BETA


2023/0172(COD) Compliance with flag State requirements
Next event: Indicative plenary sitting date 2024/04/11

Progress: Awaiting Parliament's position in 1st reading

RoleCommitteeRapporteurShadows
Lead TRAN TAX Vera (icon: S&D S&D) NOVAK Ljudmila (icon: EPP EPP), KARLESKIND Pierre (icon: Renew Renew), DELLI Karima (icon: Verts/ALE Verts/ALE), CAMPOMENOSI Marco (icon: ID ID), VAN OVERTVELDT Johan (icon: ECR ECR), DALY Clare (icon: GUE/NGL GUE/NGL)
Committee Opinion BUDG
Committee Opinion PECH MIRANDA Ana (icon: Verts/ALE Verts/ALE) Izaskun BILBAO BARANDICA (icon: RE RE), Annie SCHREIJER-PIERIK (icon: PPE PPE), Raffaele STANCANELLI (icon: ECR ECR), Predrag Fred MATIĆ (icon: S&D S&D)
Lead committee dossier:
Legal Basis:
TFEU 100-p2

Events

2024/04/11
   Indicative plenary sitting date
2024/03/15
   CSL - Coreper letter confirming interinstitutional agreement
2024/03/15
   EP - Text agreed during interinstitutional negotiations
Documents
2023/12/13
   EP - Committee decision to enter into interinstitutional negotiations confirmed by plenary (Rule 71)
2023/12/11
   EP - Committee decision to enter into interinstitutional negotiations announced in plenary (Rule 71)
2023/12/08
   EP - Committee report tabled for plenary, 1st reading
Details

The Committee on Transport and Tourism adopted the report by Vera TAX (S&D, NL) on the proposal for a directive of the European Parliament and of the Council amending Directive 2009/21/EC on compliance with flag State requirements.

The committee responsible recommended that the European Parliament's position adopted at first reading under the ordinary legislative procedure should amend the proposal as follows:

Conditions for allowing a ship to operate upon granting the right to fly the flag of a Member State

To ensure the effectiveness of this Directive, every EU flag State should carry out its fair share of inspections, commensurate with the size and type of its fleet. A yearly minimum inspection quota of at least 30 % of ships flying its flag for every Member State should be set.

The Commission, with the assistance of EMSA, should produce a guidance document offering advice on how to implement Directive 2013/54/EU concerning certain flag State responsibilities for compliance with and enforcement of the Maritime Labour Convention, 2006. EMSA should also provide detailed information about the problems most frequently detected during port State inspections of ships under each flag, as well as explanations and clarifications concerning the specific documentation and certificates of each flag State.

Electronic certificates should be mandatory for all Members States from three years from the date of entry into force of this amending Directive, at the latest. The report also called for Member States to ensure that shipboard working arrangements and records of seafarers' daily hours of work or of their daily hours of rest are transmitted electronically to the inspection database..

Flag State auditing process

Member States should take the necessary measures to undergo the IMO audit of their administration at least once every five years (compared to seven years proposed by the Commission) and should publish the outcome of the audit as well as any corrective actions in the Global Integrated Shipping Information System (GISIS) database set up by the IMO. Member States should also make the same information available to the public, in accordance with relevant national legislation on confidentiality.

Quality management system and internal evaluation

Members suggested that flag States should revise the guidelines provided to their inspectors, and to those authorised to act on their behalf, so that they cover the systematic verification of the accuracy of records. Training provided by EMSA to flag State administrations should cover such verification procedures and should be continuous, reinforced and extended to cover MLC 2006 in more detail. EMSA should also facilitate the coordination and exchange of information and good practices between flag State administrations.

Reports and Review

The report stated that every five years, and for the first time by three years from the date of entry into force of this amending Directive, the Commission should present a report to the European Parliament and to the Council on the application of this Directive. This report should contain an assessment of the performance of the Member States as flag States and should be accompanied, where appropriate, by a legislative proposal for the amendment of this Directive.

The Commission should also issue an annual report based on the information collected, which should be published on the official website.

