Activities of Ivo VAJGL
Plenary speeches (88)
Preparations for the European Council meeting (20-21 March 2014) (debate)
2013 progress report on Serbia - European integration process of Kosovo (debate)
Main aspects and basic choices of the common foreign and security policy and the common security and defence policy (Article 36 TEU) - Annual report from the Council to the European Parliament on the common foreign and security policy in 2012 (debate)
Detention of Greenpeace activists in Russia (debate)
Situation in Syria (debate)
Pressure exercised by Russia on countries of the Eastern Partnership (in the context of the upcoming Eastern Partnership Summit in Vilnius) (debate)
Closure of Greek national broadcasting company (debate)
US NSA surveillance programme, surveillance bodies in various Member States and impact on EU citizens' privacy (debate)
Situation in Turkey (debate)
A macro-regional strategy for the Alps
Asset recovery to Arab Spring countries in transition (debate)
Asset recovery to Arab Spring countries in transition (debate)
2012 comprehensive monitoring report on Croatia (debate)
2012 progress report on Montenegro (debate)
Statute for a European mutual society (debate)
Match-fixing and corruption in sport (debate)
Recommendations of the Non-Proliferation Treaty Review Conference regarding the establishment of a Middle East free of weapons of mass destruction (debate)
Situation in Mali (debate)
Multiannual framework for the EU Agency for Fundamental Rights (debate)
Annual report on human rights and democracy in the world 2011 and the European Union's policy on the matter - EU's human rights strategy (debate)
Israeli government's decision to expand settlements in the West Bank (debate)
One-minute speeches (Rule 150)
Situation in Gaza (debate)
Marketing and use of explosives precursors (debate)
Elections in Belarus (debate)
Situation in Syria (debate)
Programme of activities of the Cyprus Presidency (debate)
Anti-Counterfeiting Trade Agreement between the EU and its Member States, Australia, Canada, Japan, the Republic of Korea, Mexico, Morocco, New Zealand, Singapore, Switzerland and the USA (debate)
Latest developments in the Middle East, including the situation in Syria (debate)
Situation in Ukraine, case of Yulia Tymoshenko (debate)
Situation in Ukraine, case of Yulia Tymoshenko (debate)
Human rights in the world and the European Union's policy on the matter (debate)
Human rights in the world and the European Union's policy on the matter (debate)
Enlargement report for Turkey (debate)
Enlargement report for Montenegro (debate)
Enlargement report for the former Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia (debate)
Enlargement report for Bosnia and Herzegovina (debate)
Agreement between the EU and Morocco concerning reciprocal liberalisation measures on agricultural products and fishery products (debate)
Agreement between the EU and Morocco concerning reciprocal liberalisation measures on agricultural products and fishery products (debate)
EU-Russia Summit (debate)
EU-Morocco fisheries partnership agreement - Future protocol setting out the fishing opportunities and financial compensation provided for in the Fisheries Partnership Agreement between the European Union and the Kingdom of Morocco (debate)
Accession Treaty : Treaty concerning the accession of the Republic of Croatia - Application of Croatia to become a member of the European Union (debate)
Voting time
Situation in the Arab world and North Africa - Situation in Yemen - Situation in Syria (continuation of debate)
Situation in the Arab world and North Africa - Situation in Yemen - Situation in Syria (continuation of debate)
One-minute speeches on matters of political importance
Revised Hungarian constitution (debate)
Sudan and South Sudan (debate)
Report: Zver - Youth on the Move: – a framework for improving Europe's education and training systems - Report: Honeyball - Early years learning - Report: Schaake - Cultural dimensions of EU external actions - Report: Sanchez-Schmid - Unlocking the potential of cultural and creative industries - Sarajevo as a European Capital of Culture in 2014 (debate)
One-minute speeches (Rule 150)
Review of the European Neighbourhood Policy - Eastern Dimension - Review of the European Neighbourhood Policy - Southern Dimension
Review of the European Neighbourhood Policy - Eastern Dimension - Review of the European Neighbourhood Policy - Southern Dimension
Question Time (Commission)
Female poverty - Equality between women and men - 2010 (debate)
European integration process of Montenegro (debate)
2010 progress report on Croatia (debate)
Financing instrument for development cooperation - Financing instrument for the promotion of democracy and human rights worldwide (amendment of Regulation (EC) No 1889/2006) - A financing instrument for development cooperation (amendment of Regulation (EC) No 1905/2006) - Establishment of a financing instrument for cooperation with industrialised countries (amendment of Regulation (EC) No 1934/2006) (debate)
Situation in the Mediterranean, in particular in Tunisia and Egypt (debate)
An EU Strategy for the Black Sea (debate)
The programme of activities of the Hungarian Presidency of the Council (debate)
EC-Serbia Stabilisation and Association Agreement - Stabilisation and Association Agreement between the EC and Serbia (continuation of debate)
A new strategy for Afghanistan (debate)
Outcome of the NATO Summit in Lisbon (debate)
One-minute speeches on matters of political importance
Situation in Western Sahara (debate)
Ukraine (debate)
Financial Regulation applicable to the general budget of the European Communities as regards the European External Action Service - Draft amending budget No 6/2010: Section II - European Council and Council; Section III - Commission; Section X - European External Action Service - Amendment of the Staff Regulations of Officials of the European Communities and the Conditions of Employment of Other Servants of those Communities (debate)
Draft bill on Israeli NGOs (debate)
European External Action Service (debate)
Israeli military operation against the humanitarian flotilla and the Gaza blockade (debate)
Union for the Mediterranean (debate)
One-minute speeches on matters of political importance
Kyrgyzstan (debate)
Situation in Tibet (debate)
2008 annual report on the CFSP - The implementation of the European Security Strategy and the Common Security and Defence Policy - Non-proliferation Treaty (debate)
2009 progress report on Croatia - 2009 progress report on the Former Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia - 2009 progress report on Turkey (debate)
Situation in Ukraine (debate)
Progress made on resettling Guantánamo detainees and on closing Guantánamo (debate)
Recent attacks on religious minorities in Egypt and in Malaysia
Situation in Yemen (debate)
Results of the Swedish Presidency - Outcome of the European Council on 10 and 11 December 2009 (debate)
New EU action plan for Afghanistan and Pakistan (debate)
Conclusions of the Foreign Affairs Council on the Middle East peace process, including the situation in eastern Jerusalem (debate)
Enlargement strategy 2009 concerning the countries of the western Balkans, Iceland and Turkey (debate)
One-minute speeches on matters of political importance
EU-Russia Summit on 18 November 2009 in Stockholm (debate)
The institutional aspects of the creation of a European external action service - Creation of a European external action service: State of the negotiations with Member States (debate)
Energy security (Nabucco and Desertec) (debate)
Shadow reports (6)
RECOMMENDATION on the draft Council decision on the conclusion on behalf of the European Union and its Member States of the Protocol to the Stabilisation and Association Agreement between the European Communities and their Member States, of the one part, and the Republic of Montenegro, of the other part, to take account of the accession of the Republic of Croatia to the European Union PDF (135 KB) DOC (54 KB)
REPORT on assessing and setting priorities for EU relations with the Eastern Partnership countries PDF (199 KB) DOC (109 KB)
REPORT on the efforts of the international community in the area of development and of ‘state building’ in South Sudan PDF (331 KB) DOC (160 KB)
REPORT Report on an EU Strategy for the Black Sea PDF (278 KB) DOC (203 KB)
REPORT on implementation of the European Consensus on Humanitarian Aid: the mid-term review of its action plan and the way forward PDF (187 KB) DOC (109 KB)
REPORT on the Union for the Mediterranean PDF (271 KB) DOC (180 KB)
Shadow opinions (6)
OPINION on the efforts of the international community in the area of development and of ‘state building’ in South Sudan
OPINION on the situation of human rights in the Sahel Region
OPINION on the European Court of Auditors: Special Report No. 1/2012 – Effectiveness of European Union development aid for food security in Sub-Saharan Africa
OPINION on the EU Strategy for the Horn of Africa
OPINION on the proposal for a regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council establishing the Asylum and Migration Fund
OPINION on the proposal for a regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council introducing emergency autonomous trade preferences for Pakistan
Written explanations (831)
Mechanism to resolve legal and administrative obstacles in a cross-border context (A8-0414/2018 - Matthijs van Miltenburg)
. ‒ I voted in favour of the Report on the proposal for a regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council on a mechanism to resolve legal and administrative obstacles in a cross-border context. In the European Union, cross-border regions make up approximately 40% of the Union’s territory, while harbouring almost a third of its 512 million citizens. At the same time, border regions in Europe generally perform less well economically, have higher unemployment rates and have relatively underdeveloped infrastructure compared to regions that are more centrally located in the Member States.It has been estimated that if 20% of existing border obstacles were to be removed, border regions would gain 2% in GDP, amounting to approximately EUR 91 billion per year in GDP. In their past, many border regions in Europe have been stages of war and conflict between countries. For those reasons, the Lisbon Treaty in Article 174 not only lists economic and social cohesion as its explicit objectives, but also territorial cohesion (with particular attention to cross-border regions). The proposed European cross-border mechanism (ECBM) aims to resolve cross-border obstacles of a legal or administrative nature.
Draft Agreement on Cooperation between Eurojust and Georgia (A8-0065/2019 - Sylvia-Yvone Kaufmann)
I voted in favour of the Report on the draft Council implementing decision approving the conclusion by Eurojust of the Agreement on Cooperation between Eurojust and Georgia. The Eurojust-Georgia Cooperation Agreement follows the model of similar agreements concluded by Eurojust in the past (for example, Eurojust-FYROM, Eurojust-US, Eurojust-Norway, Eurojust-Switzerland, and most recently Eurojust-Albania).The purpose of such agreements is to foster cooperation as regards combating serious crime, especially organised crime and terrorism. They provide, inter alia, for liaison officers, contact points and exchange of information. Such cooperation agreements are based on Article 26a(2) of the Council Decision 2002/187/JHA of 28 February 2002 setting up Eurojust with a view to reinforcing the fight against serious crime.Such cooperation will also aid Georgian authorities to ensure continuous fulfilment of their obligations, and their serious commitment, to preventing and fighting organised crime.
Health technology assessment (A8-0289/2018 - Soledad Cabezón Ruiz)
I voted in favour of the Report on the proposal for a regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council on health technology assessment and amending Directive 2011/24/EU. The fundamental aim of the proposal is to introduce a joint clinical assessment of health technologies at EU level. EU citizens value their health highly, as Eurobarometer surveys have repeatedly shown. As the TFEU recognises, improvements to citizens’ health must be a political priority for the EU in all its actions, but particularly in areas which have a specific bearing on health. The right to health is a fundamental right. It is important to the integrity of the individual and to personal development, but also as a key factor in social cohesion and productivity. The welfare system, which is one of the defining features of the EU, where healthcare systems play a crucial role in society, makes it possible to achieve high standards of health in the EU. The proposal may also help to further cooperation in emerging fields, such as precision medicine, disinvestment in obsolete technology and the preparation of clinical practice guidelines.
Framework for screening of foreign direct investments into the European Union (A8-0198/2018 - Franck Proust)
I voted in favour of the Report on the proposal for a regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council establishing a framework for screening of foreign direct investments into the European Union. All the G7 countries and EU partner countries already have an investment screening mechanism, which they have already reinforced several times. Thirteen out of twenty-eight Member States have already introduced this mechanism into their system; in its text the Commission proposes filling this legislative void at European level to establish a foreign direct investment screening framework. The proposed mechanism does not replace the decision-making power of the Member States with regard to investments in their territory. It aims above all to create a mechanism for the exchange of information at European level. The European Union’s strength in other areas lies in the quality of the information collected. Contacts between Member States and investors will be more regular and create trust owing to this transparency.
European Fisheries Control Agency (A8-0037/2019 - Lidia Joanna Geringer de Oedenberg)
. ‒ I voted in favour of the Report on the proposal for a regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council on the European Fisheries Control Agency (codification). A codification of Council Regulation (EC) No 768/2005 establishing a European Fisheries Control Agency and amending Regulation (EEC) No 2847/93 establishing a control system applicable to the common fisheries policy is necessary. The European Fisheries Control Agency (EFCA) will have the objective of organising the operational coordination of fisheries control and inspection activities by the Member States and assisting Member States to cooperate so as to comply with common fisheries policy rules in order to ensure its effective and uniform application. The Agency’s mission will also be to coordinate the controls and inspections of fisheries by EU countries, the deployment of national means of control and inspection pooled by EU countries, and operations to combat illegal, unreported and unregulated fishing. The Agency will coordinate operational cooperation between Member States in accordance with joint deployment plans which organise the use of the available means of control and inspection of the Member States concerned so as to give effect to control and inspection programmes.
Computerising the movement and surveillance of excise goods (A8-0010/2019 - Kay Swinburne)
. ‒ I voted in favour of the Report on the proposal for a decision of the European Parliament and of the Council on computerising the movement and surveillance of excise goods (recast). This proposal accompanies the proposal for a Council directive laying down the general arrangement for excise duty as regards the automation of the procedure for movements of excise goods which have been released for consumption in the territory of one Member State and that are moved to the territory of another Member State in order to be delivered for commercial purposes in that other Member State.Decision No 1152/2003/EC is the founding decision for the computerised system (Excise Movement and Control System – EMCS). The objective of the proposal is to extend the Excise Movement and Control System to intra—EU movements of excise goods that are released for consumption, in order to simplify the procedure and allow for proper monitoring of such movements, and to provide a base for the governance of further automation of processes defined by European Union excise legislation, where such automation is considered beneficial.
Law applicable to the third-party effects of assignments of claims (A8-0261/2018 - Pavel Svoboda)
. ‒ I voted in favour of the Report on the proposal for a regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council on the law applicable to the third party effects of assignments of claims. Conflict-of-laws rules governing the third-party (or proprietary) effects of assignments of claims do not currently exist at Union level. These conflict-of-laws rules are laid down at Member State level, but they are inconsistent and often unclear. In cross-border assignments of claims, the inconsistency of national conflict-of-laws rules leads to legal uncertainty as to which law applies to the third-party effects of the assignments. Rules relating to the law applicable to third-party effects of assignments of claims were included in the Commission proposal that later became Regulation (EC) No 593/208 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 17 June 2008 on the law applicable to contractual obligations (Rome I), but they did not end up in the final text.
Exchange, assistance and training programme for the protection of the euro against counterfeiting for the period 2021-2027 (Pericles IV programme) (A8-0069/2019 - Dennis de Jong)
. ‒ I voted in favour of the Report on the proposal for a regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council establishing an exchange, assistance and training programme for the protection of the euro against counterfeiting for the period 2021-2027 (the ‘Pericles IV programme’). The Treaty (the TFEU) provides that Parliament and the Council are to establish the measures necessary for the use of the euro as the single currency (Article 133 TFEU). Among these measures is the protection of the euro against counterfeiting. On the basis of this, the EU is responsible for protection of the euro as the single currency.Counterfeiting of the euro poses a real problem for the Union and its institutions. Its threats are still substantial, as demonstrated by the increasing availability of high-quality counterfeit euros and security features on the internet/darknet and the existence of counterfeiting hotspots, e.g. in Colombia, Peru and China. Given the cross-border circulation of the euro and the deep involvement of international organised crime in euro counterfeiting (production and distribution), it is necessary for national protection frameworks to be complemented by an EU initiative to ensure homogeneous cooperation, and to face possible emerging transnational risks.
EU-Singapore Free Trade Agreement (A8-0053/2019 - David Martin)
I voted in favour of the Recommendation on the draft Council decision on the conclusion of the Free Trade Agreement between the European Union and the Republic of Singapore. Singapore is a hub in the region and this deal will enhance EU trade flows with the rest of ASEAN. The agreement is crucial to avoid EU exporters being at a competitive disadvantage compared with businesses from countries which Singapore has already concluded trade agreements with, such as the Comprehensive and Progressive Trans-Pacific Partnership. Singapore is by far the EU’s largest partner in the region, accounting for slightly under one-third of EU-ASEAN trade in goods and services, and roughly two-thirds of investments between the two regions. The agreement is of key geostrategic importance. It is the first bilateral trade agreement the EU has negotiated with an ASEAN member and an important stepping stone towards a region to region FTA. Furthermore, it also serves as a benchmark for the FTAs the EU is currently negotiating with the other main ASEAN economies. Trade flows with Singapore must go hand in hand with increased level of labour and environmental protection, promote EU values and uphold EU standards.
EU-Singapore Free Trade Agreement (resolution) (A8-0048/2019 - David Martin)
I voted in favour of the Report containing a motion for a non-legislative resolution on the draft Council decision on the conclusion of the Free Trade Agreement between the European Union and the Republic of Singapore. This is the first bilateral trade agreement concluded between the EU and an ASEAN member state and an important stepping stone towards the final objective of a region-to-region free trade agreement (FTA). Within the ASEAN region, Singapore is by far the EU’s largest partner, with EU-Singapore trade worth more than EUR 50 billion annually. More than 10 000 European companies have their regional offices in Singapore. The report noted that Singapore removed most of its tariffs on EU products and that this agreement will eliminate the remaining ones completely as of its entry into force. Singapore will remove certain measures that may constitute barriers to trade, such as double safety tests in cars and car parts, which will simplify the export of goods by EU businesses to Singapore. The FTA will grant EU companies better access to the Singapore services market such as in financial, telecommunications, engineering, architectural, maritime transport and postal services, and that such liberalisation follows a ‘positive list’ approach.
EU-Singapore Investment Protection Agreement (A8-0054/2019 - David Martin)
I voted in favour of the Recommendation on the draft Council decision on the conclusion on behalf of the European Union of the Investment Protection Agreement between the European Union and its Member States, of the one part, and the Republic of Singapore, of the other part. In 2014, in light of the EU’s exclusive competence on foreign direct investment including investment protection acquired with the Lisbon Treaty, EU and Singapore agreed to and included investment protection provisions in the bilateral FTA initialled the year before. In 2015 the Commission decided to request the opinion of the Court of Justice of the EU on the EU competence to sign and conclude the FTA by itself or whether the participation of Member States was required. After the EU adopted its new approach on investment protection and enforcement mechanism reflected in the EU-Canada trade deal, Singapore agreed to review the investment protection provisions negotiated in 2014 and therefore to re-open a closed agreement. It is important to highlight that this agreement will replace the existing bilateral investment treaties between 13 EU Member States and Singapore. Such treaties are based on outdated investment protection provisions and feature the controversial investor-state dispute settlement.
EU-Singapore Investment Protection Agreement (resolution) (A8-0049/2019 - David Martin)
I voted in favour of the Report containing a motion for a non-legislative resolution on the draft Council decision on the conclusion on behalf of the European Union of the Investment Protection Agreement between the European Union and its Member States, of the one part, and the Republic of Singapore, of the other part. As a reminder, Singapore is the eighth largest destination for EU foreign direct investment and the first in the ASEAN region. It is the number one location for European investment in Asia, with bilateral investment stocks reaching EUR 256 billion in 2016. This is the first ‘investment protection only’ agreement concluded between the EU and a third country following discussions among the institutions on the new architecture of EU FTAs. In the light of the EU’s new approach to investment protection and its enforcement mechanism, the investment court system (ICS), in 2017 Singapore agreed to review the investment protection provisions negotiated in 2014, thereby re-opening a closed agreement. The agreement will replace the existing bilateral investment treaties between 13 EU Member States and Singapore, which do not include the EU’s new approach to investment protection and its enforcement mechanism (ICS).
EU-Singapore Partnership and Cooperation Agreement (A8-0020/2019 - Antonio López-Istúriz White)
I voted in favour of the Recommendation on the draft Council decision on the conclusion, on behalf of the European Union, of the Partnership and Cooperation Agreement between the European Union and its Member States, of the one part, and the Republic of Singapore, of the other part. This agreement with Singapore constitutes a stepping stone towards enhanced political and economic involvement of the EU in South-East Asia. It will provide the basis for more effective bilateral engagement by the EU and its Member States with Singapore by strengthening political dialogue and enhancing cooperation in a broad range of areas. The agreement covers the EU’s standard political clauses on human rights, International Criminal Court (ICC), Weapons of Mass Destructions (WMD), Small Arms and Light Weapons (SALW) and counter-terrorism. It also provides for the possibility of suspending the application of the Agreement or of any specific agreement in case of a violation of essential elements of the agreement, i.e. the human rights clause and the non-proliferation clause. It also encompasses cooperation in areas such as trade and investment issues, industrial policy, health, environment, climate change, energy, tax, education and culture, labour, and social affairs, science and technology, etc.
EU-Singapore Partnership and Cooperation Agreement (resolution) (A8-0023/2019 - Antonio López-Istúriz White)
I voted in favour of the Report containing a motion for a non-legislative resolution on the draft Council decision on the conclusion, on behalf of the European Union, of the Partnership and Cooperation Agreement between the European Union and its Member States, of the one part, and the Republic of Singapore, of the other part. Members welcomed the conclusion of the PCA, which is of strategic importance and will provide a legal framework for the long-standing bilateral relations and commitment to strengthening and widening cooperation in regional and international forums, and in areas such as environmental protection, international stability, justice, security and development. It shall create opportunities in new areas of cooperation, such as human rights, justice, freedom and security and non-proliferation of nuclear weapons, and for scientific and technological cooperation in fields such as energy, the environment, the fight against climate change, protection of natural resources, and transport, in particular maritime and air transport. The report reaffirmed the needed commitment and engagement with regard to respect for human rights, including social rights, democracy, fundamental freedoms, good governance and the rule of law, and to working together in this regard.
Treaty establishing the Transport Community (A8-0022/2019 - Karima Delli)
I voted in favour of the recommendation on the draft Council decision on the conclusion, on behalf of the European Union, of the Treaty establishing the Transport Community. The Treaty on establishing the Transport Community (TCT) aims to take a more comprehensive cooperation approach – involving other transport policies and transport related areas. The Treaty aims to create a transport community in the field of road, rail, inland waterway and maritime transport and to develop the transport network between the European Union and the Western Balkans, referred to as ‘the Transport Community’. The Transport Community shall work towards the progressive integration of transport markets of the South-Western Balkans into the European Union transport market on the basis of the relevant acquis , including in the areas of technical standards, interoperability, safety, security, traffic management, social policy, public procurement and environment, for all modes of transport excluding air transport. TCT is beneficial with regard to the accession processes in Western Balkans and to fostering regional cooperation and the reform process in the context of the Western Balkan Six initiative as well as the implementation of the Trans-European Transport Network (TEN-T) as extended to the Western Balkans.
2018 Report on Bosnia and Herzegovina (A8-0467/2018 - Cristian Dan Preda)
I voted in favour of the report on the 2018 Commission report on Bosnia and Herzegovina. The EU will continue to provide guidance to the country’s authorities on reform priorities on the country’s EU membership path. Political and economic dialogue took place between the EU and Bosnia and Herzegovina in the framework of the Stabilisation and Association Agreement (SAA) structures, which continued to operate smoothly. Bosnia and Herzegovina’s constitution remains in breach of the European Convention on Human Rights, as per the Sejdić-Finci and related cases. The functioning of the Presidency of Bosnia and Herzegovina was affected by the expression of divergent positions by its individual members on a number of issues under its competence over foreign policy. Key remaining issues are weak rule of law, a business environment that is still poor, a fragmented and inefficient public administration and major labour market imbalances, related to a poor education system, weak institutional capacities, and an unsupportive investment climate. The EU has continued to deploy considerable resources in Bosnia and Herzegovina under the common foreign and security policy and the common security and defence policy. However, Bosnia and Herzegovina’s alignment with EU common foreign and security policy has yet to be improved.
Common provisions on the European Regional Development Fund, the European Social Fund Plus, the Cohesion Fund, and the European Maritime and Fisheries Fund and financial rules for those (A8-0043/2019 - Andrey Novakov, Constanze Krehl)
I voted in favour of the report on the proposal for a regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council laying down common provisions on the European Regional Development Fund, the European Social Fund Plus, the Cohesion Fund, and the European Maritime and Fisheries Fund and financial rules for those and for the Asylum and Migration Fund, the Internal Security Fund and the Border Management and Visa Instrument. This proposal is very important because it lays down the main rules for the Union’s cohesion policy for the next seven-year period. The proposed commons provision regulation contains common rules for the European Regional Development Fund, the Cohesion Fund, the European Social Fund Plus, the European Maritime and Fisheries Fund, the Asylum and Migration Fund, the Border Management and Visa Instrument and the Internal Security Fund. Having a common rulebook for the different shared-management funds contributes to administrative simplification and coherence, and allows synergies between the different funds. The Commission’s proposed Regulation sets out common provisions for seven shared management funds. These funds are a symbol of European solidarity and an expression of our common desire for upward social and economic convergence.
Justice programme (A8-0068/2019 - Josef Weidenholzer, Heidi Hautala)
I voted in favour of the report on the proposal for a regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council establishing the justice programme. The Union is a community of law, and its values constitute the very basis of its existence. These values are enshrined in the EU Treaties. To promote common European values and rights, the EU has combined several instruments in a policy mix of legislation, policies and funding. In particular, the following funding programmes have showed a strong societal focus and are clearly related to European values: the rights, equality and citizenship programme, the Europe for citizens programme, and the justice programme. These programmes have led to real progress in promoting values and implementing the rights that EU legislation grants to people throughout the Union. However, the fragmented nature and limited resources of current EU funding programmes limit the EU’s capacity to respond to existing and new challenges. This programme has the general objective of contributing to the further development of a European area of justice based on the rule of law and mutual recognition and mutual trust between justice professionals in cross-border proceedings.
The state of the debate on the Future of Europe (A8-0427/2018 - Ramón Jáuregui Atondo)
I voted in favour of the report on the state of the debate on the future of Europe. There is a lot going on in the world, with developments occurring thick and fast on every level. We are affected by everything that happens, as the world is so connected and is becoming increasingly interdependent. Europe therefore finds itself facing new challenges that are forcing us to take decisions within an institutional system that does not function efficiently or quickly enough, and is unable to cope with the sheer scope and scale of the issues at stake. Many of the serious problems we have faced in recent years are only in the process of being addressed: they have not been solved. Migration is one such issue, and a new policy is required. The euro crisis has underlined the pressing issues surrounding the governance of that currency. In the wake of the economic crisis, a greater degree of convergence and new policies are the order of the day.
Cooperation between the courts of the Member States in the taking of evidence in civil or commercial matters (A8-0477/2018 - Emil Radev)
I voted in favour of the report on the proposal for a regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council amending Council Regulation (EC) No 1206/2001 of 28 May 2001 on cooperation between the courts of the Member States in the taking of evidence in civil or commercial matters. Among the EU’s tasks is that of developing a European area of justice in civil matters based on the principles of mutual trust and the mutual recognition of judgments. The area of justice requires judicial cooperation across borders. For this purpose, and to facilitate the proper functioning of the internal market, the EU has adopted legislation on the cross-border service of judicial documents and on cooperation in the taking of evidence. These instruments are crucial in the regulation of judicial assistance in civil and commercial matters between the Member States. Their common purpose is to provide an efficient framework for cross-border judicial cooperation. They have replaced the earlier international, more cumbersome system of the Hague Conventions between the Member States. Smooth cooperation between courts is also necessary for the proper functioning of the internal market.
Service in the Member States of judicial and extrajudicial documents in civil or commercial matters (A8-0001/2019 - Sergio Gaetano Cofferati)
I voted in favour of the report on the proposal for a regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council amending Regulation (EC) No 1393/2007 of the European Parliament and of the Council on the service in the Member States of judicial and extrajudicial documents in civil or commercial matters (service of documents). Regulation (EC) 2007/1393 of the European Parliament and of the Council on the service in the Member States of judicial and extrajudicial documents in civil or commercial matters (service of documents) has been a successful part of the programme on civil justice cooperation of the EU.In 2017 the Commission undertook a regulatory fitness (REFIT) evaluation, in line with the better regulation guidelines, to assess the operation of the instrument in relation to the five key mandatory evaluation criteria of effectiveness, efficiency, relevance, coherence and EU added value. In this report, a number of issues were raised, primarily in relation to the possibility of modernising the rules given advances in communication technology. The proposal by the European Commission aims at clarifying certain elements of Regulation (EC) 2007/1393 and at improving the efficiency and speed of judicial procedures with cross-border implications in commercial and civil matters.
Common rules ensuring basic road freight connectivity with regard to the withdrawal of the United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland from the Union (A8-0063/2019 - Isabella De Monte)
I voted in favour of the report on the proposal for a regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council on common rules ensuring basic road freight connectivity with regard to the withdrawal of the United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland from the Union. This proposed act would establish basic connectivity subject to equivalent rights being granted by the United Kingdom. Such connectivity would be ensured in an equal manner for traffic to and from all points in the Union, which avoids distortions in the internal market. The proposed regulation lays down a mechanism to ensure that the rights enjoyed by Union road haulage operators in the United Kingdom are equivalent to those granted to UK road haulage operators under the proposed regulation. If that is not the case, the Commission is empowered to adopt the necessary measures to correct the situation by means of delegated acts, including the limitation to the allowable capacity available to UK road haulage operators or to the number of journeys, or to both.
Common rules ensuring basic air connectivity with regard to the withdrawal of the United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland from the Union (A8-0062/2019 - Pavel Telička)
I voted in favour of report on the proposal for a regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council on common rules ensuring basic air connectivity with regard to the withdrawal of the United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland from the Union. Direct air transport services between the United Kingdom and the Member States are almost entirely in the hands of United Kingdom and Union air carriers. The loss by air carriers of their right to provide air services between the United Kingdom and the Member States would therefore result in serious disruption. Most, if not all, air routes between the Union and the United Kingdom would cease to be served. The present proposal thus has the objective to lay down provisional measures to govern air transport between the Union and the United Kingdom following the latter’s withdrawal from the Union. This proposal complements Union Regulation (EC) No 1008/2008. The proposed regulation provides for the unilateral grant of first, second, third and fourth-freedom traffic rights to United Kingdom air carriers so that these can continue to overfly and make technical stops in Union’s territory, as well as serve direct routes between the respective territories.
Aviation safety with regard to the withdrawal of the United Kingdom of Great Britain and Nothern Ireland from the Union (A8-0061/2019 - Kosma Złotowski)
I voted in favour of the report on the proposal for a regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council on certain aspects of aviation safety with regard to the withdrawal of the United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland from the Union. the proposal aims to put in place a mechanism to temporarily extend (for nine months) the validity of certain aviation safety certificates in the absence of an agreement to withdraw the United Kingdom from the Union. It would thus allow post-Brexit EU-27 manufacturers to continue their production and operators to continue to use these products in accordance with the applicable EU legal requirements. This regulation shall apply to the certificates listed in the annex to this regulation, which are valid on the day preceding the date of application of this regulation and which have been issued by any of the following: the European Union Aviation Safety Agency, to natural or legal persons having their principal place of business in the United Kingdom as set out in section 1 of the annex; natural or legal persons certified by the competent authorities of the United Kingdom as set out in section 2 of the annex.
GATS: necessary compensatory adjustments resulting from the accession of Czechia, Estonia, Cyprus, Latvia, Lithuania, Hungary, Malta, Austria, Poland, Slovenia, Slovakia, Finland and Sweden to the EU (A8-0067/2019 - José Ignacio Salafranca Sánchez-Neyra)
I voted in favour of the recommendation on the draft Council decision on the conclusion of the relevant agreements under Article XXI of the General Agreement on Trade in Services with Argentina, Australia, Brazil, Canada, China, the separate customs territory of Taiwan, Penghu, Kinmen and Matsu (Chinese Taipei), Columbia, Cuba, Ecuador, Hong Kong China, India, Japan, Korea, New Zealand, the Philippines, Switzerland, and the United States, on the necessary compensatory adjustments resulting from the accession of Czechia, Estonia, Cyprus, Latvia, Lithuania, Hungary, Malta, Austria, Poland, Slovenia, Slovakia, Finland and Sweden to the European Union. The schedule is needed to enter into force to ensure that all the Member States concerned are covered by the same horizontal limitations, that their commitments are not in breach of the acquis communautaire and to advance in further consolidation processes. The rapporteur is of the opinion that the proposal for a Council decision is of purely technical nature and should be concluded expeditiously, for the EU to be able to continue negotiations for a GATS Schedule covering all present Member States of the European Union.
Streamlining measures for advancing the realisation of the trans-European transport network (A8-0015/2019 - Dominique Riquet)
I voted in favour of the report on the proposal for a regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council on streamlining measures for advancing the realisation of the trans-European transport network. The Union needs a network of modern, effective infrastructure at EU level which will connect its citizens and businesses and support the single market. In order to achieve this, the European institutions have designated trans-European transport networks (TEN-Ts) comprising a comprehensive network but above all a core network: a real backbone for the Union. Projects of common interest form part of this network and are the subject of this regulation, and they provide considerable European added value. The completion of TEN-T networks is vital to achieving lasting, sustainable economic growth in the Union while ensuring its competitiveness in the face of increasing global competition. The Union and its Member States have set themselves a deadline of 2030 to complete the core network. This is expected to generate an additional EUR 4 500 billion or 1.8% of Union GDP and account for 13 million job-years until 2030.
Insurance of motor vehicles (A8-0035/2019 - Dita Charanzová)
I voted in favour of the Report on the proposal for a directive of the European Parliament and of the Council amending Directive 2009/103/EC of the European Parliament and the Council of 16 September 2009 relating to insurance against civil liability in respect of the use of motor vehicles, and the enforcement of the obligation to ensure against such liability.The proposal, as submitted by the Commission, seeks to amend the Motor Insurance Directive (2009/103/EC) in five specific areas: insolvency of the insurer; claims history; risks due to uninsured driving; minimum amounts of cover; and scope of the Directive. The Motor Insurance Directive remains fit for purpose, while in certain areas there is room for improvement. There has been some confusion among Member States on which vehicles fall within the scope of the Directive. This concerns, in particular, vehicles like eBikes, segways or electric scooters, but also vehicles for instance used in motor sports.The rapporteur believes that, in principle, the Directive should not cover such vehicles, as the requirement of motor insurance could hinder the uptake, for instance, of eBikes or may unnecessarily increase the insurance premiums for all vehicles.
Experiencing backlash in women’s rights and gender equality in the EU (B8-0096/2019, B8-0099/2019)
I voted in favour of the Question for Oral Answer B8 0005/2019 pursuant to Rule 128(5) of the Rules of Procedure on experiencing a backlash in women’s rights and gender equality in the EU (2018/2684(RSP)). A backlash can be defined as resistance to progressive social change, regression on acquired rights or maintenance of a non-egalitarian status quo, and whereas the backlash against women’s rights and gender equality is particularly worrying; whereas such resistance can be exercised regardless of one’s social background or age, can be of both a formal or informal nature, and can involve passive or active strategies to counter further progress by trying to change laws or policies which would ultimately limit citizens’ acquired rights; whereas this has been accompanied by the dissemination of fake news and harmful stereotypical beliefs. All Member States have assumed obligations and duties under international law and the EU Treaties to respect, guarantee, protect and fulfil fundamental rights and the rights of women.
Policy challenges and strategies against women's cancers and related comorbidities (B8-0097/2019)
I voted in favour of the Question for Oral Answer B8 0006/2019 pursuant to Rule 128(5) of the Rules of Procedure on policy challenges and strategies against women’s cancers and related comorbidities (2018/2782(RSP)). The Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union recognises the right for persons to access preventive health care and the right to benefit from medical treatment. One in three Europeans develops cancer during his or her lifetime and every year around 1.3 million people die of cancer in the EU, which amounts to approximately 26 % of all death.Every year, thousands of women receive breast prostheses for medical or aesthetic reasons, or sometimes a combination of both, without any real consideration being given to the risks before these implants are recommended to patients. Cooperation at European level together with the efficient use of EU funds can contribute to the development of an effective EU strategy against cancer.
Use of cannabis for medicinal purposes (B8-0071/2019)
I voted in favour of the motion for a resolution further to question for Oral Answer B8 0001/2019 pursuant to Rule 128(5) of the Rules of Procedure on use of cannabis for medicinal purposes (2018/2775(RSP)). The cannabis plant is made up of more than 480 compounds, including over 100 cannabinoids composed of both psychoactive and non-psychoactive compounds. Many of the compounds constituting the cannabis plant are unique to cannabis. The numerous other cannabinoids which make up the cannabis plant, such as cannabichromene, cannabinol, cannabidiolic acid, cannabigerol and tetrahydrocannabivarin, can have neuroprotective effects, can help reduce certain symptoms affecting patients – such as chronic pain, inflammation or bacterial infections – and can stimulate bone growth.The Commission and national authorities should work together to provide a legal definition of medical cannabis, and to draw a clear distinction between cannabis-based medicines approved by the EMA or other regulatory agencies, medical cannabis not supported by clinical trials, and other applications of cannabis (e.g. recreational or industrial).
Deliberations of the Committee on Petitions 2018 (A8-0024/2019 - Cecilia Wikström)
I voted in favour of the Report on the outcome of the Committee on Petitions’ deliberations during 2018. Pursuant to Rule 216 (7) of the Rules of Procedure of the European Parliament, the Committee on Petitions shall report annually on the outcome of its deliberations. During the current legislative term, this report is the last one for a full calendar year.The stocktaking and the assessment of the work of the committee should be carried out by its current members. As statistical data for the year 2018 is not available yet, this report is a simplified version of the regular report on the committee’s deliberations. The precise and full view of the work done by the Committee on Petitions, including statistics on the number of petitions received, dealt with and closed as well as countries concerned and matters raised will be part of the annual report for the year 2019.It is essential that a good cooperation between the Committee on Petitions and the European Commission, as the EU institution responsible for ensuring the application of and compliance with EU law, is established and is maintained.
Fisheries Partnership Agreement between Côte d’Ivoire and the EU (2018-2024) (A8-0030/2019 - João Ferreira)
I voted in favour of the recommendation on the draft Council decision on the conclusion of the Protocol on the implementation of the Fisheries Partnership Agreement between the European Union and the Republic of Côte d’Ivoire (2018-2024). This protocol between the EU and the Republic of Côte d’Ivoire has to comply with the new Common Fisheries Policy (CFP) Regulation, which puts the emphasis on, in particular, sustainable fisheries and good governance, while recognising the importance of policy consistency between the CFP and EU development cooperation objectives. The protocol covers a six-year period, thus providing a degree of stability. The fishing opportunities granted to EU vessels are, according to the Commission, in line with the best scientific opinions available and with the recommendations of the International Commission for the Conservation of Atlantic Tunas, and are in keeping with the ‘available surplus’ principle. The new protocol lays down a reference tonnage of 5 500 tonnes per year, which is lower than under the previous protocol (6 500 tonnes per year). The catch level is therefore controlled.
Fisheries Partnership Agreement between Côte d’Ivoire and the EU (2018-2024) (resolution) (A8-0034/2019 - João Ferreira)
I voted in favour of the report containing a motion for a non-legislative resolution on the draft Council decision on the conclusion of the Protocol on the implementation of the Fisheries Partnership Agreement between the European Union and the Republic of Côte d’Ivoire (2018-2024). The Commission should urge the Republic of Côte d’Ivoire to use the financial contribution provided by the protocol for sectoral support to sustainably strengthen its national fisheries industry, particularly artisanal fishing, encouraging demand for local investment and industrial projects in the blue economy and creating local jobs. The Commission should endeavour to include this in the multiannual sectoral programme, provided for in Article 4 of the protocol.
Motion for a resolution pursuant to Rule 108(6) seeking an opinion from the Court of Justice on the compatibility with the Treaties of the proposed EU-Morocco Sustainable Fisheries Partnership Agreement (B8-0100/2019)
I voted in favour of the motion for a resolution pursuant to Rule 108(6) of the Rules of Procedure seeking an opinion from the Court of Justice on the compatibility with the Treaties of the proposed Sustainable Fisheries Partnership Agreement between the European Union and the Kingdom of Morocco, the Implementation Protocol thereto and an exchange of letters accompanying the said Agreement (2019/2565(RSP)). Under Article 21 of the Treaty on European Union, the EU and its Member States are under an obligation to respect the principles of the United Nations Charter and international law; and Article 1, paragraph 2, and Article 55 of the UN Charter include respect for the principle of self-determination of peoples. There is legal uncertainty as to whether the proposed agreement is compatible with the Treaties and, in particular, with the CJEU’s judgments of 21 December 2016 in case C-104/16 P and of 27 February 2018 in case C-266/16.
Agreement to prevent unregulated high seas fisheries in the Central Arctic Ocean (A8-0016/2019 - Norica Nicolai)
I voted in favour of this agreement, as its objective is to prevent unregulated fishing (IUU) in the high seas portion of the central Arctic Ocean. The parties to this agreement are Canada, the People’s Republic of China, the Kingdom of Denmark in respect of the Faroe Islands and Greenland, Iceland, Japan, the Republic of Korea, the Kingdom of Norway, the Russian Federation, the United States of America and the European Union. The Government of Canada was chosen to be the depository of the agreement and will perform the functions as provided for in the 1969 Vienna Convention on the Law of Treaties. Exploratory fishing must not undermine the objective of the agreement and must be limited in duration, scope and scale in order to minimise the impact on stocks. Any commercial fishing authorisation should be based on the management measures derived from the scientific information given by the Joint Programme or based on the conservation and management measures adopted by a regional or subregional fishing management organisation (RFMO), which would operate in the agreement area in accordance with international law and international standards.
Protocol to the EU-Mexico Economic Partnership, Political Coordination and Cooperation Agreement (accession of Croatia) (A8-0066/2019 - Inmaculada Rodríguez-Piñero Fernández)
I voted in favour of the report on the draft Council decision on the conclusion, on behalf of the European Union and its Member States, of the Third Additional Protocol to the Economic Partnership, Political Coordination and Cooperation Agreement between the European Community and its Member States, of the one part, and the United Mexican States, of the other part, to take account of the accession of the Republic of Croatia to the European Union. Under Article 6(2) of the Act of Accession of the Republic of Croatia, Croatia undertook to accede to the existing agreements concluded or signed by the Member States and the European Union with third countries. Unless otherwise provided for in specific agreements, Croatia accedes to these existing agreements by means of protocols that the Council, acting unanimously on behalf of the Member States, concludes with the third countries concerned.
EU Anti-Fraud Programme (A8-0064/2019 - José Ignacio Salafranca Sánchez-Neyra)
. ‒ I voted in favour of the Report on the proposal for a regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council establishing the EU Anti-Fraud Programme. Fraud affecting the EU’s financial interests is a cross-border phenomenon affecting all EU Member States. Experience shows that the Union’s financial interests are impacted by both fraud and irregularities. The implementation of the past Union multi-annual budgets has been accompanied by a set of measures to support the Member States and the Union as a whole in preventing and fighting fraud affecting the Union’s financial interests, and supporting mutual administrative assistance and cooperation in customs and agriculture matters. Although it is difficult to quantify their financial impact, these measures have contributed to bringing back large amounts of money into the EU budget.
Multiannual plan for stocks fished in the Western Waters and adjacent waters, and for fisheries exploiting those stocks (A8-0310/2018 - Alain Cadec)
. ‒ I voted in favour of the Report on the proposal for a Regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council establishing a multiannual plan for fish stocks in the Western Waters and adjacent waters, and for fisheries exploiting those stocks, amending Regulation (EU) 2016/1139 establishing a multiannual plan for the Baltic Sea, and repealing Regulations (EC) No 811/2004, (EC) No 2166/2005, (EC) No 388/2006, (EC) No 509/2007 and (EC) No 1300/2008. The basic regulation establishing the Common Fisheries Policy calls for the establishment of multiannual management plans. This meets a dual requirement: more predictable management policies achieved by long-term planning, and a regionalised approach to these plans by sea basin, so as to take due account of the specific situation of individual stakeholders and the contributions made by them. The aim is to put in place a regionalised fisheries management framework for the exploitation of fish stocks in line with maximum sustainable yield (MSY). The plans for the Baltic Sea and the North Sea provide a good starting point for the multiannual Western Waters management plan.
Union Civil Protection Mechanism (A8-0180/2018 - Elisabetta Gardini)
. ‒ I voted in favour of the Report on the proposal for a decision of the European Parliament and of the Council amending Decision No 1313/2013/EU on a Union Civil Protection Mechanism. Europe and the world are facing a growing number of disasters, with great human and material costs. The frequency and intensity of weather-related disasters, notably floods and forest fires are also increasing as a result of climate change. The European Union Civil Protection Mechanism (EUCPM) aims to support, complement and facilitate the coordination of Member States actions with the objective of increasing the prevention, preparedness and response to disaster. The EUCPM can be activated in response to disasters occurring both inside and outside the Union (the latter represent more than half of all activations of the mechanism). In response to disasters outside the Union, the EUCPM is often activated in parallel to the provision of humanitarian assistance by the EU.
Minimum requirements for water reuse (A8-0044/2019 - Simona Bonafè)
. ‒ I voted in favour of the Report on the proposal for a regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council on minimum requirements for water reuse. According to the five IPCC reports published in the period between 1983 and 2012, each of the last three decades has been successively warmer at a global level than any previous decade since the 1850s. The period from 1983 to 2012 is probably the warmest 30-year period in the last 1400 years. Recent climatic changes have significantly affected agriculture and the economy, and it is estimated that the impact of climate change has significantly increased the frequency and intensity of droughts and the damage that they cause to the environment and economy over the last thirty years. In accordance with adopted legislation and adopted Union policies, such as the Water Framework Directive and the EU Action Plan for the Circular Economy, opportunities to regulate the reuse of water from municipal wastewater treatment systems for irrigation purposes in agriculture are being opened up in order to be able to compensate for potential and actual deficits of this vital resource in a timely manner.
Approval and market surveillance of agricultural and forestry vehicles (A8-0318/2018 - Nicola Danti)
. ‒ I voted in favour of the Report on the proposal for a regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council amending and correcting Regulation (EU) No 167/2013 on the approval and market surveillance of agricultural and forestry vehicles. Type-approval requirements applying to agricultural and forestry vehicles are set out in Directive 2003/37/EC and its implementing Directives, which have been repealed with effect from 1 January 2016 and replaced by Regulation (EU) No 167/2013 and its four delegated acts and one implementing act. It is necessary to introduce clarifications to two definitions of tractor categories and correct certain terms important for the uniform application of the Regulation without allowing varying interpretations. Moreover, there is a continuous need to update elements of these delegated acts to technical progress.
Programme for single market, competitiveness of enterprises and European statistics (A8-0052/2019 - Nicola Danti)
I voted in favour of the report on the proposal for a regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council establishing the Programme for single market, competitiveness of enterprises, including small and medium-sized enterprises, and European statistics and repealing Regulations (EU) No 99/2013, (EU) No 1287/2013, (EU) No 254/2014, (EU) No 258/2014, (EU) No 652/2014 and (EU) 2017/826. The single market has been, and remains, the cornerstone at the heart of the European project. In its 25 years of existence, the single market has contributed to achieving a high level of integration among Member States, bringing tangible benefits to businesses, citizens and consumers in many ways, such as providing greater choice and lower prices in a more competitive market, opportunities for travelling and working across the EU, access to an enormous market for businesses and better consumer protection. Despite the adoption and implementation of over 3500 measures, the single market project is far from completed. Many barriers continue to hinder the accomplishment of the single market. For the next 2021-2027 period, the Commission is proposing a new Single Market Programme, which will bring six programmes and numerous actions, previously separate, under one coherent framework.
VAT: Definitive system for the taxation of trade between Member States (A8-0028/2019 - Fulvio Martusciello)
I voted in favour of the Report on the proposal for a Council directive amending Directive 2006/112/EC as regards the introduction of the detailed technical measures for the operation of the definitive VAT system for the taxation of trade between Member States. The creation of a simple, modern and fraud-proof VAT system is one of the fiscal priorities set out by the Commission. This arrangement, as far as business-to-business (B2B) transactions on goods are concerned, splits the cross-border movement of goods into two different transactions: an exempt supply in the Member State of departure of the goods and an intra-Community acquisition taxed in the Member State of destination. The goal is to simplify how goods are taxed: in the current VAT system, trade in goods between businesses is split into two transactions: a VAT-exempt sale in the Member State of origin and a taxed acquisition in the Member State of destination.
Roma integration strategies (B8-0098/2019)
I voted in favour of the effort to wind up the debate on the statements by the Council and the Commission pursuant to Rule 123(2) of the Rules of Procedure on the need for a strengthened post-2020 Strategic EU Framework for National Roma Inclusion Strategies and stepping up the fight against anti-Gypsyism (2019/2509(RSP)). Anti-Gypsyism is a specific form of racism, an ideology founded on racial superiority, a form of dehumanisation and institutional racism nurtured by historical discrimination, which is expressed, among others, by violence, hate speech, exploitation, stigmatisation and the most blatant kind of discrimination. Roma people are still being deprived of their basic human rights in Europe. It is important to place the fight against anti-Gypsyism at the heart of the Strategic EU Framework, including by adding a specific anti-discrimination goal, along with other goals, such as inclusion of Roma in an environmentally sustainable, digital society, and their equitable representation in all spheres of life, and to encourage Member States to develop targeted strategies and concrete actions to fight anti-Gypsyism, in addition to one of its manifestations, social and economic exclusion.
Implementation of the Treaty provisions related to EU Citizenship (A8-0041/2019 - Maite Pagazaurtundúa Ruiz)
I voted in favour of the Report on the implementation of the Treaty provisions related to EU citizenship. In accordance with Article 9 of the Treaty of the European Union (TEU) and Article 20 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union (TFEU), every person who holds the nationality of a Member State is a citizen of the Union. Union citizenship is additional to national citizenship without substituting it, and is made up of a combination of rights and duties that are associated to those conferred by the citizenship of a Member State. European citizenship has never managed to fully capture the role that European citizens have in other aspects of the construction of Europe and it has very limited substantive effects for the average citizen. This report on the implementation of the Treaty provisions concerning citizenship aims to evaluate the effectiveness of the concepts present in the Treaties. Its objective is also to make recommendations to the European institutions with a view to the improvement of their implementation and their scope and effectiveness, in order to reduce the gap between the European integration process and the potential offered by European citizenship.
Implementation of the Treaty provisions concerning enhanced cooperation (A8-0038/2019 - Alain Lamassoure)
I voted in favour of the Report on the implementation of the Treaty provisions concerning enhanced cooperation. According to the Treaties, enhanced cooperation can be initiated by at least nine Member States under the framework of European policies, except for the areas of exclusive EU competences. It enables participating States to organise greater cooperation than that initially provided for by the Treaties under the policy concerned. Enhanced cooperation is carried out under the auspices of the European Union, through the European institutions and procedures (Article 20 TEU and Article 326 TFEU). This report suggests that the next revision of the Treaties should explore the possibility of regions or sub-national entities playing a role in enhanced cooperation where the latter relates to an area of exclusive competence of the level in question, with due respect for national constitutions.
Implementation of the Treaty provisions on Parliament’s power of political control over the Commission (A8-0033/2019 - Mercedes Bresso)
. ‒ I voted in favour of the report on the implementation of the Treaty provisions on Parliament’s power of political control over the Commission. Parliamentary oversight is a precondition for democratic legitimacy. Recent changes in the law-making process and the increased legislative role of the executive have created the need for a reinforcement of parliamentary scrutiny procedures. This phenomenon is not foreign to the institutional structure of the Union, with the Commission gaining law-making powers through delegated acts, its increasing ‘politicisation’ and the stronger need for law reinforcement to complement the efficiency of legislation. The report aims to reassess Parliament’s scrutiny role over the Commission and bring it up to date with these new institutional developments.
Implementation of the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union in the EU institutional framework (A8-0051/2019 - Barbara Spinelli)
. ‒ I voted in favour of the report on the implementation of the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union in the EU institutional framework. The adoption of the Charter represented a crossroads in the European integration process. The EU took on a formal responsibility before its citizens: turning from an economic community into a Union based on the rule of law and human rights. The Lisbon Treaty, by virtue of Article 6(1) TEU, has constitutionalised that choice, by conferring on the Charter same legal value as the Treaties.Pursuant to Article 51(1) of the Charter, the conduct of the EU institutions vis-à-vis the Charter constitutes the main reference point for analysing its scope and assessing the degree of implementation of its provisions. The report aims to evaluate, from an EU institutional perspective, the current state of play concerning the role of the Charter as a source of EU primary law, while suggesting room for improvements.
Regulations and general conditions governing the performance of the Ombudsman’s duties (Statute of the European Ombudsman) (A8-0050/2019 - Paulo Rangel)
. ‒ I voted in favour of the report on a draft regulation of the European Parliament laying down the regulations and general conditions governing the performance of the Ombudsman’s duties (Statute of the European Ombudsman) and repealing Decision 94/262/ECSC, EC, Euratom. The first European Ombudsman took office in 1995, after the Treaty of Maastricht had set up this body in 1992. After more than 20 years of activity, the Ombudsman has established a reputation and working methods that have contributed to the growing prestige, and the moral and social recognition, of this body’s role.The Statute was not updated during the last decade. In fact, the Decision now repealed precedes the entry into force of the Treaty of Lisbon. It is thus of paramount importance to adapt its provisions to the applicable Treaties, whilst guaranteeing that this body continues to play a specific and decisive role in the constitutional framework of the European Union. The Ombudsman is a mediator. The performance of this body’s duties should not depend on other institutions, bodies, offices or agencies, whether from a political or a fiscal perspective. Hence, the new Statute aims to reinforce the independence and impartiality of this authority.
A comprehensive European industrial policy on artificial intelligence and robotics (A8-0019/2019 - Ashley Fox)
. ‒ I voted in favour of the report on a comprehensive European industrial policy on artificial intelligence and robotics. Artificial intelligence (AI) is one of the strategic technologies for the 21st century, both globally and in Europe, bringing positive change for the European economy and enabling innovation, productivity, competitiveness and wellbeing. The European framework for AI must be developed on a basis of full respect for fundamental rights as enshrined in the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union, and in particular for the principles of data protection, privacy and security.Human-centric AI and machine learning constitute an advantage for European society and can help address some of the most pressing societal challenges, with tangible benefits for citizens. The Commission and other competent institutions should collaborate closely with researchers representing different disciplines in order to identify, support and leverage the potential positive effects of innovative uses of AI, to investigate, prevent and mitigate potential harmful effects of malicious or negligent uses, and to develop appropriate tools, policies and norms to ensure the ethical governance of AI applications.
Sustainable use of pesticides (A8-0045/2019 - Jytte Guteland)
The Seventh Environment Action Programme (7th EAP) sets the objective, that by 2020 the use of plant protection products should not have any harmful effects on human health or unacceptable influence on the environment, and that such products should be used sustainably. Pesticide use plays an important role in Europe’s agricultural production by keeping plants healthy and preventing their destruction by disease and infestation. However, pesticides applied to crops can enter soil and surface water via leaching and run-off, and can enter groundwater, with the risk of negatively affecting non-target species. This impacts habitat function and contributes to biodiversity loss, including large reductions of insect populations; it also affects soil formation and composition and provision of clean drinking water. Pesticide residues in food may also pose a risk for human health. Particular concerns have been raised regarding the health impacts of human exposure to pesticides with endocrine-disrupting properties and the associated costs to human health. The present dependence on pesticides as the dominant means of controlling pests clearly is not compatible with sustainable agriculture as the prolonged use of pesticides frequently leads to pests becoming resistant.
Implementation of the cross-border Healthcare Directive (A8-0046/2019 - Ivo Belet)
. ‒ I voted in favour of the Report on the implementation of the Cross-Border Healthcare Directive. According to Article 168(1) of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union, a high level of human health protection is to be ensured in the definition and implementation of all Union policies and activities, whilst the organisation, management, financing and delivery of healthcare remains the responsibility of the EU Member States. Case law over the years has acknowledged that patients have, under specific conditions, the right to access healthcare in Member States other than their own.The main purpose of the Directive is to originate an EU framework and set of rights to ensure the access of EU citizens to care abroad, with the intention to facilitate closer cooperation in a number of areas of medicine and healthcare such as eHealth and rare disease treatment. The Directive applies without prejudice to the Regulation. In practice, planned and unplanned care may often be provided more favourably under the Regulation. Accordingly, patients will choose to receive care in another Member State under the provisions of the Regulation rather than the Directive, because up-front payments and reimbursement claims afterwards are not necessary for unplanned care.
Amendments to Parliament's Rules of Procedure (A8-0462/2018 - Richard Corbett)
I voted in favour of the report on amendments to Parliament’s Rules of Procedure affecting Chapters 1 and 4 of Title I; Chapter 3 of Title V; Chapters 4 and 5 of Title VII; Chapter 1 of Title VIII; Title XII; Title XIV and Annex II. The changes made to the Rules provide that Members shall respect Parliament’s dignity and shall not harm its reputation. A serious breach of these rules by a Member may entail possible sanctions. Parliament shall lay down rules governing the transparency of its Members’ financial interests in the form of a Code of Conduct, which shall be adopted by a majority of its component Members. The proposed revision also includes measures relating to parliamentary questions, in particular interpellations to the Council and the European Commission, committee consultations on confidential information, rules of standing committees and parliamentary groups.
Union Customs Code: inclusion of the municipality of Campione d'Italia and the Italian waters of Lake Lugano in the customs territory of the Union (A8-0368/2018 - Jasenko Selimovic)
. ‒ I voted in favour of the report on the proposal for a regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council amending Regulation (EU) No 952/2013 laying down the Union Customs Code. Following the entry into force of the new substantial provisions of Regulation (EU) No 952/2013 of the European Parliament and the Council laying down the Union Customs Code (UCC) in May 2016, the process of regular consultation with Member States and business has resulted in the identification of errors and technical anomalies that need to be corrected in order to ensure legal certainty and consistency. The Commission has therefore prepared this proposal to amend the UCC with a view to correcting these errors and omissions, including by aligning the UCC with an international agreement that was not in force at the time of adoption of the UCC, namely the Canada-EU Comprehensive Economic and Trade Agreement (CETA). The proposal also aims to address a request from Italy to include the municipality of Campione d’Italia and the Italian waters of Lake Lugano in the EU customs territory.
Accession of the Dominican Republic to the 1980 Hague Convention on the Civil Aspects of International Child Abduction (A8-0451/2018 - Mary Honeyball)
. ‒ I voted in favour of the report on the proposal for a Council decision authorising Austria, Cyprus, Croatia, Luxembourg, Portugal, Romania and the United Kingdom to accept, in the interest of the European Union, the accession of the Dominican Republic to the 1980 Hague Convention on the Civil Aspects of International Child Abduction. The Hague Convention of 25 October 1980 on the Civil Aspects of International Child Abduction is a vitally important instrument. It has been ratified by all EU Member States.The convention introduces a system of cooperation between the contracting states aimed at settling cases of international child abduction. In many instances, these problems arise when a couple has separated. If the mother and father are from different states, there is a temptation to exploit the lack of cooperation between those states in order to secure custody of the child. The Dominican Republic deposited the accession instrument to the 1980 Convention on 11 August 2004. The Convention entered into force in the Dominican Republic on 1 November 2004. The 1980 Convention is already into force between the Dominican Republic and 20 EU Member States.
Accession of Ecuador and Ukraine to the 1980 Hague Convention on the Civil Aspects of International Child Abduction (A8-0452/2018 - Mary Honeyball)
. ‒ I voted in favour of the report on the proposal for a Council decision authorising Austria to accept, in the interest of the European Union, the accession of Ecuador and Ukraine to the 1980 Hague Convention on the Civil Aspects of International Child Abduction. The Hague Convention of 25 October 1980 on the Civil Aspects of International Child Abduction is a vitally important instrument. It has been ratified by all EU Member States.The convention introduces a system of cooperation between the contracting states aimed at settling cases of international child abduction. In many instances, these problems arise when a couple has separated. If the mother and father are from different states, there is a temptation to exploit the lack of cooperation between those states in order to secure custody of the child. The biggest problem in such cases is the national bias of the legal systems of individual states. The 1980 Convention is already into force between Ecuador and 26 EU Member States.
Accession of Honduras to the 1980 Hague Convention on the Civil Aspects of International Child Abduction (A8-0457/2018 - Mary Honeyball)
. ‒ I voted in favour of the report on the proposal for a Council decision authorising Austria and Romania to accept, in the interest of the European Union, the accession of Honduras to the 1980 Hague Convention on the Civil Aspects of International Child Abduction. The Hague Convention of 25 October 1980 on the Civil Aspects of International Child Abduction is a vitally important instrument. It has been ratified by all EU Member States.The convention introduces a system of cooperation between the contracting states aimed at settling cases of international child abduction. In many instances, these problems arise when a couple has separated. If the mother and father are from different states, there is a temptation to exploit the lack of cooperation between those states in order to secure custody of the child. The purpose of the convention is to resolve such situations at an international level, by establishing that the competent courts and applicable laws are those of the state of residence of the child.
Accession of Belarus and Uzbekistan to the 1980 Hague Convention on the Civil Aspects of International Child Abduction (A8-0458/2018 - Mary Honeyball)
. ‒ I voted in favour of the report on the proposal for a Council decision authorising Austria, Luxembourg and Romania to accept, in the interest of the European Union, the accession of Belarus and Uzbekistan to the 1980 Hague Convention on the Civil Aspects of International Child Abduction. The Hague Convention of 25 October 1980 on the Civil Aspects of International Child Abduction is a vitally important instrument. It has been ratified by all EU Member States.The convention introduces a system of cooperation between the contracting states aimed at settling cases of international child abduction. In many instances, these problems arise when a couple has separated. If the mother and father are from different states, there is a temptation to exploit the lack of cooperation between those states in order to secure custody of the child. The purpose of the convention is to resolve such situations at an international level, by establishing that the competent courts and applicable laws are those of the state of residence of the child.
Association of the Overseas Countries and Territories with the European Union including relations between the EU, Greenland and Denmark (A8-0480/2018 - Maurice Ponga)
. ‒ I voted in favour of the report on the proposal for a Council Decision on the association of the overseas countries and territories with the European Union, including relations between the European Union, on the one hand, and Greenland and the Kingdom of Denmark, on the other (an Overseas Association Decision, or OAD). Overseas Countries and Territories (OCTs) have been associated with the European Union (EU) since the entry into force of the Treaty of Rome.There are currently 25 OCTs, located in the Atlantic, Antarctic, Caribbean, Indian Ocean and Pacific regions. They are linked to four EU Member States: Denmark, France, the United Kingdom and the Netherlands. In general, OCTs have wide-ranging autonomy. The OCTs are not part of the Union’s customs territory and are outside the internal market. Union legislation therefore does not apply. However, as nationals of a European Union Member State to which their countries and territories are constitutionally linked, the OCTs’ inhabitants hold European citizenship. This new OAD merges the current OAD and the Greenland Decision, both of which are based on Article 203 TFEU.
Annual report 2017 on the protection of the European Union’s financial interests- fight against fraud (A8-0003/2019 - Marian-Jean Marinescu)
. ‒ I voted in favour of the report on the Annual Report 2017 on the protection of the European Union’s financial interests – fight against fraud. De jure , the Member States and the Commission have shared responsibility for implementing 74% of the Union’s budget for 2017, but de facto Member States spend those resources and the Commission is responsible for their supervision through its control mechanisms.Sound public spending and the protection of the EU’s financial interests should be key elements of EU policy in order to increase citizens’ confidence by ensuring that their money is used properly and effectively. The report calls on the Commission to establish a uniform system for the collection from the Member States of comparable data on irregularities and cases of fraud, in order to standardise the reporting process and ensure the quality and comparability of the data provided.The report points out that many Member States do not have specific laws against organised crime, which is involved with cross-border activities and sectors affecting the EU’s financial interests.
Implementation and functioning of the .eu top level domain name (A8-0394/2018 - Fredrick Federley)
I voted in favour of the Report on the proposal for a regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council on the implementation and functioning of the .eu Top Level Domain name and repealing Regulation (EC) No 733/2002 and Commission Regulation (EC) No 874/2004. The new proposal on the .eu Top Level Domain (.eu TLD) published by the Commission on 24 April 2018 aims at repealing the existing legislations. Although the.eu TLD continues to function properly, the legal framework governing it has to be adapted to an evolving online environment and market. In line with the objectives of the Digital Single Market Strategy, the present initiative seeks to ensure that a TLD that has worked relatively well continues to do so in the future in order to ensure that the benefits linked to it can reach as many Union citizens as possible in the near future. The existence of a specific domain name for the EU is very important for the EU online identity. I believe that it is an opportunity for Institutions, companies or citizens to have the possibility to access to a .eu TLD. They will therefore be easily identified as part of the EU community sharing the same set of rules and values.
Harmonisation of gross national income at market prices (GNI Regulation) (A8-0009/2018 - Roberto Gualtieri)
I voted in favour of the Report on the proposal for a regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council on the harmonisation of gross national income at market prices (GNI Regulation) repealing Council Directive 89/130/EEC, Euratom and Council Regulation (EC, Euratom) No 1287/2003. Gross national income at market prices (‘GNI’) constitutes the basis for calculating the largest share of own resources in the budget of the Union. The increasing share of the Union’s own resources based on GNI of the Member States makes it necessary to further reinforce the comparability, reliability and exhaustiveness of this aggregate. Those data are also an important analytical tool for the coordination of national economic policies and for various Union policies, as well as for research activities. In order to ensure the reliability, exhaustiveness, and highest possible degree of comparability of GNI data, the power to adopt acts in accordance with Article 290 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union should be delegated to the Commission in respect of the definition of the content of the inventory of the sources and methods used to produce GNI data, as well as measures ensuring the reliability, exhaustiveness and comparability of GNI data.
Objection pursuant to Rule 106: genetically modified oilseed rapes Ms8, Rf3 and Ms8 × Rf3 (B8-0073/2019)
I voted in favour of the Objection pursuant to Rule 106: genetically modified oilseed rapes Ms8, Rf3 and Ms8 × Rf3. On 20 May 2016, Bayer CropScience AG submitted to the Commission an application, in accordance with Articles 11 and 23 of Regulation (EC) No 1829/2003, for the renewal of the authorisation for the placing on the market of the products covered by Commission Decision 2007/232/EC. Many critical comments were submitted by competent authorities during the three-month consultation period. GM OSRs Ms8, Rf3 and Ms8 x Rf3 have been engineered to be resistant to the application of the herbicide glufosinate. Application of a complementary herbicide is part of regular agricultural practice in the cultivation of herbicide-resistant plants, and it can therefore be expected that these plants will be exposed to both higher and repeated doses, which will not only lead to a higher burden of residues in the harvest, and therefore the imported product, but may also influence the composition of the GM plant and its agronomic characteristics. I voted in favour because I believe that the draft Commission implementing decision is not consistent with Union law.
Objection pursuant to Rule 106: genetically modified maize 5307 (SYN-Ø53Ø7-1) (B8-0074/2019)
I voted in favour of the Objection pursuant to Rule 106: genetically modified maize 5307 (SYN-Ø53Ø7-1). On 7 April 2011, Syngenta Crop Protection AG submitted an application, through its affiliated company Syngenta Crop Protection NV/SA, in accordance with Articles 5 and 17 of Regulation (EC) No 1829/2003, for the placing on the market of foods, food ingredients and feed containing, consisting of, or produced from genetically modified (GM) maize 5307 (‘the application’) to the national competent authority of Germany. The application also covered the placing on the market of products containing or consisting of GM maize 5307 for uses other than food and feed, with the exception of cultivation. GM maize 5307 produces a new insecticidal protein, eCry3.1Ab, which is toxic to certain beetles and weevils and which is derived from a fusion and rearrangement of toxins that naturally occur in soil bacteria known as Bacillus thuringiensis (Bt). Moreover, GM maize 5307 also expresses the protein phosphommanose isomerase (PMI), which is used as a selection marker. I voted in favour because I believe that the draft Commission implementing decision exceeds the implementing powers provided for in Regulation (EC) No 1829/2003.
Objection pursuant to Rule 106: genetically modified maize MON 87403 (MON-874Ø3-1) (B8-0075/2019)
I voted in favour of the Objection pursuant to Rule 106: genetically modified maize MON 87403 (MON-874Ø3-1). On 26 June 2015, Monsanto Europe SA/NV submitted, on behalf of the Monsanto company, United States, an application, in accordance with Articles 5 and 17 of Regulation (EC) No 1829/2003, for the placing on the market of foods, food ingredients and feed containing, consisting of or produced from genetically modified (GM) maize MON 87403 (‘the application’) to the national competent authority of Belgium. The application also covered the placing on the market of products containing or consisting of GM maize MON 87403 for uses other than food and feed, with the exception of cultivation. Maize MON 87403 is genetically modified to increase the biomass and yield of the ears (which become the corn cob for harvest) through insertion of a truncated gene sequence derived from another plant species. This leads to the expression of a protein (AtHB17Δ113) which is intended to act in competition with a similar natural protein that controls gene regulation and growth of the plants. I voted in favour because I believe that the draft Commission implementing decision exceeds the implementing powers provided for in Regulation (EC) No 1829/2003.
Objection pursuant to Rule 106: genetically modified cotton GHB614 × LLCotton25 × MON 15985 (B8-0076/2019)
Application of the complementary herbicides, in this case glyphosate and glufosinate, is part of regular agricultural practice in the cultivation of herbicide-resistant plants and it can therefore be expected that they will be exposed to both higher and repeated doses, which will not only lead to a higher burden of residues in the harvest, and therefore in the imported product, but may also influence the composition of the GM plant and its characteristics. The use of glufosinate is no longer permitted in the Union since 1 August 2018, as it has been classified as toxic to reproduction and thus falls under the cut-off criteria set out in Regulation (EC) No 1107/2009 of the European Parliament and of the Council. However, questions remain concerning the carcinogenicity of glyphosate. EFSA concluded in November 2015 that glyphosate was unlikely to be carcinogenic and the European Chemicals Agency concluded in March 2017 that no classification was warranted. On the contrary, in 2015 the World Health Organisation’s International Agency for Research on Cancer classified glyphosate as a probable carcinogen for humans. I voted in favour because I believe that the draft Commission implementing decision exceeds the implementing powers provided for in Regulation (EC) No 1829/2003.
Situation in Venezuela (B8-0082/2019, B8-0083/2019, B8-0084/2019, B8-0085/2019, B8-0086/2019, B8-0087/2019)
I voted in favour of the motion for resolution on the situation in Venezuela. Last week saw rising tensions and the dramatic escalation of violence in relation to protests in Venezuela, with at least 20 people killed, many injured and large-scale detentions. I believe that there is a serious need to overcome and find a negotiated way out of the current situation. The social unrest, economic hardship and exodus of millions of Venezuelans, the severe shortage of food, scarcity of medicines and lack of adequate medical services, and the insufficient protection of human rights, insecurity and violence in the streets are all a consequence of political mismanagement and autocratic behaviour by the Maduro government. I voted in favour because I condemn the response of President Maduro and the authorities to the demonstrations in the country as well as the escalation of violence and all cases of extrajudicial killings, injuries and unlawful detentions.
Annual report on competition policy (A8-0474/2018 - Michel Reimon)
I voted in favour of the Report on the Annual Report on Competition Policy. A competition policy aimed at ensuring a level playing field in all sectors is a cornerstone of the European social market economy and a key factor in guaranteeing the proper functioning of the internal market. The Commission report on Competition Policy 2017 as well as its efforts and activities to ensure the effective application of competition rules in the Union for the benefit of all EU citizens, especially those in weak consumer positions. The Report calls on the Commission to continue ensuring the full enforcement of EU competition rules, with particular attention to the difficulties faced by SMEs and to avoid the uneven application thereof in the Member States.The enormous changes in markets resulting from continuing technological development bring both opportunities and challenges. The competition policy plays a crucial role in the further development of the digital single market. I believe that there is an urgent need for a framework that, while promoting data innovation and new business models, effectively addresses the challenges of the data-driven and algorithm economy.
European Globalisation Adjustment Fund (EGF) (A8-0445/2018 - Maria Arena)
. ‒ I voted in favour of the Report on the proposal for a regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council on the European Globalisation Adjustment Fund (EGF). The European Globalisation Adjustment Fund (EGF), initially established for the programming period 2007—2013, is a concrete expression of EU solidarity with European workers who lost their jobs. It was set up to provide support to workers made redundant as a result of major structural changes in world trade patterns caused by globalisation and whose redundancies have a significant adverse impact on the regional or local economy.European Union involvement through the EGF complements national measures in order to re-integrate dismissed workers by offering them a unique combination of tailored measures that lead to more sustainable results, increase the self-esteem of beneficiaries, who finally have a more proactive approach to job seeking, and improve their employability. Experience achieved so far with the EGF indicates that the help offered would not have been available without the involvement of the EGF. The purpose of this report is to ensure the continuation of the EGF.
European Social Fund Plus (ESF+) (A8-0461/2018 - Verónica Lope Fontagné)
. ‒ I voted in favour of the Report on the proposal for a regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council on the European Social Fund Plus (ESF+). Ever since the European Social Fund was created in 1958 under the Treaty of Rome, it has been the main financial instrument for generating employment in Europe. The Commission proposal on the European Social Fund Plus (ESF+) for the period 2021-2027 not only continues to promote employment and social inclusion but also aims for clear progress in strengthening the European social dimension by directly linking its 11 specific objectives with the country specific recommendations adopted in the context of the European Semester, which at the same time links in with implementation of the European Pillar of Social Rights.The ESF+ will remain part of cohesion policy and will mainly be regulated via the Common Provisions Regulation (CPR). However, and so as to ensure closer consistency between funding objectives and implementation, the ESF+ constitutes a merger of the current European Social Fund, the Youth Employment Initiative (YEI), the Fund for European Aid to the Most Deprived (FEAD), the EU Programme for Employment and Social Innovation (EaSI) and the European Health Programme.
Protocol to the EU-Kyrgyzstan Partnership and Cooperation Agreement (accession of Croatia) (A8-0443/2018 - Cristian Dan Preda)
I voted in favour of the recommendation on the draft Council decision on the conclusion, on behalf of the Union and of the Member States, of the Protocol to the Partnership and Cooperation Agreement establishing a partnership between the European Communities and their Member States, of the one part, and the Kyrgyz Republic, of the other part, to take account of the accession of the Republic of Croatia to the European Union. In accordance with its Act of Accession, Croatia has undertaken to accede to the international agreements signed or concluded by the European Union and its Member States by means of a Protocol to those Agreements. The Partnership and Cooperation Agreement establishing a partnership between the European Communities and their Member States, of the one part, and the Kyrgyz Republic, of the other part, was signed in Brussels on 9 February 1995 and entered into force on 1 July 1999.
EU-Kyrgyzstan comprehensive agreement (A8-0450/2018 - Cristian Dan Preda)
I voted in favour of the report on a European Parliament recommendation to the Council, Commission and the Vice-President of the Commission / High Representative of the Union for Foreign Affairs and Security Policy on the comprehensive agreement between the EU and the Kyrgyz Republic. In December 2017, the EU and Kyrgyzstan launched negotiations on a comprehensive agreement, which would replace the current EU-Kyrgyzstan PCA, with the aim of enhancing and deepening cooperation in areas of mutual interest, based on the shared values of democracy, the rule of law and good governance, within a new legal framework. The report takes into account Kyrgyzstan’s role as one of the few nascent democratic countries in the region, requiring the EU’s long-term political, diplomatic, financial and technical support. Moreover, its goals are to strengthen political dialogue and sectoral cooperation, and to provide for meaningful regular dialogue on all matters of relevance, as well as to step up cooperation on crisis management, conflict prevention, countering terrorism and organised crime.
EU guidelines and the mandate of the EU Special Envoy on the promotion of freedom of religion or belief outside the EU (A8-0449/2018 - Andrzej Grzyb)
I voted in favour of the Report on EU Guidelines and the mandate of the EU Special Envoy on the promotion of freedom of religion or belief outside the EU. Freedom of thought, conscience, religion and belief is a human right inherent to all human beings and a fundamental right of individuals on a par with all others, which should be subjected to no kind of discrimination, as enshrined by international and European founding texts. Moreover, the principle of the separation of church and state is a prime constitutional principle worldwide and in Europe. Unfortunately, recent years have seen a dramatic rise in violations of this right. I voted in favour because I believe in the importance of linking up efforts to promote inter- and intra-religious, interfaith, inter-convictional, intercultural and interphilosophical dialogues with the prevention of religious extremism on a complementary and mutually reinforcing basis.
Coordination of social security systems (A8-0386/2018 - Guillaume Balas)
I voted in favour of the report on the proposal for a regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council amending Regulation (EC) No 883/2004 on the coordination of social security systems and Regulation (EC) No 987/2009 laying down the procedure for implementing Regulation (EC) No 883/2004. The Commission’s proposed revision aims to facilitate mobility by ensuring that individuals do not lose their rights when moving within Europe (EU, Iceland, Liechtenstein, Norway and Switzerland) and to ensure the continuity of social security when moving from one national legislation to another. I voted in favour because it is legitimate for the country receiving the social security contributions also to be responsible for paying unemployment benefits. Moreover, the Commission proposes creating a specific chapter on long-term care based on the approach taken for sickness benefits. It intends to standardise the issuance procedures for, and the format and content of, portable documents certifying membership of a social security scheme. In order to optimise exchanges between administrations and to protect those covered by the regulations, I support the setting-up of new arrangements and an operational electronic network linking social security institutions.
Rail passengers' rights and obligations (A8-0340/2018 - Bogusław Liberadzki)
I voted in favour of the Report on the proposal for a regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council on rail passengers’ rights and obligations (recast). The railway sector went through major changes since 1991, when the first legislative proposal at EU level was published. Since then we have seen the complete restructuring of the so-called incumbents. However, many things still remain to be accomplished, among them is the migration of new technologies such as European Rail Traffic Management System (ERTMS). One of the key achievements in the railway sector is the establishment of a legal framework for the protection of passengers’ rights, as part of a broader EU policy regarding consumer rights. Despite some necessary and constant improvements, it should be stressed that the EU railway system, compared to many countries in the world, is one of the most efficient, modern and consumer-friendly. Nevertheless, improvements and modernisation of the railway sector should remain permanent goals for the sector, including for the protection of railway passengers. This Recast provides momentum to further improve the EU railway system and set an even clearer framework for the relationship between the carriers and the customers.
Persistent organic pollutants (A8-0336/2018 - Julie Girling)
I voted in favour of the Report on the proposal for a regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council on persistent organic pollutants (recast). The POPs recast is the latest update of the report first adopted in 2004 and updates the annexes in line with the decisions made at 2015 and 2017 Stockholm Convention COP meetings. The update also lays out a new role for the European Chemicals Agency (ECHA) supporting the work of the Commission in the preparation of dossiers on substances. The EU, through its pioneering REACH regulation, is a world leader when it comes to chemicals regulation and, as such, its decisions regarding the safety of chemicals have far-reaching consequences. In order to support the new role proposed for ECHA it is necessary to ensure that their findings are incorporated into all decision making processes and that their activities are adequately funded.
Care services in the EU for improved gender equality (A8-0352/2018 - Sirpa Pietikäinen)
I voted in favour of the Report on care services in the EU for improved gender equality. The unequal involvement of men and women in the European Union in care and domestic activities remains a persistent challenge. The Gender Equality Index 2017 of the European Institute for Gender Equality found that the overall trend in Europe over the last ten years has been negative: the proportion of time by women spent on care, domestic work and social activities grew in comparison to men. The fact that women spend a disproportionate amount of time carrying out unpaid work compared to men has serious economic and social consequences. It is an impediment to the achievement of the EU goals on gender equality. Ultimately, it leads to a gender gap in poverty, which is highest among the elderly. At the institutional level, the access of services including by those at risk of social exclusion should be monitored. This is particularly important given the changing nature of work. The impact of digitalisation, increased productivity and the move to a circular, service-based economy need to be considered. The design of care services needs to support and facilitate new models of work.
Lyme disease (Borreliosis) (B8-0514/2018)
I voted in favour of the Motion for a resolution on Lyme disease. The right to health is a fundamental right recognised by the European Treaties, in particular in Article 168 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union. Lyme disease, or Lyme borreliosis, is a bacterial disease caused by the bacterium Borrelia burgdorferi, and is transmitted to humans through the bite of a tick, which itself is contaminated by the bacterium. Lyme disease is an infectious disease in humans and in various species of domestic and wild animals, and is transmitted by ticks. Lyme borreliosis is the most common zoonotic disease in Europe, with an estimated 650 000 - 850 000 cases and a higher incidence in Central Europe; whereas infection occurs in the spring-summer semester, and borreliosis is recognised as an occupational disease for farmers, forestry workers and field researchers in the countries in which it is present. The Resolution expresses its concern at the alarming proportions of the spread of Lyme disease in the European population, with around 1 million citizens suffering from the disease according to the census methods used and calls for additional funding of the methods for diagnosing and treating Lyme disease.
Interim report on the Multiannual Financial Framework 2021-2027 – Parliament's position with a view to an agreement (A8-0358/2018 - Jan Olbrycht, Isabelle Thomas, Janusz Lewandowski, Gérard Deprez)
. ‒ I voted in favour of the Interim Report on the Multiannual Financial Framework 2021-2027 – Parliament’s position with a view to an agreement. In light of the growing challenges affecting global and regional stability, there is a need to significantly increase appropriations for EU external action under the new multiannual financial framework (MFF) while preserving the EU’s foreign policy based on democracy, the rule of law, respect for human rights and fundamental rights. The modest real-term funding increase proposed by the Commission and calls for a further relative increase in external action commitments, which needs to be preserved in the interinstitutional negotiations. The European Neighbourhood Instrument, the Instrument for Pre-Accession Assistance (IPA III) and the European Instrument for Democracy and Human Rights, including their goals and objectives, should be preserved as independent instruments due to their specific nature, and it stresses the need to avoid competition between the different policies. The connection among thematic and geographical programmes should be strengthened, given the cross-cutting nature of many issues such as human rights, gender equality, non-discrimination of persons with disabilities and climate change.
State aid rules: new categories of State aid (A8-0315/2018 - Sander Loones)
I voted in favour of the Report on the proposal for a Council regulation amending Council Regulation (EU) 2015/1588 of 13 July 2015 on the application of Articles 107 and 108 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union to certain categories of horizontal state aid. While the differences in the legal status of EU money directly paid to final beneficiaries (no state resources) and EU money indirectly paid via national authorities (state resources) are well-established, national or regional authorities often lack appreciation of the fact that EU money is not automatically excluded from state aid rules nor automatically qualifies as state aid. The confusion arises largely from the fact that EU money falls within the scope of Article 107(1) TFEU only if a public authority can exercise control over it. The initiatives taken by the European Commission is to improve the interplay of EU funding programmes with state aid rules. The proposed amendment to the EU’s State Aid Enabling Regulation contributes to this goal, as it will enable the Commission to make targeted modifications to the General Block Exemption Regulation.
Arms export: implementation of Common Position 2008/944/CFSP (A8-0335/2018 - Sabine Lösing)
I voted in favour of the Report on Arms Exports: Implementation of Common Position 2008/944/CFSP. Arms exports and transfers have an undeniable impact on human rights and human security, on socio-economic development and on democracy. Arms exports also contribute to circumstances that force people to flee from their countries; whereas these are strong reasons for establishing a strict, transparent, effective and commonly accepted and defined arms control system. The report underlines that states have the legitimate right to acquire military technology for the purposes of self-defence and notes that maintaining a defence industry serves as part of the self-defence of the Member States. A European defence market serves as an instrument for guaranteeing the security and defence of Member States and Union citizens and contributes to the implementation of the Common Foreign and Security Policy (CFSP) and in particular the Common Security and Defence Policy (CSDP). It calls on the Member States to overcome the current lack of efficiency in defence spending due to duplication, fragmentation and lack of interoperability, and to aim for the EU to become a security provider also by better controlling arms exports.
Empowering competition authorities and ensuring the proper functioning of the internal market (A8-0057/2018 - Andreas Schwab)
I voted in favour of the Report on the proposal for a directive of the European Parliament and of the Council to empower the competition authorities of the Member States to be more effective enforcers and to ensure the proper functioning of the internal market. Effective enforcement of Articles 101 and 102 TFEU is necessary to ensure more open and fairer competitive markets in Europe. This Directive sets out certain rules to ensure that national competition authorities have the necessary guarantees of independence and resources and enforcement and fining powers to be able to effectively apply Articles 101 and 102 TFEU so that competition in the internal market is not distorted and consumers and undertakings, especially small and medium-sized enterprises, are not put at a disadvantage by national laws and measures which prevent national competition authorities from being effective enforcers. The scope of the Directive covers the application of Articles 101 and 102 TFEU and national competition law provisions applied in parallel to Articles 101 and 102 TFEU to the same case, with the exception of Article 29(2) which also extends to national competition law applied exclusively.
European Electronic Communications Code (A8-0318/2017 - Pilar del Castillo Vera)
I voted in favour of the report on the proposal for a directive of the European Parliament and of the Council establishing the European Electronic Communications Code (EECC) (recast). This is a decisive moment to maximise the opportunities that more advanced digital technologies bring. Since the 2009 review, the market has dramatically changed. New players have emerged as consumers and businesses increasingly rely on data services. The role of electronic communications as an enabler of the economy has hugely increased. Data services replace traditional services as key products for all users. This means that the sector must meet increased demand and socio-economic development needs. The framework rests on three main objectives: competition, internal market and end-user interest. Those remain the guiding principles for the Code. The competition approach, based on significant market power, has proven successful in the liberalisation process since the 1990s and must remain at the core of the Code. The complete toolbox of remedies, from transparency obligations to functional separation, must remain available to national regulatory authorities.
Body of European Regulators for Electronic Communications (A8-0305/2017 - Evžen Tošenovský)
I voted in favour of the report on the proposal for a regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council establishing the Body of European Regulators for Electronic Communications. The Body of European Regulators for Electronic Communications (BEREC) and the Office were established by Regulation (EC) No 1211/2009, as part of the telecommunications package. BEREC is made up of a Board of Regulators, composed of the representatives of the national regulatory authorities (NRAs) established in each Member State. As a consequence, BEREC is well anchored in the realities of 28 national telecoms markets to provide relevant expertise. BEREC is aiming to ensure a consistent implementation of the regulatory framework for electronic communications, for instance through dissemination of best practices and issuing guidelines and opinions, provides advice to the NRAs and EU institutions and carries out other tasks assigned to it by the regulatory framework. The main thrust of the Commission proposal is to convert BEREC and BEREC Office into a single EU Agency. The Board of Regulators would become the Management Board of the Agency and the Administrative Manager of the Office would become the Executive Director.
CO2 emission performance standards for new heavy-duty vehicles (A8-0354/2018 - Bas Eickhout)
I voted in favour of the Report on the proposal for a regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council setting CO2 emission performance standards for new heavy-duty vehicles. The Union and its Member States committed to the Paris Agreement, which aims at keeping the increase of global temperature to well below 2°C above pre-industrial levels and to pursue efforts to limit the temperature increase to 1.5°C above pre-industrial levels. The transport sector, whose emissions are increasing and were responsible for 25% of total GHG emissions in the EU in 2016, has to do a substantial part of the EU climate effort. The decarbonisation of the transport sector must be accelerated, and GHG and air pollutant emissions from transport should be net zero by mid-century at the latest. Setting emission performance requirements for new HDVs has the potential to reduce CO2 emissions, thus contributing towards the reduction of greenhouse gas emissions and the mitigation of climate change, while at the same time delivering significant fuel savings to transport operators, maintaining a high level of innovation and technological leadership for EU HDV manufacturers, and bringing about substantial air quality improvements.
Need for a comprehensive Democracy, Rule of Law and Fundamental Rights mechanism (B8-0523/2018, B8-0524/2018)
I voted in favour of the motion for a resolution on the need for a comprehensive democracy, rule of law and fundamental rights mechanism. The Union is a community based on law and acts only within the limits of the competences conferred on it by the Member States in the Treaties, and the exercise of those powers is subject to the principles of subsidiarity and proportionality.The Union pursues its objectives by appropriate means in accordance with the competences conferred on it. The Resolution recognises that the EU has sufficient Treaty mechanisms in place to prevent extraordinary violations of the rights and values on which the Union is founded. However, it recalls that, in accordance with Article 2 TEU, the values of democracy, the rule of law and respect for human rights are common to the Member States and the EU cannot question the lawful character of any Member State without sufficient evidence, verified under rules grounded in the law, except where such questioning is justified by final and sufficiently reasoned judgments by the competent authorities, made within the relevant Treaty procedures.
Implementation of the EU-Georgia Association Agreement (A8-0320/2018 - Andrejs Mamikins)
I voted in favour of the Report on the Implementation of the EU Association Agreement with Georgia. Four years after the signing by the EU of three Association Agreements (AA) including a Deep and Comprehensive Free Trade Area (DCFTA) with Georgia, Moldova and Ukraine, and two years after their full entry into force, the European Parliament has decided to evaluate the level of implementation of these agreements, in line with its strong commitment to its closest Eastern partners and to their deepening relations with the EU. The findings of this report provide a positive image of the implementation of the Association Agreement with Georgia. Whilst calling on the Georgian authorities to address some remaining concerns in line with the AA, notably as regards labour standards, environmental protection and discrimination against vulnerable groups and women, the report also welcomes the legislative and institutional steps taken in order to address those topics. Finally, the report addresses the institutional framework in place to implement the AA, both from the Georgian and the EU side, with a focus on capacity in terms of human resources and expertise.
Implementation of the EU-Moldova Association Agreement (A8-0322/2018 - Petras Auštrevičius)
I voted in favour of the Report on the Implementation of the EU Association Agreement with Moldova. Four years after the signing by the EU of three Association Agreements (AA) including a Deep and Comprehensive Free Trade Area (DCFTA) with Moldova, Georgia and Ukraine and two years after their full entry into force, the European Parliament has decided to evaluate the level of implementation of these agreements, in line with its strong commitment to its closest Eastern partners and to their deepening relations with the EU. The findings of the Foreign Affairs Committee provide a contrasted image of the implementation of the Association Agreement with Moldova. There have incontestably been positive developments in a number of areas covered by the AA/DCFTA, notably the resolute actions taken to systemically improve the financial sector and hence minimise the risk of a repetition of a large-scale bank fraud such as the one revealed in 2014, as well as the growing cooperation in the field of energy and the impressive increase in bilateral trade through the implementation of the DCFTA. However, these developments have been overshadowed by an increasing backsliding on core values related to democratic standards.
Humanitarian visas (A8-0328/2018 - Juan Fernando López Aguilar)
I voted in favour of the Report with recommendations to the Commission on Humanitarian Visas. Parliament started to call for humanitarian visas against the background of the migration crisis and the unacceptable death toll in the Mediterranean. It has expressed its views, among others, in the resolution of 12 April 2016 on the situation in the Mediterranean and the need for a holistic EU approach to migration.Currently, there are a number of targeted national programmes, but no legal framework in EU law. The objective of the new instrument should be limited to provisions on the procedures and conditions for issuing a humanitarian visa. In its nature it should be a visa with limited territorial validity to allow its holder to reach this territory to lodge there an application for international protection. The Member State issuing the visa would therefore become responsible for the asylum procedures.Discussions have taken place as to whether there should be a kind of relocation mechanism. The new instrument should cover third-country nationals who are subject to the visa requirement who are in need of protection against a real risk of being exposed to persecution or serious harm and who are not covered by any other instrument.
Mobilisation of the European Union Solidarity Fund to provide assistance to Latvia (A8-0357/2018 - Inese Vaidere)
I voted in favour of the report on the proposal for a decision of the European Parliament and of the Council on the mobilisation of the European Union Solidarity Fund to provide assistance to Latvia. The Commission proposes to mobilise the European Union Solidarity Fund (EUSF) to grant financial assistance relating to flooding in Latvia. The mobilisation of the EU Solidarity Fund is a sign of solidarity in the Union to the country and people that suffered as a result of force majeure. During August, September and October 2017, Latvia was affected by a long-lasting period of intense rainfall, leading to the saturation of soil and subsequent flooding throughout the country, particularly in the Latgale region and surrounding territories. The flood destroyed crops and caused widespread damage to watercourses, the drainage system, and connected water treatment installations, as well as road and railway infrastructure. The proposed mobilisation will be financed in full through the partial use of the remaining EUR 47 479 154 in commitment and payment appropriations already entered in the 2018 budget to cover advances. The total amount available for the mobilisation of the EUSF at the beginning of 2018 was EUR 421 142 057.
EU development assistance in the field of education (A8-0327/2018 - Vincent Peillon)
I voted in favour of the report on EU development assistance in the field of education. Education is a fundamental human right and central to the achievement of all the SDGs. It prevents the transmission of poverty between generations and plays a pivotal role in achieving gender equality and women’s empowerment. The rights that should be respected in education go beyond mere arithmetical equality and include the promotion of genuine gender equality in and through education. I believe that education aid must be a priority, not only because education is a fundamental right, but also because it is essential for the achievement of the other SDGs. However, achieving SDG 4 calls for massive investment in education systems. That investment will first have to be made by developing countries, but international aid will continue to be indispensable to bridge the gap in funding. The greater efforts needed on the part of developing countries to promote fair tax systems and combat illegal financial flows, and increases in ODA, will not be sufficient to bridge the funding gap.
Energy efficiency (A8-0391/2017 - Miroslav Poche)
. ‒ I voted in favour of the Report on the proposal for a directive of the European Parliament and of the Council amending Directive 2012/27/EU on energy efficiency. Directive 2012/27/EU of the European Parliament and of the Council is an element to progress towards the Energy Union, under which energy efficiency should be treated as an energy source in its own right. The ‘energy efficiency first’ principle should be taken into account when setting new rules for the supply side and other policy areas. The European Council of October 2014 set a 27% energy efficiency target for 2030, to be reviewed by 2020 ‘having in mind a Union level of 30%’. In December 2015, the European Parliament called upon the Commission to also assess the viability of a 40% energy efficiency target for the same timeframe. The Commission proposed to review and consequently amend the Directive to adapt it to the 2030 perspective. Energy efficiency is one of the most cost effective ways to support the transition to a low-carbon economy and to create growth, employment and investment opportunities.
Governance of the Energy Union (A8-0402/2017 - Michèle Rivasi, Jakop Dalunde)
. ‒ I voted in favour of the Report on the proposal for a regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council on the Governance of the Energy Union. While 2016 has been reported as the warmest year in history, the Energy Union needs to acknowledge the challenge of global warming and establish a strong governance system to deliver its commitment under the Paris Agreement. In order to do so, our report on the governance of the Energy Union calls for the adoption of a proper carbon budget for the EU, calculating the maximum quantity of greenhouse gases that the EU can still emit to allow us to live in a world where climate change is limited to 1.5°C by the end of the century. The report also calls on the Commission to address the ‘poor relation’ of climate policy: methane. Given the high global warming potential and short atmospheric lifetime of methane, the Union should rapidly consider relevant policy options and come with a comprehensive Methane Strategy. Carbon budget and methane strategies should be the basis of a reliable long-term 2050 planning.
Promotion of the use of energy from renewable sources (A8-0392/2017 - José Blanco López)
I voted in favour of the Report on the proposal for a directive of the European Parliament and of the Council on the promotion of the use of energy from renewable sources (recast). The European Parliament is committed to European citizens and their quality of life, and to economic and social development. The time has come to build a clear, effective legal framework geared towards decarbonisation of the economy, the course charted in the historic Paris Agreement, which was signed in 2015 and has been in force since November 2016. More than ever, we need to be ambitious in the new Renewable Energy Directive. The substantial expansion now occurring, and likely to continue, in the global renewable energy market offers a major opportunity both for our industry and for creating high-quality jobs within the EU. Our technological knowledge base, industrial structure and skilled professionals have enabled us to become a trailblazer in the worldwide development of renewable energy technologies: these are assets which should be exploited and promoted. The use of renewable energy sources is also helping to increase the EU’s energy independence by enhancing energy security, as well as making us less vulnerable in relation to outside energy suppliers.
Multiannual plan for small pelagic stocks in the Adriatic Sea and the fisheries exploiting those stocks (A8-0337/2018 - Ruža Tomašić)
I voted in favour of the Proposal for a regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council establishing a multiannual plan for small pelagic stocks in the Adriatic Sea and the fisheries exploiting those stocks. The multiannual plan for small pelagic stocks in the Adriatic Sea and the fisheries exploiting those stocks is being established in accordance with the Basic Regulation. Multiannual plans are adopted as a priority, based on scientific, technical, and economic advice, and have to contain conservation measures to restore and maintain fish stocks above levels capable of producing the maximum sustainable yield. The Basic Regulation also stipulates that measures cannot be included in multiannual plans unless their economic and social impact has been taken into account. The multiannual plan for the Adriatic Sea, the first plan of its kind in the Mediterranean area, is likely to have a major impact on fisheries management in the Mediterranean as a whole. The Adriatic Sea is an important sub-area within the Mediterranean, accounting for about a third of the total landing value. Sardine and anchovy make up the bulk of small pelagic catches. The ultimate goal of the proposal is to attain the maximum sustainable yield (MSY) by 2020.
The rule of law in Romania (B8-0522/2018)
. ‒ I voted in favour of the motion for a resolution on the rule of law in Romania. The European Union is founded on the values of respect for human dignity, freedom, democracy, equality, the rule of law and human rights, including the rights of persons belonging to minorities. The resolution stresses the fundamental importance of ensuring that the common European values listed in Article 2 of the TEU are upheld in full, and that fundamental rights as laid down in the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union are guaranteed. The redrafted law relating to Romanian judicial and criminal legislation, regarding specifically its potential structurally to undermine the independence of the judicial system and the capacity to fight corruption effectively in Romania, as well as to weaken the rule of law, is deeply worrying.The resolution condemns the violent and disproportionate intervention by the police during the protests in Bucharest in August 2018, and calls on the Romanian authorities to put in place safeguards to ensure a transparent and legal basis for any institutional cooperation.
Minimum standards for minorities in the EU (A8-0353/2018 - József Nagy)
. ‒ I voted in favour of the report on minimum standards for minorities in the EU. The EU has a special duty to protect and guarantee the rights of the more than 50 million people belonging to national or regional minorities who live on its territory and who speak one of the 60 minority and regional languages that are in serious danger of extinction.The protection of minorities’ rights is guaranteed under the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union. Minority issues have not been placed sufficiently high on the EU agenda and there is not, at present, a comprehensive EU approach to addressing issues under minority protection policy. It is the responsibility of the Member States to implement political and legislative measures to safeguard and promote the identity and rights of minorities, including ethnic, cultural, religious and linguistic rights. I believe that preventing or hindering minorities from progressively availing themselves of their rights has implications for the general well-being of individuals and communities and for the preservation of their identities.The EU needs an integrated approach in order to ensure that Member States deal adequately with the diversity of people in their societies.
Digitalisation for development: reducing poverty through technology (A8-0338/2018 - Bogdan Brunon Wenta)
. ‒ I voted in favour of the Report on digitalisation for development: reducing poverty through technology. Digitalisation is global and it affects all aspects of our lives. And yet still, some people are left behind, although new technologies create opportunities. The internet is not only the place for goods and services, but it also helps us to exercise our economic, civic and political rights. In developing countries, modern communications technology is a necessity and can allow people to participate successfully in the changing world.According to the 2016 World Development Report on digital dividends, six billion people lack access to high speed internet and four billion still have no internet access at all. At a time when digitalisation is growing exponentially, this lack of access is a major challenge to development as it continues to widen gaps and inequalities in the world. Bridging the digital divide must be given a central role in all development policies: not just as a stand-alone policy but mainstreamed into every other policy area. Affordable access to broadband connectivity must be the basis for any such effort.
Request for the waiver of the immunity of Steeve Briois (A8-0349/2018 - Tadeusz Zwiefka)
I voted in favour of the Report on the request for waiver of the immunity of Steeve Briois. The waiver of immunity of Steeve Briois relates to an alleged offence of public incitement to discrimination on grounds of nationality, race or religion by word of mouth, in written form or by means of images or electronic public communication by a person or persons unknown. Mr. Briois was not a Member of the European Parliament when the alleged offence took place, namely on 19 September and 30 November 2013, but the allegedly offensive materials were still available for consultation by anyone wishing to access them on 23 June and 2 October 2014. The charges are manifestly unrelated to the position of Steeve Briois as a Member of the European Parliament. Therefore, there is no reason to suspect that the intention underlying the legal proceedings, which were opened following an application by the ‘Maison des Potes – Maison de l’Égalité’ association and submitted before the Member assumed his seat in the European Parliament, is to obstruct the parliamentary work of Steeve Briois.
Request for the waiver of the immunity of Sophie Montel (A8-0350/2018 - Tadeusz Zwiefka)
I voted in favour of the Report on the request for waiver of the immunity of Sophie Montel. The request for waiver of the immunity of Sophie Montel forwarded on 21 February 2018 by the French Minister of Justice and Liberties in connection with a judicial inquiry (B-49 2018/00243) opened against Sophie Montel at the Nanterre Regional Court in response to an application with joinder filed by the ‘Maison des Potes – Maison de l’Égalité’ association on grounds of public incitement to racial or religious discrimination and announced in plenary on 28 May 2018. The alleged actions do not relate to opinions expressed or votes cast by the Member of the European Parliament in the performance of her duties within the meaning of Article 8 of Protocol No 7 on the Privileges and Immunities of the European Union. There is no reason to suspect that the intention underlying the legal proceedings, which were opened following an application by the ‘Maison des Potes – Maison de l’Égalité’ association and submitted before the Member assumed her seat in the European Parliament, is to obstruct the parliamentary work of Sophie Montel.
Request for the waiver of the immunity of Georgios Kyrtsos (A8-0351/2018 - Heidi Hautala)
I voted in favour of the Report on the request for waiver of the immunity of Georgios Kyrtsos. The Prosecutor’s Office of the Supreme Court of Greece has requested the waiver of the immunity of Georgios Kyrtsos, Member of the European Parliament, in connection with possible legal action concerning an alleged offence. Georgios Kyrtsos, as legal representative (chairman and chief executive officer) of the companies KMP Publishing House Ltd and Free Sunday Publishing House Ltd, hired his former employee on 26 July 2005 in the name of KMP Publishing House Ltd under a contract for employment in both companies as art director. Georgios Kyrtsos is accused of non-payment to his former employee of an Easter bonus of EUR 986 46 on 27 April 2016, in violation of Emergency Law No 690/1945, as replaced by Article 8(1) of Law 236/95, and constituting an offence under Article 28 of Law No 3996/2011, in conjunction with Joint Ministerial Decision 19040/1981. The alleged offence clearly has no direct link with the office of Georgios Kyrtsos as a Member of the European Parliament but is instead connected to his former position as manager of two newspaper firms.
General budget of the European Union for 2019 - all sections (A8-0313/2018 - Daniele Viotti, Paul Rübig)
I voted in favour of the general budget of the European Union for the financial year 2019 – all sections. Parliament’s reading of the 2019 budget fully reflects the political priorities adopted by an overwhelming majority in its resolutions of 15 March 2018 on general guidelines and of 5 July 2018 on a mandate for the trialogue. At the core of those priorities are: sustainable growth, innovation, competitiveness, security, tackling root causes of refugees and migration flows, managing refugee and migration flows, the fight against climate change and the transition to sustainable energy, and a particular focus on young people. Ahead of the withdrawal of the United Kingdom from the Union, the Union needs the necessary financial resources to respond to citizens’ expectations, to allow the Union to effectively tackle the numerous priorities and challenges it faces and to improve the day-to-day life of its citizens. Europe’s citizens expect the Union to strain every sinew to ensure economic growth and foster job creation evenly within all its regions.
Discharge 2016: EU general budget - European Council and Council (A8-0300/2018 - Marco Valli)
. ‒ I voted in favour of the second report on discharge in respect of the implementation of the general budget of the European Union for the financial year 2016, Section II - European Council and Council. All Union institutions ought to be transparent and fully accountable to the citizens of the Union for the funds entrusted to them. Parliament’s role in respect of the budget discharge is specified in the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union (TFEU) and in the Financial Regulation. The report points out that the Union institutions have administrative autonomy in matters relating to their respective operations and underlines the importance of their acting responsibly in the implementation of their budgets. It underlines the role of Parliament in the discharge procedure, as governed by the TFEU, the Financial Regulation and Parliament’s rules of procedure.
Support to structural reforms in Member States (A8-0316/2018 - Lambert van Nistelrooij, Constanze Krehl)
. ‒ I voted in favour of the report on the proposal for a regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council amending Regulation (EU) No 1303/2013 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 17 December 2013. This proposal, adopted by the Commission on 6 December 2017, seeks to amend the Common Provisions Regulation (CPR) in order to allow the performance reserve (6% of the resources allocated to the European Regional Development Fund, the European Social Fund, the Cohesion Fund Investment for Jobs and Growth Goal, the European Agricultural Fund for Rural Development and the European Maritime and Fisheries Fund) to be used for structural reforms instead of for the ‘specific priorities’ set out in Partnership Agreements. In particular, the proposal seeks to insert Articles 22(1a), 22(8) and 23a into the CPR, setting out the principles and procedures for using cohesion policy monies for structural reforms. Consequential amendments affect the CPR’s provisions on its objective, definitions and reporting obligations accordingly.
Launch of automated data exchange with regard to dactyloscopic data in Ireland (A8-0344/2018 - Branislav Škripek)
. ‒ I voted in favour of the report on the draft Council implementing decision on the launch of automated data exchange with regard to dactyloscopic data in Ireland. Council Decision 2008/615/JHA on the stepping up of cross-border cooperation, particularly in combating terrorism and cross-border crime, confers implementing powers on the Council with a view to adopting measures necessary to implement the decision, in particular as regards the receiving and supply of personal data. The supply of personal data provided for under the decision may not take place until the general provisions on data protection set out in the decision have been implemented in the national law of the territories of the Member States involved in such supply.
Launch of automated data exchange with regard to DNA data in Ireland (A8-0343/2018 - Branislav Škripek)
. ‒ I voted in favour of the Report on the draft Council implementing decision on the launch of automated data exchange with regard to DNA data in Ireland. Council Decision 2008/615/JHA on the stepping up of cross-border cooperation, particularly in combating terrorism and cross-border crime, confers implementing powers upon the Council with a view to adopting measures necessary to implement that Decision, in particular as regards the receiving and supply of personal data provided for under that Decision. The supply of personal data provided for under that Decision may not take place until the general provisions on data protection set out in that Decision have been implemented in the national law of the territories of the Member States involved in such supply.
Launch of automated data exchange with regard to dactyloscopic data in Croatia (A8-0345/2018 - Branislav Škripek)
. ‒ I voted in favour of the Report on the draft Council implementing decision on the launch of automated data exchange with regard to dactyloscopic data in Croatia. Council Decision 2008/615/JHA on the stepping up of cross-border cooperation, particularly in combating terrorism and cross-border crime, confers implementing powers upon the Council with a view to adopting measures necessary to implement that Decision, in particular as regards the receiving and supply of personal data provided for under that Decision. The supply of personal data provided for under that Decision may not take place until the general provisions on data protection set out in that Decision have been implemented in the national law of the territories of the Member States involved in such supply.
Reduction of the impact of certain plastic products on the environment (A8-0317/2018 - Frédérique Ries)
. ‒ I voted in favour of the Report on the proposal for a directive of the European Parliament and of the Council on the reduction of the impact of certain plastic products on the environment. Invented in the mid-19th century, plastic has been mass-produced since the early 1950s, with an exponential rise in production in the last 15 years: over eight billion tonnes in barely 65 years resulting in more than six billion tonnes of waste. This is an alarming figure. Every year in Europe, 150 000 tonnes of plastic are dumped into the sea.A raft of measures has been introduced, based on initiatives in some Member States or regions which they will supplement, supersede and harmonise in a global community approach: Directive (EU) 2015/720 on reducing the consumption of lightweight plastic carrier bags; the strategy for plastic; the action plan for the circular economy and the revised legislation on waste. The Commission is targeting the 10 main sources of macroplastics found in Europe’s seas and beaches, which account for 70% of marine litter.
Establishment, operation and use of the Schengen Information System in the field of border checks (A8-0347/2017 - Carlos Coelho)
I voted in favour of the Report on the proposal for a regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council on the establishment, operation and use of the Schengen Information System (SIS) in the field of border checks, amending Regulation (EU) No 515/2014 and repealing Regulation (EC) No 1987/2006. The current Schengen Information System II (‘SIS II’) legal framework although agreed by 2006/2007 only became applicable on 9 April 2013 when the SIS II system was ready. The SIS II has, however, developed into a European success story. As the evaluation report of the Commission and the SIS II statistics show, the number of alerts and hits have been constantly increasing. However, there is still much room for improvement by Member States. SIS is regularly subject to evaluation and these new proposals, along with the amendments in this draft, are a reflection of this. However, the rapporteur calls on the Member States to swiftly implement all recommendations that have been addressed to them and to take all measures to fully exploit the functionalities offered by SIS II according to its legal framework without delay.
Establishment, operation and use of the Schengen Information System in the field of police cooperation and judicial cooperation in criminal matters (A8-0349/2017 - Carlos Coelho)
I voted in favour of the Report on the proposal for a regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council on the establishment, operation and use of the Schengen Information System (SIS) in the field of police cooperation and judicial cooperation in criminal matters, amending Regulation (EU) No 515/2014 and repealing Regulation (EC) No 1986/2006, Council Decision 2007/533/JHA and Commission Decision 2010/261/EU. In 2016, the Commission carried out a comprehensive evaluation of SIS, three years after the entry into operation of its second generation. This evaluation showed that SIS has been a genuine operational success. Nonetheless, the effectiveness and efficiency of the system should be further strengthened. To this end, the Commission is presenting a first set of three proposals to improve and extend the use of SIS as result of the evaluation while continuing its work to make existing and future law enforcement and border management systems more interoperable.
Use of the Schengen Information System for the return of illegally staying third-country nationals (A8-0348/2017 - Jeroen Lenaers)
I voted in favour of the Report on the proposal for a regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council on the use of the Schengen Information System for the return of illegally staying third-country nationals. The use of the Schengen Information System for information sharing on return decisions is another small but crucial step in a series of Union measures with the aim of improving the effectiveness of the return of illegally staying third-country nationals. Improving the effectiveness of the Union return policy is crucial in order to maintain public trust in the Union migration and asylum policy. This proposal will set up for the first time a Union-wide system for sharing information between Member States on return decisions and will therefore allow for monitoring whether third-country nationals subject to those decisions have left the territory of the Member States and implementation of Union wide return decisions, which should thereby increase the effectiveness of Union return policies.
Discharge 2016: European Asylum Support Office (EASO) (A8-0299/2018 - Bart Staes)
. ‒ I voted in favour of this second report on discharge in respect of the implementation of the budget of the European Asylum Support Office (EASO) for the financial year 2016. Parliament’s role in respect of the budget discharge is specified in the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union (TFEU), in the Financial Regulation and in the Framework Financial Regulation. The report underlines the importance of acting responsibly, in an accountable and transparent manner, and in accordance with all relevant rules and regulations, in the implementation of the Union budget. It recalls Parliament’s role in the discharge procedure, as governed by the TFEU, the Financial Regulation and its Rules of Procedure. It recognises that, apart from the completion of the OLAF investigation into the previous leadership of the Office, the corrective measures taken to date have sufficiently responded to Parliament’s reservations in its decision of 18 April 2018 postponing discharge.
Consultation on the immunity of Alfonso Luigi Marra (A8-0325/2018 - Gilles Lebreton)
I voted in favour of the Report on the request for consultation on the privileges and immunities of Alfonso Luigi Marra. Mr Marra served as a Member of the European Parliament from 21 July 1994 to 19 July 1999. Two sets of legal proceedings were instituted against Mr Marra in connection with allegedly defamatory statements he had made in a leaflet dated 19 September 1996, i.e. when he was a Member of the European Parliament. Mr Marra was ordered to pay compensation to the injured parties by both the Court of First Instance and the Court of Second Instance. At the request of Mr Marra, by decisions of 20 February 2007, the Italian Supreme Court referred the matter to the Court of Justice for preliminary rulings on the interpretation of the Community rules on the immunity of Members of the European Parliament. The Court of Justice has held that, in order to enjoy immunity, an opinion must be expressed by a Member of the European Parliament in the performance of his duties. Mr Marra’s statements do not have a direct and obvious connection with his parliamentary duties.
Request for the waiver of the immunity of Manolis Kefalogiannis (A8-0333/2018 - Jean-Marie Cavada)
I voted in favour of the Report on the request for waiver of the immunity of Manolis Kefalogiannis. The Deputy Public Prosecutor of the Supreme Court of Greece has requested that the parliamentary immunity of a Member of the European Parliament, Manolis Kefalogiannis, be waived in order to initiate criminal proceedings against him for two alleged offences. Article 8 of Protocol No 7 on the Privileges and Immunities of the European Union stipulates that Members of the European Parliament may not be subject to any form of inquiry, detention or legal proceedings in respect of opinions expressed or votes cast by them in the performance of their duties. Manolis Kefalogiannis is alleged to have attempted to commit fraud affecting the financial interests of the European Union, resulting in a loss of more than EUR 73 000, for attempting to illegally misappropriate part of his assistant’s salary by an amount of EUR 4 240 per month between July 2014 and the end of 2016. On the basis of the information and explanations provided in this case, the immunity of Manolis Kefalogiannis should not be waived.
Electronic publication of the Official Journal of the European Union (A8-0323/2018 - Pavel Svoboda)
I voted in favour of the recommendation on the draft Council regulation amending Regulation (EU) No 216/2013 on the electronic publication of the Official Journal of the European Union. The Official Journal of the European Union (hereinafter ʻOJʼ) ensures official publication of the legislation and other acts of the European Union. Until 2014, only the printed edition of the OJ was considered to be the valid and legally binding publication. The electronic version, which had been available on the Internet since 1998, was considered to be an information tool only, devoid of any legal value. The Court of Justice ruled in the Skoma-Lux case that legal acts of the Union are not enforceable against individuals if they have not been properly published in the Official Journal and that making such acts available online does not equate to valid publication in the Official Journal in the absence of any rules in that regard in Union law. The aim of the proposal is to update the procedure for authenticating the electronic version of the OJ by an electronic signature.
EU-Bahamas Agreement on the short-stay visa waiver (A8-0304/2018 - Emilian Pavel)
I voted in favour of the recommendation on the draft Council decision on the conclusion, on behalf of the Union, of the Agreement between the European Union and the Commonwealth of the Bahamas amending the Agreement between the European Community and the Commonwealth of the Bahamas on the short-stay visa waiver. This agreement on the waiver of short-stay visas crowns the deepening of relations between the European Union and the Commonwealth of the Bahamas, which is politically highly significant in the context of the Cotonou Agreement. The amending agreement ensures legal coherence as well as harmonisation among Member States, by adhering to the new definition of short-stay provided by the Schengen Borders Code amendment, which gives a clearer interpretation of ʻshort-stayʼ. The Bahamas is a member of the African, Caribbean and Pacific Group of States, the Association of Caribbean States, the Caribbean Community, the Non-Aligned Movement, the Organization of American States and the United Nations. The EU’s political dialogue with the various ACP countries and the Commonwealth of the Bahamas in particular is gradually increasing. This agreement may enable us to continue our partnership under a clear legal framework.
EU-Mauritius Agreement on the short-stay visa waiver (A8-0303/2018 - Emilian Pavel)
I voted in favour of the recommendation on the draft Council decision on the conclusion, on behalf of the Union, of the Agreement between the European Union and the Republic of Mauritius amending the Agreement between the European Community and the Republic of Mauritius on the short-stay visa waiver. This amending agreement on the waiver of short-stay visas crowns the deepening of relations between the European Union and the Republic of Mauritius, which is politically highly significant in the context of the Cotonou Agreement. The amending agreement ensures legal coherence as well as harmonisation among Member States, by adhering to the new definition of short-stay provided by the Schengen Borders Code amendment, which gives a clearer interpretation of ʻshort-stayʼ. The EU’s political dialogue with the various ACP countries and Mauritius in particular is gradually increasing.
EU-Antigua and Barbuda Agreement on the short-stay visa waiver (A8-0305/2018 - Emilian Pavel)
I voted in favour of the recommendation on the draft Council decision on the conclusion, on behalf of the Union, of the Agreement between the European Union and Antigua and Barbuda amending the Agreement between the European Community and Antigua and Barbuda on the short-stay visa waiver. This amending agreement on the waiver of short-stay visas crowns the deepening of relations between the European Union and Antigua and Barbuda, which is politically highly significant in the context of the Cotonou Agreement. The amending agreement ensures legal coherence as well as harmonisation among Member States, by adhering to the new definition of short-stay provided by the Schengen Borders Code amendment, which gives a clearer interpretation of ʻshort-stayʼ. Antigua and Barbuda is a member of the African, Caribbean and Pacific Group of States, the Association of Caribbean States, the Caribbean Community, the Non-Aligned Movement, the Organisation of Eastern Caribbean States, the Organization of American States, the United Nations and the World Trade Organisation. The EU’s political dialogue with the various Pacific ACP countries and Antigua and Barbuda in particular is gradually increasing. This agreement may enable us to continue our partnership under a clear legal framework.
EU-Federation of Saint Kitts and Nevis Agreement on the short-stay visa waiver (A8-0306/2018 - Emilian Pavel)
I voted in favour of the Recommendation on the draft Council decision on the conclusion, on behalf of the Union, of the Agreement between the European Union and the Federation of St Kitts and Nevis amending the Agreement between the European Community and the Federation of Saint Kitts and Nevis on the short-stay visa waiver. This amending agreement on the waiver of short-stay visas simultaneously represents a culmination of the deepening of relations between the European Union and the Federation of Saint Kitts and Nevis, which is politically highly significant in the context of the Cotonou Agreement. The amending agreement ensures legal coherence as well as harmonisation among Member States, by adhering to the new definition of ‘short stay’ as provided by the Schengen Borders Code amendment, which provides a clearer interpretation of the term. Saint Kitts and Nevis is a member of the African, Caribbean and Pacific Group of States, Association of Caribbean States, Caribbean Community, Non-Aligned Movement, Organisation of Eastern Caribbean States, Organization of American States, United Nations and World Trade Organization. The EU’s political dialogue with the various ACP countries and the Federation of Saint Kitts and Nevis in particular is gradually increasing.
EU-Barbados Agreement on the short-stay visa waiver (A8-0301/2018 - Emilian Pavel)
I voted in favour of the Recommendation on the draft Council Decision on the conclusion, on behalf of the Union, of the Agreement between the European Union and Barbados amending the Agreement between the European Community and Barbados on the short-stay visa waiver. This amending agreement on the waiver of short-stay visas simultaneously represents a culmination of the deepening of relations between the European Union and Barbados, which is politically highly significant in the context of the Cotonou Agreement. The amending agreement ensures legal coherence as well as harmonisation among Member States, by adhering to the new definition of ‘short stay’ as is provided by the Schengen Borders Code amendment, which provides a clearer interpretation of the term. Barbados is a member of the African, Caribbean and Pacific Group of States, Association of Caribbean States, Caribbean Community, Non-Aligned Movement, Organization of American States, United Nations and World Trade Organization. Barbados has an exceptionally high quality of life rating for a developing country. The EU’s political dialogue with the various Pacific ACP countries and Barbados in particular is gradually increasing.
EU-Seychelles Agreement on the short-stay visa waiver (A8-0302/2018 - Emilian Pavel)
I voted in favour of the Recommendation on the draft Council Decision on the conclusion, on behalf of the Union, of the Agreement between the European Union and the Republic of Seychelles amending the Agreement between the European Community and the Republic of Seychelles on the short-stay visa waiver. This amending agreement simultaneously represents a culmination of the deepening of relations between the European Union and the Republic of Seychelles, which is politically highly significant in the context of the Cotonou Agreement. The amending agreement ensures legal coherence as well as harmonisation among Member States, by adhering to the new definition of ‘short stay’ as is provided by the Schengen Borders Code amendment, which provides a clearer interpretation of the term. The Seychelles is a member of the African, Caribbean and Pacific Group of States, African Union, Common Market for Eastern and Southern Africa, Indian Ocean Rim Association for Regional Cooperation, Non-Aligned Movement, Organisation internationale de la Francophonie, Southern African Development Community and United Nations. The Seychelles became a member of the Indian Ocean Rim Association for Regional Cooperation on 15 November 2011. The EU’s political dialogue with the various ACP countries and the Seychelles in particular is gradually increasing.
Mobilisation of the European Globalisation Adjustment Fund: application EGF/2018/002 PT/Norte – Centro – Lisboa wearing apparel (A8-0311/2018 - José Manuel Fernandes)
. ‒ I voted in favour of the Report on the proposal for a decision of the European Parliament and of the Council on the mobilisation of the European Globalisation Adjustment Fund (application from Portugal – EGF/2018/002 PT/Norte – Centro – Lisboa wearing apparel). The European Globalisation Adjustment Fund has been created in order to provide additional assistance to workers suffering from the consequences of major structural changes in world trade patterns. On 10 September 2018, the Commission adopted a proposal for a decision on the mobilisation of the EGF in favour of Portugal to support the reintegration in the labour market of workers made redundant by two enterprises operating in the economic sector classified under the NACE Revision 2 Division 14 (Manufacture of wearing apparel) in the NUTS level 2 regions of Norte (PT11), Centro (PT16) and Lisboa (PT17) in Portugal. This is the eighth application to be examined under the 2018 budget and the sixth in the economic sector classified under the NACE Revision 2 Division 14 since the establishment of the EGF. It concerns 1 161 workers made redundant and refers to the mobilisation of a total amount of EUR 4 655 883 from the EGF for Portugal.
Quality of water intended for human consumption (A8-0288/2018 - Michel Dantin)
. ‒ I voted in favour of the Report on the proposal for a directive of the European Parliament and of the Council on the quality of water intended for human consumption (recast). Access to high quality drinking water remains an important issue for EU citizens and one which affects their daily lives, their health and their activities. The Drinking Water Directive is one of the pillars of current EU water legislation. Initially drafted at the end of the 1980s, today this text ensures a compliance rate of over 99% with regard to high-quality water supply in the EU. However, Directive 98/83/EC has been in force for 20 years and has not undergone any significant recasts since then. This revised directive thus aims to align drinking-water quality standards with the most up-to-date scientific data and to adapt the legislative framework in order better to meet new challenges, such as climate change and the transition to a circular economy.
Resources for economic, social and territorial cohesion and resources for the investment for growth and jobs goal (A8-0282/2018 - Iskra Mihaylova)
. ‒ I voted in favour of the Report on the proposal for a regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council amending Regulation (EU) No 1303/2013 as regards the resources for economic, social and territorial cohesion and correcting that Regulation as regards the resources for the Investment for growth and jobs goal. On 28 June 2018, the Commission submitted a new proposal to amend the current Common Provisions Regulation (CPR). This amendment concerns two points. Firstly, the proposal concerns the funding for the Youth Employment Initiative (YEI) in 2018. The YEI provides support to young people living in regions where youth unemployment was higher than 25% in 2012. In 2017, funds were increased for regions where youth unemployment was higher than 25% in 2016. The YEI supports young people who are not in education, employment or training (NEETs), including the long-term unemployed and those not registered as job-seekers. It ensures that, in those parts of Europe facing the greatest challenges, young people can receive targeted support. Generally, the YEI funds the provision of apprenticeships, traineeships, job placements and further education courses leading to a qualification.
Alignment of reporting obligations in the field of environment policy (A8-0324/2018 - Adina-Ioana Vălean)
I voted in favour of the Report on the proposal for a Regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council on the alignment of reporting obligations in the field of environment policy and thereby amending Directives 86/278/EEC, 2002/49/EC, 2004/35/EC, 2007/2/EC, 2009/147/EC and 2010/63/EU, Regulations (EC) No 166/2006 and (EU) No 995/2010, and Council Regulations (EC) No 338/97 and (EC) No 2173/2005. This Commission proposal comes at a conducive moment when efforts are being made to simplify the environmental legislation, including reporting provisions, that has been gradually increasing since the 1970s. Concretely, this legislative proposal derives from an updated action plan to streamline environmental reporting, one of the outcomes of the fitness check evaluation on reporting and monitoring of Union environment policy. Moreover, this Commission proposal complements the recently adopted decision on procedural rules in the field of environmental reporting.
The role of employee financial participation in creating jobs and reactivating the unemployed (A8-0293/2018 - Renate Weber)
I voted in favour of the Report on the role of employee financial participation in creating jobs and reactivating the unemployed. In the last 30 years, employee financial participation (EFP) has developed a lot through Europe. In 2018, there are around 10 million employee shareholders in Europe and 20 EU countries have some sort of EFP incentive regulation. The EU 2020 strategy on smart, sustainable and inclusive growth highlights the need for inclusive growth, which amongst other things empowers citizens through employment, investing in skills, fighting poverty and modernising labour markets and social protection. EFP offers tangible means in this respect by involving workers more in the decision—making of the companies they work for, helping to strengthen their skills and employability, ensuring a share of the financial benefits and fighting capital concentration, reactivating the unemployed and creating jobs.
Public procurement strategy package (A8-0229/2018 - Carlos Coelho)
. ‒ I voted in favour of the Report on the public procurement strategy package. In early 2014, the EU co-legislators concluded their revision of the Union’s public procurement legislative framework. This extensive reform, identified by the 2011 Single Market Act as a necessity in the process of European integration, was meant to serve directly the Europe 2020 Strategy and contribute considerably to the Union’s growth and competitiveness.At that time Parliament was reasonably satisfied with the outcome of the negotiations. It had fought firm – and succeeded – that the new Directives provide the Member States with the tools to modernise public buying, to digitally transform public procurement, and to move from simply regulating public procurement to implementing strategic public procurement.However, while the Directives are indeed offering options and opportunities for Member States, it is up to each country to make the choices. For the moment, there is no clear picture of how the Directives are transposed and implemented in different Member States. This is unfortunately also due to the fact that considerable delays occurred as regards transposition in many Member States – to the extent that the Commission had to start infringement procedures for a few of them.
EU Agency for Criminal Justice Cooperation (Eurojust) (A8-0320/2017 - Axel Voss)
. ‒ I voted in favour of the Report on the proposal for a regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council on the European Union Agency for Criminal Justice Cooperation (Eurojust). Eurojust was set up by Council Decision 2002/187/JHA to reinforce the fight against serious organised crime in the European Union. Since then, Eurojust has facilitated coordination and cooperation between national investigative and prosecutorial authorities in dealing with cases affecting a number of Member States. It has helped to build mutual trust and to bridge the EU’s wide variety of legal systems and traditions.By rapidly solving legal problems and identifying competent authorities in other countries, Eurojust has facilitated the execution of requests for cooperation and the application of mutual recognition instruments, thereby improving cross-border prosecution.On 17 July 2013 the Commission submitted a proposal for a regulation on Eurojust. As the Commission stresses in its proposal for a regulation, organised cross-border crime has ‘exploded’ in the past 10 years. These are cross-border crimes committed by extremely mobile, flexible groups which are active in many Member States and areas of crime and which should be tackled with a ‘pan-European strategy’.
Mutual recognition of freezing and confiscation orders (A8-0001/2018 - Nathalie Griesbeck)
I voted in favour of the Report on the proposal for a regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council on the mutual recognition of freezing and confiscation orders. In 2016 the European Commission presented of a series of measures aimed at boosting the EU’s capacity to combat the financing of organised crime and terrorism. The three legislative proposals contained in this legislative package will enable the EU’s legal framework in the areas of money laundering, illegal movements of cash and the freezing and confiscation of assets to be supplemented and reinforced, thereby constituting a more powerful and better-coordinated European response in this field. Freezing and confiscation of the proceeds of crime are among the most effective means of combating organised crime. Money coming from and going to criminal organisations needs to be blocked. Having a mutual recognition instrument is of fundamental importance, given that the principle of mutual recognition of judgments and judicial decisions is a cornerstone of judicial cooperation in criminal matters in the EU.
Free flow of non-personal data in the European Union (A8-0201/2018 - Anna Maria Corazza Bildt)
I voted in favour of the Report on the proposal for a regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council on a framework for the free flow of non-personal data in the European Union. The Digital Single Market (DSM) is a cornerstone of the European economy with enormous potential to create growth and jobs. This Regulation on the Free flow of non-personal data de facto establishes data as the fifth freedom in the Single Market. With the emergence of new technologies such as cloud computing, big data, and artificial intelligence, the possibility to move data freely has become a key issue for European companies. This is of course a possibility, not an obligation. Localisation requirements put in place by Member States reduce competition and increase storage costs by an estimated 120 per cent. However, by removing these requirements the EU could benefit from up to EUR 8 billion, or 0.06 percent, in GDP gains per year. The possibility for companies and public sector entities to process their data outside of their Member State of establishment should under no circumstances be used as a way to keep information from competent authorities.
The EU's input on a UN binding instrument on transnational corporations with respect to human rights (B8-0443/2018, B8-0472/2018, B8-0473/2018, B8-0474/2018)
I voted in favour of the Resolution further to Questions for Oral Answer B8 0402/2018, B8-0403/2018 and B8 0404/2018 pursuant to Rule 128(5) of the Rules of Procedure on the EU’s input to a UN Binding Instrument on transnational corporations and other business enterprises with transnational characteristics with respect to human rights. The EU is founded on the values of respect for human dignity, freedom, democracy, equality, the rule of law and respect for human right. Its actions on the international scene must be guided by these principles and must be consistent with the principle of Policy Coherence for Development. The UN Global Compact calls on corporations to embrace, support and enact, within their sphere of influence, a set of core values in the areas of human rights, labour standards, the environment and the fight against corruption, making a commitment to those values and integrating them into their business operations on a voluntary basis. The globalisation and increasing internationalisation of business activities and supply chains make the role that corporations play in ensuring respect for human rights more important. I believe that transnational corporations should refrain from financing or engaging in activities, commercial or non-commercial, that might fuel radicalism or extremism.
Situation in Yemen (RC-B8-0444/2018, B8-0444/2018, B8-0445/2018, B8-0446/2018, B8-0447/2018, B8-0448/2018, B8-0449/2018, B8-0450/2018)
I voted in favour of the resolution on the situation in Yemen. Yemen has been devastated by four years of increasingly complex civil war, which has left 23 million people in need of humanitarian support, more than two million people internally displaced, eight million people on the verge of famine, 13 600 people dead and more than 40 000 people injured. It is estimated that more than 50 000 people have died as a result of famine caused by the war. The conflict started in 2015 when Iran-backed Shia Houthi rebels ousted the country’s internationally recognised president, who subsequently drew in a multinational coalition led by Saudi Arabia to fight the rebels and those troops allied to them. The war has led to the destruction of infrastructure and the collapse of Yemen’s economy, and has caused widespread disruption to basic commodities and to the supply of utilities, sanitation, and clean drinking water. The resolution deplores the continuing war in Yemen, the loss of life and the targeting of, and impact on, innocent civilians. I believe that sustainable peace in Yemen can only be achieved through negotiations, with the meaningful participation of all declared parties.
Fighting customs fraud and protecting EU own resources (B8-0400/2018)
I voted in favour of the resolution on fighting customs fraud and protecting EU own resources. Traditional own resources, comprised mainly of duties on imports from outside the EU and sugar levies, account for around 12.8% of EU own resources. In early 2017 the European Anti-Fraud Office (OLAF) concluded an investigation into a case of customs fraud in the UK, the main conclusions of which appear in the 2017 OLAF activity report. OLAF calculated a loss for EU budget own resources of EUR 1 987 billion in terms of lost customs duties due on textiles and shoes imported from China through the UK in the period 2013-2016. As a means of comparison, in 2016 OLAF recommended the financial recovery of a total amount of EUR 631.1 million as a result of 272 investigations it carried out. The European Court of Auditors has pointed out that there is no harmonised and standardised application of customs controls by Member States and that this may incentivise fraudsters to choose the weakest link in the chain to perform their fraudulent imports. The resolution calls on the Commission to develop a suitable methodology and produce periodic estimates of the customs gap as from 2019.
Harmonising and simplifying certain rules in the VAT system (A8-0280/2018 - Jeppe Kofod)
. ‒ I voted in favour of the Report on the proposal for a Council directive amending Directive 2006/112/EC as regards harmonising and simplifying certain rules in the value added tax system and introducing the definitive system for the taxation of trade between Member States. This proposal, presented by the Commission in October 2017, introduces a series of fundamental principles or ‘cornerstones’ for the future definitive VAT system, and four ‘quick fixes’ to improve the day-to-day functioning of the current VAT system, tackling the VAT identification number, chain transactions, call-off stock situations and proof of intra-Community supply. According to the impact assessment accompanying the work on establishing a definitive VAT system, the changes and cornerstones here proposed, constitute a vital step in reducing cross-border VAT fraud by upwards of EUR 41 billion and at the same time reducing compliance costs for businesses by EUR 1 billion. This proposal also notably introduces the new concept of a certified taxable person, in analogy to the ‘authorised economic operator’ in the EU Customs Code. A business can apply to its national tax authority and become a CTP by proving compliance with pre-defined criteria such as regular payment of taxes, internal controls, and proof of solvency.
VAT: period of application of the reverse charge mechanism and of the Quick Reaction Mechanism (A8-0283/2018 - Sirpa Pietikäinen)
I voted in favour of the Report on the proposal for a Council directive amending Directive 2006/112/EC on the common system of value added tax as regards the period of application of the optional reverse charge mechanism in relation to supplies of certain goods and services susceptible to fraud and of the Quick Reaction Mechanism against VAT fraud. The purpose of this proposal is to prolong the possibility for Member States to apply the reverse charge mechanism to combat existing fraud in supplies of goods and services included in Article 199a of the VAT Directive as well as the possibility to use the Quick Reaction Mechanism (QRM) to combat fraud. Article 199a of the VAT Directive allows Member States to optionally use the reverse charge mechanism for payment of VAT on supplies of pre-defined goods and services, which are susceptible to fraud, and in particular, to Missing Trader Intra-Community (MTIC) fraud. The purpose of the measures foreseen in Articles 199a and 199b is to allow Member States to quickly tackle problems of the MTIC fraud Article 199a by an option of applying the reverse charge mechanism for listed supplies and Article 199b by offering a faster procedure.
