Progress: Procedure completed, awaiting publication in Official Journal
Role | Committee | Rapporteur | Shadows |
---|---|---|---|
Lead | JURI | LEITÃO-MARQUES Maria-Manuel ( S&D), DZHAMBAZKI Angel ( ECR) | |
Committee Opinion | IMCO |
Lead committee dossier:
Legal Basis:
TFEU 050-p2-ag, TFEU 114, TFEU 050-p1
Legal Basis:
TFEU 050-p2-ag, TFEU 114, TFEU 050-p1Subjects
Events
The European Parliament adopted by 550 votes to 3, with 19 abstentions, a legislative resolution on the proposal for a directive of the European Parliament and of the Council amending Directives 2009/102/EC and (EU) 2017/1132 as regards further expanding and upgrading the use of digital tools and processes in company law.
The objectives of this Directive aim to increase the amount and improve the reliability of company data available in business registers or through the system of interconnection of registers, and to enable direct use of company data available in business registers when setting up cross-border branches and subsidiaries and in other cross-border activities and situations.
The European Parliament’s position adopted at first reading under the ordinary legislative procedure amends the proposal as follows:
Preventive control
Member States should provide for preventive administrative, judicial or notarial control , or any combination thereof, of the instrument of constitution, the company statutes and any amendments to those documents.
Documents and information to be disclosed by partnerships
Member States should ensure compulsory disclosure by the types of partnerships listed in Annex IIB of at least the following documents and information:
- the name of the partnership; the legal form of the partnership; the registered office of the partnership or equivalent; the registration number of the partnership;
- the maximum amount of liability or contribution of limited partners, where this information is recorded in the national register;
- the instrument of constitution, and the statutes if they are contained in a separate instrument, if the filing of these documents to the register is required by national law;
- the particulars of the partners, directors or other statutory representatives who are authorised to represent the partnership in dealings with third parties and in legal proceedings, and information as to whether those persons are authorised to represent the partnership alone or are required to act jointly, or, if not applicable, information about the nature and scope of the authorisation of the partners, directors or other representatives to represent the partnership and their particulars;
- the particulars of the liquidators and their respective powers, unless such powers are expressly and exclusively derived from law or from the statutes of the partnership, where this information is recorded in the national register.
Applying the ‘once-only’ principle
Applying the ‘once-only’ principle entails that companies are not asked to submit the same information to public authorities more than once. For example, companies should not have to resubmit the company documents or information relating to the existence and registration of the founder company and thus already submitted to the register where the company is registered when creating a subsidiary in another Member State. Applying the ‘once-only’ principle also means that the founder company should not have to resubmit the company documents or information to any authority, body or person. These authorities should directly access information that is publicly available through the system of interconnections of registers via the European e-Justice portal.
EU Company Certificate
The certificate should include the object of the company describing its main activity or activities, which can be expressed using the Statistical Classification of Economic Activities in the European Community (NACE) code, where such code is used for the purposes of the register pursuant to applicable national law, and where the object is recorded in the national register.
Member States should ensure that each company listed in Annexes II and IIB may obtain its EU Company Certificate in electronic format free of charge unless it causes a serious prejudice to the financing of the business registers but in any case each company should be able to obtain its EU company certificate free of charge at least once per calendar year. In any case, the price for obtaining the EU Company Certificate, whether by paper or electronic means, should not exceed the administrative costs thereof, including the costs of development and maintenance of registers.
Digital EU power of attorney
Member States should ensure that, in order to carry out procedures in another Member State within the scope of this Directive, in particular the formation of companies, registration or closure of branches, cross-border conversions, mergers and divisions, may use a template for the digital EU power of attorney to authorise a person to represent the company.
Member States may require that the digital EU power of attorney, any amendment to it, and any revocation is to be filed in a register. The Commission should publish the template for the digital EU power of attorney on the portal in all official languages of the Union.
Safeguards in case of reasonable doubt as to abuse or fraud
Where justified by reasons of public interest to prevent abuse or fraud, the authorities in another Member State may exceptionally and on a case-by-case basis where they have reasonable grounds to suspect fraud or abuse, refuse to accept information or documents about a company from a register in another Member State as evidence of the registration of a company or its continued existence, or as evidence of the specific company information subject to suspicion of fraud or abuse.
Company groups
Information about company groups is important to promote transparency and enhance trust in the business environment as well as to contribute to the effective detection of fraudulent or abusive schemes that could affect public revenues and the credibility of the single market. Therefore, information about group structures should be publicly available through the system of interconnection of registers for both domestic and cross-border groups.
Lastly, the Commission should assess whether cooperatives , which play an important role in many Member States, should be included in the scope of this Directive, taking into account their specificities.
Text adopted by Parliament, 1st reading/single reading
The Committee on Legal Affairs adopted the report by Emil RADEV (EPP, BG) on the proposal for a directive of the European Parliament and of the Council amending Directives 2009/102/EC and (EU) 2017/1132 as regards further expanding and upgrading the use of digital tools and processes in company law.
The committee responsible recommended that the European Parliament's position adopted at first reading under the ordinary legislative procedure should amend the proposal as follows:
With a view to reducing administrative burden for companies in order for them to fully benefit from a harmonised, integrated and digitalised single market, without administrative barriers, Members proposed the following changes:
Complementary public electronic controls of identity, legal capacity and legality
The report stated that the legality of company law transactions, the protection of reliable public registers and the prevention of illegal activities require the correct and secure identification of the participants to company law transactions as well as the verification of their legal capacity. The reliable identification of the customer in line with the know-your-customer principle under AML/CFT rules is the prerequisite for any AML/CFT customer due diligence obligations and thus any ML/TF prevention.
Therefore, for the procedures within the scope of this Directive, Member States should be allowed to provide for complementary public electronic controls of identity, legal capacity and legality. Those complementary public electronic controls could include public remote audio-visual identity controls, including electronic checks of identity photos.
EU Company Certificate
To encourage companies to apply for an EU Company Certificate, the amended text stated that Member States should ensure that each company listed in Annexes II and IIB, as well as third parties which need reliable essential information about companies, may obtain its EU Company Certificate in electronic format free of charge.
EU digital power of attorney
Members consider that the EU power of attorney should be signed using qualified electronic signatures or in case the digital EU power of attorney is certified or authenticated, the certifying or authenticating authority should use qualified electronic signatures or seals. Once filed, the digital EU power of attorney should be deemed to be valid in its published form until an amendment or revocation has been published in the register. Any amendment or revocation of the EU power of attorney has to be published in the register.
Competent authorities, registers or any other third party who can demonstrate legitimate interest, should have access to the digital EU power of attorney in the register of the company. Any charge for accessing such document should be proportionate to the actual cost for the register.
Committee report tabled for plenary, 1st reading/single reading
PURPOSE: to further expand the use of digital tools and processes in EU company law.
PROPOSED ACT: Directive of the European Parliament and of the Council.
ROLE OF THE EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT: the European Parliament decides in accordance with the ordinary legislative procedure and on an equal footing with the Council.
BACKGROUND: companies are at the heart of the single market. Thanks to their business activities and investments, including on a cross-border basis, they play a leading role in contributing to the EU's economic prosperity, competitiveness and in carrying through the EU's twin transition to a sustainable and digital economy. To this end, companies need a predictable legal framework that is conducive to growth and adapted to face the new economic and social challenges in an increasingly digital world. The proposed measures will apply to around 16 million limited liability companies and 2 million partnerships in the EU.
