Progress: Awaiting final decision
Role | Committee | Rapporteur | Shadows |
---|---|---|---|
Lead | ECON | PEREIRA Lídia ( EPP) | LALUCQ Aurore ( S&D), HLAVÁČEK Martin ( Renew), GRUFFAT Claude ( Verts/ALE), MOŻDŻANOWSKA Andżelika Anna ( ECR) |
Lead committee dossier:
Legal Basis:
TFEU 115
Legal Basis:
TFEU 115Subjects
Events
The European Parliament adopted by 443 votes to 110, with 51 abstentions, following a special legislative procedure (consultation), a legislative resolution on the proposal for a Council directive establishing a Head Office Tax system for micro, small and medium sized enterprises, and amending Directive 2011/16/EU.
Simplification of tax rules for certain SMEs
Members stressed that it is essential to support micro-enterprises and SMEs. The 24 million SMEs in the EU account for two-thirds of private sector jobs and 99% of all businesses in the EU. They spend around 2.5% of their turnover on compliance costs related to tax obligations. A calculation of the taxable results based on the rules of the Member State where the head office (headquarters of the SME) is resident for tax purposes should significantly reduce tax compliance cost and free financial resources to allow SMEs to invest.
The aim of the Directive should be to simplify the tax rules for certain SMEs carrying out cross-border activities in the internal market through one or more permanent establishments and a maximum of two subsidiaries. It lays down rules for calculating the taxable income of permanent establishments and subsidiaries of SMEs that meet certain criteria.
Head office taxation
The head office may opt to apply the head office taxation rules in respect of its permanent establishments and subsidiaries in other Member States if it meets the following requirements:
- the joint turnover of its permanent establishments and subsidiaries did not exceed, for the last three fiscal years , an amount equal to triple the turnover generated by the head office;
- it has been resident for tax purposes in the head office Member State during the last fiscal year or, if more recently, since the establishment of the head office;
- the SME is considered to be a micro, small or medium-sized enterprise for the last fiscal year or, if more recently, since the establishment of the head office.
If the head office opts to apply the head office taxation rules, it should apply those rules to all its permanent establishments or subsidiaries in other Member States. If it creates a new permanent establishment in another Member State, it should apply head office taxation rules to such permanent establishment from the moment of its establishment. If it creates a first subsidiary in another Member State, it should apply head office taxation rules to that subsidiary from the moment of its establishment and should inform the host Member State thereof.
Exercise of the option to apply Head office taxation rules
For the establishment of its first permanent establishment or subsidiary in another Member State, an SME may apply the head office taxation rules from the year in which the permanent establishment or subsidiary is established, without having to notify the filing authority three months before the end of the previous tax year.
The filing authority should obtain confirmation from the host Member State that the establishment in the host Member State constitutes a permanent establishment for the purposes of bilateral tax treaties.
Duration of the option to apply the head office taxation rules
The head office that has opted to apply head office taxation rules to its permanent establishments or subsidiaries in one or more host Member States should apply those rules for a renewable period of seven fiscal years .
The option to apply the head office taxation rules should be terminated before the end of the seven-year period for any of the following reasons: (i) the SME transfers its tax residence out of the head office Member State, if the SME wishes to stop applying the taxation rules; (ii) for the last three fiscal years, the joint turnover of its permanent establishments and subsidiaries exceeded an amount which is equal to triple the turnover of the head office; (iii) the SME is no longer considered to be an SME; (iv) the SME sets up more than two subsidiaries.
Audits
To support the functioning of a one-stop-shop, it would be critical to provide for joint audits, creating a cooperation obligation for the Member States’ tax authorities, whereby the Member State of the head office should cooperate if the tax authority of the permanent establishment or subsidiary requests an audit covering the computation of the taxable result of its taxpayer. In that sense, if the Member State of the head office conducts an audit at its own initiative, it should invite the host Member State to carry out such audit jointly.
Report
The Commission’s evaluation report should assess all relevant aspects of implementation of this Directive and focus on the advantages of a possible extension of the scope, the adequacy of the eligibility requirements, the appropriateness of the exclusion situations, namely the set-up of subsidiaries, and the need for the exclusion of shipping activities. The Commission should address those aspects in its possible proposal to amend this Directive, or give reasons to justify why it is not necessary to change the existing rules.
Transposition
Member States should transpose the Directive before 31 December 2024 and it should apply from 1 January 2025.
PURPOSE: to establish a Head Office Tax (HOT) system to simplify tax rules for certain small and medium-sized enterprises (SMEs) operating in the internal market.
PROPOSED ACT: Council Directive.
ROLE OF THE EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT: the Council adopts the act after consulting the European Parliament but without being obliged to follow its opinion.
BACKGROUND: in the EU, there is currently no common approach to the computation of the taxable base for businesses. EU businesses are therefore obliged to comply with the rules of different corporate tax systems, depending on the Member State in which they operate. The co-existence and interaction of 27 different corporate income tax systems in the Union gives rise to complexity in tax compliance and leads to an uneven level playing field for businesses. This state of play has a higher impact on SMEs than on larger taxpayers and has become more evident as globalisation and digitalisation of the economy have significantly altered the perception of borders and business models. The attempts by governments to adapt to this new reality have resulted in a fragmented response among Member States, leading to further distortions in the internal market. Furthermore, the various legal frameworks inevitably lead to different tax administration practices across Member States. This often entails lengthy procedures characterised by unpredictability and inconsistency along with high compliance costs.
With a view to simplifying tax rules for small and medium-sized enterprises (SME) to do business in the internal market, the Commission adopted the SME ‘Relief Package’ which aims to deliver much-needed support for SMEs to secure cash flow, to simplify and to invest and grow. The present initiative is part of the package.
CONTENT: to address the needs of Europe's SMEs in the current economic environment, the Commission is proposing this draft Directive which aims to provide for a simplified approach to subjecting standalone SMEs operating cross-border in the EU to taxation in respect of their permanent establishments in other Member States. It lays down rules for computing the taxable result of permanent establishments of SMEs.
Head Office Taxation
The proposal aims to set a tax framework in support of the internal market, in particular for SMEs. The Head Office Tax System for SMEs will give SMEs operating cross-border through permanent establishments the option to interact with only one tax administration – that of the Head Office – instead of having to comply with multiple tax systems. This proposal will increase tax certainty and fairness, reduce compliance costs and distortions in the market that influence business decisions, while minimising the risk of double and over taxation and tax disputes.
One-stop-shop
The proposal aims to provide significant procedural simplification , thus a one-stop-shop should be put in place, whereby the tax filing, tax assessments and the collection of the tax due by the permanent establishments would be dealt with through a single tax authority (‘filing authority’), i.e. the tax authority in the Member State of the head office. SMEs will thus file one single tax return with the tax administration of their head office. This tax administration will then transfer the resulting tax revenues to each Member State where the SME maintains a permanent establishment. Such an approach will eliminate the complexities and related costs of having to deal with multiple tax systems and tax administrations.
The Member State of the head office will apply the rates applicable in the Member State(s) where the SME maintains permanent establishments and subsequently, transfer the resulting tax revenues to the latter.
