Progress: Procedure completed
Role | Committee | Rapporteur | Shadows |
---|---|---|---|
Lead | CONT | FLANAGAN Luke Ming ( GUE/NGL) | MARINESCU Marian-Jean ( EPP), RÓNAI Sándor ( S&D), STRUGARIU Ramona ( Renew), PEKSA Mikuláš ( Verts/ALE), CZARNECKI Ryszard ( ECR), KUHS Joachim ( ID) |
Committee Opinion | JURI | LEBRETON Gilles ( ID) | Ibán GARCÍA DEL BLANCO ( S&D) |
Committee Opinion | LIBE | ZDECHOVSKÝ Tomáš ( EPP) | Ramona STRUGARIU ( RE) |
Lead committee dossier:
Subjects
Events
The European Parliament adopted by 489 votes to 87, with 18 abstentions, to grant the Administrative Director of the European Public Prosecutor’s Office discharge in respect of the implementation of the Office’s budget for the financial year 2022.
Members acknowledged the important role of EPPO as an independent Union body and stressed the particular responsibility that this imposes on it towards the other institutions and the public at large in the areas falling within the remit of the legal system. They also recognise the role it plays in contributing to the protection of the financial interests of the Union and, in particular, the budget of the Union.
In its resolution, adopted by 494 votes to 90 with 21 abstentions, Parliament made the following observations:
Members recognised the role of the European Public Prosecutor's Office in contributing to the protection of the financial interests of the Union and, in particular, of the Union budget, as well as the valuable work carried out by the European Public Prosecutor's Office in investigating, prosecuting crimes against the financial interests of the Union and bringing to judgment the perpetrators of, and accomplices to, criminal offences.
Budgetary and financial management
The overall final budget allocated to the EPPO for 2022 was EUR 51.2 million , reduced from the initial endowment amounting to EUR 57.1 million, and sensibly increased from the EUR 35.4 million allocated in 2021.
Noting that it is only possible to compare the budgetary performance of the EPPO for the period following its financial autonomy, which began in June 2021, Parliament welcomed the satisfactory level of budget implementation of 98.1 % of commitment appropriations (against 97.4 % in 2021) and of 76.6% of payment appropriations (compared to 78.2 % in 2021). Members appreciated that the overall execution rate for payments progressed in 2022 with 76.6 % of paid appropriations completed in the final budget, compared to 71 % in 2021.
Parliament observed that it is difficult to estimate the forecast of expenditure for the caseload related to the Recovery and Resilience Facility (RRF) because of the unprecedented implementation mode and sheer volume of resources.
Members reiterated its call to factor in the impact of the deployment of the RRF in the forecast that the EPPO is to communicate to the Commission in the framework of the budgetary procedure.
Members noted that the EPPO currently has an estimated 170 active investigations in over 7 countries involving RRF cases and that the damages in these active investigations is currently estimated at EUR 530 million. Members noted that the EPPO estimates that the number of new active investigations involving recovery and resilience funds will increase as more countries become the recipients of RRF funds. The EPPO is encouraged to plan their budget and capacities accordingly.
The Commission is called on to review the EPPO budgetary framework in close cooperation with the EPPO to find adequate ways to support it in its work.
Performance
Parliament observed the increase in crime reports submitted to the EPPO (3 318 in 2022 compared to 2 832 in 2021) and, as a result, the increase in open investigations (865 in 2022 with estimated damages amounting to EUR 9.9 billion, compared to 576 in 2021 with estimated damages amounting to EUR 5.4 billion). Members noted the number of closed cases (251 in 2022 compared to 57 in 2021) and the number of indictments (87 in 2022 compared to 5 in 2021) together with the freezing orders obtained by the EPPO amounted to EUR 359.1 million in 2022 alone (compared to EUR 516 million requested). In 2022, 20 cases were concluded in Court, and it is important that the EPPO reports systematically on the follow-up to these cases in terms of the financial measures adopted (confiscation and/or recovery) to provide a clearer understanding of the impact of the EPPO’s actions.
Human resources
Members noted that there was upward trend in the number of staff, increasing from 58 in 2020, to 122 in 2021, to 217 by the end 2022. More legal experts are needed to handle the large number of investigations. Members asked for further capacities to be fulfilled especially considering the backlog and additional RRF-related cases and far-reaching VAT fraud.
