Next event: Indicative plenary sitting date, 1st reading 2025/03/31
Progress: Awaiting committee decision
Role | Committee | Rapporteur | Shadows |
---|---|---|---|
Lead | ENVI | TSIODRAS Dimitris ( EPP) | CLERGEAU Christophe ( S&D), TIMGREN Beatrice ( ECR), HOJSÍK Martin ( Renew), PAULUS Jutta ( Greens/EFA), HAZEKAMP Anja ( The Left) |
Former Responsible Committee | ENVI | SPYRAKI Maria ( EPP) | |
Committee Opinion | AGRI | ||
Former Committee Opinion | BUDG | ||
Former Committee Opinion | ITRE | ||
Former Committee Opinion | AGRI | ||
Committee for budgetary assessment | BUDG |
Lead committee dossier:
Legal Basis:
TFEU 043, TFEU 114, TFEU 207, TFEU 192-p1, TFEU 168-p4
Legal Basis:
TFEU 043, TFEU 114, TFEU 207, TFEU 192-p1, TFEU 168-p4Subjects
Events
PURPOSE: to amend Regulations (EC) No 178/2002, (EC) No 401/2009, (EU) 2017/745 and (EU) 2019/1021 of the European Parliament and of the Council as regards the re-attribution of scientific and technical tasks and improving cooperation among Union agencies in the area of chemicals.
PROPOSED ACT: Regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council.
ROLE OF THE EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT: the European Parliament decides in accordance with the ordinary legislative procedure and on an equal footing with the Council.
BACKGROUND: the Commission has, in its Communication ‘European Green Deal’, set an objective that chemical safety assessments should move towards a process of ‘one-substance, one-assessment’, calling for more transparent and simpler risk assessment processes in order to reduce the burden on all stakeholders, accelerate decision-making, as well as to increase consistency and predictability of scientific decisions and opinions.
To achieve that objective, part of the scientific and technical work on chemicals performed at Union level in support of Union legislation needs to be reattributed to the most suitable Union agencies. This would simplify the current set-up, improve quality and coherence of safety assessments across Union legislation, and ensure more efficient use of existing resources.
CONTENT: this proposal proposes targeted amendments to attribute tasks in Regulation (EU) 2019/1021 on persistent organic pollutants, and Regulation (EU) 2017/745 on medical devices. The proposal also amends Regulation (EC) No 401/2009 establishing the European Environmental Agency and Regulation (EC) No 178/2002 laying down the general principles and requirements of food law and establishing the European Food Safety Authority. These amendments will ensure good cooperation among EU agencies on all aspects involving the consistency and efficiency of chemical assessments. These include the development of methodologies, data exchanges and reconciling divergence in scientific output.
The proposal:
- amends Regulation (EC) No 178/2002 (General Food Law Regulation). It includes provisions enabling EFSA to better cooperate and coordinate with ECHA, EMA and EEA . This cooperation would lead to more consistent scientific assessments of chemicals and encourage the agencies to develop consistent scientific opinions and methodologies, taking into account specific sectoral characteristics. The provisions on data and information exchange would bring the EU a step closer to the one substance, one assessment goals. These provisions make greater interoperability possible and scientific processes more robust;
- amends Regulation (EC) No 401/2009 (the EEA Founding Regulation). It includes streamlining obligations on the EEA to promote and coordinate the development of assessment methodologies and places cooperation obligations on the EEA;
- amends Annex I of Regulation (EU) 2017/745 (the Medical Devices Regulation) to task ECHA with updating existing guidelines on conducting the risk-benefit assessment of the presence of phthalates in medical devices. The agency will also develop guidelines for other substances, which are classified as either carcinogenic, mutagenic or toxic to reproduction, of category 1A or 1B or have endocrine disrupting properties for human health of Category 1;
- amends Regulation (EU) No 2019/1021 by giving the Commission the possibility to request ECHA to develop a report analysing the human health, environmental, social, and economic impact of introducing or modifying concentration limit values specified in Annexes IV and V to Regulation (EU) No 2019/1021 (POPs Regulation).
Considering the highly technical nature of the amendments, this provision also introduces the adoption of amendments to Annexes IV and V by means of a delegated act. To promote the development of a comprehensive chemical exposure and toxicity knowledge base, as well as streamline data flows in line with the one substance, one assessment policy target, the provision also diverts data flows on the presence of persistent organic pollutant substances in the environment to EEA, which is the agency responsible for collecting occurrence data on chemicals in the environment.