The proposal is expected to bring a strong positive recurrent administrative costs saving for companies, of around EUR 437 million per year.
This proposal upgrades EU digital company law further through the use of digital tools and processes. While the proposal focuses primarily on online procedures and electronic copies and extracts of company documents or information, its provisions take into account both the physical and digital environment and also address physical procedures, e.g. any other forms of formation of companies than fully online, and paper copies and extracts.
The proposal is updating the existing EU rules for companies (Directive (EU) 2017/1132) to adapt them further to the digital developments and new challenges, and to stimulate growth and competitiveness in the single market.
CONTENT: the proposal’s overall objectives are to enhance transparency and trust in the business environment, achieve more digitalised and connected cross-border public services for companies, and easier cross-border expansion for SMEs leading, in turn, to a more integrated and digitalised single market.
In particular, the proposal aims to:
- make more information about companies (e.g. about partnerships and groups of companies) publicly available in particular at EU level through the Business Registers Interconnection System (BRIS);
- ensure that company data in business registers is accurate, reliable and up-to-date , for example by providing for checks of company information before it is entered in business registers in all Member States;
- cut red tape when companies use company information from business registers in cross-border situations, e.g. by removing formalities such as the need for an apostille for company documents, applying the “once-only principle” when companies set up subsidiaries and branches in another Member State, and introducing a multilingual EU Company Certificate to be used in cross-border situations. Companies will benefit from reduction in administrative burden estimated at around EUR 437 million per year.
The new proposal, among other things, uses and expands the scope of the existing Business Registers Interconnection System (BRIS), which financing by the EU budget is mandatory under EU law, and that is already being funded by the Digital Europe Programme and managed by the Commission. In addition, the proposal does not introduce any new IT systems, but builds on the use of the existing and operational system of interconnection of registers as well as on the eIDAS Regulation.
Legislative proposal
PURPOSE: to further expand the use of digital tools and processes in EU company law.
PROPOSED ACT: Directive of the European Parliament and of the Council.
ROLE OF THE EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT: the European Parliament decides in accordance with the ordinary legislative procedure and on an equal footing with the Council.
BACKGROUND: companies are at the heart of the single market. Thanks to their business activities and investments, including on a cross-border basis, they play a leading role in contributing to the EU's economic prosperity, competitiveness and in carrying through the EU's twin transition to a sustainable and digital economy. To this end, companies need a predictable legal framework that is conducive to growth and adapted to face the new economic and social challenges in an increasingly digital world. The proposed measures will apply to around 16 million limited liability companies and 2 million partnerships in the EU.
The proposal is expected to bring a strong positive recurrent administrative costs saving for companies, of around EUR 437 million per year.
This proposal upgrades EU digital company law further through the use of digital tools and processes. While the proposal focuses primarily on online procedures and electronic copies and extracts of company documents or information, its provisions take into account both the physical and digital environment and also address physical procedures, e.g. any other forms of formation of companies than fully online, and paper copies and extracts.
The proposal is updating the existing EU rules for companies (Directive (EU) 2017/1132) to adapt them further to the digital developments and new challenges, and to stimulate growth and competitiveness in the single market.
CONTENT: the proposal’s overall objectives are to enhance transparency and trust in the business environment, achieve more digitalised and connected cross-border public services for companies, and easier cross-border expansion for SMEs leading, in turn, to a more integrated and digitalised single market.
In particular, the proposal aims to:
- make more information about companies (e.g. about partnerships and groups of companies) publicly available in particular at EU level through the Business Registers Interconnection System (BRIS);
- ensure that company data in business registers is accurate, reliable and up-to-date , for example by providing for checks of company information before it is entered in business registers in all Member States;
- cut red tape when companies use company information from business registers in cross-border situations, e.g. by removing formalities such as the need for an apostille for company documents, applying the “once-only principle” when companies set up subsidiaries and branches in another Member State, and introducing a multilingual EU Company Certificate to be used in cross-border situations. Companies will benefit from reduction in administrative burden estimated at around EUR 437 million per year.
The new proposal, among other things, uses and expands the scope of the existing Business Registers Interconnection System (BRIS), which financing by the EU budget is mandatory under EU law, and that is already being funded by the Digital Europe Programme and managed by the Commission. In addition, the proposal does not introduce any new IT systems, but builds on the use of the existing and operational system of interconnection of registers as well as on the eIDAS Regulation.
Legislative proposal
Documents
- Draft final act: 00074/2024/LEX
- Commission response to text adopted in plenary: SP(2024)394
- Decision by Parliament, 1st reading: T9-0360/2024
- Results of vote in Parliament: Results of vote in Parliament
- Committee report tabled for plenary, 1st reading: A9-0394/2023
- Amendments tabled in committee: PE753.448
- Contribution: COM(2023)0177
- Committee draft report: PE751.881
- Contribution: COM(2023)0177
- ESC: CES1272/2023
- EDPS: OJ C 253 18.07.2023, p. 0008
- EDPS: N9-0046/2023
- Document attached to the procedure: Go to the pageEur-Lex
- Document attached to the procedure: SWD(2023)0177
- Document attached to the procedure: Go to the pageEur-Lex
- Document attached to the procedure: SWD(2023)0178
- Document attached to the procedure: Go to the pageEur-Lex
- Document attached to the procedure: SWD(2023)0179
- Document attached to the procedure: Go to the pageEur-Lex
- Document attached to the procedure: SEC(2023)0377
- Legislative proposal: COM(2023)0177
- Legislative proposal: Go to the pageEur-Lex
- Legislative proposal published: COM(2023)0177
- Legislative proposal published: Go to the page Eur-Lex
- Committee draft report: PE751.881
- Amendments tabled in committee: PE753.448
- Draft final act: 00074/2024/LEX
- Legislative proposal: COM(2023)0177 Go to the pageEur-Lex
- Document attached to the procedure: Go to the pageEur-Lex SWD(2023)0177
- Document attached to the procedure: Go to the pageEur-Lex SWD(2023)0178
- Document attached to the procedure: Go to the pageEur-Lex SWD(2023)0179
- Document attached to the procedure: Go to the pageEur-Lex SEC(2023)0377
- Commission response to text adopted in plenary: SP(2024)394
- Contribution: COM(2023)0177
- Contribution: COM(2023)0177
- EDPS: OJ C 253 18.07.2023, p. 0008 N9-0046/2023
- ESC: CES1272/2023
Votes
A9-0394/2023 – Emil Radev – Provisional agreement – Am 58 #
Amendments | Dossier |
96 |
2023/0089(COD)
2023/09/18
JURI
96 amendments...
Amendment 100 #
Proposal for a directive Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point 21 Directive (EU) 2017/1132 Article 16 b – paragraph 2 – point n a (na) the number of employees at the end of the last fiscal year;
Amendment 101 #
Proposal for a directive Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point 21 Directive (EU) 2017/1132 Article 16 b (nb) the sectors of activity of the company, with the use of the Statistical Classification of Economic Activities in the European Community (NACE)
Amendment 102 #
Proposal for a directive Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point 21 Directive (EU) 2017/1132 Article 16 b – paragraph 2 – point n b (nb) the NACE sectors of activity.
