BETA


2023/0137(CNS) Excessive deficit procedure: speeding up and clarifying the implementation

Progress: Procedure completed

RoleCommitteeRapporteurShadows
Lead ECON FERBER Markus (icon: EPP EPP), MARQUES Margarida (icon: S&D S&D) KELLEHER Billy (icon: Renew Renew), LAMBERTS Philippe (icon: Verts/ALE Verts/ALE), RINALDI Antonio Maria (icon: ID ID), VAN OVERTVELDT Johan (icon: ECR ECR), GUSMÃO José (icon: GUE/NGL GUE/NGL)
Committee Opinion BUDG VAN OVERTVELDT Johan (icon: ECR ECR)
Committee Opinion EMPL
Lead committee dossier:
Legal Basis:
TFEU 126-p14-a2

Events

2024/04/30
   Final act published in Official Journal
2024/04/29
   EP/CSL - Act adopted by Council after consultation of Parliament
2024/04/23
   EP - Text adopted by Parliament, 1st reading/single reading
Documents
2024/04/23
   EP - Debate in Parliament
2024/04/23
   EP - Decision by Parliament
Documents
2024/02/16
   EP - FERBER Markus (EPP) appointed as rapporteur in ECON
2024/02/16
   EP - MARQUES Margarida (S&D) appointed as rapporteur in ECON
2024/01/03
   CSL - Supplementary legislative basic document
Details

PURPOSE: to speed up and clarify the implementation of the excessive deficit procedure.

PROPOSED ACT: Council Regulation (Agreement in principle with a view to consulting the European Parliament).

ROLE OF THE EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT: the Council adopts the act after consulting the European Parliament but without being obliged to follow its opinion.

Parliament is being consulted again on the proposal to amend Regulation (EC) No 1467/97 laying down provisions on speeding up and clarifying the implementation of the excessive deficit procedure. The aim of the excessive deficit procedure is to prevent the occurrence of excessive government deficits and, if they do occur, to speed up their correction, with compliance with budgetary discipline being examined on the basis of the government deficit and debt criteria.

The proposed Regulation is part of a package together with the Regulation on the preventive arm of the stability and growth pact and the Directive amending 2011/85/EU on requirements for budgetary frameworks of the Member States. Together, they establish a reformed Union economic governance framework that incorporates into Union law the substance of Title III ‘Fiscal Compact’ of the Treaty on Stability, Coordination and Governance (TSCG) in the Economic and Monetary Union.

The main elements of the Council draft are as follows:

Excessive deficit procedure

It is foreseen that to trigger the process, the Commission would prepare a report , when the ratio of the government debt to GDP exceeds the reference value, the headline deficit is not close to balance or in surplus and when the deviations recorded in the control account of the Member State either exceed 0.3 percentage points of GDP annually, or 0.6 percentage points of GDP cumulatively .

The Council and the Commission would make a balanced overall assessment of all the relevant factors that affect the assessment of compliance with the deficit and/or the debt criteria of the member state concerned. These include among other things, the degree of public debt challenges, the size of the deviation, the progress in the implementation of reforms and investments and, where applicable the increase of government spending on defence.

Rules relating to the excessive deficit procedure

When it decides that an excessive deficit exists, the Council should at the same time make recommendations to the Member State concerned. The Council recommendation should establish a maximum deadline of six months for effective action to be taken by the Member State concerned. When warranted by the seriousness of the situation, the deadline for effective action may be three months. The Council recommendation should also establish a deadline for the correction of the excessive deficit. It should also request that the Member State implements a corrective net expenditure path, which ensures that the general government deficit remains or is brought and maintained below the reference value within the deadline set in the recommendation.

The Council proposes to maintain the rules of the excessive deficit procedure in so far as when the excessive deficit procedure is opened on the basis of the deficit criterion, the corrective net expenditure path should be consistent with a minimum annual structural adjustment of at least 0.5% of the GDP .

However, the Council also decided that the Commission may, for a transitory period in 2025, 2026 and 2027 , take into account the increase in interest payments in calculating the adjustment effort within the excessive deficit procedure.

The Council agreed that the fine in case of non-compliance would amount to up to 0.05% of GDP and accumulate every six months until effective action is taken.

Documents
2024/01/03
   FR_SENATE - Contribution
Documents
2023/12/19
   IT_SENATE - Contribution
Documents
2023/12/15
   EP - Committee report tabled for plenary, 1st reading/single reading
Details

The Committee on Economic and Monetary Affairs adopted, following a special legislative procedure (consultation), the report by Esther de LANGE (EPP, NL) and Margarida MARQUES (S&D, PT) on the proposal for a Council regulation amending Regulation (EC) No 1467/97 on speeding up and clarifying the implementation of the excessive deficit procedure.