Legislative proposal
PURPOSE: to amend Regulations (EC) No 178/2002, (EC) No 401/2009, (EU) 2017/745 and (EU) 2019/1021 of the European Parliament and of the Council as regards the re-attribution of scientific and technical tasks and improving cooperation among Union agencies in the area of chemicals.
PROPOSED ACT: Regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council.
ROLE OF THE EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT: the European Parliament decides in accordance with the ordinary legislative procedure and on an equal footing with the Council.
BACKGROUND: the Commission has, in its Communication ‘European Green Deal’, set an objective that chemical safety assessments should move towards a process of ‘one-substance, one-assessment’, calling for more transparent and simpler risk assessment processes in order to reduce the burden on all stakeholders, accelerate decision-making, as well as to increase consistency and predictability of scientific decisions and opinions.
To achieve that objective, part of the scientific and technical work on chemicals performed at Union level in support of Union legislation needs to be reattributed to the most suitable Union agencies. This would simplify the current set-up, improve quality and coherence of safety assessments across Union legislation, and ensure more efficient use of existing resources.
CONTENT: this proposal proposes targeted amendments to attribute tasks in Regulation (EU) 2019/1021 on persistent organic pollutants, and Regulation (EU) 2017/745 on medical devices. The proposal also amends Regulation (EC) No 401/2009 establishing the European Environmental Agency and Regulation (EC) No 178/2002 laying down the general principles and requirements of food law and establishing the European Food Safety Authority. These amendments will ensure good cooperation among EU agencies on all aspects involving the consistency and efficiency of chemical assessments. These include the development of methodologies, data exchanges and reconciling divergence in scientific output.
The proposal:
- amends Regulation (EC) No 178/2002 (General Food Law Regulation). It includes provisions enabling EFSA to better cooperate and coordinate with ECHA, EMA and EEA . This cooperation would lead to more consistent scientific assessments of chemicals and encourage the agencies to develop consistent scientific opinions and methodologies, taking into account specific sectoral characteristics. The provisions on data and information exchange would bring the EU a step closer to the one substance, one assessment goals. These provisions make greater interoperability possible and scientific processes more robust;
- amends Regulation (EC) No 401/2009 (the EEA Founding Regulation). It includes streamlining obligations on the EEA to promote and coordinate the development of assessment methodologies and places cooperation obligations on the EEA;
- amends Annex I of Regulation (EU) 2017/745 (the Medical Devices Regulation) to task ECHA with updating existing guidelines on conducting the risk-benefit assessment of the presence of phthalates in medical devices. The agency will also develop guidelines for other substances, which are classified as either carcinogenic, mutagenic or toxic to reproduction, of category 1A or 1B or have endocrine disrupting properties for human health of Category 1;
- amends Regulation (EU) No 2019/1021 by giving the Commission the possibility to request ECHA to develop a report analysing the human health, environmental, social, and economic impact of introducing or modifying concentration limit values specified in Annexes IV and V to Regulation (EU) No 2019/1021 (POPs Regulation).
Considering the highly technical nature of the amendments, this provision also introduces the adoption of amendments to Annexes IV and V by means of a delegated act. To promote the development of a comprehensive chemical exposure and toxicity knowledge base, as well as streamline data flows in line with the one substance, one assessment policy target, the provision also diverts data flows on the presence of persistent organic pollutant substances in the environment to EEA, which is the agency responsible for collecting occurrence data on chemicals in the environment.
Legislative proposal
Documents
- Amendments tabled in committee: PE766.688
- Committee draft report: PE763.253
- Contribution: COM(2023)0783
- Contribution: COM(2023)0783
- ESC: CES5710/2023
- Document attached to the procedure: Go to the pageEur-Lex
- Document attached to the procedure: SWD(2023)0850
- Legislative proposal: COM(2023)0783
- Legislative proposal: Go to the pageEur-Lex
- Legislative proposal published: COM(2023)0783
- Legislative proposal published: Go to the page Eur-Lex
- Committee draft report: PE763.253
- Amendments tabled in committee: PE766.688
- Document attached to the procedure: Go to the pageEur-Lex SWD(2023)0850
- Legislative proposal: COM(2023)0783 Go to the pageEur-Lex
- Contribution: COM(2023)0783
- Contribution: COM(2023)0783
- ESC: CES5710/2023
Amendments | Dossier |
41 |
2023/0455(COD)
2024/12/05
ENVI
41 amendments...
