BETA


2023/0136(NLE) Economic governance: requirements for budgetary frameworks of the Member States

Progress: Awaiting Parliament's vote

RoleCommitteeRapporteurShadows
Lead ECON FERBER Markus (icon: EPP EPP), MARQUES Margarida (icon: S&D S&D) KELLEHER Billy (icon: Renew Renew), LAMBERTS Philippe (icon: Verts/ALE Verts/ALE), RINALDI Antonio Maria (icon: ID ID), VAN OVERTVELDT Johan (icon: ECR ECR), GUSMÃO José (icon: GUE/NGL GUE/NGL)
Committee Opinion EMPL
Lead committee dossier:
Legal Basis:
TFEU 126-p14-a3

Events

2024/04/23
   Debate scheduled
2024/02/16
   EP - FERBER Markus (EPP) appointed as rapporteur in ECON
2024/02/16
   EP - MARQUES Margarida (S&D) appointed as rapporteur in ECON
2024/01/03
   CSL - Supplementary legislative basic document
Details

PURPOSE: to reform the EU economic governance framework.

PROPOSED ACT: Council Directive (Agreement in principle with a view to consulting the European Parliament).

ROLE OF THE EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT: Council may adopt the act only if Parliament has given its consent to the act.

Parliament is being consulted again on the proposed amendments to Council Directive 2011/85/EU on the requirements for the budgetary frameworks of the Member States.

The proposed Directive is part of a package together with a Regulation of the Parliament and of the Council replacing Regulation (EC) No 1466/979 (the preventive arm of the Stability and Growth Pact) and Council Regulation amending Council Regulation (EC) No 1467/97 (the corrective arm of the Stability and Growth Pact). Together, they establish a reformed Union economic governance framework that incorporates into Union law the substance of Title III ‘Fiscal Compact’ of the intergovernmental Treaty on Stability, Coordination and Governance (TSCG) in the Economic and Monetary Union.

In order to ensure Member States' compliance with the obligations under the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union (TFEU) in the area of budgetary policy, and in particular with regard to avoiding excessive government deficits, Council Directive 2011/85/EU laid down detailed rules concerning the characteristics of the budgetary frameworks of the Member States.

Building upon the experience gained with the economic and monetary union since Directive 2011/85/EU came into force, it is proposed to amend its requirements regarding the rules and procedures forming the budgetary frameworks of the Member States.

The proposal includes the following aspects:

- specific provisions in Member States' law to strengthen national ownership beyond those currently required by Directive 2011/85/EU, in order to improve compliance with the provisions of the TFEU and, in particular, to prevent the occurrence of excessive government deficits;

- improve the collection of accrual data and information needed to generate accrual-based statistics in a way that is comprehensive and consistent across all subsectors of general government;

- oblige Member States to ensure that their annual and multiannual budgetary planning is based on realistic macroeconomic and budgetary forecasts, using the most up-to-date information. To improve baseline assumptions, Member States should compare their macroeconomic and budgetary forecasts with the most updated ones of the Commission and, if appropriate, those of other independent bodies;

- ensure that macroeconomic and budgetary forecasts for annual and multiannual fiscal planning for the general government should be subject to regular, objective and comprehensive ex post evaluations performed by an independent body or other bodies with functional autonomy vis-à-vis the fiscal authorities of the Member States different from the one producing the forecast in order to enhance their quality;

- provide that independent fiscal institutions should have a high degree of operational independence, the necessary resources to perform their tasks and extensive and timely access to necessary information in order to achieve strengthened responsibility in fiscal policy;

- improve budgetary planning, due attention should be paid, to the extent possible, to the macro fiscal risks from climate change, including its environmental and distributional impacts;

- oblige Member States to publish: (i) information on how the relevant elements of their budgets contribute to achieving climate and environmental national and international commitments and the methodology used; (ii) data and descriptive information separately for expenditure, tax expenditure and revenue items; (iii) information on the distributional impact of budgetary policies and take into account employment, social and distributional aspects in the development of green budgeting;

- pay particular attention to government obligations and risks to government finances stemming from natural disasters and climate-related shocks, starting with collecting and publishing information on the fiscal cost of past events to the extent possible.