In full respect of Member States’ sovereignty in tax matters, audits, appeals and dispute resolution procedures would primarily be kept domestic and in accordance with the procedural rules of the respective Member State. To support the functioning of a one-stop-shop, it would be critical to provide for joint audits , which create an obligation to the Member State of the head office to cooperate if the tax authority of the permanent establishment requests an audit covering the computation of the taxable result of its taxpayer.
Exchange of information
For the purpose of the automatic exchange of information, the Head Office Member States will have to exchange the information required by this proposal with other Host Member States, and the other way around, through a bilateral network between the Member States concerned, by electronic means using the EU common communication network (CCN), accessible to all Member States. The Commission will have the task to provide Member States with the platform for exchange of information CCN and remains data processor with limited access.
Eligibility requirements
SMEs would have to explicitly opt-in . To prevent circumvention, the rules would be coupled with the requirement that an opting-in SME would be under the obligation to apply the rules of the state of the head office for a minimum period of time, for example five years . In addition, SMEs will be entitled to renew their choice every five years without limit as long as they continue to meet the eligibility requirements. The eligibility, but also the termination provisions are designed to discourage abuse and potential tax planning practices, such as the deliberate transfer of the Head Office to a low-tax country.
Documents
- Commission response to text adopted in plenary: SP(2024)377
- Results of vote in Parliament: Results of vote in Parliament
- Decision by Parliament: T9-0218/2024
- Committee report tabled for plenary, 1st reading/single reading: A9-0064/2024
- Committee report tabled for plenary, 1st reading/single reading: A9-0064/2024
- Contribution: COM(2023)0528
- Contribution: COM(2023)0528
- Contribution: COM(2023)0528
- Economic and Social Committee: opinion, report: CES4262/2023
- Amendments tabled in committee: PE757.288
- Committee draft report: PE755.999
- Document attached to the procedure: EUR-Lex
- Document attached to the procedure: SEC(2023)0308
- Document attached to the procedure: EUR-Lex
- Document attached to the procedure: SWD(2023)0301
- Document attached to the procedure: EUR-Lex
- Document attached to the procedure: SWD(2023)0302
- Document attached to the procedure: EUR-Lex
- Document attached to the procedure: SWD(2023)0303
- Legislative proposal published: COM(2023)0528
- Legislative proposal published: EUR-Lex
- Document attached to the procedure: EUR-Lex SEC(2023)0308
- Document attached to the procedure: EUR-Lex SWD(2023)0301
- Document attached to the procedure: EUR-Lex SWD(2023)0302
- Document attached to the procedure: EUR-Lex SWD(2023)0303
- Committee draft report: PE755.999
- Amendments tabled in committee: PE757.288
- Economic and Social Committee: opinion, report: CES4262/2023
- Committee report tabled for plenary, 1st reading/single reading: A9-0064/2024
- Commission response to text adopted in plenary: SP(2024)377
- Contribution: COM(2023)0528
- Contribution: COM(2023)0528
- Contribution: COM(2023)0528
Votes
A9-0064/2024 – Lídia Pereira – Commission proposal #
Amendments | Dossier |
139 |
2023/0320(CNS)
2023/12/18
ECON
139 amendments...
Amendment 100 #
Proposal for a directive Article 6 – paragraph 3 – subparagraph 4 If the filing authority concludes that the eligibility requirements are not met, it shall inform the head office within two months of the notification referred to in paragraph 1 and the head office may appeal against it in accordance with the national law and in turn the head office taxation rules shall continue to apply.
Amendment 101 #
Proposal for a directive Article 6 – paragraph 3 – subparagraph 4 If the filing authority concludes that the eligibility requirements are not met, it shall inform the head office within
Amendment 102 #
Proposal for a directive Article 6 – paragraph 3 – subparagraph 4 If the filing authority concludes that the eligibility requirements are not met, it shall
Amendment 103 #
Proposal for a directive Article 6 – paragraph 4 4. Where a host Member State concludes that the presence of an SME in its territory qualifies as a permanent establishment, it shall inform the filing authority. Upon that information, the filing authority shall inform the competent tax authority of the host Member State on whether the head office applies the head office taxation rules in respect of its permanent establishments. The Head Office must be duly informed about these procedures, without undue delay.
Amendment 104 #
Proposal for a directive Article 6 – paragraph 4 4. Where a host Member State concludes that the presence of an SME in its territory qualifies as a permanent establishment or a subsidiairy, it shall inform the filing authority. Upon that information, the filing authority shall inform the competent tax authority of the host Member State on whether the head office applies the head
Amendment 105 #
Proposal for a directive Article 7 – paragraph 1 1. The head office that has opted to apply head office taxation rules to its permanent establishments in one or more host Member States shall apply those rules for a period
Amendment 106 #
Proposal for a directive Article 7 – paragraph 1 1. The head office that has opted to apply head office taxation rules to its permanent establishments and/or the subsidiairy in one or more host Member States shall apply those rules for a period of five fiscal years, renewable once.
Amendment 107 #
Proposal for a directive Article 7 – paragraph 1 1. The head office that has opted to apply head office taxation rules to its permanent establishments in one or more host Member States shall apply those rules
Amendment 108 #
Proposal for a directive Article 7 – paragraph 2 Amendment 109 #
Proposal for a directive Article 7 – paragraph 2 2. At the end of the period
Amendment 110 #
Proposal for a directive Article 7 – paragraph 2 2. At the end of the period referred to in paragraph 1, the head office taxation rules shall cease to apply in respect of the permanent establishments situated in the host Member States, unless the head office notifies to the filing authority its option to renew the application of the head office taxation rules, in accordance with the procedure set out in Article 9, for another 5 years.
Amendment 111 #
Proposal for a directive Article 8 – paragraph 1 – introductory part 1. The option to apply the
Amendment 112 #
Proposal for a directive Article 8 – paragraph 1 – introductory part 1. The option to apply the head office taxation rules shall be terminated
Amendment 113 #
Proposal for a directive Article 8 – paragraph 1 – point a (a) the SME referred to in Article 2(1) transfers its tax residence out of the head office Member State, if the SME wishes to stop applying the taxation rules;
Amendment 114 #
Proposal for a directive Article 8 – paragraph 1 – point b (b)
Amendment 115 #
Proposal for a directive Article 8 – paragraph 1 – point b (b) for the last two fiscal years, the joint turnover of its permanent establishments exceeded an amount which is equal to triple the turnover of the head office in the head office Member State.
Amendment 116 #
Proposal for a directive Article 8 – paragraph 1 – point b (b) for the last two fiscal years, the joint turnover of its permanent establishments and/or the subsidiary exceeded an amount which is equal to
Amendment 117 #
(b a) the SMEs referred to in Article 2(1) set up one or more subsidiaries;
Amendment 118 #
Proposal for a directive Article 8 – paragraph 1 – point b b (new) (b b) the undertaking does not anymore qualify as micro, small and medium-sized undertakings pursuant to Article 2(1)(b).
Amendment 119 #
Proposal for a directive Article 8 – paragraph 2 2.