At the end of 2022, geographical and gender balance is adequately pursued overall across the 217 members of staff (with 122 men and 95 women). The EPPO having been rendered less attractive than the four other Union institutions operating from Luxembourg, Members highlighted the need for the EPPO to offer attractive salaries to contract and temporary agents, that are competitive with what is on offer in the private sector, including legal services and IT services, in order to attract the best and brightest talent with international experience.
Ethical framework and transparency
Specific rules on conflicts of interest have been established for members of the College of the European Public Prosecutor, Deputy European Public Prosecutors and staff of the operational unit. The EPPO is encouraged to adopt a policy on revolving doors. The resolution emphasised that a whistleblowing and anti-retaliation policy should be formalised as soon as possible to ensure a safe and protected workplace.
Interinstitutional cooperation
Members praised the efforts deployed by the EPPO to engage in intensive cooperation and coordination with partners and stakeholders. They called on the EPPO and OLAF to further progress their dialogue to strengthen their cooperation in consideration of the benefits that would stem from it in terms of sound use of the available resources.
Communication
Parliament praised the EPPO’s efforts to enhance internal and external communication and appreciated the intensive actions carried out via social network platforms.
Effect of Russia’s war of aggression against Ukraine
Russia’s war of aggression against Ukraine impacted the EPPO’s general budget implementation, (resulting in a 6.9% indexation in staff remuneration and a general increase of prices in the acquisition of goods and services).
Parliament called on the authorities concerned to adopt a new agreement in mutual assistance in criminal matters between the Union and Ukraine to further strengthen cooperation in the specific context of the Ukraine Facility mechanism, in particular for the seizure, confiscation and recovery of assets.
Lastly, taking note of the high rate of corruption and fraud present in Ukraine, both before the current war and at present, Members caution that extra precautions should be taken when cooperating on investigations, in order to protect staff and witnesses.
The Committee on Budgetary Control adopted the report by Luke Ming FLANAGAN (The Left, IE) on discharge in respect of the implementation of the budget of the European Public Prosecutor’s Office for the financial year 2022.
The committee called on the European Parliament to grant the Administrative Director of the European Public Prosecutor’s Office discharge in respect of the implementation of the Office’s budget for the financial year 2022.
Members acknowledged the important role of EPPO as an independent Union body and stressed the particular responsibility that this imposes on it towards the other institutions and the public at large in the areas falling within the remit of the legal system. They also recognise the role it plays in contributing to the protection of the financial interests of the Union and, in particular, the budget of the Union.
Budgetary and financial management
The overall final budget allocated to the EPPO for 2022 was EUR 51.2 million, reduced from the initial endowment amounting to EUR 57.1 million, and sensibly increased from the EUR 35.4 million allocated in 2021.
Noting that it is only possible to compare the budgetary performance of the EPPO for the period following its financial autonomy, which began in June 2021, the report welcomed the satisfactory level of budget implementation of 98.1 % of commitment appropriations (against 97.4 % in 2021) and of 76.6% of payment appropriations (compared to 78.2 % in 2021). Members appreciated that the overall execution rate for payments progressed in 2022 with 76.6 % of paid appropriations completed in the final budget, compared to 71 % in 2021.
Following the achievement of its financial autonomy, in June 2021, the EPPO has prioritised the operational expenditure related to investigation, prosecution and security measures, limiting non-operational expenditure to essential compliance requirements and basic level support services.
The Commission is called on to review the EPPO budgetary framework in close cooperation with the EPPO to find adequate ways to support it in its work, with the knowledge that in the context of a growing number of complex cases, additional resources will be needed.
Performance
The report observed the increase in crime reports submitted to the EPPO (3 318 in 2022 compared to 2 832 in 2021) and, as a result, the increase in open investigations (865 in 2022 with estimated damages amounting to EUR 9.9 billion, compared to 576 in 2021 with estimated damages amounting to EUR 5.4 billion). Members noted the number of closed cases (251 in 2022 compared to 57 in 2021) and the number of indictments (87 in 2022 compared to 5 in 2021) together with the freezing orders obtained by the EPPO amounted to EUR 359.1 million in 2022 alone (compared to EUR 516 million requested). In 2022, 20 cases were concluded in Court, and it is important that the EPPO reports systematically on the follow-up to these cases in terms of the financial measures adopted (confiscation and/or recovery) to provide a clearer understanding of the impact of the EPPO’s actions.
