6 Amendments of Sabine VERHEYEN related to 2020/2012(INL)
Amendment 13 #
Draft opinion
Paragraph 2
Paragraph 2
2. Stresses the need to develop tailor- made criteria for the use of AI in education, media and creative sectors, by developing ben respecting the different needs and specifications of eachm arksea to ensure for ethically responsible and accepted uses of AI technologies in these areas; underlines that these criteria must be constantly adjusted to the progress in AI technologies;
Amendment 25 #
Draft opinion
Paragraph 3
Paragraph 3
3. Notices that AI personalised learning systems are increasingly being deployed in schools and universities, which is gradually changing the role of teachers in the learning process to one more of facilitation; stresses that this shift should be assessed throughout and, if necessary, reflected in curricula;
Amendment 38 #
Draft opinion
Paragraph 4
Paragraph 4
4. Acknowledges the great potential of AI in the areas of information and media; underlines that, if not regulated, it might have also particular attention must be given to the danger of misuse and possible ethically adverse effects by spreading disinformation, fake news, creating information bubbles and exploiting biases incorporated into AI algorithms;
Amendment 43 #
Draft opinion
Paragraph 5
Paragraph 5
5. Emphasises that meducation should empower citizensia competence is crucial in order to be able to critically assess and understand these new developments; thus, calls on the Member States to invest in media competence education so that all citizens, including the vulnerable social groups, are able, from an early age, to develop new forms of critical thinking, including ‘algorithm awareness’ and the ability to reflect on the impact of AI on information, knowledge, and decision-making; and so that everyone in Europe can benefit from the AI transformation of the Union economy;
Amendment 52 #
Draft opinion
Paragraph 6
Paragraph 6
6. ENotes the important distinction between transparency of algorithms and transparency of the use of algorithms, emphasises the importance for transparency and accountability of algorithms used by AI-enabled systems such as, for example, media streaming companies, in order to ensure access to culturally and linguistically diverse content; stresses that such algorithms should not replace nor limit users' choice and should be designed in such a way that they do not privilege specific workscontent by limiting their ‘personalised’ suggestions to the most popular workcontent, but further enhance offers by enabling platforms to organize and present their content under different categories and on the basis of multiple factors;
Amendment 66 #
Draft opinion
Paragraph 7
Paragraph 7
7. Notes that the use of AI technologies is increasingly raising questions of fair competition in sport; stresses thatemphasises that these developments have to be closely monitored in order to assess whether this area needs a regulatory framework.;