Documents
2023/12/07
   EP - Vote in committee, 1st reading
2023/12/07
   EP - Committee decision to open interinstitutional negotiations with report adopted in committee
2023/11/29
   EP - Committee opinion
Documents
2023/10/13
   EP - Amendments tabled in committee
Documents
2023/09/20
   ESC - Economic and Social Committee: opinion, report
Documents
2023/09/19
   EP - Committee draft report
Documents
2023/09/05
   EP - MIRANDA Ana (Verts/ALE) appointed as rapporteur in PECH
2023/07/13
   EP - TAX Vera (S&D) appointed as rapporteur in TRAN
2023/07/10
   EP - Committee referral announced in Parliament, 1st reading
2023/06/01
   EC - Document attached to the procedure
Documents
2023/06/01
   EC - Document attached to the procedure
2023/06/01
   EC - Document attached to the procedure
2023/06/01
   EC - Legislative proposal published
Details

PURPOSE: to update certain provisions of Directive 2009/21/EC on compliance with flag State requirements.

PROPOSED ACT: Directive of the European Parliament and of the Council.

ROLE OF THE EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT: the European Parliament decides in accordance with the ordinary legislative procedure and on an equal footing with the Council.

BACKGROUND: Directive 2009/21/EC on compliance with flag State requirements regulates the enforcement of rules applicable to flag State at the Union level. The responsibility for monitoring the compliance of ships with particular IMO conventions lies with the State where the ship is registered and whose nationality the ship holds - the flag State. The Directive therefore aims to ensure that ships flying the flags of EU Member States meet all safety and pollution prevention requirements and are fit for service.

The International Maritime Organisation (IMO) has, since the adoption of the Directive, made the IMO Instruments Implementation code (III-Code) and IMO audit mandatory as of 2016 for all flag States in the world, including EU Member States. The III-Code and the IMO audit aims to ensure that States take all necessary steps to correctly implement and apply the Conventions and have the resources and powers needed as a flag State to assume their international obligations and ensure compliance of their flagged ships with these rules.

The Directive consequently needs to be revised and incorporate the flag State relevant parts of the III-Code into EU legislation, to make it enforceable under the EU legal order.

This initiative is part of a package to modernise EU rules on maritime safety.

CONTENT: in the light of this, a proposal to amend Directive 2009/21/EC has been prepared.

The main changes concern the following:

Subject-matter, scope and definition

The proposal updates some references to IMO instruments in the existing definitions and includes further definitions relevant for the Directive, notably the III-Code.

Conditions for allowing a ship to sail

The Directive is amended to introduce the use of the database for verification of the condition of the ship (transferring in, as the case may be) before the ship is allowed to operate. A new article requires the Member State as flag State to adhere to the III-Code and the requirement to carry out supplementary flag State inspections to ensure the safety of ships flying the flag of a Member State.

Administrations should have the appropriate resources , commensurate with the size and type of fleet (ships registered under the flag) to meet the supplementary inspection obligations.

The proposal lays down responsibilities and common capacity building of the flag State personnel. This includes the continuous development of training schemes and material reflecting updates in the international IMO Conventions as well as possible new requirements following on from environmental considerations especially as regards new technologies (e.g. propulsion, new types of fuel etc).

Actions in relation to or following monitoring of flagged ships

The proposal requires Member States as flag States to use the Union Maritime Information Exchange System (SafeSeaNet) to control and monitor ships under their flag and check e.g. whether they are being detained under port State control. This amendment also addresses the lack of flexibility of the flag State regime in cases of crisis or unexpected events, such as the COVID-19 pandemic.

Electronic information and inspection database

The proposal introduces e-documents that are to be recorded, kept, reported and shared via a national e-certification registry compatible with the inspections database. E-documents concern among others e-inspection reports and e-certificates. The information will be communicated to the inspection database developed by the Commission. Electronic transmissions of electronic certificates will use the same technical solutions as those established by the Port State Control Directive.

Monitoring of compliance and performance

The Directive is amended to clarify what information should be published following an IMO Audit. It also introduces the requirement that the Member State as auditee should allow for the possibility of the Commission, assisted by EMSA, to observe such IMO audits. The aim is to ensure transparency and facilitate synergies between IMO Audits and EMSA visits.

Quality Management and performance of flag States

The scope and coverage of the Quality Management System is clarified to cover all registries, whether it is the traditional (so-called first registers), international or overseas or similar (called second registers) under the authority of the flag State and flying the flag of that State as well as coverage of all flag State-related activities.

