Progress: Procedure rejected
Role | Committee | Rapporteur | Shadows |
---|---|---|---|
Lead | LIBE | ERNST Cornelia ( GUE/NGL) | SKYTTEDAL Sara ( EPP), BIELOWSKI Theresa ( S&D), OETJEN Jan-Christoph ( Renew), CARÊME Damien ( Verts/ALE), VANDENDRIESSCHE Tom ( ID), WIŚNIEWSKA Jadwiga ( ECR) |
Committee Opinion | AFET | OETJEN Jan-Christoph ( Renew) | Marisa MATIAS ( GUE/NGL), Christian SAGARTZ ( PPE), Theresa BIELOWSKI ( S&D) |
Lead committee dossier:
Legal Basis:
RoP 114, RoP 54, RoP 57
Legal Basis:
RoP 114, RoP 54, RoP 57Events
The Committee on Civil Liberties, Justice and Home Affairs adopted the own-initiative report by Cornelia ERNST (The Left, DE) on a European Parliament recommendation to the Commission concerning on the ongoing negotiations on a status agreement on operational activities carried out by the European Border and Coast Guard Agency (Frontex) in Senegal.
The committee noted that the official negotiations between the EU and Senegal on the establishment of a status agreement that provides for the deployment of Frontex border management teams in Senegal have not yet started. While acknowledging the ongoing exchange with Senegalese authorities, Members noted that the Senegalese Government is reluctant to sign the status agreement.
While acknowledging the efforts by the Senegalese Government to uphold or improve human rights, Members expressed concern about the increasing reports of human rights violations, specifically those concerning the use of force or abuse of migrants during border control checks and the increased criminalisation of civil society. They condemned the repeated pushbacks of migrants and refugees from the Mauritanian and Mali borders to Senegal. They reiterated that Frontex should not take part in any form of pushbacks.
The committee considered that the possible conclusion of a status agreement between the EU and Senegal providing for the exercise of executive powers by Frontex in the country would entail a high risk for Frontex of becoming complicit in direct and indirect violations of fundamental rights or international protection obligations.
Moreover, Members considered that the provisions in the model status agreement must be improved to address these serious concerns, which could lead to severe accountability gaps in the event of fundamental rights violations and should be properly addressed.
Members are of the opinion that any deployment of Frontex personnel to Senegal and the conducting of operational activities with local and regional security forces can only take place where adequate human rights protection can be guaranteed for migrants and asylum seekers throughout the entire process of their application or return. However, the Senegalese Government has expressed its unwillingness to pursue this kind of cooperation. Therefore, Members expressed their reservations regarding the possible conclusion of a status agreement, taking into account the abovementioned concerns.
Members urged the Commission and Frontex to adopt the following measures without further delay, taking into account the fact that Frontex has been increasingly operating in third countries, should negotiations for a status agreement between Frontex and Senegal be opened:
The European Commission is recommended to:
- ensure that Frontex staff who are granted immunity for their activities in Senegal must continue to be held accountable under EU or Member State laws in order to guarantee legal certainty;
- ensure sufficient and accessible internal and external mechanisms for non-EU individuals to submit complaints to Frontex;
- ensure safe and legal pathways to the EU for Senegalese nationals and migrants, including refugees living in or transiting Senegal, including by facilitating the granting of Schengen visas;
- ensure that EU development aid policies, as well as any cooperation with third countries on migration and border management, including border surveillance, are implemented with full transparency and under parliamentary scrutiny;
- engage in regular dialogue with local human rights organisations and other NGOs in Senegal that protect and promote the rights of migrants regarding the human rights situation in the country;
- refrain from including specific provisions allowing for the agreement to be provisionally applied before the European Parliament assesses whether to give its consent to it;
- include clear guidelines and mitigating measures on combating corruption in identified areas of cooperation between officers of Frontex and Senegalese authorities and security forces, as well as safeguards to avoid the misuse of EU material support;
- keep the European Parliament fully and regularly informed on all steps of the negotiations process and inform the European Parliament before opening negotiations with third countries on a status agreement.
