Progress: Procedure completed
Role | Committee | Rapporteur | Shadows |
---|---|---|---|
Lead | CONT | SARVAMAA Petri ( EPP) | RÓNAI Sándor ( S&D), STRUGARIU Ramona ( Renew), EICKHOUT Bas ( Verts/ALE), CZARNECKI Ryszard ( ECR), KUHS Joachim ( ID), OMARJEE Younous ( GUE/NGL) |
Committee Opinion | LIBE | ZDECHOVSKÝ Tomáš ( EPP) | Ramona STRUGARIU ( RE) |
Lead committee dossier:
Subjects
Events
The European Parliament decided to grant discharge to the Executive Director of the European Union Agency for Asylum (before 19.1.2022 the European Asylum Support Office) for the financial year 2022 in respect of the implementation of its budget for the financial year 2022 and to approve the closure of the accounts for that year.
Noting that the Court of Auditors stated that it had obtained reasonable assurance that the Agency’s annual accounts for the financial year 2022 were reliable and that the underlying transactions were legal and regular, Parliament adopted, by 473 votes to 126, with 2 abstentions, a resolution containing a series of recommendations which form an integral part of the discharge decision and which complement the general recommendations contained in the resolution on the performance, financial management and control of EU agencies.
Agency’s financial statements
The final budget of the European Union Agency for Asylum for the financial year 2022 was EUR 186 842 192 , representing an increase of 12.46 % compared to 2021.
Budgetary and financial management
Budget monitoring efforts during the financial year 2022 resulted in a budget implementation rate of current year commitment appropriations of 96.23 %, representing a slight decrease of 0.44 % compared to 2021 (96.67 %). Payment appropriations execution rate was at 89.55 %, representing a decrease of 1.36 % compared to the previous year 2021 (90.91 %). Parliament noted with concern a relatively high cancellation rate (15 %) of funds carried over from 2021 to 2022, thus missing the Agency’s annual target rate of less than 10 %.
In 2022, the Agency conducted a mid-year review of its 2022 budget which determined the Agency to ask the Commission for an additional subsidy of EUR 12 million in commitments and EUR 6 million in payments to address the additional tasks stemming from the humanitarian crisis instigated by the illegal and unprovoked Russian invasion of Ukraine.
There is a lack of clarity and different interpretations regarding the contributions of Schengen associated countries to the Agency’s budget leading to contributions. This issue should be addressed.
Other comments
Parliament also made a series of observations concerning performance and staff policy.
In particular, it noted that:
- the Agency’s performance was measured against 204 annual targets, of which 48 % were exceeded, 26 % achieved, 10 % nearly achieved, 12 % delayed and 4 % not applicable;
- the Agency faced new tasks and multiple challenges due to the Russian illegal invasion of Ukraine. It expanded its operations to six additional Member States, leading to operational plans in a total of 14 Member States;
- on 31 December 2022, the establishment plan was 90 % executed (87 % in 2021), with 333 temporary agents appointed out of 371 temporary agents posts authorised under the Union budget (compared to 366 authorised posts in 2021);
- concern was raised about the internal management and procedures of the Agency given that in 2022 OLAF launched one investigation into the management and staffing policies, allegedly involving nepotism and also an investigation relating to lack of observance of human rights;
- the Agency should continue providing support to Member States and third countries in dealing with asylum and migration applications;
- the budget should be focused on further staff recruitment if needed to help Member States to ensure fair and just examination of the asylum applications for international protection, especially of interpreters and psychologists for applicants that belong to vulnerable groups.