This Regulation lays down the provisions for speeding up and clarifying the implementation of the excessive deficit procedure . The objective of the excessive deficit procedure is to deter excessive government deficits and, if they occur, to further prompt their correction, where compliance with the budgetary discipline is examined on the basis of the government deficit and government debt criteria.

The committee responsible recommended that the European Parliament approve the Commission's proposal subject to amendments.

Assessment of excessive debt

When assessing the existence of an excessive deficit in accordance with Article 126(3) TFEU, the Commission should take into account, as a key relevant factor, the degree of debt challenge in the Member State concerned .

The Commission, when drawing up a report under Article 126(3) TFEU, should take into account, as a key relevant factor, the degree of debt challenge in the Member State concerned. A substantial public debt challenge established according to the most recent Debt Sustainability Monitor should be considered a key factor leading to the opening of an EDP as a rule.

The Commission should take into account all other relevant factors, in so far as they significantly affect the assessment of compliance with the deficit and debt criteria by the Member State concerned, that should include in particular the developments in the medium-term economic position and the developments in the medium-term budgetary position, and the delivery and commitment by the Member State on the implementation of the investments and reforms to address the common priorities of the Union as set out in the EU Regulation on the preventive arm , the reforms and investments committed in the national plans of the Recovery and Resilience Facility, Cohesion Funds and future EU investments instruments that serve the same purpose.

Net expenditure

In order to simplify the Union fiscal framework and increase transparency, a single operational indicator anchored in debt sustainability should serve as a basis for setting the fiscal path and carrying out annual fiscal surveillance for each Member State.

According to Members, that single indicator should be based on nationally financed net primary expenditure, that is to say expenditure net of discretionary revenue measures and excluding interest expenditure as well as cyclical unemployment expenditure, expenditure on Union programmes fully matched by revenue from Union funds, national expenditure on co-financing of programmes funded by the Union cap with a limit of 0.25% of GDP, cyclical elements of unemployed benefit expenditure, and costs related to the borrowing of funds for the loans related to the national Recovery and Resilience Facility Plans.

By 31 December 2028 and every five years thereafter, the Commission should publish a report on the application of this Regulation.

Documents
2023/12/13
   IT_CHAMBER - Contribution
Documents
2023/12/11
   EP - Vote in committee
2023/11/23
   EP - Specific opinion
Documents
2023/10/25
   EP - Amendments tabled in committee
Documents
2023/10/10
   CofR - Committee of the Regions: opinion
Documents
2023/09/20
   ESC - Economic and Social Committee: opinion, report
Documents
2023/07/20
   CZ_SENATE - Contribution
Documents
2023/07/05
   ECB - European Central Bank: opinion, guideline, report
2023/06/12
   EP - Committee referral announced in Parliament
2023/05/25
   EP - VAN OVERTVELDT Johan (ECR) appointed as rapporteur in BUDG
2023/04/26
   EC - Legislative proposal published
Details

PURPOSE: to reform the EU economic governance framework.

PROPOSED ACT: Council Regulation.

ROLE OF THE EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT: the Council adopts the act after consulting the European Parliament but without being obliged to follow its opinion.

BACKGROUND: this proposal forms part of a package and aims to amend Council Regulation (EC) No 1467/97 on speeding up and clarifying the implementation of the excessive deficit procedure (the corrective arm of the Stability and Growth Pact). It is accompanied by:

- a proposal to replace Council Regulation No 1466/97 on the strengthening of the surveillance of budgetary positions and the surveillance and coordination of economic policies (the preventive arm of the Stability and Growth Pact);

- a proposal to amend Council Directive 2011/85/EU on requirements for budgetary frameworks of the Member States.

The review of the EU's economic governance framework was based on a consultation with a wide range of stakeholders. It revealed that the framework has a number of strengths, but also a series of shortcomings, in particular i) increased complexity, ii) the need to be more effective in reducing high levels of debt and building up buffers for future shocks, as well as (iii) the need to update a number of instruments and procedures to incorporate lessons learned from the response to recent economic shocks, including the interaction between reforms and investments under the Recovery and Resilience Facility.

The strong policy response to the COVID19 pandemic proved effective in mitigating the economic and social damage of the crisis, but resulted in a significant increase in public- and private-sector debt ratios, underscoring the importance of reducing debt ratios to prudent levels in a gradual, sustained and growth-friendly manner and addressing macroeconomic imbalances, while paying due attention to employment and social objectives.

The package including this legislative proposal aims at making the EU governance framework simpler, more transparent and effective , with greater national ownership and better enforcement, while allowing for reform and investment and reducing high public debt ratios in a realistic, gradual and sustained manner. In this way, in the context of the European Semester, the reformed framework should help build the green, digital and resilient economy of the future, while ensuring the sustainability of public finances in all Member States.

Stronger ex-post enforcement would be the necessary counterpart of a risk-based surveillance framework that provides more leeway to Member States to set their adjustment paths.

