Progress: Procedure completed
Role | Committee | Rapporteur | Shadows |
---|---|---|---|
Lead | CONT | WIEZIK Michal ( Renew) | WINZIG Angelika ( EPP), CREȚU Corina ( S&D), THIOLLET François ( Verts/ALE), CZARNECKI Ryszard ( ECR), ADINOLFI Matteo ( ID), OMARJEE Younous ( GUE/NGL) |
Committee Opinion | ITRE |
Lead committee dossier:
Subjects
Events
The European Parliament to grant discharge to the Director of the European Joint Undertaking for ITER and the Development of Fusion Energy (Fusion for Energy) for the financial year 2022 and to approve the closure of the Joint Undertaking’s accounts for that year.
Noting that the Court of Auditors found that the Joint Undertaking's annual accounts for the financial year 2022 present fairly the financial situation of the Joint Undertaking on 31 December 2022, as well as the results of its operations, Parliament adopted, by 555 votes to 24 with 18 abstentions, a resolution containing a series of observations which form an integral part of the discharge decision.
General
The Commission’s current estimate regarding the total Euratom budget needed for Joint Undertaking to finance the European part of the implementation of the ITER project and the associated activities up to 2035, amounts to EUR 15 billion (in current values); the ITER host state (France) and the Euratom Member States are to contribute an additional EUR 3.2 billion (in current values).
The Court draws attention to the fact that the Joint Undertaking disclosed in the 2022 annual accounts its estimate of the total cost for completing its delivery obligations for the ITER project (estimate at completion), assessed at EUR 19.1 billion (in 2022 values), consisting of the total payments made up to the end of 2022, amounting to EUR 9.2 billion and the estimate of the future payments, assessed at EUR 9.9 billion (in 2022 values). The 2022 estimate at completion is still based on 2016 milestone and cost assumptions and that these estimates will be subject to significant revision, once the new ITER project baseline and requirements are finalised, approved by the ITER Council, and formally communicated to the Joint Undertaking.
Parliament acknowledged that, during 2022, the Joint Undertaking experienced strong inflationary effects, initially due to COVID-19 induced supply chain issues and then (after February 2022) due to Russia’s war of aggression against Ukraine. It is worried that the estimated impact of these on the Joint Undertaking’s total estimate at completion amounts to EUR 144 million (2008 values) per the latest assessment. In addition, this estimate at completion increase is expected to materialise as additional expenditure in the years 2023-2026.
Members also noted with concern that Russia is a member of the ITER International Fusion Energy Organisation (ITER-IO), with the obligations to deliver several components for the ITER project to the ITER assembly site in France (Cadarache) and to provide annual contributions to the ITER-IO. This situation presents a high risk of delays and higher costs for the ITER project. Members insisted on the need to develop solutions in order to mitigate these risks appropriately. Any decision taken should safeguard Union's strategic interests and policy priorities.
Budgetary and financial management
Parliament noted that for the Multiannual Financial Framework period 2021-2027, the European Council has agreed a budget for the Euratom contribution to ITER amounting to a total value of EUR 5 614 million (in current values) of which EUR 5 560 million (in current values) of direct contribution to the project. The ITER Host State and Membership contributions will be added to this figure.
The final available appropriations, including the carry-over from the previous year amount to EUR 981.18 million in commitment appropriations (compared to EUR 1 069.9 million in 2021) and EUR 844.02 million in payment appropriations (compared to EUR 764.8 million in 2021).
The execution rate of the Joint Undertaking’s final available budget stood at 72 % in commitments and 91 % in payments (compared to 99.7 % and 97.4 % respectively in 2021). The low implementation rates resulted from the slowdown of operational activities at the level of both the ITER-IO and the Joint Undertaking, mainly due to the aftermath of the COVID-19 pandemic, Russia’s war of aggression against Ukraine, and recent technical design issues concerning the current assembly phase of the ITER project.
At the end of 2022, for Title 2 - Infrastructure and Operating Expenditure, the implementation rate was 63 % when considering the new 2022 administrative payment budget only, and 69 % when also considering the unused administrative payment budget of previous years reactivated in 2022 for implementation, and the cancellation rate of commitment carried over from the previous year was high with an average of 20 %.
Other observations
The resolution also contains a series of observations on staff, prevention of fraud and conflict of interest and the management and controls systems.