Amendment 10 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 8 a (new) (8a) A consistent and predictable regulatory framework is essential for fostering innovation and encouraging investment in sustainable chemical technologies. By simplifying assessment methodologies under the ‘one substance, one assessment’ approach, this Regulation promotes regulatory efficiency and supports the Union’s objective of creating a more competitive internal market.
Amendment 11 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 9 (9) In the more specific case of scientific divergence pertaining to the hazard identification of chemical substances, a new procedure enabling the resolution of the divergence should be established. This procedure should enable the Commission to request the European Chemicals Agency, as the Union agency most equipped with expertise and capacity in hazard assessment, as well as long- standing experience with the harmonised classification and labelling process, to develop a proposal for harmonised classification and labelling, in accordance the Regulation (EC) No 1272/2008 of the European Parliament and Council, moving closer to the ‘one substance, one assessment’ vision as regards uniformity of hazard assessments of chemicals across the Union, optimising the protection of health and the environment. This possibility should be reflected in the relevant provision providing for the resolution of diverging scientific opinions laid down in Regulation (EC) No 178/2002.
Amendment 12 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 9 (9) In the more specific case of scientific divergence pertaining to the hazard identification of chemical substances, a new procedure enabling the resolution of the divergence should be established. This procedure should enable the Commission to request the European Chemicals Agency, as the Union agency most equipped with expertise and capacity in hazard assessment, as well as long- standing experience with the harmonised classification and labelling process, to develop a proposal for harmonised classification and labelling, in accordance with
Amendment 13 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 10 a (new) (10a) Leveraging existing digital tools and data-sharing platforms, this Regulation aims to minimize duplicative reporting obligations, reduce costs for Member States and economic operators, and provide better access to data for stakeholders. This approach strengthens the role of digital solutions in achieving regulatory efficiency and cost savings.
Amendment 14 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 11 (11) To comply with the obligation laid out in Section 10.4.4. of Annex I to Regulation (EU) 2017/745, the Commission should mandate the relevant scientific committee to prepare guidelines for substances other than phthalates and which are classified as either carcinogenic, mutagenic or toxic to reproduction category 1A or 1B, or which have endocrine disrupting properties for which there is scientific evidence of probable serious effects to human health or the environment and which are identified in accordance with the procedure set out in Article 59 of Regulation (EC) No 1907/2006 of the European Parliament and of the Council.
Amendment 15 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 13 (13) Taking account of the new hazard classes and criteria for classification, labelling and packaging of substances introduced by Commission Delegated Regulation (EU) 2023/707 of 19 December 20227 , reference to endocrine disruptors for human health or the environment, of Category 1, should be specified in 10.4.1., point (b) of Annex I of Regulation (EU) 2017/745 in light of the relevance of that hazard class to the type of substances in medical devices.
Amendment 16 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 14 a (new) (14a) The amendment of Regulation (EU) 2019/1021 introduced by this Regulation expands the tasks, workload and remit of scientific committees of the European Chemicals Agency. In order to provide adequate expertise, support and thorough scientific evaluations, appropriate and stable resources, capacity and governance of the scientific committees should be ensured. In this respect, the European Commission shall regularly monitor the needs of the European Chemicals Agency stemming from this Regulation and provide the Agency with sufficient and stable resources.
Amendment 17 #
Proposal for a regulation Article -1 (new) Article -1 Forum on Hazard Assessment 1. The Commission shall, by means of an implementing decision, establish and manage a Forum on Hazard Assessment ('the Forum') which shall include representatives from each of the Agencies, the Commission, Member states and the European Parliament. 2. The Forum shall establish a work programme to (a) foster cooperation in the area of hazard assessment of chemicals; (b) improve the sharing and re-use of data between agencies; (c) establish a strategy toward the common hazard assessment of chemicals across Union legislation in the area of chemicals. 2. The forum shall meet and update its work programme regularly. 3. The Forum shall draw up an annual report, compiling and analysing the advancement and conclusions of its work programme referred to in paragraph 2. The first report shall be prepared by [OP: please insert date: 1 year after the end of the first calendar year after entry into force of this Regulation]. The Forum shall present this report to the Commission, relevant Union agencies and Member State competent authorities, the European Parliament and the Council for consideration of the need for regulatory or policy action related to the conclusion of this report
Amendment 18 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 1 Regulation (EC) No 178/2002 Article 23 – paragraph 1 – point m m) to cooperate with the competent bodies in the Member States that carry out similar tasks to those of the Authority and to cooperate with other scientific bodies established under Union law, notably the European Chemicals Agency, the European Medicines Agency, and the European Environment Agency
Amendment 19 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 2 Regulation (EC) No 178/2002 Article 30 – paragraph 2 – subparagraph 3 Where the Authority identifies a potential source of divergence, it shall contact the body concerned in order to ensure that all relevant scientific or technical information is shared and in order to identify the potentially contentious scientific or technical issues. Difference in assessment methodologies resulting in divergent opinions shall be duly justified, especially regarding the protection of vulnerable groups.