CONTENT: the proposal to amend Council Regulation (EC) No 1467/97 (the corrective arm of the Stability and Growth Pact - SGP) provides for a shift to a more risk-based surveillance framework that puts debt sustainability at the centre and, in order to further differentiate between Member States, takes into account their public debt challenges, while respecting a transparent and common EU framework consistent with the 3% of GDP and 60% of GDP reference values set out in Protocol No 12 on the excessive deficit procedure annexed to the Treaties

Under the proposal, the rules for the opening and closing of an excessive deficit procedure (EDP) for breaches of the 3% of GDP deficit reference value would remain unchanged , with some adjustments to ensure consistency with the EDP for breaches of the debt criterion, to recognise the role of independent fiscal institutions and to clarify cases of severe economic downturn in the Union or the euro area as a whole. It is a well-established element of EU fiscal surveillance that has been effective in influencing fiscal behaviour and is well understood by policy makers and the general public, thanks to its simplicity.

The excessive deficit procedure for breaches of the debt criterion would be strengthened for both activation and abrogation. It would focus on departures by Member States with debt above 60% of GDP from the fiscal path that the Member State has committed itself to and has been endorsed by the Council under the proposed Regulation replacing the preventive arm of the Stability and Growth Pact (SGP).

A substantial public debt challenge established according to the most recent Debt Sustainability Monitor should be considered a key factor leading to the opening of an EDP as a rule. In case this original path is no longer feasible, due to objective circumstances, the Commission could propose to the Council an amended path under the EDP.

More specifically, the proposal:

- changes the operationalisation of the Treaty debt criterion, abandoning the ‘1/20th rule’ and focusing on the respect of the net expenditure path set by the Council under the proposed Regulation replacing the preventive arm of the SGP;

- removes the reference to a quantitative description of a severe economic downturn and refers instead to the proposed Regulation replacing the preventive arm of the SGP;

- streamlines the list of relevant factors to decide on the existence of an excessive deficit;

- provides that, in the event of a severe economic downturn, the Commission and the Council may decide in their assessment not to conclude on the existence of an excessive deficit, in line with the approach followed when the general escape clause was activated during the COVID-19 crisis;

- specifies the requirements of the corrective net expenditure path set out in a Council Recommendation, namely that the government deficit should be brought back to or maintained below the 3% of GDP reference value and that the debt ratio should be placed on a plausible downward path or kept at a prudent level;

- maintains, for the years in which the government deficit is expected to exceed the reference value, a minimum annual adjustment of at least 0.5% of GDP as a benchmark;

- imposes an additional obligation on Member States to include in their report on effective action the opinion of their independent fiscal institution;

- provides that in case of a severe economic downturn in the euro area or the Union as a whole, the Commission and the Council may decide not to conclude on the existence of an excessive deficit.

Lastly, the proposal provides that the missions undertaken by the Commission in Member States allow an exchange also with relevant stakeholders other than the national authorities, including independent fiscal institutions. It also requires the Commission to carry out dedicated surveillance missions to Member States which were given a notice by the Council and provides that, in that context and upon invitation by the parliament of the Member State concerned, the Commission may present its assessment of the economic and fiscal situation in the Member State concerned.

Documents

Votes

A9-0444/2023 – Markus Ferber, Margarida Marques – Commission proposal #

2024/04/23 Outcome: +: 368, -: 166, 0: 64
PL ES RO CZ BG SE DE SK PT SI FI LT DK LV EE EL MT LU HR BE IE ?? AT HU NL IT FR
Total
43
53
23
21
15
20
87
13
19
8
14
10
14
7
6
10
4
6
5
21
11
1
17
15
27
56
72
icon: PPE PPE
149

Denmark PPE

For (1)

1

Malta PPE

For (1)

1

Luxembourg PPE

2

Hungary PPE

1
icon: Renew Renew
94

Poland Renew

1

Bulgaria Renew

2
3

Slovenia Renew

2

Finland Renew

3

Lithuania Renew

1

Latvia Renew

For (1)

1

Estonia Renew

3

Greece Renew

1

Luxembourg Renew

2

Ireland Renew

2

Austria Renew

For (1)

1

Hungary Renew

For (1)

1

Italy Renew

For (1)

Abstain (1)

3
icon: S&D S&D
122

Czechia S&D

For (1)

1

Slovakia S&D

For (1)

1

Slovenia S&D

2

Lithuania S&D

2

Latvia S&D

2

Estonia S&D

2

Greece S&D

1

Luxembourg S&D

For (1)

1

Belgium S&D

2

S&D

For (1)

1
icon: ECR ECR
57

Romania ECR

1

Bulgaria ECR

2

Sweden ECR

For (1)

Against (1)

2

Germany ECR

1

Slovakia ECR

Against (1)

1

Lithuania ECR

1

France ECR

Against (1)

1
icon: NI NI
34
1

Romania NI

For (1)

1

Czechia NI

Against (1)

1

Germany NI

For (1)