Documents
2024/01/03
   FR_SENATE - Contribution
Documents
2023/12/18
   IT_SENATE - Contribution
Documents
2023/12/15
   EP - Committee report tabled for plenary, 1st reading/single reading
Details

The Committee on Economic and Monetary Affairs adopted the report by Esther de LANGE (EPP, NL) and Margarida MARQUES (S&D, PT) on the proposal for a Council directive amending Directive 2011/85/EU on requirements for budgetary frameworks of the Member States.

The committee responsible recommended that the European Parliament approve the Commission's proposal subject to amendments.

Independent fiscal institutions

Members considered that Member States should ensure that independent fiscal institutions, such as structurally independent bodies or bodies endowed with functional autonomy as regards the budgetary authorities of the Member States, are established by national laws, regulations or binding administrative provisions, and adequately staffed and funded .

Member States should ensure diversity of views and backgrounds in the composition of these institutions.

The report added that the institutions should:

- allow for the disclosure of minority and divergent positions in such assessments and opinions;

- regularly exchange best practices among each other coordinated by the European Fiscal Board (EFB);

- regularly consult relevant stakeholders;

- producing the annual and multiannual macroeconomic and budgetary forecasts underlying the government’s medium-term planning or supporting or, where applicable according to national rules, endorsing the planning by the budgetary authorities;

- producing debt sustainability assessments underlying the government’s medium-term planning by the budgetary authorities or supporting or, where applicable according to national rules, endorsing the assessment;

- producing assessments on the impacts of policies, including reform and investment commitments under the national medium-term fiscal-structural plans, on fiscal sustainability and sustainable and inclusive growth by the budgetary authorities or supporting or, where applicable according to national rules, endorsing;

- participate in regular hearings and discussions at the national Parliament and be available to provide technical analysis and advice to the national Parliament upon request.

Medium-term budgetary frameworks

Medium-term budget frameworks should include procedures for establishing the following elements:

- a description of medium-term policies, including investment and reforms, and if applicable, specifying the investments and reforms in the common priorities of the Union referred to in the Regulation on the preventive arm of the stability and growth pact;

- an assessment as to how in the light of their direct medium-term and long-term impact on general government finances, the policies envisaged are likely to affect the medium-term and long-term sustainability of the public finances and sustainable and inclusive growth. The assessment should specify, to the extent possible and based on a transparent and replicable scientific methodology, the macro fiscal risks from climate change and their environmental and distributional impacts, and the implications on public finance of climate-related mitigation and adaptation policies over the medium-term and long-term.

Updating its medium-term budgetary framework plan

This Directive should not prevent a Member State’s new government from updating its medium-term budgetary framework plan to reflect its new policy priorities, nevertheless this is not to be encouraged , as it would imply lost momentum, particularly on the implementation of the reform agenda. The ambition of the reforms and investments in the revised plan should not be lower than the original plan.

Documents
2023/12/13
   IT_CHAMBER - Contribution
Documents
2023/12/11
   EP - Vote in committee
2023/10/24
   EP - Amendments tabled in committee
Documents
2023/10/10
   CofR - Committee of the Regions: opinion
Documents
2023/09/20
   ESC - Economic and Social Committee: opinion, report
Documents
2023/07/20
   CZ_SENATE - Contribution
Documents
2023/07/05
   ECB - European Central Bank: opinion, guideline, report
2023/06/28
   DE_BUNDESRAT - Contribution
Documents
2023/06/27
   IE_HOUSES-OF-OIREACHTAS - Contribution
Documents
2023/06/12
   EP - Committee referral announced in Parliament
2023/04/26
   EC - Legislative proposal published
Details

PURPOSE: to reform the EU economic governance framework.

PROPOSED ACT: Council Directive.

ROLE OF THE EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT: the Council adopts the act after consulting the European Parliament but without being obliged to follow its opinion.

BACKGROUND: the proposed changes to Council Directive 2011/85/EU on requirements for Member States' budgetary frameworks are part of a package which also includes:

- a proposal for a regulation replacing Regulation (EC) No 1466/972 (preventive arm of the Stability and Growth Pact) and

- amendment of Regulation (EC) No 1467/973 (corrective arm of the Stability and Growth Pact).

The Directive and the preventive and corrective arms of the Stability and Growth Pact are part of the EU's economic governance framework.

In order to ensure Member States' compliance with the obligations under the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union (TFEU) in the area of budgetary policy, and in particular with regard to avoiding excessive government deficits, Council Directive 2011/85/EU laid down detailed rules concerning the characteristics of the budgetary frameworks of the Member States. Building upon the experience gained with the economic and monetary union since Directive 2011/85/EU came into force, it is necessary to amend its requirements regarding the rules and procedures forming the budgetary frameworks of the Member States.

