Progress: Preparatory phase in Parliament
Legal Basis:
RoP 58, TFEU 164, TFEU 175-p3, TFEU 178-p1Subjects
Events
PURPOSE : to provide additional assistance and further flexibility to Member States affected by natural disasters.
PROPOSED ACT: Regulation of the European Parliament and the Council.
ROLE OF THE EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT: the European Parliament decides in accordance with the ordinary legislative procedure and on an equal footing with the Council.
BACKGROUND: the recent natural disasters in Central, Eastern and Southern Europe have had a devastating effect on the populations living in these regions. Extensive reconstruction works will be required in many cities, towns and villages to repair damaged infrastructure and equipment. Immediate measures will be needed to alleviate the social and economic consequences of such natural disasters.
In order to tackle the devastating effect of natural disasters on people’s health, access to healthcare including for people who are not in imminent socio-economic vulnerability should also be allowed. Europe needs to be able to rapidly provide additional, effective support through the European Regional Development Fund (ERDF) and the European Social Fund Plus (ESF+) to Member States, regions, local authorities and people severely affected by regional disasters, complementing the resources available from the European Union Solidarity Fund.
CONTENT: in order to provide additional assistance and further flexibility to Member States affected by natural disasters, the Commission proposes to amend Regulation (EU) 2021/1058 on the European Regional Development Fund and on the Cohesion Fund:
- introduce a new specific objective under Policy Objective 2 within the existing scope of the ERDF support in response to natural disasters that occur as from 1 January 2024. This would allow Member States to reprogramme under their 2021-2027 programmes under the Investments for Jobs and Growth goal amounts for the reconstruction following natural disasters as defined in Council Regulation (EC) No 2012/2002 establishing the European Union Solidarity Fund or recognised as such by a competent public authority of a Member State;
- allow for the application of a Union financing rate of up to 100% from the EU budget for a separate priority established within a programme to support operations linked to reconstruction and repair. Member States should also ensure that support from other national or Union instruments or private insurance schemes is taken into account so that overpayment is excluded;
- provide additional pre-financing for this separate priority by applying 30% to the allocation of the priority as set out in the decision approving the programme where the new dedicated priority is established. Where subsequently the allocation for the priority is increased as a result of further natural disasters, the additional pre-financing will only be paid on the amount by which the allocation to the priority is increased;
- allow Member States to select for support operations that have been physically completed or fully implemented before the application for the funding under the programme is duly submitted to the managing authority where they provide a response to a natural disaster occurring as of 1 January 2024;
- set out a deadline of four months after the first occurrence of damage as a result of a natural disaster or the entry into force of the amending Regulation where a disaster occurred before that date to submit corresponding programme amendments.
In order to ensure further flexibility for Member States in response to natural disasters that occur as from 1 January 2024 it is proposed to amend Regulation (EU) 2021/1057 to:
- provide flexibility for Member States in the implementation of the ESF+, including the additional pre-financing and the Union financing of up to 100%, to alleviate the socio-economic consequences of natural disasters and;
- provide immediate food and/or basic material assistance to people directly affected by natural disasters, as well as short-time work schemes for employees and self-employed without active measures and access to healthcare including for people who are not in imminent socio-economic vulnerability.
In order to safeguard the long-term strategic nature of cohesion policy investments, the total amount allocated to such dedicated priorities cannot exceed 10% of the total initial national allocation of the ERDF, the ESF+ and the Cohesion Fund taken together in a Member State for the 2021-2027 programming period. Member States should also ensure that support from other national or Union instruments or private insurance schemes is taken into account so that overpayment is excluded.
Budgetary implications
The proposal concerns cohesion policy programmes from the 2021-2027 programming period and does not modify existing budgetary commitments. It remains within the limits of the overall allocation for the period 2021-2027 and is therefore budgetarily neutral.
The proposal will result in additional pre-financing to be paid under the ERDF and ESF+ and will lead to frontloading of payment appropriations.