3

Slovakia NI

Against (1)

3

Latvia NI

Against (1)

1

Greece NI

For (1)

Against (1)

2

Croatia NI

Against (1)

1

Belgium NI

For (1)

1

Netherlands NI

Against (1)

1

France NI

3
icon: The Left The Left
28

Czechia The Left

Against (1)

1

Sweden The Left

Against (1)

1
4

Finland The Left

Abstain (1)

1

Denmark The Left

Against (1)

1

Greece The Left

1

Belgium The Left

Against (1)

1

Ireland The Left

3
icon: ID ID
48

Czechia ID

Against (1)

1

Denmark ID

Against (1)

1

Estonia ID

Abstain (1)

1

Austria ID

3
icon: Verts/ALE Verts/ALE
66

Poland Verts/ALE

Against (1)

1

Spain Verts/ALE

3

Czechia Verts/ALE

3

Sweden Verts/ALE

3

Portugal Verts/ALE

Against (1)

1

Finland Verts/ALE

3

Lithuania Verts/ALE

Against (1)

Abstain (1)

2

Denmark Verts/ALE

2

Greece Verts/ALE

Against (1)

1

Luxembourg Verts/ALE

Against (1)

1

Belgium Verts/ALE

3

Ireland Verts/ALE

2

Austria Verts/ALE

3

Netherlands Verts/ALE

3

Italy Verts/ALE

Against (1)

1
AmendmentsDossier
277 2023/0137(CNS)
2023/10/25 ECON 277 amendments...
source: 754.925

History

(these mark the time of scraping, not the official date of the change)