In 2019, the European Court of Auditors published a report in which it identified weaknesses in the effectiveness of medium-term budgeting and independent budgetary institutions and recommended that the Commission strengthen the requirements for medium-term budgetary frameworks and independent budgetary institutions in line with international standards.

In its Communication of 9 November 2022, the Commission presented its guidelines for a reform of the EU economic governance framework. These guidelines provided for greater ownership of the framework by the Member States, its simplification and increased targeting in the medium term , while ensuring stricter and more consistent application of the rules. They also aimed to improve the structure and performance of independent fiscal institutions.

CONTENT: the proposed amendments to Council Directive 2011/85/EU aim to strengthen national ownership and the medium-term orientation of budgetary planning . Amendments should also address provisions on transparency and statistics, forecasting and medium-term budgeting to address weaknesses identified during implementation.

Specifically, the objectives of the changes are:

Simplification of existing legislation

Provisions on the submission of monthly cash-based fiscal data are not useful for strengthening national budgetary frameworks. Some provisions will become redundant if these requirements are included in the proposed preventive arm regulation.

Clarification of provisions

With regard to the macroeconomic and budgetary forecasts drawn up for the purposes of budgetary programming, it is proposed that the directive now makes specific reference to the independent bodies in charge of the ex-post evaluation of the forecasts. The directive should also better specify reporting requirements on general government bodies and funds that are not part of the regular national budgets, requirements on tax expenditure and contingent liabilities.

Strengthening national ownership

It is proposed to add or clarify requirements on independent fiscal institutions. In some cases, the proposed new provisions already applied to the euro area Member States as well as to Denmark, Bulgaria and Romania, as contracting parties to the Treaty on Stability, Coordination and Governance in Economic and Monetary Union (the TSCG).

Other proposed provisions aim to add tasks that would give independent fiscal institutions a role in the surveillance of the EU fiscal framework at national level. These include the preparation or endorsement of budgetary forecasts as well as assessing sustainability analyses and the impact of policies.

Lastly, some of the proposed provisions ensure the independence and accountability of IFIs to reflect standards identified by international organisations.

Promoting a medium-term orientation

It is proposed that the multiannual budgetary dimension in the forecasts is more systematically specified and so would be the link between the annual budget and medium-term planning.

Improving the quality of public finance

Provisions are proposed to promote the accountability of public budgets and increase the transparency of fiscal risks vis-à-vis climate change. The directive would now require assessing the risks deriving from climate change and the implications of climate policies on public finances.

It would also require Member States to publish data to the extent possible on disaster and climate-related contingent liabilities as well as on economic losses incurred from natural disasters and climate-related shocks. For these shocks, the fiscal costs borne by the public sector and the instruments used to mitigate or cover the shocks would also be reported.

Documents

AmendmentsDossier
108 2023/0136(NLE)
2023/10/24 ECON 108 amendments...
source: 754.923

History

(these mark the time of scraping, not the official date of the change)