Frontex is called on to:
- establish a robust, independent, efficient and easily accessible complaint mechanism for non-EU nationals and persons potentially affected by Frontex’s actions on the territory of Senegal in to effectively seek remedy through external bodies, such as the European Ombudsman, the CJEU or a different entity;
- conduct periodical evaluations of joint operations in Senegal, with a focus on fundamental rights. These should be shared with the European Parliament and the Council and made public;
- ensure consistent, regular and transparent reporting on Frontex’s activities in Senegal under any potential status agreement, with a focus on human rights compliance and the human rights context in the country;
- fulfil its responsibility for addressing direct and indirect human rights violations by its staff in Senegal to ensure accountability;
- ensure that any operational plan establishing operations on the territory of Senegal should inter alia: (i) ensure that the FRO permanently deploy a Fundamental Rights Monitor to oversee operations in Senegal and monitor the cooperation in relation to fundamental rights; (ii) include special guidelines for the processing of asylum requests from vulnerable migrants , most notably children, unaccompanied minors, women, LGBTQI+ persons and members of communities that face targeted violence or discriminatory prosecution in their country of origin;
- sign a Memorandum of Understanding with Senegal in order to align complaint mechanisms;
- ensure that national and human rights institutions and civil society organisations have access to all the information deemed necessary for them to scrutinise the impact of the status agreement on migration management in Senegal, as well as any human rights risks and consequences.
Documents
Activities
Votes
A9-0032/2024 – Cornelia Ernst – After § 1 – Am 19 #
A9-0032/2024 – Cornelia Ernst – § 9, point 9.1, point b #
A9-0032/2024 – Cornelia Ernst – § 9, point 9.2, point b/1 #
A9-0032/2024 – Cornelia Ernst – § 10, point 10.2, point a/2 #
A9-0032/2024 – Cornelia Ernst – § 11/3 #
A9-0032/2024 – Cornelia Ernst – Motion for a resolution (text as a whole) #
PT | ES | EE | MT | DK | ?? | SK | LU | NL | SI | CY | RO | HU | HR | LV | FI | LT | BG | IE | AT | BE | SE | EL | IT | CZ | FR | PL | DE | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Total |
18
|
48
|
7
|
5
|
13
|
1
|
12
|
6
|
24
|
7
|
4
|
23
|
14
|
12
|
6
|
13
|
11
|
15
|
12
|
18
|
19
|
21
|
13
|
55
|
21
|
63
|
42
|
85
|
|
S&D |
118
|
Portugal S&DFor (9) |
Spain S&DFor (18)Alicia HOMS GINEL, Clara AGUILERA, César LUENA, Domènec RUIZ DEVESA, Eider GARDIAZABAL RUBIAL, Estrella DURÁ FERRANDIS, Ibán GARCÍA DEL BLANCO, Inma RODRÍGUEZ-PIÑERO, Isabel GARCÍA MUÑOZ, Javi LÓPEZ, Jonás FERNÁNDEZ, Juan Fernando LÓPEZ AGUILAR, Laura BALLARÍN CEREZA, Lina GÁLVEZ, Marcos ROS SEMPERE, Mónica Silvana GONZÁLEZ, Nacho SÁNCHEZ AMOR, Nicolás GONZÁLEZ CASARES
|
2
|
4
|
3
|
1
|
1
|
1
|
Netherlands S&DFor (6) |
1
|
1
|
5
|
4
|
4
|
1
|
2
|
2
|
3
|
5
|
1
|
5
