Events

Documents

• Text adopted by Parliament, single reading: T9-0272/2024
• Decision by Parliament: T9-0272/2024
• Debate in Parliament: Debate in Parliament
• Supplementary non-legislative basic document: 06182/2024
• Committee report tabled for plenary, single reading: A9-0087/2024
• Committee report tabled for plenary: A9-0087/2024
• Amendments tabled in committee: PE757.340
• Committee opinion: PE753.748
• Committee draft report: PE753.485
• Court of Auditors: opinion, report: OJ C 000 16.11.2023, p. 0000
• Court of Auditors: opinion, report: N9-0085/2023
• Non-legislative basic document: COM(2023)0391
• Non-legislative basic document: EUR-Lex
• Non-legislative basic document published: COM(2023)0391
• Non-legislative basic document published: EUR-Lex
• Non-legislative basic document: COM(2023)0391 EUR-Lex
• Court of Auditors: opinion, report: OJ C 000 16.11.2023, p. 0000 N9-0085/2023
• Committee draft report: PE753.485
• Committee opinion: PE753.748
• Amendments tabled in committee: PE757.340
• Supplementary non-legislative basic document: 06182/2024
• Committee report tabled for plenary, single reading: A9-0087/2024
• Text adopted by Parliament, single reading: T9-0272/2024