forecasts/0
date
2024-04-23T00:00:00
title
Debate scheduled
forecasts/0
date
2024-04-22T00:00:00
title
Indicative plenary sitting date
forecasts/0
date
2024-04-23T00:00:00
title
Debate in plenary scheduled
forecasts/0
date
2024-04-22T00:00:00
title
Indicative plenary sitting date
forecasts/0
date
2024-04-23T00:00:00
title
Debate in plenary scheduled
forecasts/0
date
2024-04-22T00:00:00
title
Indicative plenary sitting date
forecasts/0
date
2024-04-23T00:00:00
title
Debate in plenary scheduled
forecasts/0
date
2024-04-22T00:00:00
title
Indicative plenary sitting date
forecasts/0
date
2024-04-23T00:00:00
title
Debate in plenary scheduled
forecasts/0
date
2024-04-22T00:00:00
title
Indicative plenary sitting date
committees/0
type
Responsible Committee
body
EP
committee_full
Economic and Monetary Affairs
committee
ECON
associated
False
rapporteur
shadows
committees/0
type
Responsible Committee
body
EP
committee_full
Economic and Monetary Affairs
committee
ECON
associated
False
rapporteur
shadows
docs/4
date
2024-01-03T00:00:00
docs
title: 15396/2023
type
Supplementary legislative basic document
body
CSL
docs/4
date
2023-12-15T00:00:00
docs
url: https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/A-9-2023-0440_EN.html title: A9-0440/2023
type
Committee report tabled for plenary, 1st reading/single reading
body
EP
docs/4/summary
  • PURPOSE: to reform the EU economic governance framework.
  • PROPOSED ACT: Council Directive (Agreement in principle with a view to consulting the European Parliament).
  • ROLE OF THE EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT: Council may adopt the act only if Parliament has given its consent to the act.
  • Parliament is being consulted again on the proposed amendments to Council Directive 2011/85/EU on the requirements for the budgetary frameworks of the Member States.
  • The proposed Directive is part of a package together with a Regulation of the Parliament and of the Council replacing Regulation (EC) No 1466/979 (the preventive arm of the Stability and Growth Pact) and Council Regulation amending Council Regulation (EC) No 1467/97 (the corrective arm of the Stability and Growth Pact). Together, they establish a reformed Union economic governance framework that incorporates into Union law the substance of Title III ‘Fiscal Compact’ of the intergovernmental Treaty on Stability, Coordination and Governance (TSCG) in the Economic and Monetary Union.
  • In order to ensure Member States' compliance with the obligations under the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union (TFEU) in the area of budgetary policy, and in particular with regard to avoiding excessive government deficits, Council Directive 2011/85/EU laid down detailed rules concerning the characteristics of the budgetary frameworks of the Member States.
  • Building upon the experience gained with the economic and monetary union since Directive 2011/85/EU came into force, it is proposed to amend its requirements regarding the rules and procedures forming the budgetary frameworks of the Member States.
  • The proposal includes the following aspects:
  • - specific provisions in Member States' law to strengthen national ownership beyond those currently required by Directive 2011/85/EU, in order to improve compliance with the provisions of the TFEU and, in particular, to prevent the occurrence of excessive government deficits;
  • - improve the collection of accrual data and information needed to generate accrual-based statistics in a way that is comprehensive and consistent across all subsectors of general government;
  • - oblige Member States to ensure that their annual and multiannual budgetary planning is based on realistic macroeconomic and budgetary forecasts, using the most up-to-date information. To improve baseline assumptions, Member States should compare their macroeconomic and budgetary forecasts with the most updated ones of the Commission and, if appropriate, those of other independent bodies;
  • - ensure that macroeconomic and budgetary forecasts for annual and multiannual fiscal planning for the general government should be subject to regular, objective and comprehensive ex post evaluations performed by an independent body or other bodies with functional autonomy vis-à-vis the fiscal authorities of the Member States different from the one producing the forecast in order to enhance their quality;
  • - provide that independent fiscal institutions should have a high degree of operational independence, the necessary resources to perform their tasks and extensive and timely access to necessary information in order to achieve strengthened responsibility in fiscal policy;
  • - improve budgetary planning, due attention should be paid, to the extent possible, to the macro fiscal risks from climate change, including its environmental and distributional impacts;