Moreover, the current performance measurement should be revised and modernised, via an implementing act. The requirements to be applied by the Member States for their own assessment of performance as well as the requirement for the Commission to make overall results publicly available is introduced.

Cooperation and exchange of information

The proposal establishes a high-level group on flag State matters, composed of Member States’ Flag State authorities and experts for discussing all flag State related and pertinent issues. It also establishes a dynamic electronic reporting tool for gathering information and statistics.

Budgetary implications

The proposal has net present costs for the Union Budget of EUR 7 to 8.1 million over the period 2025-2050.

Documents

  • Coreper letter confirming interinstitutional agreement: GEDA/A/(2024)001557
  • Text agreed during interinstitutional negotiations: PE759.991
  • Committee report tabled for plenary, 1st reading: A9-0418/2023
  • Committee opinion: PE752.995
  • Amendments tabled in committee: PE754.747
  • Economic and Social Committee: opinion, report: CES2992/2023
  • Committee draft report: PE753.548
  • Document attached to the procedure: SEC(2023)0210
  • Document attached to the procedure: EUR-Lex
  • Document attached to the procedure: SWD(2023)0165
  • Document attached to the procedure: EUR-Lex
  • Document attached to the procedure: SWD(2023)0166
  • Legislative proposal published: COM(2023)0272
  • Legislative proposal published: EUR-Lex
  • Document attached to the procedure: SEC(2023)0210
  • Document attached to the procedure: EUR-Lex SWD(2023)0165
  • Document attached to the procedure: EUR-Lex SWD(2023)0166
  • Committee draft report: PE753.548
  • Economic and Social Committee: opinion, report: CES2992/2023
  • Amendments tabled in committee: PE754.747
  • Committee opinion: PE752.995
  • Coreper letter confirming interinstitutional agreement: GEDA/A/(2024)001557
  • Text agreed during interinstitutional negotiations: PE759.991
AmendmentsDossier
127 2023/0172(COD)
2023/10/13 TRAN 127 amendments...
source: 754.747

History

(these mark the time of scraping, not the official date of the change)