Amendments

Dossier

19

2023/2173(DEC) 2023/11/21 TRAN 14 amendments... Amendment 1 # Vlad GHEORGHE, Jan-Christoph OETJEN Draft opinion Paragraph 3 a (new) 3 a. Notes that according to the Annual report of the European Court of Auditors on EU Joint Undertakings for the financial year 2022, the Undertaking’s final budget for 2022 was € 411.2 million in commitment appropriations and €415.3 million in payment appropriations (Title V unused included); Amendment 10 # Vlad GHEORGHE, Jan-Christoph OETJEN Draft opinion Paragraph 8 a (new) 8 a. Welcomes that the ex-post audit results in 2022 had a representative error rate of 1.56% and that the corresponding residual error rate of 0.43%, staying well below the targeted threshold of 2%; Amendment 11 # Gheorghe FALCĂ Draft opinion Paragraph 8 b (new) 8 b. Emphasizes that mid-2030s will bring a new generation of large aircraft platforms aiming towards sustainable climate-neutral flight; while hybrid/electric energy architectures and ultra-efficient aircraft designs will pave the way towards climate-neutral aviation on routes of less than 1 000 km, aircraft for classical short- and medium-range distances rely on ultra-efficient thermal energy-based propulsion technologies using sustainable drop-in and non-drop- in fuels to enable climate-neutral flight; the novel aircraft and propulsion concepts will enable low source noise and low noise flight procedures; Amendment 12 # Vlad GHEORGHE, Jan-Christoph OETJEN Draft opinion Paragraph 8 b (new) 8 b. Acknowledges the efforts undertaken by the JU to enhance gender balance within its operations; recognizing the specific challenges presented by the technical nature of its focus areas, stresses the importance of continuous improvement in promoting diversity and gender equality; Amendment 13 # Gheorghe FALCĂ Draft opinion Paragraph 8 c (new) 8 c. Calls to expand and foster integration of the climate-neutral aviation research and innovation value chains, including academia, research organisations, industry and SMEs, also by benefiting from exploiting synergies with other national and European related programmes and by supporting the uptake of industry-related skills across the value chain; Amendment 14 # Vlad GHEORGHE, Jan-Christoph OETJEN Draft opinion Paragraph 8 c (new) 8 c. Acknowledges that the follow-up on the Court of Auditors' 2021 recommendation concerning the use of interim staff remains pending; Urges the Undertaking to promptly resolve this matter; Amendment 2 # Vlad GHEORGHE, Jan-Christoph OETJEN Draft opinion Paragraph 3 b (new) 3 b. Applauds that the JU has had a 100% rate of implementation for the commitment appropriations in 2022 and 89% for the payment appropriations; Amendment 3 # Vlad GHEORGHE, Jan-Christoph OETJEN Draft opinion Paragraph 3 c (new) 3 c. Notes that implementation rate for the JU’s administrative payment budget (Title 2) stood at a low 54%; As outlined in the JU's report on budgetary and financial management, this was primarily attributed to the provision of IT and communication services in the last quarter of 2022 and to be paid in 2023, and reduced costs for services provided by the Commission; calls a and strategic planning to address the challenge identified and enhance the efficiency of administrative payment budget use; Amendment 4 # Vlad GHEORGHE, Jan-Christoph OETJEN Draft opinion Paragraph 6 6. Welcomes the first open Call for Proposals by the JU, resulting in 19 Grant Agreements by year-end, totalling EUR 654 million around three core thrusts: Hybrid Electric Regional aircraft, Hydrogen-powered aircraft and Ultra- Efficient Short and Medium Range aircraft; the call comprehended 14 topics covering 13 Innovation Actions and one Coordination Support Action; in total 244 participants were selected across 24 different countries; Amendment 5 # Gheorghe FALCĂ Draft opinion Paragraph 6 a (new) 6 a. Welcomes the 20 projects to steer aviation towards a sustainable future; notes that the call has successfully brought together a wide array of public and private partners, research centres and academia to find impactful solutions that can deliver sustainable aircraft and, ultimately, climate-neutral aviation future with a budget of €654 million in EU grant funding; Amendment 6 # Gheorghe FALCĂ Draft opinion Paragraph 6 b (new) 6 b. Welcomes that in September 2022, Clean Aviation became a founding member of the Alliance for Zero-Emission Aviation (AZEA) which brings together public and private stakeholders from across the aeronautical sector to support the roll-out of hydrogen-powered and electric aircraft; Amendment 7 # Gheorghe FALCĂ Draft opinion Paragraph 7 a (new) 7 a. Notes that a new independent study on the socio-economic impact of the Clean Sky 2 Programme underlined the total estimated economic benefit for Europe to be worth €8.6 billion; the study also noted that the Clean Aviation programme’s Strategic Research and Innovation Agenda (SRIA) – which sets out how to achieve the objectives related to sustainable aircraft by 2030 and climate neutrality by 2050 – is both “resilient” and “fit for purpose”; points out that this would apply even in a wide range of possible economic scenarios, potential developments and structural changes to the aviation system; Amendment 8 # Gheorghe FALCĂ Draft opinion Paragraph 8 8. Salutes the progress in R&I, particularly engine manufacturing and SAF technologies and calls to intensify the research to contribute to the greening of aviation; urges the Commission to provide funding to implement new technologies; calls further to provide incentives for the SAF production to allow economy of scale production and overall market uptake of the sustainable fuels; Amendment 9 # Gheorghe FALCĂ Draft opinion Paragraph 8 a (new) 8 a. Calls for sufficient investment in R&I that will drive the energy efficiency and the emissions reductions of future aircraft such as ultra-efficient aircraft architectures – to address the short, medium and long-range needs with innovative aircraft architectures making use of highly integrated, ultra-efficient thermal propulsion systems and providing disruptive improvements in fuel efficiency; notes that this will be essential for the transition to low/zero emission energy sources (synthetic fuels, non-drop- in fuels such as hydrogen), which will be more energy intensive to produce, more expensive, and only available in limited quantities; source: 754.995 2024/01/31 CONT 5 amendments... Amendment 1 # Corina CREȚU Proposal for a decision 1 Paragraph 1 1. Grants the Executive Director of the Clean Aviation Joint Undertaking discharge in respect of the implementation of the Joint Undertaking’s budget for the financial year 2022 / Postpones its decision on granting the Executive Director of the Clean Aviation Joint Undertaking discharge in respect of the implementation of the Joint Undertaking’s budget for the financial year 2022; Amendment 2 # Corina CREȚU, Maria GRAPINI Motion for a resolution Recital C C. whereas, to increase transparency, the Joint Undertaking should disclose in its annual accounts, relevant information regarding members’ contributions at programme level; whereas, for each programme under which they operate, the Joint Undertaking should present per member category up to the year-end, all relevant information including the legal contribution targets set for the respective programme, the volume of contributions received, and the volume of legal commitments; suggests that the Joint Undertaking continues to improve transparency; Amendment 3 # Angelika WINZIG Motion for a resolution Paragraph 1 a (new) 1 a. Commends the launch of the Clean Aviation (‘CA’) program in 2022 and the role of the JU in developing innovative technologies to reduce aircraft emissions and noise; Amendment 4 # Angelika WINZIG Motion for a resolution Paragraph 4 4. Notes that in its 2022 annual accounts, the amounts of contributions recognised per member category (EU and private members) differ significantly from each other; notes that this is because EU cash contributions are validated and recognised when paid to the JU at the beginning of the project implementation, but members’ in-kind contributions are only recognised after validation of the costs incurred and declared for project implementation; notes that the Court considers thatcalls on the JU to address the gap between the recognised amount of cash contributions on the one hand and in- kind contributions on the other hand, was addressed in a suboptimal way in the JU’s 2022 annual accounts by not providing information on the JU members’ legal commitments at year end by providing information on the JU members’ legal commitments at year end; welcomes the commitment of the JU to address the issue fully in the next year's annual accounts; Amendment 5 # Angelika WINZIG Motion for a resolution Paragraph 14 14. NotWelcomes that, at the end of 2022, the Joint Undertaking had developed and implemented a complete risk-based approach to ex-ante controls in line with the CIC7 guidance, considering the JU- specific risk circumstances; notes, to this end, that the JU identified the most relevant risk criteria and designed, based on them, a risk-based monitoring approach; notes that such an approach allowed the JU to assess the risk level of each project and beneficiary during the main phases of project implementation, such as grant agreement preparation, grant agreement amendment, reporting, and payment; notes, in this regard, that the JU also drew up internal guidelines on their risk-based approach and trained and guided its staff on applying it properly and consistently; _________________ 7 Common Implementation Centre of the Commission’s DG RTD. source: 757.340

History

Filter history Commission Committees Committees.opinion Committees.rapporteur Committees.shadows Docs Events Events.docs Events.summary Forecasts Procedure.dossier_of_the_committee Procedure.other legal basis Procedure.stage_reached

(these mark the time of scraping, not the official date of the change)