Administrative cooperation in the field of excise duties as regards the content of electronic register (A8-0285/2018 - Ivana Maletić)
I voted in favour of the Report on the proposal for a Council regulation amending Regulation (EU) No 389/2012 on administrative cooperation in the field of excise duties as regards the content of electronic register. The Proposal for a Council Regulation amending Regulation (EU) No 389/2012 on administrative cooperation in the field of excise duties as regards the content of electronic register lays down the legal basis for administrative cooperation between Member States. This concerns the automation of the supervision of movements of excise goods which have been released for consumption in one Member State and that are being moved to another Member State in order to be delivered for commercial purposes in that other Member State. The new arrangements will require the registration of economic operators moving goods under Chapter V of Directive XXX/EC in the register of economic operators that is currently restricted to economic operators who make use of the arrangements in Chapters III and IV of Directive XXX/EC. The current proposal implements this requirement into Regulation (EU) No 389/2012. The objective of the proposal is to introduce the obligation of registration of economic operators moving goods under Chapter V, section 2 of Directive XXX/EC.
Health technology assessment (A8-0289/2018 - Soledad Cabezón Ruiz)
. ‒ I voted in favour of the report on the proposal for a regulation of Parliament and of the Council on health technology assessment and amending Directive 2011/24/E. The Commission’s proposal is timely and represents a high degree of added value for the EU. It constitutes a further step towards closer EU integration, in the important area of health.The fundamental aim of the proposal is to introduce joint clinical assessment of health technologies at EU level. The right to health is a fundamental right. It is important not only to the integrity of the individual and to personal development but also as a key factor in social cohesion and productivity. There are serious concerns about the growing difficulties that European citizens face in accessing suitable treatment in the EU, whether because of price, non-availability of a treatment or the quality of new products. The report proposes measures which suggest that, in fact, a directive is needed to make global regulation possible and to clear the way for the right balance to be struck between all parties and interests, with the focus on the patient, guaranteeing access to medicines and the sustainability of healthcare systems, and fostering high-quality R&D.
Emission performance standards for new passenger cars and for new light commercial vehicles (A8-0287/2018 - Miriam Dalli)
. ‒ I voted in favour of the report on the proposal for a regulation of Parliament and of the Council setting emission performance standards for new passenger cars and for new light commercial vehicles as part of the Union’s integrated approach to reduce CO2 emissions from light-duty vehicles and amending regulation (EC) No 715/2007 (recast). Improved emission performance standards for new passenger cars and new light commercial vehicles have the potential to reduce CO2 emissions, contributing to the mitigation of climate change. At the same time, the proper standards can deliver significant fuel savings to consumers and can also bring about air-quality improvements.I believe that having the right CO2 targets for vehicles is fundamental for the shift towards decarbonisation of the economy, in line with the Paris Agreement. I am of the opinion that ambitious CO2 reduction targets for light duty vehicles and a strong and stable home market for zero-emission and low-emission vehicles will help stimulate economic growth whilst reinforcing the competitiveness of the European industry.
Rates of value added tax (A8-0279/2018 - Tibor Szanyi)
I voted in favour of the Report on the proposal for a Council Directive amending Directive 2006/112/EC as regards rates of value added tax. The fragmentation of the VAT system has created a great obstacle for the smooth functioning of the Single Market. That is why an EU-level VAT regulation is needed to replace the current transitional arrangements and guarantee equal treatment to all Member States. The definitive VAT system for the taxation of trade between Member States proposed by the Commission is based on the principle of taxation in the Member State of destination. This approach helps to create a robust single European VAT area by ensuring that Member States are treated equally – also when it comes to applying reduced VAT rates. The current flexibility of the Member States in setting VAT is not restricted at all by the proposal. The harmonised and less restrictive rules would enable all Member States to apply another reduced rate between 5% and 0%, in addition to the two reduced rates of a minimum of 5% and an exemption with deductibility of the VAT paid at the preceding stage, which is what is currently allowed.
International Financial Reporting Standards: IFRS 17 Insurance Contracts (B8-0442/2018)
I voted in favour of the Resolution to wind up the debate on the statement by the Commission pursuant to Rule 123(2) of the Rules of Procedure on International Financial Reporting Standards: IFRS 17 Insurance Contracts. IFRS 17 will necessitate a fundamental change in accounting for insurance contracts, but will bring greater consistency and transparency and seek to deliver increased comparability. Moreover, considerable and significant efforts and costs will be needed to implement IFRS 17, not least for SMEs working in insurance, which is indicative of the complexity of the new standard. Implementation efforts are already in progress and the IASB is providing implementation support, in particular by setting up a Transition Resource Group (TRG) for IFRS 17. One of the aims of IFRS 17 is to generate relevant information for shareholders by evaluating insurance contract liabilities. However, this is a fundamentally complex process and may accentuate financial disturbances.
Distributed ledger technologies and blockchains: building trust with disintermediation (B8-0397/2018)
I voted in favour of the resolution further to Question for Oral Answer B8 0405/2018, pursuant to Rule 128(5) of the Rules of Procedure, on distributed ledger technologies and blockchains: building trust with disintermediation (2017/2772(RSP)). Distributed ledger technology (DLT) and blockchain can constitute a tool that promotes the empowerment of citizens by giving them the opportunity to control their own data and decide what data to share in the ledger, as well as the capacity to choose who else can see them. DLT reduces intermediation costs in a trusted environment between the transacting parties and allows peer-to-peer exchange of value that can empower citizens, disrupt legacy models, improve services and reduce costs throughout value chains, in a wide range of key sectors. DLT can transform and democratise the energy markets by allowing households to produce environment-friendly energy and exchange it on a peer-to-peer basis. Such technologies provide scalability and flexibility for plant operators, suppliers and consumers. Moreover, DLT can support the production and consumption of green energy and could improve the efficiency of energy exchanges; it can transform the grid operation and allow communities and individuals to provide grid services as well as to integrate renewable resources more efficiently.
EU Agenda for Rural, Mountainous and Remote Areas (B8-0399/2018)
I voted in favour of the resolution on addressing the specific needs of rural, mountainous and remote areas. Rural, mountainous and remote areas constitute 80% of EU territory, are home to 57% of its population and account for 46% of gross value added. GDP per capita in non-urbanised areas is 70% of the EU average, while urban residents enjoy a GDP per capita as high as 123% of the EU average. The unemployment rate in non-urbanised areas increased from 7% to 10.4% between 2008 and 2012. A quarter of the population of rural, mountainous and remote areas has no access to the internet. The resolution stresses the importance of rural, mountainous and remote areas for balanced territorial development in Europe and the need to strengthen them by addressing their specific needs through EU policies. I voted in favour because I believe that fostering local development is essential to stabilising and counterbalancing negative trends on local markets, demographic dynamics and natural assets.
Request for the waiver of the immunity of Georgios Kyrtsos (A8-0291/2018 - Laura Ferrara)
I voted in favour of the report on the request for waiver of the immunity of Georgios Kyrtsos. The Prosecutor’s Office at the Supreme Court of Greece has requested the waiver of the immunity of Georgios Kyrtsos, MEP, in connection with criminal proceedings relating to the non-payment of amounts owing to the State (exceeding EUR 200 000). Georgios Kyrtsos has been acting as legal representative (CEO) of the company ‘Free Sunday Publishing House Ltd’ since 29 June 2009. In his capacity as legal representative of Free Sunday Publishing House Ltd he is accused of failing to pay six hundred and twenty-seven thousand seven hundred and fifty-two euros and sixty five cents (EUR 627 752.65) owed to the State. The alleged offence clearly has no direct link to the office of Georgios Kyrtsos as a Member of the European Parliament, but instead relates to his former position as manager of his newspaper company. Therefore, there is no reason to suspect that the intention underlying the criminal proceedings is to damage a Member’s political activity.
Third countries whose nationals must be in possession of visas when crossing the external borders and those whose nationals are exempt from that requirement (A8-0290/2018 - Lidia Joanna Geringer de Oedenberg)
I voted in favour of the report on the proposal for a regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council listing the third countries whose nationals must be in possession of visas when crossing the external borders and those whose nationals are exempt from that requirement (codification). In the interests of clarity and transparency of the law, the purpose of this proposal is to codify Council Regulation (EC) No 539/2001 listing the third countries whose nationals must be in possession of visas when crossing the external borders and those whose nationals are exempt from that requirement. The new regulation will supersede the various acts incorporated in it. The proposal fully preserves the content of the acts being codified and hence does no more than bring them together with only such formal amendments as are required by the codification exercise itself. The third countries whose nationals are subject to the visa requirement, and those whose nationals are exempt, are determined on the basis of a case-by-case assessment of various criteria.
EU-Morocco Agreement for scientific and technological cooperation: terms and conditions for the participation of Morocco in the Partnership for Research and Innovation in the Mediterranean Area (PRIMA) (A8-0281/2018 - Aldo Patriciello)
I voted in favour of the recommendation on the draft Council decision on the conclusion, on behalf of the Union, of the Agreement for scientific and technological cooperation between the European Union and the Kingdom of Morocco setting out the terms and conditions for the participation of the Kingdom of Morocco in the Partnership for Research and Innovation in the Mediterranean Area (PRIMA). The Partnership on Research and Innovation in the Mediterranean Area (PRIMA) is the first public-to-public partnership under Article 185 TFEU to target a specific geographical area (the Mediterranean basin) and to include the participation of neighbouring countries. This important tool brings the research capacities of the Union and of participating Mediterranean countries to bear together on facilitating the development and the implementation of innovative and integrated solutions for more efficient, safer, more secure and more sustainable agro-food and water provision and management systems in the Mediterranean area. PRIMA’s specific objective is, in fact, to coordinate and strengthen the separate national research and innovation programmes in these sectors by providing a comprehensive and integrated approach. At this point, 19 countries are jointly undertaking PRIMA.
EU-Canada air transport agreement (A8-0254/2018 - Francisco Assis)
I voted in favour of the recommendation on the draft Council decision on the conclusion, on behalf of the Union, of the Air Transport Agreement between the European Community and its Member States, of the one part, and Canada, of the other part. In October 2007, the Council gave the Commission a mandate to negotiate a comprehensive aviation agreement with Canada. The negotiating mandate set the objective of establishing an Open Aviation Area between the EU and Canada, to create a single market for air transport in which investment could flow freely and where European and Canadian airlines would be able to provide air services without any restriction, including in the domestic markets of both parties. The agreement includes a gradual phasing-in of traffic rights and investment opportunities, as well as far-reaching cooperation on a number of issues including safety, security, social matters, consumer interests, environment, air traffic management, state aids and competition. All EU airlines will be able to operate direct flights to Canada from anywhere in Europe. The agreement removes all restrictions on routes, prices, or the number of weekly flights between Canada and the EU.
Inclusion of the Italian municipality of Campione d’Italia and the Italian waters of Lake Lugano in the customs territory of the Union (A8-0284/2018 - Roberto Gualtieri)
I voted in favour of the report on the proposal for a Council directive amending Directives 2006/112/EC and 2008/118/EC as regards the inclusion of the Italian municipality of Campione d’Italia and the Italian waters of Lake Lugano in the customs territory of the Union and in the territorial application of Directive 2008/118/EC. In its letter of 18 July 2017, the Italian Government requested that the Italian municipality of Campione d’Italia and the Italian waters of Lake Lugano should be included in the EU customs territory and in the territory of the Union to which Directive 2008/118/EC concerning the general arrangements for excise duty applies. For geographic reasons, such as isolation and economic disadvantage, the two Italian exclaves within the territory of Switzerland have been historically justified by their exclusion from the EU customs territory. However, Italy now considers this exclusion to be no longer necessary, in particular because otherwise Switzerland now wishes to include them within its customs territory. It therefore requests that these two territories be brought within the scope of the EU customs territory and the territory of the Union to which the excise directive applies. It is proposed that this amendment should apply from 1 January 2019.
Mobilisation of the European Globalisation Adjustment Fund: application EGF/2018/001 NL/Financial service activities (A8-0294/2018 - Ivana Maletić)
I voted in favour of the Report on the proposal for a decision of the European Parliament and of the Council on the mobilisation of the European Globalisation Adjustment Fund (application from the Netherlands – EGF/2018/001 NL/Financial service activities).The European Globalisation Adjustment Fund has been created in order to provide additional assistance to workers suffering from the consequences of major structural changes in world trade patterns. The Netherlands have notified the Commission that the sources of national pre-financing or co-funding are the funds of the Employee Insurance Agency (UWV), the provinces, educational funds and social partners. The financial contribution will be managed by the Implementation of Policy part of the Service, Collaboration and Implementation department.In order to mobilise the Fund, the Commission has submitted to the Budgetary Authority a request to transfer a global amount of EUR 1 192 500 from the EGF reserve (40 02 43) to the EGF budget line (04 04 01). This is the seventh transfer proposal for the mobilisation of the Fund transmitted to the Budgetary Authority to date during 2018. The trilogue procedure will be initiated in the event of disagreement, as provided for in Article 15(4) of the EGF Regulation.
Provision of audiovisual media services (A8-0192/2017 - Sabine Verheyen, Petra Kammerevert)
I voted in favour of the Resolution on fighting customs fraud and protecting EU own resources. Traditional own resources, comprised mainly of duties on imports from outside the EU and sugar levies, account for around 12.8 % of EU own resources. In early 2017, the European Anti-Fraud Office (OLAF) concluded an investigation into a case of customs fraud in the UK, the main conclusions of which appear in the 2017 OLAF activity report.OLAF calculated a loss for EU budget own resources of EUR 1.987 billion in terms of lost customs duties due on textiles and shoes imported from China through the UK in the period 2013-2016. As a means of comparison, in 2016 OLAF recommended the financial recovery of a total amount of EUR 631.1 million as a result of 272 investigations it carried out. The European Court of Auditors has pointed out that there is no harmonised and standardised application of customs controls by Member States, and that this may incentivise fraudsters to choose the weakest link in the chain to perform their fraudulent imports.The Resolution calls on the Commission to develop a suitable methodology and produce periodic estimates of the customs gap as from 2019.
Draft Amending Budget No 5/2018: cancellation of the reserve related to the support to Turkey from the Instrument for Pre-Accession and reinforcement of the European Neighbourhood Instrument and of the Humanitarian Aid for orther urgent actions (A8-0292/2018 - Siegfried Mureşan)
. ‒ I voted in favour of the Report on the Council position on Draft amending budget No 5/2018 of the European Union for the financial year 2018, Section III – Commission: Cancellation of the reserve related to the support to Turkey from the Instrument for Pre-Accession (IPA II), reinforcement of the European Neighbourhood Instrument (ENI) and of the Humanitarian Aid for other urgent actions and modification of the establishment plan of the Innovation and Networks Executive Agency (INEA) in the context of the WiFi4EU initiative. At the insistence of Parliament, the budgetary authority decided, within the context of the 2018 budgetary procedure, to place in reserve EUR 70 million of commitment appropriations and EUR 35 million of payment appropriations of the Union’s support to Turkey from the Instrument for Pre-Accession (IPA II). However, Parliament and the Council decided that for the amounts put in reserve to be released, Turkey would need to make ‘measurable sufficient improvements in the fields of rule of law, democracy, human rights and press freedom, according to the annual report of the Commission’. Therefore, the Commission has proposed to fully cancel the amounts, which have been placed in reserve as well as the related budgetary remarks.
Eurojust and Albania Cooperation Agreement (A8-0275/2018 - Laura Ferrara)
I voted in favour of the report on the draft Council implementing decision approving the conclusion by Eurojust of the Agreement on Cooperation between Eurojust and Albania. Its purpose is to approve the conclusion by Eurojust of the agreement on cooperation between Eurojust and Albania. Decision 2002/187/JHA provides that Eurojust may conclude agreements with third countries and organisations. Such agreements may concern the exchange of information, including personal data and the secondment of liaison officers or liaison magistrates to Eurojust. Such agreements may only be concluded after consultation by Eurojust with the Joint Supervisory Body concerning the provisions on data protection and after approval by the Council. In order to strengthen its capacity to work with Albania, Eurojust has negotiated an agreement on cooperation between Eurojust and Albania. Albania has ratified the Council of Europe Convention and its Additional Protocol regarding supervisory authorities and transborder data flows. The Joint Supervisory Body of Eurojust gave a positive opinion on the provisions of the agreement concerning data protection.
Protection of individuals with regard to the processing of personal data by the Union institutions, bodies, offices and agencies and free movement of such data (A8-0313/2017 - Cornelia Ernst)
I voted in favour of the report on the proposal for a regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council on the protection of individuals with regard to the processing of personal data by the Union institutions, bodies, offices and agencies and on the free movement of such data, and repealing Regulation (EC) No 45/2001 and Decision No 1247/2002/EC. The purpose of the proposal is to enhance the protection of individuals with regard to the processing of personal data by the Union institutions, bodies, offices and agencies and on the free movement of such data. The proposal will apply to the processing of personal data, by automated means or otherwise, by all Union institutions and bodies insofar as such processing is carried out in the exercise of activities all or part of which fall within the scope of Union law. The material scope of this proposed regulation is technologically neutral. The protection of personal data applies to the processing of personal data by automated means, as well as to manual processing if the personal data are contained or are intended to be contained in a filing system.
Single Digital Gateway (A8-0054/2018 - Marlene Mizzi)
I voted in favour of the report on the proposal for a regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council on establishing a single digital gateway to provide information, procedures, assistance and problem solving services and amending Regulation (EU) No 1024/2012. The purpose of the regulation is to establish a single digital gateway to ensure that citizens and businesses have easy online access to the information, procedures and assistance and problem solving services they need for the exercise of their rights in the internal market. The Single Market is one of Europe’s key achievements, making it possible for people, goods, services and capital to move more freely. However, significant obstacles exist for both citizens and businesses interested in moving to, selling products or providing services in another EU country. Finding relevant, accurate and understandable information online is crucial for those willing to make the most of the advantages of the Single Market, but often remains complicated.
July 2018 fires at Mati in the Attica Region, Greece and the EU response
I voted in favour of the Resolution on the July 2018 fires in Mati in the Attica region, Greece, and the EU’s response. Climate change is causing and intensifying extreme weather events and natural disasters (such as flooding, extreme droughts and fires), which have been occurring in ever more rapid succession throughout the world, and have caused grave damage in terms of human losses, environmental deterioration and a reduction in economic activity. Situations of extreme drought and forest fires have increased in frequency and scale all over Europe, and whereas, while being exacerbated by climate change, these situations are to a certain extent both unforeseeable and inevitable. Greece was not the only Member State requesting EU support following forest fires, but Latvia and Sweden did so as well. I want to stress the need for more funding for scientific research in risk assessment mechanisms, prevention systems and other means of combating these phenomena.
The threat of demolition of Khan al-Ahmar and other Bedouin villages
The threat of demolition of the Bedouin village of Khan al-Ahmar represents another step of the Israeli authorities towards a situation where reaching a real and not only hypothetical two-state solution of the long standing Israeli-Palestinian conflict will not be possible. This is the reason why the European Parliament should echo the statement of High Representative Mogherini as well as the joint statement of France, Germany, Italy and Spain. They all have made a call to the Israeli government not to go ahead with its plan to demolish the village including its school and forcefully displace its residents. A couple of years ago I had the possibility to visit Khan al-Ahmar and listen to its inhabitants who obviously knew a long time ago that their future had been sealed. Nevertheless, they have been using all legal possibilities to prevent the worse scenario from happening. The decision of the Israeli High Court of Justice of 5 September did not come as a surprise, neither for Bedouins nor for us. Israel is once again proving that it does not abide to international law, notably the Fourth Geneva Convention, which prohibits the forcible transfer of population unless the security of the population or imperative military reasons so demand.
A European Strategy for Plastics in a circular economy (A8-0262/2018 - Mark Demesmaeker)
I voted in favour of the Report on a European strategy for plastics in a circular economy. The purpose is to have a European strategy for plastics. The plastic strategy shall lay the foundations for a new circular plastics economy. This will help to reduce plastic litter in land, air and sea while also bringing new opportunities for innovation, competitiveness and high quality jobs. To reduce discharges of waste by ships, the Commission is presenting together with this strategy a legislative proposal on port reception facilities. This presents measures to ensure that waste generated on ships or gathered at sea is delivered on land and adequately managed. Building on this, the Commission will also develop targeted measures for reducing the loss or abandonment of fishing gear at sea. Awareness campaigns, measures to prevent littering and projects to clean up beaches can be set up by public authorities and receive support from EU funds, for instance through the European Solidarity Corps.
Options to address the interface between chemical, product and waste legislation (B8-0363/2018)
I voted in favour of the Resolution on implementation of the circular economy package: options to address the interface between chemical, product and waste legislation. The 7th Environment Action Programme (EAP) provides for the development of a Union strategy for a non-toxic environment, to ensure the minimisation of exposure to chemicals in products, including imported products, with a view to promoting non-toxic material cycles, so that recycled waste can be used as a major, reliable source of raw material for the Union. Article 9 of Directive (EU) 2018/851 stipulates that the measures taken by Member States to prevent waste generation must reduce the generation of waste, in particular waste that is not suitable for preparing for reuse or recycling. I want to stress the need to find local, national, regional and European solutions by involving all stakeholders, with a view to detecting chemicals of concern in recycling streams and removing them therefrom. I call on companies to fully embrace a forward-looking holistic approach to progressive chemicals management by seizing the opportunity to substitute toxic substances in products and supply chains, accelerating and leading the innovation of the market.
A European One Health Action Plan against Antimicrobial Resistance (A8-0257/2018 - Karin Kadenbach)
I voted in favour of the Report on a European One Health Action Plan against Antimicrobial Resistance (AMR). The purpose is to present a new European action plan to strengthen the fight against antimicrobial resistance (AMR). According to the World Health Organisation (WHO), AMR already presents a serious social and economic burden. It is estimated to be responsible for 25 000 deaths per year in the EU alone and 700 000 deaths per year globally, and might cause more deaths than cancer by 2050. In the EU alone it is estimated that AMR costs EUR 1.5 billion annually in healthcare costs and productivity losses. The EU was quick to recognise the importance of tackling AMR. The 2001 Community strategy against AMR was reinforced by the 2011 Commission action plan, notable for its One Health approach, addressing AMR in both humans and animals. In view of the challenges of antimicrobial resistance at regional and global levels, the Union is at the forefront of combating this phenomenon. Since 1999, the Commission has invested more than EUR 1.3 billion in antimicrobial resistance research.
Europe on the Move: an agenda for the future of mobility in the EU (A8-0241/2018 - István Ujhelyi)
I voted in favour of the Report on Europe on the Move: agenda for the future of mobility in the EU. The purpose is to propose a programme for the future of mobility in the EU and the modernisation of European transport: Europe on the move. The mobility sector plays a vital role in the EU economy and society. It employs more than 11 million people, accounting for more than 5% of total employment and almost 5% of EU GDP. It accounts for about 20% of EU exports to the EU’s main trade partners. The Commission is revising the EU rules on access to the road haulage market and on hired vehicles with the aim of ensuring an adequate level playing field among transport operators, reducing the number of unnecessary empty runs, improving the clarity of the rules to tackle market fragmentation, and better enforcement. Other measures should enable better application of social legislation in the field of road transport in order to improve the social conditions of drivers in the international transport sector. These measures will help combat illegal employment practices. The aim is to ensure a high level of social protection for all transport workers in the Union.
Implementation of the Plant Protection Products Regulation (A8-0268/2018 - Pavel Poc)
I voted in favour of the Report on the implementation of the Plant Protection Products Regulation (EC) No 1107/2009. The report notes in particular that the objectives and instruments of the regulation and its implementation are not always sufficiently in line with EU policies in the fields of agriculture, health, animal welfare, food security, water quality, climate change, sustainable use of pesticides and maximum residue levels of pesticides in food and feed. The Commission is urged to propose improvements to further enhance the transparency of the regulatory process, including on access to the data in safety studies submitted by producers as part of their applications for market authorisation of PPPs in the EU. Members recognise the need to review the procedure in order to improve evaluations, increase the independence of the authorities tasked with carrying out studies, avoid conflicts of interest and make the procedure more transparent. The report stressed that the authorisation and promotion of low-risk and non-chemical pesticides is an essential measure to support integrated pest management with low pesticide inputs.
Dual quality of products in the Single Market (A8-0267/2018 - Olga Sehnalová)
I voted in favour of the report on dual quality of products in the single market. The report welcomes the Commission’s recent announcement of initiatives to address this issue, including the commitment to delivering a common testing methodology, to allocate a budget for its preparation and enforcement and for the collection of further reliable and comparable evidence, and to updating Directive 2005/29/EC on unfair commercial practices. It took note of the mandate given by the European Council to the High-Level Forum on Better Functioning Food Supply Chain in order to address the issue of dual quality. It also welcomed the adoption by Parliament of a pilot project for 2018 providing for a series of market investigations into several categories of consumer products in order to assess the different aspects of the dual quality. It is essential to provide consumers with accurate and easy-to-understand information to consumers is key to tackling dual quality of products.
Nominal quantities for placing on the Union market of single distilled shochu (A8-0255/2018 - Adina-Ioana Vălean)
. ‒ I voted in favour of the report on the proposal for a regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council amending Regulation (EC) No 110/2008 as regards nominal quantities for placing on the Union market of single distilled shochu produced by pot still and bottled in Japan. The purpose is to implement the provisions of the EU-Japan Economic Partnership Agreement (EPA) concerning exports from Japan to the Union of shochu, a spirit drink produced by pot still and bottled in Japan.The negotiations for an Economic Partnership Agreement between the European Union and Japan have been successfully concluded. The agreement provides that single distilled shochu, as defined in Japan’s Liquor Tax Law, produced by pot still and bottled in Japan, shall be allowed to be placed on the market of the European Union in traditional bottles of sizes of four go and one sho , corresponding to nominal quantities of 720 ml and of 1800 ml, respectively, provided that other applicable EU legal requirements are fulfilled.
Amendment to the US-EU Memorandum of Cooperation (deployment of air traffic management systems) (A8-0214/2018 - Rolandas Paksas)
. ‒ I voted in favour of the recommendation on the draft Council decision on the conclusion, on behalf of the Union, of Amendment 1 to the Memorandum of Cooperation NAT-I-9406 between the United States of America and the European Union. Since 2004, the European Union has set out to improve the performance of air traffic management (ATM) in Europe by reforming the way air traffic is managed and organised and also by modernising and harmonising the European ATM infrastructure through the Single European Sky (SES) initiative. Sharing the common goal of developing safer and more efficient air transport, in 2011 the European Union and the United States of America signed the Memorandum of Cooperation (MoC) in civil aviation research and development. The cooperative activities carried out so far under the MoC mainly address ATM, particularly cooperation in the field of research and development between the SESAR project and the NextGen programme managed by the US Federal Aviation Administration.
Agreement on Air Transport between Canada and the EU (accession of Croatia) (A8-0256/2018 - Francisco Assis)
I voted in favour of the Recommendation on the draft Council decision on the conclusion, on behalf of the Union and its Member States, of a Protocol amending the Agreement on Air Transport between Canada and the European Community and its Member States, to take account of the accession to the European Union of the Republic of Croatia.The purpose is to conclude, on behalf of the Union and its Member States, a Protocol amending the Agreement on Air Transport between Canada and the European Community and its Member States, to take account of the accession to the European Union of Croatia. The Protocol amending the Agreement on Air Transport between Canada and the European Community and its Member States (to take account of the accession to the European Union of Croatia) has been signed. It is now necessary to approve the Protocol. The draft Council Decision seeks the approval on behalf of the Union and its Member States, of a Protocol amending the Agreement on Air Transport between Canada and the European Community and its Member States, to take account of the accession to the European Union of Croatia.
Copyright in the Digital Single Market (A8-0245/2018 - Axel Voss)
I voted in favour of the Report on the Proposal for a directive of the European Parliament and of the Council on copyright in the Digital Single Market. The purpose is to modernise certain aspects of the European Union copyright framework to take account of technological developments and new channels for distribution of protected content in the internal market. Complementing Directive 2010/13/EU and the proposal amending it, this draft directive lays down rules which aim at further harmonising European Union law applicable to copyright and related rights in the framework of the internal market, taking into account in particular digital and cross-border uses of protected content. It also lays down rules on exceptions and limitations, on the facilitation of licences as well as rules aiming at ensuring a well-functioning marketplace for the exploitation of works and other subject matter.
Controls on cash entering or leaving the Union (A8-0394/2017 - Mady Delvaux, Juan Fernando López Aguilar)
I voted in favour of the Report on the proposal for a regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council on controls on cash entering or leaving the Union and repealing Regulation (EC) No 1889/2005. The purpose is to provide for a system of controls with respect to cash entering or leaving the European Union to complement the legal framework for the prevention of money-laundering and terrorist financing.This proposal brings the Cash Controls Regulation (CCR) into line with international norms and best practices in the fight against money-laundering and the financing of terrorism. It implements a number of action points set out in the Commission’s Communication on an action plan for strengthening the fight against terrorist financing. This regulation provides for a system of controls with respect to cash entering or leaving the European Union to complement the legal framework for the prevention of money-laundering and terrorist financing laid down in Directive (EU) 2015/849.
Countering money laundering by criminal law (A8-0405/2017 - Ignazio Corrao)
I voted in favour of the Report on the proposal for a directive of the European Parliament and of the Council on countering money laundering by criminal law. The purpose is to tackle money laundering by means of criminal law, allowing for better cross-border cooperation between competent authorities. According to United Nations estimates, the total amount of criminal proceeds in 2009 was approximately USD 2.1 trillion, or 3.6% of global GDP. The size of proceeds from criminal activity in the main illicit markets in the European Union for which evidence is available, has been estimated to amount to EUR 110 billion. The cross-border dimension of money laundering and the need to address this phenomenon through judicial cooperation among Member States are confirmed by the number of cases registered by Member States and Liaison Prosecutors at Eurojust. I consider that the current legislative framework is neither comprehensive nor sufficiently coherent to be fully effective. The differences in legal frameworks can be exploited by criminals and terrorists, who can choose to carry out their financial transactions where they perceive anti-money laundering measures to be weakest.
The situation in Hungary (A8-0250/2018 - Judith Sargentini)
I voted in favour of the Report on a proposal calling on the Council to determine, pursuant to Article 7(1) of the Treaty on European Union, the existence of a clear risk of a serious breach by Hungary of the values on which the Union is founded. The Union is founded on the values of respect for human dignity, freedom, democracy, equality, the rule of law and respect for human rights, including the rights of persons belonging to minorities. These values are common to the Member States in a society in which pluralism, non-discrimination, tolerance, justice, solidarity and equality between women and men prevail. The EU has the task of safeguarding these common values by making use of the process under Article 7 TEU. It can assess the existence of a clear risk of a serious breach of the common values in areas falling under Member States’ competences. I consider that Hungary is at risk of seriously breaching the values of the European Union. This report sets out a series of facts and trends which, taken together, represent a systemic threat to the values of Article 2 of the EU Treaty.
Autonomous weapon systems (RC-B8-0308/2018, B8-0308/2018, B8-0309/2018, B8-0355/2018, B8-0359/2018, B8-0360/2018, B8-0361/2018, B8-0362/2018)
I voted in favour of the Resolution on autonomous weapon system. An unknown number of countries, publicly funded industries and private industries are reportedly researching and developing lethal weapon systems with autonomous capabilities, ranging all the way from missiles capable of selective targeting to learning machines with cognitive skills to decide whom, when and where to fight. Lethal autonomous weapon systems have the potential to fundamentally change warfare by prompting an unprecedented and uncontrolled arms race. The use of lethal autonomous weapon systems raises fundamental ethical and legal questions of human control, in particular with regard to critical decisions such as target selection and engagement. The use of lethal autonomous weapon systems raises key questions about the applicability of international human rights law, international humanitarian law and European norms and values with regard to future military actions. I stress the imperative of establishing a common EU policy to prevent the emergence and subsequent potential proliferation of any autonomous lethal weapon system. I call on the Member States to take responsibility for fulfilling their existing international legal and ethical obligations in the development and use of their weapons technology.
State of EU-US relations (A8-0251/2018 - Elmar Brok)
I voted in favour of the Report on the state of EU-US relations. The EU-US relationship is the fundamental guarantor for global stability and has been the cornerstone of efforts to ensure peace and stability since the end of the Second World War, as well as the building-up of a multilateral trade system based on rules and values. They believed that the current one-sided ‘America first’ policy harms the interests of both the EU and the US, undermines mutual trust and may also have wider implications for global stability. The report calls for the fostering of dialogue on all elements of this partnership, including with civil society organisations. It urged the US administration to uphold the shared core values that are at the foundation of transatlantic relations, and to ensure, in all circumstances, respect for international law. The VP/HR, the Council, the Commission and Member States were called upon to enhance cooperation and effectiveness in EU policy towards the US, so as to present the EU as a unified and effective international player with a coherent message.
State of EU-China relations (A8-0252/2018 - Bas Belder)
I voted in favour of the report on the state of EU-China relations. The EU-China Comprehensive Strategic Partnership is one of the most important for the EU, and is founded on a shared commitment to openness and working together as part of a rules-based international system. However, Parliament was concerned that the increase in China’s global economic and political weight over the past decade has put these shared commitments to the test. Members referred to Europe’s much greater collective bargaining power with China, and urged Europe to defend its democracies so as to better face up to China’s systematic efforts to influence its politicians and civil society. The larger Member States were called upon to use their political and economic weight towards China to promote the EU’s interests. The report underlines the fact that the promotion of human rights and the rule of law must be at the core of the EU’s engagement with China. It firmly condemned the ongoing harassment, arbitrary arrest and prosecution of human rights defenders, lawyers, journalists, bloggers, academics and labour rights defenders.
Equivalence of field inspections (A8-0253/2018 - Czesław Adam Siekierski)
I voted in favour of the report on the proposal for a decision of the European Parliament and of the Council amending Council Decision 2003/17/EC as regards the equivalence of field inspections. The purpose is to recognise the equivalence of legal requirements and official controls of Brazil and Moldova for the certification of seeds. Council Decision 2003/17/EC grants equivalence to certain non-EU countries as regards field inspections and production of seed of certain species that are carried out in accordance with Union law. The national provisions governing seed harvested and controlled in these countries afford the same assurances as regards the seed’s characteristics and the arrangements for examining it, for ensuring seed identification, for marking and for control as the provisions applicable to seed harvested and controlled within the European Union. After audits of the field inspections and seed certification systems in Brazil and Moldova, the Commission concluded that the requirements and systems in place in these two countries are equivalent to the EUʼs and provide the same assurances.
Common system of value added tax as regards the special scheme for small enterprises (A8-0260/2018 - Tom Vandenkendelaere)
I voted in favour of the report on the proposal for a Council directive amending Directive 2006/112/EC on the common system of value added tax as regards the special scheme for small enterprises. The purpose is to amend the current VAT rules with a view to reducing VAT costs for small businesses (SMEs). Small businesses (SMEs) face proportionately higher VAT compliance costs than larger businesses. The VAT Directive (Council Directive 2006/112/EC) therefore lays down a number of provisions aimed at reducing the burden on SMEs dealing with VAT matters. In particular, it allows Member States to grant a VAT exemption to small businesses, provided that they do not exceed a certain annual turnover, which varies from one country to another. Despite the fact that Member States may exempt SMEs from VAT – an option that is widely used – SMEs continue to suffer from disproportionate VAT compliance costs because of the way in which the SME exemption is designed. In particular, SMEs involved in cross-border trade cannot benefit from the SME exemption in Member States other than the one in which they are established. The current system has distortive effects on competition on both domestic and EU markets.
Implementing decision on subjecting the new psychoactive substances cyclopropylfentanyl and methoxyacetylfentanyl to control measures (A8-0271/2018 - Branislav Škripek)
I voted in favour of the report on the draft Council implementing decision on subjecting the new psychoactive substances N-phenyl-N-[1-(2-phenylethyl)piperidin-4-yl]cyclopropanecarboxamide (cyclopropylfentanyl) and 2-methoxy-N-phenyl-N-[1-(2-phenylethyl)piperidin-4-yl]acetamide (methoxyacetylfentanyl) to control measures. The risks of cyclopropylfentanyl and methoxyacetylfentanyl were assessed by the European Monitoring Centre for Drugs and Drug Addiction (EMCDDA), and the assessment was submitted to the Commission and the Council on 23 March 2018. Cyclopropylfentanyl has been available in the Union since at least June 2017 and has been detected in six Member States, which reported 140 seizures in total between June 2017 and January 2018. 77 deaths have been reported by two Member States where exposure to cyclopropylfentanyl was confirmed. Methoxyacetylfentanyl has been available in the Union since at least November 2016 and has been detected in 11 Member States, which reported 44 seizures in total between June and December 2017. 13 deaths have been reported by four Member States where exposure to methoxyacetylfentanyl was confirmed. These are both synthetic opioids and structurally related to fentanyl, a controlled substance widely used in medicine as an adjunct to general anaesthesia during surgery and for pain management.
Mobilisation of the European Union Solidarity Fund to provide assistance to Bulgaria, Greece, Lithuania and Poland (A8-0272/2018 - Janusz Lewandowski)
I voted in favour of the report on the proposal for a decision of the European Parliament and of the Council on the mobilisation of the European Union Solidarity Fund to provide assistance to Bulgaria, Greece, Lithuania and Poland. The purpose is to mobilise the European Union Solidarity Fund to assist Bulgaria, Greece, Lithuania and Poland following a series of disasters in these countries in the course of 2017. The Commission proposes to mobilise the European Union Solidarity Fund (EUSF) for an amount of EUR 33 992 206 to assist Bulgaria, Greece, Lithuania and Poland following a series of disasters in these countries during 2017.
Draft Amending Budget No 4/2018: mobilisation of the European Union Solidarity Fund to provide assistance to Bulgaria, Greece, Lithuania and Poland (A8-0273/2018 - Siegfried Mureşan)
I voted in favour of the Report on the Council position on draft amending budget No 4/2018 of the European Union for the financial year 2018 accompanying the proposal to mobilise the European Union Solidarity Fund to provide assistance to Bulgaria, Greece, Lithuania and Poland. The purpose is to present draft amending budget No 4 to the 2018 budget accompanying the proposal to mobilise the European Union Solidarity Fund to assist Bulgaria, Greece, Lithuania and Poland. Draft amending budget (DAB) No 4 for the year 2018 accompanies the proposal to mobilise the European Union Solidarity Fund (EUSF) to provide assistance to Bulgaria, Greece, Lithuania and Poland following natural disasters that took place in these Member States in the course of 2017.
The impact of EU cohesion policy on Northern Ireland (A8-0240/2018 - Derek Vaughan)
I voted in favour of the report on the impact of EU cohesion policy on Northern Ireland. I believe that the special EU programmes for Northern Ireland are of key importance for sustaining the peace process, as they foster cross-community trust-building measures, and measures for a peaceful coexistence. The funding is seen as ‘neutral money’ in Northern Ireland, and the Committee feared that an end to these programmes would endanger cross-border and inter- and cross-community trust-building activities and, as a consequence, the peace process.I want to stress that the Northern Irish reconciliation process is a positive example for other areas in the EU which have experienced conflict, and good practices with cohesion funding and the PEACE programme should be taken as the EU model and promoted in order to overcome mistrust among communities in conflict and to achieve lasting peace in other parts of Europe and even worldwide.
Specific measures for Greece (A8-0244/2018 - Pascal Arimont)
I voted in favour of the Report on the implementation of specific measures for Greece under Regulation (EU) 2015/1839. According to the data presented in that report, following the adoption of the Regulation as regards specific measures for Greece, the direct impact on liquidity in 2015 was EUR 1 001 709 731.50, and the contributions in 2016 amounted to EUR 467 674 209.45.Together with the increase of the initial pre-financing for the 2014-2020 programming period, Greece received approximately EUR 2 billion in 2015-2016. The report highlights that a significant improvement in the absorption of structural funds has occurred and, as at the end of March 2016, the payments rate in Greece for the 2007-2013 programming period was over 97 %. In addition, it is estimated that investments supported by cohesion and rural development policies in Greece increased GDP in 2015, at the end of the previous programming period, by more than 2% above the level it would have reached in the absence of the funding provided.
Pathways for the reintegration of workers recovering from injury and illness into quality employment (A8-0208/2018 - Jana Žitňanská)
I voted in favour of the report on pathways for the reintegration of workers recovering from injury and illness into quality employment. In the context of an ageing European workforce, the report suggests an approach that will help identify the policy options needed to shape our labour markets in order to become: (i) more inclusive and responsive to the needs of ageing and ailing society and (ii) less prone to the loss of skills as a result of inactivity in the labour market.The Commission should encourage integration and rehabilitation measures and support Member States in their efforts to identify and exchange good practices in workplace accommodation. Eurofound should analyse the employment opportunities and employability levels of people with chronic diseases. The forthcoming EU strategic framework on health and safety at work post 2020 should further prioritise investments, through EU funds, aimed at prolonging and promoting healthier lives and working lives, and individualised working arrangements, and at supporting recruitment and well-adapted return to work, where desired and where medical conditions allow.
Relationships between the EU and third countries concerning financial services regulation and supervision (A8-0263/2018 - Brian Hayes)
. ‒ I voted in favour of the Report on relationships between the EU and third countries concerning financial services regulation and supervision. There is no single framework underpinning equivalence decisions, each legislative act sets out a targeted equivalence regime tailored to its policy objectives. I welcome the increased regulatory and supervisory cooperation between the EU and third countries. They recognised that this has contributed to improving global consistency in financial regulation and has contributed to making the EU more resilient to global financial shocks. In a context where international cooperation is becoming increasingly difficult due to diverging national interests, we insisted that any framework for international regulatory and supervisory cooperation should preserve the Union’s financial stability and respect its regulatory and supervisory regime and standards and their enforcement.
Boosting growth and cohesion in EU border regions (A8-0266/2018 - Krzysztof Hetman)
. ‒ I voted in favour of the Report on boosting growth and cohesion in EU border regions. Тhe purpose is to propose measures and issue recommendations that make it easier for internal land border regions to cooperate, contribute to reducing hurdles and help border citizens and businesses use the full potential of these regions. The European Union (EU) and its immediate neighbours in the European Free Trade Association (EFTA) count 40 internal land borders. The EU’s internal border regions cover 40% of the Union’s territory, represent 30% of the population (150 million people), produce 30% of the Union’s GDP and see nearly 2 million commuters pass through, including 1.3 million cross-border workers who represent 0.6% of the Union’s working population as a whole. Since 1990, Interreg funding has supported cross-border cooperation programmes along EU border regions including those with EFTA countries. Interreg has made a genuine difference to border regions and has contributed to their transformation. This work continues today, with just under EUR 6 billion from the EU budget earmarked for the Interreg 2014-2020 cross-border programmes.
European Solidarity Corps (A8-0060/2018 - Helga Trüpel)
. ‒ I voted in favour of the Report on the proposal for a regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council laying down the legal framework of the European Solidarity Corps and amending Regulations (EU) No 1288/2013, (EU) No 1293/2013, (EU) No 1303/2013, (EU) No 1305/2013, (EU) No 1306/2013 and Decision No 1313/2013/EU. The European Solidarity and Voluntary Service (ESVS) should support placements in solidarity activities in the form of volunteering, internships or jobs, networking projects. Its aim should be to promote solidarity as a value and volunteerism in Europe and beyond to build an open society, by involving youth and non-profit organisations in accessible and high-quality solidarity activities in Europe with the aim of contributing to strengthening cohesion and citizenship. It should complement existing actions and structures in organisations that support local communities, especially the most vulnerable, respond to societal challenges, and contribute to environmental protection, climate change mitigation and the need to strengthen social integration.
Structural Reform Support Programme: financial envelope and general objective (A8-0227/2018 - Ruža Tomašić)
I voted in favour of the Report on the proposal for a regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council amending Regulation (EU) 2017/825 to increase the financial envelope of the Structural Reform Support Programme and adapt its general objective. The financial envelope for the implementation of the programme should amount to EUR 222.8 million in current prices, of which EUR 80 million would be provided from the flexibility instrument under Regulation (EU, Euratom) No 1311/2013 laying down the multiannual financial framework for the period 2014-2020. That increase shall not negatively impact the other priorities of cohesion policy. Moreover, Member States shall not be obliged to transfer their national and regional allocations from European Structural and Investment Funds (ESIF) with a view to filling the financing gap of the programme. The programme shall not replace or substitute funding from Member States’ national budgets or be used to cover current expenditure.
Euratom Programme complementing the Horizon 2020 Framework Programme (A8-0258/2018 - Rebecca Harms)
I voted in favour of the Report on the proposal for a Council regulation on the Research and Training Programme of the European Atomic Energy Community (2019-2020) complementing the Horizon 2020 Framework Programme for Research and Innovation. The purpose is to ensure the continuation, during the period 2019-2020, of the Union-funded research and training activities in the field of nuclear science and technology. The Euratom programme proposal for the period 2019-2020 aims to ensure the continuation of Union-funded research and training activities in the field of nuclear science and technology in addition to the Horizon 2020 programme. The Euratom Programme shall strengthen the research and innovation framework in the nuclear field and coordinate Member States’ research efforts, thereby avoiding duplication, retaining critical mass in key areas and ensuring public funding is used in an optimal way. On a technical level, the Euratom Programme aims to improve nuclear safety, security and radiation protection and to contribute to the long-term decarbonisation of the energy system in a safe, efficient and secure way.
Measures to prevent and combat mobbing and sexual harassment at the workplace, in public spaces, and in political life in the EU (A8-0265/2018 - Pina Picierno)
I voted in favour of the Report on measures to prevent and combat mobbing and sexual harassment at workplace, in public spaces, and political life in the EU. Stressing that sexual harassment is a violation of human rights, the report called on the Commission to submit a proposal for a directive to tackle all forms of violence against women and girls and gender-based violence. Members noted that women in the EU are not equally protected against gender-based violence and sexual and psychological harassment owing to differing policies and legislation across the Member States. The draft directive should therefore include common definitions of the different types of violence against women, including an updated and comprehensive definition of harassment (be it sexual or otherwise) and mobbing, and common legal standards on criminalising this violence. The Commission was also asked to present a comprehensive EU strategy against all forms of gender-based violence, including the sexual harassment and abuse of women and girls, drawing on testimonies in the form of women’s stories and first-hand experience.
Language equality in the digital age (A8-0228/2018 - Jill Evans)
. ‒ I voted in favour of the report on language equality in the digital age. Less-used European languages are at a significant disadvantage on account of an acute lack of tools, resources and research funding. Europe remains far behind on language technologies, because of market fragmentation, inadequate investment in knowledge and culture, poorly coordinated research, insufficient funding and legal barriers, and the market is currently dominated by non-European operators, which are not addressing the specific needs of a multilingual Europe.The Digital Single Market remains fragmented by various barriers, including language barriers. Stressing that European education policies should be aimed at retaining talent in Europe, Members have recommended the provision of guidelines for the implementation of cohesive joint action at European level, raising awareness among students of the career opportunities in the language technology industry, including the language-centric artificial intelligence industry.
Transparent and accountable management of natural resources in developing countries: the case of forests (A8-0249/2018 - Heidi Hautala)
. ‒ I voted in favour of the report on transparent and accountable management of natural resources in developing countries: the case of forests. The report calls on the EU to establish stronger cooperation and effective partnerships with major timber-consuming countries and international stakeholders. It stresses the need to encourage participatory and community-based forest management by strengthening the involvement of civil society in the planning and implementation of forest management policies and projects, raising awareness and ensuring that local communities share the benefits of forest resources. The report notes that imports of timber and timber products should be more thoroughly checked at the EU borders, to ensure that they do indeed comply with the criteria for entry to the EU. It notes too that more than half of the commodities produced and exported onto the global market are products of illegal deforestation.
Copyright in the Digital Single Market (A8-0245/2018 - Axel Voss) SL
Danes sem na zasedanju Evropskega parlamenta glasoval PROTI predlogu, da se prične postopek tristranskih pogajanj o predlogu direktive o avtorskih pravicah na enotnem digitalnem trgu. S tem želim prispevati, da se odločanje prestavi na jesen in tako omogoči več časa za mirno, argumentirano in poglobljeno razpravo.Okoli te direktive so se očitno angažirali vsi resursi velikega kapitala na čelu z Googlom in drugimi spletnimi velikani, dobil sem tudi mnoge odzive umetnikov in drugih ustvarjalcev – avtorjev, ki z močnimi argumenti podpirajo sprejetje direktive. Množično so se odzvali tudi tisti, ki iskreno verjamejo, da poznajo najboljšo rešitev.Prepričan sem, da je po osemnajstih letih čas, da prenovimo pravni sistem zaščite avtorskih pravic, nikakor pa se to ne sme zgoditi na račun svobode interneta. Tako kot v primeru sporazuma ACTA, ki sem mu od vsega začetka nasprotoval, sem tudi v tem primeru po načelu previdnosti za to, da vse strani še enkrat soočijo argumente in poiščejo ustrezne rešitve, ki bodo omogočile, da bo ‘volk sit in koza cela’ oziroma sprejetje direktive o avtorskih pravicah, ki ne bo posegala v svobodo interneta, in da gospodarji interneta ne bodo posegali v naša življenja.
European citizens’ initiative (A8-0226/2018 - György Schöpflin)
I voted in favour of the report on the proposal for a regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council on the European citizens’ initiative. The purpose is to reform the European Citizens’ Initiative in order to facilitate its organisation. The instrument of the European Citizens’ Initiative (ECI) was introduced by the Treaty of Lisbon and was made operational on 1 April 2012 by Regulation No 211/2011. The aim of this instrument is to enhance citizens’ involvement in the democratic life of the European Union, by allowing them to directly address the Commission with a request to submit a proposal for legal acts of the Union for the purpose of implementing the Treaties. The specific budgetary implications of the proposal relate to a number of online systems for the European citizens’ initiative which the Commission will put in place and make available free of charge to citizens and organisers. The estimated impact on expenditure (in commitment appropriations) is estimated at EUR 2.050 million for 2019 and EUR 2.140 million for 2020. For administrative expenditure, the impact is estimated to EUR 1.071 million per year.
Launch of automated data exchange with regard to DNA data in Croatia (A8-0225/2018 - Jaromír Štětina)
I voted in favour of the report on the draft Council implementing decision on the launch of automated data exchange with regard to DNA data in Croatia. The purpose is to the launch of an automated data exchange with regard to DNA in Croatia. It provides that the verification that the condition has been met with respect to automated data exchange is to be done on the basis of an evaluation report based on: (i) a questionnaire drawn up by the relevant Council Working Group concerns each of the automated data exchanges; (ii) an evaluation visit and a pilot run. Croatia has completed the questionnaire on data protection and the questionnaire on DNA data exchange. It conducted a successful pilot run with Lithuania and Poland.
Financial rules applicable to the general budget of the Union (A8-0211/2017 - Ingeborg Gräßle, Richard Ashworth)
I voted in favour of the report on the proposal for a regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council on the financial rules applicable to the general budget of the Union. The Commission proposed that efforts must continue in order to remove bottlenecks, ensure synergies and complementarities between ESI Funds and the other EU funds and improve efficiency of delivery and control requirements. Simpler and more flexible financial rules will contribute to optimising spending and impact of the MFF 2014-2020 and constitute as such one of the key elements of the Commission’s initiative for a Budget Focused on Results (BFOR). This legislative proposal forms an integral part of the mid-term review/revision of the multiannual financial framework (MFF) 2014-2020. It contributes to two of its main objectives: simplification and flexibility. It paves the way for the preparation of the next generation of spending programmes (post-2020).
European Agency for the operational management of large-scale IT systems in the area of freedom, security and justice (A8-0404/2017 - Monica Macovei)
I voted in favour of the Report on the proposal for a regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council on the European Agency for the operational management of large-scale IT systems in the area of freedom, security and justice, and amending Regulation (EC) 1987/2006 and Council Decision 2007/533/JHA and repealing Regulation (EU) 1077/2011. The purpose is to create an agency at European Union level responsible for the operational management and, where appropriate, the development of large-scale information systems within the area of freedom, security and justice (extending the mandate of eu-LISA). The proposal follows on from the Commission Communication of 6 April 2016 entitled ‘Stronger and smarter information systems for borders and security’, the High Level Expert Group’s final report of 11 May 2017 and in the Commission’s Seventh progress report towards an effective and genuine Security Union of 16 May 2017. The proposal is based to a large extent on the results and recommendations of the independent external evaluation report of the Agency’s work. No impact assessment was carried out since the evaluation concluded that the amendments are essentially technical in nature.
73rd Session of the UN General Assembly (A8-0230/2018 - Eugen Freund)
I voted in favour of the report on a European Parliament recommendation to the Council on the 73rd session of the United Nations General Assembly. The EU and its Member States remain fully committed to multilateralism, global governance, the promotion of the UN’s core values as an integral part of the EU’s external policy, and the three pillars of the UN system: human rights, peace and security, development. The EU’s global strategy reflects the level of today’s global challenges, which require a strong and more efficient UN and a deepening of cooperation at Member State level both within the EU and the UN.
The migration crisis and humanitarian situation in Venezuela and at its borders (RC-B8-0315/2018, B8-0315/2018, B8-0316/2018, B8-0317/2018, B8-0318/2018, B8-0319/2018, B8-0320/2018, B8-0321/2018)
I voted in favour of the resolution on the migration crisis and humanitarian situation in Venezuela and at its borders. I urge the Venezuelan authorities to acknowledge the ongoing humanitarian crisis, prevent its further deterioration, and promote political and economic solutions to ensure the safety of all civilians and stability for the country and the region. Parliament demands that the Venezuelan authorities allow unimpeded humanitarian aid into the country as a matter of urgency to prevent the aggravation of the humanitarian and public health crisis, and in particular to tackle the re-emergence of diseases such as measles, malaria and diphtheria, and that they grant unhindered access to international organisations wishing to assist all affected sectors of society; it also calls for the rapid implementation of a short-term response to counter malnutrition among the most vulnerable groups, such as children. Parliament expresses grave concern at increasing reports of Venezuelans fleeing their country, in particular vulnerable groups, being subjected to discrimination, social exclusion, racism, xenophobia, forced and illegal labour (including among adolescents), human trafficking, sexual exploitation, migrant smuggling and gender-based violence, particularly among indigenous and afro-descendent populations, and at the growing numbers of unaccompanied minors.
Guidelines for Member States to prevent humanitarian assistance being criminalised (B8-0314/2018)
I voted against the Resolution on Guidelines for Member States to prevent humanitarian assistance being criminalised. I regret the very limited transposition by Member States of the humanitarian assistance exemption provided for in the Facilitation Directive and notes that the exemption should be implemented as a bar to prosecution, to ensure that prosecution is not pursued against individuals and civil society organisations assisting migrants for humanitarian reasons. Parliament calls on Member States to transpose the humanitarian assistance exemption provided for in the Facilitation Directive and to put in place adequate systems to monitor the enforcement and effective practical application of the Facilitators Package, by collecting and recording annually information about the number of people arrested for facilitation at the border and inland, the number of judicial proceedings initiated, the number of convictions, along with information on how sentences are determined, and reasons for discontinuing an investigation.
Adequacy of the protection afforded by the EU-US Privacy Shield (B8-0305/2018)
I voted in favour of the resolution on the adequacy of the protection afforded by the EU-US Privacy Shield. Parliament highlights the persistant weaknesses of the Privacy Shield as regards the respect of fundamental rights of data subjects, and underlines the increasing risk that the Court of Justice of the EU may invalidate Commission Implementing Decision (EU) 2016/1250 on the Privacy Shield. Parliament stresses that the recent revelations regarding the practices of Facebook and Cambridge Analytica highlight the need for proactive oversight and enforcement actions which are not only based on complaints but which include systematic checks of the practical compliance of privacy policies with the Privacy Shield principles throughout the certification lifecycle, and calls on the competent EU data protection authorities to take appropriate action and suspend transfers in cases of non-compliance.
The adverse effects of the US Foreign Account Tax Compliance Act on EU citizens (B8-0306/2018)
I voted in favour of the resolution on the adverse effects of the US Foreign Tax Compliance Act (FATCA) on EU citizens and in particular ‘accidental Americans’. I call on the Member States and the Commission to ensure that the fundamental rights of all citizens, in particular those of ‘accidental Americans’, are guaranteed, especially the right to a private and family life, the right to privacy and the principle of non-discrimination, as laid down in the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union and in the European Convention on Human Rights. The Parliament urges the Commission to initiate without delay infringement procedures in the event of established breaches in the implementation of the Payment Accounts Directive, and to report back to Parliament and the Council on the measures taken to ensure the proper implementation of the said directive.
Statute for social and solidarity-based enterprises (A8-0231/2018 - Jiří Maštálka)
I voted in favour of the report with recommendations to the Commission on a Statute for social and solidarity-based enterprises. There are substantial differences among Member States in the way they regulate social and solidarity-based enterprises and the organisational forms available to social entrepreneurs under their legal systems. This diversity and the innovative character of certain of these legal forms indicate that it will be difficult to find consensus in Europe as to whether it is convenient or necessary at the present moment to set up at EU level a specific legal form of social enterprise. This is why Members suggested adopting a more cautious approach that they consider could help build more political consensus and, more importantly, that can have substantial benefits for social enterprises. The Commission is requested to submit, on the basis of Article 50 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union, a proposal for a legislative act on the creation of a European social economy label for enterprises based on the social economy and solidarity.
Partnership Agreement between the EU and EAEC and Armenia (A8-0177/2018 - László Tőkés)
. ‒ I voted in favour of the Recommendation on the draft Council decision on the conclusion, on behalf of the Union, of the Comprehensive and Enhanced Partnership Agreement between the European Union and the European Atomic Energy Community and their Member States, of the one part, and the Republic of Armenia, of the other part. The purpose is to conclude, on behalf of the European Union, the Comprehensive and Enhanced Partnership Agreement between the European Union and the European Atomic Energy Community and their Member States, of the one part, and Armenia, on the other. The Joint Proposal of the Commission and the High Representative of the Union for Foreign Affairs and Security Policy is the legal instrument required for the conclusion of the Comprehensive and Enhanced Partnership Agreement between the European Union and the European Atomic Energy Community and their Member States, of the one part, and Armenia, of the other part. The Agreement aims to strengthen political dialogue by creating an institutional framework and organising cooperation procedures between Armenia and the EU in a wide range of areas.
EU-Iraq Partnership and Cooperation Agreement (resolution) (A8-0224/2018 - Tokia Saïfi)
. ‒ I voted in favour of the report containing a motion for a non—legislative resolution on the draft Council decision on the conclusion of a Partnership and Cooperation Agreement between the European Union and its Member States, of the one part, and the Republic of Iraq, of the other part. The purpose is to conclude a Partnership and Cooperation Agreement between the European Union and its Member States, of the one part, and the Republic of Iraq, of the other part. The EU—Iraq Partnership and Cooperation Agreement provides a legal framework covering issues from regular political dialogue to trade relations and regulatory cooperation, and development assistance. The Agreement comprises a non—preferential trade agreement that incorporates basic World Trade Organisation (WTO) rules, although Iraq is not yet a member of the WTO, and provides for some substantial preferential elements, namely as regards public procurement and services and investments. The trade section also includes an efficient dispute settlement mechanism, featuring binding panel rulings and compliance procedures.
EU-New Zealand Agreement relating to the modification of concessions (accession of Croatia) (A8-0220/2018 - Daniel Caspary)
. ‒ I voted in favour of the Recommendation on the draft Council decision on the conclusion of the Agreement in the form of an Exchange of Letters between the European Union and New Zealand pursuant to Article XXIV:6 and Article XXVIII of the General Agreement on Tariffs and Trade (GATT) 1994 relating to the modification of concessions in the schedule of the Republic of Croatia in the course of its accession to the European Union.The purpose is to conclude the Agreement in the form of an Exchange of Letters between the European Union and New Zealand pursuant to Article XXIV:6 and Article XXVIII of the General Agreement on Tariffs and Trade (GATT) 1994 relating to the modification of concessions in the schedule of Croatia in the course of its accession to the European Union. With the accession of Croatia, the European Union enlarged its customs union. Consequently, it was required under World Trade Organization (WTO) rules to enter into negotiations with WTO members having negotiating rights related to the tariff schedule of Croatia in order to eventually agree on a compensatory adjustment.
Statute of the European System of Central Banks and of the European Central Bank: clearing and payment systems (A8-0219/2018 - Gabriel Mato, Danuta Maria Hübner)
. ‒ I voted in favour of the Report on the draft decision of the European Parliament and of the Council amending Article 22 of the Statute of the European System of Central Banks and of the European Central Bank. The purpose is to amend Article 22 of the Statute of the European System of Central Banks (ESCB) and of the European Central Bank (ECB) with a view to granting the ECB regulatory competence over clearing systems, in particular central counterparties (CCPs).In the light of this, the ECB considers it should have the power to regulate clearing systems, in particular CCPs, in order to fulfil its fundamental tasks. It therefore submits a recommendation for a Decision of the European Parliament and of the Council with a view to amending Article 22 of the Statute of the ESCB accordingly. The ECB recommends that Parliament and the Council adopt a decision amending Article 22 of the ESCB Statute on clearing and payments systems in order to allow the ECB and the national central banks to provide facilities, and to enable the ECB to make regulations, and ensure efficient and sound clearing and payment systems, and clearing systems for financial instruments.
Draft amending budget No 2/2018: Entering the surplus of the financial year 2017 (A8-0209/2018 - Siegfried Mureşan)
I voted in favour of the Report on the Council position on Draft amending budget No 2/2018 of the European Union for the financial year 2018: Entering the surplus of the financial year 2017. The implementation of the budget year 2017 shows a surplus of EUR 555 542 325, which is therefore entered as revenue in the 2018 budget. The budgeting of the surplus will diminish accordingly the global contribution of the Member States to the financing of the 2018 budget. The contributions by Member States will also be influenced by the updated own resources forecast (Traditional Own Resources (TOR), Value Added Tax (VAT) and Gross National Income (GNI)) including the updated amount of the UK correction which will be available after the Advisory Committee on Own Resources meeting in May 2018 and included in a subsequent Draft Amending Budget. The implementation by the Commission reached 99.9% of the authorised payment appropriations. The amount not implemented was EUR 201 million, of which EUR 99 million of the Emergency Aid Reserve. The under-implementation of the other institutions of EUR 83 million was lower than in previous two years (EUR 103 million in 2016 and EUR 94 million in 2015).
Draft amending budget No 3/2018: Extension of the Facility for refugees in Turkey (A8-0246/2018 - Siegfried Mureşan)
I voted in favour of the Report on the Council position on Draft amending budget No 3/2018 of the European Union for the financial year 2018, Section III - Commission: Extension of the Facility for refugees in Turkey. On 23 May 2018, the Commission submitted to the Council draft amending budget (DAB) No 3 to the general budget for 2018. This DAB provides the financing in 2018 of the extension of the Facility for Refugees in Turkey for an amount of EUR 500 million in commitment appropriations to be channelled through the Instrument for Pre-accession Assistance. The corresponding appropriations are to be recorded under budget line 22 02 03 02 (Support to Turkey - Support for economic, social and territorial development and related progressive alignment with the Union acquis). The Council adopted its position on DAB No 3 to the general budget for 2018 as set out in the technical annex to its explanatory memorandum.
EU guarantee to the EIB against losses under financing operations supporting investment projects outside the Union, as regards Iran (B8-0313/2018)
I voted against Resolution on Commission Delegated Decision (EU) .../... of 6 June 2018 amending Annex III to Decision No 466/2014/EU of the European Parliament and of the Council granting an EU guarantee to the European Investment Bank against losses under financing operations supporting investment projects outside the Union, as regards Iran.
Towards an EU external strategy against early and forced marriages (A8-0187/2018 - Charles Goerens)
I voted in favour of the Report Towards an EU external strategy against early and forced marriages – next steps. Child, early and forced marriages are a serious violation of human rights and, in particular, women’s rights and have an extremely negative impact on the physical and mental health and personal development of the individuals concerned. The Istanbul Convention classifies forced marriage as a form of violence against women, and calls for the acts of forcing a child to enter into a marriage and of luring a child abroad with the purpose of forcing her or him to enter into a marriage to be criminalised. This problem exists not only in third countries, but in some Member States. Eliminating these practices is one of the priorities for the EU’s external action in the field of promoting women’s rights and human rights.
Negotiations on the EU-Azerbaijan Comprehensive Agreement (A8-0185/2018 - Norica Nicolai)
I voted in favour of the report on a European Parliament recommendation to the Council, the Commission and the Vice-President of the Commission/High Representative of the Union for Foreign Affairs and Security Policy on the negotiations on the EU-Azerbaijan Comprehensive Agreement. The EU is Azerbaijan’s top trading partner and its biggest export and import market, representing 48.6% of Azerbaijan’s total trade and constituting its largest source of foreign direct investment. Azerbaijan is a strategic energy partner for the EU – it has enabled the Union to diversify its energy sources. The European Parliament favours a deepening of relations with all Eastern Partnership members as long as they respect these core values. The new agreement between the EU and Azerbaijan should advance the interests of the Union in the region and promote its values.
Enforcement requirements and specific rules for posting drivers in the road transport sector (A8-0206/2018 - Merja Kyllönen)
I voted in favour of the report on the proposal for a directive of the European Parliament and of the Council amending Directive 2006/22/EC as regards enforcement requirements and laying down specific rules with respect to Directive 96/71/EC and Directive 2014/67/EU for posting drivers in the road transport sector. The European road transport sector provides jobs for more than 5 million people, while its annual greenhouse gas emissions account for around one fifth of emissions from the transport sector as a whole. The first mobility package, of course, aims to modernise the European transport/mobility sector and make it more socially equitable and more competitive in a transition towards cleaner transport. The amendments proposed by the Commission aim to make existing road transport legislation fairer and more efficient and to increase social responsibility in the field. At the same time, the aim is to lighten excessive regulatory burden for operators and to prevent distortions of competition.
Daily and weekly driving times, minimum breaks and rest periods and positioning by means of tachographs (A8-0205/2018 - Wim van de Camp)
I voted in favour of the report on the proposal for a regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council amending Regulation (EC) No 561/2006 as regards on minimum requirements on maximum daily and weekly driving times, minimum breaks and daily and weekly rest periods and Regulation (EU) 165/2014 as regards positioning by means of tachographs. The EU has developed a range of market and social rules aiming at ensuring a fair, well-functioning, safe and socially sustainable road transport sector. The current regulations were adopted in order to improve road safety and drivers’ working conditions, and enhance both rule compliance and fair competition between road operators. However, evaluations show that shortcomings in the current rules, as well as insufficient enforcement, have led to the stated goals not being fully achieved. Unclear and/or unsuitable rules on weekly rest periods, resting facilities, breaks in multi-manning and the absence of rules on drivers returning to their homes have enabled Member States to use different interpretations and enforcement practices. The Commission adopted a set of eight legislative proposals with the purposes of ensuring fair competition, simplifying existing rules, preserving the internal market and ensuring the rights of workers in this sector.
Adapting to development in the road transport sector (A8-0204/2018 - Ismail Ertug)
The road transport sector is a very important sector and crucial to making our society function. The sector employs more than 11 million people and carries almost half of all the freight volume in the EU. On 31 May 2017, the Commission adopted a mobility package with the aim to ensure fair competition, simplify existing rules, preserve the EU internal market and ensure the rights of workers in this sector. The Mobility Package consists of several legislative proposals. One of them is the current proposal, amending Regulations 1071/2009 and 1072/2009, on the access to the road haulage market and to the occupation of road transport undertaking. These regulations lay down provisions that companies need to comply with if they wish to operate on the international road haulage market or in national markets other than their own (cabotage).
Opening of negotiations for an EU-Jordan Agreement on the exchange of personal data for fighting serious crime and terrorism (A8-0232/2018 - Claude Moraes)
I voted in favour of the report on the recommendation by the Commission for a Council decision authorising the opening of negotiations for an agreement between the European Union and the Hashemite Kingdom of Jordan on the exchange of personal data between the European Union Agency for Law Enforcement Cooperation (Europol) and the Jordanian competent authorities for fighting serious crime and terrorism. The objective is to open negotiations for an agreement between the European Union and Jordan on the exchange of personal data between the European Union Agency for Law Enforcement Cooperation and the Jordanian competent authorities for fighting serious crime and terrorism.Taking into account the political strategy as outlined in the European agenda on security and the potential benefits of closer cooperation in this area, the Commission considers it necessary to start negotiations in the short-term with eight countries, as identified in the 11th progress report towards a genuine and effective Security Union. Jordan is a key partner for the EU in particular for its role in promoting stability, moderation and inter-faith tolerance in the Middle East. The EU and Jordan have a strong partnership across many sectors and have been linked by an association agreement since 2002.
Opening of negotiations for an EU-Turkey Agreement on the exchange of personal data for fighting serious crime and terrorism (A8-0233/2018 - Claude Moraes)
I voted in favour of the report on the recommendation by the Commission for a Council decision authorising the opening of negotiations for an agreement between the European Union and the Republic of Turkey on the exchange of personal data between the European Union Agency for Law Enforcement Cooperation and the Turkish competent authorities for fighting serious crime and terrorism. The objective is to open negotiations for an agreement between the European Union and Turkey on the exchange of personal data between the European Union Agency for Law Enforcement Cooperation (Europol) and the Turkish competent authorities for fighting serious crime and terrorism. The 2016-2020 Europol strategy identifies the Mediterranean region as a priority for enhanced partnerships. The 2017-2020 Europol external strategy also stresses the need for closer cooperation between Europol and the Middle East/North Africa (MENA) given the current terrorist threat and migration-related challenges. Turkey is a key partner for the European Union. Cooperation in the area of migration was stepped up on the basis of a Joint Action Plan activated at the EU-Turkey Summit held on 29 November 2015 and the EU-Turkey Statement of 18 March 2016, with the aim of ending irregular migration from Turkey to the EU.
Opening of negotiations for an EU-Israel Agreement on the exchange of personal data for fighting serious crime and terrorism (A8-0235/2018 - Claude Moraes)
I voted in favour of the Report on the recommendation, by the Commission, for a Council decision authorising the opening of negotiations for an agreement between the European Union and the State of Israel on the exchange of personal data between the European Union Agency for Law Enforcement Cooperation (Europol) and the Israeli competent authorities for fighting serious crime and terrorism.The purpose is to open negotiations for an agreement between the European Union and Israel on the exchange of personal data between the European Union Agency for Law Enforcement Cooperation (Europol) and the Israeli competent authorities for fighting serious crime and terrorism. Taking into account the political strategy as outlined in the European agenda on security and the potential benefits of closer cooperation in this area, the Commission considers it necessary to start negotiations in the short-term with eight countries, as identified in the 11th progress report towards a genuine and effective Security Union.The 2016-2020 Europol strategy identifies the Mediterranean region as a priority for enhanced partnerships. The 2017-2020 Europol external strategy also stresses the need for closer cooperation between Europol and the Middle East/North Africa (MENA) due to the current terrorist threat and migration-related challenges.
Opening of negotiations for an EU-Tunisia Agreement on the exchange of personal data for fighting serious crime and terrorism (A8-0237/2018 - Claude Moraes)
I voted in favour of the Report on the recommendation, by the Commission, for a Council decision authorising the opening of negotiations for an agreement between the European Union and Tunisia on the exchange of personal data between the European Union Agency for Law Enforcement Cooperation (Europol) and the Tunisian competent authorities for fighting serious crime and terrorism. The purpose is to open negotiations for an agreement between the European Union and Tunisia on the exchange of personal data between the European Union Agency for Law Enforcement Cooperation (Europol) and the Tunisian competent authorities for fighting serious crime and terrorism. Taking into account the political strategy as outlined in the European agenda on security and the potential benefits of closer cooperation in this area, the Commission considers it necessary to start negotiations in the short-term with eight countries, as identified in the 11th progress report towards a genuine and effective Security Union.
Opening of negotiations for an EU-Morocco Agreement on the exchange of personal data for fighting serious crime and terrorism (A8-0238/2018 - Claude Moraes)
I voted in favour of the Report on the recommendation, by the Commission, for a Council decision authorising the opening of negotiations for an agreement between the European Union and the Kingdom of Morocco on the exchange of personal data between the European Union Agency for Law Enforcement Cooperation (Europol) and the Moroccan competent authorities for fighting serious crime and terrorism.The purpose of this Recommendation for a Council Decision is to obtain from the Council an authorisation from the Council for the Commission to negotiate, on behalf of the European Union, an agreement between the European Union and Morocco on the exchange of personal data between the European Union Agency for Law Enforcement Cooperation (Europol) and the Moroccan competent authorities for fighting serious crime and terrorism.In order to respect the principle of purpose limitation, cooperation under the agreement will only cover forms of crime and related criminal offences for which Europol is competent. In particular, cooperation should aim to combat terrorism and prevent radicalisation, disrupt organised crime, including trafficking of migrants, firearms and drugs, and combat cybercrime.
Opening of negotiations for an EU-Lebanon Agreement on the exchange of personal data for fighting serious crime and terrorism (A8-0234/2018 - Claude Moraes)
I voted in favour of the Report on the recommendation, by the Commission, for a Council decision authorising the opening of negotiations for an agreement between the European Union and the Lebanese Republic on the exchange of personal data between the European Union Agency for Law Enforcement Cooperation (Europol) and the Lebanese competent authorities for fighting serious crime and terrorism.The purpose of this Recommendation for a Council Decision is to obtain from the Council an authorisation from the Council for the Commission to negotiate, on behalf of the European Union, an agreement between the European Union and Lebanon on the exchange of personal data between the European Union Agency for Law Enforcement Cooperation (Europol) and the Lebanese competent authorities for fighting serious crime and terrorism.In order to respect the principle of purpose limitation, cooperation under the agreement shall only cover forms of crime and related criminal offences for which Europol is competent. In particular, cooperation should aim to combat terrorism and prevent radicalisation, disrupt organised crime, including trafficking of migrants, firearms and drugs, and combat cybercrime.
Opening of negotiations for an EU-Egypt Agreement on the exchange of personal data for fighting serious crime and terrorism (A8-0236/2018 - Claude Moraes)
I voted in favour of the report on the recommendation, by the Commission, for a Council decision authorising the opening of negotiations for an agreement between the European Union and the Arab Republic of Egypt on the exchange of personal data between the European Union Agency for Law Enforcement Cooperation (Europol) and the Egyptian competent authorities for fighting serious crime and terrorism. The purpose of this recommendation for a Council Decision is to obtain from the Council an authorisation from the Council for the Commission to negotiate, on behalf of the European Union, an agreement between the European Union and Egypt on the exchange of personal data between the European Union Agency for Law Enforcement Cooperation (Europol) and the Egyptian competent authorities for fighting serious crime and terrorism. In order to respect the principle of purpose limitation, cooperation under the agreement shall only cover forms of crime and related criminal offences for which Europol is competent. In particular, cooperation should aim to combat terrorism and prevent radicalisation, disrupt organised crime, including trafficking of migrants, firearms and drugs, and combat cybercrime.
Opening of negotiations for an EU-Algeria Agreement on the exchange of personal data for fighting serious crime and terrorism (A8-0239/2018 - Claude Moraes)
I voted in favour of the Report on the recommendation, by the Commission, for a Council decision authorising the opening of negotiations for an agreement between the European Union and the People’s Democratic Republic of Algeria on the exchange of personal data between the European Union Agency for Law Enforcement Cooperation (Europol) and the Algerian competent authorities for fighting serious crime and terrorism.The purpose of this Recommendation for a Council Decision is to obtain from the Council an authorisation from the Council for the Commission to negotiate, on behalf of the European Union, an agreement between the European Union and Algeria on the exchange of personal data between the European Union Agency for Law Enforcement Cooperation (Europol) and the Algerian competent authorities for fighting serious crime and terrorism.In order to respect the principle of purpose limitation, cooperation under the agreement shall only cover forms of crime and related criminal offences for which Europol is competent. In particular, cooperation should aim to combat terrorism and prevent radicalisation, disrupt organised crime, including trafficking of migrants, firearms and drugs, and combat cybercrime.
Cooperation Agreement between the EU and the Agency for Aerial Navigation Safety in Africa and Madagascar (A8-0213/2018 - Jerzy Buzek)
I voted in favour of the recommendation on the draft Council decision on the conclusion on behalf of the Union of the Cooperation Agreement between the European Union and the Agency for Aerial Navigation Safety in Africa and Madagascar (ASECNA) on the development of satellite navigation and the provision of associated services in ASECNAʼs area of competence for the benefit of civil aviation. The purpose is to conclude the Cooperation Agreement between the European Union and the Agency for Aerial Navigation Safety in Africa and Madagascar (ASECNA) on the development of satellite navigation and the provision of associated services in ASECNAʼs area of competence for the benefit of civil aviation. On 25 September 2014 the Council authorised the Commission to negotiate, on behalf of the Union, an international agreement with ASECNA establishing the conditions for the provision of a satellite-based augmentation service (SBAS) in Africa on the basis of the EGNOS European satellite navigation programme. The Cooperation Agreement between the European Union and ASECNA on the development of satellite navigation and the provision of associated services in ASECNAʼs area of competence for the benefit of civil aviation was signed on 5 December 2016.
Extension of the EU-US Agreement for scientific and technological cooperation (A8-0212/2018 - Rolandas Paksas)
I voted in favour of the recommendation on the draft Council decision concerning the extension of the Agreement for scientific and technological cooperation between the European Community and the Government of the United States of America. The purpose is to extend the Agreement for scientific and technological cooperation between the European Union and the Government of the United States of America. The Agreement for scientific and technological cooperation between the European Community and the Government of the United States of America was signed in Washington, DC, on 5 December 1997 and entered into force on 14 October 1998. The agreement was concluded for an initial period of five years and may be extended thereafter, possibly with amendments, for additional periods of five years, by mutual written agreement between the parties. The assessment carried out by the Commission demonstrates that the agreement provides an important framework for facilitating cooperation between the Union and the United States of America in common priority areas for science and technology, leading to mutual benefits. It is therefore in the Union’s interest to extend the agreement for a new five—year period.
European High Performance Computing Joint Undertaking (A8-0217/2018 - Zigmantas Balčytis)
I voted in favour of the report on the proposal for a Council regulation on establishing the European High-Performance Computing Joint Undertaking. The purpose of the report is to establish a European Joint Undertaking for High Performance Computing (EuroHPC) during the period 2019-2026. High-performance computing (HPC) is an indispensable tool for addressing major scientific and societal challenges such as early detection of diseases, forecasting climate change or the prevention of natural disasters. It has an increasingly significant impact on industries and businesses, as it reduces design and production cycles. Lastly, it is essential for national security and defence. At present, the supercomputers available in the Union do not satisfy demand. European scientists and industry are increasingly processing their data outside the EU. This lack of independence can create problems, especially with regard to the protection of personal data and the ownership of data, in particular for sensitive applications such as health.
Mobilisation of the European Globalisation Adjustment Fund: application EGF/2017/009 FR/Air France (A8-0210/2018 - Alain Lamassoure)
I voted in favour of the report on the proposal for a decision of the European Parliament and of the Council on the mobilisation of the European Globalisation Adjustment Fund (application from France – EGF/2017/009 FR/Air France). The purpose is to mobilise the European Globalisation Adjustment Fund (EGF) to assist France in facing redundancies in the air transport sector. The events giving rise to these redundancies are the massive increase in the capacity of subsidised airlines based in countries with much better investment and production conditions (Qatar and the United Arab Emirates), which has resulted in a sharp decline among EU companies in terms of market share. Between 2008 and 2016, the trend in market shares (origin/destination) between Europe, on the one hand, and sub-Saharan Africa, the Middle East and Asia, on the other hand, shows a fall of nearly 10 points for EU companies, and this has benefited Emirates, Qatar Airways, Etihad and Turkish Airlines.
Role of cities in the institutional framework of the Union (A8-0203/2018 - Kazimierz Michał Ujazdowski)
I voted in favour of the report on the role of cities in the institutional framework of the Union. I welcome the Urban Agenda for the EU as a new model of multi-level governance based on partnership through engaging cities in the review of existing legislation and reflecting on the future shape of policies. They have called for the Urban Agenda to be coordinated, reinforced and formalised, stating that it should not remain a voluntary process and that the Member States and the Commission should acquire more of its ownership. As regards strengthening the role and participation of cities: the report stressed the key role of cities, as well as of all local authorities, in preparing, designing, financing and implementing key Union policies, e.g. tackling climate change. Cities might also have an important role in the Union’s external policies as a tool of public diplomacy. Parliament is calling for better coordination and integration of the instruments and programmes dedicated to cities in various EU policies, to be achieved by designating a Commissioner to take a political lead in the matter, so as to give strategic direction to those policies.
Three-dimensional printing: intellectual property rights and civil liability (A8-0223/2018 - Joëlle Bergeron)
. ‒ I voted in favour of the Report on three-dimensional printing, a challenge in the fields of intellectual property rights and civil liability. The report noted that legal experts are of the view that 3D printing has not fundamentally altered intellectual property rights, but files created may be considered a work. If that is the case, the work must be protected as such. In the short and medium term, and with a view to tackling counterfeiting, the main challenge will be to involve professional copyright intermediaries more closely. The report pointed out in general, civil liability is a matter that is not harmonised and is subject to national legislation. At EU level, Directive 85/374/EEC on liability for defective products covers all contracts. Parliament felt that it should be noted that it is progress in 3D printing among other things that has led the Commission to undertake a public consultation with the aim of assessing whether this Directive is fit for purpose in relation to new technological developments. Parliament noted that 3D printing is viewed as one of the most prominent technologies, with regard to which Europe can play a leading role.
European Defence Industrial Development Programme (A8-0037/2018 - Françoise Grossetête)
. ‒ I voted in favour of the Report on the proposal for a regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council establishing the European Defence Industrial Development Programme aiming at supporting the competitiveness and innovative capacity of the EU defence industry. The purpose is to establish a European defence industrial development programme. The defence industry is a major element of the economy of the European Union. For Europe to take over more responsibility for its defence, the Commission considers it crucial to improve competitiveness and enhance innovation across the Union defence industry. The proposal for a European defence industrial development programme aims at enhancing the competitiveness and innovation of the Union defence industry including cyber defence. In November 2016, the Commission adopted the European Defence Action Plan, which sets out measures to achieve greater European defence cooperation and support the competitiveness of the European defence industry. It proposed in particular to launch a European Defence Fund to support investment in joint research and the joint development of defence equipment and technologies.
Integrated farm statistics (A8-0300/2017 - Maria Gabriela Zoană)
. ‒ I voted in favour of the Report on the proposal for a regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council on integrated farm statistics and repealing Regulations. The purpose is to ensure the systematic production of European statistics on agricultural holdings in the Union in order to guarantee consistency and comparability at EU level. Agricultural statistics used at the Union level are taken from a variety of sources: statistical surveys, administrative data, data from farms and other businesses, as well as farm level data in the form of an agricultural census and samples. The current proposal relates to that last source of agricultural statistics data. This initiative is part of the regulatory fitness and performance programme (REFIT) and is the first step of the Strategy for Agricultural Statistics 2020 and beyond, that aims at streamlining the EASS as a whole and to render the data collection process more efficient and relevant.
Notification of investment projects in energy infrastructure: repeal (A8-0211/2018 - Barbara Kappel)
. ‒ I voted in favour of the Report on the proposal for a regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council repealing Regulation (EU) No 256/2014 of the European Parliament and of the Council concerning the notification to the Commission of investment projects in energy infrastructure within the European Union. The purpose is to repeal Regulation (EU) No 256/2014 of the European Parliament and of the Council concerning the notification to the Commission of investment projects in energy infrastructure within the European Union. This proposal to repeal Regulation (EU) No 256/2014 is put forward in the context of the Commission’s REFIT programme and commitment on better regulation. The European Parliament, the Council of the European Union and the European Commission confirmed their joint commitment to updating and simplifying legislation in the Interinstitutional Agreement on Better Law-Making of 13 April 2016. Repealing such legislation keeps the legislative framework transparent, clear and easy to use. Regulation (EU) No 256/2014 was adopted to ensure that the EU’s energy policy develops in an effective way and responds to the EU’s real needs.
Measures to strengthen administrative cooperation in the field of value-added tax (A8-0215/2018 - Roberts Zīle)
. ‒ I voted in favour of the Report on the amended proposal for a Council regulation amending Regulation (EU) No 904/2010 as regards measures to strengthen administrative cooperation in the field of value-added tax. The purpose is to amend Council Regulation (EU) No 904/2010 on administrative cooperation in the field of VAT as regards the status of certified taxable person. In its VAT action plan, the Commission announced its intention to submit a proposal setting out the principles of a definitive value added tax (VAT) system for cross-border business-to-business trade between Member States. The certified taxable person is one of the essential elements of this new definitive VAT system for intra-Union trade. The concept of the certified taxable person should allow or proving that a specific taxable person can be considered as a reliable taxpayer within the Union. In this context, it is essential for businesses and tax administrations that the certified taxable person status of a business can be checked immediately and online.
Violation of rights of indigenous peoples in the world (A8-0194/2018 - Francisco Assis)
. ‒ I voted in favour of the Report on violation of the rights of indigenous peoples in the world, including land—grabbing. The total population of indigenous peoples is estimated to be over 370 million people living in over 70 countries worldwide, representing around 5% of the total world population. There are at least 5 000 distinct indigenous peoples, who, despite their geographical dispersion, face similar threats and challenges. These people are victims of violence as well as racism, discrimination, forced evictions, destructive settlement, and illegal expropriation of their ancestral lands or lack of access to their resources, livelihoods and traditional knowledge. The report called for the withdrawal of private security and military forces deployed in the territories of indigenous peoples in violation of their rights.
Structural and financial barriers in the access to culture (A8-0169/2018 - Bogdan Andrzej Zdrojewski)
. ‒ I voted in favour of the Report on structural and financial barriers in the access to culture. This report provides a cross-sectoral analysis of existing obstacles to cultural access and participation. It concerns not only structural and financial barriers to access, but also social and digital barriers, and by far the most important problem of educational barriers. Article 27 of the Universal Declaration of Human Rights recognises participation in cultural life as one of the fundamental human rights. This right is enshrined in the Faro Convention, which recognises the right to participate in cultural life.Around 8.4 million people are employed in the EU’s cultural sector (accounting for 3.7% of the total workforce). While recalling the vital role of an active and accessible cultural sector for the development of an inclusive democratic society, the report stressed that promoting and improving access to culture was one of the main political priorities. Member States and the European Union are called on, within the sphere of their competences, to develop and implement specific measures in order to guarantee access to and participation in cultural life.
Proportionality test before adoption of new regulation of professions (A8-0395/2017 - Andreas Schwab)
. ‒ I voted in favour of the Report on the proposal for a directive of the European Parliament and of the Council on a proportionality test before adoption of new regulation of professions. The purpose of this was to remove disproportionate restrictions on access to or pursuit of regulated professions.According to a recent survey carried out in April 2015 in all 28 Member States, at least 21% of the labour force in the European Union (50 million people) can be considered as working in a regulated profession (activities where a specific professional qualification is required). It is up to each Member State to decide whether there is a need to intervene and impose rules and restrictions for access to or pursuit of a profession, so long as the principles of non-discrimination and proportionality are respected. Directive 2005/36/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council on the recognition of professional qualifications established the obligation for Member States to assess the proportionality of their requirements restricting access to or pursuit of regulated professions and to communicate to the Commission the results of the assessment, launching the so-called mutual evaluation process.
Use of vehicles hired without drivers for the carriage of goods by road (A8-0193/2018 - Cláudia Monteiro de Aguiar)
. ‒ I voted in favour of the Report on the proposal for a directive of the European Parliament and of the Council amending Directive 2006/1/EC on the use of vehicles hired without drivers for the carriage of goods by road. The purpose is to enable undertakings to benefit to a greater extent from the advantages of using vehicles hired without drivers for the carriage of goods by road.The use of hired vehicles can reduce the costs of undertakings carrying goods on their own account or for hire and reward and at the same time increase their operational flexibility. The Commission therefore proposes to remove these restrictions and establish a uniform regulatory framework across the EU to ensure equal access for transport operators across the EU to the market for hired vehicles. The proposal is part of a series of proposals in the field of road transport which the Commission intends to adopt in 2017.
Decision to enter into interinstitutional negotiations: Enforcement requirements and specific rules for posting drivers in the road transport sector (A8-0206/2018 - Merja Kyllönen)
I voted in favour of the Report on the proposal for a directive of the European Parliament and of the Council amending Directive 2006/22/EC as regards enforcement requirements and laying down specific rules with respect to Directive 96/71/EC and Directive 2014/67/EU for posting drivers in the road transport sector. The purpose is to adapt social rules applying to the road transport sector in order to ensure a balance between the drivers’ social protection and operators’ freedom to provide cross-border services. The current evaluation of the social legislation in road transport in the EU has shown shortcomings in the current legal framework and problems regarding enforcement. Furthermore, a number of discrepancies exist between Member States in interpretation, application and implementation of the rules. This creates legal uncertainty and unequal treatment of drivers and operators, which is detrimental to the working, social and competition conditions in the sector. The Commission aims to amend the existing rules in order to make the road transport sector fair, efficient and socially accountable, whilst at the same time mitigating the excessive regulatory burdens on operators and preventing distortions of competition.
Decision to enter into interinstitutional negotiations: Amending Regulation (EC) No 561/2006 as regards on minimum requirements on maximum daily and weekly driving times, minimum breaks and daily and weekly rest periods and Regulation (EU) 165/2014 as regards positioning by means of tachographs (A8-0205/2018 - Wim van de Camp)
I voted in favour of the Report on the proposal for a regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council amending Regulation (EC) No 561/2006 as regards on minimum requirements on maximum daily and weekly driving times, minimum breaks and daily and weekly rest periods and Regulation (EU) 165/2014 as regards positioning by means of tachographs. The purpose is to adapt and clarify the social rules in the Union in road transport in order to improve the business and working conditions in the sector. Driving and resting times of drivers are regulated under EU law. Regulation (EC) No 561/2006 (the ‘Driving Time Regulation’) and Regulation (EU) 165/2014 on tachographs are part of a wider effort to improve the working conditions of drivers, ensure fair competition between operators and improve the road safety of European roads. An evaluation the effectiveness and efficiency of the implementation of the existing set of Union social rules in road transport, identified certain deficiencies in the existing legal framework. Unclear and unsuitable rules on weekly rest, resting facilities, breaks in multi-manning and the absence of rules on the return of drivers to their home, lead to diverging interpretations and enforcement practices in the Member States.
Decision to enter into interinstitutional negotiations Amending Regulation (EC) No 1071/2009 and Regulation (EC) No 1072/2009 with a view to adapting them to developments in the sector (A8-0204/2018 - Ismail Ertug)
I voted in favour of the Report on the proposal for a regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council amending Regulation (EC) 1071/2009 and Regulation (EC) 1072/2009 with a view to adapting them to developments in the sector. The purpose is to improve the single market in road transport through amendments intended to eliminate causes for disparities and to ensure better enforcement of the rules. Experience with the implementation of these Regulations revealed that the rules provided for in those regulations offered scope for improvement on a number of points. The proposal is part of a broader ongoing review of the road transport legislation. It is closely linked to other existing legal acts concerning road transport, in particular the social legislation for road transport (Regulation (EC) No 561/2006, Directive 2002/15/EC, Directive 2006/22/EC and Regulation (EU) 165/2014. The preferred option combines substantive changes in the rules on cabotage and establishment, with a partial extension of Regulation (EC) No 1071/2009 to light vehicles. This option is estimated to generate savings for businesses in the range of EUR 2.7-5.2 billion for the EU-28 in 2020-2035.
Objection to Commission delegated regulation amending delegated regulation (EU) 2017/118 establishing fisheries conservation measures for the protection of the marine environment in the North Sea (B8-0299/2018)
I voted in favour of the Resolution on the Commission Delegated Regulation of 2 March 2018 amending Delegated Regulation (EU) 2017/118 establishing fisheries conservation measures for the protection of the marine environment in the North Sea (C(2018) 1194 – 2018/2614(DEA)). Member States are required to achieve good environmental status for marine waters by 2020, in line with Article 1(1) of Directive 2008/56/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 17 June 2008 establishing a framework for Community action in the field of marine environmental policy (Marine Strategy Framework Directive)(3), while Article 2(5)(j) of Regulation 1380/2013 requires the common fisheries policy to contribute to this goal. The Scientific, Technical and Economic Committee for Fisheries (STECF), in the conclusions to its relevant scientific advice(4), voiced a number of concerns as regards the effectiveness of the proposed measures for protected species and habitats and seafloor integrity – those concerns have not been fully reflected in the recitals to the delegated regulation under review.
Georgian occupied territories ten years after the Russian invasion (RC-B8-0275/2018, B8-0275/2018, B8-0276/2018, B8-0277/2018, B8-0278/2018, B8-0279/2018, B8-0285/2018)
I voted in favour of the resolution on Georgian occupied territories 10 years after the Russian invasion. I welcome the in-depth engagement and efforts by Georgia in deepening relations with the EU based on AA/DCFTA commitments and aspirations to European integration, and consider it of the utmost importance that the Georgian authorities continue to uphold democracy and respect human and minority rights, fundamental freedoms and the rule of law. Parliament reaffirms its support for the sovereignty and territorial integrity of Georgia within its internationally recognised borders and remains firmly committed to conflict resolution and its policy of non-recognition and engagement in Georgia, using all instruments at its disposal as part of a comprehensive approach. Parliament demands that the Russian Federation end its occupation of the Georgian regions of Abkhazia and South Ossetia, fully respect the sovereignty and territorial integrity of Georgia, and adhere to the binding commitments of the ceasefire agreement of 12 August 2008, especially with regard to the commitment to withdraw all its military forces.
Negotiations for a new EU-ACP Partnership Agreement (B8-0274/2018)
I voted in favour of the Resolution on the Commission Delegated Regulation of 2 March 2018 amending Delegated Regulation (EU) 2017/118 establishing fisheries conservation measures for the protection of the marine environment in the North Sea (C(2018) 1194 – 2018/2614(DEA)). Member States are required to achieve good environmental status for marine waters by 2020, in line with Article 1(1) of Directive 2008/56/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 17 June 2008 establishing a framework for Community action in the field of marine environmental policy (Marine Strategy Framework Directive)(3), while Article 2(5)(j) of Regulation 1380/2013 requires the common fisheries policy to contribute to this goal. The Scientific, Technical and Economic Committee for Fisheries (STECF), in the conclusions to its relevant scientific advice(4), voiced a number of concerns as regards the effectiveness of the proposed measures for protected species and habitats and seafloor integrity. Those concerns have not been fully reflected in the recitals to the delegated regulation under review.
Monitoring the application of EU law 2016 (A8-0197/2018 - Kostas Chrysogonos)
I voted in favour of the Report on monitoring the application of EU law 2016. The Commission restated its commitment to improving the application of EU law in a Communication of December 2016, which sets out a more strategic approach to its infringement policy. This annual report highlights the main developments in enforcement policy in 2016. The EU Pilot dialogue between the Commission and Member States was set up to quickly resolve potential breaches of EU law at an early stage in appropriate cases. 790 new EU Pilot files were opened in 2016. The high number of infringement procedures, which in 2016 rose to a five-year peak, remains a serious concern. The Commission launched 986 new procedures by sending a letter of formal notice.The 2016 annual report reflects the focus on enforcement in the political priority areas of the Commission. For example, the Commission pursued enforcement actions in the area of the internal market, where it specifically targeted Member States’ failure to establish or apply penalties systems to deter car manufacturers from violating car emissions legislation.
Composition of the European Parliament (A8-0207/2018 - Danuta Maria Hübner, Pedro Silva Pereira)
I voted in favour of the Recommendation on the draft European Council decision establishing the composition of the European Parliament. The purpose of this recommendation is to establish the composition of the European Parliament. The first subparagraph of Article 14(2) of the Treaty on European Union (TEU) lays down the criteria for the composition of the European Parliament, namely that representatives of the Union’s citizens are not to exceed 750 in number, plus the President, that representation is to be degressively proportional, with a minimum threshold of six Members per Member State, and that no Member State is to be allocated more than 96 seats.
Insolvency proceedings: updated annexes to the Regulation (A8-0174/2018 - Tadeusz Zwiefka)
I voted in favour of the Report on the proposal for a regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council replacing Annex A to Regulation (EU) 2015/848 on insolvency proceedings. The purpose of this report is to replace Annex A to Regulation (EU) 2015/848 on insolvency proceedings. In January 2017, Croatia notified the Commission on recent changes to its domestic insolvency law introducing new types of insolvency proceedings, such as a pre-insolvency proceeding and a consumer’s insolvency proceeding. At the same time, Croatia requested that the list setting out exhaustively the insolvency proceedings in Annex A of Regulation (EU) 2015/848 be amended accordingly. The Commission carefully analysed this request in order to ensure compliance of the notification with the requirements of the Regulation. Changes to Annex A of the Regulation do not affect the substantive set of rules and may only be made by the Union legislature and not by the Member States.
EU-Iceland Agreement on supplementary rules for external borders and visas for 2014-2020 (A8-0196/2018 - Anders Primdahl Vistisen)
I voted in favour of the recommendation on the draft Council decision on the conclusion on behalf of the European Union of the agreement between the European Union and Iceland on supplementary rules in relation to the instrument for financial support for external borders and visa, as part of the Internal Security Fund, for the period 2014 to 2020. Regulation (EU) No 515/2014 of the European Parliament and of the Council establishing, as part of the Internal Security Fund, the instrument for financial support for external borders and visa entered into force on 21 May 2014 and became applicable as of 1 January 2014.
EU-Switzerland Agreement on supplementary rules for external borders and visas for 2014-2020 (A8-0195/2018 - Claude Moraes)
. ‒ I voted in favour of the recommendation on the draft Council decision on the conclusion, on behalf of the Union, of the Agreement between the European Union and the Swiss Confederation on supplementary rules in relation to the instrument for financial support for external borders and visa, as part of the Internal Security Fund, for the period 2014 to 2020. The agreement was signed by the Commission.
Implementation of the remaining provisions of the Schengen acquis relating to the Schengen Information System in Bulgaria and Romania (A8-0192/2018 - Monica Macovei)
. ‒ I voted in favour of the report on the draft Council Decision on putting into effect the remaining provisions of the Schengen acquis relating to the Schengen Information System (SIS) in the Republic of Bulgaria and Romania. In order to increase the level of security in the Schengen area and to make the fight against serious crime and terrorism more effective, the checks by Bulgaria and Romania at their external borders, and within their territory, should become more effective. The draft Council Decision provides that the remaining restrictions of the Schengen acquis relating to SIS, as referred to in Decision 2010/365/EU, shall not apply to Bulgaria and Romania between themselves or in their relations with the 26 member countries of the Schengen Area.
Cohesion policy and the circular economy (A8-0184/2018 - Davor Škrlec)
I voted in favour of the Report on cohesion policy and the circular economy. The report welcomed the efforts of the Commission to support the circular economy through cohesion policy. Given that the current policy framework does not allow the full contribution of cohesion policy to the circular economy to be captured, Parliament called on the Commission to implement the planned circular economy measures, including measures to monitor implementation, while reducing the administrative burden. Parliament reiterated that the circular economy goes beyond waste management and includes areas such as green jobs, renewable energy, resource efficiency, the bio-economy, agricultural and fisheries policy, with their bio-industries aiming to replace fossil fuels; water management, energy efficiency, food waste, marine waste, improved air quality, research and development and innovation in related areas. The report stressed the important role that local authorities can play in making the circular economy a reality and the important role that public-private partnerships play in the design and planning of new products and services in a life-cycle approach.
Negotiations on the modernisation of the EU-Chile Association Agreement (A8-0158/2018 - Charles Tannock)
. ‒ I voted in favour of the report on the European Parliament recommendation to the Council, the Commission and the Vice-President of the Commission / High Representative of the Union for Foreign Affairs and Security Policy on the negotiations on the modernisation of the EU-Chile Association Agreement. The existing Association Agreement has been instrumental in deepening EU-Chile political relations and substantially increasing trade and investment flows. Continued respect for the rule of law and a stable legal and political framework enables both Chile and the EU to exercise free enterprise and fosters an adequate investment environment that includes safeguards on the principle of legal certainty. I believe that modernisation of the EU-Chile Association Agreement has the potential significantly to deepen the existing relationship, including relations in the areas of foreign affairs and security.
EU-NATO relations (A8-0188/2018 - Ioan Mircea Paşcu)
. ‒ I voted in favour of the Report on EU-NATO relations. The EU and NATO are indispensable for ensuring the security of Europe and of their citizens. Their cooperation should not be considered a goal in itself but a way to achieve shared security priorities and goals through complementarity of missions and available means. The EU and NATO, both engaged in crisis management, would be more efficient in that activity if they were to act in a truly coordinated manner and make the most of their expertise and resources.Parliament stressed openness and transparency in full respect of the decision-making autonomy and procedures of both organisations. Moreover, the report noted that cooperation with non-NATO EU Member States and non-EU NATO Parliament is an integral part of EU-NATO cooperation. However, recent political developments could have an impact on the strength of the transatlantic relationship. The report noted that the US, which generally encouraged and welcomed the substantive developments in EU defence, should continue efforts for a better understanding of European strategic interests, including the development of European defence capabilities.
State of play of recreational fisheries in the EU (A8-0191/2018 - Norica Nicolai)
I voted in favour of the report on the state of play in recreational fisheries in the European Union. The estimated number of those practising marine recreational fishing in Europe stands somewhere between 8.7 million and 9 million people, or 1.6% of the European population. Recreational fishing is a hobby, but the economic, social and environmental importance of this activity is a factor that shows how important this activity is and should thus be taken into consideration and analysed when considering future regulations. Furthermore, the UK’s withdrawal from the Union should be taken into consideration for the future management of maritime recreational fisheries, in view of the importance of this activity in the UK and its significance for shared fish stocks. The report stressed the importance of collecting sufficient data on recreational fisheries, and on maritime recreational fisheries in particular, in order to properly evaluate the total fishing mortality levels for all stocks. Data should be collected on the number of recreational fishermen, the volume of their catches and the added value which they generate in coastal communities.
Clearing obligation, reporting requirements and risk-mitigation techniques for OTC derivatives and trade repositories (A8-0181/2018 - Werner Langen)
I voted in favour of the report on the state of play in recreational fisheries in the European Union. The estimated number of those practising marine recreational fishing in Europe stands somewhere between 8.7 million and 9 million people, or 1.6% of the European population. Recreational fishing is a hobby, but the economic, social and environmental importance of this activity is a factor that shows how important this activity is and should thus be taken into consideration and analysed when considering future regulations. Furthermore, the UK’s withdrawal from the Union should be taken into consideration for the future management of maritime recreational fisheries, in view of the importance of this activity in the UK and its significance for shared fish stocks. The report stressed the importance of collecting sufficient data on recreational fisheries, and on maritime recreational fisheries in particular, in order to properly evaluate the total fishing mortality levels for all stocks. Data should be collected on the number of recreational fishermen, the volume of their catches and the added value which they generate in coastal communities.
Common rules in the field of civil aviation and European Union Aviation Safety Agency (A8-0364/2016 - Marian-Jean Marinescu)
. ‒ I voted in favour of the Report on the proposal for a regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council on common rules in the field of civil aviation and establishing a European Union Aviation Safety Agency, and repealing Regulation (EC) No 216/2008 of the European Parliament and of the Council. The purpose is to revise the rules on aviation safety in the EU in order to maintain a high uniform level of civil aviation safety in the Union, while ensuring a high uniform level of environmental protection. building on over twelve years of experience in the implementation of Regulation (EC) No 216/2008, this initiative is part of the Commission’s 2015 ‘Aviation Strategy to Enhance the Competitiveness of the EU Aviation Sector’. Its objective is to prepare the EU aviation safety regulatory framework for the challenges of the next ten to fifteen years and thus to continue to ensure safe, secure and environmentally friendly air transport for passengers and the general public. Safety and consideration for environmental protection are pre-requisites for a competitive aviation sector.
CO2 emissions from and fuel consumption of new heavy-duty vehicles (A8-0010/2018 - Damiano Zoffoli)
. ‒ I voted in favour of the Report on the proposal for a regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council on the monitoring and reporting of CO2 emissions from and fuel consumption of new heavy-duty vehicles. The purpose is to monitor and report on CO2 emissions from and fuel consumption of new EU heavy-duty vehicles. In its climate and energy framework for 2030, the EU is committed to reducing its emissions by at least 40% by 2030 compared to 1990 levels. The Commission’s 2016 European Strategy for low-emission mobility set the objective of at least a 60% reduction in emissions from transport by 2050 compared to 1990 levels. In 2014, greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions from heavy-duty vehicles (HDVs) represented 5% of total EU emissions, a fifth of all transport emissions and about a quarter of road transport emissions and they are set to increase by 2030.
Modernisation of education in the EU (A8-0173/2018 - Krystyna Łybacka)
I voted in favour of the Report on modernisation of education in the EU. The purpose of this report is to outline the new EU strategy for higher education. The success of the European project depends on the EU’s capacity to build a better future for European citizens. It is also at the heart of the initiative ‘Investing in Europe’s Youth’ and the New Skills Agenda for Europe. These made clear that effective education and training systems are a foundation of fair, open and democratic societies and of sustained growth and employment. The EU’s ‘pillar of social rights’ and recent reflection paper on harnessing globalisation identify education and skills as a priority for European cooperation. The EU has a successful record of supporting higher education through policy cooperation and funding programmes. The European Semester is a key driver of reform, namely through education-related country specific recommendations. As part of the Europe 2020 strategy and the strategic framework for European cooperation in education and training (ET 2020), the Council agreed that 40 % of young people should have a tertiary education qualification or equivalent by 2020.
Towards a sustainable and competitive European aquaculture sector (A8-0186/2018 - Carlos Iturgaiz)
I voted in favour of the Report ‘Towards a sustainable and competitive European aquaculture sector. Current status and future challenges’. EU legislation should be better adapted to aquaculture’s realities, specificities and needs in the framework of the common fisheries policy and in coherence, inter alia, with EU environmental legislation. Environmental sustainability should go hand—in—hand with social and economic sustainability. Regretting the lack of a level playing field and the dangerous distortions of competition in the sector, Parliament called for imported aquaculture products to be subject to the same environmental, food safety, socio-labour standards and respect for human rights as EU operators. It is insisted that measures be taken to encourage EU investment in aquaculture projects in third countries. The aquaculture sector is an innovative economic sector, which is the fastest growing food production activity, and, potentially, a high-technology sector requiring structural and research investment and long-term operational and financial planning.
Odometer manipulation in motor vehicles: revision of the EU legal framework (A8-0155/2018 - Ismail Ertug)
I voted in favour of the Report with recommendations to the Commission on odometer manipulation in motor vehicles: revision of the EU legal framework. Odometer tampering, i.e. the malpractice of deliberate and unauthorised altering of the real mileage of a vehicle shown on its odometer, is a serious and widespread problem throughout the whole European Union especially in cross-border trade and harms third countries, which import second-hand cars from the European Union. Studies estimate the share of tampered vehicles between 5% and 12% of used cars in national sales and between 30% and 50% in cross-border sales, accumulating to a total economic damage between EUR 5.6 and 9.6 billion in the whole Union. In the absence of a common, integrated system for exchange of information between Member States, there is an increased risk of legalising a mileage reading already manipulated before its initial verification in the country in which the car will ultimately be registered and where there are already measures to register the vehicle and verify its mileage.
Union Civil Protection Mechanism (A8-0180/2018 - Elisabetta Gardini)
. ‒ I voted in favour of the report on the proposal for a decision of the European Parliament and of the Council amending Decision No 1313/2013/EU on a Union Civil Protection Mechanism. The Union Civil Protection Mechanism (UCPM) governed by Decision No 1313/2013/EU of the European Parliament and the Council strengthens cooperation between the Union and the Member States and facilitates coordination in the field of civil protection in order to improve the Union’s response to natural and man-made disasters.Several recent disasters have hit several Member States simultaneously: the refugee and migration crisis and its humanitarian impact, terrorist attacks, the lack of available assets during the 2016 and 2017 forest-fire seasons that resulted in over 100 deaths, as well as the severe impact of a series of hurricanes in the Caribbean and fierce storms and flooding in the EU, have constituted a real stress test for the UCPM. Recent experience has shown that reliance on voluntary offers of mutual assistance, coordinated and facilitated by the Union Mechanism, does not always ensure that sufficient capacities are made available to address the basic needs of people affected by disasters in a satisfactory manner, nor that the environment and property are properly safeguarded.
Connecting Europe facility after 2020 (RC-B8-0242/2018, B8-0242/2018, B8-0243/2018, B8-0245/2018, B8-0246/2018, B8-0247/2018)
. ‒ I voted in favour of the resolution on Connecting Europe facility (CEF) after 2020. The resolution emphasises the European added value that the CEF brings for all Member States by supporting connectivity projects with a cross-border dimension and funding projects that bridge missing links and remove bottlenecks, with the aim of ensuring the proper functioning of the EU internal market and territorial cohesion among Member States.Parliament welcomes the introduction of cross-sectoral synergies in the CEF. The future sectoral policy guidelines and the CEF instrument are expected to be more flexible in order to facilitate synergies and be more responsive to new technological developments and priorities such as digitalisation, while accelerating decarbonisation and addressing common societal challenges such as cybersecurity. The CEF has been, is and must remain an effective and targeted instrument for investment in trans-European infrastructure (TEN) in transport, energy and the digital sector, and in order to contribute to the EU’s priorities on jobs, growth and investment, the internal market, the Energy Union, the climate and the digital single market. The Commission is asked to bear in mind that the completion of the TEN defined in the EU policy priorities will require significant investments.
Situation in Nicaragua (RC-B8-0244/2018, B8-0244/2018, B8-0248/2018, B8-0249/2018, B8-0250/2018, B8-0251/2018, B8-0252/2018, B8-0253/2018)
. ‒ I voted in favour of the resolution on the situation in Nicaragua. Parliament strongly condemns the brutal repression of the demonstrations held in Nicaragua against the social security reforms, and expresses its grave concern at the reports of the use of live ammunition to break up the protests, which resulted in at least 76 deaths and almost 900 injured; it calls on the Nicaraguan authorities immediately to cease all acts of violence by armed forces, police and paramilitary groups linked to the Government towards Nicaraguan people exercising their rights to freedom of expression and assembly; and it urges the Nicaraguan authorities to guarantee these freedoms, in line with the international agreements to which the country is party. Parliament urges the Nicaraguan authorities to release all those who have been arbitrarily detained and to provide guarantees that no criminal action will be taken against them.
Gender equality and women's empowerment: transforming the lives of girls and women through EU external relations 2016-2020 (A8-0167/2018 - Linda McAvan, Dubravka Šuica)
I voted in favour of the Report on the implementation of the Joint Staff Working Document (SWD(2015)0182 - Gender Equality and Women’s Empowerment: Transforming the Lives of Girls and Women through EU External Relations 2016-2020. The fifth Sustainable Development Goal (SDG5) is to achieve gender equality and to empower all women and girls worldwide. SDG5 must be mainstreamed into the entire 2030 agenda so as to achieve progress across all SDGs and targets. The original Gender Action Plan I (2010-2015) (GAP I) brought some progress, but was also marked by a number of shortcomings. The new Gender Action Plan II 2016-2020 (GAP II) focuses on shifting EU institutional culture at headquarters and delegation levels in order to create a systemic change in how the EU approaches gender, as well as on transforming women’s and girls’ lives. One year on since the adoption of GAP II, a number of positive trends have been noted. However, a number of challenges have been noted as regards the reporting and implementation of key priorities and gender-related SDGs and the monitoring of progress on all objectives, as well as in terms of mainstreaming gender into sector policy dialogue.
Implementation of the EU Youth Strategy (A8-0162/2018 - Eider Gardiazabal Rubial)
I voted in favour of the Report on the implementation of the EU Youth Strategy. This implementation report aims to provide ideas for a more coordinated and focused EU strategy for sustainable youth. I believe that recommended that the future EYS should be participatory and centred around young people. The EU should express solidarity with young people and continue to empower them to participate in society by developing specific measures, such as mainstreaming volunteering, supporting youth work, developing new tools – especially those involving new technologies – and promoting exchanges based on solidarity, community engagement, free space and democratic dialogue. In this regard, I believe that stressed the importance of non-formal and informal learning, as well as participation in sport and volunteering activities, in stimulating the development of civic, social and intercultural competences and skills among young Europeans.
Implementation of the Ecodesign Directive (A8-0165/2018 - Frédérique Ries)
I voted in favour of the Report on the implementation of the Ecodesign Directive (2009/125/EC). The report stated that the Ecodesign Directive has been a successful instrument for the improvement of energy efficiency. It has resulted in a significant reduction in greenhouse gas emissions and has led to economic benefits for consumers. I believe that the Commission can continue to include more product groups selected on the basis of their ecodesign potential, including both energy efficiency and material efficiency potential as well as other environmental aspects. Stressing that coordination with initiatives connected to the circular economy would further enhance the effectiveness of the directive, I believe that called for an ambitious plan on ecodesign and the circular economy, providing both environmental benefits and opportunities for sustainable growth and jobs, including in the SME sector, as well as advantages for consumers.
Responding to petitions on tackling precariousness and the abusive use of fixed-term contracts (B8-0238/2018)
I voted in favour of the Resolution on Responding to petitions on tackling precariousness and the abusive use of fixed-term contracts. Women are more likely to work part-time or on time-limited or low-wage contracts and are therefore more at risk of precariousness resulting from discrimination in the labour market, and this is slowing down progress in combating and eliminating the gender pay and pension gaps. The Parliament understands precarious employment to mean employment which arises from, among other things, an abusive use of temporary employment contracts in violation of international standards on working conditions, labour rights and EU law; underlines that precarious employment implies higher exposure to socio-economic vulnerability, insufficient resources for a decent life and inadequate social protection. It is important to make a distinction between atypical work and the existence of precarious employment; stresses that the terms ‘atypical’ and ‘precarious’ cannot be used synonymously. The Parliament urges the Commission to take immediate action in its legislation to effectively address the employment practices leading to precariousness.
Mobilisation of the EU Solidarity Fund to provide assistance to Greece, Spain, France and Portugal (A8-0175/2018 - José Manuel Fernandes)
I voted in favour of the Report on the proposal for a decision of the European Parliament and of the Council on the mobilisation of the European Union Solidarity Fund to provide assistance to Greece, Spain, France and Portugal. European Union Solidarity Fund aims to enable the Union to respond in a rapid, efficient and flexible manner to emergency situations in order to show solidarity with the population of regions struck by natural disasters. The Fund is not to exceed a maximum annual amount of EUR 500 million (2011 prices), as laid down in Article 10 of Council Regulation (EU, Euratom) No 1311/2013 laying down the multiannual financial framework (MFF).This decision covers the mobilisation of the European Union Solidarity Fund (EUSF) for an amount of EUR 104 166 951 to provide assistance to Greece in the aftermath of the earthquakes in Lesbos, France for hurricanes in Saint-Martin and Guadeloupe, as well as in Portugal and Spain following forest fires in the Centro region and Galicia in the course of 2017.
Draft amending budget No 1/2018 accompanying the proposal to mobilise the EU Solidarity Fund to provide assistance to Greece, Spain, France and Portugal (C8-0181/2018)
. ‒ I voted in favour of the Report on the Council position on Draft amending budget No 1/2018 of the European Union for the financial year 2018 accompanying the proposal to mobilise the European Union Solidarity Fund to provide assistance to Greece, Spain, France and Portugal. Draft amending budget (DAB) No 1 for the year 2018, presented by the Commission accompanies the proposal to mobilise the European Union Solidarity Fund (EUSF) for an amount of EUR 104 166 951 to provide assistance to Greece for the earthquakes in Lesbos, to France for the hurricanes in Saint Martin and Guadeloupe, as well as to Portugal and Spain for the forest fires that occurred in Centro and in Galicia in the course of 2017.DAB No 1/2018 proposes to enter the necessary appropriations in the general budget 2018, both in commitments and payments, after having deducted the advances already paid out to Greece, France and Portugal (EUR 6 520 846).In accordance with the Multiannual Financial Framework (MFF) regulation, the total amount available for the mobilisation of the EUSF at the beginning of 2018 was EUR 421 142 057.
Protection against dumped and subsidised imports from countries not members of the EU (A8-0182/2018 - Christofer Fjellner)
. ‒ I voted in favour of the Recommendation for second reading on the Council position at first reading with a view to the adoption of a Regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council amending Regulation (EU) 2016/1036 on protection against dumped imports from countries not members of the European Union and Regulation (EU) 2016/1037 on protection against subsidised imports from countries not members of the European Union. I believe that added that the use of any dumped product in connection with the exploration of the Continental Shelf or the Exclusive Economic Zone of a Member State, or the exploitation of its resources, shall be treated as an import under this Regulation and shall be charged to duty accordingly, when causing injury to the Members clarified the notion of a raw material in relation to the concept of structural distortion. The lesser duty rule shall not apply in anti-dumping cases when it is established that the exporting country engages in practices that significantly distort the regular course of trade, when the exporting country has an insufficient level of social and environmental standards or when complainants are SMEs.
Mobilisation of the European Globalisation Adjustment Fund: application EGF/2018/000 TA 2018 - Technical assistance at the initiative of the Commission (A8-0172/2018 - Eider Gardiazabal Rubial)
. ‒ I voted in favour of the Report on the proposal for a decision of the European Parliament and of the Council on the mobilisation of the European Globalisation Adjustment Fund. Members recalled the importance of a dedicated website on the EGF to be accessible to all Union citizens as well as multilingualism when communicating broadly to the public. They took note that the Commission intends to invest EUR 105 000 of the available budget under the technical assistance in holding three meetings of the Expert Group of Contact Persons of the EGF. They also noted the Commission’s intention to invest EUR 120 000 in order to promote networking through seminars among Member States, EGF implementing bodies and social partners. Members welcomed the Commission’s readiness to invite members of its EGF Working Group to participate in EGF networking seminars when possible and called on the Commission to continue to invite the Parliament to these meetings and seminars.
Objection pursuant to Rule 106: genetically modified maize GA21 (MON-ØØØ21-9) (D056125) (B8-0232/2018)
I voted in favour of the resolution on renewing the authorisation for the placing on the market of products containing, consisting of, or produced from genetically modified maize GA21. GA21 maize has been developed to provide tolerance to glyphosate by expressing a modified version of the EPSPS protein. Application of the complementary herbicide, in this case glyphosate, is part of regular agricultural practice in the cultivation of herbicide-resistant plants, and it can therefore be expected that residues from spraying will be present in the harvest and are inevitable constituents. On the other hand, it has been shown that herbicide-tolerant genetically modified crops result in a higher use of complementary herbicides than their conventional counterparts. It has to be expected that GA21 maize will be exposed to both higher and repeated doses of glyphosate, which will not only lead to a higher burden of residues in the harvest, but may also influence the composition of the GM maize plant and its agronomic characteristics.
Objection pursuant to Rule 106: genetically modified maize 1507 × 59122 × MON 810 × NK603, and genetically modified maize combining two or three of the single events 1507, 59122, MON 810 and NK603 (D056123) (B8-0233/2018)
I voted in favour of the resolution on authorising the placing on the market of products containing, consisting of, or produced from genetically modified maize 1507 × 59122 × MON 810 × NK603, and genetically modified maize combining two or three of the single events 1507, 59122, MON 810 and NK603, and repealing Decisions 2009/815/EC, 2010/428/EU and 2010/432/EU. The application covered ten sub-combinations of the single transformation events constituting the GM maize, of which five had already been authorised. Eight of those sub-combinations are governed by the draft Commission implementing decision; the sub-combinations 1507 x NK603 and NK603 x MON 810 have already been authorised under different Commission decisions. On 14 November 2017 the European Food Safety Authority (EFSA) adopted a favourable opinion, in accordance with Articles 6 and 18 of Regulation (EC) No 1829/2003, which was published on 28 November 2017. The GM maize is derived from crossing four genetically engineered maize events: 1507 produces the insecticidal protein Cr1F and is resistant to the herbicide glufosinate; 59122 produces the insecticidal proteins Cry34Ab1 and Cry35Ab1 and is also resistant to the herbicide glufosinate.
Conformity of fisheries products with access criteria to the EU market (A8-0156/2018 - Linnéa Engström)
. ‒ I voted in favour of the report on the implementation of control measures for establishing the conformity of fisheries products with access criteria to the EU market. Parliament has emphasised that one of the key aims of EU policy on fishery and aquaculture imports must be to ensure that imported products meet in every respect the same requirements which apply to EU production, and has also stressed that EU efforts to make fishing sustainable are incompatible with importing products from countries which fish with no concern for sustainability. However, the outermost regions of the EU, in the Caribbean, the Indian Ocean and the Atlantic Ocean, neighbour third countries whose fishing, production and marketing conditions do not always meet European standards, resulting in unfair trade vis-à-vis local production.I believe that, in order to ensure equitable treatment of imported and European fishery and aquaculture products, which should be a key aim of EU fisheries policy, the EU should require all imported products to comply with EU conservation and management standards, as well as the hygiene requirements imposed by EU legislation.
The future of food and farming (A8-0178/2018 - Herbert Dorfmann)
. ‒ I voted in favour of the report on the future of food and farming. The EU is one of the world’s leading producers of food, and EU agriculture guarantees food security for over 500 million European citizens. The EU’s farmers are also the first stewards of the natural environment, as they care for the natural resources of soil, water, air and biodiversity on 48% of the EU’s land, provide essential carbon sinks and supply renewable resources for industry and energy.The CAP has enabled the development of the world’s most integrated single market. It is thanks to the CAP that the EU farm sector is able to respond to citizens’ demands in relation to food security, safety, quality and sustainability. Farming is strongly affected by the weather and it is also frequently tested by volatile prices, natural disasters, pests and diseases. At the same time, pressure on natural resources is still clearly present, partly as a result of some farming activities. Climate change threatens to make all of the above-mentioned problems weigh more heavily.
Interpretation and implementation of the Interinstitutional Agreement on Better Law-Making (A8-0170/2018 - Pavel Svoboda, Richard Corbett)
I voted in favour of the Report on the interpretation and implementation of the Interinstitutional Agreement on Better Law-Making. I believe that welcomed the three Institutions’ agreement to reinforce the Union’s annual and multiannual programming by means of a more structured procedure with a precise timeline. They considered that priority treatment for certain legislative files agreed upon in joint declarations should not be used to exert undue pressure on the co-legislators and that greater speed should not be prioritised at the expense of legislative quality. I believe that called on the Commission to present more inclusive, more detailed and more reliable Work Programmes and impact assessments should always encompass a thorough and rigorous analysis of the compliance of a proposal with the principles of subsidiarity and proportionality and specify its European added value. They encouraged developing efficient legislation geared to developing employment protection and European competitiveness with a particular focus on small and medium-sized enterprises, across all sectors of the economy. I believe that considered it essential that parliamentary committees are fully consulted throughout the joint declaration preparation and implementation process.
2021-2027 Multiannual Financial Framework and own resources (B8-0239/2018, B8-0240/2018, B8-0241/2018)
I voted in favour of the Resolution on Multiannual Financial Framework and own resources. The Parliament urges the Council to ensure that the next financial framework reflects a clear and positive vision of the Union’s future and responds to the needs, concerns and expectations of EU citizens. It is stressed that the decision on the MFF will need to provide the Union with the necessary financial means to meet important challenges and attain its political priorities and objectives over the next seven-year period. The Council will act in consistency with the political commitments that it has already undertaken and will be courageous in its approach.
Recommendation to the Council, the Commission and the Vice-President of the Commission/High Representative on Libya (A8-0159/2018 - Pier Antonio Panzeri)
I voted in favour of the Report on a European Parliament recommendation to the Council, the Commission and the Vice-President of the Commission / High Representative of the Union for Foreign Affairs and Security Policy on Libya. The situation in Libya is highly fragile and the country is facing a number of complex, interrelated challenges regarding political stability, economic development, and security which is also affecting the surrounding region and the EU. EU action is showing results on the migration front, given that the figures fell by one third at the end of 2017 compared to 2016 and for the early months of 2018 the figures are 50% down on those for the same period last year.
Annual Report on the functioning of the Schengen area (A8-0160/2018 - Carlos Coelho)
I voted in favour of the report on the annual report on the functioning of the Schengen area. Parliament noted that the EU legislator had adopted a number of measures in the last three years which were designed to reinforce the integrity of the Schengen area without internal border controls. They welcomed the effectiveness of the measures taken at the external borders and the creation of the European Border and Coast Guard Agency (EBCGA).They noted the importance of the newly introduced vulnerability assessment mechanism in uncovering weaknesses at the common external borders and preventing crises. They noted the steps taken through amendment of the Schengen Borders Code and introduction of mandatory systematic checks against relevant databases at the external borders on entry and exit for third-country nationals and for EU nationals, while remaining vigilant about the effects, necessity and proportionality of these measures on the border crossings of EU nationals. They expressed concerns regarding the critical shortcomings and deficiencies discovered through the Schengen Evaluation Mechanism and the vulnerability assessment.
Minimum standards on the rights, support and protection of victims of crime (A8-0168/2018 - Teresa Jiménez-Becerril Barrio, Angelika Mlinar)
I voted in favour of the Report on the implementation of Directive 2012/29/EU establishing minimum standards on the rights, support and protection of victims of crime. Member States are called on to establish coordinated mechanisms for collecting information on the victims of terrorist attacks taking place in their territory, and, through the creation and development of a one-stop shop, to provide victims with a web portal and emergency telephone line or other means of communication, such as e-mail or multimedia messaging tools, giving access to secure, personalised, specific and relevant information in accordance with the user’s needs, with a confidential, free-of-charge and easily accessible support service.In the event of a terrorist attack, a coordination centre should be established in order to bring together organisations and experts with the necessary expertise to provide information, support and practical services to the victims and to their families and relatives. These services should include specialist emotional and psychological support and vocational rehabilitation services. The report called on the Commission to propose the creation of a European fund for assistance to the victims of terrorism.
Annual report on the implementation of the Common Commercial Policy (A8-0166/2018 - Tokia Saïfi)
I voted in favour of the Report on the Annual report on the implementation of the Common Commercial Policy. I believe that pointed out that the international context has changed profoundly since the Trade for All strategy was published in 2015 and that new trade challenges and concrete tasks now need to be addressed.The rise of some protectionist practices that are incompatible with WTO rules, around the world and reiterated support for an open, fair, balanced, sustainable, and rules-based trading system. The report emphasised that the United Kingdom’s departure from the EU will have consequences for internal and external trade and called on the Commission to take immediate steps to anticipate the impact of Brexit on the Union’s trade policy and to present in a timely manner an impact assessment that includes different options for future trade relations so as to ensure continuity in the implementation of EU trade policy and relations with third countries and also ways of finding a solution as regards common commitments in the WTO.
Fishing mortality ranges and safeguard levels for certain herring stocks in the Baltic Sea (A8-0149/2018 - Alain Cadec)
I voted in favour of the report on the proposal for a regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council amending Regulation (EU) 2016/1139 as regards fishing mortality ranges and safeguard levels for certain herring stocks in the Baltic Sea. Following the reform of the Common Fisheries Policy (CFP), Regulation (EU) 2016/1139 established a multiannual plan for cod, herring and sprat stocks in the Baltic Sea. The objective of the plan is to ensure that the exploitation of the stocks concerned restores and maintains populations of these stocks above the levels that achieve maximum sustainable yield (MSY). The scientific evaluation of the Bothnian Sea herring stock and the Bothnian Bay herring stock conducted in 2017 by the International Council for the Exploration of the Sea (ICES) showed that those two stocks are similar. As a consequence, ICES combined the two stocks into one, changed the boundaries of its geographic distribution area and re-estimated the MSY fishing mortality ranges, as well as the relevant conservation reference points.
Statistics of goods transport by inland waterways (codification) (A8-0154/2018 - Lidia Joanna Geringer de Oedenberg)
I voted in favour of the Report on the proposal for a regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council on statistics of goods transport by inland waterways. The proposal establishes common rules for the production of European statistics concerning inland waterways transport. It shall enable the Commission to have statistics concerning the transport of goods by inland waterways in order to monitor and develop the common transport policy, as well as the transport elements of policies on the regions and on trans-European networks. The committee recommended that the European Parliament adopt its position at first reading by adopting the Commission proposal as adapted to the recommendations of the Consultative Working Party of the Legal Services of the European Parliament, the Council and the Commission. In the opinion of the Consultative Working Party of the Legal Services of the European Parliament, the Council and the Commission, the proposal in question is limited to a straightforward codification of the existing texts, without any change in their substance.
EU-Switzerland Agreement on the cumulation of origin between the EU, Switzerland, Norway and Turkey in the framework of the Generalised System of Preferences (A8-0151/2018 - Tiziana Beghin)
I voted in favour of the Recommendation on the draft Council decision on the conclusion of an Agreement in the form of an Exchange of Letters between the European Union and the Swiss Confederation on the cumulation of origin between the European Union, the Swiss Confederation, the Kingdom of Norway and the Republic of Turkey in the framework of the Generalised System of Preferences. As set out in the explanatory memorandum accompanying the recommendation, the present agreement between the EU and Switzerland was negotiated in order to enact the changes brought by the reform of the General System of Preferences (GSP) rules of origin in 2010. The reform introduced a new system of cumulation of origin by registered exporters and provided for inclusion of Turkey in the system of cumulation which so far worked between the Union, Switzerland and Norway. The new legislation also provided for replaced the former Certificates of origin of Form A by a new system of establishment of proofs of origin by registered exporters (Registered Exporter (REX) system).
EU-Norway Agreement on the cumulation of origin between the EU, Switzerland, Norway and Turkey in the framework of the Generalised System of Preferences (A8-0152/2018 - Tiziana Beghin)
I voted in favour of the EU-Norway Agreement on the cumulation of origin between the EU, Switzerland, Norway and Turkey in the framework of the Generalised System of Preferences. As set out in the explanatory memorandum accompanying the recommendation, the present agreement between the EU and Norway was negotiated in order to enact the changes brought by the reform of the General System of Preferences (GSP) rules of origin in 2010. The reform introduced a new system of cumulation of origin by registered exporters and provided for inclusion of Turkey in the system of cumulation which so far worked between the Union, Switzerland and Norway. The new legislation also provided for replacing of the former Certificates of origin of Form A by a new system of establishment of proofs of origin by registered exporters (Registered Exporter (REX) system). Under the present agreement, the EU and Norway will give preferential treatment and access to products originating in beneficiary countries when these countries use materials originating respectively in the EU or in Norway.
EU-Norway Agreement on administrative cooperation, combating fraud and recovery of claims in the field of Value Added Tax (A8-0147/2018 - Miguel Viegas)
I voted in favour of the Report on the proposal for a Council decision on the conclusion, on behalf of the European Union, of the Agreement between the European Union and the Kingdom of Norway on administrative cooperation, combating fraud and recovery of claims in the field of Value Added Tax. As stated in the explanatory memorandum accompanying the report, the conclusion of cooperation agreements with the Union’s neighbours and trading partners is likely to improve the Member States’ ability to identify cases of VAT fraud and to combat this phenomenon while putting an end to the financial losses it generates. Norway is a Member of the European Economic Area with a VAT system similar to that applied in the EU, which enjoys a good tradition of cooperation in the field of VAT with the EU Member States. With the current legal framework, administrative cooperation with Norway is occasional and only possible on the basis of bilateral agreements between Norway and individual Member States, the Nordic convention or rare invitations to Norway to participate in the VAT observatory meetings as an observer.
Optimisation of the value chain in the EU fishing sector (A8-0163/2018 - Clara Eugenia Aguilera García)
I voted in favour of the report on the optimisation of the value chain in the EU fishing sector. The value chain of fisheries products is complex, going from producers through various middlemen to the retailer or restaurant. The report highlighted that fish brokers and fish processors play an important role in the value chain and that, on average, the margin in the value chain is such that only 10% goes to producers, and the remaining 90% is for intermediaries. Shortening of the value chain – notably through the establishment of producer organisations which are key players through their production and marketing plans – is an initial vehicle for improving the income of the small-scale fishers, but also for getting a better product (probably at a better price) to the consumer. Systems should be set up with a view to improving first-sale prices, so as to benefit fishermen by increasing the reward for their work, and promoting fair and proper distribution of added value along the sector’s value chain by reducing operating margins, raising the prices paid to producers, and limiting the prices paid by end consumers.
Implementation of CAP young farmers’ tools in the EU after the 2013 reform (A8-0157/2018 - Nicola Caputo)
I voted in favour of the report on the implementation of CAP young farmers’ tools in the EU after the 2013 reform.The report highlighted that the strengthening of a start-up aid measure for young farmers (young farmer grants) should be considered in any future CAP. While they welcomed the creation of an agricultural guarantee instrument, proposed by the Commission and the European Investment Bank (EIB) in March 2015 and which should make it easier for young farmers to access credit, Members recommended that access to finance be improved through subsidised interest rates on loans for new entrants, including from private financial operators, in particular, by implementing financial instruments to disburse interest-free loans for the investments of young farmers. They called for improved cooperation with the EIB and the European Investment Fund (EIF) in order to foster the creation of financial instruments dedicated to young farmers across all Member States. The Common Agricultural Policy (CAP) reform 2014-2020 introduced new measures to support young farmers in setting up farms.