Amendment 20 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 2 Regulation (EC) No 178/2002 Article 30 – paragraph 2 – subparagraph 1 Where the Authority identifies a potential source of divergence that is not associated with the specific nature and requirements of the applicable legal framework, it shall contact the body concerned in order to ensure that all relevant scientific or technical information is shared and in order to identify the potentially contentious scientific or technical issues.
Amendment 21 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 2 Regulation (EC) No 178/2002 Article 30 – paragraph 2 – subparagraph 2 The Authority and the body concerned shall cooperate to resolve the divergence, with the aim of optimising the protection of health and the environment, prioritising the most protective opinion. If the Authority and the body concerned are not able to resolve the divergence, they shall draw up a joint report. The report shall clearly outline the contentious scientific issues
Amendment 22 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 2 Regulation (EC) No 178/2002 Article 30 – paragraph 2 – subparagraph 2 The Authority and the body concerned shall cooperate to resolve the divergence. Priority shall be given to the opinion that affords the highest level of protection in order to safeguard the most vulnerable groups. If the Authority and the body concerned are not able to resolve the divergence, they shall draw up a joint report. The report shall clearly outline the contentious scientific issues and identify the relevant uncertainties in the data and be made publicly available.
Amendment 23 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 2 Regulation (EC) No 178/2002 Article 30 – paragraph 2 – subparagraph 2 The Authority and the body concerned shall cooperate to resolve the divergence, with the aim to ensure highest level of protection of health and environment. If the Authority and the body concerned are not able to resolve the divergence, they shall draw up a joint report. The report shall clearly outline the contentious scientific issues and identify the relevant uncertainties in the data, potential consequences on health and environment, and be made publicly available.
Amendment 24 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 2 Regulation (EC) No 178/2002 Article 30 – paragraph 2 – subparagraph 2 The Authority and the body concerned shall cooperate to resolve the divergence. If the Authority and the body concerned are not able to resolve the divergence, they shall draw up a joint report within six months after the identification of the source of divergence by the Authority. The report shall clearly outline the contentious scientific issues and identify the relevant uncertainties in the data and be made publicly available.
Amendment 25 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 2 Regulation (EC) No 178/2002 Article 30 – paragraph 3 3. Where relevant, and where the divergence concerns conflicting scientific opinions of the Authority and another Union body or agency on whether a substance fulfils the criteria laid out in Annex I of Regulation (EC) No 1272/2008 of the European Parliament and of the Council11 , the Commission may request the European Chemicals Agency to prepare a proposal for harmonised classification and labelling of substances and, where appropriate, specific concentration limits, M-factors or acute toxicity estimates, or a proposal for revision thereof following the procedure laid out in Article 37 of Regulation (EC) No 1272/2008, with the aim of optimising the protection of health and the environment. The Authority and the Union body or agency concerned shall co-operate with the European Chemicals Agency in developing that proposal.
Amendment 26 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 2 a (new) Regulation (EC) No 178/2002 Article 30 – paragraph 3 a (new) In article 30, the following paragraph is added 3a. In cases where a divergence is identified, and the Authority requests additional information from the other Union or Member State authority, the period by when the relevant authorities are required to adopt their respective output, or the joint output referred to in paragraph 2, may be extended. After consulting the body concerned, the Authority shall lay down a period within which this information shall be provided and shall inform the Commission of the additional period needed. The Commission shall inform the concerned business operator(s) and the Member States of the extension.
Amendment 27 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point 1 a (new) Regulation (EC) No 401/2009 Article 15 – paragraph 4 Amendment 28 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point 2 Regulation (EC) No 401/2009 Article 15 – paragraph 5 5. The Agency shall cooperate with other scientific bodies established under Union law, notably the European Chemicals Agency, the European Food Safety Authority, and the European Medicines Agency, on the exchange of data and information on chemicals, including the possible establishment of related data formats and controlled vocabularies to facilitate such an exchange, and on the development of scientific methodologies for the assessment of chemicals. This cooperation shall aim to support the development of innovative methods and tools, notably non animal approaches and aim to ensure that animal testing takes place only as last resort.