|
1
|
1
|
France S&DAgainst (1) |
Poland S&DFor (6) |
Germany S&DFor (12)Against (1) |
||
Renew |
89
|
Spain RenewFor (6)Against (1) |
3
|
Denmark RenewAbstain (1) |
4
|
2
|
Netherlands Renew |
2
|
Romania Renew |
2
|
1
|
1
|
3
|
1
|
3
|
2
|
1
|
4
|
3
|
1
|
4
|
Czechia RenewFor (2)Abstain (3) |
France RenewFor (18)Bernard GUETTA, Catherine AMALRIC, Catherine CHABAUD, Christophe GRUDLER, Dominique RIQUET, Fabienne KELLER, Gilles BOYER, Ilana CICUREL, Jérémy DECERLE, Laurence FARRENG, Marie-Pierre VEDRENNE, Nathalie LOISEAU, Pascal CANFIN, Pierre KARLESKIND, Salima YENBOU, Sandro GOZI, Sylvie BRUNET, Valérie HAYER
|
1
|
Germany RenewAgainst (1) |
||||
NI |
37
|
2
|
2
|
1
|
1
|
Hungary NIAgainst (8) |
2
|
1
|
1
|
1
|
Greece NIAgainst (3)Abstain (1) |
Italy NIFor (7) |
1
|
3
|
3
|
||||||||||||||
The Left |
29
|
2
|
Spain The LeftAgainst (4) |
1
|
1
|
2
|
1
|
3
|
1
|
1
|
2
|
1
|
France The LeftFor (1)Against (5) |
4
|
|||||||||||||||
ID |
45
|
1
|
1
|
3
|
3
|
Italy IDAgainst (17) |
1
|
France IDAgainst (11) |
Germany IDAgainst (8) |
||||||||||||||||||||
ECR |
56
|
Spain ECR |
1
|
3
|
1
|
1
|
1
|
2
|
1
|
2
|
3
|
3
|
Italy ECRAgainst (6) |
4
|
1
|
Poland ECRAgainst (21)
Adam BIELAN,
Andżelika Anna MOŻDŻANOWSKA,
Anna ZALEWSKA,
Beata KEMPA,
Beata MAZUREK,
Bogdan RZOŃCA,
Dominik TARCZYŃSKI,
Elżbieta KRUK,
Elżbieta RAFALSKA,
Grzegorz TOBISZOWSKI,
Izabela-Helena KLOC,
Jacek SARYUSZ-WOLSKI,
Jadwiga WIŚNIEWSKA,
Joanna KOPCIŃSKA,
Kosma ZŁOTOWSKI,
Krzysztof JURGIEL,
Patryk JAKI,
Rafał ROMANOWSKI,
Ryszard Antoni LEGUTKO,
Witold Jan WASZCZYKOWSKI,
Zdzisław KRASNODĘBSKI
Abstain (1) |
1
|
||||||||||||
Verts/ALE |
67
|
1
|
3
|
2
|
1
|
2
|
2
|
2
|
2
|
3
|
3
|
3
|
1
|
3
|
3
|
France Verts/ALEAgainst (11) |
1
|
Germany Verts/ALEFor (1)Against (22)
Alexandra GEESE,
Anna CAVAZZINI,
Anna DEPARNAY-GRUNENBERG,
Damian BOESELAGER,
Daniel FREUND,
Erik MARQUARDT,
Hannah NEUMANN,
Henrike HAHN,
Jutta PAULUS,
Katrin LANGENSIEPEN,
Malte GALLÉE,
Martin HÄUSLING,
Michael BLOSS,
Nico SEMSROTT,
Patrick BREYER,
Pierrette HERZBERGER-FOFANA,
Rasmus ANDRESEN,
Romeo FRANZ,
Sergey LAGODINSKY,
Ska KELLER,
Terry REINTKE,
Viola VON CRAMON-TAUBADEL
Abstain (1) |
|||||||||||
PPE |
147
|
Portugal PPE |
1
|
1
|
1
|
4
|
2
|
Netherlands PPEAgainst (5)Abstain (1) |
4
|
1
|
Romania PPEAgainst (11) |
4
|
2
|
3
|
4
|
Bulgaria PPEAgainst (7) |
5
|
Austria PPEFor (1)Against (5) |
3
|
Sweden PPEAgainst (6) |
Greece PPEAgainst (4) |
Italy PPEAgainst (6) |
Czechia PPEAgainst (4)Abstain (1) |
France PPEAgainst (7) |
12
|
Germany PPEAgainst (26)
Andreas SCHWAB,
Angelika NIEBLER,
Axel VOSS,
Christian DOLESCHAL,
Christine SCHNEIDER,
Daniel CASPARY,
David MCALLISTER,
Dennis RADTKE,
Hildegard BENTELE,
Jens GIESEKE,
Karolin BRAUNSBERGER-REINHOLD,
Manfred WEBER,
Marion WALSMANN,
Markus FERBER,
Markus PIEPER,
Marlene MORTLER,
Monika HOHLMEIER,
Niclas HERBST,
Niels GEUKING,
Norbert LINS,
Peter JAHR,
Peter LIESE,
Rainer WIELAND,
Ralf SEEKATZ,
Sabine VERHEYEN,
Sven SIMON
|
Amendments | Dossier |
75 |
2023/2086(INI)
2023/07/07
AFET
75 amendments...