Documents
- Results of vote in Parliament: Results of vote in Parliament
- Decision by Parliament: T9-0268/2024
- Debate in Parliament: Debate in Parliament
- Committee report tabled for plenary, single reading: A9-0106/2024
- Committee report tabled for plenary: A9-0106/2024
- Supplementary non-legislative basic document: 06180/2024
- Amendments tabled in committee: PE757.240
- Committee opinion: PE756.192
- Committee draft report: PE753.532
- Court of Auditors: opinion, report: OJ C 000 27.10.2023, p. 0000
- Court of Auditors: opinion, report: N9-0096/2023
- Non-legislative basic document: COM(2023)0391
- Non-legislative basic document: EUR-Lex
- Non-legislative basic document published: COM(2023)0391
- Non-legislative basic document published: EUR-Lex
- Non-legislative basic document: COM(2023)0391 EUR-Lex
- Court of Auditors: opinion, report: OJ C 000 27.10.2023, p. 0000 N9-0096/2023
- Committee draft report: PE753.532
- Committee opinion: PE756.192
- Amendments tabled in committee: PE757.240
- Supplementary non-legislative basic document: 06180/2024
- Committee report tabled for plenary, single reading: A9-0106/2024
Votes
A9-0106/2024 – Petri Sarvamaa – After § 10 – Am 2 #
PL | IT | CZ | HU | LT | SK | LV | BG | EL | HR | SI | MT | CY | AT | FI | EE | SE | LU | DK | BE | NL | IE | RO | FR | ES | PT | DE | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Total |
48
|
61
|
20
|
17
|
10
|
12
|
7
|
12
|
14
|
5
|
7
|
4
|
3
|
18
|
13
|
7
|
21
|
6
|
13
|
21
|
26
|
12
|
19
|
67
|
53
|
21
|
85
|
|
PPE |
144
|
Poland PPEFor (12)Against (2)Abstain (1) |
Italy PPEFor (7) |
Czechia PPEAbstain (1) |
1
|
4
|
4
|
3
|
Bulgaria PPEFor (2)Abstain (3) |
Greece PPEFor (4) |
1
|
4
|
1
|
1
|
Austria PPEFor (6)Against (1) |
3
|
1
|
Sweden PPEAbstain (1) |
2
|
1
|
Belgium PPEFor (1)Against (2)Abstain (1) |
Netherlands PPEAbstain (1) |
Ireland PPEFor (1)Against (4) |
Romania PPEAgainst (1)Abstain (1) |
France PPEFor (6)Abstain (1) |
Portugal PPEAgainst (7) |
Germany PPEFor (20)Andreas SCHWAB, Angelika NIEBLER, Axel VOSS, Christian DOLESCHAL, Christian EHLER, Christine SCHNEIDER, Daniel CASPARY, David MCALLISTER, Hildegard BENTELE, Karolin BRAUNSBERGER-REINHOLD, Manfred WEBER, Marion WALSMANN, Markus FERBER, Marlene MORTLER, Monika HOHLMEIER, Norbert LINS, Peter JAHR, Peter LIESE, Sabine VERHEYEN, Sven SIMON
Against (3)Abstain (3) |
|
ECR |
62
|
Poland ECRFor (24)Adam BIELAN, Andżelika Anna MOŻDŻANOWSKA, Anna ZALEWSKA, Beata KEMPA, Beata MAZUREK, Beata SZYDŁO, Bogdan RZOŃCA, Dominik TARCZYŃSKI, Elżbieta KRUK, Elżbieta RAFALSKA, Grzegorz TOBISZOWSKI, Izabela-Helena KLOC, Jacek SARYUSZ-WOLSKI, Jadwiga WIŚNIEWSKA, Joachim Stanisław BRUDZIŃSKI, Joanna KOPCIŃSKA, Karol KARSKI, Kosma ZŁOTOWSKI, Krzysztof JURGIEL, Patryk JAKI, Rafał ROMANOWSKI, Ryszard CZARNECKI, Tomasz Piotr PORĘBA, Witold Jan WASZCZYKOWSKI
Abstain (1) |
Italy ECRFor (7) |
4
|
1
|
1
|
1
|
2
|
1
|
1
|
2
|
3
|
3
|
Netherlands ECRFor (4)Against (1) |
1
|
Spain ECR |
1
|
|||||||||||
ID |
50
|
Italy IDFor (19)Aldo PATRICIELLO, Alessandra BASSO, Angelo CIOCCA, Anna BONFRISCO, Annalisa TARDINO, Antonio Maria RINALDI, Danilo Oscar LANCINI, Elena LIZZI, Gianna GANCIA, Isabella TOVAGLIERI, Marco CAMPOMENOSI, Marco ZANNI, Maria Veronica ROSSI, Matteo ADINOLFI, Paola GHIDONI, Paolo BORCHIA, Rosanna CONTE, Susanna CECCARDI, Valentino GRANT
|
1
|
2
|
1
|
1
|
3
|
Germany IDFor (7)Against (1) |
||||||||||||||||||||
NI |
37
|
Italy NIFor (1)Against (8) |
Hungary NIFor (10) |
Slovakia NIFor (2)Against (2) |
1
|
Greece NIFor (1)Against (3)Abstain (1) |
1
|
1
|
1
|
3
|
2
|
|||||||||||||||||
The Left |
32
|
1
|
1
|
1
|
1
|
1
|
1
|
1
|
1
|
4
|
France The LeftAgainst (5) |
Spain The LeftFor (2) |
4
|
Germany The LeftAgainst (5) |
||||||||||||||
Verts/ALE |
65
|
1
|
3
|
3
|
2
|
1
|
3
|
3
|
3
|
1
|
2
|
3
|
2
|
1
|
France Verts/ALEAgainst (11) |
3
|
1
|
Germany Verts/ALEAgainst (22)
Anna CAVAZZINI,
Anna DEPARNAY-GRUNENBERG,
Damian BOESELAGER,
Daniel FREUND,
Erik MARQUARDT,
Hannah NEUMANN,
Henrike HAHN,
Jan OVELGÖNNE,
Katrin LANGENSIEPEN,
Manuela RIPA,
Martin HÄUSLING,
Michael BLOSS,
Nico SEMSROTT,
Niklas NIENASS,
Patrick BREYER,
Pierrette HERZBERGER-FOFANA,
Rasmus ANDRESEN,
Reinhard BÜTIKOFER,
Romeo FRANZ,
Sergey LAGODINSKY,
Ska KELLER,
Terry REINTKE
|
||||||||||
Renew |
93
|
1
|
3
|
Czechia RenewFor (3)Against (2) |