Amendment 29 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 3 – paragraph 1 – point 1 Regulation (EU) 2017/745 Annex I – Section 10.4.1 – point b (b) substances which are
Amendment 3 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 2 (2) In order to achieve this objective, a part of the scientific and technical work on chemicals performed at Union level in support of Union legislation needs to be consolidated in the relevant Union agencies, while obligations on Union agencies to cooperate for the development of assessment methodologies and exchange of data and information should be introduced. This would simplify the current set-up, improve quality and coherence of safety assessments across Union legislation, and ensure more efficient use of existing resources as well as reduce duplication of efforts across multiple Union agencies. This approach supports the competitiveness of Union industries by reducing compliance costs and administrative burdens on businesses.
Amendment 30 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 3 – paragraph 1 – point 1 Regulation (EU) 2017/745 Annex I – Section 10.4.1 – point b (b) substances which are
Amendment 31 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 3 – paragraph 1 – point 3 Regulation (EU) 2017/745 Annex I – Section 10.4.3 When deemed appropriate based on the latest scientific evidence, but at least every
Amendment 32 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 4 – paragraph 1 – point 2 Regulation (EU) 2019/1021 Article 8 – paragraph 1a – point a (a)
Amendment 33 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 4 – paragraph 1 – point 2 Regulation (EU) 2019/1021 Article 8 – paragraph 1a – point a (a)
Amendment 34 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 4 – paragraph 1 – point 2 Regulation (EU) 2019/1021 Article 8 – paragraph 1a – subparagraph 2 The Agency shall, as soon as it receives the request referred to in
Amendment 35 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 4 – paragraph 1 – point 2 Regulation (EU) 2019/1021 Article 8 – paragraph 1a – subparagraph 3 At the latest 9 months following the submission of that report referred to in Article 8(1), point (i), the Committee for Socio-economic Analysis of the Agency, set up pursuant to Article 76(1), point (d), of Regulation (EC) No 1907/2006 shall adopt an opinion on the report and on the concentration limit values proposed therein. For the purpose of adopting an opinion on the report, Article 87 of Regulation (EC) No 1907/2006 shall apply mutatis mutandis.
Amendment 36 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 4 – paragraph 1 – point 4 Regulation (EU) 2019/1021 Article 15 – paragraph 2 2. The Commission is empowered to adopt delegated acts in accordance with Article 18, to amend Annexes IV and V to adapt them to the changes to the list of substances set out in the Annexes I, II or III to Regulation(EU) 2019/1021, or the Annexes to the Convention or the Protocol or to adapt them to scientific and technical progress.
Amendment 37 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 4 – paragraph 1 – point 4 a (new) Regulation (EU) 2019/1021 Article 16 – paragraph 2 a (new) (4a) In Article 16 following paragraph is added 2a. The Commission shall monitor the situation regarding the resources of the European Chemicals Agency and tasks, workload and remit of the scientific committees of the European Chemicals Agency and present, where necessary, a legislative proposal to reflect any needs of the European Chemicals Agency stemming from tasks introduced by this Regulation and to improve governance of its scientific committees."
Amendment 38 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 4 – paragraph 1 – point 5 – point c Regulation (EU) 2019/1021 Article 18 – paragraph 6 6. A delegated act adopted pursuant to Articles 4(3), 10(2) and 15 shall enter into force only if no objection has been expressed either by the European Parliament or by the Council within a period of two months of notification of that act to the European Parliament and the Council or if, before the expiry of that period, the European Parliament and the Council have both informed the Commission that they will not object. That period may be extended by two months at the initiative of the European Parliament or of the Council’.
Amendment 39 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 4 – paragraph 1 – point 5 – point c Regulation (EU) 2019/1021 Annex IV – Table 1 – Row 5 Present text Amendment 4 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 2 a (new) (2a) To improve further the cooperation among Union agencies in the area of chemicals, and to increase coherence and efficiency of assessments related to chemicals across Union legislation, it is necessary to lay the foundation for a common approach to hazard assessment of chemicals across Union legislation. This Regulation should establish a forum for Agencies to improve sharing and re-use of chemicals data, exchange best practices, and foster cooperation in the hazard assessment of chemicals.