Amendment 120 #
Proposal for a directive Article 8 – paragraph 3 3. The filing authority shall inform the host Member States of the termination referred to in paragraph 1 as soon as possible and, in any case, before the end of the fiscal year in which the reason
Amendment 121 #
Proposal for a directive Article 8 – paragraph 4 4. If the SME referred in Article 2(1) transfers its tax residence to another Member State, it may opt to apply the head office taxation rules of its new Member State of tax residence in accordance with Articles 4 to 7. This shall be considered a new option. The requirement set out in Article 4(2), point be, shall not apply if the transfer of the tax residence of the SME has been carried out for valid commercial reasons.
Amendment 122 #
Proposal for a directive Article 8 – paragraph 4 4. If the SME referred in Article 2(1) transfers its tax residence to another Member State, it may opt to apply the head office taxation rules of its new Member State of tax residence in accordance with Articles 4 to 7.
Amendment 123 #
Proposal for a directive Article 9 Amendment 124 #
Proposal for a directive Article 9 – paragraph 1 1. If the head office wishes to renew its option, it shall notify the filing authority thereof
Amendment 125 #
Proposal for a directive Article 9 – paragraph 1 1. If the head office wishes to renew its option for another 5 years, it shall notify the filing authority thereof at least six months before the end of the period referred to in Article 7(1) and shall list the names of the host Member States. The filing authority shall verify whether the SME continues to meet the eligibility requirements set out in Article 4.
Amendment 126 #
Proposal for a directive Article 9 – paragraph 1 1. If the head office wishes to renew its option, it shall notify the filing authority thereof at least
Amendment 127 #
Proposal for a directive Article 9 – paragraph 2 2. The filing authority shall confirm the renewal of the option within
Amendment 128 #
Proposal for a directive Article 10 Amendment 129 #
Proposal for a directive Article 10 – paragraph 1 – introductory part The head office shall not be entitled to renew the option for applying the head office taxation rules if
Amendment 130 #
Proposal for a directive Article 10 – paragraph 1 – point a Amendment 131 #
Proposal for a directive Article 10 – paragraph 1 – point a Amendment 132 #
Proposal for a directive Article 10 – paragraph 1 – point a (a) for any two fiscal years taken separately, the joint turnover of the permanent establishments and/or the subsidiairy exceeded an amount which is equal to double the
Amendment 133 #
Proposal for a directive Article 10 – paragraph 1 – point b Amendment 134 #
Proposal for a directive Article 10 – paragraph 1 – point b (b) the SME set up
Amendment 135 #
Proposal for a directive Article 10 – paragraph 1 – point b (b) the SME set up one or more subsidiaries within
Amendment 136 #
Proposal for a directive Article 10 – paragraph 1 – point c Amendment 137 #
Proposal for a directive Article 10 – paragraph 1 – point c (c) the criterion set out in Article 2(1), point (d) has not been met for t
Amendment 138 #
Proposal for a directive Article 11 – paragraph 1 1. The head office shall file the Head office taxation tax return with the filing authority. The head office Member State shall assist the SME in the elaboration of the tax return, in particular regarding the attribution of taxable result to each permanent establishment in other Member States.
Amendment 139 #
Proposal for a directive Article 11 – paragraph 2 – point b (b) the tax liability of the SME with regard to the taxable result of each permanent establishment and/or the subsidiairy in other Member States. The tax liability shall be computed by applying the national tax rate of the respective host Member State to the taxable result, as it was computed in accordance with the head office taxation rules.
Amendment 140 #
Proposal for a directive Article 11 – paragraph 3 – introductory part 3. Where one or more permanent establishment of the SME are not required to prepare separate financial accounting statements under the law of the host Member State, the H
Amendment 141 #
Proposal for a directive Article 11 – paragraph 3 – point a (a) assets and liabilities attributed to the permanent establishment(s) and/or the subsidiairy;
Amendment 142 #
Proposal for a directive Article 11 – paragraph 3 – point a (a)
Amendment 143 #
Proposal for a directive Article 11 – paragraph 3 – point b (b) profits attributable to the permanent establishment(s) and/or the subsidiairy in other Member States.
Amendment 144 #
Proposal for a directive Article 11 – paragraph 4 – point b (b) a draft tax assessment notice for
Amendment 145 #
Proposal for a directive Article 11 – paragraph 5 – subparagraph 1 – point b (b) a draft tax assessment notice for the relevant permanent establishment(s) and/or the subsidiairy;
Amendment 146 #
Proposal for a directive Article 11 – paragraph 8 8. If the tax authority of the host Member State rejects the draft tax assessment notice, it shall revise this draft tax assessment in connection with the attribution of profits to the permanent establishment and/or the subsidiairy in accordance with the provisions laid down in the applicable bilateral convention for the avoidance of double taxation between the host and head office Member States. After the attribution of profits to the permanent establishment and/or the subsidiairy has been revised and communicated to the filing authority in accordance with Article 8ae of Directive 2011/16/EU, the filing authority shall re- compute the taxable result in accordance with the taxation rules of the head office Member State, and a revised tax assessment shall be issued by this Member State. The taxpayer shall be
Amendment 147 #
Proposal for a directive Article 11 – paragraph 9 9. Where, under the tax rules of the host Member State, certain expenses associated with the employees of the permanent establishment and/or the subsidiairy are deductible for tax purposes insofar as the respective amounts are taxed at the level of the employee or are subject to social security charges, and there is no similar tax treatment in the head office Member State allowing for such deduction, the head office and host Member States shall -,with the guidance of the Commission, take appropriate measures to prevent possible mismatches.
Amendment 148 #
Proposal for a directive Article 11 – paragraph 9 a (new) 9 a. The Commission shall, by means of implementing acts, lay down guidance on appropriate measures regarding mismatches as referred to paragraph 8. Those implementing acts shall be adopted in accordance with the examination procedure referred to in Article 15.
Amendment 149 #
Proposal for a directive Article 12 – title Collection of tax due by the permanent establishment(s)and/or the subsidiary in the host Member State(s)
Amendment 150 #
Proposal for a directive Article 12 – paragraph 1 1. The head office shall settle, through the filing authority, the income tax liabilities with regard to both its taxable result and the taxable result of its permanent establishment(s) in the host Member State(s)
Amendment 151 #
Proposal for a directive Article 12 – paragraph 1 1. The head office shall settle, through the filing authority, the income tax liabilities with regard to both its taxable result and the taxable result of its permanent establishment(s) and/or the subsidiary in the host Member State(s).
Amendment 152 #
Proposal for a directive Article 12 – paragraph 2 2. The filing authority shall collect the tax corresponding to the tax liability of each permanent establishment and/or the subsidiary of the head office in the Union, apply the tax rate the respective host Member State and transfer the relevant amount to the competent authority of the respective host Member State.
Amendment 153 #
Proposal for a directive Article 12 – paragraph 2 2. The filing authority shall collect the tax corresponding to the tax liability of each permanent establishment of the head office in the Union, apply the tax rate the respective host Member State and transfer the relevant amount to the competent authority of the respective host Member State without any delay.
Amendment 154 #
Proposal for a directive Article 12 – paragraph 3 3. The Commission shall, by means of implementing acts, lay down the practical arrangements necessary to ensure the collection and transfer of the tax corresponding to the tax liability of the permanent establishment(s) and/or the subsidiary from the head office Member State to the host Member State. Those implementing acts shall be adopted in accordance with the examination procedure referred to in Article 15.