events/6
date
2024-04-29T00:00:00
type
Act adopted by Council after consultation of Parliament
body
EP/CSL
events/7
date
2024-04-30T00:00:00
type
Final act published in Official Journal
procedure/final
title
Regulation 2024/1264
url
https://eur-lex.europa.eu/smartapi/cgi/sga_doc?smartapi!celexplus!prod!CELEXnumdoc&lg=EN&numdoc=32024R1264
procedure/stage_reached
Old
Awaiting final decision
New
Procedure completed
events/6
date
2024-04-30T00:00:00
type
Final act published in Official Journal
procedure/final
title
Regulation 2024/1264
url
https://eur-lex.europa.eu/smartapi/cgi/sga_doc?smartapi!celexplus!prod!CELEXnumdoc&lg=EN&numdoc=32024R1264
docs/6
date
2024-04-23T00:00:00
docs
url: https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/TA-9-2024-0312_EN.html title: T9-0312/2024
type
Text adopted by Parliament, 1st reading/single reading
body
EP
events/4
date
2024-04-23T00:00:00
type
Debate in Parliament
body
EP
docs
url: https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/CRE-9-2024-04-23-TOC_EN.html title: Debate in Parliament
events/5
date
2024-04-23T00:00:00
type
Decision by Parliament
body
EP
docs
url: https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/TA-9-2024-0312_EN.html title: T9-0312/2024
forecasts
  • date: 2024-04-22T00:00:00 title: Indicative plenary sitting date
procedure/stage_reached
Old
Awaiting Parliament's vote
New
Awaiting final decision
docs/6
date
2024-04-23T00:00:00
docs
url: https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/TA-9-2024-0312_EN.html title: T9-0312/2024
type
Text adopted by Parliament, 1st reading/single reading
body
EP
events/4
date
2024-04-23T00:00:00
type
Debate in Parliament
body
EP
docs
url: https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/CRE-9-2024-04-23-TOC_EN.html title: Debate in Parliament
events/5
date
2024-04-23T00:00:00
type
Decision by Parliament
body
EP
docs
url: https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/TA-9-2024-0312_EN.html title: T9-0312/2024
forecasts
  • date: 2024-04-22T00:00:00 title: Indicative plenary sitting date
procedure/stage_reached
Old
Awaiting Parliament's vote
New
Awaiting final decision
docs/6
date
2024-04-23T00:00:00
docs
url: https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/TA-9-2024-0312_EN.html title: T9-0312/2024
type
Text adopted by Parliament, 1st reading/single reading
body
EP
events/4
date
2024-04-23T00:00:00
type
Debate in Parliament
body
EP
events/5
date
2024-04-23T00:00:00
type
Decision by Parliament
body
EP
docs
url: https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/TA-9-2024-0312_EN.html title: T9-0312/2024
forecasts
  • date: 2024-04-22T00:00:00 title: Indicative plenary sitting date
procedure/stage_reached
Old
Awaiting Parliament's vote
New
Awaiting final decision
forecasts/0
date
2024-04-23T00:00:00
title
Debate scheduled
forecasts/0
date
2024-04-22T00:00:00
title
Indicative plenary sitting date
forecasts/0
date
2024-04-23T00:00:00
title
Debate in plenary scheduled
forecasts/0
date
2024-04-22T00:00:00
title
Indicative plenary sitting date
forecasts/0
date
2024-04-23T00:00:00
title
Debate in plenary scheduled
forecasts/0
date
2024-04-22T00:00:00
title
Indicative plenary sitting date
forecasts/0
date
2024-04-23T00:00:00
title
Debate in plenary scheduled
forecasts/0
date
2024-04-22T00:00:00
title
Indicative plenary sitting date
forecasts/0
date
2024-04-23T00:00:00
title
Debate in plenary scheduled
forecasts/0
date
2024-04-22T00:00:00
title
Indicative plenary sitting date
committees/0
type
Responsible Committee
body
EP
committee_full
Economic and Monetary Affairs
committee
ECON
associated
False
rapporteur
shadows
committees/0
type
Responsible Committee
body
EP
committee_full
Economic and Monetary Affairs
committee
ECON
associated
False
rapporteur
shadows
docs/5/summary
  • PURPOSE: to speed up and clarify the implementation of the excessive deficit procedure.
  • PROPOSED ACT: Council Regulation (Agreement in principle with a view to consulting the European Parliament).
  • ROLE OF THE EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT: the Council adopts the act after consulting the European Parliament but without being obliged to follow its opinion.
  • Parliament is being consulted again on the proposal to amend Regulation (EC) No 1467/97 laying down provisions on speeding up and clarifying the implementation of the excessive deficit procedure. The aim of the excessive deficit procedure is to prevent the occurrence of excessive government deficits and, if they do occur, to speed up their correction, with compliance with budgetary discipline being examined on the basis of the government deficit and debt criteria.
  • The proposed Regulation is part of a package together with the Regulation on the preventive arm of the stability and growth pact and the Directive amending 2011/85/EU on requirements for budgetary frameworks of the Member States. Together, they establish a reformed Union economic governance framework that incorporates into Union law the substance of Title III ‘Fiscal Compact’ of the Treaty on Stability, Coordination and Governance (TSCG) in the Economic and Monetary Union.
  • The main elements of the Council draft are as follows:
  • Excessive deficit procedure
  • It is foreseen that to trigger the process, the Commission would prepare a report , when the ratio of the government debt to GDP exceeds the reference value, the headline deficit is not close to balance or in surplus and when the deviations recorded in the control account of the Member State either exceed 0.3 percentage points of GDP annually, or 0.6 percentage points of GDP cumulatively .
  • The Council and the Commission would make a balanced overall assessment of all the relevant factors that affect the assessment of compliance with the deficit and/or the debt criteria of the member state concerned. These include among other things, the degree of public debt challenges, the size of the deviation, the progress in the implementation of reforms and investments and, where applicable the increase of government spending on defence.
  • Rules relating to the excessive deficit procedure
