Activities of Dawid Bohdan JACKIEWICZ
Plenary speeches (20)
Access to finance for SMEs (debate) PL
Doubling the capacity of the North Stream pipeline and impact on the energy union and the security of supply (debate) PL
Limitation of emissions of certain pollutants into the air (debate) PL
Decision adopted on 15 July 2015 on the energy summer package (debate) PL
One-minute speeches on matters of political importance PL
Harmonisation of certain aspects of copyright and related rights (debate) PL
Decision adopted on the action plan for a fairer corporate tax system in the EU (debate) PL
European energy security strategy (debate) PL
European energy security strategy (debate) PL
Cyber-attacks against the media - new level of threat to cybersecurity (debate) PL
ACER - Human resources for monitoring wholesale energy markets (debate) PL
Fuel quality directive and renewable energy directive (debate) PL
Carbon dioxide emissions from maritime transport (debate) PL
Employment conditions including minimum rates of pay applicable to the transport sector - Compliance of the German provisions with European law on the minimum wage in the transport sector (debate) PL
Relations between the EU and the League of Arab States and cooperation in countering terrorism (debate) PL
Mass graves of the missing persons of Ashia at Ornithi village in the occupied part of Cyprus PL
Russia, in particular the case of Alexey Navalny PL
Situation in Egypt (debate) PL
Autonomous trade preferences for the Republic of Moldova (debate) PL
Child malnutrition in developing countries (debate) PL
Shadow opinions (2)
OPINION on Towards a new international climate agreement in Paris
AVIS sur l'incidence des évolutions du marché européen de la défense sur les capacités de sécurité et de défense en Europe FR
Institutional motions (1)
JOINT MOTION FOR A RESOLUTION on human rights in Uzbekistan PDF (137 KB) DOC (68 KB)
Oral questions (1)
Breaches of the human rights of children with disabilities PDF DOC
Written questions (12)
Operation of trans-European transport network at risk owing to sale of PKP Energetyka in Poland PDF (104 KB) DOC (25 KB)
Regional operational centres to manage cross-border gas flows, as referred to in the Energy Union Package communication PDF (101 KB) DOC (25 KB)
European Fund for Strategic Investments PDF (5 KB) DOC (23 KB)
Interpretation of claims relating to 'A fully integrated European energy market' that are made in the Energy Union Package communication PDF (5 KB) DOC (24 KB)
Energy Union Package: more powers and independence for ACER within the framework of a fully integrated internal energy market PDF (6 KB) DOC (24 KB)
List of energy infrastructure projects identified by the European Union in 2013 PDF (5 KB) DOC (24 KB)
Question regarding the interpretation of the proposals concerning 'energy efficiency' raised in the Energy Union Package PDF (103 KB) DOC (26 KB)
Question regarding the interpretation of provisions of the Energy Union Package as regards 'energy efficiency' PDF (105 KB) DOC (26 KB)
Question regarding the measurement of 'energy efficiency' included in the Energy Union Package PDF (103 KB) DOC (26 KB)
Question regarding the interpretation of the definition of 'energy efficiency' in accordance with the Energy Union Package PDF (105 KB) DOC (25 KB)
Withdrawal of the proposal on the establishment of the market stability reserve PDF (190 KB) DOC (24 KB)
Withdrawal of the proposal on the establishment of the market stability reserve PDF (190 KB) DOC (24 KB)
Amendments (44)
Amendment 183 #
2015/2113(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Recital R a (new)
Recital R a (new)
Ra. whereas since 1990 the European industry has made significant investments and improvements in energy efficiency which resulted in an increase in industrial output accompanied by a decrease in energy consumption;
Amendment 269 #
2015/2113(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 2
Paragraph 2
2. Calls on the Commission to actively pursue the diversification of supply (energy sources, suppliers and routes); to this end, calls on the Commission to promote the construction of the relevant energy infrastructure priority corridors, as specified in Annex I to the trans-European energy networks (TEN-E) regulation and Part II of the Annex I to the Connecting Europe Facility (CEF) regulation, such as the Southern Gas Corridor; Stresses the importance of ensuring a stable and predictable regulatory framework, providing fair remuneration of the assets and enabling long-term commitments, which is necessary to deliver new investments in energy infrastructure;
Amendment 299 #
2015/2113(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 3 a (new)
Paragraph 3 a (new)
3a. Supports actions aimed at developing strategic energy partnerships with key producing countries which are currently supplying gas to the EU or may do so in the future; invites Commission to intensify dialogue with Norway and producing countries from the Southern Gas Corridor, North Africa and Eastern Mediterranean areas; and dedicate special attention to other LNG producing countries such as, USA and Canada and other relevant LNG producers;
Amendment 354 #
2015/2113(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 8
Paragraph 8