Amendment 103 #
Proposal for a directive Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point 21 Directive (EU) 2017/1132 Article 16 b – paragraph 5 – subparagraph 2 Member States shall ensure that each company listed in Annexes II and IIB as well as third parties, including authorities, workers' representatives and other stakeholders, which need reliable essential information about companies, may obtain its EU Company Certificate in electronic format free of charge at least once per calendar year.
Amendment 104 #
Proposal for a directive Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point 21 Directive (EU) 2017/1132 Article 16 b – paragraph 5 – subparagraph 2 Member States shall ensure that each company listed in Annexes II and IIB as well as relevant third parties may obtain its EU Company Certificate in electronic format free of charge
Amendment 105 #
Proposal for a directive Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point 21 Directive (EU) 2017/1132 Article 16 b – paragraph 5 – subparagraph 2 Member States shall ensure that each company listed in Annexes II and IIB may obtain its EU Company Certificate in
Amendment 106 #
Proposal for a directive Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point 21 Directive (EU) 2017/1132 Article 16 b – paragraph 7 7. Member States shall ensure that the EU Company Certificate provided by the register in paper format is to include the date of issuance, as well as the seal or stamp of the register in order to certify that its content is a true copy of the information held by the register or that it is consistent with the information contained therein.
Amendment 107 #
Proposal for a directive Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point 21 Directive (EU) 2017/1132 Article 16 c – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 1 Member States shall ensure that, in order to carry out procedures in another Member State within the sco
Amendment 108 #
Proposal for a directive Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point 21 Directive (EU) 2017/1132 Article 16 c – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 2 The digital EU power of attorney shall be drawn up and revoked in accordance with national legal and formal requirements. The national requirements for drawing up the digital EU power of attorney shall at least include the verification of the identity, legal capacity and authority to represent the company of the person granting the power of attorney by courts, notaries or other administrative authorities or any combination thereof.
Amendment 109 #
Proposal for a directive Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point 21 Directive (EU) 2017/1132 Article 16 c – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 3 Member States shall ensure that the digital EU power of attorney
Amendment 110 #
Proposal for a directive Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point 21 Directive (EU) 2017/1132 Article 16 c – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 3 Member States shall ensure that the digital EU power of attorney is authenticated in accordance with the assurance level ‘high’ by means of trust services referred to in Regulation (EU) No 910/2014, and compatible with the European Digital Identity Wallet referred to in [PO: Reference to Proposal for a Regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council amending Regulation (EU) No 910/2014 as regards establishing a framework for a European Digital Identity].
Amendment 111 #
Proposal for a directive Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point 21 Directive (EU) 2017/1132 Article 16 c – paragraph 2 2. The digital EU power of attorney disclosed in accordance with paragraph 1 shall be accepted as evidence of the authorised person’s entitlement to represent the company as specified in the document and as disclosed in the file referred to in Article 16(1).
Amendment 112 #
Proposal for a directive Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point 21 Directive (EU) 2017/1132 Article 16 c – paragraph 3 3. Member States shall ensure that the companies referred to in paragraph 1 file the digital EU power of attorney, any amendment to it, and any revocation, with the register where the company is registered within 5 working days.
Amendment 113 #
Proposal for a directive Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point 21 Directive (EU) 2017/1132 Article 16 c – paragraph 4 4. Competent authorities, registers referred to in Article 16, or any other third party who can demonstrate legitimate interest, shall have access to the digital EU
Amendment 114 #
Proposal for a directive Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point 21 Directive (EU) 2017/1132 Article 16 c – paragraph 5 5. The Commission shall publish the
Amendment 115 #
Proposal for a directive Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point 21 Directive (EU) 2017/1132 Article 16 d – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 1 Where electronic copies and extracts of documents and information provided and certified as true copies by a register referred to in Article 16, including certified translations, are to be presented in another Member State, Member States shall ensure that they are exempted from all forms of legalisation and similar formality, where they have been authenticated by means of qualified electronic signatures or seals plus an attribute in accordance with Regulation (EU) No 910/2014.
Amendment 116 #
Proposal for a directive Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point 21 Amendment 117 #
Proposal for a directive Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point 21 Directive (EU) 2017/1132 Article 16 d – paragraph 2 2. Member States shall ensure that the EU Company Certificate issued in accordance with Article 16b
Amendment 118 #
Where
Amendment 119 #
Proposal for a directive Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point 21 Directive (EU) 2017/1132 Article 16 d – paragraph 3 – subparagraph 2 Amendment 120 #
Proposal for a directive Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point 21 Directive (EU) 2017/1132 Article 16 e – paragraph 4 4. If the authenticity of the copies and extracts of documents and information is not confirmed by the contact points, the requesting authority may decide not to accept them. In such case, they shall notify those who submitted such documents and information of that decision within 5 working days of receiving the reply from the contact points.
Amendment 121 #
Proposal for a directive Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point 21 4.
Amendment 122 #
Proposal for a directive Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point 29 Directive (EU) 2017/1132 Article 28 – subparagraph 1 Member States shall provide for effective, proportionate and dissuasive penalties, including pecuniary penalties, at least in the case of:
Amendment 123 #
Proposal for a directive Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point 29 Directive (EU) 2017/1132 Article 28 – subparagraph 2 Member States shall take all the measures necessary to ensure that those penalties are enforced.
Amendment 124 #
Proposal for a directive Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point 30 Directive (EU) 2017/1132 Article 28 a – paragraph 4 – point c (c) verify the legality of the documents and information submitted for the registration of the branch
Amendment 125 #
Proposal for a directive Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point 32 Directive (EU) 2017/1132 Article 28 a – paragraph 5 a Notwithstanding other means to exchange documents and information, Member States shall ensure that where a company listed in Annexes II or IIB registers a branch in another Member State,
Amendment 126 #
Proposal for a directive Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point 32 Directive (EU) 2017/1132 Article 28 a – paragraph 5 a – subparagraph 1 Member States shall ensure that where a company listed in Annexes II or IIB
Amendment 127 #
Proposal for a directive Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point 32 Directive (EU) 2017/1132 Article 28 a – paragraph 5 a – subparagraph 2 a Documents or information transmitted as part of electronic communication through the system of interconnection of registers shall not be denied legal effect or be considered inadmissible solely on the ground that they are in electronic form.
Amendment 128 #
Proposal for a directive Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point 36 Directive (EU) 2017/1132 Article 40 – subparagraph 1 Member States shall provide for effective, proportionate and dissuasive penalties, including pecuniary penalties, in the event of failure to disclose the matters set out in Articles 29, 30, 31, 36, 37 and 38 and of omission from letters and order forms of the compulsory information provided for in Articles 35 and 39.
Amendment 129 #
Proposal for a directive Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point 36 Directive (EU) 2017/1132 Article 40 – subparagraph 2 Member States shall take all the measures necessary to ensure that those penalties are enforced. In determining their nature and appropriate level, due account shall be taken of the seriousness and duration of the infringement, of any previous infringements, and of the company's turnover.
Amendment 130 #
Proposal for a directive Article 4 – paragraph 3 – point b a (new) (ba) factors that promote or dissuade the use of digital tools and processes in company law
Amendment 35 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 8 (8) Therefore, while strictly respecting Member State traditions, it is important to ensure that certain checks are carried out in all Member States according to the same standards that guarantee a high level of accuracy and reliability of the information. For this purpose, it is necessary to extend the current standards by making them mandatory in general, not only for fully online formation of companies, but also for any other forms of formation of companies. Similarly, where Member States still allow other filing methods in addition to online filing, the same standards should apply in order to subject all information entered into the register to the same standard.