Amendment 40 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 4 – paragraph 1 – point 5 – point c Regulation (EU) 2019/1021 Annex IV – Table 1 – Row 12 Present text Amendment 41 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 4 – paragraph 1 – point 5 – point c Regulation (EU) 2019/1021 Annex IV – Table 1 – Row 30 Amendment 42 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 4 – paragraph 1 – point 5 – point c Regulation (EU) 2019/1021 Annex IV – Table 1 – Row 27 Present text Amendment 43 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 4 – paragraph 1 – point 5 – point c Regulation (EU) 2019/1021 Annex IV – Table 1 – Row 31 Present text Amendment 5 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 6 (6) To ensure the coherence and efficiency of assessments related to chemicals across Union legislation, it is also important to enable data interoperability and easy exchange of data between the relevant Union agencies, as well as to encourage cooperation on the development of standard formats and controlled vocabularies. Thus, to facilitate data exchange between agencies, any new data formats defined by the European Food Safety Authority or by the European Environmental Agency should be set in cooperation with other relevant Union agencies working on chemicals. To this end, relevant provisions should be introduced in Regulation (EC) No 401/2009 of the European Parliament and of the Council and, in Regulation (EC) No 178/2002 of the European Parliament and of the Council, existing provisions should be strengthened and, where relevant, new ones be introduced. Similar provisions should also be
Amendment 6 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 7 (7) To promote the transition towards a toxic-free environment and zero pollution, and the robustness, coherence and efficiency of assessments related to chemicals across Union legislation, steps should be taken by the relevant Union agencies to avoid divergent scientific opinions. Existing cases of divergent opinions have lead to increased uncertainty for operators, as well as to declined public trust in the scientific robustness and coherence of scientific decision making. Proposals to address and strengthen procedures for resolving divergence of scientific opinions concerning the European Medicines Agency with other scientific bodies is proposed as part of the revision of Union pharmaceutical legislation. Similar provisions should also be
Amendment 7 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 7 a (new) (7a) The measures introduced under this Regulation seek to align regulatory requirements and processes across relevant sectors without creating unnecessary administrative burdens or overregulation. By prioritizing proportionality and efficiency, the Regulation ensures that new tasks are effectively integrated into existing systems while maintaining high standards of environmental and public health protection.
Amendment 8 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 8 (8) Correspondingly, this Regulation aims to address the eventual divergence between scientific opinions of the European Food Safety Authority and those of other Union agencies. Regulation (EC) No 178/2002 of the European Parliament and Council already contains provisions establishing a procedure to solve divergent scientific opinions. Those resolution procedures should be reinforced, in that the European Food Safety Authority and the other dissenting agency should be bound to make their best effort to resolve the divergence on general scientific issues,
Amendment 9 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 8 (8) Correspondingly, this Regulation aims to address the eventual divergence between scientific opinions of the European Food Safety Authority and those of other Union agencies. Regulation (EC) No 178/2002 of the European Parliament and Council already contains provisions establishing a procedure to solve divergent scientific opinions. Those resolution procedures should be reinforced, in that the European Food Safety Authority and the other dissenting agency should be bound to make their best effort to resolve the divergence on general scientific issues, and only when they are not able to resolve the divergence, should they refer to risk managers. Differences in assessment methodologies resulting in divergent opinions, particularly with regards to the protection of vulnerable groups, should be duly clarified. In such instances, priority should be given to the most protective opinion to safeguard the most vulnerable populations.