8. Stresses that greater transparency of intergovernmental agreements could be achieved by strengthening the role of the Commission in energy-related negotiations involving one or more Member States and third countries, including by having the Commission participate in those negotiations if there is a risk of abuse of a dominant position by one supplier; notes that furthermore the Commission should carry out ex-ante and ex-post assessments and draw up both a positive and a negative list of agreement clauses, such as export ban and, destination clauses, 'take-or-pay' clauses; or clauses forbidding a third party making energy supplies conditional on being granted preferential access to energy transport infrastructure in the EU;
Amendment 498 #
2015/2113(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 19
Paragraph 19
19. Calls on the Commission and the Member States to strengthen the Energy Community through, inter alia, better implementation and enforcement of EU law, enhancing its institutions and implementing key infrastructure projects in order to ensure better integration with the EU energy market and security of supply mechanisms; this shall in particular refer to Strategic Partnership on energy with Ukraine;
Amendment 570 #
2015/2113(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 22 a (new)
Paragraph 22 a (new)
22a. Calls on the Commission to early allocate appropriate resources to the Agency for the Cooperation of Energy Regulators (ACER) to enable the full and effective implementation of the monitoring of energy markets to ensure integrity and transparency in energy trading and compliance with the Regulation on Energy Market Integrity and Transparency (REMIT) as a precondition for the proper functioning of the EU internal energy market.
Amendment 584 #
2015/2113(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 23
Paragraph 23
23. Stresses the need for full implementation and enforcement of existing EU energy legislation and for a swift adoption of ambitious European network codes and guidelines, which must go hand in hand with strengthening the competences of the Agency for the Cooperation of Energy Regulators (ACER), the European Network of Transmission System Operators for Electricity (ENTSO-E) and the European Network of Transmission System Operators for Gas (ENTSO-G); as specified in the relevant EU legislation;
Amendment 645 #
2015/2113(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 25
Paragraph 25
25. Calls on the Member States and the Commission to concentrate their efforts on driving projects of common interest (PCIs) forward, with a view to achieving a pan- European ‘super grid' with the capacity to transmit power and natural gas across EU countries from multiple sources and therefore capable of diverting energy from surplus to deficit areas, thereby allowing the market to instantly respond to interruptions of supply wherever they occur;
Amendment 671 #
2015/2113(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 26
Paragraph 26
26. Supports regional approaches where there are particular regional challenges or opportunities, or where acting regionally could speed up market integration, including through the creation of regional hubs to enhance market liquidity; primarily in the CEE region, recognises the important role of power exchanges in fostering liquid, transparent and secure energy trading to the market participants;
Amendment 689 #
2015/2113(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 27
Paragraph 27
27. Points out that in order to successfully balance the internal market, investment is needed not only in interconnectors but also in, inter alia, flexible generation, storage capacity, such as LNG terminals and smart grids, in order to cope with enhanced renewable and distributed generation;
Amendment 794 #
2015/2113(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 30 b (new)
Paragraph 30 b (new)
30b. Underlines that investments in energy efficiency improvements made by the industry so far must be recognised and duly taken into account while discussing energy efficiency in the EU,
Amendment 6 #
2015/2112(INI)
Draft opinion
Paragraph 1
Paragraph 1
1. WelcomRecognizes the EU's leadership on climate change mitigation and adaption, including the creation of skills, jobs and growth that it brings; notes the crucial need for a global binding agreement binding the world's biggest greenhouse gas emitters to be concluded in Paris and stresses that continued EU leadership requires the full commitment of all parties to this agreement; insists on a regular, transparent performance review based on the most up- to-date data and technology;
Amendment 36 #
2015/2112(INI)
Draft opinion
Paragraph 3
Paragraph 3
Amendment 55 #
2015/2112(INI)
Draft opinion
Paragraph 4
Paragraph 4
4. Insists on the global phase-out of environmentally and that energy subsidies must respect technology-neutral approach which levels the playing field for development of all low-emission tecohnomically harmful subsidies, whichlogies, recognizes that selective subsidy schemes supporting only certain technologies distort competitiveness and hinder innovation;
Amendment 1 #
2015/2065(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Recital C
Recital C
C. whereas the food trade has an increasingly significant cross-border dimension and is of particulamajor importance for the functioning of the internal market; whereas cross-border trade between the EU Member States accounts for 20% of the EU’s total food and drink production; whereas 70% of all Member States’ food exports are to other Member States;