Amendment 36 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 9 (9) A preventive administrative or judicial control
Amendment 37 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 9 (9) A preventive administrative
Amendment 38 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 9 (9) A preventive administrative or judicial control, respecting Member States traditions including the possible involvement of notaries and of lawyers as well as combine control by such authorities, should be ensured in all Member States in order to ensure reliability of cross-border company data. A legality check of the company’s instrument of constitution, the company statutes if contained in a separate instrument, and of any amendment of such instruments and statutes, should be carried out, given that these are the most important documents concerning the company.
Amendment 39 #
(9) A preventive administrative or judicial control, strictly respecting Member States traditions including the possible involvement of notaries, should be ensured in all Member States in order to ensure reliability of cross-border company data. A legality check of the company’s instrument of constitution, the company statutes if contained in a separate instrument, and of any amendment of such instruments and statutes, should be carried out, given that these are the most important documents concerning the company.
Amendment 40 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 9 a (new) (9a) The legality of company law transactions, the protection of reliable public registers and the prevention of illegal activities require the correct and secure identification of the participants in such transactions, including company founders and directors, as well as the verification of their legal capacity. TIn particular, the reliable identification of the customer in line with the ‘know-your- customer’ principle under the rules regarding anti-money laundering and combating the financing of terrorism (AML/CFT), is a prerequisite for any AML/CFT customer due diligence obligations and thus any money laundering and terrorist financing prevention. Therefore, for the procedures within the scope of this Directive, Member States should provide for electronic controls of identity, legal capacity and legality. Those electronic controls could include remote audio-visual identity controls, including electronic checks of identity photos.
Amendment 41 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 11 (11) Applying the ‘once-only’ principle entails that companies are not asked to submit the same information to public authorities more than once. For example, companies should not have to resubmit the company documents or information already submitted to the register where the company is registered when creating a subsidiary in another Member State. Instead, information about the company should be exchanged electronically, between the register where the company is registered and the register where a subsidiary is to be registered, using the system of interconnection of registers, notwithstanding other means to exchange documents and information. Such information should be made available by the business register to any authority, body or person mandated under national law to deal with any aspect of the formation of a company. Documents or information transmitted as part of electronic communication through the system of interconnection of registers should not be denied legal effect or be considered inadmissible solely on the ground that they are in electronic form. They should have the same legal effect as that provided by the register of the Member State where the company in question is registered.
Amendment 42 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 11 (11) Applying the ‘once-only’ principle entails that companies are not asked to submit the same information to public authorities more than once. For example, companies should not have to resubmit the company documents or information already submitted to the register where the company is registered when creating a subsidiary in another Member State. Instead, information about the company should be exchanged electronically, between the register where the company is registered and the register where a subsidiary is to be registered, using the system of interconnection of registers. Such information should be made available by the business register to any authority, body or person mandated under national law to deal with any aspect of the formation of a company. Documents or information transmitted as part of electronic communication through the system of interconnection of registers should not be denied legal effect or be considered inadmissible solely on the ground that they are in electronic form. They should have the same legal effect as that provided by the register of the Member State where the company in question is registered.
Amendment 43 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 11 (11) Applying the ‘once-only’ principle entails that companies are not asked to submit the same information to public authorities more than once. For example, companies should not have to resubmit the company documents or information already submitted to the register where the company is registered when creating a subsidiary in another Member State. Instead, information about the company should be exchanged electronically, between the register where the company is registered and the register where a subsidiary is to be registered, using the system of interconnection of registers. Such information should be made available by the business register to any authority, body or person mandated under national law to deal with any aspect of the formation of a company. Documents or information transmitted as part of electronic communication through the system of interconnection of registers should not be denied legal effect or be considered inadmissible solely on the ground that they are transmitted in electronic form.
Amendment 44 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 11 (11) Applying the ‘once-only’ principle entails that companies are not asked to submit the same information to public authorities more than once. For example, companies should not have to resubmit the company documents or information already submitted to the register where the company is registered when creating a subsidiary in another Member State. Instead, information about the company should be exchanged electronically, between the register where the company is registered and the register where a subsidiary is to be registered, using the system of interconnection of registers. Such information should be made available by the business register to any authority, body or person mandated under national law to deal with any aspect of the formation of a company. Documents or information transmitted as part of electronic communication through the system of interconnection of registers should not be denied legal effect or be considered inadmissible solely on the ground that they are in electronic form.
Amendment 45 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 12 (12) In order to increase transparency and trust with respect to companies in the
Amendment 46 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 16 a (new) (16a) Cooperatives have an important place in many Member States. Therefore, where information on cooperatives is also included in national registers, this information should also be accessible at Union level through the system of interconnection of registers in the same way as for limited liability companies, with certain information to be made available free of charge, and they should be unequivocally identified through the European unique identifier (“EUID”).
Amendment 47 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 20 (20) In order to avoid unnecessary burden, the obligation to update the group information, at least once per year and upon request by a competent authority, should be on the ultimate parent or, where applicable, on the intermediate parent or on the subsidiary company governed by the law of a Member State. If no change has occurred within a year, such parent company or subsidiary company should confirm this to its register, which should record and make this information publicly available. In addition, each subsidiary company should be responsible for keeping the information related to its affiliation to the group in its register up to date. In this regard, the ultimate parent or, where applicable, the intermediate parent or the subsidiary company governed by the law of a Member State should provide any changes in the group information to the (other) subsidiaries without delay in order for the subsidiaries to fulfil in time the obligation to keep the group-related information in their register up to date.
Amendment 48 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 22 (22) In addition to common standards
Amendment 49 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 23 a (new) (23a) Company law should not be a means that permits the circumvention of important Union and Member State laws that protect the public interest. Therefore, the legality of corporate transactions and procedures with effect for the internal market and their compliance with important Union and Member State laws should be checked in the public interest by public gatekeepers under Union or Member State public supervision. This public preventive control and the related formal requirements for the most important company documents should ensure not only the reliability of cross- border company data but also prevent the misuse of company law for illegal activities such as money laundering, tax evasion, social security fraud and the circumvention of sanctions and of co- determination rights.