In particular, it noted the following:
- from 31 December 2022, the occupied staff posts at the Joint Undertaking included 46 officials, 224 temporary agents and 164 contract agents;
- the Joint Undertaking has slightly improved the gender imbalance (38 % were female and 62 % male). The Joint Undertaking continues to improve gender imbalance and strives for a balanced geographical balance in this respect;
- the implementation of the actions in the anti-fraud action plan has been systematically followed up using a dedicated database (RAPID); the anti-fraud and ethics officer provided information and support on fraud prevention matters to staff involved in procurement, contracts management, finance, and human resources management;
- the Joint Undertaking’s contract management has weaknesses that have seriously affected the achievement of contract’s objectives and – if not addressed - may also affect other operational activities of Joint Undertaking;
- as regards the contract signed in 2013 amounting to EUR 500 million for the design, equipment, and installation of the ITER nuclear and non-nuclear buildings; the Joint Undertaking’s director settled with the contractor only the first cost claim for an amount of EUR 75 million, and the contractor opened a dispute for the unsettled second cost claim;
- the Joint Undertaking continues to implement a recognised, mature and well-functioning internal control system.
Documents
- Results of vote in Parliament: Results of vote in Parliament
- Decision by Parliament: T9-0270/2024
- Debate in Parliament: Debate in Parliament
- Supplementary non-legislative basic document: 06182/2024
- Committee report tabled for plenary, single reading: A9-0090/2024
- Committee report tabled for plenary: A9-0090/2024
- Amendments tabled in committee: PE757.344
- Committee draft report: PE753.493
- Court of Auditors: opinion, report: OJ C 000 16.11.2023, p. 0000
- Court of Auditors: opinion, report: N9-0085/2023
- Non-legislative basic document: COM(2023)0391
- Non-legislative basic document: EUR-Lex
- Non-legislative basic document published: COM(2023)0391
- Non-legislative basic document published: EUR-Lex
- Non-legislative basic document: COM(2023)0391 EUR-Lex
- Court of Auditors: opinion, report: OJ C 000 16.11.2023, p. 0000 N9-0085/2023
- Committee draft report: PE753.493
- Amendments tabled in committee: PE757.344
- Supplementary non-legislative basic document: 06182/2024
- Committee report tabled for plenary, single reading: A9-0090/2024
Votes
A9-0090/2024 – Michal Wiezik – Motion for a resolution #
Amendments | Dossier |
16 |
2023/2178(DEC)
2024/01/31
CONT
16 amendments...
Amendment 1 #
Proposal for a decision 1 Paragraph 1 1. Grants the Director of the European Joint Undertaking for ITER and the Development of Fusion Energy (Fusion for Energy)
Amendment 10 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 7 a (new) Amendment 11 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 8 8.
Amendment 12 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 12 12. Notes that the execution rate of F4E’s final available budget stood at 72% in commitments and 91% in payments (99.7% and 97.4% respectively in 2021); notes that, the low implementation rates resulted from the slowdown of operational activities at the level of both the ITER-IO and F4E, mainly due to the aftermath of the COVID-19 crisis, the illegal and unjustified war of aggression against Ukraine, and recent technical design issues concerning the current assembly phase of the ITER project;
Amendment 13 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 14 14.
Amendment 14 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 17 a (new) 17 a. Notes that, the Joint Undertaking has slightly improved the gender balance; notes from the Consolidated Annual Activity Report, as regards gender balance that around 38% were female and 62% male in F4E’s workforce; suggests that the Joint Undertaking continues to improve gender balance and strive for a balanced geographical balance in this respect;
Amendment 15 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 18 18.
Amendment 16 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 19 19. Echoes the Court’s concern that this situation presents a risk to F4E’s sound management and continuity, at a time when experienced senior management staff will be required to implement the new ITER baselines, which have a significant impact on F4E’s activities; recalls its discharge resolution of 10 May 2023[i] underlining that “according to internal and external management assessments and several internal surveys, the main reasons for the deterioration of the working environment at the Joint Undertaking were shortcomings at senior management level, such as non-transparent and dysfunctional decision-making and a lack of social dialogue”. [i] https://oeil.secure.europarl.europa.eu/oeil /popups/ficheprocedure.do?reference=202 2/2129(DEC)&l=en
Amendment 2 #
Motion for a resolution Recital D a (new) D a. whereas 2001 ITER “Baseline” estimated that building ITER would cost EUR 5.9 billion (2008 prices) over a 10 years period, with first plasma scheduled for 2016; whereas since then the project has accumulated delays and cost overruns and the current ITER “Baseline” - revised in 2016 - raised the estimated cost to approximately EUR 20 billion and postponed first plasma to 2025;
