10 Amendments of Martina MICHELS related to 2014/2149(INI)
Amendment 1 #
Draft opinion
Paragraph - 1
Paragraph - 1
-1. Notes that an integrated approach for cultural heritage for Europe is necessary for the contemporary processes of cultural dialogue and cultural mutual understanding between EU regions;
Amendment 2 #
Draft opinion
Paragraph - 1 – a (new)
Paragraph - 1 – a (new)
-1a. Notes that cultural heritage by nature is not a mere commodity, hence an integrated approach to cultural heritage for Europe cannot be based on a business as usual model;
Amendment 3 #
Draft opinion
Paragraph - 1 – b (new)
Paragraph - 1 – b (new)
-1b. Believes that unconditional private sector engagement in cultural heritage projects and the application of sole market-oriented criteria in this field, does not favour cultural heritage promotion in remote, poor and sparsely populated European regions;
Amendment 4 #
Draft opinion
Paragraph - 1 – c (new)
Paragraph - 1 – c (new)
-1c. Notes that the expansion of using cultural traditions, architecture and cultural history as a marketing issue drastically affects the blossom of unique regional cultures and customs, which in many occasions are the locomotives of local economies, by imposing a framework of standardized cultural models;
Amendment 5 #
Draft opinion
Paragraph - 1 – d (new)
Paragraph - 1 – d (new)
-1d. Notes that economic, social and territorial disparities, which were increased during the economic crisis, create inequalities in access to culture and cultural heritage sights among the citizens of EU regions;
Amendment 6 #
Draft opinion
Paragraph - 1 – e (new)
Paragraph - 1 – e (new)
-1e. Believes that culture and culture heritage are common and public goods and must be provided equitably, without exclusions and artificial barriers in order to promote economic, social and territorial cohesion;
Amendment 7 #
Draft opinion
Paragraph -1 – f (new)
Paragraph -1 – f (new)
-1f. Notes that an integrated approach to cultural heritage for Europe should mainstream social and territorial cohesion in all its dimensions and should support and enhance public and free profit-making projects;
Amendment 9 #
Draft opinion
Paragraph 1
Paragraph 1
1. Notes that cultural heritage projects can contribute to the creation of new, innovative and high qualified jobs in the fields of museum restoration, public relations, research, cultural statistics and digitalization; and in addition to the required state and regional public funding; Notes that cultural heritage projects are often examples of innovative and sustainable economic activities which create jobs and develop the business and research capabilities of small and medium- sized enterprises (SMEs);
Amendment 53 #
Draft opinion
Paragraph 11
Paragraph 11
11. Welcomes the Commission proposal to introduce VALOR as the platform for the dissemination of project results, but calls on the Commission also to include in the platform examples of good practice taken from the cultural heritage projects carried out under the ERDF during the 2000-2006 and 2007-2013 programming periods; Calls on the Commission to introduce a communication platform in order to inform potential beneficiaries in an effective way about existing European funding lines for cultural heritage.
Amendment 57 #
Draft opinion
Paragraph 11 a (new)
Paragraph 11 a (new)
11a. Establish a European Year of Cultural heritage in the near future with an adequate budget.