Amendment 1 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 1 1.
Amendment 10 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 1 a (new) 1a. Opposes the policy of externalising EU borders, points out that on the "West Euro-African" border between 2018 and 2022, 7 865 people from 31 different countries, including 1 273 women and 383 children, would have died trying to reach the Spanish coasts of the Canary Islands in wooden canoes and dented rubber dinghies – an average of 6 victims every day and that it is one of the most dangerous migratory routes and deadliest in the world, is indignant at the fact that Frontex is participating, with military means, in the construction of walls in Senegal, by moving the European border towards the Senegalese coast;
Amendment 11 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 1 a (new) 1a. Calls for the inclusion of an adequate human rights monitoring mechanism of Frontex activities in all Frontex missions in third countries and clear commitments to transparency and information sharing of Frontex activities in Senegal;
Amendment 12 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 2 Amendment 13 #
2. Calls on the Commission
Amendment 14 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 2 2. Calls on the Commission
Amendment 15 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 2 2. Calls on the Commission
Amendment 16 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 2 2. Calls on the Commission
Amendment 17 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 2 2. Calls on the Commission and the Fundamental Rights Officer to conduct an independent assessment of the
Amendment 18 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 2 2. Calls on the Commission and the Fundamental Rights Officer to conduct a
Amendment 19 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 2 a (new) 2a. Welcomes that, under popular pressure, the government of Senegal has refused to sign the agreement; takes note of the fact that the negotiations are still ongoing; supports the social movement, civil society and the Senegalese trade union and political forces in their refusal of the programmes for border police training and the Frontex agreement;
Amendment 2 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 1 1.
Amendment 20 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 3 3.
Amendment 21 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 3 3.
Amendment 22 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 3 3. Maintains that the launch of Frontex operational activities under a status agreement should
Amendment 23 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 3 3. Maintains that the launch of Frontex operational activities under a status agreement sh
Amendment 24 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 3 3. Maintains that the launch of Frontex operational activities under a status agreement should promote fundamental human rights and EU values; considers that any status agreement leading to Frontex operations in third countries should integrate this aspect into their mission;
Amendment 25 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 3 3. Maintains that the launch of Frontex operational activities under a status
Amendment 26 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 3 3. Maintains that the launch of Frontex operational activities under a status agreement should promote
Amendment 27 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 4 4.
Amendment 28 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 4 4. Considers that
Amendment 29 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 4 4. Considers that Frontex staff who are granted immunity for their activities in Senegal
Amendment 3 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 1 1.
Amendment 30 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 4 4. Considers that deployed Frontex staff
Amendment 31 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 4 4. Considers that
Amendment 32 #
5. Calls for
Amendment 33 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 5 5. Calls for clear guidelines
Amendment 34 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 5 5. Calls for clear guidelines and training to be provided to Frontex staff deployed in Senegal including the establishment of a better understanding of and sensibility for the regional human rights situation and the legal framework in which they operate, which includes international human rights and humanitarian laws and standards;
Amendment 35 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 5 5. Calls for clear guidelines and human rights training to be provided to Frontex staff deployed in Senegal;
Amendment 36 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 5 5. Calls for clear fundamental rights guidelines and training to be provided to Frontex staff deployed in Senegal;
Amendment 37 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 5 a (new) 5a. Calls on the EU to assist Senegalese authorities to strengthen their capacity for training and education of Senegalese civil servants charged with processing asylum applications and complaints of asylum seekers;
Amendment 38 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 6 Amendment 39 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 6 6. Calls for consistent, regular and transparent reporting on Frontex activities
Amendment 4 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 1 1.