source: 766.688
|
History
(these mark the time of scraping, not the official date of the change)
committees/0 |
|
committees/0 |
|
committees/1/rapporteur/0/group |
Old
Group of European People's PartyNew
European People's Party |
committees/2 |
|
committees/3 |
|
committees/3 |
|
committees/3/type |
Old
Committee OpinionNew
Former Committee Opinion |
committees/5 |
|
committees/5 |
|
committees/6 |
|
committees/7 |
|
committees/7/rapporteur |
|
docs/0 |
|
docs/0 |
|
docs/1 |
|
docs/1 |
|
docs/2 |
|
docs/3 |
|
docs/6 |
|
events/0 |
|
events/0 |
|
events/2 |
|
forecasts |
|
procedure/dossier_of_the_committee |
Old
New
ENVI/10/00306 |
procedure/instrument/1 |
Amending Regulation 2002/178
|
procedure/instrument/1 |
Amending Regulation 2002/178 2000/0286(COD) Amending Regulation 2009/401 2007/0235(COD) Amending Regulation 2017/745 2012/0266(COD) Amending Regulation 2019/1021 2018/0070(COD)
|
procedure/instrument/2 |
2000/0286(COD)
|
procedure/instrument/3 |
Amending Regulation 2009/401
|
procedure/instrument/4 |
2007/0235(COD)
|
procedure/instrument/5 |
Amending Regulation 2017/745
|
procedure/instrument/6 |
2012/0266(COD)
|
procedure/instrument/7 |
Amending Regulation 2019/1021
|
procedure/instrument/8 |
2018/0070(COD)
|
procedure/other_consulted_institutions |
Old
European Economic and Social Committee European Committee of the RegionsNew
|
committees/0/shadows |
|
committees/0/shadows |
|
committees/0/shadows |
|
committees/0/shadows |
|
committees/0/shadows |
|
committees/0/shadows |
|
committees/0/shadows |
|
committees/0/shadows |
|
committees/0/shadows |
|
committees/0/shadows |
|
committees/0/shadows |
|
committees/0/shadows |
|
committees/0/shadows |
|
committees/0/shadows |
|
committees/0/shadows |
|
committees/0/shadows |
|
committees/0/shadows |
|
committees/0/shadows |
|
committees/0/rapporteur |
|
committees/0/rapporteur |
|
committees/0/rapporteur |
|
committees/0/rapporteur |
|
committees/0/rapporteur |
|
committees/0/rapporteur |
|
committees/0/rapporteur |
|
committees/0/rapporteur |
|
committees/0/rapporteur |
|
committees/0/rapporteur |
|
events/0 |
|
events/0 |
|
events/0 |
|
events/0 |
|
events/0 |
|
events/0 |
|
committees/0/rapporteur |
|
committees/1 |
|
committees/1 |
|
committees/1/rapporteur |
|
committees/2 |
|
committees/2 |
|
committees/2/opinion |
False
|
committees/3 |
|
committees/3 |
|
committees/3/rapporteur |
|
committees/4 |
|
committees/5 |
|
committees/6 |
|
committees/7 |
|
docs/1 |
|
docs/2 |
|
procedure/dossier_of_the_committee/0 |
ENVI/10/00306
|
procedure/dossier_of_the_committee/0 |
ENVI/9/13840
|
committees/0/rapporteur |
|
committees/1 |
|
committees/1 |
|
committees/1/rapporteur |
|
committees/2 |
|
committees/2 |
|
committees/2/opinion |
False
|
committees/3 |
|
committees/3 |
|
committees/3/rapporteur |
|
committees/4 |
|
committees/5 |
|
committees/6 |
|
committees/7 |
|
docs/1 |
|
docs/2 |
|
procedure/dossier_of_the_committee/0 |
ENVI/10/00306
|
procedure/dossier_of_the_committee/0 |
ENVI/9/13840
|
committees/0/rapporteur |
|
committees/1 |
|
committees/1 |
|
committees/1/rapporteur |
|
committees/2 |
|
committees/2 |
|
committees/2/opinion |
False
|
committees/3 |
|
committees/3 |
|
committees/3/rapporteur |
|
committees/4 |
|
committees/5 |
|
committees/6 |
|
committees/7 |
|
docs/1 |
|
docs/2 |
|
procedure/dossier_of_the_committee/0 |
ENVI/10/00306
|
procedure/dossier_of_the_committee/0 |
ENVI/9/13840
|
committees/0/rapporteur |
|
committees/1 |
|
committees/1 |
|
committees/1/rapporteur |
|
committees/2 |
|
committees/2 |
|
committees/2/opinion |
False
|
committees/3 |
|
committees/3 |
|
committees/3/rapporteur |
|
committees/4 |
|