docs/7
date
2024-03-15T00:00:00
docs
title: GEDA/A/(2024)001557
type
Coreper letter confirming interinstitutional agreement
body
CSL
docs/8
date
2024-03-15T00:00:00
docs
url: https://www.europarl.europa.eu/RegData/commissions/tran/inag/2024/03-15/TRAN_AG(2024)759991_EN.docx title: PE759.991
type
Text agreed during interinstitutional negotiations
body
EP
docs/7
date
2024-03-15T00:00:00
docs
title: GEDA/A/(2024)001557
type
Coreper letter confirming interinstitutional agreement
body
CSL
docs/8
date
2024-03-15T00:00:00
docs
url: https://www.europarl.europa.eu/RegData/commissions/tran/inag/2024/03-15/TRAN_AG(2024)759991_EN.docx title: PE759.991
type
Text agreed during interinstitutional negotiations
body
EP
docs/7
date
2024-03-15T00:00:00
docs
title: GEDA/A/(2024)001557
type
Coreper letter confirming interinstitutional agreement
body
CSL
docs/8
date
2024-03-15T00:00:00
docs
url: https://www.europarl.europa.eu/RegData/commissions/tran/inag/2024/03-15/TRAN_AG(2024)759991_EN.docx title: PE759.991
type
Text agreed during interinstitutional negotiations
body
EP
docs/7
date
2024-03-15T00:00:00
docs
title: GEDA/A/(2024)001557
type
Coreper letter confirming interinstitutional agreement
body
CSL
docs/8
date
2024-03-15T00:00:00
docs
url: https://www.europarl.europa.eu/RegData/commissions/tran/inag/2024/03-15/TRAN_AG(2024)759991_EN.docx title: PE759.991
type
Text agreed during interinstitutional negotiations
body
EP
docs/7
date
2024-03-15T00:00:00
docs
title: GEDA/A/(2024)001557
type
Coreper letter confirming interinstitutional agreement
body
CSL
docs/8
date
2024-03-15T00:00:00
docs
url: https://www.europarl.europa.eu/RegData/commissions/tran/inag/2024/03-15/TRAN_AG(2024)759991_EN.docx title: PE759.991
type
Text agreed during interinstitutional negotiations
body
EP
docs/7
date
2024-03-15T00:00:00
docs
title: GEDA/A/(2024)001557
type
Coreper letter confirming interinstitutional agreement
body
CSL
docs/8
date
2024-03-15T00:00:00
docs
url: https://www.europarl.europa.eu/RegData/commissions/tran/inag/2024/03-15/TRAN_AG(2024)759991_EN.docx title: PE759.991
type
Text agreed during interinstitutional negotiations
body
EP
docs/7
date
2024-03-15T00:00:00
docs
title: GEDA/A/(2024)001557
type
Coreper letter confirming interinstitutional agreement
body
CSL
docs/8
date
2024-03-15T00:00:00
docs
url: https://www.europarl.europa.eu/RegData/commissions/tran/inag/2024/03-15/TRAN_AG(2024)759991_EN.docx title: PE759.991
type
Text agreed during interinstitutional negotiations
body
EP
docs/7
date
2024-03-15T00:00:00
docs
title: GEDA/A/(2024)001557
type
Coreper letter confirming interinstitutional agreement
body
CSL
docs/8
date
2024-03-15T00:00:00
docs
url: https://www.europarl.europa.eu/RegData/commissions/tran/inag/2024/03-15/TRAN_AG(2024)759991_EN.docx title: PE759.991
type
Text agreed during interinstitutional negotiations
body
EP
forecasts
  • date: 2024-04-11T00:00:00 title: Indicative plenary sitting date
links
Research document
docs/7
date
2023-12-08T00:00:00
docs
url: https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/A-9-2023-0418_EN.html title: A9-0418/2023
type
Committee report tabled for plenary, 1st reading/single reading
body
EP
events/4/summary
  • The Committee on Transport and Tourism adopted the report by Vera TAX (S&D, NL) on the proposal for a directive of the European Parliament and of the Council amending Directive 2009/21/EC on compliance with flag State requirements.
  • The committee responsible recommended that the European Parliament's position adopted at first reading under the ordinary legislative procedure should amend the proposal as follows:
  • Conditions for allowing a ship to operate upon granting the right to fly the flag of a Member State
  • To ensure the effectiveness of this Directive, every EU flag State should carry out its fair share of inspections, commensurate with the size and type of its fleet. A yearly minimum inspection quota of at least 30 % of ships flying its flag for every Member State should be set.
  • The Commission, with the assistance of EMSA, should produce a guidance document offering advice on how to implement Directive 2013/54/EU concerning certain flag State responsibilities for compliance with and enforcement of the Maritime Labour Convention, 2006. EMSA should also provide detailed information about the problems most frequently detected during port State inspections of ships under each flag, as well as explanations and clarifications concerning the specific documentation and certificates of each flag State.
  • Electronic certificates should be mandatory for all Members States from three years from the date of entry into force of this amending Directive, at the latest. The report also called for Member States to ensure that shipboard working arrangements and records of seafarers' daily hours of work or of their daily hours of rest are transmitted electronically to the inspection database..
  • Flag State auditing process
  • Member States should take the necessary measures to undergo the IMO audit of their administration at least once every five years (compared to seven years proposed by the Commission) and should publish the outcome of the audit as well as any corrective actions in the Global Integrated Shipping Information System (GISIS) database set up by the IMO. Member States should also make the same information available to the public, in accordance with relevant national legislation on confidentiality.