Amendment 155 #
Proposal for a directive Article 12 a (new) Article 12a Retention of collected tax by head office Member State Concerning the tax liability to be transferred to the host Member State in accordance with article 12, the head office Member State shall be entitled to retain 15% of the collected tax corresponding to the tax liability of the permanent establishment(s) or subsidiary(ies) to compensate for the administrative burden incurred.
Amendment 156 #
Proposal for a directive Article 13 – paragraph 1 1. Unless specified otherwise, the rules of this Directive shall not affect the national rules of Member States that govern local tax audits, legal remedies and proceedings, or the dispute resolution mechanisms available at the level of the Union or provided for in the applicable bilateral tax conventions on the avoidance of double taxation. The commercial, accounting and fiscal obligations of a permanent establishment pursuant to the national rules of the host Member State shall not be affected by this Directive.
Amendment 157 #
Proposal for a directive Article 13 – paragraph 2 2. The tax authority of the host Member State may request that an audit be carried out jointly with the filing authority covering the computation of the taxable result of the permanent establishment in accordance with the head office taxation rules, the attribution of profits to the permanent establishment and/or the applicable tax rate. Joint audits shall be conducted in accordance with Council Directive 2011/16/EU18 . Notwithstanding the provisions in the aforementioned Directive, the requested competent authority shall accept such request by the authorities of the host Member State. If an audit is carried out at the initative of the head office member state, the head office Member State shall invite the host Member State to carry out such audit jointly. _________________ 18 Council Directive 2011/16/EU of 15
Amendment 158 #
Proposal for a directive Article 13 – paragraph 2 2. The tax authorit
Amendment 159 #
Proposal for a directive Article 13 – paragraph 2 2. The tax authority of the host Member State may request that an audit be carried out jointly with the filing authority covering the computation of the taxable result of the permanent establishment or the subsidiairy in accordance with the head office taxation rules, the attribution of profits to the permanent establishment and/or the profits to the subsidiary and/or the applicable tax rate. Joint audits shall be conducted in accordance with Council Directive 2011/16/EU18 . Notwithstanding the provisions in the aforementioned Directive, the requested competent authority shall accept such request by the authorities of the host Member State. _________________ 18 Council Directive 2011/16/EU of 15
Amendment 160 #
Proposal for a directive Article 13 – paragraph 2 2. The tax authority of the host Member State may request that an audit be carried out jointly with the filing authority covering the computation of the taxable result of the permanent establishment in accordance with the head office taxation rules, the attribution of profits to the permanent establishment and/or the applicable tax rate. Joint audits shall be conducted in accordance with Council Directive 2011/16/EU18 .
Amendment 161 #
Proposal for a directive Article 14 – paragraph 1 – point 2 Directive 2011/16/EU Article 8ae 1. If a head office as defined in Article 3, point (2), of Directive on establishing a Head Office taxation rules for micro, small and medium sized enterprises20 , which opts to apply the head office taxation rules to its permanent establishment(s) and/or its subsidiary in accordance with Article 6 of that, meets the eligibility requirements for applying such rules, the competent authority of the Member State of the head office shall by means of automatic exchange of information communicate to the competent authority of the Member State of the permanent establishment or the subsidiary that the taxable result of the relevant permanent establishment or subsidiary is to be computed in accordance with the head office taxation rules. Such communication shall take place within two months from the notification by the Head Office of its option to apply head office taxation rules. _________________ 20 Directive…[OJ: Please insert the
Amendment 162 #
Proposal for a directive Article 14 – paragraph 1 – point 2 Directive 2011/16/EU Article 8ae 2. The competent authority of the Member State of the permanent establishment or the subsidiary shall communicate to the competent authority of the Member State of the head office the tax rate applicable
Amendment 163 #
Proposal for a directive Article 14 – paragraph 1 – point 2 Directive 2011/16/EU Article 8ae 3. The competent authority of the Member State of the head office shall by means of automatic exchange of information communicate the information specified in paragraph 2 of this Article to the competent authority(ies) of the Member State(s) of the permanent establishment(s) or the subsidiary in accordance with the practical arrangements adopted pursuant to Article 21.
Amendment 164 #
Proposal for a directive Article 14 – paragraph 1 – point 2 Directive 2011/16/EU Article 8ae (iii) a draft tax assessment notice for the
Amendment 165 #
Proposal for a directive Article 14 – paragraph 1 – point 2 Directive 2011/16/EU Article 8ae 6. Where the tax authority of the Member State of the permanent establishment(s) or subsidiary revises the draft tax assessment notice in connection with the attribution of profits to the permanent establishment or subsidiaryin accordance with the provisions laid down in the applicable bilateral convention for the avoidance of double taxation between the host and head office Member States, after rejection of the draft tax assessment notice issued by the head office Member State, the competent authority of the Member State of the permanent establishment(s) or subsidiairy shall communicate such revised tax assessment notice to the competent authority of the Member State of the head office, within one month from its issuance, for the purpose of re-computing the taxable result of the permanent establishment or subsidiairy, issuance of a revised tax assessment and collecting the tax.
Amendment 166 #
Proposal for a directive Article 18 – paragraph 2 2. Information, including personal data, processed in accordance with this Directive shall be retained only as long as necessary to achieve the purposes of this Directive, in particular, verification of eligibility requirements and determination of the tax liability of the taxpayers, in accordance with each data controller’s domestic rules on the statute of limitations, but in any case no longer than
Amendment 167 #
Proposal for a directive Article 19 – paragraph 1 1. Five years after this Directive starts to apply, the Commission shall examine and evaluate its functioning and report to the European Parliament and the Council to that effect. In the evaluation report, the Commission shall, among others., examine whether the head office taxation rules should be also applied to one or more subsidiaries of the SMEs. The report shall, where appropriate, be accompanied by a proposal to amend this Directive.
Amendment 168 #
Proposal for a directive Article 19 – paragraph 1 a (new) 1 a. The report referred to in paragraph 1 shall in particular assess: (a) whether an extension of the scope of this Directive is justified; (b) if and how the procedures in this Directive can be further streamlined to reduce compliance costs; (c) if there are lessons to be learnt from the application of this Directive for corporate taxation in general;
Amendment 169 #
Proposal for a directive Article 19 – paragraph 1 a (new) 1 a. The report referred in paragraph 1 shall evaluate, among other relevant aspects, the possible extension of the scope of the Directive, the appropriateness of the criteria laid down in article 10, namely the exclusion of SMEs that set one or more subsidiaries, and the adequacy of the exclusion of the shipping activities laid down in article 5.
Amendment 170 #
Proposal for a directive Article 19 – paragraph 2 2. Member States shall communicate to the Commission relevant information for
Amendment 171 #
Proposal for a directive Article 19 – paragraph 2 2. Member States shall communicate to the Commission relevant information for the evaluation of the Directive, in accordance with paragraph 3, including aggregated data regarding the number of eligible SMEs compared to SMEs that opted in, their turnover and compliance costs relative to turnover; data on the number of SMEs that expanded cross- border by setting up a permanent establishment and the number of SMEs that disqualified due to creating
Amendment 172 #
Proposal for a directive Article 19 – paragraph 2 a (new) 2 a. The Commission shall evaluate potential legal hurdles in applying this directive such as the lack of a common and harmonised definition of permanent establishments in the EU.