  • When it decides that an excessive deficit exists, the Council should at the same time make recommendations to the Member State concerned. The Council recommendation should establish a maximum deadline of six months for effective action to be taken by the Member State concerned. When warranted by the seriousness of the situation, the deadline for effective action may be three months. The Council recommendation should also establish a deadline for the correction of the excessive deficit. It should also request that the Member State implements a corrective net expenditure path, which ensures that the general government deficit remains or is brought and maintained below the reference value within the deadline set in the recommendation.
  • The Council proposes to maintain the rules of the excessive deficit procedure in so far as when the excessive deficit procedure is opened on the basis of the deficit criterion, the corrective net expenditure path should be consistent with a minimum annual structural adjustment of at least 0.5% of the GDP .
  • However, the Council also decided that the Commission may, for a transitory period in 2025, 2026 and 2027 , take into account the increase in interest payments in calculating the adjustment effort within the excessive deficit procedure.
  • The Council agreed that the fine in case of non-compliance would amount to up to 0.05% of GDP and accumulate every six months until effective action is taken.
docs/5
date
2023-12-15T00:00:00
docs
url: https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/A-9-2023-0444_EN.html title: A9-0444/2023
type
Committee report tabled for plenary, 1st reading/single reading
body
EP
events/3/summary
  • The Committee on Economic and Monetary Affairs adopted, following a special legislative procedure (consultation), the report by Esther de LANGE (EPP, NL) and Margarida MARQUES (S&D, PT) on the proposal for a Council regulation amending Regulation (EC) No 1467/97 on speeding up and clarifying the implementation of the excessive deficit procedure.
  • This Regulation lays down the provisions for speeding up and clarifying the implementation of the excessive deficit procedure . The objective of the excessive deficit procedure is to deter excessive government deficits and, if they occur, to further prompt their correction, where compliance with the budgetary discipline is examined on the basis of the government deficit and government debt criteria.
  • The committee responsible recommended that the European Parliament approve the Commission's proposal subject to amendments.
  • Assessment of excessive debt
  • When assessing the existence of an excessive deficit in accordance with Article 126(3) TFEU, the Commission should take into account, as a key relevant factor, the degree of debt challenge in the Member State concerned .
  • The Commission, when drawing up a report under Article 126(3) TFEU, should take into account, as a key relevant factor, the degree of debt challenge in the Member State concerned. A substantial public debt challenge established according to the most recent Debt Sustainability Monitor should be considered a key factor leading to the opening of an EDP as a rule.
  • The Commission should take into account all other relevant factors, in so far as they significantly affect the assessment of compliance with the deficit and debt criteria by the Member State concerned, that should include in particular the developments in the medium-term economic position and the developments in the medium-term budgetary position, and the delivery and commitment by the Member State on the implementation of the investments and reforms to address the common priorities of the Union as set out in the EU Regulation on the preventive arm , the reforms and investments committed in the national plans of the Recovery and Resilience Facility, Cohesion Funds and future EU investments instruments that serve the same purpose.
  • Net expenditure
  • In order to simplify the Union fiscal framework and increase transparency, a single operational indicator anchored in debt sustainability should serve as a basis for setting the fiscal path and carrying out annual fiscal surveillance for each Member State.
  • According to Members, that single indicator should be based on nationally financed net primary expenditure, that is to say expenditure net of discretionary revenue measures and excluding interest expenditure as well as cyclical unemployment expenditure, expenditure on Union programmes fully matched by revenue from Union funds, national expenditure on co-financing of programmes funded by the Union cap with a limit of 0.25% of GDP, cyclical elements of unemployed benefit expenditure, and costs related to the borrowing of funds for the loans related to the national Recovery and Resilience Facility Plans.
  • By 31 December 2028 and every five years thereafter, the Commission should publish a report on the application of this Regulation.
links
Research document
forecasts
  • date: 2024-04-22T00:00:00 title: Indicative plenary sitting date
docs/6
date
2024-01-03T00:00:00
docs
title: 15876/2023
type
Supplementary legislative basic document
body
CSL
docs/10
date
2024-01-03T00:00:00
docs
url: https://connectfolx.europarl.europa.eu/connefof/app/exp/COM(2023)0241 title: COM(2023)0241
type
Contribution
body
FR_SENATE
docs/5
date
2023-12-15T00:00:00
docs
url: https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/A-9-2023-0444_EN.html title: A9-0444/2023
type
Committee report tabled for plenary, 1st reading/single reading
body
EP
docs/7
date
2023-12-13T00:00:00
docs
url: https://connectfolx.europarl.europa.eu/connefof/app/exp/COM(2023)0241 title: COM(2023)0241
type
Contribution
body
IT_CHAMBER
docs/8
date
2023-12-19T00:00:00
docs
url: https://connectfolx.europarl.europa.eu/connefof/app/exp/COM(2023)0241 title: COM(2023)0241
type
Contribution
body
IT_SENATE
events/3
date
2023-12-15T00:00:00
type
Committee report tabled for plenary, 1st reading/single reading
body
EP
docs
url: https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/A-9-2023-0444_EN.html title: A9-0444/2023