  • Quality management system and internal evaluation
  • Members suggested that flag States should revise the guidelines provided to their inspectors, and to those authorised to act on their behalf, so that they cover the systematic verification of the accuracy of records. Training provided by EMSA to flag State administrations should cover such verification procedures and should be continuous, reinforced and extended to cover MLC 2006 in more detail. EMSA should also facilitate the coordination and exchange of information and good practices between flag State administrations.
  • Reports and Review
  • The report stated that every five years, and for the first time by three years from the date of entry into force of this amending Directive, the Commission should present a report to the European Parliament and to the Council on the application of this Directive. This report should contain an assessment of the performance of the Member States as flag States and should be accompanied, where appropriate, by a legislative proposal for the amendment of this Directive.
  • The Commission should also issue an annual report based on the information collected, which should be published on the official website.
events/6
date
2023-12-13T00:00:00
type
Committee decision to enter into interinstitutional negotiations confirmed by plenary (Rule 71)
body
EP
events/5
date
2023-12-11T00:00:00
type
Committee decision to enter into interinstitutional negotiations announced in plenary (Rule 71)
body
EP
docs/7
date
2023-12-08T00:00:00
docs
url: https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/A-9-2023-0418_EN.html title: A9-0418/2023
type
Committee report tabled for plenary, 1st reading/single reading
body
EP
events/4
date
2023-12-08T00:00:00
type
Committee report tabled for plenary, 1st reading
body
EP
docs
url: https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/A-9-2023-0418_EN.html title: A9-0418/2023
procedure/stage_reached
Old
Awaiting committee decision
New
Awaiting Parliament's position in 1st reading
docs/6
date
2023-11-29T00:00:00
docs
url: https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PECH-AD-752995_EN.html title: PE752.995
committee
PECH
type
Committee opinion
body
EP
events/2
date
2023-12-07T00:00:00
type
Vote in committee, 1st reading
body
EP
events/3
date
2023-12-07T00:00:00
type
Committee decision to open interinstitutional negotiations with report adopted in committee
body
EP
forecasts
  • date: 2023-12-07T00:00:00 title: Vote scheduled in committee
procedure/Other legal basis
Rules of Procedure EP 159
docs/4
date
2023-09-20T00:00:00
docs
url: https://dmsearch.eesc.europa.eu/search/public?k=(documenttype:AC)(documentnumber:2992)(documentyear:2023)(documentlanguage:EN) title: CES2992/2023
type
Economic and Social Committee: opinion, report
body
ESC
docs/4
date
2023-10-13T00:00:00
docs
url: https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/TRAN-AM-754747_EN.html title: PE754.747
type
Amendments tabled in committee
body
EP
forecasts/0/date
Old
2023-11-07T00:00:00
New
2023-12-07T00:00:00
docs/3
date
2023-09-19T00:00:00
docs
url: https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/TRAN-PR-753548_EN.html title: PE753.548
type
Committee draft report
body
EP
committees/0/shadows/3
name
CAMPOMENOSI Marco
group
Identity and Democracy
abbr
ID
committees/1/rapporteur
  • name: MIRANDA Ana date: 2023-09-05T00:00:00 group: Group of the Greens/European Free Alliance abbr: Verts/ALE
committees/0/shadows/3
name
VAN OVERTVELDT Johan
group
European Conservatives and Reformists Group
abbr
ECR
committees/0/shadows/2
name
DELLI Karima
group
Group of the Greens/European Free Alliance
abbr
Verts/ALE
committees/0/shadows/1
name
KARLESKIND Pierre
group
Renew Europe group
abbr
Renew
forecasts
  • date: 2023-11-07T00:00:00 title: Vote scheduled in committee
committees/0/rapporteur
  • name: TAX Vera date: 2023-07-13T00:00:00 group: Group of Progressive Alliance of Socialists and Democrats abbr: S&D
committees/0/shadows/1
name
DALY Clare
group
The Left group in the European Parliament - GUE/NGL
abbr
GUE/NGL
events/1
date
2023-07-10T00:00:00
type
Committee referral announced in Parliament, 1st reading
body
EP
procedure/dossier_of_the_committee
  • TRAN/9/12174
procedure/stage_reached
Old
Preparatory phase in Parliament
New
Awaiting committee decision
committees/0/shadows
  • name: NOVAK Ljudmila group: Group of European People's Party abbr: EPP
committees/1
Old
type
Committee Opinion
body
EP
committee_full
Budgets
committee
BUDG
associated
False
opinion
False
New
type
Committee Opinion
body
EP
committee_full
Fisheries
committee
PECH
associated
False
committees/2
Old
type
Committee Opinion
body
EP
committee_full
Fisheries
committee
PECH
associated
False
New
type
Committee Opinion
body
EP
committee_full
Budgets
committee
BUDG
associated
False
opinion
False
committees/1
type
Committee Opinion
body
EP
committee_full
Budgets
committee
BUDG
associated
False
committees/1/opinion
False
committees/2
type
Committee Opinion
body
EP
committee_full
Budgets
committee
BUDG
associated
False
committees/1
type
Committee Opinion
body
EP
committee_full
Fisheries
committee
PECH
associated
False
docs/0
date
2023-06-01T00:00:00
docs
type
Legislative proposal
body
EC
events/0/summary
  • PURPOSE: to update certain provisions of Directive 2009/21/EC on compliance with flag State requirements.
  • PROPOSED ACT: Directive of the European Parliament and of the Council.