Amendment 2 #
2015/2065(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Recital D
Recital D
D. whereas significant structural changes have taken place in the business-to- business (B2B) food supply chain in recent years, involving concentration and vertical integration of entities operating in the production, processing and retail sectora very high level of concentration and horizontal, cross border and vertical integration of entities operating in the production sector, and especially in the processing and retail sectors, leading to the formation of full- blown oligopolies;
Amendment 3 #
2015/2065(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Recital D a (new)
Recital D a (new)
Da. whereas supermarkets are developing their own brands and squeezing independent brands, and whereas there is therefore a conflict of interests in that, because of vertical integration, traders are competing directly with their own suppliers; whereas, where supermarkets have their own brands, agricultural producers are vulnerable in price negotiations with them and there is a lack of outlets for products in a number of countries;
Amendment 4 #
2015/2065(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 9 a (new)
Paragraph 9 a (new)
9a. Points out that own brands represent a strategic issue in the medium and long term; calls on the Commission to look in detail at the growing penetration of the agri-food chain by so-called ‘own brands’, which is liable to hamper both the competitiveness of the agri-food industry and fair competition and adversely affect innovation and product quality, as well as consumer choices when making purchases, if the market penetration of own brands exceeds a certain risk threshold, which ought to be set for each category of product; points out that some competition authorities have found that own brands introduce a horizontal dimension to competition in respect of industrial brands which had never previously been a factor; believes it necessary, therefore, to introduce specific measures to guarantee effective competition in this sector based on a balanced relationship between distributors and producers, which will also ensure that consumers receive correct information; notes that while own brand-labelled products can bring increased value and choice to consumers, they give an unfair and anti-competitive position to retailers, who become both customer and competitor;
Amendment 5 #
2015/2065(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Recital F
Recital F
F. whereas unfair practices may have harmful consequences for the individual entities in the food supply chain, which in turn may havehas a detrimental impact on the entire EU economy, on the economic interests of states and on consumers, by limiting their choice of products and their access to new and innovative products; whereas UTPs may discourage cross-border trade in the EU and hinder the proper functioning of the internal market; whereas unfair practices can result in particular in individual enterprises cutting back on investment and innovation, particularly in the areas of environmental protection, working conditions and animal welfare, owing to a reduction in income and a lack of certainty, and may lead them to abandon production, processing or trading activities;
Amendment 6 #
2015/2065(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Recital G a (new)
Recital G a (new)
Ga. whereas UTPs can result in excessive costs or lower-than-expected revenues for businesses with weaker bargaining power, as well as overproduction and food waste;
Amendment 7 #
2015/2065(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Recital I a (new)
Recital I a (new)
Ia. whereas there is a practice known as ‘forum shopping’, whereby, taking advantage of disparities between the Member States’ laws on UTPs in the food supply chain, the stronger contractual party unilaterally decides in which Member State – i.e. under which regulatory framework – the contract will apply in order to avoid stricter measures against UTPs; points out that a fragmented market leads to regulatory uncertainty for those involved and thus creates an imbalance in surplus distribution along the value chain in the various countries concerned;
Amendment 8 #
2015/2065(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Recital K
Recital K
K. whereas the ‘fear factor’ caoften comes into play in commercial relationships, with the weaker party being unwilling to lodge a complaint about UTPs imposed by the stronger party, out of concern that this would put an end to their commercial relationship;
Amendment 9 #
2015/2065(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 1
Paragraph 1
1. Welcomes the steps taken to date by the Commission to combat UTPs with a view to securing a more balanced market but believes that they do not go far enough;
Amendment 9 #
2015/2065(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Recital B
Recital B
B. having regard to the size and strategic importance of the food supply chain for the European Union; whereas the sector employs over 47 million people in the EU and accounts for around 7% of gross value added at EU level, and whereas the total value of the EU market for products connected with the retail food trade is estimated at EUR 1.05 billion; whereas the retail services sector accounts for 4.3% of the EU’s GDP and 17% of the EU’s SMEs2a; __________________ 2a Eurostat, 2010.