Multiannual plan for demersal stocks in the North Sea and the fisheries exploiting those stocks (A8-0263/2017 - Ulrike Rodust)
I voted in favour of the report on the proposal for a regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council on establishing a multi-annual plan for demersal stocks in the North Sea and the fisheries exploiting those stocks and repealing Council Regulation (EC) 676/2007 and Council Regulation (EC) 1342/2008. The Regulation establishes a multiannual plan for the demersal stocks in the Union waters in International Council for the Exploration of the Sea (ICES) zones IIa, IIIa and IV (North Sea) and the fisheries, including recreational fisheries, exploiting those stocks. ‘Demersal stocks’ will cover those roundfish, flatfish and cartilaginous fish species, Norway lobster (Nephrops Norvegicus) and Northern prawn (Pandalus borealis) that live at or near the bottom of the water column. Measures of the multiannual plan based on the precautionary approach must guarantee a degree of conservation of the relevant stocks that is at least comparable to exploitation rates in accordance with the maximum sustainable yield. When allocating the fishing opportunities available to them, Member States should take account of transparent and objective criteria. In the case of joint management of stocks shared with third countries, Member States should allow the exchange of fishing opportunities.
Posting of workers in the framework of the provision of services (A8-0319/2017 - Elisabeth Morin-Chartier, Agnes Jongerius)
I voted in favour of the report on the proposal for a directive of the European Parliament and of the Council amending Directive 96/71/EC of The European Parliament and of the Council of 16 December 1996 concerning the posting of workers in the framework of the provision of services. The purpose of the Report is to address the unfair practices concerning the posting of workers in the framework of the provision of services. Posting of workers supports the cross-border provision of services in the Internal Market, particularly in construction and some personal and business services sectors. The Directive sets the EU regulatory framework to establish a balance between the objectives of promoting and facilitating the cross-border provision of services, providing protection to posted workers and ensuring a level-playing field between foreign and local competitors. It stipulates a ‘core set’ of terms and conditions of employment of the host Member State which are mandatory to be applied by foreign service providers. I voted in favour because I believe that the Directive seeks to ensure fair wage conditions to posted workers and a level playing field between posting and local companies in the host country.
Management, conservation and control measures applicable in the Convention Area of the South Pacific Regional Fisheries Management Organisation (A8-0377/2017 - Linnéa Engström)
I voted in favour of the Report on the proposal for a regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council laying down management, conservation and control measures applicable in the Convention Area of the South Pacific Regional Fisheries Management Organisation (SPRFMO). Pursuant to Council Decision 2012/130/EU the Union is a Contracting Party to the Convention on the Conservation and Management of High Seas Fishery Resources in the South Pacific Ocean (the SPRFMO Convention), which established the South Pacific Regional Fisheries Management Organisation (SPRFMO), since 26 July 2010. Within the SPRFMO, the Commission of the South Pacific Regional Fisheries Management Organisation is responsible for the adoption of measures designed to ensure the long-term conservation and sustainable use of fishery resources through the application of the precautionary approach and an ecosystem approach to fisheries management, and, in so doing, to safeguard the marine ecosystems in which these resources occur. Such measures may become binding upon the Union. The conservation and management measures adopted by SPRFMO must be fully transposed into Union law and uniformly and effectively implemented within the Union. This proposal aims at transposing already existing SPRFMO conservation and management measures, binding upon the Contracting Parties.
Sustainable finance (A8-0164/2018 - Molly Scott Cato)
I voted absent of the Report on sustainable finance. Members emphasised the instrumental role of economic, fiscal and monetary policy in fostering sustainable finance by facilitating capital allocation and the reorientation of investments towards more sustainable technologies and businesses, and towards decarbonised, disaster-resilient and resource-efficient economic activities which are able to reduce the current need for future resources and are thereby capable of meeting goals related to EU sustainability and to the Paris Agreement. They acknowledged that an appropriate and increasing price for greenhouse gas emissions is an important component in a functioning and efficient environmental and social market economy by correcting current market failures. They noted that the price in the European carbon market has been unstable and called on the Commission and the Member States to work towards phasing out direct and indirect subsidies for fossil fuels.
The 2017 EU Justice Scoreboard (A8-0161/2018 - Jytte Guteland)
I voted in favour of the Report on the 2017 EU Justice Scoreboard. Members underlined the importance of efficient and timely proceedings. However, they noted with concern that such proceedings are still too lengthy in some Member States and pointed out that a large backlog of pending cases might also make citizens and businesses less willing to trust the judicial system, as well as decrease legal certainty. Member States are encouraged to invest in the use and continued development of ICT tools in their judicial systems, in an effort to make them more accessible, more comprehensible and easier to use for all EU citizens, especially those with any form of disability and vulnerable groups, including national minorities and/or migrants. They are also called on to publish all court rulings online as this will help citizens and businesses become better acquainted with the judicial system as well as make it more transparent. Further training should be offered to judges in the fields of gender roles, norms and stereotypes, judicial ethics, IT skills, judicial management, mediation, and communication with parties and with the press.
EU-Korea Framework Agreement (accession of Croatia) (A8-0120/2018 - Tokia Saïfi)
I voted in favour of the recommendation on the draft Council decision on the conclusion, on behalf of the European Union and its Member States, of a Protocol to the Framework Agreement between the European Union and its Member States, of the one part, and the Republic of Korea, of the other part, to take account of the accession of the Republic of Croatia to the European Union. With this proposal, the Council is invited to adopt a decision to approve, on behalf of the European Union and its Member States, a Protocol to the Framework Agreement between the European Union and its Member States, of the one part, and the Republic of Korea, of the other part, to take account of the accession of Croatia to the European Union. In accordance with the Act of Accession of the Republic of Croatia, Croatia is to accede to the international agreements signed or concluded by the European Union and its Member States by means of protocols to those agreements. The Framework Agreement between the European Union and its Member States, of the one part, and Korea, of the other part, was signed on 10 May 2010.
Subjecting the new psychoactive substance ADB-CHMINACA to control measures (A8-0133/2018 - Maite Pagazaurtundúa Ruiz)
I voted in favour of the report on the draft Council implementing decision on subjecting the new psychoactive substance ADB-CHMINACA to control measures. The purpose of this proposal for a Council Implementing Decision is to call on the Member States to subject ADB-CHMINACA to control measures across the Union and criminal penalties as provided under their legislation by virtue of their obligations under the 1971 United Nations Single Convention on Narcotic Drugs. Currently, 13 Member States control ADB-CHMINACA under national drug control legislation and four Member States control ADB-CHMINACA under other legislation. Subjecting this substance to control measures across the Union would help avoid the emergence of obstacles in cross-border law enforcement and judicial cooperation, and would help guard against the risks that its availability and use can pose. This substance has no recognised human or veterinary medical use in the Union – nor, it appears, elsewhere. There are no indications that it may be used for any other purpose than as an analytical reference standard and in scientific research. The risk assessment report reveals that many of the questions related to ADB-CHMINACA could be answered through further research.
Subjecting the new psychoactive substance CUMYL-4CN-BINACA to control measures (A8-0134/2018 - Maite Pagazaurtundúa Ruiz)
. ‒ I voted in favour of the report on the draft Council implementing decision on subjecting the new psychoactive substance CUMYL-4CN-BINACA to control measures.On 15 September 2017, following the request made by the Commission and seven Member States and pursuant to Council Decision 2005/387/JHA on information exchange, risk-assessment and control in respect of new psychoactive substances, the Council requested an assessment of the risks caused by the use, manufacture and trafficking of the new psychoactive substance CUMYL-4CN-BINACA, the involvement of organised crime and the possible consequences of control measures introduced for the substance. A risk assessment report on the new psychoactive substance was drawn up by the Scientific Committee of the European Monitoring Centre for Drugs and Drug Addiction (EMCDDA), and was subsequently submitted to the Commission on 14 November 2017.Currently, nine Member States control CUMYL-4CN-BINACA under national drug-control legislation and five Member States control it under other legislation. Subjecting this substance to control measures across the Union would help avoid the emergence of obstacles to cross-border law enforcement and judicial cooperation, and would help protect people from the risks that the availability and use of the substance can pose.
Mobilisation of the European Globalisation Adjustment Fund: application EGF/2017/010 BE/Caterpillar (A8-0148/2018 - Eider Gardiazabal Rubial)
I voted in favour of the report on the proposal for a decision of the European Parliament and of the Council on the mobilisation of the European Globalisation Adjustment Fund for an application from Belgium – EGF/2017/010 BE/Caterpillar.In order to establish the link between the redundancies and major structural changes in world trade patterns due to globalisation, Belgium argues that the main reason behind the workforce reductions is the worldwide competition in the construction and mining machinery sectors, and the consequent loss of machinery market share by Caterpillar. The European mining sector’s production has decreased from EUR 234 million in 2012 to EUR 180 million in 2015, and EU28 exports have been in dramatic decline since 2014. The primary event in the Caterpillar redundancies was the company’s announcement on 2 September 2016 that it would start a collective redundancy procedure at its production plant located in Gosselies. This is Belgium’s second EGF application in relation to Caterpillar. In 2014, 1 399 workers were the subjects of the first EGF application involving redundancies at the enterprise. The current proposal covers the remaining 1 997 workers at the site.
Annual report 2016 on the protection of EU’s financial interests - Fight against fraud (A8-0135/2018 - Gilles Pargneaux)
I voted in favour of the Report on the Annual Report 2016 on the protection of the EU’s financial interests – Fight against fraud. The adoption of the Directive on the fight against fraud to the Union’s financial interests by means of criminal law (the PIF Directive) includes cross-border VAT fraud involving total damages of at least EUR 10 million. It also includes the decision of 20 Member States to proceed with the establishment of the European Public Prosecutor’s Office through enhanced cooperation. In this context, it called for effective cooperation among Member States, the EPPO, OLAF and Eurojust. The Parliament expressed concern about losses due to the VAT gap and fraud relating to EU VAT, which amounted to EUR 159.5 billion in 2015. They emphasised that the problems related to cross-border VAT fraud demand strong, coordinated and speedy measures. The Commission is urged to speed up its procedures to present its proposals for a definitive VAT system, as provided for in the action plan.
Annual report on the control of the financial activities of the European Investment Bank for 2016 (A8-0139/2018 - Marco Valli)
I voted in favour of the Report on the annual report on the control of the financial activities of the EIB for 2016. The EIB Group’s total financing of EUR 83.8 billion for 2016, mobilising EUR 280 billion of total investment that year. The set of EIB annual reports for 2016 presenting the various investing activities and their expected impacts. The EIB present a more comprehensive, detailed and harmonised annual activity report and significantly improve the presentation of the information. The report reiterated Parliament’s concern with regard to defining a balanced strategy with a dynamic, fair and transparent geographical distribution of projects and investments among Member States, taking into account the special focus on the less developed countries and regions. 70% of the EIB’s total lending for 2016 (EUR 46.8 billion) is concentrated in six Member States, which shows that not all Member States or regions are able to benefit equally from investment opportunities. It was noted that the United Kingdom subscribed 16.1% of the EIB’s capital, accounting for EUR 3.5 billion of the paid-in capital and EUR 35.7 billion of the Bank’s callable capital.
Presidential elections in Venezuela (B8-0225/2018)
. ‒ I voted in favour of the resolution on the elections in Venezuela. The early presidential elections called by the internationally non—recognised National Constituent Assembly and endorsed by the National Electoral Council (CNE) are now to be held on 20 May 2018, the CNE decided to limit participation in simultaneous local and regional elections to those parties that present candidates for the presidential elections. On 25 January 2018 the Venezuelan Supreme Court decided to exclude the Mesa de la Unidad Democrática (MUD), a coalition of opposition parties, from the presidential elections, which represents a serious breach of the principle of equitable elections, prohibiting opposition candidates from competing freely and on equal terms in the elections. Parliament strongly rejects the decision by the internationally non—recognised National Constituent Assembly endorsed by the National Electoral Council to hold the early presidential elections, currently scheduled for 20 May 2018, and calls for their immediate suspension until the necessary conditions for credible, transparent and inclusive elections are met.
Cohesion policy and thematic objective ‘promoting sustainable transport and removing bottlenecks in key network infrastructures’ (A8-0136/2018 - Andrey Novakov)
. ‒ I voted in favour of the Report on the implementation of cohesion policy and the thematic objective of ‘promoting sustainable transport and removing bottlenecks in key network infrastructures’ – Article 9(7) of the Common Provisions Regulation. The report noted that the EU’s cohesion policy stands as the single most visible instrument of European added value. Transport infrastructure investments under the thematic objective ‘promoting sustainable transport and removing bottlenecks in key network infrastructures’ are among cohesion policy’s most tangible achievements, which contribute to closing different divergence gaps within the EU and to building a strong single market for a competitive Europe. Members underlined that the Connecting Europe Facility (CEF), the European Regional and Development Fund (ERDF) and the Cohesion Fund (CF) should remain the core EU sources for transport infrastructure investments under the thematic objective of ‘promoting sustainable transport and removing bottlenecks in key network infrastructures’ in the next programming period. They proposed that, due to the high European added value and the extensive spillover effects generated, these funding sources should remain available and provide balanced coverage for all EU Member States and regions in order to contribute to the implementation of EU cohesion policy.
Protection of children in migration (B8-0218/2018)
I voted in favour of the Resolution on Protection of children in migration. The Parliament underlines the fact that all children, irrespective of their migration or refugee status, are first and foremost entitled to all the rights enshrined in the UN Convention on the Rights of the Child. The Commission should assist Member States in adopting and properly implementing a holistic rights-based approach in all child-related policies. The Parliament stresses the importance of building an individual plan based on the needs and other specific vulnerabilities of each child, taking into account the fact that children’s quality of life and well-being also require early integration, a community support system and having the chance to fulfil their full potential, takes the view that such an approach has also proven effective in preventing children from going missing. The Parliament calls on the Member States to implement the principle of the best interests of the child for all decisions concerning children, regardless of their status.
A global ban on animal testing for cosmetics (B8-0217/2018)
I voted in favour of the Resolution on global ban on animal testing for cosmetics. The Parliament recalls that the animal testing ban has led to increased research efforts to develop alternative testing methods, with effects going far beyond the cosmetics sector; notes that significant progress has also been made on the validation and regulatory acceptance of alternative methods. The Parliament also calls on the Commission, the Council and the Member States to make sufficient medium- to long-term funding available for the fast development, validation and introduction of alternative testing methods for the full replacement of animal testing for key toxicological endpoints such as carcinogenicity, reproduction toxicity and repeated dose toxicity. The resolution stresses the need for a sustained training and education effort to ensure proper knowledge of alternatives and processes in laboratories and among competent authorities. It points out that academic institutions have an important role to play in terms of promoting alternatives to animal testing in scientific disciplines and disseminating new knowledge and practices, which are available but not always widely used.
Current situation and future prospects for the sheep and goat sectors in the EU (A8-0064/2018 - Esther Herranz García)
. ‒ I voted in favour of the report on the current situation and future prospects for the sheep and goat sectors in the EU. The report noted that sheep and goat farming are low—profit sectors in most of the EU, with incomes among the lowest in the EU, chiefly as a result of high operating and regulatory costs. Imbalances in the food chain aggravate the vulnerability of these sectors and the Commission has so far failed to take the necessary regulatory action. The sheep and goat sectors account for 3% of European milk and 9% of European cheese production, and together they employ 1.5 million people in the European Union. Brexit could cause significant changes to intra—EU trade in sheep meat, given that the UK is the largest producer and the main gateway for imports from third countries. The Commission should provide incentives and support for sheep and goat farmers who can demonstrate that they have attained high vaccination coverage among their animals, in keeping with the European One Health Action Plan against Antimicrobial Resistance (AMR), as there would otherwise be little market incentive for farmers to do so.
Media pluralism and media freedom in the European Union (A8-0144/2018 - Barbara Spinelli)
. ‒ I voted in favour of the report on media pluralism and media freedom in the European Union.Parliament expresses deep concern at the abuses, crimes and deadly attacks still being committed against journalists and media workers in the Member States because of their activities. It calls on the Member States to do their utmost to prevent such violence, to ensure accountability, avoid impunity and guarantee that victims and their families have access to appropriate legal remedies. The House also calls on Member States to set up an independent and impartial regulatory body, in cooperation with journalists’ organisations, for monitoring, documenting and reporting on violence and threats against journalists and to deal with the protection and safety of journalists at national level.Members expressed concern, too, over the deteriorating working conditions for journalists and the degree of psychological violence they experience, and called on the Member States to set up national action plans, in close cooperation with journalists’ organisations, to improve the working conditions of journalists and to ensure that journalists will not be victims of psychological violence.
Common system of value added tax, with regard to the obligation to respect a minimum standard rate (A8-0124/2018 - Roberto Gualtieri)
. ‒ I voted in favour of the Report on the proposal for a Council directive amending Directive 2006/112/EC on the common system of value added tax, with regard to the obligation to respect a minimum standard rate. The minimum of 15% for the standard VAT rate has been prolonged six times since the Council agreed in 1992 on rules limiting the discretion of Member States to set VAT rates, requiring Member States to apply this minimum standard rate over a certain period.The proposal will finally permanently set an agreed limit that ensures the proper functioning of the internal market whilst leaving flexibility for Member States in setting the standard VAT rate, instead of numerous last-minute prolongations of a temporary minimum rate. This proposal is part of a series of several legislative Commission proposals aiming at reforming the EU VAT system, and moving towards a definitive EU VAT system. The rapporteur considered these reforms urgently necessary, and called upon Member States to agree and implement them swiftly.
Prevention of the use of the financial system for the purposes of money laundering or terrorist financing (A8-0056/2017 - Krišjānis Kariņš, Judith Sargentini)
. ‒ I voted in favour of the Report on the proposal for a directive of the European Parliament and of the Council amending the Directive on the prevention of the use of the financial system for the purposes of money laundering or terrorist financing. Directive (EU) 2015/849 shall also apply to: auditors, external accountants and tax advisors, or any other persons offering tax-related services and advice; estate agents including letting agents; persons trading in works of art and electronic money issuers and distributors. Offences relating to direct taxes and indirect taxes as defined in the national law of the Member States shall also apply. A shareholding of 10% plus one share or an ownership interest of more than 10% in the customer held by a natural person shall be an indication of direct ownership. Key transparency standards should be binding and guide the negotiation and renegotiation of Union trade agreements and partnerships. Member States shall ensure that competent authorities supervising credit and financial institutions cooperate with each other to the greatest extent possible, regardless of their respective nature or status. Such competent authorities should have an adequate legal basis for exchanging confidential information and cooperate to the widest extent possible.
Approval and market surveillance of motor vehicles and their trailers, and of systems, components and separate technical units intended for such vehicles (A8-0048/2017 - Daniel Dalton)
. ‒ I voted in favour of the Report on the proposal for a regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council on the approval and market surveillance of motor vehicles and their trailers, and of systems, components and separate technical units intended for such vehicles. The proposed amendments aim to clarify the roles and responsibilities of national type-approval authorities, testing centres and market surveillance bodies, in order to reinforce their independence and prevent conflicts of interest.Consumer protection is a priority of the European Union and everything should be done to prevent cheating by car manufacturers designed to manipulate pollution emission and fuel consumption tests in order to produce false results or circumvent any other rules. The proposal provides that the Commission may impose administrative fines (of up to EUR 30 000 per vehicle) on the manufacturer concerned in breach of the regulation. Administrative fines levied by the Commission may be used for the purposes of market surveillance measures and for measures to support persons negatively affected by infringements of this regulation or other such activities to the benefit of affected consumers and, where appropriate, environmental protection.
Organic production and labelling of organic products (A8-0311/2015 - Martin Häusling)
. ‒ I voted in favour of the Report on the proposal for a regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council on organic production and labelling of organic products. The principles and methods for organic production have to be applied throughout the whole process of organic farming/organic production. As well as principles concerning organic production, the regulation will establish the principles of organic production and the control and certification thereof, and lay down the rules concerning organic production, processing, distribution, and controls. It will provide the basis for sustainable development of organic production and its positive effects on the environment and public health, while ensuring the effective functioning of the internal market and fair competition, thereby helping farmers to achieve a fair income, ensuring consumer confidence and protecting consumer interests. The amendments concern the definitions needed to clarify provisions and positive lists for authorised substances foreseen in the annexes. They list a series of products originating from agriculture, including aquaculture and beekeeping, where such products are, or are intended to be, produced, prepared, labelled, distributed, placed on the EU market, or imported into or exported from the EU as organic.
Guidelines for the employment policies of the Member States (A8-0140/2018 - Miroslavs Mitrofanovs)
. ‒ I voted in favour of the Report on the proposal for a Council decision on guidelines for the employment policies of the Member States. The guidelines, other than framing the scope and direction for Member States’ policy coordination, also provide the basis for country—specific recommendations in the respective domains. The current set of ‘integrated guidelines’ underpin the Europe 2020 Strategy within the context of the approach to economic policymaking built on investment, structural reform and fiscal responsibility. Within this framework the integrated guidelines are to support the achievement of smart, sustainable and inclusive growth and the aims of the European Semester for economic policy coordination.The guidelines for the employment policies of the Member States are presented as a Council Decision on guidelines for the employment policies of the Member States – Part II of the Integrated Guidelines. The revised guidelines for the employment policies of the Member States have been amended to align the text with the principles of the European Pillar of Social Rights, with a view to improving Europe’s competitiveness and making it a better place to invest in, create jobs and foster social cohesion.
Estimates of revenue and expenditure for the financial year 2019 – Section I – European Parliament (A8-0146/2018 - Paul Rübig)
I voted in favour of the Report on Parliament’s estimates of revenue and expenditure for the financial year 2019. Parliament stresses that the share of Parliament’s budget in 2019 should be maintained at under 20% of Heading V and notes that the level of estimates for 2019 corresponds to 18.53 %, which is lower than that achieved in 2018 (18.85%) and the lowest part of Heading V in more than 15 years. It emphasises that the largest part of Parliament’s budget is fixed by statutory or contractual obligations and is subject to annual indexation. Due to the 2019 European elections, expenditure will be substantially higher in some areas, in particular in respect of Members who are not re-elected and their assistants, whilst savings, albeit of a lesser magnitude, will be generated in other areas as a result of the reduction in the volume of parliamentary business in an election year.
Proposal for a regulation of the European Parliament and the Council on European business statistics, amending Regulation (EC) no 184/2005 and repealing 10 legal acts in the field of business statistics (A8-0094/2018 - Janusz Lewandowski)
I voted in favour of the resolution on protection of investigative journalists in Europe: the case of Slovak journalist Jan Kuciak and Martina Kušnírová. The Parliament calls on the Slovak Prosecutor-General to look again into the criminal complaint submitted by Jan Kuciak after being threatened, and to investigate the reports that personal information was leaked after he filed several freedom of information requests with the Slovak authorities.The Commission shall safeguard, promote and apply the values enshrined in the Treaty on European Union and the Charter of Fundamental Rights, as well as in the ICCPR, and, in this context, monitor and address challenges to media freedom and pluralism across the EU, while respecting the principle of subsidiarity. The Parliament strongly calls for a regular process of monitoring and dialogue involving all Member States in order to safeguard the EU’s basic values of democracy, fundamental rights and the rule of law, involving the Council, the Commission and Parliament.
Protection of investigative journalists in Europe: the case of Slovak journalist Ján Kuciak and Martina Kušnírová (B8-0186/2018)
I voted in favour of the Resolution on protection of investigative journalists in Europe: the case of Slovak journalist Jan Kuciak and Martina Kušnírová. The Parliament calls on the Slovak Prosecutor-General to look again into the criminal complaint submitted by Jan Kuciak after being threatened, and to investigate the reports that personal information was leaked after he filed several freedom of information requests with the Slovak authorities. The Commission shall safeguard, promote and apply the values enshrined in the Treaty on European Union and the Charter of Fundamental Rights, as well as in the ICCPR, and, in this context, to monitor and address challenges to media freedom and pluralism across the EU, while respecting the principle of subsidiarity. The Parliament strongly calls for a regular process of monitoring and dialogue involving all Member States in order to safeguard the EU’s basic values of democracy, fundamental rights and the rule of law, involving the Council, the Commission and Parliament.
A European values instrument to support civil society organisations which promote democracy, rule of law and fundamental values within the European Union (B8-0189/2018)
I voted in favour of the resolution on the need to establish a European Values Instrument to support civil society organisations (CSOs) which promote fundamental values within the European Union at local and national level. The EU provides direct funding – the European Instrument for Democracy and Human Rights – to CSOs operating in third countries to foster EU values, but funds for CSOs promoting values within the EU are very limited, particularly for CSOs operating at local and national level. CSOs are facing difficulties to secure enough funds to develop and perform their activities independently and effectively. Parliament calls on the EU to set up a funding instrument – the European Values Instrument – for the promotion and protection of EU values, especially democracy, freedom, rule of law and fundamental rights, within the EU budget of the next Multiannual Financial Framework (MFF). The new instrument should be complementary to already existing European funds and should be financed with the fresh money.
The violation of human rights and the rule of law in the case of two Greek soldiers arrested and detained in Turkey (B8-0194/2018, B8-0196/2018)
I voted in favour of the resolution on the violation of human rights and the rule of law in the case of two Greek soldiers arrested and detained in Turkey. Parliament calls on the Turkish authorities to swiftly conclude the judicial process and release the two detained Greek soldiers and return them to Greece. The Council, Commission, External Action Service and all EU Member States have to show solidarity with Greece and call for the immediate release of the two Greek soldiers in any contacts or communications with Turkish leaders and authorities, in the spirit of international law and good neighbourly relations. The Turkish authorities have to scrupulously follow legal proceedings and fully respect, for all those concerned, the human rights enshrined in international law, including the Geneva Convention.
Implementation of the Treaty provisions concerning national Parliaments (A8-0127/2018 - Paulo Rangel)
I voted in favour of the report on the implementation of the Treaty provisions concerning national parliaments. The report noted that national parliaments improve and contribute actively to the good constitutional functioning of the European Union (Article 12 TEU), thereby playing an important role in its democratic legitimacy and realising it to the fullest extent. While reaffirming that Article 12 TEU and Protocol No 1 give national parliaments the right to receive information directly from the European institutions, Members stressed that national parliaments could better cope with the information sent to them either by virtue of the EWS, or under their right to information, if the IPEX platform was given the relevance of an Agora, or forum, for an informal permanent dialogue among national parliaments and between these and the European institutions. They resolved, therefore, to promote the use of the platform for the enhancement of political dialogue. The report is recommending that national parliaments use the IPEX platform in a timely fashion to ensure an early start to the national scrutiny mechanism.
Annual Report on Competition Policy (A8-0049/2018 - Ramon Tremosa i Balcells)
I voted in favour of the Report on the Annual Report on Competition Policy. The Report on Competition Policy, published annually, provides detailed information on the most important policy and legislative initiatives, and on decisions adopted by the European Commission in application of EU competition law during the previous year. Competition policy is interlinked with taxation policy, and fair tax treatment between undertakings is essential for the integrity of the internal market and a level playing field. Parliament encourages the Commission to strengthen its efforts to tackle all types of illegal state aid that distort competition in the internal market and notes the importance of compliance with precise and effective competition rules. Parliament calls on the Commission to ensure the fairness of the terms and conditions imposed by certain dominant on-line platforms on suppliers, particularly SMEs, for example with regard to price parity and conditional parity clauses which may undermine free competition, especially in the Digital Single Market, and asks the Commission to further analyse such clauses and, if needed, to propose restrictions on their use.
Vaccine hesitancy and drop in vaccination rates in Europe (B8-0188/2018, B8-0195/2018)
I voted in favour of the resolution on vaccine hesitancy and drop in vaccination rates in Europe. Vaccines could potentially play a big role in reducing the need for antibiotics, thereby helping to limit the spread of antimicrobial resistance (AMR), which should continue to be explored. Urgently reducing the overuse and misuse of, and unintended exposure to, antibiotics must remain a top priority. Parliament proposes that researchers subject to a conflict of interest be excluded from evaluation panels, calls for the confidentiality of the deliberations of the EMA’s evaluation panel to be lifted and also proposes that the scientific and clinical data which inform the conclusions of the panel, and whose anonymity is guaranteed in advance, be made public. Member States and the Commission shall promote awareness-raising campaigns among healthcare professionals who provide vaccinations, which underline their obligation, both moral and ethical, to protect public health by providing patients (or patients’ legal guardians) with sufficient information about vaccines so that they can make an informed decision.
Implementation of the European Protection Order Directive (A8-0065/2018 - Soraya Post, Teresa Jiménez-Becerril Barrio)
I voted in favour of the report on the implementation of Directive 2011/99/EU on the European Protection Order. This instrument is based on the principle of mutual recognition, which means that protection orders issued in one Member State have to be recognised and enforced in another Member State. One of the main challenges in the application of this instrument is to ensure that the protection of victims is not hampered by the diversity of national measures. An important point is the need to provide adequate information to the protected person, including the possibility of requesting an EPO if he/she is moving to another Member State. The authors of the study point to great deficiencies in that regard and underline a general lack of information and awareness campaigns targeted at the victims themselves across the Member States. In these situations, the lack of access to information is detrimental to victims’ protection. As EPOs always imply the moving of a victim from one Member State to another, all victims at some point will be confronted with an unknown legal system or language, placing them in a particularly vulnerable situation.
Implementation of the Bologna Process – state of play and follow-up (B8-0190/2018)
. ‒ I voted in favour of the resolution on the implementation of the Bologna Process – state of play and follow-up. Тhe Bologna Process is an intergovernmental initiative, with which countries, in open and collaborative dialogue, aim to achieve common goals through internationally agreed commitments, thus contributing to the construction of the European Higher Education Area (EHEA), which provides equal opportunities and quality education. The Bologna Process has promoted mobility by enhancing the internationalisation of higher education and improving the compatibility and comparability of standards in different higher education systems, while respecting the principles of academic freedom and institutional autonomy and focusing on strengthening the quality of higher education and offering equal opportunities for citizens.Education is one of the main pillars of our society and higher education has an important role to play in fostering personal and skills development, boosting employability and competitiveness, strengthening civic engagement, active citizenship and intercultural understanding, promoting common values, and addressing the challenges of a rapidly changing world.
EU-Australia Framework Agreement (A8-0110/2018 - Francisco José Millán Mon)
. ‒ I voted in favour of the recommendation on the draft Council decision on the conclusion, on behalf of the Union, of the Framework Agreement between the European Union and its Member States, of the one part, and Australia, of the other part. The purpose of the agreement is to: establish a strengthened partnership between the parties; provide a framework to facilitate and promote cooperation across a broad range of areas of mutual interest; and enhance cooperation to develop solutions to regional and global challenges. The content of the agreement covers three pillars: political cooperation on foreign policy and security issues of common interest; cooperation on economic and trade matters, including economic policy dialogue, promoting trade and investment, and sectoral economic and trade issues; and sectoral cooperation, including in the areas of environment, climate change, migration and asylum, research and innovation.
EU-Australia Framework Agreement (Resolution) (A8-0119/2018 - Francisco José Millán Mon)
. ‒ I voted in favour of the resolution on the draft Council decision on the conclusion, on behalf of the Union, of the Framework Agreement between the European Union and its Member States, of the one part, and Australia, of the other part. The purpose of the agreement is: to establish a strengthened partnership between the parties; to provide a framework to facilitate and promote cooperation across a broad range of areas of mutual interest; and to enhance cooperation to develop solutions to regional and global challenges. The content of the agreement covers three pillars: political cooperation on foreign-policy and security issues of common interest; cooperation on economic and trade matters, including economic-policy dialogue, promoting trade and investment matters, and sectoral economic and trade issues; as well as sectoral cooperation, including in the areas of environment, climate change, migration and asylum, research and innovation.
Council of Europe Convention on the Prevention of Terrorism (A8-0131/2018 - Helga Stevens)
. ‒ I voted in favour of the recommendation on the draft Council decision on the conclusion, on behalf of the European Union, of the Council of Europe Convention on the Prevention of Terrorism. This proposal concerns the decision to conclude Convention No 196 on behalf of the Union. It must be read together with a proposal concerning a decision to conclude the Additional Protocol (Convention No 217) that supplements the Convention on the Prevention of Terrorism (Convention No 196).Convention No 196 defines criminal offences related to terrorism, an area for which the Union has competence under Article 83(1) TFEU. It covers areas to which the ordinary legislative procedure applies, including the setting of minimum rules for the definition of criminal offences in the area of terrorism, as well as police and judicial cooperation in criminal matters. The purpose of Convention No 196 is to enhance the efforts of the parties, both by measures taken at national level and through international cooperation, in preventing terrorism and its negative effects on the full enjoyment of human rights, in particular the right to life.
Council of Europe Convention on the Prevention of Terrorism (Additional Protocol) (A8-0132/2018 - Helga Stevens)
. ‒ I voted in favour of the Recommendation on the draft Council decision on the conclusion, on behalf of the European Union, of the Council of Europe Convention on the Prevention of Terrorism. This proposal concerns the decision to conclude Convention No 196 on behalf of the Union. It must be read together with a proposal concerning a decision to conclude the Additional Protocol (Convention No 217) that supplements the Convention on the Prevention of Terrorism (Convention No 196). Convention No 196 defines criminal offences related to terrorism, an area for which the Union has competence under Article 83(1) TFEU. It covers areas to which the ordinary legislative procedure applies, including the setting of minimum rules for the definition of criminal offences in the area of terrorism, as well as police and judicial cooperation in criminal matters.The purpose of Convention No 196 is to enhance the efforts of the parties, both by measures taken at national level and through international cooperation, in preventing terrorism and its negative effects on the full enjoyment of human rights, in particular the right to life.
Packaging and packaging waste (A8-0029/2017 - Simona Bonafè)
I voted in favour of the report on the proposal for a directive of the European Parliament and of the Council amending Directive 94/62/EC on packaging and packaging waste. The current linear development model, which may be summarised as ‘take, produce, consume and dispose of’, is beginning to show signs of reaching its limits. Our planet is warming, and the resources used, on which we depend, are becoming increasingly scarce. Unless structural measures are taken, demand for raw materials by the world economy could increase by more than 50% in the next 15 years. In order to reverse this trend, we must adopt a circular development model which keeps materials and their value in circulation within the economic system for as long as possible by optimising the integrated waste cycle in order to put resources to efficient use. Quantitative prevention and qualitative improvement of packaging should be the primary objective of a revision of the Directive, in line with the principles on which the circular economy is based. It is necessary to remove incentives for the excessive use of packaging imposed on the consumer, promoting the design of packaging which can be recycled and/or re-used more easily.
End-of-life vehicles, waste batteries and accumulators and waste electrical and electronic equipment (A8-0013/2017 - Simona Bonafè)
I voted in favour of the report on the proposal for a directive of the European Parliament and of the Council amending the directives on end-of-life vehicles, on batteries and accumulators and waste batteries and accumulators, and on waste electrical and electronic equipment. Parliament stressed that an effective and sustainable circular economy requires the removal of hazardous substances from products at the design stage and, in this context, it stressed the importance of encouraging effective and low—energy consumption management of secondary raw materials. Once recycled material re-enters the economy, as it receives end-of-waste status, it is required to be fully compliant with Union chemicals legislation. The aim of this proposal is simplify the obligations of Member States as far as reporting obligations are concerned and align them with the reporting provisions in the Waste Framework Directive, the Packaging and Packaging Waste Directive and the Landfill Directive. This proposal is also intended to align the comitology provisions to the Lisbon Treaty.
Waste (A8-0034/2017 - Simona Bonafè)
I voted in favour of the report on the proposal for a directive of the European Parliament and of the Council amending Directive 2008/98/EC on waste. The package should be viewed in a far broader context than that of a mere review of waste legislation. The rapporteur seeks to encourage the Commission in its aim of preserving the environment, making the European economy more competitive and promoting sustainable reindustrialisation. Increasing the value of resources means intervening in all phases of the product life cycle: from extraction of raw materials to product design and from distribution, through consumption, to products’ end of life. A clear and stable legislative framework is the first step in promoting the transition. The transformation of the Union into a green, low-carbon economy which uses resources efficiently is already one of the main objectives of the Seventh European Environmental Action Programme, and it is worth recalling that Europe has committed itself to attaining the UN’s sustainable development targets. In order to achieve those aims, the amendments to the Waste Framework Directive should hinge around two main objectives: strengthening waste prevention measures and encouraging the development of an efficient secondary raw materials market.
Landfill of waste (A8-0031/2017 - Simona Bonafè)
I voted in favour of the report on the proposal for a directive of the European Parliament and of the Council amending Directive 1999/31/EC on the landfill of waste. The amount of waste that is landfilled is a strong indicator and restrictions on landfilling can be used as a lever in the context of a circular economy. The targets in the Landfill Directive and in the Waste Framework Directive are interlinked; a reduction in the amounts of landfilled waste can only be accomplished and must go hand in hand with higher targets for the collection and recycling of waste. Landfilling should only be a last resort for waste that can be neither avoided nor recycled or recovered or at least minimised and decontaminated. Parliament therefore welcomes the Commission’s proposal to amend the Landfill Directive and to further limit the landfilling of municipal waste. The Commission’s proposal introduces a target for a maximum of 10% of municipal waste to be landfilled by 2030. It also provides for an optional additional five—year transition period for seven specific Member States. Furthermore, it introduces an early warning system in cooperation with the European Environment Agency and amends the reporting scheme. Finally, it updates the provisions for secondary legislation.
Procedural rules in the field of environmental reporting (A8-0253/2017 - Francesc Gambús)
I voted in favour of the Report on the proposal for a decision of the European Parliament and of the Council amending Directives of the Council, Directives of the European Parliament as regards procedural rules in the field of environmental reporting and repealing. The proposal for a decision aims to repeal Council Directive 91/692/EEC on the standardisation of reports and amends six legal acts referring to it. Members pointed out that the objective of the proposed decision was in line with the principle of subsidiarity and the principle of proportionality. With regard to Directive 2009/31/EC on the geological storage of carbon dioxide and Directive 86/278/EEC on the protection of the environment, and in particular of soil, when using sewage sludge in agriculture, Members requested that the power to adopt delegated acts should be conferred on the Commission for a period of five years with the possibility of tacitly extending the delegation of power for periods of identical duration.
Integrity policy of the Commission, in particular the appointment of the Secretary-General of the European Commission (B8-0214/2018)
I voted in favour of the Resolution on Integrity policy of the Commission, in particular the appointment of the Secretary-General of the European Commission. The Parliament regrets that the procedure for the appointment of the new Secretary-General of the European Commission on 21 February 2018 was conducted in a manner which provoked widespread irritation and disapproval in public opinion, among Members of the European Parliament and within the European civil service. It notes that the result of this procedure constitutes a reputational risk not only for the European Commission but for all the European Union institutions. The Parliament recalls that only through the proper publication of vacant posts is it possible to secure a wide gender-balanced choice of the most qualified candidates, allowing for informed and optimal appointment decisions, stresses that publication procedures whose sole purpose is to fulfil the formal requirement for publication must be avoided by all European institutions and bodies.The decision-making processes and procedures of the College of Commissioners need to be strengthened in order to avoid any indiscriminate waving-through of appointments or other important decisions, and that it is therefore necessary for all such items to be included in the draft agenda.
Progress on UN Global compacts for safe, orderly and regular migration and on refugees (B8-0184/2018)
I voted in favour of the resolution to wind up the debate on the statement by the Vice-President of the Commission / High Representative of the Union for Foreign Affairs and Security Policy pursuant to Rule 123(2) of the Rules of Procedure on progress on the UN Global Compacts for Safe, Orderly and Regular Migration and on Refugees.Parliament strongly believes that it is now time to bring together all elements of the UN’s architecture, including the International Organisation for Migration (IOM), to support international efforts to manage migration and consolidate cooperation. It deeply regrets, therefore, the decision of the US administration to end its participation in the negotiations for a Global Compact for Safe, Orderly and Regular Migration. We call for the EU to show leadership in this process and to condemn other countries which exit the negotiations or succeed in watering down the content of the final Compact. The EU should live up to its responsibility as a global actor and to work to ensure the successful completion of the negotiations. It insists on the need for EU Member States to demonstrate unity and to speak with one voice in support of an international human rights-based regime for managing migration.
Implementation of the EU external financing instruments: mid-term review 2017 and the future post-2020 architecture (A8-0112/2018 - Marietje Schaake)
I voted in favour of the Report on the implementation of the EU external financing instruments: mid-term review 2017 and the future post-2020 architecture. Members called for funding of external relations instruments to reflect ambitious external actions, and for the budget for the EU as a global player to be increased. They stressed that in the event of the United Kingdom withdrawing from the European Union, the current budget ratio destined for external action should be increased or at least maintained at current levels. The current architecture of the instruments lacks strategic and overarching vision and is managed by different services within both the Commission and EEAS. This has proven at times to be inefficient and incoherent. At the same time, legal barriers and institutional structures have prevented flexibility, which has reduced the EU’s capacity to swiftly respond to new and emerging challenges.The new MFF, set to come into force in 2020, provides for an opportunity to improve at least the current institutional structure of EU external funding. It should directly contribute to greater efficiency, flexibility and transparency of EU external relations, with the aim of strengthening EU values and interests worldwide.
Annual reports 2015-2016 on subsidiarity and proportionality (A8-0141/2018 - Mady Delvaux)
I voted in favour of the Report on the Annual Reports 2015-2016 on subsidiarity and proportionality. The report looks at how the European Union’s institutions and bodies implemented these two principles in 2016 and how the practice has evolved in comparison with previous years. It also provides an analysis of the Commission proposals that were the subject of reasoned opinions from national Parliaments during the year. This report on subsidiarity and proportionality aims to analyse the application of these principles by the European institutions and their partners with a view to meeting the expectations of citizens and their national institutions. It is one of the reports drawn up every year by the Committee on Legal Affairs. Given the accumulated backlog in adopting these reports since the start of the legislature, it was decided that the analysis for 2015 and 2016 should be merged. The principles of subsidiarity and proportionality are fundamental principles inherent to the efficient running of the Union. The Lisbon Treaty gave these principles a position of prominence, enshrining them in Article 5 of the Treaty on European Union.
Discharge 2016: EU general budget - Commission and executive agencies (A8-0137/2018 - Joachim Zeller)
I voted in favour of the report on discharge in respect of the implementation of the general budget of the European Union for the financial year 2016, Section III – Commission and executive agencies. Budget, programming periods and political priorities: Members insisted that the Union budget, as a consequence of the ‘budget focused on results initiative’, be presented according to the Union’s political objectives for the MFF. In the light of the post-2020 MFF, the Union budget should be a true European added value budget, aimed at common Union objectives promoting the sustainable economic and social development of the whole Union. They expressed the need to establish an independent disclosure, advice and referral body in order to help whistle-blowers use the right channels to disclose information on possible irregularities while protecting their confidentiality and offering needed support and advice. Some of the main priorities are: reviewing the young farmers’ and greening schemes for the next MFF; providing Parliament and the Court with more balanced reporting, by including in its performance reports more transparent information on challenges, pitfalls and failures; improving the transparency of migration policy financing and actively monitoring public procurement procedures when they are held in emergency situations.
Discharge 2016: Court of Auditors' special reports in the context of the 2016 Commission discharge (A8-0130/2018 - Joachim Zeller)
I voted in favour of the report on the Court of Auditors’ special reports in the context of the 2016 Commission discharge. Parliament welcomes the Court’s special report, which is in the form of a meta-audit presenting an overview of the Commission’s management of pre-accession assistance in Albania, Bosnia and Herzegovina, Kosovo, the former Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia, Montenegro and Serbia, and sets out its observations and recommendations below. We call on all stakeholders both to pay particular attention to the definition of qualitative national strategies and national and regional programmes that would include clear, realistic and measurable objectives and to better link the design of programmes in the beneficiary country to these strategies and respective needs assessments. Parliament supports the efforts of the Western Balkans countries’ authorities to pursue efforts in key areas of good governance and towards reform of their public administration, including in the area of financial control in the context of public finance management, and invites all actors to intensify efforts for developing or consolidating strategies to coordinate the implementation of public finance management reform.
Discharge 2016: EU general budget - 8th, 9th, 10th and 11th EDFs (A8-0123/2018 - Barbara Kappel)
I voted in favour of the report on discharge in respect of the implementation of the budget of the eighth, ninth, tenth and eleventh European Development Funds for the financial year 2016. The report welcomed the continuous efforts made by the Commission’s services to ameliorate the overall financial management of the EDFs with regard to old outstanding pre-financing commitments and payments. The efforts of the Commission services to improve the overall financial management of the EDFs with regard to the old outstanding pre-financing payments and commitments. It regretted, however, that according to the Court of Auditors, the supervisory and control systems were still assessed as only partially effective. Members reiterated their concern about the Court’s assessment of the legality and regularity of payments underlying the accounts, which are materially affected by error. They were concerned by the recurrence and persisting typology of errors, in particular in the area of public procurement. The Commission should refine its existing corrective action plan, in particular when quantifiable errors point to shortcomings in the checks by international organisations on compliance with contractual provisions.
Discharge 2016: EU general budget - European Parliament (A8-0105/2018 - Derek Vaughan)
I voted in favour of the report on discharge in respect of the implementation of the general budget of the European Union for the financial year 2016, Section I – European Parliament. The report noted that, according to the Court, the costs of the geographic dispersion of Parliament amount to EUR 114 million per year. Members recalled that the estimate of the environmental impact of that dispersal is between 11 000 to 19 000 tonnes of CO2 emissions and called on the Council to find a solution for this waste of taxpayers money. Members considered it appropriate to keep the small increase in budget line 422 ‘Expenditure related to parliamentary assistance’, taking into account the higher workload through Brexit, the growing number of trilogues and increasing number of temporary and special committees, which has reached a historical record of 25 standing and temporary committees, and the coincidence of the end of legislature with the complex package of legislative MFF proposals.
Discharge 2016: EU general budget - European Council and Council (A8-0116/2018 - Ingeborg Gräßle)
I voted in favour of the report on discharge in respect of the implementation of the general budget of the European Union for the financial year 2016, Section II – European Council and Council. The report reiterated that the budget of the European Council and the Council should be separated in order to contribute to the transparency of the financial management of the institutions and to improve the accountability of both institutions. Members expressed their support for the successful paradigm shift towards performance-based budgeting in the Commission’s budget planning and encouraged the European Council and the Council to apply the method to their own budget-planning procedure. Members regretted the decision by the UK to withdraw from the Union and stated that at this point no predictions can be made about the financial, administrative, human and other consequences related to the withdrawal. The European Council and the Council are asked to perform impact assessments and inform Parliament of the results by the end of the year 2018.
Discharge 2016: EU general budget - Court of Auditors (A8-0089/2018 - Ingeborg Gräßle)
I voted in favour of the report on discharge in respect of the implementation of the general budget of the European Union for the financial year 2016, Section V – Court of Auditors. Members welcomed the overall prudent and sound financial management of the Court in the 2016 budget period and expressed support for the successful paradigm shift towards performance-based budgeting in the Commission’s budget planning. They encouraged the Court to apply the method to its own budget-planning procedure. The report noted that the Court reformed its chambers and committees in 2016 with significant impact on the preparation of its work. This reform is complementary to the introduction of a task-based organisation and the establishment of an institution-wide network to strengthen knowledge management. The Court is asked to provide more detailed data on each institution in order to achieve a better view of the weaknesses in administrative expenditures. Members considered that country specific reporting by the Court for every Member State would be welcome in the future.
Discharge 2016: EU general budget - European Economic and Social Committee (A8-0097/2018 - Ingeborg Gräßle)
I voted in favour of the report on discharge in respect of the implementation of the general budget of the European Union for the financial year 2016, Section VI – European Economic and Social Committee. No significant weaknesses were identified in respect of the audited topics relating to human resources and procurement. Financial and budgetary management: Members welcomed the overall prudent and sound financial management of the Committee in the 2016 budget period. They expressed support for the successful paradigm shift towards performance-based budgeting in the Commission’s budget planning. They encouraged the Committee to apply that method to its own budget-planning procedure. Parliament recommended to the EESC to continue applying performance-based budget principles in its daily operations and keep Parliament informed of the update of the key activity performance indicators (KAPIs) in 2017, to provide the discharge authority with clarifications of expenditure in connection with the modernisation of the Committee, in order to boost transparency and accountability, and to publish the cost-benefit assessment, and to provide the discharge authority with a cost-benefit assessment of the missions for the Union and visited countries, and the list of the countries visited in 2016.
Discharge 2016: EU general budget - Committee of the Regions (A8-0117/2018 - Ingeborg Gräßle)
I voted in favour of the report on discharge in respect of the implementation of the general budget of the European Union for the financial year 2016, Section VII – Committee of the Regions. The report welcomed the administrative cooperation agreement between the Committee and the European Economic and Social Committee, which entered into force in 2016 and provides for shared translation and logistics directorates. This agreement will ensure also further efficiency in both committees’ performance and economic savings. The reopening of the direct access between the RMD and the REM buildings was also welcomed following the decision by Belgian authorities to reduce the threat level for European Institutions. This will facilitate the communication and cooperation between Parliament and the Committee. Parliament noted the lack of progress concerning the continued shortage of women holding senior and middle management posts and encouraged the Committee to improve its performance in this regard.
Discharge 2016: EU general budget - European External Action Service (A8-0128/2018 - Marco Valli)
I voted in favour of the report on discharge in respect of the implementation of the general budget of the European Union for the financial year 2016, Section X – European External Action Service. Parliament regretted that the Court found again, as in 2015, weaknesses in procurement procedures organised by Union delegations for contracts worth less than EUR 60 000. The report acknowledged that the EEAS undertook a series of initiatives aiming at reducing errors in procurement procedures by improving the training, support and advice provided to the delegation staff responsible for procurement. The EEAS is asked to continue its efforts to actively support and monitor the implementation of procurement rules and procedures in the delegations in order to improve the overall compliance and effectiveness of their tendering procedures and contract management. Parliament recommended to the EEAS to continue its efforts to actively support and monitor the implementation of procurement rules and procedures in the delegations in order to improve the overall compliance and effectiveness of their tendering procedures and contract management and to consider the possibility of introducing global or regional procurement procedures covering several Union delegations to replace individual low-value contracts.
Discharge 2016: EU general budget - European Ombudsman (A8-0100/2018 - Ingeborg Gräßle)
I voted in favour of the report on discharge in respect of the implementation of the general budget of the European Union for the financial year 2016, Section VIII – European Ombudsman. The report noted that the Ombudsman closed five strategic inquiries and opened four new ones in 2016 on issues related, inter alia, to transparency and conflicts of interest. Results in the handling of complaints was noted in 2016. Union institutions complied with the Ombudsman’s decisions at a rate of 84% (83% in 2015). This has been the second highest rate of compliance with the Ombudsman’s decisions and recommendations so far. Parliament welcomed the fact that the Court of Auditors observed that no significant weaknesses had been identified in respect of the audited topics relating to human resources and procurement for the Ombudsman. The Court concluded that the payments as a whole for the year ended on 31 December 2016 for administrative and other expenditure of the institutions and bodies were free from material error.
Discharge 2016: EU general budget - European Data Protection Supervisor (A8-0099/2018 - Ingeborg Gräßle)
I voted in favour of the report on discharge in respect of the implementation of the general budget of the European Union for the financial year 2016, Section IX – European Data Protection Supervisor. The report noted the Supervisor has published in its annual activity report a chapter about inter—institutional cooperation with other institutions as was requested in the 2015 discharge report. It noted that in 2016 the Supervisor signed two new Single Cooperation Agreements and called on the Supervisor to continue strengthening inter—institutional cooperation and to provide an update on its achievements in its next annual activity report. Parliament called on the Supervisor to include in its annual activity report: a detailed list of missions undertaken by its members in 2016, indicating the price, the place and the cost of each mission, the missions undertaken in 2017 to be included in its next annual activity report and information on implementing measures to ensure effective internal control of the processes in order to guarantee an economic, efficient and effective achievement of the Supervisor’s objectives.
Discharge 2016: Performance, financial management and control of EU agencies (A8-0115/2018 - Bart Staes)
I voted in favour of the report on discharge in respect of the implementation of the budget of the European Union agencies for the financial year 2016: performance, financial management and control. Parliament emphasised that the agencies are highly visible in the Member States and have a significant influence on policy and decision—making and programme implementation in areas of vital importance to European citizens, such as health, safety, security, freedom and justice, research and industrial development, economic and monetary affairs, employment and social progress. Parliament expressed concern that in general the visibility of agencies for European citizens is still limited, whereas a high level of visibility is required for their accountability and independence. The report called on the Commission to work in close cooperation with the agencies Network and the individual agencies when preparing its proposal for the post-2020 Multiannual Financial Framework and examining alternative sources of financing for the Union’s decentralised agencies.
Discharge 2016: Agency for the Cooperation of Energy Regulators (ACER) (A8-0074/2018 - Bart Staes)
I voted in favour of the report on discharge in respect of the implementation of the budget of the Agency for the Cooperation of Energy Regulators for the financial year 2016. Noting that the Court of Auditors stated that it had obtained reasonable assurance that the annual accounts of the Agency for the financial year 2016 were reliable and that the underlying transactions were legal and regular, Members called on Parliament to approve the closure of the Agency’s accounts. A number of recommendations need to be taken into account when discharge is granted, in addition to the general recommendations that appear in the draft resolution on the performance, financial management and control of EU agencies – the Agency’s financial statements, budget and financial management and commitments and carryovers. Parliament also made a series of observations regarding staff policy and internal controls. In particular, it welcomed the decision adopted in 2017 by the administrative board on preventing psychological and sexual harassment.
Discharge 2016: Office of the Body of European Regulators for Electronic Communications (BEREC) (A8-0069/2018 - Bart Staes)
I voted in favour of the report on discharge in respect of the implementation of the budget of the Office of the Body of European Regulators for Electronic Communications for the financial year 2016. Noting that the Court of Auditors stated that it had obtained reasonable assurance that the annual accounts of the Office for the financial year 2016 were reliable and that the underlying transactions were legal and regular, Members called on Parliament to approve the closure of the Office’s accounts. They made, however, a number of recommendations that need to be taken into account when discharge is granted, in addition to the general recommendations that appear in the draft resolution on performance, financial management and control of EU agencies – the Office’s financial statements, legality and regularity of transactions, budget and financial management, commitments and carryovers. Members also made a series of observations regarding transfers, procurement, staff policy, the prevention and management of conflicts of interests and internal audits.
Discharge 2016: Translation Centre for the Bodies of the European Union (CdT) (A8-0106/2018 - Bart Staes)
I voted in favour of the report on discharge in respect of the implementation of the budget of the Translation Centre for the Bodies of the European Union for the financial year 2016. Noting that the Court of Auditors stated that it had obtained reasonable assurance that the annual accounts of the Centre for the financial year 2016 were reliable and that the underlying transactions were legal and regular, Members called on Parliament to approve the closure of the Centre’s accounts. Parliament noted that the final budget of the Centre for the financial year 2016 was EUR 50 576 283, representing an increase of 2% compared to 2015. Members strongly regretted that the Centre does not yet have a business continuity plan in place and thus is not complying with the Internal Control Standard. The Centre is urged to inform the discharge authority about further action.
Discharge 2016: European Centre for the Development of Vocational Training (Cedefop) (A8-0068/2018 - Bart Staes)
I voted in favour of the report on discharge in respect of the implementation of the budget of the European Centre for the Development of Vocational Training for the financial year 2016. Noting that the Court of Auditors stated that it had obtained reasonable assurance that the annual accounts of the Centre for the financial year 2016 were reliable and that the underlying transactions were legal and regular, Members called on Parliament to approve the closure of the Centre’s accounts. Parliament made, however, a number of recommendations that needed to be taken into account when the discharge is granted, in addition to the general recommendations that appear in the draft resolution on performance, financial management and control of EU agencies – the Centre’s financial statements, budget and financial management, commitments and carryovers. Parliament noted that the Centre has adopted guidelines on whistle-blowing, which are based on the Commission’s guidelines and which satisfy the requirements as set out in the Staff Regulations. There were no whistle-blowing cases at the Centre in 2016.
Discharge 2016: European Union Agency for Law Enforcement Training (CEPOL) (A8-0098/2018 - Bart Staes)
I voted in favour of the report on discharge in respect of the implementation of the budget of the European Union Agency for Law Enforcement Training (before 1 July 2016: European Police College – CEPOL) for the financial year 2016. On performance, Parliament stated that in 2016 the College’s training portfolio encompassed 174 training activities, of which 87 residential activities and 87 webinars, 492 exchanges in the framework of the European Police Exchange Programme, 27 online modules, one online course. Parliament noted with satisfaction that for the sixth year in a row the outreach of the College had increased, resulting in the College training 18 009 law enforcement professionals in 2016 compared to 12 992 in 2015, representing an increase of over 38%. the five—year external evaluation of the College (2011—2015) was completed by the external evaluator in January 2016. It was concluded that the College is efficient. However, there is a clear need for a significant reinforcement of the College with both human and financial resources.
Discharge 2016: European Aviation Safety Agency (EASA) (A8-0066/2018 - Bart Staes)
I voted in favour of the report on discharge in respect of the implementation of the budget of the European Asylum Support Office for the financial year 2016. Parliament expressed deep regret the material findings made by the Court in relation to two out of five significant procurement procedures from 2016 for which payments were incurred during that year, which demonstrates a lack of rigour in the Office’s procurement procedures. The report recalled that two of the three tenderers participating in one audited procurement procedure for the provision of travel services under a framework service contract amounting to EUR 4 million for the period from 2016 to 2020 were asked to provide additional information in relation to the same selection criteria. Although neither of them submitted the requested information (CVs of the persons who would perform the task at the Office’s premises), only one of them was excluded from the procedure for this reason. The other tenderer was awarded the contract on the basis that the relevant CVs would be provided following the award of the contract. The procurement procedure did not comply with the principle of equal treatment.
Discharge 2016: European Asylum Support Office (EASO) (A8-0083/2018 - Bart Staes)
I voted in favour of the report on discharge in respect of the implementation of the budget of the European Asylum Support Office for the financial year 2016. Parliament expressed deep regret the material findings made by the Court in relation to two out of five significant procurement procedures from 2016 for which payments were incurred during that year, which demonstrates a lack of rigour in the Office’s procurement procedures. The report recalled that two of the three tenderers participating in one audited procurement procedure for the provision of travel services under a framework service contract amounting to EUR 4 million for the period from 2016 to 2020 were asked to provide additional information in relation to the same selection criteria. Although neither of them submitted the requested information (CVs of the persons who would perform the task at the Office’s premises), only one of them was excluded from the procedure for this reason. The other tenderer was awarded the contract on the basis that the relevant CVs would be provided following the award of the contract. The procurement procedure did not comply with the principle of equal treatment.
Discharge 2016: European Banking Authority (EBA) (A8-0067/2018 - Bart Staes)
I voted in favour of the report on discharge in respect of the implementation of the budget of the European Banking Authority for the financial year 2016. They stated that the Court issued an ʽemphasis of matter paragraphʼ for the two London—based agencies, concerning the United Kingdom’s decision to withdraw from the Union. Parliament noted that, in view of the decision on its future location, the Authority has disclosed as contingent liabilities in its financial statements the residual EUR 14 000 000 cost related to the office lease contract (assuming its cancellation by the end of 2020) and the fact that other potential costs associated with relocation, such as the relocation of staff together with their families, cannot yet be estimated. A future decrease in the Authority’s revenue resulting from the United Kingdom’s decision to withdraw from the Union is possible. The EBA is called on to report to the discharge authority on the costs of the relocation. The report highlighted that, as the Authority’s workload is increasingly shifting from regulatory tasks to enforcing and applying the Union law, the Authority’s budget and manpower should be reallocated internally.
Discharge 2016: European Centre for Disease Prevention and Control (ECDC) (A8-0085/2018 - Bart Staes)
I voted in favour of the report on discharge in respect of the implementation of the budget of the European Centre for Disease Prevention and Control for the financial year 2016. Noting that the Court of Auditors stated that it had obtained reasonable assurance that the annual accounts of the Centre for the financial year 2016 were reliable and that the underlying transactions were legal and regular, Members called on Parliament to approve the closure of the Centre’s accounts. The final budget of the Centre for the financial year 2016 was EUR 58 247 650, representing a slight decrease of 0.35% compared to 2015. 97.46% of the Centre derives from the Union budget. Parliament acknowledged from the Centre that, following the Court’s comments on various weaknesses found regarding the transparency of the Centre’s procurement procedures, the Centre has changed the format and process it uses to create the financing decision for its procurements.
Discharge 2016: European Chemicals Agency (ECHA) (A8-0086/2018 - Bart Staes)
I voted in favour of the report on discharge in respect of the implementation of the budget of the European Chemicals Agency for the financial year 2016. Parliament highlighted that in December 2016 the Agency started together with European Food Safety Authority to draft guidance in identifying chemicals with endocrine disrupting properties. Parliament called on the Commission to launch a policy debate with relevant stakeholders in order to review Union legislation related to risk assessment for food, chemicals and related products and the effectiveness of such legislation. Budget monitoring efforts during the financial year 2016 resulted in a budget implementation rate of 97%, representing a decrease of 1.48%. In 2016, the fees and charges collected covered 46% of the Agency’s expenditure including for the first time a high proportion of fees from authorisation applications. Members called in this respect for safeguards to be built into the Agency’s work so that it can remain independent vis-à-vis the industry, and, in particular, to retain a critical, independent attitude towards industry’s own research.
Discharge 2016: European Environment Agency (EEA) (A8-0090/2018 - Bart Staes)
I voted in favour of the report on discharge in respect of the implementation of the budget of the European Environment Agency for the financial year 2016. The final budget of the European Environment Agency for the financial year 2016 was EUR 50 509 265, representing an increase of 2.75% compared to 2015. The Agency’s budget derives mainly from the Union budget. The budget monitoring efforts during the financial year 2016 resulted in a budget implementation rate of 99.9% and that the payment appropriations execution rate was 89.8%.Parliament took note that the carryovers from 2016 to 2017 were at EUR 4 203 111, representing a decrease of EUR 741 628 compared to the previous year (EUR 4 944 739 in 2015). Carryovers may often be justified and do not necessarily indicate weaknesses in budget planning and implementation. Parliament stressed that the Commission, in line with the Better Regulation Agenda, initiated in 2016 an evaluation of the Agency and the European Environment Information and Observation Network (EIONET), covering the period between mid—2012 and end—2016, the findings of which will be used to assess how well the Agency is performing.
Discharge 2016: European Fisheries Control Agency (EFCA) (A8-0107/2018 - Bart Staes)
I voted in favour of the report on discharge in respect of the implementation of the budget of the European Fisheries Control Agency for the financial year 2016. Parliament also made a series of observations regarding commitments, carryovers, transfers, procurement, recruitment and staff policy, the prevention and management of conflicts of interests, internal audits and controls. Lastly, Members recalled the importance of expanding the Agency’s mandate with a view to developing joint operational activities with other Union agencies in the maritime sector, in order to prevent disasters at sea and to coordinate the work of European coastguards. They also stressed the need to increase the allocation of resources in order to boost the Agency’s operational capacity to cope with the uncertainties linked to Brexit and the resulting additional checks. Parliament proposed including a Member of the European Parliament on the Administrative Board of the Agency in order to strengthen its institutional transparency, particularly during the approval of the budget by the Board. That Member should be chosen from within Parliament’s Committee on Fisheries.
Discharge 2016: European Food Safety Authority (EFSA) (A8-0091/2018 - Indrek Tarand)
I voted in favour of the report on discharge in respect of the implementation of the budget of the European Food Safety Authority for the financial year 2016. Parliament noted that close cooperation with the Commission’s DG SANTE is well on track towards its preparation related to the United Kingdom’s decision to leave the Union. The Authority is well aware of the financial risks due to the United Kingdom’s decision to leave the Union, such as restricted budget availability, contractual issues for ongoing and new contracts and related payments, and unemployment allowances, and the operational risks such as access to United Kingdom citizens as members of staff or as experts, access to United Kingdom entities for services and information/data, change in the volumes of work and access rights to documents. Members noted that the Authority adopted in 2016 the strategy called ‘EFSA Strategy 2020: trusted science for safe food’, based on five strategic objectives: prioritise public and stakeholder engagement in the process of scientific assessment, widen the Authority’s evidence base and optimise access to its data, build the Union’s scientific assessment capacity and knowledge community.
Discharge 2016: European Institute for Gender Equality (EIGE) (A8-0087/2018 - Bart Staes)
I voted in favour of the report on discharge in respect of the implementation of the budget of the European Institute for Gender Equality for the financial year 2016. Parliament noted with satisfaction that the Institute worked closely in 2016 with its sister agencies, the European Foundation for the Improvement of Living and Working Conditions (Eurofound), the European Union Agency for Fundamental Rights (FRA) and the European Agency for Safety and Health at Work (EU-OSHA). It discussed synergies and presented its work to other agencies such as the European Asylum Support Office (EASO) and the European Chemicals Agency (ECHA). Members highlighted, as an example of synergies, the Institute’s participation in the Fundamental Rights Forum organised by the FRA, which provided an opportunity to reach out to other important policy stakeholders. Parliament regretted that, having regard to the number of all posts occupied on 31 December 2016, the gender balance ratio was 72% female to 28% male. They noted furthermore the gender imbalance in the management board, with a ratio of 80% to 20% and called on the Institute to aim for a more gender—balanced staff composition.
Discharge 2016: European Insurance and Occupational Pensions Authority (EIOPA) (A8-0088/2018 - Bart Staes)
I voted in favour of the report on discharge in respect of the implementation of the budget of the European Insurance and Occupational Pensions Authority for the financial year 2016. The Authority has made efforts to reallocate its budget and manpower internally, as the Authority’s workload is increasingly shifting from regulatory tasks to supervisory convergence and enforcement. Parliament regards it as essential that the Authority have sufficient resources to carry out its assignments in full, including dealing with any additional workload necessitated by such assignments, whilst ensuring an appropriate level of prioritisation as regards resource allocation and budgetary efficiency. Parliament pointed out that 2016 marked the first phase of the move to an open office. A quarter of the Authority’s staff is now working in an open office environment in order to accommodate the increase in staff within the existing premises and reduce building related costs. Parliament welcomed the fact that the Authority proactively engages with its members to understand the extent of the impact of the United Kingdom’s decision to withdraw from the Union on the supervision of insurance and pension activity as well as the impact on the Authority as an institution.
Discharge 2016: European Institute of Innovation and Technology (EIT) (A8-0096/2018 - Bart Staes)
I voted in favour of the report on discharge in respect of the implementation of the budget of the European Institute of Innovation and Technology for the financial year 2016. The level of carryovers for committed appropriations for operational expenditure was high, at 40% (EUR 400 000), compared to 44% in 2015. Those carryovers relate mainly to contracts for IT services going beyond year—end and for meetings for which invoices had not yet been received. Carryovers may often be justified and do not necessarily indicate weaknesses in budget planning and implementation. Parliament regretted that knowledge and innovation communities (KIC) legal entities’ procurements of up to EUR 2 200 000 were considered irregular in 2016 and proved significant shortcomings in their procurement procedures. It also regretted that the Institute had four directors between its creation in 2008 and July 2014. Since August 2014, the position of director and, since February 2013, another managerial position, have been filled on an ad interim basis.
Discharge 2016: European Medicines Agency (EMA) (A8-0103/2018 - Bart Staes)
I voted in favour of the report on discharge in respect of the implementation of the budget of the European Medicines Agency for the financial year 2016. Parliament stressed that the Agency will be facing an additional workload and additional budgetary needs throughout the 2018-2020 relocation and transition period, as a consequence of the decision of the United Kingdom to withdraw from the Union. The Commission is called on to provide adequate staff and budgetary resources in preparation for its relocation in 2019. Parliament proposed in addition that the Agency be authorised to maintain a budgetary reserve generated from revenue fees to respond to unforeseen costs and unfavourable exchange rate fluctuations that may be incurred in 2018 and beyond. It also stressed the need for the accelerated building approval so as to avoid any delays in the start of the construction of the new Agency’s premises in Amsterdam. The Agency has disclosed in its financial statements an estimated EUR 448 million in rent for the remaining rental period between 2017 and 2039 as a contingent liability, as the rental contract does not include any exit clause.
Discharge 2016: European Monitoring Centre for Drugs and Drug Addiction (EMCDDA) (A8-0081/2018 - Bart Staes)
I voted in favour of the report on discharge in respect of the implementation of the budget of the European Monitoring Centre for Drugs and Drug Addiction for the financial year 2016. Parliament noted that the Centre put in place a new procurement plan which was successfully executed in close collaboration with all units. Parliament stressed the need for the Centre to improve the management of IT projects and encouraged the commitment of the Centre to provide improved access to its data to interested third parties, given that one of its main objectives is the dissemination of data and information on the state of the drugs problem, including data on relevant new trends. The level of committed appropriations carried over for 2016 amounts to EUR 671 266 (4.36%). Carryovers are often justified and do not necessarily indicate weaknesses in budget planning and implementation.
Discharge 2016: European Maritime Safety Agency (EMSA) (A8-0078/2018 - Bart Staes)
I voted in favour of the report on discharge in respect of the implementation of the budget of the European Maritime Safety Agency for the financial year 2016. Parliament noted that during 2016, cooperation with participating Member States and Union bodies continued, including the provision of services to Frontex (border control), EFCA (fisheries monitoring), OLAF (customs and illegal cross border activities), MAOC-N (law enforcement – narcotics) and EUNAVFOR (anti-piracy and anti-people—smuggling). There was the proposal for a revision of the Agency’s Founding Regulation for the development of European cooperation on coastguard functions had a significant impact on the Agency’s multi-annual programming exercises, conducted in 2016. Also noted was the European Parliament—funded pilot project aiming to explore and further develop, in 2016 and 2017, inter-agency synergies between EMSA, Frontex and EFCA to enhance cooperation on coastguard functions.
Discharge 2016: European Union Agency for Network and Information Security (ENISA) (A8-0114/2018 - Bart Staes)
I voted in favour of the report on discharge in respect of the implementation of the budget of the European Union Agency for Network and Information Security for the financial year 2016. Parliament welcomed the fact that the Agency has – with the aim of ensuring a cost-effective and environment-friendly workplace, recycling paper, glass and plastics – been encouraging staff to avoid printing documents and has introduced an electronic system for internal workflows which has significantly reduced the use of physical files. They also welcomed that the Agency has, with the aim of reducing or offsetting CO2 emissions, encouraged the use of electronic means of communication as an alternative to physical travel, and implemented the ‘Greenhouse Gas Protocol (GHG) Transport tool’ for the first time in 2017 in order to compile the statistical data of business travel undertaken by Agency staff. The carryovers of committed appropriations for administrative expenditure were at EUR 300 000 (25%), compared to EUR 150 000 (22%) in 2015.
Discharge 2016: European Union Agency for Railways (ERA) (A8-0079/2018 - Bart Staes)
I voted in favour of the report on discharge in respect of the implementation of the budget of the European Railway Agency (now European Union Agency for Railways) for the financial year 2016. Parliament also made a series of observations regarding staff policy, the prevention and management of conflicts of interests, procurement and internal audits and controls. Overall, Parliament welcomed the adoption of the Agency Regulation, which entered into force on 15 June 2016. By the end of the transitional period (16 June 2019), this expected strategic change will transform the Agency from a mere policy preparation and dissemination role into an authority working directly for the industry as regards authorisations for safety certifications and rolling stock. This transition is expected to deliver huge benefits in terms of reduced costs. The European Parliament’s position in the budgetary procedure for recovering total amounts relocated from the Connecting Europe Facility to the European Fund for Strategic Investments was recalled. Funding for the completion of the single European rail area should be safeguarded, including with a view to modernising and expanding rail infrastructures in the outlying regions of the Union.
Discharge 2016: European Securities and Markets Authority (ESMA) (A8-0101/2018 - Bart Staes)
I voted in favour of the report on discharge in respect of the implementation of the budget of the European Securities and Markets Authority for the financial year 2016. The report welcomed the fact that the Authority, together with the European Banking Authority and the European Insurance and Occupational Pensions Authority, forms part of the Joint Committee which works to ensure cross-sector consistency and joint positions in the area of supervision of financial conglomerates and on other cross-sector issues. It has also worked on building its cooperation with the Single Supervisory Mechanism and the European Central Bank in areas of mutual interest such as market infrastructures and financial stability. Parliament noted that the final budget of the Authority for the financial year 2016 was EUR 39 398 106, representing an increase of 7.11% compared to 2015. As a reminder, the Authority is financed by a contribution from the Union (EUR 10 203 000), contributions from national supervisory authorities of the Member States and observers (EUR 16 180 250) and fees (EUR 10 550 293).
Discharge 2016: European Training Foundation (ETF) (A8-0080/2018 - Bart Staes)
I voted in favour of the report on discharge in respect of the implementation of the budget of the European Training Foundation for the financial year 2016. Parliament noted that the final budget of the Foundation for the financial year 2016 was EUR 20 900 849.11, representing a decrease of 0.63% compared to 2015. The budget of the Foundation derives mainly from the Union budget. Budget and financial management: budget monitoring efforts during the financial year 2016 resulted in a high budget implementation rate of 99.99%, indicating that commitments were made in a timely manner, and that the payment appropriations execution rate was at 97.66%. The overall carryovers decreased from 3.3% in the period 2015 to 2016 to 3.1% in the period 2016 to 2017, which is an indication of the improved alignment of the Foundations’ administrative activities and their payments to its annual cycle. On performance, Parliament noted the unsatisfactory situation regarding the Foundation’s premises and the fact that this risked disrupting the Foundation’s activities.
Discharge 2016: European Agency for the operational management of large-scale IT systems in the area of freedom, security and justice (eu-LISA) (A8-0111/2018 - Bart Staes)
I voted in favour of the report on discharge in respect of the implementation of the budget of the European Agency for the Οperational Management of Large-Scale IT Systems in the Area of Freedom, Security and Justice for the financial year 2016. Members noted that the final budget of the Agency for the financial year 2016 was EUR 82 267 949, representing an increase of 21.77% compared to the year 2015, entirely derived from the Union budget. Parliament condemned the fact that the Agency received and accepted supplies amounting to EUR 2.8 million without having budget and legal commitments (contracts) in place. Parliament called on the Agency to significantly improve budget planning and budget implementation. It was noted that the committed appropriations for administrative expenditure carried over amounted to EUR 5 million (63% of committed appropriations), compared to EUR 9 million (50%) in 2015. These concerned mainly building maintenance and consultancy services to be delivered in 2017. These carryovers may be justified and do not necessarily indicate weaknesses in budget planning and implementation.
Discharge 2016: European Agency for Safety and Health at Work (EU-OSHA) (A8-0084/2018 - Bart Staes)
I voted in favour of the report on discharge in respect of the implementation of the budget of the European Agency for Safety and Health at Work for the financial year 2016. Carryovers mainly concern IT services which had not been fully delivered or invoiced by the end of the year. Parliament proposed that the Agency should consider introducing differentiated budget appropriations to better reflect the multiannual nature of operations and unavoidable delays between the signature of contracts, deliveries and payments. Parliament strongly regretted the fact that the Agency has yet to implement internal rules on whistleblowing and expressed the need to establish an independent disclosure, advice and referral body with sufficient budgetary resources, in order to help whistle-blowers use the right channels to disclose their information on possible irregularities affecting the financial interests of the Union. Parliament recalled the on-going work packages on supporting medium, small and micro enterprises (MSEs), with MSE-specific tools and guidelines to address knowledge gaps and facilitate better occupational safety and health compliance.
Discharge 2016: Euratom Supply Agency (ESA) (A8-0102/2018 - Bart Staes)
I voted in favour of the report on discharge in respect of the implementation of the budget of the Euratom Supply Agency for the financial year 2016. The final budget of the Agency for the financial year 2016 remained stable at EUR 125 000. EUR 119 000 (95.2%) of the budget of the Agency derives from the Union budget and EUR 6 000 (4.8%) from its own revenues (bank interest on the paid—up capital). Budget monitoring efforts during the financial year 2016 resulted in a commitment appropriations execution rate of 94.34%, representing a decrease of 4.58% compared to 2015. Parliament noted that the Agency processed 344 transactions in 2016, including contracts, amendments and notifications in order to ensure the security of supply of nuclear materials. The Agency advisory committee gave its positive opinion on a draft proposal for its updated rules, in order to bring them up to date with current market practices. Members noted that, before entering into force, the proposed rules must be approved by the Commission. However, the approval process was still not finalised at the beginning of 2017.
Discharge 2016: European Foundation for the Improvement of Living and Working Conditions (Eurofound) (A8-0092/2018 - Bart Staes)
I voted in favour of the report on discharge in respect of the implementation of the budget of the European Foundation for the Improvement of Living and Working Conditions for the financial year 2016. Budget monitoring efforts during the financial year 2016 resulted in a budget implementation rate of 99.99% and that the payment appropriations execution rate was 84.80%, representing a decrease of 2.55% compared to 2015. Parliament expressed concern about the negative budgetary impact of the growing Irish country coefficient which increasingly risks undermining the financial capability of the Foundation to deliver on its mandate. It is expected action to be taken by the Institutions of the Union to offset the effects. Parliament recalled that staffing cuts have been implemented with great difficulty and reiterated their concern towards any further cuts which would limit the agencies’ ability to carry out their mandate. On internal audits, Members noted with satisfaction that the Foundation and the internal audit service (IAS) agreed on a plan to take corrective action against the weaknesses found in the Foundation’s management of projects, mainly in relation to governance arrangements, monitoring and reporting.
Discharge 2016: EU Judicial Cooperation Unit (Eurojust) (A8-0113/2018 - Bart Staes)
I voted in favour of the report on discharge in respect of the implementation of the budget of Eurojust for the financial year 2016. Eurojust demonstrated a significant improvement in carryovers from 2015, with much lower cancellations (5.6%) than in previous years. The carryovers were mainly related to works beyond year—end and purchases ordered in preparation of Eurojust’s move to new premises in 2017. Members called on the Court to keep the volume to be carried over to the next year as low as possible. Parliament noted that Eurojust successfully completed the move to its new premises in June and July 2017. The redelivery of the former building to the host state took place on 31 August 2017 and the host state will determine the costs related to the redelivery to be borne by Eurojust. It is noted with satisfaction that the budget monitoring efforts during the financial year 2016 resulted in a budget implementation rate of 99.89%, including EUR 6 980 000 that is ring—fenced for the new building.
Discharge 2016: European Police Office (Europol) (A8-0109/2018 - Bart Staes)
I voted in favour of the report on discharge in respect of the implementation of the budget of the European Police Office (Europol) for the financial year 2016. Parliament took note of the carryovers of committed appropriations for administrative expenditure reached EUR 3.5 million (39%), compared to EUR 4.2 million (41%) in 2015. They noted that these carryovers mainly concerned Europol’s headquarters, which were only invoiced by the host state in 2017 (EUR 2 million). These carryovers may be justified and do not necessarily indicate weaknesses in budget planning and implementation. Parliament also made a series of observations regarding budgetary and financial management, procurement and staff policy, internal audits and controls. It deeply regretted that having regard to the total number of posts occupied on 31 December 2016, gender balance has not been achieved since the ratio is more than two to one – 32.4% female to 67.6% male. They report welcomed the establishment of the European Counter Terrorism Centre and the European Migrant Smuggling Centre, including the on—the—spot deployment of staff to perform over 4 800 secondary security checks in migration hotspots by the end of 2016.
Discharge 2016: European Union Agency for Fundamental Rights (FRA) (A8-0093/2018 - Bart Staes)
I voted in favour of the report on discharge in respect of the implementation of the budget of the European Union Agency for Fundamental Rights for the financial year 2016. Parliament noted with satisfaction that budget monitoring efforts in the financial year 2016 resulted in a budget implementation rate of 100%, which is the same rate as the previous year, and that the payment appropriations execution rate was 73.21%, representing an increase of 1.59% compared to the previous year. The level of committed appropriations carried over to 2017 for operating expenditure was again very high at EUR 5.2 million (68%), compared to EUR 5.7 million (70%) for the previous year. These carryovers mainly reflect the nature of activities of the Agency which involve financing studies that span over many months, often beyond year-end. Carryovers are often justified and do not necessarily indicate weaknesses in budget planning and implementation. The Agency is called on to aim for a more gender—balanced staff composition at the level of senior posts.
Discharge 2016: European Border and Coast Guard Agency (Frontex) (A8-0108/2018 - Bart Staes)
I voted in favour of the report on discharge in respect of the implementation of the budget of the European Border and Coast Guard Agency (Frontex) for the financial year 2016. Parliament noted that the final budget of the European Border and Coast Guard Agency for the financial year 2016 was EUR 232 757 000, representing an increase of 62.43% compared to 2015. In response to the migration crisis faced by the Union, the mandate of the Agency was considerably extended in 2016. Parliament welcomed that the budget—monitoring efforts during the financial year 2016 resulted in a budget implementation rate of 97.90%. It is noted that under the Agency’s extended mandate, high importance is attached to return operations and EUR 63 million had been assigned to that in its 2016 budget. However, EUR 23 million was repaid to the Union budget since fewer return operations were carried out than envisaged. On 22 December 2015, the Commission and the Agency signed a grant agreement amounting to EUR 5.5 million on regional support to protection-sensitive migration management in the Western Balkans and Turkey for a three year period starting on 1 January 2016.
Discharge 2016: European GNSS Agency (GSA) (A8-0082/2018 - Bart Staes)
I voted in favour of the report on discharge in respect of the implementation of the budget of the European GNSS Agency for the financial year 2016. Parliament pointed out that the Agency has still not adopted a whistle—blowing policy. The Agency will start the process of adoption of a whistle—blowing policy on the basis of the Commission’s implementing rules for agencies, which are expected to be finalised in 2018. It was also noted that the Agency operates the Galileo Security Monitoring Centre and the Galileo ground stations, both of which are located on United Kingdom territory. The status of the United Kingdom within those frameworks remains to be determined. The report called on the Agency to work in close cooperation with the Commission regarding the Brexit negotiations in order to be sufficiently prepared to minimise any negative operational or financial impact that may occur. Parliament expressed disappointment that the Agency’s visibility is still not satisfactory. They called on it to be more proactive in presenting its mission and work to the wider public and to increase its overall visibility.
Discharge 2016: Bio-based Industries Joint Undertaking (BBI) (A8-0071/2018 - Brian Hayes)
I voted in favour of the report on discharge in respect of the implementation of the budget of the Bio-based Industries Joint Undertaking for the financial year 2016. Parliament noted that the maximum Union contribution to the activities of the Joint Undertaking is EUR 975 000 000, to be paid from Horizon 2020. The industry members of the Joint Undertaking are to contribute resources of at least EUR 2 730 000 000 over the period of the Joint Undertaking, consisting of at least EUR 975 000 000 of in—kind and cash contributions to the Joint Undertaking’s operational activities and at least EUR 1 755 000 000 of in—kind contributions to the Joint Undertaking’s additional activities. Parliament noted that 29 out of 65 retained proposals from Call 2016 were at the grant agreement preparation stage by the end of 2016. By early 2017, the Joint Undertaking programme will have a portfolio of 65 ongoing projects with a total of 729 participants from 30 countries with a total grant value of EUR 414 000 000.
Discharge 2016: Clean Sky 2 Joint Undertaking (A8-0070/2018 - Brian Hayes)
I voted in favour of the report on discharge in respect of the implementation of the budget of the Clean Sky 2 Joint Undertaking for the financial year 2016. Parliament welcomed the fact that the governing board adopted a common anti-fraud strategy action plan in 2016. They also welcomed the continued progress in the field of cooperation with Member States and Regions on synergies in aeronautics R&I with the Structural and Investment Funds. The Commission is called on to ensure the direct involvement of the Joint Undertaking in the process of the Horizon 2020 mid-term review in the sphere of further simplifications and harmonisation of joint undertakings. the Joint Undertaking’s final budget for 2016 included commitment appropriations of EUR 310 498 422 and payment appropriations of EUR 287 755 748. The commitment appropriations utilisation rate was 97.5% (compared to 99.5% in 2015) and the rate of payment appropriations was 87.9% (compared to 75.4% in 2015).
Discharge 2016: ECSEL Joint Undertaking (A8-0072/2018 - Brian Hayes)
I voted in favour of the report on discharge in respect of the implementation of the budget of the ECSEL Joint Undertaking for the financial year 2016. Parliament highlighted as a matter of particular concern that the Court issued a qualified opinion on the Joint Undertaking’s payments related to projects taken over from its legal predecessors Artemis and ENIAC joint undertakings and invited the Undertaking to reconsider the methodology that results in repetitive qualified opinions based on this reoccurring issue that cannot be solved until the Seventh Framework Programme projects are terminated. It was noted that the payments made for those projects by the ECSEL Joint Undertaking in 2016, against certificates of acceptance of costs issued by the national funding authorities (NFAs) of the Participating States, amounted to EUR 118 000 000, which represents 54% of the total operational payments made by the Joint Undertaking in 2016. Parliament also noted that the NFAs compiled ‘declarations of assurance’ on the 2016 expenditure as received on 22 January 2018 from Joint Undertaking which cover 98% of the participation fees from the participating Member States for the 2016 Seventh Framework Programme expenditure.
Discharge 2016: Fuel Cells and Hydrogen 2 Joint Undertaking (FCH2) (A8-0073/2018 - Brian Hayes)
I voted in favour of the report on discharge in respect of the implementation of the budget of the Fuel Cells and Hydrogen 2 Joint Undertaking for the financial year 2016. Parliament regretted that the overall 2016 budget execution of commitment and payment appropriations reached 77.7% and 83.9% respectively, representing a lower commitment execution rate compared to the previous year due to the outcome of the evaluation for the 2016 call. It was noted that the payment execution represented the best execution rate of payments for the FCH2 to date. The report recognised the need for the FCH2 to communicate with Union citizens, through the Union institutions, concerning the significant research and collaboration that it is undertaking. It stressed the importance of highlighting the real improvements achieved as a consequence of its work, which are an important part of its mandate. Parliament called on the Commission to ensure the direct involvement of the Joint Undertaking in the process of the Horizon 2020 mid-term review in the sphere of further simplifications and harmonisation of joint undertakings.
Discharge 2016: Innovative Medicines Initiative 2 Joint Undertaking (IMI) (A8-0075/2018 - Brian Hayes)
I voted in favour of the report on discharge in respect of the implementation of the budget of the Innovative Medicines Initiative 2 Joint Undertaking for the financial year 2016. Parliament regretted to discover that in 2016 one instance of suspicion was communicated to OLAF which decided to dismiss the case based on the documentation provided. The Joint Undertaking undertook in parallel an independent financial audit which concluded with a minor adjustment and no significant material findings. Parliament also regretted to note that the IMI 2 Joint Undertaking experienced some delays in payments to beneficiaries (universities, research organisations and small and medium-sized enterprises). The time-to-pay target of 90 days for interim payments was exceeded by 5 days in 2016. Corrective measures were taken by the IMI 2 Joint Undertaking to improve the situation, notably by enhancing cooperation with project consortia, by reviewing internal procedures and by hiring more staff for the financial unit. The Commission is called on to ensure the direct involvement of the IMI 2 Joint Undertaking in the process of the Horizon 2020 mid-term review in the sphere of further simplifications and harmonisation of joint undertakings.
Discharge 2016: ITER and the Development of Fusion Energy Joint Undertaking (A8-0095/2018 - Brian Hayes)
I voted in favour of the report on discharge in respect of the implementation of the budget of the European Joint Undertaking for ITER and the Development of Fusion Energy for the financial year 2016. Parliament noted that in November 2016, the Council of ITER Organisation (the ‘ITER Council’) approved a new ITER project baseline for the scope, schedule and the costs of the project. They noted, moreover, that the overall project schedule for operations ‘First Plasma ‘ and ‘Deuterium-Tritium’ was approved. Following the approval of the new ITER project baseline, the Joint Undertaking set the new timetable and recalculated the related cost at completion of the Joint Undertaking’s contribution to the project construction phase. The Parliament expressed ongoing concern that the estimated completion date for the whole construction phase is currently planned with a delay of about 15 years compared to the original baseline. The new schedule endorsed by the ITER Council set out a four-stage approach, making December 2025 the deadline for achieving the first strategic milestone of the project construction phase (‘First Plasma’) and December 2035 the estimated completion date for the whole construction phase.
Discharge 2016: SESAR Joint Undertaking (A8-0077/2018 - Brian Hayes)
I voted in favour of the report on discharge in respect of the implementation of the budget of the SESAR Joint Undertaking for the financial year 2016. The report highlighted the signing of the renewed Eurocontrol/SESAR Joint Undertaking agreement in 2016, which outlines the new role of Eurocontrol as a co-founder of SESAR and includes a series of commitments and engagements regarding the implementation of SESAR 2020. Parliament welcomed the expansion of membership to 19 members, representing over 100 companies across the industry, who will participate in the industrial research, validation and demonstration activities of SESAR 2020. Parliament noted that all SESAR 1 projects were closed from an operational standpoint at the end of 2016 and that 61 solutions which are ready for industrialisation and deployment, contained in the first edition of the SESAR Solution Catalogue, have been delivered to the aviation community. 54 solutions initiated in SESAR 1 will be further developed in SESAR 2020, exemplifying the efforts to ensure an effective transition between the two programmes.
Discharge 2016: Shift2Rail Joint Undertaking (S2R) (A8-0076/2018 - Brian Hayes)
I voted in favour of the report on discharge in respect of the implementation of the budget of the Shift2Rail Joint Undertaking for the financial year 2016. The report also contained a series of observations on procurement and recruitment procedures, the prevention and management of conflicts of interests and internal control systems. Parliament regretted that at the end of 2016, the Joint Undertaking had not yet performed a specific anti-fraud risk assessment, nor had it established an action plan for the implementation of its own anti-fraud strategy. Highlighting that the objectives of the Joint Undertaking are to achieve a Single European Railway Area and to enhance the attractiveness and competitiveness of the European railway system, Members stressed that it is significantly important to identify among the research and innovation projects those that are capable to bring innovative solutions to the market. Parliament also stressed that there is a need to foresee the use of the principle of multiannual financing and to adopt flexible timetables for publishing projects proposals.
EU-Lebanon Agreement for scientific and technological cooperation: participation of Lebanon in the Partnership for Research and Innovation in the Mediterranean Area (PRIMA) (A8-0352/2017 - Sofia Sakorafa)
. ‒ I voted in favour of the Recommendation on the draft Council decision on the conclusion of the Agreement for scientific and technological cooperation between the European Union and the Republic of Lebanon setting out the terms and conditions for the participation of the Republic of Lebanon in the Partnership for Research and Innovation in the Mediterranean Area (PRIMA). In July 2017, the European Parliament adopted the new Partnership on Research and Innovation in the Mediterranean Area (PRIMA). This is the first ever Public-to-Public Partnership under Article 185 TFEU to target a specific geographical area, the Mediterranean Basin, including the participation of neighbouring EU countries. For a period of 10 years and launching on 1 January 2018, the overall aim of PRIMA is the development and the adoption of innovative and integrated solutions for improving the efficiency, safety, security and sustainability of agro-food and water provision and management systems in the Mediterranean area. PRIMA’s specific objective is to coordinate, strengthen, intensify, widen and align the currently fragmented research and innovation national programmes of these sectors within a multi-actor, multidimensional comprehensive and integrated approach.
EU-Mauritius Fisheries Partnership Agreement: fishing opportunities and financial contribution (A8-0053/2018 - Norica Nicolai)
. ‒ I voted in favour of the Recommendation on the draft Council decision on the conclusion of a Protocol setting out the fishing opportunities and the financial contribution provided for by the Fisheries Partnership Agreement between the European Union and the Republic of Mauritius. The new Protocol, initialled on 26 April 2017, covers a period of four years, provides fishing opportunities for 40 tuna seiners and 45 surface long-liners, as well as a maximum of 20 supply vessels to assist the operations of the EU fishing vessels. As part of the Protocol, the Republic of Mauritius will apply the same technical and conservation measures to all industrial fleets operating in its waters, in order to ensure a level playing field. At the same time, the Mauritius authorities will provide the EU with relevant information regarding foreign fishing activities in its waters. The EU and Mauritius will implement this agreement in accordance with the Article 9 of the Cotonou Agreement as regards the respect of human rights, democratic principles and the rule of law, and the Parties will cooperate in the fight against legal, unreported and unregulated fishing (IUU).
EU-Norway Agreement concerning additional trade preferences in agricultural products (A8-0126/2018 - Tiziana Beghin)
. ‒ I voted in favour of the Recommendation on the draft Council decision on the conclusion of an Agreement in the form of an exchange of letters between the European Union and the Kingdom of Norway concerning additional trade preferences in agricultural products. The proposed agreement will offer new trade opportunities for EU exporters and deepen trade relations between the EU and Norway. It seeks to increase the degree of liberalisation further, enlarging the current tariff rate quotas, opening new tariff rate quotas for additional agricultural products and addressing certain pending trade irritants. Under the new agreement, both parties agreed to mutually grant duty free access to 36 new tariff lines. These include live horses, certain animal products and types of offal, plants, vegetables for feed purposes, provisionally preserved vegetables, fruit, berries and nuts, algae, certain sugars, fruit juices and fermented beverages. While Norway’s overall trade with the EU shows a surplus, in trade of basic agricultural products balance is much in favour of the EU, with the EU exports in 2016 reaching EUR 2 495 million against EUR 307 million imports from Norway. The agreement represents a step towards engaging on liberalising agricultural trade between the EU and Norway.
A European strategy for the promotion of protein crops (A8-0121/2018 - Jean-Paul Denanot)
. ‒ I voted in favour of the Report on a European strategy for the promotion of protein crops – encouraging the production of protein and leguminous plants in the European agriculture sector. The report noted that the European Union is suffering from a major deficit in vegetable proteins due to the needs of its livestock sector which is dependent on feed imports from third countries. It is vital to reduce the Union’s massive dependency on imports of protein crops, which are mainly used for animal feed. In addition to the environmental impact in soya producing regions, the current situation carries major risks especially for the EU livestock sector, as price volatility on international markets has substantially increased. The European Parliament called the Commission to take immediate actions aimed at avoiding any reduction in the current production level of protein crops, taking into due account the environmental benefits deriving from the conventional cultivation of nitrogen-fixing crops in EFAs, and to establish a European platform, supported by the European Crops Market Observatory to identify protein cultivation areas, determine protein production capabilities and catalogue all research done so far on proteins.
Inclusion of greenhouse gas emissions and removals from land use, land use change and forestry into the 2030 climate and energy framework (A8-0262/2017 - Norbert Lins)
. ‒ I voted in favour of the Report on the proposal for a regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council on the inclusion of greenhouse gas emissions and removals from land use, land use change and forestry into the 2030 climate and energy framework. This proposal seeks to reduce greenhouse gas emissions and increase removals from forests in order to combat climate change. For the period after 2030, Member States shall endeavour to increase their removals so that they exceed their emissions. The Commission shall propose a framework for targets after 2030, which includes such increased removals, in line with the Union’s long-term climate objectives, and the commitments made under the Paris Agreement. During the period from 2021 to 2025, a Member State may choose to include managed wetland. It shall notify that choice to the Commission by 31 December 2020. During this period, Member States that have not chosen to include managed wetland in the scope of their commitments shall nevertheless report the emissions and removals from managed wetland to the Commission.
Binding annual greenhouse gas emission reductions to meet commitments under the Paris Agreement (A8-0208/2017 - Gerben-Jan Gerbrandy)
. ‒ I voted in favour of the Report on the proposal for a regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council on binding annual greenhouse gas emission reductions by Member States from 2021 to 2030 for a resilient Energy Union and to meet commitments under the Paris Agreement. Members stated that the general objective of this Regulation is to set the Union on track to a low-carbon economy through the establishment of a predictable long-term pathway to reducing by 2050 the greenhouse gas emissions of the Union by 80 to 95% compared to 1990 levels. Shipping emissions should be covered under this Regulation unless they are included in the EU Emissions Trading System (EU ETS). A Member State shall not transfer any part of its annual emission allocation if, at the time of transfer, that Member State’s emissions exceed its annual emission allocation. Access to the flexibility shall be granted on condition that the Member States concerned commit to taking measures in other sectors where insufficient results have been achieved in the past.
Statute and funding of European political parties and European political foundations (A8-0373/2017 - Mercedes Bresso, Rainer Wieland)
I voted in favour of the report on the proposal for a regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council amending the regulation of the European Parliament and the Council of 22 October 2014 on the statute and funding of European political parties and European political foundations. Members noted that a political alliance is entitled to apply to register as a European political party when its member parties are not members of another European political party. In order to receive funding, a European political party must include in its application evidence demonstrating that the majority of its member parties, and in any event a minimum of seven of them, have continuously published on their websites, in a comprehensive, reliable and user-friendly way, during the 12 months preceding the moment at which the application is made, the political programme and logo of the European political party. When it comes to penalties, the authority will decide to remove a European political party or a European political foundation from the Register by way of punishment where a decision to register the party or foundation in question is based on incorrect or misleading information.
Energy performance of buildings (A8-0314/2017 - Bendt Bendtsen)
I voted in favour of the report on the proposal for a directive of the European Parliament and of the Council amending Directive 2010/31/EU on the energy performance of buildings. The development and implementation of Member States’ long-term renovation strategies is to be supported by structured, permanent stakeholder platforms. Each Member State must include details of the implementation of its long-term renovation strategy. The strategy must include actions to mobilise investment to facilitate the necessary renovations, including the identification of cost-effective approaches and actions to stimulate technology-neutral renovations relevant to the building type and climatic zone, considering relevant trigger points in the life cycle of the building, and secondly policies and actions to stimulate cost-effective deep renovations of buildings, including staged deep renovations and decarbonisation of the heating and cooling demand, for example by introducing a scheme for building renovation passports. Member States will require the installation of a minimum number of recharging points in all public and commercial non-residential buildings with more than ten parking spaces, by 1 January 2025. Members proposed strengthening the elements of the proposal concerning the use of building automation, to clarify its value in its own right.
Implementation of the 7th Environment Action Programme (A8-0059/2018 - Daciana Octavia Sârbu)
I voted in favour of the report on the implementation of the seventh environment action programme. By way of a reminder, the seventh environment action programme (‘7th EAP’) sets legally binding targets in the areas of environment and climate change to be achieved by 2020. It also presents a long-term vision for 2050. Members considered that the 7th EAP has added value and a positive influence on environmental policies at EU and Member State level. While noting that there is general support for an 8th EAP, the report stresses that there is there is still great potential for improvement and called on the Commission and the competent authorities in the Member States to show increased political will at the highest level to implement the 7th EAP. The Commission was called upon to significantly improve the volume, use and administration of EU funds for the EAP’s objectives; to develop, without delay, a comprehensive, overarching framework strategy on the implementation of the sustainable development goals (SDGs) in the EU; and, finally, to guarantee the enforcement of existing EU law and ensure Member States’ full compliance with the objectives of 7th EAP by utilising all tools at its disposal, e.g. infringement procedures.
Gender equality in the media sector in the EU (A8-0031/2018 - Michaela Šojdrová)
I voted in favour of the report on gender equality in the media sector in the EU. This report deals with equality between men and women in the media across the EU. The media are the fourth power, and they wield a great deal of influence over politics and society. We must therefore take great care to ensure that they can function properly and in a balanced way, which necessarily involves ensuring that there is a balance between women and men. Given that the media – both public and private – are supposed to serve society as a whole, their structure and their work should reflect the fact that women make up half of society. The report focuses on the situation of women working in the media as reporters or commentators, but also draws attention to the lack of women in decision-making positions. This latter situation is particularly worrying: only 30%-40% of directorial posts in the media are occupied by women, although the majority of media graduates are female. Not only can this imbalance affect the content and focus of the media, but it also contributes to the general widening of the pay and pension gap between women and men.
Empowering women and girls through the digital sector (B8-0183/2018)
I voted in favour of the resolution on empowering women and girls through the digital sector. Digitalisation has revolutionised and fundamentally changed the way in which people access and provide information, communicate, socialise, study and work, creating new opportunities to participate in public and political discussions, education and the labour market, opening up new prospects for a self-determined life, and having enormous economic potential for the European Union and beyond. This resolution calls on the Commission to exploit and better target the Digital Agenda and the Digital Single Market Strategy with a view to addressing the serious gender gap within the ICT sector and fostering the full integration of women into the sector, particularly in relation to technical and telecommunication professions, and to foster the education and training of women and girls in ICT and other science, technology, engineering and mathematics (STEM) subjects. Parliament is calling for the EU and the Member States to develop, support and implement the actions promoted by the UN and its bodies, in particular under the Beijing Declaration and Platform for Action and at the World Summit on the Information Society (WSIS).
Implementation of the Development Cooperation Instrument, the Humanitarian Aid Instrument and the European Development Fund (A8-0118/2018 - Enrique Guerrero Salom)
I voted in favour of the Report on the Implementation of the Development Cooperation Instrument, the Humanitarian Aid Instrument and the European Development Fund. Awareness that, as human beings, we are part of one and the same world has grown steadily in recent decades. Peace cannot prosper in the midst of poverty, injustice and exclusion. Violence and insecurity constitute risks which spread and end up affecting all. The extremely unequal development and lack of life opportunities feed conflict, destabilise regions, lead to border tensions and cause disorderly population movements. The purpose of this report is to contribute to the review of the EDF, DCI and the Humanitarian Aid Instrument, launched by the Commission to assess their appropriateness with regard to the objectives of EU development cooperation and humanitarian aid policies. Based on the analysis of the implementation, from January 2014 to June 2017, of the EDF and the DCI, the report makes a series of recommendations aimed at improving the functioning of the EDF and the DCI until the end of its term in 2020, as well as a number of proposals and recommendations regarding the new multiannual financial framework.
Enhancing developing countries' debt sustainability (A8-0129/2018 - Charles Goerens)
I voted in favour of the report on enhancing developing countries’ debt sustainability. Debt may be beneficial or harmful. It is beneficial if used to finance something that remains fit for purpose once the debt has been redeemed. It is harmful if the funds are used for consumer spending or eroded by corruption. Debt should be contracted for the purpose of lasting investment, while consumer spending should be financed by cash. This should be the golden rule for not only private individuals but also economic operators or politicians. Ill-considered borrowing places the repayment burden on future generations. Ill-considered lending means incurring an inadmissible risk for both savers and borrowers. The report calls on the EU and its Member States to actively combat tax havens, tax avoidance and illicit financial flows, which merely increase the debt burden of developing countries, to cooperate with developing countries in order to combat aggressive tax avoidance, and to seek ways to help developing countries withstand pressures to engage in tax competition, which would damage the mobilisation of domestic revenue for development.
Strengthening economic, social and territorial cohesion in the EU (A8-0138/2018 - Marc Joulaud)
I voted in favour of the report on strengthening economic, social and territorial cohesion in the European Union. Members considered it crucial that cohesion policy in the new programming period should continue to adequately cover all European regions and remain the European Union’s main public investment instrument based on long-term strategy and perspectives, with a budget commensurate with existing and new challenges, and ensuring the fulfilment of the basic goals of the policy. The Commission is called on to take account of the recommendations of the High Level Group on Simplification in its future legislative proposals. Members stressed the need to provide a framework which guarantees legal stability through simple, clear and predictable rules – particularly as regards management and auditing – in order to ensure a proper balance between performance and simplification objectives. Members called for a reduction in the volume of legislation and guidelines. Regarding the fields of intervention, the rapporteur supports a strong thematic concentration on a limited number of priorities corresponding to major European policy goals, leaving managing authorities the task of drawing up their territorial strategies. Employment, innovation, support for SMEs, climate change and the circular economy should constitute priority areas for future cohesion policy.
EU-Comoros fisheries partnership agreement: denunciation (A8-0058/2018 - João Ferreira)
I voted in favour of the Recommendation on the draft Council decision denouncing the Partnership Agreement in the fisheries sector between the European Community and the Union of the Comoros. The Union of the Comoros (Comoros) is a group of three main islands located in the western Indian Ocean, off the coast of East Africa. The fisheries sector is the second largest sector in the country. Bilateral fisheries relations between the European Union (and its predecessors) and Comoros date back to 1988. From 2006 onwards, however, their relations have been governed by a Fisheries Partnership Agreement. Notwithstanding the conditions laid down in the Agreement and the associated protocol, its implementation was affected by various constraints – particularly relating to piracy – that meant that these fishing licences were not used. Simultaneously, Comoros’ involvement in operations in breach of the Regulation on Illegal, Unreported and Unregulated Fishing (IUU) led the EU to notify Comoros in October 2015 of the possibility of its being identified as a non-cooperating country – which indeed happened in May and June 2017. In the absence of any reaction by the Comorian authorities throughout this process, the Commission and the Council are proposing that the Agreement be denounced.
EU-Comoros fisheries partnership agreement: denunciation (resolution) (A8-0055/2018 - João Ferreira)
I voted in favour of the Report containing a motion for a non-legislative resolution on the draft Council decision denouncing the Partnership Agreement in the fisheries sector between the European Community and the Union of the Comoros. The Union of the Comoros (Comoros) is a group of three main islands located in the western Indian Ocean, off the coast of East Africa. The fisheries sector is the second largest sector in the country. Bilateral fisheries relations between the European Union and the Comoros date back to 1988.From 2006 onwards, their relations have been governed by a Fisheries Partnership Agreement. Notwithstanding the conditions laid down in the Agreement and the associated protocol, its implementation was affected by various constraints that meant that these fishing licences were not used. Simultaneously, the Comoros’ involvement in operations in breach of the Regulation on illegal, unreported and unregulated fishing (IUU) led the EU to notify the Comoros in October 2015 of the possibility of its being identified as a non-cooperating country – which indeed happened in May and June 2017. In the absence of any reaction by the Comorian authorities throughout this process, the Commission and the Council are proposing that the Agreement be denounced.
Europass: framework for skills and qualifications (A8-0244/2017 - Thomas Mann, Svetoslav Hristov Malinov)
I voted in favour of the report on the proposal for a decision of the European Parliament and of the Council on a common framework for the provision of better services for skills and qualifications (Europass) and repealing Decision No 2241/2004/EC. The European Parliament welcomes the New Skills Agenda and greatly appreciates the Commission’s efforts to update, modernise and improve the European tools and services regarding skills, competences and qualifications. Decision No 2241/2004/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council established a framework to address these challenges. It clearly laid down responsibilities and achieved better transparency of qualifications and competences through a portfolio of documents known as ‘Europass’, which individuals can use on a voluntary basis. The new common framework provided with this text serves to adapt Europass services to the needs and expectations of users and providers on all sides: learners, job-seekers, employers – especially small and medium-sized enterprises – education and training facilities, social partners, Europass centres and the national authorities responsible. The revised Europass services could also use, and be adapted to, the potential of the future digital systems.
Creative Europe Programme (2014 to 2020) (A8-0369/2017 - Silvia Costa)
I voted in favour of the report on the proposal for a regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council amending Regulation (EU) No 1295/2013 establishing the Creative Europe Programme (2014 to 2020). The purpose is to create a legally sound and transparent solution to ensure sustainable support for the European Union Youth Orchestra (EUYO). EUYO is a unique orchestra in Europe, founded following a 1976 European Parliament resolution. Composed of very talented young musicians from all over Europe in a world-class European orchestra, it plays a unique role in promoting intercultural dialogue and mutual respect and understanding through culture. It also contributes to the circulation of European works and the mobility of young European talent beyond national and European borders. The Creative Europe programme and its previous funding programmes have supported the EUYO in various ways. I voted in favour because I believe that the EUYO should be included among the measures benefiting from support from the ‘Culture’ sub-programme of the Creative Europe programme.
Location of the seat of the European Medicines Agency (A8-0063/2018 - Giovanni La Via)
I voted in favour of the report on the proposal for a regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council amending Regulation (EC) No 726/2004 as regards the location of the seat of the European Medicines Agency. The European Medicines Agency (EMA) is an important EU decentralised agency, responsible for the scientific evaluation, supervision and safety monitoring of medicines in the EU. The agency, currently based in London, has to be relocated in the context of the UK’s withdrawal from the EU. The offer from the Netherlands indicates one proposed building, the Vivaldi Building, which according to the offer, has a planned delivery of the conference centre as well as some of the workplaces by 1 April 2019. However, I believe that the European Parliament, and ultimately the representatives of EU citizens, were not fully involved in the procedure to select the new seat of the EMA. I think that all decisions relating to the location of EU bodies and agencies need and – legally – have to be taken under the ordinary legislative procedure.
Common Consolidated Corporate Tax Base (A8-0051/2018 - Alain Lamassoure)
I voted in favour of the report on the proposal for a Council directive on a Common Consolidated Corporate Tax Base (CCCTB). In late 2016 the Commission put forward a major overhaul of the corporate taxation rules in a two-step approach, namely a proposal for the Common Corporate Tax Base (CCTB) and a proposal for the Common Consolidated Corporate Tax Base (CCCTB). At the same time, the Commission withdrew its 2011 CCCTB proposal blocked in the Council. The objective of this re-launched project is to strengthen the internal market by making it easier and cheaper for companies to operate cross-border in the EU, and also to counter practices of corporate aggressive tax planning and to increase corporate tax transparency in the EU. While the CCTB provides for a single set of rules for calculation of the corporate tax base, the CCCTB introduces a consolidation element which would enable businesses to offset losses in one Member State against profits in another Member State.
Common Corporate Tax Base (A8-0050/2018 - Paul Tang)
I voted in favour of the report on the proposal for a Council directive on a Common Corporate Tax Base (CCTB). In late 2016 the Commission put forward a major overhaul of the corporate taxation rules in a proposal for the CCTB and a proposal for the Common Consolidated Corporate Tax Base (CCCTB). At the same time, the Commission withdrew its 2011 CCCTB proposal blocked in the Council. The project should strengthen the internal market by making it easier and cheaper for companies to operate cross-border in the EU, and also to counter practices of corporate aggressive tax planning and to increase corporate tax transparency in the EU. While the CCTB provides for a single set of rules for calculation of the corporate tax base, the CCCTB introduces a consolidation element which would enable businesses to offset losses in one Member State against profits in another Member State.
Guidelines for the 2019 budget - Section III (A8-0062/2018 - Daniele Viotti)
I voted in favour of the report on the general guidelines for the preparation of the 2019 budget, Section III – Commission. Negotiations on the 2019 Union budget, the last under the current parliamentary term, will run in parallel with the negotiations on the next multiannual financial framework (MFF) and the reform of the EU’s own resources system; 2019 will mark the sixth year of the 2014-2020 MFF. The two arms of the budgetary authority should endeavour to reach an ambitious and comprehensive agreement on the 2019 budget in the Conciliation Committee, in order to positively influence the parallel negotiations and enable an agreement on the post-2020 MFF and own resources by the end of this parliamentary term. I voted in favour because I believe that the 2019 EU budget should reinforce all the relevant instruments for tackling youth unemployment, especially in EU regions that are lagging economically, paying particular attention to the improvement of entrepreneurial and professional skills and mobility, recognition of qualifications at all levels of education and vocational training, and support to growth, competitiveness, job creation, investments in infrastructure, innovation, research and SMEs.
Situation in Syria (RC-B8-0139/2018, B8-0139/2018, B8-0141/2018, B8-0142/2018, B8-0143/2018, B8-0144/2018, B8-0146/2018, B8-0150/2018)
I voted in favour of the resolution on the situation in Syria. The escalation of the Syrian conflict is the result of foreign regional and international powers exploiting the situation for their own gain, leading to a bloody war. In the seventh year of the crisis in Syria, the scale, severity and complexity of needs across the country remain overwhelming. Civilians have been killed and injured on a horrific scale – reports suggest more than 1 000 civilian casualties in the first week of February alone – and strikes have continued to hit hospitals, schools and markets. The report expresses outrage at the unacceptable levels of violence escalating in several parts of the country, particularly in the Idlib Governorate and Eastern Ghouta, but also in Damascus City, and at the attacks against civilians, civilian objects and medical facilities, which are further compounding suffering and displacing large numbers of people. I voted in favour of the resolution because I believe that ending the war and finding a political solution to the conflicts requires dialogue with all elements of Syrian society, without excluding anyone.
US attack on EU farm support under the CAP (in the context of Spanish olives) (B8-0137/2018, B8-0137/2018, B8-0138/2018, B8-0145/2018, B8-0147/2018, B8-0148/2018, B8-0149/2018, B8-0151/2018)
I voted in favour of the resolution on the US attack on EU farm support under the CAP (in the context of Spanish olives). On 22 June 2017, the Coalition for Fair Trade in Ripe Olives, consisting of the two largest US processors of ripe olives, filed a petition with the Department of Commerce, alleging that the olive industry in the US is materially injured or threatened by imports of LTFV (less than fair value), subsidised ripe olives from Spain. The basis of the petition is the idea that aid to the olive sector granted under the CAP could constitute unfair competition vis-à-vis US producers. Parliament’s report expresses its concern that the US is calling into question the EU’s CAP, since public support plays an important role in both the US and the EU. I voted in favour because I believe that making CAP payments conditional on, inter alia, environmental, animal welfare, human health, social and labour standards not only directs public money towards public goods, but also ensures that our farm support system is WTO Green Box compatible, and therefore provides farmers with certainty in the farm support system.
Corporate social responsibility (B8-0140/2018, B8-0152/2018, B8-0153/2018, B8-0154/2018, B8-0155/2018, B8-0156/2018, B8-0157/2018, B8-0158/2018)
I voted in favour of the resolution on corporate social responsibility. Closures and layoffs are being announced throughout the EU while economies are returning to growth and shareholder values have been maximised. Transfers of activities within the Union towards cheaper labour unit-cost locations are still occurring, as in the cases of Carrefour, Embraco, Kingfisher, Castorama and Brico Dépôt, with companies sometimes even calling for active participation by those who are losing their jobs. The resolution deplores the double negative impact of companies’ restructuring plans, namely mass redundancies and the wasting of public funds. It urges Member States to recover all resources dedicated to supporting companies in the form of subsidies, tax breaks, land price reductions, etc. when a company decides to relocate or close its production plants, and to guarantee adequate social protection, working conditions and decent wages, through legislation or collective agreements, as well as effective protection against unfair dismissal. I believe that there is a need to extend the scope of corporate social responsibility to include new areas such as the organisation of work, equal opportunities and social inclusion, anti-discrimination measures, and the development of lifelong education and training.
Guidelines on the framework of future EU-UK relations (B8-0134/2018, B8-0135/2018)
I voted in favour of the Motion for a Resolution on the framework of the future EU-UK relationship. The purpose of negotiations between the European Union (EU) and the United Kingdom (UK) pursuant to Article 50 of the Treaty on European Union (TEU) is to provide for an orderly withdrawal of the UK from the EU. Article 50 TEU states that the arrangements for the UK’s withdrawal should take account of the framework for its future relationship with the Union. The Resolution states that an international agreement on the new relationship between the EU and the UK can only be formally negotiated once the UK has left the EU and is a third country. I believe that an association agreement negotiated and agreed between the EU and the UK following the latter’s withdrawal pursuant to Article 8 TEU and Article 217 TFEU could provide an appropriate framework for the future relationship, and secure a consistent governance framework, which should include a robust dispute resolution mechanism, thus avoiding a proliferation of bilateral agreements and the shortcomings which characterise the EU’s relationship with Switzerland.
Rail transport statistics (A8-0038/2018 - Karima Delli)
I voted in favour of the Report on the proposal for a regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council on rail transport statistics (recast). In the context of the revision of the regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council on rail transport statistics, Parliament had sought to extend the scope of the regulation. It had stressed the importance of having comprehensive and accurate statistics on freight and passenger transport, as well as data concerning cross-border connections or railway infrastructure equipment fitted with an ERTMS system, in order to obtain a clear picture of the evolution of the trans-European transport network (TEN-T), and in particular the rail network. Under the Memorandum of Understanding between Eurostat and the European Union Agency for Railways (ERA), ERA agreed to facilitate access to data concerning the length of the section of track equipped with ERTMS. The ERA also undertook to provide Eurostat with annual data regarding the number of vehicles equipped with ERTMS. I voted in favour because I believe in the importance of providing policy makers, as well as European citizens, with relevant information on the impact of EU policies in the field of transport and of the relevant investments.
Measures for the control of Newcastle disease (A8-0026/2018 - Adina-Ioana Vălean)
I voted in favour of the Report on the proposal for a directive of the European Parliament and of the Council amending Council Directive 92/66/EEC introducing Community measures for the control of Newcastle disease. The purpose of the Proposal is to amend Council Directive 92/66/EEC introducing Community measures for the control of Newcastle disease, in order to bring it into line with the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union (TFEU) and the new official control provisions in force. It is necessary to simplify and streamline the procedures regarding the control of Newcastle disease, in particular taking into account the new rules in relation to the designation of European Union reference laboratories provided for by Article 93 of Regulation (EU) 2017/625 of the European Parliament and of the Council, and also the new system of implementing acts provided for in Article 291 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union (TFEU). The current European reference laboratory (EURL) for Newcastle disease is located in the United Kingdom. Hence, it needs to be replaced by an EURL located in one of the other 27 Member States in view of the United Kingdom exiting the EU.
Further macro-financial assistance to Georgia (A8-0028/2018 - Hannu Takkula)
I voted in favour of the Report on the proposal for a decision of the European Parliament and of the Council providing further macro-financial assistance to Georgia. This is the third time since 2008 when the Commission is proposing macro-financial assistance at the request of the Government of the Republic of Georgia. The first two operations were EUR 46 million each, with the first one fully in the form of grants and the second one half in grants and half in loans.Georgia implemented all relevant economic policy measures agreed in the Memorandum of Understanding and the last tranche was disbursed in May 2017. This time, the Commission proposes EUR 45 million, of which EUR 35 million is in loans and EUR 10 million is in grants to help the country to cover part of its external financing needs for the period 2017-2020. Georgia continues to face a weak external environment, its fiscal deficit has widened, and the lari has depreciated sharply over recent years, which has resulted in a higher public debt to GDP ratio. Georgia’s financial system remains sound and well capitalised overall, particularly thanks to prudent supervision and regulation by the central bank.
Objection to Commission delegated regulation amending Regulation (EU) No 347/2013 as regards the Union list of projects of common interest (B8-0136/2018)
I voted in favour of the Resolution on the Commission delegated regulation of 23 November 2017 amending Regulation (EU) No 347/2013 of the European Parliament and of the Council as regards the Union list of projects of common interest. Regulation (EU) No 347/2013 and the amending delegated regulation are meant to ‘support the completion of the Union internal energy market while encouraging the rational production, transportation, distribution and use of energy resources, to reduce the isolation of less-favoured and island regions, to secure and diversify the Union’s energy supplies, sources and routes, including through cooperation with third countries, and to contribute to sustainable development and protection of the environment’.It recognises the efforts made by the Commission to keep in the Union list of projects of common interest a stable number of electricity projects, which are necessary to effectively pave the way for the decarbonisation of the European energy system. Moreover, the counting methodology and bundling of projects applied by the Commission for identifying gas projects is inconsistent and results in a seemingly reduced number of projects, while in reality their number is much higher. I voted in favour because I believe that it is crucial to reach energy independence.
Mobilisation of the European Globalisation Adjustment Fund: application EGF/2017/008 DE/Goodyear (A8-0061/2018 - Ingeborg Gräßle)
I voted in favour of the Report on the proposal for a decision of the European Parliament and of the Council on the mobilisation of the European Globalisation Adjustment Fund (application from Germany – EGF/2017/008 DE/Goodyear). The European Globalisation Adjustment Fund has been created in order to provide additional assistance to workers suffering from the consequences of major structural changes in world trade patterns. On 9 February 2017, the Commission adopted a proposal for a decision on the mobilisation of the EGF in favour of Germany to support the reintegration into the labour market of workers made redundant by one enterprise operating in the economic sector classified under the NACE Revision 2 Division 22 (Manufacture of rubber and plastic products).The redundancies made by Goodyear are located in the NUTS level 2 region of Regierungsbezirk Karlsruhe (DE12) in Germany. The dismissals occurred in the Karlsruhe district, which is facing a structural change. Several smaller or medium-sized companies in the region have made hundreds of workers redundant. The Goodyear plant was the largest employer in the region. I voted in favour because the German authorities have provided all necessary assurances.
The next MFF: Preparing the Parliament’s position on the MFF post-2020 (A8-0048/2018 - Jan Olbrycht, Isabelle Thomas)
. ‒ I abstained from voting on the Report on the next MFF: Preparing the Parliament’s position on the MFF post-2020. The multiannual financial framework (MFF) 2014-2020 quickly proved its inadequacy in meeting actual needs and political ambitions, as, from the outset, it was called upon to address a series of crises and new challenges in the areas of investment, migration and refugees, youth employment, security, the environment and climate change, which had not been anticipated at the time of its adoption. As a result, the current MFF had already been pushed to its limits after only two years of implementation. The Commission will present its package of proposals on the post-2020 MFF, including future own resources, in May 2018.
Reform of the European Union’s system of own resources (A8-0041/2018 - Gérard Deprez, Janusz Lewandowski)
I voted in favour of the Report on reform of the European Union’s system of own resources. The report requires that the future Multiannual Financial Framework (MFF) proposed by the Commission include ambitious proposals to revise the Own Resources Decision and all related legislative acts, as well as to introduce new own resources. It underlines that both the expenditure and the revenue side of the next MFF will be treated as a single package in the upcoming negotiations between the Council and Parliament. Moreover, it states that no agreement will be reached on the MFF without corresponding headway being made on own resources. I voted in favour because I am convinced of the imperative need to make significant progress on the revenue side of the EU budget in order to facilitate an agreement on the next MFF. The next MFF should be embedded in a broader strategy and narrative for the future of Europe and should enable the Union to provide solutions and emerge strengthened from the crises of the decade. I voted in favour because I believe that a stronger and a more ambitious Europe can only be achieved if it is provided with reinforced financial means.
European Semester for economic policy coordination: Annual Growth Survey 2018 (A8-0047/2018 - Hugues Bayet)
I voted in favour of the Report on the European Semester for economic policy coordination: Annual Growth Survey. The European Union has been in a deep economic and monetary crisis since 2008. Ten years on, improvements in economic results and an upturn in growth are beginning to be detected in the euro area. Yet these macro-economic indicators cannot prevent growing inequalities in the Member States. The 2018 European Semester has to be the opportunity to apply an economic policy which ensures growth, investment and full employment. It must also contribute fully to implementing the objectives enshrined by the European Union in the Pillar of Social Rights. The current European economic governance framework has shown its limitations. The Juncker Plan was an important first stage for the private sector, but it must be accompanied by an investment plan for the public sector. High-quality public infrastructure is one of the drivers of competitiveness in Europe. However, the European Union must also apply a sustainable development policy which ensures the necessary environmental transition and will enable the European Union to achieve the objectives it has set itself.
European Semester for economic policy coordination: employment and social aspects in the Annual Growth Survey 2018 (A8-0052/2018 - Krzysztof Hetman)
I voted in favour of the Report on the European Semester for economic policy coordination: employment and social aspects in the Annual Growth Survey 2018. The Annual Growth Survey (AGS), an integral part of the European Semester cycle, aims at strengthening sustainable economic development and social convergence by identifying the priorities for the European Union and its Member States for the year ahead. The AGS of 2018 shows the positive signs of recovery of Europe’s economy with stable economic growth, falling rates of unemployment and improvements in investment and public finances. In the second quarter of 2017, there were a record 235.4 million people in jobs, with 8 million additional jobs created since the second quarter of 2014. Rates of poverty and social exclusion are diminishing. Nevertheless, certain problems persist. Youth unemployment remains at an unacceptably high level of 16.6% and 18.7% for the euro area. One of the solutions to tackle the high unemployment rate is to address the mismatch between labour market demands and workforce skills. Structural reforms are needed in order to boost investments and improve productivity and at the same time ensure adequate social protection systems.
Implementation of the Protocol on the financial consequences of the expiry of the ECSC Treaty and on the Research Fund for Coal and Steel (A8-0034/2018 - Jean Arthuis)
I voted in favour of the Recommendation on the draft Council decision amending Council Decision 2003/76/EC establishing the measures necessary for the implementation of the Protocol, annexed to the Treaty establishing the European Community, on the financial consequences of the expiry of the ECSC Treaty and on the Research Fund for Coal and Steel. The Research Fund for Coal and Steel (RFCS), established upon the expiry of the Treaty establishing the European Coal and Steel Community (ECSC), serves to finance research in the sectors concerned, 72.8% being earmarked for steel and 27.2% for coal. These activities are financed by means of relatively safe financial investments made by the Commission. In view of the monetary policy established by the European Central Bank, the value of these investments is declining substantially. The aim of the proposal for a decision is to allow all the de-commitments made in the RFCS research programme since 2003 to be used. The Commission estimates the potential gains from this recycling at EUR 40.3 million. The adoption of the proposal would thus enable the Commission to increase the RFCS budget for 2018 to EUR 40 million and to use the remainder of the appropriations for the 2019 budget.
EU-New Zealand agreement on cooperation and mutual administrative assistance in customs matters (A8-0029/2018 - Daniel Caspary)
I voted in favour of the Recommendation on the draft Council decision on the conclusion, on behalf of the European Union, of the Agreement between the European Union and New Zealand on cooperation and mutual administrative assistance in customs matters. In October 2017, the European Parliament adopted its recommendations for the negotiating mandate of a free trade agreement (FTA) between the European Union and New Zealand, aiming at a modern, deep, ambitious, balanced, fair and comprehensive FTA as a way of deepening and further reinforcing the existing, already mature, bilateral trade and investment relationship between both partners. While not directly linked to prospective FTA negations, the Agreement between the EU and New Zealand on cooperation and mutual administrative assistance in customs matters can be seen as another step in deepening the EU-New Zealand trade and economic relationship by creating a more trade-friendly and secure customs environment. Hence, the conclusion of this agreement would be a welcome step in preparation of a future FTA.
A European strategy on Cooperative Intelligent Transport Systems (A8-0036/2018 - István Ujhelyi)
I voted in favour of the Report on a European strategy on Cooperative Intelligent Transport Systems. The world is about to experience an extremely fast-moving industrial and digital revolution, to which the EU is also in some way a party but for which neither Europe’s economy nor its society is properly prepared. There are major discrepancies in the level of development and preparedness of the Member States, but we must not allow digitalisation and technological advances to heighten this imbalance. Every European citizen must benefit equally from the modern industrial revolution and the benefits it brings. The transport sector, similarly, is on the cusp of dramatic change, and the EU must contribute with meaningful, long-term responses of its own. We must satisfy at once the requirements of safety, effectiveness and sustainability. It is crucial for all industrial sectors to join forces – the telecommunications, car manufacturing, energy and transport sectors – so that the results of digital advances can be properly put in place and applied.
Cross-border parcel delivery services (A8-0315/2017 - Lucy Anderson)
I voted in favour of the Report on the proposal for a regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council on cross-border parcel delivery services. Parcel delivery is a competitive, innovative and fast growing sector. Around four billion parcels annually are ordered online and delivered across the European Union. However, the potential for further growth in this sector is clear. Concerns about the delivery of items bought and sold cross-border have been found to be a key problem experienced by EU online consumers and small businesses. The European Commission in the framework of its Digital Single Market Strategy proposed a regulation on cross-border parcel delivery services aiming to secure more efficiency in the sector, transparency of tariffs and terminal rates, and affordable prices. Consumer confidence would benefit from improved requirements for more transparent and comparable information on available price and delivery options and requirements for more guidance on procedures for damage, loss of goods, delays and returns, and for complaints handling. I believe that the introduction of two new articles to add to the information already provided to the users by traders and to promote the further harmonisation of quality of service and technical standards would be very useful.
Initial qualification and periodic training of drivers of certain road vehicles and driving licences (A8-0321/2017 - Peter Lundgren)
. ‒ I voted in favour of the Report on the proposal for a directive of the European Parliament and of the Council amending Directive 2003/59/EC on the initial qualification and periodic training of drivers of certain road vehicles for the carriage of goods or passengers and Directive 2006/126/EC on driving licences. The purpose of the Directive is to improve the EU-wide standard of initial qualification and periodic training for drivers of certain road vehicles for the carriage of goods or passengers. Around 33% of all journeys made by heavy goods vehicles in the EU cross borders between Member States. Around 8% of cross-border transport in the EU involves busses or coaches. The revision of Directive 2003/59/EC would ensure the application of appropriate minimum training requirements and the recognition of training throughout the EU. It would remedy the current problem of mutual recognition which may affect some 46 700 drivers (2016).
Establishing the European Defence Industrial Development Programme aiming at supporting the competitiveness and innovative capacity of the EU defence industry (A8-0037/2018 - Françoise Grossetête)
. ‒ I abstained of voting on the Report on the proposal for a regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council establishing the European Defence Industrial Development Programme aiming at supporting the competitiveness and innovative capacity of the EU defence industry. The European Defence Fund proposed by the Commission on 7 June 2017 contains two windows covering the entire cycle of defence industrial development. A first window is intended to fund collaborative research in innovative defence technologies. A second window is for the cooperative acquisition of defence capabilities. It includes the European Defence Industrial Development Programme, which seeks to meet the challenges facing the European defence industry.
Gender equality in EU trade agreements (A8-0023/2018 - Eleonora Forenza, Malin Björk)
I voted in favour of the report on gender equality in EU trade agreements. Trade is not gender neutral and trade policies have gender specific effects. Trade is not gender neutral and trade policies have gender specific effects. Trade and investment agreements affect women and men differently due to structural gender inequalities: women are paid less and the global gender gap remains significant. Gender equality has not been met in any country. Moreover, women and men are structured into different sectors of the economy. The majority of women work in sectors such as agriculture, the informal and unpaid care sector, or as seasonal workers. These workers, essential contributors to the global economy, remain invisible in trade policies and are the ones that are mostly affected by the current trade and investment practices. Beyond international commitments and vague EU objectives in the field of gender equality, we should aim to sustain livelihoods for everyone, the environment and ecosystems, as well as social and human resources. Such an economic policy must also encompass the care work, or reproductive work. Such economies cannot be governed by the narrow principles of growth, competition and efficiency that currently dominate the trade agenda.
Lagging regions in the EU (A8-0046/2018 - Michela Giuffrida)
I voted in favour of the report on lagging regions in the EU. This report aims to identify possible solutions with a view to underpinning growth and increasing income in these regions. It focuses on 47 regions in eight Member States, including: low-growth regions (regions with a GDP that is close to the EU average but with no growth, this being the case of Italy, Spain, Greece and Portugal) and low-income regions (regions with a GDP that is still very low but with a very encouraging upward curve). In the low-income regions (in Bulgaria, Hungary, Poland and Romania), cohesion policy is working extremely successfully. The solutions proposed in the report include better relations between businesses and with higher education institutions, investment in infrastructure and education, improved links between cities and their surrounding areas, greater investment in public institutions to improve the effectiveness and efficiency of public services and to strengthen the link between the European Semester and the cohesion policy by identifying areas of investment. I voted in favour because I believe that the macroeconomic conditionality mechanism must be reformed in order to avoid jeopardising investments in those very regions with the greatest structural problems.
The role of EU regions and cities in implementing the COP 21 Paris Agreement on climate change (A8-0045/2018 - Ángela Vallina)
I voted in favour of the report on the role of EU regions and cities in implementing the COP21 Paris Agreement on climate change. Climate change is a scientifically proven fact whose symptoms and consequences are becoming more and more noticeable both for the public and for holders of public office. The temperature increase in the EU over the past decade has been faster than in the rest of the planet. Many sectors are being affected: the primary sector and tourism, along with public services such as health and the water and energy supply. The EU is responsible for 9% of global emissions, and its cities generate 75% of them. In the face of this challenge, the EU launched a Strategy on adaptation to climate change back in 2013. The signing of the COP21 strengthened the EU’s commitment in the fight against climate change, created a link with the SDGs (also signed by the EU) and in turn established the appropriate framework for the EU to shape its policies, which must transcend all other levels: Member States, regional and local authorities, private sector and citizens. The adoption of this Agreement thus represents an opportunity for global well-being and development.
Insurance distribution: date of application of Member States' transposition measures (A8-0024/2018 - Werner Langen)
I voted in favour of the Report on the proposal for a directive of the European Parliament and of the Council amending Directive (EU) 2016/97 as regards the date of application of Member States’ transposition measures. Pursuant to Article 42 of Directive (EU) 2016/97, Member States have to bring into force the laws, regulations and administrative provisions necessary to comply with that Directive by 23 February 2018. In order to ensure legal certainty and avoid potential market disruption, it is necessary that this Directive enters into force as a matter of urgency and that it applies, with retroactive effect, from 23 February 2018. Consequently, it is also justified to apply in this case the exception for urgent cases provided for in Article 4 of Protocol (No 1) on the role of national Parliaments in the European Union. By 1 July 2018, Member States shall adopt and publish the measures necessary to comply with this Directive. They shall immediately inform the Commission thereof. Member States shall apply the measures referred to in the first subparagraph from 1 October 2018 at the latest.
EU-USA Bilateral Agreement on prudential measures regarding insurance and reinsurance (A8-0008/2018 - Roberto Gualtieri)
I voted in favour of the Recommendation on the draft Council decision on the conclusion of the Bilateral Agreement between the European Union and the United States of America on prudential measures regarding insurance and reinsurance. The Agreement sets out the conditions for group supervision in both Parties of their respective insurance and reinsurance groups. The conclusion of the Agreement will lead to enhanced regulatory certainty in the application of insurance and reinsurance regulatory frameworks for insurers and reinsurers operating in the European Union and the United States of America as well as to improved policy-holders and other consumers’ protection through cooperation between supervisors on the exchange of information. It reinsurers that one Party operating in the other Party will not be subjected to any requirement to post collateral or to establish a branch or subsidiary, if they meet the prudential conditions laid down in the Agreement. Moreover, it insurances groups of one Party operating in the other Party which meet the conditions will not be subjected to a requirement to carry out a group solvency calculation for their worldwide activities nor to other aspects of group supervision for their worldwide activities.