Amendment 34 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 1 (1) In the Union, there is currently no common approach to the computation of the taxable base for businesses. EU businesses are therefore obliged to comply with the rules of different corporate tax systems, depending on the Member State in which they operate, which constitutes a significant obstacles for small and medium-sized enterprises when accessing the Single Market.
Amendment 35 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 1 (1) In the Union, there is currently no common approach to the computation of the taxable base for businesses that operate in two or more Member States. EU businesses are therefore obliged to comply with the rules of different corporate tax systems, depending on the Member State in which they operate.
Amendment 36 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 2 (2) The co-existence and interaction of 27 different corporate income tax systems in the Union gives rise to complexity in tax compliance and leads to a
Amendment 37 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 2 (2) The co-existence and interaction of 27 different corporate income tax systems in the Union gives rise to complexity in tax compliance and leads to an uneven level playing field for businesses. This state of play has a higher impact on SMEs than on larger taxpayers and has become more evident as globalisation and digitalisation of the economy have significantly altered the perception of borders and business models. The attempts by governments to adapt to this new reality have resulted in a fragmented response among Member States, leading to further distortions in the internal market. Furthermore, the various legal frameworks inevitably lead to different tax administration practices across Member States. This often entails lengthy procedures characterised by unpredictability and inconsistency along with high compliance costs. Creating a common, hamonized framework on taxation for SMEs would ensure that the SMEs can use the full potential and that the consumers are able to enjoy the possibilities of the internal market.
Amendment 38 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 2 (2) The co-existence and interaction of 27 different corporate income tax systems in the Union gives rise to complexity in tax compliance, disproportionate compliance costs and leads to an uneven level playing field for businesses. This state of play has a higher impact on SMEs than on larger taxpayers and has become more evident as globalisation and digitalisation of the economy have significantly altered the perception of borders and business models. The attempts by governments to
Amendment 39 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 2 a (new) (2 a) The 24 million SMEs established in the EU represent two thirds of private sector jobs and 99% of all businesses in the Union, being the backbone of European economy. It is therefore essential to support micro, small and medium enterprises in order to promote job creation, to enhance growth, to stand for a fair and transparent competition, to support competitiveness and to attract investment. To that end, the EU must tackle dimensions such as payment delays, access to finance, skills, digital transition, innovation, internationalisation or access to data. However, regulatory obstacles or administrative burden continues to be the key challenge for European SMEs. This Directive must be interpreted according to the principle of SME relief and support.
Amendment 40 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 2 b (new) (2 b) SMEs spend approximately 2,5% of their turnover on compliance costs related to tax obligations. The situation of very small enterprises is particularly serious, as they represent 90% of the estimated yearly EUR 54 billion costs of EU businesses compliance costs related to their corporate income taxes. This scenario proves the need for the adoption of this Directive in order to significantly reduce tax compliance costs and free financial resources to allow SMEs to invest on their business.
Amendment 41 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 3 (3) The variety of ways for doing business in the internal market requires different solutions for different businesses when it comes to tackling the current challenges posed by their cross-border operations. For smaller businesses
Amendment 42 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 3 (3) The variety of ways for doing business in the internal market requires different solutions for different businesses when it comes to tackling the current challenges posed by their cross-border operations. For smaller businesses which are not part of a group, it is more difficult to expand cross-border than for larger businesses. It is thus more burdensome for those smaller businesses to grapple with complex procedures and high compliance costs. It is therefore evident that micro, small and medium-sized enterprises, at the initial stages of expansion, need a solution such as a simplified mechanism for the computation of their taxable result when they operate across the border
Amendment 43 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 3 (3) The variety of ways for doing business in the internal market requires different solutions for different businesses when it comes to tackling the current challenges posed by their cross-border operations. For smaller businesses
Amendment 44 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 3 a (new) (3 a) Combatting fraud, tax evasion and tax avoidance are overriding political priorities, as aggressive tax planning practices are unacceptable from the point of view of the integrity of the internal market and social justice.
Amendment 45 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 4 (4) To remedy tax uncertainty and the difficulty in complying with the rules of an unknown tax system when operating in (an)other Member State(s) (which is one of the key impeding factors for SMEs to expanding abroad), the taxable result of permanent establishments should be computed on the basis of the rules of the Member State where the Head Office (headquarters of the SME) is resident for tax purposes. This also means that the principles governing the attribution of income to a permanent establishment, set out in the applicable bilateral convention for the avoidance of double taxation between the Member State of the permanent establishment and the Member State of the Head Office, would also continue to apply. To ensure that any new rules constitute a source of simplification for SMEs, their application should be optional, and thus left to the choice of the taxpayer. Moreover, the application of these rules shall not, under any circumstances, lead to higher tax rates than the ones defined in the national tax legal frameworks.
Amendment 46 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 4 (4) To remedy tax uncertainty and the difficulty in complying with the rules of an unknown tax system when operating in (an)other Member State(s) (which is one of the key impeding factors for SMEs to expanding abroad), the taxable result of permanent establishments should be
Amendment 47 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 4 a (new) (4 a) Equality of tax treatment for all, and in particular for all undertakings, is a sine qua non for the single market. A coordinated and harmonised approach to the implementation of national tax systems is vital for the proper functioning of the single market, and would contribute to preventing tax avoidance and profit shifting
Amendment 48 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 4 b (new) (4 b) A fair and effective corporate tax system should respond to the urgent need for a progressive and fair global tax policy, promote the redistribution of wealth and combat inequalities.
Amendment 49 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 5 (5) To prevent abusive tax practices, specific anti-tax abuse rules are designed
Amendment 50 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 5 (5) To prevent abusive tax practices, robust and specific anti-tax abuse rules are designed, for example to address the tax avoidance risks associated with transferring the tax residence of an SME, and thus to avoid that the location of the head office is determined on the basis of tax motives. Such anti abuse measures are based on quantitative requirements to avoid artificial transfers of profits. Accordingly, it would be necessary to monitor the evolution of the turnover attributed to the permanent establishment(s) and/or the subsidiary in order to maintain their operations as secondary to the main activity which should be carried out by the head office. In this way, the rules would not risk being misused by setting up empty head offices while the bulk of business activities takes place abroad. In the same vein, the eligibility to the tax simplification system as well as the termination and renewal of the option should be subject to strict conditions. Such conditions should be coupled with requirements relating to the turnover of the head office as compared to that of the permanent establishment(s) and/or the subsidiary. The aim would be to further underline that the business operated through the permanent establishment(s) and/or the subsidiary can merely be an extension of the main activity of the head office. Additionally, once the option is made to apply the tax simplification framework, it should have an obligatory
Amendment 51 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 5 a (new) (5 a) Considering that the Head Office Tax system is meant to facilitate the expansion and development of the activity of firms in other Member States, such system should be made available for a limited period of time and the renewal to opt in should be limited to once. After a period of 10 years, firms would have the possibility to rely on other paneuropean tools such as the Business in Europe: Framework for Income Taxation, which provides for a common rulebook for corporate income tax across Member States.