For 2025, the additional pre-financing was not envisaged in the draft budget. In order to address the urgent needs and provide swift support to the disaster-stricken Member States, the Commission proposed to cover the additional payment needs through an amending letter to the 2025 draft budget. The additional amount for 2025 is EUR 3 billion - for the ERDF and the ESF+ taken together - and corresponds to the 30% pre-financing to the estimated allocation (EUR 10 billion) of the dedicated priorities subsequent to the natural disasters having taken place as from 1 January 2024.
Documents
- Legislative proposal: COM(2024)0496
- Legislative proposal: EUR-Lex
- Legislative proposal published: COM(2024)0496
- Legislative proposal published: EUR-Lex
- Legislative proposal: COM(2024)0496 EUR-Lex
Amendments | Dossier |
17 |
2024/0275(COD)
2024/11/15
BUDG
17 amendments...
Amendment 1 #
Recital A A. whereas the proposal does not modify existing budgetary commitments and remains within the limits of the overall allocations for the period 2021-2027
Amendment 10 #
Paragraph 7 7. Notes that payments to 2021-2027 cohesion policy programmes were on a very low level in the first years of implementation leading to an increase of payment needs towards the later years; recalls that this actual payment cycle does not co-incide with the more linear payment profile set out in the MFF Regulation and that this situation results in a risk of exceeding payment ceilings in the later years; considers that the frontloading of payments towards 2025 and 2026 could alleviate the pressure on payments; calls on the Commission to closely monitor the payments evolution and provide timely information to the European Parliament in this regard; considers that the frontloading of payments towards 2025 and 2026 could alleviate the pressure on payments;
Amendment 11 #
Paragraph 8 8. Notes that support under RESTORE according to the Commission is considered not to alter the contribution of ERDF and ESF+ to climate targets as set out in the relevant regulations and in point 16 of the IIA; underlines, however, that re- programming and inclusion of repair and reconstruction measures, particularly under ERDF support, could lead to shifting resources from interventions with a higher coefficient for calculation of support to climate change objectives to lower actual coefficients stemming from the programs agreed, thus potentially reducing the expenditures supporting climate objectives therefore, while still respecting the regulation threshold and insist that the commitment made by the Commission not to allow for prevention measures already programmed to alter their geographical scope is the bare minimum in this regard; regrets that the Commission has not made an impact assessment of the proposal on the requirement for climate spending or climate-related classification of spending;
Amendment 12 #
Paragraph 8a (new) 8a. Stresses the need for more flexibilities in the regulatory framework covering the Common Provisions Regulation, the European Regional Development Fund and Cohesion Fund Regulation, the European Social Fund Plus Regulation in order to enable the Member states to help affected regions more effectively; calls on the Commission to consider flexibilities in the rules related to thematic concentration of ERDF support;
Amendment 13 #
Paragraph 9 9. Fears that
Amendment 14 #
Paragraph 9 9. Fears that a broad definition of ‘natural disaster’ could lead to more than estimated programme amendments, thus potentially triggering higher than estimated payment needs that have not yet been factored in for the coming years; recalls the need for a more precise definition of the concept of ‘natural disaster’ to avoid ambiguous interpretations and to ensure that RESTORE resources are allocated exclusively to genuine emergencies and to supporting the creation or renovation of infrastructures for natural disaster risk prevention; calls on the Commission to revise this definition to prevent any misuse or improper reallocation of funds;
Amendment 15 #
Paragraph 9a (new) 9a. Welcomes the commitment for building back better as the best way to ensure effectiveness of the spending also beyond climate-proofing in this context; stresses therefore that reconstruction in response to natural disasters, operations based on the “build back better principle” should be prioritised in line with other Union instruments and using the recovery, rehabilitation and reconstruction phases after a disaster to increase the resilience of communities through integrating disaster risk reduction measures as indicated in the Sendai Framework for Disaster Risk Reduction 2015-2030;
Amendment 16 #
Paragraph 9b (new) 9b. Fears that the possible reprogramming of ESF+ objectives Art 4 (m) exempting reprogramming from accompanying measures will impact the overall delivery of this particular objective significantly, especially in light of the passivity to use this retroactively;