2
|
1
|
3
|
1
|
3
|
1
|
2
|
1
|
2
|
3
|
3
|
2
|
Denmark RenewFor (1)Against (5) |
4
|
Netherlands RenewFor (1)Against (5) |
2
|
Romania RenewAgainst (5) |
France RenewFor (3)Against (19)
Bernard GUETTA,
Catherine AMALRIC,
Catherine CHABAUD,
Christophe GRUDLER,
Dominique RIQUET,
Gilles BOYER,
Ilana CICUREL,
Irène TOLLERET,
Jérémy DECERLE,
Laurence FARRENG,
Marie-Pierre VEDRENNE,
Max ORVILLE,
Nathalie LOISEAU,
Pascal CANFIN,
Salima YENBOU,
Sandro GOZI,
Stéphane BIJOUX,
Stéphanie YON-COURTIN,
Valérie HAYER
|
Spain RenewFor (2)Against (6) |
Germany RenewAgainst (7) |
||||
S&D |
119
|
Poland S&DAgainst (6) |
13
|
1
|
4
|
2
|
1
|
2
|
1
|
3
|
1
|
3
|
1
|
Austria S&DAgainst (5) |
2
|
2
|
5
|
1
|
2
|
2
|
Netherlands S&DAgainst (6) |
Romania S&DAgainst (8) |
France S&DAgainst (6) |
Spain S&DAgainst (19)
Alicia HOMS GINEL,
Clara AGUILERA,
Cristina MAESTRE,
César LUENA,
Domènec RUIZ DEVESA,
Eider GARDIAZABAL RUBIAL,
Ibán GARCÍA DEL BLANCO,
Inma RODRÍGUEZ-PIÑERO,
Iratxe GARCÍA PÉREZ,
Isabel GARCÍA MUÑOZ,
Javier MORENO SÁNCHEZ,
Jonás FERNÁNDEZ,
Juan Fernando LÓPEZ AGUILAR,
Laura BALLARÍN CEREZA,
Lina GÁLVEZ,
Marcos ROS SEMPERE,
Mónica Silvana GONZÁLEZ,
Nacho SÁNCHEZ AMOR,
Nicolás GONZÁLEZ CASARES
|
Portugal S&DAgainst (9) |
Germany S&DAgainst (14) |
A9-0106/2024 – Petri Sarvamaa – Motion for a resolution (as a whole) #
Amendments | Dossier |
13 |
2023/2164(DEC)
2024/02/12
CONT
13 amendments...
Amendment 1 #
Proposal for a decision 1 Paragraph 1 1.
Amendment 10 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 17 a (new) 17 a. Is concerned about the internal management and procedures of the Agency given that in 2022 OLAF launched one investigation into the management and staffing policies, allegedly involving nepotism and also an investigation relating to lack of observance of human rights; reiterates its call on the Agency to fully cooperate with the investigative body and timely inform the discharge authority about outcomes and remedial measures;
Amendment 11 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 18 18. Recalls that in 2018 OLAF concluded another investigation which led to findings linked to e.g. mismanagement of human resources, the resignation of the Agency’s executive director at that time and the adoption by the Agency’s MB of a governance action plan aimed at restoring trust internally and externally, reinforcing the governance structure, and rebuilding internal capacity; observes that
Amendment 12 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 18 18. Recalls that in 2018 OLAF concluded another investigation which led to findings linked to e.g. mismanagement of human resources, the resignation of the Agency’s executive director at that time and the adoption by the Agency’s MB of a governance action plan aimed at restoring trust internally and externally, reinforcing the governance structure, and rebuilding internal capacity; observes that in spite of the reorganisations performed by the Agency in recent years, issues still appear to exist
Amendment 13 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 19 19. Notes with concern that the Agency has not
Amendment 2 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 5 5. Commends the Agency for the significant progress made in 2022 towards the full implementation of the new provisions of Regulation (EU) 2021/2033; notes in particular, from the Agency’s follow-up report for the 2021 discharge (hereinafter the ‘follow-up report’), that the Agency established the Consultative Forum (CF), as well as the Asylum reserve pool which mid-June 2023 already comprised 360 Members States’ approved experts (out of 500 as required by that Regulation), and
Amendment 3 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 5 a (new) 5 a. Takes note of the decision of the Agency to appoint a Fundamental Rights Officer (FRO); highlights that the FRO has worked with Unia, a controversial public body in Belgium; underlines that Flanders, the biggest region in Belgium, has decided to leave Unia by democratic decision of the Flemish Parliament over Unia´s political bias; calls on the Agency to review the appointment of the current FRO and propose a candidate who has no ties to controversial organisations;
Amendment 4 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 11 11.