Human resources
Members observed the upward trend in the number of staff, increasing from 58 in 2020, to 122 in 2021, to 217 by the end 2022. The EPPO expressed the dire need for more legal experts to handle the large number of investigations (over 1117 active investigations according to 2022 statistics). According to the report, the EPPO has been rendered less attractive than the four other Union institutions operating from Luxembourg, as it cannot offer a path towards becoming a Union Official.
Ethical framework and transparency
The EPPO is encouraged to adopt a policy on revolving doors. The report emphasises that a whistleblowing and anti-retaliation policy should be formalised as soon as possible to ensure a safe and protected workplace.
Interinstitutional cooperation
Members praised the efforts deployed by the EPPO to engage in intensive cooperation and coordination with partners and stakeholders. They called on the EPPO and OLAF to further progress their dialogue to strengthen their cooperation in consideration of the benefits that would stem from it in terms of sound use of the available resources.
Communication
The report praised the EPPO’s efforts to enhance internal and external communication and appreciated the intensive actions carried out via social network platforms.
Effect of Russia’s war of aggression against Ukraine
Russia’s war of aggression against Ukraine impacted the EPPO’s general budget implementation, (resulting in a 6.9% indexation in staff remuneration and a general increase of prices in the acquisition of goods and services).
The report called on the authorities concerned to adopt a new agreement in mutual assistance in criminal matters between the Union and Ukraine to further strengthen cooperation in the specific context of the Ukraine Facility mechanism, in particular for the seizure, confiscation and recovery of assets.
Lastly, taking note of the high rate of corruption and fraud present in Ukraine, both before the current war and at present, Members caution that extra precautions should be taken when cooperating on investigations, in order to protect staff and witnesses.
Documents
- Results of vote in Parliament: Results of vote in Parliament
- Decision by Parliament: T9-0237/2024
- Debate in Parliament: Debate in Parliament
- Committee report tabled for plenary: A9-0117/2024
- Supplementary non-legislative basic document: 06179/2024
- Amendments tabled in committee: PE758.206
- Committee opinion: PE756.206
- Committee draft report: PE753.489
- Committee opinion: PE753.633
- Court of Auditors: opinion, report: OJ C 000 27.10.2023, p. 0000
- Court of Auditors: opinion, report: N9-0096/2023
- Non-legislative basic document: COM(2023)0391
- Non-legislative basic document: EUR-Lex
- Non-legislative basic document published: COM(2023)0391
- Non-legislative basic document published: EUR-Lex
- Non-legislative basic document: COM(2023)0391 EUR-Lex
- Court of Auditors: opinion, report: OJ C 000 27.10.2023, p. 0000 N9-0096/2023
- Committee opinion: PE753.633
- Committee draft report: PE753.489
- Committee opinion: PE756.206
- Amendments tabled in committee: PE758.206
- Supplementary non-legislative basic document: 06179/2024
Votes