  • - oblige Member States to publish: (i) information on how the relevant elements of their budgets contribute to achieving climate and environmental national and international commitments and the methodology used; (ii) data and descriptive information separately for expenditure, tax expenditure and revenue items; (iii) information on the distributional impact of budgetary policies and take into account employment, social and distributional aspects in the development of green budgeting;
  • - pay particular attention to government obligations and risks to government finances stemming from natural disasters and climate-related shocks, starting with collecting and publishing information on the fiscal cost of past events to the extent possible.
docs/5
date
2024-01-03T00:00:00
docs
title: 15396/2023
type
Supplementary legislative basic document
body
CSL
events/3/summary
  • The Committee on Economic and Monetary Affairs adopted the report by Esther de LANGE (EPP, NL) and Margarida MARQUES (S&D, PT) on the proposal for a Council directive amending Directive 2011/85/EU on requirements for budgetary frameworks of the Member States.
  • The committee responsible recommended that the European Parliament approve the Commission's proposal subject to amendments.
  • Independent fiscal institutions
  • Members considered that Member States should ensure that independent fiscal institutions, such as structurally independent bodies or bodies endowed with functional autonomy as regards the budgetary authorities of the Member States, are established by national laws, regulations or binding administrative provisions, and adequately staffed and funded .
  • Member States should ensure diversity of views and backgrounds in the composition of these institutions.
  • The report added that the institutions should:
  • - allow for the disclosure of minority and divergent positions in such assessments and opinions;
  • - regularly exchange best practices among each other coordinated by the European Fiscal Board (EFB);
  • - regularly consult relevant stakeholders;
  • - producing the annual and multiannual macroeconomic and budgetary forecasts underlying the government’s medium-term planning or supporting or, where applicable according to national rules, endorsing the planning by the budgetary authorities;
  • - producing debt sustainability assessments underlying the government’s medium-term planning by the budgetary authorities or supporting or, where applicable according to national rules, endorsing the assessment;
  • - producing assessments on the impacts of policies, including reform and investment commitments under the national medium-term fiscal-structural plans, on fiscal sustainability and sustainable and inclusive growth by the budgetary authorities or supporting or, where applicable according to national rules, endorsing;
  • - participate in regular hearings and discussions at the national Parliament and be available to provide technical analysis and advice to the national Parliament upon request.
  • Medium-term budgetary frameworks
  • Medium-term budget frameworks should include procedures for establishing the following elements:
  • - a description of medium-term policies, including investment and reforms, and if applicable, specifying the investments and reforms in the common priorities of the Union referred to in the Regulation on the preventive arm of the stability and growth pact;
  • - an assessment as to how in the light of their direct medium-term and long-term impact on general government finances, the policies envisaged are likely to affect the medium-term and long-term sustainability of the public finances and sustainable and inclusive growth. The assessment should specify, to the extent possible and based on a transparent and replicable scientific methodology, the macro fiscal risks from climate change and their environmental and distributional impacts, and the implications on public finance of climate-related mitigation and adaptation policies over the medium-term and long-term.
  • Updating its medium-term budgetary framework plan
  • This Directive should not prevent a Member State’s new government from updating its medium-term budgetary framework plan to reflect its new policy priorities, nevertheless this is not to be encouraged , as it would imply lost momentum, particularly on the implementation of the reform agenda. The ambition of the reforms and investments in the revised plan should not be lower than the original plan.
links
Research document
forecasts
  • date: 2024-04-22T00:00:00 title: Indicative plenary sitting date
docs/5
date
2024-01-03T00:00:00
docs
title: 15396/2023
type
Supplementary legislative basic document
body
CSL
docs/10
date
2024-01-03T00:00:00
docs
url: https://connectfolx.europarl.europa.eu/connefof/app/exp/COM(2023)0242 title: COM(2023)0242
type
Contribution
body
FR_SENATE
docs/4
date
2023-12-15T00:00:00
docs
url: https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/A-9-2023-0440_EN.html title: A9-0440/2023
type
Committee report tabled for plenary, 1st reading/single reading
body
EP
docs/9
date
2023-12-18T00:00:00
docs
url: https://connectfolx.europarl.europa.eu/connefof/app/exp/COM(2023)0242 title: COM(2023)0242