Amendment 5 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 12 12. Notes the Agency’s gender distribution with 9 men (69 %) and 4 women (31 %) in its senior and middle management (same distribution as in 2021), with 27 men (48 %) and 29 women (52 %) on its MB (an improved distribution compared to 2021) and with 203 men (39 %) and 316 women (61 %) for staff overall (same distribution as in 2021); recalls the importance to ensure staff gender balance and calls on the Agency to take this aspect into consideration with regard to future recruitments of staff and appointments within its senior and middle management; observes
Amendment 6 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 14 a (new) 14 a. stresses the importance of having robust anti-harassment frameworks in place, especially in highly-stressful and demanding work environments; invites the Agency to introduce a training scheme on the matter both for newcomers and existing staff;
Amendment 7 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 15 15. Notes from the Agency’s follow-up
Amendment 8 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 15 15. Notes from the Agency’s follow-up to Parliament’s horizontal observations made in connection with the 2021 discharge procedure, as well as from the Agency’s follow-up report, that in recent years (as from 2019) the Agency has been using the services of an external law firm (specialised in Union civil service law) when dealing with cases of alleged
Amendment 9 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 16 16. Recalls the Court’s finding that in 2020 the Agency had 16 vacant management posts, with 10 of those occupied on an acting basis for more than one year, as well as other issues such as acting managers occupying two posts, in the Agency’s establishment plan; notes
source: 757.240
|
History
(these mark the time of scraping, not the official date of the change)
events/7 |
|
procedure/stage_reached |
Old
Procedure completed, awaiting publication in Official JournalNew
Procedure completed |
events/5 |
|
events/5 |
|
events/5 |
|
events/5 |
|
events/5 |
|
events/5 |
|
docs/7 |
|
events/5/summary |
|
docs/7 |
|
events/5/summary |
|
docs/7 |
|
events/5/summary |
|
docs/7 |
|
events/5/summary |
|
docs/7 |
|
events/5/summary |
|
docs/7 |
|
events/5/summary |
|
docs/7 |
|
events/5/summary |
|
docs/7 |
|
events/5/summary |
|
docs/7 |
|
events/5/summary |
|
docs/7 |
|
events/4 |
|
events/5 |
|
forecasts |
|
procedure/stage_reached |
Old
Awaiting Parliament's voteNew
Procedure completed, awaiting publication in Official Journal |
docs/7 |
|
events/4 |
|
events/5 |
|
forecasts |
|
procedure/stage_reached |
Old
Awaiting Parliament's voteNew
Procedure completed, awaiting publication in Official Journal |
events/4 |
|
forecasts |
|
events/4 |
|
forecasts |
|
events/4 |
|
forecasts/0 |
|
forecasts/0 |
|
docs/6 |
|
events/3 |
|
events/3 |
|
docs/6 |
|
events/3 |
|
events/3 |
|
events/3/date |
Old
2024-03-12T00:00:00New
2024-03-21T00:00:00 |
events/3/date |
Old
2024-03-12T00:00:00New
2024-03-21T00:00:00 |
events/3/date |
Old
2024-03-12T00:00:00New
2024-03-21T00:00:00 |
events/3/date |
Old
2024-03-12T00:00:00New
2024-03-21T00:00:00 |
docs/5 |
|
events/3 |
|
procedure/stage_reached |
Old
Awaiting committee decisionNew
Awaiting Parliament's vote |
events/3 |
|
procedure/stage_reached |
Old
Awaiting committee decisionNew
Awaiting Parliament's vote |
events/2 |
|
forecasts |
|
docs/4 |
|
docs/3 |
|
docs/2 |
|
docs/1 |
|
committees/1/rapporteur |
|
commission |
|
events/1 |
|
procedure/dossier_of_the_committee |
|
procedure/stage_reached |
Old
Preparatory phase in ParliamentNew
Awaiting committee decision |
committees/0/shadows/4 |
|
committees/0 |
|
committees/0 |
|