A9-0117/2024 – Luke Ming Flanagan – Proposal for a decision #
A9-0117/2024 – Luke Ming Flanagan – After § 29 – Am 2 #
A9-0117/2024 – Luke Ming Flanagan – After recital K – Am 1 #
IT | HU | FR | PL | SK | CZ | CY | BE | SE | LU | HR | MT | LV | SI | EE | IE | LT | EL | FI | DK | BG | PT | NL | AT | RO | ES | DE | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Total |
61
|
16
|
66
|
47
|
14
|
20
|
3
|
20
|
21
|
6
|
5
|
4
|
7
|
7
|
7
|
12
|
9
|
12
|
11
|
13
|
13
|
17
|
26
|
18
|
20
|
53
|
83
|
|
ECR |
60
|
Italy ECRFor (7) |
1
|
Poland ECRFor (23)Adam BIELAN, Andżelika Anna MOŻDŻANOWSKA, Anna FOTYGA, Anna ZALEWSKA, Beata KEMPA, Beata MAZUREK, Beata SZYDŁO, Bogdan RZOŃCA, Dominik TARCZYŃSKI, Elżbieta KRUK, Elżbieta RAFALSKA, Grzegorz TOBISZOWSKI, Izabela-Helena KLOC, Jacek SARYUSZ-WOLSKI, Joachim Stanisław BRUDZIŃSKI, Joanna KOPCIŃSKA, Karol KARSKI, Kosma ZŁOTOWSKI, Krzysztof JURGIEL, Rafał ROMANOWSKI, Ryszard CZARNECKI, Tomasz Piotr PORĘBA, Witold Jan WASZCZYKOWSKI
|
1
|
4
|
3
|
3
|
1
|
1
|
1
|
1
|
2
|
2
|
Netherlands ECR |
Spain ECR |
1
|
|||||||||||
ID |
49
|
Italy IDFor (17)Against (1) |
1
|
3
|
1
|
1
|
2
|
Germany IDFor (8) |
||||||||||||||||||||
The Left |
29
|
France The LeftFor (6) |
1
|
1
|
1
|
1
|
4
|
1
|
2
|
1
|
Spain The LeftFor (6) |
Germany The Left |
||||||||||||||||
NI |
35
|
Italy NIFor (1)Against (6)Abstain (2) |
Hungary NIFor (10) |
4
|
1
|
Greece NIFor (1)Against (2)Abstain (1) |
1
|
1
|
3
|
2
|
||||||||||||||||||
Verts/ALE |
64
|
3
|
France Verts/ALEFor (10)Against (1) |
1
|
3
|
3
|
3
|
1
|
1
|
2
|
1
|
2
|
2
|
1
|
2
|
3
|
3
|
Germany Verts/ALEFor (2)Against (20)
Anna CAVAZZINI,
Damian BOESELAGER,
Daniel FREUND,
Erik MARQUARDT,
Hannah NEUMANN,
Henrike HAHN,
Jan OVELGÖNNE,
Katrin LANGENSIEPEN,
Manuela RIPA,
Michael BLOSS,
Nico SEMSROTT,
Niklas NIENASS,
Patrick BREYER,
Pierrette HERZBERGER-FOFANA,
Rasmus ANDRESEN,
Reinhard BÜTIKOFER,
Romeo FRANZ,
Sergey LAGODINSKY,
Ska KELLER,
Terry REINTKE
|
||||||||||
Renew |
93
|
3
|
2
|
France RenewAgainst (21)
Bernard GUETTA,
Catherine AMALRIC,
Catherine CHABAUD,
Christophe GRUDLER,
Dominique RIQUET,
Fabienne KELLER,
Gilles BOYER,
Guy LAVOCAT,
Ilana CICUREL,
Irène TOLLERET,
Jérémy DECERLE,
Laurence FARRENG,
Marie-Pierre VEDRENNE,
Max ORVILLE,
Nathalie LOISEAU,
Pierre KARLESKIND,
Salima YENBOU,
Sandro GOZI,
Stéphane BIJOUX,
Stéphanie YON-COURTIN,
Valérie HAYER
|
1
|
4
|
Czechia RenewAgainst (1) |
4
|
3
|
2
|
1
|
2
|
3
|
2
|
1
|
1
|
2
|
Denmark RenewAgainst (6) |
3
|
Netherlands RenewAgainst (6) |
1
|
Romania RenewAgainst (5) |
Germany RenewFor (7) |
|||||
S&D |
118
|
Italy S&DFor (1)Against (3) |
3
|
France S&DFor (1)Against (4) |
Poland S&DAgainst (6)Abstain (1) |
1
|
1
|
1
|
2
|
5
|
1
|
3
|
3
|
1
|
1
|
2
|
2
|
1
|
2
|
2
|
2
|
Portugal S&DFor (1)Against (7) |
Netherlands S&DAgainst (6) |
Austria S&DAgainst (5) |
Romania S&DFor (1)Against (3)Abstain (4) |
Spain S&DAgainst (18)
Alicia HOMS GINEL,
Clara AGUILERA,
Cristina MAESTRE,
César LUENA,
Domènec RUIZ DEVESA,
Eider GARDIAZABAL RUBIAL,
Ibán GARCÍA DEL BLANCO,
Inma RODRÍGUEZ-PIÑERO,
Iratxe GARCÍA PÉREZ,
Isabel GARCÍA MUÑOZ,
Javi LÓPEZ,
Javier MORENO SÁNCHEZ,
Jonás FERNÁNDEZ,
Laura BALLARÍN CEREZA,
Lina GÁLVEZ,
Marcos ROS SEMPERE,
Nacho SÁNCHEZ AMOR,