Amendment 50 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 24 (24) In the single market, companies should be able to prove that their company is legally incorporated in a Member State through simple and reliable means, which are recognised cross-border by other Member States. Therefore, a harmonised EU Company Certificate should be established. Companies could apply for such an EU Company Certificate to use it for different purposes, including for administrative procedures before national authorities and court proceedings in other Member States or before EU institutions and bodies. Such EU Company Certificate should be issued and certified by the national business registers, should include essential company information used by companies in cross-border situations, including the company name, its registered office and legal representatives, and should be available in all official languages of the Union. The electronic EU Company Certificate should be authenticated by using trust services as referred to in Regulation (EU) No 910/201456 . Th
Amendment 51 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 24 (24) In the single market, companies should be able to prove that their company is legally incorporated in a Member State through simple and reliable means, which are recognised cross-border by other Member States. Therefore, a harmonised EU Company Certificate should be established. Companies could apply for such an EU Company Certificate to use it for different purposes, including for administrative procedures before national authorities and court proceedings in other Member States or before EU institutions and bodies. Such EU Company Certificate should be issued and certified by the national business registers, should include essential company information used by companies in cross-border situations, including the company name, its registered office and legal representatives, and should be available in all official languages of the Union. The electronic EU Company Certificate should be authenticated by using trust services as referred to in Regulation (EU) No 910/201456 . This EU Company Certificate
Amendment 52 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 24 (24) In the single market, companies should be able to prove that their company is legally incorporated in a Member State through simple and reliable means, which are recognised cross-border by other Member States. Therefore, a harmonised EU Company Certificate should be established. Companies could apply for such an EU Company Certificate to use it for different purposes, including for administrative procedures before national authorities and court proceedings in other Member States or before EU institutions and bodies. Such EU Company Certificate should be issued and certified by the national business registers, should include essential company information used by companies in cross-border situations, including the company name, its registered office and legal representatives, and should be available in all official languages of the
Amendment 53 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 25 (25) In order to further facilitate cross- border procedures for companies and simplify and reduce formalities, such as apostille or translation, a digital EU power of attorney should be established. The digital EU power of attorney will be a multilingual standard model based on a common European template which companies may choose to use in cross-
Amendment 54 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 25 (25) In order to further facilitate cross- border procedures for companies and simplify and reduce formalities, such as apostille or translation, a digital EU power of attorney should be established. The digital EU power of attorney will be a multilingual standard model based on a common European template which companies may choose to use in cross- border situations. It should have a minimum mandatory content, while it would be drawn up in accordance with national legal and formal requirements. The standard digital EU power of attorney would only exist in digital form and it should be authenticated by using trust services as referred to in Regulation (EU) No 910/2014 and in accordance with the assurance level ‘high’. In addition, in order to contribute to higher security of transactions, the digital EU power of attorney should be filed in the register of the company where third parties that can demonstrate legitimate interest can consult it. In particular, third parties, such as lawyers, notaries, credit and financial institutions or competent authorities to whom the digital EU power of attorney is presented, could thus verify the existence of these powers in the register of the company. Member States may also require that the digital EU power of attorney is filed, in addition, in another register in accordance with national law. In order to overcome language barriers and facilitate their use, the template for an EU Company Certificate and a standard model of the digital EU power of attorney should be available on the E-justice portal in all Union languages.
Amendment 55 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 26 (26) Companies often face difficulties and administrative barriers to use company information, which is already available in their national business register, in cross- border situations, including when dealing with competent authorities or in court proceedings in another Member State. The company data available in the business register of one Member State is often not accepted in another Member State without
Amendment 56 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 30 (30) In order to help companies, and in particular SMEs, to expand their business activities cross-border more easily, the ‘once-only’ principle should be further developed in cases where companies register branches in another Member State. The information about the company registering the cross-border branch should be retrieved electronically from the register of the company by the register of the branch through the system of interconnection of registers, notwithstanding other means to exchange documents and information. This exchange of information, as any other exchange of information between registers through the system of interconnection of registers, will be carried out via secure transmission between national registers, which ensures that the information can be trusted and should not be required to be certified or subject to any legalisation or similar formality. Documents or information transmitted as part of electronic communication through the system of interconnection of registers should not be denied legal effect or be considered inadmissible solely on the ground that they are in electronic form. They should have the same legal effect as that provided by the register of the Member State where the company in question is registered.
Amendment 57 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 30 (30) In order to help companies, and in particular SMEs, to expand their business activities cross-border more easily, the ‘once-only’ principle should be further developed in cases where companies register branches in another Member State. The information about the company registering the cross-border branch should be retrieved electronically from the register of the company by the register of the branch through the system of interconnection of registers. This exchange of information, as any other exchange of information between registers through the system of interconnection of registers, will be carried out via secure transmission between national registers, which ensures that the information can be trusted and should not be required to be certified or subject to any legalisation or similar formality. Documents or information transmitted as part of electronic communication through the system of interconnection of registers should not be denied legal effect or be considered inadmissible solely on the ground that they are in electronic form.
Amendment 58 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 30 (30) In order to help companies, and in particular SMEs, to expand their business activities cross-border more easily, the ‘once-only’ principle should be further developed in cases where companies register branches in another Member State. The information about the company registering the cross-border branch should be retrieved electronically from the register of the company by the register of the branch through the system of interconnection of registers. This exchange of information, as any other exchange of information between registers through the system of interconnection of registers, will be carried out via secure transmission between national registers, which ensures that the information can be trusted and should not be required to be certified or subject to any legalisation or similar formality. Documents or information transmitted as part of electronic communication through the system of interconnection of registers should not be denied legal effect or be considered inadmissible solely on the ground that they are in electronic form.
Amendment 59 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 38 (38) The Commission should carry out an evaluation of this Directive within five years of the end of its transposition period. Pursuant to paragraph 22 of the Interinstitutional Agreement of 13 April 2016 on Better Law-Making, that evaluation should be based on the five criteria of efficiency, effectiveness, relevance, coherence and value added and should provide the basis for impact assessments of possible further measures. The evaluation should cover the practical experience with the EU Company Certificate, digital EU power of attorney and the reduced formalities in cross-border situations for companies. In addition, the Commission should assess the potential for cross-sector interoperability between the system of interconnection of registers (BRIS) and other systems providing mechanisms for cooperation between competent authorities, such as in the areas of taxation or social security or the Once- only Technical System established under Regulation (EU) 2018/1724 of the European Parliament and of the Council64, with the aim of creating more connected public administrations cross-border in the single market65. Finally, the Commission should also assess the need to introduce additional measures to fully address the needs of persons with disabilities when they access company information provided by the business registers. _________________ 64 Regulation (EU) 2018/1724 of the
Amendment 60 #
Proposal for a directive Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point 5 Directive (EU) 2017/1132 Article 10 – paragraph 1 1. Member States shall provide for preventive administrative
Amendment 61 #
Proposal for a directive Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point 5 Directive (EU) 2017/1132 Article 10 – paragraph 1 1. Member States shall provide for preventive administrative or judicial control, at the time of the formation of a company, of the instrument of constitution, the company statutes and any amendments to those documents. Member States may provide that those documents shall be drawn up and certified in due legal form, in accordance with national law.
Amendment 62 #
Proposal for a directive Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point 5 Directive (EU) 2017/1132 Article 10 – paragraph 1 1. Member States shall provide for preventive administrative
Amendment 63 #
Proposal for a directive Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point 5 Directive (EU) 2017/1132 Article 10 – paragraph 2 – subparagraph 2 – point c (c) the
Amendment 64 #
Proposal for a directive Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point 5 Directive (EU) 2017/1132 Article 10 – paragraph 2 – subparagraph 2 – point d a (da) the identity of the company’s founders and directors has been verified;
Amendment 65 #
Proposal for a directive Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point 5 Directive (EU) 2017/1132 Article 10 – paragraph 2 – subparagraph 2 – point d b Amendment 66 #
Proposal for a directive Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point 5 Directive (EU) 2017/1132 Article 10 – paragraph 2 – subparagraph 2 – point c (dc) it is verified that, for undertakings founded on the basis of EU legislation, in particular Regulation (EC) No 2157/2001, Regulation (EC) No 1435/2003 and Directive (EU) 2019/2121, agreements required in accordance with this legislation on worker information, consultation and participation have been concluded;
Amendment 67 #
Proposal for a directive Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point 5 Directive (EU) 2017/1132 Article 10 – paragraph 2 – subparagraph 2 – point c (dd) ultimate beneficial owners have been identified and verification of their identities is not solely based on self- declaration.