Setting up a special committee on financial crimes, tax evasion and tax avoidance (TAX3), its responsibilities, numerical strength and term of office (B8-0125/2018)
I voted in favour of the proposal for a decision on setting up a special committee on financial crimes, tax evasion and tax avoidance, and defining its responsibilities, numerical strength and term of office. With this proposal, it is decided to set up a special committee on financial crimes, tax evasion and tax avoidance vested with the powers: to build on and complement the work carried out by the TAXE 1 and TAXE 2 special committees, to build on and complement the work carried out by the PANA inquiry committee, to follow up on the progress by the Member States in ending tax practices allowing for tax avoidance and/or tax evasion that are harmful for the proper functioning of the single market, to assess how EU VAT rules were circumvented in the framework of the Paradise Papers, to assess national schemes providing tax privileges, to analyse and assess the third country dimension in tax avoidance practices, to assess the Commission’s own assessment and screening process, to examine consequences of bilateral tax treaties concluded by Member States and to make any recommendations that it deems necessary in this matter.
Definition, presentation and labelling of spirit drinks and protection of geographical indications thereof (A8-0021/2018 - Pilar Ayuso)
I voted in favour of the report on the proposal for a regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council on the definition, presentation and labelling of spirit drinks, the use of the names of spirit drinks in the presentation and labelling of other foodstuffs and the protection of geographical indications for spirit drinks. The principal objective of the proposal for a regulation is to align current legislation in this area with the provisions of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union. Spirit drinks make up one of the most important European agri-food export sectors amounting to over EUR 10bn in 2016. It is therefore essential to keep in mind the importance of geographical indications in protecting the distinctive character and quality of spirit drinks and other local, regional, national and EU products, thereby helping to keep alive traditional skills and occupations and providing consumers with clear information. I voted in favour because I believe that it is advisable to adopt regulatory framework provisions designed to ensure the same degree of statutory protection against the use of counterfeit geographical indications for products in transit on EU territory, even if they are not intended for the internal market.
Mandatory automatic exchange of information in the field of taxation (A8-0016/2018 - Emmanuel Maurel)
I voted in favour of the Report on the proposal for a Council Directive amending Directive 2011/16/EU as regards mandatory automatic exchange of information in the field of taxation in relation to reportable cross-border arrangements. The final objective is to strengthen the Union’s fiscal transparency framework by introducing new rules for intermediaries in tax planning. Improving transparency, particularly through the exchange of information between tax administrations, is one of the main pillars of the Commission’s strategy to combat tax avoidance and evasion. The proposal amends Directive 2011/16/EU on administrative cooperation in the field of taxation in order to provide for the mandatory disclosure of potentially aggressive tax planning arrangements and to extend the scope of the automatic exchange of information between tax authorities to include such arrangements. I voted in favour because I believe that it is crucial to increase transparency and access to the right information at an early stage, as this should allow the authorities to improve the speed and accuracy of their risk assessment and make timely and informed decisions on how to protect their tax revenues.
Mobilisation of the European Globalisation Adjustment Fund: application EGF/2017/006 ES/Galicia apparel (A8-0033/2018 - Esteban González Pons)
I voted in favour of the report on the proposal for a decision of the European Parliament and of the Council on the mobilisation of the European Globalisation Adjustment Fund (application from Spain – EGF/2017/006 ES/Galicia apparel). The European Globalisation Adjustment Fund has been created in order to provide additional assistance to workers suffering from the consequences of major structural changes in world trade patterns. On 28 November 2017, the Commission adopted a proposal for a decision on the mobilisation of the EGF in favour of Spain to support the reintegration in the labour market of workers made redundant by five enterprises operating in the economic sector classified under the NACE Revision 2 Division 14 (Manufacture of wearing apparel) in the NUTS level 2 region of Galicia in Spain. Spain argues that the redundancies are linked to major structural changes in world trade patterns due to globalisation, more particularly to the liberalisation of trade in textiles and clothing. Spain is confronted with exceptional circumstances having a serious impact on employment and the local, regional or national economy. The inland territories in Galicia face depopulation issues and lack of jobs.
Mobilisation of the European Globalisation Adjustment Fund: application EGF/2017/007 SE/Ericsson (A8-0032/2018 - Urmas Paet)
I voted for the report on the proposal for a decision of the European Parliament and of the Council on the mobilisation of the European Globalisation Adjustment Fund (application from Sweden – EGF/2017/007 SE/Ericsson). The European Globalisation Adjustment Fund has been created in order to provide additional assistance to workers suffering from the consequences of major structural changes in world trade patterns. The Commission adopted a proposal for a decision on the mobilisation of the EGF in favour of Sweden to support the reintegration in the labour market of workers made redundant by one enterprise operating in the economic sector classified under the NACE Revision 2 Division 26 (Manufacture of computer, electronic and optical products) in the NUTS level 2 regions of Stockholm (SE11), Västsverige (SE23), Östra Mellansverige (SE12) and in the area of Sydsverige (SE22) in Sweden. Sweden argues that the redundancies are linked to major structural changes in world trade patterns due to globalisation, more particularly to the negative growth in the hardware-centric business line of the telecom industry for Ericsson in Sweden, because of global competition. Ericsson faces an uncertain future due to the structural changes due to globalisation and increased competition from competitors, especially in Asia.
Commission decision to activate Article 7 (1) TEU as regards the situation in Poland (B8-0119/2018, B8-0120/2018, B8-0121/2018)
I voted in favour of the resolution to wind up the debate on the statement by the Commission pursuant to Rule 123(2) of the Rules of Procedure on the Commission decision to activate Article 7(1) TEU as regards the situation in Poland. Its previous resolution of 15 November 2017 on the situation of the rule of law and democracy in Poland states that the current situation in Poland represents a clear risk of a serious breach of the values referred to in Article 2 of the TEU. Considering that the Government of the Republic of Poland was elected with a large majority and continues to enjoy increasing support from its people, any attempt to interfere in the Member States’ internal affairs would be unfounded. The resolution reaffirms strongly its attachment to the principle of subsidiarity.
Situation of fundamental rights in the EU in 2016 (A8-0025/2018 - Frank Engel)
I voted in favour of the report on the situation of fundamental rights in the EU in 2016. Safeguarding fundamental rights is a stated ambition of the European Union and a commitment which is part and parcel of the European integration process. For decades, the development of Europe as a political entity has gone hand in hand with improvements to the legal and judicial safeguards which enable EU citizens to assert their rights. Europe is, and must remain, a place of refuge. People whose lives or physical integrity are endangered by circumstances that they are forced to flee must still to be able to count on being taken in and looked after in Europe. It should go without saying that the rule of law prevails in Europe. We face many challenges in the area of fundamental rights. However, I voted in favour because I believe that we should mainly focus on issues in fields of the rule of law and migration and integration.
Prospects and challenges for the EU apiculture sector (A8-0014/2018 - Norbert Erdős)
I voted in favour of the report on prospects and challenges for the EU apiculture sector. The beekeeping sector is an integral part of European agriculture, providing over 620 000 EU citizens with their main income or additional earnings. The importance of the sector is much greater than we might judge from the amount of its contribution to the gross production value of the economy, as 84% of plant species and 76% of Europe’s food production depend on pollination by bees, so that the economic value thus produced – estimated at EUR 14.2 billion annually in the EU – exceeds the value of the honey produced by a long way. The situation of beekeepers active in the EU today is far from easy, with many factors making their lives difficult. The biggest problem by far is the spread of fake honey in the internal market, which is responsible for the purchase price of honey falling to half its 2014 value by the end of 2016, primarily in the major honey-producing countries such as Romania, Bulgaria, Spain, Portugal, France, Croatia and Hungary. I voted in favour because I believe in developing analytical laboratory methods which can filter out the more sophisticated forgeries.
Banking Union - Annual Report 2017 (A8-0019/2018 - Sander Loones)
I voted in favour of the Report on Banking Union – Annual Report 2017. On an unconsolidated basis, the total number of credit institutions in the euro area stood at 5 073 at the end of 2016, down from 5 474 at the end of 2015 and from 6 768 at the end of 2008, amounting to a 25% decrease over the period from 2008 to 2016. On a consolidated basis, the total number of credit institutions in the euro area stood at 2 290 at the end of 2016, down from 2 904 in 2008 and 2 379 at the end of 2015.Participation in the Banking Union is open to Member States that have not yet adopted the euro. The Banking Union has improved the exchange of relevant information between supervisory authorities and has improved the collection and exchange of data on the European banking system, contributing for example to better benchmarking and enabling a more holistic supervision of cross-border banking groups. I voted in favour because I believe that prior asset evaluations must be based on solid evidence, including evidence that shows that the bank is solvent and in compliance with EU state aid rules.
Cutting the sources of income for Jihadists - targeting the financing of terrorism (A8-0035/2018 - Javier Nart)
I voted in favour of the report on a European Parliament recommendation to the Council, the Commission and the Vice-President of the Commission/High Representative of the Union for Foreign Affairs and Security Policy on cutting the sources of income for jihadists – targeting the financing of terrorism. Some financing may come from within European countries for use elsewhere by terrorist organisations, while other funding comes from outside Europe, in order to finance radicalisation and actual terrorist acts. The external and internal dimensions of the fight against terrorism are interlinked, whereas cutting off the sources of financing of terrorism should be part of a broader EU strategy integrating both external and internal security dimensions.The report calls on the Member States and the Commission to consider cutting the funding sources of terrorist networks as a key priority, as it constitutes an effective tool for hampering the effectiveness of those networks. I voted in favour because I believe that preventive strategies based on the sharing of best practice and exchange of suspicious and relevant information among intelligence agencies is vital in combating the financing of terrorism and more generally terrorist attacks.
EU priorities for the 62nd session of the UN Commission on the Status of Women (A8-0022/2018 - Izaskun Bilbao Barandica, Ángela Vallina)
I voted in favour of the report on a European Parliament recommendation to the Council on the EU priorities for the 62nd session of the UN Commission on the Status of Women. Equality between women and men is a fundamental principle of the Union, as recognised in the Treaties and the Charter of Fundamental Rights. The Union and its Member States must be at the forefront of the empowerment of women and girls, and have a duty to work towards the achievement of full gender equality in the Union, and to promote this goal in all external relations. The lack of governmental action against gender inequality puts current and future achievements in the field at risk. I voted in favour because I believe that addressing traditional gender power relations, stereotypes and beliefs is key to ensuring women’s empowerment and poverty eradication.
Nominal composition of the special committee on the Union’s authorisation procedure for pesticides
I voted in favour of the nominal composition of the special committee on the Union’s authorisation procedure for pesticides. The special committee has the task to look into the EU’s authorisation procedure for pesticides. The special committee was set up in response to concerns about the risk assessment of the herbicide glyphosate. EU Member States renewed glyphosate’s marketing licence for five years in November last year.
Guarantee Fund for external actions (A8-0132/2017 - Eider Gardiazabal Rubial)
I voted in favour of the report on the proposal for a regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council amending Regulation (EC, Euratom) No 480/2009 establishing a Guarantee Fund for external actions. The Guarantee Fund for External Action (GFEA) protects the EU budget from shocks that might otherwise occur in case of defaults on loans that are guaranteed by the EU. It is intended to cover the activation of general budget guarantees for third countries in order to avoid possible disruptions to the implementation of the budget in the event of default. The Commission entrusted so far the financial management of the GFEA to the EIB, however the funds in it remain the property of the EU. The Commission’s proposal to take over the asset management of the Guarantee Fund from the EIB is part of a larger plan to eventually internalise all asset management. The Commission claims that the transfer of the asset management to the Commission would generate over a full MFF period savings allowing the financing of a volume of investments of EUR 66 million.
EU guarantee to the European Investment Bank against losses under financing operations supporting investment projects outside the Union (A8-0135/2017 - Eider Gardiazabal Rubial)
I voted in favour of the report on the proposal for a decision of the European Parliament and of the Council amending Decision No 466/2014/EU granting an EU guarantee to the European Investment Bank against losses under financing operations supporting investment projects outside the Union. The Commission proposal aims at expanding the External Lending Mandate of the European Investment Bank (EIB) both quantitatively and qualitatively, in particular with the objective of stepping up activities in the Southern Neighbourhood and Western Balkans and contributing to the new External Investment Plan. I voted in favour because I believe that the essential link between the EIB operations and EU external policy should be further strengthened. In particular, the country distribution within the regional ceilings should fully reflect external policy priorities and constraints and should be defined in consultation with the European External Action Service. Furthermore, transparency should be improved with regard to EIB projects financed through financial intermediaries.
Annual report on the financial activities of the European Investment Bank (A8-0013/2018 - Eider Gardiazabal Rubial)
I voted in favour of the report on the Annual Report on the Financial Activities of the European Investment Bank. The EIB has contributed a lot to restoring investment activity in the EU after the economic and financial crises. The EIB’s activities during the current recovery period and improved credit availability in the majority of countries and sectors must be carefully directed towards products and projects ensuring high added value while especially taking into account regions with a low level of investment activity and countries with underlying investment gaps in both the public and private sector. According to the EIB Economics Department’s brief of 28 September 2017, the cumulative investments approved by the EIB Group in 2015 and 2016 will add 2.3% to the EU’s GDP by 2020 will add 2.25 million jobs, which shows the substantial macroeconomic impact of the EIB. I believe that the EIB’s advisory services and financing in key areas such as infrastructure financing, climate change mitigation and adaptation, urban development and SME support should continue. However, expanding the EIB’s financing activities is no substitute for socially balanced and sustainable structural reforms and sustainable fiscal policy in the Member States.
Current human rights situation in Turkey (B8-0079/2018, RC-B8-0082/2018, B8-0082/2018, B8-0084/2018, B8-0091/2018, B8-0092/2018, B8-0095/2018, B8-0097/2018, B8-0103/2018)
I voted in favour of the resolution on the current human rights situation in Turkey. Turkey’s Government has extended the state of emergency for the sixth time since July 2016, although according to Turkey’s constitution, a state of emergency can be declared for a maximum period of six months. The continued emergency rule has created a de facto presidential system, as well as entrenching the one—man rule of President Erdoğan. Since the attempted coup, the human rights situation has deteriorated exponentially, as mainly three groups of people have been put under pressure, judicially harassed, arrested and persecuted: anyone suspected of belonging to the Gullenist movement, elected officials and supporters of Kurdish movements, and leading voices and activists from civil society organisations critical of the current government. The resolution calls on the Turkish authorities to ensure respect for human rights and fundamental freedoms. I voted in favour because I believe that the Turkish Government has to stop interfering in the judicial system by pressuring judges and prosecutors, by dismissing or arresting them and by confiscating their properties, and to restore and implement all legal guarantees to ensure full respect for the independence of the judiciary.
Situation in Venezuela (RC-B8-0078/2018, B8-0078/2018, B8-0080/2018, B8-0081/2018, B8-0083/2018, B8-0087/2018, B8-0094/2018)
I voted in favour of the resolution on the situation in Venezuela. The internationally non—recognised National Constituent Assembly has called for a presidential election to be held by the end of April 2018. However, according to the Venezuelan Constitution, the body responsible for calling an election is the National Electoral Council. However, on 25 January 2018 the Venezuelan Supreme Court decided to exclude the Mesa de la Unidad Democrática (MUD), a coalition of opposition parties, from the presidential elections, which represents a serious breach of the principle of equitable elections, prohibiting opposition candidates from competing freely and on equal terms in the elections. Such an unconstitutional call for an early election resulted in Mexico’s withdrawal from the process of national political negotiations between the Venezuelan Government and opposition. The resolution strongly rejects the decision by the internationally non—recognised National Constituent Assembly to call early presidential elections by the end of April 2018. Moreover, it states that under the current circumstances, the European Parliament will recognise neither the elections nor the authorities put in place by this illegitimate process.
Situation of UNRWA (RC-B8-0085/2018, B8-0085/2018, B8-0086/2018, B8-0088/2018, B8-0089/2018, B8-0090/2018, B8-0093/2018)
I voted in favour of the resolution on the situation of UNRWA. UNRWA is a United Nations agency established by the General Assembly in 1949 and mandated to provide assistance and protection to some 5 million registered Palestine refugees. UNRWA’s services encompass education, healthcare, relief and social services, camp infrastructure and improvement, protection and microfinance. The spokesperson of the US State Department stated on 16 January 2018 that the United States had committed a voluntary contribution of USD 60 million to UNRWA for 2018. However, according to the spokesperson, the United States would like to see some revisions made to how UNRWA operates. The resolution stresses that UNRWA’s work helps ensure that the essential needs for the well—being, protection and human development of Palestine refugees are met within its five fields of operation. Moreover, it expresses its concern at UNWRA’s funding crisis and urges all donors to honour their promises to the Agency. Finally, it notes that the EU is committed to continuing to assist UNRWA in securing financial resources to enable the Agency to support Palestine refugees.
Summer-time arrangements (B8-0070/2018, B8-0071/2018)
I voted in favour of the resolution on summer—time arrangements. According to the Interinstitutional Agreement on better law—making, the evaluation of existing legislation should provide a basis for impact assessments as regards options for future action. Numerous scientific studies have failed to arrive at any definitive conclusions, but have indicated the existence of negative effects on human health. A number of citizens’ initiatives have highlighted citizens’ concerns about the biannual clock change. The resolution calls on the Commission to conduct a thorough assessment of Directive 2000/84/EC on summer—time arrangements and, if necessary, come up with a proposal for its revision.
Composition of the European Parliament (A8-0007/2018 - Danuta Maria Hübner, Pedro Silva Pereira)
I abstained from voting on the Report on the composition of the European Parliament. The apportionment of seats in the Parliament is a politically sensitive issue as it has a direct impact on citizens’ representation in the only directly elected European institution. In this respect, it is of utmost importance to ensure that the composition of the European Parliament is based on fair, transparent, objective, sustainable, and equitable principles. The current distribution of seats in the Parliament only partially respects the principle of degressive proportionality as defined in secondary legislation.
Revision of the Framework Agreement on relations between the European Parliament and the European Commission (A8-0006/2018 - Esteban González Pons)
I voted in favour of the Report on the revision of the Framework Agreement on relations between the European Parliament and the European Commission. Article 10(1) TEU states that the functioning of the Union is founded on representative democracy. Article 10(3) and Article 11 TEU confer on the citizens of the Union the right to participate in the democratic life of the Union. Article 17(3) TEU states that, in carrying out its responsibilities, the Commission shall be completely independent, that the members of the Commission are to be chosen on the ground of their general competence and European commitment from persons whose independence is beyond doubt and that they are neither to seek nor take instructions from any Government or other institution, body, office or entity. The aim of the draft amendments is to implement democratic principles when electing the President of the Commission, in accordance with Article 17(7) TEU. The Report recalls that the ‘Spitzenkandidaten’ process reflects the interinstitutional balance between the Parliament and the European Council as provided for in the Treaties. Furthermore, it emphasises that this further step in strengthening the Union’s parliamentary dimension is a principle that cannot be overturned.
Automated data exchange with regard to vehicle registration data in Portugal (A8-0017/2018 - Ignazio Corrao)
I voted in favour of the Report on the draft Council implementing decision on the launch of automated data exchange with regard to vehicle registration data in Portugal. The purpose is to authorise Portugal to receive and supply personal data for the purposes of automated searching of vehicle registration data (VRD). Council Decision 2008/615/JHA on the stepping up of cross-border cooperation, particularly in combating terrorism and cross-border crime, confers implementing powers upon the Council with a view to adopting measures necessary to implement that Decision, in particular as regards the receiving and supply of personal data provided for under that Decision. The supply of personal data provided for under that Decision may not take place until the general provisions on data protection have been implemented in the national law of the territories of the Member States involved in such supply. The draft Council Implementing Decision aims, for the purposes of the automated consultation of vehicle registration data, to allow Portugal to receive and supply personal data in accordance with Decision 2008/615/JHA.
Protection and non-discrimination with regard to minorities in the EU Member States (B8-0064/2018)
I voted in favour of the Resolution on protection and non-discrimination with regard to minorities in the EU Member States. The Committee on Petitions has received several petitions raising concerns about various practices that discriminate against EU citizens belonging to minorities and has organised a hearing on the different issues raised. There is a strong link between minority rights and the principle of the rule of law. Article 2 of the TEU expressly mentions the rights of persons belonging to minorities and whereas these rights deserve to be accorded the same treatment as the other rights enshrined in the Treaties. The resolution deplores the fact that persons belonging to minorities still encounter obstacles in ensuring respect for their fundamental rights and remain victims of hate speech and hate crimes. Moreover, it considers that Member States should consistently uphold the rights of minorities and periodically assess whether those rights are being respected. I voted in favour because I believes that the EU has a responsibility to protect and promote the rights of minorities and I consider it necessary to improve the EU’s legislative framework to protect the rights of persons belonging to minorities in a comprehensive manner.
Objection to a delegated act: Adding Sri Lanka, Trinidad and Tobago and Tunisia to the list of high-risk third countries (B8-0074/2018)
I voted in favour of the Revolution on the Commission delegated regulation of 13 December 2017 amending Delegated Regulation (EU) 2016/1675 supplementing Directive (EU) 2015/849 of the European Parliament and of the Council, as regards adding Sri Lanka, Trinidad and Tobago and Tunisia to the table in point I of the Annex. Delegated regulation, its annex and amending delegated regulations are meant to identify high-risk third countries with strategic deficiencies as regards anti-money laundering and countering terrorist financing (AML/CTF), which represent a threat to the EU financial system and for which enhanced customer due diligence measures are necessary at EU obliged entities under 4AMLD. Parliament appreciates the efforts made by the Commission towards establishing a new methodology that does not only rely on external information sources to identify jurisdictions presenting strategic deficiencies in tackling money laundering and the financing of terrorism. However, Parliament urges the Commission to adopt a more ambitious timeframe for both steps in its roadmap towards the new methodology, including committing to completing its Priority 2 list by the end of 2020, and to allocate sufficient resources to this process.
Zero tolerance for female genital mutilation (B8-0068/2018)
. ‒ I voted in favour of the resolution on zero tolerance for female genital mutilation (FGM). The 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development explicitly calls for the elimination of female genital mutilation alongside other harmful practices. UNICEF’s 2016 statistical report states that a minimum of 200 million girls and women worldwide have undergone FGM, but the exact figure remains unknown. FGM practice exists in the European Union as a result of migration from parts of the world where it is practiced, notably from the African continent but also from parts of the Middle East, Asia and Oceania.There has been progress, albeit uneven, over the past three decades, with the prevalence rates dropping by some 30%. The resolution sees this momentum as an opportunity for international organisations and states to step up their efforts, primarily through creating links and connections so that different regions, stakeholders and sectors can actively work together to achieve the abandonment of this and other practices that are harmful to a girl child.I voted in favour because I believe that criminal law and targeted training must go hand in hand with efforts to raise awareness in order to dis-incentivise practitioners of FGM from continuing.
Request for waiver of the immunity of Steeve Briois (A8-0011/2018 - Evelyn Regner)
I voted in favour of the Report on the request for waiver of the immunity of Steeve Briois. On 23 December 2015, Mr Briois posted on his personal, publicly accessible Facebook account a text stating, among other things, that the opposition bid to ban the Christmas crib had been dismissed by the Court. In response to this text, a number of comments, which the municipal councillor targeted deemed insulting to him, were posted on Steeve Briois’ Facebook page. As a consequence, the municipal councillor lodged a complaint with the Senior Examining Magistrate of Douai concerning, in particular, Mr Briois’ alleged failure to remove those comments from his Facebook page. The requesting authorities consider that the waiver of Mr Briois’ immunity is necessary so that he can be required, under coercion if need be, to appear before the examining magistrate for initial interrogation. I voted in favour because there was no fumus persecutionis, i.e. a sufficiently serious and precise suspicion that the matter is being raised with the intention of causing political damage to the Member concerned.
EU-Brazil Agreement for scientific and technological cooperation (A8-0004/2018 - Angelo Ciocca)
I voted in favour of the Recommendation on the draft Council decision concerning the renewal of the Agreement for scientific and technological cooperation between the European Community and the Federative Republic of Brazil. The Agreement for scientific and technological cooperation between the European Community and the Federative Republic of Brazil entered into force on 7 August 2007. The agreement was concluded initially for five years and may be renewed by consensus on a five-yearly basis, subject to evaluation during the penultimate year of each subsequent five-year period. Parliament is now being called upon to give its consent to the second renewal. As regards the substance, the renewed agreement will be identical to the agreement now in force. The EU-Brazil S&T agreement covers a wide range of research fields falling under the EU research and innovation framework programme. I voted in favour because I believe that the agreement provides an important framework for facilitating cooperation between the EU and Brazil in common S&T priority areas leading to mutual benefits. Given that its potential as a research and innovation partner is continuing to grow, Brazil should be viewed as a strategic partner for the EU in Latin America.
Setting up a special committee on the Union’s authorisation procedure for pesticides, its responsibilities, numerical strength and term of office (B8-0077/2018)
I voted in favour of the Proposal for a decision on setting up a special committee on the Union’s authorisation procedure for pesticides, its responsibilities, numerical strength and term of office. Recently, concerns have been raised about the assessment of glyphosate, in particular as to whether an independent, objective and transparent assessment has taken place, whether the classification criteria of Regulation (EC) No 1272/2008 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 16 December 2008 on classification, labelling and packaging of substances and mixtures, amending and repealing Directives 67/548/EEC and 1999/45/EC, and amending Regulation (EC) No 1907/2006 have been properly applied, and whether relevant guidance documents have been properly used. Therefore, the European Parliament decided to set up a special committee on the Union’s authorisation procedure for pesticides, vested with the following strictly defined responsibilities. Any recommendation of the special committee shall be presented to and, if necessary, followed up by Parliament’s competent standing committees. The powers and available resources of Parliament’s standing committees with responsibility for matters concerning the adoption, monitoring and implementation of Union legislation relating to the area of responsibility of the special committee shall remain unchanged.
Geo-blocking and other forms of discrimination based on customers' nationality, place of residence or place of establishment (A8-0172/2017 - Róża Gräfin von Thun und Hohenstein)
I voted in favour of the Report on the proposal for a regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council on addressing geo-blocking and other forms of discrimination based on customers’ nationality, place of residence or place of establishment within the internal market and amending Regulation (EC) No 2006/2004 and Directive 2009/22/EC. As part of its eCommerce package, the Commission presented a proposal for a regulation on addressing geo-blocking and other forms of discrimination based on customers’ nationality, place of residence or place of establishment. The purpose of the regulation is to ensure that customers have the same access to goods and services as local customers. The Regulation builds upon the provisions of the Services Directive (Art 20), which already establishes the principle for non-discrimination. The regulation seeks to provide more legal certainty and enforceability by defining specific situations when there can be no justified reason for discrimination on the grounds of nationality or residence. The proposed regulation also includes provisions of non-discrimination within accepted payment means. The Regulation is part of the overall strategy to stimulate cross-border e-commerce by ensuring better access to goods and services, by building trust and providing greater certainty and by reducing administrative burden.
Cost-effective emission reductions and low-carbon investments (A8-0003/2017 - Julie Girling)
I voted in favour of the Report on the proposal for a directive of the European Parliament and of the Council amending Directive 2003/87/EC to enhance cost-effective emission reductions and low-carbon investments. On the 15th of July 2015 the European Commission published its proposal for Phase IV of the ETS. The proposal aims to meet the EU’s 2030 greenhouse gas emissions target of ‘at least’ 40% while protecting European industry from the risk of carbon leakage and promoting innovation and modernisation in Europe’s industrial and power sectors over the decade from 2020. The proposal stems from the European Council conclusions of the 23rd and 24th of October 2014, which lay down guidelines on how these aims should be achieved. I voted in favour because I believe that a market-based mechanism such as the ETS is the most cost-effective way of meeting our climate change obligations and notes with positivity the spread of carbon pricing around the world. The new linear reduction factor (LRF) is 2.2% and I believe it is the minimum by which the overall number of allowances should decline annually throughout Phase IV.
European Central Bank Annual Report for 2016 (A8-0383/2017 - Jonás Fernández)
I voted in favour of the Report on the European Central Bank Annual Report for 2016. Members acknowledged the federal nature of the ECB, which enables it to act decisively in various matters such as addressing the crisis. They also noted the contribution of the ECB’s accommodative monetary policy in the period 2012-2016) to cyclical economic recovery and employment creation, also by preventing deflation. Members were, however, concerned at the consequences of the unconventional monetary policy measures for individual savers and the financial equilibrium of pension and insurance schemes as well as the build-up of asset bubbles, which the ECB should carefully monitor. They also remained concerned at the still significant levels of non-marketable assets and asset-backed securities put forward as collateral to the Eurosystem in the framework of its refinancing operations. In accordance with Article 7 of the ECB Statute, neither the ECB, nor a national central bank, nor any member of their decision-making bodies shall seek or take instructions from Community institutions or bodies, from any government of a Member State or from any other body. Therefore, the independence of the ECB in its role as the euro area’s monetary authority.
Accelerating clean energy innovation (A8-0005/2018 - Jerzy Buzek)
I voted in favour of the Report on accelerating clean energy innovation. Modern economies are undergoing a profound transition in the way they produce, transmit, store and use energy. This transition is founded on three elements: the need for affordable, reliable and secure energy to power our economic growth, more sustainable use of available resources and new technologies. European Union has been a global leader of this energy transition which remains for the EU a key to building its global comparative advantage. In this context, EU’s ability to accelerate clean energy innovation is a matter of overarching importance. It is clear as the Union strives to ensure its global industrial competitiveness, sustainable growth and high-value jobs for its citizens, while making the transition to high-efficiency, low-emission economy and strengthening its overall energy security and independence from imports. I voted in favour because I believe that ensuring the overall coherence of cross-policy regulatory framework is one of the key factors in boosting energy innovation. This is about stable, long-term policy vision that brings together its different strands - including Structural Funds - and private schemes.
Sustainable management of external fishing fleets (A8-0374/2017 - Linnéa Engström)
I voted in favour of the Recommendation for a second reading of the Council position at first reading with a view to the adoption of a regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council on the sustainable management of external fishing fleets, and repealing Council Regulation (EC) No 1006/2008. The European Parliament and the Council agreed on a new legislative framework for the sustainable management of the external fishing fleets. The new regime sets out strict, transparent and harmonised rules for issuing and managing fishing authorisations to EU vessels fishing outside Community waters and to foreign vessels operating in EU waters. The existing Regulation has been revised in order to adapt to the new objectives enshrined in the new Common Fisheries Policy. I voted in favour because the Regulation aims to improve governance, increase transparency, and bring in better monitoring and enforcement of the rules, especially in certain cases such as direct licenses, transhipments or reflagging.
Amendments to various Regulations in the field of agriculture and rural development (A8-0380/2017 - Albert Deß)
I voted in favour of the Report on the proposal for a regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council on the financial rules applicable to the general budget of the Union and amending Regulations (EU) No 1305/2013, (EU) No 1306/2013, (EU) No 1307/2013, (EU) No 1308/2013 and (EU) No 652/2014 of the European Parliament and of the Council. The proliferation of rules, their heterogeneity and their complexity have all slowed down the implementation of EU funds, making it costly and prone to errors. Whilst a first step towards more coherent and simpler financial rules was achieved in 2012, the Commission considers that there is room for further simplification. The Commission wishes to continue efforts to remove bottlenecks, ensure synergies and complementarities between ESI Funds and the other EU funds and improve efficiency of delivery and control requirements. I voted in favour because I believe that in the interests of administrative simplification, it is appropriate to increase the threshold below which Member States may decide not to pursue recovery of undue payments from EUR 150 to EUR 250 provided that the Member State applies an equal or higher threshold for not pursuing national debts.
EU Emissions Trading System (EU ETS): continuing current limitations of scope for aviation activities and preparing to implement a global market-based measure from 2021 (A8-0258/2017 - Julie Girling)
I voted in favour of the Report on the proposal for a regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council amending Directive 2003/87/EC to continue current limitations of scope for aviation activities and to prepare to implement a global market-based measure from 2021. Approximately 1.3% of global CO2 emissions are derived from international aviation. With anticipated growth in air traffic over the next three decades, worldwide emissions could further increase by 300-700% by 2050 unless action is taken to curtail the rise. ICAO must develop the modalities, procedures, and implementation tools to allow the CORSIA to enter into force in 2021, which includes the monitoring, reporting, and verification of emissions, offset criteria and eligibility, baseline emissions, and the regulatory framework. I believe that that the CORSIA has to be integrated into EU climate policy in the most efficient way. Enhanced transparency will be crucial to ICAO’s work on implementation progresses over the next two years. ICAO’s Committee on Aviation and Environmental Protection, which, along with the ICAO Council, will set the framework and governance provisions on MRV and offset units, applies a strict non-disclosure protocol on its Members and Observers.
Mobilisation of the Contingency margin in 2017 (A8-0372/2017 - Jens Geier)
I voted in favour of the report on the proposal for a decision of the European Parliament and of the Council amending Decision EU 2017/344 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 14 December 2016 on the mobilisation of the Contingency Margin in 2017.The European Parliament and the Council decided on 14 December 2016 to mobilise the Contingency margin in 2017 to address the needs stemming from the migration, refugee and security crisis, by increasing the commitment appropriations in the general budget of the EU for 2017 over and above the ceilings of Heading 3 (EUR 1 167 million) and Heading 4 (EUR 730 million). The decision also specifies the offsetting of the amount mobilised in 2017, 2018 and 2019. Given the need to increase flexibility in the 2018 budget, the Commission proposes to amend the 2017 mobilisation decision and to adjust the offsetting profile to decrease the amount offset in Heading 5 in 2018 from EUR 570 million to EUR 318 million and correspondingly introduce offsetting of EUR 252 million in Heading 5 in 2020. This does not change the overall amount mobilised and offset.
Draft amending Budget No 6/2017: Reduction of payment and commitment appropriations in line with updated forecasts of expenditure and update of revenue (own resources and fines) (A8-0379/2017 - Jens Geier)
I voted in favour of the report on the Council position on Draft amending budget No 6/2017 of the European Union for the financial year 2017: Reduction of payment and commitment appropriations in line with updated forecasts of expenditure and update of revenue (own resources and fines).Draft amending budget No 6/2017 aims to update both the expenditure and the revenue sides of the budget to take account of the latest developments. Draft amending budget No 6/2017 decreases the level of payment appropriations by EUR 7 719.7 million, mostly in budget lines under heading 1b (Economic, social and territorial cohesion) and, to a lesser extent, under headings 2 (Sustainable growth – natural resources), 3 (Security and Citizenship) and 4 (Global Europe) and in the European Union Solidarity Fund (EUSF), and therefore reduces national contributions accordingly. Moreover, Draft amending budget No 6/2017 takes account of a total amount of EUR 3 209.7 million in fines which has become definitive and exceeds the level initially planned for the 2017 budget, and assigns the difference between the latter and the former (amounting up to EUR 2 209.7 million) to the reduction of own resources contributions from Member States to the Union budget.
Mobilisation of the European Union Solidarity Fund to provide for the payment of advances in the general budget 2018 (A8-0371/2017 - Inese Vaidere)
I voted in favour of the Report on the proposal for a decision of the European Parliament and of the Council on the mobilisation of the European Union Solidarity Fund to provide for the payment of advances in the general budget of the Union for 2018.The European Union Solidarity Fund (EUSF) was set up to enable the Union to respond to emergency situations caused by major natural disasters and to express European solidarity to disaster-stricken regions within Europe. The Fund can provide financial aid to Member States and countries involved in accession negotiations in the event of a ‘major natural disaster’, i.e. where total direct damage caused by the disaster exceeds EUR 3 billion in 2011 prices or 0.6% of the country’s GNI, whichever is the lower. The current proposal for a decision of the European Parliament and of the Council is not linked to a specific disaster. Instead, it aims at entering into the general budget of the Union for 2018 the amount of EUR 50 million in commitment and payment appropriations for the payment of advances in a timely and efficient way in the event of a disaster occurring next year.
Mobilisation of the Flexibility Instrument to finance immediate budgetary measures to address the on-going challenges of migration, refugee inflows and security threats (A8-0370/2017 - Siegfried Mureşan)
I voted in favour of the report on the proposal for a decision of the European Parliament and of the Council on the mobilisation of the Flexibility Instrument to finance immediate budgetary measures to address the on-going challenges of migration, refugee inflows and security threats.The Flexibility Instrument is intended to allow the financing of clearly identified expenditure which could not be financed within the limits of the ceilings available for one or more other headings. The ceiling on the annual amount available for the Flexibility Instrument is EUR 600 000 000, as laid down in Article 11 of the Council Regulation. In order to address the ongoing challenges of migration, refugee inflows and security threats, it is necessary to mobilise significant additional amounts to finance such measures as a matter of urgency. I voted in favour because I believe that it is necessary to mobilise the Flexibility Instrument to supplement the financing available in the general budget of the Union for the financial year 2018, beyond the ceilings of heading 3 by the amount of EUR 837 241 199 to finance measures in the field of migration, refugees and security. This amount includes amounts which lapsed in the previous years of the European Union Solidarity Fund.
Mobilisation of the European Globalisation Adjustment Fund: application EGF/2017/003 GR/Attica retail (A8-0367/2017 - Marie-Pierre Vieu)
I voted in favour of the Report Proposal for a decision of the European Parliament and of the Council on the mobilisation of the European Globalisation Adjustment Fund following an application from Greece – EGF/2017/003 GR/Attica retail.The European Globalisation Adjustment Fund (EGF) has been created in order to provide additional assistance to workers suffering from the consequences of major structural changes in world trade patterns. Under the provisions of Article 12 of the Regulation, the Fund may not exceed a maximum annual amount of EUR 150 million. The appropriate amounts are entered into the general budget of the Union as a provision. On 23 October 2017, the Commission adopted a proposal for a decision on the mobilisation of the EGF in favour of Greece to support the reintegration in the labour market of workers made redundant by nine enterprises operating in the economic sector classified under NACE Rev. 2 division 47 in Greece. I voted in favour because I believe that active, personalised measures may help to ease the unemployment situation in the regions concerned and are particularly important for people aged over 55, who make up more than 85% of the workers in question.
Mobilisation of the European Globalisation Adjustment Fund: application EGF/2017/005 FI/Retail (A8-0366/2017 - Răzvan Popa)
I voted in favour of the Report on the proposal for a decision of the European Parliament and of the Council on the mobilisation of the European Globalisation Adjustment Fund (application from Finland – EGF/2017/005 FI/Retail).The European Globalisation Adjustment Fund has been created in order to provide additional assistance to workers suffering from the consequences of major structural changes in world trade patterns. According to the provisions of Article 12 of Regulation (EU, Euratom) No 1311/2013 laying down the multiannual financial framework for the years 2014-2020 and of Article 15 of Regulation (EU) No 1309/2013, the Fund may not exceed a maximum annual amount of EUR 150 million.On 23 October 2017, the Commission adopted a proposal for a decision on the mobilisation of the EGF in favour of Finland to support the reintegration in the labour market of workers made redundant by three enterprises operating under the NACE Revision 2 Division 47 (Retail trade, except motor vehicles and motorcycles) in the NUTS level 2 regions. I voted in favour because the Finnish authorities have provided all necessary assurances. The financial contribution will be managed and controlled by the Employment and Entrepreneurship Department of the MEAE.
2018 budgetary procedure (A8-0359/2017 - Siegfried Mureşan, Richard Ashworth)
I voted in favour of the report on the joint text on the draft general budget of the European Union for the financial year 2018 approved by the Conciliation Committee under the budgetary procedure.The 2018 draft budget is in line with the annual evolution foreseen in the multiannual financial framework (MFF). It focuses on the challenge of migration, both within and outside the EU. The 2018 budget will be the fifth of the current MFF. The budget is proposed in the context of the mid-term review of the MFF formally adopted by the Council. The Commission should also use the budget under the ‘Agriculture’ heading to allocate additional funding for security and migration. The main budgetary priorities for the year are employment and investment, the promotion of sustainable development and increasing security.
Request for the waiver of the immunity of Ana Gomes (A8-0363/2017 - Laura Ferrara)
I voted in favour of the report on the request for waiver of the immunity of Ana Gomes MEP. A prosecutor of the Vila Real Public Prosecution Service attached to the Peso de Régua District Court has requested waiver of the parliamentary immunity of Ms Ana Gomes in connection with statements made by her in an interview with the Diário de Noticias, published by that newspaper on the internet on 29 April 2016. The request has been made with a view to initiating criminal proceedings against Ms Gomes and so that she may be questioned in that connection.In principle, the acts allegedly committed by Ms Gomes constitute three offences. I voted in favour because statements by Ms Gomes during the interview were made in the performance of her duties as a Member of the European Parliament and within her remit as Vice-Chair of the Committee of Inquiry to investigate alleged contraventions and maladministration in the implementation of Union law in relation to money laundering, tax avoidance and tax evasion.
Changes to the resources for economic, social and territorial cohesion and to the resources for the investment for growth and jobs goal and for the European territorial cooperation goal (A8-0358/2017 - Iskra Mihaylova)
I voted in favour of the Report on the proposal for a regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council amending Regulation (EU) No 1303/2013 as regards the changes to the resources for economic, social and territorial cohesion and to the resources for the Investment for growth and jobs goal and for the European territorial cooperation goal.The legislative proposal carries out a number of technical changes to the Common Provisions Regulation (CPR – Regulation (EU) No 1303/2013) in order to take into account the most recent statistical data available and to bring the figures in that regulation into line with the outcome of various financial decisions that have already been taken. The Multiannual Financial Framework for 2014-2020 (MFF – Regulation provides in Article 7 for an adjustment of cohesion policy envelopes between 2016 and 2017. The procedure provides for the adjustment of the total allocation for each Member State where the national GDP has changed by more than 5%. I voted in favour because the proposal carries out a series of technical modifications to the figures in the CPR in order to reflect various decisions already taken to update or adjust cohesion programme funding.
EU-Egypt Agreement for scientific and technological cooperation: participation of Egypt in the Partnership for Research and Innovation in the Mediterranean Area (PRIMA) (A8-0353/2017 - Sofia Sakorafa)
I voted in favour of the recommendation on the draft Council decision on the conclusion of the Agreement for scientific and technological cooperation between the European Union and the Arab Republic of Egypt setting out the terms and conditions for the participation of the Arab Republic of Egypt in the Partnership for Research and Innovation in the Mediterranean Area (PRIMA).In July 2017 the European Parliament adopted the new Partnership on Research and Innovation in the Mediterranean Area (PRIMA) with a vast majority. PRIMA is the first ever Public-to-Public Partnership under Article 185 TFEU to target a specific geographical area, the Mediterranean Basin, including the participation of the EU’s neighbouring countries. PRIMA’s specific objective is to coordinate, strengthen, intensify, widen and align the currently fragmented research and innovation national programmes of these sectors within a multi-actor, multidimensional comprehensive and integrated approach. I voted in favour because I believe that PRIMA is one of the rare attempts of EU science diplomacy that could also help address the forced displacement of Mediterranean residents, and therefore address some of the root causes of migration.
EU-Algeria Agreement for scientific and technological cooperation: participation of Algeria in the Partnership for Research and Innovation in the Mediterranean Area (PRIMA) (A8-0354/2017 - Sofia Sakorafa)
I voted in favour of the Recommendation on the draft Council decision on the conclusion of the agreement for scientific and technological cooperation between the European Union and the People’s Democratic Republic of Algeria setting out the terms and conditions for the participation of the People’s Democratic Republic of Algeria in the Partnership for Research and Innovation in the Mediterranean Area (PRIMA).In July 2017 the European Parliament adopted the new Partnership on Research and Innovation in the Mediterranean Area (PRIMA) with a vast majority. PRIMA is the first ever, Public-to-Public Partnership under Article 185 TFEU to target a specific geographical area, the Mediterranean Basin, including the participation of the EU’s neighbouring countries. PRIMA’s specific objective is to coordinate, strengthen, intensify, widen and align the currently fragmented research and innovation national programmes of these sectors within a multi-actor, multidimensional comprehensive and integrated approach. I voted in favour because I believe that PRIMA is one of the rare attempts of EU science diplomacy that could also help address the forced displacement of Mediterranean residents, and thereby to address some of the root causes of migration.
EU-Jordan Agreement for scientific and technological cooperation: participation of Jordan in the Partnership for Research and Innovation in the Mediterranean Area (PRIMA) (A8-0355/2017 - Sofia Sakorafa)
I wanted in favour of the Recommendation on the draft Council decision on the conclusion of the Agreement for scientific and technological cooperation between the European Union and the Hashemite Kingdom of Jordan setting out the terms and conditions for the participation of the Hashemite Kingdom of Jordan in the Partnership for Research and Innovation in the Mediterranean Area (PRIMA).In July 2017 the European Parliament adopted the new Partnership on Research and Innovation in the Mediterranean Area (PRIMA) with a vast majority. PRIMA is the first ever, Public-to-Public Partnership under Article 185 TFEU to target a specific geographical area, the Mediterranean Basin, including the participation of the EU’s neighbouring countries. PRIMA’s specific objective is to coordinate, strengthen, intensify, widen and align the currently fragmented research and innovation national programmes of these sectors within a multi-actor, multidimensional comprehensive and integrated approach. I voted in favour because I believe that PRIMA is one of the rare attempts of science diplomacy that could also help address the forced displacement of the Mediterranean residents, and thereby address some of the root causes of migration.
Accession of Chile, Iceland and Bahamas to the 1980 Hague Convention on the Civil Aspects of International Child Abduction (A8-0364/2017 - Angel Dzhambazki)
I voted in favour of the Report on the proposal for a Council decision authorising Romania to accept, in the interest of the European Union, the accession of Chile, Iceland and Bahamas to the 1980 Hague Convention on the Civil Aspects of International Child Abduction. The Hague Convention of 25 October 1980 on the Civil Aspects of International Child Abduction is a vitally important instrument. It has been ratified by all EU Member States. The Convention introduces a system of cooperation between the contracting states aimed at settling cases of international child abduction. In many instances, these problems arise when a couple has separated. If the mother and father are from different states, there is a temptation to exploit the lack of cooperation between those states in order to secure custody of the child. The biggest problem in such cases is the national bias of the legal systems of individual states. The purpose of the Convention is to resolve such situations at an international level, by establishing that the competent courts and applicable laws are those of the state of residence of the child. The Convention introduces a system which ensures the immediate return of children who have been abducted.
Accession of Panama, Uruguay, Colombia and El Salvador to the 1980 Hague Convention on the Civil Aspects of International Child Abduction (A8-0362/2017 - Angel Dzhambazki)
I voted in favour of the Report on the proposal for a Council decision authorising Austria and Romania to accept, in the interest of the European Union, the accession of Panama, Uruguay, Colombia and El Salvador to the 1980 Hague Convention on the Civil Aspects of International Child Abduction. The Hague Convention of 25 October 1980 on the Civil Aspects of International Child Abduction is a vitally important instrument. It has been ratified by all EU Member States. The Convention introduces a system of cooperation between the contracting states aimed at settling cases of international child abduction. These problems arise when a couple has separated. If the mother and father are from different states, there is a temptation to exploit the lack of cooperation between those states in order to secure custody of the child. The biggest problem is the national bias of the legal systems of individual states. The purpose of the Convention is to resolve such situations at an international level, by establishing that the competent courts and applicable laws are those of the state of residence of the child. The Convention introduces a system which ensures the immediate return of children who have been abducted.
Accession of San Marino to the 1980 Hague Convention on the Civil Aspects of International Child Abduction (A8-0360/2017 - Angel Dzhambazki)
I voted in favour of the Report on the proposal for a Council decision authorising Croatia, the Netherlands, Portugal and Romania to accept, in the interest of the European Union, the accession of San Marino to the 1980 Hague Convention on the Civil Aspects of International Child Abduction. The Hague Convention of 25 October 1980 on the Civil Aspects of International Child Abduction is a vitally important instrument. It has been ratified by all EU Member States. The Convention introduces a system of cooperation between the contracting states aimed at settling cases of international child abduction. In many instances, these problems arise when a couple has separated. If the mother and father are from different states, there is a temptation to exploit the lack of cooperation between those states in order to secure custody of the child. The biggest problem is the national bias of the legal systems of individual states. The purpose of the Convention is to resolve such situations at an international level, by establishing that the competent courts and applicable laws are those of the state of residence of the child. The Convention introduces a system which ensures the immediate return of children who have been abducted.
Accession of Georgia and South Africa to the 1980 Hague Convention on the Civil Aspects of International Child Abduction (A8-0361/2017 - Angel Dzhambazki)
I voted in favour of the report on the proposal for a Council decision authorising Luxembourg and Romania to accept, in the interest of the European Union, the accession of Georgia and South Africa to the 1980 Hague Convention on the Civil Aspects of International Child Abduction. The Hague Convention of 25 October 1980 on the Civil Aspects of International Child Abduction is a vitally important instrument. It has been ratified by all EU Member States. The Convention introduces a system of cooperation between the contracting states aimed at settling cases of international child abduction. These problems arise when a couple has separated. If the mother and father are from different states, there is a temptation to exploit the lack of cooperation between those states in order to secure custody of the child. The biggest problem in such cases is the national bias of the legal systems in individual states. The purpose of the Convention is to resolve such situations at international level, by establishing that the competent courts and applicable laws are those of the state of residence of the child. The Convention introduces a system which ensures the immediate return of children who have been abducted.
Transitional arrangements for mitigating the impact of the introduction of IFRS 9 (A8-0255/2017 - Peter Simon)
. ‒ I voted in favour of the Report on the proposal for a regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council amending Regulation (EU) No 575/2013 as regards the leverage ratio, the net stable funding ratio, requirements for own funds and eligible liabilities, counterparty credit risk, market risk, exposures to central counterparties, exposures to collective investment undertakings, large exposures, reporting and disclosure requirements, and amending Regulation (EU) No 648/2012.The purpose of the proposal is to reinforce the existing provisions of Union law which lay down uniform prudential requirements for banks and investment firms across the Union.In the aftermath of the financial crisis that unfolded in 2007-2008, the Union implemented a substantial reform of the financial services regulatory framework to enhance the resilience of its financial institutions. That reform was largely based on internationally agreed standards. While the reform has rendered the financial system more stable and resilient against many types of possible future shocks and crises, it did not address all the problems identified. I voted in favour of the proposal because I believe further concrete legislative steps are needed in terms of reducing risks in the financial sector.
Instrument contributing to stability and peace (A8-0261/2017 - Arnaud Danjean)
. ‒ I abstained in the vote on the report on the proposal for a regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council amending Regulation (EU) No 230/2014 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 11 March 2014 establishing an instrument contributing to stability and peace. On 5 July 2016, the Commission published a legislative proposal to help strengthen the security and defence capabilities of partner countries. The aim is to enable the Union to finance, out of its own budget, both training activities and the supply of non-lethal equipment to the security forces of third countries.
Ranking of unsecured debt instruments in insolvency hierarchy (A8-0302/2017 - Gunnar Hökmark)
. ‒ I voted in favour of the report on the proposal for a directive of the European Parliament and of the Council on amending Directive 2014/59/EU of the European Parliament and of the Council as regards the ranking of unsecured debt instruments in insolvency hierarchy. The purpose of the proposal is to harmonise the priority ranking of unsecured debt instruments in insolvency hierarchy.Following the adoption of the total loss absorbing capacity (TLAC) standard by the G20, and in order to facilitate a more efficient path towards compliance with TLAC, a number of EU Member States have amended (or are in the process of amending) the ranking of creditor claims under their national insolvency laws, creating significant divergences. The Commission recognised the need for further risk reduction, and committed to bringing forward a legislative proposal that would build on internationally agreed standards. The proposed amendments to Directive 2014/59/EU (the Bank Recovery and Resolution Directive or BRRD) propose a harmonised national insolvency ranking of unsecured debt instruments to facilitate banks’ issuance of such loss-absorbing debt instruments. This would enable banks to issue debt in a new statutory category of unsecured debt available in all EU Member States.
Value added tax obligations for supplies of services and distance sales of goods (A8-0307/2017 - Cătălin Sorin Ivan)
I voted in favour of the Report on the proposal for a Council directive amending Directive 2006/112/EC and Directive 2009/132/EC as regards certain value added tax obligations for supplies of services and distance sales of goods. The current VAT directive in force was set up before the rise of the digital economy and encompasses an origin based taxation system which was intended to be transitional. Taking into account the new realities, an update is necessary. The Commission’s proposal for a Directive is part of a larger package of Commission responses to the VAT gap as well as a general modernisation exercise of the VAT system. The Commission’s proposal builds on the mini One-Stop-Shop (MOSS) which was introduced in 2015 in order to reduce the compliance costs of providers of electronic services. I voted in favour because I believe that the proposes aims to simplify VAT rules regarding cross-border e-commerce, reduce compliance costs and boost both intra- an extra- EU trade by eradicating the existing competitiveness distortion created by non EU-businesses making VAT-free supplies into the EU.
Administrative cooperation and combating fraud in the field of value added tax (A8-0306/2017 - Luděk Niedermayer)
I voted in favour of the Report on the proposal for a Council regulation amending the Council Regulation (EU) No 904/2010 on administrative cooperation and combating fraud in the field of value added tax. This proposal, put forward by the Commission on 1 December 2016, is part of the package of legislation on modernising VAT for cross-border B2C e-commerce. The proposal provides the basis for the underlying IT infrastructure and the rules and procedures necessary for cooperation by Member States to ensure successful extension of the Mini One Stop Shop (MOSS) to services beyond telecommunications, broadcasting and electronically supplied services (for which the MOSS already applies) and to distance sales of goods, both within and from outside the EU. The overall package is estimated to increase VAT revenues for Member States by EUR 7 billion annually and reduce regulatory costs for business by EUR 2.3 billion annually. The proposal is estimated to have important positive budgetary implications for MS. I voted in favour because the proposal is estimated to have important positive budgetary implications for MS.
Situation in Yemen (RC-B8-0649/2017, B8-0649/2017, B8-0650/2017, B8-0651/2017, B8-0652/2017, B8-0653/2017, B8-0654/2017, B8-0655/2017, B8-0656/2017)
Implementation of the European Disability Strategy (A8-0339/2017 - Helga Stevens)
I voted in favour of the Report on the Implementation of the European Disability Strategy. Fundamental rights, inclusive growth and social fairness are at the heart of the Commission’s agenda. In this context, the elimination of barriers preventing people with disabilities from fully participating in society and enjoying their rights is therefore a priority for the EU. To this end, the European strategy for disabled persons 2010-2020 was the main instrument supporting the implementation by the EU of the UN Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities. The report indicates that the implementation of the 10-year strategy has cemented the paradigm shift towards a human rights approach to disability policies. In general, the actions carried out over the last five years have made progress in the eight areas of the strategy. Significant progress was notably achieved in the area of accessibility with the adoption of the Directive on Web Accessibility and the proposal for a European accessibility act. I voted in favour because I believe that the objectives set out in all the eight areas of the strategy in 2010 remain valid, as well as the instruments underpinning them.
EU-New Zealand Partnership Agreement on Relations and Cooperation (Consent) (A8-0327/2017 - Charles Tannock)
. ‒ I voted in favour of the Recommendation on the draft Council decision on the conclusion on behalf of the Union of the Partnership Agreement on Relations and Cooperation between the European Union and its Member States, of the one part, and New Zealand, of the other part. I believe that the agreement will contribute significantly to the improvement of the partnership between the EU and New Zealand, a partnership which is based on common values and principles, including respect for democratic principles, human rights and fundamental freedoms, the rule of law, international peace and security.The agreement is premised on respect for human rights and democratic principles, and for international law and the principles set out in the Charter of the United Nations, which constitute the basis for cooperation between the parties.
EU-New Zealand Partnership Agreement on Relations and Cooperation (Resolution) (A8-0333/2017 - Charles Tannock)
I voted in favour of the report containing a motion for a non-legislative resolution on the draft Council decision on the conclusion on behalf of the Union of the Partnership Agreement on Relations and Cooperation between the European Union and its Member States, of the one part, and New Zealand, of the other part. New Zealand enjoys a close and historic partnership with the European Union and its Member States. The European Union shares common values and principles with New Zealand, including respect for democratic principles, human rights, fundamental freedoms, the rule of law, including international law, and peace and security. Moreover, the European Union remains New Zealand’s third largest trading partner and both sides maintain a wide range of economic and commercial interests. I voted in favour because I believe that this agreement will provide a forward-looking political framework within which EU-New Zealand relations and cooperation on sustainable development and a comprehensive range of issues will be developed even further for years to come in order to match new ambitions and aspirations.
The EU-Africa Strategy: a boost for development (A8-0334/2017 - Maurice Ponga)
I voted in favour of the Report on the EU-Africa Strategy: a boost for development. The ties between the European Union and African countries are historic and their destinies are intimately linked. The EU is Africa’s main partner in the fields of economic activity and trade, as well as development, humanitarian aid and security. There is a need to provide the Africa-EU partnership with a new vision that reflects the evolution of the political, economic, environmental and social situations of both continents in order to move towards an enhanced, modernised and more political partnership, with a focus on defending our key common interests. The report invites the future partnership to focus on the priority areas identified by both the AU and the EU, such as: economic development, good governance, including human rights, human development via public services covering basic needs, security and the fight against terrorism, migration and mobility, and the environment – including climate change. I voted in favour because I believe that there is the need to adopt, within the Africa-EU partnership, an approach coordinated among the EU Member States themselves.
Activities of the European Ombudsman in 2016 (A8-0328/2017 - Marlene Mizzi)
I voted in favour of the Report on the annual report on the activities of the European Ombudsman in 2016. Ms Emily O’Reilly, the European Ombudsman, presented the report to the Committee on Petitions in Brussels on 30 May 2017. European citizens are empowered to complain to the European Ombudsman, according to Article 24 of the TFEU and Article 43 of the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union. The Ombudsman opened 245 inquiries in 2016, of which 235 were complaint-based and 10 were own-initiative inquiries, whilst closing 291. Out of the 291 closed inquiries, in 148 cases a solution has been agreed or it has been settled by the institution; in 89 cases (30.6%), no maladministration was found; in 52 cases no further inquiries justified and in 20 cases maladministration was found. Spain remains at the top position with 308 complaints, followed by Poland, Belgium and the United Kingdom. In the report, the rapporteur also stresses the importance of transparency-related issues and access to information and documents as the top subject matter of inquiries submitted to the Ombudsman, following good management of EU personnel issues, and service culture.
Environmental Implementation Review (EIR) (B8-0590/2017)
I voted in favour of the Resolution on the Environmental Implementation Review (EIR). The EU has strong environmental legislation, but the weak and defective implementation thereof is a long-standing problem. Seventy per cent of EU environmental law is implemented by regional and local authorities. The EU Environmental Implementation Review (EIR) and the 28 Country reports have shown once again that implementation of environmental law in the EU is not homogeneous, but varies dramatically between Member States as well as between the different environmental areas. However, the EIR has the potential to put implementation problems high on the political agenda, to serve as an early warning mechanism for decision-makers and, ultimately, to improve the implementation of EU environmental legislation and policy. The report stresses the importance of harmonising data and reporting cycles in order to streamline future review processes. I voted in favour because I believe that the EIR should take into account and assess any serious problems and possible conflicting goals between environmental policies and other sectoral policies, highlighting any misalignments where they are found, and drawing up proposals to correct them.
Combating inequalities as a lever to boost job creation and growth (A8-0340/2017 - Javi López)
I voted in favour of the Report on combating inequalities as a lever to boost job creation and growth. Inequality, understood as the widening gap in terms of both income and wealth among those at the bottom and those at the top of economic gains, has recently acquired a key relevance for understanding not only economic trends but also recent social, political and institutional changes. The Great Recession has only exacerbated the observed differences in the levels of inequality between and within countries. The aim of this initiative is to lift the challenge of inequality to the highest priority at European level given the context in which we find ourselves. It proposes to do so following European cohesion and investment policies and European developments in terms of the coordination of social policies, in particular in terms of combating poverty and social exclusion, but also in terms of improving living and working conditions and active labour market policies or strengthening trade union and workers’ rights. I voted in favour because I believe that the most relevant employment policies in the Union in recent years have to be strengthened, focusing on two particularly vulnerable groups: the young and long-term unemployed.
Period for adopting delegated acts (A8-0332/2017 - Gesine Meissner)
I voted in favour of the Report on the proposal for a decision of the European Parliament and of the Council amending Directive 2010/40/EU as regards the period for adopting delegated acts. The ITS Directive was one of the first pieces of EU legislation stipulating the use of delegated acts and the power to adopt the delegated acts was conferred on the Commission for a limited period only, until 27 August 2017.Five delegated acts have been adopted since the entry into force of the ITS Directive: on the harmonised provision for an interoperable EU-wide eCall. The proposal for a decision seeks to extend the delegation of power for an additional period of five years starting from 27 August 2017. This period should be tacitly extended for periods of the same duration, unless Parliament or the Council oppose such an extension. The fifth delegated act has just been finalised with Member States’ experts and addresses the provision of EU-wide multimodal travel information services. I voted in favour because I believe that, in order that the Commission can adopt further specifications through delegated acts, it is essential that the delegation of power be extended.
Protection against dumped and subsidised imports from countries not members of the EU (A8-0236/2017 - Salvatore Cicu)
I voted in favour of the report on the proposal for a regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council amending Regulation (EU) 2016/1036 and Regulation (EU) 2016/1037.The purpose of the proposal is to make targeted amendments to the Basic Anti-Dumping Regulation and to the Basic Anti-Subsidy Regulation. The Regulation stipulates the basis on which normal value should be determined in the case of imports from non-market economy countries. In view of developments with respect to certain countries that are Members of the WTO, it is proposed to amend the method used to calculate the normal value and the dumping margin for the countries concerned. Experience shows that the actual magnitude of subsidisation is not always evident at the time of initiation. Yet those subsidies clearly provide an unfair benefit to the exporters concerned, which allow them to sell at injurious prices to the EU market. When such subsidies are found in the course of any given investigation or review, the Commission will offer additional consultations to the country of origin and/or export concerned with regard to such subsidies identified in the course of the investigation.
Rule of law in Malta (B8-0596/2017, B8-0597/2017)
I voted in favour of the resolution on the rule of law in Malta. The European Union is founded on the values of respect for human dignity, freedom, democracy, equality, the rule of law and respect for human rights. Freedom of expression and freedom and pluralism of the media are enshrined in Article 11 of the Charter of Fundamental Rights and Article 10 of the ECHR.The Maltese anti-corruption investigative journalist and blogger Daphne Caruana Galizia was assassinated in a car bomb attack on 16 October 2017. This assassination led to street demonstrations and civil society protests in Malta calling for justice, accountability and respect for the rule of law. The Media Pluralism Monitor’s 2016 Country Report on Malta identified medium levels of risk with regard to market plurality and political independence. The resolution notes that the protection of investigative journalists and whistle-blowers is in the vital interests of society and calls on the Maltese authorities to ensure the protection of journalists’ and whistle-blowers’ personal safety and livelihoods. I voted in favour because I believe that Malta and all the other Member States have to ensure that the fight against tax evasion is given priority.
Multilateral negotiations in view of the 11th WTO Ministerial Conference (B8-0593/2017)
I voted in favour of the Resolution on multilateral negotiations in view of the 11th WTO Ministerial Conference in Buenos Aires. Since its creation, the WTO has played a pivotal role in strengthening multilateralism, promoting an inclusive world economic order and fostering an open, rule-based and non-discriminatory multilateral trading system. The EU has consistently advocated a strong multilateral rule-based approach to trade, while recognising that complementary approaches may also foster trade opening and economic development, especially in policy areas tackled less thoroughly by the WTO. The outcomes achieved at the 9th and the 10th Ministerial Conference in 2015 were of major importance.The resolution emphasises the need to build on the results agreed at the 9th and 10th Ministerial Conferences to take and guarantee substantive progressive steps at MC11 in Buenos Aires in December 2017. Moreover, it underlines the importance of the WTO functioning as an efficient and effective negotiating forum on all issues of interest to its members and providing a platform for open discussion on global trade-related issues. I voted in favour because I believe that it is extremely important that all WTO members deliver on the decisions taken in both Nairobi and Bali.
Eastern Partnership: November 2017 Summit (A8-0308/2017 - Laima Liucija Andrikienė, Knut Fleckenstein)
I voted in favour of the Report on a European Parliament recommendation to the Council, the Commission and the EEAS on the Eastern Partnership, in the run-up to the November 2017 Summit. The Eastern Partnership is based on a shared commitment between Armenia, Azerbaijan, Belarus, Georgia, Moldova, Ukraine and the European Union to deepening their relations and adhering to international law and fundamental values, including democracy, the rule of law, respect for human rights, fundamental freedoms and gender equality, as well as to the social market economy, sustainable development and good governance.Through its global strategy and the revised ENP, the EU seeks to bring its partners closer via accelerated political association and economic integration with the EU. The Report emphasises the importance of living up to the high expectations of citizens in all the partner countries as regards eradicating corruption, fighting organised crime and bolstering the rule of law and good governance. I voted in favour because I believe that civil society in the partner countries has to be strengthened due to its vital role within the Eastern Partnership, both as an indispensable actor in the process of democratic consolidation and as a platform for regional cooperation.
Action Plan for nature, people and the economy (B8-0589/2017)
I voted in favour of the Resolution on an Action Plan for nature, people and the economy. Approximately only half of protected bird species and a smaller number of other protected species and habitats in the Union currently have good conservation status, and only 50% of all Natura 2000 sites have management plans with conservation objectives and measures. The Nature Directives have an important role to play in helping achieve the targets of the Convention on Biological Diversity (CBD) Strategic Plan for Biodiversity 2011-2020, the 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development and the Paris Agreement on climate change. The Action Plan for nature, people and the economy as a step in the right direction with regard to delivering the objectives of the Nature Directives. The targets of the EU’s 2020 Biodiversity Strategy and the CBD will not be met without immediate, substantial and additional efforts. The Action Plan aims to ‘accelerate progress toward the EU 2020 goal of halting and reversing the loss of biodiversity and ecosystem services’. I voted in favour because I believe that Union nature legislation needs to be fully and faithfully implemented.
The situation of the rule of law and democracy in Poland (B8-0594/2017, B8-0595/2017)
I voted in favour of the Resolution on the situation of the rule of law and democracy in Poland. The Resolution stresses that it is fundamentally important to uphold the common European values listed in Article 2 of the TEU and in the Polish Constitution, and to guarantee fundamental rights as laid down in the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union. The rapid legislative developments taking place in many areas in Poland without proper consultations or the possibility of an independent and legitimate constitutional review, thus risking the systematic undermining of fundamental human rights, democratic checks and balances and the rule of law are concerning. On 27 July 2017 President Duda vetoed two controversial laws which had been passed by the Polish Parliament as being incompatible with the Polish Constitution, claiming that they seriously threatened judicial independence in Poland. I voted in favour because I believe that the Polish Parliament and Government need to implement fully all recommendations of the Commission and the Venice Commission, and to refrain from conducting any reform which would put at risk respect for the rule of law, and in particular the independence of the judiciary.
Mobilisation of the European Globalisation Adjustment Fund: application EGF/2017/004 IT/Almaviva (A8-0346/2017 - Daniele Viotti)
I voted in favour of the Report on the proposal for a decision of the European Parliament and of the Council on the mobilisation of the European Globalisation Adjustment Fund (application from Italy – EGF/2017/004 IT/Almaviva). The European Globalisation Adjustment Fund has been created in order to provide additional assistance to workers suffering from the consequences of major structural changes in world trade patterns. On 26 September 2017, the Commission adopted a proposal for a decision on the mobilisation of the EGF in favour of Italy to support the reintegration in the labour market of workers made redundant by Almaviva Contact SpA, an enterprise operating under the NACE Revision 2 Division in the NUTS level 2 region of Lazio (ITI4) in Italy. It concerns 1 664 workers made redundant, of which 1 610 are expected to participate in the proposed measures, and refers to the mobilisation of a total amount of EUR 3 347 370 from the EGF for Italy. The application was sent to the Commission that has concluded, in accordance with all applicable provisions of the EGF Regulation, that the application meets the conditions for a financial contribution from the EGF. The Italian authorities have provided all necessary assurances.
Saving lives: boosting car safety in the EU (A8-0330/2017 - Dieter-Lebrecht Koch)
I voted in favour of the Report on saving lives: boosting car safety in the EU. We are still far from meeting the target of halving the number of road accident victims by 2020 and achieving the Vision Zero goal of no road fatalities in Europe by 2050. Europe’s roads have not only become safer, they have long been the safest in the world. Nevertheless, around 25 500 people die on Europe’s roads every year and some 135 000 people are seriously injured. Given that road safety depends on the vehicle, the infrastructure and the driver, efficient active and passive safety measures are needed at all three levels. The infrastructure factor is crucial. In particular, more account should be taken of vulnerable road users in the construction and maintenance of roads. The vehicle factor is fundamental for road safety. Driver safety systems make a key contribution to improving and correcting behaviour conducive to human error and thereby play an essential role in improving road safety. I believe that we can shape the legislation wisely only if the revision of Regulation 661/2009 is not further delayed and the Commission submits a corresponding proposal by the beginning of 2018.
Territorial typologies (A8-0231/2017 - Iskra Mihaylova)
I voted in favour of the Report on the proposal for a regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council amending Regulation (EC) No 1059/2003 as regards the territorial typologies (Tercet). Evidence-based policy interventions and more integrated territorial approaches that reflect the diversity of EU regions have gained momentum in recent years. The principles for cohesion policy 2014-2020 set out in the Common Strategic Framework stress that the approach to promoting smart, sustainable and inclusive growth must reflect the role of cities, urban, rural and coastal areas and take urban-rural linkages into account. To better meet the needs of EU policy-makers, the statistical office of the European Union, Eurostat, has over recent years started to publish statistics covering a range of these territorial typologies. The European Commission and the Organisation for Economic Cooperation and Development (OECD) have jointly defined the territorial typologies in question and the Commission has adopted methodologies to set up and maintain them. I voted in favour because the proposal would make it possible to aggregate data based on the typologies. For example, GDP in rural and urban areas could be compared and employment could be measured according to the degree of urbanisation.
Recognition of professional qualifications in inland navigation (A8-0338/2016 - Gesine Meissner)
I voted in favour of the Report on the proposal for a directive of the European Parliament and of the Council on the recognition of professional qualifications in inland navigation and repealing Council Directive 96/50/EC and Council Directive 91/672/EEC. For geographical reasons inland waterway activities are limited to a certain number of Member States. Inland waterway transport in the European Union is mainly concentrated on the Rhine with a share of 75% of the traffic and the Danube with around 10%. The EU fleet (around 17.000 vessels) is predominantly (80%) owned by five Member States: Netherlands (33%), Germany (20%), France (11%), Romania (9%) and Belgium (7%). Europe’s inland waterways still offer unexploited potential, which will be even more important as forecasts predict increasing transport needs and volumes for the coming decades. The Commission therefore proposed measures to facilitate labour mobility inside the Union and to attract qualified people with a different background to the profession. According to the proposal, certificates of qualification, service record books and logbooks shall be recognised by all Member States for all crew members. I voted in favour because I support the shift of qualification of workforce from an experience-based system to a competence-based system.
Cooperation between national authorities responsible for the enforcement of consumer protection laws (A8-0077/2017 - Olga Sehnalová)
I voted in favour of the Report on the proposal for a regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council on cooperation between national authorities responsible for the enforcement of consumer protection laws. In 2003 the Commission proposed for the first time a system for cross-border cooperation between the national authorities, in order to promote more effective surveillance, investigation and prosecution of cross-border infringements, thereby closing gaps exploited by rogue traders. Regulation 2006/2004 (the so-called ‘CPC Regulation’) was adopted by the European Parliament and the Council on 27 October 2004 and entered into force on 29 December 2006. Ten years after, the Commission submits a proposal to revise the CPC Regulation, to improve the effectiveness of the rules and procedures relevant to this cooperation, in particular with the aim to better addressing the challenges of the Digital Single Market. I voted in favour because I believe that the Commission’s proposal has rightly identified the powers needed by the enforcement authorities in all Member States and considers this set of powers as a prerequisite for a proper cross-border cooperation to tackle infringements. For achieving an effective cooperation these powers should be available to enforcement authorities in all Member States.
Deployment of cohesion policy instruments by regions to address demographic change (A8-0329/2017 - Iratxe García Pérez)
I voted in favour of the report on the deployment of cohesion policy instruments by regions to address demographic change. Demographic change is one of the major challenges that European regions have to face now and in the near future. Projection figures published by Eurostat show an ageing Europe, as the share of the working-age population is expected to decrease in size from 65.5% of the total population in 2015 to 56.2% in 2080. Over the period 2008-2030, one region out of three – mostly located in Central Europe, Eastern Germany, Southern Italy and Northern Spain – is projected to experience population decline. One of the first challenges for the definition of a demographic policy at European level is that it needs to take into account all the territories of the Member States facing serious demographic disadvantages and imbalances as well as their characteristics and special features. This requires a rigorous identification of demographic phenomena and of the equilibriums for a given population and a territory. I believe that the cohesion policy measures are often the main provisions that address demographic challenges at the regional and local levels and often complement national and regional strategies.
Action plan on retail financial services (A8-0326/2017 - Olle Ludvigsson)
I voted in favour of the Report on the Action Plan on Retail Financial Services. The digitalisation of retail financial services will be changing consumer behaviour and financial markets in ever-increasing speed. Consequently, policy-making has to adapt much faster to remove cross-border barriers, increasing competition benefiting consumers in terms of better products to lower prices, while at the same time enforcing consumers. New pieces of legislation should carefully be monitored in the later stages of the policy cycle so we make sure that the level 2 measure get fit and proper. Continuously and closely monitoring national implementation is key to achieve the intended policy objectives. Ultimately, the Commission Action plan manifests a dynamic approach to policy-making necessary in the field of financial services. Moreover, legislative initiatives specifically targeted at the financial sector to end unjustified geo-blocking will be crucial to facilitate for consumers to switch to more advantageous retail services in other Member States. I voted in favour because I believe that concrete action is essential for the remaining years of the current mandate period in order to take further steps towards a genuine technology-enabled Single Market for retail financial services.
Implementation of the Environmental Liability Directive (A8-0297/2017 - Laura Ferrara)
I voted in favour of the report on the application of Directive 2004/35/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 21 April 2004 on environmental liability with regard to the prevention and remedying of environmental damage (the ‘ELD’). The aim of Directive was to establish a common framework for the prevention and remedying of environmental damage at a reasonable cost to society, based on the ‘polluter pays’. To achieve this aim, the ELD sets out a general definition of ‘damage’ as a measurable adverse change in a natural resource or measurable impairment of a natural resource service. The ELD applies strictly to all ‘operators’ who, through their activities, cause or could cause ‘environmental damage’ based on a strict list set out in Annex III to the directive. Over and beyond these activities, it has to be proven that the operator who pursues the occupational activity. I believe that, in order to ensure greater coverage in cases of environmental damage that are not covered by the current ELD rules, or which cannot be covered by normal financial guarantees, it would be appropriate to consider establishing a European fund for the remedying of environmental damage.
Framework for simple, transparent and standardised securitisation (A8-0387/2016 - Paul Tang)
I voted in favour of the report on the proposal for a regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council laying down common rules on securitisation and creating a European framework for simple, transparent and standardised securitisation and amending Directives 2009/65/EC, 2009/138/EC, 2011/61/EU and Regulations (EC) No 1060/2009 and (EU) No 648/2012. Securitisation involves transactions that enable a lender – typically a credit institution – to refinance a set of loans or exposures such as loans for immovable property, auto leases, consumer loans or credit cards, by transforming them into tradable securities. In the Investment Plan for Europe presented on 26 November 2014, the Commission announced its intention to restart high-quality securitisation markets, without repeating the mistakes made before the 2008 financial crisis. The European Union aims to strengthen the legislative framework implemented after the financial crisis to address the risks inherent in highly complex, opaque and risky securitisation. For that purpose, this Regulation introduces a ban on re-securitisation and enhances the conditions for complying with the risk retention obligations. It is essential to ensure that rules are adopted to better differentiate simple, transparent and standardised products from complex, opaque and risky financial instruments and apply a more risk-sensitive prudential framework.
Prudential requirements for credit institutions and investment firms (A8-0388/2016 - Othmar Karas)
I voted in favour of the report on the proposal for a regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council amending Regulation (EU) No 575/2013 on prudential requirements for credit institutions and investment firms. Securitisations are an important constituent part of well-functioning financial markets insofar as they contribute to diversifying institutions' funding sources and releasing regulatory capital which can then be reallocated to support further lending, provided that financial stability is guaranteed and that the capital is used to fund the real economy rather than for speculative activity. Furthermore, securitisations provide institutions and other market participants with additional investment opportunities. In recent years, securitisation issuance volumes in the Union have remained below their pre-crisis peak for a number of reasons. In light of the possible future modifications of regulatory capital treatment of securitisation exposures under the Revised Basel Framework, the Commission should be empowered to adopt a delegated act to make further amendments to the regulatory capital requirements for securitisation in Regulation (EU) No 575/2013 to take account of the outcome of such modifications.
Combating sexual harassment and abuse in the EU (RC-B8-0576/2017, B8-0576/2017, B8-0577/2017, B8-0578/2017, B8-0579/2017, B8-0580/2017, B8-0581/2017, B8-0582/2017)
I voted in favour of the motion for a resolution to wind up the debate on the statement by the Commission pursuant to Rule 123(2) of the Rules of Procedure on combating sexual harassment and abuse in the EU (2017/2897(RSP)). Sexual harassment is a form of violence against women and girls and is the most extreme yet persistent form of gender-based discrimination; whereas some 90% of victims of sexual harassment are female and approximately 10% are male. In the 28 EU Member States, it is estimated that 83 to 102 million women (45-55% of women) have experienced at least one form of sexual harassment since the age of 15. The problem of sexual harassment persists in all Member States. Combating harassment related to sex and sexual harassment through the prohibition of discrimination has added value at the EU level. I voted in favour because I believe that the EU Member States need to implement measures to set up and ensure the effective functioning of dedicated committees which investigate reported cases of sexual harassment, and to provide victims with support offered by specialist advisory members and staff.
Economic policies of the euro area (A8-0310/2017 - Gunnar Hökmark)
I voted in favour of the report on the economic policies of the euro area. The European Union is the world’s largest economy. It accounts for over 20% of global gross domestic product. We have made landmark achievements in terms of creating the world’s largest single market where our 500 million citizens can work, travel and invest freely. The picture is, however, clouded. The EU has entered a period of stagnation. Productivity growth is close to zero. Cohesion of social prosperity can only be achieved by cohesion of growth. This demands structural reforms in many Member States. If reforms in market competition, taxation and decreased public expenditures were to be implemented, Europe would see positive effects on growth and prosperity. It would ensure the jobs that we need to fight unemployment and it would provide for the demand that would create new opportunities. Increased convergence regarding reforms would give more of the social cohesion we need. I believe that the agenda for reform needs to be done both with a general approach and by country specific measures.
Negotiating mandate for trade negotiations with Australia (A8-0311/2017 - Daniel Caspary)
I voted in favour of the report and recommendation to the Council on the proposed negotiating mandate for trade negotiations with Australia. Australia is one of the major global players in the trade in agricultural products and has developed strong export sectors (70 % of products are exported). In 2015, Australia was the third-largest global exporter of beef and veal, the eighth-largest global exporter of dairy products, the fifth-largest global exporter of arable crops and the third-largest global exporter of sugar. Australia, due to its low agricultural production costs stemming from its extensive, large-scale holdings, has a very competitive, export-focused agricultural sector, which constantly seeks new outlets for its produce on the international market. Deepening relations between the EU and the Asia-Pacific region is important, among other things, in order to foster economic growth within Europe and this needs to be reflected in the EU’s trade policy. I voted in favour because I believe that the negotiation of a modern, deep, ambitious, balanced, fair and comprehensive FTA is a suitable way of deepening the bilateral partnership and further reinforcing the existing, already mature bilateral trade and investment relationships.
Negotiating mandate for trade negotiations with New Zealand (A8-0312/2017 - Daniel Caspary)
. – I voted in favour of the Report on the Negotiating Mandate for Trade Negotiations with New Zealand. The EU and New Zealand work together in tackling common challenges across a broad spectrum of issues and cooperate in a number of international fora, including on trade policy issues in the multilateral arena. In 2015, the EU was New Zealand’s second largest trading partner in goods after Australia, with trade in goods between the EU and New Zealand amounting to EUR 8.1 billion, and trade in services amounting to EUR 4.3 billion. In 2015 EU foreign direct investment stock in New Zealand amounted to nearly EUR 10 billion.New Zealand is among the EU’s oldest and closest partners, sharing common values and a commitment to promoting prosperity and security within a global rules-based system. New Zealand has ratified and implemented the main international covenants on human, social and labour rights and on environmental protection, and fully respects the rule of law. I voted in favour of the report because I believe in the importance of deepening relations between the EU and the Asia-Pacific region. I am of the opinion that New Zealand is a key part of this strategy.
Monitoring the application of EU law 2015 (A8-0265/2017 - Kostas Chrysogonos)
I voted in favour of the report on monitoring the application of EU law 2015. Member States may, when notifying the Commission of national transposition measures, have an obligation, in justified cases, also to provide supporting information in the form of ‘explanatory documents’. According to Article 6(1) TEU, the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union (CFREU) has the same legal value as the Treaties, and is addressed to the institutions, bodies, offices and agencies of the Union and the Member States when they are implementing Union law. The Union has a number of instruments and processes to ensure the full and correct application of the principles and values enshrined in the Treaties, but in practice these instruments appear to be of limited scope, inadequate or ineffective. It is therefore necessary to establish a new mechanism, providing a single and coherent framework, building on existing instruments and mechanisms, which should be applied in a uniform manner to all EU institutions and all Member States. I voted in favour because I believe that the Commission should deliver a reasoned opinion to a Member State when it considers that the latter has failed to fulfil an obligation under the Treaties.
Draft general budget of the European Union for 2018 - all sections
I voted in favour of the draft general budget of the European Union for 2018 - all sections. The 2018 draft budget is in line with the annual evolution foreseen in the multiannual financial framework (MFF). It focuses on the challenge of migration, both within and outside the EU. The 2018 budget will be the fifth of the current MFF. The budget is proposed in the context of the mid-term review of the MFF formally adopted by the Council. The Commission should also use the budget under the ‘Agriculture’ heading to allocate additional funding for security and migration. The overall ceiling for commitment appropriations (CAs) amounts to EUR 160.6 billion, corresponding to 1.02% of GNI, and represents an increase of EUR 2 213.9 million compared to the 2017 budget. The ceiling on payment appropriations (PAs) amounts to EUR 145.4 billion, which corresponds to 0.92% of GNI. The main budgetary priorities for the year are employment and investment, new prospects for young people and increasing security within and outside the EU. Additional funds will also be available to combat the root causes of migration externally.
General budget of the European Union for 2018 - all sections (A8-0299/2017 - Siegfried Mureşan, Richard Ashworth)
I voted in favour of the report on the Council position on the draft general budget of the European Union for the financial year 2018. Parliament’s reading of the 2018 Budget fully reflects the political priorities adopted by an overwhelming majority in its abovementioned resolutions of 15 March 2017 on general guidelines and of 5 July 2017 on a mandate for the trilogue. Sustainable growth, jobs, in particular youth employment, security and climate change are at the core of those priorities. The Union continues to face numerous challenges and, while maintaining budget discipline, the necessary financial resources must be deployed from the Union budget in order to meet the political priorities and allow the Union to deliver concrete answers and effectively respond to those challenges. The cohesion policy plays a primary role in achieving economic and social convergence in the Union, and thus ensuring development and growth. In 2018, cohesion policy programmes are expected to catch up and reach cruising speed. I voted in favour because I believe that while at present the peak of the migratory and refugee crisis seems to have decreased, the Union must stand ready to respond to any future unforeseen event in this area and pursue a more proactive approach in the field of migration.
Discharge 2015: EU general budget - European Council and Council (A8-0291/2017 - Bart Staes)
I voted in favour of the second report on discharge in respect of the implementation of the general budget of the European Union for the financial year 2015, Section II – European Council and Council. All Union institutions ought to be transparent and fully accountable to the citizens of the Union for the funds entrusted to them as Union institutions. The combined effect of an open and transparent Union administration and the need to protect the Union’s financial interests require an open and transparent discharge procedure whereby every Union institution is accountable for the budget which it executes. The European Council and the Council, as Union institutions, should be democratically accountable towards the citizens of the Union as far as they are beneficiaries of the general budget of the European Union. I voted in favour because I believe that an effective budgetary control exercise requires the cooperation of Parliament and the Council, as set out in Parliament’s resolution of 27 April 2017.
Establishing an Entry/Exit System (EES) to register entry and exit data of third country nationals crossing the EU external borders (A8-0057/2017 - Agustín Díaz de Mera García Consuegra)
I voted in favour of the Report on the proposal for a regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council establishing an Entry/Exit System (EES) to register entry and exit data and refusal of entry data of third country nationals crossing the external borders of the Member States of the European Union and determining the conditions for access to the EES for law enforcement purposes and amending Regulation (EC) No 767/2008 and Regulation (EU) No 1077/2011. The increase in traveller flows at the EU’s external borders in recent years has highlighted the inefficiency of the current border control systems, something which could get worse as the number of travellers. Our traveller management systems need to be modernised, so that they become not only more flexible and efficient but also more secure. The legislative proposal under review is to establish a system to facilitate border crossings, help to combat irregular migration among people exceeding the legal period of stay and support the fight against organised crime and terrorism. I believe that these objectives must be guaranteed and made compatible with the protection of data collected in the EES in terms of proportionality and necessity.
Amendment of the Schengen Borders Code as regards the use of the Entry/Exit System (A8-0059/2017 - Agustín Díaz de Mera García Consuegra)
I voted in favour of the Report on the proposal for a regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council amending Regulation (EU) 2016/399 as regards the use of the Entry/Exit System. This draft report complements the draft report on a regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council establishing an Entry/Exit System to register entry and exit data and refusal of entry data of third country nationals crossing the external borders of the Member States of the European Union and determining the conditions for access to the EES for law enforcement purposes and amending Regulation (EC) No 767/2008 and Regulation (EU) No 1077/2011. More needs to be done to facilitate border crossings and to meet the general objectives of the EES. Thus, the Member States should be encouraged to develop national facilitation programmes, such as the Registered Travellers Programme, based on common legislation. I voted in favour because I believe that the rules on the use of self-service and automated border crossing systems need to be standardised.
Fundamental rights aspects in Roma integration in the EU: fighting anti-Gypsyism (A8-0294/2017 - Soraya Post)
I voted in favour of the Report on fundamental rights aspects in Roma integration in the EU: fighting anti-Gypsyism. The Roma have been treated unthinkably and unacceptably for centuries. They have been deprived of their human rights. After a very long delay, politicians have to take equal responsibility for their Roma citizens. Otherwise, political rhetoric featuring hate speech and scapegoating will further contaminate our societies, which most of us still hope will be based on the values of respect, tolerance and openness. Although European societies have become more and more diverse, the 2015 Eurobarometer survey on `Discrimination in the EU clearly shows that 20% of the respondents would be uncomfortable working with a Roma person, and only 45% of them would be at ease if their son or daughter had a relationship with a Roma person. Discrimination on the grounds of ethnic origin is the most widespread form of discrimination in the EU. School segregation is a shameful reality across Europe. I voted in favour because I believe that we have to demand nothing more, but also nothing less for the Roma people, than we demand for the majority society.
EU-Morocco Euro-Mediterranean Aviation Agreement (A8-0303/2017 - Dominique Riquet)
I voted against the recommendation on the draft Council Decision on the conclusion, on behalf of the Union, of the Euro-Mediterranean Aviation Agreement between the European Community and its Member States, of the one part, and the Kingdom of Morocco, of the other part. There has not been a clear guarantee from the Commission that this Aviation Agreement only applies to the territory of Morocco within its internationally recognised borders and not to the territory of Western Sahara, which Morocco has illegally occupied since 1975. The exclusion of Western Sahara would be strictly in line with the landmark ruling of the Court of Justice of The European Union of 21 December 2016 POLISARIO v Council. The CJEU ruled that the territory of Western Sahara is to be considered as a ‘a separate and distinct territory’ from the Morocco and that the application of any bilateral agreement with the EU would require the prior consent of the people of Western Sahara. If the Agreement applied to Western Sahara, the Commission would be enabling the further entrenchment of Moroccan control over the territory and would risk exposing the EU once again to a humiliating defeat in the European courts.
Authorising France to apply a reduced rate of certain indirect taxes on ‘traditional’ rum produced in Guadeloupe, French Guiana, Martinique and Réunion (A8-0304/2017 - Iskra Mihaylova)
I voted in favour of the report on the proposal for a Council decision amending Council Decision No 189/2014/EU authorising France to apply a reduced rate of certain indirect taxes on ‘traditional’ rum produced in Guadeloupe, French Guiana, Martinique and Réunion and repealing Decision No 2007/659/EC. Traditional rum from France’s outermost regions has been subject to special excise duty arrangements on the French mainland market since 1923. Since the creation of the internal market and the harmonisation of excise duty in Europe, these special excise duty arrangements have been extended with EU approval. The proposal amending Council Decision No 189/2014/EU provides that the reduced rates of excise duty and of VSS applicable to the rum shall be confined, for the period between 1 January 2016 and 31 December 2020, to an annual quota of 144 000 hectolitres of pure alcohol. I voted in favour because an independent economic analysis carried out by the Commission concluded that French imports of traditional rum represented only a small proportion of total alcohol consumption in France. Therefore, the presence of a reduced rate for rum was not likely to create distortions of competition on the French rum market.
Bio-based Industries Joint Undertaking: financial contributions (A8-0293/2017 - Miroslav Poche)
I voted in favour of the report on the proposal for a Council regulation amending Council Regulation (EU) No 560/2014 of 6 May 2014 establishing the Bio-based Industries Joint Undertaking. Research and innovation are high risk activities and there is no guarantee of success. If the risk of failure is too large, the private sector may be unwilling to invest. In a number of cases, public support to individual projects is not effective. It is for these cases that structured partnerships are needed between the public and the private sector to develop jointly. For sectors that operate at European and international levels, and where the scale of the investments is beyond the means of individual Member States, the most effective approach is to establish such partnerships at EU level. For these reason Joint Technology Initiatives (JTIs) and Joint Undertaking (JUs) were set up as European institutional public-private partnerships to carry out the strategic research agenda of some established European technology platforms. I voted in favour because I am persuaded that effective cooperation, for the purpose of research, between the public and private sectors is the key to delivering the best results for European citizens.
Subjecting furanylfentanyl to control measures (A8-0309/2017 - Michał Boni)
I voted in favour of the initial legislative proposal to subject the new psychoactive substance N-phenyl-N-[1-(2-phenylethyl) piperidin-4yl]furan-2-carboxamide (furanylfentanyl) to control measures.On 28 February 2017, following the request made by the Commission and 9 Member States, the Council requested an assessment of the risks caused by the use, manufacture and trafficking of the new psychoactive substance. Furanylfentanyl is a synthetic opioid and is structurally similar to fentanyl, a controlled substance widely used in medicine for general anaesthesia during surgery and for pain management. It has been available in the Union since June 2015 and has been detected in 16 Member States. 23 deaths associated with furanylfentanyl have been reported by five Member States. In at least ten deaths furanylfentanyl was the cause of death or is likely to have contributed to the death. In addition, 11 acute non-fatal intoxications associated with furanylfentanyl were reported by three Member States. Furanylfentanyl has no recognised human or veterinary medical use in the Union. Based on the findings, the Commission considers that there are grounds for subjecting this substance to control measures across the Union. According to the risk assessment report, furanylfentanyl can cause severe harm to the health of individuals.
Control of spending and monitoring of EU Youth Guarantee schemes cost-effectiveness (A8-0296/2017 - Derek Vaughan)
I voted in favour of the report on control of spending and monitoring of EU Youth Guarantee schemes’ cost-effectiveness. Youth unemployment has been and continues to be a serious problem in a number of Member States, with more than 4 million young people aged between 15 and 24 unemployed in the EU in 2016. However, the situation in the Union is highly varied. The fight against youth unemployment is a political priority which is shared by Parliament, the Commission and the Member States, and which contributes to achieving the Union’s objective of growth and jobs. The report notes that in four years of the YG’s implementation, from 2013 to 2017, the youth unemployment rate in the EU has decreased by more than 7 percentage points. The younger people are and the less training they have, the higher the rate of youth unemployment, and this trend has been accentuated with the crisis, which has also affected young adults over 25 without qualifications. I voted in favour because I believe that it is necessary to facilitate the diversity and accessibility of funding and to focus on effective spending, while implementing further policy and service reforms.
Criminal acts and penalties in the field of illicit drug trafficking (A8-0317/2017 - Teresa Jiménez-Becerril Barrio)
I voted in favour of the legislative proposal on minimum provisions on the constituent elements of criminal acts and penalties in the field of illicit drug trafficking: definition of ‘drug’.Illicit drug trafficking and drug abuse are major threats to the health and safety of individuals and to societies in the EU. Although consumption of substances controlled under the UN Conventions on drugs, such as cocaine, ecstasy or cannabis, seems to have stabilised in recent years, albeit at high levels, a major challenge is to address new substances that emerge on the market at a rapid speed. New psychoactive substances are often marketed as legal alternatives to them because they are not subjected to similar control measures. The purpose of the proposal is to amend Council Framework Decision 2004/757/JHA as regards the definition of the term ‘drug’ in order to take into account new psychoactive substances.I voted in favour because the two proposals are linked, so that new psychoactive substances that pose severe health, social and safety risks, and are therefore submitted to permanent market restriction under that Regulation, are also subjected to the criminal law provisions on illicit drug trafficking set by the Framework Decision 2004/757/JHA.
CE marked fertilising products (A8-0270/2017 - Mihai Ţurcanu)
I voted in favour of the report on the proposal for a regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council laying down rules on the making available on the market of CE marked fertilising products and amending Regulations (EC) No 1069/2009 and (EC) No 1107/2009.The proposal is based on extensive consultations with stakeholders and an impact assessment. The evaluation of the existing Fertilisers Regulation carried out in 2010 concluded that the Fertilisers Regulation could be more effective in promoting innovative fertilisers, and that reforms would also be needed to strengthen the internal market. It also showed that neither economic operators, nor national authorities considered that mutual recognition was sufficient for ensuring free movement of organic fertilisers, since fertilisers are products for which strict rules are needed to ensure product quality, protection of the environment and health.I voted in favour because the proposal has been supported by an impact assessment, which showed that the reform would lead to administrative simplification and ensure the flexibility needed on the market, while at the same time ensuring protection of health and environment.
Information exchange on, and an early warning system and risk assessment procedure for, new psychoactive substances (A8-0359/2016 - Michał Boni)
I voted in favour of the report on the proposal for a regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council amending Regulation (EC) No 1920/2006 as regards information exchange, early warning system and risk assessment procedure on new psychoactive substances.New psychoactive substances can pose serious cross-border threats to health which makes it necessary to enhance the monitoring, early warning and combating of those threats. In 2015, 100 new substances were reported for the first time to the EU Early Warning System (EWS), bringing the total number of new substances monitored to more than 560 – with more than 380 (70%) of these detected in the last five years alone. The proposal reflects the priorities set out by the European Agenda on Security adopted on 28 April 2015. This proposal seeks to amend Regulation (EC) No 1920/2006 in order to strengthen the EU early warning system and the risk assessment and streamline procedures to ensure more effective and fast action. This proposal also ensures the participation of Europol in the early warning system and risk assessment procedure, in particular as input on the involvement of criminal groups in the manufacture and distribution of new psychoactive substances is concerned.
Common Fisheries Policy: implementation of the landing obligation (A8-0285/2017 - Alain Cadec)
I voted in favour of the report on the proposal for a regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council amending Regulation (EU) No 1380/2013 on the Common Fisheries Policy.Regulation (EU) No 1380/2013(1) introduced the obligation to land all catches for species subject to catch limits or a minimum conservation reference size. The detailed arrangements for implementing the landing obligation are to be laid down in regional multiannual management plans adopted by means of codecision. The discard plans may incorporate provisions concerning fisheries or species to which the landing obligation already applies and may provide, in particular, for de minimis exemptions based on high survival rates and include provisions on catch documents and, where appropriate, on the fixing of minimum conservation reference sizes. The proposal is that the Commission should be empowered to adopt discard plans for a further total period of up to three years, in order to facilitate the implementation of the landing obligation. I welcome the Commission proposal, which will facilitate the implementation of the landing obligation pending the adoption of regional multiannual management plans.
Renewing the approval of the active substance glyphosate (Objection pursuant to Rule 106) (B8-0567/2017)
I voted in favour of the motion for a resolution on the draft Commission implementing regulation renewing the approval of the active substance glyphosate in accordance with Regulation (EC) No 1107/2009 of the European Parliament and of the Council concerning the placing of plant protection products on the market, and amending the Annex to Implementing Regulation (EU) No 540/2011.The purpose of the Regulation (EC) is ‘to ensure a high level of protection of both human and animal health and the environment and to improve the functioning of the internal market through the harmonisation of the rules on the placing on the market of plant protection products, while improving agricultural production’. The systemic herbicide glyphosate currently has the highest global production volume of all herbicides. The general population is exposed primarily through residence near sprayed areas, through home use, and through diet. I voted in favour because I believe that the Commission’s draft implementing regulation fails to ensure a high level of protection of both human and animal health and the environment, fails to apply the precautionary principle, and exceeds the implementing powers provided for in Regulation (EC) No 1107/2009.
Authorisation of genetically modified maize 1507 (Objection pursuant to Rule 106) (B8-0568/2017)
I voted in favour of the motion for a resolution on the draft Commission implementing decision renewing the authorisation for the placing on the market of products containing, consisting of, or produced from genetically modified maize 1507 (DAS-Ø15Ø7-1) pursuant to Regulation (EC) No 1829/2003 of the European Parliament and of the Council on genetically modified food and feed.Regulation (EU) No 1829/2003 states that genetically modified food or feed must not have adverse effects on human health, animal health or the environment and requires that the Commission take into account any relevant provisions of Union law and other legitimate factors relevant to the matter under consideration when drafting its decision. Genetically modified maize 1507 expresses the Cry1F protein, which is a Bt protein conferring resistance to the European corn borer and certain other lepidopteran pests. Many critical comments were submitted by Member States during the three-month consultation period for EFSA’s risk assessment relating to the initial authorisation. I voted in favour because I believe that the Commission implementing decision is not consistent with Union law in that it is not compatible with the aim of Regulation (EC) No 1829/2003.
Authorisation of genetically modified soybean 305423 x 40-3-2 (Objection pursuant to Rule 106) (B8-0570/2017)
I voted in favour of the motion for a resolution pursuant to Rule 106(2) and (3) of the Rules of Procedure on the draft Commission implementing decision authorising the placing on the market of products containing, consisting of, or produced from genetically modified soybean 305423 x 40-3-2 (DP-3Ø5423-1 × MON-Ø4Ø32-6) pursuant to Regulation (EC) No 1829/2003 of the European Parliament and of the Council on genetically modified food and feed.On 20 September 2007 Pioneer Overseas Corporation submitted an application for the placing on the market of foods, food ingredients and feed containing, consisting of, or produced from genetically modified soybean 305423 x 40-3-2 to the national competent authority of the Netherlands in accordance with Articles 5 and 17 of Regulation (EC) No 1829/2003. That application also covered the placing on the market of genetically modified soybean 305423 x 40-3-2. According to the EFSA pesticide panel, conclusions on the safety of residues from spraying genetically modified crops with glyphosate formations cannot be drawn on the basis of the data provided so far. I voted in favour because I believe that the draft Commission implementing decision is not consistent with Union law.
Authorisation of genetically modified oilseed rapes MON 88302 x Ms8 x Rf3 (Objection pursuant to Rule 106) (B8-0569/2017)
I voted in favour of the motion for a resolution pursuant to Rule 106(2) and (3) of the Rules of Procedure on the draft Commission implementing decision authorising the placing on the market of products containing, consisting of, or produced from genetically modified oilseed rapes MON 88302 x Ms8 x Rf3 (MON-883Ø2-9 × ACSBNØØ5-8 × ACS-BNØØ3-6), MON 88302 x Ms8 (MON-883Ø2-9 × ACSBNØØ5-8) and MON 88302 x Rf3 (MON-883Ø2-9 × ACS-BNØØ3-6) pursuant to Regulation (EC) No 1829/2003 of the European Parliament and of the Council on genetically modified food and feed (D052753-2017/2907(RSP)).On 3 December 2013 Monsanto Europe S.A. and Bayer CropScience N.V. submitted an application for the placing on the market of foods, food ingredients and feed containing, consisting of, or produced from genetically modified oilseed rape MON 88302 x Ms8 x Rf3 to the national competent authority of the Netherlands. Member State competent authorities have raised concerns about the potential of this GM OSR to establish itself as a feral crop population in the Union, particularly along import transport routes. I voted in favour because I believe that the draft Commission implementing decision exceeds the implementing powers provided for in Regulation (EC) No 1829/2003.
Draft amending budget No 5/2017: financing for the European Fund for Sustainable Development and increasing the Emergency Aid Reserve (A8-0301/2017 - Jens Geier)
I voted in favour of the report on the Council position on Draft amending budget No 5/2017 of the European Union for the financial year 2017 providing the financing for the European Fund for Sustainable Development (EFSD) and increasing the Emergency Aid Reserve (EAR) further to the revision of the Multiannual Financial Framework regulation.Draft amending budget No 5/2017 aims to provide for the financing of the European Fund for Sustainable Development (EFSD) further to the adoption of the related legal base, and to reflect in the 2017 general budget the outcome of the mid-term revision of the MFF Regulation as regards the increase of the annual amount of the Emergency Aid Reserve (EAR) from EUR 280 million to EUR 300 million in 2011 prices. Within the 2017 budgetary procedure, the European Parliament and the Council invited the Commission to request the necessary appropriations for the financing of the EFSD in an amending budget as soon as the legal base is adopted. I voted in favour because I believe that the mid-term revision of the Multiannual Financial Framework allows for the financing of the EFSD through an increased Flexibility Instrument, while also increasing the size of the EAR.
Mobilisation of the Flexibility Instrument to provide the financing for the European Fund for Sustainable Development (A8-0298/2017 - Jens Geier)
I voted in favour of the Report on the Council position on Draft amending budget No 5/2017 of the European Union for the financial year 2017 providing the financing for the European Fund for Sustainable Development (EFSD) and increasing the Emergency Aid Reserve (EAR) further to the revision of the Multiannual Financial Framework regulation.After the revision of the MFF Regulation, an annual amount of EUR 676 million in current prices is available under the Flexibility Instrument, increased by lapsed amounts from the European Union Solidarity Fund and the European Globalisation Adjustment Fund, namely EUR 646 million at the end of 2016. An amount of EUR 530 million is already mobilised under the Flexibility instrument in the 2017 budget, thus leaving EUR 792 million available for a further mobilisation. After having examined all possibilities for re-allocating commitment appropriations under Heading 4, the Commission has proposed to mobilise the Flexibility Instrument for an amount of EUR 275 million beyond the ceiling of Heading 4 to provide the financing for the EFSD. The mobilisation of this instrument, as provided for in Article 11 of the MFF Regulation, shows, once more, the crucial need for the Union budget to be more flexible.
Reflection paper on the future of EU finances (B8-0565/2017)
I voted in favour of the reflection paper on the future of EU finances. A debate on the future financing of the European Union cannot happen without taking into account the lessons learnt from the previous multiannual financial frameworks (MFF) and particularly the 2014-2020 MFF. Pursuant to Article 6 of the Treaty on European Union (TEU), the Union shall provide itself with the means necessary to attain its objectives. I believe that the shortcomings of the current MFF and the scale of the new priorities, as well as the impact of the United Kingdom’s withdrawal, all point to the same conclusion: the need to break the ceiling for expenditure of 1% of the EU’s Gross National Income (GNI) and, therefore, to significantly increase the Union’s budget in order to respond to the challenges ahead. The EU budget is predominantly financed from national contributions based on GNI instead of genuine own resources, as provided for in the EU Treaties. The Paper reiterates its commitment to a fully-fledged reform of the EU own resources system, with simplicity, fairness and transparency as guiding principles, and in line with the recommendations of the High Level Group on Own Resources.
Legitimate measures to protect whistle-blowers acting in the public interest (A8-0295/2017 - Virginie Rozière)
I voted in favour of the report on legitimate measures to protect whistle-blowers acting in the public interest when disclosing the confidential information of companies and public bodies. Over a number of years, the crucial role that whistle-blowers play in revealing serious breaches of the public interest has been brought to light as a result of a series of scandals in such varied areas as public health protection, the environment and tax avoidance. Today, protecting whistle-blowers is one of the best ways to safeguard the public interest and bring about responsible and ethical conduct in public and private institutions. However, the protection offered, if at all, is still largely inadequate and is too disjointed to offer a coherent framework in the EU, whose activities are currently limited to sectoral protections. I believe that the EU should take action by means of a horizontal legislative instrument, in accordance with its objectives regarding democracy, pluralism of opinions and freedom of expression. A number of international standards to protect whistle-blowers have already been developed. Therefore EU legislation should support them. In accordance with those standards, the definition of ‘whistle-blower’ should be broad enough to cover as many scenarios as possible.
Minimum income policies as a tool for fighting poverty (A8-0292/2017 - Laura Agea)
I voted in favour of the report on minimum income policies as a tool for fighting poverty. The great financial crisis that has been affecting the European continent since 2008 has had a permanent impact on the European labour market. It has had a significant effect on the social fabric and has deeply changed it, hugely widening the gap between social classes, highlighting a sort of subdivision between the north and south of the continent and resulting in, to date, 120 million citizens at risk of poverty and social exclusion. The effects of the crisis, unemployment levels and poverty still do not appear to be declining. This report aims to provide practical guidance on how to take a twin-track approach – firstly, to curb the social impact of the economic crisis by taking effective action to lift people out of poverty and social exclusion and, secondly, to encourage active job-creation policies. I voted in favour because I believe that Europe should make every possible effort to try to achieve the goals of the Europe 2020 strategy which establishes, as a fundamental target, that of enabling people living in poverty and social exclusion to be lifted out of that state.
Enhanced cooperation: European Public Prosecutor's Office (A8-0290/2017 - Barbara Matera)
I voted in favour of the Recommendation on the draft Council regulation implementing enhanced cooperation on the establishment of the European Public Prosecutor’s Office (‘the EPPO’). The protection and prosecution of offences against the EU budget and the financial interests of the EU is currently within the exclusive competence of Member States. OLAF, Eurojust and Europol do not have the mandate to conduct criminal investigations and the EPPO will fill this institutional gap.The establishment of the EPPO will bring about substantial change in the way the Union’s financial interests are protected. It will combine European and national law-enforcement efforts in a unified, seamless and efficient approach to counter fraud against the EU. Currently, only national authorities can investigate and prosecute fraud against the EU and their competences stop at their national borders.On 17 July 2013, the Commission submitted a proposal for a regulation of the Council to set up the European Public Prosecutor’s Office (EPPO) defining its competences and procedures. A European Public Prosecutor will head the EPPO and every participating member will be represented with one prosecutor. The EPPO will be responsible for investigating, prosecuting and bringing to judgment the perpetrators of offences against the European Union’s financial interests.
Prison systems and conditions (A8-0251/2017 - Joëlle Bergeron)
I voted in favour of the report on prison systems and conditions. Between 2013 and 2014 the prison population fell by 7% in Council of Europe member countries. The proportion of detainees per 100 places fell from 99 in 2011 to 96 in 2013, and 94 in 2014, according to the 2014 edition of the Annual Penal Statistics of the Council of Europe (SPACE). But the situation remains problematic in many countries, including certain Member States, such as Hungary, Belgium, Greece, Spain, France, Portugal and Italy.While Europe’s prisons remain close to saturation point, houses of detention regularly exceed it. Imprisonment is all too often accompanied by living conditions in detention which amount to inhuman or degrading treatment as referred to in Article 3 of the European Convention on Human Rights. In addition to this difficulty, there are often problems with the obsolescence of prison facilities, the lack of care and medical attention, and violence between prisoners and even between prisoners and prison staff. I voted in favour because I believe that prisons policy should allow more scope for measures which limit deprivation of liberty as an alternative to detention.
Agreement establishing the EU-LAC International Foundation (A8-0279/2017 - Javier Couso Permuy)
I voted in favour of the Recommendation on the proposal for a Council decision on the conclusion, on behalf of the European Union, of the Agreement establishing the EU-LAC International Foundation. Latin America, the Caribbean and the European Union launched the ‘Bi-regional Strategic Partnership’ at the First Rio de Janeiro Summit in 1999. Their strong historical, social and economic relations, together with their shared values, formed the basis for this ambitious project whose primary aims are dynamic political dialogue and the establishment of a forum for political and economic exchange between the two regions.The EU-LAC Foundation has a number of programmes that examine the bi-regional relationship, delving more deeply into issues that are part of the bi-regional agenda and identifying within them new aspects of the partnership that might lead to new forms and areas of cooperation between the EU and Latin America and the Caribbean. It also seeks to promote fora for dialogue and reflection with non-governmental actors, thereby enriching and strengthening the intergovernmental process as answers are sought to the challenges faced by societies in both regions. I voted in favour because I believe that the EU-LAC Foundation will enable stronger bi-regional dialogue.
Schengen acquis provisions relating to the Visa Information System in Bulgaria and Romania (A8-0286/2017 - Agustín Díaz de Mera García Consuegra)
I voted in favour of the report on the draft Council decision on the putting into effect of certain provisions of the Schengen acquis relating to the Visa Information System in the Republic of Bulgaria and Romania. The proposed Council Decision aims to grant Bulgaria and Romania passive access to the Visa Information System (VIS) and, in accordance with the agreement reached by the co-legislators on a draft regulation establishing an Entry/Exit System (EES), it is a precondition for the application of the EES to those Member States. Therefore, I voted in favour of the report so as to encourage the Member States to proceed speedily with the adoption of the decision.
Automated data exchange with regard to vehicle registration data in the Czech Republic (A8-0288/2017 - Maria Grapini)
Report on the draft Council implementing decision on the launch of automated data exchange with regard to vehicle registration data in the Czech Republic. The purpose of the legislative proposal is to authorise the Czech Republic to receive and supply personal data for the purpose of the automated searching of vehicle registration data. Council Decision 2008/615/JHA on the stepping up of cross-border cooperation, particularly in combating terrorism and cross-border crime, confers implementing powers upon the Council with a view to adopting measures necessary to implement that Decision, in particular as regards the receiving and supply of personal data provided for under that Decision. The supply of personal data provided for under that Decision may not take place until the general provisions on data protection set out in that Decision have been implemented in the national law of the territories of the Member States involved in such supply. I voted in favour because the evaluation report, summarising the results of the questionnaire, the evaluation visit and the pilot run on vehicle registration data exchange have been presented to the Council, and the Council concluded that the Czech Republic had fully implemented the general provisions on data protection set out in Decision 2008/615/JHA.
Automated data exchange with regard to dactyloscopic data in Portugal (A8-0289/2017 - Jaromír Štětina)
I voted in favour of the report on the draft Council implementing decision on the launch of automated data exchange with regard to dactyloscopic data in Portugal. The purpose of the legal proposal is to authorise Portugal to receive and supply personal data in respect of dactyloscopic data in Portugal (fingerprint data). Council Decision 2008/615/JHA on the stepping up of cross-border cooperation, particularly in combating terrorism and cross-border crime, confers implementing powers upon the Council with a view to adopting measures necessary to implement that Decision, in particular as regards the receiving and supply of personal data. The supply of personal data provided for under that Decision may not take place until the general provisions on data protection set out in that Decision have been implemented in the national law of the territories of the Member States involved in such supply. I voted in favour because an overall evaluation report, summarising the results of the questionnaire, the evaluation visit and the pilot run concerning dactyloscopic data exchange has been presented to the Council and the Council concluded that Portugal had fully implemented the general provisions on data protection set out in Decision 2008/615/JHA.
Automated data exchange with regard to dactyloscopic data in Greece (A8-0287/2017 - Claude Moraes)
I voted in favour of the Report on the draft Council implementing decision on the launch of automated data exchange with regard to dactyloscopic data in Greece. The purpose of the legislative proposal is to authorise Greece to receive and supply personal data in respect of fingerprint data (dactyloscopic data). Council Decision 2008/615/JHA on the stepping up of cross-border cooperation, particularly with a view to combating terrorism and cross-border crime, gives the Council implementing powers to lay down the measures in particular as regards the reception and supply of personal data provided for in that Decision. The supply of personal data provided for in Decision 2008/615/JHA may not take place until the general provisions on data protection have been implemented in the national law of the territories of the Member States involved in that decision. I voted in favour because on the basis of the evaluation report submitted to the Council, the Council concluded that Greece had fully implemented the general provisions on data protection of Decision 2008/615/JHA.
Safety rules and standards for passenger ships (A8-0167/2017 - Daniela Aiuto)
I voted in favour of the Report on the proposal for a directive of the European Parliament and of the Council amending Directive 2009/45/EC on safety rules and standards for passenger ships. Directive 2009/45/EC sets safety rules and standards for new and existing passenger ships made of steel and equivalent material and high-speed craft which provide domestic services in the Member States of the EU. It implements at the level of the EU the provisions of the IMO SOLAS Convention which establishes the technical requirements for vessel construction, stability, machinery, electrics, fire safety and life-saving equipment for passenger ships, that is, ships carrying more than 12 passengers. The domestic passenger ship fleet in the EU includes about 3 175 vessels which navigate in different sea areas classified under the directive, and about 900 ships which operate only in designated port areas. I voted in favour because I believe that the proposed simplification should indeed help to fully implement, monitor and enforce the rules in the Member States and thereby contribute to maintain a high overall safety level.
Registration of persons sailing on board passenger ships operating to or from ports of the Member States (A8-0168/2017 - Izaskun Bilbao Barandica)
I voted in favour of the Report on the proposal for a directive of the European Parliament and of the Council amending Council Directive 98/41/EC on the registration of persons sailing on board passenger ships operating to or from ports of the Member States of the Community and amending Directive 2010/65/EU of the European Parliament and of the Council on reporting formalities for ships arriving in and/or departing from ports of the Member States.The proposal to amend Council Directive 98/41/EC of 18 June 1998 on the registration of persons sailing on board passenger ships is part of a wider review of EU legislation on passenger ship safety that is taking place under the Commission’s Regulatory Fitness and Performance programme (REFIT). In the report drawn up in the light of the fitness check, the Commission concluded that the EU’s legal framework was generally fit for purpose and had improved safety, but that there was room for improvement with regard to simplifying and clarifying the legislation. The aim of this exercise is therefore to update, clarify and simplify the existing requirements for the counting and registration of passengers and crew on board passenger ships, while enhancing safety levels.
System of inspections for the safe operation of ro-ro ferry and high-speed passenger craft in regular service (A8-0165/2017 - Dominique Riquet)
I voted in favour of the Report on the proposal for a directive of the European Parliament and of the Council on a system of inspections for the safe operation of ro-ro ferry and high-speed passenger craft in regular service and amending Directive 2009/16/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council on port State control and repealing Council Directive 1999/35/EC.The Commission proposal on inspections of ro-ro ferries and high-speed passenger craft is part of the REFIT programme, which aims to simplify and rationalise the current legislative framework. Parliament’s debate on the proposal will open at a key moment for the maritime sector, as 2017 is the European Year of the Sea. 2017 should therefore be crucial in reinforcing the position of the maritime sector in the internal market. The proposal aims to eliminate the legal uncertainty and redundancy caused by the co—existence of two directives on the inspection of vessels. I voted in favour because I believe that the Commission proposal should help reduce the administrative and financial burden on operators/owners whilst maintaining a high level of security.
Objection to an implementing measure: scientific criteria for the determination of endocrine disrupting properties (B8-0542/2017)
I voted in favour of the Objection pursuant to Rule 106. An active substance is only to be approved if it is not considered to have endocrine disrupting properties that may cause adverse effects on non-target organisms, unless the exposure of non-target organisms to that active substance under realistic proposed conditions of use is negligible. The Standing Committee on Plants, Animals, Food and Feed delivered a positive opinion on the draft regulation on 4 July 2017.It is not scientific to exclude a substance with an intended endocrine mode of action from being identified as an endocrine disrupter for non-target organisms. The draft regulation can therefore not be considered to be based on objective scientific data related to the endocrine system, as required by the Court. Therefore, the Commission thereby exceeds its implementing powers.The failure to include a suspected endocrine disrupter category means that no action can be taken to tackle such substances, unless a complementary proposal laying down criteria for them is put forward. I voted in favour because I believe that the inclusion of a suspected endocrine disrupter category would have been extremely relevant, enabling adequate protection against such substances in other sectors.
Objection pursuant to Rule 106: draft Commission implementing decision authorising the placing on the market of products containing, consisting of, or produced from genetically modified soybean DAS-44406-6, pursuant to Regulation (EC) No 1829/2003 of the European Parliament and of the Council on genetically modified food and feed (B8-0541/2017)
I voted in favour of the objection pursuant to Rule 106. On 16 February 2012 Dow Agrosciences LLC and MS Technologies LLC submitted an application for the placing on the market of foods, food ingredients and feed containing, consisting of, or produced from genetically modified soybean DAS-44406-6 to the national competent authority of the Netherlands, in accordance with Articles 5 and 17 of Regulation (EC) No 1829/2003. On 17 February 2017 the European Food Safety Authority (EFSA) adopted a favourable opinion in accordance with Articles 6 and 18 of Regulation (EC) No 1829/2003. Regulation (EC) No 1829/2003 states that genetically modified food or feed must not have adverse effects on human health, animal health or the environment, and requires the Commission to take into account any relevant provisions of Union law and other legitimate factors relevant to the matter under consideration when drafting its decision. Many critical comments were submitted by Member States during the three-month consultation period. I voted in favour of the Objection because I believe that the draft Commission implementing decision is not consistent with Union law and that it is not compatible with the aim of Regulation (EC) No 1829/2003.
Ending child marriage (B8-0535/2017)
I voted in favour of the resolution further to Question for Oral Answer B8 0328/2017 pursuant to Rule 128(5) of the Rules of Procedure on ending child marriage. The EU is committed to promoting the rights of the child, and child, early and forced marriage (CEFM) is a violation of these rights.The EU is committed to comprehensively protecting and promoting the rights of the child in its external policy. CEFM has been recognised under international human rights law as a harmful practice and is often associated with serious forms of violence against women and girls, including intimate partner violence. It has a devastating impact on the overall realisation and enjoyment of girls’ and women’s rights, and on girls’ health, including serious risks of complications in pregnancy and HIV infections.The resolution emphasises that child marriage is a violation of the rights of the child and a form of violence against women and girls and as such it should be condemned. I voted in favour because I believe that the EU and the Members States have to increase access to health services, including sexual and reproductive health and rights services, for women and child brides.
2017 UN Climate Change Conference in Bonn, Germany (COP23) (B8-0534/2017)
I voted in favour of the Motion for a Resolution further to Questions for Oral Answer B8 0330/2017 and B8 0329/2017 pursuant to Rule 128(5) of the Rules of Procedure on the 2017 UN Climate Change Conference in Bonn, Germany (COP23). The Paris Agreement entered into force on 4 November 2016, with 160 of the 197 Parties to the Convention having deposited their instruments of ratification, acceptance, approval or accession with the UN. The July 2015 reform proposal for the emissions trading scheme (ETS) and the July 2016 climate package (covering effort sharing, land use, land use change and forestry (LULUCF) proposals and a European strategy for low-emission mobility) are the key instruments to deliver on these commitments and to reaffirm the EU’s position as a global leader in the fight against climate change. The efforts to mitigate global warming should not be seen as an obstacle to striving for economic growth but should, on the contrary, be seen as a driving force for the realisation of new and sustainable growth and employment. I voted in favour because I believe that climate policy objectives should be placed at the centre of the EU’s foreign policy efforts and global agenda.
State of play of negotiations with the United Kingdom (B8-0538/2017, B8-0539/2017)
I voted in favour of the motion for a resolution to wind up the debate on the state of play of negotiations with the United Kingdom pursuant to Rule 123(2) of the Rules of Procedure. There are currently around 3.2 million citizens of the remaining 27 Member States resident in the United Kingdom and 1.2 million citizens of the United Kingdom resident in the EU-27. In her speech in Florence on 22 September 2017, the Prime Minister of the United Kingdom offered some clarifications concerning citizens’ rights, the Ireland and Northern Ireland issue, the financial settlement and the need for a transitional period and prospects for future relations between the European Union and the United Kingdom. The Prime Minister of the United Kingdom proposed a time-limited transitional period. I voted in favour of the resolution because I believe that that such a transitional period can only be the continuation of the whole of the acquis communautaire which entails the full application of the four freedoms, and that this must take place without any limitation on the free movement of persons through the imposition of any new conditions.
Restriction of the use of certain hazardous substances in electrical and electronic equipment (A8-0205/2017 - Adina-Ioana Vălean)
I voted in favour of the Report on the proposal for a directive of the European Parliament and of the Council amending Directive 2011/65/EU on the restriction of the use of certain hazardous substances in electrical and electronic equipment. EU legislation to restrict the use of certain hazardous substances in electrical and electronic equipment (EEE) has been in force since August 2004. The ‘RoHS legislation’ contributes to reducing the risks to health and the environment relating to those substances. The current Directive, Directive 2011/65/EU on the restriction of the use of certain hazardous substances in EEE (or RoHS 2) entered into force in July 2011. The Commission’s proposal amends the scope of RoHS 2. This scope review is explicitly required in the Directive. It aims to tackle ‘unintended side-effects’ of the Directive that would arise after 22 July 2019. I voted in favour because I believe that the Commission’s legislative proposal is a necessary step towards solving pressing issues linked to the current wording of RoHS 2. The scope review of RoHS 2 will particularly help to preserve jobs in SMEs, support the public health sector relying on refurbished medical equipment, and foster a circular economy.
Management, conservation and control measures applicable in the ICCAT Convention area (A8-0173/2017 - Gabriel Mato)
I voted in favour of the Report on the proposal for a regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council laying down management, conservation and control measures applicable in the Convention Area of the International Commission for the Conservation of Atlantic Tunas (ICCAT) and amending Council Regulations (EC) No 1936/2001, (EC) No 1984/2003 and (EC) No 520/2007. The objective of the common fisheries policy (CFP), as set out in Regulation (EU) No 1380/2013 of the European Parliament and of the Council is to ensure exploitation of marine biological resources that provides long-term environmental, economic and social sustainability. The European Union has been a Contracting Party to the International Convention for the Conservation of Atlantic Tunas (‘the ICCAT Convention’) since 14 November 1997. The objective of the proposal is to transpose into EU law the conservation, control and enforcement measures adopted by the International Commission for the Conservation of Atlantic Tunas (ICCAT) in the Atlantic Ocean and adjacent seas. I am in favour of faithfully transposing the ICCAT recommendations so as not to create a situation of discrimination against European fleets vis-à-vis to third-country fleets.
Women’s economic empowerment in the private and public sectors in the EU (A8-0271/2017 - Anna Hedh)
I voted in favour of the Report on women’s economic empowerment in the private and public sectors in the EU. Europe is indisputably one of the world leaders when it comes to women’s rights and gender equality. However, a precondition for excelling in equality and women’s empowerment is women’s equal participation in the labour market and in economic decision-making. The latest statistics shows that the EU remains only halfway towards achieving gender equality. Despite that women on average hold a higher education level than men the gender pay gap is still very prevalent at 16.1% and the pension gap as well, at an alarming 40.2% though the difference between Member States is significant. A more even distribution of unpaid work in the household is also necessary for women to be able to be present on the labour market to the same extent as men. I voted in favour because I believe that gender equality plans are a tool that tackles inequality in the workplace through many various ways, addressing recruitment, pay, promotion, training and work-life balance.
Addressing shrinking civil society space in developing countries (A8-0283/2017 - Teresa Jiménez-Becerril Barrio)
I voted in favour of the Report on addressing shrinking civil society space in developing countries. Article 21 TEU states that the Union’s action on the international scene, which includes therein development cooperation, must be guided by the principles of democracy, the rule of law, the universality and indivisibility of human rights and fundamental freedoms. Civil society represents the third sector of a healthy and decent society, along with the public and private sectors. Civil society comprises non-governmental and non-profit organisations that have a presence in public life, expressing the interests and values of their members or others, based on ethical, cultural, political, scientific, religious or philanthropic considerations. The closing down of civil society space in developing countries is being carried out in increasingly complex and sophisticated ways, which are harder to tackle and imposed through legislation, taxation, funding limitations, increased bureaucracy, reporting and banking requirements, the criminalisation and stigmatisation of CSO representatives, defamation, all forms of harassment, online repression and internet access limitations, censorship, arbitrary detention, gender-based violence, torture and assassination, in particular in conflict-stricken states. I voted in favour because I believe in the necessity of tackling governmental and non-governmental tactics of marginalising critical voices.
The fight against cybercrime (A8-0272/2017 - Elissavet Vozemberg-Vrionidi)
I voted in favour of the Report on the fight against cybercrime. Cybercrime is causing increasingly significant social and economic damage affecting the fundamental rights of individuals, posing threats to the rule of law in cyberspace and endangering the stability of democratic societies. It is a growing problem in the Member States. The 2016 IOCTA reveals that cybercrime is increasing in intensity, complexity and magnitude even exceeding traditional crime in some EU countries. The Report stresses the need to streamline common definitions of cybercrime, cyber warfare, cybersecurity, cyber harassment and cyber-attacks to ensure that the EU institutions and EU Member States share a common legal definition. It underlines that the fight against cybercrime should be first and foremost about safeguarding and hardening critical infrastructures and other networked devices, and not only about pursuing repressive measures. I voted in favour because I believe that a common European approach to criminal justice in cyberspace is a matter of priority, as it will improve the enforcement of the rule of law in cyberspace and facilitate the obtaining of e-evidence in criminal proceedings, as well as contributing to making the settlement of cases much speedier than today.
EU political relations with ASEAN (A8-0243/2017 - Reinhard Bütikofer)
I voted in favour of the report on EU political relations with ASEAN. This year we celebrate the 50th anniversary of ASEAN, the 60th anniversary of the Treaties of Rome, and the 40th anniversary of EU-ASEAN formal relations. The ASEAN region has emerged as one of the world’s most dynamic and fastest-growing, particularly in terms of the economy, technology and research, has a geopolitically and geo-economically strategic position, has rich resources, is pursuing a goal of increased economic integration and an ambitious Sustainable Development Goals (SDG) agenda, notably on education, and is a strong advocate of multilateralism. The two regions have attained a considerable level of interaction, and EU-ASEAN relations are comprehensive and cover a wide range of sectors including trade and investment, development, economic matters and political affairs. I voted in favour because I believe that there is significant potential for EU-ASEAN trade relations to grow with the EU being the top foreign investor in ASEAN.
Accessibility requirements for products and services (A8-0188/2017 - Morten Løkkegaard)
I voted in favour of the Report on the proposal for a directive of the European Parliament and of the Council on the approximation of the laws, regulations and administrative provisions of the Member States as regards the accessibility requirements for products and services. The purpose of this Report is to improve the proper functioning of the internal market and remove and prevent barriers for the free movement of accessible products and services, including for disabled people. The demand for accessible products and services is high and the number of citizens with disabilities and/or functional limitations will increase significantly with the ageing of the European Union’s population. Differences in legislation, standards and guidelines on accessibility exist and are very likely to increase as Member States develop new accessibility rules. The proposed Directive will provide for a common EU definition and implementation framework for accessibility requirements of certain products and services, so that the latter might benefit from free circulation on the internal market and ensure the full participation of persons with disabilities in society. I voted in favour because I believe that harmonisation of national measures on accessibility is a necessary condition to put an end to the legislative divergence.
EU-Chile Agreement on trade in organic products (A8-0257/2017 - Inmaculada Rodríguez-Piñero Fernández)
. ‒ I voted in favour of the Recommendation on the draft Council decision on the conclusion of the Agreement between the European Union and the Republic of Chile on trade in organic products.On 6 March 2017, the Council adopted a Decision on the signing of the Agreement between the EU and Chile on trade in organic products. The agreement aims to foster trade in organic products, contributing to the development and expansion of the organic sector in the Union and in the Republic of Chile and achieving a high level of respect for the principles of organic production, guaranteeing the control systems and ensuring the integrity of organic products. Under the agreement, Chile will recognise as equivalent all EU organic products included in the scope of Regulation (EC) No 834/2007.Moreover, the agreement provides for the establishment of a Joint Committee on Organic Products composed of representatives of the Union and representatives of the Government of Chile. The Commission’s proposal also includes, as a strong safeguard, the possibility of unilaterally suspending recognition of equivalence if one party considers that the laws, regulations or administrative procedures and practices of the other party no longer meet the requirements for equivalence.
Modernisation of the trade pillar of the EU-Chile Association Agreement (A8-0267/2017 - Inmaculada Rodríguez-Piñero Fernández)
. ‒ I voted in favour of the Recommendation on the draft Council decision on the conclusion, on behalf of the European Union and its Member States, of the Third Additional Protocol to the Agreement establishing an association between the European Community and its Member States, of the one part, and the Republic of Chile, of the other part, to take account of the accession of the Republic of Croatia to the European Union. The conclusion of a Third Protocol is being proposed by Council to take into account the accession of Croatia to the EU. By this means, Croatia becomes a contracting party to the Association Agreement.This protocol adds a maximum of 1 000 metric tonnes of pig meat to the existing 8 400 tonnes (following standard calculations on compensations), updates the schedule on services to integrate the schedule for Croatia and adjusts public procurement to integrate Croatian entities. I voted in favour because I think Croatia’s accession to the agreement is a logical step.
Extension of the European statistical programme to 2020 (A8-0158/2017 - Roberto Gualtieri)
I voted in favour of the Report on the proposal for a regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council amending Regulation (EU) No 99/2013 of the European Parliament and of the Council on the European statistical programme 2013-17, by extending it to 2018-2020.Prompt, reliable, relevant and publicly available evidence based on European statistics without unnecessary time lags in the provision of such statistics is absolutely essential to measuring the progress and evaluating the efficiency of the European Union’s policies and programmes, especially in the context of the Europe 2020 Strategy and the Agenda for jobs, growth, fairness and democratic change. The regulation establishes a financial envelope for the extension of the European statistical programme to cover the years 2018 to 2020.I voted in favour because I believe that European statistics should have a comprehensive Union-wide approach and go beyond the Commission’s policies and political priorities in order to provide accurate data that is of assistance with regard to further integration processes in the Union. It is particularly important to measure pockets of extreme unemployment, including extreme youth unemployment in cross-border regions.
European venture capital funds and European social entrepreneurship funds (A8-0120/2017 - Sirpa Pietikäinen)
I voted in favour of the Report on the proposal for a regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council amending Regulation (EU) No 345/2013 on European venture capital funds and Regulation (EU) No 346/2013 on European social entrepreneurship funds.The Regulation lays down uniform requirements and conditions for managers of collective investment undertakings that wish to use in the Union the ‘EuVECA’ or ‘EuSEF’ designations. It contains rules governing, in particular, qualifying investment, qualifying portfolio undertaking and eligible investors. The market of qualifying venture capital funds and qualifying social entrepreneurship funds should be opened to increase scale effects, reduce transaction and operational costs, improve competition and strengthen investor choice. Enlarging the base of prospective managers contributes to opening up that market. It should benefit undertakings seeking investment by giving them access to financing from a greater and more varied range of risk investment sources.I voted in favour because I believe that in order to make the framework more appealing and further increase the supply of capital to social businesses, the range of eligible undertakings in which qualifying social entrepreneurship funds can invest should be expanded by extending the definition of positive social impact.
Multi-annual plan for demersal stocks in the North Sea and the fisheries exploiting those stocks (A8-0263/2017 - Ulrike Rodust)
I voted in favour of the report on the proposal for a regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council on establishing a multi-annual plan for demersal stocks in the North Sea and the fisheries exploiting those stocks and repealing Council Regulation (EC) 676/2007 and Council Regulation (EC) 1342/2008.The basic regulation regards multiannual plans as essential to the multiannual, sustainable exploitation of biological marine resources, the idea behind these plans being to address the characteristics of different fisheries. The Baltic Sea Plan is the first multi-annual plan in line with the basic regulation to have been adopted. It is considered a blueprint for multiannual plans for other marine areas, but the characteristics of different fisheries still need to be taken into consideration. The impact assessment that the Commission proposal for this multiannual plan is based upon sets out the following objectives: reduction of underfishing using F(MSY) ranges, safeguards for the precautionary approach, easier application of the landing obligation and a framework for adopting regionalisation.I voted in favour because although the Baltic Sea Plan only proposes delegated acts for by-catch species, the Commission can adopt ‘specific conservation measures’ for different groups and a large number of species.
Establishing an instrument contributing to stability and peace (A8-0261/2017 - Arnaud Danjean)
I voted in favour of the report on the proposal for a regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council amending Regulation (EU) No 230/2014 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 11 March 2014 establishing an instrument contributing to stability and peace.On 5 July 2016, the Commission published a legislative proposal to help strengthen the security and defence capabilities of the partner countries. The aim is to enable the European Union to finance out of its own budget both training activities and the supply of non-lethal equipment to the security forces of third countries. This support given by the European Union to its partners should help to sustain the effectiveness of the training activities provided by the EU and the development of the rule of law.The Commission’s initiative is intended to strengthen the link between security and development established since 2003. The EU thus lacks a financial instrument that can be activated quickly and efficiently to provide direct support in the field of security for its third-country partners when needed. I voted in favour because I believe that the urgently—needed assistance proposed by the Commission would fill in the gaps in the existing arrangements.