Amendment 52 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 6 (6) International shipping is a specific sector of activity subject to special tax regimes in several Member States. Those regimes mostly consist of computing the tax base on the basis of the tonnage (i.e. the carrying capacity) of the operated ships rather than on the basis of actual profits or losses incurred by the company. On this premise, SMEs that derive income from shipping activities covered by a tonnage tax regime should be excluded from opting in the SME simplification rules in respect of such income attributed to a permanent establishment. This exclusion would avoid additional complication, which would be expected to arise from the interaction between the SME tax simplification framework and tonnage tax regimes. In addition, such a potential complication would appear disproportionate, considering the absence of such special tax regimes in some Member States. In any case, this exclusion shall be proper evaluated after 5 years of implementation of this Directive. No other sectors of activity would be excluded from the scope of the Directive.
Amendment 53 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 6 (6) International shipping is a specific sector of activity subject to special tax regimes in several Member States. Those regimes mostly consist of computing the tax base on the basis of the tonnage (i.e. the carrying capacity) of the operated ships rather than on the basis of actual profits or losses incurred by the company. On this premise, SMEs that derive income from shipping activities covered by a tonnage
Amendment 54 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 7 (7) The proposal aims to provide significant procedural simplification, thus a one-stop-shop should be put in place, whereby the tax filing, tax assessments and the collection of the tax due by the permanent establishment(s) would be dealt with through a single tax authority (‘filing authority’), i.e. the tax authority in the Member State of the head office. The one- stop-shop should provide all the features of simplification so it does not become another obstacle for businesses that wish to invest abroad. In full respect of Member States’ sovereignty in tax matters, audits, appeals and dispute resolution procedures would primarily be kept domestic and in accordance with the procedural rules of the respective Member State. To support the functioning of a one-
Amendment 55 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 7 (7) The proposal aims to provide significant procedural simplification, thus a one-stop-shop should be put in place, whereby the tax filing, tax assessments and the collection of the tax due by the permanent establishment(s) would be dealt with through a single tax authority (‘filing authority’), i.e. the tax authority in the Member State of the head office. In full respect of Member States’ sovereignty in tax matters, audits, appeals and dispute resolution procedures would primarily be kept domestic and in accordance with the procedural rules of the respective Member State. To support the functioning of a one- stop-shop, it would be critical to provide for joint audits, which create an obligation to the Member State of the head office to cooperate if the tax authority of the permanent establishment requests an audit covering the computation of the taxable result of its taxpayer. In that sense, if the head office Member State conducts an audit at its own initiative, it shall invite the host Member State to carry out such audit jointly.
Amendment 56 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 7 (7) The proposal aims to provide significant procedural simplification, thus a one-stop-shop should be put in place, whereby the tax filing, tax assessments and the collection of the tax due by the permanent establishment(s) would be dealt with through a single tax authority (‘filing authority’), i.e. the tax authority in the Member State of the head office. In full respect of Member States’ sovereignty in tax matters, audits, appeals and dispute resolution procedures would primarily be kept domestic and in accordance with the procedural rules of the respective Member State. To support the functioning of a one- stop-shop, it would be critical to provide for joint audits,
Amendment 57 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 7 a (new) (7 a) The One-Stop-Shop (OSS) solution is valued by European SMEs and its creation shall represent an optional facilitation tool for the tax-related procedures of SMEs. The good experience with the VAT return via the OSS, with 130.000 companies filling their VAT return via the OSS and more than EUR 17 billion collected in VAT revenue, in 2022, motivates the model replication in the context of this Directive.
Amendment 58 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 7 a (new) (7 a) To avoid a too large of a burden on the head office tax authority in applying the rules the proposal ensures that the head office Member State should be entitled to retain 15% of the collected tax corresponding to the tax liability of the permanent establishment(s) or subsidiary(ies) in the host Member State.
Amendment 59 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 13 a (new) (13 a) The evaluation report shall assess all relevant aspects of the Directive implementation and shall focus on the advantages of a possible extension of the scope, the adequacy of the eligibility requirements, the appropriateness of the exclusion situations - namely the set up of subsidiaries - and the need for the exclusion of shipping activities. These dimensions must be also addressed in the possible proposal to amend this Directive, either with concrete legislative changes or a reasonable justification for the maintenance of the rules.
Amendment 60 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 13 a (new) (13 a) The Commission shall set up a thorough and comprehensive way of communicating about the Head Office Taxation System to the SMEs. The information will be provided in all EU languages. For the SMEs to benefit and enjoy the full potential of the Head Office Taxation System, the Commission shall start an information campaign targeted to the SMEs.
Amendment 61 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 13 b (new) (13 b) As the potencial reduction of tax compliance costs by SMEs depends directly from their voluntary adoption of the rules set out in this Directive, an EU- wide information campaign towards SMEs must be envisaged by the Commission. Such information campaign shall be integrated in a wider communication strategy on the new tax- related EU legislation and its impact on EU businesses.
Amendment 62 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 15 (15) A reasonable retention period is provided to allow Member States to comply with most of the statute of limitation rules, thus following closely such domestic rules in respect of its starting point or suspension. The retention period should not however go further than what is necessary to ensure that the competent tax authorities are able to determine the tax liabilities, thus striking a balance between the ability of the tax authority to ensure proper assessment and collection of taxes and taxpayers’ right to legal certainty.
Amendment 63 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 18 (18) Since the objective of this Directive, namely the simplification of tax rules for certain SMEs operating cross border in the internal market through permanent establishment(s), cannot sufficiently be achieved by the Member States but can rather, by reason of the existing challenges which are caused by the interaction between 27 different national corporate tax systems, be better achieved at Union level, while respecting the national tax sovereignty of Member States, the Union may adopt measures, in accordance with the principle of subsidiarity as set out in Article 5 of the Treaty on the European Union. In accordance with the principle of proportionality as set out in that Article,
Amendment 64 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 18 (18) Since the objective of this Directive, namely the simplification of tax rules for certain SMEs operating in the internal market through permanent establishment(s), cannot sufficiently be achieved by the Member States individually but can rather, by reason of the existing challenges which are caused by the interaction between 27 different corporate tax systems, be better achieved at Union level through mutual cooperation between Member States, the Union may adopt measures, in accordance with the principle of subsidiarity as set out in Article 5 of the Treaty on the European Union. In accordance with the principle of proportionality as set out in that Article, this Directive does not go beyond what is necessary in order to achieve that objective;
Amendment 65 #
Proposal for a directive Article 1 – paragraph 1 This Directive lays down rules for computing the taxable result of permanent establishments and subsidiaries of SMEs which fulfil the criteria set out in Article 2(1) (“Head Office Taxation” rules). (This Amendment applies throughout the text. Adopting it will necessitate corresponding changes throughout.)
