18 Amendments of Helga TRÜPEL related to 2011/0046(NLE)
Amendment 8 #
Proposal for a decision
Recital 1 a (new)
Recital 1 a (new)
(1a) Whereas it has clearly been demonstrated that the risks of nuclear energy have become unmanageable;
Amendment 9 #
Proposal for a decision
Recital 1 b (new)
Recital 1 b (new)
(1b) Whereas hardly any progress has been made during the last decades in the production of fusion energy, despite billions of allocations of EU research money;
Amendment 10 #
Proposal for a decision
Recital 2
Recital 2
(2) The Framework Programme of the European Atomic Energy Community for nuclear research and training activities (2012 - 2013), hereinafter ‘the Framework Programme (2012 - 2013)’, should complement other Union actions in the area of research policy that are necessary for implementing the Europe 2020 strategy set out in the Communication from the Commission of 3 March 2010 entitled Europe 2020 - A strategy for smart, sustainable and inclusive growth9 , in particular those on education, training, competitiveness and innovation, industry, employment, and the environmentnstitute the beginning of a phasing-out process of EU investments in nuclear energy. Such a phasing-out would free up very much needed funds for future- oriented and far less risky investments in research and technology;
Amendment 11 #
Proposal for a decision
Recital 3
Recital 3
Amendment 12 #
Proposal for a decision
Recital 4
Recital 4
(4) The Framework Programme (2012- 2013) should contribute to the implementation of the Innovation Union, one of the Europe 2020 flagship initiatives adopted by the Communication from the Commission of 6 October 2010 entitled Europe 2020 Flagship Initiative Innovation Union, by enhancing competition for scientific excellence and accelerating the deployment of key innovations in the nuclear energy field to tackle energy and climate change challengesinitiating a phasing-out process of EU funding of nuclear energy;
Amendment 15 #
Proposal for a decision
Recital 5
Recital 5
Amendment 18 #
Proposal for a decision
Recital 6
Recital 6
Amendment 19 #
Proposal for a decision
Recital 7
Recital 7
Amendment 20 #
Proposal for a decision
Recital 9
Recital 9
(9) Euratom has created a single and fully integrated fusion research programme that has taken a leading international role in the development of fusion as a source of energy, but whose results are meagre and whose costs are out of control;
Amendment 21 #
Proposal for a decision
Recital 10
Recital 10
Amendment 22 #
Proposal for a decision
Recital 13
Recital 13
Amendment 23 #
Proposal for a decision
Recital 14
Recital 14
Amendment 29 #
Proposal for a decision
Article 2 – paragraph 3 – point a
Article 2 – paragraph 3 – point a
Amendment 30 #
Proposal for a decision
Article 2 – paragraph 3 – point b
Article 2 – paragraph 3 – point b
b) nuclear fission and radiation protection, with the objective of enhancing resource efficiency, cost-effectiveness and in particular the safety of nuclear fission and other uses of radiation in industry and medicine. Particular emphasis should be put on the decommissioning of nuclear plant research.
Amendment 32 #
Proposal for a decision
Article 3 – paragraph 1 – point a – indent 1
Article 3 – paragraph 1 – point a – indent 1
– fusion energy research 2.208.80910.000.000;
Amendment 34 #
Proposal for a decision
Article 3 – paragraph 1 – point a – indent 2
Article 3 – paragraph 1 – point a – indent 2
– nuclear fissionsafety, improving the management of nuclear waste and radiation protection 118.245.000;
Amendment 36 #
Proposal for a decision
Annex 1 – part I.A
Annex 1 – part I.A
Amendment 37 #
Proposal for a decision
Annex 1 – part I.B – paragraph 2
Annex 1 – part I.B – paragraph 2