Amendment 40 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 6 6. Calls for consistent, regular and transparent reporting on Frontex activities concerning migration and asylum in
Amendment 41 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 6 a (new) 6a. Considers that national and human rights institutions must have access to all information deemed necessary to scrutinise the impact of this status agreement on migration management in Senegal and to scrutinise the proceedings of Senegalese security forces in conducting migration management and its human rights risks and consequences;
Amendment 42 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 7 7.
Amendment 43 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 7 7. Notes the efforts made by Senegalese authorities in receiving and processing migrants and refugees in the region; calls for the
Amendment 44 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 7 7. Notes the efforts made by Senegalese authorities in receiving and processing migrants and refugees in the region; highlights the repeated occurrences of pushbacks of migrants and refugees from Mauritanian and Malian borders to Senegal; calls for the EU to continue to support Senegal in providing adequate protection for migrants and refugees in transit and to assist in capacity building;
Amendment 45 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 7 a (new) 7a. Highlights and condemns the repeated occurrences of pushbacks of migrants and refugees by Mauritanian and Malian security forces from Mauritanian and Malian borders to Senegal; reiterates and underlines that Frontex should not take part in any form of pushbacks; maintains that the allegations of Frontex involvement in pushbacks have not yet been processed and that a clarification is essential in order to envisage to externalise Frontex operations;
Amendment 46 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 7 a (new) 7a. Calls on the Commission and Frontex to establish mechanisms for persons potentially affected by the Agency’s action on the territory of the third country to effectively seek remedy through external bodies, such as the Court of Justice of the European Union and the Ombudsman;
Amendment 47 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 8 8.
Amendment 48 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 8 8. Calls for the establishment of a
Amendment 49 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 8 8. Calls for the establishment of a robust complaint mechanism that is independent and publicly accessible and for an incident reporting mechanism for Frontex activities;
Amendment 5 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 1 1. Supports the ongoing negotiations between the EU and Senegal on the establishment of a status agreement that provides for Frontex deployment in Senegal
Amendment 50 #
8. Calls for the establishment of a robust complaint mechanism that is publicly and easily accessible and for an incident reporting mechanism for Frontex activities as well as independent control of Frontex activities;
Amendment 51 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 8 8. Calls for the establishment of a robust complaint mechanism that is publicly accessible and for an incident reporting mechanism for Frontex activities; considers that this incident reporting mechanism should guarantee the anonymity and confidentiality of individuals reporting on Frontex activities, that infringe on international humanitarian law or violate human rights;
Amendment 52 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 9 Amendment 53 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 9 9. Calls for the
Amendment 54 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 9 9. Calls for the EU and Senegalese authorities to enable
Amendment 55 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 9 9. Calls for the EU and Senegalese authorities to enable inclusive dialogue in the preparation of the status agreement; stresses in this context the importance of working with human rights organisations and NGOs to get a full picture of the human rights situation in the country;
Amendment 56 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 9 9. Calls for the EU and Senegalese authorities to enable inclusive
Amendment 57 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 9 a (new) 9a. Is of the opinion that any Frontex deployment of personnel to Senegal and the conduct of operational activities with local and regional security forces can only take place under guarantees of adequate human rights protection for migrants and asylum seekers throughout the entire process of their application or return;
Amendment 58 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 10 10. Considers that the EU and Frontex sh
Amendment 59 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 10 10. Considers that the
Amendment 6 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 1 1. Supports the ongoing negotiations between the EU and Senegal on the establishment of a status agreement that provides for Frontex deployment in Senegal;
Amendment 60 #
10. Considers that the EU and Frontex should
Amendment 61 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 10 10. Considers that
Amendment 62 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 10 10.
