BETA

Activities of Andrey SLABAKOV related to 2021/0227(BUD)

Shadow opinions (1)

OPINION on the draft general budget of the European Union for the financial year 2022 – all sections
2021/09/28
Committee: CULT
Dossiers: 2021/0227(BUD)
Documents: PDF(136 KB) DOC(69 KB)
Authors: [{'name': 'Romeo FRANZ', 'mepid': 193273}]

Amendments (6)

Amendment 2 #
Draft opinion
Paragraph 1
1. Believes that the economic crisis triggered by the COVID-19 pandemic should not adversely affect investments of a social, educational and cultural nature; therefore, increases the allocations of Erasmus+ and the European Solidarity Corps Programme to better support the recovery, in particular by ‘greening’ those programmes; underlines that particular attention should be paid to ensure good outreach to vulnerable people, whose exclusion has been worsened by the pandemic;
2021/09/08
Committee: CULT
Amendment 9 #
Draft opinion
Paragraph 2
2. Given the dramatic consequences of the COVID-19 crisis on Europe’s cultural and creative sectors and industries (CCSI), reinforces the Culture strand of the Creative Europe Programme, to support organisations and artists in their recovery, to provide targeted support for the performing arts, in particular the music sector, and to ‘green’ the programme;
2021/09/08
Committee: CULT
Amendment 13 #
Draft opinion
Paragraph 3
3. Urges the Member States once more to earmark at least 2 % of the Recovery and Resilience Facility for the recovery of the CCS and industriI; believes that such earmarking is necessary and important for preserving the values of the Member States;
2021/09/08
Committee: CULT
Amendment 16 #
Draft opinion
Paragraph 4
4. Insists that no funding from any of the three strands of the Creative Europe Programme should be used for financing projects in the framework of the New European Bauhaus initiative, in line with the repeated commitment of the Commissioner for Innovation, Research, Culture, Education and Youth to this effect, in order to prevent diversion ofstop the programme’s already thinly spread funds towards new, unforeseen political prioritiestrained funding from being spread too thin to cover new, unforeseen political priorities, thus "watering down" the effects and impacts of such funding where it really matters;
2021/09/08
Committee: CULT
Amendment 18 #
Draft opinion
Paragraph 5
5. Emphasises that more funding is needed to fund all high-quality projects submitted in the framework of calls for proposals under the Citizens’ engagement and participation strand of the Citizens, Equality, Rights and Values Programme and to tackle the historically low application success rate of that strand;deleted
2021/09/08
Committee: CULT
Amendment 20 #
Draft opinion
Paragraph 5 a (new)
5 a. Suggests that more funding for all high-quality projects submitted in the framework of calls for proposals under the Citizens’ engagement and participation strand of the Citizens, Equality, Rights and Values Programme might tackle the historically low application success rate of that strand;
2021/09/08
Committee: CULT