 65, 0: 58
IT DE PL FR ES RO NL BG AT HR FI PT LT CZ BE SE SK HU SI LV EL LU DK MT EE CY IE
Total
65
86
44
70
51
28
24
15
18
12
14
19
9
19
19
17
12
17
7
8
15
6
12
5
7
6
13
icon: PPE PPE
160

Slovakia PPE

Abstain (1)

4

Luxembourg PPE

2

Denmark PPE

Abstain (1)

1

Malta PPE

For (1)

1

Estonia PPE

For (1)

1

Cyprus PPE

2
icon: S&D S&D
125
3

Lithuania S&D

2

Belgium S&D

2

Slovakia S&D

For (1)

1

Slovenia S&D

For (1)

1

Latvia S&D

2

Greece S&D

1

Luxembourg S&D

For (1)

1

Denmark S&D

Against (1)

3

Estonia S&D

2

Cyprus S&D

2
icon: Renew Renew
87

Austria Renew

For (1)

1

Croatia Renew

For (1)

1

Finland Renew

3

Lithuania Renew

1

Sweden Renew

2

Hungary Renew

2

Slovenia Renew

2

Latvia Renew

For (1)

1

Greece Renew

1

Luxembourg Renew

2

Estonia Renew

3

Ireland Renew

2
icon: Verts/ALE Verts/ALE
63

Italy Verts/ALE

3

Spain Verts/ALE

2

Romania Verts/ALE

1

Netherlands Verts/ALE

2

Austria Verts/ALE

3

Finland Verts/ALE

3

Portugal Verts/ALE

1

Lithuania Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Czechia Verts/ALE

3

Belgium Verts/ALE

3

Sweden Verts/ALE

2

Luxembourg Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Denmark Verts/ALE

2

Ireland Verts/ALE

2
icon: ECR ECR
60

Germany ECR

1

Romania ECR

Abstain (1)

1

Netherlands ECR

4

Bulgaria ECR

2

Croatia ECR

1

Finland ECR

Abstain (1)

2

Lithuania ECR

1

Belgium ECR

2

Sweden ECR

3

Slovakia ECR

Abstain (1)

1

Latvia ECR

For (1)

1
icon: NI NI
40

Germany NI

For (1)

Against (1)

2

France NI

4

Netherlands NI

Against (1)

1

Croatia NI

Abstain (1)

2

Belgium NI

For (1)

1

Latvia NI

Against (1)

1
icon: ID ID
50

Austria ID

3

Czechia ID

For (1)

Against (1)

2

Denmark ID

Against (1)

1

Estonia ID

Against (1)

1
icon: The Left The Left
33

Netherlands The Left

Against (1)

1

Finland The Left

Against (1)

1

Czechia The Left

Against (1)

1

Belgium The Left

Against (1)

1

Sweden The Left

Against (1)

1

Cyprus The Left

2

Ireland The Left

4
AmendmentsDossier
292 2022/2146(INI)
2023/07/06 ECON 292 amendments...
source: 751.609

History

(these mark the time of scraping, not the official date of the change)