Nicolás GONZÁLEZ CASARES
Abstain (1) |
Germany S&DAgainst (14) |
|
PPE |
143
|
Italy PPEAgainst (8) |
1
|
France PPEFor (1)Against (6) |
Slovakia PPEFor (1)Against (2)Abstain (1) |
Czechia PPEAgainst (5) |
1
|
4
|
Sweden PPEAgainst (6) |
2
|
1
|
1
|
3
|
4
|
1
|
5
|
3
|
Greece PPEAgainst (4) |
3
|
1
|
Bulgaria PPEAgainst (6) |
Portugal PPEAgainst (6) |
Netherlands PPEAgainst (5) |
Austria PPEAgainst (7) |
Romania PPEAgainst (6) |
Germany PPEAgainst (24)
Andreas SCHWAB,
Angelika NIEBLER,
Axel VOSS,
Christian DOLESCHAL,
Christine SCHNEIDER,
Daniel CASPARY,
David MCALLISTER,
Hildegard BENTELE,
Jens GIESEKE,
Karolin BRAUNSBERGER-REINHOLD,
Lena DÜPONT,
Manfred WEBER,
Marion WALSMANN,
Marlene MORTLER,
Michael GAHLER,
Niclas HERBST,
Niels GEUKING,
Norbert LINS,
Peter JAHR,
Peter LIESE,
Rainer WIELAND,
Ralf SEEKATZ,
Sabine VERHEYEN,
Stefan BERGER
|
A9-0117/2024 – Luke Ming Flanagan – Motion for a resolution (as a whole) #
Amendments | Dossier |
15 |
2023/2139(DEC)
2023/11/09
JURI
7 amendments...
Amendment 1 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 1 1. Encourages the services of the European Public Prosecutor and the European Delegated Prosecutors to continue their work in a coordinated fashion
Amendment 2 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 2 Amendment 3 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 2 2. Regrets the
Amendment 4 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 3 a (new) 3 a. Recalls EP's strong support for the establishment of the European Public Prosecutor Office (EPPO); acknowledges the important roleof EPPO as an independent European Union body in investigating, prosecuting and bringing to judgment crimes affecting the financial interests of the Union;highlights that since starting its operations on 1 June 2021, EPPO has registered more than 4000 crime reports from participating EU Member States and private parties and over 929 investigations have been opened (as of June 2022);
Amendment 5 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 4 4. Points out that it was set up recently, but nonetheless invites it, in the official relations it is called upon to develop with national and European institutions, to gain an insight into the various procedures they implement and to comply with them
Amendment 6 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 4 a (new) 4a. Considers it regrettable that for a year the European Public Prosecutor has not provided any communication on the progress of her investigation into the procurement of COVID-19 vaccines in the European Union given ‘the extremely high public interest’: requests made to the institutions and replies received; number of testimonies collected; searches carried out or exchanges with national authorities;
Amendment 7 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 4 a (new) 4 a. Stresses the need for the creation of an EU Green Prosecutor through the extension of the EPPO’s mandate in accordance with Article 86(4) of the TFEU in order to improve the implementation and enforcement of EU environmental legislation, combat serious environmental crimes with a cross-border dimension and protect the EU budget;
source: 756.077
2023/12/05
LIBE
8 amendments...
