28 Amendments of Markus PIEPER related to 2014/2242(INI)
Amendment 34 #
Motion for a resolution
Recital C
Recital C
Amendment 43 #
Motion for a resolution
Recital D
Recital D
Amendment 91 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 2 a (new)
Paragraph 2 a (new)
2a. Points out that land use planning is the most important phase for creating smooth and safe transportation networks that are long-lasting and that have real impact on traffic volumes and traffic distribution;
Amendment 96 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 3
Paragraph 3
Amendment 109 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 3 a (new)
Paragraph 3 a (new)
3a. Supports the development of innovative forms of mobility and intelligent transport solutions; supports forming of regulatory framework that enables the use of new forms of mobility and new sharing models making better utilisation of existing resources;
Amendment 113 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 4
Paragraph 4
Amendment 121 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 5
Paragraph 5
5. Invites the Member States to take preventive measures, in accordance with the precautionary principle, to improve air quality in cities and to guarantee pollutant concentrations below the levels set in the World Health Organisation guidelines, in particular by providing free public transport or by alternating traffic;
Amendment 142 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 6
Paragraph 6
Amendment 166 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 7
Paragraph 7
7. Considers that the use of renewable energy is keyimportant to achieving sustainable urban mobility, and that technology neutrality should be respected when adopting measures to meet EU targets for CO2 emissions and energy savingsefficiency;
Amendment 178 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 8
Paragraph 8
8. Calls forEncourages the EU and national and local authorities to draw up electric mobility plans which give priority to trams, urban trains, sky ropes, electric bicycles and shared/pooled e-cars;
Amendment 181 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 8
Paragraph 8
8. Calls for the EU and national and local authorities to draw up electric mobility plans which give priority to trams, urban trains, sky ropes, electric bicycles and shared/pooled e-carsfor all modes of transport;
Amendment 195 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 9
Paragraph 9
9. Calls onEncourages the Member States to set ambitious targets for reducing the use of transport-related energy in cities, thereby reducing emissions, and to set a target of doubling cycling rates by 2025;
Amendment 207 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 10
Paragraph 10
Amendment 253 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 13
Paragraph 13
13. Emphasises the importance of SUMPs for achieving EU targets in respect of CO2 emissions, noise, air pollution and accident reduction; considers that the development of SUMPs should be a precondition for finn aid to plancning EU projects in the area of urban transport;
Amendment 283 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 15
Paragraph 15
Amendment 297 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 16
Paragraph 16
Amendment 319 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 17
Paragraph 17
17. Believes that innovative green urban logistics is of the utmost importance for solving congestion and environmental problems in cities, and that logistics shcould inter alia be based on sustainable modes of transport such as cargo bikes, electric vans, inland vessels, trams and buses;
Amendment 330 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 18
Paragraph 18
Amendment 368 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 21
Paragraph 21
Amendment 371 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 21
Paragraph 21
21. Invites the Member States and local authorities to rethink speed management in cities and to introduce a default speed limit of 30 km/h by 2020;
Amendment 392 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 22
Paragraph 22
22. Stresses that cost-benefit assessments of investments should be directed to maximising external societal benefits and minimising external costs arising from, for example, climate change, accidents, health, noise, air pollution and spatial usethe benefit of the economy and the environment;
Amendment 400 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 24
Paragraph 24
Amendment 418 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 25
Paragraph 25
Amendment 424 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 25
Paragraph 25
25. Recalls the ‘use of revenues' principle with regard to road charging, and requests that 50 % of Eurovignette revenue be dedicated to improving urban mobility and that 75 % of urban tolls be used for developing and maintaining urban transport infrastructure;
Amendment 437 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 26
Paragraph 26
Amendment 461 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 27
Paragraph 27
Amendment 477 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 29
Paragraph 29
29. Supports the Horizon 2020 priorities regarding societal challenges for smart, green and integrated transport, and believes that Horizon 2020 must boost research and innovation in the areas of quality of life, sustainable jobs, demographics and active mobility chang; supports the development of such Mobility-as-a- Service (Maas) initiatives across Europe in the context of its Horizon 2020 priorities;
Amendment 490 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 30
Paragraph 30