Transparency, accountability and integrity in the EU institutions (A8-0133/2017 - Sven Giegold)
I voted in favour of the report on transparency, accountability and integrity in the EU institutions. EU institutions are more transparent, accountable and cleaner than most other political institutions at national or regional levels in Europe. Citizens can follow nearly all committee meetings by web streaming – transparency which does not exist in most Member State parliaments so far. The European Commission is an open administration, much more transparent and accessible than what we know from most Member States. Yet, for several reasons, politics in Brussels is more distant to citizens across the EU. Local and national politics are less distant to citizens and media reports more about them and citizens have more personal contacts with their representatives. I voted in favour because I believe that the best available standards are needed to protect the integrity of the EU institutions’ own members and staff. These standards need to encompass the members’ and staff’s activities inside and outside EU institutions as well as during and after their office in EU institutions.
The future of the Erasmus+ programme (B8-0495/2017)
I voted in favour of the motion for a resolution further to Question for Oral Answer B8-0326/2017 pursuant to Rule 128(5) of the Rules of Procedure on the future of the Erasmus+ programme (2017/2740(RSP)).In the current context, the 30th anniversary of the Erasmus+ programme should be not only a moment for celebration, but also an opportunity to reflect on how the programme can be made more accessible and inclusive, and improve the development of European citizens and organisations active in the fields of education, training, youth and sport. Erasmus is one of the most successful EU programmes and an essential tool to support activities in the fields of education, training, youth and sport, and in bringing Europe closer to its citizens. Erasmus has, through mobility and strategic collaboration, contributed to enhancing the quality of education and training institutions in the EU, increasing the competitiveness of the European education sector, creating a strong European knowledge economy and achieving the Europe 2020 goals. I voted in favour because I believe that education is a fundamental human right and a public good which should be accessible to all applicants, especially students with a lower income.
A new skills agenda for Europe (A8-0276/2017 - Martina Dlabajová, Momchil Nekov)
I voted in favour of the report on a new skills agenda for Europe. The New Skills Agenda for Europe is a long awaited initiative, which rightly puts the focus on the need to upgrade European education and training systems in line with the fast changing economic and societal environment. However, the skills package puts emphasis mainly on the immediate needs of the labour market, whilst the labour market is dynamic and there is also a need to better estimate future skills needs. It is essential, therefore, to move towards a pan-European skills forecasting tool. The report highlights the importance of going beyond the ‘right occupational skills’ and focusing also on those aspects of education that are able to foster an entrepreneurial mind-set and creativity, to allow people to think critically, to take informed decisions and to fully participate in democratic and social life. I voted in favour because I believe that in order to achieve the ambitious goals of the Agenda, there is a need to adopt a holistic approach to education and skills development providing citizens with a key set of competences for lifelong learning.
Multilateral Agreement on the establishment of a European Common Aviation Area (ECAA) (A8-0260/2017 - Roberts Zīle)
I voted in favour of the Multilateral Agreement on the establishment of a European Common Aviation Area (ECAA). The aim of this Agreement is the creation of a European Common Aviation Area (ECAA), integrating the EU’s neighbours in South-East Europe in the EU’s internal aviation market which consists of EU Member States as well as Norway and Iceland. The ECAA agreement, by creating a single aviation market, should deliver substantial economic benefits for air travellers and the aviation industry, covering 36 countries and more than 500 million people. I voted in favour because I believe that the agreement offers the same high standards in term of safety and security across Europe, through the uniform application of rules. The agreement creates an open framework accessible for European neighbour countries which wish to fully integrate into the European aviation community. This means that the Western Balkan States individually and step by step integrate into the European aviation market on the basis of the transitional arrangements which are part of the Agreement.
Subjecting acryloylfentanyl to control measures (A8-0284/2017 - Brice Hortefeux)
I voted in favour of the Report on the draft Council implementing decision on subjecting N-(1-phenethylpiperidin-4-yl)-N-phenylacrylamide (acryloylfentanyl) to control measures. Parliament is required under the consultation procedure to deliver its opinion within three months on the draft Council implementing decision on subjecting N-(1-phenethylpiperidin-4-yl)-N-phenylacrylamide (acryloylfentanyl) to control measures. The risk assessment report jointly drawn up by the European Monitoring Centre for Drugs and Drug Addiction (EMCDDA) and Europol concludes that this psychoactive substance is a synthetic opioid structurally similar to fentanyl, a controlled substance widely used in medicine as an adjunct to general anaesthesia during surgery and for pain management. The bulk of production takes place in China. The report notes that acryloylfentanyl has been available in the EU since April 2016 and has been detected in six Member States. Forty-seven deaths associated with the substance have been reported by three Member States, together with 20 acute intoxications apparently due to acryloylfentanyl. Accordingly, I voted in favour because I believe that the draft Council implementing decision should be approved.
EU political relations with India (A8-0242/2017 - Cristian Dan Preda)
I voted in favour of the Report on EU political relations with India. The EU and India are the world’s two largest democracies, which both draw on deep cultural histories and are jointly committed to the promotion of peace, stability, security, prosperity, sustainable development and social justice, as well as to the respect for human rights, fundamental freedoms, the rule of law and good governance. The EU and India have built over the last two decades a Strategic Partnership founded on shared values and interests, given that they are natural partners and factors of stability in the present multipolar world. The EU and India, as important economic and trade and investment partners, and with the EU being India’s most important trading partner, have been engaged since 2007 in negotiations for an ambitious free trade and investment agreement. I voted in favour because I believe that increased coordination between the EU and its Member States regarding their relationship with India would further allow the Strategic Partnership to be strengthened. The Report emphasises that stronger political engagement is needed on both sides to make the relationship more dynamic and valuable for the challenges the two partners face at regional and international level.
Mobilisation of the EU Solidarity Fund to provide assistance to Italy (A8-0280/2017 - Giovanni La Via)
I voted in favour of the Report on the proposal for a decision of the European Parliament and of the Council on the mobilisation of the European Union Solidarity Fund to provide assistance to Italy. Between end of August 2016 and mid-January 2017, a series of strong earthquakes with magnitudes ranging from 5.9 to 6.5 in the Richter scale, followed by a multitude of aftershocks, affected wide areas of the Apennines chain in Central Italy, in particular the regions of Abruzzo, Lazio, Marche and Umbria. They led to 333 casualties, over 30 000 people in need of assistance, significant damage to the infrastructure, businesses, including farms and tourism sector, and living conditions of the affected population. The affected regions fall under the category of ‘transition regions’ and ‘more developed regions’ under the European Structural and Investment (ESI) Funds (2014-2020). The Italian authorities declared their intention to reallocate funding from the ESI Funds programmes towards recovery measures. The proposed mobilisation requires an amendment to the 2017 budget and a draft amending budget (N°4/2017), aiming at increasing budget article 13 06 01. I voted in favour because I believe that Europe needs to show solidarity with the affected Italian regions.
Draft amending budget No 4/2017 accompanying the proposal to mobilise the EU Solidarity Fund to provide assistance to Italy (A8-0281/2017 - Jens Geier)
I voted in favour of the Report on the Council position on Draft amending budget No 4/2017 of the European Union for the financial year 2017 accompanying the proposal to mobilise the European Union Solidarity Fund to provide assistance to Italy. Draft amending budget No 4/2017 relates to the mobilisation of the European Union Solidarity Fund (EUSF) for an amount of EUR 1 196 797 579 in relation to the earthquakes that occurred in Italy between August 2016 and January 2017 in the regions of Abruzzo, Lazio, Marche and Umbria. The amount of EUR 30 000 000 was already paid for this EUSF case by means of an advance from the 2016 Union budget and that mobilisation represents the biggest ever mobilisation of the EUSF. The total amount available for the mobilisation of the EUSF at this stage of the year is EUR 293 971 080 short of the proposed amount, the Commission proposes to cover that difference from the annual amount available in 2018. I voted in favour because I believe that Europe needs to show solidarity with the affected Italian regions.
Mobilisation of the European Globalisation Adjustment Fund: application EGF/2017/002 FI Microsoft 2 (A8-0278/2017 - Petri Sarvamaa)
I voted in favour of the report on the proposal for a decision of the European Parliament and of the Council on the mobilisation of the European Globalisation Adjustment Fund (application from Finland – EGF/2017/002 FI Microsoft 2). The European Globalisation Adjustment Fund has been created in order to provide additional assistance to workers suffering from the consequences of major structural changes in world trade patterns. On 21 June 2017, the Commission adopted a proposal for a decision on the mobilisation of the EGF in favour of Finland in order to support the reintegration in the labour market of workers following redundancies in Microsoft and 11 suppliers and downstream producers. The ICT sector is highly susceptible to changes in global economy, due to high competition, rapid technological progress and innovations, mergers, acquisitions and outsourcing. The competition between employees from the EU and from outside the EU is intensive. Employees in the European ICT sector are ageing and less educated than their American and Asian counterparts. Finnish ICT professionals are facing increasingly global competition compared to employees in any other sector. I voted in favour because I believe that personalised measures targeted at the dismissed worker need to be applied.
EU Emissions Trading System (EU ETS): continuing current limitations of scope for aviation activities and preparing to implement a global market-based measure from 2021 (A8-0258/2017 - Julie Girling)
. ‒ I voted in favour of the report on the proposal for a regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council amending Directive 2003/87/EC to continue current limitations of scope for aviation activities and to prepare to implement a global market-based measure from 2021. Approximately 1.3% of global CO2 emissions is derived from international aviation. The development of a global market-based measure has been on the agenda of the International Civil Aviation Organisation (ICAO) for some time.In 2010, ICAO agreed a global aspirational goal of carbon-neutral growth by 2020. The organisation established a working group for developing a global market-based mechanism to achieve this objective. In 2016, ICAO adopted Resolution 39-3, which introduces a global Carbon Offsetting and Reduction Scheme for International Aviation, under which aircraft operators that are in excess of baseline emissions will be required to purchase offsets in order to achieve carbon neutrality in international civil aviation from 2021. The scheme is intended to complement new technologies, operational improvements and infrastructure measures, with the aim of achieving sustainable growth for aviation and the sector’s aspirational long-term goal of halving net CO2 emissions by 2050. All EU Member States will join the scheme from the start.
Inclusion of greenhouse gas emissions and removals from land use, land use change and forestry into the 2030 climate and energy framework (A8-0262/2017 - Norbert Lins)
I voted in favour of the Report on the proposal for a regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council on the inclusion of greenhouse gas emissions and removals from land use, land use change and forestry into the 2030 climate and energy framework and amending Regulation No 525/2013 of the European Parliament and the Council on a mechanism for monitoring and reporting greenhouse gas emissions and other information relevant to climate change.In December 2015, a historic legally binding climate agreement was reached in Paris. This agreement applies to 195 countries globally and aims to limit global warming to well below 2 degrees Celsius. The importance of the fight against climate change at international level has been further exemplified by the prominence of climate change actions in the 17 Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs) of the 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development. The SDGs will apply universally to all, and aim to fight poverty, inequalities and tackle climate change, over the next fifteen years. I voted in favour because I believe that if the world needs to generate negative emissions from forests, global equity considerations require the EU to take a leading role in this.
Uniform format for residence permits for third country nationals (A8-0065/2017 - Jussi Halla-aho)
I voted in favour of the report on the proposal for a regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council amending Council Regulation (EC)1030/2002 laying down a uniform format for residence permits for third-country nationals. The proposal does not aim at a fully harmonised residence permit, as it should be cost-neutral and as it has been considered appropriate to allow those Member States that wish to give third-country nationals the same advantages as their own citizens, to add a contact chip for e-government purposes. The present regulation updates the Annex to provide for greater harmonisation. Even if full uniformity is still not achieved and some divergences remain, the instrument presents a step forward. The proposal aims to ensure a uniform design and certain standard security features, to which optional features can be added. I voted in favour because I believe that further harmonisation of the residence permit helps border guards and other relevant authorities to conduct their tasks and contributes to the security of EU citizens and legal residents.
Objection pursuant to Rule 106: draft Commission implementing decision authorising the placing on the market of products containing, consisting of, or produced from genetically modified soybean DAS- 68416-4 (B8-0498/2017)
I voted in favour of the objection pursuant to Rule 106. On 25 January 2011, Dow AgroSciences Europe submitted an application for the placing on the market of foods, food ingredients and feed containing, consisting of, or produced from genetically modified DAS-68416-4 soybean. That application also covered the placing on the market of genetically modified soybean DAS-68416-4 in products consisting of it or containing it for uses other than food and feed as any other soybean, with the exception of cultivation. The European Food Safety Authority (EFSA) adopted a favourable opinion in accordance with Articles 6 and 18 of Regulation (EC) No 1829/2003. Regulation (EU) No 1829/2003 specifies that genetically modified food or feed must not have adverse effects on human health, animal health or the environment and that the Commission shall take into account any relevant provisions of Union law and other legitimate factors relevant to the matter under consideration when drafting its decision. I voted in favour of the Objection because I believe that that the Commission implementing decision is not consistent with Union law and that the Commission should request much more detailed testing of health risks relating to stacked events such as DAS-68416-4.
Objection pursuant to Rule 106: draft Commission implementing Regulation amending Commission implementing Regulation (EU) 2016/6 as regards feed and food subjected to special conditions governing the import of feed and food originating in or consigned from Japan following the accident at the Fukushima nuclear power station (B8-0502/2017)
I voted in favour of the Objection pursuant to Rule 106. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2016/6 currently requires that consignments of a number of foodstuffs, including mushrooms, fish and fishery products, rice and soybeans, originating in or consigned from any part of Japan be accompanied by a valid declaration from the Japanese authorities attesting that the products comply with the maximum contamination limits in force in Japan. The draft Commission implementing regulation now only requires that a limited list of food and feed from twelve prefectures be accompanied by such a declaration and the draft proposal also deletes a number of food and feed categories. The draft proposal is based on occurrence data provided by the Japanese authorities and is therefore very difficult to verify whether the measures proposed are sufficient to protect the health of Union citizens. I voted in favour because I believe that the draft Commission implementing regulation is not consistent with Union law in that it is not compatible with the aim and general principles laid down in Regulation (EC) No 178/2002 of providing the basis for ensuring a high level of protection of human life and health, animal health and welfare, the environment and consumer interests.
Draft amending budget No 3/2017: budgetary resources of the Youth Employment Initiative; establishment plans of ACER and SESAR2 (A8-0282/2017 - Jens Geier)
I voted in favour of the report on the Council position on Draft amending budget No 3/2017 of the European Union for the financial year 2017. Amending budget No 3/2017 relates to the provision of EUR 500 million of additional commitment appropriations to the Youth Employment Initiative (YEI) as agreed by the European Parliament and the Council in their agreement on the budget 2017, as well as to an amendment of the establishment plans of the decentralised agency ACER and the joint undertaking SESAR2, without incurring any changes to the overall budget or the total number of posts. Following the adoption of the technical adjustment, the Commission consequently proposes to amend the Union budget for 2017 and increase Article 04 02 64 ‘Youth Employment Initiative’. In the context of the mid-term revision of the MFF, the Commission also underlined in its statement, that consideration should be given to increase the funding for YEI beyond the amount of EUR 1.2 billion. I voted in favour because I believe that there is the urgent need to further increase Union’s financial commitment in the fight against the youth unemployment through additional funding for the YEI.
Arms export: implementation of Common Position 2008/944/CFSP (A8-0264/2017 - Bodil Valero)
I voted in favour of the report on arms exports: implementation of Common Position 2008/944/CFSP. The inherent right of individual or collective self-defence is laid down in Article 51 of the Charter of the United Nations. The latest data show that international transfers of major weapons between 2012-2016 reached their highest volume for any five-year period since the end of the Cold War. Arms exports contribute to circumstances that force people to flee from their countries and this calls for a strict, transparent, effective and commonly—accepted and defined arms control system. The report urges the Member States and the European External Action Service (EEAS) to significantly improve the consistency of the implementation of the Common Position in order to enhance the security of civilians who are suffering because of conflict and human rights abuses in third countries, the security of the Union and its citizens, and create a level playing field for EU companies. I voted in favour because I believe that the Member States and the EEAS need to cooperate closely to prevent risks arising from the diverting and stockpiling of weapons, such as illegal arms trafficking and smuggling.
EU political relations with Latin America (A8-0268/2017 - Javi López)
I voted in favour of the report on EU political relations with Latin America. The Latin American and Caribbean region (LAC) constitutes a key partner for the EU when it comes to jointly facing current global challenges. The report underlines that the EU-LAC bi-regional partnership is based on common principles, values and interests such as democracy, human rights, peace and solidarity, the rule of law and an independent judiciary as well as a commitment to uphold them in a horizontal relationship and has become critical to the advancement of the bi-regional and cooperation exchanges. It equally highlights the fact that the new geopolitical scenario reinforces the LAC region as a strategic priority and opportunity for the EU’s foreign policy, as both regions share a common vision of the world based on multilateralism, dialogue, sustainability, the rule of law, respect for human rights and inclusive open societies. I voted in favour because I believe that this cooperation will contribute effectively to the consolidation of economic growth via sustainable socio-economic development policies while ensuring social inclusion, civil liberties and human rights and the reduction of poverty.
Corruption and human rights in third countries (A8-0246/2017 - Petras Auštrevičius)
I voted in favour of the report on corruption and human rights in third countries. Corruption is a complex global phenomenon, affecting both North and South, that can be defined as the abuse of entrusted power for individual, collective, direct or indirect private gain, which poses a serious threat to the public interest and social, political and economic stability and security by undermining public trust and the efficiency and effectiveness of institutions, and the values of democracy and human rights, ethics, justice, sustainable development and good governance. Reducing corruption is vital for economic growth, poverty reduction, wealth creation, education, welfare, healthcare, infrastructure development and conflict resolution, as well as to build trust in institutions, business and politics. The report calls for collective action to be taken at national and international level to prevent and combat corruption, given that corruption spreads across borders and that enhanced cooperation between countries and between regions needs to be encouraged alongside the work of civil society organisations in the fight against corruption. I voted in favour because I believe that the development of an EU external anti-corruption strategy is essential to combat corruption and financial crime effectively.
Request for the waiver of the immunity of Marie-Christine Boutonnet (A8-0259/2017 - Heidi Hautala)
I voted in favour of the report on the request for waiver of the immunity of Marie-Christine Boutonnet. The application for waiver of the immunity of Marie-Christine Boutonnet was forwarded on 14 April 2017 by the French Ministry of Justice, on the basis of a request made by the Prosecutor-General at the Paris Court of Appeal, and announced in plenary on 26 April 2017 in connection with a case pending before examining magistrates at the Paris Regional Court pertaining to a judicial investigation on grounds of breach of trust in connection with funds received by virtue of the parliamentary assistant’s contract of a named individual. It appears that the Front National establishment plan published in February 2015 showed that it listed 15 Members of the European Parliament, 21 local parliamentary assistants and 5 accredited parliamentary assistants. A certain number of parliamentary assistants declared that their place of employment was the headquarters of the Front National in Nanterre, in some cases indicating that they were employed there full-time. However, most of the employment contracts of the parliamentary assistants described identical, general tasks, without entering into any detail. I voted in favour because I believe that there is clearly a case to answer.
Nominal composition of the special committee on terrorism
I voted in favour of the nominal composition of the Special Committee on Terrorism. The special committee will examine and evaluate the extent of the terrorist threat on European soil and look into any potential faults and malfunctions which might have allowed recent terrorist attacks in member states to occur. The committee is in particular charged with looking into the implementation of existing measures in the field of external border management, deficiencies in sharing judicial, law enforcement and intelligence information among Member states, the interoperability of European information-sharing databases, the impact of EU anti-terror laws on fundamental rights, radicalisation and the effectiveness of de-radicalisation programmes, money laundering and terrorism financing, including its links to organised crime as well as best practice with regard to the protection of soft targets and critical infrastructure, such as airports and train stations. 30 MEPs will sit on the special committee and its mandate will run for 12 months, which can be prolonged, starting from the date of its constitutive meeting.
EU-Iceland Agreement on the protection of geographical indications for agricultural products and foodstuffs (A8-0254/2017 - David Borrelli)
I voted in favour of the recommendation on the draft Council decision on the conclusion of the Agreement between the European Union and Iceland on the protection of geographical indications for agricultural products and foodstuffs. The 2007 EU-Iceland bilateral Agreement on trade preferences includes, among others, a commitment by the Parties to promote trade in products with geographical indications (GIs). The EU-Iceland GIs negotiations were conducted from 4 July 2012 to 17 September 2015. The negotiations were carried out in conjunction with the EU-Iceland negotiations on further liberalisation of trade in agricultural and processed agricultural products. The conclusion of the GIs Agreement with Iceland fits into the overall EU strategy of promoting the production and the consumption of EU products with GIs. The EEA Agreement already provides for the mutual recognition and protection of geographical indications for wines, aromatised wine products and spirit drinks. I voted in favour because the scope of this Agreement covers only agricultural products and foodstuffs other than wines, aromatised wine products and spirit drinks. I voted in favour because, under this Agreement, 1 150 EU foodstuff GIs will obtain a high level of direct protection in Iceland.
EU-Iceland Agreement concerning additional trade preferences in agricultural products (A8-0256/2017 - David Borrelli)
I voted in favour of the recommendation on the draft Council decision on the conclusion of the Agreement in the form of an exchange of letters between the European Union and Iceland concerning additional trade preferences in agricultural products. The EU and Iceland are signatories to the Agreement on the European Economic Area (EEA Agreement), which provides for the free movement of goods, with the exception of agricultural and fisheries products. Article 19 of the EEA Agreement provides that the Parties will review efforts on the further reduction of any type of barriers to trade in the agricultural sector. The Agreement provides for further trade preferences for trade in agricultural products, including additional fully liberalised tariff lines. As a result, almost 90% of EU agricultural products will enter Iceland duty-free. For more sensitive products such as meat, dairy, fruit, vegetable and ornamental plants, additional tariff quotas or tariff reductions have been agreed upon. The Agreement will have no impact on the expenditure side of the EU budget. The new concessions granted on imports from Iceland will likely result in a reduction of own resources through a lower collection of customs duties.
Implementation of the Mediation Directive (A8-0238/2017 - Kostas Chrysogonos)
I voted in favour of the report on the implementation of Directive 2008/52/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 21 May 2008 on certain aspects of mediation in civil and commercial matters (the ‘Mediation Directive’). The Mediation Directive has as its objective the facilitation of access to alternative dispute resolution and the promotion of the amicable settlement of disputes, by the promotion of the use of mediation as well as of a balanced relationship between mediation and judicial proceedings. The principle of access to justice is fundamental and one of the main objectives of the EU policy in the field of civil justice cooperation. The European Council at its meeting in Tampere on 15 and 16 October 1999 called for alternative, extra-judicial procedures to be created by the Member States with a view to facilitating better access to justice. I voted in favour because I believe that effective and efficient justice systems are of fundamental importance to the proper functioning of the internal market, to economic stability, to investment and to competitiveness. They foster confidence in commercial transactions, facilitate the resolution of disputes and help ensure that the necessary trust exists to encourage economic activity.
The functioning of franchising in the retail sector (A8-0199/2017 - Dennis de Jong)
I voted in favour of the report on the functioning of franchising in the retail sector. There is no common European definition of franchising and franchising agreements differ from one business to another, but one key feature of such relationships is a contractual partnership concluded on a voluntary basis between entrepreneurs or natural or legal persons that are legally and financially independent of each other. Given its current under-utilisation in the EU in comparison to other developed economies, for the completion of the single market in the retail sector, franchising can play an even more important role. It is important that the Member States apply effective measures against any unfair trading practices in the field of franchising. However, there is still a high degree of divergence and diversification between Member States in this respect. I voted in favour because I believe that in view of the strong cross-border element of franchising, a uniform approach to correct unfair trading practices at EU level is advisable.
A Space Strategy for Europe (A8-0250/2017 - Constanze Krehl)
I voted in favour of the report on a Space Strategy for Europe. The benefits of space for society are manifold and can lead to a more competitive economy for Europe by stimulating the development of many new products and services, and by supporting agriculture, forestry, fisheries and maritime transport. Satellite technology can lead to better access to communication technologies, high-resolution Earth observation systems that allow for the exchange of information in real time, a rapid response to natural disasters, and more effective border and security controls. The report highlights the ability of satellites to provide uninterrupted, very high-capacity connectivity, in particular in remote areas and outermost regions, which is essential for overcoming the digital divide, for the development of high-speed networks and for the expansion of the Internet of Things networks, enabling services such as autonomous driving, smart fleet and freight management, e-governance, e-learning and e-health applications. I voted in favour because I believe that space technologies, data and services can support a variety of EU public policies and key political priorities, such as boosting the Digital Single Market, stimulating the European economy and tackling climate change.
Academic further and distance education as part of the European lifelong learning strategy (A8-0252/2017 - Milan Zver)
I voted in favour of the report on academic further and distance education as part of the European lifelong learning strategy. Education and training reflect society. They make a key contribution to the formation of human capital. In Europe, over a number of decades, a wide range of teaching in the context of lifelong learning has been built upon the traditional educational systems, based on the recognition that lifelong learning is essential in today’s dynamic, complex, risk-full society which is technologically ever more demanding.Continuous enhancement of knowledge, experience and skills is imperative not only at work but also in an individual’s private life and public life. Easier access to education is therefore the standard which should be universally applied, but in practice that is not the case. This is why distance education is so important in ensuring easier access for all, as well as in lowering the cost of study. E-learning, or distance education, can be a more suitable, more accessible form of education because it avoids the normal operating costs of educational institutions. I believe that distance education can improve accessibility for all, without discrimination in terms of nationality, region, social status, age or sex.
Repeal of obsolete regulations with regard to inland waterway and road haulage sectors (A8-0228/2017 - Karima Delli)
I voted in favour of the Report on the proposal for a regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council repealing Council Regulation (EEC) No 1101/89, Regulations (EC) No 2888/2000 and (EC) No 685/2001. In order to clean up and reduce the volume of the legislative acquis, it needs to be regularly reviewed and obsolete legislation identified. Repealing obsolete legislation keeps the legislative framework transparent, clear and easy for Member States and relevant stakeholders, in this case the road haulage sector, to use.Regulation (EEC) No 1101/89 introduced arrangements for structural improvements in the inland waterway sector for fleets operating on the linked inland waterway networks of Belgium, Germany, France, Luxembourg, the Netherlands and Austria. Regulation (EC) No 2888/2000 distributed the permits for heavy goods vehicles granted by Switzerland for the years 2001 to 2004 among the Member States of the European Community. Regulation (EC) No 685/2001 lays down the rules for distributing the authorisations made available to the European Community by means of agreements between the European Community and the Republic of Bulgaria and between the European Community and Romania, which lay down certain conditions governing the carriage of goods by road and the promotion of combined transport.
Promotion of internet connectivity in local communities (A8-0181/2017 - Carlos Zorrinho)
I voted in favour of the Report on the proposal for a regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council amending Regulations (EU) No 1316/2013 and (EU) No 283/2014 as regards the promotion of internet connectivity in local communities. The WiFi4EU initiative is a proposal that will help to bolster the development of a more inclusive European digital society.The WiFi4EU initiative represents an opportunity to affirm the principle of universal access for European citizens to the benefits of the information society, by implementing a pilot scheme with a balanced geographical dimension and distribution that will serve as a reference point for the development of inclusive platforms providing free access to wireless networks that is dynamic and resilient in the face of technological change.Universal access aims to boost local digital ecosystems, strengthen the link between the European Union and its citizens, and create more and better opportunities for the development of new generation networks. To this end, it is crucial to ensure that the focus on access to networks is complemented by the universal free availability of public interest services and content of general interest, and to promote a simplified application and implementation system.
Measures to safeguard the security of gas supply (A8-0310/2016 - Jerzy Buzek)
I voted in favour of the report on the proposal for a regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council concerning measures to safeguard the security of gas supply and repealing Regulation (EU) No 994/2010. With the coming into force of Regulation (EU) No 994/2010, the EU took the first step towards enhanced coordination between natural gas undertakings, the Member States and the Commission in responding to the transnational challenge of security of the gas supply.The 2010 regulation proved vital for improving energy security in Europe. At the same time, taking into account the findings of the stress tests carried out after subsequent supply crises, of the implementation report on the 2010 Regulation and of the public consultation carried out by the Commission in 2015, the country-level approach has proven to be insufficient in fully tackling the regional disparities and cross-border character of the gas supply. I voted in favour because I believe that eliminating further barriers between Member States, lowering prevention costs and maximising the effectiveness of mitigation require more cooperation, coordination and transparency, especially given the ongoing integration of EU gas markets and the corridor-based approach to gas supply and reverse flows in Europe.
Whale hunting in Norway (B8-0499/2017)
I voted in favour of the resolution on whale hunting in Norway. In 1982 the International Whaling Commission (IWC) introduced a moratorium on all commercial whaling, which came into effect in 1986 and is still in force, in order to protect species and populations from extinction and allow them to recover. Norway, despite this international ban, has continued its whaling activities, and in 1993 fully resumed commercial whaling using a formal objection to the moratorium, as well as entering and maintaining reservations regarding the CITES listings.Norway became a party to CITES on 19 December 1979, making it one of the first countries to agree to be bound by that Convention. Media sources estimate that approximately 90% of whales killed by Norway are female, most of them pregnant, by reason of their slower response time. The resolution calls on Norway to cease all its commercial whaling operations and to abide by the IWC moratorium. I voted in favour because I strongly support the continuation of the global moratorium on commercial whaling and a ban on international commercial trade in whale products.
EU accession to the Council of Europe Convention on preventing and combating violence against women and domestic violence (A8-0266/2017 - Christine Revault d'Allonnes Bonnefoy, Anna Maria Corazza Bildt)
I voted in favour of the interim report on the proposal for a Council decision on the conclusion, by the European Union, of the Council of Europe Convention on preventing and combating violence against women and domestic violence.Modern forms of slavery and human trafficking, which mainly affect women, are still persistent in the EU. Member States have to acknowledge that once violence has occurred society has failed in its first and foremost duty of protection, and the only means left are reactive measures such as compensating the victims and prosecuting the offenders. The EU must take all necessary measures, in cooperation with its Member States, to promote and protect the right of all women and girls to live free from violence.Violence against women and gender-based violence, both physical and psychological, are widespread in the EU and are to be understood as an extreme form of discrimination and a violation of human rights affecting women at all levels of society. I voted in favour because I believe that measures must be taken to address the emerging phenomenon of gender-based violence online, including bullying, harassment and intimidation, particularly of young women and girls and of LGBTI people.
Agreement to amend the Montreal Protocol on substances that deplete the ozone layer, adopted in Kigali (A8-0237/2017 - Kateřina Konečná)
I voted in favour of the recommendation on the draft Council decision on the conclusion, on behalf of the European Union, of the Kigali Amendment to the Montreal Protocol on substances that deplete the ozone layer. The main outcome of the 28th Meeting of the Parties to the Montreal Protocol, which took place from 10 to 15 October 2016 in Kigali, Rwanda, was the adoption of an amendment to the Montreal Protocol. The amendment adds hydrofluorocarbons (HFCs) to the list of substances regulated by the Protocol and amends the applicable articles in the Protocol accordingly.HFCs are commonly used in air conditioners, refrigerators, aerosols, foams and other products. It has been discovered, however, that HFCs are active greenhouse gases whose global warming potential can be one thousand times greater than that of carbon dioxide. Their use must therefore be reduced as soon as possible. I voted in favour because I believe that the EU’s prompt adoption of the Kigali Amendment will signal its commitment to making a substantial contribution to the reduction of greenhouse gas emissions and thereby meeting the targets set in the Paris Agreement.
Convention on long-range transboundary air pollution to abate acidification, eutrophication and ground-level ozone (A8-0241/2017 - Adina-Ioana Vălean)
I voted in favour of the recommendation on the draft Council decision on the acceptance on behalf of the European Union of an Amendment to the 1999 Protocol to the 1979 Convention on Long-Range Transboundary Air Pollution to Abate Acidification, Eutrophication and Ground-level Ozone. The Convention on Long-range Transboundary Air Pollution (LRTAP) is intended to protect the human environment against air pollution. The Convention was the first international legally binding instrument in this area. To date, the Convention has been extended by eight protocols. The eighth protocol is a multi-pollutant protocol designed to reduce acidification, eutrophication and ground-level ozone by setting emissions ceilings for sulphur dioxide, nitrogen oxides, volatile organic compounds and ammonia to be met by 2010. Several of the Protocol’s technical annexes were revised with updated sets of emission limit values for both key stationary sources and mobile sources. The revised Protocol is also the first binding agreement to include emission reduction commitments for fine particulate matter. I voted in favour because I believe that reducing particulate matter (including black carbon) through the implementation of the Protocol is thus considered to be a major step in reducing air pollution, while at the same time facilitating climate co-benefits.
Conclusion of the EU-Cuba Political Dialogue and Cooperation Agreement (Consent) (A8-0232/2017 - Elena Valenciano)
I voted in favour of the recommendation on the draft Council decision on the conclusion, on behalf of the Union, of the Political Dialogue and Cooperation Agreement between the European Union and its Member States, of the one part, and the Republic of Cuba, of the other part. The Political Dialogue and Cooperation Agreement (PDCA) between the European Union and its Member States, of the one part, and the Republic of Cuba, of the other part defines general principles and objectives for the relationship between the EU and Cuba and creates an institutional structure for the management of the agreement. It builds essentially on three main chapters, on political dialogue, cooperation and sector policy dialogue as well as trade and trade cooperation. I voted in favour because I believe that, through this agreement, the EU is pledging to accompany Cuba in its evolution while fully respecting its autonomy, sovereignty and independence.
Conclusion of the EU-Cuba Political Dialogue and Cooperation Agreement (Resolution) (A8-0233/2017 - Elena Valenciano)
I voted in favour of the report containing a motion for a non-legislative resolution on the draft Council decision on the conclusion, on behalf of the European Union, of the Political Dialogue and Cooperation Agreement between the European Union and its Member States, of the one part, and the Republic of Cuba, of the other part. The PDCA creates an institutional structure for the management of the agreement. It builds essentially on three main chapters, on political dialogue, cooperation and sector policy dialogue as well as trade and trade cooperation.The structure, content and dynamic of the agreement match the principles and values established by the EU institutions for its external relations. The PDCA, as the first agreement between the EU and Cuba, will mark a turning point in bilateral relations between the two parties; [Parliament] welcomes the fact that both parties have agreed to develop this relationship in a structured manner, mutually subscribing to an agenda and obligations that are binding on both signatories. I voted in favour because I believe that the PDCA will contribute to improving the living conditions and social rights of Cuban citizens, reaffirming the importance of working systematically in promoting the values of democracy and human rights.
EU-Kosovo Framework Agreement on the general principles for the participation of Kosovo in Union programmes (A8-0207/2017 - Ulrike Lunacek)
I voted in favour of the Recommendation on the draft Council decision on the conclusion of a Framework Agreement between the European Union and Kosovo on the general principles for the participation of Kosovo in Union programmes. The Stabilisation and Association Agreement with Kosovo entered into force on 1 April 2016. According to the framework agreement, Kosovo will be able to participate in European Union programmes in accordance with its commitments to adopt and apply standards in the areas relevant to the programme concerned and the progress made in that respect. Kosovo will contribute financially to the general budget of the European Union in proportion to the specific European Union programmes in which it participates. The conclusion of the framework agreement will permit the gradual opening of or reinforced participation in certain European Union programmes for Kosovo. I voted in favour because I believe that the participation of Kosovo in European Union programmes will strengthen the European perspective of the country and deepen bilateral relations.
Mobilisation of the European Globalisation Adjustment Fund: application EGF/2017/001 ES/Castilla y León mining (A8-0248/2017 - Monika Vana)
I voted in favour of the Report on the proposal for a decision of the European Parliament and of the Council on mobilisation of the European Globalisation Adjustment Fund (application from Spain EGF/2017/001 ES/Castilla y León mining). The European Globalisation Adjustment Fund has been created in order to provide workers suffering from the consequences of major structural changes in world trade patterns with additional assistance. On 2 June 2017, the Commission adopted a proposal for a decision on the mobilisation of the EGF in favour of Spain to support the reintegration in the labour market of workers made redundant in five mining enterprises operating under the NACE Revision 2 Division 5 in the NUTS level 2 region of Castilla y León (ES41) in Spain. This is the third application to be examined under the 2017 budget and the first in the ‘mining of coal and lignite’ sector. It concerns 339 workers made redundant as well as up to 125 targeted young persons not in employment, education or training (NEETs) under the age of 30. I voted in favour because the region suffers from a lack of job offers in the mining district and high emigration of persons in employable age.
European standards for the 21st century (A8-0213/2017 - Marlene Mizzi)
I voted in favour of the Report on European Standards – implementation of Regulation (EU) No 1025/2012. On 1 June 2016, the Commission presented a package of Communications outlining the Commission’s vision on how European standard setting should evolve in the next few years. The package consists of four Communications. The package also includes a Commission decision providing the framework for the Joint Initiative on Standardisation (JIS), which is a close partnership between public and private organisations to address current challenges in the standards development process and promote a European standardisation hub, where standards are developed in a timely, open, transparent and inclusive manner. The overarching Commission standardisation package together with the ICT Standards Communication and with the JIS aims at setting out a single and coherent European Standardisation System (ESS) that adapts to the changing environment, supports multiple policies and brings benefits and predictability to consumers and businesses. I voted in favour because I believe that standards are an important tool for the operation of the single market, to enhance European competitiveness, growth and innovation, to support quality, performance and the protection of consumers, business, workers, and the environment, and to develop interoperability of networks and systems.
Towards a pan-European covered bonds framework (A8-0235/2017 - Bernd Lucke)
I voted in favour of the report ‘Towards a pan-European covered bonds framework’. Covered bonds (CBs) have always been, ever since their invention more than two centuries ago, a very specific asset class in many ways. Long-established instruments in the financing structures of several Member States, they have proved to be reliable investments for a variety of financial institutions and a convenient and efficient funding option for issuers. The extraordinary degree of safety and liquidity which CBs have exhibited over decades prevailed even in times of severely troubled financial markets, e.g. during the last 10 years. This has led to the recognition of CBs as assets whose holding warrants preferential regulatory treatment under the EU’s financial services legislation. I voted in favour because I believe that more transparency, more public supervision, and more legal certainty can be achieved by extending the institutional principles of CBs to debt instruments which finance important and growth-enhancing economic activities.
Limitation periods for traffic accidents (A8-0206/2017 - Pavel Svoboda)
I voted in favour of the report with recommendations to the Commission on limitation periods for traffic accidents. Almost 10 years have passed since Parliament adopted a resolution on ‘Limitation periods in cross-border disputes involving personal injuries and fatal accidents’, but the Commission has not yet prepared a specific legislative proposal. Rules of limitation determine the time available for the bringing of a claim for compensation before a court or other competent body. Rules of limitation for tort claims vary widely between the Member States. Specifically, while legal systems in continental Europe refer to ‘prescription periods’, namely periods of time after the expiry of which a claim is deemed extinguished. Rules of limitation for claims are essential to ensure legal certainty and the finality of disputes. These interests should be balanced with the fundamental right to obtain an effective remedy, since unnecessarily short rules of limitation could obstruct effective access to justice across the EU. I voted in favour, because this report contains a proposal for a directive which is to be considered as a first step in facilitating a more natural and spontaneous convergence of Member States’ rules in time.
Common minimum standards of civil procedure (A8-0210/2017 - Emil Radev)
I voted in favour of the report with recommendations to the Commission on common minimum standards of civil procedure in the EU. Civil procedure provides the means for the enforcement of the substantive rights and duties of legal subjects in legal proceedings. As such, it is inextricably linked with the fundamental right to a fair trial and effective remedy guaranteed under the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union (Article 47) and the European Convention on Human Rights (Article 6 ECHR). Currently, there is no uniform law of civil procedure in the EU and the EU still lacks a clear vision on the functioning of common civil procedural law in the European legal order. I voted in favour because I believe that the principle of mutual recognition of judgments and the necessary approximation of legislation would facilitate cooperation between competent authorities and the judicial protection of individual rights. The increased mutual trust between the Member States’ judicial systems will also contribute to the better functioning of the internal market and the fundamental Union freedoms.
Macro-financial assistance to Moldova (A8-0185/2017 - Sorin Moisă)
I voted in favour of the report on the proposal for a decision of the European Parliament and of the Council providing macro—financial assistance to the Republic of Moldova. The Republic of Moldova is in the process of recovering its political and economic stability after two challenging years. The country entered economic recession in 2014, when the well-known banking scandal and the fiscal difficulties caused by the suspension of international donors’ support that followed worsened its economic performance, already affected by a contraction in agricultural output due to adverse weather conditions and weak export performance towards some of Moldova’s traditional economic partners, notably Belarus, Russia and Ukraine. In 2015, EU imports from Moldova grew by 5%, despite Moldovan exports contracting with the rest of the World. The Commission proposal is to provide EUR 100 million to Moldova in the form of loans (EUR 60 million) and grants (EUR 40 million). The EU is also providing other financial assistance through budget support relaunched in December 2016 (EUR 45.3 million delivered) following an agreement with the IMF. I voted in favour, because given the difficult economic situation in Moldova, it would be in the EU’s interest to support the reformist programme of the current Moldovan Government.
Disclosure of income tax information by certain undertakings and branches (A8-0227/2017 - Hugues Bayet, Evelyn Regner)
I voted in favour of the report on the proposal for a directive of the European Parliament and of the Council amending Directive 2013/34/EU as regards disclosure of income tax information by certain undertakings and branches. Public country-by-country reporting (CBCR) on tax-relevant company data is a key element in the fight against international tax evasion and tax avoidance and against the race to the bottom between tax systems. Yet the benefits of this directive will go much further. With growing mobility and global and European-wide economic activities, transparency in terms of disclosure is a prerequisite for a strong corporate governance and a tool to enhance corporate social responsibility. I voted in favour because I believe that it is essential that the format of the publication allows for comparison of data and, therefore, propose a standardisation of the format of the reporting documents for all companies within the scope of this directive.
Introduction of temporary autonomous trade measures for Ukraine (A8-0193/2017 - Jarosław Wałęsa)
I voted in favour of the report on the proposal for a regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council on the introduction of temporary autonomous trade measures for Ukraine supplementing the trade concessions available under the Association Agreement. The Deep and Comprehensive Free Trade Area (DCFTA), the economic and trade pillar of the Association Agreement (AA) between the European Union and Ukraine, has been provisionally applied since 1 January 2016. The DCFTA establishes a free trade area for trade in goods over a transitional period of a maximum of ten years. The current Commission proposal is launched in addition to the EU concessions under the DCFTA that are already in force, in view of the enduring difficult economic situation and the economic reform efforts undertaken by Ukraine. The proposal aims at increasing the existing trade flows between the EU and Ukraine. The ATMs are proposed in the form of increased zero tariff-rate quotas for maize, wheat, barley, oats, natural honey, processed tomato and grape juice and a partial or full removal of import duties for industrial products. I voted in favour because I believe that additional preferences to Ukraine may support its economic recovery efforts.
Draft amending budget n° 2 to the General budget 2017 entering the surplus of the financial year 2016 (A8-0229/2017 - Jens Geier)
I voted in favour of the report on the Council position on Draft Amending Budget No 2/2017 of the European Union for the financial year 2017: Entering the surplus of the financial year 2016. The present draft amending budget (DAB) No 2/2017 is intended to enter in the budget 2017 the surplus resulting from the implementation of the budget year 2016. The implementation of the budget year 2016 shows a surplus of EUR 6 404 529 791.03 (excluding the outturn of contributions received from European Free Trade Association (EFTA) countries part of the European Economic Area (EEA) agreement), which is therefore entered as revenue in the 2017 budget. The budgeting of the surplus will diminish accordingly the global contribution of the Member States to the financing of the 2017 EU budget. The final contributions by Member States will also be influenced by the updated own resources forecast.
A longer lifetime for products: benefits for consumers and companies (A8-0214/2017 - Pascal Durand)
I voted in favour of the report on a longer lifetime for products: benefits for consumers and companies. Durability of goods, an issue for consumers. The problem of the durability of goods relates to a number of factors: the lack of robust and repairable products, the longevity of software in computer products, the information available to the purchaser etc. Consumer confidence in the robustness of products is low. The declining quality of low-cost products and media coverage of particularly scandalous, albeit apparently marginal, incidents, have played a part in reducing this confidence. European consumers have almost no information on product reliability. Having lost the price signal linking cost to quality, they increasingly opt for low-end products from emerging countries, accelerating the race to the bottom in economic terms. This situation also harms European companies, which often offer higher quality, more durable products. Furthermore, the widespread use of connected objects and the dependence of users on new technologies raises the delicate social issue of the accelerated obsolescence of software and media. I voted in favour because I believe that the development of increasingly resource-efficient products must not encourage short lifetimes or the premature disposal of products.
Addressing human rights violations in the context of war crimes, and crimes against humanity, including genocide (A8-0222/2017 - Cristian Dan Preda)
I voted in favour of the Report on addressing human rights violations in the context of war crimes, and crimes against humanity, including genocide. The crime of genocide, crimes against humanity and war crimes, also known as ‘atrocity crimes’, are the most serious crimes against humankind. The international community has the duty to prevent atrocity crimes from taking place. The International Criminal Court is currently conducting investigations in nine countries. I voted in favour because I believe that the EU has a commitment to act on the international scene in the name of the principles that inspired its creation: it should be of paramount importance for the EU to address and hold accountable those responsible for severe violations of human rights reaching the gravity threshold of crimes against humanity and genocide and grave breaches of international humanitarian law reaching the level of war crimes. The EU has to step up its efforts to develop a coherent and efficient approach to identifying and responding in a timely fashion to crisis or conflict situations that might lead to an atrocity crime being committed.
Private security companies (A8-0191/2017 - Hilde Vautmans)
I voted in favour of the report on private security companies. Eurobarometer polls showed that the EU’s citizens want the EU to be more active in the field of security and defence. Private security companies (PSCs), a term which includes private military companies, have been increasingly employed by national governments as well as militaries and civilian agencies, both for the domestic provision of services and support for overseas deployment. However, the European Union does not have a regulatory framework of its own. It is therefore of vital importance to prioritise the establishment of clear rules for interaction, cooperation and assistance between law enforcement and private security companies. PSCs play an important complementary role in aiding the state’s military and civilian agencies by closing capability gaps created by increasing demand for the use of forces abroad, while also occasionally, if circumstances allow, providing surge capacity. I voted in favour because I believe that the EU and its Member States should refrain from outsourcing military operations that involve the use of force and weaponry, participating in hostilities and otherwise engaging in combat or combat areas, beyond legitimate self-defence.
Working conditions and precarious employment (A8-0224/2017 - Neoklis Sylikiotis)
I voted in favour of the report on working conditions and precarious employment. According to the findings of a number of studies, atypical forms of employment are manifestly on the rise in the EU. The number of workers with – often involuntary – fixed-term and part-time employment contracts has increased considerably in the EU over the last 15 years. At the same time, new forms of employment are blurring the boundaries between dependent employment and self-employment, leading to a decline in job quality and a rise in bogus self-employment. New challenges such as digitalisation, facing both workers and employers, are resulting in a radical transformation of work, with atypical forms of employment becoming increasingly prevalent. It is therefore essential to ensure that social protection and protection under collective agreements and through collective bargaining rights are extended to all workers. I voted in favour because I believe that the Commission and Member States must ensure effective protection at the workplace and introduce comprehensive policies designed to reduce and phase out insecure forms of employment.
European agenda for the collaborative economy (A8-0195/2017 - Nicola Danti)
I voted in favour of the Report on a European Agenda for the collaborative economy. The concept of a ‘collaborative economy’ encompasses a wide range of activities, which stem from a variety of collaborative business models, including non-profit-driven ones. The business models range from collaborative platforms which enable the exchange of goods or services all over the world to small collaborative SMEs which provide services for the local communities.In the last years, the collaborative economy has experienced a rapid growth in terms of users, transactions and revenues, ultimately reshaping how products and services are provided in many fields. The collaborative economy may create significant opportunities for consumers, entrepreneurs and citizens, as well as generate new jobs, growth and sources of income. At the same time, it is also important to notice the considerable effects the collaborative economy business models are having on many traditional businesses and their long-established models of production and consumption.I voted in favour because I believe there is a need for a horizontal European framework consisting of a combination of general principles and specific rules which would pave the way for a homogenous and dynamic EU level playing field.
Online platforms and the Digital Single Market (A8-0204/2017 - Henna Virkkunen, Philippe Juvin)
I voted in favour of the report on online platforms and the digital single market. The evolving development and use of internet platforms for a wide set of activities, including commercial activities and sharing goods and services, have changed the ways in which users and companies interact with content providers, traders and other individuals offering goods and services.However, online platforms present new policy and regulatory challenges. The report stated that one single EU definition or ‘one size fits all’ approach would not help the EU succeed in the platform economy. Therefore, the report calls for online platforms to be distinguished and defined in relevant sector-specific legislation at EU level according to their characteristics, classifications and principles and following a problem-driven approach. Moreover, it emphasizes the importance of fair and effective competition between online platforms in order to promote consumer choice and avoid the creation of monopolies or dominant positions that distort markets.I voted in favour because I believe that there is a need for net neutrality and fair and non-discriminatory access to online platforms as a prerequisite for innovation and a truly competitive market.
Humanitarian situation in Yemen (RC-B8-0407/2017, B8-0407/2017, B8-0408/2017, B8-0409/2017, B8-0410/2017, B8-0411/2017, B8-0412/2017, B8-0413/2017)
I voted in favour of the Resolution on the on the humanitarian situation in Yemen. Since the Saudi-led alliance, including the US and the UK, started bombarding Yemen in March 2015, the country has been descending ever deeper into an armed conflict which is dramatically affecting the civilian population, which has already and for many years been suffering from insecurity and political tensions, high levels of poverty, dramatic environmental devastation and economic paralysis. Imports account for almost 90% of the country’s staple foods, yet the military raids have severely curtailed commercial imports and prevented humanitarian aid deliveries from reaching Yemen and have led to the destruction of basic infrastructure.The UN Special Rapporteur on human rights and international sanctions has stressed that the aerial and naval blockade imposed on Yemen by the coalition forces since March 2015 was one of the main causes of the humanitarian catastrophe. The dramatic situation has further deteriorated with outbreak of cholera. I voted in favour because I believe that there is a need for an immediate halt to the naval and air blockade by the Saudi-led alliance against Yemen, so that humanitarian aid, water and fuel can be delivered to the civilian population.
Statute and funding of European political parties and foundations (B8-0405/2017, B8-0406/2017)
I voted in favour of the Resolution on funding of political parties and political foundations at European level. Transnational political parties and foundations help to form a wider European political awareness and express the will of the citizens of the Union. The funding of European political parties and foundations should support political activities in line with the principles of the Union and be transparent and not open to abuse.The Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union guarantees freedom of expression and information, and freedom of assembly and of association. All European political parties shall contribute to the implementation of the motto of the European Union ‘United in Diversity. I voted in favour because I believe that there are numerous shortcomings of Regulation No 1141/2014, especially in respect of the level of co-financing (own resources), and of the possibility of multi-party membership of Members of the European Parliament at which the Commission should take a closer look.
Binding annual greenhouse gas emission reductions to meet commitments under the Paris Agreement (A8-0208/2017 - Gerben-Jan Gerbrandy)
. ‒ I voted in favour of the report on the proposal for a regulation on binding annual greenhouse-gas emission reductions by Member States from 2021 to 2030 for a resilient Energy Union and to meet commitments under the Paris Agreement, and amending Regulation No 525/2013 on a mechanism for monitoring and reporting greenhouse-gas emissions and other information relevant to climate change.The world is moving towards a low-carbon economy and the Paris Agreement adopted last year marks this development as irreversible. The Paris Agreement sets out the goal to keep the global temperature increase well below two degrees Celsius, and to strive for no more than a 1.5-degree increase. Consistent with these goals, the Paris Agreement also requires that net zero emissions be achieved in the second half of this century. Despite these commitments, the Commission proposal for a regulation is aimed only at delivering on the EU’s 2030 objective. I voted in favour because I believe that the Commission proposal is a welcome first step, aiming to deliver, in the sectors covered, 30% emission reductions by 2030 compared to 2005 levels.
The need for an EU strategy to end and prevent the gender pension gap (A8-0197/2017 - Constance Le Grip)
I voted in favour of the Report on the need for an EU strategy to end and prevent the gender pension gap. The gender gap in pensions (GGP) is one of the many manifestations of inequality between men and women. In 2012 the GGP – the gap between the average pre-tax income received as a pension by women and that received by men – stood at 38% in the 65 and over age group, which is unacceptable. What is needed is action not only to ensure genuine gender equality but also to guard against poverty and vulnerability, from which women with small pensions are the most likely to suffer. I believe that, as the GGP is influenced by a wide range of variables, a comprehensive, far-reaching strategy is required in order to address it. Although, as things stand, the influence of those variables is not directly quantifiable owing to a lack of accurate, reliable data, it may reasonably be asserted that the GGP is a reflection of the many inequalities women experience throughout their private and working lives. There continues to be a gender pay gap in the EU. The principal causes of that gap are discrimination, segregation and career breaks.
2016 Report on Serbia (A8-0063/2017 - David McAllister)
I voted in favour of the 2016 Report on Serbia. Serbia’s progress under rule of law chapters 23 and 24 and in the process of normalisation of relations with Kosovo under chapter 35 remains essential for the overall pace of the negotiating process, in line with the Negotiating Framework. However, Serbia has taken important steps towards the normalisation of relations with Kosovo, resulting in the First Agreement on the Principles of Normalisation of Relations of 19 April 2013 and the August 2015 agreements, but there is still a lot to be done in this regard. Serbia has remained committed to creating a functioning market economy and has continued to implement the Stabilisation and Association Agreement. Nevertheless, the implementation of the legal framework on the protection of minorities needs to be fully ensured. The Report underlines that the thorough implementation of reforms and policies remains a key indicator of a successful integration process and calls on Serbia to improve the planning, coordination and monitoring of the implementation of new legislation and policies. I voted in favour because I believe that effective reforms in the judiciary field are needed, in particularly in promoting judicial independence which is not assured in practice.
2016 Report on Kosovo (A8-0062/2017 - Ulrike Lunacek)
I voted in favour of the Report on the 2016 Commission Report on Kosovo. The European Union has repeatedly reiterated its willingness to assist in the economic and political development of Kosovo through a clear European perspective, in line with the European perspective of the region and Kosovo has shown aspiration in its path towards European integration. In this regard, the Report welcomes the launch of the European Reform Agenda on 11 November 2016 and the adoption of the national strategy for the implementation of the Stabilisation and Association Agreement (SAA) as a platform to facilitate implementation of this Agreement. However, the government of Kosovo has to focus on the implementation of the comprehensive reforms that are required to meet its obligations under the SAA, in particular holding free, fair and transparent municipal elections in 2017 which are crucial for the democratic future of Kosovo as well as for the future of its EU integration process. I voted in favour because I believe that the leaders of the Kosovo-Serbian community need to take full ownership of their place and role in the institutions of the country, acting independently and constructively for the benefit of all the people of Kosovo.
2016 Report on the former Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia (A8-0055/2017 - Ivo Vajgl)
I voted in favour of the Report on the 2016 Commission Report on the former Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia. The Report welcomes the early elections on 11 December 2016, which were held in a transparent and inclusive manner but it calls for a swift formation of a new, stable and accountable government and for the promotion of cross-party and inter-ethnic cooperation in order to maintain the positive recommendation to open EU accession negotiations. TheEU supports the opening of accession negotiations, conditional on the progress of the implementation of the Pržino Agreement to ensure its full, tangible and sustainable implementation and substantial progress in the implementation of the Urgent Reform Priorities on systemic reforms. A regular and constructive dialogue and cooperation with civil society organisations is of high importance. I voted in favour because I believe that all political parties and civil society organisations should actively promote an inclusive and tolerant multi-ethnic, multi-cultural and multi-religious society. There is no place for any form of irredentism or any attempt to disintegrate different social groups. The authorities and civil society should take appropriate measures to achieve historical reconciliation in order to overcome the divide between and within different ethnic and national groups.
Situation in the Democratic Republic of Congo (RC-B8-0397/2017, B8-0397/2017, B8-0398/2017, B8-0399/2017, B8-0400/2017, B8-0401/2017, B8-0402/2017)
I voted in favour of the Resolution on the situation in the Democratic Republic of the Congo. The DRC has suffered from continuous cycles of conflict and brutal political repression. The humanitarian and security crisis in the DRC has further deteriorated as a result of the political crisis caused by non-compliance by President Joseph Kabila with the constitutionally mandated two-term limit. The conflict is occurring in the context of a political crisis. An agreement reached on 31 December 2016 under the auspices of the National Episcopal Conference of the Congo envisages a political transition to end with free and fair presidential elections to be held by the end of 2017 without changing the constitution. To date no progress has been made on the implementation of the agreement. In August 2016 armed clashes broke out between the Congolese army and local militia in the Central Kasai province and spread to the neighbouring provinces. Human rights organisations are continually reporting on the worsening situation in the country. I voted in favour because I believe that the Government of the DRC is responsible for protecting civilians within its territory and subject to its jurisdiction, including protection from crimes against humanity and war crimes.
Increasing engagement of partners and visibility in the performance of European Structural and Investment Funds (A8-0201/2017 - Daniel Buda)
I voted in favour of the Report on increasing engagement of partners and visibility in the performance of European Structural and Investment Funds. Cohesion policy is the most important investment vehicle of growth of the Union with a budget of EUR 35.8 billion, having an impact on all EU regions and citizens. With a major contribution to the economies of the Member States, Cohesion Policy investments, alongside national co-financing, accounted on average for 15% of total public investment in the EU 28. The own—initiative report seeks to scrutinise actual experiences and work on an increased visibility of the structural and investment funds and proposes an approach to link Cohesion Policy instruments with local policies, in order to increase the effectiveness of decisions at the local level through developing participatory governance as an effective tool to increase the visibility of ESI Funds. The draft report also aims to encourage public support and involve the local community in decision making. I voted in favour because I believe that the EU should focus on identifying new ways to increase ownership, vertically and horizontally, putting together all relevant societal partners in all stages related to cohesion policy implementation.
Cost effectiveness of the 7th Research Programme (A8-0194/2017 - Martina Dlabajová, Inés Ayala Sender)
I voted in favour of the Report on cost effectiveness of the 7th Research Programme. The multiannual financial framework (MFF) 2007-2013 has come to an end, but the implementation of the Seventh Framework Programme for research and innovation (FP7) is still ongoing. Research and innovation projects during the MFF 2014-2020 fall under the Horizon 2020 regulation and a comprehensive evaluation of FP7 should – ideally – have preceded the entry into force of Horizon 2020. The Report highlights the fact that FP7 represented a total voted budget of EUR 55 billion, accounting for an estimated 3% of total research and technological development (RTD) expenditure in Europe, or 25% of competitive funding. Moreover, it points to the ex-post evaluation of FP7, undertaken by a high-level expert group, which considered FP7 to have been a success. I voted in favour because I believe that that cost effectiveness should be measured against economy, efficiency and effectiveness (sound financial management) in achieving the policy objectives.
Statelessness in South and South East Asia (A8-0182/2017 - Amjad Bashir)
I voted in favour of the Report on statelessness in South and Southeast Asia. The right to nationality has been enshrined in the Universal Declaration of Human Rights for close to seventy years, yet for millions of people this is still a seemingly unattainable fantasy. The international definition of a stateless person is ‘a person who is not considered as a national by any state under the operation of its law’. There are broader concerns surrounding statelessness, as it creates unfair barriers in the workplace, can stop people from getting married, impede access to healthcare, education and prevent the right to property. It contributes to human trafficking, making children especially vulnerable. Unfortunately, statelessness is a predicament that affects an estimated ten million people around the world, but the report focus on two groups in particular: the Rohingya and Bihari, who in many ways have come to symbolise the plight of stateless people globally. I voted in favour because I believe that the EU’s role in tackling statelessness should be examined, including what programmes have been financed and whether or not they’ve been successful, including examples of multilateral engagement.
Cross-border mergers and divisions (A8-0190/2017 - Enrico Gasbarra)
I voted in favour of the Report on cross-border mergers and divisions. In September 2014, the European Commission launched a public consultation procedure on cross-border mergers and divisions of undertakings, which was concluded in February 2015. The responses made it possible to gather information about the existing barriers to cross-border operations and about the amendments that needed to be made to existing legislation. The Lisbon Treaty devotes particular attention to freedom of establishment for companies. However, the EU legal framework for this whole field of company law continues to lack uniformity, particularly with regard to the transfer of the registered office or real head office of a company from one Member State to another. Directive 2005/56/EC had the positive effect of facilitating cross-border mergers between limited liability companies, filling a substantial gap in EU company law by means of harmonisation. However, more than 10 years after its adoption, the Directive now requires revision to tackle certain difficulties in its implementation and to respond to the development of company law in the European Union. I voted in favour because I believe that the future legislative proposal should set out certain guidelines for further legislation on the mobility of undertakings.
Participation of the Union in the Partnership for Research and Innovation in the Mediterranean Area (PRIMA) (A8-0112/2017 - Sofia Sakorafa)
I voted in favour of the Report on the proposal for a decision of the European Parliament and of the Council on the participation of the Union in the Partnership for Research and Innovation in the Mediterranean Area (PRIMA) jointly undertaken by several Member States. In 1995, the Barcelona Process, with its Declaration, initiated an ambitious programme for Euro-Mediterranean partnership aiming at establishing an area of peace, stability and prosperity. Since the outset of this process, cooperation in research and innovation has been considered of significant importance. On 18 October 2016, the European Commission adopted a proposal to establish a new public-public Partnership for Research and Innovation in the Mediterranean Area (PRIMA) under Article 185 TFEU, focusing on two key socioeconomic issues that are important for the region: agrifood systems and water management. I voted in favour because I believe that the current situation of social and political turmoil in the Mediterranean Basin should lead us to reflect upon the challenges that economies are facing in EU’s bordering countries and the potential leverage for sustainable development in the region. The access to food and water are determining interconnected challenges in this area.
Specific measures to provide additional assistance to Member States affected by natural disasters (A8-0070/2017 - Iskra Mihaylova)
I voted in favour of the report on the proposal for a regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council amending Regulation (EU) No 1303/2013 as regards specific measures to provide additional assistance to Member States affected by natural disasters. The recent series of earthquakes in Italy have had a devastating effect in the regions affected. Large-scale reconstruction works are necessary in order to help local people live in decent conditions and preserve the cultural heritage. Besides the initial support offered by the European Union Solidarity Fund (EUSF), additional amounts from the European Regional Development Fund (ERDF) can be provided to Member States in order to support the reconstruction of regions hit by major natural disasters. However, in order to provide such additional assistance to Member States affected by natural disasters, the overall legal framework established for the European Structural and Investment Funds (ESI) has to be adjusted. I voted in favour because I believe that cohesion policy must adapt to new challenges and offer a fast response to all Member States whose regions are affected by major natural disasters.
Energy efficiency labelling (A8-0213/2016 - Dario Tamburrano)
I voted in favour of the report on the proposal for a regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council setting a framework for energy efficiency labelling and repealing Directive 2010/30/EU. A few months ago, the automotive car emissions case shook the lives of all European citizens. Among other aspects, their trust was particularly damaged and now we must help to restore this trust. The concrete proposals of the present legislative initiative can take a step in this sense. Since its creation, the label has provided citizens a deeper understanding of the products’ impact on the environment and of their life-cycle. I voted in favour because I believe that a regulation would be the best legal instrument to avoid different transpositions in the Member States. Its aim should be to combine several equilibriums: reassuring continuity while stimulating evolution; among citizens, industry, and other stakeholders; between solid pragmatism and inspired ambition; between technological emphasis and social awareness.
European Capitals of Culture for the years 2020 to 2033 (A8-0061/2017 - Santiago Fisas Ayxelà)
I voted in favour of the report on the proposal for a decision of the European Parliament and of the Council amending Decision No 445/2014/EU establishing a Union action for the European Capitals of Culture for the years 2020 to 2033. Comparised with Decision No 1622/2006/EC, Decision No 445/2014/EU extends action to candidate countries and potential candidates for EU membership, providing they participate in the Creative Europe Programme or in the subsequent Union programmes supporting culture at the date of publication of the call for applications. As a result, every third year starting from 2021, cities from candidate countries or potential candidates may hold the title. However, Decision No 445/2014/EU does not include European Free Trade Association countries which are parties to the Agreement on the European Economic Area. Nonetheless, it is proposed to modify Decision No 445/2014/EU so as to make it possible for cities from EFTA/EEA countries participating in the Creative Europe Programme or in the subsequent Union programmes supporting culture, to apply for the ECOC title. I voted in favour because I think it is crucial to encourage mutual understanding and intercultural dialogue and bring common cultural heritage to the fore.
Assessment of Horizon 2020 implementation (A8-0209/2017 - Soledad Cabezón Ruiz)
I voted in favour of the report on the assessment of Horizon 2020 implementation in view of its interim evaluation and the Framework Programme 9 proposal. H2020 is the biggest research programme in the world. Its aim of responding to societal and economic challenges provides us with a starting point for this assessment in acknowledging its success, and examining those aspects that need to be improved so its ambitious goals can be achieved efficiently and sustainably, and difficulties in implementation arising from its complexity overcome. Horizon 2020 has its origins within the framework of the Europe 2020 goals – which prioritise innovation, enhanced competitiveness, greater SME involvement, and excellence – and was shaped in particular by the economic crisis and deindustrialisation in Europe. However, the deep and rapid changes facing European society call for a new paradigm requiring answers from society’s perspective and in its interest, while preserving the values and principles that characterise the EU. I voted in favour because I believe that H2020 has thus constituted a reaction to the changing world and the next FP9 should continue to follow this line. Moreover, all EU stakeholders need to boost their commitment to R&D.
Status of fish stocks and socio-economic situation of the fishing sector in the Mediterranean (A8-0179/2017 - Marco Affronte)
Report on the status of fish stocks and the socio-economic situation of the fishing sector in the Mediterranean. The Mediterranean, with its 17 000 maritime species, is one of the areas with the greatest biodiversity in the world and a multi-species approach therefore needs to be taken when deciding how it should be managed. For all stocks and by 2020 at the latest, the Mediterranean has to respond to the major challenge of achieving the objective of progressively restoring and maintaining fish stock populations above biomass levels capable of producing the maximum sustainable yield. Fisheries in this region are of great socio-economic importance to coastal populations and the sector employs hundreds of thousands of people. I voted in favour because I believe that, in order to protect and safeguard Mediterranean fisheries and environmental resources, fisheries management policies must be effective and backed up by strong, wide-ranging and urgent policies and measures to counter the factors that affect and have an adverse impact on those resources such as: climate change (global warming, acidification, rainfall), pollution (chemical, organic, macro- and microscopic), uncontrolled gas and oil exploration and extraction, maritime transport, invasive species and the destruction or alteration of natural habitats, especially coastal.
Request for the waiver of the immunity of Béla Kovács (A8-0203/2017 - Heidi Hautala)
I voted in favour of the Report on the request for waiver of the immunity of Béla Kovács. The Prosecutor General of Hungary has requested the waiver of the immunity of a Member of the European Parliament, Béla Kovács, in order that investigations can be carried out to verify whether a charge will lie against him with regard to the crimes of budget fraud resulting in substantial financial loss in accordance with Section 396(1)(a) of the Hungarian Criminal Code and of the multiple use of forged private documents in accordance with Section 345 of the Criminal Code. In order to decide whether or not to waive a Member’s parliamentary immunity, the European Parliament applies its own consistent principles.I voted in favour because I believe that the penalty of a reprimand issued to Mr Kovács is a mere disciplinary action which lays down a reasoned decision of the former President, as he concluded that the misappropriation by Mr Kovács of public funds granted by the European Parliament can be considered as established and that it results from a deliberate disregard of the European Parliament’s rules on the scholarships granted to trainees.
Rates of value added tax applied to books, newspapers and periodicals (A8-0189/2017 - Tom Vandenkendelaere)
I voted in favour of the Report on the proposal for a Council directive amending Directive 2006/112/EC, as regards rates of value added tax applied to books, newspapers and periodicals. The Commission’s proposal is part of a broader VAT package designed to bring VAT rules into line with the realities of an increasingly digital economy. The package as a whole seeks to cut compliance costs and complexity for businesses, drive down non-compliance-related revenue losses for Member States and ensure that EU businesses are not disadvantaged vis-à-vis non-EU businesses because of VAT rules on imported goods. The specific proposal to amend Directive 2006/112/EC would enable Member States to apply the same VAT rate to e-publications as to print publications. Under existing rules, e—publications are treated as ‘electronically supplied services’ and are thus subject to a minimum 15% tax rate.I voted in favour because I believe that the new legislation should establish clarity in the media and books market, help businesses to explore new avenues and ultimately drive down prices for consumers, thus boosting access to cultural content.
Internet connectivity for growth, competitiveness and cohesion: European gigabit society and 5G (A8-0184/2017 - Michał Boni)
I voted in favour of the Report on internet connectivity for growth, competitiveness and cohesion: European gigabit society and 5G. The concept of developing a Gigabit society is rooted in the opportunities presented by the rollout of 5G solutions. 5G opens a new stage in the digital world with the creation of new high—performance networks, including High Quality and Very High Capacity Networks. By providing new connectivity opportunities, the infrastructure becomes an enabler. There are, however, some conditions for 5G infrastructure development. An investment-friendly regulatory environment should create the legal certainty, transparency, equality and simplification of rules that are key to current and future electronic communication. Infrastructure-based competition should involve all possible partners competing for investments within a framework of flexible, business—efficient, co-investment models. I voted in favour because I believe that, with 5G, Europe has a great opportunity to reinvent the industrial landscape of telecoms. We are now at a crossroads for exciting developments. I expect that the EU industry as a whole will set the ball rolling for ambitious developments in 5G technology and a deployment roadmap.
Protection of vulnerable adults (A8-0152/2017 - Joëlle Bergeron) SL
Močno podpiram poročilo s priporočili Komisiji o varstvu ranljivih odraslih skupin.Pri zaščiti ranljivih skupin gre za zaščito osnovnih človekovih pravic in uživanje osnovnih človekovih pravic se ne sme in ne more končati na mejah članic Evropske unije.Zato se pridružujem pozivom Evropski komisiji, da države članice pristopijo k vzpostavljanju osrednjih organov, ki bodo nosilci izmenjave potrebnih informacij med državami članicami EU o pravicah in položaju ranljive osebe. To bo vsekakor zagotovilo ranljivim osebam ter njihovim skrbnikom oz. pooblaščencem dostojnejše in manj zapleteno življenje pri njihovem gibanju ter bivanju znotraj Evropske unije.Naša dolžnost in dolžnost Evropske komisije je, da države članice Evropske unije, ki še niso ratificirale Haaške konvencije, pozovemo, da to storijo čim preje. Zaščita ranljivih skupin na mednarodnem nivoju oz. nivoju mednarodnega prava je še toliko bolj pomembna v luči demografskih sprememb. Evropska unija oziroma njene članice morajo zato pri sprejemanju mednarodnih aktov za zaščito ranljivih skupin odigrati napredno in vidno vlogo.Demografske spremembe v Evropi namreč spreminjajo našo družbo in več kot potrebno je, da se temu prilagodi tudi mednarodno pravo. Prebivalstvo Evropske unije postaja vse starejše in zato bomo morali v prihodnje še več pozornosti nameniti zaščiti pravic starejših in vseh ranljivih skupin.
Introduction of temporary autonomous trade measures for Ukraine (A8-0193/2017 - Jarosław Wałęsa)
I voted in favour of the report on the proposal for a regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council on the introduction of temporary autonomous trade measures for Ukraine supplementing the trade concessions available under the Association Agreement.The Deep and Comprehensive Free Trade Area (DCFTA), the economic and trade pillar of the Association Agreement (AA) between the European Union and Ukraine, has been provisionally applied since 1 January 2016. The DCFTA establishes a free trade area for trade in goods over a transitional period of a maximum of ten years. The tariff liberalisation of the DCFTA is asymmetrical, as the EU reduces or abolishes its customs duties faster than Ukraine. The current Commission proposal is launched in addition to the EU concessions under the DCFTA that are already in force, in view of the enduring difficult economic situation and the economic reform efforts undertaken by Ukraine. In line with the AA objectives, the proposal aims at increasing the existing trade flows between the EU and Ukraine. I voted in favour because I believe that in long term, the EU should focus on assisting Ukraine in areas such as SPS standards, support to investment in the agriculture sector and fostering visa liberalisation.
Uniform format for visas (A8-0028/2016 - Sylvia-Yvonne Kaufmann)
I voted in favour of the report on the proposal for a regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council amending Regulation (EC) No 1683/1995 of 29 May 1995 laying down a uniform format for visas. The introduction of a uniform format for visas is an important element of the EU visa policy. A uniform format for visas should contain all the necessary information and meet very high technical standards, notably as regards safeguards against counterfeiting and falsification. Furthermore it must also be suited to use by all the Member States and bear universally recognisable security features which are clearly visible to the naked eye. Over the past few years forged visa stickers have arisen in several Member States. The present sticker is, as far as specialists are concerned, not secure any longer. I voted in favour because I believe that since forged stickers are circulating, there is urgent need for action to produce new, unforgeable visa stickers.
Multiannual Framework for the EU Agency for Fundamental Rights for 2018-2022 (A8-0177/2017 - Angelika Mlinar)
I voted in favour of the recommendation on the draft Council decision establishing a Multiannual Framework for the European Union Agency for Fundamental Rights for 2018–2022. On 15 February 2007, the Council adopted Regulation (EC) No 168/2007 establishing a European Union Agency for Fundamental Rights (FRA). The objective of the Agency is to provide the relevant institutions, bodies, offices and agencies of the Union and its Member States, when implementing Union law, with assistance and expertise relating to fundamental rights in order to support them when they take measures or formulate courses of action within their respective spheres of competence to fully respect fundamental rights. The tasks entrusted to the Agency relate to the collection and analysis of information and data; to the provision of advice through reports and opinions; and to cooperation with civil society and raising awareness of fundamental rights.I voted in favour because I believe that one of the fundamental aspects of the work of the agency is to provide advice relating to the respect of fundamental rights in the domain of the Union law, and that requires that the activities of the agency should not suffer interruption.
Multiannual Framework for the EU Agency for Fundamental Rights for 2018-2022 (B8-0384/2017)
I voted in favour of the resolution on the Multiannual Framework for 2018-2022 for the European Union Agency for Fundamental Rights. The European Union is committed to guaranteeing the rights proclaimed in the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union. The draft Council decision establishing a Multiannual Framework for the European Union Agency for Fundamental Rights for 2018-2022, submitted to Parliament for consent, includes eight thematic areas.Including the area of police cooperation and judicial cooperation in criminal matters in the Multiannual Framework would not only reflect the needs on the ground, but would also allow the Agency to provide comprehensive analysis on its own initiative in areas that are of obvious relevance to fundamental rights, especially given the recent and ongoing legislative developments at EU level in this field. Following the Treaty of Lisbon, police cooperation and judicial cooperation in criminal matters have become part of Union law.I voted in favour because I believe that one of the fundamental aspects of the work of the Agency is to continue providing support relating to respect for fundamental rights in the domain of Union law, thus requiring that the activities of the Agency do not suffer interruption.
Digitising European industry (A8-0183/2017 - Reinhard Bütikofer)
I voted in favour of the Report on digitising European industry. Industry plays a key role in Europe’s economy. It provides jobs, economic dynamism and can crucially contribute solutions to mastering the great societal challenges that the European Union faces, ranging from the Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs) and climate change to changing demographics, social precariousness and loss of biodiversity. At the same time the world is in the midst of a new industrial revolution based on digitalisation and automation. This is changing business models, value chains, production and consumption. A global race is emerging for who can take on these new developments and adapt to them in a sustainable and social way the fastest. For European industry to remain competitive it is essential that it leads this new industrial revolution with innovation and on the basis of sustainability. I voted in favour because I believe that the European Commission’s Communication is an important first step in the right direction. Different security aspects must also get greater attention in this new digital industrial era. This includes ensuring that key European strategic technologies aren’t sold cheaply to foreign competitors without inhibiting free markets.
The new European Consensus on Development - our world, our dignity, our future (B8-0387/2017, B8-0390/2017)
I abstained from voting on the Resolution on the joint statement by the Council and the representatives of the governments of the Member States meeting within the Council, the European Parliament and the Commission on the new European Consensus on Development – Our World, Our Dignity, Our Future. The resolution stresses the importance of the new European Consensus on Development as a key strategic document setting out a common vision, values and principles for the EU and its Member States regarding the implementation of the 2030 Agenda in their development cooperation policies. Moreover, it underlines the clear recognition by the new Consensus that the primary objective of EU development policy is the reduction and, in the long term, the eradication of poverty in line with Article 208 TFEU. However, this should be done fully in line with the principles of effective development cooperation. I abstained from voting because I believe that there is the need for accountability mechanisms for the monitoring and implementation of the SDGs and the 0.7% ODA/GNI (Official Development Assistance/Gross National Income) objectives. Furthermore, I am of the opinion that development cooperation should be based on the principle of solidarity between Member States.
Resilience as a strategic priority of the EU external action (B8-0381/2017)
I voted in favour of the resolution on resilience as a strategic priority of the external action of the EU (2017/2594(RSP)). According to the Organisation for Economic Cooperation and Development (OECD), 1.6 billion people live in 56 countries identified as fragile. Situations of fragility have largely man-made causes and they increase the vulnerability of populations due to various factors.The resolution considers that the current EU approach to resilience, including commitments to address the underlying causes of crises and vulnerability, remains fundamentally valid and should be continued. It stresses the multidimensional – human, economic, environmental, political, security and societal – nature of resilience and highlights the fact that building resilience in partner countries is a long-term process and that it therefore needs to be integrated into development programmes that are inclusive of the most vulnerable segments of the population and into financial commitments.I voted in favour because I believe in the importance of early-warning systems and early-response capabilities as a mechanism to promote resilience.
Combating anti-semitism (B8-0383/2017, B8-0388/2017)
I voted in favour of the resolution on combating anti-Semitism. Recent reports from the EU Agency for Fundamental Rights (FRA) show an increase in fear and insecurity among the Jewish, migrant, Muslim and Roma communities in the EU. The number of anti-Semitic incidents in EU Member States has risen significantly in recent years, as reported by the Organization for Security and Cooperation in Europe (OSCE) and the FRA.The resolution stresses that hate speech and all kinds of violence against European Jewish citizens are incompatible with the values of the European Union. It condemns all incidents of hate crime and hate speech motivated by racism, xenophobia or religious intolerance, or by bias against a person’s minority status. Moreover, it stresses the importance of everyone being well aware of their rights in terms of protection against anti-Semitism, and calls on the Member States to take all appropriate measures to encourage the reporting of anti-Semitic crimes, and to ensure adequate protection and support for people who report such crimes and for the victims. I voted in favour because I believe that combating anti-Semitism is a responsibility for society as a whole.
High-level UN Conference to support the implementation of Sustainable Development Goal 14 (UN Ocean Conference) (B8-0382/2017)
I voted in favour of the High-Level UN Conference to Support the Implementation of SDG 14 (UN Ocean Conference) (2017/2653(RSP)). The oceans and seas are central to our lives, welfare and future but the current rapid decline in ocean health – with the warming and acidification of oceans, the bleaching of corals, increasing pressure on fish stocks, and increasing amounts of marine litter – is alerting us that the time has come for action to mobilise the necessary leadership to protect our oceans. Despite the world’s commitment to curbing overfishing by 2015, made in 2002 at the World Summit on Sustainable Development in Johannesburg, 31.4% of the world’s fish stocks are still overfished. The resolution stresses the need for an ecosystem-based and precautionary approach as enshrined in the Treaties and the common fisheries policy (CFP) to be implemented in global fisheries management, so as to rebuild and maintain exploited fish stocks above levels that can produce the maximum sustainable yield. I voted in favour because I believe in the importance of conserving at least 10% of coastal and marine areas, in line with UN Sustainable Development Goal (SDG) 14.5.
Agreement between the EU, Iceland, Liechtenstein and Norway on an EEA Financial Mechanism 2014-2021 (A8-0072/2017 - David Borrelli)
I voted in favour of the Recommendation on the draft Council decision on conclusion of the Agreement between the European Union, Iceland, the Principality of Liechtenstein and the Kingdom of Norway on an EEA Financial Mechanism 2014-2021, the Agreement between the Kingdom of Norway and the European Union on a Norwegian Financial Mechanism for the period 2014-2021, the Additional Protocol to the Agreement between the European Economic Community and the Kingdom of Norway, and the Additional Protocol to the Agreement between the European Economic Community and Iceland. The Agreement on the European Economic Area allows Norway, Iceland and Liechtenstein to participate fully in the single market. The EEA incorporates the four freedoms of the single market and related policies. The EEA Financial Mechanism Agreement and the Norway Agreement will together provide a financial contribution of the EEA EFTA States to economic and social cohesion in the EEA of EUR 2.8 billion for the period 2014-2021. I voted in favour because I believe that the 2014-2021 EEA Financial Mechanism and Norway Grants, jointly amounting to EUR 2.8 billion, will significantly contribute to achieving the overall objectives of the Europe 2020 Strategy for smart, sustainable and inclusive growth.
The right funding mix for Europe’s regions: balancing financial instruments and grants in EU cohesion policy (A8-0139/2017 - Andrey Novakov)
I voted in favour of the Report on the right funding mix for Europe’s regions: balancing financial instruments and grants in EU cohesion policy. The delivery methods of EU cohesion policy consist mainly of a mix of grants and financial instruments, invested through the ESI funds under shared management or centrally managed by the Commission and the EIB Group. According to Article 2(p) of the Financial Regulation, ‘financial instruments’ means ‘Union measures of financial support provided on a complementary basis from the budget in order to address one or more specific policy objectives of the Union. Such instruments may take the form of equity or quasi-equity investments, loans or guarantees, or other risk-sharing instruments, and may, where appropriate, be combined with grants’. The performance of cohesion policy through the turbulent financial and economic period after 2008 appeared as solid proof of EU’s ability to support recovery and growth objectives. In the framework of the last programming period, financial instruments were deployed through the ERDF and the ESF. I voted in favour because evidence from the last programming period suggests a positive contribution to cohesion policy implementation and a number of benefits.
Future perspectives for technical assistance in cohesion policy (A8-0180/2017 - Ruža Tomašić)
I voted in favour of the Report on future perspectives for Technical Assistance in Cohesion Policy. Although technical assistance (TA) has been used in the context of cohesion policy since 1988, a global analysis of its contributions and role has never been made in the European Parliament. TA is a cross-cutting area of spending for which there is no single clear definition and it is difficult to make a detailed assessment of its importance and contribution to support institutional strengthening and administrative capacity building for the effective management of the European Structural and Investment Funds. The new provisions for TA have introduced certain innovations, in particular: support for institutional strengthening and administrative capacity-building; and measures to identify, prioritise and implement structural and administrative reforms in response to economic and social challenges in certain Member States. I voted in favour because I believe that at the EU level, TA supports, among other measures, the institutional strengthening and administrative capacity-building for the effective management of the Funds.
Cross-border portability of online content services in the internal market (A8-0378/2016 - Jean-Marie Cavada)
I voted in favour of the Report on the proposal for a regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council on ensuring the cross-border portability of online content services in the internal market. Its purpose is to define and regulate portability, so as to enable consumers who subscribe to online content services acquired legally in their Member State of habitual residence to continue to access the service when they are temporarily in another Member State. The proposal requires providers of online content services to ensure portability for subscribers on the basis of a legal fiction. Thanks to this principle of a legal fiction, cross-border portability of online content services does not encroach upon territoriality and does not affect copyright rules in the other Member States. The regulation must remain proportionate to the reality of the market in online content services and to the number of potential users of these services, who are thought to comprise some 5.7% of European consumers. I voted in favour because I believe that consumer access to cross-border portability of online content services will promote the proper functioning of the internal market, based in particular on the free movement of services and persons.
Implementation of the EU-Korea Free Trade Agreement (A8-0123/2017 - Adam Szejnfeld)
I voted in favour of the Report on the implementation of the Free Trade Agreement between the European Union and the Republic of Korea. The Commission’s new trade strategy ‘Trade for all’ emphasises the importance of ensuring the effective implementation of EU free trade agreements, including through the use of the dispute settlement mechanism therein. The EU-Korea Free Trade Agreement is the first of a new generation of free trade agreements concluded by the EU with an Asian partner, which, in addition to removing tariffs, also contains rules on eliminating non-tariff barriers, thereby creating new market access opportunities for services and investments, as well as in the areas of intellectual property, public procurement and competition policy, and will thus serve as an example for future free trade agreements. I voted in favour because I believe that the Agreement has already led to a significant growth in trade between the EU and Korea.
Achieving the two-state solution in the Middle East (RC-B8-0345/2017, B8-0345/2017, B8-0346/2017, B8-0347/2017, B8-0348/2017, B8-0352/2017, B8-0354/2017)
I voted in favour of the Resolution on achieving the two-state solution in the Middle East. The prospects of a meaningful resumption of negotiations for a comprehensive settlement of the Israel-Palestine conflict within the framework of the so-called Middle East Peace Process remain bleak. The two-state solution remains the preferred option of both Palestinians and Israelis and only a minority on both sides supports the idea of a bi-national one-state solution, according to a poll carried out in February 2017 by the Palestinian Centre for Policy and Survey Research and the Tami Steinmetz Center for Peace Research. I voted in favour because I believe that the continued entrenchment of a one-state reality of unequal rights, unending occupation and creeping annexation of the West Bank, as well as the vanishing prospect of Palestinian statehood, require a rethink of EU policy towards the conflict. Moreover, I am of the opinion that non-violent means are the only way to achieve peace between Israelis and Palestinians and that all acts of violence against civilians, including acts of terror, as well as all acts of provocation, incitement and destruction on both sides should be strongly condemned.
EU Strategy on Syria (RC-B8-0331/2017, B8-0331/2017, B8-0333/2017, B8-0335/2017, B8-0337/2017, B8-0338/2017, B8-0341/2017, B8-0342/2017)
I voted in favour of the EU Strategy on Syria. The war in Syria has become one of the worst humanitarian crises the world has faced since World War II and continues to have devastating and tragic consequences for its people. Over 400 000 people have lost their lives since the beginning of the conflict in Syria in 2011. The crisis in Syria is having an increasingly destabilising impact on the wider region. Since the outbreak of the war in 2011, the EU, together with its Member States, has, as of January 2017, collectively mobilised more than EUR 9.4 billion in response to the Syrian crisis, both within Syria and in the region, making it the largest donor. Furthermore, the EU has also substantially supported the neighbouring refugee host countries. The EU has repeatedly stated that there can be no military solution to the Syrian conflict and that only a Syrian-led, inclusive transition can put an end to the unacceptable suffering of the Syrian people. I voted in favour because I believe that reconciliation efforts should start as soon as possible and be supported by the EU with the aim of securing long-term stability.
Road transport in the European Union (B8-0290/2017)
I voted in favour of the resolution on road transport in the European Union. The road transport economy in the EU accounts for five million direct jobs and contributes close to 2% of the EU’s GDP, with 344 000 road passenger transport companies and over 560 000 road freight transport companies. In 2013, passenger transport activities by road in the EU amounted to 5 323 billion passenger kilometres. However, road safety remains a topical issue for the EU, with 135 000 seriously injured victims and 26 100 fatalities in 2015.Road transport is a driving force of the EU’s economy and should remain a frontrunner in generating further economic growth and job creation, and in promoting competitiveness and territorial cohesion. Nevertheless, it is necessary, at the same time, that the sector becomes more sustainable and respects decent working conditions and social rights. I voted in favour because I believe that it is crucial that European road transport continues to develop, invest and renew itself in a sustainable and ecological manner, in order to maintain its technological leadership at global level within a global economy.
Dadaab refugee camp (RC-B8-0300/2017, B8-0300/2017, B8-0332/2017, B8-0334/2017, B8-0336/2017, B8-0339/2017)
I voted in favour of the Resolution on the Dadaab refugee camp. The Horn of Africa region, with nearly 250 million inhabitants and a rapidly growing population, hosts the largest number of internally displaced persons and refugees in Africa and the world. The challenges have numerous drivers which vary according to local contexts, but which are commonly rooted in a lack of socio-economic opportunities, poverty, instability and climate change. The Dadaab refugee complex was established in 1991 as a temporary solution to those seeking shelter and fleeing persecution, violence and instability in the East Africa region, and most notably the civil war in Somalia. Although Dadaab was intended to host around 90 000 people, the complex currently has a population of approximately 260 000. After three decades the Somali refugee situation is among the most protracted in the world, with a third generation of refugees being born in exile. The resolution regrets the very low-key role played by the EU Member States when it comes to efforts to resettle refugees from Dadaab. I voted in favour because I believe that considering that given the current circumstances of ongoing security problems in Somalia and a high risk of famine, voluntary returns should be the only option.
Making relocation happen (B8-0340/2017, B8-0343/2017, B8-0344/2017)
I voted in favour of the Revolution on making relocation happen. Member States have committed to relocating 160 000 asylum seekers from Italy and Greece. Under Council Decision 2016/1754 54 000 of those places can be used for the admission of Syrian refugees from Turkey. The number of people eligible for relocation present in Italy and Greece is currently below what is foreseen in the Council decisions. So far 26 997 eligible applicants have been registered in Greece while Member States have formally pledged 19 603 relocation places. The preconditions and operational infrastructure to make relocation happen are fully in place. However, despite some progress, only two Member States, Finland and Malta, are fully on track to fulfil their relocation obligations. I voted in favour because I believe that Member States have to do everything in their power to fulfil their obligations under the Council decisions and to systematically relocate asylum seekers from Greece and Italy.
Implementation of the Council's LGBTI Guidelines, particularly in relation to the persecution of (perceived) homosexual men in Chechnya, Russia (B8-0349/2017, B8-0349/2017, B8-0350/2017, B8-0351/2017, B8-0353/2017, B8-0355/2017, B8-0356/2017)
. ‒ I voted in favour of the resolution on the implementation of the Council’s LGBTI Guidelines, particularly in relation to the persecution of (perceived) homosexual men in Chechnya, Russia.On 1 April 2017 an article in the Russian independent newspaper Novaya Gazeta reported that more than 100 men, gay or believed and perceived to be gay, had been abducted and detained in the Autonomous Republic of Chechnya in the Russian Federation, as part of a coordinated campaign allegedly organised by the republic’s authorities and security forces on the direct orders of the President of Chechnya, Ramzan Kadyrov, The initial reports have been separately confirmed by Human Rights Watch and the International Crisis Group.The authorities in Chechnya reportedly dismissed these allegations and demonstrated an unwillingness to investigate them or to prosecute. President Putin has instructed the Russian Ministry of the Interior and the Federal Prosecutor to investigate the events in Chechnya.I voted in favour because I believe that there is a need for immediate, independent, objective and thorough investigations into the acts of imprisonment, torture and murder, in order to bring their intellectual and material perpetrators to justice and to put an end to impunity.
Mobilisation of the European Globalisation Adjustment Fund: application EGF/2016/008 FI/Nokia Network Systems (A8-0196/2017 - Petri Sarvamaa)
I voted in favour of the report on the proposal for a decision of the European Parliament and of the Council on the mobilisation of the European Globalisation Adjustment Fund (application from Finland – EGF/2016/008 FI/Nokia Network Systems). The European Globalisation Adjustment Fund (‘EGF’) aims to provide support for workers made redundant and self-employed persons whose activity has ceased as a result of major structural changes in world trade patterns due to globalisation, as a result of a continuation of the global financial and economic crisis, or as a result of a new global financial and economic crisis, and to assist them with their reintegration into the labour market. On 7 April 2017, the Commission adopted a proposal for a decision on the mobilisation of the EGF in favour of Finland to support the reintegration in the labour market of workers following redundancies in Nokia Oy (Nokia Network Systems) and three suppliers and downstream producers in the NACE Rev. 2 division 26. The Finnish ICT sector is characterised by a significant pressure to increase efficiency and to maintain the competitiveness of products. I voted in favour because Finland has provided all necessary assurances required in order to mobilise EGF funds.
Annual report 2014 on subsidiarity and proportionality (A8-0114/2017 - Sajjad Karim)
I voted in favour of the report on the Annual Report 2014 on subsidiarity and proportionality. The annual report on subsidiarity and proportionality 2014 shows that in 2014 the Commission received 21 reasoned opinions from national parliaments concerning 15 proposals, which represented a decrease of 76% compared to the number of reasoned opinions received in the previous year (88 in 2013). This considerably lower number of reasoned opinions should not be seen as the result of a loss of interest of national parliaments on subsidiarity but mostly the result of a decrease in the overall number of proposals made by the Commission towards the end of its term of office. I voted in favour because I believe that the principles of subsidiarity and proportionality are an integral element of policy formulation in order to establish whether European Union can achieve policy objectives better than national or regional initiatives.
FinTech: the influence of technology on the future of the financial sector (A8-0176/2017 - Cora van Nieuwenhuizen)
I voted in favour of the report on FinTech: the influence of technology on the future of the financial sector. New technologies are rapidly changing the nature of the financial infrastructure around the globe. This presents massive opportunities for Europe. It is now up to policymakers to make the right choices and create a conducive environment so that Europe can benefit to the full extent. ‘FinTech’ is often used to refer to a specific scene of start-ups disrupting finance with innovation. The current rise of FinTech comes after the origination of a number of different technological developments within a short timespan, namely Artificial Intelligence, cloud computing and Distributed Ledger Technology (DLT). These provide new opportunities for disruptions like mobile payments, open banking, crowdfunding, virtual currencies and robo-advice. I voted in favour because I believe that FinTech can lead to significant benefits, such as cost reductions, efficiency gains and more transparency. It can be an effective tool for financial inclusion, opening up high-level services for those that could not afford them before.
Automated data exchange with regard to vehicle registration data in Croatia (A8-0171/2017 - Claude Moraes)
I voted in favour of the report on the draft Council implementing decision on the launch of automated data exchange with regard to vehicle registration data in Croatia. In accordance with Decision 2008/615/JHA on the stepping up of cross—border cooperation, particularly in combating terrorism and cross—border crime, the supply of personal data provided for under that Decision may not take place until the general provisions on data protection have been implemented in the national law of the territories of the Member States involved in such supply. Council Decision 2008/616/JHA on the implementation of Decision 2008/615/JHA provides that the verification that the condition has been met with respect to automated data exchange is to be done on the basis of an evaluation report based on a questionnaire, an evaluation visit and a pilot run. Croatia completed the questionnaire on data protection and the questionnaire on vehicle registration data (VRD) exchange. A successful pilot run was carried out by Croatia with the Netherlands. An evaluation visit took place in Croatia. I voted in favour because Croatia had fully implemented.
Objection to a delegated act: Identifying high-risk third countries with strategic deficiencies (B8-0294/2017)
I voted in favour of the Objection to Commission Delegated Regulation amending Delegated Regulation (EU) 2016/1675, as regards deleting Guyana from the table in point I of the Annex and adding Ethiopia to that table. The delegated regulation, its annex and the amending delegated regulation are meant to identify high—risk third countries with strategic deficiencies as regards anti-money laundering and countering terrorist financing, which represent a threat to the EU financial system and for which enhanced customer due diligence measures are necessary at EU obliged entities under 4AMLD. The most recent Commission Delegated Regulation (EU) 2016/1675 supplementing Directive (EU) 2015/849 by identifying high—risk third countries with strategic deficiencies has been in force since 23 September 2016. The list of countries, including after the amendments introduced in the amending delegated regulation adopted by the Commission in 2017, matches those identified by the Financial Action Task Force (FATF) at their 29th plenary meeting in 2017. I voted in favour because I believe that the Commission assessment is an autonomous process which has to be carried out in a comprehensive and unbiased manner, assessing all third countries based on the same criteria defined in Article 9(2) of 4AMLD.
Genetically modified maize DAS-40278-9 (B8-0292/2017)
I voted in favour of the objection pursuant to Rule 106: GMO cotton GHB119. On 25 March 2011, Bayer submitted an application in accordance with Articles 5 and 17 of Regulation (EC) No 1829/2003 for the placing on the market of foods, food ingredients and feed containing, consisting of, or produced from GHB119 cotton to the competent authority of the Netherlands. That application also covered the placing on the market of genetically modified cotton GHB119 in products consisting of it or containing it for uses other than food and feed as any other cotton, with the exception of cultivation. The European Food Safety Authority (EFSA) adopted a favourable opinion in accordance with Articles 6 and 18 of Regulation (EC) No 1829/2003.However, glufosinate is classified as toxic to reproduction and thus falls under the exclusion criteria set out in Regulation (EC) No 1107/2009 and the approval of glufosinate expires on 31 July 2018. Moreover, independent research raises concerns about major gaps in the comparative assessment. Considering all the abovementioned concerns, I voted in favour of the objection.
Situation in Hungary (B8-0295/2017, B8-0296/2017)
I voted in favour of the resolution on the situation in Hungary. The European Union is founded on the values of respect for human dignity, freedom, democracy, equality, the rule of law and respect for human rights. Hungary has been a Member State of the European Union since 2004 and according to opinion polls, a large majority of Hungarian citizens are in favour of the country’s EU membership. However, the most recent developments in Hungary, in particular the Act amending certain acts related to increasing the strictness of procedures carried out in the areas of border management and asylum, the Act amending the National Higher Education Act, and the proposed Act on the Transparency of Organisations Receiving Support from Abroad have given rise to concerns regarding their compatibility with EU law and the Charter of Fundamental Rights. I voted in favour because I believe that the Commission, as guardian of the Treaties, should thoroughly assess the situation in Hungary, and fully support the Hungarian Government in efforts to find adequate remedies to the concerns raised.
European Qualifications Framework for lifelong learning (B8-0298/2017)
I voted in favour of the European Qualifications Framework for lifelong learning. A proper recognition, understanding and evaluation of skills extends beyond the realms of what is sought after by the labour market. The skills that are available and in demand on the labour market would benefit from an EQF which can identify and match those skills and thus provide social and economic benefits. The Framework points out that the promotion of critical thinking and thinking outside the box is crucial for developing new skills that will be needed in the future. It notes that one of the roles of the EQF is to increase the comparability of qualifications attained in Member States while safeguarding the specific features of national education systems. The Framework acknowledges that the Union should make it possible, regardless of age or status, to make everyone’s skills and competences, including those gained through volunteering, more visible, and better appreciated and recognised in a clear and accessible manner, in particular in cross-border areas, no matter where or how those skills and competences have been acquired. I voted in favour because I believe in the importance of analysing and developing tools for anticipating future skill needs.
Protocol to the EU-Mongolia Framework Agreement on Partnership and Cooperation (accession of Croatia) (A8-0074/2017 - Helmut Scholz)
I voted in favour of the Recommendation on the draft Council decision on the conclusion, on behalf of the Union and its Member States, of the Protocol to the Framework Agreement on Partnership and Cooperation between the European Union and its Member States, of the one part, and Mongolia, of the other part, to take account of the accession of the Republic of Croatia to the European Union. The Act of Accession of the Republic of Croatia to the EU specifies that Croatia will accede to the international agreements signed or concluded by the European Union and its Member States by means of protocols to these agreements. The purpose of this Protocol is to take account of the accession of the Republic of Croatia to the European Union. I voted in favour because I believe that this Agreement is a step forward in relations between the EU and Mongolia.
EU-Bosnia and Herzegovina Stabilisation and Association Agreement (accession of Croatia) (A8-0169/2017 - Cristian Dan Preda)
I voted in favour of the Recommendation on the draft Council decision on the conclusion, on behalf of the Union and its Member States, of the Protocol to the Stabilisation and Association Agreement between the European Communities and their Member States, of the one part, and Bosnia and Herzegovina, of the other part, to take account of the accession of the Republic of Croatia to the European Union. With this proposal, the Council is invited to adopt a decision aiming to approve, on behalf of the Union and its Member States, the Protocol to the Stabilisation and Association Agreement between the European Communities and their Member States, of the one part, and Bosnia and Herzegovina, of the other part, to take account of the accession of Croatia to the European Union. The signature and provisional application of the Protocol are subject to a proposal for a separate Council decision. The conclusion of the Protocol on behalf of the European Atomic Energy Community follows a separate procedure, by which the Commission recommends that the Council gives its approval, pursuant to the second paragraph of Article 101 of the Treaty establishing the EAEC.
EU-Norway Agreement on supplementary rules in relation to the instrument for financial support for external borders and visa (A8-0174/2017 - Tomáš Zdechovský)
I voted in favour of the Recommendation on the draft Council decision on the conclusion on behalf of the Union of the Agreement between the European Union and the Kingdom of Norway on supplementary rules in relation to the instrument for financial support for external borders and visa, as part of the Internal Security Fund for the period 2014 to 2020.In 2014, Parliament and the Council adopted the instrument for financial support for external borders and visa for the period 2014 to 2020. The main aim of the ISF Borders and Visa is to ensure a high level of security in the European Union while facilitating legitimate travel through a uniform and high level of control of the external border and the effective processing of Schengen visas. The purpose is to establish exactly those arrangements, namely to enable the Commission to assume responsibility for the implementation of the budget of the instrument in this associated country and to determine the Kingdom of Norway’s contribution to the European Union budget in respect of this instrument. I voted in favour because I believe that the ISF Borders and Visa establishes a solidarity mechanism.
EU accession to the International Cotton Advisory Committee (ICAC) (A8-0187/2017 - Fernando Ruas)
I voted in favour of the Recommendation on the draft Council decision on the accession of the European Union to the International Cotton Advisory Committee (ICAC). The ICAC (established in 1939) is one of the oldest international commodity bodies (ICBs), currently bringing together 27 cotton producing, consuming and trading countries. The ICAC assists governments in promoting a sound and better informed world cotton economy by improving transparency in the world cotton market, raising awareness for new challenges or problems, fostering international cooperation, gathering statistical data, providing technical information and forecasts. The ICAC remains one of the few ICBs of which the European Union is not yet a member, regardless of nine Member States being former members of the ICAC. As cotton is extremely important to the Union’s economic, trade and development objectives, the EU cannot afford to stay outside the ICAC. The accession of the EU to the ICAC will imply a reduction in the annual contribution paid to this organisation, when compared to that paid by the nine Members States mentioned. I voted in favour because I believe that membership of this international body will allow the EU to enhance cooperation and dialogue on a wide range of cotton issues.
EU eGovernment action plan 2016-2020 (A8-0178/2017 - Sabine Verheyen)
I voted in favour of the Report on the EU eGovernment Action Plan 2016-2020. All Member States and the European Union, as well as all administrative levels, are affected by digitalisation. Public administration must be put into a position to make best use of the potential of digitalisation. It is indeed the EU administration which should lead the transformation process by example. Such potential is attached to both the internal and external workflow of the administration as employees expect to work and citizens and businesses expect to participate in an up-to-date digital environment. A digitalised administration must be open, efficient and inclusive, providing borderless, personalised, user-friendly, end-to-end digital public services to citizens and businesses. I voted in favour because I support the eGovernment Action Plan presented by the Commission, which sets ambitious targets to be achieved in the coming years. Unlike the Action Plan for the period 2011-2015, the current measures are set in a wider context and form part of the Commission’s digital market strategy. I believe that eParticipation enables citizens to easily and actively engage in policymaking and Member States should make more use of eConsultation, eInformation and eDecision.
Annual report 2015 on the protection of EU's financial interests - Fight against fraud (A8-0159/2017 - Julia Pitera)
I voted in favour of the report on the Annual Report 2015 on the protection of the EU’s financial interests – Fight against fraud. Protection of the EU’s financial interests should be a key element of the EU’s policy to increase citizens’ confidence by ensuring that their money is used properly. However, the total number of fraudulent and non-fraudulent irregularities reported in 2015 increased significantly. The Commission package of four delegated and four implementing regulations on the reporting of irregularity provisions in the area of shared management aims to improve the quality and consistency of the information on irregularities and fraud reported by the Member States. The report emphasises that not all Member States have adopted national anti-fraud strategies. I voted in favour because I believe that all relevant Member State authorities, including customs authorities, and the relevant Union agencies, including the European Anti-Fraud Office, need to cooperate fully and exchange information on a regular basis.
Resource efficiency: reducing food waste, improving food safety (A8-0175/2017 - Biljana Borzan)
I voted in favour of the Report on initiative on resource efficiency: reducing food waste, improving food safety. The European Union, as one of the richest and most prosperous communities in the world, has a moral and political obligation to reduce huge quantities of food wasted every year. Wasted food and food loss also entails wasted water, soil, working hours, energy, and other valuable and often limited resources. Estimates show that 88 million tonnes of food are wasted in the EU each year. The production and disposal of EU food waste leads to the emission of 170 million tonnes of CO2 and consumes 261 million tonnes of resources. The Sustainable Development Goal 12.3 aims at halving per capita global food waste at the retail and consumer levels by 2030 and reducing food losses along production and supply chains. The Action Plan on the Circular Economy is progressing and should lay the groundwork for coordinated European action. The European Parliament should have a coherent position regarding these issues. I voted in favour because I believe that the European Union, Member States, farmers, processors, packaging producers, transporters, retailers, food services, consumers and all the other stakeholders have a responsibility to act.
Evaluation of external aspects of customs performance and management as a tool to facilitate trade and fight illicit trade (A8-0162/2017 - Tiziana Beghin)
I voted in favour of the report on the evaluation of external aspects of customs performance and management as a tool to facilitate trade and fight illicit trade. The Customs Union is a basic pillar of the European Union, making it one of the largest trading blocs in the world. A fully functional customs union is essential for the credibility which the EU needs to guarantee its strength when negotiating trade agreements. The report highlights that there is no system in place for identifying and monitoring differences in how customs authorities treat economic operators. It equally emphasises the importance of completing the work of harmonising controls at all points of entry into the Customs Union, in particular on the basis of existing instruments. Moreover, it notes that the efficiency of customs procedures is crucial not only for trade facilitation, but also for effective and expedient law enforcement with regard to the counterfeiting and smuggling of excisable goods entering the EU. I voted in favour because I am of the opinion that the quality and performance of customs controls on the transit of goods, particularly for shipment and transport operations, is of the first importance and must be improved.
EU trade mark (A8-0054/2017 - Tadeusz Zwiefka)
I voted in favour of the Report on the proposal for a Regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council on the European Union trade mark (codified text). In the interests of clarity and transparency, the aim of the proposal is to proceed with the codification of Council Regulation (EC) No 207/2000 on the European Union trade mark. The new Regulation will supersede the various acts incorporated in it. The proposal fully preserves the content of the acts being codified and hence does no more than bring them together with only such formal amendments as are required by the codification exercise itself. The draft regulation establishes, at Union level, the modalities and the conditions for the granting of an EU trade mark. An EU trade mark shall have a unitary character. It shall have equal effect throughout the Union. The proposal also sets up a European Union Intellectual Property Office. I voted in favour because I believe that the rights inherent in an EU trade mark should not be obtained other than by registration, and registration should be refused in particular if the trade mark is not distinctive, if it is unlawful or if it conflicts with earlier rights.
Minamata Convention on Mercury (A8-0067/2017 - Stefan Eck)
I voted in favour of the Recommendation on the draft Council decision on the conclusion on behalf of the European Union of the Minamata Convention on Mercury. The Minamata Convention on Mercury is a global treaty under the auspices of the United Nations Environment Programme. It is the main international legal framework for cooperation and measures to control and limit the use and anthropogenic emissions of mercury and mercury compounds to air, water and land. It aims to protect human health and the environment from all adverse effects of mercury. Scientific evidence proves the acute toxicity of mercury, an element that can neither be destroyed nor disappear. With its immensely debilitating health impacts, mercury is among the world’s worst pollutants. Mercury is a global and ubiquitous metal that has broad uses in everyday objects. It is released to the atmosphere, soil and water from a variety of sources. I voted in favour of the Recommendation because I believe that the ratification of the Convention will be an important step towards a higher level of protection of human health and the environment from mercury. It will also allow the EU to take an active role in shaping a global mercury-free policy.
Hybrid mismatches with third countries (A8-0134/2017 - Olle Ludvigsson)
I voted in favour of the Report on the proposal for a Council directive amending Directive (EU) 2016/1164 as regards hybrid mismatches with third countries. Consequently, the OECD and G20 countries adopted a 15-point Action Plan to address BEPS in September 2013. Hybrid mismatch arrangements exploit differences in the tax treatment of an entity or instrument under the laws of two or more tax jurisdictions to achieve double non-taxation. These types of arrangements are frequently created with the sole purpose to reduce corporate taxation, resulting in a substantial erosion of the taxable bases of corporate taxpayers in the EU. Hence, it has been necessary to lay down rules against these types of arrangements. Taxpayers in the EU also take advantage of hybrid mismatches to reduce their overall tax liability in the EU through engagement in cross-border structures involving third countries. I voted in favour because I believe that this proposed directive is a fundamental step in to counter hybrid mismatches involving third countries in order to neutralize hybrid mismatch arrangements.
Agreement on Operational and Strategic Cooperation between Denmark and Europol (A8-0164/2017 - Agustín Díaz de Mera García Consuegra)
I voted in favour of the report on the draft Council implementing decision approving the conclusion by the European Police Office (Europol) of the Agreement on Operational and Strategic Cooperation between the Kingdom of Denmark and Europol. Denmark is currently fully participating in Europol, which operates under the existing Council Decision (2009/371/JHA). However, Denmark could not take part in the adoption of the new Europol Regulation and is not subject to its application. The new Europol Regulation will start to apply on 1 May 2017, on which date the existing Europol Council Decision will automatically be repealed. In the joint statement between the EU and Denmark it is proposed, in order to minimise the negative effects of the Danish departure from Europol, that Denmark will be associated to Europol in the form of an operational cooperation agreement. I voted in favour because I believe that a sudden departure of Denmark from Europol without a smooth transition regime into some form of an association between Denmark and Europol, could lead to operational gaps and reduce the EU’s capacity to effectively fight organised crime and terrorism.
Annual report on the control of the financial activities of the European Investment Bank for 2015 (A8-0161/2017 - Nedzhmi Ali)
I voted in favour of the report on the annual report on the control of the financial activities of the EIB for 2015. The EIB is treaty-bound to contribute to EU integration, economic and social cohesion and regional development through dedicated investment instruments such as loans, equities, guarantees, risk-sharing facilities and advisory services. The EIB, as the biggest public lender in the world, operates in the international capital markets, offering competitive terms to clients and favourable conditions to support EU policies and projects. The report welcomes the EIB’s annual reports for 2015 and its achievements presented therein, and the efforts achieved for a better presentation and reporting the EIB’s contribution and results. It emphasises that all EIB-financed activities must be part of and steadily consistent with the EU’s general strategy and political priority areas as defined in the Europe 2020 strategy, the Growth and Employment Facility and the Compact for Growth and Jobs. I voted in favour because I believe that it is fundamental that the EIB keep its triple-A rating in order to preserve its access to international capital markets under the best borrowing conditions and to pass on the benefits in its investment strategy and lending conditions.
Structural Reform Support Programme for 2017-2020 (A8-0374/2016 - Lambert van Nistelrooij, Constanze Krehl)
I voted in favour of the Report on the proposal for a regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council on the establishment of the Structural Reform Support Programme for the period 2017 to 2020 and amending Regulations (EU) No 1303/2013 and (EU) No 1305/2013. As a consequence of the economic crisis, the need for structural reforms has emerged stronger and more urgent than ever in the European Union. Six years after the launch of the Europe 2020 strategy, this pledge is far from being met. The process of properly designing and implementing reforms can be very arduous and requires strong analytical, planning and managing capacities, as well as access to information and adequate human resources. I believe that the Commission proposal to establish the Structural Reform Support Programme providing assistance for a broad spectrum of reforms is a welcome initiative, as all EU Member States should be offered the possibility to ask and receive support for moving forward on the way of reforms that can create a healthy economic environment, boost growth and employment and improve the living standards of their citizens. I am of the opinion that all successful reforms will eventually lead to increased social, economic and territorial cohesion in the EU.
European Year of Cultural Heritage (A8-0340/2016 - Mircea Diaconu)
I voted in favour of the Report on the proposal for a decision of the European Parliament and of the Council on a European Year of Cultural Heritage. Since the adoption of the European Agenda for Culture in 2007, cultural heritage has been a priority under successive Council Work Plans for Culture, including the current plan for the period 2015-2018. The heritage sector in Europe is facing many challenges. Against this backdrop, the main objective is to raise awareness of the challenges and opportunities and highlight the role of the EU in promoting shared solutions. I voted in favour because I believe that the European Year shall contribute to promoting the role of European cultural heritage as a pivotal component of cultural diversity and intercultural dialogue.
Union programme to support specific activities in the field of financial reporting and auditing (A8-0291/2016 - Theodor Dumitru Stolojan)
I voted in favour of the Report on the proposal for a regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council amending Regulation (EU) No 258/2014 establishing a Union Programme to support specific activities in the field of financial reporting and auditing for the period of 2014-20. In 2009, the European Parliament and the Council established a Community Programme to support specific activities in the field of financial services, financial reporting and auditing. The European Financial Reporting Advisory Group (EFRAG) was established in 2001 as a private organisation to provide the Commission with technical expertise in financial reporting matters. EFRAG is now well equipped to strengthen the legitimacy of its positions and significantly contribute to the objective of Europe speaking with one voice. I voted in favour because I believe that it is appropriate to propose to continue financing of EFRAG for the period 2017-2020 in order to meet the long-term objectives of the Union programme to support specific activities in the field of financial reporting and auditing.
Union programme to enhance the involvement of consumers in financial services policy making (A8-0008/2017 - Philippe Lamberts)
I voted in favour of the Report on the proposal for a regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council on establishing a Union programme to support specific activities enhancing the involvement of consumers and other financial services end-users in Union policy making in the field of financial services for the period of 2017-2020. In 2007, the confidence of financial services’ end-users’ was shaken by the financial and economic crisis. Therefore, the European legislators considered that the concerns of consumers and other financial services end-users should be systematically and adequately taken into account to restore citizens’ confidence in the soundness of the financial sector. The proposal seeks to establish a Union programme for the period from 1 January 2017 to 31 December 2020 to support the activities of the organisations Finance Watch and Better Finance who contribute to the achievement of the policy objectives of the Union in relation to enhancing the involvement of consumers and other financial services end-users, as well as stakeholders representing their interests in Union policy making in the field of financial services. I voted in favour because I believe that the Programme will further enhance the participation of consumers and other financial services end-users.
Discharge 2015: EU general budget - European Commission and executive agencies (A8-0150/2017 - Joachim Zeller)
I voted in favour of the Report on discharge in respect of the implementation of the general budget of the European Union for the financial year 2015, Section III – Commission and executive agencies because it is in accordance with the general budget of the European Union for the financial year 2015.
Discharge 2015: Court of Auditors' special reports in the context of the 2015 Commission discharge (A8-0160/2017 - Joachim Zeller)
Discharge 2015: EU general budget - 8th, 9th, 10th and 11th EDFs (A8-0125/2017 - Younous Omarjee)
Discharge 2015: EU general budget - European Parliament (A8-0153/2017 - Dennis de Jong)
Discharge 2015: EU general budget - European Council and Council (A8-0131/2017 - Bart Staes)
Discharge 2015: EU general budget - European Court of Justice (A8-0136/2017 - Benedek Jávor)
Discharge 2015: EU general budget - European Court of Auditors (A8-0151/2017 - Benedek Jávor)
Discharge 2015: EU general budget - European Economic and Social Committee (A8-0144/2017 - Bart Staes)
I voted in favour of the Report on discharge in respect of the implementation of the general budget of the European Union for the financial year 2015, Section VI – European Economic and Social Committee because it is in accordance with the general budget of the European Union for the financial year 2015.
Discharge 2015: EU general budget - Committee of the Regions (A8-0141/2017 - Bart Staes)
Discharge 2015: EU general budget - European External Action Service (A8-0122/2017 - Benedek Jávor)
Discharge 2015: EU general budget - European Ombudsman (A8-0142/2017 - Benedek Jávor)
Discharge 2015: EU general budget - European Data Protection Supervisor (A8-0140/2017 - Bart Staes)
I voted in favour of the Report on discharge in respect of the implementation of the general budget of the European Union for the financial year 2015, Section IX – European Data Protection Supervisor because it is in accordance with the general budget of the European Union for the financial year 2015.
Discharge 2015: Performance, financial management and control of EU agencies (A8-0149/2017 - Inés Ayala Sender)
I voted in favour of the Report on discharge in respect of the implementation of the budget of the European Union agencies for the financial year 2015: performance, financial management and control because it is in accordance with the general budget of the European Union for the financial year 2015.
Discharge 2015: Agency for the Cooperation of Energy Regulators (ACER) (A8-0147/2017 - Inés Ayala Sender)
Discharge 2015: Office of the Body of European Regulators for Electronic Communications (BEREC) (A8-0143/2017 - Inés Ayala Sender)
I voted in favour of the Report on discharge in respect of the implementation of the budget of the Office of the Body of European Regulators for Electronic Communications for the financial year 2015 because it is in accordance with the general budget of the European Union for the financial year 2015.
Discharge 2015: Translation Centre for the Bodies of the European Union (CdT) (A8-0075/2017 - Inés Ayala Sender)
Discharge 2015: European Centre for the Development of Vocational Training (Cedefop) (A8-0145/2017 - Inés Ayala Sender)
Discharge 2015: European Police College (CEPOL) (A8-0081/2017 - Inés Ayala Sender)
I voted in favour of the Report on discharge in respect of the implementation of the budget of the European Police College (now European Union Agency for Law Enforcement Training) (CEPOL) for the financial year 2015 because it is in accordance with the general budget of the European Union for the financial year 2015.
Discharge 2015: European Aviation Safety Agency (EASA) (A8-0087/2017 - Inés Ayala Sender)
Discharge 2015: European Asylum Support Office (EASO) (A8-0093/2017 - Inés Ayala Sender)
Discharge 2015: European Banking Authority (EBA) (A8-0079/2017 - Inés Ayala Sender)
Discharge 2015: European Centre for Disease Prevention and Control (ECDC) (C8-0293/2016)
Discharge 2015: European Chemicals Agency (ECHA) (A8-0086/2017 - Inés Ayala Sender)
Discharge 2015: European Environment Agency (EEA) (A8-0085/2017 - Inés Ayala Sender)
Discharge 2015: European Fisheries Control Agency (EFCA) (A8-0100/2017 - Inés Ayala Sender)
Discharge 2015: European Institute of Innovation and Technology (EIT) (A8-0127/2017 - Inés Ayala Sender)
Discharge 2015: European Medicines Agency (EMA) (A8-0084/2017 - Inés Ayala Sender)
Discharge 2015: European Monitoring Centre for Drugs and Drug Addiction (EMCDDA) (A8-0099/2017 - Inés Ayala Sender)
Discharge 2015: European Maritime Safety Agency (EMSA) (A8-0130/2017 - Inés Ayala Sender)
Discharge 2015: European Network and Information Security Agency (ENISA) (A8-0115/2017 - Inés Ayala Sender)
Discharge 2015: European Police Office (Europol) (A8-0107/2017 - Inés Ayala Sender)
Discharge 2015: European Union Agency for Fundamental Rights (FRA) (A8-0146/2017 - Inés Ayala Sender)
Discharge 2015: European Agency for the Management of Operational Cooperation at the External Borders of the Member States of the European Union (Frontex) (A8-0137/2017 - Inés Ayala Sender)
I voted in favour of the report on discharge in respect of the implementation of the budget of the European Agency for the Management of Operational Cooperation at the External Borders of the Member States of the European Union (now European Border and Coast Guard Agency (Frontex)) for the financial year 2015 because it is in accordance with the general budget of the European Union for the financial year 2015.
Discharge 2015: European GNSS Agency (GSA) (A8-0148/2017 - Inés Ayala Sender)
Discharge 2015: Bio-based Industries Joint Undertaking (BBI) (A8-0103/2017 - Miroslav Poche)
Discharge 2015: Clean Sky 2 Joint Undertaking (A8-0094/2017 - Miroslav Poche)
Discharge 2015: ECSEL Joint Undertaking (A8-0113/2017 - Miroslav Poche)
Discharge 2015: Fuel Cells and Hydrogen 2 Joint Undertaking (FCH) (A8-0109/2017 - Miroslav Poche)
Discharge 2015: Innovative Medicines Initiative 2 Joint Undertaking (IMI) (A8-0083/2017 - Miroslav Poche)
Discharge 2015: ITER Joint Undertaking (A8-0108/2017 - Miroslav Poche)
I voted in favour of the Report on discharge in respect of the implementation of the budget of the European Joint Undertaking for ITER and the Development of Fusion Energy (Fusion for Energy) for the financial year 2015 because it is in accordance with the general budget of the European Union for the financial year 2015.
Discharge 2015: SESAR Joint Undertaking (A8-0096/2017 - Miroslav Poche)
Wholesale roaming markets (A8-0372/2016 - Miapetra Kumpula-Natri)
I voted in favour of the Report on the proposal for a regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council amending Regulation (EU) No 531/2012 as regards rules for wholesale roaming markets. Regulation (EU) 2015/2120, the Telecoms Single Market (‘TSM’) Regulation, adopted in 2015 provided for the abolition of retail roaming charges on voice calls, data and SMS as of 15 June 2017: so-called Roam Like at Home (RLAH). For RLAH to come into effect, legislation adapting the price caps for wholesale roaming services has to be applicable by that date.The wholesale prices for data have decreased on the markets for years and there is no reason to believe that this development would not continue. The decreasing prices are very much linked to the rapidly growing usage of data all over the world. Increased data usage will also drive new investments into infrastructure, enabling both domestic and visiting consumers to use even more data. I voted in favour because I believe that there would still be room for both competition and cost recovery even with a lowered wholesale cap also for voice calls.
European Solidarity Corps (B8-0238/2017)
I voted in favour of the resolution on the European Solidarity Corps. The foundations of the European Union are based on fundamental ideas, values and principles, which are agreed and subscribed to by the Member States. The EU institutions and the Member States need to take a strong stand to actively support the civic involvement of citizens and recognise that volunteering contributes to strengthening the sense of solidarity, social responsibility, and shared common citizenship values and experiences. The Resolution underlines the need to guarantee equal access to the ESC for all EU citizens and encourages stronger promotion of the possibilities available to people with special needs and people from disadvantaged backgrounds to participate in the initiative. I voted in favour because I strongly believe that while the learning component, including that conducted through non-formal and informal education experience, and the impact on the individual volunteer are important elements, the ESC’s main goal should be to achieve a positive impact on the entire community as a clear expression of solidarity and social responsibility.
Adequacy of the protection afforded by the EU-US privacy Shield (B8-0235/2017, B8-0244/2017)
I voted in favour of the resolution on the adequacy of the protection afforded by the EU-US Privacy Shield. In 2015 the Court of Justice of the European Union invalidated the EU-US Safe Harbour decision on the exchange of personal data on the grounds that it provided insufficient protection for EU citizens’ data protection rights. Subsequently, in 2016, the Commission negotiated a new agreement, the EU-US Privacy Shield. The resolution notes that while the Safe Harbour Framework did not refer to any specific limitations on US Government access to data transferred to the US, the EU-US Privacy Shield Framework documentation now includes binding commitments of the US Government in the form of letters from the Director of National Intelligence, the US Secretary of State and the US Department of Justice. I voted in favour because I believe that the introduction of the EU-US Privacy Shield will have positive impact on companies that will no longer be left in legal limbo, as the EU-US Privacy Shield Framework provides a legal base for the data transfer.
Negotiations with the United Kingdom following its notification that it intends to withdraw from the European Union (RC-B8-0237/2017, B8-0237/2017, B8-0241/2017, B8-0242/2017, B8-0243/2017)
I voted in favour of the Resolution on negotiations with the United Kingdom following its notification that it intends to withdraw from the European Union. The notification by the United Kingdom Government to the European Council begins the process by which the United Kingdom will cease to be a Member State of the European Union and the Treaties will no longer apply to it. This will be an unprecedented and regrettable event as a Member State has never withdrawn from the European Union before. However, that withdrawal must be arranged in an orderly fashion so as not to negatively affect the European Union, its citizens and the process of European integration. The Resolution calls for the negotiations between the European Union and the United Kingdom, as provided for in Article 50(2) of the Treaty on European Union, to begin as soon as possible. It emphasizes that the mandate and the negotiating directives applying throughout the whole negotiation process must fully reflect the positions and interests of the citizens of the EU-27, including those of Ireland. I voted in favour because I believe that the negotiations between the European Union and the United Kingdom must be conducted in good faith and full transparency.
Certain aspects of company law (A8-0088/2017 - Tadeusz Zwiefka)
I voted in favour of the Report on the proposal for a directive of the European Parliament and of the Council relating to certain aspects of company law (codified text). In the interests of clarity and rationality, this proposal seeks to codify the following directives: Sixth Council Directive (82/891/EEC), Eleventh Council Directive (89/666/EEC), Directive 2005/56/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council, Directive 2009/101/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council, Directive 2011/35/EU of the European Parliament and of the Council, Directive 2012/30/EU of the European Parliament and of the Council. The new Directive will supersede the various acts incorporated in it. I voted in favour because the proposal fully preserves the content of the acts being codified and hence does no more than bring them together with only such formal amendments as are required by the codification exercise itself.
Ratification and accession to the 2010 Protocol to the Hazardous and Noxious Substances Convention with the exception of aspects related to judicial cooperation in civil matters (A8-0076/2017 - Pavel Svoboda)
I voted in favour of the Recommendation on the draft Council decision on the ratification and accession by Member States, in the interest of the European Union, to the Protocol of 2010 to the International Convention on Liability and Compensation for Damage in Connection with the Carriage of Hazardous and Noxious Substances by Sea, with the exception of aspects related to judicial cooperation in civil matters. The International Convention on Liability and Compensation for Damage in connection with the Carriage of Hazardous and Noxious Substances by Sea 1996 deals with liability and compensation for damages arising from the carriage of Hazardous and Noxious Substances by sea, including liquefied natural gas and liquefied petroleum gas. The 2010 Protocol to the 1996 HNS Convention contained amendments to address problems identified in the 1996 HNS Convention. I voted in favour because so long as all Member States do not ratify the Convention, the mutually exclusive application of the ELD and the HNS Convention cannot be guaranteed and as a result there would be a risk that the industry will be subjected to two different regimes at the same time, the EU and international one, which could also create a disparity for the victims.
Ratification and accession to the 2010 Protocol to the Hazardous and Noxious Substances Convention with regard to aspects related to judicial cooperation in civil matters (A8-0078/2017 - Pavel Svoboda)
I voted in favour of the Recommendation on the draft Council decision on the ratification and accession by Member States, in the interest of the European Union, to the Protocol of 2010 to the International Convention on Liability and Compensation for Damage in Connection with the Carriage of Hazardous and Noxious Substances by Sea, with regard to the aspects related to judicial cooperation in civil matters. The International Convention on Liability and Compensation for Damage in connection with the Carriage of Hazardous and Noxious Substances by Sea 1996 deals with liability and compensation for damages arising from the carriage of Hazardous and Noxious Substances by sea. The 2010 Protocol to the 1996 HNS Convention contained amendments to address problems identified in the 1996 HNS Convention. Neither the 1996 HNS Convention, nor the 2010 Protocol to the HNS Convention have entered into force. I voted in favour because I believe that in light of the highly specific nature of the jurisdiction regime of the HNS Convention as well as due to the anticipated legal and practical difficulties in applying a separate jurisdiction regime within the Union, an exception to the general application of the recast Brussels I Regulation is justified.
Application of the provisions of the Schengen acquis relating to the Schengen Information System in Croatia (A8-0073/2017 - Nuno Melo)
I voted in favour of the Report on the proposal for a Council decision on the application of the provisions of the Schengen acquis in the area of the Schengen Information System in the Republic of Croatia. In line with Article 4(2) of Croatia’s Act of Accession to the European Union, certain provisions of the Schengen acquis are already applicable in Croatia from the date of accession, while other provisions only apply pursuant to a Council Decision to that effect after verification that the necessary conditions for the application of all parts of that acquis have been met. The present draft decision concerning the application of the provisions relating to the Schengen Information System (SIS) in Croatia is a very first step towards lifting checks at the EU internal borders to Croatia. The lifting of borders will be subject to a separate Council decision at a later stage, following further evaluations. I voted in favour because I believe that a Working Group on Schengen Scrutiny should be set up within the LIBE Committee.
Medical devices (A8-0068/2017 - Glenis Willmott)
I voted in favour of the Recommendation for second reading on the Council position at first reading with a view to the adoption of a regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council on medical devices, amending Directive 2001/83/EC, Regulation (EC) No 178/2002 and Regulation (EC) No 1223/2009 and repealing Council Directives 90/385/EEC and 93/42/EEC. The medical devices regulatory system in Europe was shaken by a number of device scandals that exemplified the existing weaknesses and stressed the urgent need to tighten up the loose ends in the framework. The Commission proposal and the subsequently agreed text for a new regulation replacing all existing directives seek to efficiently address weaknesses while still maintaining and strengthening the current approval system. The initial Commission proposal was a solid starting point which was further strengthened by the subsequent amendments by Parliament and Council. I voted in favour because I believe that new additional provisions and structures will fill in the gaps and increase the levels of protection of public health and safety while ensuring clear rules with regard to the roles and obligations of all actors operating on the market, without stifling the innovation that is an essential element of this industry.
In vitro diagnostic medical devices (A8-0069/2017 - Peter Liese)
I voted in favour of the Recommendation for second reading on the Council position at first reading with a view to the adoption of a regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council on in vitro diagnostic medical devices and repealing Directive 98/79/EC and Commission Decision 2010/227/EU. The medical devices regulatory system in Europe was shaken by a number of device scandals which exemplified the existing weaknesses and stressed the urgent need to tighten up the loose ends in the framework. For example, there has been an HIV test on the market for many years, which significantly more often than not showed false negative results. That means the test was negative even though the HIV virus was present. The Commission proposal and the subsequently agreed text for a new regulation replacing all existing directives seeks to efficiently address such weaknesses while still maintaining and strengthening the current approval system. The initial Commission proposal was a solid starting point which was further strengthened by the subsequent amendments by Parliament and Council. I voted in favour because I believe that new additional provisions and structures will fill in the gaps and increase the levels of protection of public health and safety.
Money market funds (A8-0041/2015 - Neena Gill)
I voted in favour of the Report on the proposal for a regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council on Money Market Funds. Money market funds (MMF) provide short-term finance to financial institutions, corporates or governments. Therefore, MMFs contribute to the financing of the European economy. Such entities use their investments in MMFs as an efficient way to spread their credit risk and exposure, rather than relying solely on bank deposits. MMFs are used by a wide range of entities including charities, housing associations, local authorities and larger professional investors such as corporations and pension funds seeking to invest their excess cash for a short time frame. MMFs, therefore, represent a crucial link bringing together demand and offer of short-term money. The Regulation lays down rules concerning the financial instruments eligible for investment by a MMF, its portfolio and valuation, and the reporting requirements. I voted in favour because I believe that the new uniform rules on MMFs respect the fundamental rights and observe the principles recognised in particular by the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union and notably consumer protection, the freedom to conduct a business and the protection of personal data.
Prospectus to be published when securities are offered to the public or admitted to trading (A8-0238/2016 - Petr Ježek)
I voted in favour of the Report on the proposal for a regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council on the prospectus to be published when securities are offered to the public or admitted to trading. The current Prospectus Directive 2003/71/EC harmonises rules for publishing prospectuses when companies want to raise capital either by listing shares or by offering investment opportunities to the general public. The prospectus must contain the necessary information for investors to make an informed investment decision. As part of the Capital Markets Union, the Commission has proposed an overhaul of the Prospectus Directive with a view to making it easier and less expensive for companies, particularly SMEs to raise capital and to provide clear information for potential investors, including retail investors. I voted in favour because I believe that this proposal constitutes an essential step towards the completion of the Capital Markets Union as set out in the Communication from the Commission to the European Parliament, the Council, the European Economic and Social Committee and the Committee of the Regions, entitled ‘Action Plan on Building a Capital Markets Union’ of 30 September 2015.
Multiannual financial framework for 2014-2020 (A8-0110/2017 - Jan Olbrycht, Isabelle Thomas)
I voted in favour of the Recommendation on the draft Council regulation amending Regulation (EU, Euratom) No 1311/2013 laying down the multiannual financial framework for the years 2014-2020. Special instruments have been extensively used in the first years of implementation of the 2014-2020 multiannual financial framework (MFF) to address new challenges which have arisen in the European neighbourhood and called for swift and comprehensive Union action to deal with their far-reaching humanitarian and security implications. In order to maintain a sufficient capacity for the Union to react to unforeseen circumstances with particular focus on the new challenges, the Emergency Aid Reserve and the Flexibility Instrument should be reinforced, the temporal restrictions regarding the constitution of the global margin for commitments should be removed and the scope of the global margin for commitments should be expanded. I voted in favour because I believe that specific and maximum possible flexibility should be ensured by providing for unused amounts from the European Union Solidarity Fund and the European Globalisation Adjustment Fund to be made available to the Flexibility Instrument.