  • ROLE OF THE EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT: the European Parliament decides in accordance with the ordinary legislative procedure and on an equal footing with the Council.
  • BACKGROUND: Directive 2009/21/EC on compliance with flag State requirements regulates the enforcement of rules applicable to flag State at the Union level. The responsibility for monitoring the compliance of ships with particular IMO conventions lies with the State where the ship is registered and whose nationality the ship holds - the flag State. The Directive therefore aims to ensure that ships flying the flags of EU Member States meet all safety and pollution prevention requirements and are fit for service.
  • The International Maritime Organisation (IMO) has, since the adoption of the Directive, made the IMO Instruments Implementation code (III-Code) and IMO audit mandatory as of 2016 for all flag States in the world, including EU Member States. The III-Code and the IMO audit aims to ensure that States take all necessary steps to correctly implement and apply the Conventions and have the resources and powers needed as a flag State to assume their international obligations and ensure compliance of their flagged ships with these rules.
  • The Directive consequently needs to be revised and incorporate the flag State relevant parts of the III-Code into EU legislation, to make it enforceable under the EU legal order.
  • This initiative is part of a package to modernise EU rules on maritime safety.
  • CONTENT: in the light of this, a proposal to amend Directive 2009/21/EC has been prepared.
  • The main changes concern the following:
  • Subject-matter, scope and definition
  • The proposal updates some references to IMO instruments in the existing definitions and includes further definitions relevant for the Directive, notably the III-Code.
  • Conditions for allowing a ship to sail
  • The Directive is amended to introduce the use of the database for verification of the condition of the ship (transferring in, as the case may be) before the ship is allowed to operate. A new article requires the Member State as flag State to adhere to the III-Code and the requirement to carry out supplementary flag State inspections to ensure the safety of ships flying the flag of a Member State.
  • Administrations should have the appropriate resources , commensurate with the size and type of fleet (ships registered under the flag) to meet the supplementary inspection obligations.
  • The proposal lays down responsibilities and common capacity building of the flag State personnel. This includes the continuous development of training schemes and material reflecting updates in the international IMO Conventions as well as possible new requirements following on from environmental considerations especially as regards new technologies (e.g. propulsion, new types of fuel etc).
  • Actions in relation to or following monitoring of flagged ships
  • The proposal requires Member States as flag States to use the Union Maritime Information Exchange System (SafeSeaNet) to control and monitor ships under their flag and check e.g. whether they are being detained under port State control. This amendment also addresses the lack of flexibility of the flag State regime in cases of crisis or unexpected events, such as the COVID-19 pandemic.
  • Electronic information and inspection database
  • The proposal introduces e-documents that are to be recorded, kept, reported and shared via a national e-certification registry compatible with the inspections database. E-documents concern among others e-inspection reports and e-certificates. The information will be communicated to the inspection database developed by the Commission. Electronic transmissions of electronic certificates will use the same technical solutions as those established by the Port State Control Directive.
  • Monitoring of compliance and performance
  • The Directive is amended to clarify what information should be published following an IMO Audit. It also introduces the requirement that the Member State as auditee should allow for the possibility of the Commission, assisted by EMSA, to observe such IMO audits. The aim is to ensure transparency and facilitate synergies between IMO Audits and EMSA visits.
  • Quality Management and performance of flag States
  • The scope and coverage of the Quality Management System is clarified to cover all registries, whether it is the traditional (so-called first registers), international or overseas or similar (called second registers) under the authority of the flag State and flying the flag of that State as well as coverage of all flag State-related activities.
  • Moreover, the current performance measurement should be revised and modernised, via an implementing act. The requirements to be applied by the Member States for their own assessment of performance as well as the requirement for the Commission to make overall results publicly available is introduced.
  • Cooperation and exchange of information
  • The proposal establishes a high-level group on flag State matters, composed of Member States’ Flag State authorities and experts for discussing all flag State related and pertinent issues. It also establishes a dynamic electronic reporting tool for gathering information and statistics.
  • Budgetary implications
  • The proposal has net present costs for the Union Budget of EUR 7 to 8.1 million over the period 2025-2050.