Amendment 66 #
Proposal for a directive Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point d (d) they qualify as micro, small and medium-sized (SMEs), as defined in Directive 2013/34/EU16
Amendment 67 #
Proposal for a directive Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point e (e) they operate in other Member States exclusively through one or more permanent establishments and/or one subsidiary;
Amendment 68 #
Proposal for a directive Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point e (e) they operate in other Member States
Amendment 69 #
Proposal for a directive Article 2 – paragraph 2 – introductory part 2. The Commission is empowered to adopt delegated acts in accordance with Article 16 to amend Annexes I to IV, in order to take account of changes to the laws of the Member States and based on the information provided by the relevant Member State concerning:
Amendment 70 #
Proposal for a directive Article 2 – paragraph 3 3. This Directive shall not affect the right of the Member State where a permanent establishment or the subsidiary is situated to determine the applicable tax rate, nor the applicability of bilateral conventions for the avoidance of double taxation, or the rules on the social protection of workers in the Member State of the permanent establishment.
Amendment 71 #
Proposal for a directive Article 3 – paragraph 1 – point 1 (
Amendment 72 #
Proposal for a directive Article 3 – paragraph 1 – point 1 a (new) (1 a) ‘subsidiary’ means an undertaking in another Member State which is wholly- owned and controlled by the head office of an SME;
Amendment 73 #
Proposal for a directive Article 3 – paragraph 1 – point 1 a (new) (1 a) ‘subsidiary’ means an undertaking in another Member States which is wholly-owned and controlled by the head office of an SME;
Amendment 74 #
Proposal for a directive Article 3 – paragraph 1 – point 2 (2) ‘head office’ means an SME, as referred to in Article 2(1), which operates in (an)other Member State(s)
Amendment 75 #
Proposal for a directive Article 3 – paragraph 1 – point 2 (2) ‘head office’ means an SME, as referred to in Article 2(1), which operates in (an)other Member State(s)
Amendment 76 #
Proposal for a directive Article 3 – paragraph 1 – point 6 (6) ‘taxable result of the permanent establishment’ means the taxable income or loss attributed to the permanent establishment and computed in accordance with the Head Office Taxation rules;
Amendment 77 #
Proposal for a directive Article 4 – paragraph 1 – point a Amendment 78 #
Proposal for a directive Article 4 – paragraph 1 – point a Amendment 79 #
Proposal for a directive Article 4 – paragraph 1 – point a (a) the joint turnover of its permanent establishments did not exceed, for the last two fiscal years, an amount equal to double the turnover generated by the head office; for the last year the joint turnover of its permanent establishments is calculated based on the date available until the 30th September of that year;
Amendment 80 #
Proposal for a directive Article 4 – paragraph 1 – point a (a) the joint turnover of its permanent establishments did not exceed, for the last two fiscal years, an amount equal to double the turnover generated by the head office in the head office Member State;
Amendment 81 #
Proposal for a directive Article 4 – paragraph 1 – point b (b) it has been resident for tax purposes in the head office Member State during the last
Amendment 82 #
Proposal for a directive Article 4 – paragraph 1 – point b (b) it has been resident for tax purposes in the head office Member State during the last two fiscal years; for newly created SMEs the minimum lenght of tax residency is not taken into account;
Amendment 83 #
Proposal for a directive Article 4 – paragraph 1 – point b (b) it has been resident for tax purposes in the head office Member State during the last two fiscal years or, if more recently, since the establishment of the head office;
Amendment 84 #
Proposal for a directive Article 4 – paragraph 1 – point b (b) it has been resident for tax purposes in the head office Member State during the last two fiscal years or since the creation of the head office;
Amendment 85 #
Proposal for a directive Article 4 – paragraph 1 – point b (b) it has been resident for tax purposes in the head office Member State during the last
Amendment 86 #
Proposal for a directive Article 4 – paragraph 1 – point c (c) it has met the conditions laid down in Article 2(1), point d) for the last two fiscal years or, if more recently, since the establishment of the head office.
Amendment 87 #
Proposal for a directive Article 4 – paragraph 1 – point c (c) it has met the conditions laid down in Article 2(1), point d) for the last
Amendment 88 #
Proposal for a directive Article 4 – paragraph 2 2. If the head office opts to apply the head office taxation rules in accordance with paragraph 1, it shall apply those rules to all its permanent establishments and/or subsidiairy in other Member States. If it creates a new permanent establishment in another Member State, it shall apply head office taxation rules to such permanent establishment from the moment of its establishment. If it creates a first subsidiary, in another Member State, it shall apply head office taxation rules to such subsidiary from the moment of its establishment
Amendment 89 #
Proposal for a directive Article 4 – paragraph 2 2. If the head office opts to apply the head office taxation rules in accordance with paragraph 1, it shall apply those rules to all its permanent establishments in other Member States. If it creates a new permanent establishment in another Member State, it shall apply head office taxation rules to such permanent establishment from the moment of its establishment. In that case the head office should inform the host Member State that it has opted to apply the head office taxation rules in accordance with paragraph 1;
Amendment 90 #
Proposal for a directive Article 4 – paragraph 2 2. If the head office opts to apply the head office taxation rules in accordance with paragraph 1, it
Amendment 91 #
Proposal for a directive Article 5 – paragraph 1 Where the head office derives income from shipping activities and this income is subject in the head office Member State to a tonnage tax regime, such head office shall be excluded from applying the head office taxation rules in respect of its permanent establishment(s) and/or the subsidiary in other Member States to the extent that these derive income from shipping activities.
Amendment 92 #
Proposal for a directive Article 6 – paragraph 1 1. The head office which opts to apply the head office taxation rules to its permanent establishment(s) shall notify its choice to the filing authority, together with the name of the host Member State(s). The notification shall be made at least three months before the end of the fiscal year preceding the fiscal year in which that SME wishes to start applying the head office taxation rules. For the establishment of its first permanent establishment or subsidiary in another Member State, an SME may apply the head office taxation rules from the year in which the permanent establishment or subsidiary is established, without having to notify the filing authority three months before the end of the previous tax year.
Amendment 93 #
Proposal for a directive Article 6 – paragraph 1 1. The head office which opts to apply the head office taxation rules to its permanent establishment(s) and/or the subsidiary shall notify its choice to the filing authority, together with the name of the host Member State(s). The notification shall be made at least three months before the end of the fiscal year preceding the fiscal year in which that SME wishes to start applying the head office taxation rules.
Amendment 94 #
Proposal for a directive Article 6 – paragraph 2 2. The filing authority shall verify whether the eligibility requirements set out in Article 4 are met and shall inform the head office of its findings within two months of the notification referred to in paragraph 1. The filing authority shall obtain confirmation from the host Member State that the establishment in the host Member State constitutes a permanent establishment for treaty purposes.
Amendment 95 #
Proposal for a directive Article 6 – paragraph 2 2. The filing authority shall verify whether the eligibility requirements set out in Article 4 are met and shall inform the head office of its findings within
Amendment 96 #
Proposal for a directive Article 6 – paragraph 3 – subparagraph 1 If the eligibility requirements are met, the filing authority shall inform the tax authorities of the host Member States within two months of the notification referred to in paragraph 1 that the taxable result of the relevant permanent establishments and/or the relevant subsidiary shall be computed in accordance with the head office taxation rules as of the following fiscal year, as applied in the head office Member State. The tax authority of the host Member State(s) shall communicate to the filing Authority the applicable tax rate.