Multiannual financial framework for 2014-2020 (Resolution) (A8-0117/2017 - Jan Olbrycht, Isabelle Thomas)
I voted in favour of the Report containing a motion for a non-legislative resolution on the draft Council regulation amending Regulation (EU, Euratom) No 1311/2013 laying down the multiannual financial framework for the years 2014-2020. The European Parliament and the Council call on the Commission to continue closely scrutinising the implementation of the 2014-2020 programmes in order to ensure an orderly progression of payment appropriations consistent with the authorised commitment appropriations. As an equal arm of the budgetary authority, the European Parliament will exercise fully its prerogatives, which will not be compromised by any political declaration. The European Parliament intends to examine any Commission proposals on a case-by-case basis, in order to ensure that no reduction is sustained on key Union programmes, notably if they are conducive to growth and jobs or respond to current pressing needs and present a high implementation rate. I voted in favour because I believe that should the downwards trend in youth unemployment observed since 2013 reverse again, consideration should be given to increase the funding for the Youth Employment Initiative beyond the amount of EUR 1.2 billion agreed in the framework of the mid-term review/revision of the multiannual financial framework (MFF) 2014-2020.
Mobilisation of the Contingency Margin (A8-0104/2017 - Jan Olbrycht, Isabelle Thomas)
I voted in favour of the Report on the proposal for a decision of the European Parliament and of the Council amending Decision (EU) 2015/435 on the mobilisation of the Contingency Margin. In 2014 the European Parliament and the Council mobilised the contingency margin in the amount of EUR 3 168 233 715 in payment appropriations. An amount of EUR 350 million was included in the mobilisation of the Contingency Margin pending an agreement on the treatment of payments for special instruments. According to the medium-term payment forecast, pressure on the annual payment ceilings in the years 2018-2020 is to be expected. The budget for the year 2017 shows a margin below the payment ceiling of EUR 9.8 billion, allowing for the offsetting of the full amount mobilised in 2014. The Report emphasises that the exclusion of the remaining amount of EUR 350 million from the offsetting confirms Parliament’s long standing position that payment appropriations for special instruments are counted over and above the MFF ceilings. I voted in favour because I believe that the amount of EUR 2 818 233 715 shall be offset against the margin under the payment ceiling for the year 2017.
Estimates of revenue and expenditure for the financial year 2018 – Section I – European Parliament (A8-0156/2017 - Richard Ashworth)
I voted in favour of the Report on Parliament’s estimates of revenue and expenditure for the financial year 2018. The 2018 budget, as proposed in the Secretary-General’s report, is being prepared against the backdrop of an increase in the ceiling for heading V when compared to 2017, allowing more room for growth and investment as well as continuing to implement policies of achieving savings and seeking to improve efficiency. Seven priority objectives have been proposed by the Secretary-General for the 2018 budget, namely: launching the communication campaign in preparation for the 2019 elections, consolidating the security measures taken, continuing the multiannual building projects, investing in the digitisation and computerisation of procedures, continuing to implement the measures needed to introduce Irish as a full official language, analysing the possible impact of Brexit and encouraging a green approach to transport. The Report stresses that the share of Parliament’s budget in 2018 should be maintained under 20% of heading V. I voted in favour because I believe that savings are required and all efforts to strive for a more efficient and transparent use of public money are strongly encouraged.
Draft Amending Budget No 1/2017 accompanying the proposal to mobilise the EU Solidarity Fund to provide assistance to the United Kingdom, Cyprus and Portugal (A8-0155/2017 - Jens Geier)
I voted in favour of the Report on the Council position on Draft amending budget No 1/2017 to the general budget for 2017 accompanying the proposal to mobilise the European Union Solidarity Fund to provide assistance to the United Kingdom, Cyprus and Portugal. Draft amending budget No 1/2017 relates to the mobilisation of the European Union Solidarity Fund (EUSF) for an amount of EUR 71 524 810 in relation to the floods that occurred in the United Kingdom during December 2015 to January 2016, drought and fires in Cyprus between October 2015 and June 2016 and fires on the Portuguese island of Madeira in August 2016. The purpose of Draft amending budget No 1/2017 is to formally enter this budgetary adjustment into the 2017 Union budget. The EUSF is a special instrument as defined in the MFF Regulation, and the corresponding commitment and payments appropriations are to be budgeted over and above the MFF ceilings. The Report stresses the urgent need to release financial assistance through the EUSF to the regions affected by the natural disasters.
Mobilisation of the European Globalisation Adjustment Fund: application EGF/2017/000 TA 2017 - Technical assistance at the initiative of the Commission (A8-0157/2017 - Victor Negrescu)
I voted in favour of the Report on the proposal for a decision of the European Parliament and of the Council on mobilisation of the European Globalisation Adjustment Fund (EGF/2017/000 TA 2017 - Technical assistance at the initiative of the Commission). The European Globalisation Adjustment Fund was created in order to provide additional assistance to workers suffering from the consequences of major structural changes in world trade patterns. According to the provisions of Article 12 of Regulation (EU, Euratom) No 1311/2013 laying down the multiannual financial framework for the years 2014-2020 and of Article 15 of Regulation (EU) No 1309/2013, the Fund may not exceed a maximum annual amount of EUR 150 million. The appropriate amounts are entered into the general budget of the Union as a provision. On 28 February 2017, the Commission adopted a new proposal for a decision on the mobilisation of the EGF. It concerns the mobilisation of EUR 310 000 from the Fund, covering technical assistance for the Commission. The objective of the technical assistance is to finance monitoring, information, to create a knowledge base interface and to advice Member States on using, following up and evaluating the EGF.
Mobilisation of the EU Solidarity Fund to provide assistance to the United Kingdom, Cyprus and Portugal (A8-0154/2017 - José Manuel Fernandes)
I voted in favour of the Report on the proposal for a decision of the European Parliament and of the Council on the mobilisation of the European Union Solidarity Fund to provide assistance to the United Kingdom, Cyprus and Portugal. The Commission proposes to mobilise the European Union Solidarity Fund (EUSF) to grant financial assistance relating to floods in the United Kingdom, drought and fires in Cyprus and fires in Portugal. During December 2015 and January 2016, 11 regions in the United Kingdom were affected by heavy rainfall and strong winds, which led to flooding and infrastructure damage. From October 2015 to June 2016, Cyprus suffered from very low precipitation combined with extremely high temperatures, leading to severe drought with important crop failure, forest and vegetation fires and scarcity of water. Between 8 and 13 August 2016, the Portuguese island of Madeira suffered from large wild fires, burning an area of 6 000 hectares. The proposed mobilisation requires an amendment to the 2017 budget and a draft amending budget (N°1/2017), aiming at increasing budget article 13 06 01 by EUR 71 524 810 both in commitment and in payment appropriations.
Automated data exchange with regard to dactyloscopic data in Latvia (A8-0089/2017 - Claude Moraes)
I voted in favour of the Report on the draft Council implementing decision on the automated data exchange with regard to dactyloscopic data in Latvia, and replacing Decision 2014/911/EU. Council Decision 2008/615/JHA on the stepping up of cross-border cooperation, particularly in combating terrorism and cross-border crime, confers upon the Council implementing powers with a view to adopting measures necessary to implement that Decision, in particular as regards the receipt and supply of personal data provided for under that Decision. The supply of personal data provided for under that Decision may not take place until the general provisions on data protection have been implemented in the national law of the territories of the Member States involved in such supply. Council Decision 2008/616/JHA provides that the verification that the condition with respect to automated data exchange has been met is to be done on the basis of an evaluation report based on a questionnaire, an evaluation visit and a pilot run. An overall evaluation report, the evaluation visit and the pilot run has been presented to the Council. Therefore, I believe that Latvia should be authorised to receive and supply personal data for the purpose of automated searching of dactyloscopic data.
Automated data exchange with regard to DNA data in Slovakia, Portugal, Latvia, Lithuania, Czech Republic, Estonia, Hungary, Cyprus, Poland, Sweden, Malta and Belgium (A8-0091/2017 - Judith Sargentini)
I voted in favour of the Report on the draft Council implementing decision on the automated data exchange with regard to DNA data in Slovakia, Portugal, Latvia, Lithuania, Czech Republic, Estonia, Hungary, Cyprus, Poland, Sweden, Malta and Belgium. Council Decision 2008/615/JHA on the stepping up of cross-border cooperation confers upon the Council implementing powers with a view to adopting measures necessary to implement that Decision, in particular as regards the receipt and supply of personal data provided for under that Decision. The supply of personal data may not take place until the general provisions on data protection have been implemented in the national law of the territories of the Member States involved in such supply. Council Decision 2008/616/JHA provides that the verification that the condition with respect to automated data exchange has been met is to be done on the basis of an evaluation report, an evaluation visit and a pilot run. The overall evaluation reports, the evaluation visit and the pilot run have been presented to the Council what should authorise these countries to be entitled to receive and supply personal data for the purpose of automated searching and comparison of DNA data.
Automated data exchange with regard to dactyloscopic data in Slovakia, Bulgaria, France, Czech Republic, Lithuania, the Netherlands, Hungary, Cyprus, Estonia, Malta, Romania and Finland (A8-0092/2017 - Tomáš Zdechovský)
I voted in favour of the Report on the draft Council implementing decision on the automated data exchange with regard to dactyloscopic data in Slovakia, Bulgaria, France, Czech Republic, Lithuania, the Netherlands, Hungary, Cyprus, Estonia, Malta, Romania and Finland. Council Decision 2008/615/JHA on the stepping up of cross-border cooperation confers upon the Council implementing powers with a view to adopting measures necessary to implement that Decision, in particular as regards the receipt and supply of personal data. The supply of personal data provided for under that Decision may not take place until the general provisions on data protection have been implemented in the national law of the territories of the Member States involved in such supply. Council Decision 2008/616/JHA provides that the verification that the condition with respect to automated data exchange has been met is to be done on the basis of an evaluation report based on a questionnaire, an evaluation visit and a pilot run. The overall evaluation reports, the evaluation visit and the pilot run have been presented to the Council what should authorise these countries to be entitled to receive and supply personal data for the purpose of automated searching of dactyloscopic data.
Automatic exchange of data concerning vehicles registered in Finland, Slovenia, Romania, Poland, Sweden, Lithuania, Bulgaria, Slovakia and Hungary (A8-0095/2017 - Filiz Hyusmenova)
I voted in favour of the Report on the draft Council implementing decision on the automated data exchange with regard to vehicle registration data in Finland, Slovenia, Romania, Poland, Sweden, Lithuania, Bulgaria, Slovakia and Hungary. Council Decision 2008/615/JHA on the stepping up of cross-border cooperation confers upon the Council implementing powers with a view to adopting measures necessary to implement that Decision. The supply of personal data provided for under that Decision may not take place until the general provisions on data protection have been implemented in the national law of the territories of the Member States involved in such supply. Council Decision 2008/616/JHA provides that the verification that the condition with respect to automated data exchange has been met is to be done on the basis of an evaluation report based on a questionnaire, an evaluation visit and a pilot run. The overall evaluation reports, the evaluation visit and the pilot run concerning vehicle registration data in each of these Member States, have been presented to the Council what should authorise these countries to be entitled to receive and supply personal data for the purposes of the automated searching of vehicle registration data.
Automated data exchange with regard to vehicle registration data in Malta, Cyprus and Estonia (A8-0090/2017 - Maria Grapini)
I voted in favour of the Report on the draft Council implementing decision on the automated data exchange with regard to vehicle registration data in Malta, Cyprus and Estonia, and replacing Decisions 2014/731/EU, 2014/743/EU and 2014/744/EU. Council Decision 2008/615/JHA on the stepping up of cross-border cooperation confers upon the Council implementing powers with a view to adopting measures necessary to implement that Decision. The supply of personal data provided for under that Decision may not take place until the general provisions on data protection have been implemented in the national law of the territories of the Member States involved in such supply. Council Decision 2008/616/JHA provides that the verification that the condition with respect to automated data exchange has been met is to be done on the basis of an evaluation report based on a questionnaire, an evaluation visit and a pilot run. The overall evaluation reports, summarising the results of the questionnaire, the evaluation visit and the pilot run concerning vehicle registration data in Malta, Cyprus and Estonia, have been presented to the Council what should authorise these countries to receive and supply personal data for the purposes of the automated searching of vehicle registration data.
Genetically modified maize Bt11 × 59122 × MIR604 × 1507 × GA21 (B8-0236/2017)
I voted in favour of the Resolution on the draft Commission implementing decision authorising the placing on the market of products containing, consisting of, or produced from genetically modified maize Bt11 × 59122 × MIR604 × 1507 × GA21, and genetically modified maizes combining two, three or four of the events Bt11, 59122, MIR604, 1507 and GA21. On 1 July 2011 Syngenta submitted an application for the placing on the market of foods, food ingredients, and feed containing, consisting of, or produced from Bt11 × 59122 × MIR604 × 1507 × GA21 maize to the national competent authority of Germany in accordance with Articles 5 and 17 of Regulation (EC) No 1829/2003. That application also covered the placing on the market of genetically modified maize Bt11 × 59122 × MIR604 × 1507 × GA21 in products consisting of it or containing it for uses other than food and feed as any other maize, with the exception of cultivation. I voted in favour because the EFSA gave a favourable opinion with regard to the GM-maize Bt11 × 59122 × MIR604 × 1507 × GA21 and all of the sub-combinations covered by the scope of the application.
Addressing refugee and migrant movements: the role of EU External Action (A8-0045/2017 - Elena Valenciano, Agustín Díaz de Mera García Consuegra)
I voted in favour of the report on addressing refugee and migrant movements: the role of EU External Action. There is a humanitarian crisis affecting more than 65.3 million ‘displaced’ persons, including 21.3 million refugees and 40.8 million internally displaced persons. Those people are fleeing conflict and persecution; whereas 80% of migration takes place between countries with shared borders and very little difference in income. The report emphasises that migration is a global phenomenon that calls for a global response. It expresses its solidarity with people who are forced to leave their countries on account of a number of factors, such as conflict, persecution, exploitation, gender-based violence, human rights violations, extreme poverty and environmental problems, whether natural or man-made. I voted in favour because I believe that the EU and its Member States must lead by example in promoting and safeguarding the human rights of migrants in their internal and external policies, and cooperate with third countries whilst fully upholding international law, human rights, the principle of non-refoulement and the right to asylum.
Approval and market surveillance of motor vehicles and their trailers, and of systems, components and separate technical units intended for such vehicles (A8-0048/2017 - Daniel Dalton)
I voted in favour of the report on the proposal for a regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council on the approval and market surveillance of motor vehicles and their trailers, and of systems, components and separate technical units intended for such vehicles. Technical services play a key role in maintaining and complying with the high technical, safety and environmental standards of the Union. In 2016, the Commission published its proposal on type-approval and market surveillance requirements for motor vehicles and their trailers, currently set out in Directive 2007/46/EC. A comprehensive fitness check was performed on the Union’s type-approval system in 2013. The results showed that although the current system has met policy objectives to a certain extent, it has been widely criticised in the wake of the Volkswagen software manipulation scandal. I voted in favour because I believe that it is essential to reinforce the EU type-approval system, particularly by putting in place appropriate supervisory mechanisms to guarantee harmonised application of the procedures across the Member States. Furthermore, it is crucial that the legislation functions smoothly and does not lead to an increase of red tape, either for national administrations or for the industry.
Palm oil and deforestation of rainforests (A8-0066/2017 - Kateřina Konečná)
I voted in favour of the Report on palm oil and deforestation of rainforests. 20 years have not yet passed since palm oil became the world’s most widely used oil, and in this time it has also become one of the causes of the widespread devastation of diverse ecosystems in the tropics. Unfortunately, owing to the unprecedented speed at which this industry has expanded, not all of the dangers associated with the massive implementation of monoculture plantations were fully understood. Time has shown that the risks were underestimated, and negative connotations relating to the excessive and almost unregulated cultivation of this crop are now evident. Tropical ecosystems are facing their greatest challenge since the dawn of man. Not only is hugely valuable vegetation being lost, but so too are many animal species. The EU is the third largest market for palm oil, and it thus plays a significant role in what is happening in the tropical countries in which palm oil is being cultivated. I voted in favour because I believe that palm oil is becoming the root of numerous social and economic conflicts. The speed with which these changes are happening is alarming, and it therefore calls for an immediate response.
Women and their roles in rural areas (A8-0058/2017 - Marijana Petir, Maria Lidia Senra Rodríguez)
I voted in favour of the Report on women and their roles in rural areas. Social and economic circumstances and living conditions have changed substantially in recent decades and differ quite considerably between the Member States as well as within them. Women make significant contributions to the rural economy and the diversification measures and the concept of multifunctionality, as an essential basis for sustainable development strategies have opened up new opportunities for women. The Report emphasises the active role of women in rural areas and recognises women’s contribution to the economy in such areas as entrepreneurs, heads of the family business and promoters of sustainable development. It takes the view that, given the different roles, occupations and situations of women in rural areas, improving employment prospects requires tailored assistance and support for their needs and interests. I voted in favour because I believe that women’s participation in the labour market in rural areas includes a wide spectrum of jobs that goes beyond conventional agriculture. Moreover, women in rural areas can be agents of change in moving towards sustainable and ecologically sound agriculture and can play an important role in the creation of green jobs.
EU-Brazil Agreement: modification of concessions in the schedule of Croatia in the course of its accession (A8-0052/2017 - José Ignacio Salafranca Sánchez-Neyra)
I voted in favour of the recommendation on the draft Council decision on the conclusion of the Agreement in the form of an Exchange of Letters between the European Union and the Federative Republic of Brazil pursuant to Article XXIV:6 and Article XXVIII of the General Agreement on Tariffs and Trade 1994 relating to the modification of concessions in the schedule of the Republic of Croatia in the course of its accession to the EU. With the accession of the Republic of Croatia, the EU enlarged its Customs Union and was therefore required in compliance with WTO rules to enter into negotiations with the Federative Republic of Brazil regarding the tariff schedule of Croatia in order to eventually agree on a compensatory adjustment connected to the EU-28 as the EU’s external tariff regime results in an increase of tariffs for Brazil. Following the Agreement signed on 25 November 2016, the EU will incorporate in its schedule for the customs territory of the EU-28 that of the EU-27 with modifications related to tariff rate quotas on raw sugar and poultry meat. I voted in favour because I believe that this is a logical step in EU-Brazil relations.
Launch of automated data exchange with regard to vehicle registration data in Denmark (A8-0051/2017 - Maria Grapini)
I voted in favour of the report on the draft Council implementing decision on the launch of automated data exchange with regard to vehicle registration data in Denmark. According to Decision 2008/615/JHA on the stepping up of cross-border cooperation, particularly in combating terrorism and cross-border crime, the supply of personal data provided for under that Decision may not take place until the general provisions on data protection set out in that Decision have been implemented in the national law of the territories of the Member States involved in such supply. Council Decision 2008/616/JHA on the implementation of Decision 2008/615/JHA provides that the verification that the condition has been met with respect to automated data exchange and is to be done on the basis of an evaluation report based on a questionnaire, an evaluation visit and a pilot run. Denmark has completed the questionnaire on data protection and the questionnaire on vehicle registration data exchange as well as a successful pilot run and an evaluation visit. The Council concluded that Denmark had fully implemented the general provisions on data protection. I voted in favour because I believe that, in case of Denmark, all the requirements have been met.
Launch of automated data exchange with regard to DNA data in Greece (A8-0053/2017 - Claude Moraes)
I voted in favour of the report on the draft Council implementing decision on the launch of automated data exchange with regard to DNA data in Greece. According to Decision 2008/615/JHA on the stepping up of cross-border cooperation, particularly in combating terrorism and cross-border crime, the supply of personal data provided for under that Decision may not take place until the general provisions on data protection set out in that Decision have been implemented in the national law of the territories of the Member States involved in such supply. Council Decision 2008/616/JHA on the implementation of Decision 2008/615/JHA provides that the verification that the above condition has been met with respect to automated data exchange and is to be done on the basis of an evaluation report based on: a questionnaire, an evaluation visit and a pilot run. Greece has completed the questionnaire on data protection and the questionnaire on DNA data exchange as well as successful pilot run and an evaluation visit. On 13 October 2016, the Council concluded that Greece had fully implemented the general provisions on data protection. I voted in favour because I believe that, in case of Greece, all the requirements have been met.
Food and feed law, rules on animal health and welfare, plant health and plant protection products (A8-0022/2017 - Karin Kadenbach)
I voted in favour of the recommendation for second reading on the Council position at first reading with a view to the adoption of a regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council on official controls and other official activities performed to ensure the application of food and feed law, rules on animal health and welfare, plant health and plant protection products. The purpose of this regulation is to lay down a harmonised approach governing the performance of official controls to ensure the uniform application of the agri-food chain rules across the EU. Union legislation provides for a set of harmonised rules. However, to ensure that this extensive set of rules is enforced by the Member States across the EU in a harmonised manner, a legislative framework for the organisation of official controls has been established through Regulation (EC) No 882/2004. The Commission proposes revising the legislation on official controls to overcome shortcomings identified in its wording and in its application. I voted in favour because I believe that the system should be simplified and clarified and that a single framework applicable to all official controls along the entire food chain should be established.
Use of the 470-790 MHz frequency band in the Union (A8-0327/2016 - Patrizia Toia)
I voted in favour of the report on the proposal for a decision of the European Parliament and of the Council on the use of the 470-790 MHz frequency band in the Union. Connectivity services are developing rapidly around the world and therefore call for speed, but also for communications networks that are able to transmit a large amount of data and reach not only densely populated areas, but also remote ones. The completion of the Digital Union also depends on new technologies for transmitting and receiving data, and therefore also on parts of the spectrum that are valuable for wireless communications. This proposal for a decision, adopted by the Commission on 2 February 2016, is one of the set of measures provided for in the Digital Single Market Strategy COM(2015)192. The aim of the proposal under consideration is to harmonise, at EU level, the allocation of frequencies, to provide businesses and citizens with universal high-speed wireless connectivity. I voted in favour because I believe that – given that by 2020, according to some statistics, mobile Internet traffic will increase by eight times compared to today – the capacity of the networks needs to be strengthened.
Obstacles to EU citizens’ freedom to move and work in the Internal Market (B8-0179/2017)
I voted in favour of the resolution on obstacles to EU citizens’ freedom to move and work in the internal market. The Committee on Petitions has received several petitions raising concerns about the different obstacles encountered by EU citizens in exercising their freedom of movement. The non-recognition by some Member States of LGBTI marriage or legal union can be an obstacle to the freedom of movement in the Union of these people and their partners, preventing them from accessing some social benefits or public services in those countries. The resolution stresses the principle of equal pay for equal work, and deplores the fact that some Member States deny social protection to EU non-national workers. Moreover, it urges the Member States to comply with current EU legislation and the fundamental principles of labour law in order to protect all EU workers. I voted in favour because I believe that the EU and its Member States must successfully address the lack of employment opportunities and inadequate social protection in workers’ home regions to ensure that mobility is voluntary.
Commission's approval of Germany's revised plan to introduce a road toll (B8-0180/2017)
I voted in favour of the European Parliament resolution on the Commission’s approval of Germany’s revised plan to introduce a road toll. It is currently under review whether the intended German road toll system on light-duty vehicles (LDVs) is in line with standing European Union policies. A reimbursement system directly or indirectly based on nationality is discriminatory, contradicts guiding principles of the European Union, hampers cross-border mobility and weakens the European single market. The intended German toll system is possibly contrary to the ‘non-discrimination’, ‘user pays’ and ‘polluter pays’ principles. The resolution points out that the Commission and the Member States should invest adequately in transport infrastructure. Moreover, it stresses that road charging systems for any type of motor vehicle should be electronic and distance-based and should comply with the ‘user pays’ and ‘polluter pays’ principles, as enshrined in EU policies and EU legislation, in order to ensure the internalisation of external costs related to road transport. I voted in favour because I believe that there is the need for common rules to establish a coherent, fair, non-discriminatory and harmonised framework for road charging systems for all types of vehicles in the European Union.
Guidelines for the 2018 budget - Section III (A8-0060/2017 - Siegfried Mureşan)
I voted in favour of the report on general guidelines for the preparation of the 2018 budget, Section III – Commission. The internal economic and social context as well as external challenges and political uncertainties are likely to uphold the pressure on the 2018 EU budget. The budgetary reaction to immediate challenges and crises must go hand in hand with sustainable answers that invest in the Union’s common future. The report underlines that enhancing the competitiveness of the EU economy, infrastructure, well-funded research, support for developing skills and the continued commitment of the EU to strengthening investment are key to ensuring economic growth and job creation. In addition, it stresses that only a strong and targeted EU budget with genuine European added value will benefit all Member States and EU citizens alike. I voted in favour because I believe that, while growth and jobs must continue to remain the core priorities of the EU budget, obtaining sustainable progress and development in these fields has to be accomplished in parallel to addressing EU citizens’ concerns regarding safety and security.
Responsible ownership and care of equidae (A8-0014/2017 - Julie Girling)
I voted in favour of the Report on responsible ownership and care of equidae. Equidae have a unique place in European history and civilisation. They are the most versatile of animals, which not only provide milk and meat, but are also sporting athletes, companion animals, working animals in transport, tourism, forestry, agriculture and therapy, research animals, and wild and semi-feral animals too. According to Fédération Equestre Internationale, the equid sector is worth over EUR 100 billion per annum. The EU’s estimated seven million equidae use at least 2.6 million hectares of land, and at least 900 000 jobs are dependent solely on the equestrian sports industry across the EU. Whilst the full size and scale of the equid sector is not completely clear, it is apparent that it has a disproportionately large impact upon the economy in relation to the relatively small number of animals involved. The handling requirements of equidae are quite different from many other species, and nowhere is this more apparent than at the time of slaughter. I voted in favour because I believe that the Commission should explore the possibility of disseminating guidance to slaughterhouses which are licenced to take equidae.
Mercury (A8-0313/2016 - Stefan Eck)
I voted in favour of the Report on the proposal for a regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council on mercury, and repealing Regulation (EC) No 1102/2008. Scientific evidence incontestably proves the acute toxicity of mercury, an element that can neither be destroyed nor disappear. With its immensely debilitating health impacts, mercury is among the world’s top 10 worst pollutants. Mercury exposure is a widespread health problem and may have toxic effects on the nervous, digestive and immune systems, and on lungs, kidneys, skin and eyes. It is obvious how urgent the need is for the ratification of the legally binding Minamata Convention on Mercury, which will regulate the supply, trade and use of the substance and go even further. Its overall goal is to protect human health and the global environment from the release of mercury and its compounds, by diminishing and ultimately eliminating global human-induced releases to air, water and land. I voted in favour because I believe that Europe needs to continue to play a leading role in the Minamata process by fully exploiting all the Convention’s potential and by fully respecting prior commitments under pre-existing EU mercury legislation.
Long-term shareholder engagement and corporate governance statement (A8-0158/2015 - Sergio Gaetano Cofferati)
I voted in favour of the Report on the proposal for a directive of the European Parliament and of the Council amending Directive 2007/36/EC as regards the encouragement of long-term shareholder engagement and Directive 2013/34/EU as regards certain elements of the corporate governance statement. The aim of Commission’s proposal on shareholder engagement was to enhance the long-term perspective in the running of listed companies. At present, too many companies have an overly strong focus on satisfying demands for high short-term profits and returns. This dynamic leads to planning deficiencies, under-investment and suboptimal performance in the long run. In order to at least partly come to terms with the problem, the Commission wants to give minority shareholders – and institutional investors in particular – a more transparent, easily managed and influential role in corporate governance. The idea is that if investors engage more and are more long-term oriented in their engagement, companies will give higher priority to long-term concerns. I voted in favour because I believe that this will in turn benefit the end-customers of institutional investors and asset managers, for the companies and for society as a whole.
Control of the acquisition and possession of weapons (A8-0251/2016 - Vicky Ford)
I voted in favour of the Report on the proposal for a directive of the European Parliament and of the Council amending Council Directive 91/477/EEC on control of the acquisition and possession of weapons. This directive lays down rules regarding the marking and traceability of firearms, as well as the conditions that must be met by individuals to be able to acquire and possess a firearm. It is important to recognise that the vast majority of firearms held legally in the EU do not present any danger to the public. Although the use of legally acquired firearms by criminals and terrorists is limited, there have been recorded cases. I believe that it is appropriate that the Commission takes the initiative when it comes to better control of privately owned weapons. Each weapon is a potential threat, because that is the very purpose for which it has been produced. I believe that, as indicated by those who have created this document, this directive will not jeopardise the citizens that use weapons for professional and sporting activities. Moreover, the experience of the United States and more recently some European countries demonstrates that weapons held at home represent a potential risk.
End-of-life vehicles, waste batteries and accumulators and waste electrical and electronic equipment (A8-0013/2017 - Simona Bonafè)
I voted in favour of the Report on the proposal for a directive of the European Parliament and of the Council amending Directives 2000/53/EC on end-of-life vehicles, 2006/66/EC on batteries and accumulators and waste batteries and accumulators, and 2012/19/EU on waste electrical and electronic equipment. The aim of this proposal is to simplify the obligations of Member States regarding reporting obligations and align them with the reporting provisions in the Waste Framework Directive, the Packaging and Packaging Waste Directive and the Landfill Directive. This proposal also aims at aligning the comitology provisions with the Lisbon Treaty. If the EU wants to realistically consider a shift to the circular economy, it is necessary to create an adequate infrastructure and an open market for transport and waste management in the EU. Targets proposed by the European Commission have to be ambitious, yet realistic and achievable. A long-term vision with sufficiently ambitious goals is the proper way to proceed. I voted in favour because I agree with the objectives of this proposal. Moreover, I am of the view that verification of implementation of the targets should be based on sound and reliable data.
Waste (A8-0034/2017 - Simona Bonafè)
I voted in favour of the report on the proposal for a directive of the European Parliament and of the Council amending Directive 2008/98/EC on waste. The current linear development model, known as ‘take, produce, consume and dispose of’, is beginning to show signs of reaching its limits. Our planet is warming, and the resources used, on which we depend, are becoming increasingly scarce. Unless structural measures are taken, demand for raw materials by the world economy could increase by a further 50% in the next 15 years. In order to reverse this trend, we must adopt a circular development model which keeps materials and their value in circulation within the economic system for as long as possible, by optimising the integrated waste cycle in order to put resources to efficient use. A clear and stable legislative framework is the first step in promoting the transition. Such a systemic change calls for ambitious policies, backed by legislation capable of sending the right signals to investors. I voted in favour because I believe that it is particularly important that the Member States take measures in line with Agenda 2030 for Sustainable Development in respect of major environmental and ethical issues.
Landfill of waste (A8-0031/2017 - Simona Bonafè)
I voted in favour of the report on the proposal for a directive of the European Parliament and of the Council amending Directive 1999/31/EC on the landfill of waste. The report supports effective action to foster the efficient use of resources and a reduction in the production of waste and in its environmental impact to encourage by practical means the transition to a circular economy. The circular economy is an efficient economic model from the point of view of resources, which will improve and at the same reduce their use, simultaneously tackling problems associated with raw material supplies. In this way, the environment will receive greater protection, while reindustrialisation will also be promoted and European competitiveness will be increased in the global context, and the creation of quality jobs and new business opportunities will be fostered. Such a systemic change calls for ambitious policies, backed by a clear legislative framework capable of sending the right signals to investors. I voted in favour because I believe that full implementation of the European rules on waste is needed. It should be achieved by means of strict application of the waste hierarchy and should be complemented by further measures to reduce waste production.
Packaging and packaging waste (A8-0029/2017 - Simona Bonafè)
I voted in favour of the report on the proposal for a directive of the European Parliament and of the Council amending Directive 94/62/EC on packaging and packaging waste. The current linear development model, which may be summarised as ‘take, produce, consume and dispose of’, is beginning to show signs of reaching its limits. Our planet is warming, and the resources used, on which we depend, are becoming increasingly scarce. In order to reverse this trend, we must adopt a circular development model which keeps materials and their value in circulation within the economic system for as long as possible. A clear and stable legislative framework is the first step in promoting the transition. The package should therefore be considered in a far wider context than that of a mere review of waste legislation. I voted in favour because I believe that the right conditions and incentives need to be created to make it an attractive proposition for industry to incorporate packaging waste in its production processes in order to produce added-value products while saving virgin raw materials.
Equality between women and men in the EU in 2014-2015 (A8-0046/2017 - Ernest Urtasun)
I voted in favour of the Report on equality between women and men in the European Union in 2014-2015. Europe is indisputably one of the world’s leaders when it comes to women’s rights and gender equality, however the reality is that we are only half way towards achieving gender equality and the current rate of progress is actually very slow. As the latest statistics show, the EU remains only halfway towards achieving gender equality. According to the 2015 EIGE Gender Equality Index, the EU overall score on gender equality is 52.9 out of 100, having risen since 2005 1.6p, and thus showing almost no progress in the matter. The gender pay gap remains at 16.5%. In the current political atmosphere in Europe, we need the EU leadership to take a firm stance in making gender equality a priority, in order to demonstrate their commitment to the values upon which the EU is founded and to ensure that human dignity, democracy, equality, non-discrimination and equality between women and men prevail in the EU. I voted in favour because I believe that that discussing Member States’ performances is essential for holding an informed and constructive democratic debate.
Equal treatment between men and women in the access to and supply of goods and services (A8-0043/2017 - Agnieszka Kozłowska-Rajewicz)
I voted in favour of the report on the application of Council Directive 2004/113/EC implementing the principle of equal treatment between men and women in the access to and supply of goods and services. The primary objective of the Directive 2004/113 has been to extend the principle of equal treatment between women and men, as enshrined in the Treaty on the Functioning of the European and other relevant directives, beyond the realm of employment and the labour market to include the field of access to and supply of goods and services in both the public and private sector, as well as to strengthen the principle of gender mainstreaming in these areas. The Directive prohibits direct and indirect discrimination within the relevant sectors of goods and services provision. The Commission has concluded that all Member States have transposed the Directive into their domestic laws. While significant progress has been achieved as regards equal treatment of women and men in the field of goods and services, the remaining gaps in practical application need to be addressed. I voted in favour because I believe that awareness raising as well as sectorial gender-mainstreaming recommendations are crucial for practical application of the principle of equal treatment.
EU funds for gender equality (A8-0033/2017 - Clare Moody)
I voted in favour of the report on EU funds for gender equality. Equality between men and women is a fundamental value of the European Union enshrined in the Treaties. Gender equality has also been addressed in 15 directives that have been adopted by the EU and has been an explicit goal of some parts of the EU Budget. However, regardless of the measure that is used to determine gender equality we are still a long way from achieving this aim. This report therefore calls for the budget to be used much more proactively and targeted to deliver on the goal of gender equality. EU funding already makes an important positive contribution to promoting gender equality. This report assesses how gender mainstreaming is applied in the EU funds allocations with focus on EU funding for child care in the framework of the ESI Funds, gender mainstreaming in the use of Horizon2020 funding and gender mainstreaming in the use of the REC programme. I voted in favour because I believe that mainstreaming gender equality in the EU Budget provides an opportunity to help inform and then target action to restore progression on our stated path towards achieving gender equality.
Fundamental rights implications of big data (A8-0044/2017 - Ana Gomes)
I voted in favour of the report on fundamental rights implications of big data: privacy, data protection, non-discrimination, security and law-enforce. Big data refers to the collection, analysis and the recurring accumulation of large amounts of data, including personal data, from a variety of sources, which are subject to automatic processing by computer algorithms and advanced data-processing techniques using both stored and streamed data in order to generate certain correlations, trends and patterns. The Report stresses that the prospects and opportunities of big data can only be fully tapped into by citizens, the public and private sectors, academia and the scientific community when public trust in these technologies is ensured by a strong enforcement of fundamental rights and compliance with current EU data protection law and legal certainty for all actors involved. Moreover, it points out that sensitive information about persons can be inferred from non-sensitive data, which blurs the line between sensitive and non-sensitive data. I voted in favour because I believe that the Digital Single Market must be built on reliable, trustworthy and high-speed networks and services that safeguard the fundamental rights of the data subject to data protection and privacy.
Minimum standards for the protection of farm rabbits (A8-0011/2017 - Stefan Eck)
I voted in favour of the report on minimum standards for the protection of farm rabbits. Rabbits are, in numbers, the second most farmed livestock species in the European Union with over 340 million rabbits slaughtered each year. However, rabbit farming in the EU accounts only for roughly 1.1% of the total EU meat production. Currently, rabbits in the EU are kept under cruel conditions in breeding and fattening farms, despite the existence of European legal safeguards. Most Member States lack specific legislation for the keeping, breeding and fattening of rabbits. The proposal should aim at closing the existing loopholes that lead to serious animal welfare abuses in the keeping, breeding, husbandry, transportation and slaughtering of farm rabbits. In recent years, major European animal welfare organisations and NGOs have increasingly highlighted the subject of rabbit farming and launched campaigns for the abolition of battery cages. One can expect public pressure on this issue to increase in the near future. I believe that EU legislation should ensure uniform interpretation, create a level playing field and meet the increasing demand from consumers for better animal welfare in farming.
Request for the waiver of the immunity of Marine Le Pen (A8-0047/2017 - Laura Ferrara)
I voted in favour of the Report on the request for waiver of the immunity of Marine Le Pen. The French judicial authorities have requested that the immunity of Marine Le Pen, Member of the European Parliament and Chair of the Front National (FN) party, should be waived in connection with proceedings relating to the posting on her Twitter account, on 16 December 2015, of violent images showing the murder of three hostages by the terrorist group Daesh, together with the comment ‘This is Daesh’, following an interview broadcast on RMC in which a comparison was drawn between the rise of the FN and the activities of Daesh. I voted in favour because although the images posted by Ms Le Pen can be accessed by anyone via Google and have been widely reposted on the Internet since they appeared on her Twitter account, it is beyond question that their violent nature is likely to undermine human dignity. Moreover, it should be emphasised that Ms Le Pen removed only the photograph of the murder of the hostage James Foley, and not the other two images.
EU-Lebanon Euro-Mediterranean Agreement (accession of Croatia) (A8-0027/2017 - Ramona Nicole Mănescu)
I voted in favour of the Recommendation on the draft Council decision on the conclusion, on behalf of the European Union and its Member States, of a Protocol to the Euro-Mediterranean Agreement establishing an Association between the European Community and its Member States, of the one part, and the Republic of Lebanon, of the other part, to take account of the accession of the Republic of Croatia to the European Union.The Euro-Mediterranean Agreement establishing an Association between the European Community and its Member States, of the one part, and Lebanon, of the other part, was signed in Brussels on 1 April 2002 and entered into force on 1 April 2006. Croatia became a Member State of the European Union on 1 July 2013. The Act of Accession of Croatia provides that Croatia shall accede to the international agreements signed or concluded by the European Union and its Member States by means of a protocol to those agreements. I voted in favour because I believe that this is a logical step considering that Croatia is now a full Member State.
EU-Liechtenstein Agreement on supplementary rules in relation to the instrument for financial support for external borders and visa (A8-0025/2017 - Josef Weidenholzer)
. ‒ I voted in favour of the Recommendation on the draft Council decision on the conclusion on behalf of the European Union of the Agreement between the European Union and the Principality of Liechtenstein on supplementary rules in relation to the instrument for financial support for external borders and visa, as part of the Internal Security Fund for the period 2014 to 2020. In 2014, the European Parliament and the Council adopted, as part of the Internal Security Fund, the instrument for financial support for external borders and visa for the period 2014 to 2020. Its main aim is to ensure a high level of security in the Union while facilitating legitimate travel. It stipulates that the countries associated with the implementation, application and development of the Schengen acquis participate in the instrument in accordance with its provisions and that arrangements are to be concluded on their financial contributions and the supplementary rules necessary for such participation. The Agreement with Liechtenstein is to establish exactly those arrangements. I voted in favour because I believe that this proposal will allow shared responsibility for an efficient, high and uniform level of control at the external borders.
Information exchange mechanism with regard to intergovernmental agreements and non-binding instruments in the field of energy (A8-0305/2016 - Zdzisław Krasnodębski)
I voted in favour of the report on the proposal for a decision of the European Parliament and of the Council on establishing an information exchange mechanism with regard to intergovernmental agreements and non-binding instruments between Member States and third countries in the field of energy and repealing Decision No 994/2012/EU. The main component of a successful energy policy as defined in the Energy Union communication is access to secure, sustainable and competitively priced energy for all Europeans.As far as security is concerned, the Commission proposes that non-binding instruments, such as joint declarations between EU Member States and third countries, be subject to a review after they have been signed. Up-front regulatory check-ups would ensure a well-functioning internal market without fragmentation and encourage more fair competition. I voted in favour because I believe that there is a unique opportunity in front of us to put a game-changing piece of legislation in place which would show that Europe stands united on the energy front.
Obligations in the field of visa reciprocity (B8-0173/2017)
I voted in favour of the resolution on obligations of the Commission in the field of visa reciprocity in accordance with Article 1(4) of Regulation (EC) No 539/2001 (2016/2986(RSP)). The criterion of visa reciprocity as one of the criteria guiding the EU’s visa policy is generally understood to imply that EU citizens should be subject to the same conditions when travelling to a third country as the nationals of that third country are when travelling to the EU.Moreover, the purpose of the visa reciprocity mechanism is to achieve such visa reciprocity. The reciprocity mechanism sets out a procedure starting with a situation of non-reciprocity with precise timeframes and actions to be taken with a view to ending a situation of non-reciprocity. The Commission contested the choice of delegated acts in the second phase of application of the reciprocity mechanism before the Court of Justice of the European Union and the Court considered the choice of the legislator to be correct. I voted in favour because I believe that the mechanism clearly assigns obligations and responsibilities to Parliament and the Council and to the Commission in the different phases of the reciprocity mechanism.
Options for improving access to medicines (A8-0040/2017 - Soledad Cabezón Ruiz)
. ‒ I voted in favour of the report on EU options for improving access to medicines. The pharmaceutical system we currently have in the developed world dates back to the 1970s, when it was set up with the principal aim of improving and ensuring patients’ health-care safety. In the development of the current pharmaceutical market, the World Trade Organisation greatly encouraged the inclusion of medicines in the patent system and the protection of intellectual property rights in the industrial sector, in connection with the development of new drugs. The pharmaceutical market in Europe has generally faced high levels of safety regulation but looser control over financial matters and innovation quality. Thus, after being in place for four decades, the system needs to be reviewed, as does its regulation, to strike a balance between public and private interests, the sustainability of health-care systems and the right everyone has to health protection.I voted in favour because I believe that, given the multi-disciplinary nature of the subject and the diversity of the bodies responsible, there needs to be a review at a global level.
Implementation of the Creative Europe programme (A8-0030/2017 - Silvia Costa)
I voted in favour of the report on the implementation of Regulation (EU) No 1295/2013 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 11 December 2013 establishing the Creative Europe Programme (2014 to 2020) and repealing Decisions No 1718/2006/EC, No 1855/2006/EC and No 1041/2009/EC. The Regulation establishing the Creative Europe Programme entered into force on 1 January 2014 and the programme will be implemented from 1 January 2014 to 31 December 2020. The Creative Europe programme brings together the previously separate MEDIA and Culture programmes 2007-2013 and MEDIA MUNDUS and covers the cultural, creative and audiovisual sectors.The goal of the implementation report is to assess how the programme realizes its general and specific objectives set out in the Regulation and how it is being implemented. The programme consists of two separate sub-programmes: Culture and MEDIA, and a cross-sectoral strand including a new financial instrument, the Guarantee Facility. Creative Europe is the only EU direct programme for the creative, cultural and audiovisual sectors and has cemented its role in this respect. I voted in favour because I believe that Creative Europe helps to develop a critical mass by consolidating the cultural, creative and audiovisual sectors.
Implementation of the Europe for Citizens programme (A8-0017/2017 - María Teresa Giménez Barbat)
I voted in favour of report on the implementation of Council Regulation (EU) No 390/2014 of 14 April 2014 establishing the Europe for Citizens (EfC) programme for the period 2014–2020. Bringing the European Union closer to its citizens has for long been a key objective of European policymakers and the European Parliament, but it has never been as important as it is in the present situation. The report is intended to research first experiences with the implementation of the Europe for Citizens programme 2014-2020. The Programme’s objectives seek to contribute to citizens’ understanding of the Union, its history and diversity, and to foster European citizenship and improve the conditions for civic and democratic participation. The EfC Programme is open to all stakeholders promoting European citizenship and integration. The programme is jointly managed by the DG for Migration and Home Affairs (DG HOME) of the European Commission, the Education, Audiovisual and Cultural Executive Agency (EACEA) and the Programme Committee. I voted in favour because I believe that the EfC Programme has proved to play a valuable part in different policy areas, including justice, freedom and security, migration, employment and social policy, as well as education, training and youth.
Common Commercial Policy in the context of wildlife sustainability imperatives (A8-0012/2017 - Emma McClarkin)
I voted in favour of the Report on EU Common Commercial Policy in the context of wildlife sustainability imperatives. The world is facing an unprecedented surge in wildlife trafficking, and concomitant biological crises arise from the continued illegal and unsustainable harvesting and marketing of global fauna and flora. The illegal trade in wild flora and fauna is the fourth most profitable area of criminal activity, with an estimated turnover of as much as EUR 20 billion.The report stresses that the EU, alongside the USA, remains a significant destination market and transit route for illicit wildlife products. It considers that the customs dimension of the European Union’s Action Plan should be further strengthened, with regard to both cooperation with partner countries and better and more effective implementation within the Union.The report calls for the EU and its Member States to consider a possible ban at European level of trade, export or re-export within and outside the EU of elephant ivory. I voted in favour because I support an approach to EU trade policy that not only prioritises the issue of combating the illegal wildlife trade but includes in all future agreements provisions aimed at its reduction and ultimate elimination.
Combating terrorism (A8-0228/2016 - Monika Hohlmeier)
. ‒ I voted against the report on the proposal for a directive of the European Parliament and of the Council on combating terrorism and replacing Council Framework Decision 2002/475/JHA on combating terrorism. Recent terrorist attacks on European soil and beyond, and most significantly the terrorist attacks in Paris on 13 November 2015, which left more than 130 dead, have underscored the need substantially to boost our efforts to prevent and fight terrorism. With more than 5 000 EU nationals currently suspected of having joined the fighting in Iraq and Syria, the issue of so-called ‘foreign fighters’ and their possible return to the EU is a very real one.Another serious challenge in the fight against terrorism is the growing convergence between terrorism and international organised crime. The fight against terrorism is a global fight that the EU cannot win by itself. However, I voted against the report because the proposal for a directive is too restrictive.
Reinforcement of checks against relevant databases at external borders (A8-0218/2016 - Monica Macovei)
I voted in favour of the report on the proposal for a regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council amending Regulation (EC) No 562/2006 as regards the reinforcement of checks against relevant databases at external borders. Control at and protection of external borders remain the most efficient way to guarantee the long-term security of the Union. Border control at the external borders is carried out in the interest of all Member States. One of the purposes of such control is to contribute to fighting irregular migration and human trafficking and to prevent, inter alia , any threat to the Member States’ internal security and public policy and public health, irrespective of the origin of such threat, including where such a threat derives from Union citizens. The implementation of this regulation should take into account the Universal Declaration of Human Rights, the Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms and Article 2 of the Treaty on European Union. I voted in favour because I believe that border checks should be carried out in such a way as to fully respect human dignity.
Possible evolutions of and adjustments to the current institutional set-up of the European Union (A8-0390/2016 - Guy Verhofstadt)
I voted in favour of the report on possible evolutions of and adjustments to the current institutional set-up of the European Union. This resolution is aimed at providing solutions which cannot be reached using the tools currently provided for in the Treaties and which are therefore only feasible through a future Treaty change. The inability of the EU institutions to cope with the deep and multiple crises currently faced by the Union and the rise of populist parties and nationalist movements have all led to increased dissatisfaction among a growing section of the population regarding the functioning of the current European Union. The report notes that the direction of the Union’s reform should lead towards its modernisation by establishing new instruments, new effective European capacities, and by making decision-making processes more democratic, rather than its renationalisation by means of greater intergovernmentalism. It stresses that a comprehensive democratic reform of the Treaties must be achieved through a reflection on the future of the EU and an agreement on a vision for present and future generations of European citizens. I voted in favour because I believe that the single institutional framework should be preserved in order to achieve the Union’s common objectives.
Improving the functioning of the European Union building on the potential of the Lisbon Treaty (A8-0386/2016 - Mercedes Bresso, Elmar Brok)
I voted in favour of the report on improving the functioning of the European Union building on the potential of the Lisbon Treaty. The European Union and its Member States are facing major challenges, which no Member State can tackle on its own. The EU is also facing disillusion of its citizens with the European project, as illustrated also by the continuing low turnout in European elections and the rise of Eurosceptic or openly anti-European political forces. The report notes that the European Union and its Member States are facing unprecedented challenges that cannot be adequately tackled individually by the Member States but need a collective response. Moreover, it points out that not all of the provisions of the Lisbon Treaty have yet been exploited to their full potential even though they contain some necessary tools that could have been applied to prevent some of the crises with which the Union is confronted, or could be used to cope with the current challenges. I voted in favour because I believe that it is vital to strengthen institutional transparency and openness in the EU as well as the way in which political decision-making in the EU is communicated.
Budgetary capacity for the Eurozone (A8-0038/2017 - Reimer Böge, Pervenche Berès)
I voted in favour of the report on budgetary capacity for the Eurozone. In a single market, a common currency implies benefits such as lower transaction costs, better price transparency and absence of foreign-exchange risk. If strong enough, it can reduce the exposure of the area to the monetary policies of other major economic powers. On the other hand, a common currency eliminates well-tried policy options for counterbalancing asymmetric shocks such as exchange rate fluctuation. In the financial, economic and sovereign debt crisis, it has become apparent that the European Economic and Monetary Union (EMU lacks appropriate adjustment mechanisms to absorb asymmetric shocks. The report aims at giving an overview of the historical background, presenting the recent positions taken by the relevant EU institutions, available options and corresponding challenges put forward by politics and academia, and posing questions linked to key issues to be addressed in the upcoming own-initiative report. I voted in favour because I believe that membership of a common currency area requires common tools and solidarity at European level and obligations and responsibilities on the part of each participating Member State.
Civil Law Rules on Robotics (A8-0005/2017 - Mady Delvaux)
I voted in favour of the report with recommendations to the Commission on Civil Law Rules on Robotics. Under Annex VI to the Rules of Procedure, the Committee on Legal Affairs is responsible, inter alia, for civil and commercial law, company law, intellectual property law and the interpretation, application of international law, in so far as the European Union is affected, and ethical questions related to new technologies. The development of robotics and artificial intelligence raises legal and ethical issues. Robotics and AI have become one of the most prominent technological trends of our century. The fast increase of their use and development brings new and difficult challenges to our society. The resolution establishes general as well as ethical principles concerning the development of robotics and AI for civil use. First, in order to properly address this development, a common definition of smart autonomous robots is fundamental. Furthermore, research in robotics and ICT as well as in the implications of their dissemination should be strengthened. I voted in fvaour because I believe that the increasing use of robots and AI requires European standardisation in order to avoid discrepancies between Member States and fragmentation of the European Union internal market.
European Cloud Initiative (A8-0006/2017 - Jerzy Buzek)
I voted in favour of the report on the European Cloud Initiative. The current cloud capacity available in the EU is insufficient and data produced by EU research and industry is therefore often processed elsewhere, making EU researchers and innovators move to places outside the EU, where high data and computing capacity is more immediately available. The lack of a clear structure of incentives to share data, the lack of interoperability of scientific data systems and the fragmentation of scientific data infrastructures across disciplines and borders hamper the full potential of data-driven science. The report underlines the importance of making the European Union a centre for global research, gaining critical mass and creating clusters of excellence. Moreover, it stresses that the added value of this European initiative is based on the sharing of open data and on developing a trusted, open environment for the community for storing, sharing and re-using scientific data and results. I voted in favour because I believe that a state-of-the-art supercomputing infrastructure is crucial for the EU’s competitiveness.
Investing in jobs and growth - maximising the contribution of European Structural and Investment Funds (A8-0385/2016 - Lambert van Nistelrooij)
I voted in favour of the report on investing in jobs and growth – maximising the contribution of European Structural and Investment Funds: an evaluation of the report under Article 16(3) of the CPR. Europe has been going through a difficult phase in both economic and political terms and therefore a decent investment policy close to the citizens is needed more than ever. With a budget of EUR 454 billion for the period 2014-2020, the European Structural and Investment Funds (ESI Funds) are the European Union’s main investment policy tool. As a consequence of the financial crisis, public investments have considerably decreased. The ex-ante conditionalities have been introduced in order to improve investment conditions in the European Union and its regions. In its communication the Commission states that 75% of the ex-ante conditionalities were fulfilled at the time the programmes were approved; this means that 750 were not. I voted in favour because I believe that cohesion policy should therefore continue to have thematic focus, though allowing for some degree of flexibility in order to take on board the specific needs of each region.
Aviation Strategy for Europe (A8-0021/2017 - Pavel Telička)
I voted in favour of the report on an Aviation Strategy for Europe. The EU aviation sector today represents one of the building blocks of the European transport network, an indispensable element for the mobility of people and businesses within and outside the EU, making it one of the most successful EU stories. The aviation sector directly employs between 1.4 and 2 million people and overall provides for between 4.8 million and 5.5 million jobs, contributing EUR 110 bn to the EU GDP. Undeniably, the whole aviation sector is a strong driving force for economic growth, job creation and trade for the EU. On 7 December 2015, in an attempt to address challenges to the aviation sector, the Commission published a Communication on an Aviation Strategy for Europe. The Communication proposes ways to boost Europe’s economy, strengthen its industrial base and reinforce its global leadership position in the aviation sector. I voted in favour because I believe that there is a need for the EU to act also to reinforce the social agenda, to further protect passenger rights, to embrace a new era of innovation and technologies and to contribute to high environmental standards.
Delayed implementation of ESI Funds operational programmes - impact on cohesion policy and the way forward (B8-0149/2017)
I voted in favour of the resolution on Delayed implementation of ESI Funds operational programmes – impact on cohesion policy and the way forward. The late conclusion of the 2014-2020 MFF negotiations and the late adoption of the European Structural and Investment Funds (ESI Funds) regulations resulted in delays in the process of adoption and implementation of partnership agreements and operational programmes, designation of managing, certifying and auditing authorities, the process of defining and fulfilling ex-ante conditionalities, and project implementation at local, regional and national level. Although factual information and analysis are missing on the reasons for these delays, they are impacting in the first part of the programming period on the potential of the ESI Funds to increase competitiveness and enhance social, economic and territorial cohesion. The resolution reiterates the contribution made by ESI Funds investments to reducing economic, social and territorial disparities within and between the European regions, as well as to generating smart, sustainable and inclusive growth and job creation. I voted in favour because I believe that a quicker and more effective implementation of ESI Funds operational programmes is directly linked to increased simplification.
EU-Canada Comprehensive Economic and Trade Agreement (A8-0009/2017 - Artis Pabriks)
I voted against the Recommendation on the draft Council decision on the conclusion of the Comprehensive Economic and Trade Agreement (CETA) between Canada, of the one part, and the European Union and its Member States, of the other part. The CETA agreement has raised many doubts, both among professionals and among the general public. The Agreement was particularly opposed by youth. Moreover, the Agreement was created in secret, without public debate and without a dialogue with representatives of civil society.Although the Commission claims that the effects of CETA on the European economy would be completely positive, I do not find these arguments convincing enough. I believe that trade is not the most important thing in the world and that this type of agreement requires more in-depth reflection. Removing tariff barriers is theoretically positive but it needs to be consistent and mutually reinforcing. In addition, CETA could allow infiltration of the interests of several tens of thousands of US companies that are registered in Canada and that are influenced by the new protectionist policy of Trump’s administration, which would create one-way duty-free trade between the US and Europe.
Conclusion of the EU-Canada CETA (B8-0141/2017, B8-0142/2017, B8-0143/2017, B8-0144/2017, B8-0145/2017, B8-0146/2017)
I abstained from the vote on the Resolutions on Conclusion of the EU-Canada CETA. CETA agreement has raised many doubts, both among professionals as well as among the general public. The Agreement was particularly opposed by youth. Moreover, the Agreement was created in secret, without public debate and without a dialogue with representatives of civil society.Although the Commission claims that the effects of CETA on the European economy would be completely positive, I do not find these arguments convincing enough. I believe that trade is not the most important thing in the world and that this type of agreement requires more in-depth reflection. Removing tariff barriers is theoretically positive but it needs to be consistent and mutually reinforcing. In addition, CETA could allow infiltration of the interests of several tens of thousands of US companies that are registered in Canada and that are influenced by new protectionist policy of Trump´s administration what would create one-way duty-free trade between the US and Europe.
EU-Canada Strategic Partnership Agreement (A8-0028/2017 - Charles Tannock)
I voted against of the Recommendation on the draft Council decision on the conclusion, on behalf of the Union, of the Strategic Partnership Agreement between the European Union and its Member States, of the one part, and Canada, of the other part. CETA agreement has raised many doubts, both among professionals as well as among the general public. The Agreement was particularly opposed by youth. Moreover, the Agreement was created in secret, without public debate and without a dialogue with representatives of civil society.Although the Commission claims that the effects of CETA on the European economy would be completely positive, I do not find these arguments convincing enough. I believe that trade is not the most important thing in the world and that this type of agreement requires more in-depth reflection. Removing tariff barriers is theoretically positive but it needs to be consistent and mutually reinforcing. In addition, CETA could allow infiltration of the interests of several tens of thousands of US companies that are registered in Canada and that are influenced by new protectionist policy of Trump’s administration what would create one-way duty-free trade between the US and Europe.
EU-Mongolia Framework Agreement on Partnership and Cooperation (A8-0382/2016 - Helmut Scholz)
I voted in favour of the Recommendation on the draft Council decision on the conclusion of the Framework Agreement on Partnership and Cooperation between the European Union and its Member States, of the one part, and Mongolia, of the other part. Mongolia can serve as a democratic model not only for the region’s other emerging democracies, but also for the regimes with more authoritarian tendencies. The EU and Mongolia enjoy friendly relations based on political, societal, economic, cultural and historical ties. Moreover, the EU-Mongolia relationship is expanding, as manifested in the Framework Agreement on Partnership and Cooperation (PCA), which takes in areas including political dialogue and human rights, trade and development assistance, as well as cooperation in the fields of agriculture and rural development, energy, climate change, research and innovation and education and culture. I voted in favour because I believe that the democratic transformation of Mongolia could produce a positive spillover effect in the region, in which complex transformation processes are taking place.
EU-Mongolia Framework Agreement on Partnership and Cooperation (Resolution) (A8-0383/2016 - Helmut Scholz)
I voted in favour of the Report containing a motion for a non-legislative resolution on the draft Council decision on the conclusion of the Framework Agreement on Partnership and Cooperation between the European Union and its Member States, of the one part, and Mongolia, of the other part. Mongolia can serve as a democratic model not only for the region’s other emerging democracies, but also for the regimes with more authoritarian tendencies. The EU and Mongolia enjoy friendly relations based on political, societal, economic, cultural and historical ties. The Report welcomes the deepening and expanding nature of the EU-Mongolia relationship, as manifested in the Framework Agreement on Partnership and Cooperation (PCA), which takes in areas including political dialogue and human rights, trade and development assistance, as well as cooperation in the fields of agriculture and rural development, energy, climate change, research and innovation and education and culture. I voted in favour because I believe that the democratic transformation of Mongolia could produce a positive spillover effect in the region, in which complex transformation processes are taking place.
Agreement on Trade in Civil Aircraft (Product Coverage Annex) (A8-0007/2017 - Inmaculada Rodríguez-Piñero Fernández)
I voted in favour of the Recommendation on the draft Council decision on the conclusion, on behalf of the European Union, of the Protocol (2015) amending the Annex to the Agreement on Trade in Civil Aircraft. Signed by 32 parties and entered into force in 1980, the Agreement on Trade in Civil Aircraft (ATCA) eliminates import duties on all aircraft, other than military aircraft, as well as on all other products covered by the agreement - civil aircraft, all components and sub-assemblies of civil aircraft, and flight simulators. The Agreement contains an Annex, which lists the products that shall be accorded duty-free treatment. Products in the Annex are classified according to their respective tariff headings under the Harmonized Commodity Description and Coding System, developed by the World Customs Organisation. The protocol covers matters that fall under the common commercial policy and the amendment concerns a technical update of an international agreement.
Cost-effective emission reductions and low-carbon investments (A8-0003/2017)
I voted in favour of the Report on the proposal for a directive of the European Parliament and of the Council amending Directive 2003/87/EC to enhance cost-effective emission reductions and low-carbon investments. On the 15th of July 2015 the European Commission published its proposal for Phase IV of the ETS. The proposal aims to meet the EU’s 2030 greenhouse gas emissions target of ‘at least’ 40% while protecting European industry from the risk of carbon leakage and promoting innovation and modernisation in Europe’s industrial and power sectors over the decade from 2020. On the 12th of December the nations of the world arrived at the Paris Agreement, and in doing so committed to arresting the global temperature rise to ‘well below’ two degrees, while acknowledging that 1.5 degrees would better combat the worst effects of climate change. The Report underlines that it is crucial that the ETS is able to reflect the Paris Agreement going forward. I voted in favour because I believe that a market-based mechanism such as the ETS is the most cost-effective way of meeting our climate change obligations.
Objection pursuant to rule 105(3): Regulatory technical standards for the application of position limits to commodity derivatives (B8-0139/2017, B8-0147/2017, B8-0148/2017)
I voted in favour of the Objection pursuant to rule 105(3): Regulatory technical standards for the application of position limits to commodity derivatives. G20 leaders met in Pittsburgh on 24-25 September 2009, in response to the financial crisis, and committed to improving the regulation, functioning and transparency of financial and commodity markets to address excessive commodity price volatility. Directive 2014/65/EU of the European Parliament and of the Council on markets in financial instruments and amending Directive 2002/92/EC and Directive 2011/61/EU (MiFID II) introduces a new harmonised position limits regime for derivative contracts in relation to commodities, representing the EU’s implementation of the G20 commitments made in Pittsburgh in 2009. I voted in favour because the Resolution calls on the Commission to submit a new delegated act which takes into account the concerns, especially to include the following recommendations: reduce the ‘baseline’ position limit for the most sensitive and highly liquid food contracts to a maximum 15%, broaden the scope of contracts covered by reduced limits to at least all commodities with indirect effects on the prices of food for human consumption, redefine volatility so that it becomes a mandatory parameter in the methodology of setting the position limits.
2016 Report on Albania (A8-0023/2017 - Knut Fleckenstein)
I voted in favour of the Report on the 2016 Commission Report on Albania. Albania has made progress towards meeting the political criteria for membership and steady progress in the five key priorities for the opening of accession negotiations. However, further implementation of, inter alia, the judicial reform package, electoral reform and the so-called decriminalisation law are indispensable in strengthening citizens’ trust in their public institutions and political representatives. Challenges still persist and need to be addressed swiftly and efficiently in a spirit of dialogue, cooperation and compromise between government and opposition, in order to ensure further progress on Albania’s path to EU accession. Constructive and sustainable political dialogue between political forces on EU-related reforms is essential for making further progress in the EU accession process. The EU has highlighted the need to strengthen economic governance, the rule of law and public administration capacities in all of the Western Balkan countries. I voted in favour because I believe that a constructive dialogue, sustainable political cooperation, mutual trust and a willingness to compromise are crucial for the success of the reforms and for the entire EU accession process.
2016 Report on Bosnia and Herzegovina (A8-0026/2017 - Cristian Dan Preda)
I voted in favour of the report on the 2016 Commission Report on Bosnia and Herzegovina. The EU remains committed to BiH’s EU perspective, to its territorial integrity, sovereignty and unity. With the Reform Agenda for BiH 2013-2018, the authorities at all levels recognised the urgent need to initiate a process of rehabilitating and modernising the economy with a view to creating new jobs and fostering sustainable, efficient, socially just and steady economic growth. Moreover, BiH has demonstrated commitment and readiness to embark on further socio-economic reforms necessary to reduce youth unemployment, which is still at far too high a rate. However, challenges remain in relation to the sustainability of the reconciliation process. Moreover, corruption, including at the highest level, continues to be widespread. The report points out that the polarisation of the country, in combination with the deterioration of the socio-economic situation, especially for young people, increases the danger of spreading radicalism. I voted in favour because I believe that the reforms have to be maintained in order to transform BiH into a fully effective, inclusive and functional state based on the rule of law, guaranteeing equality and democratic representation of all its constituent peoples and citizens.
European Semester for Economic Policy Coordination: Annual Growth Survey 2017 (A8-0039/2017 - Gunnar Hökmark)
I voted in favour of the report on the European Semester for economic policy coordination: Annual Growth Survey 2017. The European Union’s economy is slowly recovering and growing at a moderate pace, albeit unevenly across Member States. Consumer spending is the current key driver of growth and is expected to remain as such in 2017. However, Europe still faces an important ‘investment gap’ where investment remains well below pre-crisis levels. The employment rate in the EU is growing, although unevenly and at an insufficient pace, reducing unemployment in the euro area to 10.1 % in 2016, but not enough to significantly curb youth and long-term unemployment. The report notes that growth in 2016 is continuing at a positive moderate pace, surpassing the pre-crisis level, but that the modest growth must be seen in the perspective of an extraordinary monetary policy and that it remains weak and uneven between Member States. I voted in favour because I believe that access to finance and the strengthening of the single market are crucial for businesses to innovate and grow.
European Semester for Economic Policy Coordination: employment and social aspects in the Annual Growth Survey 2017 (A8-0037/2017 - Yana Toom)
I voted in favour of the report on the European Semester for economic policy coordination: Employment and Social Aspects in the Annual Growth Survey 2017. Unemployment in the EU has been slowly decreasing since the second half of 2013, 8 million new jobs have been created since 2013, and unemployment stood at 8.6 % in September 2016, reaching its lowest level since 2009. However, the proportion of young people not in employment, education or training remains high and represents 14.8 % of those aged between 15 and 29. Employment rates are generally lower among women, and in 2015, the employment rate for men aged 20–64 stood at 75.9 % in the EU-28, as compared with 64.3 % for women. If the current trends are reinforced with adequate public policies, the Europe 2020 employment rate target of 75 % could be reached. The report highlights that public and private debt is too high in some Member States and that this hampers investment, economic growth and employment. I voted in favour because I believe that employment support and measures to improve active labour market participation need to be part of a broader rights-centred approach to tackling social exclusion and poverty.
Single Market Governance within the European Semester 2017 (A8-0016/2017 - Antonio López-Istúriz White)
I voted in favour of the report on the Annual Report on the Single Market Governance within the European Semester 2017. Delivering a deeper and fairer single market will be instrumental in creating new jobs, promoting productivity and ensuring an attractive climate for investment and innovation, as well as a consumer-friendly environment. This requires a renewed focus across Europe, including the timely completion and implementation of different single market strategies, in particular the Digital Single Market strategy. The report stresses that the single market pillar within the European Semester should serve to identify the key areas, as regards all dimensions of the single market, for the creation of growth and jobs. It equally underlines that improving the investment environment means strengthening the single market by providing greater regulatory predictability and by reinforcing the level playing field in the EU and removing unnecessary barriers to investment both from within and outside the EU. I voted in favour because I believe that, with regard to national measures or implementation, early intervention may be more effective and better results achieved than through infringement procedures.
Banking Union - Annual Report 2016 (A8-0019/2017 - Danuta Maria Hübner)
I voted in favour of the report on Banking Union – Annual Report 2016. The establishment of the Banking Union (BU) is an indispensable component of a monetary union and a fundamental building block of a genuine Economic and Monetary Union. However, further efforts are needed as the Banking Union remains incomplete as long as it lacks a fiscal backstop and a third pillar. The European Central Bank might on specific occasions suffer from conflict of interests due to its dual responsibility as both a monetary policy authority and a banking supervisor. Proper clean-up of bank balance sheets after the crisis has been delayed and this continues to hamper economic growth. Nevertheless, it is not the role of the European institutions to ensure the profitability of the banking sector. The report stresses that national options and discretions may hinder the creation of a level playing field between Member States and the comparability of the financial reporting by banks to the public. I voted in favour because I believe that there is the need to introduce a Bank Structural Reform, including the reversal of the burden of proof, to end the problem of very large institutions being too big to fail.
Biological low risk pesticides (B8-0140/2017)
I voted in favour of the resolution on biological low—risk pesticides. The use of conventional plant protection products is increasingly subject to public debate, due to the potential risks they pose to human health, animals and the environment. The number of active substances available on the EU market used for plant protection is decreasing and EU farmers continue to require a variety of crop protection tools. The resolution stresses the need to increase the availability of low-risk pesticides, including low-risk plant protection products of biological origin in the Union, without further delay. It equally emphasises that consumers’ demand for safe food that is both affordable and produced in a sustainable way must be satisfied. Moreover, it underlines the importance of a public debate about the availability of alternatives to conventional plant protection products and about making a wider choice of substances available to farmers and growers, including low-risk plant protection products of biological origin and other biological control measures, in order to find the solutions that are most viable in environmental, health and economic terms. I voted in favour because I believe that there is the necessity to educate on the need to ensure sustainability of crop protection.
EU-Cook Islands sustainable fisheries partnership agreement (A8-0010/2017 - João Ferreira)
I voted in favour of the recommendation on the draft Council decision on the conclusion on behalf of the European Union of a sustainable fisheries partnership agreement between the European Union and the Government of the Cook Islands and the implementation protocol thereto. The Cook Islands exclusive economic zone (EEZ), which borders Kiribati, Tokelau, French Polynesia, American Samoa, Niue, and high sea areas, extends over 1.98 million km2.The Cook Islands have traditionally allowed vessels from other countries to have access to their EEZ. The agreements in question, however, were concluded on a private basis for purely commercial purposes and thus make it harder to build relations based on stock sustainability criteria. Concluding a sustainable fisheries partnership agreement is a strategic choice for the EU and the Cook Islands that will provide fishing opportunities for vessels flying the flags of Member States. The contributions intended to support the development of the Cook Islands’ sectoral fisheries policy range between 47.6% and 50% of the total to be transferred. I voted in favour because I believe that this protocol is very important both to the Cook Islands and to the EU fleets operating in their waters.
EU-Cook Islands sustainable fisheries partnership agreement (Resolution) (A8-0015/2017 - João Ferreira)
I voted in favour of the Report containing a motion for a non-legislative resolution on the draft Council decision on the conclusion on behalf of the European Union of the Sustainable Fisheries Partnership Agreement between the European Union and the Government of the Cook Islands and the Implementation Protocol thereto. The general objective of the EU-Cook Islands FPA/Protocol is to increase cooperation between the EU and the Cook Islands in the field of fisheries in the interest of both parties, creating a partnership framework that will promote a sustainable fisheries policy and sustainable exploitation of fishery resources in the exclusive economic zone of the Cook Islands. The EU-Cook Islands FPA is based on the best available scientific advice, respecting the conservation and management measures of the Western and Central Pacific Fisheries Commission (WCPFC) within the limits of the available surplus. I voted in favour because I believe that support for sectoral development is an important aspect of contributing to the sustainability of a partner country, as it helps to enhance the country’s operational independence, underpin its development strategy and guarantee its sovereignty.
Control of the Register and composition of the Commission's expert groups (A8-0002/2017 - Dennis de Jong)
I voted in favour of the Report on control of the register and composition of the Commission’s expert groups. In the context of the discharge procedures relating to the European Commission, the Committee on Budgetary Control (CONT) of the Parliament has regularly considered the question of the composition and of the functioning of the Commission’s expert groups. In 2015, CONT/BUDG commissioned a study on the composition of the Commission’s expert groups and the status of the register of expert groups, which identified a widespread lack of transparency and an imbalance in composition in a certain number of expert groups. In light of the findings of the study and the need for a proper follow-up, on 26 November 2015 the Conference of Committee Chairs approved the CONT proposal for the elaboration of an own-initiative report on this subject. The report would contain concrete recommendations for the Commission to improve the balanced composition and transparency of its expert groups. I voted in favour because I believe that the report could become the basis for a resumed informal dialogue with the Commission.
The role of whistleblowers in the protection of EU´s financial interests (A8-0004/2017 - Dennis de Jong)
I voted in favour of the Report on the role of whistle-blowers in the protection of EU’s financial interests. For the work of the Committee on Budgetary Control, the role of whistleblowers has been a matter of concern since many years. In 2011, the Committee commissioned a study on ‘Corruption and conflict of interest in the European institutions: the effectiveness of whistleblowers’, which contained a number of recommendations for the rights and duties of EU staff in this respect. For the Committee, not only EU staff reporting irregularities are of importance, but also external whistleblowers. Whereas the revised EU Staff Regulations contain provisions on the protection of whistleblowers, for other whistleblowers it depends on the national legislation how they are protected, if at all. The situation varies from Member State to Member State. I voted in favour because I believe that there is the need for a legislative instrument and an independent European institution protecting also external whistleblowers, whenever the financial interests of the Union are at issue.
List of third States and organisations with which Europol shall conclude agreements (A8-0035/2017 - Agustín Díaz de Mera García Consuegra)
I voted in favour of the Report on the draft Council implementing decision amending Decision 2009/935/JHA as regards the list of third States and organisations with which Europol shall conclude agreements. Denmark is currently fully participating in Europol, which operates under the existing Council Decision. Under the terms of Protocol No 22 to the Treaty on European Union and the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union, Denmark could not take part in the adoption of this new Europol Regulation and is not subject to its application. The new Europol Regulation will start to apply on 1 May 2017 when Denmark will no longer be part of Europol and will not be able to participate in its activities, consult its databases or exchange data with it. In the joint statement by the President of the European Council, the President of the European Commission and the Prime Minister of Denmark, it is proposed that Denmark will be associated to Europol in the form of an operational cooperation agreement. I voted in favour because I believe that combating cross-border serious and organised crime and international terrorism within the Union necessitates close cooperation and the sharing of data between all European countries.
Subjecting the new psychoactive substance methyl 2-[[1-(cyclohexylmethyl)-1H-indole-3-carbonyl]amino]-3,3-dimethylbutanoate (MDMB-CHMICA) to control measures (A8-0024/2017 - Lorenzo Fontana)
I voted in favour of the Report on the draft Council implementing decision on subjecting methyl 2-[[1-(cyclohexylmethyl)-1H-indole-3-carbonyl]amino]-3,3-dimethylbutanoate (MDMB-CHMICA) to control measures. A risk-assessment report on the new psychoactive substance MDMB-CHMICA was drawn up in accordance with Decision 2005/387/JHA by a special session of the extended Scientific Committee of the European Monitoring Centre for Drugs and Drug Addiction, and was subsequently submitted to the Commission and to the Council on 28 July 2016. MDMB-CHMICA is classed as a synthetic cannabinoid receptor agonist. Cannabinoid receptor agonists are controlled under the 1971 United Nations Convention on Psychotropic Substances. MDMB-CHMICA has been available on the drug market in the Union since at least August 2014 and has been detected in 23 Member States. Eight Member States have reported a total of 28 deaths and 25 acute intoxications where MDMB-CHMICA was detected. I voted in favour because I believe that subjecting this substance to control measures across the Union would help avoid the emergence of obstacles in cross-border law enforcement and judicial cooperation, and would help protect against the risks that its availability and use could pose.
Mobilisation of the European Globalisation Adjustment Fund: application EGF/2016/005 NL/Drenthe Overijssel Retail (A8-0036/2017 - Nedzhmi Ali)
I voted in favour of the Report on the proposal for a decision of the European Parliament and of the Council on the mobilisation of the European Globalisation Adjustment Fund (application from the Netherlands – EGF/2016/005 NL/Drenthe Overijssel Retail). The European Globalisation Adjustment Fund (EGF) aims to provide support for workers made redundant and self-employed persons whose activity has ceased as a result of major structural changes in world trade patterns due to globalisation, as a result of a continuation of the global financial and economic crisis, or as a result of a new global financial and economic crisis, and to assist them with their reintegration into the labour market. On 12 July 2016, the Netherlands submitted an application to mobilise the EGF, in respect of redundancies in six enterprises operating in the retail trade sector in two regions (Drenthe and Overijssel) in the Netherlands. It was supplemented by additional information provided in accordance with Article 8(3) of Regulation (EU) No 1309/2013. That application complies with the requirements for determining a financial contribution from the EGF as laid down in Article 13 of Regulation (EU) No 1309/2013. I voted in favour because the Netherlands has provided all the necessary assurances.
Revision of the European Consensus on Development (A8-0020/2017 - Bogdan Brunon Wenta, Norbert Neuser)
I voted in favour of the Report on the revision of the European Consensus on Development. A revision of the European Consensus on Development is timely and necessary, considering the changed external framework. The Report stresses the importance of the European Consensus on Development in providing a joint and coherent position at both EU and Member State level on the objectives, values, principles and main aspects of development policy. It warns against the widening of official development assistance criteria with the aim of covering expenses other than those directly linked to the previously mentioned objectives. Moreover, it stresses that any reform of official development assistance (ODA) must be aimed at increasing development impact. The Report recognises the importance of a clear European external strategy, which requires policy coherence, notably on peace and security, migration, trade, the environment and climate change, humanitarian assistance and development cooperation. I voted in favour because I believe that for an EU development strategy to be effective, the EU must promote a fair redistribution by developing countries of wealth through national budgets.
Annual report on EU competition policy (A8-0001/2017 - Tibor Szanyi)
I voted in favour of the Report on the annual report on EU competition policy. Competition policy has always been one of the core policies of the EU that are crucial for the proper functioning of the single market. Today the European Union needs a strong and firmly enforced competition policy more than ever. EU competition policy cannot, and is not supposed to, solve all the challenges of the Union, but has a great potential to achieve robust improvements in many areas. Fortunately, these improvements are already happening. The Commission’s in-depth investigations on anti—competitive practices, such as preferential tax advantages, show the dedication and the effectiveness of the EU. Competition policy also makes a significant contribution to the EU’s current key political priorities, and reinforces the Single Market with special regard to the Digital Single Market and the Energy Union. National regulators must find solutions in order not to undermine online platforms and innovative businesses that fall into the category of sharing economy and which have the potential to provide hundreds of thousands of jobs and affordable services to customers. I voted in favour because I believe that the Energy Union also relies on the Commission’s ability to ensure fair competition.
Promoting gender equality in mental health and clinical research (A8-0380/2016 - Beatriz Becerra Basterrechea)
I voted in favour of the report on promoting gender equality in mental health and clinical research. Unequal access to resources coupled with other social factors produce unequal health risks and access to health information, care, and services for women and men. In addition to this, biological differences imply that women have particular health concerns and needs. Existing research indicates gender inequalities in health status, health-related behaviour, access to health and treatment. As to mental health, according to the WHO, lifetime prevalence rates for any kind of psychological disorder are higher than previously thought, are ever—increasing and affect nearly half the population. Although overall rates of psychiatric disorder are almost identical for men and women, there are significant gender differences in the patterns of mental illness. I voted in favour because I believe that the lack of a consistent and integrated approach to women’s rights and gender issues within health policy needs to be urgently addressed and is crucial for the attainment of a high level of human health protection for all.
An integrated approach to Sport Policy: good governance, accessibility and integrity (A8-0381/2016 - Hannu Takkula)
I voted in favour of the Report on an integrated approach to sport policy: good governance, accessibility and integrity. Sport plays a prominent role in the life of millions of EU citizens. With the entry into force of the Lisbon Treaty in 2009, the European Union acquired a specific competence for sport to build up and implement an EU-coordinated sport policy. The Report calls on international, European and national sports organisations to commit to good governance practices and to develop a culture of transparency and sustainable financing. Moreover, it calls on sports organisations to put forward by 2018, and duly implement, concrete proposals to enhance good governance standards for sports organisations, sports governing bodies and their member associations. I voted in favour because I believe that ensuring a positive and sustainable legacy from major sports events is important not only for sports, but also for the cohesion of the cities and countries where such competitions are organised.
Cross-border aspects of adoptions (A8-0370/2016 - Tadeusz Zwiefka)
I voted in favour of the report with recommendations to the Commission on cross border aspects of adoptions. In the area of adoption, it is essential that any decision should be taken in accordance with the principle of the best interests of the child, non-discrimination, and with respect for his or her fundamental rights. The report calls on the authorities of the Member States to take all decisions in adoption matters with the best interests of the child in mind and with respect for his or her fundamental rights, while always taking into account the specific circumstances of the particular case. It equally underlines that each adoption case is different and must be assessed on its individual merits. Moreover, it considers that in cases of adoption with cross-border aspects the cultural and linguistic traditions of the child should be taken into consideration and be respected as much as possible. I voted in favour because I believe that where a child being considered for adoption is the citizen of another Member State, the consular authorities of that Member State and the child’s family residing in that Member State should be informed and consulted prior to any decision being taken.
Bilateral safeguard clause and stabilisation mechanism for bananas of the EU-Colombia and Peru Trade Agreement (A8-0277/2016 - Marielle de Sarnez)
. ‒ I voted in favour of the report on the proposal for a regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council amending Regulation (EU) No 19/2013 implementing the bilateral safeguard clause and the stabilisation mechanism for bananas of the Trade Agreement between the European Union and its Member States, of the one part, and Colombia and Peru, of the other part, and amending Regulation (EU) No 20/2013 implementing the bilateral safeguard clause and the stabilisation mechanism for bananas of the Agreement establishing an Association between the European Union and its Member States, on the one hand, and Central America on the other.Bananas are eaten in greater quantities than any other fruit in the world. The EU is the biggest market, accounting for roughly a third of global exports. EU banana consumption in 2015 amounted to 5.8 million tonnes, and demand has been rising in recent years. European imports come mainly from Central and Latin American countries. I voted in favour because I believe that EU trade policy should help to keep European standards high and aim for compliance with equivalent standards at global level, rather than encouraging a race to the bottom.
Sustainable management of external fishing fleets (A8-0377/2016 - Linnéa Engström)
. ‒ I voted in favour of the report on the proposal for a regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council on the sustainable management of external fishing fleets, repealing Council Regulation (EC) No 1006/2008.The EU control regime under the Common Fisheries Policy (CFP) comprises three pillars – the control regulation, the IUU regulation and the Regulation on Fishing Authorisations for EU vessels operating outside Union waters. The basic structure of the proposal includes all types of activities by EU vessels fishing abroad and imposes consistent eligibility criteria. As one of the major players in the fisheries world the EU must lead by example and encourage others, both coastal and distant-water states, to adopt and implement fisheries management systems that ensure the sustainable and equitable exploitation of marine resources, contributing to food security and the future of men and women in coastal communities whose livelihood depends on fishing.I voted in favour because I believe that this proposal will create a level playing field for all fishing activities being conducted under the EU flags and will ensure that the EU fulfils its responsibilities as flag state, as well as state of beneficial ownership.
Third countries whose nationals are subject to or exempt from a visa requirement: Georgia (A8-0260/2016 - Mariya Gabriel)
I voted in favour of the report on the proposal for a regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council amending Regulation (EC) No 539/2001 listing the third countries whose nationals must be in possession of visas when crossing the external borders and those whose nationals are exempt from that requirement (Georgia). The conclusion of a visa waiver agreement with the EU is not considered a precondition for the implementation of the visa exemption for Georgian citizens since Georgia has already exempted all EU citizens from the visa requirement for stays of 90 days (within a 180-day period). Since the launch of the Visa Liberalisation Dialogue between EU and Georgia in June 2012, the Commission issued four progress reports on Georgia’s implementation of the Visa Liberalisation Action Plan (VLAP). The last progress report of the Commission, adopted on 18 December 2015, concluded that Georgia had made the necessary progress and had fulfilled all the benchmarks set in the VLAP. I voted in favour because I believe that Georgia is a strategic partner for the EU in the framework of the European Neighbourhood Policy and in particular of the Eastern Partnership.
Rule of law crisis in the Democratic Republic of Congo and in Gabon (RC-B8-0120/2017, B8-0120/2017, B8-0121/2017, B8-0122/2017, B8-0123/2017, B8-0124/2017, B8-0125/2017, B8-0126/2017)
I voted in favour of the European Parliament resolution on the rule of law crisis in the Democratic Republic of the Congo and in Gabon. The situation in Gabon following the presidential election of 27 August 2016 erupted into a national crisis, with protests in Libreville against the re-election of Ali Bongo Ondimba descending into violence and extreme disorder. Many lives were lost during these disturbances. The resolution condemns the use of violence in Gabon, both by protestors and in the manner in which police and government officials have attempted to resolve the situation. It calls on the Government of Gabon to commit itself to ensuring that future elections are free, fair and democratic, with transparent and rigorous polling procedures open to international observation. Moreover, it condemns the expulsion of human rights defenders and urges the Government of the DRC to allow defenders to remain in the country. I voted in favour because I believe that all international actors should provide major political, financial, technical and logistical support to Congo, if needed for the elections to take place by December 2017.
Implementation of Erasmus + (A8-0389/2016 - Milan Zver)
. ‒ I voted in favour of the report on the implementation of Regulation (EU) No 1288/2013 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 11 December 2013 establishing ‘Erasmus+’: the Union programme for education, training, youth and sport and repealing Decisions No 1719/2006/EC, No 1720/2006/EC and No 1298/2008/EC.Erasmus+, launched in 2014, is based on a long historical development of EU programmes in education and training and youth provision. Many EU citizens value Erasmus+ as the major tool to support activities in the fields of education and training, youth and sport, and consider it a success story of European integration. The programme offers a variety of new opportunities for potential participants, and its objectives are considered to be very relevant to today’s policies in the fields concerned. The report highlights the importance of clear learning outcomes and specific job descriptions for Erasmus+ work-experience abroad for vocational education and training students, trainees, apprentices and volunteers.I voted in favour because I believe that the programme’s achievements have to be safeguarded and consolidated. Moreover, further improvements have to be made where necessary, while keeping the existing structure of the programme.
EU-Kosovo Stabilisation and Association Agreement: procedures for its application (A8-0361/2016 - Adam Szejnfeld)
I voted in favour of the report on the proposal for a regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council on certain procedures for applying the Stabilisation and Association Agreement between the European Union and the European Atomic Energy Community, of the one part, and Kosovo of the other part. The EU-Kosovo Stabilisation and Association Agreement entered into force on 1 April 2016, following the ratification by the European Parliament and the Kosovo National Assembly. I voted in favour because I strongly support the conclusion of this Agreement, and I welcome that Kosovo would finally have, like the other countries of the Western Balkans, contractual relations with the EU. The entry into force of the SAA also prompted the establishment of the Stabilisation and Association Parliamentary Committee, which promptly adopted its rules of procedure and has held two meetings.
Imports of textile products from certain third countries not covered by specific Union import rules (A8-0311/2016 - Hannu Takkula)
I voted in favour of the report on the proposal for a regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council amending Regulation (EU) 2015/936 of the European Parliament and of the Council on common rules for imports of textile products from certain third countries not covered by bilateral agreements, protocols or other arrangements, or by other specific Union import rules. The regulation lays down the common rules for imports of textile products from certain third countries not covered by bilateral agreements, protocols or other arrangements, or by other specific Union import rules. It currently covers two countries which are not members of the World Trade Organisation – the Republic of Belarus and the Democratic People’s Republic of Korea. Recognising the positive political developments in relations between the European Union and the Republic of Belarus, the Commission proposed to abolish the autonomous quotas on imports of textiles and clothing originating in the Republic of Belarus. This abolition aims at contributing to the further improvement of the EU-Belarus relations. I voted in favour because I believe that intensified EU-Belarus trade relations could be a vector for modernisation of Belarussian economy and promotion the EU’s core values.
Conclusion of the Agreement continuing the International Science and Technology Center (A8-0363/2016 - Elmar Brok)
I voted in favour of the Recommendation on the draft Council decision on the conclusion of the Agreement continuing the International Science and Technology Centre. Two intergovernmental organisations, ISTC (in Astana) and the Science and Technology Centre in Kiev, Ukraine (STCU), exist to support research and development projects with scientists and engineers with dual-use knowledge mainly originating in the weapons of mass destruction programmes of the former USSR. The aim of the current Council Draft Decision is to conclude the Agreement continuing the International Science and Technology Centre (ISTC) after the withdrawal of Russian participation, signed on 9 December 2015, requiring Parliament’s consent in order to enter into force for the parts falling under the competence of the Treaties on the EU, and on Functioning of the EU, respectively. The Agreement foresees that all the activities will benefit from the tax-free regime and other tax privileges in the recipient countries, and accords immunities and privileges to participating personnel, in compliance with the 1961 Vienna Convention on diplomatic relations. I voted in favour because I believe that this collaborative project amongst the participating countries will contribute to global, and European, security and safety.
Objection to a delegated act: Identifying high-risk third countries with strategic deficiencies (B8-0001/2017)
I voted in favour of the Commission Delegated Regulation amending Commission Delegated Regulation (EU) 2016/1675 supplementing Directive (EU) 2015/849 by identifying high-risk third countries with strategic deficiencies. The delegated regulation, its annex and the amending delegated regulation are meant to identify high-risk third countries with strategic deficiencies as regards anti-money laundering and countering terrorist financing (AML/CFT), which represent a threat for the EU financial system and for which enhanced customer due diligence measures are necessary at EU obliged entities under Directive (EU) 2015/849 (4AMLD). The list of countries, including after the amendment introduced in the amending delegated regulation adopted by the Commission on 24 November 2016, matches those identified by the Financial Action Task Force (FATF) at their 28th plenary meeting from 19 to 21 October 2016. However, the Commission assessment is an autonomous process and the Commission is thus free to move beyond FATF standards. I voted in favour because I believe that the Commission assessment has to be carried out in a comprehensive and unbiased manner, assessing all third countries based on the same criteria defined in Article 9 of Directive (EU) 2015/849.
Logistics in the EU and multimodal transport in the new TEN-T corridors (A8-0384/2016 - Inés Ayala Sender)
I voted in favour of the report on logistics in the EU and multimodal transport in the new TEN-T corridors. Logistics includes the services and processes of planning, managing and carrying out the flow of goods and information between the point of origin and the point of destination. Efficient and sustainable freight transport logistics play a vital role for the smooth functioning of many other services and activities in our economy, covering the production of goods to their delivery and recycling and ranging from local to global levels. In 2007 the Commission has last set out a Freight Logistics Action Plan for improving the EU freight transport system. There has been substantial progress since then in many areas. This report aims to formulate the European Parliament’s position and stimulate initiatives to promote the field of freight transport logistics. I voted in favour because I believe that it is urgent to make the field of logistics a focus on the political agenda. There should be a debate on how to shape a future EU freight transport and logistics policy which supports the sector’s important function and sets the necessary priorities for implementing the multimodal TEN-T network.
A European Pillar of Social Rights (A8-0391/2016 - Maria João Rodrigues)
I voted in favour of the report on a European Pillar of Social Rights. The European Social Model has contributed to important productivity gains and to Europe’s competitiveness, based on a healthy and skilled workforce with a decent purchasing power to sustain a sophisticated internal market. The European Social Model has been an important factor for the success story of European integration, which has brought peace, security and broadly-shared prosperity for several decades. At the same time, Europe is facing a number of well-known structural trends and challenges such as globalisation, demographic changes, climate change and natural resource constraints. It will be necessary in the future to rely less on labour-based contributions and more on general taxation, financial regulation and a forceful fight against tax avoidance. European economic governance needs to be rebalanced further, with greater consideration of social indicators in economic policy-making. I believe that the European Pillar of Social Rights is an important and urgent initiative, which the Commission and European Parliament have rightly put on the top of their political priorities. However, I am of the opinion that the strength of the EPSR needs to spread through the entire multi-level structure of the EU.
Tackling the challenges of the EU Customs Code (UCC) implementation (B8-0024/2017)
I voted in favour of the resolution on tackling the challenges of the EU Customs Code (UCC) implementation. The Customs Union is a cornerstone of the European Union as one of the largest trading blocks in the world and it is essential for the proper functioning of the single market for the benefit of both EU businesses and citizens. The Digital Single Market aims at offering better access for consumers and businesses to digital goods and services across Europe and the Customs Union should further facilitate this access in order to maximise the opportunities of global trade. The different customs systems create fragmentation, additional administrative burdens and delays, which cause uncertainty and market disparity, and which may undermine economic operators’ compliance with the Union’s customs legislation. I voted in favour because I believe that the Commission and the Member States have to come up with a clear, coherent and ambitious strategy and timeline to ensure that any elements that are necessary for the enforcement of the EU customs systems are covered by appropriate proposals that are aligned with and fit for purpose for the current evolution of global trade and the implementation of the EU trade policy agenda.
Written declarations (21)
Amendments (1442)
Amendment 9 #
2018/2159(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Citation 6
Citation 6
— having regard to UN Security Council resolutions 1325, 1820, 1888, 1889, 1960, 2106, 2122 and 2242 on women, peace and security and UN Security Council resolutions 2250 and 2419 on youth, peace and security,
Amendment 22 #
2018/2159(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Citation 14 a (new)
Citation 14 a (new)
- having regard to Regulation (EU) 2017/2306 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 12 December 2017 amending Regulation (EU) No 230/2014 establishing an instrument contributing to stability and peace,
Amendment 23 #
2018/2159(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Citation 14 b (new)
Citation 14 b (new)
- having regard to the Proposal of 13 June 2018 of the High Representative of the Union for Foreign Affairs and Security Policy, with the support of the Commission, to the Council for a Council Decision establishing a European Peace Facility(HR(2018) 94),
Amendment 32 #
2018/2159(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Recital B
Recital B
B. whereas the EU is committed to implementing the Women, Peace and Security Agenda in line with UN Security Council Resolution 1325 and subsequent updates and the Youth, Peace and Security Agenda in line with UN Security Council Resolution 2250 and subsequent updates;
Amendment 38 #
2018/2159(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Recital C
Recital C
C. whereas the EU, as a key contributor to international organisations, an core aid donor and the world's largest trading partner, should take a leading role in peacebuilding and conflict prevention;
Amendment 42 #
2018/2159(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Recital D
Recital D
D. whereas the prevention of violent conflict is fundamental to political and social advancement; whereas it is instrumental to achieving the Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs); whereas continued EU support to civil and military actors in third countries is an important factor for preventing recurrent violent conflict;
Amendment 72 #
2018/2159(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Recital L
Recital L
L. whereas it is essential to include and support the active and meaningful participation of local actors, both civilian and military, especially women, minorities, indigenous peoples and youth, when promoting and facilitating capacity and confidence building in mediation, dialogue and reconciliation;
Amendment 90 #
2018/2159(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 2 a (new)
Paragraph 2 a (new)
2a. Calls for long term peacebuilding addressing root causes of conflict;
Amendment 102 #
2018/2159(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 5
Paragraph 5
5. Welcomes the integrated approach to external conflicts and crises; calls for further institutionalisation of this approach, supports more coherent and holistic engagement by the EU to external conflicts and crises; calls for further institutionalisation of this approach and supports its aim to clarify EU responses at each stage of the conflict;
Amendment 103 #
2018/2159(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 5 a (new)
Paragraph 5 a (new)
5a. Welcomes the fact that the involvement of military actors is increasingly being recognised by the EU as a potentially important element in conflict prevention; welcomes in this regard the Capacity Building for Security and Development initiative and the recent proposal by the High Representative for a European Peace Facility, two instruments aimed at enhancing the Union's ability to contribute to stability, to preserve peace and prevent conflicts in third countries and hence to provide a secure basis for development;
Amendment 111 #
2018/2159(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 6
Paragraph 6
6. Calls for the establishment, under the authority of the VP/HR, of an EU high- level advisory board on mediation with the aim of setting up a gender-sensitive pool of senior political mediators and conflict prevention experts to make available political and technical expertise at short notice;
Amendment 141 #
2018/2159(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 15
Paragraph 15
15. Highlights the fact that all EU interventions in violent and conflict- affected areas need to be conflict and gender sensitive; calls for immediate action to embed these aspects in all relevant policies, strategies, actions and operations, entailing a greater focus on the avoidance of doing harm, while maximising the EU's contribution to achieving long term conflict prevention and peacebuilding objectives;
Amendment 145 #
2018/2159(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 16
Paragraph 16
16. Underlines the role of the Democracy Support and Election Coordination Group (DEG) and its lead MEPs as the operational body for coordinating mediation and dialogue initiatives and welcomes new initiatives such as the Jean Monnet Dialogue for peace and democracy and the Young Political Leaders’ programme, and recommends that these should be developed further; welcomes the decision of the DEG to build on the success of the Jean Monnet Dialogue process with the Macedonian Sobranie by extending the Jean Monnet dialogue's methodology throughout the Western Balkans countries;
Amendment 146 #
2018/2159(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 16 a (new)
Paragraph 16 a (new)
16a. Recognizes growing role of the European parliament in political mediation processes; highlights, in this respect, the joint initiative of the Commissioner for European Neighbourhood Policy and Enlargement Negotiations and three mediators of the European Parliament, Mr Kukan, Mr Vajgl and Mr Fleckenstein in supporting the party leaders in the former Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia in overcoming the political crisis through the adoption of the 2015 Przino Agreement; confirms European parliament's readiness to build on this example of close inter-institutional cooperation with the European Commission and the EEAS by stepping up its engagement to strengthen political dialogues and reconciliation throughout the Western Balkans and wider Neighbourhood;
Amendment 152 #
2018/2159(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 17
Paragraph 17
17. Recommends that the existing parliamentary training and coaching programmes available for Members of the European Parliament, as well as training programmes for third country parliamentarians, political parties and staff, be further developed, including those on gender and youth aspects;
Amendment 159 #
2018/2159(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 21
Paragraph 21
21. CWelcomes the Council Conclusions on Women, Peace and Security; calls for the EU to take a lead role in the implementation of the UN Security Council resolutions on women, peace and security, and the incorporation of the principles contained therein at all stages of EU conflict prevention and mediation activities;
Amendment 166 #
2018/2159(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 24
Paragraph 24
24. Calls for the inclusion of expertise on gender, including gender-based violence, in all stages of conflict prevention and, the mediation process and peacebuilding;
Amendment 169 #
2018/2159(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 24 a (new)
Paragraph 24 a (new)
24a. Calls for the EU to actively engage and share best practice with key international actors such as the UN, AU and NATO, including NATO's Special Representative for Women, Peace and Security;
Amendment 18 #
2018/2156(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Recital C
Recital C
C. whereas, in line with the objectives of the Global Strategy, the EU is increasing its responsibility for its own security and defence and its role as a partner for international peace and security, as well as its strategic autonomy, based on the implementation of a common foreign and security policy that leads to a common defence policy;
Amendment 19 #
2018/2156(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Recital C a (new)
Recital C a (new)
Ca. whereas the Union must develop its own strategic autonomy through an efficient foreign and security policy, in order to maintain peace, prevent conflicts, reinforce international security, while guaranteeing the security of its own citizens and that of the people concerned by the CSDP missions, to protect its interests and defend its founding values, all the while contributing to an effective multilateralism;
Amendment 20 #
2018/2156(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Recital C b (new)
Recital C b (new)
Cb. whereas the EU must be capable to decide and act without depending on third-party capacities, in order to build own resilience and consolidate its strategic autonomy in the field of defence, the fight against terrorism, and cybersecurity;
Amendment 21 #
2018/2156(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Recital C c (new)
Recital C c (new)
Cc. whereas standardisation and interoperability at infrastructure and procurement level are key prerequisites for the achievement of strategic autonomy, the Defence Union and an efficient military mobility;
Amendment 75 #
2018/2156(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 1
Paragraph 1
1. Underlines that military mobility is a central strategic tool enabling the EU and NATO to pursue their security and defence interests effectively and in a complementary manner and should not be limited only to physical, legal and infrastructural obstacles; welcomes the fact that military mobility has recently gained a substantial level of attention from all relevant actors; notes that it enhances our preparedness and increases our deterrence posture in the face of potential adversaries and crisis situations, while helping to achieve the EU level of ambition in defence and security policy, including political, operational and industrial strategic autonomy;
Amendment 79 #
2018/2156(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 1 a (new)
Paragraph 1 a (new)
1a. Highlights that coherent military planning is imperative for effective strategic autonomy, based on standardisation and interoperability of equipment and weaponry as we all as strategic doctrine and command and control processes;
Amendment 80 #
2018/2156(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 1 b (new)
Paragraph 1 b (new)
1b. Stresses that furthering the EU Defence Union and building on strategic autonomy and self-resilience should not lead to raising tensions in the relations of the EU with strategically relevant regional actors;
Amendment 88 #
2018/2156(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 2 a (new)
Paragraph 2 a (new)
2a. Supports the decision made by the Member States that participate in the Permanent Structured Cooperation to include Military Mobility on the initial list of seventeen priority projects to be developed within the PESCO framework;
Amendment 96 #
2018/2156(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 4 a (new)
Paragraph 4 a (new)
4a. Believes that an efficient military mobility policy will strengthen the EU's CSDP missions, given their international dimension and their peace-keeping objective, complementary to the UN's missions' mandate of peace building, by increasing synergies between defence needs;
Amendment 144 #
2018/2156(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 15
Paragraph 15
15. Notes that the Action Plan identifies a considerable number of tasks that need to be accomplished at Member- State level, to which end the European Defence Agency and the European Commission are to provide support and guidance for a swift and efficient implementation; emphasises in particular the importance of achieving harmonised rules for cross-border movement permissions, which are a major obstacle to rapid terrestrial, aerial and maritime movements;
Amendment 2 #
2018/2155(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Citation 1
Citation 1
– having regard to the international legal protection of freedom of thought, conscience, religion or belief guaranteed by Article 18 of the 1948 Universal Declaration of Human Rights (UDHR), Article 18 of the 1966 International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights (ICCPR), the 1981 Declaration on the Elimination of all Forms of Intolerance and of Discrimination based on Religion or Belief, Article 9 of the European Convention on Human Rights and Articles 10, 21 and 22 of the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union,
Amendment 10 #
2018/2155(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Recital A
Recital A
A. whereas the right to freedom of thought, conscience, religion orand belief (FoRB) is a, and the rights to apostasy and to espouse atheistics views are human rights inherent to all human beings and a fundamental right of individuals which should be subjected to no kind of discrimination, as enshrined by international and European founding texts, including the Universal Declaration of Human Rights and the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union;
Amendment 21 #
2018/2155(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Recital B
Recital B
B. whereas FoRBfreedom of thought, conscience, religion and belief implies the right of the individual to choose what to believe or to not believe, the right to change and quit one’s religion and convictions without any constraints, and the right to practise and manifest the religion of one’s choice, whether individually or in community and whether in private or in public; whereas the manifestation of religion or belief can be expressed in worship, teaching, practice and observance; whereas FoRBfreedom of thought, conscience, religion and belief entails the right of believers’ and non- believers' communities to preserve or quit their ethos and to act in accordance with it, and the entitlement for their religious and non-confessional organisations to have recognised legal personality; whereas protecting individuals adhering to any religion or none and effectively addressing violations of FoRBfreedom of thought, conscience, religion and belief, such as discrimination or legal restrictions based on thought, conscience, religion or belief, are primordial conditions to ensure that individuals may enjoy FoRBfreedom of thought, conscience, religion and belief on an equal basis;
Amendment 30 #
2018/2155(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Recital C
Recital C
C. whereas FoRBfreedom of thought, conscience, religion and belief is indivisible, is interdependent on and interrelated to fundamental freedoms and other human rights, and is a cornerstone human right that protects the core of human dignity;
Amendment 34 #
2018/2155(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Recital D
Recital D
D. whereas FoRB directlfreedom of thought, conscience, religion and belief may contributes to democracy, development, the rule of law, peace and stability; whereas violations of FoRBfreedom of thought, conscience, religion and belief are increasingly widespread, affect people in all parts of the world and may exacerbate intolerance, often constituting early indicators of potential violence and conflicts;
Amendment 46 #
2018/2155(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Recital H
Recital H
H. whereas the promotion of FoRBfreedom of thought, conscience, religion and belief, including through civil society support for the protection of the rights of individuals belonging to religious and belief minorities and non-believers, support for human rights defenders (HRDs) and the fight against discrimination on grounds of religion and belief , as well as the promotion of intercultural and interreligious dialogue, is a funding priority under the 2014-2020 European Instrument for Democracy and Human Rights (EIDHR); whereas the European Development Fund (EDF) and EU financial instruments such as the Development Cooperation Instrument (DCI), the European Neighbourhood Instrument (ENI), the Instrument contributing to Stability and Peace (IcSP) and the Instrument for Pre-Accession Assistance (IPA) have also supported projects that are conducive to improving the environment for FoRB;
Amendment 51 #
2018/2155(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 1
Paragraph 1
1. Stresses that freedom of thought, conscience, religion orand belief is an important undeniable pillar of human identity, greatlor to not believe is a pillar of personal identity impacting individuals and societies, and is therefore a reality that must not be neglected or denied in policies but requires proper recognition and addressing;
Amendment 58 #
2018/2155(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 2
Paragraph 2
2. Affirms that the right to freedom of thought, conscience and, religion, commonly referred as freedom of religion or belief (FoRB), as a fundamental and belief or to not believe, and the rights to apostasy and to espouse atheistic views are an important human right and a founding value of the EU, and has to be duly protected, promoted and safeguarded by all actors; underscores the duty of states to guarantee FoRB as well as enhanced through interreligious and intercultural dialogue; underscores the duty of states to guarantee freedom of thought, conscience, religion and belief in order to preserve peaceful, democratic and pluralistic societies that are respectful of diversity and beliefs;
Amendment 64 #
2018/2155(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 3
Paragraph 3
3. Expresses its deep concern at the fact that recent years have seen a dramatic rise in violations of FoRB worldwide, including persecution basefreedom of thought, conscience, religion or belief, and persecution of believers and non r-beligion or beliefevers worldwide; stresses that these violations are frequently at the root of or increasingly exacerbate wars or other forms of armed conflict, resulting in violations of humanitarian law, including mass murders or genocide; stresses that violations of FoRBfreedom of thought, conscience, religion and belief undermine democracy, impede development, and negatively affect the enjoyment of other fundamental freedoms and rights; emphasises that this obligates the international community, the EU and its Member States to reaffirm their determination and strengthen their actions in promoting FoRBfreedom of thought, conscience, religion and belief and the rights to apostasy and to espouse atheistic views;
Amendment 75 #
2018/2155(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 5
Paragraph 5
5. Stresses that, in accordance with Article 17 TEU, the EU is committed to maintaining open, transparent and regular dialogues with churches and religious, philosophical and non-confessional organisations; highlights the supporting effect of these dialogues for respect for other human rights, equal rights for women, children’s rights, as well as for democracy, development, the rule of law, good governance, peace and stability, and environmental and labour standards; stresses that such interreligious and intercultural dialogues are often met by greater openness by some EU international partners and can create a starting-point for progress in other areas;
Amendment 78 #
2018/2155(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 5 a (new)
Paragraph 5 a (new)
5a. Condemns the persecution of and attacks under religious basis against ethnic, religious groups, non-believers, atheists, women or other minorities such as LGBTI and calls for immediate accountability of such violations; condemns forced conversions and harmful practices such as female genital mutilation, forced marriages and certain other practices associated with or perceived as manifestations of a religion or belief; opposes such practices that often affect women and girls, members of religious minorities and persons on the basis of their sexual orientation or gender identity and stresses that they may constitute violations of international human rights standards;
Amendment 82 #
2018/2155(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 6
Paragraph 6
6. Welcomes the enhancement of the promotion of FoRBfreedom of thought, conscience, religion and belief in EU foreign policy and external actions over recent years, in particular through the EU Global Strategy for foreign policy and security and the 2015-2019 EU Action Plan on Human Rights and Democracy; welcomes the fact that this enhancement is being met with an increased commitment on the part of many partner countries to comply with the respective Articles 18 of the UDHR and ICCPR;
Amendment 85 #
2018/2155(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 7
Paragraph 7
7. CommendNotes the creation of the post of Special Envoy for the promotion of FoRB outside the EU in 2016 by the President of the Commission, in response to the resolution of Parliament of 4 February 2016; considers the appointment of the Special Envoy as an important step forward and a clear recognition of FoRB as one of the core parts offreedom of thought, conscience, religion and belief within the human rights agenda of EU foreign policy and external actions, both bilateral and multilateral, and within development cooperation; praisesaffirms that the Special Envoy for his continuous engagement and cooperation and complementarity of actions with the EU Special Representative for Human Rights on this issue, including the promotion of the EU Guidelines; commends the Commissioner on International Cooperation and Development, together with the Commission’s DG DEVCO, for actively supporting the Special Envoyshould clearly advocate for freedom of thought, conscience, religion and belief that also includes the rights to not belief, apostasy and to espouse atheistic views; in this sense also stresses the need to pay a particular attention to the situation of non-believers at risks; supports the Special Envoy continuous engagement and cooperation of actions with the EU Special Representative for Human Rights on this issue, including the promotion of the EU Guidelines;
Amendment 89 #
2018/2155(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 8
Paragraph 8
8. Stresses the importance of linking up efforts to promote FoRB and inter- and intra-religiousfreedom of thought, conscience, religion and belief and inter- and intra-religious, inter-convictional and cultural dialogues with the prevention of violent extremism on a complementary and mutually reinforcing basis, in particular within neighbouring and other countries with which the EU has special relations; underlines that non-confessional, humanist and "laique" organisations are also key actors in preventing violent extremism;
Amendment 99 #
2018/2155(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 9
Paragraph 9
9. Deplores the fact that some countries in order to limit freedom of religion and belief and freedom of expression, have, enforce or seek to introduce penal laws providing punishment for blasphemy, conversion or apostasy, including the death penalty; also draws attention to the situation of some other countries facing or being at risk of conflicts of a religious dimension; calls for the EU to take further actions and increase its political engagement to prioritise in its foreign policy efforts towards all the countries concerned with a view to the repeal of such discriminatory laws and protect the ones at risk;
Amendment 104 #
2018/2155(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 9 a (new)
Paragraph 9 a (new)
9a. Denounces the recourse to blasphemy, apostasy or other accusations based on religious grounds, in order to crack-down on human rights defenders in relation to their legitimate activities, including on social media, and more broadly to restrict civil society space; condemns the continued detention of Sakharov Prize laureate Raif Badawi after an unlawful trial and presses the Saudi authorities to immediately and unconditionally release him;
Amendment 107 #
2018/2155(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 10
Paragraph 10
10. Welcomes the fact that the Special Envoy has developed effective working networks within the Commission, the Council, and the European Parliament, as well as with other stakeholders; deplores, however, the fact that the Special Envoy’s mandate was not established and consolidated with sufficient human and financial resources;
Amendment 115 #
2018/2155(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 11
Paragraph 11
11. Calls on the Council and the Commission to strengthenmake an assessment of the Special Envoy’s institutional mandate and capacity, by earmarking funding and human resources adequate to the Envoy’s duties, developing a systemic institutionalisation of working networks established by the Special Envoy within all relevant EU institutions or establishing the positionin order to establish if necessary adequate funding and human resources to carry out Envoy’s duties that should focus on promoting freedom of thought, conscience, religion and belief, and the rights to apostasy and to espouse atheistic views; calls ofn the EU Special Representative for FoRBEnvoy to annually report on his achievements and priorities;
Amendment 122 #
2018/2155(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 12
Paragraph 12
Amendment 139 #
2018/2155(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 13
Paragraph 13
Amendment 146 #
2018/2155(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 14
Paragraph 14
Amendment 152 #
2018/2155(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 15
Paragraph 15
15. Recommends the setting up of a regularn informal advisory working group of Member States’ FoRB institutions and European Parliament representatives together with experts, scholars, and representatives of civil society, including churches and other faith-based organisations, providing advice on FoRB issues to assist the Special Envoy as well as non-confessional organisations, providing advice on freedom of thought, conscience, religion and belief;
Amendment 159 #
2018/2155(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 16
Paragraph 16
16. Recommends that the EU Special Representative for Human rights in collaboration with the Special Envoy further develop cooperation with counterparts outside the EU, in particular by working in close cooperation with the different UN Special Rapporteurs and in particular the one on FoRB, as well as exploring the possibility of EU-UN joint annualinitiatives reporting on discrimination against religious minorities and non- believers, also formulating common proposals on how to put an end to such acts;
Amendment 168 #
2018/2155(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 18
Paragraph 18
18. Urgently calls for the implementation of the EU Guidelines on FoRB to be increased in intensity and effectiveness; nNotes that further dedicated efforts need to be made by the EU and its Member States to implement more effectively theall thematic EU Guidelines and make the EU more influential in advancing FoRBfreedom of thought, conscience, religion and belief worldwide; stresses that understanding how societies may be shaped and influenced by thoughts, religions and other beliefs, including non-belief, is instrumental to better comprehending the promotion of FoRBfreedom of thought, conscience, religion and belief in EU foreign policy and international cooperation; calls for a particular attention to be paid to the situation of non-believers facing discrimination and violence;
Amendment 174 #
2018/2155(INI)
19. Commends, inUnderlines thise respect, the efforts made to date by the EEAS and the Commission to provide training on religonsibilities fulfilled by human rights focal points within all EU Delegatiouns literacy to EU officials and national diplomats; stresses, however, the need for broader and more systematic training programmes which would raisand CSDP Missions and calls for the strengthening of knowledge on freedom of thought, conscience, religion and belief to increase the awareness of and increase the use of the EU Guidelines among the EU’'s and Member States’ officials and diplomats and strengthen cooperation with the Special Envoy; asks for churches and religious communities and associat; notes, in this respect, the efforts made to date by the EEAS and the Commissions to be involved in this training process; calls on the Commission and the Council to earmark resources for establishing such training programmeprovide training on the situation of religious minorities as well as non-believers to EU officials and national diplomats;
Amendment 184 #
2018/2155(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 20
Paragraph 20
20. Calls on the Commission and the EEAS to produce EU Annual Reports on FoRBcontinue including a chapter on freedom of thought, conscience, religion and belief within the EU Annual Reports on human rights and democracy in the world, to be communicated to the European Parliament and the Council; notes that the EU Guidelines on FoRB provide for an evaluation of their implementation by COHOM after a period of three years, and that no such evaluation has been communicated or made public; calls for the evaluation to be made public without delay; considers that the evaluation should highlight best practices, identify areas for improvement, and provide concrete recommendations on implementation in accordance with a specified timeline and milestones subject to regular annual evaluation; calls for the evaluation to be included in the EU Annual Reports on FoRBHuman rights and democracy in the world;
Amendment 186 #
2018/2155(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 21
Paragraph 21
Amendment 198 #
2018/2155(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 23
Paragraph 23
23. Welcomes the EU commitment to promoting FoRBfreedom of thought, conscience, religion and belief in multilateral fora, in particular within the UN, the Council of Europe and the OSCE and with the Organisation of Islamic Cooperation (OIC); supports, in this respect, EU cooperation with the UN Special Rapporteur on freedom of religion or belief, and the Office of the UN High Commissioner for Human Rights; recommends continuing the EU practice of taking the lead on resolutions at the UNGA and UNHRC on FoRBfreedom of thought, conscience and religion and seeking to build alliances and defend common positions with third countries and international organisations; calls on the EEASU and the OIC to consider preparing a joint resolution on FoRBfreedom of thought, conscience, religion and belief within the UN framework;
Amendment 206 #
2018/2155(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 24
Paragraph 24
24. Expresses its satisfaction that FoRBfreedom of thought, conscience, religion and belief is identified as a priority of the European Instrument of Democracy and Human Rights (EIDHR); welcomnotes the significant increase of EIDHR funding allocated to FoRB-related projects since the adoption of the EU Guidelines; calls on the Commission and the EEAS to ensure that EU diplomatic work for the promotion of FoRBhuman rights, including freedom of thought, conscience, religion and belief and EIDHR-funded projects is mutually reinforcing; stresses that FoRBfreedom of thought, conscience, religion and belief can also be supported by other instruments than human rights- oriented funds, among others those dedicated to the conflict prevention dimension or to education and culture; calls on the Commission and the Council to maintain sufficient funding for FoRB-human rights related projects, including equal treatment of all convictions, under the EU external financial instruments, within the Multiannual Financial Framework (MFF) for 2021-2027;
Amendment 216 #
2018/2155(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 25
Paragraph 25
25. Stresses that the EU’s policies in the fields of peace, security and conflict prevention and development and cooperation face challenges, for which solutions can be devised with the participation among others of churches, religious leaders, academics, religious communities and associations or faith- based organisations that are a critical part of civil societyas well as non- confessional organisations; acknowledges the importance of being mindful of the diversity of churches, religious communities and associations and faith- based and secular organisations which perform actual development and humanitarian work for and with communities; calls on the Council and the Commission to incorporate, where relevant, objectives and activities relating to the promotion and protection of FoRB into the programming of funding instruments linked to those policies, namely the EDF, the DCI, the ENI, the IcSP and the IPA;
Amendment 29 #
2018/2150(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Citation 21 a (new)
Citation 21 a (new)
- having regards to the 2019 budget under which IPAII funds to Turkey will be cut by 146.7 million in view of the situation in Turkey as regards human rights, democracy and the rule of law,
Amendment 45 #
2018/2150(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 2
Paragraph 2
2. Recalls that over 150 000 people were taken into custody in the post-coup crackdown and 78 000 have been arrested on terrorism charges, while more than 50 000 people remain in jail; expresses concern at the excessively lengthy pre-trial detention and judicial proceedings, the fact that in several cases no indictment has been issued yet, and the harshness of detention conditions; is particularly concerned at the fact that such arrests seem to also target legitimate voices of dissent or members of the opposition, human rights defenders, journalists or members of the opposition; warns against the abuse of anti-terror measures to legitimize the repression of human rights; is very worried at the allegations of ill-treatment and torture of those in prison, as reported by several human rights organisations;
Amendment 61 #
2018/2150(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 4
Paragraph 4
4. Condemns the increased executive control over and political interference with the work of judges and prosecutors; is concerned that EU funding intended for the training of the judiciary and law enforcement to abide by such principles as impartiality, independence and human rights is instead being used to legitimize repressive behaviour; stresses that a serious reform of the legislative and judicial branches of power is needed for Turkey to comply with its obligations under international human rights law; is awaiting, in this regard, the Reform Action Group’s action plan on judicial reforms;
Amendment 68 #
2018/2150(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 5
Paragraph 5
5. Expresses serious concern about the disproportionate and arbitrary measures curtailing freedom of expression, media freedom and access to information; condemns the closure of more than 160 media outlets and, the large number of arrests of journalists in the aftermath of the coup attempt as well as the unsubstantiated and disproportionate sentences handed down to journalists; urges Turkey to guarantee media freedom as a matter of priority and to immediately release and acquit all unlawfully detained journalists;
Amendment 75 #
2018/2150(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 6
Paragraph 6
6. Expresses concern at the shrinking space for civil society and the promotion of fundamental rights and freedoms; notes that a large number of activists, including human rights defenders, were arrested and demonstrations were recurrently banned during the state of emergency; calls on Turkey to protect the fundamental rights of minorities, such asincluding LGBTI people and to immediately and unconditionally release all human rights defenders currently detained, to drop all trumped up charges against them and to immediately seize all direct and indirect harassment against them;
Amendment 96 #
2018/2150(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 6 a (new)
Paragraph 6 a (new)
6 a. Notes with concern the increase in the number of so-called 'honour killings' that took place in Turkey; calls for all perpetrators of this crime to be brought to justice under appropriate manslaughter or murder charges;
Amendment 102 #
2018/2150(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 6 b (new)
Paragraph 6 b (new)
6 b. Expresses serious concern about Internet censorship in Turkey with the growing number of websites blocked from Turkey reaching 220,000 including that of Wikipedia since April 2017 and urges the authorities to bring Law No.5651 in line with European standards;
Amendment 142 #
2018/2150(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 10
Paragraph 10
10. Notes that the state of emergency further constrained the capacity of the Grand National Assembly to fulfil its fundamental role of democratic scrutiny and accountability; notes with great concern the arrest of two members of parliament from the Republican People’s Party (CHP), as well as the way the People’s Democratic Party (HDP) has been particularly marginalised, with many HDP lawmakers being arrested on the grounds of alleged support for terrorist activities; underlines that the Turkish Grand National Assembly should be the central institution in Turkish democracy, and represent all citizens on equal terms, regrets the high electoral threshold as a distortion of true political representation;
Amendment 159 #
2018/2150(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 11 a (new)
Paragraph 11 a (new)
11 a. Calls on the EU and Member States to increase their protection and support for human rights defenders at risk in Turkey, including through emergency grants, and to ensure full implementation of the EU Guidelines on Human Rights Defenders by the EU Delegation and Member State embassies and consulates;
Amendment 166 #
2018/2150(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 13
Paragraph 13
13. Calls on the Commission and the Member States, taking all of the above into account and in accordance with the Negotiating Framework, to formally suspend the accession negotiations with Turkey; remains, however, committed to democratic dialogue with Turkey; asks the Commission to use, during the formal suspension of negotiations, all funds available underremove Turkey from the list of beneficiaries of both the IPA II and the future IPA III to support, through a dedicated envelope directly managed by the EU, Turkey’s civil society, and to increase opportunities for people-to-people contacts, academic dialogue, access for Turkish students to European universities and media platforms for journalistregulations; calls for an appropriate amount of funding reserved for Turkey under these regulations to be put under a dedicated envelope under the EIDHR or future NDICI respectively, in order to directly, without governance interference, support Turkey’s civil society, human rights defenders and journalists and to increase opportunities for people-to-people contacts, academic dialogue, access for Turkish students to European universities and media platforms for journalists; underlines that this suspension is without prejudice to article 49 TEU which states that all European countries which meet the Copenhagen criteria can apply for EU membership and it does not close the door for Turkey`s future European ambitions;
Amendment 187 #
2018/2150(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 14
Paragraph 14
14. Notes that while the EU accession process was at its start a strong motivation for reforms in Turkey, there has been a stark regression in the areas of the rule of law and human rights during the last few years; reiterates its concerns over announced plans to reinstate the death penalty in Turkey; recalls that Parliament repeatedly called for the opening of Chapter 23 on Judiciary and Fundamental Rights and Chapter 24 on Justice, Freedom and Security at a time when the Turkish government had pledged to conduct serious reforms; regrets deeply that the accession instruments could not be used to the fullest extent owing to a continued blockage by the Council;
Amendment 190 #
2018/2150(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 14 a (new)
Paragraph 14 a (new)
14 a. Points out that Turkey is a member of the Council of Europe and must abide by the commitments of that membership; points out that Turkey had the highest number of applications to and cases before the European Court on Human Rights (ECHR) in 2017; calls on Turkey to abide by and implement the rulings of the ECHR and to remain in compliance with its Council of Europe commitments and to implement constitutional and judicial changes and reforms in cooperation with the Venice Commission;
Amendment 193 #
2018/2150(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 14 b (new)
Paragraph 14 b (new)
14 b. Expects the accession negotiation process to be replaced with a renewed political engagement between the EU and Turkey on economic cooperation, including issues such as deepening the Customs Union but also on shared geopolitical challenges such as the ongoing civil war in Syria and the fight against Daesh, as well as on refugee and migration related issues; underlines that any new EU-Turkey relations should be built on conditionality provisions on respect for democracy, the rule of law and fundamental rights, but also aim at increasing people-to-people contacts, such as student exchanges, scientific and university cooperation and visa liberalisation;
Amendment 212 #
2018/2150(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 15
Paragraph 15
15. Believes therefore that a door should be left open for the modernisation and upgrading of the 1995 Customs Union between the EU and Turkey, to include relevant areas such as agriculture, services and public procurement, which currently are not covered; recalls that two thirds of Foreign Direct Investment (FDI) in Turkey comes from EU Member States and that Turkey is an important growth market for the EU; believes that the upgrade would provide a valuable opportunity for democratic conditionality, positive leverage and the possibility of a roadmap where upgrading the Customs Union would go hand in hand with concrete commitments by Turkey on democratic reforms; believes further that the upgrading of the Customs Union would provide an important opportunity for policy dialogue on climate change as well as on labour rights in Turkey; calls on the Commission to start preparatory work for the upgrading of the Customs Union as soon as the Turkish Government indicates its readiness for serious reforms;
Amendment 259 #
2018/2150(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 18
Paragraph 18
18. Recalls the important role played by Turkey in responding to the migration crisis resulting from the war in Syria; takes the view that Turkey’s population has shown great hospitality by offering shelter to more than 3 million Syrian refugees; reiterates its concern about the legitimacy and functioning of the EU-Turkey statement on migration and the (political) conditions under which it was concluded; calls on the EU and its Member States to keep their promise regarding a large-scale resettlement, and to ensure adequate financial resources for the long-term support of Syrian refugees in Turkey;
Amendment 273 #
2018/2150(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 18 a (new)
Paragraph 18 a (new)
18 a. Notes that the EU and Turkey continue to cooperate on issues of (military) strategic importance within the NATO framework; calls on Turkish authorities to resume its cooperation with EU members under NATO’s rolling program of cooperation with non-EU countries; points to the high number of Turkish generals suspected of involvement in the failed coup attempt;
Amendment 281 #
2018/2150(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 18 b (new)
Paragraph 18 b (new)
18 b. Regrets the actions undertaken by the Turkish government against Turkish citizens in third countries, including harassments and kidnappings as well as hotlines through which people are encouraged to report other citizens to the Turkish government; reiterates Interpol arrest warrants cannot be misused to target Turkish dissidents, human rights defenders, journalists and those critical of the government;
Amendment 288 #
2018/2150(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 18 c (new)
Paragraph 18 c (new)
18 c. Expresses its concern about the risks migrant and refugee children in Turkey face, including discrimination and different forms of exploitation including forced labour, sexual exploitation and violence as well as forced marriages;
Amendment 298 #
2018/2150(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 19
Paragraph 19
19. Welcomes the efforts by the UN to resume negotiations on the reunification of Cyprus; supports a fair, comprehensive and viable settlement in line with the relevant UN Security Council resolutions and the EU acquis; reiterates its call on Turkey to commit and contribute to a comprehensive settlement, to begin withdrawing its troops from Cyprus, to transfer the sealed-off area of Famagusta to the UN, and to refrain from actions altering the demographic balance on the island; underlines that following a settlement, the united Cyprus will be a Member of the European Union, thus rendering the concept of 'guarantors' obsolete and outdated praises the important work of the Committee on Missing Persons; recognises the right of the Republic of Cyprus to enter into bilateral agreements concerning its exclusive economic zone; urges Turkey to engage in the peaceful settlement of disputes, and to refrain from any threat or action which might have negative effects on good neighbourly relations; stresses that a reunification of Cyprus will have a substantial and positive economic impact also for Turkey;
Amendment 319 #
2018/2150(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 20
Paragraph 20
20. Instructs its President to forward this resolution to the Council, the Commission, the Vice-President of the Commission / High Representative of the Union for Foreign and Security Policy, the Member States, the Government of Turkey and the Grand National Assembly of Turkey and for translation of this report into Turkish.