Amendment 1 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 2 a (new) 2 a. Welcomes that in 2022 the EPPO confirmed an ongoing investigation into the acquisition of COVID-19 vaccines in the EU and, due to the extremly high public interest on the case, calls for the proper resources and staff to be alocated by EPPO to finalize this case as soon as possible;1a _________________ 1a https://www.eppo.europa.eu/en/news/ongo ing-eppo-investigation-acquisition-covid- 19-vaccines-eu
Amendment 2 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 3 a (new) 3 a. Welcomes that EPPO was granted additional human resources with highly specialised and qualified profiles, including, for the first time in 2022, Seconded National Experts; notes that 34 selection procedures for statutory staff were launched and completed, as well as three selection procedures for Seconded National Experts; welcomes the total number of statutory staff members and SNEs reaching 221, which translates to an occupancy rate of 89% of the Establishment Plan;
Amendment 3 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 4 4. Is concerned about the high-risk environment in physical an information security in which EPPO operates and about the current level of recourses; stresses the importance to adapt human and financial resources to the growing workload and to
Amendment 4 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 4 a (new) 4 a. Calls for the expansion of EPPO's mandate within the area of EU imposed sanctions on Russia in order to stop EU companies and oligarchs from circumventing EU sanctions;
Amendment 5 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 5 5. Recalls that EPPO is an independent body of the EU, established through the concept of enhanced cooperation in criminal matters responsible for investigating, prosecuting and bringing to judgment crimes against the financial interests of the Union; notes that 22 different EU Member States participate in EPPO
Amendment 6 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 6 6. Highlights that effective cooperation with relevant stakeholders; welcomes the conclusion of several working arrangements with authorities from third countries notably the Ukraine, Albania, Moldova, Montenegro, Georgia and North Macedonia and considers that including non-participating states authorities is pivotal;
Amendment 7 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 6 6. Highlights that effective cooperation with relevant stakeholders including non-participating states authorities is pivotal; welcomes finalisation of the negotiations on a working arrangement at the technical level with the Danish and Polish authorities;
Amendment 8 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 7 7. Notes that the appointment of European delegated prosecutors
source: 757.007
|
History
(these mark the time of scraping, not the official date of the change)
events/7 |
|
procedure/stage_reached |
Old
Procedure completed, awaiting publication in Official JournalNew
Procedure completed |
events/5 |
|
procedure/Other legal basis |
Old
Rules of Procedure EP 159New
Rules of Procedure EP 165 |
events/5 |
|
procedure/Other legal basis |
Old
Rules of Procedure EP 159New
Rules of Procedure EP 165 |
events/5 |
|
procedure/Other legal basis |
Old
Rules of Procedure EP 159New
Rules of Procedure EP 165 |
events/5 |
|
procedure/Other legal basis |
Old
Rules of Procedure EP 159New
Rules of Procedure EP 165 |
events/5 |
|
procedure/Other legal basis |
Old
Rules of Procedure EP 159New
Rules of Procedure EP 165 |
events/5 |
|
procedure/Other legal basis |
Old
Rules of Procedure EP 159New
Rules of Procedure EP 165 |
docs/7 |
|
events/5/summary |
|
docs/7 |
|
events/5/summary |
|
docs/7 |
|
events/5/summary |
|
docs/7 |
|
events/5/summary |
|
docs/7 |
|
events/5/summary |
|
docs/7 |
|
events/5/summary |
|
docs/7 |
|
events/5/summary |
|
docs/7 |
|
events/5/summary |
|
docs/7 |
|
events/5/summary |
|
docs/7 |
|
docs/7 |
|
events/3/summary |
|
events/4 |
|
events/5 |
|
forecasts |
|
procedure/stage_reached |
Old
Awaiting Parliament's voteNew
Procedure completed, awaiting publication in Official Journal |
docs/7 |
|
docs/7 |
|
events/3/summary |
|
events/4 |
|
events/5 |
|
forecasts |
|
procedure/stage_reached |
Old
Awaiting Parliament's voteNew
Procedure completed, awaiting publication in Official Journal |
docs/7 |
|
events/3/summary |
|
events/4 |
|
forecasts |
|
docs/7 |
|
events/3/summary |
|
events/4 |
|
forecasts |
|
docs/7 |
|
events/3/summary |
|
events/4 |
|
forecasts/0 |
|
forecasts/0 |
|
docs/7 |
|
events/3/summary |
|
docs/7 |
|
events/3/summary |
|
docs/7 |
|
events/3/summary |
|
docs/7 |
|
events/3/summary |
|
docs/7 |
|
events/3/summary |
|
docs/7 |
|
events/3/summary |
|
docs/7 |
|
events/3/docs |
|
docs/7 |
|
events/3/docs |
|
docs/6 |
|
events/3 |
|
procedure/stage_reached |
Old
Awaiting committee decisionNew
Awaiting Parliament's vote |
events/2 |
|
forecasts/0 |
|
forecasts/0 |
|
procedure/Other legal basis |
Rules of Procedure EP 159
|
docs/5 |
|
docs/4/date |
Old
2024-01-23T00:00:00New
2024-01-25T00:00:00 |
docs/4 |
|
docs/3 |
|
docs/1 |
|
docs/2 |
|
committees/2/rapporteur |
|
commission |
|
committees/1/rapporteur |
|
events/1 |
|
procedure/dossier_of_the_committee |
|
procedure/stage_reached |
Old
Preparatory phase in ParliamentNew
Awaiting committee decision |
committees/0/shadows/5 |
|
committees/0 |
|
committees/0 |
|
forecasts |
|