type
Contribution
body
IT_SENATE
events/3
date
2023-12-15T00:00:00
type
Committee report tabled for plenary, 1st reading/single reading
body
EP
docs
url: https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/A-9-2023-0440_EN.html title: A9-0440/2023
procedure/stage_reached
Old
Awaiting committee decision
New
Awaiting Parliament's vote
docs/5
date
2023-12-13T00:00:00
docs
url: https://connectfolx.europarl.europa.eu/connefof/app/exp/COM(2023)0242 title: COM(2023)0242
type
Contribution
body
IT_CHAMBER
events/2
date
2023-12-11T00:00:00
type
Vote in committee
body
EP
forecasts
  • date: 2023-12-11T00:00:00 title: Vote scheduled in committee
forecasts
  • date: 2023-12-11T00:00:00 title: Vote scheduled in committee
forecasts
  • date: 2023-12-04T00:00:00 title: Vote scheduled in committee
docs/0/docs/1/url
Old
https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/?uri=OJ:C:2023:290:TOC
New
https://eur-lex.europa.eu/oj/daily-view/L-series/EN/TXT/?uri=OJ:C:2023:290:TOC
docs/2
date
2023-06-26T00:00:00
docs
url: https://connectfolx.europarl.europa.eu/connefof/app/exp/COM(2023)0242 title: COM(2023)0242
type
Contribution
body
IE_HOUSES-OF-OIREACHTAS
docs/2
date
2023-10-10T00:00:00
docs
url: https://dmsearch.cor.europa.eu/search/public?k=(documenttype:AC)(documentnumber:0157)(documentyear:2023)(documentlanguage:EN) title: CDR0157/2023
type
Committee of the Regions: opinion
body
CofR
docs/3
date
2023-07-19T00:00:00
docs
url: https://connectfolx.europarl.europa.eu/connefof/app/exp/COM(2023)0242 title: COM(2023)0242
type
Contribution
body
CZ_SENATE
docs/3
date
2023-10-24T00:00:00
docs
url: https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/ECON-AM-754923_EN.html title: PE754.923
type
Amendments tabled in committee
body
EP
docs/4
date
2023-06-26T00:00:00
docs
url: https://connectfolx.europarl.europa.eu/connefof/app/exp/COM(2023)0242 title: COM(2023)0242
type
Contribution
body
IE_HOUSES-OF-OIREACHTAS
docs/4
date
2023-06-27T00:00:00
docs
url: https://connectfolx.europarl.europa.eu/connefof/app/exp/COM(2023)0242 title: COM(2023)0242
type
Contribution
body
DE_BUNDESRAT
docs/4/date
Old
2023-06-26T00:00:00
New
2023-06-27T00:00:00
docs/5
date
2023-07-19T00:00:00
docs
url: https://connectfolx.europarl.europa.eu/connefof/app/exp/COM(2023)0242 title: COM(2023)0242
type
Contribution
body
CZ_SENATE
docs/5/date
Old
2023-07-19T00:00:00
New
2023-07-20T00:00:00
docs/6
date
2023-06-27T00:00:00
docs
url: https://connectfolx.europarl.europa.eu/connefof/app/exp/COM(2023)0242 title: COM(2023)0242
type
Contribution
body
DE_BUNDESRAT
docs/6/date
Old
2023-06-27T00:00:00
New
2023-06-28T00:00:00
forecasts/0/date
Old
2023-11-13T00:00:00
New
2023-12-04T00:00:00
docs/1
date
2023-09-20T00:00:00
docs
url: https://dmsearch.eesc.europa.eu/search/public?k=(documenttype:AC)(documentnumber:2275)(documentyear:2023)(documentlanguage:EN) title: CES2275/2023
type
Economic and Social Committee: opinion, report
body
ESC
committees/0/rapporteur
  • name: DE LANGE Esther date: 2023-05-30T00:00:00 group: Group of European People's Party abbr: EPP
  • name: MARQUES Margarida date: 2023-05-30T00:00:00 group: Group of Progressive Alliance of Socialists and Democrats abbr: S&D
forecasts
  • date: 2023-11-13T00:00:00 title: Vote scheduled in committee
docs/2
date
2023-07-19T00:00:00
docs
url: https://connectfolx.europarl.europa.eu/connefof/app/exp/COM(2023)0242 title: COM(2023)0242
type
Contribution
body
CZ_SENATE
docs/0
date
2023-07-05T00:00:00
docs
type
European Central Bank: opinion, guideline, report
body
ECB
docs/0
date
2023-06-26T00:00:00
docs
url: https://connectfolx.europarl.europa.eu/connefof/app/exp/COM(2023)0242 title: COM(2023)0242
type
Contribution
body
IE_HOUSES-OF-OIREACHTAS
docs/0
date
2023-04-26T00:00:00
docs
type
Legislative proposal
body
EC
docs/1
date
2023-06-27T00:00:00
docs
url: https://connectfolx.europarl.europa.eu/connefof/app/exp/COM(2023)0242 title: COM(2023)0242
type
Contribution
body
DE_BUNDESRAT
committees/0/shadows/1
name
LAMBERTS Philippe
group
Group of the Greens/European Free Alliance
abbr
Verts/ALE
committees/1/opinion
False
committees/0/shadows/2
name
VAN OVERTVELDT Johan
group
European Conservatives and Reformists Group
abbr
ECR
committees/0/shadows/0
name
KELLEHER Billy
group
Renew Europe group
abbr
Renew
committees/0/shadows/1
name
GUSMÃO José
group
The Left group in the European Parliament - GUE/NGL
abbr
GUE/NGL
events/1
date
2023-06-12T00:00:00
type
Committee referral announced in Parliament
body
EP
procedure/dossier_of_the_committee
  • ECON/9/11910
procedure/stage_reached
Old
Preparatory phase in Parliament
New
Awaiting committee decision
committees/0/shadows
  • name: RINALDI Antonio Maria group: Identity and Democracy abbr: ID
commission
  • body: EC dg: Economic and Financial Affairs commissioner: GENTILONI Paolo
events/0/summary
  • PURPOSE: to reform the EU economic governance framework.
  • PROPOSED ACT: Council Directive.