Amendment 68 #
Proposal for a directive Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point 5 Directive (EU) 2017/1132 Article 10 – paragraph 2 – subparagraph 3 a (new) Where the company is a European company (SE) or a European Cooperative Society (SCE), or where the company is resulting from a cross-border conversion, merger or division, through the legality check, it shall also be ascertained that the requirements on the involvement of employees under Council Regulation (EC) No 2157/2001, Council Regulation (EC) No 1435/2003 and Directive (EU) 2017/1132 have been fulfilled.
Amendment 69 #
Proposal for a directive Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point 5 Directive (EU) 2017/1132 Article 10 – paragraph 3 3. Member States may waive the obligation to perform the legality check under paragraph 2
Amendment 70 #
Proposal for a directive Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point 5 Directive (EU) 2017/1132 Article 10 – paragraph 4 The rules laid down in Artcle 13c, Article 13g(4), points (b) and (c), Article 13g(5) and (7), and Article 13g(3), points (a), (d), (e), (f), shall apply mutatis mutandis to other forms of formation of the companies listed in Annexes II and IIB that are not fully online.
Amendment 71 #
Proposal for a directive Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point 8 Directive (EU) 2017/1132 Article 13 a – paragraph 1 – point 12 a (12a) “principal place of business” means the head office or the registered office of the company within which the principal financial functions and operational control of its activities are exercised;
Amendment 72 #
(12b) "central administration" means the head office of the company within which ultimate decision making takes place;
Amendment 73 #
Proposal for a directive Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point 9 – point a Directive (EU) 2017/1132 Article 13 b – paragraph 1 – point b (b) an electronic identification means issued in another Member State and recognised for the purpose of cross-border authentication in accordance with Article 6 of Regulation (EU) No 910/2014.;
Amendment 74 #
Proposal for a directive Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point 9 – point b Directive (EU) 2017/1132 Article 13 b – paragraph 2 2. Member States may refuse to recognise electronic identification means where the assurance levels of those electronic identification means do not
Amendment 75 #
Proposal for a directive Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point 11 a (new) Directive (EU) 2017/1132 Article 13 f a (new) (11a) the following Article is inserted: Article 13fa Acceptance of electronic communication Documents or information transmitted as part of electronic communication, in accordance with this Directive, through the system of interconnection of registers should not be denied legal effect or be considered inadmissible solely on the ground that they are in electronic form. They should have the same legal effect as that provided by the register of the Member State where the company in question is registered.
Amendment 76 #
Proposal for a directive Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point 12 – point a Directive (EU) 2017/1132 Article 13 g – paragraph 2 a Notwithstanding other means to exchange documents and information, Member States shall ensure that, where a
Amendment 77 #
Proposal for a directive Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point 12 – point a Directive (EU) 2017/1132 Article 13 g – paragraph 2 a – subparagraph 2 a (new) Documents or information transmitted as part of electronic communication through the system of interconnection of registers shall not be denied legal effect or be considered inadmissible solely on the ground that they are in electronic form.
Amendment 78 #
Proposal for a directive Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point 12 – point a Directive (EU) 2017/1132 Article 13 g – paragraph 2 a – subparagraph 3 a (new) Documents or information transmitted as part of electronic communication through the system of interconnection of registers shall not be denied legal effect or be considered inadmissible solely on the ground that they are transmitted in electronic form.
Amendment 79 #
Proposal for a directive Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point 15 – point b Directive (EU) 2017/1132 Article 14 – point m a (new) (ma) at least once a year, the number of employees calculated on a full-time equivalent basis;
Amendment 80 #
Proposal for a directive Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point 15 – point b Directive (EU) 2017/1132 Article 14 – point m a (new) (ma) the number of employees as reported at the end of the last fiscal year;
Amendment 81 #
Proposal for a directive Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point 15 – point b Directive (EU) 2017/1132 Article 14 – point m b (new) (mb) where the company is a European company (SE) or a European Cooperative Society (SCE), or where the company is resulting from a cross-border conversion, merger or division, the agreement on arrangements for employee involvement concluded or information on the relevant procedures;
Amendment 82 #
Proposal for a directive Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point 15 – point b Directive (EU) 2017/1132 Article 14 – point m b (new) (mb) the NACE sectors of activity;
Amendment 83 #
Proposal for a directive Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point 15 – point b Directive (EU) 2017/1132 Article 14 – point m c (new) (mc) for companies founded on the basis of EU legislation, in particular Regulation (EC) No 2157/2001, Regulation (EC) No 1435/2003 and Directive (EU) 2019/2121, the agreements required in accordance with this legislation on worker information, consultation and participation have been concluded.
Amendment 84 #
Proposal for a directive Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point 15 – point b Directive (EU) 2017/1132 Article 14 – point m c (new) (mc) the sectors of activity of the company, with the use of the Statistical Classification of Economic Activities in the European Community (NACE)
Amendment 85 #
(g) the instrument of constitution, and the statutes if they are contained in a separate instrument
Amendment 86 #
Proposal for a directive Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point 16 Directive (EU) 2017/1132 Article 14 a – point g (g) the instrument of constitution, and the statutes if they are contained in a separate instrument,
Amendment 87 #
Proposal for a directive Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point 16 Directive (EU) 2017/1132 Article 14 b – point d (d) the name of the group, if existant and different from the name of the ultimate parent company.
Amendment 88 #
Proposal for a directive Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point 16 Directive (EU) 2017/1132 Article 14 b – paragraph 6 6. The ultimate parent company or, where applicable, the intermediate parent company or the subsidiary company referred to in paragraph 2 shall at least once per year as well as upon request of a competent authority, and in any case no later than the date of the disclosure of the accounting documents and, if no such disclosure is required, by the end of the financial year, update the information required in paragraphs 1 to 3, where applicable, or confirm that no changes to the group structure have occurred.
Amendment 89 #
Proposal for a directive Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point 16 Directive (EU) 2017/1132 Article 14 b – paragraph 8 8. In the case of changes to the information referred to in paragraph 5, each subsidiary company of the group governed by the law of a Member State, including any intermediate parent
Amendment 90 #
Proposal for a directive Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point 16 Directive (EU) 2017/1132 Article 14 b – paragraph 11 a (new) 11a. Member States may choose to disclose the information in accordance with this Article in a register referred to in Article 16.
Amendment 91 #
Proposal for a directive Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point 16 a (new) Directive (EU) 2017/1132 Article 14 c (new) Amendment 92 #
Proposal for a directive Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point 17 Directive (EU) 2017/1132 Article 15 – paragraph 2 – point b (b) that any changes in the documents and information regarding companies listed in Annexes II and IIB are entered in the register and are disclosed, in accordance with Article 16(3), within 5 working days from the date of the completion of all formalities required for the filing, including the receipt of all documents and information, which comply with national law, or within 15 working days where necessary due to the complexity of the checks to be conducted in accordance with Article 10;
Amendment 93 #
Proposal for a directive Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point 17 Directive (EU) 2017/1132 Article 15 – paragraph 2 – point c (c) that companies listed in Annexes II and IIB confirm once every calendar year as well as upon request by a competent authority, that the information about the company in the register is up to date and that the registers make publicly available the date when the company provided that confirmation or updated the information;
Amendment 94 #
Proposal for a directive Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point 21 Directive (EU) 2017/1132 Article 16 b – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 1 a (new) 1a. A Member State may decide to only recognise register data from another Member State as evidence where the register data of that Member State are subject to an equivalent level of preventive scrutiny before the entry into the register of the Member State concerned, taking into account objective criteria, including the reliability of identity and legality checks. Member States shall notify the Commission of any registers whose data shall not be recognised as evidence. The Commission shall publish the list of registers on the portal in all official languages of the Union.