Amendment 23 #
2018/2149(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Recital D a (new)
Recital D a (new)
Da. whereas the flourishing informal economy hinders the development of a viable Kosovar economy;
Amendment 24 #
2018/2149(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Recital D b (new)
Recital D b (new)
Db. whereas gender based violence still forms a major challenge for Kosovo, including prenatal gender selection;
Amendment 25 #
2018/2149(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Recital D c (new)
Recital D c (new)
Dc. whereas Kosovo struggles with serious problems related to medication registration and quality, corrupt links between doctors and pharmaceutical companies, inflated prices and an 'essential medicines list' fabricated by pharmaceutical companies; whereas Kosovar citizens pay the price;
Amendment 27 #
2018/2149(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Recital E a (new)
Recital E a (new)
Ea. whereas on 8 June 2018 the Council decided to refocus the mandate of the EU rule of law mission EULEX Kosovo, bringing the judicial executive part of the mission’s mandate to an end; whereas the mandate’s end date is set on 14 June 2020;
Amendment 52 #
2018/2149(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 4
Paragraph 4
4. Urges the Kosovar authorities to comprehensively deal with previously identified electoral shortcomings by enacting timely legislative and administrative measures to address the outstanding recommendations of EU and European Parliament observation missions well in advance of the next round of elections; welcomes the steps forward in relation to gender equality in the election administration; calls on Kosovo to further step up its efforts to increase female political participation;
Amendment 127 #
2018/2149(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 19 a (new)
Paragraph 19 a (new)
19a. Takes note of EULEX’s new mandate and its end date; stresses however the prevalence of concrete progress in the country over a set timetable;
Amendment 138 #
2018/2149(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 20
Paragraph 20
20. Calls for the enforcement of the human rights framework to be prioritised, and backed by sufficient coordination and funding, especially in the field of gender equality, child and labour protection, social exclusion and discrimination against persons with disabilities and minorities, including LGBTI people; expresses in particular its concern about the high number of cases of gender based violence and prenatal gender selection; calls on the Kosovar authorities to effectively address these cases and provide support to victims, to collect data, and to train police, prosecutors and judges; believes that a comprehensive plan of awareness raising, the elimination of gender based discrimination, access to education and reproductive health services can prevent prenatal gender selection; underlines the need to reinforce the Agency for Gender Equality and the National Coordinator for the Protection from Domestic Violence and to strengthen prevention;
Amendment 186 #
2018/2149(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 22 a (new)
Paragraph 22 a (new)
22a. Notes the on-going debate concerning possible adjustments of the border between Serbia and Kosovo, including exchanges of territories; underlines that any changes to internationally recognized borders can only take place after thorough and inclusive debates in the framework of a comprehensive, legally binding agreement on the normalization of relations between Belgrade and Pristina, and with the full support of all parties concerned; underlines the multi-ethnic nature of both Kosovo and Serbia and that ethnically pure states cannot and should not be the objective in the region; stresses that any border changes should not undermine overall stability in the region and should not represent an alternative to the adequate protection of national minorities;
Amendment 202 #
2018/2149(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 25 a (new)
Paragraph 25 a (new)
25a. Regrets the rise of nationalist and right wing rhetoric in the region; requests the European Commission to support reconciliation in the region as a whole, by for example supporting cultural projects;
Amendment 212 #
2018/2149(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 29
Paragraph 29
29. CExpresses its concern about the dire registration and quality of medicines, as well as the corruption involved in the sector; urges the Kosovar Ministry of health to speed up its efforts in investigating these crimes and in addressing the registration and quality problems as soon as possible; calls for a comprehensive reform of the health sector, including the implementation of universal health insurance, in order to ensure universal access to healthcare; underlines the need for adequate funding of the public health system;
Amendment 215 #
2018/2149(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 30
Paragraph 30
30. Call on the Commission to develop a regional strategy to address the persistent youth unemployment and brain drain by tackling the skills mismatch between the education system and the labour market, improving the quality of teaching, and ensuring adequate funding for active labour market measures and vocational training schemes, along with adequate childcare and pre-school education facilities; regrets the persisting discrimination and segregation in the education system; calls on Kosovo to develop a joint schooling system including all components of Kosovo’s society;
Amendment 222 #
2018/2149(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 31 a (new)
Paragraph 31 a (new)
31a. Calls on the European Commission and Kosovo to effectively support SMEs in order to develop a viable Kosovar economy;
Amendment 51 #
2018/2148(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 3
Paragraph 3
3. Regrets that no compromise has been reached with regard to changes to the electoral legislation required to implement the Constitutional Court decision in the Ljubić case on the election of the members of the Federation House of Peoples; urges all political leaders to show responsibility and amend swiftly the electoral framework in order to ensure smooth implementation of the results of the elections; stresses that holding credible elections and implementing the results is an essential feature of a well-functioning democracy, as well as a requirement for any country aspiring to join the EU; reiterates that all acts of election irregularities should be investigated and condemned in the clearest possible terms, and any unlawful activities prosecuted;
Amendment 52 #
2018/2148(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 3 a (new)
Paragraph 3 a (new)
3a. Firmly reiterates the need of rapid formation of the Federation House of Peoples in line with rulings by the Constitutional Court of Bosnia and Herzegovina; expresses deep concern because of the risks of complete dysfunctionality of the Presidency of BiH; regrets the possibility of election of the member of the presidency of BiH against democratic will of Peoples that he is to represent which points toward much needed reform of the election process in BiH;
Amendment 60 #
2018/2148(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 4
Paragraph 4
4. Deplores the fact that delegates from BiH have still been unable to agree on the rules of procedure for the SAPC, due to the attempts to introduce ethnic blocking into the SAPC's voting rules, which has consequently not met for three years; regrets the failure to cooperate with the European Parliament and, recalls that this is a clear breach of the obligations stemming from the SAA and urges all actors to agree to and accept Rules and procedures of the SAPC based on the recommendation of the European Parliament's opinion on the subject;
Amendment 64 #
2018/2148(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 4 a (new)
Paragraph 4 a (new)
4a. Notes incoherent legal framework for inclusive and evidence-based policy as well as its legislative development which hinders effective implementation; is concerned about the lack of systematic regulatory impact assessments and public consultations, the limited quality of and practice in monitoring and reporting and lack of a formal requirement to publish key government planning documents;
Amendment 104 #
2018/2148(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 8 a (new)
Paragraph 8 a (new)
8a. Notes that legislation without implementation is futile and urges swift implementation of legal provisions providing equality between women and men; firmly points at the lack of effective implementation of legislation on the prevention and protection which facilitates gender-based violence, in particular domestic violence; urges aligning of the relevant legislation with the Istanbul Convention on preventing and combating violence against women and domestic violence; is concerned that the number of protective measures issued remains low, and calls for improvement of the general system of response and support to victims; draws attention to the fact that the existing safe houses remain in most cases strongly underfunded, which is in breach of existing legislation;
Amendment 110 #
2018/2148(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 8 b (new)
Paragraph 8 b (new)
8b. Is concerned about lack of educational and economy reforms that fosters high youth unemployment and high economic emigration which will have long-term consequences on country’s demography; notes with concern a high gender imbalance of labour force participation rates;
Amendment 134 #
2018/2148(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 12
Paragraph 12
12. Acknowledges that some progress has been made in establishing institutional mechanisms of cooperation between authorities and civil society organisations (CSOs) and in ensuring public financing for CSOs; reiterates its call for the adoption of a strategic framework of cooperation with civil society at all levels of governance; urges authorities to open an effective dialogue with social partners which could in turn produce legislative and capacity-building initiatives needed in order to strengthen the capability of social partners;
Amendment 138 #
2018/2148(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 13
Paragraph 13
13. Remains concerned by the widespread corruption in BiH and the persistent gap between the declared political will to fight it and the lack of concrete results; underlines that there is a lack of track record of high profile cases and that legal and institutional framework for combating systemic corruption like political party finance, public procurement, conflict of interest, and assets declaration is weak and inadequate; calls for steps to be taken to improve the legal and institutional anti- corruption framework in line with European standards, by better harmonising the action plans adopted at various levels, implementing the existing strategies and enhancing the cooperation between corruption prevention bodies and with the aAnti-corruption agency;
Amendment 142 #
2018/2148(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 15
Paragraph 15
15. Welcomes the adoption of the action plan on the implementation of the 2014-2018 Justice Sector Reform Strategy in March 2017 and the establishment of the necessary reporting and monitoring structures; points to the need for decisive action regarding its implementation; is concerned by continuing politically motivated threats against the judiciary; reiterates the need to strengthen the independence of the judiciary, including from political influence, as well as its impartiality, professionalism, efficiency and accountability; welcomes the implementation of the action plan adoptedadopted detailed action plan to implement the European Commission's recommendations on issues within the HJPC remit by the High Judicial and Prosecutorial Council (HJPC) aimed at strengthening appointment, disciplinary and integrity measures as regards the judiciary; urges for a swift adoption of related legislative acts and start of its implementation;
Amendment 151 #
2018/2148(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 16 a (new)
Paragraph 16 a (new)
16a. Deplores any kind of glorification of persons convicted for the gravest crimes against humanity; calls, as a matter of urgency, for respect for victims of war crimes and for reconciliation to be promoted; reminds all political leaders and institutions in BiH that they have a responsibility to assess war-time events objectively, in the interests of truth, reconciliation and a peaceful future, and to avoid misuse of judiciary for political purposes;
Amendment 156 #
2018/2148(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 17
Paragraph 17
17. Acknowledges that some progress has been achieved in the implementation of Annex VII to the Dayton Peace Agreement on refugees and internally displaced persons; calls again for significant attention to be devoted to damages compensation for property that cannot be returned, access to healthcare and employment, social protection, safety and education; notes that there are still extremely high number of internally displaced persons (98,324 according to UNHCR data from 2017), 47,000 minority returnees and a huge number of refugees; is concerned with persistently high number of missing persons and slow progress in that respect; urges resumption of operations of the Commission for Real Property Claims of Displaced Persons and Refugees; calls again for significant attention to be devoted to damages compensation for property that cannot be returned, access to healthcare and employment, social protection, safety and education; deplores cases of attacks against properties of returnees; calls on the authorities to embark on intensive cooperation between the two entities, and strengthen the efforts to find persons still missing as a result of the war, including full sharing of all relevant military and intelligence data;
Amendment 165 #
2018/2148(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 18 a (new)
Paragraph 18 a (new)
18a. Commends Bosnia and Herzegovina authorities' efforts to stop departures of its citizens to foreign battlefields since 2015 as well as conviction of 23 returned foreign terrorist fighters for terrorism-related offences, but urges authorities to apply appropriate sentencing for foreign terrorist fighters and to manage their subsequent social re- integration; notes with concern that the cells of radicalisation have been identified in certain locations in the country, in particular in the Wahhabi communities;
Amendment 6 #
2018/2147(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Recital –A (new)
Recital –A (new)
-A. whereas the EU enlargement continues to represent a strategic investment in peace, democracy, prosperity, security and stability in Europe;
Amendment 9 #
2018/2147(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Recital A
Recital A
A. whereas Albania has continued to make steady progress towards meeting the political criteria and the five key priorities for the opening of accession negotiations: public administration reform, reform of the judiciary, fight against corruption, fight against organised crime and protection of human rights, including rights of persons belonging to minorities and property rights;
Amendment 13 #
2018/2147(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Recital B a (new)
Recital B a (new)
B a. whereas challenges still persist and need to be addressed swiftly and efficiently in a spirit of dialogue and cooperation;
Amendment 15 #
2018/2147(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Recital C
Recital C
C. whereas constructive dialogue between political forces on reforms is essential for making further progress in the EU accession processthe government and the opposition on EU-related reforms remains crucial to advance on the reform agenda to the benefit of the citizens and move the country closer to the EU;
Amendment 27 #
2018/2147(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 2
Paragraph 2
2. Fully supports the Commission’s recommendation that accession negotiations be opened in recognition of the reform efforts made by Albania; calls onwelcomes the Council to open accession talks without delay in order to sustadecision to set out the path towards opening the reform momentumaccession negotiations in June 2019; considers that the opening of negotiations would provide further incentives for the reform process and enhance its scrutiny;
Amendment 40 #
2018/2147(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 5
Paragraph 5
5. Calls for action addressing the outstanding recommendations of the Office for Democratic Institutions and Human Rights of the Organisation for Security and Cooperation in Europe (OSCE/ODIHR) as regards electoral reform; underlines that inclusive and timely electoral reform is needed with a view to increasing public trust in the electoral process; welcomes the work by the Ad-hoc Committee on Electoral Reform of the Albanian Parliament related to election administration, campaign finance, voter registration, vote buying, the use of new voting technologies and out-of-country voting, and urges it to reach consensus on, and adoption of, the necessary reforms in due time before the 2019 local elections; notes that additional efforts are needed to better involve civil society organisations as part of an inclusive policy dialogue;
Amendment 53 #
2018/2147(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 9
Paragraph 9
9. Welcomes the progress made in justice reform aimed at increasing the independence, accountability, professionalism and efficiency of judicial institutions; regrets that the administration of justice continues to be slow and inefficient; notes that the re-evaluation process for all judges and prosecutors has started and is delivering the first tangible results; calls on the Albanian authorities to speed upfurther advance the vetting process, without compromising on quality or fairness, which is crucial for the success of justice reform; takes note of first dismissals and voluntary resignations of candidates prior to their hearings;
Amendment 54 #
2018/2147(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 9 a (new)
Paragraph 9 a (new)
9 a. Encourages Albania to continue its good cooperation with the International Monitoring Operation and pursue intensively the justice reform;
Amendment 68 #
2018/2147(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 15
Paragraph 15
15. Calls for increased attention to be given to political and public-private corruption, and stresses that a convincing track record can only be attained through; calls for strengthening the track record of proactive investigations, prosecutions and final convictions in corruption cases at all levelsthe fight against corruption and organised crime, including high-level cases;
Amendment 74 #
2018/2147(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 16
Paragraph 16
16. Welcomes the progress made in the fight against organised crime, including the substantial progress made in seizures of illicit drugs and the reduction of cannabis cultivationand calls to further pursue tangible and sustainable results, including in the specific area of countering cultivation and trafficking of drugs; notes Albania’s intensified international police cooperation – leading to effective operations against criminal networks – including in joint working groups with Member States;
Amendment 83 #
2018/2147(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 19
Paragraph 19
19. Welcomes the additional steps takenReiterates the need for effective legislative and policy measures to reinforce the protection of human rights, minority rights and anti- discrimination policies, including the equal treatment of all minorities; insists that measures be taken to further improve the education, employment rates and living conditions for Roma, Egyptians and other ethnic minorities;
Amendment 117 #
2018/2147(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 24
Paragraph 24
24. Urges the Albanian authorities to address the largstep up reforms aimed at increasing competitiveness and tackling the informal economy; stresses that corruption, rule-of- law deficiencies and cumbersome regulatory procedures continue to deter investment; calls to further improve the business and investment environment, including ensuring enforcement of property rights, vigorously pursuing fiscal consolidation and strengthening tax administration;
Amendment 128 #
2018/2147(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 26 a (new)
Paragraph 26 a (new)
26 a. Commends that according to the Institute of Statistic in Albania (INSTAT) the level of unemployment in Albania decreased; stresses the need to improve the quality of the education system, including increasing capacity in order to better equip people with skills and knowledge in line with labour market needs; underlines the need to support long-term growth by developing the capacity for technological absorption, research, development and innovation;
Amendment 132 #
2018/2147(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 27
Paragraph 27
27. Welcomes Albania’s commitment to implement the Connectivity Agenda in the framework of the Berlin Process; supports the proposal to reduce roaming fees in the Western Balkans in order to promote a market- and investment- friendly environment towards a digital economy;
Amendment 151 #
2018/2147(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 29
Paragraph 29
29. Expresses concern that Albania remains the Western Balkan country from which are made the highest number of illegal entries and stays, and unfounded asylum claims, in Member States; calls to increase the measures taken in recent months to address effectively the phenomenon of unfounded asylum applications in the EU as well as unaccompanied minors;
Amendment 67 #
2018/2146(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 4
Paragraph 4
4. Takes note of the presidential elections on 2 April 2017 and calls on the authorities to ensure that procedures for free and fair elections are in line with international standards; welcomes the general conduct of the elections; calls on the authorities to fully address the recommendations of the OSCE/ODIHR election observation mission and to engage in dialogue with domestic independent election observation missions; calls on the authorities to properly investigate claims of irregularities, violence and intimidation that arose during the electoral process;
Amendment 87 #
2018/2146(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 7
Paragraph 7
7. Urges Serbia to step up its reform efforts in the area of rule of law, and in particular to ensure the independence and overall efficiency of the judicial system; stresses that special focus should be put on implementing effective reform in this area; notes that while some progress has been made in reducing the backlog of old enforcement cases, and in putting in place measures to harmonise court practice, judicial independence in Serbia is not fully assured; calls on Serbia to strengthen the accountability, impartiality, professionalism and overall efficiency of the judiciary, and to establish a free legal aid system ensuring the broad range of free legal aid providers, including civil society organisations;
Amendment 100 #
2018/2146(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 8
Paragraph 8
8. Reiterates the importance of intensifying the fight against corruption and urges Serbia to show a clear commitment to tackle this issue; welcomes the adoption of the amendments made in the economic crimes section of the country’s criminal code; reiterates its call to swiftly adopt a new law on the Anti- Corruption Agency to improve the planning, coordination and monitoring of the implementation of new legislation and policies; urges Serbia to adopt or amend other necessary anti-corruption legislation, as identified in the Action Plan for Chapter 23 of negotiations and in GRECO and ODIHR recommendations; stresses that it is critical that the Agency receives and maintains the human and financial resources it needs to carry out its mandate in an independent manner; calls on the authorities to fill all open positions in the Agency; urges the Serbian Parliament to finalize the election of the Anti-corruption Agency Board members in a transparent and democratic manner; calls on Serbia to further improve its track record on investigations, indictments and final convictions in high- level corruption cases, and to publish statistics and information about the results of investigations in all publicly known cases of alleged corruption of public officials;
Amendment 103 #
2018/2146(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 9
Paragraph 9
9. Acknowledges some progress has been made in theUrges Serbia to show a clear commitment in fighting against organised crime; calls on Serbia to establish a convincing track record of investigations, prosecutions and convictions in organised crime cases, including mafia-related murders and money laundering, based on proactive investigations; calls on Serbia to focus on the implementation of the action plan agreed with the Financial Action Task Force (FATF);
Amendment 115 #
2018/2146(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 10
Paragraph 10
10. Stresses that the Serbian parliament still does not exercise effective oversight of the executive, and that the transparency, inclusiveness and quality of the legislative process need to be enhanced; welcomes the declining use of urgent procedures to adopt legislation; stresses, however,stresses that the still-frequent use of urgent procedures undermines parliamentary and public scrutiny; stresses thcondemns the deliberate actions that limit the ability of the Serbian parliament to conduct an effective debate on, and scrutiny of, legislation should be avoided; is concerned by the increased practice of filibustering adopted by the ruling majority, which prevents the opposition from actively taking part in parliamentary procedures: calls for additional measures to ensure cross-party dialogue and the effective involvement of civil society in the work of the parliament; welcomes the Serbian parliament’s continued efforts to improve transparency through debates on Serbia’s negotiating positions on EU accession chapters, and through exchanges with the core negotiating team and with the National Convention on the European Union; stresses that the role of independent regulatory bodies, including the country’s Ombudsman, needs to be fully acknowledged and supported; urges the Serbian Parliament to engage in promoting and monitoring the implementation of independent regulatory bodies' findings and recommendations;
Amendment 145 #
2018/2146(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 13
Paragraph 13
13. Underlines that the legislative and institutional framework for upholding human rights is in place; stresses that consistent and efficient implementation across the whole country is needed; calls on Serbia to adopt the new Law on Personal Data Protection fully in line with EU standards; notes that further sustained efforts are necessary to improve the situation of persons belonging to vulnerable groups, including children, persons with disabilities, persons with HIV/AIDS, and LGBTI persons; underlines that shortcomings in the legislative and institutional framework for upholding human rights of children and adults with disabilities still persist; calls on Serbia to actively pursue investigations, prosecutions and convictions of hate- motivated crimes;
Amendment 163 #
2018/2146(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 14
Paragraph 14
14. Reiterates its concern that no progress has been made to improve the situation regarding freedom of expression and of the media; stresses that threats, violence and intimidation against journalists remain an issue of concernand media outlets, including administrative harassment and intimidation through the courts remain an issue of concern especially when coming from elected officials; calls upon officials at all levels to be consistent in publicly condemning any form of intimidation of journalists and to refrain from such behaviour; notes, in this regard, that while several cases have been solved and some criminal charges have been filed, convictions are still rare; calls on the authorities to investigate and prosecute any cases of attacks against journalists and media outlets; express its concern over the Regulatory Body for Electronic Media's absence of supervision and action, especially during the election period; calls for the full implementation of media laws and the strengthening of the independence of the country’s Regulatory Body for Electronic Media by eliminating any political interference and influence over its work through the process of nomination and appointment of its Council members, and by broadening its mandate to issue sanctions and securing its financial independence; welcomes the renewed efforts to adopt a media strategy to create a pluralistic media environment, and stresses, in this regard, the importance of a transparent and inclusive consultation with stakeholders; underlines the need for complete transparency in media ownership and funding;
Amendment 166 #
2018/2146(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 10 a (new)
Paragraph 10 a (new)
10a. Notes that no progress was made towards establishing an enabling environment for the development and financing of civil society; regrets that the relationship between government and CSOs is still marked by fragmented cooperation and a selective approach towards individual CSOs; condemns the negative statements made by government officials on civil society in general and the harsh criticism of human rights defenders by some media outlets; notes that most CSOs lack stable funding and transparent criteria for public financial support are not clearly defined; calls for the adoption of a national strategy and related action plan to regulate the environment in which CSOs operate; stresses that further efforts are needed to ensure systematic cooperation between government and civil society;
Amendment 179 #
2018/2146(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 15
Paragraph 15
15. Welcomes the adoption of an action plan for the realisation of the rights of national minorities, and the adoption of a decree establishing a fund for national minorities; calls for the full implementation of the action plan and for improved coordination and inclusion of stakeholders; notes that the fund for national minorities is functioning and that its funding has been increased; reiterates its call on Serbia to ensure consistent implementation of legislation on the protection of minorities, including in relation to education, the use of languages, representation in public administration and access to media and religious services in minority languages; calls for full implementation of the right to timely birth registration for all children born in Serbia, including those of undocumented parents;
Amendment 199 #
2018/2146(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 17
Paragraph 17
17. Welcomes the adoption of the new Roma social inclusion strategy for the period 2016-2025 along with an action plan covering education, health, housing and employment; notes that the majority of Roma live in informal settlements lacking adequate access to fresh water and electricity, suffer from social exclusion and face systematic violations of their rights: calls for full implementation of the new strategy for Roma inclusion and the action plan; highlights the importance of formulating policies to combat discrimination against Roma and Anti-gypsyism;
Amendment 212 #
2018/2146(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 19
Paragraph 19
19. Welcomes the adoption of a national strategy for the investigation and prosecution of war crimes and the adoption of an operational prosecutorial strategy; welcomes the appointment in May 2017 of a new war crimes prosecutor; reiterates its call for thean efficient and timely implementation of this strategy, in particular by means of bringing forward indictments, and; calls for the adoption of an operational prosecutorial strategy;effective investigation of high-profile war crimes cases: calls on Serbia to again cooperate fully with the current Mechanism for International Criminal Tribunals; urges the Serbian authorities to continue working on the issue of the fate of missing personscalls on the Serbian political and judicial authorities to fully cooperate with their regional partners in order to identify remaining war criminals and bring them to justice; urges the Serbian authorities to continue working on the issue of the fate of missing persons, including opening state archives related to the war period; urges Serbia to prepare a reparations scheme for victims and their families as an important precondition for reconciliation; highlights the importance of the work carried out by the Regional Youth Cooperation Office (RYCO) and its local branches in promoting reconciliation among the youth;
Amendment 217 #
2018/2146(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 19 a (new)
Paragraph 19 a (new)
19a. Regrets the persisting lack of an objective assessment and understanding of the crimes committed in the former Yugoslavia; stresses the need for far- reaching political decisions and initiatives aimed at establishing responsibilities and raising awareness in schools about Serbia's troubled past; calls for enhanced inclusiveness of education systems across the region so as to eliminate old prejudices and eradicate the seeds of hatred in the new generations; reiterates its support for the initiative to set up a Regional Commission for the establishment of facts about war crimes and other serious violations of human rights committed in the former Yugoslavia, and urges the Serbian government to take the lead in its creation;
Amendment 224 #
2018/2146(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 20 a (new)
Paragraph 20 a (new)
20a. Notes the on-going debate concerning possible adjustments of the border between Serbia and Kosovo, including exchanges of territories; underlines that any changes to internationally recognized borders can only take place after thorough and inclusive debates in the framework of a comprehensive, legally binding agreement on the normalization of relations between Belgrade and Pristina, and with the full support of all parties concerned; underlines the multi-ethnic nature of both Kosovo and Serbia and that ethnically pure states cannot and should not be the objective in the region; stresses that any border changes should not undermine overall stability in the region and should not represent an alternative to the adequate protection of national minorities;
Amendment 227 #
2018/2146(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 20 b (new)
Paragraph 20 b (new)
20b. Expresses its concern over repeated statements by high-ranking politicians putting into question the territorial integrity of Bosnia and Herzegovina and condemns any form of nationalist rhetoric aimed at encouraging its disintegration;
Amendment 5 #
2018/2145(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Citation 11
Citation 11
– having regard to the decision of the Heads of State and Government of the NATO meeting of 11-12 July 2018 to invite the country to begin accession talks to join the Alliance,
Amendment 14 #
2018/2145(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Recital B
Recital B
B. whereas the agreement of 127 June 2018 on the settlement of differences and the establishment of a strategic partnership between the former Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia and Greece sends a much- needed positive signal for stability and reconciliation in the whole Western Balkans region;
Amendment 56 #
2018/2145(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 3
Paragraph 3
3. Welcomes the ratification by the Parliament of the former Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia of the strategic partnership agreement with Greece on 20 June 2018; urges the parties to duly inform their citizens of the contents and implications of the agreement and to diligently complete all internal procedures for the ratification and implementation of this strategically important agreement, bringing an end to a protracted geopolitical limbo and setting a good example for the region; underlines the importance of the 30 September 2018 referendum concerning Macedonian integration into the EU and NATO;
Amendment 84 #
2018/2145(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 6 a (new)
Paragraph 6 a (new)
6a. Welcomes the country's upcoming passage to the second stage of the Stabilisation and Association Agreement and its inclusion in the Adriatic-Ionian Initiative, and calls on the Council to include the country in the EU Strategy for the Adriatic and Ionian Region;
Amendment 110 #
2018/2145(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 13
Paragraph 13
13. Calls for sustained efforts inWelcomes ongoing efforts to promote good governance and accountability, to increasinge transparency, accountability and and improve access to public information, including through publication of the expenditures of state institutions; calls for sustained efforts in increasing inclusiveness of the decision-making process and improving interinstitutional coordination;
Amendment 125 #
2018/2145(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 15
Paragraph 15
15. Remains concerned by widespread corruption and welcomes initial achievements in the prevention and prosecution thereof; notes the first court verdicts on cases of corruption and abuse of power, and on the events of 27 April 2017; calls for sustained efforts to establish a track record of convictions in cases of high-level corruption and organised crime; commends the work carried out by the Special Prosecutor’s Office (SPO) in difficult circumstances;
Amendment 145 #
2018/2145(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 19 a (new)
Paragraph 19 a (new)
19a. Acknowledges the country's efforts to address the challenges of the European migration and refugee crisis and expects the mutually beneficial cooperation to continue in the future;
Amendment 167 #
2018/2145(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 24
Paragraph 24
24. Welcomes the initial steps taken in enhancing the prevention of discrimination and urges the authorities to effectively address hate crime and hate speech against minorities, including the Roma and the LGBTI community; deplores persistent deficiencies in the work of the Commission for Protection from Discrimination; welcomes the establishing of the Inter- Party parliamentary group for the rights of the LGBTI community and the Inter- Party parliamentary group for the rights of Roma;
Amendment 173 #
2018/2145(INI)
25. Welcomes the substantial improvement in the operational environment for, and the consultations with, civil society organisations (CSOs) and, including the establishment of the Council for cooperation with civil society; stresses the need to enhance the legal, financial and policy framework, including through laws on foundations and donations;
Amendment 182 #
2018/2145(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 25 a (new)
Paragraph 25 a (new)
25a. Welcomes the partnership between the government and the country's National Youth Council in the implementation of the Youth Guarantee Scheme as a good mechanism of cooperation between young people and decision makers in the formulation and implementation of youth policies; calls on the government to increase financial support to youth organizations and young people in order to tackle the issue of brain drain;
Amendment 207 #
2018/2145(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 31
Paragraph 31
31. CWelcomes the adoption of the new Energy Law, transposing the Third Energy Package and making it fully compatible with the Energy Community Treaty; calls upon the authorities to focus on energy market reforms, while ensuring security of supply and diversification of energy sources;
Amendment 7 #
2018/2144(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Recital F
Recital F
F. whereas Montenegro has to further strengthen, inter alia, parliamentary, legislative and oversight capacity, institutional transparency, respect for the rule of law, domestic handling of war crimes cases, integrity of the electoral process, media freedom, and the fight against corruption, organised crime and the informal economy;
Amendment 22 #
2018/2144(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 5
Paragraph 5
5. Notes that fundamental freedoms were respected in the April 2018 presidential elections; calls for shortcomings identified by the OSCE ODIHR to be comprehensively addressed in order to improve public trust in the electoral process, notes that frequent local elections cause ‘election fatigue’ that hinders quality of and transparent elections and calls for comprehensive electoral reform;
Amendment 30 #
2018/2144(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 8
Paragraph 8
8. Welcomes the efforts made to improve the transparency of public administration and information sharing but would encourage steps towards establishing a more citizen- friendly, professional and de-politicised public administration; calls for improved regulatory impact assessments, comprehensive reports on audit and inclusive public consultations on law proposals; stresses the importance of cooperation with the CSOs;
Amendment 37 #
2018/2144(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 9
Paragraph 9
9. Welcomes the moderate progress made towards increasing the independence, transparency, accountability, professionalism and efficiency of judicial institutions; calls for safeguards against political interference, but notes with the concern that the corruption in judiciary is still prevalent; calls for safeguards against political interference, particularly of Anti- Corruption Agency, proactive attitude of institutions, and for a coherent application of codes of ethics and disciplinary measures; welcomes the fact that new judges and prosecutors have been appointed for the first time using the new recruitment system;
Amendment 42 #
2018/2144(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 11
Paragraph 11
11. Is concerned by the increasing instances of violence and assassinations linked to organised crime, which have a detrimental effect on the daily life of ordinary citizens; welcomes the fact that the authorities have identified this issue but calls for more robust preventative action and production of a convincing track record against money laundering and human trafficking;
Amendment 75 #
2018/2144(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 20
Paragraph 20
20. Reiterates its call for systematic, inclusive, timely and genuine consultations with civil society on key EU-related legislative reforms, including their implementation at local level; stresses the need to improve financial regulatory environment for CSOs;
Amendment 80 #
2018/2144(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 22
Paragraph 22
22. UHighlights the need to ensure effective implementation of fundamental rights policies on gender equality, disability rights, rights of the child and Roma rights by securing sufficient budget allocation to implement the policies, improve the capacity of responsible institutions and increase their inter- institutional coordination; urges improvement in the enforcement and monitoring mechanisms for human rights protection, including by tackling violence against women and children, highlighting the findings of the recent evaluation of the child rights monitoring system in Montenegro;
Amendment 98 #
2018/2144(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 25
Paragraph 25
25. Urges that the full potential offered by digital tools in the field of land registry, invoicing and the issuing of construction permits be used; notes the need to speed up the roll-out of broadband access to businesses and households; stresses the need for government-wide interoperability framework to support further digitalisation and simplification of administrative and business procedures;
Amendment 101 #
2018/2144(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 26
Paragraph 26
26. Welcomes regulatory changes in the field of education; urges the authorities to address and efforts to increase pre-school participation rates, including by children from disadvantaged backgrounds and highlights the importance of a comprehensive approach to early childhood development including by addressing health concerns such as the low immunization coverage; encourages continued curricular reform in primary and secondary education to teach basic and transversal skills and focus on learning outcomes; urges the authorities to address the low secondary education completion among Roma students (3%, the lowest in the region) and the high long-term unemployment rate among youth, Roma and women;
Amendment 108 #
2018/2144(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 27
Paragraph 27
27. Welcomes Montenegro’s strengthened participation in the Erasmus+ programme and expresses its support for the Commission’s proposal to double the Erasmus+ budget; encourages stronger coordination on horizontal issues affecting youth employment, inclusion, active citizenship, volunteering and education;
Amendment 114 #
Amendment 117 #
2018/2144(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 28
Paragraph 28
28. Notes that the development of additional hydropower and tourism capacities must meet EU environmental standards; urges the further exploitation of potential renewables and energy-efficiency measures and the improvement of water and waste management; urges the Montenegrin authorities to fully align national legislation with the Renewable Energy Directive and Energy Performance of Buildings Directive;
Amendment 123 #
2018/2144(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 29 a (new)
Paragraph 29 a (new)
29 a. Highlights Montenegro's proactive participation and constructive role in regional and international cooperation trough the "Berlin process" and the Western Balkans six initiative, welcomes the outcome of the Sofia Summit 2018 and the adoption of IPA 2018 package that includes funding of two important infrastructure projects “Budva bypass” on the Adriatic Ionian Corridor and “Vrbnica- Bar railway section” on Orient/East-Med Corridor; emphasizes the importance of those traffic routes that are the direct link between Balkan countries and the EU markets;
Amendment 131 #
2018/2144(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 32
Paragraph 32
32. Urges Montenegro to intensify its efforts in proactively prioritising and punishing war crimes and clarifying the fate of missing persons; welcomes the efforts for reintegration of displaced persons under the Regional Housing Programmeis concerned that the Special Prosecutor's Office (SPO) opened eight new cases in 2016 of which six are still in preliminary investigation phase, as well as that in all cases SPO had to rely on letters rogatory to ICTY & prosecution services of neighbouring countries; notes with disappointment that there is still no charges for command responsibility, co-perpetration and aiding and abetting, and that the judicial decisions reached contained legal mistakes and shortcomings in application of international humanitarian law; welcomes the efforts for reintegration of displaced persons under the Regional Housing Programme; urges the insurance of the equal access to justice for all victims, reparations in line with national legislation; stresses the need to fight the impunity;
Amendment 15 #
2018/2098(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Citation 17 a (new)
Citation 17 a (new)
- having regard to the UN General Assembly Resolution 67/139 of 20 December 2012, which creates the Open- Ended Working Group on Ageing with a mandate to consider proposals for an international legal instrument to promote and protect the rights and dignity of older persons,
Amendment 16 #
2018/2098(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Citation 17 b (new)
Citation 17 b (new)
- having regard to the Report of the Independent Expert on the Enjoyment of All Human Rights by Older Persons to the 33rd session of the UN Human Rights Council of 8 July 2016,1a _________________ 1a A/HRC/33/44
Amendment 17 #
2018/2098(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Citation 17 c (new)
Citation 17 c (new)
- having regard to the Report of the UN Open-Ended Working Group on Ageing on its eighth working session of 28 July 2017,1a _________________ 1a A/AC.278/2017/2
Amendment 18 #
2018/2098(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Citation 17 d (new)
Citation 17 d (new)
- having regard to the 2017 Lisbon Ministerial Declaration entitled "A Sustainable Society for All Ages: Realizing the potential of living longer", adopted at the 4th UNECE Ministerial Conference on Ageing on 22 September 2017,
Amendment 343 #
2018/2098(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 29
Paragraph 29
29. Strongly condemns all forms of discrimination, including that carried out on the grounds of race, gender, sexual orientation, age, disability or any other status; is alarmed by the many manifestations of racism, xenophobia and other forms of intolerance and a lack of political representation for the most vulnerable groups, such as ethnic, linguistic and religious minorities, people with disabilities, the LGBTI community, women and children; calls for the EU to enhance its efforts to eradicate, without distinction, all forms of discrimination and to promote awareness, a culture of tolerance and inclusion, and special protection for the most vulnerable groups by means of human rights and political dialogues, the work of EU delegations and public diplomacy; calls on all countries to ensure that their respective institutions provide effective legal protection within their jurisdictions;
Amendment 346 #
2018/2098(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 29 a (new)
Paragraph 29 a (new)
29a. Welcomes the EU's and EU Members States' participation to the 8th session of the UN Open-Ended Working Group on Ageing, and in particular the submission of common EU inputs and the delivery of common EU statements on equality, non-discrimination, violence, abuse and neglect of older people; remains concerned about the prevalence of 'ageism' and other barriers to the fulfilment of older people's human rights; calls on the EU and Member States to fully support the process of the Open- Ended Working Group, including by allocating and/or supporting the allocation of adequate resources for the functioning of this Group; invites the EU and Member States to respond to upcoming calls for inputs and to consult and involve older persons in preparing them, and to include older persons in their respective delegations;
Amendment 352 #
2018/2098(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 29 b (new)
Paragraph 29 b (new)
29b. Welcomes the EU's active participation to the review of the Regional Implementation Strategy for Europe of the Madrid International Plan of Action on Ageing (MIPAA) in Lisbon; stresses that MIPAA can substantially contribute to a better realization of the rights of older people;
Amendment 8 #
2018/2097(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Recital A
Recital A
A. whereas the EU’s security environment is now more volatile, unpredictable, complex and ambiguous than at any time since the end of the Cold War, confronted with interstate conflicts, natural disasters, terrorism, failed states, cyber attacks and hybrid warfare; whereas current EU policies may no longer suffice to promote a stable and prosperous neighbourhood;
Amendment 12 #
2018/2097(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Recital B
Recital B
B. whereas EU external action has a direct impact on our citizens’ lives, be it by supporting security and stability in our neighbourhoodwithin and outside our borders or preventing crises before they happen;
Amendment 26 #
2018/2097(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Recital F
Recital F
F. whereas the new world order is increasingly characterised by asymmetry, with numerous non-state actors becoming increasinglyhaving expanded their influentialce over the past decade: from NGOs advocating human rights, to transnational corporations influencing government policy, to social media activists calling for democratic change, to international organized criminal groups, to terrorist organisations committing terrorist attacks in an attempt to undermine democratic principles; whereas, nevertheless, no emergent state or non-state actor can impose an incontestable world view;
Amendment 32 #
2018/2097(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Recital G
Recital G
G. whereas globalisation has increased interdependence, with decisions taken in Beijing or Washington having a direct impact on our lives; whereas, in turn, interdependence has resulted in global public opinion becoming cognisant of transnational problems, which requirehe need for transnational solutions to address transnational solutionproblems;
Amendment 35 #
2018/2097(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Recital H
Recital H
H. whereas almost one fourth of the world’s population live in fragile states or societies; whereas these states or societies are increasingly a breeding ground for frustration and socio-economic inequality; whereas, as a result, terrorist organisations take advantage of the power vacuum to establish a recruitment base;
Amendment 74 #
2018/2097(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 1
Paragraph 1
1. Stresses that the time has come for the European Union to take its destiny into its own hands; takes the view that the EU should embrace its role as a fully-fledged, sovereign political power in international relations thatembrace its role as a fully-fledged, influential political actor that relies on its economic weight and soft power to helps to resolve conflicts worldwide and shapes global governance;
Amendment 87 #
2018/2097(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 2
Paragraph 2
2. Is convinced that no single EU Member State can respond effectively to today’s global challenges on its own; believes that, by pulling their weight together within the EU, the Member States can exert an influence on the world stage that they would not otherwise possess; is convincedis convinced that a coherent and unified position by thate 28 Member States together, representing 500 million citizens, haveprovides for more leverage in international negotiations and in setting international regulations and standards; believes, moreover, that under the protection of the EU, globalisation can represent an opportunity for EU citizens and not a threat;
Amendment 100 #
2018/2097(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 3
Paragraph 3
3. Regrets the fact that the Member States all too often prioritise their national interests, regardless of the possible consequences at a European level, thereby undermining the EU’s credibility as a global player; calls for a greabetter division of responsibilities and enhanced coordination between the EU and its Member States; believes that good cooperation among the Member States is essential to safeguard our democracy, our freedom, and our social and environmental standards;
Amendment 141 #
2018/2097(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 6
Paragraph 6
6. Stresses that the EU should stay true to its principles of democracy, human rights and the rule of law; emphasises the importance of assessing whether the promotion of these principles in third countries has been successful; stresses that the EU's reputation as promotor of these principles could only be sustained if it ensures that these exact principles are protected and adhered to within all of its Member States;
Amendment 145 #
2018/2097(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 6 a (new)
Paragraph 6 a (new)
6a. Considers that the EU should use more effectively its foreign policy instruments, including human rights and development instruments and bilateral agreements with third countries when breaches of democratic standards and human rights are taking place, and to exert effective and tailored pressure at the highest level on the host governments in question to rise systematically those issues in political and human rights dialogues; private demarches are an important first step, but should they do not work, it is important to consider more public diplomacy;
Amendment 187 #
2018/2097(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 10
Paragraph 10
10. Notes that the EU has played an important role in de-escalating and resolving foreign policy crises, namely when some Member States have taken the lead under the auspices of the Union overall, such as in the Normandy format or the EU3+3 negotiations with Iran; supportstakes that, while pursuing increased security and defence cooperation in the long term, the establishment of ad hoc coalitions of Member States that can intervene to respond swiftly to international crises, making could render EU external action more flexible and responsive in the short term by reducing the pressure of having to achieve universal consensus among the Member States;
Amendment 222 #
2018/2097(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 14
Paragraph 14
14. Highlights that transatlantic relations are indispensable for the security and prosperity of both sides of the Atlantic; regrets the US’s progressive retreat from the multilateral, rules-based world order, namely its withdrawal from the Paris Agreement, the Joint Comprehensive Plan of Action (JCPOA) and the Trans-Pacific Partnership (TPP) Agreement, and deplores the cutting of funds to the UN Relief and Works Agency for Palestine Refugees in the Near East (UNRWA);
Amendment 227 #
2018/2097(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 14 a (new)
Paragraph 14 a (new)
14a. Reaffirms its full support and commitment to the JCPOA as a cornerstone of peace and stability and crucial for the security of the region;
Amendment 237 #
2018/2097(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 15
Paragraph 15
15. Stresses that investing in the stability and prosperity of the Western Balkans means investing in the security and future of our Union; reiterates the European perspective for the countries in the Western Balkans; highlights that the enlargement process is merit-based and must depend on nothing other than the concrete results achieved by each individual country on issues such as fundamental human rights, corruption, money-laundering practices, overall transparency and judicial independence; reiterates the importance, throughout this process, of the rule of law, reconciliation and good neighbourly relations, security and migration, socio-economic development, transport and energy connectivity and the digital agenda;
Amendment 243 #
2018/2097(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 16
Paragraph 16
16. Calls on the Commission and the EEAS to continue using the EU’s transformative power at its Eastern borders, using trade agreements and access to the single market as incentives to foster democratic reforms and the adoption of European rules and standards; calls further on the EEAS to monitor democratic processes in its direct neighbourhood and ensure that democratic progress is not halted or reverted;
Amendment 247 #
2018/2097(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 16 a (new)
Paragraph 16 a (new)
16a. Stresses that protracted conflicts in the Eastern Neighbourhood area represent a threat to the stability of the countries concerned and of the entire region in the immediate vicinity of the EU; underlines the need to address all frozen conflicts in accordance with international law;
Amendment 261 #
2018/2097(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 16 d (new)
Paragraph 16 d (new)
16d. Calls on the EU to make use of all instruments at its disposal to improve the lives and guarantee the human dignity of IDPs and refugees in the Eastern Neighbourhood area;
Amendment 273 #
2018/2097(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 17 a (new)
Paragraph 17 a (new)
17a. Insists that only by engaging with the real relevant actors on the ground, by involving local communities and working on solutions that tackle the root causes for migrations at their source of origin and that any financial support is subjected to strict terms and conditionalities on upholding respect for the rule of law, fundamental and human rights and democracy;
Amendment 276 #
2018/2097(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 17 b (new)
Paragraph 17 b (new)
17b. Reiterates its supports to the EU's CSDP stabilisations missions in the sub- Saharan area and calls on their reinforcement, by entrusting the mandate and means that are appropriate to the grave challenges they are facing; recalls also its support to the northern African countries, in the understanding that economic development is the base of a stable and just society, in the framework and respect for human rights as core values;
Amendment 280 #
2018/2097(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 17 c (new)
Paragraph 17 c (new)
17c. Stresses that the EU must play a leading role in the Middle East and the Persian Gulf, my means of its decisive soft-power and the full implementation, in all their provisions, of all association agreements with the countries in the region;
Amendment 281 #
2018/2097(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 17 d (new)
Paragraph 17 d (new)
17d. Stresses that preserving peace, stability and prosperity in the Asia-Pacific region is of substantial interest to the EU and its member states; calls for all parties concerned in the region to solve differences through peaceful means and to refrain from taking unilateral actions to change the status quo, including in the East and South China Sea and the Taiwan Strait, in order to safeguard regional security;
Amendment 284 #
2018/2097(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 17 e (new)
Paragraph 17 e (new)
17e. Emphasises that strengthening regional security in the Indo-Pacific is of critical importance to the interests of the EU and its Member States; stresses that all disputes should be settled through peaceful means based on international laws; takes note that official dialogue between China and Taiwan has been frozen over the past two years; encourages a quick resumption of bilateral talks to de-escalate tensions between the two sides and maintain peace and stability in the Taiwan Strait; reiterates its firm support for Taiwan's meaningful participation in international organisations, mechanisms and activities;
Amendment 285 #
2018/2097(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 17 f (new)
Paragraph 17 f (new)
17f. In the aftermath of the recent presidential and parliamentary elections in the region, reaffirms its commitment to continue forging strong relations with Latin America, promoting the defence of democracy and human rights in so far as shared core values by both the EU and LAC; expresses its grave concern on the lack of respect for democracy and rule of law, especially in Cuba, Nicaragua and Venezuela, and on the attacks against democratically elected opposition leaders, journalists, students and human rights defenders, in particular those working on environmental issues and their lawyers; emphasizes that respect to rule of law and to stable political and legal framework, including fight against corruption and impunity, as well as progress towards democracy and the respect for and promotion of fundamental freedoms, are cornerstone for deeper integration and cooperation with LAC;
Amendment 286 #
2018/2097(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 17 g (new)
Paragraph 17 g (new)
17g. Observes with concern the electoral developments in Brazil, key country in the region;
Amendment 287 #
2018/2097(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 17 h (new)
Paragraph 17 h (new)
17h. Commends the efforts of all the parties concerned in the Peace Process in Colombia; reiterates its full support to the Peace Process and to its effective implementation, which is decisive for the future of Colombians and for stabilisation in the region of which this country is a part;
Amendment 319 #
2018/2097(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 20
Paragraph 20
20. Believes that the capacity to dispatch forces to global conflicts is an essential pre-condition for becoming a credible political power; calls on the EEAS and the Member States to develop sufficient military capabilities, covering the full-spectrum of land, air, space, maritime and cyber capabilities to defend their values and interests around the world;
Amendment 326 #
2018/2097(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 20 c (new)
Paragraph 20 c (new)
20c. Stresses that furthering the Defence Union should provide for a complementary role in the EU's external relations;
Amendment 2 #
2018/2040(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Citation 1 a (new)
Citation 1 a (new)
- having regard to the Universal Declaration of Human Rights and to the UN Human Rights Conventions and the optional protocols thereto,
Amendment 10 #
2018/2040(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Citation 4 a (new)
Citation 4 a (new)
- having regard to the resolution (A/RES/65/276) of the United Nations General Assembly (UNGA) on the participation of the European Union in the work of the United Nations, which grants the EU the right to intervene in the UN General Assembly, to present proposals and amendments orally which will be put to a vote at the request of a Member State, and to exercise the right to reply,
Amendment 13 #
2018/2040(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Citation 7 b (new)
Citation 7 b (new)
- having regard to its Annual report on the implementation of CFSP of 13 December 2017,
Amendment 17 #
2018/2040(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Recital A
Recital A
A. whereas the EU remains fully committed to multilateralism, good global governance and the promotion of UN core values as an integral part of the EU’s external policy;
Amendment 31 #
2018/2040(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Recital D
Recital D
D. whereas the EU and its Member States remain collectively the single largest financial contributor to the UN, with the primary aims of eradicating poverty, promoting long-term peace and stability, combating social inequalities, and providing humanitarian assistance to populations, countries and regions that are confronted with all types of crises, whether natural or human-made;
Amendment 46 #
2018/2040(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Recital E d (new)
Recital E d (new)
Ed. whereas the EU is one of the most dedicated defenders and promoters of human rights, fundamental freedoms, cultural values and diversity, democracy and the rule of law;
Amendment 51 #
2018/2040(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 1 – point a
Paragraph 1 – point a
(a) to actively support the UN Secretary-General’s (UNSG) three pillar reform agenda; to support the streamlining of the peace and security structure, which needs to become more efficient, focused and operational with power divided in a more balanced way and with more effective diversity in the regional representation at all its bodies;
Amendment 95 #
2018/2040(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 1 – point g
Paragraph 1 – point g
(g) to call on the EU and the UN to play complementary and reinforcing roles every time peace and security are threatened; to initiate structured political cooperation between the EU and the UN; to push for stronger multilateral commitments to find lasting sustainable political and peaceful solutions to current conflicts in the Middle East and North Africa;
Amendment 98 #
2018/2040(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 1 – point g a (new)
Paragraph 1 – point g a (new)
(ga) to continue to support UN special envoys’ work, actions and initiatives aimed at solving these conflicts;
Amendment 119 #
2018/2040(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 1 – point i b (new)
Paragraph 1 – point i b (new)
(ib) to further strengthen the role of R2P as an important principle in UN Member States' work on conflict resolution, human rights and development; to promote a broad definition of the human security concept and the R2P principle;
Amendment 127 #
2018/2040(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 1 – point i h (new)
Paragraph 1 – point i h (new)
(ih) to support actions strengthening the resilience of communities targeted by extremist propaganda and vulnerable to radicalisation, including by addressing the economic, social, cultural, and political causes which lead to it;
Amendment 129 #
2018/2040(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 1 – point i i (new)
Paragraph 1 – point i i (new)
(ii) to reiterate its unequivocal condemnation of terrorism and its full support for actions aimed at defeating and eradicating terrorist organisations, which pose a clear threat to regional and international security;
Amendment 131 #
2018/2040(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 1 – point i j (new)
Paragraph 1 – point i j (new)
(ij) to support efforts deployed by the UN to find a sustainable resolution to the conflict in Syria and to continue to back the EU’s role in the humanitarian field;
Amendment 132 #
2018/2040(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 1 – point i k (new)
Paragraph 1 – point i k (new)
(i k) to urge the international community to do whatever is in their power in order to strongly condemn those responsible for war crimes and crimes against humanity committed during the Syrian conflict; to support the UNSG’s call for the establishment of a new impartial and independent panel to determine perpetrators of chemical attacks in Syria, as the absence of such a body increases the risks of a military escalation;
Amendment 134 #
2018/2040(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 1 – point i l (new)
Paragraph 1 – point i l (new)
(i l) to support the UN peace plan initiative in Yemen and to tackle the ongoing humanitarian crisis as a matter of urgency; to call on all parties to respect the human rights and freedoms of all Yemeni citizens, and to stress the need of negotiated political settlement through inclusive intra-Yemeni dialogue;
Amendment 143 #
2018/2040(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 1 – point i t (new)
Paragraph 1 – point i t (new)
(i t) to continue to call for the full respect of internationally recognised borders and the territorial integrity of Ukraine and all other Eastern European countries in light of the violations of international law in these areas; to support and reinvigorate diplomatic efforts for a peaceful and sustainable settlement of these ongoing and protracted conflicts;
Amendment 155 #
2018/2040(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 1 – point j d (new)
Paragraph 1 – point j d (new)
(jd) to continue to promote equality and non-discrimination between women and men, and to actively promote the support of further actions against violation of LGBTI rights;
Amendment 160 #
2018/2040(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 1 – point k
Paragraph 1 – point k
(k) to recall that sexual violence such as rape is used as a tactic of war and constitutes a war crime; to ensure safe medical assistance for cases of war rape; to call for strengthened protection of women and girls in conflict situations, especially as regards sexual violence; to urge all UN Member States to make all necessary financial and human resources available to assist the population in conflict areas;
Amendment 200 #
2018/2040(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 1 – point r a (new)
Paragraph 1 – point r a (new)
(ra) to strongly condemn the widespread human rights abuses and violations of international humanitarian law; to call for greater protection of human rights and fundamental freedoms in every dimension of their expression, including in the context of new technologies;
Amendment 240 #
2018/2040(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 1 – point u b (new)
Paragraph 1 – point u b (new)
(ub) to recall the obligation of the General Assembly, when electing the membership of the UN Human Rights Council (UNHRC), to take into account the respect of candidates for the promotion and protection of human rights, the rule of law and democracy; to call for the establishment of clear human rights performance-based criteria for membership of the UNHRC;
Amendment 262 #
2018/2040(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 1 – point v
Paragraph 1 – point v
(v) to fully support the UN-led efforts to negotiate two Global Compacts for Migration and on Refugees based on the September 2016 New York Declaration for Refugees and Migrants; to recall that the Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs), contained in the UN 2030 Agenda, recognise that planned and well-managed migration policies can help achieve sustainable development and inclusive growth, as well as reduce inequality within and between states;
Amendment 270 #
2018/2040(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 1 – point x
Paragraph 1 – point x
(x) to ensure that human rights are put at the core of the Global CompactsGlobal Compacts are people-centred and human rights-based, and provide long-term, sustainable and comprehensive measures, for the benefit of all parties involved; to pay specific attention to migrants in situations of vulnerability, such as children, women at risk, victims of human trafficking or persons with disabilities;
Amendment 278 #
2018/2040(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 1 – point x a (new)
Paragraph 1 – point x a (new)
(xa) to call for a strengthening of the child protection systems and to support concrete measures in the best interests of the child refugees and migrants, based on the Convention on the Rights of the Child;
Amendment 283 #
2018/2040(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 1 – point y a (new)
Paragraph 1 – point y a (new)
(ya) to assist Eastern Partnership countries in dealing with problems that they have been facing as a result of massive forced internal displacement from conflict areas, and to act resolutely for the protection and restoration of the rights of displaced people, including their rights to return, property rights and the right to personal security;
Amendment 286 #
2018/2040(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 1 – point y b (new)
Paragraph 1 – point y b (new)
(yb) to reiterate its serious concern that hundreds of thousands of IDPs and refugees who fled their native lands in connection with protracted conflicts remain displaced and to reaffirm the right of all IDPs and refugees to return to their places of origin in safety and dignity;
Amendment 305 #
2018/2040(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 1 – point z
Paragraph 1 – point z
Amendment 5 #
2018/2018(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Recital D
Recital D
D. whereas Chile has been a major player in regional affairs, for example as a guarantor country in the Colombian peace process and the Santo Domingo talks between the Venezuelan Government and opposition; whereas Chile decided to suspend indefinitely its participation in the Santo Domingo talks as the minimum conditions for a democratic presidential election and an institutional normalization were not reached;
Amendment 10 #
2018/2018(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Recital F
Recital F
F. whereas the recent parliamentary and presidential elections have once again demonstrated the stable and mature character of Chilean democracy; whereas Chile has benefited from strong economic growth in recent decades; whereas Chile is one of South America’s fastest-growing economies in recent decades, and reform efforts in the country are still ongoing;
Amendment 13 #
2018/2018(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Recital G
Recital G
G. whereas the existing Association Agreement has been instrumental in deepening EU-Chile political relations and substantially increasing trade and investment flows; whereas continued respect to the rule of law and to a stable legal and political framework enables both Chile and the EU to exercise a free enterprise and adequate investment environment that include safeguards to the principle of legal certainty;
Amendment 21 #
2018/2018(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 1 – point a
Paragraph 1 – point a
a) to considerably strengthen cooperation between Chile and the EU, two like-minded partners in an environment of new uncertainty in international relations, on the basis of our shared values and principles of democracy, the rule of law, good governance, respect for human rights and fundamental freedoms; welcomes the regular dialogue between the EU and Chile on human rights, notably the successful VIII Dialogue of 13 December 2017, and encourages both parties to continue to address it in a multilateral cooperation, strengthening the institutional framework and public policies to promote human rights;
Amendment 26 #
2018/2018(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 1 – point c
Paragraph 1 – point c
c) to put shared values at the core of the modernisation process and to continue the practice of including a human rights clause, as it is done in all AAs; to include a joint commitment to the protection and promotion of human rights, fundamental freedoms, gender equality, and the rights of minorities such as the LGBTI community, ethnic minorities and indigenous people;
Amendment 38 #
2018/2018(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 1 – point e
Paragraph 1 – point e
e) to strengthen dialogue and cooperation on regional and global challenges, such as organised crime, migration, terrorism and climate change, including the implementation of Agenda 2030 for sustainable development;
Amendment 40 #
2018/2018(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 1 – point e a (new)
Paragraph 1 – point e a (new)
ea) to recall the importance of the multilateral agenda and that any bilateral negotiation must not undermine the ambition to achieve progress multilaterally;
Amendment 43 #
2018/2018(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 1 – point g
Paragraph 1 – point g
g) to encourage Chile to continue supporting regional integration and cooperation schemes, most importantly the Pacific Alliance taking into consideration its encouraging results as a real and active driver of economic integration between the members of the region, as well as, UNASUR, and the Community of Latin American and Caribbean States (CELAC); to examine the possibility of the EU gaining an observer status in the Pacific Alliance;
Amendment 44 #
2018/2018(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 1 – point g a (new)
Paragraph 1 – point g a (new)
ga) to create innovative mechanisms that broaden and strengthen triangular cooperation which Chile and the EU has undertaken in Central America and in the Caribbean;
Amendment 51 #
2018/2018(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 1 – point k
Paragraph 1 – point k
k) to enhance cooperation on the fight against corruption, money laundering and tax evasion; to promote international effortsinclude provisions on tax good governance and transparency standards that reaffirm the parties’ commitment to implementing international standards in the fight against tax avoidance and tax evasion;
Amendment 53 #
2018/2018(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 1 – point k a (new)
Paragraph 1 – point k a (new)
ka) to recall that corruption undermines human rights, equality, social justice, trade and fair competition, impeding economic growth; to include specific sections outlining clear and strong commitments and measures to combat corruption in all its forms and to implement international standards and multilateral anti-corruption conventions;
Amendment 67 #
2018/2018(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 1 – point q
Paragraph 1 – point q
q) to ensure the appropriate involvement of civil society both during the negotiations and in the implementation phase of the Association Agreement, including but not limited to the Joint Consultative Committee; stresses the need to establish an institutionalized mechanism for political dialogue of civil society organizations in both regions;
Amendment 69 #
2018/2018(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 1 – point t
Paragraph 1 – point t
t) to delaensure that any provisional application of the new agreement until Parliament has given itsshould be subject to the Parliament giving its prior consent;
Amendment 13 #
2018/0256M(NLE)
Draft opinion
Paragraph 2
Paragraph 2
2. Stresses that it is important for this agreement to give guarantees regarding respect for international law, including human rights, in the territories concerned;
Amendment 25 #
2018/0256M(NLE)
Draft opinion
Paragraph 3
Paragraph 3
3. Notes that this agreement does not imply recognition of Morocco’s sovereignty over Western Sahara and that the EU’s position remains that of supporting UN efforts to secure a fairachieve a just, lasting and mutually acceptable settlement of the Western Sahara conflict, on the basis of the right topolitical solution, which will provide for the self- determination of the Sahrawi people and in accordance withpeople of Western Sahara and in accordance with International Law and the relevant UN resolutions; reiterates, therefore, its full support to the UN Secretary-General’s Personal Envoy for Western Sahara, Mr Horst Köhler, in helping the parties to achieve this settlement;
Amendment 38 #
2018/0256M(NLE)
Draft opinion
Paragraph 3 a (new)
Paragraph 3 a (new)
3a. Points out that a meeting of the parties involved in the conflict is to be held in Geneva in early December on the initiative of the UN and with the participation of Algeria and Mauritania, and hopes that meeting will help kick- start the peace process;
Amendment 40 #
2018/0256M(NLE)
Draft opinion
Paragraph 3 a (new)
Paragraph 3 a (new)
3 a. Calls on the parties to resume the negotiations under the auspices of the UN Secretary-General without preconditions and in good faith;
Amendment 42 #
2018/0256M(NLE)
Draft opinion
Paragraph 3 b (new)
Paragraph 3 b (new)
3b. Takes the view that if Morocco were to free Sahrawi political prisoners, that would send a positive message as part of the peace process, making it possible for practical commitments to be made on both sides with a view to achieving a negotiated political solution;
Amendment 53 #
2018/0256M(NLE)
Draft opinion
Paragraph 4
Paragraph 4
4. Notes that during inclusive consultations led by the Commission and the European External Action Service (EEAS) with a wide variety of Western Saharan local representatives, civil society organisations and other organisations and bodies, broada majority support was expressed, by the parties participating, for the socio- economic benefits the proposed tariff preferences would bring;
Amendment 78 #
2018/0256M(NLE)
Draft opinion
Paragraph 5 a (new)
Paragraph 5 a (new)
5 a. Recalls that according to art. 21. TEU the Union's action on the international scene shall be guided by the principles of democracy, the rule of law, the universality and indivisibility of human rights and fundamental freedoms and respect for the principles of the United Nation Charter and International law; therefor consent can only be given when a clear intend of improvement of the human rights is shown;
Amendment 75 #
2018/0212(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 14
Recital 14
(14) The activation of EISF support should therefore be determined by a double activation trigger based on both the level of national unemployment and long-term unemployment rate compared to its past average and the change in unemployment compared to a certain threshold. The activation of EISF support should be determined also by the level of population at-risk-of-poverty or social exclusion and the level of general government expenditure in social aspects in terms of GDP compared with the past levels;
Amendment 97 #
2018/0212(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 4 – paragraph 1 – introductory part
Article 4 – paragraph 1 – introductory part
1. A Member State shall be considered to experience a large asymmetric shock if at least three of the following activation criteria are simultaneously fulfilled:
Amendment 98 #
2018/0212(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 4 – paragraph 1 – point a
Article 4 – paragraph 1 – point a
a) the quarterly national unemployment rate exceeded the averageand long-term unemployment rate exceeded the average unemployment and long-term unemployment rate in the Member State concerned over a period of 60 quarters preceding the quarter during which the request is made;
Amendment 100 #
2018/0212(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 4 – paragraph 1 – point b
Article 4 – paragraph 1 – point b
b) the quarterly national unemployment and long-term unemployment rate increased above one percentage point in comparison to the unemployment and long-term unemployment rate observed in same quarter of the previous year.
Amendment 102 #
2018/0212(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 4 – paragraph 1 – point b a (new)
Article 4 – paragraph 1 – point b a (new)
b a) the percentage of people at risk of poverty and social exclusion in the Member State exceeds the EU average over a period of 12 quarters preceding the quarter during which the request is made;
Amendment 104 #
2018/0212(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 4 – paragraph 1 – point b b (new)
Article 4 – paragraph 1 – point b b (new)
b b) the percentage of general government expenditure on social aspects in terms of GDP in the Member States concerned have been decreasing over a period of 12 quarters preceding the quarter during which the request is made;
Amendment 105 #
2018/0212(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 4 – paragraph 1 a (new)
Article 4 – paragraph 1 a (new)
1 a. The activation criteria described in subparagraphs (a) and (b) must be simultaneously fulfilled by the requesting Member State.
Amendment 49 #
2018/0207(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 5
Recital 5
(5) In order to bring the European Union closer to its citizens, a variety of actions and coordinated efforts are necessary. Bringing together citizens in town-twinning projects or networks of towns and supporting civil society organisations in the areas covered by the programme will contribute to increase citizens' engagement in society and ultimately their involvement in the democratic life of the Union. At the same time supporting activities promoting mutual understanding, diversity, dialogue and respect for others fosters a sense of belongingsocial integration and a European identity, based on a shared understanding of European values, culture, history and heritage. The promotion of a greater sense of belonging to the Union and of Union values is particularly important amongst citizens of the EU outermost regions due to their remoteness and distance from continental Europe.
Amendment 61 #
2018/0207(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 8
Recital 8
(8) Equality between women and men is a fundamental value and an objective of the European Union. Article 8 of the Treaty gives the Union the task of eliminating inequalities and promoting an effective equality between men and women through all its activities. Discrimination against and unequal treatment of women violates their fundamental rights and prevents their full political, social and economic participation in society. In addition, the existence of structural and cultural barriers hinders the achievement of real gender equality. Promoting gender equality in all activities of the Union, including in work and employment, where discrimination persists on the level of payment and on access to the labour market, is therefore a core activity for the Union and a driver for economic growth and should be supported by the programme.
Amendment 64 #
2018/0207(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 10
Recital 10
(10) Strong political will and coordinated action based on the methods and results of the previous Daphne Programmes, the Rights, Equality and Citizenship Programme and the Justice Programme are necessary in order to prevent and combat all forms of violence and to protect victims, groups at risk and particularly vulnerable persons. In particular, since its launch in 1997, the Daphne funding to support victims of violence and combat the violence against women, children and young people has been a genuine success, both in terms of its popularity with stakeholders (public authorities, academic institutions and non- governmental organisations) and in terms of the effectiveness of the funded projects. It has funded projects to raise awareness, to provide support services to victims, groups at risk, and particularly vulnerable persons, to support the activities of non- governmental organisations (NGOs) working on the ground. It has addressed all forms of violence, such as for instance domestic violence, sexual violence, trafficking in human beings, as well as new emerging forms of violence such as cyber- bullying. It is therefore important to continue all these actions and that those results and lessons learned are taken into due consideration in the implementation of the Programme.
Amendment 71 #
2018/0207(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 11
Recital 11
(11) Non-discrimination is a fundamental principle of the Union. Article 19 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union provides for action to combat discrimination based on sex, racial or ethnic origin, religion or belief, disability, age or sexual orientation. Non- discrimination is also enshrined in Article 21 of the Charter. The specific features of the diverse forms of discrimination should be taken into account and appropriate action should be developed in parallel to prevent and combat discrimination on one or more grounds. The Programme should support actions to prevent and combat discrimination, racism, xenophobia, anti- semitism, anti-muslim hatred and other forms of intolerance, as misogyny, homophobia and ageism. In that context, particular attention should also be devoted to preventing and combating all forms of violence, hatred, segregation and stigmatisation, as well as combating bullying (including cyber-bullying), harassment and intolerant treatment. The Programme should be implemented in a mutually reinforcing manner with other Union activities that have the same objectives, in particular with those referred to in the Commission Communication of 5 April 2011 entitled ‘An EU Framework for National Roma Integration Strategies up to 202010 ’ and in the Council Recommendation of 09 December 2013 on effective Roma integration measures in the Member States11 . __________________ 10 COM(2011)173. 11 OJ C 378, 24.12.2013, p. 1.
Amendment 79 #
2018/0207(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 21 a (new)
Recital 21 a (new)
(21a) A high level of employment, the guarantee of adequate social protection, the fight against social exclusion, the pursuit of a high level of education and training are objectives to be incorporated by the EU when defining its policies and activities. The Programme should aim for equal opportunities among European citizens and to promote the objectives enshrined in article 9 TFEU, including exploring synergies and complementarities between those objectives.
Amendment 99 #
2018/0207(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 5 – paragraph 1 – point a
Article 5 – paragraph 1 – point a
(a) preventing, including with informative and educational actions, and combating all forms of violence against children, young people and women, women and aged persons, as well as violence against other groups at risk, and particularly vulnerable persons;
Amendment 101 #
2018/0207(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 5 – paragraph 1 – point b
Article 5 – paragraph 1 – point b
(b) supporting and protecting victims, groups at risk, and particularly vulnerable persons of such violence.
Amendment 674 #
2018/0197(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 6 – paragraph 2
Article 6 – paragraph 2
2. In addition, the Cohesion Fund shall not support investment in housing unless related to the promotion of energy efficiency or renewable energy use and seismic retrofitting.
Amendment 197 #
2018/0191(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point 25
Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point 25
(25) 'people with fewer opportunities' means people facing obstacles that prevent them from having effective access to opportunities under the Programme for economic, social, cultural, geographical or health reasons, a migrant background or for reasons such as disability, age and educational difficulties;
Amendment 237 #
2018/0191(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 8 – paragraph 1 – point d a (new)
Article 8 – paragraph 1 – point d a (new)
(da) intergenerational exchange activities between youth and older persons
Amendment 243 #
2018/0191(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 10 – paragraph 1 – point c a (new)
Article 10 – paragraph 1 – point c a (new)
(ca) structured dialogue with young people and structured intergenerational dialogue;
Amendment 31 #
2018/0081(COD)
Proposal for a directive
Recital 2
Recital 2
(2) Directive 2004/37/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council44 aims to protect workers against risks to their health and safety from exposure to carcinogens or mutagens at the workplace. A consistent level of protection from the risks related to carcinogens and mutagens is provided for in Directive 2004/37/EC by a framework of general principles to enable Member States to ensure the consistent application of the minimum requirements. Binding occupational exposure limit values need to be evidence-based, proportionate and measurable, being established on the basis of available information, including updated scientific and technical data, economic feasibility of implementation and compliance, a thorough assessment of the socioeconomic impact and availability of exposure measurement protocols and techniques at the workplace, are important components of the general arrangements for the protection of workers established by Directive 2004/37/EC. The minimum requirements provided for in Directive 2004/37/EC aim to protect workers at Union level. More stringent binding occupational exposure limit values can be set by Member States. Social partners should also be encouraged by Member States to adopt when possible higher levels of protection for their workers. __________________ 44 Directive 2004/37/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 29 April 2004 on the protection of workers from the risks related to exposure to carcinogens or mutagens at work (Sixth individual Directive within the meaning of Article 16(1) of Council Directive 89/391/EEC) (OJ L 158, 30.4.2004, p. 50).
Amendment 39 #
2018/0081(COD)
Proposal for a directive
Recital 2 c (new)
Recital 2 c (new)
(2c) Wide differences in the Member States regarding the setting of limit values for the carcinogens and mutagens persist which leads to different workers protection levels across the Union and also distorts competition.
Amendment 62 #
2018/0081(COD)
Proposal for a directive
Recital 8 a (new)
Recital 8 a (new)
(8a) The precautionary principle based on sound scientific assessment should be applied in the protection of workers' health and safety.
Amendment 50 #
2017/2282(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 3 o (new)
Paragraph 3 o (new)
3o. Recommends that the Georgian authorities ensure proper involvement of the civil society in the reform processes;
Amendment 112 #
2017/2282(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 9
Paragraph 9
9. Notes with satisfactionAcknowledges Georgia’s results in fighting corruption; commends Georgia’s continued implementation of the Anti-Corruption Strategy and its Action Plan; calls on Georgia to ensure that the Anti-Corruption Agency is separated from the State Security Service;
Amendment 119 #
2017/2282(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 9 a (new)
Paragraph 9 a (new)
9a. Reiterates the importance of effective separation of powers and a clear dissociation between politics and economic interests;
Amendment 129 #
2017/2282(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 11
Paragraph 11
11. Welcomes the progress of the judicial reform; calls for more transparency of the judicial system and for further improvements to its independenhowever, calls on the Georgian government to keep up with the reforms to ensure full independence and transparency of the prosecutor’s office, judiciary and the Ministry of Interior, including the Police and the Security Services;
Amendment 157 #
2017/2282(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 17 c (new)
Paragraph 17 c (new)
17c. Stresses the importance of elaborating a clear, transparent and human-rights based policy and mechanisms for investigating, prosecuting and compensating human rights violations committed during previous administrations with the assurance that this process fully respects the principle of rule of law and due process;
Amendment 179 #
2017/2282(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 19 a (new)
Paragraph 19 a (new)
19a. Reiterates the responsibility of the Georgian government to thoroughly supervise the situation of children in orphanages and religious residential institutions;
Amendment 180 #
2017/2282(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 19 b (new)
Paragraph 19 b (new)
19b. Stresses the responsibility of the Government under international human rights law to protect all children from violence and calls for measures to ensure effective investigation and rehabilitation for children affected by sexual abuse;
Amendment 196 #
2017/2282(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 21
Paragraph 21
21. Welcomes the emphasis put on job creation as well as labour rights notably through the adoption of the law on occupational safety; stresses the need to put in place a fully-fledged labour inspection system aligned with ILO conventions to improve safety at work and reduce undeclared work; takes note of the Georgian authorities’ ambition to do so by September 2019; is concerned by child labour and insufficient freedom of association for trade unions; recalls that occupational safety according to the requirements of the Association Agreement is of critical importance and calls to be applied to all workplaces; is concerned by the lack of progress in terms of enforcement of criminal justice in the cases of violation of labour safety rules;
Amendment 4 #
2017/2279(INI)
Draft opinion
Recital A
Recital A
A. whereas unemployment and youth unemployment in the Union have been falling gradually since 2013, but are still slightly above 2008 levels, at 7.3% and 16.1% respectively1a, and with considerable differences amongbetween and within the Member States; _________________ 1a http://ec.europa.eu/eurostat/documents/29 95521/8631691/3-31012018-BP- EN.pdf/bdc1dbf2-6511-4dc5-ac90- dbadee96f5fb
Amendment 7 #
2017/2279(INI)
Draft opinion
Recital A a (new)
Recital A a (new)
A a. whereas in the current financial period, cohesion policy is expected to help support 1.1 million SMEs, 7.4 million unemployed people find a job, 8.9 million people gain new qualifications, invest €16 billion in the digital economy and make substantial investments in social infrastructure;
Amendment 10 #
2017/2279(INI)
Draft opinion
Recital B
Recital B
B. whereas the employment rate in the EU has been growing for four consecutive years and now surpasses the 2008 figure at 71%, but still remains below the pre-crisis level in halfsome2a of the Member States; whereas regional disparities have started to narrow;while there remain marked differences in the average employment rate between more and less developed regions, regional disparities have started to narrow; _________________ 2a http://ec.europa.eu/eurostat/statistics- explained/index.php/File:Employment_ra te,_age_group_20_%E2%80%93_64,_201 6_%28%25%29_YB17.png
Amendment 23 #
2017/2279(INI)
Draft opinion
Recital C
Recital C
C. whereas while the risk of poverty or social exclusion in the EU has fallen back to its pre-crisis level, it remains verytoo high and far from reaching the Europe 2020 poverty and social exclusion target;
Amendment 69 #
2017/2279(INI)
Draft opinion
Paragraph 4
Paragraph 4
Amendment 55 #
2017/2277(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Recital D
Recital D
D. whereas good occupational safety and health practices are crucial for a productive and motivated workforce, which helps companies remain competitive and innovative and helps to maintain valuable skills and work experience, reduce staff turnover and prevent exclusion; whereas SMEs have particular needs in this regard, demanding support measures in order to attain their OSH objectives; whereas, on the other hand, good OSH practices are crucial for SMEs to stay in the market and keep ensuring employment;
Amendment 64 #
2017/2277(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Recital E
Recital E
E. whereas the improved health and reintegration of workers increases the overall wellbeing of society, has economic benefits to Member States, employees and employers and helps to retain; whereas to retain and to reintegrate older workers is key to secure skills that would otherwise be lost;
Amendment 67 #
2017/2277(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Recital E a (new)
Recital E a (new)
Ea. whereas older workers, despite being more subjected to chronic illness, also are proved to have a lower degree of exposure to physical risks and greater working time autonomy;
Amendment 137 #
2017/2277(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 6 a (new)
Paragraph 6 a (new)
6a. Stresses in this regard the importance of developing and updating workers’ skills, matching the company and market needs, with special emphasis on digital skills, by providing workers with relevant training and access to lifelong learning;
Amendment 179 #
2017/2277(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 13
Paragraph 13
13. Believes that financial incentives, including financial incentives for SMEs, should be in place to keep people with reduced working capacity in employment;, in particular workers with reduced working capacity, if medical conditions allow, them to work; strongly encourages the integration of workers through re- training and upskilling into the open labour market; underlines that support should be available in particular to SMEs in order to allow the delivery of efficient training;
Amendment 193 #
2017/2277(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 15
Paragraph 15
15. Recognises in this regard that flexible working arrangements, such as telework, flexitime and reduced working hours, play an important role in returning to work; stresses the importance of encouraging early return to work (if medical conditions allow) through flexible working arrangements and reduced working time arrangements, which could be accompanied by partial sickness benefit; stresses that these arrangements, that include geographical, temporal and functional flexibility, must be positive both for workers and employers, helping on the management of the work organization and taking into account the variations in production cycles;
Amendment 238 #
2017/2277(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 20
Paragraph 20
20. Takes the view that EU-wide campaigns play an important role in shifting popular opinion, increasing awareness of the demographic challenges facing the European labour markets as well as fighting existing myths and stereotypes that still exist about older workers; considers regrettable that older persons are still often exposed to age discrimination, stereotypes and barriers;
Amendment 240 #
2017/2277(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 20 a (new)
Paragraph 20 a (new)
20a. Stresses that national policy frameworks have a decisive impact on the policies and practices that enterprises develop to support active aging and to secure comprehensive age diversity on the work force;
Amendment 4 #
2017/2269(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Citation 5 b (new)
Citation 5 b (new)
- having regard to its resolution of 23 October 2013 on European Neighbourhood Policy as well as resolution of 9 July 2015 on the review of the European Neighbourhood Policy,
Amendment 7 #
2017/2269(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Citation 5 c (new)
Citation 5 c (new)
- having regard to its Annual report on the implementation of CFSP of 13 December 2017,
Amendment 32 #
2017/2269(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 5
Paragraph 5
5. Notes that the Agreement is in keeping with the spirit and principles expressed in the European Parliament recommendation of 15 November 2017, which unambiguously states that no comprehensive agreement will be ratified with a country that does not respect EU values; urges the authorities in Armenia nevertheless to ensure, with the support of the EU, there is no backsliding on these values, which could trigger suspension of the application of the Agreement through its Article 379; reiterates that EU financial assistance to Armenia remains conditional to implementation and quality of reforms;
Amendment 43 #
2017/2269(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 9
Paragraph 9
9. Notes that the Agreement is also in keeping with the spirit and principles expressed in the European Parliament recommendation of 15 November 2017 as regards making the ratifprovisional and full application of a new agreement with Armenia or Azerbaijan conditional upon meaningful commitments to and substantial progress towards solving the Nagorno-Karabakh conflict in line with United Nations Security Council resolutions 882, 853, 874 and 884; urges both sides to increase the pace and output of their negotiations following the 2018 elections in both countries in order to make history by ending a conflict which has claimed too many lives, especially those of civilians, and which has prevented the establishment of peace and hampered socio-economic development in the region for almost three decades;
Amendment 44 #
2017/2269(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 9
Paragraph 9
9. Notes that the Agreement is also in keeping with the spirit and principles expressed in the European Parliament recommendation of 15 November 2017 as regards making the ratifprovisional and full application of a new agreement with Armenia or Azerbaijan conditional upon meaningful commitments to and substantial progress towards solving the Nagorno-Karabakh conflict; urges both sides to increase the pace and output of their negotiations following the 2018 elections in both countries in order to make history by ending a conflict which has claimed too many lives, especially those of civilians, and which has prevented the establishment of peace and hampered socio-economic development in the region for almost three decades;
Amendment 53 #
2017/2269(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 9 d (new)
Paragraph 9 d (new)
9d. Urges the Commission to strictly oversee the abidance of EU Member States by Council Regulation 833/2014 which is instrumental in avoiding indirect sale, supply, transfer or export of dual use goods and technology to Armenia through intermediaries which are partly intended for military uses or a military end-user;
Amendment 62 #
2017/2269(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 11 a (new)
Paragraph 11 a (new)
11a. Calls on the Armenian authorities to refrain from excessive use of force against peaceful protesters and pressures such as unjustified criminal charges against protest leaders;
Amendment 63 #
2017/2269(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 11 b (new)
Paragraph 11 b (new)
11b. Regrets that investigations into the actions of police on the cases of excessive use of force against peaceful protesters and other law enforcement–even when opened–were ineffective and no charges were pursued against any officials, despite the gravity of some of the force used;
Amendment 67 #
2017/2269(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 12
Paragraph 12
12. Urges the Armenian authorities, in view of future elections, to swiftly and fully implement all the recommendations of the international observation missions led by the Organisation for Security and Cooperation in Europe’s Office for Democratic Institutions and Human Rights (OSCE/ODIHR), in particular in relation to allegations of vote buying, voter intimidation, the pressuring of civil servants and private sector employees and undue interference in the voting process by party representatives or law enforcement officers which failed to improve public confidence in the country’s electoral systems;
Amendment 72 #
2017/2269(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 14
Paragraph 14
14. Reiterates its strong attachment to international law and fundamental values, including democracy, the rule of law and good governance, respect for human rights and fundamental freedoms,; regrets that serious gaps in human rights protection persist and encourages Armenia to make significant progress in these areas, in particular as regards media freedom, the independence of the judiciary and the fight against corruption, organised crime and, abusive oligarchic control and to ensure that journalists face no pressure, fear of retaliation and violence over their work;
Amendment 76 #
2017/2269(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 15
Paragraph 15
15. WelcomNotes the adoption of anti- domestic violence legislation in the Armenian Parliament in December 2017 but despite alarming statistics on domestic violence, the Armenian government hasn’t done enough to protect and support survivors; commends Armenia on the signature, on 18 January 2018, of the Council of Europe’s Istanbul Convention on preventing and combating violence against women and domestic violence and encourages Armenia to swiftly ratify and thoroughly implement this Convention to effectively meet its commitments to international standards in this field;
Amendment 79 #
2017/2269(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 15 a (new)
Paragraph 15 a (new)
15a. Regrets that violence and discrimination based on sexual orientation and gender identity continue to remain as serious concerns in the country;
Amendment 87 #
2017/2269(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 16 f (new)
Paragraph 16 f (new)
16f. Notes that physical barriers and lack of reasonable accommodations at community schools often leave children with disabilities with little or no education; calls on Armenian authorities to take effective steps in this regard;
Amendment 93 #
2017/2269(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 19 a (new)
Paragraph 19 a (new)
19a. Calls upon Armenia to engage in a trustful trade relations with the EU in line with its commitments taken in the WTO accession; recalls that the terms and conditions of the WTO membership as well as the obligations under the WTO Agreements and the provisions of these Agreements shall only apply to the territories of the Republic of Armenia as recognised by the United Nations;
Amendment 9 #
2017/2260(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Citation 13 a (new)
Citation 13 a (new)
– having regard to the Interinstitutional Proclamation on the European Pillar of Social Rights on 17 November in Gothenburg,
Amendment 32 #
2017/2260(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Recital A
Recital A
A. whereas the employment rate in the EU is increasing and has reached 235.4 million people in jobs in the second quarter of 2017, which constitutes an employment rate of 72.3 %, meaning that the EU is on track to reach the 75 % employment rate target specified in the Europe 2020 strategy; whereas very substantial differences persists in many Member States and employment rates have still some way to go to recover from the crisis and notably also to attain the Europe 2020 national targets;
Amendment 39 #
2017/2260(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Recital B
Recital B
B. whereas the EU unemployment rate is at its lowest level in nine years and stands at 7.5 %18.9 million people are still without a job despite that the EU unemployment rate and the euro area unemployment is at its lowest level in nine years and eight years and stands at 7.5 % and 8.9% respectively;
Amendment 55 #
2017/2260(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Recital D a (new)
Recital D a (new)
Da. whereas the accompaniment of the long-term unemployed is essential, since otherwise this situation will begin to affect their self-confidence, wellbeing and future development, putting them at risk of poverty and social exclusion and undermining the sustainability of social security systems, as well as the European social model;
Amendment 101 #
2017/2260(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 2
Paragraph 2
2. Stresses the need for structural reforms aimed at improving labour market and social policies, in order to help the workforce to acquire the skills they need and to promote equal opportunities in the labour market, fair working conditions, increasing labour productivity to support wage growth, and sustainable and adequate social protection systems; emphasises the need of reinforcing a favourable environment for business with a view to creating more employment while balancing the social and economic dimensions; calls on the Member States to gradually shifting taxes from labour to other sources;
Amendment 114 #
2017/2260(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 3
Paragraph 3
3. Welcomes the Interinstitutional Proclamation on the European Pillar of Social Rights (EPSR) and believes its 20 key principles regarding equal opportunities and access to the labour market, fair working conditions and social protection and inclusion should serve as a point of reference when implementing the European Semester policy coordination cycle; Highlights that the EPSR is a first step through consolidation of a common approach to the protection and development of social rights across the EU, which should be reflected in measures pursued by Member States; Reiterates the call on the Commission to continue to complement this with further measures on deepening the economic and monetary union;
Amendment 132 #
2017/2260(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 4 a (new)
Paragraph 4 a (new)
4a. Notes that the percentage of people at risk of poverty and social exclusion remains high; points out that high levels of inequality reduce the output of the economy and the potential for sustainable growth;
Amendment 143 #
2017/2260(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 5
Paragraph 5
5. Reiterates its concern at the level of youth unemployment, which remains high, with the number of NEETs having stagnated; welcomes, in this respect, an increase in funding for the Youth Employment Initiative by EUR 2.4 billion for the period 2017-2020; highlights that Member States should ensure that the Youth Guarantee is fully open to all groups, including vulnerable persons;
Amendment 146 #
2017/2260(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 5 a (new)
Paragraph 5 a (new)
5a. Stresses the need to implement effective labour market policies in order to reduce long-term unemployment; Member States should further help those out of work by providing affordable, accessible and quality services support for job search, training and requalification, while protecting those unable to participate;
Amendment 171 #
2017/2260(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 6
Paragraph 6
6. Calls on the Commission and the Member States to maximise their efforts in investing in high-quality education and training, training, labour productivity growth and active labour market policies in order to guarantee that the skills acquired will match labour market demand and empower people and integrate them in the labour market; underlines, in this respect, the growing demand for digital and other transferable skills and insists that the development of these skills is urgent and particularly necessary; Believes that Member States should work towards more effective and tailor-made public and private employment services;
Amendment 173 #
2017/2260(INI)
6. Calls on the Commission and the Member States to maximise their efforts in investing in high-quality education and training in order to guarantee that the skills acquired will match labour market demand; underlines, in this respect, the growing demand for digital and other transferable skills and insists that the development of these skills is urgent and particularly necessary; takes the view that mutual recognition of qualifications will be beneficial for overcoming the gap between skills shortages on the European labour market and jobseekers, especially young people;
Amendment 178 #
2017/2260(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 6 a (new)
Paragraph 6 a (new)
6a. Underlines that Member States and the Commission should maximize efforts to ensure equal opportunity and access to education and training to ensure social inclusion and better economic outcomes; Calls on the Commission and Member States to upgrade vocational training and strengthen work-based learning, including quality apprenticeships; Recalls that recognition of skills acquired outside formal education and training and support for adults should also be made easier;
Amendment 179 #
2017/2260(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 6 a (new)
Paragraph 6 a (new)
6a. Underlines that the integration of long-term unemployed individuals through individually tailored measures is a key factor for fighting poverty and social exclusion and contributing to the sustainability of national social security systems; highlights, in this context, the importance of skills and competences acquired in non-formal and informal learning environments;
Amendment 184 #
2017/2260(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 7
Paragraph 7
7. Calls on the Member States and the Commission to take all the necessary measures to improve the services and legislation that are important for a proper work-life balance and for gender equality; calls for the development of accessible, quality and affordable childcare and early education services, and for the creation of favourable conditions for parents and carers by allowing for advantageous family leave take-up and flexible working arrangements which tap into the potential of new technologies; underlines, in this respect, the potential of public-private partnerships;
Amendment 192 #
2017/2260(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 7 a (new)
Paragraph 7 a (new)
7a. Calls on the Member States to provide labour inspectorates or other relevant public bodies with adequate resources to address the issue of undeclared work, as well as to reinforce labour inspection mechanisms and design measures to enable workers to move from the grey to the formal economy in order to have access to employment and social protection systems;
Amendment 197 #
2017/2260(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 8
Paragraph 8
8. Underlines the potential of SMEs, as well as health and social services and social enterprises, in job creation and the economy as a whole; considers it vital to support entrepreneurship and to improve the business environment by removing administrative burdens, improving access to finance and supporting the development of tax models and simplified tax compliance procedures favouring SMEs, entrepreneurs, micro-entities and start-ups;
Amendment 212 #
2017/2260(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 10
Paragraph 10
10. Considers demographic decline, which affects EU regions to different extents, to be among the serious obstacles hindering EU growth; calls on the Commission and the Member States to introduce measures designed to address this challenge; underlines the fact that demographic decline requires a holistic approach, which should include the adaptation of the necessary infrastructure, and the enhancement of public services and flexible working arrangements; Insists that innovation forms of work should go hand in hand with adequate job security and accessible social protection;
Amendment 222 #
2017/2260(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 12
Paragraph 12
12. Calls on the Commission and the Member States to pursue the policy of active ageing, the social inclusion of elderly people and solidarity between generations; Recalls that more cost- effective health systems and long-term care that ensure timely access to affordable preventive and curative healthcare of good quality are also fundamental for productivity;
Amendment 234 #
2017/2260(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 14
Paragraph 14
14. Calls on the Commission and the Member States to step up efforts for further inclusion of people with disabilities into the labour market by removing legislative barriers and creating incentives for their employment; Recalls that an adapted work environment for people with disabilities as well as targeted financial support to help them participate fully in the labour market and in the society as a whole are essential;
Amendment 237 #
2017/2260(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 14 a (new)
Paragraph 14 a (new)
14a. Encourages the Member States to implement the necessary measures for the social inclusion of refugees as well as people of ethnic minority or immigrant origin;
Amendment 242 #
2017/2260(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 15 a (new)
Paragraph 15 a (new)
15a. Welcomes new initiatives proposed by the Commission such as the launching of a public consultation on a European Labour Authority, as well as a European Social Security Number; calls, therefore, on the Member states to provide labour inspectorates with adequate resources, and also to improve cross-border cooperation between inspection services and the electronic exchange of information and data, in order to improve the efficiency of the controls intended to combat and prevent social fraud and undeclared work and reduce administrative burden;
Amendment 246 #
2017/2260(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 15 b (new)
Paragraph 15 b (new)
15b. Calls for stronger commitment to combat poverty and rising inequality, and, where needed, for greater investment in social infrastructure and support for those hit hardest to address inequalities correctly notably through social protection systems that provide adequate and well-target income support but also through the design of national tax and benefits systems;
Amendment 248 #
2017/2260(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 15 c (new)
Paragraph 15 c (new)
15c. Highlights that in the period 2014 to 2016, real wage growth lagged behind productivity growth despite improvements in the labour market; Recalls that growth in real wages, as a result of increased productivity, is crucial to tackle inequalities;
Amendment 253 #
2017/2260(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 16
Paragraph 16
16. Underlines the role of the social partners and civil society as essential stakeholders in the reform process and the added value of their involvement in the drafting, sequencing and implementation of reforms; supports the opinion that new forms of employment in the globalised market call for new forms of social dialogue; affirms that the Member States need to help people build the skills required in the labour market;
Amendment 2 #
2017/2259(INI)
Draft opinion
Recital A
Recital A
A. whereas, according to Eurostat, youth unemployment in the EU28 is steadily decreasing and stood at 18.76.1% in 2016, even exceeding 40% in some countries; December 20171a although this rate remains double the overall unemployment rate and there are considerable differences between Member States; whereas this rate is still unacceptably high and must be reduced in order to realise young people’s full potential; __________________ 1a http://ec.europa.eu/eurostat/documents/29 95521/8631691/3-31012018-BP- EN.pdf/bdc1dbf2-6511-4dc5-ac90- dbadee96f5fb
Amendment 22 #
2017/2259(INI)
Draft opinion
Recital B
Recital B
B. whereas the overall lack of investment in young people’s rights will contribute to the aggravation of phenomena such as declining populations, the lack of professional qualifications or the disma is crucial for a fair and open democratic society, social mobility and inclusion and sustainable growth and employmentl ing of social security systems Europe;
Amendment 27 #
2017/2259(INI)
Draft opinion
Recital B a (new)
Recital B a (new)
Ba. whereas the EU Youth Strategy set out a framework for cooperation in the field of youth policy for the 2010-2018 period with the objectives of creating more and equal opportunities for all young people in education and in the labour market and promoting young people´s inclusion and active participation in society;
Amendment 56 #
2017/2259(INI)
Draft opinion
Paragraph 1 c (new)
Paragraph 1 c (new)
1c. Believes that the open method of coordination could be continued beyond the current period for cooperation in youth policy in order to set a joint agenda, exchange best practices and improve knowledge based policy making; however, believes that the current strategy’s fields of action and initiatives should be simplified and streamlined and its mechanisms for monitoring and reporting outcomes improved in order to be more targeted and ambitious;
Amendment 59 #
2017/2259(INI)
Draft opinion
Paragraph 1 d (new)
Paragraph 1 d (new)
1d. Reiterates the importance of the strategy’s cross-sectoral approach as a means of mainstreaming a youth dimension and creating synergies in other relevant policy fields such as employment, education and training and believes integration of the Youth Strategy with other related initiatives at EU level could be improved;
Amendment 62 #
2017/2259(INI)
Draft opinion
Paragraph 1 e (new)
Paragraph 1 e (new)
1e. Highlights the value of structured dialogue with young people and their organisations as a means of establishing structures and processes for their participation and stresses the importance of reaching more and diverse young people, especially those at risk of exclusion;
Amendment 10 #
2017/2203(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Citation 6 a (new)
Citation 6 a (new)
– having regard to Directive (EU) 2015/849 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 20 May 2015 on the prevention of the use of the financial system for the purposes of money laundering or terrorist financing,
Amendment 18 #
2017/2203(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Citation 14 a (new)
Citation 14 a (new)
– having regard to the European Parliament Resolution of 27 October 2016 on the situation in Northern Iraq/Mosul (2016/2956(RSP)),
Amendment 81 #
2017/2203(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Recital H
Recital H
H. whereas leaked intelligence even suggests that institutions and individuals in the Arabian Gulf are providing financial and logistical support to al-Qaeda, ISIS/Da’esh and other radical groups, and whereas without this funding many of these terrorist groups would not be self- sufficient;
Amendment 163 #
2017/2203(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 1 – point g
Paragraph 1 – point g
(g) calls on the Member States to take the legislative measures necessary to guarantee that banks monitor pre-paid debit cards closely so as to ensure that they can only be reloaded via bank transfers from accounts held by the cardholder; calls furthermore on the Member States to make the necessary provisions to fully facilitate the opening of a bank account to all those present in their territory;
Amendment 216 #
2017/2203(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 1 – point l – introductory part
Paragraph 1 – point l – introductory part
(l) calls on the Member States to regulate hawalatraditional ways of money transferring (such as the hawala or the Chinese fei ch’ien amongst others), making it mandatory to declare to the authorities every transaction made using the hawalase systems, and emphasising that the aim is not to crack down on traditional informal money transfers, but on trafficking involving organised crime, terrorism or industrial/commercial profits deriving from dirty money; in this respect, calls for:
Amendment 232 #
2017/2203(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 1 – point m a (new)
Paragraph 1 – point m a (new)
(ma) calls on the Commission and the Member States to increase their monitoring regarding regulating and controlling gold, precious stones and precious metals trafficking, so that these goods are not used as ways of financing terrorist activities; calls for the establishment of common European Criteria;
Amendment 233 #
2017/2203(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 1 – point m b (new)
Paragraph 1 – point m b (new)
(mb) calls on the Commission and the Member States to prohibit and sanction all commercial traffic (both exports and imports) with terrorists and organisations controlled by jihadists, with the exception of those humanitarian aid goods necessary for the subdued population; calls for the prosecution and sanctioning for imprudence or malice of all those (either physical or juridical persons) that participate in said traffics, in either one of its modalities (buying, selling, distribution, intermediation, amongst others);
Amendment 264 #
2017/2203(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 1 – point q
Paragraph 1 – point q
(q) urges the EEAS to take the same approach with its other CSDP missions in countries in which there could be terrorist hubs, especially in the Horn of Africa, Libya and the Sahel region, and to establish, in an effective manner, close cooperation with the governments in the areas concerned;
Amendment 270 #
2017/2203(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 1 – point r
Paragraph 1 – point r
(r) urges the High Representative and the EEAS to enhance cooperation with the countries in which the proceeds of drugs trafficking, human trafficking or traffic in commercial goods (such as tobacco and others) are held, so that they can be seized;
Amendment 151 #
2017/2130(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 1 – subparagraph 1 – point r
Paragraph 1 – subparagraph 1 – point r
(r) to call for an immediate withdrawal of foreign troops from all occupied territories of Azerbaijan and an end to military hostilities between Armenia and Azerbaijan which unnecessarily claim the lives of civilians and soldiers whilst hampering socioeconomic development, and to enable hundreds of thousands of IDPs to return to their homelands; to reaffirm support to the independence, sovereignty and territorial integrity of both countries within their internationally recognized borders as well as to the OSCE Minsk Group co-Chairs’ efforts to solve the Nagorno-Karabakh conflict in line with the UN Charter, OSCE Final Act and to their 2009 Basic Principles; to call on Armenia and Azerbaijan to re-launch negotiations in good faith with a view to implementing these principles to solve the conflict; to make the ratification of new agreements between the EU and each of the parties conditional on meaningful commitments to solving the conflict through maintaining the ceasefire and supporting the implementation of the 2009 Basic Principles;
Amendment 23 #
2017/2122(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Citation 21
Citation 21
— having regard to the EU Annual Report on Human Rights and Democracy in the World in 20165,
Amendment 36 #
2017/2122(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Recital A
Recital A
A. whereas Article 21 of the TEU commits the EU to developing a common foreign and security policy (CFSP) guided by the principles of democracy, the rule of law, the universality and indivisibility of human rights and fundamental freedoms, respect for human dignity, the principle of equality and solidarity, including women's rights and gender equality and compliance with the UN Charter, the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union and international law;
Amendment 38 #
2017/2122(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Recital B
Recital B
B. whereas today’s worldwide abuses of human rights and fundamental freedoms, including crimes against humanity, war crimes and genocides, necessitate determined efforts on the part of the whole international community;
Amendment 47 #
2017/2122(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Recital D
Recital D
D. whereas an increasing number of human rights violations amounting to war crimes and crimes against humanity, including genocide, are being committed by state and non-state actors;
Amendment 48 #
2017/2122(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Recital D a (new)
Recital D a (new)
D a. whereas children and women face increasing threats, discrimination and violence, especially in war zones and authoritarian regimes;
Amendment 49 #
2017/2122(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Recital D b (new)
Recital D b (new)
D b. whereas gender equality is at the core of European values and enshrined within the EU’s legal and political framework;whereas violence and discrimination against women and girls has dramatically increased during the recent years;
Amendment 52 #
2017/2122(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Recital E
Recital E
E. whereas freedom of thought, conscience, religion and belief, as well as the right to apostasy and the right to adopt atheistic views must be enhanced unconditionally through interreligious and intercultural dialogue;
Amendment 58 #
2017/2122(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Recital F
Recital F
F. whereas Article 207 of the TFEU stipulates that the EU’s commercial policy is to be based on the principles and objectives of the Union’s external action; whereas trade and human rights reinforce each other, and whereas the business community has an important role to play in offering positive incentives in terms of promoting human rights, democracy and corporate responsibility;
Amendment 66 #
2017/2122(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Recital G a (new)
Recital G a (new)
G a. whereas in fragile, conflict-prone or oppressive societies, elections can at times trigger widespread political violence;
Amendment 76 #
2017/2122(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Recital M a (new)
Recital M a (new)
M a. whereas human rights and democracy support policies should be mainstreamed across all other EU policies with an external dimension, such as development, migration, security, counter- terrorism, women’s rights and gender equality, enlargement and trade in particular through the implementation of human rights conditionality;
Amendment 92 #
2017/2122(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 2
Paragraph 2
2. Reiterates its firm belief that the EU and its Member States must actively pursue the principle of mainstreaming human rights and democracy in all EU policies, including those with an external dimension, such as development, migration, security, counter-terrorism, enlargement and trade, in particular through the implementation of human rights conditionality; reiterates, in this regard, the crucial importance of ensuring increased coherence between the EU’s internal and external policies;
Amendment 104 #
2017/2122(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 4
Paragraph 4
Amendment 107 #
2017/2122(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 6
Paragraph 6
Amendment 114 #
2017/2122(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 7
Paragraph 7
7. Expresses grave concern about the increasing number of attacks against religious minorities, in particular Christians, which are often committed by non-state actors such as ISIS/Daesh; deplores the attempts of state actors to limit freedom of religion and belief and freedom of expression by adopting and implementing blasphemy laws; calls for the EU and its Member States to step up their efforts to enhance respect for freedom of thought, conscience, religion and belief and to promote interreligious dialogue when engaging with third countries; requests concrete action towards the effective implementation of the EU Guidelines on the promotion and protection of freedom of religion or belief, including by ensuring the systematic and consistent training of EU staff at headquarters and in delegations; supports fully the EU practice of taking the lead on thematic resolutions on freedom of religion and belief at the UN Human Rights Council (UNHRC) and the UN General Assembly (UNGA); supports fully the work of the EU Special Envoy for the Promotion of Freedom of Religion or Belief outside the EU, Mr Ján Figel;
Amendment 132 #
2017/2122(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 9
Paragraph 9
9. Is deeply concerned that civil society is increasingly under attack worldwide, through, inter alia, a growing number of repressive laws adopted throughout the world, under the pretext of combating terrorism or disclosing "foreign agents"; recalls that independent civil society plays an essential role in the defence and advancement of human rights and in the functioning of democratic societies; deeply regrets the fact that human rights defenders, journalists and civil society activists are victims of harassment, intimidation and killings; calls for the EU and its Member States to constantly monitor and raise cases of violations of freedom of assembly and association, including the various forms of bans and limitations on civil society organisations (CSOs) and their activities, such as laws aiming at shrinking civil society space or the promotion of NGOs sponsored by governments (GONGOs) which mimic a functioning and free civil society space; calls, in addition, for the EU and its Member States to use all available means, such as human rights dialogues, political dialogues and public diplomacy, to systematically raise individual cases of human rights defenders (HRDs) and civil society activists at risk, particularly those in prison;
Amendment 141 #
2017/2122(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 9 a (new)
Paragraph 9 a (new)
9 a. Calls for the establishment of a system to effectively monitor civil society space with clear benchmarks and indicators, to fill in the gaps in the overall framework under which the EU deals with the issue of civil society space, notably as regards the use and definition of terms around the enabling, conducive, legal environment for civil society;
Amendment 152 #
2017/2122(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 11
Paragraph 11
11. Considers it deeply regrettable that torture, ill-treatment and the death penalty continue all over the world, and calls for the EU to intensify its efforts to eradicate these serious human rights violationsm; urges the EEAS and the VP/HR to engage more strongly in the fight against torture and other cruel, inhuman and degrading treatment or punishment, including the death penalty, through increased diplomatic efforts and more systematic public positioning; recommends that the EEAS, the EU delegations and the Member States use all existing instruments, such as the EU Guidelines on Torture, to their full potential; welcomes the fact that the UN’s resolution on a moratorium on the use of the death penalty was adopted by the UNGA in December 2016 with the support of 117 countries; calls on countries that still retain this practice to adopt a moratorium and abolish the death penalty;
Amendment 172 #
2017/2122(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 12 a (new)
Paragraph 12 a (new)
12 a. Condemns the fact that women’s sexual and reproductive rights are frequently violated;emphasises that proper, affordable health care and universal respect for and access to sexual and reproductive rights and education should be ensured to all women;
Amendment 176 #
2017/2122(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 13
Paragraph 13
13. Reaffirms the urgent need for the universal ratification and effective implementation of the UN Convention on the Rights of the Child and its Optional Protocols; underlines that children are often exposed to specific abuses, such as child marriages or genital mutilation, and therefore are in need of enhanced protection; requests that the EU systematically consult relevant local and international child rights organisations, and raise, in its political and human rights dialogues with third countries, States Parties’ obligations to implement the Convention; welcomes the Council of Europe Strategy for the Rights of the Child (2016-2021); requests that the EU continue to promote the EU-UNICEF Child Rights Toolkit for integrating child rights in development cooperation through its external delegations, and to train the EU delegation staff adequately in this field; reiterates its request for the Commission to propose a comprehensive children’s rights strategy and action plan for the next five years, in order to prioritise children’s rights within EU external policies; welcomes the fact that under the 2016 Development Cooperation Instrument, resources were allocated to support UN agencies in carrying out measures targeted to children’s rights;
Amendment 218 #
2017/2122(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 18
Paragraph 18
18. Reaffirms the fact that the activities of all companies, including European ones, operating in third countries should be in full compliance with international human rights standards; reaffirms, moreover, the importance of promoting corporate social responsibility and of European enterprises playing a leading role in promoting international standards on business and human rights; acknowledges that global value chains contribute to enhancing international core labour, environmental and social standards, and represent an opportunity for sustainable progress, especially in developing countries; outlines, however, that in case of business-related human rights abuses, the effective access to remedies for victims should be ensured;
Amendment 240 #
2017/2122(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 20
Paragraph 20
20. Strongly condemns the heinous crimes and human rights violations committed by state actors, as well as non- state actors such as Boko Haram in Nigeria and, ISIS/Daesh in Syria and Iraq and Houthi in Yemen, among others; is horrified at the vast range of crimes committed, including murder, torture, rape as a weapon of war, enslavement and sexual slavery, the recruitment of child soldiers, forced religious conversions and the systematic killing of religious minorities, including Christians, Yazidis and others; emphasises that the EU and its Member States should support the prosecution of state actors, as well as members of non-state groups such as ISIS/Daesh by seeking a consensus within the UN Security Council to confer jurisdiction to the International Criminal Court (ICC);
Amendment 270 #
2017/2122(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 23
Paragraph 23
23. Expresses profound concern at and solidarity with the large number of refugees and migrants who suffer grave human rights violations as the victims of conflicts, persecution, governance failures and illegal migration, trafficking and smuggling networks; stresses the urgent need to tackle the root causes of migration flows and therefore to address the external dimension of the refugee crisis, including by finding sustainable solutions to conflicts in our neighbourhood by developing, among others, cooperation and partnerships with the third countries concerned; underlines the need for a comprehensive human-rights-based approach to migration and calls for the EU to collaborate further with the UN, regional organisations, governments and NGOs;
Amendment 325 #
2017/2122(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 35
Paragraph 35
35. Welcomes the adoption of the EU Annual Report on Human Rights and Democracy in the World 2015; cConsiders that the Annual Report is an indispensable tool for scrutiny, communication and debate on the EU’s policy on human rights and democracy in the world;
Amendment 339 #
2017/2122(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 43
Paragraph 43
43. Acknowledges that Human Rights Dialogues with third countries can be an efficient tool for bilateral engagement and cooperation in the promotion and protection of human rights; welcomes the establishment of Human Rights Dialogues with a growing number of countries; urges the EEAS to ensure that women’s rights are included in all agendas and to systematically hold consultation meetings with civil society, including local civil society, before and after each Dialogue; praises and further encourages the involvement of civil society in preparatory dialogues; reiterates its call for the development of a comprehensive mechanism for monitoring and reviewing the functioning of Human Rights Dialogues;
Amendment 240 #
2017/2121(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 13 a (new)
Paragraph 13 a (new)
13a. Stresses that preserving peace, stability and prosperity in the Asia-Pacific region is of substantial interest to the EU and its member states; calls for all parties concerned in the region to solve differences through peaceful means and to refrain from taking unilateral actions to change the status quo, including in the East and South China Sea and the Taiwan Strait, in order to safeguard regional security; acknowledges the continued good will and flexibility shown by the government of Taiwan in maintaining cross-Strait relations and encourages the resumption of bilateral dialogues, which will be conducive to regional peace and stability; reiterates its commitment to supporting Taiwan’s meaningful participation in international organizations and activities;
Amendment 11 #
2017/2083(INI)
Draft opinion
Paragraph 2
Paragraph 2
2. Underlines the need for a stronger and more political partnership between the EU and Africa, based on shared values and interests, in order to tackle global issues such as climate change, food insecurity, access to water, population growth, youth unemployment, urbanization of large cities, the fight against impunity, terrorism, organised crime and migratory flows, and to promote a rule-based global order based on a strong UN;
Amendment 21 #
2017/2083(INI)
Draft opinion
Paragraph 3
Paragraph 3
3. Calls for continued EU support to African partners in the area of peace and security and conflict prevention, including through specific instruments such as CSDP operations and the African Peace Facility; highlights the importance of fostering security and stability by helping our partners to build more resilient states and societies, including through capacity building and security sector reforms, the creation of more and better jobs, especially for young people, the empowerment of women and the support of education, who are and should, increasingly, be the force of economic progress in the region, the support of education by investing more in schools and universities, and research;
Amendment 41 #
2017/2083(INI)
Draft opinion
Paragraph 4
Paragraph 4
4. Stresses that the pursuit of common interests and cooperation on security must be totally consistent with the EU’s fundamental values and with the objectives of supporting democracy, good governance, and promoting human rights and the rule of law; calls for a more strategic, pragmatic, respectful, comprehensive and structured approach to political dialogue under the Cotonou Partnership Agreement, with the greater involvement of civil society and a stronger people-to-people dimension;
Amendment 47 #
2017/2083(INI)
Draft opinion
Paragraph 4 a (new)
Paragraph 4 a (new)
4a. As a well-functioning democracy enhances stability and is a powerful tool against terrorism, the European Parliament offers to work more intensively with African Parliaments in building stronger Parliaments and Parliamentarians in taking up their role in the checks and balances between the executive and parliamentary bodies;
Amendment 57 #
2017/2083(INI)
Draft opinion
Paragraph 5
Paragraph 5
5. Recalls the importance of the effective implementation of external EU policies that are able to address the real root causes of migration; calls for increased joint efforts to implement the Valetta Action Plan based on a fair and true partnership with third countries of origin and transit; recalls the importance of a balanced approach in the new partnership framework; stresses that the new partnership framework with third countries must not become the only pillar of EU action on migration and should extend beyond a quantitative approach focused mainly on border management; underlines in this matter the importance of democratic scrutiny by the European Parliament;
Amendment 62 #
2017/2083(INI)
Draft opinion
Paragraph 5 a (new)
Paragraph 5 a (new)
5a. Recalls that the root causes of migration are conflicts, weak governance, government instability, violation of human rights, corruption, non-existence of the rule of law, impunity, inequality, unemployment or underemployment, lack of livelihoods and resources, and climate change;
Amendment 63 #
2017/2083(INI)
Draft opinion
Paragraph 5 a (new)
Paragraph 5 a (new)
5a. Stresses that the upcoming Africa EU summit will provide an opportunity to stress our priorities concerning the EU- Africa relations in the context of the post Cotonou process;
Amendment 64 #
2017/2083(INI)
Draft opinion
Paragraph 5 a (new)
Paragraph 5 a (new)
5a. Calls on the Commission to present a legislative proposal on accompanying measures for the ‘Conflict Minerals Regulation’ (2014/0059(COD)) in line with the relevant Joint Communication (JOINT (2014) 8);
Amendment 65 #
2017/2083(INI)
Draft opinion
Paragraph 5 a (new)
Paragraph 5 a (new)
5a. Underlines the importance of small- scale development projects which have a direct effect on people’s lives; urges the Commission to continue their support;
Amendment 66 #
2017/2083(INI)
Draft opinion
Paragraph 5 a (new)
Paragraph 5 a (new)
5a. Emphasises the added value of transport infrastructures to boost the economy and trade between the EU and Africa; Underlines the strategic importance of ports, harbours and airports;
Amendment 67 #
2017/2083(INI)
Draft opinion
Paragraph 5 a (new)
Paragraph 5 a (new)
5a. urges the European Commission to give special attention to sexual and reproductive health rights of women and girls in their external development programmes;
Amendment 173 #
2017/2044(BUD)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 65 a (new)
Paragraph 65 a (new)
65 a. Recalls the 2013 Fox-Häfner report, which estimated the costs of the geographic dispersion of the Parliament to be between EUR 156 million and EUR 204 million and equivalent to 10 % of the Parliament's budget; notes the finding that 78 % of all missions by Parliament statutory staff arise as a direct result of the Parliament's geographic dispersion; emphasises that the report also estimates the environmental impact of the geographic dispersion to be between 11,000 to 19,000 tonnes of CO2 emissions; reiterates the negative public perception caused by this dispersion and calls therefore for a roadmap to a single seat and a reduction in the relevant budget lines;
Amendment 4 #
2017/2043(BUD)
Draft opinion
Paragraph 1
Paragraph 1
1. Recalls that growth is the key to more jobssustainable growth and investment are the key to job creation and increased prosperity and that it is necessary to direct the structural funds more effectively towards promoting growth;
Amendment 7 #
2017/2043(BUD)
Draft opinion
Paragraph 2
Paragraph 2
2. Emphasises that the 2018 budget must play a key role in enhancing the Union’'s contribution to growth and jobssustainable growth, jobs and social inclusion, especially in combatingthe areas of youth unemployment and inequality;
Amendment 13 #
2017/2043(BUD)
Draft opinion
Paragraph 3
Paragraph 3
3. Recalls that youth unemployment rates remain verunacceptably high in the Union1a and that the situation of unemployed young people, especially NEETS (not in education, employment, or training), is particularly worrying; emphasises that, in order to address this issue, it is of the utmost importance to ensure the properadequate and timely funding of the Youth Guarantee schemes through the European Youth Initiative and the European Social Fund;Youth Employment Initiative and the European Social Fund; in this regard, highlights the importance of continuing the YEI up to the end of the current MFF; also notes the Court of Auditors statement that it is not possible to address the whole NEET population with the resources available from the EU budget alone1b; _________________ 1aIn March 2017, the youth unemployment rate was 17.2% in the EU28 and 19.4% in the euro area, compared with 19.1% and 21.3% respectively in March 2016 - Eurostat, 2nd May 2017: http://ec.europa.eu/eurostat/documents/29 95521/8002525/3-02052017-AP- EN.pdf/94b69232-83a9-4011-8c85- 1d4311215619 1bSpecial report No 5/2017: Youth unemployment – have EU policies made a difference?, p. 8
Amendment 18 #
2017/2043(BUD)
Draft opinion
Paragraph 3 a (new)
Paragraph 3 a (new)
3 a. Believes it is essential that the Youth Employment Initiative continues to be adequately funded and stresses in the context of the Multiannual Financial Framework mid-term review that the Council must adopt the agreed increase of EUR 500 million;
Amendment 20 #
2017/2043(BUD)
Draft opinion
Paragraph 4
Paragraph 4
4. Underlines the importance of sufficient funding and good budgetary management of the programmes within the 2014-2020 Multiannual Financial Framework that aim to address unemployment, poverty and social exclusion, such as the Youth Employment Initiative (YEI), the European Globalisation Adjustment Fund (EGF), the different axes of the Programme for Employment and Social Innovation (EaSI) and the Fund for European Aid to the Most Deprived (FEAD); insists, therefore, that for 2018 these programmes’' resources should at least be maintained at the levels of the previous EU budget; notes that payment amounts for this year's budget were limited as the structural funds have not been absorbed as quickly as expected and stresses that adequate payment appropriations be provided for in budget 2018;
Amendment 25 #
2017/2043(BUD)
Draft opinion
Paragraph 5
Paragraph 5
5. Takes the view that the EU budget should also support vocational training and professional qualification measures; highlights, in this respect, that proper funding for the European Centre for the Development of Vocational Training (CEDEFOP) is paramountensure the adequate financial and human resourcing of EUROFOUND, CEDEFOP, ETF and EU-OSHA in order to allow them to fulfil their respective remits and ensure the best possible results in support of EU legislative and policy objectives;
Amendment 33 #
2017/2043(BUD)
Draft opinion
Paragraph 6
Paragraph 6
6. Points out that micro, small, and medium-sized enterprises are a major source of employment in the Union andthe backbone of Europe's economy, representing 99% of all businesses in the EU; notes that one of the main problems in setting up and maintaining such enterprises and keeping them going is that of obtaining finance; underlines that the 2018 budget should support measures promoting entrepreneurship in those enterprises, including social entrepreneurship and, innovative social enterprises and self-employment; stresses, in this respect, that the budget 2018 should in particular facilitate access to micro- credits available through the microfinance and social entrepreneurship axis of the Employment and Social Innovation (EaSI) programme;
Amendment 38 #
2017/2043(BUD)
Draft opinion
Paragraph 7
Paragraph 7
7. Urges that financial support be provided for programmes creating jobs for those with multiple disadvantages onfrom EU funds reaches as many targeted beneficiaries as possible in particular for those furthest from the labour market, such as the long-term unemployed, people with disabilities and people from minority backgrounds;
Amendment 44 #
2017/2043(BUD)
Draft opinion
Paragraph 8
Paragraph 8
8. Reiterates that pilot projects and preparatory actions are very valuable tools to initiate new activities and policies in the fields of employment and social inclusion; stresses that several ideas of the Committee on Employment and Social Affairs have been implemented successfully in the past as pilot projects/preparatory actions; is of the opinion, therefore, that that committee will make further use of those instruments in 2018; encourages the full use of the margins available under each heading; calls for Parliament to be given regular, detailed updates on the various stages in the implementation of pilot projects and preparatory actions by the Commission.
Amendment 31 #
2017/2028(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Recital B
Recital B
B. whereas in many countries corruption not only constitutes a significant systemic obstacle to the realisation of all human rights, — civil, political, economic, social and cultural but may also cause many human rights violations; whereas corruption is one of the most neglected human rights violations of our times as it fuels injustice, inequality and deprivation;
Amendment 38 #
2017/2028(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Recital C
Recital C
C. whereas corruption, far from being an abstract crime, has specific negative impacts on the enjoyment of human rights affecting individuals, targeted groups such as women, children, persons with disabilities, the elderly, the poor, indigenous people or people belonging to minorities, or society at large, notably as regards financial and economic resources and the realisation of democracy and the rule of law;
Amendment 44 #
2017/2028(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Recital C a (new)
Recital C a (new)
C a. whereas corruption directly affects social programmes addressed to improve the lives of vast sectors of the population, in particular those in need of basic services such as healthcare, education, and housing;
Amendment 59 #
2017/2028(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Recital D a (new)
Recital D a (new)
D a. whereas according to the World Bank about 1 trillion dollars is paid each year in bribes around the world and the total economic loss from corruption is estimated to be many times that number;
Amendment 69 #
2017/2028(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Recital F
Recital F
F. whereas acts of corruption and human rights violations typically involve the misuse of power, lack of accountability and the institutionalisation of various forms of discrimination; whereas corruption shows strong correlation with deficiencies in the rule of law, and whereas corruption often undermines the effectiveness of the institutions and entities which are entrusted to ensure checks and balances and respect for democratic principles and human rights, such as parliaments, law enforcement authorities, the judiciary and civil society;
Amendment 79 #
2017/2028(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Recital G
Recital G
G. whereas practices such as electoral fraud, illicit funding of political parties or the perceived disproportionate influence of money in politics erode confidence and create social dissatisfaction in elected representatives and governments, undermine democratic legitimacy and may significantly weaken civil and political rights; whereas inadequate regulation of political financing can create opportunities for organized criminals to influence and interfere in the conduct of public affairs; whereas corruption can also be used as a political instrument in order to discredit the reputation of politicians;
Amendment 87 #
2017/2028(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Recital H a (new)
Recital H a (new)
H a. whereas it is difficult to measure corruption as it usually involves illegal practices that are deliberately covered up, although some mechanisms to identify, monitor, measure and combat corruption have been developed and implemented;
Amendment 94 #
2017/2028(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Recital K a (new)
Recital K a (new)
K a. whereas existing international obligations are good mechanisms to take appropriate and reasonable measures in order to prevent or punish corruption in public and private sectors, in particular under the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights, the International Covenant on Economic, Social and Cultural Rights, and other relevant human rights instruments;
Amendment 141 #
2017/2028(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 2 a (new)
Paragraph 2 a (new)
2 a. Is concerned over the harassment, threats, intimidation and reprisals suffered by members of civil society organisations, including anticorruption associations and human rights movements, journalists, bloggers and whistle-blowers that expose and denounce corruption cases; calls on the authorities to take all the necessary measures to guarantee their physical and psychological integrity and to ensure immediate, thorough and impartial investigations in order to bring those responsible to justice in accordance with international standards;
Amendment 159 #
2017/2028(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 4
Paragraph 4
4. Underlines the need to mainstream the principle of local and democratic ownership of projects financed under EU assistance programmes; highlights the need to establish and operationalise conditionality and incentives of EU external financial instruments based on anti-corruption norms and commitments made by partner countries; recalls the need of permanent monitoring of the EU funded projects and holding recipient country authorities accountable if the EU funds are not used appropriately;
Amendment 177 #
2017/2028(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 6 b (new)
Paragraph 6 b (new)
6 b. Welcomes persistent efforts under the Development Cooperation Instrument and the Neighbourhood Programming Instrument to establish and consolidate independent and effective anti-corruption institutions;
Amendment 185 #
2017/2028(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 8 a (new)
Paragraph 8 a (new)
8 a. Calls on EU delegations to make use of local demarches and public diplomacy to denounce cases of corruption and impunity, in particular when they lead to serious human rights violations;
Amendment 207 #
2017/2028(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 11
Paragraph 11
11. Is convinced that an ambitious anti- corruption policy in EU external relations is only credible if underpinned by an effective anti-corruption strategy within the EU; regrets in this context that the Commission decided not to follow up its 2014 EU anti-corruption report, which would have also reinforced the EU’s credibility to promote an ambitious anti- corruption agenda in its external policies; stresses that the European Commission and other EU institutions should undertake regular, ambitious and rigorous reporting and self-assessment in line with the provisions of the UN Convention against Corruption;
Amendment 213 #
2017/2028(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 15
Paragraph 15
15. Emphasises the need to step up national and international communication and awareness-raising campaigns targeting citizens participation in order to highlight the fact that corruption has negative impact on human rights and leads among others to social inequalities, lack of social justice and increased levels of poverty; stresses that education is key in building strong individuals in our society based on respect for the rule of law;
Amendment 22 #
2017/0242(COD)
Proposal for a decision
Recital 15
Recital 15
(15) The Union’s macro-financial assistance should support Georgia’s commitment to values shared with the Union, including democracy, the rule of law, good governance, respect for human rights - including an accountable, transparent and de- politicised public administration, an independent judiciary, impartial and effective law enforcement bodies and the stimulation of a free and fair environment allowing political competition, respect for human rights and fundamental freedoms, and free, independent and pluralistic media, sustainable development and poverty reduction, as well as its commitment to the principles of open, rules-based and fair trade.
Amendment 26 #
2017/0242(COD)
Proposal for a decision
Recital 16
Recital 16
(16) A pre-condition for granting the Union’s macro-financial assistance should be that Georgia fully respects effective democratic mechanisms –, including a multi- party parliamentary system – and the rule of law, and guarantees respect for human rightsand a strict separation of powers, and the rule of law, including the independence of the judiciary, and that it ensures an effective fight against corruption, guarantees respect for human rights, including freedom of expression and free, independent and pluralistic media. In addition, the specific objectives of the Union’s macro-financial assistance should strengthen the efficiency, transparency and accountability of the public finance management systems in Georgia, and promote structural reforms aimed at supporting sustainable and inclusive growth, employment creation and fiscal consolidation. Both the fulfilment of the preconditions and the achievement of those objectives should be regularly monitored by the Commission and the European External Action Service.
Amendment 30 #
2017/0242(COD)
Proposal for a decision
Recital 17
Recital 17
(17) In order to ensure that the Union’s financial interests linked to the Union’s macro-financial assistance are protected efficiently, Georgia should takefully implement appropriate measures relating to the prevention of, and fight against, fraud, corruption and any other irregularities linked to the assistance. In addition, provision should be made for the Commission to carry out checks and for the Court of Auditors to carry out audits.
Amendment 46 #
2017/0242(COD)
Proposal for a decision
Article 2 – paragraph 1
Article 2 – paragraph 1
1. A pre-condition for granting the Union’s macro-financial assistance shall be that Georgia respects effective democratic mechanisms –, including a multi-party parliamentary system – and the rule of law, andand the strict separation of powers, the rule of law, a clear separation between politics and economic interests, and that it guarantees respect for human rights.
Amendment 48 #
2017/0242(COD)
Proposal for a decision
Article 2 – paragraph 2 a (new)
Article 2 – paragraph 2 a (new)
2 a. The Commission shall closely follow the opinions presented by the Council of Europe's Venice Commission on all the issues falling within its remits.
Amendment 60 #
2017/0242(COD)
Proposal for a decision
Article 6 – paragraph 3 – point b
Article 6 – paragraph 3 – point b
(b) ensuring the protection of the Union’s financial interests, in particular providing forfully implementing specific measures in relation to the prevention of, and fight against, fraud, corruption and any other irregularities affecting the Union’s macro- financial assistance, in accordance with Council Regulation (EC, Euratom) No 2988/9512 , Council Regulation (EC, Euratom) No 2185/9613 and Regulation (EU, Euratom) No 883/2013 of the European Parliament and of the Council14 ; _________________ 12 Council Regulation (EC, Euratom) No 2988/95 of 18 December 1995 on the protection of the European Communities financial interests (OJ L 312, 23.12.1995, p. 1). 13 Council Regulation (EC, Euratom) No 2185/96 of 11 November 1996 concerning on-the-spot checks and inspections carried out by the Commission to protect the Communities’ financial interests against fraud and other irregularities (OJ L 292, 15.11.1996, p. 2). 14 Regulation (EU, Euratom) No 883/2013 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 11 September 2013 concerning investigations conducted by the European Anti-Fraud Office (OLAF) and repealing Regulation (EC) No 1073/1999 of the European Parliament and of the Council and Council Regulation (Euratom) No 1074/1999 (OJ L 248, 18.9.2013, p. 1).
Amendment 62 #
2017/0242(COD)
Proposal for a decision
Article 6 – paragraph 3 – point d
Article 6 – paragraph 3 – point d
(d) expressly authorising the Commission and the Court of Auditors to perform audits during and after the availability period of the Union’s macro- financial assistance in order to evaluate the efficiency of the assistance, including through document audits and on-the-spot audits, such as operational assessments;
Amendment 29 #
2017/0143(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 1
Recital 1
(1) EU households are amongst the highest savers in the world, but the bulk of these savings are held in bank accounts with short maturities and low returns. Nonetheless, household saving rates differ significantly among EU countries and persistent differences among EU member states may have an impact on investment and growth as household saving is an important financing source for private and public investment. More investment into capital markets can help meet the challenges posed by population ageing and , low interest rates and low levels of investment in the long-term.
Amendment 32 #
2017/0143(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 1 a (new)
Recital 1 a (new)
Amendment 36 #
2017/0143(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 1 b (new)
Recital 1 b (new)
(1b) The aging of society and falling birth rates are significant demographic challenges for the Union, which threatens both pension adequacy and sustainability as well as intergenerational solidarity. In addition, digitalisation and labour market changes are likely to further exacerbate the problem and put increasing pressure on first and second pillar pensions.
Amendment 37 #
2017/0143(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 1 c (new)
Recital 1 c (new)
(1c) According to EIOPA, only 67 million people, or 27% of the total EU population between 25-59 years old, are currently voluntarily subscribed to financial products with a long-term pension objective and that this is concentrated in only a few Member States.
Amendment 38 #
2017/0143(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 1 d (new)
Recital 1 d (new)
(1d) Priority should be given to further developing and strengthening the first pillar public pension schemes of Member States as the primary source of income for pensioners. However, in light of the impending reduction of the working population from a ratio of 1:4 to 1:2 a multi-pillar pension approach is crucial. A voluntary, long-term pan-European Personal Pension Product will act as a complement to and strengthen existing pension savings, boosting their adequacy as well as increasing coverage for categories of people previously faced with a lack, or partial lack, of adequate coverage such as women, young people the self-employed and persons in atypical or new forms of employment.
Amendment 39 #
2017/0143(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 1 e (new)
Recital 1 e (new)
(1e) Portability of the PEPP will increase its attractiveness as a product particularly to young people and help to further facilitate citizens’ right to live and work across the Union.
Amendment 42 #
2017/0143(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 2
Recital 2
(2) Personal pensions are important in linking long-term savers with long-term investment opportunities. A larger, European market for personal pensions will support the supply of funds for institutional investors and investment into the real economy which could help increase job creation across the EU.
Amendment 47 #
2017/0143(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 3
Recital 3
(3) Currently, the functioning of the internal market for personal pensions is impeded by the high degree of fragmentation between national markets and the limited degree of portability of personal pension products. This can result in difficulties for individuals to make use of their basic freedoms. For instance, they may be prevented from searching for or taking up a job in or retiring into another Member State. In addition, the possibility for providers to use the freedom of establishment and the freedom to provide services is hampered by the lack of standardisation of existing personal pension products.
Amendment 61 #
2017/0143(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 9
Recital 9
(9) In its Communication Mid-Term Review of the Capital Markets Union Action Plan32 , the Commission announced "a legislative proposal on a pan-European Personal Pension Product (PEPP) by end June 2017. This will lay the foundations for a safer, more cost-efficient and transparent market in affordable and voluntary personal pension savings that can be managed on a pan-European scale. It will address the demographical challenge and pension gap, meet the needs of people wishing to enhance the adequacy of their retirement savings, address the demographical challenge, complement the existing pension products and schemes in particular under the first and second pillar, and support the cost-efficiency of personal pensions by offering good opportunities for long-term investment of pension savings". __________________ 32 COM(2017) 292 final, p. 6. COM(2017) 292 final, p. 6.
Amendment 69 #
2017/0143(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 10
Recital 10
(10) Among personal pension products, the development of a PEPP will contribute to increasing choices for retirement saving and establish an EU market for PEPP providers. It will provide households with bettermore and quality options to meet their retirement goals. Personal pension savings must be safe, cost-effective, transparent and sufficiently flexible to accommodate the current economic and labour market environment in the EU and to promote a Single Market for personal pensions.
Amendment 75 #
2017/0143(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 11
Recital 11
(11) A legislative framework for a PEPP will lay the foundations for a successful market in affordable and voluntary retirement-related investments that can be managed on a pan-European scale. By complementing the existing pension products and schemes, it will contribute to meeting the needs of people wishing to enhance the adequacy of their retirement savings, addressing the demographical challenge and providing a powerful new source of private capital for long-term investment. This framework will not replace or harmonise existing national personal pension schemes.
Amendment 91 #
2017/0143(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 20
Recital 20
(20) A PEPP should comprise national compartments, each of them accommodating personal pension product features allowing that contributions to the PEPP qualify for incentives. At the level of the individual PEPP saver, a first compartment should be created upon opening of a PEPP.
Amendment 93 #
2017/0143(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 21
Recital 21
(21) In order to allow a smooth transition for PEPP providers, the obligation of providing PEPPs comprising compartments for each Member State will apply three years after the entry into force of this Regulation. However, uUpon launching a PEPP, the provider should provide information on which national compartments are immediately available, in order to avoid a possible misleading of consumersthe contract.
Amendment 97 #
2017/0143(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 21 a (new)
Recital 21 a (new)
(21a) In order to facilitate provisions to open national compartments in all Member States, PEPP providers should be able to enter partnerships with other PEPP providers.
Amendment 105 #
2017/0143(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 24
Recital 24
(24) In order to ensure optimal product transparency, PEPP manufacturproviders should draw up the PEPP key information document for the PEPPs that they manufacture before the product can be distributed to PEPP savers. They should also be responsible for the accuracy of the PEPP key information document. The PEPP key information document should replace and adapt the key information document for packaged retail and insurance-based investment products under Regulation (EU) No 1286/2014 of the European Parliament and of the Council33 which would not have to be provided for PEPPs. __________________ 33 Regulation (EU) No 1286/2014 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 26 November 2014 on key information documents for packaged retail and insurance-based investment products (PRIIPs), OJ L 352, 9.12.2014, p. 1.
Amendment 113 #
2017/0143(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 29
Recital 29
(29) PEPP providers should draw up a Pension Benefit Statement addressed to PEPP savers, in order to present them with key personal and generic data about the PEPP scheme and to ensure continuous information on it. The Pension Benefit Statement should be clear, updated, simple and comprehensive and should contain relevant and appropriate information to facilitate the understanding of pension entitlements over time and across schemes and serve labour mobility.
Amendment 132 #
2017/0143(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 38
Recital 38
(38) In view of the long-term retirement objective of the PEPP, the investment options grantoffered to the PEPP savers should be framclearly outlined, covering the elements which will allow investors to make an informed investment decision, including the number of investment options they can choose from. After the initial choice made upon the subscription of a PEPP, the PEPP saver should have the possibility to modify this choice at reasonable intervals (every five years), so that sufficient stability is offered to providers for their long-term investment strategy whilst at the same time investor protection is ensured.
Amendment 135 #
2017/0143(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 39
Recital 39
(39) The default investment option should allow the PEPP saver to recoup the invested capital. The PEPP providers cshould in addition include an inflation indexation mechanism to at least partly cover inflation.
Amendment 143 #
2017/0143(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 47
Recital 47
(47) In order to find better conditions for their investments, thus also stimulating the competition among PEPP providers, PEPP savers should have the right to switch providers during the accumulation and the decumulation phases, through a clear, quick and safe, safe and transparent procedure.
Amendment 154 #
2017/0143(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 55
Recital 55
(55) Full transparency on costs and fees related to the investment in a PEPP should be guaranteed. A level-playing field between providers would be established, whilst ensuring consumer protection. Comparative information wouldshall be available between different products, thus incentivising competitive pricing.
Amendment 155 #
2017/0143(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 56
Recital 56
(56) Although the ongoing supervision of PEPP providers is to be exercised by the respective competent national authorities, EIOPA should coordinate the supervision with regards to PEPPs, in order to guarantee the consistent application of a unified supervisory methodology, contributing in this way to the pane- European nature of the pension product.
Amendment 163 #
2017/0143(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 69
Recital 69
(69) Following the launch of the PEPP, Member States are strongly encouraged to take into consideration Commission Recommendation (EU) 2017/… and to extend the benefits of the tax advantages they grant to national PPPs also to the PEPP.
Amendment 192 #
2017/0143(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point 12 a (new)
Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point 12 a (new)
(12a) "lump sum" means the full payment of the accumulated capital at the end of the accumulation phase;
Amendment 204 #
2017/0143(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point 21
Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point 21
(21) "capital" means aggregate capital contributions and uncalled committed capital, calculated on the basis of amounts investible afterbefore deduction of all fees, charges and expenses that are directly or indirectly borne by investors;
Amendment 205 #
2017/0143(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point 24
Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point 24
(24) "default investment option" means an investment strategy where the PEPP saver recoups at least the capital invested and which is either selected by the PEPP saver or applied when the PEPP saver has not provided instructions on how to invest the funds accumulating in his PEPP account;
Amendment 215 #
2017/0143(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point 28 a (new)
Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point 28 a (new)
(28a) "biometric risks" mean risks linked to longevity, disability and death.
Amendment 217 #
2017/0143(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point 28 b (new)
Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point 28 b (new)
(28b) "compartment partnership" means cooperation between PEPP providers to offer compartments in different Member States as regards the portability service as referred to in Article 12.
Amendment 267 #
2017/0143(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 6 – paragraph 2
Article 6 – paragraph 2
2. Before taking a decision on the application, EIOPA shall consult the competent authority of the applicant to verify if there are any objections to the granting of the application.
Amendment 283 #
2017/0143(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 12 – paragraph 1
Article 12 – paragraph 1
1. The portability service allows PEPP savers to continue contributing to the PEPP which they have already contracted with its provider, while changing their domicile by moving to another Member State. The Commission should examine waiving the fee for changing providers as an incentive. In any case, costs shall be reasonable and communicated always at time of the contract.
Amendment 290 #
2017/0143(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 13 – paragraph 2
Article 13 – paragraph 2
2. When proposing a PEPP, the PEPP provider or PEPP distributor shall provide potential PEPP savers with information on which national compartments are immediately available and either from the PEPP provider or from a registered partner.
Amendment 294 #
2017/0143(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 13 – paragraph 3
Article 13 – paragraph 3
3. Three years at the latest aftere available compartments shall be listed in the econtry into application of this Regulation, each PEPP shallact between the PEPP saver and PEPP provider. The PEPP provider shall be obliged to offer national least the compartments for all Member States upon request addresslisted toin the PEPP providercontract.
Amendment 297 #
2017/0143(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 14 – paragraph 1
Article 14 – paragraph 1
Amendment 300 #
2017/0143(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 14 – paragraph 1 a (new)
Article 14 – paragraph 1 a (new)
PEPP providers may enter a compartment partnership with other PEPP providers in order to facilitate provisions to open compartments in all Member States.
Amendment 302 #
2017/0143(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 15 – paragraph 1
Article 15 – paragraph 1
1. Without prejudice to the deadline under Article 13(3), iImmediately after being informed about the PEPP saver's intention to exercise his right of mobility between Member States, the PEPP provider shall inform the PEPP saver about the possibility to open a new compartment within the PEPP saver's individual account and about the deadline within which such compartment could be opened.
Amendment 306 #
2017/0143(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 16 – paragraph 1
Article 16 – paragraph 1
1. At the request of the PEPP saver, the PEPP provider shall propose to the PEPP saver to arrange for transfer of accumulated assets between different compartments of the individual PEPP account, so that all assets could be consolidated in one compartment. Costs associated with this transfer must have been stipulated at the time the contract was concluded.
Amendment 308 #
2017/0143(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 17 – title
Article 17 – title
Amendment 310 #
2017/0143(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 17 – paragraph 1
Article 17 – paragraph 1
1. All contractual arrangements for providing the portability service shall be notified by the PEPP provider to the respective national authority exercising prudential supervision over itEIOPA.
Amendment 314 #
2017/0143(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 17 – paragraph 2 – introductory part
Article 17 – paragraph 2 – introductory part
2. The information under paragraph 1 shall be filed electronically in a central database held with the national supervisory authority within one month of opeEIOPA within one month of opening the new compartment. The database shall be accessible to the national competent authorities who shall automatically be notified of any changes concerning the newlocal compartment and. The database shall contain at least:
Amendment 315 #
2017/0143(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 17 – paragraph 2 – point a a (new)
Article 17 – paragraph 2 – point a a (new)
(aa) identification of the registered partner if any;
Amendment 319 #
2017/0143(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 21 – paragraph 1
Article 21 – paragraph 1
All documents and information under this Chapter shall be provided to PEPP customers electronically, provided that the PEPP customer is enabled to store such information in a way accessible for future reference and for a period of time adequate for the purposes of the information and that the tool allows the unchanged reproduction of the information stored. Upon request, PEPP providers and distributors shall provide free of charge those documents and information also on another durable medium. and in an accessible format to PEPP savers with a visual or hearing impairment as well as an easy to read version for PEPP savers with low or no financial literacy.
Amendment 322 #
2017/0143(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 23 – paragraph 1
Article 23 – paragraph 1
1. Before a PEPP is proposed to PEPP savers, the PEPP provider shall draw up for that product a PEPP key information document constituting pre-contractual information in accordance with the requirements of this Chapter and shall publish the document on its website.
Amendment 326 #
2017/0143(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 23 – paragraph 2
Article 23 – paragraph 2
2. PEPP providers and PEPP distributors shall comapply withe requirements contained in Articles 5(2), and 6 to 18 of Regulation (EU) No 1286/2014 when drawing up the PEPP key information document.
Amendment 329 #
2017/0143(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 23 – paragraph 3 – point iv
Article 23 – paragraph 3 – point iv
(iv) general information on the portability service, including information on the compartments and registered partners if any;
Amendment 361 #
2017/0143(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 23 – paragraph 5
Article 23 – paragraph 5
5. Potential PEPP savers shall also be provided with information on the past performance of investments related to the PEPP scheme covering a minimum of five years, or, where the scheme has been operating for fewer than five years, covering all the years that the scheme has been operating, as well as with information on the structure of costs and fees borne by PEPP savers and PEPP beneficiaries. In case the information could not be provided, PEPP savers should at least have access to the performance of a comparable scheme of investments.
Amendment 385 #
Amendment 392 #
2017/0143(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 27 – paragraph 1
Article 27 – paragraph 1
1. PEPP providers shall draw up a concise, clear and comprehensible personalised document containing key information for each PEPP saver taking into consideration the specific nature of national pension systems and of relevant national social, labour and tax law (“PEPP Benefit Statement”). The title of the document shall contain the words “PEPP Benefit Statement”.