Amendment 3 #
Motion for a resolution Recital E E. whereas the Commission’s current estimate regarding the total Euratom budget needed for F4E to finance the European part of the implementation of the ITER project and the associated activities up to 2035, amounts to EUR 15 billion (in current values); whereas the ITER host state (France) and the Euratom Member States are to contribute an additional EUR 3.2 billion (in current values)5 ;
Amendment 4 #
Motion for a resolution Recital E a (new) E a. whereas ITER accumulated schedule slips (35 months behind schedule), construction (defective components, supply chain), staff safety (irradiation) and staff management problems; whereas according to the French official news agency (AFP), ITER overall building cost multiplied by three and is now around 60 billion euros; whereas, in addition, this already tripled bill will probably continue to increase since the program will have to succeed in producing part of the fuel essential for nuclear fusion: tritium; 1a _________________ 1a https://www.bfmtv.com/economie/entrepri ses/energie/tout-comprendre-ou-en-sont- les-differents-projets-de-fusion-nucleaire- dans-le-monde_AD-202312100291.html
Amendment 5 #
Motion for a resolution Recital G G. whereas, to increase transparency, the Joint Undertaking should disclose in its annual accounts, relevant information regarding members’ contributions at programme level; whereas, for each programme under which they operate, the Joint Undertaking should present per member category up to the year-end, all relevant information including the legal contribution targets set for the respective programme, the volume of contributions received, and the volume of legal commitments; suggests that the Joint Undertaking continues to improve transparency;
Amendment 6 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 3 3. Notes, however, that the 2022 Estimate at Completion is still based on 2016 milestone and cost assumptions and that these estimates will be subject to significant
Amendment 7 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 3 a (new) 3 a. Notes with concern that, during 2022, ITER project faced multiple problems related to the delivery of the defective components, which pushed ITER in November 2022 to not only stop the assembly of the vacuum container, but also to remove the already installed segments for repairs; notes, in addition to all these difficulties, that the French Nuclear Safety Authority (ASN) put an end to the ITER assembly in January 2022 amid its scientist’s worries related to the planned quantity Radiation protection around the machine; notes that the ASN authority won't let assembly of the machine move forward until ITER organisation can prove it can keep personnel safe;
Amendment 8 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 5 5. Notes with concern that Russia is a member of the ITER-IO, with the obligations to deliver several components for the ITER project to the ITER assembly site in France (Cadarache) and to provide annual contributions to the ITER-IO; stresses that this situation presents a high risk of delays and higher costs for the ITER project; insists on the need to develop solutions in order to mitigate these risks appropriately; considers that any decision taken should safeguard EU's strategic interests and policy priorities;
Amendment 9 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 6 6. Is aware that, in November 2022, the 31st ITER Council
source: 757.344
|
History
(these mark the time of scraping, not the official date of the change)
events/7 |
|
procedure/stage_reached |
Old
Procedure completed, awaiting publication in Official JournalNew
Procedure completed |
events/5 |
|
events/5 |
|
events/5 |
|
events/5 |
|
events/5 |
|
events/5 |
|
docs/6 |
|
events/5/summary |
|
docs/6 |
|
events/5/summary |
|
docs/6 |
|
events/5/summary |
|
docs/6 |
|
events/5/summary |
|
docs/6 |
|
events/5/summary |
|
docs/6 |
|
events/5/summary |
|
docs/6 |
|
events/5/summary |
|
docs/6 |
|
events/5/summary |
|
docs/6 |
|
events/5/summary |
|
docs/6 |
|
events/4 |
|
events/5 |
|
forecasts |
|
procedure/stage_reached |
Old
Awaiting Parliament's voteNew
Procedure completed, awaiting publication in Official Journal |
docs/6 |
|
events/4 |
|
events/5 |
|
forecasts |
|
procedure/stage_reached |
Old
Awaiting Parliament's voteNew
Procedure completed, awaiting publication in Official Journal |
events/4 |
|
forecasts |
|
events/4 |
|
forecasts |
|
events/4 |
|
forecasts/0 |
|
forecasts/0 |
|
docs/5 |
|
events/3/docs |
|
docs/5 |
|
events/3/docs |
|
docs/4 |
|
events/3 |
|
procedure/stage_reached |
Old
Awaiting committee decisionNew
Awaiting Parliament's vote |
events/3 |
|
procedure/stage_reached |
Old
Awaiting committee decisionNew
Awaiting Parliament's vote |
events/3 |
|
procedure/stage_reached |
Old
Awaiting committee decisionNew
Awaiting Parliament's vote |
events/2 |
|
forecasts/0 |
|
forecasts/0 |
|
docs/3 |
|
committees/0/shadows/2 |
|
committees/0/shadows/2 |
|
docs/2 |
|
docs/1 |
|
commission |
|
committees/1/opinion |
False
|
events/1 |
|
procedure/dossier_of_the_committee |
|
procedure/stage_reached |
Old
Preparatory phase in ParliamentNew
Awaiting committee decision |
committees/0/shadows/4 |
|
forecasts |
|
committees/0 |
|
committees/0 |
|