committees/5 |
|
committees/6 |
|
committees/7 |
|
docs/1 |
|
docs/2 |
|
procedure/dossier_of_the_committee/0 |
ENVI/10/00306
|
procedure/dossier_of_the_committee/0 |
ENVI/9/13840
|
committees/0/rapporteur |
|
committees/1 |
|
committees/1 |
|
committees/1/rapporteur |
|
committees/2 |
|
committees/2 |
|
committees/2/opinion |
False
|
committees/3 |
|
committees/3 |
|
committees/3/rapporteur |
|
committees/4 |
|
committees/5 |
|
committees/6 |
|
committees/7 |
|
docs/1 |
|
docs/2 |
|
procedure/dossier_of_the_committee/0 |
ENVI/10/00306
|
procedure/dossier_of_the_committee/0 |
ENVI/9/13840
|
committees/0/rapporteur |
|
committees/1 |
|
committees/1 |
|
committees/1/rapporteur |
|
committees/2 |
|
committees/2 |
|
committees/2/opinion |
False
|
committees/3 |
|
committees/3 |
|
committees/3/rapporteur |
|
committees/4 |
|
committees/5 |
|
committees/6 |
|
committees/7 |
|
docs/1 |
|
docs/2 |
|
procedure/dossier_of_the_committee/0 |
ENVI/10/00306
|
procedure/dossier_of_the_committee/0 |
ENVI/9/13840
|
committees/0/rapporteur |
|
committees/1 |
|
committees/1 |
|
committees/1/rapporteur |
|
committees/2 |
|
committees/2 |
|
committees/2/opinion |
False
|
committees/3 |
|
committees/3 |
|
committees/3/rapporteur |
|
committees/4 |
|
committees/5 |
|
committees/6 |
|
committees/7 |
|
docs/1 |
|
docs/2 |
|
procedure/dossier_of_the_committee/0 |
ENVI/10/00306
|
procedure/dossier_of_the_committee/0 |
ENVI/9/13840
|
committees/0/rapporteur |
|
committees/1 |
|
committees/1 |
|
committees/1/rapporteur |
|
committees/2 |
|
committees/2 |
|
committees/2/opinion |
False
|
committees/3 |
|
committees/3 |
|
committees/3/rapporteur |
|
committees/4 |
|
committees/5 |
|
committees/6 |
|
committees/7 |
|
docs/1 |
|
docs/2 |
|
procedure/dossier_of_the_committee/0 |
ENVI/10/00306
|
procedure/dossier_of_the_committee/0 |
ENVI/9/13840
|
committees/0/rapporteur |
|
committees/1 |
|
committees/1 |
|
committees/1/rapporteur |
|
committees/2 |
|
committees/2 |
|
committees/2/opinion |
False
|
committees/3 |
|
committees/3 |
|
committees/3/rapporteur |
|
committees/4 |
|
committees/5 |
|
committees/6 |
|
committees/7 |
|
docs/1 |
|
docs/2 |
|
procedure/dossier_of_the_committee/0 |
ENVI/10/00306
|
procedure/dossier_of_the_committee/0 |
ENVI/9/13840
|
committees/0/rapporteur |
|
committees/1 |
|
committees/1 |
|
committees/1/rapporteur |
|
committees/2 |
|
committees/2 |
|
committees/2/opinion |
False
|
committees/3 |
|
committees/3 |
|
committees/3/rapporteur |
|
committees/4 |
|
committees/5 |
|
committees/6 |
|
committees/7 |
|
docs/1 |
|
docs/2 |
|
procedure/dossier_of_the_committee/0 |
ENVI/10/00306
|
procedure/dossier_of_the_committee/0 |
ENVI/9/13840
|
committees/0/rapporteur |
|
committees/1 |
|
committees/1 |
|
committees/1/rapporteur |
|
committees/2 |
|
committees/2 |
|
committees/2/opinion |
False
|
committees/3 |
|
committees/3 |
|
committees/3/rapporteur |
|
committees/4 |
|
committees/5 |
|
committees/6 |
|
committees/7 |
|
docs/1 |
|
docs/2 |
|
procedure/dossier_of_the_committee/0 |
ENVI/10/00306
|
procedure/dossier_of_the_committee/0 |
ENVI/9/13840
|
committees/0/rapporteur |
|
committees/1 |
|
committees/1 |
|
committees/1/rapporteur |
|
committees/2 |
|
committees/2 |
|
committees/2/opinion |
False
|
committees/3 |
|
committees/3 |
|
committees/3/rapporteur |
|
committees/4 |
|
committees/5 |
|
committees/6 |
|
committees/7 |
|
docs/1 |
|
docs/2 |
|
procedure/dossier_of_the_committee/0 |
ENVI/10/00306
|
procedure/dossier_of_the_committee/0 |
ENVI/9/13840
|
docs/5 |
|
committees/2/opinion |
False
|
docs/3 |
|
docs/4 |
|
committees/2/opinion |
False
|
docs/3 |
|
committees/2/opinion |
False
|
docs/3 |
|
committees/2/opinion |
False
|
docs/3 |
|
committees/2/opinion |
False
|
docs/3 |
|
committees/2/opinion |
False
|
docs/3 |
|
committees/2/opinion |
False
|
docs/3 |
|
committees/2/opinion |
False
|
docs/3 |
|
committees/0/rapporteur |
|
docs/2 |
|
committees |
|
events/1 |
|
procedure/dossier_of_the_committee |
|
procedure/stage_reached |
Old
Preparatory phase in ParliamentNew
Awaiting committee decision |
docs/1 |
|
commission |
|
docs/0 |
|
events/0/summary |
|