Amendment 17 #
Paragraph 10 10. Highlights the importance to prevent double financing and calls on the Member States and the Commission to ensure that support under RESTORE is in addition to support under Union programmes, including the EUSF; calls on the Commission to establish strict monitoring mechanisms to ensure the exclusive use of funds, limit redundancy in financing, and strengthen transparency;
Amendment 2 #
Recital B B. whereas the combined effect of 30% pre-financing, 100 % co-financing and the eligibility for physically completed or fully implemented operations as of 1st of January 2024 under the European Regional Development Fund (ERDF) and European Social Fund Plus (ESF+), while taking into account the cap for re- programming of 10 % of the total 2021- 2027 allocation, leads to a partial frontloading of payment appropriations, followed by lower payments at a later stage:
Amendment 3 #
Paragraph 1 1
Amendment 4 #
Paragraph 1 1. Recalls that the European Parliament has repeatedly called for more resources for the European Union Solidarity Fund (EUSF) in view of the increasing number and intensity of natural disasters and the need to speed-up procedures so that support reaches Member States and regions hit by natural disasters more quickly; notes that the RESTORE proposal provides additional assistance and further flexibility to Member States affected by natural disasters for their cohesion policy programmes 2021-2027 to respond to such disasters; regrets that cohesion policy is again used as an emergency response tool and maintains that this approach risks undermining its longer-term policy and investment objectives and is a symptom of a lack of flexibility and crisis response capacity in the EU budget; calls for the RESTORE proposal to explicitly include a commitment to allocate a significant portion of the funds to support the creation or renovation of infrastructure for natural disaster risk prevention, which would help mitigate the impact of future disasters and consequently reduce the costs required for repairs;
Amendment 5 #
Paragraph 3 3. Notes further that for 2025 the Commission proposes additional payment appropriations for ERDF of a total of EUR 3 000 million through the amending letter (AL); refers to the estimated payment needs in 2025 of a total amount of EUR 3 000 million in the RESTORE proposal, of which EUR 2 070 million for ERDF and EUR 930 million for ESF+; regrets the inconsistency of figures between the AL and the Legislative Financial Statement and urges the Commission to provide for coherent information and rectification, where necessary; is of the opinion that the estimate (whichever is the actual one) does not take into account that there is some retroactive eligibility, that means that clearly the increased payments will not only go to pre-financing and does not take into account the possibility of delays with the opening of the negotiations of the programs as well as the fact that at this date the Commission does not have any estimates on initial take-up of the proposal by Member States, let alone the potential volumes of the program amendments and therefore is very difficult to assess and there is a likelihood that this will therefore need to be corrected in an amending budget;
Amendment 6 #
Paragraph 4 4.
Amendment 7 #
Paragraph 5 5. Requests the Commission to provide for traceable information in the form of timely reports including on transfers referred to in Article 26 of Regulation (EU) 2021/1060 to ERDF and ESF+ and on payment forecasts for cohesion policy programmes 2021-2027 to make the impact of RESTORE clearly identifiable for the budgetary authority;
Amendment 8 #
Paragraph 5a (new) 5a. Requests the funds allocated to the regions under this new regulation may be reprogrammed, up to 10% of the total allocation, to pursue the objectives set out in this Regulation. The Commission shall commit to approving such reprogramming through a simplified procedure within 30 days from the submission of the request;
Amendment 9 #
Paragraph 7 7. Notes that payments to 2021-2027 cohesion policy programmes were on a very low level in the first years of implementation leading to an increase of payment needs towards the later years; recalls that this actual payment cycle does not co-incide with the more linear payment profile set out in the MFF Regulation and that this situation results in a risk of exceeding payment ceilings in the later years; considers that the frontloading of payments towards 2025 and 2026 could alleviate the pressure on payments; calls on the Commission to closely monitor the payments evolution
source: 765.346
|
History
(these mark the time of scraping, not the official date of the change)
events/0/summary |
|