procedure/stage_reached
Old
Awaiting committee decision
New
Awaiting Parliament's vote
events/2
date
2023-12-11T00:00:00
type
Vote in committee
body
EP
forecasts
  • date: 2023-12-11T00:00:00 title: Vote scheduled in committee
forecasts
  • date: 2023-12-11T00:00:00 title: Vote scheduled in committee
forecasts
  • date: 2023-12-04T00:00:00 title: Vote scheduled in committee
docs/4/date
Old
2023-11-09T00:00:00
New
2023-11-23T00:00:00
docs/4
date
2023-11-09T00:00:00
docs
url: https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/BUDG-AL-754864_EN.html title: PE754.864
committee
BUDG
type
Specific opinion
body
EP
docs/2
date
2023-10-10T00:00:00
docs
url: https://dmsearch.cor.europa.eu/search/public?k=(documenttype:AC)(documentnumber:0157)(documentyear:2023)(documentlanguage:EN) title: CDR0157/2023
type
Committee of the Regions: opinion
body
CofR
docs/3
date
2023-10-25T00:00:00
docs
url: https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/ECON-AM-754925_EN.html title: PE754.925
type
Amendments tabled in committee
body
EP
docs/0/docs/1/url
Old
https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/?uri=OJ:C:2023:290:TOC
New
https://eur-lex.europa.eu/oj/daily-view/L-series/EN/TXT/?uri=OJ:C:2023:290:TOC
docs/2/date
Old
2023-07-19T00:00:00
New
2023-07-20T00:00:00
forecasts/0/date
Old
2023-11-13T00:00:00
New
2023-12-04T00:00:00
docs/1
date
2023-09-20T00:00:00
docs
url: https://dmsearch.eesc.europa.eu/search/public?k=(documenttype:AC)(documentnumber:2275)(documentyear:2023)(documentlanguage:EN) title: CES2275/2023
type
Economic and Social Committee: opinion, report
body
ESC
committees/1
type
Committee Opinion
body
EP
committee_full
Budgets
committee
BUDG
associated
False
committees/2
type
Committee Opinion
body
EP
committee_full
Budgets
committee
BUDG
associated
False
committees/2/rapporteur
  • name: VAN OVERTVELDT Johan date: 2023-05-25T00:00:00 group: European Conservatives and Reformists Group abbr: ECR
committees/0/rapporteur
  • name: DE LANGE Esther date: 2023-05-30T00:00:00 group: Group of European People's Party abbr: EPP
  • name: MARQUES Margarida date: 2023-05-30T00:00:00 group: Group of Progressive Alliance of Socialists and Democrats abbr: S&D
forecasts
  • date: 2023-11-13T00:00:00 title: Vote scheduled in committee
docs/1
date
2023-07-19T00:00:00
docs
url: https://connectfolx.europarl.europa.eu/connefof/app/exp/COM(2023)0241 title: COM(2023)0241
type
Contribution
body
CZ_SENATE
docs/0
date
2023-07-05T00:00:00
docs
type
European Central Bank: opinion, guideline, report
body
ECB
docs/0
date
2023-04-26T00:00:00
docs
type
Legislative proposal
body
EC
committees/0/shadows/1
name
LAMBERTS Philippe
group
Group of the Greens/European Free Alliance
abbr
Verts/ALE
committees/1
Old
type
Committee Opinion
body
EP
committee_full
Budgets
committee
BUDG
associated
False
New
type
Committee Opinion
body
EP
committee_full
Employment and Social Affairs
committee
EMPL
associated
False
opinion
False
committees/2
Old
type
Committee Opinion
body
EP
committee_full
Employment and Social Affairs
committee
EMPL
associated
False
opinion
False
New
type
Committee Opinion
body
EP
committee_full
Budgets
committee
BUDG
associated
False
committees/1
type
Committee Opinion
body
EP
committee_full
Employment and Social Affairs
committee
EMPL
associated
False
committees/2
type
Committee Opinion
body
EP
committee_full
Employment and Social Affairs
committee
EMPL
associated
False
committees/2/opinion
False
committees/0/shadows/2
name
VAN OVERTVELDT Johan
group
European Conservatives and Reformists Group
abbr
ECR
committees/0/shadows/0
name
KELLEHER Billy
group
Renew Europe group
abbr
Renew
committees/1
Old
type
Committee Opinion
body
EP
committee_full
Budgets
committee
BUDG
associated
False
New
type
Committee Opinion
body
EP
committee_full
Employment and Social Affairs
committee
EMPL
associated
False
committees/2
Old
type
Committee Opinion
body
EP
committee_full
Employment and Social Affairs
committee
EMPL
associated
False
New
type
Committee Opinion
body
EP
committee_full
Budgets
committee
BUDG
associated
False
committees/0/shadows/1
name
GUSMÃO José
group
The Left group in the European Parliament - GUE/NGL
abbr
GUE/NGL
committees/1
Old
type
Committee Opinion
body
EP
committee_full
Employment and Social Affairs
committee
EMPL
associated
False
New
type
Committee Opinion
body
EP
committee_full
Budgets
committee
BUDG
associated
False
committees/2
Old
type
Committee Opinion
body
EP
committee_full
Budgets
committee
BUDG
associated
False
New
type
Committee Opinion
body
EP
committee_full
Employment and Social Affairs
committee
EMPL
associated
False
events/1
date
2023-06-12T00:00:00
type
Committee referral announced in Parliament
body
EP
procedure/dossier_of_the_committee
  • ECON/9/11944
procedure/stage_reached
Old
Preparatory phase in Parliament
New
Awaiting committee decision
committees/0/shadows
  • name: RINALDI Antonio Maria group: Identity and Democracy abbr: ID
commission
  • body: EC dg: Economic and Financial Affairs commissioner: GENTILONI Paolo
events/0/summary
  • PURPOSE: to reform the EU economic governance framework.
  • PROPOSED ACT: Council Regulation.
  • ROLE OF THE EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT: the Council adopts the act after consulting the European Parliament but without being obliged to follow its opinion.
  • BACKGROUND: this proposal forms part of a package and aims to amend Council Regulation (EC) No 1467/97 on speeding up and clarifying the implementation of the excessive deficit procedure (the corrective arm of the Stability and Growth Pact). It is accompanied by:
  • - a proposal to replace Council Regulation No 1466/97 on the strengthening of the surveillance of budgetary positions and the surveillance and coordination of economic policies (the preventive arm of the Stability and Growth Pact);
  • - a proposal to amend Council Directive 2011/85/EU on requirements for budgetary frameworks of the Member States.