Amendment 97 #
Proposal for a directive Article 6 – paragraph 3 – subparagraph 1 If the eligibility requirements are met, the filing authority shall inform the tax authorities of the host Member States within
Amendment 98 #
Proposal for a directive Article 6 – paragraph 3 – subparagraph 3 The host Member State may challenge the decision of the filing authority regarding the fulfilment of the eligibility requirements in accordance with the provisions set out in Article 13. In that case, the national rules of the head office Member State are applied. Notwithstanding such proceedings, the SMEs may start applying the head office taxation rules.
Amendment 99 #
Proposal for a directive Article 6 – paragraph 3 – subparagraph 4 If the filing authority concludes that the eligibility requirements are not met, it shall inform the head office within two months of the notification referred to in paragraph 1 and the head office may appeal against it in accordance with the national law. The decision of the filing authority shall only have legal effects as of the following fiscal year.
source: 757.288
|
History
(these mark the time of scraping, not the official date of the change)
docs/8/docs/0/url |
Old
/oeil/spdoc.do?i=61529&j=0&l=enNew
https://data.europarl.europa.eu/distribution/doc/SP-2024-377-TA-9-2024-0218_en.docx |
docs/8/docs/0/url |
Old
/oeil/spdoc.do?i=61529&j=0&l=enNew
https://data.europarl.europa.eu/distribution/doc/SP-2024-377-TA-9-2024-0218_en.docx |
docs/8/docs/0/url |
Old
/oeil/spdoc.do?i=61529&j=0&l=enNew
https://data.europarl.europa.eu/distribution/doc/SP-2024-377-TA-9-2024-0218_en.docx |
docs/8/docs/0/url |
Old
/oeil/spdoc.do?i=61529&j=0&l=enNew
https://data.europarl.europa.eu/distribution/doc/SP-2024-377-TA-9-2024-0218_en.docx |
docs/8/docs/0/url |
Old
/oeil/spdoc.do?i=61529&j=0&l=enNew
https://data.europarl.europa.eu/distribution/doc/SP-2024-377-TA-9-2024-0218_en.docx |
docs/8/docs/0/url |
Old
/oeil/spdoc.do?i=61529&j=0&l=enNew
https://data.europarl.europa.eu/distribution/doc/SP-2024-377-TA-9-2024-0218_en.docx |
docs/8/docs/0/url |
Old
/oeil/spdoc.do?i=61529&j=0&l=enNew
https://data.europarl.europa.eu/distribution/doc/SP-2024-377-TA-9-2024-0218_en.docx |
docs/8/docs/0/url |
Old
/oeil/spdoc.do?i=61529&j=0&l=enNew
https://data.europarl.europa.eu/distribution/doc/SP-2024-377-TA-9-2024-0218_en.docx |
docs/8/docs/0/url |
Old
/oeil/spdoc.do?i=61529&j=0&l=enNew
https://data.europarl.europa.eu/distribution/doc/SP-2024-377-TA-9-2024-0218_en.docx |
docs/8/docs/0/url |
Old
/oeil/spdoc.do?i=61529&j=0&l=enNew
https://data.europarl.europa.eu/distribution/doc/SP-2024-377-TA-9-2024-0218_en.docx |
docs/8/docs/0/url |
Old
/oeil/spdoc.do?i=61529&j=0&l=enNew
https://data.europarl.europa.eu/distribution/doc/SP-2024-377-TA-9-2024-0218_en.docx |
docs/8/docs/0/url |
Old
/oeil/spdoc.do?i=61529&j=0&l=enNew
https://data.europarl.europa.eu/distribution/doc/SP-2024-377-TA-9-2024-0218_en.docx |
docs/8/docs/0/url |
Old
/oeil/spdoc.do?i=61529&j=0&l=enNew
https://data.europarl.europa.eu/distribution/doc/SP-2024-377-TA-9-2024-0218_en.docx |
docs/8/docs/0/url |
Old
/oeil/spdoc.do?i=61529&j=0&l=enNew
nulldistribution/doc/SP-2024-377-TA-9-2024-0218_en.docx |
docs/8 |
|
docs/8 |
|
docs/8 |
|
docs/8 |
|
docs/8 |
|
docs/8 |
|
docs/8 |
|
docs/8 |
|
docs/8 |
|
docs/8 |
|
docs/8 |
|
docs/8 |
|
docs/8 |
|
docs/8 |
|
docs/8 |
|
docs/8 |
|
docs/8 |
|
docs/8 |
|
docs/8 |
|
docs/8 |
|
docs/8 |
|
docs/8 |
|
docs/8 |
|
docs/8 |
|
docs/8 |
|
docs/8 |
|
events/4 |
|
procedure/Other legal basis |
Old
Rules of Procedure EP 159New
Rules of Procedure EP 165 |
events/4 |
|
procedure/Other legal basis |
Old
Rules of Procedure EP 159New
Rules of Procedure EP 165 |
events/4 |
|
procedure/Other legal basis |
Old
Rules of Procedure EP 159New
Rules of Procedure EP 165 |
events/4 |
|
procedure/Other legal basis |
Old
Rules of Procedure EP 159New
Rules of Procedure EP 165 |
events/4 |
|
procedure/Other legal basis |
Old
Rules of Procedure EP 159New
Rules of Procedure EP 165 |
events/4 |
|
procedure/Other legal basis |
Old
Rules of Procedure EP 159New
Rules of Procedure EP 165 |
docs/8 |
|
events/4/summary |
|
docs/8 |
|
events/4/summary |
|
docs/8 |
|
events/4/summary |
|
docs/8 |
|
events/4 |
|
forecasts |
|
procedure/stage_reached |
Old
Awaiting Parliament's voteNew
Awaiting final decision |
docs/8 |
|
events/4 |
|
forecasts |
|
procedure/stage_reached |
Old
Awaiting Parliament's voteNew
Awaiting final decision |
docs/8 |
|
events/4 |
|
forecasts |
|
procedure/stage_reached |
Old
Awaiting Parliament's voteNew
Awaiting final decision |
docs/8 |
|
events/4 |
|
forecasts |
|
procedure/stage_reached |
Old
Awaiting Parliament's voteNew
Awaiting final decision |
forecasts |
|
docs/7 |
|
events/3/docs |
|
docs/7 |
|
events/3/docs |
|
docs/7 |
|
events/3/docs |
|
docs/7 |
|
events/3/docs |
|
docs/7 |
|
events/3/docs |
|
docs/7 |
|
events/3/docs |
|
docs/7 |
|
events/3/docs |
|
docs/7 |
|
events/3/docs |
|
docs/6 |
|
docs/8 |
|
docs/9 |
|
events/2 |
|
events/3 |
|
forecasts/0 |
|
procedure/Other legal basis |
Rules of Procedure EP 159
|
procedure/stage_reached |
Old
Awaiting committee decisionNew
Awaiting Parliament's vote |
docs/6 |
|
docs/5 |
|
forecasts/1 |
|
links |
|
events/1 |
|
procedure/dossier_of_the_committee |
|
procedure/stage_reached |
Old
Preparatory phase in ParliamentNew
Awaiting committee decision |
docs/4 |
|
procedure/other_consulted_institutions |
European Economic and Social Committee
|
forecasts |
|
committees/0/shadows/2 |
|
commission |
|
committees/0/rapporteur |
|
committees/0/shadows/2 |
|
committees/0/shadows |
|
docs/0 |
|
events/0/summary |
|