docs/3
date
2023-12-12T00:00:00
docs
url: https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/TA-9-2023-0460_EN.html title: T9-0460/2023
type
Text adopted by Parliament, single reading
body
EP
events/3
date
2023-12-12T00:00:00
type
Decision by Parliament
body
EP
docs
url: https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/TA-9-2023-0460_EN.html title: T9-0460/2023
procedure/stage_reached
Old
Awaiting Parliament's vote
New
Procedure completed
forecasts
  • date: 2023-12-12T00:00:00 title: Vote scheduled
forecasts/0/title
Old
Vote in plenary scheduled
New
Vote scheduled
docs/3
date
2023-11-14T00:00:00
docs
url: https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/A-9-2023-0359_EN.html title: A9-0359/2023
type
Committee report tabled for plenary, single reading
body
EP
events/2/summary
  • The Committee on Economic and Monetary Affairs adopted an own-initiative report by Isabel BENJUMEA BENJUMEA (PPE, ES) on further reform of corporate taxation rules.
  • Members recalled that although tax policy remains a Member State responsibility, the single market requires a certain level of tax cooperation and harmonisation complete, improve and further develop it. It is crucial to adopt a common approach on tax policies is crucial for addressing harmful tax competition and profit shifting, fighting against tax avoidance and evasion.
  • The report took note of the package put forward by the Commission on tax simplification for SMEs and BEFIT and the need to adopt solutions at EU level that are well designed, taking into account existing systems in the Member States and do not impose additional, disproportionate and unnecessary burdens on businesses, in particular SMEs.
  • Members deplored the fact that national tax systems, tax administrations and, in general, differences in the broader public administration of the countries have an impact on the burden of compliance, particularly for SMEs, as they have to cope with up to 27 different tax systems. The Commission is called on to make the best use of the EU’s existing forums to ensure a coherent implementation of EU tax legislation across Member States.
  • Reducing the burden of compliance on EU companies, particularly SMEs
  • The report revealed that, according to the Commission, the estimated tax compliance costs for large multinational enterprises (MNEs) amount to about 2 % of taxes paid, while for SMEs the estimate is about 30 % of taxes paid. The Commission is called on to design tax policies in a way that makes them easy to implement for smaller companies, lowering the costs that they bear and reducing their administrative obligations under tax legislation.
  • The Commission should present an overall evaluation of previous actions taken on corporate taxation since 2011 and to publish a thorough impact assessment on the best options to ease the administrative burden on businesses, particularly SMEs, to map all differences in transposition in the EU, and identify areas for simplification and to ensure that businesses already under strain have a reasonable timeframe to implement policies.
  • Member States are called on to:
  • - consider engaging in policies of full expensing for capital investments and to make capital allowance provisions permanent in order to improve real investments, in particular investments in research and development and to reach the climate targets, as well as to assist Europe’s competitiveness;
  • - relieve the burden on companies, especially SMEs, for instance through temporary tax measures to mitigate the increase in energy costs and to use the additional revenues based on higher energy prices to provide direct and targeted relief to help the most vulnerable citizens and the middle class.
  • The Pillar Two Agreement
  • The report welcomed the fact that the two-pillar solution was agreed at the OECD/G20 Inclusive Framework on the allocation of taxing rights and the application of a minimum effective tax rate of 15 % on the global profits of MNEs and the adoption of the Pillar Two Directive implementing the international agreement in EU law.
  • Members noted that Pillar One and Pillar Two rules are only applicable to MNEs with a turnover above the thresholds and most companies, notably SMEs, are therefore exempt from this agreement. They took noted of the Commission’s efforts to build BEFIT on the international pillar 2 agreement and the EU’s Pillar Two Directive.
  • The Commission took noted note that the Commission reiterated its acknowledgment that BEFIT is also relevant from an own resource perspective. Members recalled that Parliament has expressed support for new own resources linked to corporate taxation such as the common consolidated corporate tax base (CCCTB), digital services tax and, most recently, for the ‘Pillar One’-based own resource in the context of the OECD inclusive framework on Base Erosion and Profit Shifting (BEPS). Members recalled furthermore its call for a EU-wide Financial Transaction Tax (FTT) and to evaluate, as further options an excise duty on the repurchase of shares by corporations as proposed in the US Inflation Reduction Act and a common and standardised withholding tax framework.
  • Towards a coordinated and simplified company taxation regime (BEFIT)
  • The report noted that the BEFIT initiative and the SME support package on taxation are complementary and both aim to improve simplification for businesses. The Commission is invited to propose measures to help all Member States move towards a simplified, efficient and competitive tax system in order to reduce the administrative burden on businesses, especially SMEs. Members noted that simplifying refund procedures, deductions and disputes are other ways of reducing the administrative burden, particularly for SMEs.
  • The report noted the Commission's intention to work on a BEFIT proposal, with a view to designing a new single EU corporate tax rulebook and a common tax base of income taxation for businesses. It called on the Commission to ensure that the new proposal provides clarity and predictability for businesses and facilitates cross-border economic activity.
  • Members consider that the implementation of a single tax rulebook may help reduce the scope for harmful tax competition and tax avoidance between Member States while simplifying corporate tax rules in the EU.
  • Given that companies doing business across the EU have to deal with different tax laws and tax authorities, Members highlighted the idea of a one-stop-shop allowing for the filing of one consolidated tax return as a possible way of reducing administrative burdens and minimising tax obstacles to the Single Market.
  • According to Members, all the very large firms operating in the EU should come within the scope of the future BEFIT proposal. They called on Commission to make sure that the specific demands of SMEs are met, by keeping BEFIT optional for SMEs, especially those not doing cross-border business.
  • Members recalled that corporate spending on research and development was equal to only 1.5 % of EU GDP in 2020, compared to 2.6 % in the United States and Japan, according to the European Investment Bank’s 2022/2023 investment report. This shortfall could reduce the EU’s long-term competitiveness. The Commission is called on to conduct an impact assessment on the use of new technologies to improve the speed, efficiency, reliability, transparency and resilience of tax-related administrative procedures.
forecasts/0
date
2023-12-12T00:00:00
title
Vote in plenary scheduled
forecasts/0
date
2023-12-11T00:00:00
title
Indicative plenary sitting date
docs/3
date
2023-11-14T00:00:00
docs
url: https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/A-9-2023-0359_EN.html title: A9-0359/2023
type
Committee report tabled for plenary, single reading
body
EP
events/2/docs
  • url: https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/A-9-2023-0359_EN.html title: A9-0359/2023
events/2
date
2023-11-14T00:00:00
type
Committee report tabled for plenary
body
EP
procedure/stage_reached
Old
Awaiting committee decision
New
Awaiting Parliament's vote
events/1
date
2023-10-24T00:00:00
type
Vote in committee
body
EP
forecasts/0
date
2023-10-24T00:00:00
title
Vote scheduled in committee
procedure/Other legal basis
Rules of Procedure EP 159
forecasts/1
date
2023-12-11T00:00:00
title
Indicative plenary sitting date
docs/2
date
2023-07-06T00:00:00
docs
url: https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/ECON-AM-751609_EN.html title: PE751.609
type
Amendments tabled in committee
body
EP
docs/1
date
2023-06-29T00:00:00
docs
url: https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/BUDG-AL-750072_EN.html title: PE750.072
committee
BUDG
type
Specific opinion
body
EP
forecasts/0/date
Old
2023-09-20T00:00:00
New
2023-10-24T00:00:00
committees/1/rapporteur
  • name: VAN OVERTVELDT Johan date: 2023-06-19T00:00:00 group: European Conservatives and Reformists Group abbr: ECR
commission
  • body: EC dg: Taxation and Customs Union commissioner: GENTILONI Paolo
docs
  • date: 2023-05-16T00:00:00 docs: url: https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/ECON-PR-736738_EN.html title: PE736.738 type: Committee draft report body: EP
forecasts
  • date: 2023-09-20T00:00:00 title: Vote scheduled in committee
committees/0/shadows/2
name
GRUFFAT Claude
group
Group of the Greens/European Free Alliance
abbr
Verts/ALE
committees/0/rapporteur
  • name: BENJUMEA BENJUMEA Isabel date: 2023-02-07T00:00:00 group: Group of European People's Party abbr: EPP