Amendment 10 #
2015/2065(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 3
Paragraph 3
3. WelcomNotes the setting up of the Supply Chain Initiative, which has resulted in the adoption of a set of principles of good practice in B2Bfor vertical relationships in the food supply chain and a voluntary framework for the implementation of those principles; believes that efforts to promote fair trading practices in the food supply chain can make a real impactshould make an impact, although the serious shortcomings of the initiative highlighted by groups representing farmers which have chosen not to participate (such as the fact that it is not possible to lodge confidential complaints, there is no enforcement mechanism and there are no effective penalties) mean that it is inadequate for the purpose of combating UTPs;
Amendment 11 #
2015/2065(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 10
Paragraph 10
10. Points out that UTPs imposed by parties in a stronger bargaining position clearly have a negative impact, including on employment; stresses that UTPs can hamper business competitiveness, investment and product innovation throughout the food supply chain, to the detriment of consumer choice and the quality, variety and innovativeness of the products made available;
Amendment 12 #
2015/2065(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 11
Paragraph 11
11. Believes that the Supply Chain Initiative and other national and EU voluntary systems (codes of good practice, voluntary dispute settlement mechanisms) should be further developed and promoted; encourages producers and traders in conjunction with effective and robust enforcement mechanisms at Member State level ensuring that complaints can be lodged anonymously and establishing dissuasive penalties, and with EU-level coordination; encourages producers and traders, including farmers' organisations, to become involved in such initiatives; takes the view that they should play a leading role in efforts to combat UTPs; recognises the potential that such initiatives have as alternative forums for dispute resolution;
Amendment 13 #
2015/2065(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 15
Paragraph 15
15. Reaffirms that free and fair competition, freedom to contract and properstrong and effective enforcement of the relevant legislation to protect all entities in the food supply chain, irrespective of geographical location, are of key importance in ensuring the proper functioning of the food supply chain;
Amendment 13 #
2015/2065(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Recital C
Recital C
C. whereas the food trade has an increasingly significant cross-border dimension and is of particular importance for the functioning of the internal market; whereas international trade between EU Member States accounts for around 20% of total food production in the EU, and whereas it is estimated that annually at least 70% of total exports of agricultural or food products from EU Member States go to other EU Member States3a; __________________ 3aReport of the High-Level Forum for a Better Functioning Food Supply Chain, December 2012.