  • ROLE OF THE EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT: the Council adopts the act after consulting the European Parliament but without being obliged to follow its opinion.
  • BACKGROUND: the proposed changes to Council Directive 2011/85/EU on requirements for Member States' budgetary frameworks are part of a package which also includes:
  • - a proposal for a regulation replacing Regulation (EC) No 1466/972 (preventive arm of the Stability and Growth Pact) and
  • - amendment of Regulation (EC) No 1467/973 (corrective arm of the Stability and Growth Pact).
  • The Directive and the preventive and corrective arms of the Stability and Growth Pact are part of the EU's economic governance framework.
  • In order to ensure Member States' compliance with the obligations under the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union (TFEU) in the area of budgetary policy, and in particular with regard to avoiding excessive government deficits, Council Directive 2011/85/EU laid down detailed rules concerning the characteristics of the budgetary frameworks of the Member States. Building upon the experience gained with the economic and monetary union since Directive 2011/85/EU came into force, it is necessary to amend its requirements regarding the rules and procedures forming the budgetary frameworks of the Member States.
  • In 2019, the European Court of Auditors published a report in which it identified weaknesses in the effectiveness of medium-term budgeting and independent budgetary institutions and recommended that the Commission strengthen the requirements for medium-term budgetary frameworks and independent budgetary institutions in line with international standards.
  • In its Communication of 9 November 2022, the Commission presented its guidelines for a reform of the EU economic governance framework. These guidelines provided for greater ownership of the framework by the Member States, its simplification and increased targeting in the medium term , while ensuring stricter and more consistent application of the rules. They also aimed to improve the structure and performance of independent fiscal institutions.
  • CONTENT: the proposed amendments to Council Directive 2011/85/EU aim to strengthen national ownership and the medium-term orientation of budgetary planning . Amendments should also address provisions on transparency and statistics, forecasting and medium-term budgeting to address weaknesses identified during implementation.
  • Specifically, the objectives of the changes are:
  • Simplification of existing legislation
  • Provisions on the submission of monthly cash-based fiscal data are not useful for strengthening national budgetary frameworks. Some provisions will become redundant if these requirements are included in the proposed preventive arm regulation.
  • Clarification of provisions
  • With regard to the macroeconomic and budgetary forecasts drawn up for the purposes of budgetary programming, it is proposed that the directive now makes specific reference to the independent bodies in charge of the ex-post evaluation of the forecasts. The directive should also better specify reporting requirements on general government bodies and funds that are not part of the regular national budgets, requirements on tax expenditure and contingent liabilities.
  • Strengthening national ownership
  • It is proposed to add or clarify requirements on independent fiscal institutions. In some cases, the proposed new provisions already applied to the euro area Member States as well as to Denmark, Bulgaria and Romania, as contracting parties to the Treaty on Stability, Coordination and Governance in Economic and Monetary Union (the TSCG).
  • Other proposed provisions aim to add tasks that would give independent fiscal institutions a role in the surveillance of the EU fiscal framework at national level. These include the preparation or endorsement of budgetary forecasts as well as assessing sustainability analyses and the impact of policies.
  • Lastly, some of the proposed provisions ensure the independence and accountability of IFIs to reflect standards identified by international organisations.
  • Promoting a medium-term orientation
  • It is proposed that the multiannual budgetary dimension in the forecasts is more systematically specified and so would be the link between the annual budget and medium-term planning.
  • Improving the quality of public finance
  • Provisions are proposed to promote the accountability of public budgets and increase the transparency of fiscal risks vis-à-vis climate change. The directive would now require assessing the risks deriving from climate change and the implications of climate policies on public finances.
  • It would also require Member States to publish data to the extent possible on disaster and climate-related contingent liabilities as well as on economic losses incurred from natural disasters and climate-related shocks. For these shocks, the fiscal costs borne by the public sector and the instruments used to mitigate or cover the shocks would also be reported.