Amendment 63 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 10 10. Considers that the EU and Frontex should suspend their activities on migration and asylum carried out in cooperation with Senegalese authorities in the event of persistent human rights violations as set out under ICC standards;
Amendment 64 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 10 10. Considers that the EU and Frontex should suspend their activities on migration and asylum carried out in cooperation with Senegalese authorities in the event of persistent violations of human rights violations or international protection obligations that are of a serious nature or are likely to persist, in line with Article 46(4) of Regulation (EU) 2019/1896;
Amendment 65 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 10 a (new) 10a. Condemns the fact that a large part of European development aid is now conditioned on the fight against irregular migration; regrets that the majority of Member States have not achieved the target of devoting 0.7 % of their GNI to official development aid and that some have even lowered their percentage of development aid; insists that the aid provided by the EU and its Member States be carried out in full transparency and under parliamentary scrutiny; firmly opposes any subordination of this aid to migration, security or structural adjustment policies;
Amendment 66 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 10 a (new) 10a. Calls on the Commission to support local civil society organisations that protect and promote the rights of migrants, as well as to fund the civil society monitoring of the cooperation of the Senegalese authorities with Frontex;
Amendment 67 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 11 11. Calls on the Commission to ensure
Amendment 68 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 11 11. Calls on the Commission to ensure that the conclusion of this status agreement with Senegal and the Frontex’s activities in
Amendment 69 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 11 11. Calls on the Commission to ensure
Amendment 7 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 1 1. Supports the ongoing negotiations
Amendment 70 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 11 a (new) 11a. Calls on the EU and its Member States to provide humanitarian visas to those at risk in Senegal;
Amendment 71 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 11 b (new) 11b. Calls on the EU and its Member States to facilitate family reunification of Senegalese families in the EU;
Amendment 72 #
11c. Calls on the EU and its Member States to ensure international protection for Senegalese migrants and refugees in the EU, in accordance with international law;
Amendment 73 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 11 d (new) 11d. Calls on the EU and its Member States to ensure that Senegalese migrants and refugees in their territories are protected, adequately assisted, and allowed to apply for asylum;
Amendment 74 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 11 e (new) 11e. Calls on the EU Member States to support the application of the Temporary Protection Directive for Senegalese seeking international protection;
Amendment 75 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 11 f (new) 11f. Calls on the EU and its Member States to ensure safe and legal pathways for migrants and refugees leaving or in transit across Senegal and seeking a better life in the EU;
Amendment 8 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 1 1. Supports the ongoing negotiations between the EU and Senegal on the establishment of a status agreement that provides for Frontex deployment in Senegal and with the inclusion of a clear human rights clause and guarantees of accountability and reporting of human rights violations by Frontex of all their activities concerning migration and asylum in Senegal; notes however that a status agreement can only be established under the condition that it enshrines and adheres to strict fundamental human rights guarantees;
Amendment 9 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 1 1. Supports the ongoing negotiations between the EU and Senegal on the
source: 751.574
|
History
(these mark the time of scraping, not the official date of the change)
events/4 |
|
procedure/stage_reached |
Old
Awaiting Parliament's voteNew
Procedure rejected |
forecasts |
|
docs/3 |
|
events/3/summary |
|
forecasts/0 |
|
forecasts/0 |
|
docs/3 |
|
events/3/docs |
|
events/3 |
|
procedure/stage_reached |
Old
Awaiting committee decisionNew
Awaiting Parliament's vote |
events/2 |
|
forecasts/0 |
|
forecasts/0/date |
Old
2024-01-29T00:00:00New
2024-01-31T00:00:00 |
forecasts/0/date |
Old
2024-01-22T00:00:00New
2024-01-29T00:00:00 |
commission |
|
docs/2 |
|
docs/1 |
|
forecasts/1 |
|
docs |
|
committees/0/shadows/4 |
|
forecasts |
|
committees |
|
events |
|
procedure/dossier_of_the_committee |
|
procedure/legal_basis |
|
procedure/stage_reached |
Old
Preparatory phase in ParliamentNew
Awaiting committee decision |