Amendment 95 #
Proposal for a directive Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point 21 Directive (EU) 2017/1132 (f) the postal
Amendment 96 #
Proposal for a directive Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point 21 Directive (EU) 2017/1132 Article 16 b – paragraph 2 – point g (g) the electronic address of the company and details of the company website;
Amendment 97 #
Proposal for a directive Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point 21 Directive (EU) 2017/1132 Article 16 b – paragraph 2 – point j (j) the status of the company, including whether it is economically active or inactive or undergoing insolvency proceedings;
Amendment 98 #
Proposal for a directive Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point 21 Directive (EU) 2017/1132 Article 16 b – paragraph 2 – point n (n) details of the company website
Amendment 99 #
Proposal for a directive Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point 21 Directive (EU) 2017/1132 Article 16 b (na) the number of employees calculated on a full-time equivalent basis;
source: 753.448
|
History
(these mark the time of scraping, not the official date of the change)
procedure/stage_reached |
Old
Awaiting signature of actNew
Procedure completed, awaiting publication in Official Journal |
committees/0 |
|
committees/0 |
|
docs/0 |
|
docs/0 |
|
docs/0/body |
Old
EPNew
European Parliament |
docs/1 |
|
docs/1 |
|
docs/1/body |
Old
EPNew
European Parliament |
docs/2 |
|
docs/2 |
|
docs/3 |
|
docs/3 |
|
docs/4 |
|
docs/4 |
|
docs/5 |
|
docs/5 |
|
docs/6 |
|
docs/6 |
|
docs/7 |
|
docs/7 |
|
docs/8/body |
Old
ECNew
European Commission |
docs/9 |
Old
New
|
docs/10 |
Old
New
|
docs/11 |
|
docs/12 |
|
events/0 |
|
events/0 |
|
events/4/summary/11 |
Committee report tabled for plenary, 1st reading/single reading
|
events/8 |
|
events/8 |
|
events/8/summary/25 |
Text adopted by Parliament, 1st reading/single reading
|
events/9 |
|
events/9 |
|
events/9/docs/0/url |
Old
https://oeil.secure.europarl.europa.eu/oeil/popups/sda.do?id=60875&l=enNew
https://oeil.secure.europarl.europa.eu/oeil/en/sda-vote-result?sdaId=60875 |
events/10 |
|
procedure/Legislative priorities/0/url |
Old
https://oeil.secure.europarl.europa.eu/oeil/popups/thematicnote.do?id=41380&l=enNew
https://oeil.secure.europarl.europa.eu/legislative-priorities/thematic-note?id=41380 |
procedure/dossier_of_the_committee |
Old
New
JURI/9/11686 |
procedure/instrument/1 |
Amending Directive 2009/102
|
procedure/instrument/1 |
Amending Directive 2009/102 2008/0109(COD) Amending Directive 2017/1132 2015/0283(COD)
|
procedure/instrument/2 |
2008/0109(COD)
|
procedure/instrument/3 |
Amending Directive 2017/1132
|
procedure/instrument/4 |
2015/0283(COD)
|
procedure/stage_reached |
Old
Awaiting Council's 1st reading positionNew
Awaiting signature of act |
docs/8/docs/0/url |
Old
/oeil/spdoc.do?i=60875&j=0&l=enNew
https://data.europarl.europa.eu/distribution/doc/SP-2024-394-TA-9-2024-0360_en.docx |
docs/8/docs/0/url |
Old
/oeil/spdoc.do?i=60875&j=0&l=enNew
https://data.europarl.europa.eu/distribution/doc/SP-2024-394-TA-9-2024-0360_en.docx |
docs/8/docs/0/url |
Old
/oeil/spdoc.do?i=60875&j=0&l=enNew
https://data.europarl.europa.eu/distribution/doc/SP-2024-394-TA-9-2024-0360_en.docx |
docs/8/docs/0/url |
Old
/oeil/spdoc.do?i=60875&j=0&l=enNew
https://data.europarl.europa.eu/distribution/doc/SP-2024-394-TA-9-2024-0360_en.docx |
docs/8/docs/0/url |
Old
/oeil/spdoc.do?i=60875&j=0&l=enNew
https://data.europarl.europa.eu/distribution/doc/SP-2024-394-TA-9-2024-0360_en.docx |
docs/8/docs/0/url |
Old
/oeil/spdoc.do?i=60875&j=0&l=enNew
https://data.europarl.europa.eu/distribution/doc/SP-2024-394-TA-9-2024-0360_en.docx |
docs/8/docs/0/url |
Old
/oeil/spdoc.do?i=60875&j=0&l=enNew
https://data.europarl.europa.eu/distribution/doc/SP-2024-394-TA-9-2024-0360_en.docx |
docs/8/docs/0/url |
Old
/oeil/spdoc.do?i=60875&j=0&l=enNew
https://data.europarl.europa.eu/distribution/doc/SP-2024-394-TA-9-2024-0360_en.docx |
docs/8/docs/0/url |
Old
/oeil/spdoc.do?i=60875&j=0&l=enNew
https://data.europarl.europa.eu/distribution/doc/SP-2024-394-TA-9-2024-0360_en.docx |
docs/8/docs/0/url |
Old
/oeil/spdoc.do?i=60875&j=0&l=enNew
https://data.europarl.europa.eu/distribution/doc/SP-2024-394-TA-9-2024-0360_en.docx |
docs/8/docs/0/url |
Old
/oeil/spdoc.do?i=60875&j=0&l=enNew
https://data.europarl.europa.eu/distribution/doc/SP-2024-394-TA-9-2024-0360_en.docx |
docs/8/docs/0/url |
Old
/oeil/spdoc.do?i=60875&j=0&l=enNew
https://data.europarl.europa.eu/distribution/doc/SP-2024-394-TA-9-2024-0360_en.docx |
docs/8/docs/0/url |
Old
/oeil/spdoc.do?i=60875&j=0&l=enNew
https://data.europarl.europa.eu/distribution/doc/SP-2024-394-TA-9-2024-0360_en.docx |
docs/8/docs/0/url |
Old
/oeil/spdoc.do?i=60875&j=0&l=enNew
nulldistribution/doc/SP-2024-394-TA-9-2024-0360_en.docx |
docs/4/docs/0/url |
Old
https://eur-lex.europa.eu/oj/daily-view/L-series/EN/TXT/?uri=OJ:C:2023:253:TOCNew
https://eur-lex.europa.eu/oj/daily-view/L-series/default.html?&ojDate=18070202 |
docs/8 |
|
events/8 |
|
links |
|
docs/4/docs/0/url |
Old
https://eur-lex.europa.eu/oj/daily-view/L-series/EN/TXT/?uri=OJ:C:2023:253:TOCNew
https://eur-lex.europa.eu/oj/daily-view/L-series/default.html?&ojDate=18070202 |
docs/8 |
|
events/8 |
|
links |
|
docs/4/docs/0/url |