Amendment 14 #
2015/2065(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 17
Paragraph 17
17. Urges the Commission to submit without delay specific proposals for EU legislationbasic EU-level framework legislation establishing a unitary EU framework laying down general principles and taking proper account of national circumstances and best practices, with the aim of banning UTPs in the entire food supply chain that will enable markets to operate as they should and fair and transparent relations to be maintained between food producers, suppliers and distributors;
Amendment 15 #
2015/2065(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 20
Paragraph 20
20. Calls for due account to be taken, when drafting rules in this area, of the specific features of each market and the legal requirements obtaining on it, the different situations and approaches in individual Member States, the degree of consolidation or fragmentation of individual markets, and other significant factors, while also capitalising on measures already taken in some Member States that are proving to be effective; takes the view that such regulatory efforts should ensure that there is relatively broad discretion to tailor the measures to be taken to the specific features of each market and should be based on the general principle of improving enforcement by involving the relevant public agencies; stresses that one solution may be an EU framework that complements the voluntary codes and establishes general principles that reflect the differing situations at national level;
Amendment 16 #
2015/2065(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 21
Paragraph 21
21. Calls on the Commission to assess the voluntary and self-regulatory schemes put in place to date and, in particular, the progress achieved by the Supply Chain Initiative and its national platforms; points out that matters in this area hinge on the quantitative and qualitative assessment of the issues raised and resolved by the various entities in the food supply chain; calls also the Commission to assess the effectiveness of the regulatory action taken at national and EU level and of the enforcement mechanisms put in place at those levels; calls for an assessment of the likely impact of the various types of EU regulatory action that have been proposed, with due account being taken of all the possible implications for the various stakeholders and for consumer welfare; expects to be notified of the findings of this assessment;
Amendment 17 #
2015/2065(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Recital D
Recital D
D. whereas significant structural changes have taken place in the business-to- business (B2B) food supply chain in recent years, involving concentration and vertical integration of entities operating in the production, processing and retail sectors; whereas there is a problem with retailers’ own brands in that traders become direct competitors of their own suppliers; whereas ongoing structural changes in the supply chain are resulting in more intense competition on the food products market, and whereas that in turn could lead to price wars, the principal victims of which are producers (farmers), who come under pressure from falling prices and have to cut production costs;
Amendment 18 #
2015/2065(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Recital D a (new)
Recital D a (new)
Amendment 37 #
2015/2065(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Recital F a (new)
Recital F a (new)
Fa. whereas the performance of the food supply chain not only affects economic sectors such as agriculture and the processing and retail industries, but also the standard of living of consumers in the EU;
Amendment 43 #
2015/2065(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Recital G a (new)
Recital G a (new)
Amendment 51 #
2015/2065(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Recital I
Recital I
I. whereas many Member States have introduced various ways of countering UTPs, in some cases by means of voluntary and self-regulatory schemes and in others through relevant national regulations; whereas this has led to a high degree of divergence and diversification between countries in terms of the level, nature and form of legal protection; whereas some countries have not taken any action in this area;
Amendment 52 #
2015/2065(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Recital I a (new)
Recital I a (new)
Ia. whereas there is a practice known as ‘forum shopping’, whereby the stronger contractual party unilaterally decides in which Member State – i.e. under which regulatory framework – the contract will apply in order to avoid stricter measures against UTPs;
Amendment 59 #
2015/2065(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Recital J
Recital J
J. whereas UTPs are covered only in part by competition law, the provisions of which relate to only a few UTPs in the B2B food supply chain; whereas a significant majority of UTPs therefore lie beyond the scope of competition law because it essentially serves another purpose, i.e. to regulate competition on the market;
Amendment 270 #
2015/2065(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 21 a (new)
Paragraph 21 a (new)
21a. Hopes that the proposed regulations will help guarantee sustainable, fair commercial relationships and a level playing field for market operators in the food supply chain;
Amendment 29 #
2015/2037(INI)
Draft opinion
Paragraph 4
Paragraph 4
4. Urges the Commission to step up its efforts to achieve a level playing field in European defence markets, by limiting the use of justified exclusions to a strict minimum and taking steps to put an end to the situation where some Member States act solely as suppliers and others solely as buyers of defence technology;
Amendment 38 #
2015/2037(INI)
Draft opinion
Paragraph 5
Paragraph 5
5. Stresses that, in the long term, the full phase-out of offsets is indispensable for ensuring the smooth functioning of the internal market in the European defence sector; emphasises, however, that offset agreements can be used for the legitimate purpose of safeguarding Member States’ security, and that offsets can only be fully phased out when the European market is more evenly developed and free from internal imbalances, and when no Member States are technologically dependent on others;
Amendment 44 #
2015/2037(INI)
Draft opinion
Paragraph 6
Paragraph 6
6. Recalls that framework agreements and subcontracting are a means of opening up established supply chains for the benefit of SMEs; calls on the Member States, the European Defence Agency and the Commission to work together to help SMEs consolidate and facilitate their access to defence procurement and to counter the geographically uneven development of Europe’s technology and defence base;
Amendment 53 #
2015/2037(INI)
Draft opinion
Paragraph 8
Paragraph 8
8. WelcomAcknowledges the 2014 Commission Roadmap entitled ‘Towards a more competitive and efficient defence and security sector’;, while stressesing the importance of its timely implementation and of taking additional measures as necessary;