  • The review of the EU's economic governance framework was based on a consultation with a wide range of stakeholders. It revealed that the framework has a number of strengths, but also a series of shortcomings, in particular i) increased complexity, ii) the need to be more effective in reducing high levels of debt and building up buffers for future shocks, as well as (iii) the need to update a number of instruments and procedures to incorporate lessons learned from the response to recent economic shocks, including the interaction between reforms and investments under the Recovery and Resilience Facility.
  • The strong policy response to the COVID19 pandemic proved effective in mitigating the economic and social damage of the crisis, but resulted in a significant increase in public- and private-sector debt ratios, underscoring the importance of reducing debt ratios to prudent levels in a gradual, sustained and growth-friendly manner and addressing macroeconomic imbalances, while paying due attention to employment and social objectives.
  • The package including this legislative proposal aims at making the EU governance framework simpler, more transparent and effective , with greater national ownership and better enforcement, while allowing for reform and investment and reducing high public debt ratios in a realistic, gradual and sustained manner. In this way, in the context of the European Semester, the reformed framework should help build the green, digital and resilient economy of the future, while ensuring the sustainability of public finances in all Member States.
  • Stronger ex-post enforcement would be the necessary counterpart of a risk-based surveillance framework that provides more leeway to Member States to set their adjustment paths.
  • CONTENT: the proposal to amend Council Regulation (EC) No 1467/97 (the corrective arm of the Stability and Growth Pact - SGP) provides for a shift to a more risk-based surveillance framework that puts debt sustainability at the centre and, in order to further differentiate between Member States, takes into account their public debt challenges, while respecting a transparent and common EU framework consistent with the 3% of GDP and 60% of GDP reference values set out in Protocol No 12 on the excessive deficit procedure annexed to the Treaties
  • Under the proposal, the rules for the opening and closing of an excessive deficit procedure (EDP) for breaches of the 3% of GDP deficit reference value would remain unchanged , with some adjustments to ensure consistency with the EDP for breaches of the debt criterion, to recognise the role of independent fiscal institutions and to clarify cases of severe economic downturn in the Union or the euro area as a whole. It is a well-established element of EU fiscal surveillance that has been effective in influencing fiscal behaviour and is well understood by policy makers and the general public, thanks to its simplicity.
  • The excessive deficit procedure for breaches of the debt criterion would be strengthened for both activation and abrogation. It would focus on departures by Member States with debt above 60% of GDP from the fiscal path that the Member State has committed itself to and has been endorsed by the Council under the proposed Regulation replacing the preventive arm of the Stability and Growth Pact (SGP).
  • A substantial public debt challenge established according to the most recent Debt Sustainability Monitor should be considered a key factor leading to the opening of an EDP as a rule. In case this original path is no longer feasible, due to objective circumstances, the Commission could propose to the Council an amended path under the EDP.
  • More specifically, the proposal:
  • - changes the operationalisation of the Treaty debt criterion, abandoning the ‘1/20th rule’ and focusing on the respect of the net expenditure path set by the Council under the proposed Regulation replacing the preventive arm of the SGP;
  • - removes the reference to a quantitative description of a severe economic downturn and refers instead to the proposed Regulation replacing the preventive arm of the SGP;
  • - streamlines the list of relevant factors to decide on the existence of an excessive deficit;
  • - provides that, in the event of a severe economic downturn, the Commission and the Council may decide in their assessment not to conclude on the existence of an excessive deficit, in line with the approach followed when the general escape clause was activated during the COVID-19 crisis;
  • - specifies the requirements of the corrective net expenditure path set out in a Council Recommendation, namely that the government deficit should be brought back to or maintained below the 3% of GDP reference value and that the debt ratio should be placed on a plausible downward path or kept at a prudent level;
  • - maintains, for the years in which the government deficit is expected to exceed the reference value, a minimum annual adjustment of at least 0.5% of GDP as a benchmark;
  • - imposes an additional obligation on Member States to include in their report on effective action the opinion of their independent fiscal institution;
  • - provides that in case of a severe economic downturn in the euro area or the Union as a whole, the Commission and the Council may decide not to conclude on the existence of an excessive deficit.
  • Lastly, the proposal provides that the missions undertaken by the Commission in Member States allow an exchange also with relevant stakeholders other than the national authorities, including independent fiscal institutions. It also requires the Commission to carry out dedicated surveillance missions to Member States which were given a notice by the Council and provides that, in that context and upon invitation by the parliament of the Member State concerned, the Commission may present its assessment of the economic and fiscal situation in the Member State concerned.
docs/0/docs/1
url
https://eur-lex.europa.eu/smartapi/cgi/sga_doc?smartapi!celexplus!prod!DocNumber&lg=EN&type_doc=COMfinal&an_doc=2023&nu_doc=0241
title
EUR-Lex
events/0/docs/1
url
https://eur-lex.europa.eu/smartapi/cgi/sga_doc?smartapi!celexplus!prod!DocNumber&lg=EN&type_doc=COMfinal&an_doc=2023&nu_doc=0241
title
EUR-Lex