Old
https://eur-lex.europa.eu/oj/daily-view/L-series/EN/TXT/?uri=OJ:C:2023:253:TOCNew
https://eur-lex.europa.eu/oj/daily-view/L-series/default.html?&ojDate=18070202 |
docs/8 |
|
events/8 |
|
links |
|
docs/4/docs/0/url |
Old
https://eur-lex.europa.eu/oj/daily-view/L-series/EN/TXT/?uri=OJ:C:2023:253:TOCNew
https://eur-lex.europa.eu/oj/daily-view/L-series/default.html?&ojDate=18070202 |
docs/8 |
|
events/8 |
|
links |
|
docs/4/docs/0/url |
Old
https://eur-lex.europa.eu/oj/daily-view/L-series/EN/TXT/?uri=OJ:C:2023:253:TOCNew
https://eur-lex.europa.eu/oj/daily-view/L-series/default.html?&ojDate=18070202 |
docs/8 |
|
events/8 |
|
links |
|
docs/4/docs/0/url |
Old
https://eur-lex.europa.eu/oj/daily-view/L-series/EN/TXT/?uri=OJ:C:2023:253:TOCNew
https://eur-lex.europa.eu/oj/daily-view/L-series/default.html?&ojDate=18070202 |
docs/8 |
|
events/8 |
|
links |
|
docs/4/docs/0/url |
Old
https://eur-lex.europa.eu/oj/daily-view/L-series/EN/TXT/?uri=OJ:C:2023:253:TOCNew
https://eur-lex.europa.eu/oj/daily-view/L-series/default.html?&ojDate=18070202 |
docs/8 |
|
events/8 |
|
links |
|
docs/4/docs/0/url |
Old
https://eur-lex.europa.eu/oj/daily-view/L-series/EN/TXT/?uri=OJ:C:2023:253:TOCNew
https://eur-lex.europa.eu/oj/daily-view/L-series/default.html?&ojDate=18070202 |
docs/8 |
|
events/8 |
|
links |
|
docs/4/docs/0/url |
Old
https://eur-lex.europa.eu/oj/daily-view/L-series/EN/TXT/?uri=OJ:C:2023:253:TOCNew
https://eur-lex.europa.eu/oj/daily-view/L-series/default.html?&ojDate=18070202 |
docs/8 |
|
events/8 |
|
links |
|
docs/4/docs/0/url |
Old
https://eur-lex.europa.eu/oj/daily-view/L-series/EN/TXT/?uri=OJ:C:2023:253:TOCNew
https://eur-lex.europa.eu/oj/daily-view/L-series/default.html?&ojDate=18070202 |
docs/8 |
|
events/8 |
|
links |
|
docs/4/docs/0/url |
Old
https://eur-lex.europa.eu/oj/daily-view/L-series/EN/TXT/?uri=OJ:C:2023:253:TOCNew
https://eur-lex.europa.eu/oj/daily-view/L-series/default.html?&ojDate=18070202 |
docs/8 |
|
events/8 |
|
links |
|
docs/4 |
|
docs/4 |
|
docs/8 |
|
events/8 |
|
links |
|
docs/4 |
|
docs/4 |
|
docs/8 |
|
events/8 |
|
links |
|
docs/4 |
|
docs/4 |
|
docs/8 |
|
events/8 |
|
links |
|
docs/4 |
|
docs/4 |
|
docs/8 |
|
events/8 |
|
links |
|
docs/8 |
|
events/8 |
|
links |
|
docs/8 |
|
events/8 |
|
links |
|
docs/8 |
|
events/8 |
|
links |
|
docs/8 |
|
events/8 |
|
links |
|
docs/8 |
|
events/8 |
|
links |
|
docs/8 |
|
events/8 |
|
links |
|
docs/8 |
|
events/8 |
|
links |
|
docs/8 |
|
events/8 |
|
links |
|
docs/8 |
|
events/8 |
|
links |
|
docs/8 |
|
events/8 |
|
links |
|
docs/8 |
|
events/8 |
|
links |
|
events/8 |
|
links |
|
events/8 |
|
links |
|
events/8 |
|
links |
|
events/8 |
|
links |
|
events/8 |
|
links |
|
events/8 |
|
links |
|
events/8 |
|
links |
|
events/8 |
|
links |
|
events/8 |
|
links |
|
events/8 |
|
links |
|
events/8 |
|
events/8 |
|
events/8 |
|
events/8 |
|
procedure/Other legal basis |
Old
Rules of Procedure EP 159New
Rules of Procedure EP 165 |
procedure/Other legal basis |
Old
Rules of Procedure EP 159New
Rules of Procedure EP 165 |
procedure/Other legal basis |
Old
Rules of Procedure EP 159New
Rules of Procedure EP 165 |
procedure/Other legal basis |
Old
Rules of Procedure EP 159New
Rules of Procedure EP 165 |
procedure/Other legal basis |
Old
Rules of Procedure EP 159New
Rules of Procedure EP 165 |
procedure/Other legal basis |
Old
Rules of Procedure EP 159New
Rules of Procedure EP 165 |
docs/8 |
|
events/8/summary |
|
docs/8 |
|
events/8/summary |
|
docs/8 |
|
events/8/summary |
|
docs/8 |
|
events/8/summary |
|
docs/8 |
|
events/8/summary |
|
docs/8 |
|
events/8/summary |
|
docs/8 |
|
events/8/summary |
|
docs/8 |
|
events/8/summary |
|
docs/8 |
|
events/8/summary |
|
docs/8 |
|
events/7 |
|
events/8 |
|
forecasts |
|
procedure/stage_reached |
Old
Awaiting Parliament's position in 1st readingNew
Awaiting Council's 1st reading position |
docs/8 |
|
events/7 |
|
events/8 |
|
forecasts |
|
procedure/stage_reached |
Old
Awaiting Parliament's position in 1st readingNew
Awaiting Council's 1st reading position |
events/7 |
|
forecasts/0 |
|
forecasts/0 |
|
events/7 |
|
forecasts/0 |
|
forecasts/0 |
|
events/7 |
|
forecasts/0 |
|
forecasts/0 |
|
events/7 |
|
forecasts/0 |
|
forecasts/0 |
|
events/7 |
|
forecasts/0 |
|
forecasts/0 |
|
events/7 |
|
forecasts/0 |
|
forecasts/0 |
|
forecasts |
|
docs/8 |
|
events/4/summary |
|
events/6 |
|
events/5 |
|
docs/0/docs/0 |
|
docs/8 |
|
events/2 |
|
events/3 |
|
events/4 |
|
procedure/Other legal basis |
Rules of Procedure EP 159
|
procedure/stage_reached |
Old
Awaiting committee decisionNew
Awaiting Parliament's position in 1st reading |
docs/4/docs/0/url |
Old
https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/?uri=OJ:C:2023:253:TOCNew
https://eur-lex.europa.eu/oj/daily-view/L-series/EN/TXT/?uri=OJ:C:2023:253:TOC |
docs/8/date |
Old
2023-09-17T00:00:00New
2023-09-18T00:00:00 |
docs/9/date |
Old
2023-06-27T00:00:00New
2023-06-28T00:00:00 |
docs/7 |
|
docs/8 |
|
docs/4 |
|
docs/6 |
|
docs/5 |
|
docs/4 |
|
commission |
|
committees/0/shadows |
|
committees/0/rapporteur |
|
committees/1/opinion |
False
|
events/1 |
|
procedure/dossier_of_the_committee |
|
procedure/stage_reached |
Old
Preparatory phase in ParliamentNew
Awaiting committee decision |
docs/0 |
|
events/0/summary |
|
procedure/Legislative priorities |
|