Amendment 398 #
2017/0143(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 28 – paragraph 1 – introductory part
Article 28 – paragraph 1 – introductory part
1. The PEPP Benefit Statement shall be provided free of charge, annually and include, at least, the following key information for PEPP savers:
Amendment 401 #
2017/0143(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 28 – paragraph 1 – point a
Article 28 – paragraph 1 – point a
(a) personal details of the PEPP saver, name of the PEPP providand contact information of the PEPP provider, identification of the scheme of the PEPP saver, information on pension benefit projections, information on accrued entitlements or accumulated capital, contributions paid by the PEPP saver or any third party and information on the funding level of the PEPP scheme, for which Article 39, paragraphs 1(a), (b), (d), (e), (f) and (h) of Directive 2016/2341/EU shall be applied, where the “member” means the PEPP saver, the “IORP” means the PEPP provider, the “pension scheme” means the PEPP scheme and “the sponsoring undertaking” means any third party for the purposes of this Regulation;
Amendment 414 #
2017/0143(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 30 – paragraph 1
Article 30 – paragraph 1
1. PEPP savers shall receive information during the pre-retirement phase as set out in Article 42 of Directive 2016/2341/EU. This information must be provided at the latest one year prior to the retirement age.
Amendment 431 #
2017/0143(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 33 – paragraph 1 – point d
Article 33 – paragraph 1 – point d
Amendment 432 #
2017/0143(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 33 – paragraph 1 – point f
Article 33 – paragraph 1 – point f
(f) the assets shall not be iInvesteding in a high-risk and non- cooperative jurisdiction identified by the Financial Action Task Force is forbidden;
Amendment 434 #
2017/0143(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 34 – paragraph 1
Article 34 – paragraph 1
1. PEPP providers and distributors shall offer up to five investment options to PEPP savers.
Amendment 435 #
2017/0143(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 34 – paragraph 2
Article 34 – paragraph 2
2. TOne of the investment options offers shall include a default investment option while the remaining options and may include alternative investment options.
Amendment 437 #
2017/0143(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 35 – paragraph 1
Article 35 – paragraph 1
The PEPP saver shall opt for anone of the investment options upon conclusion of the PEPP contract.
Amendment 441 #
2017/0143(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 37 – paragraph 1
Article 37 – paragraph 1
1. The default investment option shall ensure capital protection for the PEPP saver, on the basis of a risk-mitigation technique that results in a safe investment strategybe a simple, easy to understand product and the PEPP provider shall guarantee the PEPP saver that the capital accumulated by the start of pay-out phase will at least equal the contributions paid including all costs and charges.
Amendment 446 #
2017/0143(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 37 – paragraph 2
Article 37 – paragraph 2
2. Capital protection shall allow the PEPP saver to recoup the capital invested including fees, cost and inflation.
Amendment 453 #
2017/0143(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 42 – paragraph 1
Article 42 – paragraph 1
PEPP providers may offer PEPPs with an option ensuring the coveragshall include a guarantee ofn the risk of biometric risks. For the purpose of this Regulation, “biometric risks” mean risks linked to longevity, disability and deathcapital invested for death and permanent disability of the PEPP saver during the accumulation phase.
Amendment 464 #
2017/0143(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 46 – paragraph 3 – introductory part
Article 46 – paragraph 3 – introductory part
3. Within twofive working days from receipt of the authorisation referred to in paragraph 2, the receiving PEPP provider shall request the transferring PEPP provider to carry out the following tasks, if provided for in the PEPP saver’s authorisation:
Amendment 478 #
2017/0143(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 48 – paragraph 3
Article 48 – paragraph 3
3. The total fees and charges applied by the transferring PEPP provider to the PEPP saver for the closure of the PEPP account held with it shall be limited to no more than 10,5 % of the positive balance to be transferred to the receiving PEPP provider. The Commission shall examine waiving the fee for changing providers as an incentive to promote the PEPP product.
Amendment 482 #
2017/0143(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 50 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 1 – introductory part
Article 50 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 1 – introductory part
Receiving PEPP providers shall give to PEPP savers the following information about the switching service:
Amendment 487 #
2017/0143(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 52 – paragraph 1 – introductory part
Article 52 – paragraph 1 – introductory part
1. PEPP providers mayshall make available to PEPP savers one or more of the following forms of out-payments:
Amendment 492 #
2017/0143(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 52 – paragraph 2 a (new)
Article 52 – paragraph 2 a (new)
2a. With regard to the default investment option, a minimum of 25% of out-payments in the form of annuities shall be mandatory.
Amendment 42 #
2017/0102(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 4
Recital 4
(4) Young people should be provided with easily accessible opportunities to engage in solidarity activities, which cwould enable them in the first place to express their commitment to the benefit of communities while acquiring useful experience, skills and competences for their personal, educational, social, civic and professional development, therebywhich would improvinge their employability. Those activities would also support the mobility of young volunteers, trainees and workers.
Amendment 49 #
2017/0102(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 5
Recital 5
(5) The solidarity activities offered to all young people should be of high quality, in the sense that they should respond to unmet societal needs, contribute to strengthening communities, offer young people the opportunity to acquire valuable knowledge and competences, be financially accessible to young people, in particular efforts must be made to ensure participation of young persons with disabilities and disadvantages and be implemented in safe and healthy conditions.
Amendment 56 #
2017/0102(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 6
Recital 6
(6) The European Solidarity Corps would provide a single entry point for solidarity activities throughout the Union. Consistency and complementarity of that framework should be ensured with other relevant Union policies and programmes. The European Solidarity Corps should build on the strengths and synergies of existing programmes, notably the European Voluntary Service. It should also complement the efforts made by Member States to support young people and ease their school-to-work transition under the Youth Guarantee19 by providing them with additional opportunities to make a start on the labour market in the form of traineeships or jobs in solidarity-related areas within their respective Member State or across borders. Complementarity with existing Union level networks pertinent to the activities under the European Solidarity Corps, such as the European Network of Public Employment Services, EURES and the Eurodesk network, the European Youth Forum (YEJ), the European Volunteer Centre (CEV) and other relevant civil society organisations including the social partners should also be ensured. Furthermore, complementarity between existing related schemes, in particular national solidarity schemes and mobility schemes for young people, and the European Solidarity Corps should be ensured, building on good practices where appropriate. __________________ 19 Council Recommendation of 22 April 2013 on establishing a Youth Guarantee (2013/C 120/01).
Amendment 65 #
2017/0102(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 8
Recital 8
(8) The European Solidarity Corps should open up new opportunities for young people to carry out volunteering, traineeship or job placements in solidarity- related areas as well as to devise and develop solidarity projects based on their own initiative. Those opportunities should help respond to unmet societal needs and contribute to strengthening communities while also contribute to enhancing their personal, educational, social, civic and professional development. The European Solidarity Corps should also support networking activities for European Solidarity Corps participants and organisations as well as measures to ensure the quality of the supported activities and to enhance the validation of their learning outcomes.
Amendment 71 #
2017/0102(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 9
Recital 9
(9) Voluntary activities constitute a rich experience in a non-formal and informal learning context which enhances young people's personal, socio-educational and professional development, active citizenship and employability. Voluntary activities should not have an adverse effect on potential or existing paid employment, nor should they be seen as a substitute for it. Solidarity placements in the form of volunteering under this Regulation should be offered by public authorities or by participating organisations in the not for profit sector or those involved in collaboration with a not for profit entity. In order to ensure continuity with respect to the volunteering activities that are supported at Union level, the volunteering activities under the European Voluntary Service that fall within the geographical scope of the European Solidarity Corps should be supported by the latter in the form of cross-border volunteering placements. The other volunteering activities under the European Voluntary Service that do not fall under the geographical scope of the European Solidarity Corps should continue to be supported under the Programme established by Regulation (EU) No 1288/2013 of the European Parliament and of the Council establishing 'Erasmus+': the Union programme for education, training, youth and sport20 . With respect to the interpretation of related legislation at Union level, both the cross-border volunteering placements under the European Solidarity Corps and the volunteering activities that continue to be supported under Regulation (EU) No 1288/2013 should be considered equivalent to those carried out under the European Voluntary Service. __________________ 20 Regulation (EU) No 1288/2013 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 11 December 2013 establishing 'Erasmus+': the Union programme for education, training, youth and sport and repealing Decisions No 1719/2006/EC, No 1720/2006/EC and No 1298/2008/EC, OJ L 347, 20.12.2013, p. 50.
Amendment 77 #
2017/0102(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 10
Recital 10
(10) Traineeships and jobs in solidarity- related areas can offer additionalhelp to build social , economic and civic cohesion while offering opportunities for young people to make a start on the labour market while contributing to addressing key societal challenges. This can help foster the employability and productivity of young people while easing their transition from education to employment, which is key to enhancing their chances on the labour market. The traineeship placements offered under the European Solidarity Corps should be remunerated by the participating organisation and follow the quality principles outlined in the Council Recommendation on establishing a Quality Framework for Traineeships of 10 March 201421 . The traineeships and jobs offered should constitute a stepping stone for young people to enter the labour market and should therefore be accompanied by adequate post-placement support. The traineeship and job placements should be facilitated by relevant labour market actors, in particular public and private employment services, social partners and Chambers of Commerce. As participating organisations, they should be able to apply for funding via the competent implementing structure of the European Solidarity Corps in view of intermediating between the young participants and employers offering traineeship and job placements in solidarity sectors. Traineeships and jobs in solidarity related areas must be entirely separate from any volunteering activities. __________________ 21 Council Recommendation of 10 March 2014 on a Quality Framework for Traineeships, OJ C 88, 27.3.2014, p. 1.
Amendment 86 #
2017/0102(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 11
Recital 11
(11) Young people’s spirit of initiative is an important asset for society and for the labour market. The European Solidarity Corps should contribute to fostering this aspect by offering young people the opportunity to devise and implement their own projects aimed at addressing specific challenges to the benefit of their local communities. Those projects should be an opportunity to try out ideas in a sustainable way and support young people to be themselves drivers of solidarity actions. They could also serve as a springboard for further engagement in solidarity activities and could be a first step towards encouraging European Solidarity Corps participants to engage in self- employment or setting up associations, NGOs or other bodies active in the solidarity, non-profit and youth sectors.
Amendment 89 #
2017/0102(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 12
Recital 12
(12) Young people and organisations participating in the European Solidarity Corps should feel that they belong to a community of individuals and entities committed to enhancing solidarity across Europe. At the same time, participating organisations need support to strengthen their capacities to offer good quality placements to an increasing number of participants. The European Solidarity Corps should support networking activities aimed at strengthening the capacity of young people and participating organisations’ engagement in this community, at fostering a European Solidarity Corps spirit, as well as at encouraging the exchange of useful practices and experience. Those activities should also contribute to raising awareness about the European Solidarity Corps among public and private actors as well as to collect feedback from participants and participating organisations on the implementation of the European Solidarity Corps.
Amendment 112 #
2017/0102(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 17
Recital 17
(17) A European Solidarity Corps Portal should continuously be developed in order to ensure easy access to the European Solidarity Corps and to provide a one-stop shop for both interested individuals and organisations as regards, inter alia, registration, identification and matching of profiles and opportunities, networking and virtual exchanges, online training, language and pre and post-placement support as well as other useful functionalities, which may arise in the future.
Amendment 138 #
2017/0102(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 41
Recital 41
(41) This Regulation should apply from 1 JanuaryMarch 2018. In order to allow for the prompt application of the measures provided for in this Regulation, this Regulation should enter into force on the day following that of its publication in the Official Journal of the European Union.
Amendment 145 #
2017/0102(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point 1
Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point 1
(1) “solidarity activity” means an activity aimed at addressing unmet societal needs to the benefit of a community while also fostering the individual’s personal, educational, social, civic and professional development, which may take the form of placements, projects or networking activities which have local or European added value, developed in relation to different areas, such as education and training, employment, gender equality, entrepreneurship, in particular social entrepreneurship, citizenship and democratic participation, environment and nature protection, climate action, disaster prevention, preparedness and recovery, agriculture and rural development, provision of food and non-food items, health and wellbeing, creativity and culture, physical education and sport, social assistance and welfare, reception and integration of third-country nationals, territorial cooperation and cohesion;
Amendment 164 #
2017/0102(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point 6
Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point 6
(6) “volunteering” means a full-time32 unpaid voluntary service for a period of up to twelve monthsn unpaid placement undertaken for a period of up to 12 months either on a full-time or on a part time basis of at least ten hours per week, which provides young people with the opportunity to contribute to the daily work of organisations active in solidarity- related fields, to the ultimate benefit of the communities within which the activities are carried out, including a solid learning and training dimension in order to enable the young volunteer(s) to gain skills and competences, which will be useful for their personal, educational, social and professional development, and which will also contribute to improving their employability; __________________ 32 As a general principle, an activity carried out continuously, 5 days a week for 7 hours a day.
Amendment 175 #
2017/0102(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point 8
Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point 8
(8) “traineeship” means a period of work practice from twohree to twelve months, remunerated by the organisation hosting the European Solidarity Corps participant, based on a written traineeship agreement, which includes a learning and training component, and undertaken in order to gain practical and professional experience with a view to improving employability and facilitating transition to regular employment;
Amendment 183 #
2017/0102(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point 9
Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point 9
(9) "job" means a period of work from twohree to twelve months, remunerated by the participating organisation employing the European Solidarity Corps participant, carried out in a participating country and based on an employment contract in accordance with the national regulatory framework of that participating country;
Amendment 191 #
2017/0102(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point 13
Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point 13
(13) “European Solidarity Corps Resource Center” means the additional functions performed by a designated national agencyn entity selected for this purpose following a tender allocation process to support the development and implementation of activities under the European Solidarity Corps as well as the identification of the competences acquired by the participants through their placements and projects;
Amendment 30 #
2016/2314(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Recital D a (new)
Recital D a (new)
D a. whereas 51 percent of the Kosovars distrust their domestic courts and an increase is noted of cases where citizens take justice in own hands;
Amendment 32 #
2016/2314(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Recital D b (new)
Recital D b (new)
D b. whereas more than 90 % of the Kosovars fears unemployment and more than 30 % receives between 0 and 120 € per month;
Amendment 55 #
2016/2314(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 2 a (new)
Paragraph 2 a (new)
2 a. Notes that a non-authorized train, covered with Serbian political and religious symbols, scheduled to travel from Belgrade to North Mitrovica on 14 January 2017, and launched by the director of Serbia's 'Office for Kosovo and Metohija,' has been stopped by Kosovo authorities; condemns these Serbian provocations;
Amendment 104 #
2016/2314(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 7
Paragraph 7
7. Welcomes the proposal by the Commission to grant visa liberalisation, which would be a very positive step for Kosovo on the path to European integration; is concerned by the stalemate in the Assembly with regard to the ratification of the demarcation agreement with Montenegro, and stresses that visa liberalisation can only be granted once Kosovo has fulfilled all criteria, including with regard to building up a track record of high-level convictions for corruption and organised crime; as Kosovo is a safe country of origin visa liberalisation won't pose too much problems;
Amendment 121 #
2016/2314(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 8
Paragraph 8
8. Welcomes the progress made in implementing the various agreements signed since August 2016 in the normalisation process with Serbia, after months of little to no progress; calls on both Kosovo and Serbia to show more engagement and sustained political will as regards the normalisation of relations and recalls that this is a condition for accession to the EU; takes note of some progress on other technical issues such as cadastre, university diplomas and licence plates and on the implementation of the agreement on the Mitrovica Bridge; welcomes the allocation of an independent international telephone code to Kosovo; reiterates its call on the European External Action Service to carry out an evaluation of the performance of the sides in fulfilling their obligations on a regular basis with reporting to the European Parliament;
Amendment 178 #
2016/2314(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 14
Paragraph 14
14. Expresses serious concerns at the lack of progress with regard to the protection of freedom of expression and media freedom, and at the increased political interference and pressure and intimidation exerted on the media; urges the Kosovo authorities to fully recognise and protect freedom of expression in line with EU standards and, to end impunity for attacks against journalists and bring those responsible to justice;
Amendment 288 #
2016/2314(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 26 a (new)
Paragraph 26 a (new)
26 a. Takes note of the demographical structure of Kosovo and urges the Commission, with International Organisations, to focus on education in Kosovo to fight poverty and unemployment; calls for further efforts to increase joint education of all components of Kosovo's society;
Amendment 291 #
2016/2314(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 26 b (new)
Paragraph 26 b (new)
26 b. Calls on the Commission to increase the focus on assistance towards SME's in order to support a viable economy in the country;
Amendment 292 #
2016/2314(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 26 c (new)
Paragraph 26 c (new)
26 c. Calls on the European Commission to continue the work on migration related issues with all the countries of the Western Balkans, in order to make sure that European and international norms and standards are followed; welcomes the work done so far and underlines that adequate IPA funding should be set aside to this end;
Amendment 46 #
2016/2313(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Recital E a (new)
Recital E a (new)
E a. whereas there are still 74 000 internally displaced persons and a significant number of refugees from Bosnia and Herzegovina in neighbouring countries, whole Europe and world-wide, as well as 6 808 missing persons;
Amendment 56 #
2016/2313(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 1
Paragraph 1
1. Welcomes the consideration of BiH’s EU membership application by the Council and looks forward to the Commission’s opinion on the merits of the application for membership; calls on competent BiH authorities at all levels to cooperate and coordinate in participating in the Commission’s Opinion process by providing a single set of replies to the Commission’s inquiries; deems unacceptable that the Government of the Republika Srpska is trying to establish parallel channels of communication by adopting provisions on direct reporting to the European Commission;
Amendment 78 #
2016/2313(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 2
Paragraph 2
2. Welcomes the progress on the implementation of the 2015-2018 Reform Agenda, as well as the country’s determination to pursue further institutional and socio-economic reforms; stresses that harmonised implementation of the Reform Agenda is needed to achieve real change across the country and to improve the lives of all BiH citizens; calls for the reform momentum to be maintained in order to transform BiH into a fully effective, inclusive and functional state; regrets that common reform efforts often continue to be hampered by ethnic and political divisions, and through further politicization of public administrations; considers it essential to maintain consensus on EU integration and to advance in a concerted manner on the rule of law, including the fight against corruption and organised crime, the reform of the judiciary and public administration;
Amendment 95 #
2016/2313(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 4
Paragraph 4
4. Regrets that the Rules of Procedure of the SAPC have still not been adopted and it therefore could not be properly constituted, due to the attempts to introduce ethnic blocking into the SAPC's voting rules, and it therefore could not be properly constituted; urges all actors to agree to and accept Rules and procedures of the SAPC based on the recommendation of the European Parliament's opinion on the subject;
Amendment 99 #
2016/2313(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 5
Paragraph 5
5. Notes that the local elections of 2 October 2016 have been broadly conducted in an orderly manner; regrets that the citizens of Mostar have again been deprived of their democratic rights to elect their local representatives owing to continued disagreements between political leaders, and urges swift implementation of the Constitutional Court ruling on Mostar; condemns the unacceptable incident in Stolac and calls on all sides to resolve the situation by respecting the rule of law; reiterates that all acts of violence or election irregularities should be investigated and condemned in the clearest possible terms, and any unlawful activities prosecuted;
Amendment 105 #
2016/2313(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 6
Paragraph 6
6. Regrets that the declared political commitment to combat corruption did not translate into tangible results; underlines that there is a lack of track record of high profile cases and that legal and institutional framework for combating systemic corruption like political party finance, public procurement, conflict of interest, and assets declaration is weak and inadequate; acknowledges progress in adopting anti- corruption action plans and setting up corruption prevention bodies at various levels of governance; notes with concern that fragmentation and weak inter- agency cooperation hamper the effectiveness of anti-corruption measures; calls for greater professional specialisation within the police and the judiciary by means of appropriate coordination channels; stresses the need to establish a track record of effective scrutiny of political party and electoral campaign financing;
Amendment 123 #
2016/2313(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 9
Paragraph 9
9. Reiterates its concern about the continued fragmentation into four different legal systems; stresses the needcalls for adoption of the principles of judicial independence and prosecutorial autonomy in Bosnia and Herzegovina constitution in order to strengthen judicial independence, including from political pressure, and to fight corruption in the judiciary; urges the rapid adoption of the action plan for the implementation of the 2014-2018 justice sector reform; welcomes the adoption of the law on free legal aid at state level and the introduction by the High Judicial and Prosecutorial Council of guidelines on prevention of conflict of interest, the drafting of integrity plans and disciplinary measures; notes the important role of the Structured Dialogue on Justice in addressing the shortcomings in the BiH judiciary; is concerned by the continuous financial and human resource difficulties of the Ombudsperson's Offices and calls for the fast adoption of the law on the reform of the Ombudsperson;
Amendment 137 #
2016/2313(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 10
Paragraph 10
10. Regrets that a high number of constitutional court decisions are not being implemented, including in particular those related to the election system, including the Sejdić- Finci ruling, the decision on the RS day, which was contested in the referendum held on 25 September 2016 and the decision concerning the respect of the basic democratic rights of the citizens of Mostar to vote in local elections; calls for constitutional and legislative changes in order to achieve equality of all constitutive peoples and citizens of BiH, as well as to establish a functioning state and democratic society; emphasises that respect for the rule of law and the country’s functioning constitutional framework is of paramount importance for advancing on the EU path;
Amendment 148 #
2016/2313(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 11
Paragraph 11
11. Notes satisfactory cooperation on war crimes cases with the International Criminal Tribunal for the former Yugoslavia (ICTY) and encourages more regional cooperation with regard to processing war crimes cases; welcomes the fact that the backlog of domestic war crimes cases is being tackled and that some further progress was achieved in the successful prosecution of war crimes involving sexual violence; reminds all political leaders and institutions in BiH that they have a responsibility to assess war-time events objectively, in the interests of truth, reconciliation and a peaceful future, and to avoid misuse of judiciary for political purposes; strongly condemns the decision of the RS National Assembly in October 2016 to express appreciation to former leaders of the RS convicted of war crimes, as well as entity- wide glorification of persons convicted for the gravest crimes against humanity; calls, as a matter of urgency, for respect for victims of war crimes and for reconciliation to be promoted;
Amendment 153 #
2016/2313(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 12
Paragraph 12
12. Notes some progress with regard to refugees and internally displaced persons in terms of repossession of property and occupancy rights as well as the reconstruction of houses; calls on the competent authorities to facilitate their access to healthcare, employment, social protection and education, including damage compensation for property that cannot be returned to victims; notes that there are still 74 000 internally displaced persons (7 500 still accommodated in 45 collective centres) and a huge number of refugees; is concerned with persistently high number of missing persons and slow progress in that respect; calls on the authorities to embark on intensive cooperation between the two entities, and strengthen the efforts to find the 6808 persons still missing as a result of the war, including full sharing of all relevant military and intelligence data;
Amendment 167 #
2016/2313(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 13
Paragraph 13
13. Notes some progress in fighting organised crime; is concerned, however, about the absence of a consistent approach in tackling organised crime owing to the numerous action plans by the various law enforcement agencies at different levels; highlights the need to strengthen the framework for inter-agency cooperation; welcomes joint investigations but calls for more coordinated operations and better exchange of information; calls for enhancing capacities of law enforcement bodies including on counter-terrorism; welcomes the signing of the operational and strategic cooperation agreement with Europol aimed at combating cross-border criminality; calls on the Federation entity to make swift changes to the criminal code that would ban all forms of human trafficking, whose victims are 80% women and girls;
Amendment 171 #
2016/2313(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 13 a (new)
Paragraph 13 a (new)
13 a. Calls for strengthening mechanisms for collecting, sharing and analysing data on migration as statistics show an increasing trend of people coming to BiH from the high-migratory- risk countries (in 2015 the number was 293 943 individuals); calls on the authorities to integrate these communities into the wider society; draws attention to the fact that there are unintegrated, often undocumented, people living in isolated pockets across BiH, who don't pay taxes and don't respect the country's secular background;
Amendment 172 #
2016/2313(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 13 b (new)
Paragraph 13 b (new)
13 b. Calls on the Commission to continue the work on migration related issues with all the countries of the Western Balkans, in order to make sure that European and international norms and standards are followed; welcomes the work done so far and underlines that adequate IPA funding should be set aside to this end;
Amendment 193 #
2016/2313(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 15
Paragraph 15
15. Deems it essential to enhance public participation in decision-making and to better engage citizens in the EU accession process; notes that civil society is fragmented, institutionally and financially weak; calls for better cooperation mechanisms between government and civil society organisations, including the developing of a strategic framework for cooperation; condemns repeated smear campaigns and violent attacks on CSO representatives and human rights defenders;
Amendment 223 #
2016/2313(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 17 a (new)
Paragraph 17 a (new)
17 a. Calls on the Government to harmonise legislation and public policies with the Istanbul Convention: to inform women survivors of violence about the available forms of support and assistance, to establish crisis centres for victims of rape or other forms of sexual violence, to criminalise offences of stalking, forced marriage and genital mutilation;
Amendment 273 #
2016/2313(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 22 a (new)
Paragraph 22 a (new)
22 a. Commends the adoption of the country-wide Framework transport strategy and action plan in July 2016; calls on the authorities to align the legal framework on transport with the relevant EU legislation to provide the functional transport chains and remove the bottlenecks on corridor Vc;
Amendment 277 #
2016/2313(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 22 c (new)
Paragraph 22 c (new)
22 c. Notes active engagement of the Joint Parliamentary Committee for Security and Defence in ensuring democratic control over the armed forces of BiH; is concerned by the widespread presence of weapons held illegally by the population and still large stockpiles of ammunition and weapons under the responsibility of the armed forces; urges a comprehensive approach to address the remaining challenges of clearing the country of mines by 2019; calls on the Commission and HR/VP to enhance its aid in these activities;
Amendment 14 #
2016/2312(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Recital A a (new)
Recital A a (new)
A a. whereas challenges still persist and need to be addressed swiftly and efficiently in a spirit of dialogue, cooperation and compromise between government and opposition in order to make further progress on its path to EU accession;
Amendment 19 #
2016/2312(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Recital B a (new)
Recital B a (new)
B a. whereas the EU has highlighted the need to strengthen economic governance, the rule of law and public administration capacities in all of the Western Balkan countries;
Amendment 38 #
2016/2312(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 1
Paragraph 1
1. Welcomes Albania’s continuous progress on EU-related reforms, in particular the adoption of constitutional amendments paving the way for a deep and comprehensive judicial reform; stresses that not only consistent adoption but also full and timely implementation of reforms and sustained political commitment are essential in order to further advance the EU accession process;
Amendment 47 #
2016/2312(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 2
Paragraph 2
2. Fully supports Albania’s accession to the EU, and calls for the accession negotiations to be opened as soon as there is credible and sustainable progress in the implementation of judicial reform, fight against organized crime and corruption in order to keep the reform momentum; expects Albania to consolidate the progress achieved and to maintain the pace of progress on implementation of all key priorities;
Amendment 52 #
2016/2312(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 3
Paragraph 3
3. Reiterates that a constructive dialogue, sustainable political cooperation and a willingness to compromise is crucial for the success of the reforms and for; underlines that lack of political cooperation and polarisation undermine the entire EU accession process;
Amendment 60 #
2016/2312(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 4
Paragraph 4
4. Commends the consensual adoption of the constitutional amendments for judicial reform and the adoption of laws on the institutional reorganisation of the judiciary in close cooperation with the Venice Commission; calls for the swift adoption and implementation of all relevant accompanying laws and by-laws, in particular the law on the re-evaluation (vetting) of judges, prosecutors and legal advisors as an important instrument to fight corruption in Albania; notes that the application of the vetting law has been suspended by the Constitutional Court, and that the latter has requested the opinion of the Venice Commission on its constitutionality; reiterates that a comprehensive judicial reform is a major demand by Albania’s citizens for re- establishing trust in their political representatives and public institutions, and that the credibility and effectiveness of the overall reform process, including the fight against corruption and organised crime, depend on the success of the vetting process and judicial reform;
Amendment 70 #
2016/2312(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 5
Paragraph 5
5. Welcomes the new justice reform strategy 2017-2020 and its action plan, as well as the increased budgetary means for implementation; stresses that administration of justice continue to be slow and inefficient; notes the lack of progress in the filling of vacancies at the High Court and the administrative courts and the effective use of the unified case management system; calls for any shortcomings in the functioning of the judicial system to be further addressed, including lack of independence from other branches of power, selective justice, limited accountability, ineffective oversight mechanisms, corruption, the overall length of judicial proceedings and enforcements;
Amendment 95 #
2016/2312(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 8
Paragraph 8
8. Notes the efforts towards a more citizen-friendly public administration and steady progress in the implementation of public administration reform; calls for further progress in strengthening the application of the Civil Service Law and the Law on Administrative Procedures, in order to safeguard the independence of regulatory bodies, improve recruitment procedures based on merit and performance, and enhance institutional and human resource capacities, with a view to ensuring efficient conduct of EU accession negotiations; calls for enhancing the authority, autonomy, efficiency and resources of human rights structures, such as the office of the Ombudsman; commends the National Council for European Integration on its initiatives to enhance the capacities of public administration and civil society in monitoring the implementation of accession-related reforms;
Amendment 104 #
2016/2312(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 9
Paragraph 9
9. Welcomes the adoption of key pieces of anti-corruption legislation, including on the protection of whistle- blowers; is concerned, however, that corruption remains prevalent in many areas and key anti-corruption institutions continue to be subject to political interference and have limited administrative capacities; notes that poor interinstitutional cooperation and exchange of information continue to hamper proactive investigation and effective prosecution of corruption; stresses the need for a more adequate legal framework for conflicts of interest, regulating lobbying and better interinstitutional cooperation, especially between police and prosecution services, with a view to improving their track record as regards investigation, prosecution and conviction, including in high level cases; in view of the upcoming parliamentary elections, calls for effective oversight of political party financing;
Amendment 114 #
2016/2312(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 10
Paragraph 10
10. Welcomes the continued implementation of the strategy and action plan on the fight against organised crime and intensified international police cooperation; welcomes recent operations against drug plantations; notes, however, that police and prosecution fail to identify criminal gangs behind drug cultivation; calls also for organised crime networks to be dismantled and for the number of final convictions in organised crime cases to be increased, by enhancing cooperation between police and prosecution services and by strengthening institutional and operational capacities; underlines the need to step up efforts to prevent human trafficking, in particular as regards unaccompanied children and child victims of trafficking;
Amendment 127 #
2016/2312(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 11
Paragraph 11
11. Notes the improving EU-related cooperation between state institutions and civil society organisations (CSOs), including their participation in meetings of the National Council on European Integration (NCEI); stressesnotes that an empowered civil society is a crucial component of any democratic system; stresses, therefore, the need for even closer coordination at all levels of government, including at local level, with CSOs; calls for the effective implementation of the right to information and public consultation and for better regulation of the fiscal framework affecting CSOs;
Amendment 136 #
2016/2312(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 12
Paragraph 12
12. Urges the competent authorities to actively promote respect of human rights and continue improving the climate of inclusion and tolerance for all minorities and other vulnerable groups in the country, including by enhancing the role of the State Committee on Minorities; as regardsunderlines the need to improve the living conditions for Roma and Egyptians,; calls for continued efforts in improving their access to employment, education, health, social housing and legal aid; is concerned that, despite improvements, the inclusion of Roma children in the education system remains the lowest in the region;
Amendment 147 #
2016/2312(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 12 a (new)
Paragraph 12 a (new)
12 a. Recalls that institutional mechanisms to protect the rights of the child and to tackle gender-based violence remain poor; calls for better policy implementation and better inter- institutional cooperation in order to tackle social exclusion and discrimination effectively; stresses the need for additional efforts in order to develop a track record of anti-discrimination cases;
Amendment 173 #
2016/2312(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 14
Paragraph 14
14. Reiterates the critical importance of professional and independent private and public service media; is concerned about political influence in the media and widespread self-censorship among journalists; notes the slow implementation of the law on audiovisual media and the delays in filling vacancies in the Audiovisual Media Authority (AMA); with a view to upcoming parliamentary elections, calls for additional efforts to fully guarantee the independence of the Audiovisual Media Authority (AMA) and of the public broadcaster; calls for measures to raise the professional and ethical standards of and prevalence of regular work contracts for journalists, to enhance the transparency of government advertising in the media and to ensure the independence of the regulatory authority and the public broadcaster;
Amendment 182 #
2016/2312(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 15 a (new)
Paragraph 15 a (new)
15 a. Commends that according to the Institute of Statistic in Albania (INSTAT) the level of unemployment in Albania decreased at the lowest level during the last three years; stresses the need to rise the quality of education at all levels in order to better equip people with skills and knowledge in line with labour market needs;
Amendment 40 #
2016/2311(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 1
Paragraph 1
1. Welcomes the opening of negotiations on Chapters 23 (Judiciary and Fundamental Rights) and 24 (Justice, Freedom and Security) as the key chapters in the EU approach to enlargement based on the rule of law; welcomes the opening of Chapters 32 (Financial Control) and 35 (Other Issues), the opening of negotiations on Chapter 5 (Public Procurement) and the opening and provisional closure of Chapter 25 (Science and Research); calls on the Council to open Chapter 26 (Education and Culture) and stresses its importance in the process of promoting European values among the young generation;
Amendment 126 #
2016/2311(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 7 a (new)
Paragraph 7 a (new)
7 a. Calls on the Commission to continue the work on migration related issues with all the countries of the Western Balkans, in order to ensure that European and international norms and standards are followed; welcomes the work done so far and underlines that adequate IPA funding should be set aside to this end;
Amendment 129 #
2016/2311(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 8
Paragraph 8
8. Notes that, while some progress has been made in the area relating to the judiciary, in particular by taking steps to harmonise jurisprudence and further promoting a merit-based recruitment system, judicial independence is not assured in practice; regrets that the constitutional and legislative framework is not yet in line with European standards thus leaving scope for undue political influence in the recruitment and appointment of judges; stresses that the quality and efficiency of the judiciary and access to justice remain undermined by an uneven distribution of the workload, a burdensome case backlog and the lack of a free legal aid system;
Amendment 146 #
2016/2311(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 9 a (new)
Paragraph 9 a (new)
9 a. Notes that public enterprises remain particularly vulnerable to corruption; urges the further development of independent supervision for the detection of potential cases of conflicts of interest in the management of state-owned companies, in privatization procedures, public-private partnerships and in relation to strategic investment partnerships; stresses that the excessive recourse to the provision on abuse of office in the private sector in the criminal code is harmful to the business climate and hampers legal certainty;
Amendment 149 #
2016/2311(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 10
Paragraph 10
10. Welcomes the progress made in the fight against organised crime and the adoption of Serbia’s first national serious and organise crime threat assessment (SOCTA); calls on Serbia to step up efforts to investigate wider criminal networks, improve financial investigations and intelligence-led policing and develop a solid track record of final convictions; has taken note of the controversial events in Belgrade’s Savamala district and calls for calls for the implementation of the February 2016 law on the police, which provides for better separation of tasks between the police and the Ministry of Interior; urges the alignment with EU rules of the law on the confiscation of criminal assets, notably as regards their swift resolutiond-party confiscation, extended confiscation and precautionary freezing of assets;
Amendment 160 #
2016/2311(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 10 a (new)
Paragraph 10 a (new)
10 a. Expresses concern over the failure of the authorities to bring to justice the organizers and perpetrators of the unlawful demolition of properties in the Belgrade Savamala district on 24 April 2016; underlines that the authorities must carry out thorough investigations and bring those responsible to justice;
Amendment 163 #
2016/2311(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 10 b (new)
Paragraph 10 b (new)
10 b. Recalls that Serbia criminalised already in 2014 the activity of foreign fighters in line with UN Security Council Resolution 2178(2014); urges the adoption of the national strategy to prevent and fight terrorism finalised in March 2016;
Amendment 165 #
2016/2311(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 11
Paragraph 11
11. Welcomes the continued initiatives by the Government Office for Cooperation with Civil Society aimed at improving cooperation between the state and the civil sector and at enhancing the legal, financial and institutional framework for the development of civil society; welcomes the measures taken to improve transparency and the consultation process within the parliament in the area of EU negotiations, including public hearings and regular meetings and consultations witthrough the National Convent on European Integration; stresses that further efforts are needed to ensure the systematic inclusion of civil society in policy dialogue; underlines, in this regard, that civil society should not be considered as a disturbing element of political and public life but as a tool to improve the standards of democratic governance; remains concerned about the extensive use of urgent procedures in adopting legislation; stresses that the frequent use of urgent procedures undermines parliamentary effectiveness; underlines that the parliament’s oversight of the executive needs to be strengthened; calls for the adoption of parliament’s code of conduct; regrets that, due to disruption, the EU Delegation was not able to present the Commission’s report in the European Integrations Committee of the Serbian Parliament;
Amendment 178 #
2016/2311(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 12 a (new)
Paragraph 12 a (new)
12 a. Calls on the authorities to ensure fair and free elections in April 2017 and, in this respect, to swiftly implement the OSCE/ODIHR recommendations following the elections in 2014 and 2016; is particularly concerned about smear campaigns against some opposition figures and presidential candidates, which have undermined democratic standards and procedures;
Amendment 191 #
2016/2311(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 14
Paragraph 14
14. Reiterates the importance of independent regulatory bodies, including the Ombudsman, in ensuring oversight and accountability of the executive; calls on the authorities to provide the Ombudsman with full political and administrative support for his work; notes with regret that the Ombudsman is constantly exposed to severe verbal attacks by leading government officials;
Amendment 201 #
2016/2311(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 15
Paragraph 15
15. Underlines that the legislative and institutional framework for observance of international human rights law is in place; stresses that consistent implementation across the whole country is needed; notes that further sustained efforts are needed to improve the situation of persons belonging to vulnerable groups, including persons with disabilities, persons with HIV/AIDS and; underlines the need for the Serbian authorities and all political parties and public figures to facilitate the emergence of a climate of tolerance and inclusion in Serbia, notably as regards LGBTI persons;
Amendment 218 #
2016/2311(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 16
Paragraph 16
16. Reiterates its concern that no progress has been made to improve the situation regarding freedom of expression and of the media; stresses that threats, violence and intimidation against journalists remain an issue of concern; calls on the authorities to fully investigate any cases of attacks against journalists and media outlephysical attacks, attacks on property and threats against journalists and media outlets; calls on the authorities to swiftly bring to justice those responsible for such actions and to ensure final judicial rulings on the unresolved cases of murdered journalists; calls for the full implementation of media laws; underlines the need for complete transparency in media ownership and funding of media;
Amendment 257 #
2016/2311(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 20
Paragraph 20
20. Welcomes the fact that SerbiaIs seriously concerned with recent rising tensions in the region and the deterioration of Serbia´s relations with its neighbors; insists that regional reconciliation and the European integration process are in the best political and economic interest of Serbia and its neighbors; calls in this respect on Serbia to remains constructively committed to bilateral relations with other enlargement countries and neighbouring EU Member States; has taken positive note of the fact that Serbia has shown an increasinglyencourages Serbia to maintain its constructive engagement in regional cooperation initiatives such as the South- East Europe Cooperation Process, the Regional Cooperation Council, the Central European Free Trade Agreement, the Adriatic-Ionian Initiative, the Brdo process, the Western Balkan Six initiative and its connectivity agenda and the Berlin process; calls on Serbia to implement the connectivity reform measures associated with the connectivity agenda; underlines that outstanding bilateral disputes should not have a detrimental effect on the accession process; welcomes the adoption of a national strategy for the investigation and prosecution of war crimes; notes that the mandate of the former War Crimes Prosecutor expired in December 2015; stresses that the appointment of his successor is a matter of serious concern; calls for the implementation of this strategy and the adoption of an operational prosecutorial strategy; calls for full cooperation with the International Criminal Tribunal for the former Yugoslavia (ICTY); urges the authorities to continue working on the issue of the fate of missing persons; regrets the hostile rhetoric and controversial statements directed at Serbia´s neighbors coming from top government officials;
Amendment 286 #
2016/2311(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 20 b (new)
Paragraph 20 b (new)
20 b. Is concerned about the message being conveyed by forces within Serbia by means of a train, adorned with nationalist slogans, (religious) symbols and the words 'Kosovo is Serbia', sent from Serbia towards Kosovo; stresses that such actions are unconstructive and severely damage relations between Kosovo and Serbia;
Amendment 307 #
2016/2311(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 22 a (new)
Paragraph 22 a (new)
22 a. Regrets the presence of the President of Serbia, along with other senior government officials, at the so called "Republika Srpska Day", a celebration which has been declared unconstitutional by BiH´s Supreme Court; calls on the Serbian authorities to support constitutional reforms in BiH in order to strengthen the country´s capacity to function and carry out EU accession talks; underlines that the unequivocal and principled condemnation of war crimes committed in the region is the cornerstone of regional stability and essential for EU integration; reiterates its call on government officials to refrain from gestures such as publicly endorsing individuals convicted for war crimes;
Amendment 312 #
2016/2311(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 22 b (new)
Paragraph 22 b (new)
22 b. Notes that a non-authorized train, covered with Serbian political and religious symbols and launched by the director of Serbia´s 'Office for Kosovo and Metohija', was scheduled to travel from Belgrade to Kosovska Mitrovica on 14 January 2017 and was stopped by Kosovar authorities; expresses deep concern over this incident and over the inflammatory rhetoric of Serbia´s highest ranking politicians linked thereto; underlines that similar gestures cannot be justified by the upcoming elections in Serbia and can seriously jeopardize the normalization of relations between Belgrade and Pristina; urges both the Serbian and Kosovar authorities to refrain from hostile actions and statements which could hamper the normalisation process;
Amendment 7 #
2016/2310(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Citation 4
Citation 4
— having regard to the European Council’s decision of 16 December 2005 to grant the country the status of candidate for EU membership, to the European Council conclusions of June 2008, to the conclusions of December 2012 and to the conclusions of 13 December 2016, which received the support of the overwhelming majority of delegations,
Amendment 20 #
2016/2310(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Recital A
Recital A
A. whereas early parliamentary elections held in Macedonia were held in an ordinary and calm atmosphere, in accordance with international standards and in line with OSCE/ODIHR recommendations and had a very high turnout;
Amendment 197 #
2016/2310(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 14
Paragraph 14
14. Is concerned about the lack ofEncourages the authorities to improve the implementation of the Law on Equal Opportunities and the limitedo strengthen the effectiveness of institutional mechanisms to advance gender equality; urges the competent authorities to make sufficient budget allocations for its implementation and to improve support services to victims of domestic violence;
Amendment 216 #
2016/2310(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 16
Paragraph 16
16. Is concerned over freedom of expression and the media, the use of hate speech, political interference and pressure, including through as well as unbalanced reporting of government advertisingctivities; calls on the government to ensure that intimidation or violence against journalists is investigated and that those responsible be brought to justice; underlines the need for the sustainability and autonomy of the public service broadcast;
Amendment 302 #
2016/2310(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 22 a (new)
Paragraph 22 a (new)
22 a. Welcomes the activities in the framework of the Berlin Process, which demonstrate strong political support for the European perspective of Western Balkan countries; points out the importance of this Process for the promotion of the economic development of the countries in the Region through investments in core networks; welcomes the establishment of the RYCO (Regional Youth Cooperation Office) and the Western Balkans Fund and urges the Commission to take into account the initiatives and projects proposed by Macedonia;
Amendment 18 #
2016/2309(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Recital D
Recital D
D. whereas organized crime and widespread corruption remains a serious concerns;
Amendment 81 #
2016/2309(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 6
Paragraph 6
6. Welcomes the new public administration reform strategy (PAR) 2016-2020, the public financial management reform programme, the entry into force of the new law on salaries and the simplification of administrative procedures; calls for measures to allocate the appropriate budgetary resources for PAR’s implementation, as well as for consistent political will to rationalise public administration, also in view of accession preparations; notes that limited progress towards strengthening administrative capacity is often due to weak commitment to reform by the authorities and a lack of clear requirements in IPA-funded projects for the authorities to follow up and capitalise on; encourages further depoliticisation of the public administration, and considers it essential to adhere to the principles of merit, accountability and transparency, and to ensure the citizens’ right to good administration, free of corruption;
Amendment 91 #
2016/2309(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 7 a (new)
Paragraph 7 a (new)
7 a. Calls on Montenegrin authorities to take a more proactive approach in following up on outstanding allegations of war crimes as well as to fight impunity; emphasises the need to effectively investigate, prosecute, try and punish war crimes in line with international standards; is concerned that no charges have been brought against officials at the top of command chain, and in regard to crimes of co-perpetration and aiding and abetting; stresses the need to effectively ensure that victims of war crimes have equal access to justice and reparations and calls for the full protection of witnesses;
Amendment 93 #
2016/2309(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 8
Paragraph 8
8. Welcomes the further strengthening of the anti-corruption framework, inter alia by making the Anti-Corruption Agency fully operational and by appointing special anti-corruption prosecutors; considers it essential to ensure their independence in investigations; stresses repeatedly the need to establish a track record on successful investigations and convictions, in particular in high-level corruption cases, and on measures to prevent corruption; calls for criminalising illicit enrichment; calls on the new government to make combating corruption one of its priorities by allocating sufficient human and budgetary resources to the task; regrets that sectorial action plans for areas particularly vulnerable to corruption, such as public procurement, privatisation, urban planning, education, health care, local government and police, has had very limited impact;
Amendment 112 #
2016/2309(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 11
Paragraph 11
11. While acknowledging CSOs’ involvement in the accession preparations, calls on the competent authorities to further improve CSOs’ access to EU-related information and to ensure that consultations with CSOs are held in a meaningful way, where possible; is deeply concerned that smear campaigns and intimidation attempts have continued against certain CSO activistof the opinion that authorities need to develop a more supportive and inclusive approach to facilitate grassroots activities by civil society, as well as to constructively accept criticism of state institutions, and to increase CSO's level of consultation in policy-making and theirs access to information; calls on authorities to encourage CSOs to actively participate in the overview of the whole electoral process and have observers in all bodies for conducting elections; is deeply concerned that smear campaigns and intimidation attempts have continued against certain CSO activists; urges authorities to establish a sustainable and efficient system of public funding for CSOs and an appropriate institutional and legal framework; insists on proper implementation, in line with legal requirements, of the law on gaming that is the largest source of public financing for CSOs;
Amendment 122 #
2016/2309(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 12
Paragraph 12
12. Notes some progress in improving the situation of minorities; is concerned about the vulnerable position of women and girls in the Roma community including forced child marriages; welcomes the adoption of a 2016-2020 strategy and action plan for the social inclusion of Roma and Egyptians; calls for an appropriate budget to be allocated so that the action plan may be implemented properly; is concerned about persistent attacks against LGBTI community members and activists; encourages the competent authorities to continue to strengthen efforts to safeguard the rights of LGBTI people, notwithstanding the difficulties in acceptance of sexual diversity within Montenegrin society; calls on authorities to make further efforts on raising awareness about anti- discrimination among general public; remains concerned that most public buildings, including medical centres and university faculties, are still not accessible to people with disabilities;
Amendment 127 #
2016/2309(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 12 a (new)
Paragraph 12 a (new)
12 a. Calls for a further strengthening of human rights institutions, including the Ombudsperson and the Ministry of Human Rights and Minorities, and is of opinion that their knowledge of international and European human rights law and standards should be increased; is concerned about the lack of a uniform approach and low levels of penalties for human rights violations;
Amendment 132 #
2016/2309(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 13
Paragraph 13
13. Remains concerned about continued gender-based violencedomestic and sexual violence, as well as prevalence of femicide, widespread gender-selective abortions on the detriment of female sex, the lack of prosecutions and the inefficient support to, and protection of, victims; calls for measures to establish adequate protection services, enhance relevant inter- institutional coordination, make effective use of the new unified database of cases of domestic violence, and implement the 2016-2020 strategy on combating domestic violence; underlines the importance to educate and train employees in state institutions to work with victims; stresses the importance of encouraging women’s representation in politics, including in key decision-making positions, as well as their access to the labour market; notes the continued implementation of the 2013- 2017 action plan on gender equality; urges the competent authorities to make sufficient budget allocations for its implementation;
Amendment 159 #
2016/2309(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 15 a (new)
Paragraph 15 a (new)
15 a. Notes with concern that some IPA- funded capacity-building outputs were not fully used or followed up by the authorities; stresses that for positive outcomes authorities need to ensure adequate staff availability, adopt the necessary legislation to allow the output to be used and grant the necessary independence to newly created institutions;
Amendment 193 #
2016/2309(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 18 a (new)
Paragraph 18 a (new)
18 a. Calls on the Commission to continue the work on migration related issues with all the countries of the Western Balkans, in order to make sure that European and international norms and standards are followed, welcomes the work done so far and underlines that adequate IPA funding should be set aside to this end;
Amendment 29 #
2016/2308(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Citation 16
Citation 16
— having regard to the fact that respect for the rule of law, including, in particular, the separation of powers, democracy, freedom of expression, human rights, the rights of minorities and religious freedom, freedom of association and peaceful protest, are at the core of the negotiataccession process,
Amendment 65 #
2016/2308(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 2
Paragraph 2
2. Underlines, however, that measures taken under the state of emergency had large-scale, disproportionate and long- lasting negative effects on a large number of ordinary citizens as well as on the protection of fundamental freedoms in the country; condemns the collective dismissal of civil servants, the mass liquidation of media outlets, the arrests of journalists, academics, judges, human rights defenders, elected officials and ordinary citizens, and the confiscation of property and passports on the basis of emergency decree laws without individualised decisions, and without the possibility of timely judicial review;
Amendment 69 #
2016/2308(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 2 a (new)
Paragraph 2 a (new)
2 a. Expresses its serious concern on confiscation, in some cases nationalization, of thousands of private enterprises and private assets without any final verdict; is strongly worried about the impact of these developments on an already-troubled Turkish economy and unemployment figures;
Amendment 88 #
2016/2308(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 3
Paragraph 3
3. Stresses the strategic importance of good EU-Turkey relations for both sides; recognises that both Turkey and the EU have gone through their own internal transformation processes since the accession negotiations were opened in 2004; regrets that the accession instruments have not been used to the fullest extent and that, over the years, Turkey’'s full integration into the EUEU- membership has lost public support oin both sidesthe Council; remains committed to cooperating and maintaining an open dialogue with the Turkish Government, in order to address common challenges; recommends that the Council urgently invite the Turkish Government to a summit to discuss the obvious crisis incurrent EU-Turkey relations that we are faced with;
Amendment 107 #
2016/2308(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 5
Paragraph 5
Amendment 137 #
2016/2308(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 6
Paragraph 6
6. Notes that measures undertaken following the declaration of the state of emergency have targeted alleged memberthrough detainment, arrest, and property confiscation have targeted among many others tens of thousands of teachers, business people, civil society representatives, lawyers, students, medical doctors, housewives who are alleged participants/supporters of the Gülen movement, dissent in general and political parties of the opposition in particular; strongly condemns the imprisonment of 13 MPs belonging to the People’s Democratic Party (HDP), including its co-chairs, and of 90 Kurdish municipal mayors; urges the Turkish Government to lift the state of emergency immediately; underlines that the reintroduction of the death penalty would violate Turkey’s international commitments and lead to an immediate end to the EU accession talks;
Amendment 176 #
2016/2308(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 9
Paragraph 9
9. Expresses its serious concern at the continuously deteriorating situation in south-east Turkey, especially in the areas where curfews were imposed, where some 2 000 people were reportedly killed in the context of security operations and an estimated half a million people became displaced in the period from July 2015 to December 2016; notes that local prosecutors have consistently refused to open investigations into the reported killings; is convinced that only a fair political settlement of the Kurdish question can bring sustainable stability and prosperity both to the area and to Turkey as a whole; therefore calls on both sides to lay down their weapons and return to the negotiation table; notes that a series of laws have created an atmosphere of ‘systematic impunity’ for the security forces; regrets the decision of the Turkish Parliament to waive the immunity of a large number of MPs unconstitutionally, paving the way for the arrests of opposition politicians;
Amendment 282 #
2016/2308(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 15
Paragraph 15
15. Calls on the Commission to take into account the latest developments in Turkey when conducting the mid-term review of the Instrument for Pre-Accession Assistance (IPA) funds in 2017, and to suspend all pre-accession funds if Turkey no longer sufficiently complies with the EU’s Copenhagen criteria; calls on the Commission to use those funds to support Turkish civil society and to invest more in people-to-people exchange programmes, such as Erasmus+ for students;
Amendment 294 #
2016/2308(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 16
Paragraph 16
16. Condemns in the strongest terms all terrorist attacks carried out in Turkey, and stands firmly by Turkey’s population in our joint fight against terrorism; welcomes the close bilateral relations between EU Member States and Turkey in the field of anti-terrorism cooperation, including on ‘foreign fighters’; underlines that strong cooperation between Europol and Turkish law enforcement authorities is key to effectively combat terrorism; reiterates its condemnation of the return to violence by the Kurdistan Workers’ Party (PKK), which has been on the EU’s list of terrorist organisations since 2002; invites the Member States to enforce legislation banning the use of signs and symbols of organisations which are on that list;
Amendment 318 #
2016/2308(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 17
Paragraph 17
17. Commends the engagement by the Turkish Government and the hospitality shown by the population in hosting around 3 million refugees; notes the EU-Turkey statement on migration, and urges the Member States to initiate the voluntary resettlement scheme for the most vulnerable refugees in Turkey; calls on the Commission to ensure long-term investment in both refugees and their host communities in Turkey; encourages the Turkish Government to grant work permits to all Syrian refugees; calls on Ankara to keep up itsTurkey and the EU to keep up their coordinated patrolling efforts in the Aegean and to implement fully the bilateral readmission agreements signed with Bulgaria and Greece;
Amendment 356 #
2016/2308(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 19
Paragraph 19
19. Underlines that a settlement of the Cyprus problem would have a positive impact on the entire region, while first and foremost benefiting both Greek Cypriots and Turkish Cypriots; praises the leaders of the Greek and Turkish communities in Cyprus for having achieved major progress in the settlement talks; welcomes the exchange of preferred maps, thus far unprecedented, and the first international conference held with the guarantor powers; supports the settlement based on a bi- communal, bi-zonal federation with political equality, a single international legal personality, single sovereignty and single citizenship with political equality between the two communities, in line with the joint declaration of 11 February 2014 by the two leaders, with the relevant UN Security Council resolutions and on the basis of respect for the principles on which the Union is founded; welcomes the intensified engagement by the parties to achieve the settlement of the Cyprus problem; expects Turkeyall parties involved to show active support for the negotiations, and reiterates that Turkey’s commitment and contribution to a comprehensive settlement remain crucial; calls on the EU to fully support the settlement, both politically and financially; praises the important work of the Committee on Missing Persons (CMP), and calls on Turkey to allowommends the fact that the CMP is granted full access to all relevant sitarchives and to assist the CMP by providing information from itssites, including military archiveas;
Amendment 6 #
2016/2271(INI)
Draft opinion
Recital A a (new)
Recital A a (new)
A a. whereas digitalisation penetrates deeply into all parts of the industrial se-ctor's activities increasing its competitiveness with innovative and sustainable production of goods and services which drives economic growth creating jobs as well as playing a significant role in the European countries' prosperity;
Amendment 16 #
2016/2271(INI)
Draft opinion
Paragraph 1
Paragraph 1
1. Stresses that the digitisation of industry represents a major challenge in terms of the organisation of work as well as resulting in an emerging opportunity of creating a significant number of new jobs and therefore requires targeted responses regarding employment, social and education policies, as well as the provision of up-to-date infrastructure;
Amendment 26 #
2016/2271(INI)
Draft opinion
Paragraph 2
Paragraph 2
2. Notes the strong regional differences as regards the digitisation of industry, which have consequences on jobs, productivity and growth; calls, therefore, for efforts in developing digital infrastructure to be stepped up, particularly in regions lagging behind, and for universal accessaccess, where the digital infrastructure are not fully developed in such rural areas, to the open internet to be promoted;
Amendment 35 #
2016/2271(INI)
Draft opinion
Paragraph 3
Paragraph 3
3. Calls on the Commission and the Member States, in cooperation with social partners, to regularly assess the impact of digitisation on the quality, number and types of jobs and to consider not only the adjust related policies accordingly in case of having a clear negative impact but also a continued strengthening of the policies already considered as having positive effects on the labour market;
Amendment 45 #
2016/2271(INI)
Draft opinion
Paragraph 4
Paragraph 4
4. Recognises the opportunities related to the digitisation of industry; stresses, however, that new forms of work must comply wi the importance to ensure the attractiveness of new forms of work by implementing adequate flexibility in the labour and social legislation and guaranteemarket to foster real economic growth while ensuring the protection of workers’ and consumer rights;
Amendment 54 #
2016/2271(INI)
Draft opinion
Paragraph 5
Paragraph 5
5. Calls on the Commission and the Member States to clarify the legal situation of platform workers and to guarantee all workers the same social rights, including the freedom of association, the right to conclude collective agreements and the right to organiseto uphold their social rights as well as the full respect of freedoms enshrined in the Treaties particularly the right of free movement;
Amendment 72 #
2016/2271(INI)
Draft opinion
Paragraph 6
Paragraph 6
6. Calls on the Member States to ensure universal access to training in digital skills, in order to allow equal participation of all citizens in the digital single market, be it as employees, entrepreneurs or customers; in this regards, highlights the importance of improving the matching between the industrial sector ´s labour requirements and the educational system at all educational levels in order to provide students with knowledge and skills required in knowledge society and for transition to a digitalised economy;
Amendment 84 #
2016/2271(INI)
Draft opinion
Paragraph 7
Paragraph 7
7. Stresses the need to identify potential occupational health and safety risksreach a balanced approach to define not only the potential occupational health and safety risks but also advantages such as flexibility and teleworking stemming from the digitisation of industry and to take appropriate measures.
Amendment 2 #
2016/2269(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Citation 10 a (new)
Citation 10 a (new)
- having regard to its recommendation to the Council of 7 July 2016 on the 71st session of the United Nations General Assembly,
Amendment 3 #
2016/2269(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Citation 16 a (new)
Citation 16 a (new)
- having regard to its resolution of 14 June 2017 on the need for an EU strategy to end and prevent the gender pension gap;
Amendment 50 #
2016/2269(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Recital F a (new)
Recital F a (new)
F a. whereas inequalities throughout the life-cycle are reflected in inequalities in old-age such as lower healthy life expectancy, old-age poverty, and a gender pension gap of almost 40 %;whereas this prevents older people to contribute fully to society and to support growth and quality of life as volunteers, carers, consumers or mentors;
Amendment 55 #
2016/2269(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Recital G a (new)
Recital G a (new)
G a. whereas on 5 October 2015 the Council adopted conclusions on 'the 2015 Pension Adequacy Report:current and future income adequacy in old age in the EU', considering it 'essential that public pension or other social protection schemes contain appropriate safeguards for women and men whose employment opportunities do or did not allow them to build up sufficient pension entitlements;such safeguards notably include minimum pensions or other minimum income provisions for older people'2a _________________ 2aCOREPER I, ‘Adequate retirement incomes in the context of ageing societies – Draft Council Conclusions = Adoption’, 12352/15, http://data.consilium.europa.eu/doc/docu ment/ST-12352-2015-INIT/en/pdf
Amendment 248 #
2016/2269(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 17
Paragraph 17
17. Calls for a common approach across Member States regarding the introduction of a Minimum Income Scheme, in order to support people with insufficient income, ease access to fundamental services, combat poverty and foster social integration; stresses that the tool of reference budgets, which indicate the cost of living in dignity for different regions, housing arrangements, household composition and ages, should be used to assess the adequacy of minimum income schemes provided by member states;
Amendment 254 #
2016/2269(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 17 a (new)
Paragraph 17 a (new)
17 a. Is concerned about the high levels of non-take up of minimum income schemes where they exist, and which highlights the many barriers including intrusive procedures and stigma linked to the application for minimum income schemes;considers that that non-take up is a major barrier to the social inclusion of people who would be entitled to receive minimum income and supporting services;calls on the Commission to carry out an in-depth analysis of the phenomenon of non-take-up and to propose guidelines on how to reduce it;
Amendment 292 #
2016/2269(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 21 a (new)
Paragraph 21 a (new)
21 a. Stresses the role of dialogue between social partners to address inequalities in the labour market;highlights that social dialogue should be complemented by civil dialogue with representatives of different groups of society, such as people living in poverty, different age groups, persons with different sexual orientations, persons with disabilities when discussing matters relating to inequalities and the fight against poverty and social exclusion;
Amendment 328 #
2016/2269(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 25
Paragraph 25
25. Affirms that universal access to public, solidarity-based and adequate retirement and old-age pensions must be granted to all; calls on the Commission to support Member States in strengthening public and occupational pension systems to provide an adequate retirement income well above the poverty threshold and to allow pensioners to maintain their standard of living and to live in dignity and independence; reiterates its call for care credits in pension systems to compensate for lost contributions of women and men due to child and long-term care responsibilities as a tool to reduce the gender pension gap; highlights that while personal pension schemes can be important tools to improve pension adequacy, statutory solidarity-based pension systems remain the most efficient tool to combat old-age poverty and social exclusion and therefore should be provided with adequate resources;
Amendment 8 #
2016/2240(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Citation 14 a (new)
Citation 14 a (new)
Amendment 29 #
2016/2240(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Recital B
Recital B
B. whereas culture has an intrinsic value, serves as a powerful bridge between people of different ethnic, religious and social backgrounds, reinforces intercultural and interreligious dialogue and mutual understanding, and should therefore be part of EU foreign policy;
Amendment 31 #
2016/2240(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Recital B a (new)
Recital B a (new)
Ba. whereas interreligious dialogue is an intrinsic component of intercultural dialogue, aiming at promoting dialogue among different religions and humanistic traditions in the world, including non- believers;
Amendment 34 #
2016/2240(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Recital B b (new)
Recital B b (new)
Bb. whereas science cooperation is an essential element of foreign policy by building bridges between countries, enhancing the quality of international research and raising the profile of science diplomacy;
Amendment 48 #
2016/2240(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Recital D
Recital D
D. whereas cultural relations are fundamental drivers of social cohesion and sustainable economic and human development, while playing a crucial role in strengthening civil society capacities, reinforcing democratisation processes and in conflict prevention, resolution and resilience;
Amendment 55 #
2016/2240(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Recital E a (new)
Recital E a (new)
Ea. whereas cultural heritage is a universal legacy and therefore its protection is a precondition for building peace and resilience;
Amendment 63 #
2016/2240(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Recital G
Recital G
G. whereas mobility of researchers, studentacademics and staffudents to and from third countries and alumni networks of former participants in EU programmes17 are a key part of the EU’s international cultural relations; __________________ 17 For instance, Erasmus and Horizon 2020.
Amendment 67 #
2016/2240(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Recital H
Recital H
H. whereas cooperation, training, mobility of artists and cultural professionals and of their works, including through European and international networks, and artist residencies are a key factor for the dissemination of and exchange of both European and non-European cultures and arts and need to be promoted and enhanced;
Amendment 73 #
2016/2240(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Recital J
Recital J
J. whereas coordination among EU programmes and resources should strengthen the cultural dimension of EU international relations, in order to create a shared space of dialogue for cross- cultural understanding and trust;
Amendment 78 #
2016/2240(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Recital L
Recital L
L. whereas the number of products and services from the audiovisual, cultural and creative sectors is increasing, as is their contribution to a broader digital freedom, to GDP and international circulation;
Amendment 90 #
2016/2240(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 2
Paragraph 2
2. Acknowledges that the joint communication aims at fostering cultural cooperation between the EU and its partner countries and at promoting a global order based on peacekeeping, intercultural and interreligious dialogue, conflict prevention and resolution with respect for the rule of law, freedom of expression, mutual understanding, human rights, cultural diversity and fundamental values;
Amendment 91 #
2016/2240(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 2 a (new)
Paragraph 2 a (new)
2a. Acknowledges the efforts realised by EEAS together with the Commission to enhance the external dimension of science and research policies and urges to foster the development of an ambitious science diplomacy;
Amendment 107 #
2016/2240(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 6
Paragraph 6
6. Stresses the mutual advantages of working together: the EU is an arena in which all Member States join forces to play a stronger role in the field of international cultural relations; suggests that each Member State’s rotating presidency could launch joint actions together with the EU, such as exhibitions and co-productions, particularly for smaller states or those with no cultural representations abroad;
Amendment 116 #
2016/2240(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 7
Paragraph 7
7. Recalls the importance of cooperation among the Member States with respect to cultural heritage in terms of research, preservation and management and the fight against trafficking, art looting and destruction, including through regionally dedicated funds and assistance; and trans-border police cooperation;
Amendment 124 #
2016/2240(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 8
Paragraph 8
8. Recommends that international cultural relations be embedded in the cultural and creative sectors (CCS), thus reinforcing and promoting the role of professionals, including through regional creative hubs and cluster, clusters and cultural networks;
Amendment 167 #
2016/2240(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 16
Paragraph 16
16. Calls on the Commission to strengthen the international dimension of Erasmus, Creative Europe, Europe for Citizens and Horizon 2020;
Amendment 181 #
2016/2240(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 18
Paragraph 18
18. Calls on the Commission and the EEAS to appoint a ‘focal point’ in each EU delegation to liaise with Member States’ national cultural institutes, representatives and local civil society, actors and authorities in a collaborative approach aimed at identifying priority areas, needs and methods of cooperation, and to provide an adequate budget and training;
Amendment 196 #
2016/2240(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 21
Paragraph 21
21. Calls for the role of Member States’ cultural institutes to be clearly framed, to be developed with an inclusive and shared European narrative, through the EU National Institutes for Culture (EUNIC) network, and others, and advocates an inclusive and equal approach towards all stakeholders, including civil society and Member States with no cultural institutes abroad;
Amendment 214 #
2016/2240(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 23
Paragraph 23
23. Calls for the setting-up of an emergency response mechanism to the destruction of cultural heritage platform that operates for the prevention, assessment and reconstruction of heritage in danger, including a rapid emergency mechanism to safeguard heritage in countries in conflict, building on the experience of the UN’'s Blue Helmets for Culture task force initiative, in close and structured cooperation with UNESCO and with the technological support of Copernicus – the European Earth Observation Programme;
Amendment 219 #
2016/2240(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 23 a (new)
Paragraph 23 a (new)
23a. Highlights the need to reinforce the strategic partnership EU- UNESCO by creating a sustained platform for cooperation and communication on shared priorities, in order to tackle effectively common challenges in culture and education;
Amendment 231 #
2016/2240(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 25
Paragraph 25
25. Recognises young people, as future decision-makers, to be one of the main target groups in the EU and partner countries, and acknowledges that music, visual arts, music, theatre, film, literature, social media and digital trends in generalplatforms are the best channels to reach and engage them;
Amendment 248 #
2016/2240(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 27
Paragraph 27
27. Recognises the need for an in-depth knowledge of the fieldcultural scene of each country, local actors and civil society, in order to improve these actors’ access to programmes and funding and to ensure that the multiplying effect of their participation in EU programmes and initiatives is exploited; recommends consulting local actors with a view to co- designing programmes; calls for the development and the follow up of innovative collaborative approaches relying on tools and networks already in place (grants, sub-grants)22 , and for them to be followed up, taking gender balance into account; __________________ 22 For example, the EU-funded programme MEDCULTURE, which is working on developing and improving cultural policies and practices related to the cultural sector. The participative approach involves civil society actors, ministries and private and public institutions working in the field of culture, as well as other related sectors.
Amendment 280 #
2016/2240(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 32
Paragraph 32
32. Praises the fact that the EU Global Strategy highlights the importance of intercultural and interreligious dialogue in enhancing mutual understanding; regrets, however, that the intrinsic value of culture and art as restraints against radicalism, terrorism and marginalisation is not mentioned;
Amendment 284 #
2016/2240(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 33 a (new)
Paragraph 33 a (new)
33a. Recommends to include policies to prevent and respond to the destruction and looting of cultural heritage in times of conflict into the EU's agenda for conflict prevention and peace building;
Amendment 68 #
2016/2221(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Recital C
Recital C
C. whereas increases in employment rates mask the insufficient and socially inadequate response to the economic crisis, promotingcan sometimes mask ongoing impacts of the economic crisis, and the development of precarious forms of employment such as zero-hour contracts, bogus self-employment and involuntary part-time jobs, which do not provide workers with either a decent livingwage or full labour rights;
Amendment 74 #
2016/2221(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Recital D
Recital D
D. whereas part-time employment had never declined since the crisis, and full- time employment is still below its 2008 pre-crisis level; whereas the number of people working full-time in the second quarter of 2016 remained 2.5 % below the figure for 2008, while part-time employment increased by 11.1 % in the same period10 ; __________________ 10 ESDE Quarterly Review autumn 2016.the most common type of contract in Europe is still permanent full- time employment, accounting for more than half of total employment, although this is decreasing in most countries; whereas the number of employees with a permanent contract grew by 2.7 million in the year to the second quarter of 2016 and full-time workers saw their numbers increase by about 3.1 million; whereas part-time employment had never declined since the crisis, and full-time employment is still below its 2008 pre-crisis level;
Amendment 97 #
2016/2221(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 1
Paragraph 1
1. Understands standard employment to mean full or part-time, regular employment on the basis of open-ended contracts or fixed-term contract work, and non- standard or atypical forms of employment to include, i.a., marginal part- time work, temporary agency work, fixed-term contract work, zero- hour contracts, internships that are not part of an education programme, and informal or undeclared work;
Amendment 124 #
2016/2221(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 2 – indent 1
Paragraph 2 – indent 1
- little or no job security owing to the non-permanent nature of the work, as in some fixed-term contracts, involuntary and often marginal part-time contracts, contracts containing poor conditions, unwritten contracts, unclear working hours, and duties that change owing to work on demand;
Amendment 131 #
2016/2221(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 2 – indent 2
Paragraph 2 – indent 2
- low remuneration below a minimum living wage, which may even be unofficial or unclear;
Amendment 140 #
2016/2221(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 2 – indent 4
Paragraph 2 – indent 4
Amendment 146 #
2016/2221(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 2 – indent 5
Paragraph 2 – indent 5
Amendment 174 #
2016/2221(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 4
Paragraph 4
4. Notes that decent work should specifically guarantee coverage by applicable collective agreements, security of collective bargaining, equal pay for equal work in the same place, and protection of the workers’ families, while supporting the work-life balance for all workers;
Amendment 191 #
2016/2221(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 5
Paragraph 5
5. Notes that numerous factors, such as digitalisation and automation, are contributing to a radical transformation of work, with an increase in non-standard forms of employment trends that willcould intensify unless newresponsive and proportionate regulation is put into place; calls on the Commission and the Member States to ensure that work being transformed through digitalisation, and new employment being created as a result of it, is decent;
Amendment 204 #
2016/2221(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 6
Paragraph 6
6. Stresses that precarious employment conditions have a long-term effect on social security protection and pensions, and can place workers at greater risk of poverty, social exclusion and deterioration of their fundamental rights;
Amendment 217 #
2016/2221(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 7
Paragraph 7
7. Stresses that social protection, and protection by collective agreements and collective bargaining, should be available to all workers; calls on the Commission and the Member States to guarantee effective protection for workers who perform work in the context of an employment relationship, and a comprehensive policy response that includes policies towards reducing and ultimately eradicating precarious work; calls for policies that empower workers by strengthening social dialogue and promoting the extension of collective bargaining, ensuring that all workers can access and exercise their right to associate, and to bargain collectively, freely and without fear;
Amendment 231 #
2016/2221(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 8
Paragraph 8
8. Stresses the importance of labour inspectorates and the social partners in safeguarding workers’ rights, defin and agreeing decent wages and incomes in accordance with Member States’ laws and practices, and in providing consultation and guidance to employers; strongly underlines that labour inspectorates should focus on the goal of monitoring and improving working conditions, and should not be used as migration control mechanisms; strongly condemns the practice of companies twho employ migrants without securing their full rights and benefits;
Amendment 250 #
2016/2221(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 9
Paragraph 9
9. Calls on the Commission and the Member States to combat non-standard, atypical and precarious forms of employment, in line with the ILO Decent Work Agenda and the European Social Charter;
Amendment 297 #
2016/2221(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 12
Paragraph 12
12. Stresses that the policies of the Member States should be formulated and implemented in accordance with national law and practice, in consultation with, and without prejudice, the most representative organisations of employers and work the social partners;
Amendment 310 #
2016/2221(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 13
Paragraph 13
13. Calls on the Commission and the Member States to ensure effective protection to workers especially affected by uncertainty and precariousness, giving special priority to women workers, young workers, older workers, workers in the informal economy, migrant workers and workers with disabilities;
Amendment 114 #
2016/2219(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Recital M c (new)
Recital M c (new)
Mc. whereas evidence of war crimes and crimes against humanity is difficult to preserve - especially at a time of unprecedented flows of refugees fleeing violence; whereas the preservation of evidence is essential to bringing perpetrators to justice;
Amendment 119 #
2016/2219(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Recital M h (new)
Recital M h (new)
Mh. whereas the European Parliament, in its resolution of 25 February 2016 on the humanitarian situation in Yemen, called for an arms embargo on Saudi Arabia on the basis of the serious allegations of ongoing breaches of international humanitarian law by Saudi Arabia in Yemen;
Amendment 126 #
2016/2219(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Recital N
Recital N
N. whereas justice is essential to advance respect for human rights, and the EU and its Member States have been unconditional supporters of the International Criminal Court (ICC) since its inception, while promoting the universality of the Rome Statute and defending its integrity with the purpose of strengthening the Court’s independence;
Amendment 151 #
2016/2219(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Recital R
Recital R
R. whereas violence against and unlawful prosecution of LGBTI people continues in many places around the world, and discrimination in health care, education, employment and other sectors is widespread;
Amendment 190 #
2016/2219(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 2
Paragraph 2
2. Expresses its serious concern at the numerous, ever-increasing attempts made to shrink the space of civil society and human rights defenders, and the growing number of repressive laws adopted throughout the world, under the pretext of combating terrorism (through the introduction of counter-terrorism laws), emergency situations and security measures), whereas there is often a negative impact on human rights as well as frequent abuse of these laws for repression; calls on clear condemnation of these abuses and violations;
Amendment 210 #
2016/2219(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 7
Paragraph 7
7. Draws attention to its long-term commitment to promote human rights and advance democratic values, as reflected, inter alia, in the annual award of the Sakharov Prize for Freedom of Thought, in the work of the Subcommittee on Human Rights, and in the monthly plenary debates and resolutions on cases of breaches of human rights, democracy and the rule of law; and the many parliamentary delegations;
Amendment 301 #
2016/2219(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 26 a (new)
Paragraph 26 a (new)
26a. Stresses that the CSDP is an instrument that not only ensures European security, but is part of the EU's foreign policy instruments and must therefore be used towards the strengthening of furthering human rights and democracy in third countries;
Amendment 324 #
2016/2219(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 30 a (new)
Paragraph 30 a (new)
30a. Underlines the need for EU leadership to push for reforms of the UN with the goal of strengthening the impact and the strength of the rules-based multilateral system, and of ensuring more efficient human rights protection and the advancing of international law;
Amendment 325 #
2016/2219(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 30 b (new)
Paragraph 30 b (new)
30b. Condemns that seats on the UNHRC are often occupied by countries with proven track record of grave human rights violations; calls on the EU to intensify its efforts to improve the credibility and effectiveness of the UNHRC;
Amendment 327 #
2016/2219(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 30 d (new)
Paragraph 30 d (new)
30d. Calls for the fundamental rights of the people of Western Sahara, including freedom of association, freedom of expression and the right to assembly, to be respected; demands the release of all Sahrawi political prisoners; demands access to the territories of Western Sahara for members of parliament, independent observers, NGOs and the press; urges the United Nations to ensure the full re- establishment of MINURSO and to provide this mission with a human rights mandate, in line with all other UN peacekeeping missions around the world; supports a fair and lasting settlement of the Western Sahara conflict, on the basis of the right to self-determination of the Sahrawi people, in accordance with the relevant United Nations resolutions;
Amendment 331 #
2016/2219(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 31
Paragraph 31
31. Condemns the dramatic number of deaths at sea in the Mediterranean; is extremely concerned about the growing numbers of human rights abuses against migrants and asylum seekers on their route to Europe; highlightdeplores the weaknesses and systematic incoherence of the policies of the EU and the Member States in this area and stresses the need for a holistic approach to find long-term solutions;
Amendment 352 #
2016/2219(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 31 f (new)
Paragraph 31 f (new)
31f. Calls on the EU to increase efforts to support Lebanon and Jordan, which shelter unprecedented numbers of refugees, who often face multiple threats to the respect for their human rights;
Amendment 381 #
2016/2219(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 34
Paragraph 34
34. Calls on the Member States to respect and fully implement the adopted EU common asylum package and the common migration legislation, particularly to safeguard vulnerable asylum seekers, such as LGBTI people, against violence and discrimination during the asylum process; calls on the Member States to participate in resettlement programmes, giving access to family reunification and granting humanitarian visas;
Amendment 457 #
2016/2219(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 40
Paragraph 40
40. Notes the persistent financing gap with regard to humanitarian aid and the shortcomings in the World Food programme resulting in cutting food; calls on the member states of the United Nations, and on the European Union and its Member States to, at a minimum, to the very least, honour their financial pledges;
Amendment 585 #
2016/2219(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 64
Paragraph 64
64. Requests that the EEAS prioritise its actions in situations where the death penalty is in forceIs deeply concerned by the increase in violence and discrimination against LGBTI people; requests that the EEAS prioritise its actions in countries with prevalent violence and discrimination against LGBTI people, including 76 countries which still criminalise homosexuality and 20 countries which still criminalise transgender identities, and/or where LGBTI people are subjected to torture and ill- treatment, by condemning these practices in accordance with the EU Guidelines on the Death Penalty and the EU Guidelines on Torture and other Cruel, Inhuman or Degrading Treatment or Punishment, and by continuing to work with the UN High Commissioner for Human Rights in this field;
Amendment 654 #
2016/2219(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 72 p (new)
Paragraph 72 p (new)
72p. Reiterates its call on the VP/HR to launch an initiative aimed at imposing an EU arms embargo against Saudi Arabia, given the serious allegations of breaches of international humanitarian law by Saudi Arabia in Yemen and the fact that the continued licensing of weapons sales to Saudi Arabia would therefore be in breach of Council Common Position 2008/944/CFSP of 8 December 2008;
Amendment 16 #
2016/2095(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Citation 4 a (new)
Citation 4 a (new)
– having regard to the Report of the Independent Expert on the enjoyment of all human rights by older persons,
Amendment 19 #
2016/2095(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Citation 4 a (new)
Citation 4 a (new)
– having regard to the UN Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities, ratified by the EU in 2010,
Amendment 62 #
2016/2095(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Citation 17 a (new)
Citation 17 a (new)
– having regard to its resolution of 10 September 2015 on creating a competitive EU labour market for the 21st century,
Amendment 98 #
2016/2095(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Recital A
Recital A
A. whereas the European Union needs a paradigm shift towards a strongmust continue to strengthen and build upon the European social model based on solidarity, social justice, a fair distribution of wealth, gender equality, a high- quality public education system, quality employment and sustainable growth - a model that ensures goodadequate social protection for all, combats economic inequality, empowers vulnerable groups, enhances participation in civil and political life, and improves the living standards for all citizens, delivering on the objectives and rights set out in the EU Treaties, the Charter of Fundamental Rights and the European Social Charter;
Amendment 190 #
2016/2095(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 2
Paragraph 2
2. Highlights that the EPSR should equihelp European citizens with stronger means to keep control over their lives and make markets work for wellbeingto maintain ownership over their lives and make economic policy also work for social cohesion and sustainable developmentgrowth;
Amendment 206 #
2016/2095(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 2 a (new)
Paragraph 2 a (new)
2a. Recognises that the UN Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities (CRPD) is ratified by the European Union and therefore believes that the EPSR should reference and mainstream the principles of the CRPD throughout each policy domain;
Amendment 231 #
2016/2095(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 3
Paragraph 3
3. Calls for the enactment of a directive on fair working conditions for all forms of employment, ensuring for every worker a core set of enforceable rights, including equal treatment, social protection, protection in case of dismissal, health and safety protection, provisions on working time and rest time, freedom of association and representation, collective bargaining, collective action, accafter a thorough assessment existing legislation and the actual implementation in Member Statess to training, and adequate information and consultation rights; underlines that this directive should apply to employees as well as to all workers in non-standard forms of employment, such as fixed-term work, part-time work, on-demand work, self-employment, crowd-working, internship or traineeship; requests that the EU acquis be updated accordingly so as to apply to all workersidentify and update possible gaps and shortcomings and ensuring proper enforcement and application of existing EU social legislation and cutting unnecessary red tape;
Amendment 262 #
2016/2095(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 3 a (new)
Paragraph 3 a (new)
3a. Emphasises that the Commission, in cooperation with the Member States and social partners, should also reinforce the European social dialogue with a view to better reconciling labour markets and social protection demands in order to address social inequalities and competitiveness challenges;
Amendment 383 #
2016/2095(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 5 a (new)
Paragraph 5 a (new)
5a. Calls on the Commission to carry out a substantive analysis of the best practice to assist Member States in the calculation of minimum pensions;
Amendment 486 #
2016/2095(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 10
Paragraph 10
10. Is aware that rising life expectancy and workforcea shrinking workforce pose a challenge to the sustainability and adequacy of pensions systems and to intergenerational fairness; reaffirms that the best response is to increase the overall employment ratenotes that tackling the gender pension gap must also be a priority in this regard; reaffirms that the best response is to increase the overall employment rate for both younger and older workers with particular attention given to disadvantaged groups most excluded from the labour market; considers that pensionable ages should reflect, besides life expectancy, other factors including labour market trends, the economic dependency ratio, the birth rate and differences in job arduousness;
Amendment 562 #
2016/2095(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 13
Paragraph 13
13. Agrees that all persons with disabilities must be ensured enabling individualised services and basic income security allowing them a decent standard of living and social inclusion; recognises that disability benefits must be developed in a way which both encourages access to the labour market and ensures a decent standard of living in the community;
Amendment 615 #
2016/2095(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 16
Paragraph 16
16. Calls for legislationon Member States to ensure that access to social housing or adequate housing benefits are provided for those in need, obviously including homeless people, and that vulnerable people and poor households are protected against eviction; calls for tax incentives to help young people on low incomes set up their own households; calls for greater use of the EFSI to support urban renewal and affordable housing provision;
Amendment 664 #
2016/2095(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 18
Paragraph 18
18. Supports a Skills Guarantee as a new right for everyone to acquire fundamental skills for the 21st century, including digital literacy; stresses that universal access to broadband is a crucial component for the implementation of this right; highlights this as an important social investment, requiring adequate financing;
Amendment 870 #
2016/2095(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 26 – point a b (new)
Paragraph 26 – point a b (new)
ab. Labour mobility and protection of workers
Amendment 891 #
2016/2095(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 26 – point e a (new)
Paragraph 26 – point e a (new)
ea. access to adequate, safe and affordable housing;
Amendment 894 #
2016/2095(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 26 – point e b (new)
Paragraph 26 – point e b (new)
eb. EIGE gender equality index;
Amendment 1029 #
2016/2095(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 31
Paragraph 31
31. Calls on the Commission and the EIB to refocus the EFSI on job creation and social investment and adapt its risk/return requirements accordingly; welcomes Commissioner Thyssen's statement that the social dimension of the investment plan for Europe will be reinforced by increasing support for social enterprises, social services and microfinance with €1 billion;
Amendment 27 #
2016/2079(INI)
Draft opinion
Paragraph 3 – introductory part
Paragraph 3 – introductory part
3. Calls on the Commission and the Member States to make information and technical support more readily available to fishermen’s organisations applying for EU funding, which should meet the sector’s needs by:
Amendment 31 #
2016/2079(INI)
Draft opinion
Paragraph 3 – indent 1
Paragraph 3 – indent 1
– promoting fleet renewal and modernisation, while seeking to reduce the fishing effortmaximising catches in a sustainable way and improve active and passive safety devices, for example personal locator systems in life jackets;
Amendment 41 #
2016/2079(INI)
Draft opinion
Paragraph 3 – indent 3
Paragraph 3 – indent 3
– encouraging those working in the sector to join forces and organise themselves for example through trade unions, community organisations, cooperatives and/or fishers' and fishing vessel owners' representative organisations;
Amendment 63 #
2016/2079(INI)
Draft opinion
Paragraph 5 a (new)
Paragraph 5 a (new)
5a. Calls on those Member States who have not already done so to ratify the ILO's Work in Fishing Convention 188 which ensures that fishers have decent conditions of work on board fishing vessels;
Amendment 15 #
2016/2067(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 1
Paragraph 1
1. Notes that the EU’s security environment has deteriorated considerably, becoming more fluid, more dangerous and less predictable; notes that threats are both conventional and hybrid, generated by both state and non-state actors, and coming from the South and the East, and thatalthough they are common threats they affect the Member States differently, thus preventing a more common approach; is firmly convinced that EU's vulnerability is direct outcome of the lack of integration as well as lack of coordination;
Amendment 107 #
2016/2067(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 6
Paragraph 6
6. Underlines, equally, that the CSDP should be based on a strong collective defence principle, efficient financing and full coordination with NATO;
Amendment 150 #
2016/2067(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 10
Paragraph 10
10. Observes that, to this effect, cooperation with similar NATO activities andis needed; emphasises that an increased exchange of intelligence and information between the Member States are indispensableis indispensable and to that goal urges formation of European Intelligence Agency with the mission and capability to implement a de facto transversal intelligence network within the Member States allowing the European Union to react in a comprehensive and coordinated way to emerging threats;
Amendment 16 #
2016/2064(INI)
Draft opinion
Paragraph 1 b (new)
Paragraph 1 b (new)
1b. Recognises the importance of the extension of the lifetime of the EFSI beyond 2020 and of the necessary increase in the EU budget guarantee but regrets that any comprehensive impact assessment has been made, so the Commission has little evidence that the proposed increase is justified;
Amendment 17 #
2016/2064(INI)
Draft opinion
Paragraph 1 c (new)
Paragraph 1 c (new)
1c. Reinforces the additionality of the projects supported under EFSI to enhance the geographical coverage and reinforces the take-up especially in areas with high level of unemployment in order to have a strong impact in the employment figures; highlights the need to develop further the investment in cross-border projects;
Amendment 18 #
2016/2064(INI)
Draft opinion
Paragraph 1 d (new)
Paragraph 1 d (new)
1d. Highlights that investment situation in Europe is slowly improving but the pace is still timid and can be reversible; investment levels are still below the pre-crisis level and the investment gap remains wide; in that sense EFSI must be oriented to any kind of projects that lead to job creation and sustainable growth and development;
Amendment 19 #
2016/2064(INI)
Draft opinion
Paragraph 1 e (new)
Paragraph 1 e (new)
1e. Highlights that initial results reveal that Member States with greater technical and administrative capacity, as well as financial institutions, are taking greater advantage of the EFSI; underlines that a greater role must be played by the EIB and the Commission in supporting those lagging behind through greater technical assistance and enhancing the capacity of some countries in taking advantage of the EFSI; notes that approximately 63% of total EFSI financing within the Innovation and Infrastructure Window was granted to three Member States, while the EFSI strategy foresees a maximum geographical concentration of 45%; notes that the situation is less problematic when it comes to the SME Window, but even here, only three Member States account for 54% of total EFSI financing;
Amendment 29 #
2016/2064(INI)
Draft opinion
Paragraph 2 a (new)
Paragraph 2 a (new)
2a. Calls on the Commission and the EIB to continue their local/national campaigns to help explain and promote the benefits of Investment Plan across the Union; welcomes the opening of new offices by the EIB in the Member States to provide more support and also enhance cooperation with National Promotional Banks contributing to generate more projects in areas of high level of unemployment that have been less covered so far;
Amendment 46 #
2016/2064(INI)
Draft opinion
Paragraph 4
Paragraph 4
4. Calls for the EFSI to operate in closer conjunction with the Structural FundsEuropean Structural Investment Funds (ESIF) and other Structural Funds; this articulation must be further simplified and administrative obstacles must be removed;
Amendment 72 #
2016/2064(INI)
Draft opinion
Paragraph 6 a (new)
Paragraph 6 a (new)
6a. Recalls that the EFSI remains without an assessment and analysis of the causes of the investment gap and the market needs and how to best address them; in that sense, calls on the Commission to provide this assessment;
Amendment 78 #
2016/2064(INI)
Draft opinion
Paragraph 7
Paragraph 7
7. Considers itmore than disappointing that the Commission’s assessment of the EFSI has failed to record the number of jobs created to date under the Fund; calls on the Commission to studied and assess the impact of these projects on the number of jobs created and the real impact of these investment in direct and indirect jobs;
Amendment 87 #
2016/2064(INI)
Draft opinion
Paragraph 7 a (new)
Paragraph 7 a (new)
7a. Recalls the importance that new figures and updates are released regularly, including independent assessments, drawing on the experience collected so far; regrets that in terms of the objectives relating to growth and jobs, no targets have been set for EFSI; Calls on the monitoring of indicators relating to growth and jobs, as these are the ultimate objectives of the investments;
Amendment 97 #
2016/2064(INI)
Draft opinion
Paragraph 8
Paragraph 8
8. Calls on the Member States to lay down more clear-cut investment priorities and to draw up projects in collaboration with the European Investment Advisory Hub; the EIB should ensure a proper feedback loop of information with the European Commission regarding eventual regulatory barriers which may be preventing good projects of taking place at the different levels; calls on the Commission to work in closer cooperation with Member States in the European Semester process in order to help them begin as soon as possible to implement the recommendations, in particular by carrying out economic and social reforms, thus removing national barriers to investment; these reforms identified in the country- specific recommendations are an important condition to sustain and increase investment levels in Member States, taking into account national specificities.
Amendment 101 #
2016/2064(INI)
Draft opinion
Paragraph 8 a (new)
Paragraph 8 a (new)
8a. Welcomes that the Commission will, in close cooperation with the EIB, further strengthen the communication on the EFSI and the Hub in order to raise awareness of the availability of funding and technical assistance across the Union; suggests that information on funding solutions, technical assistance and procedures, including through good practices examples and case studies, can stimulate new ideas and boost investment initiatives;
Amendment 104 #
2016/2064(INI)
Draft opinion
Paragraph 8 b (new)
Paragraph 8 b (new)
8b. As recalled by the European Parliament resolution of 28 April 2016 on the EIB - annual report 2014 there is a need for the EFSI to function in an effective, fully transparent and fair way, in that sense insists in the need to achieve the highest levels of transparency and institutional accountability by ensuring the disclosure of exhaustive and sound budgetary information and access to financial data related to projects funded by the EIB;
Amendment 54 #
2016/2061(INI)
Draft opinion
Paragraph 1
Paragraph 1
1. Acknowledges that the implementation of the principle of equal pay for the same work and for work of equal value is crucial to reducing pay and pension gaps and to eliminating the risk of poverty; recognises also in this regard that key to preventing and mitigating the gender pension gap is women's access to the labour market, improved work/life balance for both men and women and addressing gender segregation in education and employment;
Amendment 62 #
2016/2061(INI)
Draft opinion
Paragraph 1 a (new)
Paragraph 1 a (new)
1a. Notes that pension policies shall be combined with adequate labour and active ageing policies to reduce gender pay and pension gaps; highlights in this regard vulnerable position of women and men of racial, ethnic, religious and linguistic minority origin; stresses the importance of fight against gender stereotypes in employment;
Amendment 103 #
2016/2061(INI)
Draft opinion
Paragraph 3
Paragraph 3
3. Calls for an adequate public minimum pension not related to previous working life to eliminate coverage gaps; stresses the importance of shifting towards individual, rather than familyspousal-related, pension entitlements; highlights however the important role that survivor's pensions can play in protecting many older women from the higher risk of poverty and social exclusion they face compared to older men;
Amendment 113 #
2016/2061(INI)
Draft opinion
Paragraph 3 a (new)
Paragraph 3 a (new)
3a. Calls on the Commission to carry out a substantive analysis of the best practice to assist Member States in the calculation of such minimum pensions;
Amendment 133 #
2016/2061(INI)
Draft opinion
Paragraph 5
Paragraph 5
5. Asks the Member States to increase minimum wages asRecognises that minimum wages or sectoral collective agreements in the Member States can play an important tool forrole in narrowing pension gaps;
Amendment 155 #
2016/2061(INI)
Draft opinion
Paragraph 6
Paragraph 6
6. Calls on the Member States to introduce or reinforce pension credits for career interruptions resulting from caring, whatever the family and/or marital status; 'care credits' through labour and social security legislation for both women and men as equivalent periods for building up pension rights in order to protect those taking a break from employment to provide informal, unpaid care to a dependant or a family member; Calls on the Commission to come forward with a proposal for a Carers' leave directive which offers the carer adequate remuneration and social protection;
Amendment 162 #
2016/2061(INI)
Draft opinion
Paragraph 6 a (new)
Paragraph 6 a (new)
6a. Believes that policies which reconcile work and family life such as paid maternity, paternity and shared parental leave as well as access to affordable childcare and long term care could counteract gender inequalities in economically active years which may impact on the gender pension gap in later life and encourages Member States to make provision for such policies; Calls on the Member States to effectively implement the Barcelona targets by 2020 and to endorse the 2014 quality framework on early childhood education and care;
Amendment 173 #
2016/2061(INI)
Draft opinion
Paragraph 7
Paragraph 7
7. Stresses that the sustainability of pension schemes can be reinforced by complementing social security with tax contributionsensuring equality of access to all pension pillars for women; in this regard encourages the Member States to devise awareness raising information campaigns to encourage and facilitate women's access to second and third pillar pensions, particularly in feminised sectors where take up may be low;
Amendment 210 #
2016/2061(INI)
Draft opinion
Paragraph 9 a (new)
Paragraph 9 a (new)
9a. Calls on the Commission to support the development of gender disaggregated statistics and research to enhance the monitoring and evaluation of the effects of pension reforms on women's prosperity and well-being;
Amendment 218 #
2016/2061(INI)
Draft opinion
Paragraph 10
Paragraph 10
10. Urges the Member States to reverse any reforms of pension systems that aggravate imbalances in pensions (especwhen examining the adequacy and sustainability of their current pension systems to carry out an ex-ante gender impact assessment to address potentially gender imbalances)bias that could aggravate imbalances in pensions.
Amendment 24 #
2016/2059(INI)
Draft opinion
Paragraph 2 a (new)
Paragraph 2 a (new)
2a. Calls for better links between energy and climate policies; reminds the need to avoid the creation of a new fossil fuel lock-in and the necessity to reduce greenhouse gas emissions to 80-95% below 1990 levels by 2050;
Amendment 30 #
2016/2059(INI)
Draft opinion
Paragraph 3
Paragraph 3
3. Emphasises that liquefied natural gas (LNG) and gas storage are of particular importanccan play a role in order to avoid dependence on a single energy supplier; calls in this context for the promotion and developa thorough assessment of where new natural gas nodes and LNG storage stations in the central and south-eastern regions, the Baltic and the Mediterraneancould improve energy security, taking into account the unused capacities of existing infrastructures, declining gas demand throughout Europe, the risk of stranded assets and EU 2030 and 2050 climate and energy objectives;
Amendment 41 #
2016/2059(INI)
Draft opinion
Paragraph 4
Paragraph 4
4. Believes that LNG and gas storage are an important part of the Energy Union and should contribute towards ending any kind of energy isolation of the EU Member States and regions; highlights the need to support the most vulnerable countries in order to diversify their sources and routes of supply, and to strengthen their energy security by reducing demand through efficiency measures; recalls that promoting LNG would push Member States to be more reliant on gas imports while for every 1% improvement in energy efficiency, EU gas imports fall by 2.6%;
Amendment 4 #
2016/2053(INI)
Draft opinion
Paragraph 1
Paragraph 1
1. Highlights the need to rebuild the EU-ACP relationship on fresh foundations as a fair partnership between equals, respecting countries’' heterogeneity and sovereignty whilst achieving good governance and democracy; stresses that the partnership must have as its objectives the United Nations SDGs, the meeting of basic needs anda free and fair society with respect for human rights;
Amendment 13 #
2016/2053(INI)
Draft opinion
Paragraph 1 a (new)
Paragraph 1 a (new)
1a. Considers that while strong political alliances based on common interests and shared values should continue to be the basis of the ACP partnership, a further cooperation on global issues should be strengthened and the adequate mechanisms created so as to effectively tackle better the global challenges of today, such as climate change and water, energy, food security, migration flows, terrorism, extremism, international criminality, biodiversity, health and financial issues among others;
Amendment 26 #
2016/2053(INI)
Draft opinion
Paragraph 2
Paragraph 2
2. Emphasises the negative effects of association agreements on the economies of ACP countries; takes the view that the new partnership will need to be based on developing the countries’ productive capacities, completingBelieves that the future EU-ACP relations should as far as possible, be based on the most advantageous regional integration processes, protecting traditional agriculture, and combating land grabbing, the privatisation of national natural resources and public services, and over- exploitation;
Amendment 29 #
2016/2053(INI)
Draft opinion
Paragraph 2
Paragraph 2
2. Emphasises the negative effectsed of association agreements onfor the economiegovernments of ACP countries to enhance the overall performance of their economies; takes the view that the new partnership will need to be based on developing the countries’' productive capacities, completing the most advantageous regional integration processes, protecting traditional agriculture, and combating land grabbing, within a clear logic of sustainable development and without illegal exploitation of natural resources by state-owned foreign companies, completing the most advantageous regional integration processes while taking benefit from existing nurturing structures like the African Union, complementing traditional agriculture with efficient ways of agricultural exploitation, distribution and marketing to the benefit of the population, and combating land grabbing by foreign and domestic forces; recommends to consider the privatisation of national natural resources and public services, and over- exploitation;
Amendment 37 #
2016/2053(INI)
Draft opinion
Paragraph 2 a (new)
Paragraph 2 a (new)
2a. Highlights that the future partnership framework should allow for a comprehensive approach to peace and security and that, in this regard, sufficient planning and coordination should be established so as to avoid existing and possible duplications between regional and national support by the EU member states and ACP countries;
Amendment 39 #
2016/2053(INI)
Draft opinion
Paragraph 2 b (new)
Paragraph 2 b (new)
2b. Considers that EU-ACP partnership should try to engage further with other partners at the global level (such as AU or UN) and other international powers wherever possible, and work on an enhanced coordination and cooperation, without duplicating work or missions in order to tackle the challenges of wars, internal conflicts, insecurity, fragility and transition;
Amendment 44 #
2016/2053(INI)
Draft opinion
Paragraph 2 c (new)
Paragraph 2 c (new)
2c. Believes that the provisions on peace and security should be strengthened further and that the future partnership should provide for a more effective joint action on conflict prevention, including early warning and mediation, peace- building and tackling transnational security challenges in order to confront the current trans-regional security threats related to terrorism and violent extremisms, all forms of trafficking, including of human beings, of weapons and of drugs, as well as piracy by which EU and ACP countries are affected;
Amendment 46 #
2016/2053(INI)
Draft opinion
Paragraph 2 d (new)
Paragraph 2 d (new)
2d. Recalls that the respect for human rights, democracy and the rule of law, good governance as well as other essential elements that figure in article 9 of the Cotonou Agreement constitute the foundation of the ACP-EU partnership; highlights the necessity of the respect of human rights and the importance of part 2 of article 9 of the current Cotonou Agreement and the democratic clause in it established and further developed in article 96; reminds of the importance of fully implementing those articles when necessary;
Amendment 48 #
2016/2053(INI)
Draft opinion
Paragraph 2 e (new)
Paragraph 2 e (new)
2e. Stresses that different CPA mechanisms such as political dialogue, financial support, appropriate measures, suspension of development cooperation, among others should be further enhanced in order to effectively contribute to the improvement of human rights, democracy, rule of law and good governance, especially the fight against corruption;
Amendment 50 #
2016/2053(INI)
Draft opinion
Paragraph 3
Paragraph 3
Amendment 57 #
2016/2053(INI)
Draft opinion
Paragraph 3
Paragraph 3
3. Invites ACP countries to audit their debts with a view to their complete elimination, and invites them to claim reparations for the spoliation of natural resources by foreign multinationals, and for the wars that have been sparkedenhance their sustainability, and invites them to introduce legislation that enhances the sustainable and sound governance of natural resources; supports the United Nations working group on an international framework for sovereign debt restructuring;
Amendment 67 #
2016/2053(INI)
Draft opinion
Paragraph 4
Paragraph 4
4. Stresses that the universality of the human rights enshrined in international law, including international law on migrants and refugees, must be respected, along with the Geneva Convention; urges countries to ratify the United Nations Convention on the protection of the rights of all migrant workers and members of their familirecognizes that several root causes, among which local and regional conflicts, corruption, bad governance, unsustainable exploitation of natural resources, lack of democracy and serious violations of human rights lead to unsustainable migratory pressures;
Amendment 76 #
2016/2053(INI)
Draft opinion
Paragraph 5
Paragraph 5
5. SupportsTakes note of the decision by the United Nations to create a legal instrument to ensure that businesses respect human rights, in order to put an end to labour exploitation, neo-slavery, illicit capital flows and the financing of armed conflicts as an element in the further democratisation of ACP countries; highlights the responsibilities of the member states involved to entrust their citizens with good governance and the duty to provide security and stability for human and economic development;
Amendment 88 #
2016/2053(INI)
Draft opinion
Paragraph 6
Paragraph 6
Amendment 89 #
2016/2053(INI)
Draft opinion
Paragraph 6
Paragraph 6
Amendment 25 #
2016/2036(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Recital A
Recital A
A. whereas the EU is now surrounded by an arc of instability, as large parts of the Middle East and North Africa are engulfed in ethno-religious conflicts and proxy wars and terrorist groups such as ISIS and the Jabhat al-Nusra Front proliferate throughout the region, while an aggressive, revisionist Russia continues to violate its neighbours’ sovereignty and openly challenges the European security orderproliferate throughout the region;
Amendment 39 #
2016/2036(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Recital A a (new)
Recital A a (new)
Aa. whereas terrorism, hybrid threats, economic volatility, cyber and energy insecurity, organized crime and climate change constitute the bigger security threats of an everyday more complex and interconnected world in which the EU should do its best and search the means in order to guarantee security and deliver prosperity and democracy;
Amendment 43 #
2016/2036(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Recital A b (new)
Recital A b (new)
Ab. whereas internal and external security are increasingly blurred; whereas especial attention should be brought to preventing conflict, addressing the root causes of instability and assuring human security;
Amendment 51 #
2016/2036(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Recital B
Recital B
B. whereas these conflicts have direct and serious consequences for the security and well-being of European citizens, as they increasingly spill over into the EU, be it in the form of terrorism, massive refugee flows, or disinformation campaigns aimed at dividing our societieothers;
Amendment 57 #
2016/2036(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Recital C
Recital C
C. whereas Europe is experiencing the threat of terrorism in its territory; while terrorism and a constant violence plague in North Africa and the Middle East continue to expand; whereas the recent terrorist acts in European cities committed by radical jihadists linked to ISIS are part of that group’s comprehensive strategy, complementing a land war in Syria, Libya and Iraq, an economic war aimed at the tourism industry in North Africa, as well as online propaganda and cyber-attacks;
Amendment 92 #
2016/2036(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 2
Paragraph 2
2. Considers that the current crisis is also an opportunity for the EU if it is used to make the EU work better; considers that the current challenges demand a reform to make the EU better and more democratic, and able to deliver what citizens expect; recalls that European citizens see an effective common foreign and security policy as a priority area of action for the EU and that this is one of the areas where European cooperation can yield most value added; emphasises, therefore, that Member States must change their mentality since nowadays thinking about foreign policy and security in a narrow minded national perspective is obsolete; is convinced that no single Member State alone is able to tackle any of the challenges we face today; urges Member States to finally show sufficient levels of political will and trust in one another to make it possible to use the tools at hand in a concerted manner in order to pursue our interests and values; reiterates that the EU can only be a strong global player on an equal footing with other major powers if all Member States speak with one voice and act together in the framework of a strong EU foreign policy;
Amendment 125 #
2016/2036(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 4 a (new)
Paragraph 4 a (new)
4a. Believes that a strengthened European security and defence cooperation would lead to a higher effectiveness, unity, efficiency as well as an increase of EU assets, EU capabilities and positive potential effects on defence research and industrial matters. Highlights that only through such deeper cooperation that should gradually develop into a real European Defence Union, the EU and its member States would acquire the technological and industrial capabilities necessary to enable to act quicker, autonomously, effectively and addressing today's threats in a responsive and efficient manner;
Amendment 291 #
2016/2036(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 16
Paragraph 16
16. Takes the view that it is time to define a new, more realistic strategy for the EU’s relations with Russia, based on credible deterrence but also on dialogue in areas of common interest; stresses that sanctions have proven to be the most effective means for deterring Russian aggression; recalls that the full implementation of the Minsk agreement is a prerequisite for the suspension of sanctions; insists that the EU should consider imposing further sanctions in case Russia continues to violate international law; believes it is in the common interest of the EU and Russia to achieve a better relationship, provided international law is applied;
Amendment 340 #
2016/2036(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 19
Paragraph 19
19. Believes that a deepening of the relationship with the US and Canada is of strategic interest to the EU, while at the same time it is important for the EU to strengthen its relationship with Central and South AmericaLatin American countries;
Amendment 389 #
2016/2036(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 22
Paragraph 22
22. Underlines also the need to intensify the fight against Islamist terrorism, which affects ever larger parts of the Middle East and North Africa and has also been creeping into Europe; urges the EU to undertake concerted diplomatic efforts, together with the US and other international allies, to convince partners in the region, such as Turkey, Saudi Arabiathe Gulf States and Iran, of the need for a common strategy towards this global challenge;
Amendment 404 #
2016/2036(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 23
Paragraph 23
23. Highlights the importance of finding a sustainable solution to the conflict in Syria; supports the UN-led efforts to facilitate negotiations between all parties to the Syrian conflict on an inclusive political settlement; calls on the EU to use its leverage over key actors such as Iran, Saudi Arabia and Russia to ensure that they take a constructive position; emphasises that the use of sanctions should be considered in case some of the actors involved do not deliver on their commitments;
Amendment 425 #
2016/2036(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 24
Paragraph 24
24. Recognises Turkey’s role as an important partner in solving the Syrian conflict and the fight against Da’esh; strongly condemns the attempted military coup against the democratically elected government of Turkey; encouragedemands the Turkish government to protect the constitutional order, while underlining the importance of respect for the rule of law and independence of the judiciary in the aftermath of the coup, in cooperation with the Council of Europe;
Amendment 434 #
2016/2036(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 24 a (new)
Paragraph 24 a (new)
24a. Highlights the fragility of the security situation in the Sahel region; recalls that the current turmoil could bear very serious consequences for the entire region as well as the EU, as it is expanding both to the North and the South; stresses that a real answer needs to be given to this security situation by the EU not only economically but also politically and militarily. Europe must provide a common answer and should stop laying its responsibility on the shoulders of one solitary Member State: France;
Amendment 436 #
2016/2036(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 24 b (new)
Paragraph 24 b (new)
24b. As the half century occupation cannot continue indefinitely, highlights the need of achieving a two-state solution to the conflict in the Middle East - based on parameters set out in the Council Conclusions of July 2014 - that meets Israeli and Palestinian security needs and Palestinian aspirations for statehood and sovereignty, ends the occupation that began in 1967, and resolves all permanent status issues in order to end the conflict;
Amendment 466 #
2016/2036(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 27
Paragraph 27
27. Stresses the need for close cooperation with other global and regional powers on global threats and challenges; emphasises in particular the crucial importance of the transatlantic relationship, which ishould be always based on common interests and values in all different areas of cooperation and relationship;
Amendment 488 #
2016/2036(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 29 a (new)
Paragraph 29 a (new)
29a. Reminds of the importance of the so-called "human rights clause" included since the early 90's in all framework agreements signed with third countries; recalls the importance of the provision of a "non-execution clause" in it included and highlights the need of implementing the "appropriate measures" (including the suspension of the agreement) in case of violation by a third country of an essential element of the clause such as respect for democratic principles and fundamental rights as a tool for enforcing EU polices;
Amendment 34 #
2016/2030(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Recital A a (new)
Recital A a (new)
Aa. whereas in the Union the term "propaganda" is understood to mean spreading of ideas, concepts, information and political doctrines for the purpose of creating or changing public opinion; and the term "disinformation" is normally understood to mean deliberate spreading of intentionally false or inaccurate information;
Amendment 39 #
2016/2030(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Recital A b (new)
Recital A b (new)
Ab. whereas media freedom is the basic pillar of a democratic system and, thus, is incompatible with the creation of any counter-propaganda institution whose activity is a form of propaganda; whereas it is society, with its own TV, radio, press and internet professionals and companies who freely create the flow of information that keeps its citizenry informed; whereas the citizenry, in the exercise of their freedoms and their rights, chooses its information sources and, consequently, forms their own opinion;
Amendment 63 #
2016/2030(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Recital B a (new)
Recital B a (new)
Ba. whereas propaganda for war and any advocacy of national, racial or religious hatred that constitutes incitement to discrimination, hostility or violence shall be prohibited by law in accordance with Article 20 of the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights;
Amendment 77 #
2016/2030(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Recital C a (new)
Recital C a (new)
Ca. whereas Article 11 of the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union provides that everyone has the right to freedom of expression and this right shall include freedom to hold opinions and to receive and impart information and ideas without interference by public authority and regardless of frontiers;
Amendment 80 #
2016/2030(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Recital C b (new)
Recital C b (new)
Cb. whereas Article 10 of the European Convention of Human Rights guarantees freedom of expression but also stipulates that this freedom may be subject to such formalities, conditions, restrictions or penalties as are prescribed by law and are necessary in a democratic society;
Amendment 134 #
2016/2030(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 2 a (new)
Paragraph 2 a (new)
2a. Underlines that media freedom is based on a free society; stresses, then, that any counter-propaganda institution created by the legislative or executive power is against the principle of media freedom, as its objective is a form of propaganda;
Amendment 153 #
2016/2030(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Subheading 2
Subheading 2
Amendment 162 #
2016/2030(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 4
Paragraph 4
Amendment 197 #
2016/2030(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 5
Paragraph 5
Amendment 218 #
2016/2030(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 6
Paragraph 6
Amendment 250 #
2016/2030(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 7 a (new)
Paragraph 7 a (new)
7a. Underlines that Islamist terrorist organisations, especially ISIS and Al- Qaeda, are engaged in active information campaigns with the aim to undermine and increase the level of hatred against European values and interests;
Amendment 318 #
2016/2030(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 12
Paragraph 12
Amendment 334 #
2016/2030(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 13
Paragraph 13
13. Stresses its support for initiatives such as the Baltic Centre for Media Excellence in Tallinn or the Radicalisation Awareness Network Centre of Excellence; underlines the need for strengthening analyeducation, analytical and critical capabilities at all levelof youngsters; calls for the Commission and the Member States to initiate similar projects, engage in the training of journalists, create independent media hubs, support media diversity and exchange best practices and information in these areaeducational projects and exchange best practices and information in order to reduce radicalization amongst younger generations;
Amendment 2 #
2016/2024(BUD)
Draft opinion
Paragraph 1
Paragraph 1
1. Emphasises that the 2017 budget has to be keyshould play a key role in enhancing the Union’s contribution to growth, the creation of jobs and combatting poverty, particularly child poverty;
Amendment 8 #
2016/2024(BUD)
Draft opinion
Paragraph 2
Paragraph 2
2. Regrets that the unemployment rate among young people still remains too high and calls on the Commission to provide enoughis unacceptably high in many Member States and calls on the Commission to work with Member States in utilising the financial support tos for those programmes targeting youth unemployment;
Amendment 13 #
2016/2024(BUD)
Draft opinion
Paragraph 3
Paragraph 3
3. Stresses that the budget should support programmes creating jobs, in particular, for those with multiple disadvantages in the labour market, such as women, long-term unemployed, elderly unemployed, people with disabilities and people from minority backgrounds;
Amendment 24 #
2016/2024(BUD)
Draft opinion
Paragraph 5
Paragraph 5
5. Considers that the EU budget should invest in education and vocational training to provide opportunities, especially in the areas most affected areas by youth unemployment and in order to integrate migrants inand refugees into the labour market;
Amendment 28 #
2016/2024(BUD)
Draft opinion
Paragraph 6
Paragraph 6
6. Points out the potential of digitalisation generating new business models and new jobs and calls for coherent budgetary efforts to provide appropriate recognition, training and re-skilling in the ICT sector;
Amendment 31 #
2016/2024(BUD)
Draft opinion
Paragraph 7
Paragraph 7
7. Highlights the importance of the budget in promoting entrepreneurship initiatives including social entrepreneurship, innovative social enterprises, employee financial participation and self-employment;
Amendment 36 #
2016/2024(BUD)
Draft opinion
Paragraph 8
Paragraph 8
8. Stresses that the budget should promotereinforce a high level of workers’ protection and prevention culture across the EU and help to address new challenges to health and safety at work;
Amendment 40 #
2016/2024(BUD)
Draft opinion
Paragraph 9 a (new)
Paragraph 9 a (new)
9a. Considers that the EU budget should support efforts to upskill and retrain workers in areas where there are skills shortages as well as in the healthcare and care sectors and the ICT and digital sectors;
Amendment 42 #
2016/2024(BUD)
Draft opinion
Paragraph 9 b (new)
Paragraph 9 b (new)
Amendment 21 #
2016/2020(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Recital A
Recital A
A. whereas the EU’s commitment to effective multilateralism and good global governance, with the UN at its core, is an integral part of the EU’s external policy and is rooted in the conviction that a multilateral system founded on universal rules and values is best suited to address global crises, challenges and threats;
Amendment 23 #
2016/2020(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Recital B
Recital B
B. whereas the EU should play a proactive part in building a United Nations that can effectively contribute to global solutions, peace and security, development, human rights, democracy and a rule-of-law-based international order;
Amendment 27 #
2016/2020(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Recital C
Recital C
C. whereas the EU and its Member States are collectively the single largest financial contributor to the UN system, providing about one third of the UN’s regular budget, close to two-fifths of the UN’s peacekeeping budget and about one half of all contributions to UN funds and programmes with the primary aims of eradicating poverty, promoting long-term peace and stability, and combating social inequalities, and provides humanitarian assistance to populations, countries and regions that are confronted with all types of crises, whether natural or human- made;
Amendment 40 #
2016/2020(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph a
Paragraph a
(a) to continue to support multilateral attempts to find lasting political and peaceful solutions to ongoing conflicts in the Middle East and North Africa, in particular in Syria, Libya and Yemen; to continue to support the work of the Special Envoy of the UN Secretary-General for Syria, the Special Representative and Head of the UN Support Mission in Libya, and the Special Envoy of the Un Secretary- General for Yemen; to call for continued humanitarian, financial and political assistance from the international community in order to address the humanitarian situation, and to work towards the immediate cessation of violence;
Amendment 55 #
2016/2020(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph b b (new)
Paragraph b b (new)
(bb) to continue to be involved in and play an important role within the UN system in international negotiations and mediation, in particular in resolving of frozen conflicts;
Amendment 97 #
2016/2020(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph k
Paragraph k
(k) to support UN efforts to prevent non- state actors and terrorist groups from developing or acquiring weapons of mass destruction and their delivery systems and contribute to the comprehensive review of Security Council Resolution 1540 in 2016; to insist on full compliance with the Treaty on the Non- Proliferation Treatyof Nuclear Weapons (NPT), the Chemical Weapons Convention and the Biological Weapons Convention and to actively take steps towards global disarmament;
Amendment 117 #
2016/2020(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph q a (new)
Paragraph q a (new)
(qa) to continue to actively promote equality and non-discrimination and to support further actions against violation of LGBTI rights;
Amendment 134 #
2016/2020(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph s
Paragraph s
(s) to continue to advocate for zero tolerance for the death penalty and to further work towards the universal abolition of the death penalty, leading the way towards the adoption of the next UN General Assembly resolution on a moratorium on the use of the death penalty;
Amendment 137 #
2016/2020(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph t
Paragraph t
(t) to recall the obligation of the General Assembly, when electing the membership of the UN Human Rights Council (UNHRC), to take into account candidates’ respect for the promotion and protection of human rights, the rule of law and democracy; to call for the establishment of clear human rights performance-based criteria for membership of the UNHRC;
Amendment 169 #
2016/2020(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph v
Paragraph v
(v) to work towards the implementation of the Sustainable Development Goals of the 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development; to work towards improving the lives of future generations and to encourage and support countries to take ownership and establish national frameworks for the achievement of the 17 goals;
Amendment 175 #
2016/2020(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph v a (new)
Paragraph v a (new)
(va) to urge countries, especially DAC members, to fully implement Policy Coherence for Sustainable Development in their policies in order to reach the SDGs; to work towards the creation of a set of PCSD commitments by the UN General Assembly;
Amendment 177 #
2016/2020(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph v b (new)
Paragraph v b (new)
(vb) to work determinedly for eradicating poverty and to promote ecologically, economically and socially sustainable development all over the world; to fight against social inequalities and to provide humanitarian assistance to populations, countries and regions that are confronted with all types of crises, whether natural or human-made;
Amendment 194 #
2016/2020(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph x
Paragraph x
(x) to support actively a comprehensive reform of the United Nations Security Council in order to better reflect the new world reality and to more effectively meet present and future security challenges; to continue to advocate for the necessary negotiations, procedures and reform of the UN Security Council to be carried out to enable the EU to become a permanent member of that body, with one permanent seat and one single vote, with the aim of enabling the Union to speak with one voice in the UN; to promote the revitalisation of the work of the General Assembly, and improved coordination and coherence of the action of all UN institutions, which should enhance the efficiency, effectiveness, legitimacy, transparency, accountability, capacity and representativeness of the system; to support and build on the increased transparency in the process for the selection of the next UN Secretary- General, with candidates’ presentations being made in the General Assembly;
Amendment 197 #
2016/2020(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph x
Paragraph x
(x) to support actively a comprehensive reform of the United Nations Security Council; to promote the structural and functional reform of the economic and social council and to develop it into a body capable to enhance sustainable global development in a comprehensive and coordinated way; to promote the revitalisation of the work of the General Assembly, and improved coordination and coherence of the action of all UN institutions, which should enhance the efficiency, effectiveness, transparency, accountability, capacity and representativeness of the system; to support and build on the increased transparency in the process for the selection of the next UN Secretary- General, with candidates’ presentations being made in the General Assembly;
Amendment 246 #
2016/0379(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 17 – paragraph 4 – subparagraph 1
Article 17 – paragraph 4 – subparagraph 1
The seat of the Agency shall beis in Ljubljana, Slovenia.
Amendment 367 #
2016/0379(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 25 – paragraph 1 – point k
Article 25 – paragraph 1 – point k
(k) be responsible for deciding whether it is exceptionally necessary for the purpose of carrying out the Agency's tasks in an efficient and effective manner to locate one or more staff in one or more Member States for the purpose of carrying out the Agency's tasks in an efficient and effective manner. The decision to establish a local office requires the prior consent of the Commission, the Administrative Board, the Member State of the Seat and the Member State or Member States concerned. The decision shall specify the scope of the activities to be carried out at that local office in a manner that avoids unnecessary costs and duplication of administrative functions of the Agency and that fully respects Decision 2009/913/EU.
Amendment 82 #
2016/0378(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 37 a (new)
Recital 37 a (new)
(37a) Decision 2009/913/EU taken by common agreement between the representatives of the governments of Member States of 7 December 2009 on the location of the seat of the Agency for the Cooperation of Energy Regulators provides that the European Agency for the Cooperation of Energy Regulators shall have its seat in Ljubljana, Slovenia. The seat of the Agency is the centre of its activities and the statutory functions of the Agency. Thus, the meetings of the statutory organs should take place at the seat.
Amendment 84 #
2016/0378(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 38
Recital 38
(38) The Agency’s host Member State should provide the best possible conditions to ensure the smooth and efficient functioning of the Agency, including multilingual, European- oriented schooling and appropriate transport connectionsSeat Agreement between the Government of the Republic of Slovenia and the Agency for the Cooperation of Energy Regulators was concluded on 26 November 2010 and entered into force on 10 January 2011. It is considered that the Seat Agreement and other specific arrangements fulfil the requirements of Regulations (EU) No 713/2009 and 863/2016.
Amendment 14 #
2016/0279(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 4 a (new)
Recital 4 a (new)
(4 a) This Regulation should ensure that, in accordance with Article 9 of the Marrakesh Treaty, the contracting parties provide financial and personal resources to facilitate international cooperation between authorized entities, the adequate availability of accessible format copies and the cross-border exchange of these works.
Amendment 30 #
2016/0279(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 5 – paragraph 2 – point b a (new)
Article 5 – paragraph 2 – point b a (new)
(b a) a publicly accessible national database which lists all produced accessible format copies, as well as all imported accessible works and their sources of supply, in order to allow all concerned stakeholders to gain access to relevant information and prevent legal uncertainties;
Amendment 43 #
2016/0276(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 8 a (new)
Recital 8 a (new)
(8a) In addition, it is appropriate to reinforce the social dimension of the EFSI implementation such as education, training and vocational training for skills and lifelong learning, innovation in healthcare and medicines, social services, social housing and childcare.
Amendment 52 #
2016/0276(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 11
Recital 11
(11) In order to reinforce the take-up of the EFSI, particularly in European areas with high levels of unemployment and in less-developed and transition aregionas, the scope of the general objectives eligible for EFSI support should be enlarged.
Amendment 56 #
2016/0276(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 11 a (new)
Recital 11 a (new)
(11a) The initial results reveal that Member States with greater technical and administrative capacity as well as financial institutions are taking greater advantage of the EFSI. In order to enhance the capacity of some countries in taking advantage of the EFSI, the EIB and the Commission should work further to support those lagging behind.
Amendment 65 #
2016/0276(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 17 a (new)
Recital 17 a (new)
(17a) Major information campaigns in Member States must be put in place to strengthen dialogue with national and local authorities which would allow to increase private investment and avoid regional and sectorial concentration.
Amendment 68 #
2016/0276(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 18
Recital 18
(18) With a view to enhancing the transparency of EFSI operations, the Investment Committee should explain in its decisions, which are made public and accessible, the reasons why it deems that an operation should be granted the EU guarantee, with particular focus on compliance with the additionality criterion. The scoreboard of indicators should be made public once an operation under the EU guarantee is signed. Particular attention should be given to job creation and social investment in people's current and future capacities to engage in the labour market, using clear socio- economic indicators.
Amendment 82 #
2016/0276(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 1 – point b a (new)
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 1 – point b a (new)
Regulation (EU) 2015/1017
Article 4 – paragraph 2 – point f – point iv
Article 4 – paragraph 2 – point f – point iv
(ba) in point (f), point (iv) is replaced by the following: (iv) key performance indicators, in particular as regards the use of the EU guarantee, the fulfilment of the objectives and criteria laid down in Articles 6 and 9 and Annex II, the mobilisation of private capital, and the macro- economic impact of the EFSI, including its effect on supporting investment and job creation;
Amendment 91 #
2016/0276(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 4 – point a – point -i (new)
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 4 – point a – point -i (new)
Regulation (EU) 2015/1017
Article 7 – paragraph 8 – point a a (new)
Article 7 – paragraph 8 – point a a (new)
(-i) In Article 7(8), the following point is added: “(aa) public procurement;”
Amendment 92 #
2016/0276(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 4 – point a – point i a (new)
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 4 – point a – point i a (new)
Regulation (EU) 2015/1017
Article 7 – paragraph 8 – point f
Article 7 – paragraph 8 – point f
(f) education and traiia) point (f) is replaced by the following: (f) labour market, education and training, vocational training for skills and lifelong learning;
Amendment 96 #
2016/0276(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 5 – point - a (new)
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 5 – point - a (new)
Regulation (EU) 2015/1017
Article 9 – paragraph 2 – point g – point i
Article 9 – paragraph 2 – point g – point i
(i) education and training-a) in paragraph 2, point (g) point (i) is replaced by the following: (i) labour market, education and training, vocational training for skills and lifelong learning ;
Amendment 98 #
2016/0276(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 5 – point a
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 5 – point a
Regulation (EU) 2015/1017
Article 9 – paragraph 2 – point h a (new)
Article 9 – paragraph 2 – point h a (new)
(ha) technologies related to security and defence industries;
Amendment 100 #
2016/0276(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 5 – point a a (new)
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 5 – point a a (new)
Regulation (EU) 2015/1017
Article 9 – paragraph 2 – point i a (new)
Article 9 – paragraph 2 – point i a (new)
(aa) in paragraph 2, the following point is added: “(ia) provision of appropriate financing – long term loans and equity investment - from seed to expansion stages for social economy organizations, including social enterprises, to ensure long-term sustainability, and the usability for financial institutions/ intermediaries, addressing needs for specific groups, including elderly, long-term unemployed, young and migrants, with terms and conditions adopted to the social economy organizations, including the amount of investments adapted to social economy organizations (loans from 50.000 to 200.000 EUR);”
Amendment 101 #
2016/0276(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 5 – point a a (new)
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 5 – point a a (new)
Regulation (EU) 2015/1017
Article 9 – paragraph 2 – point i a (new)
Article 9 – paragraph 2 – point i a (new)
Amendment 122 #
2016/0276(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 9 – point b – point iii
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 9 – point b – point iii
Regulation (EU) 2015/1017
Article 14 – paragraph 2 – point f
Article 14 – paragraph 2 – point f
(f) providing advice on the combination of other sources of Union funding (such as the European Structural and Investment Funds, the Youth Guarantee and Youth Employment Initiative, Horizon 2020 and the Connecting Europe Facility) with the EFSI in order to avoid administrative burden.;
Amendment 32 #
2016/0265(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Annex I – paragraph 1 – point -1 (new)
Annex I – paragraph 1 – point -1 (new)
Regulation (EU) No 99/2013
Annex I – point I – point 1 – point 1.1 – paragraph 1
Annex I – point I – point 1 – point 1.1 – paragraph 1
(-1) In Point 1.1, the first paragraph is replaced by the following: “The endorsement of the Europe 2020 strategy by the European Council of June 2010 has shaped to a large extent the strategic agenda for the European Union and national policies in the years ahead. That agenda establishes a number of headline targets and flagship initiatives for which statistical indicators have to be delivered by the ESS in a number of areas (i.e. improving the conditions for innovation, research and development, promoting employment, meeting Union climate change and energy objectives, resource efficiency, improving education levels, including learning mobility, active and healthy ageing, and promoting social inclusion through the reduction of poverty).” with a focus on vulnerable groups).” Or. en (http://eur- lex.europa.eu/LexUriServ/LexUriServ.do?uri=OJ:L:2013:039:0012:0029:EN:PDF)
Amendment 36 #
2016/0265(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Annex I – paragraph 1 – point 1 – point a
Annex I – paragraph 1 – point 1 – point a
Regulation (EU) No 99/2013
Annex I – point I – point 1 – point 1.1 – point 1.1.1 – paragraph 1
Annex I – point I – point 1 – point 1.1 – point 1.1.1 – paragraph 1
Provide high-quality reliable statistical information, which shouldmust be available in a timely manner for the European Semester, to monitor the implementation of the Europe 2020 strategy. New indicators shall, to the extent possible, be based on available statistical data.
Amendment 39 #
2016/0265(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Annex I – paragraph 1 – point 1 – point a a (new)
Annex I – paragraph 1 – point 1 – point a a (new)
Regulation (EU) No 99/2013
Annex I – point I – point 1 – point 1.2 – paragraph 1
Annex I – point I – point 1 – point 1.2 – paragraph 1
(aa) In point 1.2., the first paragraph is replaced by the following: “The crisis and the tensions in the financial markets and the absence of a more integrated European institutional architecture have highlighted the need to strengthen the economic governance of the Union. DecisiveFurther steps in economic governance and coordination have alreadywill been taken by the Union, some of which will have major statistical implications, in addition to ongoing statistical activities.” Or. en (http://eur- lex.europa.eu/LexUriServ/LexUriServ.do?uri=OJ:L:2013:039:0012:0029:EN:PDF)
Amendment 41 #
2016/0265(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Annex I – paragraph 1 – point 1 – point b b (new)
Annex I – paragraph 1 – point 1 – point b b (new)
Regulation (EU) 0099/2013
Annex I – point I – point 1 – point 1.2 – point 1.2.1 – paragraph 2 – new indent
Annex I – point I – point 1 – point 1.2 – point 1.2.1 – paragraph 2 – new indent
(bb) In Objective 1.2.1., after the second paragraph, the following indent is inserted: - “ providing statistical input for efficiently monitoring the economic inequalities that hamper the economic growth”;
Amendment 43 #
2016/0265(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Annex I – paragraph 1 – point 1 – point b a (new)
Annex I – paragraph 1 – point 1 – point b a (new)
Regulation (EU) No 99/2013
Annex I – point I – point 1 – point 1.2 – point 1.2.1 – paragraph 2 – indent 3
Annex I – point I – point 1 – point 1.2 – point 1.2.1 – paragraph 2 – indent 3
Amendment 54 #
2016/0265(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Annex I – paragraph 1 – point 1 – point d a (new)
Annex I – paragraph 1 – point 1 – point d a (new)
Regulation (EU) No 99/2013
Annex I – point I – point 2 – point 2.1 – paragraph 1
Annex I – point I – point 2 – point 2.1 – paragraph 1
(da) in point 2.1., the first paragraph is replaced by the following: “The economic crisis has reinforced the need to have a set of high-quality macroeconomic indicators to better understand and analyse economic fluctuations, the evolution of the economic inequalities and their effects on society, and thereby facilitate the decision-making process. Increasingly globalised production makes it necessary to develop a consistent framework that facilitates the interpretation and integration of statistics from different domains.” Or. en (http://eur- lex.europa.eu/LexUriServ/LexUriServ.do?uri=OJ:L:2013:039:0012:0029:EN:PDF)
Amendment 5 #
2015/2351(INI)
Draft opinion
Paragraph 1
Paragraph 1
1. Notes the impact of the second cycle of the Youth Strategy (2013-2015) in providing a flexible framework for cross- sectoral involvement; values the structured dialogue with youth organisations in this regard; reminds of the eight fields of action promoted by the Youth Strategy;
Amendment 6 #
2015/2351(INI)
Draft opinion
Paragraph 2
Paragraph 2
2. Stresses the importance of the Youth Strategy, given the EU’s alarmingly's high youth unemployment and NEET rates; stresses that the next cycle (2016-2018) should contribute to the two objectives of the Youth Strategy by focusing on tackling youth unemployment, fostering entrepreneurship among young people, investing in education, and training andfor the skills employers look for, and facilitating the transition to the labour market;
Amendment 16 #
2015/2351(INI)
Draft opinion
Paragraph 2 a (new)
Paragraph 2 a (new)
2a. Notes that there has been a decrease in youth unemployment in most Member States since 2013, despite this fact, notes with real concern that youth unemployment continues to be almost double the overall unemployment rate with around 8 million young Europeans still being unemployed;
Amendment 29 #
2015/2351(INI)
Draft opinion
Paragraph 3
Paragraph 3
3. Stresses the need to combat early school-leaving by adequately informing students about future labour market opportunities and qualitative apprenticeshipcareer paths, including apprenticeships, technical and artisanal job profiles;
Amendment 52 #
2015/2351(INI)
Draft opinion
Paragraph 5
Paragraph 5
5. Recalls that employment and entrepreneurship constitute one of the eight priorities identified in the EU Youth Report (2010-2018); stresses that youth work and non-formal learning play a vital role in developing young people’s's creative and innovative potential, including entrepreneurial skills;
Amendment 60 #
2015/2351(INI)
Draft opinion
Paragraph 6
Paragraph 6
6. Urges the Member States to implement fully the Erasmus+ programme, thereby fostering further cross-border career and labour mobility; expresses concern that the mobility of apprentices has not yet achieved the desired levels and calls on the Commission, the Member States, companies and schools to find solutions to overcome the remaining obstacles to the mobility of apprentices;
Amendment 67 #
2015/2351(INI)
Draft opinion
Paragraph 7
Paragraph 7
7. Urges the Member States to implement fully the Youth Guarantee, by integrating young people into the labour market with a job, apprenticeship or traineeship within 4 months of leaving school or losing a job and for example by putting in place career guidance systems and compulsory registration forimproving the data available about the unemployed in order to gain a picture of the real situation as regards youth unemployment. as well as improving the services of job centres for young jobseekers;
Amendment 78 #
2015/2351(INI)
Draft opinion
Paragraph 7 a (new)
Paragraph 7 a (new)
7a. Welcomes the fact that more than EUR 12.4 billion from the European Social Fund (ESF) and the Youth Employment Initiative (YEI) have been earmarked for the fight against youth unemployment during the new programming period; calls for the assessment of the results and objectives achieved via such funding;
Amendment 82 #
2015/2351(INI)
Draft opinion
Paragraph 7 b (new)
Paragraph 7 b (new)
7b. Notes that the Court of Auditors' report on 'EU Youth Guarantee - Implementation in Member States', due to be completed at the beginning of 2017, will provide a clearer assessment of the programme's results; considers that, inter alia, analysis of the efficiency and the long-term results should be outlined in the report;
Amendment 16 #
2015/2342(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Recital A
Recital A
A. whereas human mobility is at an unprecedentedly high level, with 244 million international migrants, owing to various reasons, including the doubling of the world’s population since 1960; whereas international migration occurs primarily within the same region and between developing countries;
Amendment 63 #
2015/2342(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Recital E
Recital E
E. whereas vulnerable people, in particular women, but also children(unaccompanied) minors, people with disabilities, people in need of urgent medical treatment and the elderly, who are particularly exposed to all kinds of dangers, namely violence, trafficking and abuse, should be urgently protected and granted humanitarian protection as part of their resettlement;
Amendment 99 #
2015/2342(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Recital F a (new)
Recital F a (new)
Fa. whereas the ongoing food and nutrition crisis in the Sahel causes the erosion of people's resilience, aggravated by quick succession of crises, the absence of basic services and the conflicts in the region; whereas this situation will cause more migration;
Amendment 104 #
2015/2342(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Recital F b (new)
Recital F b (new)
Fb. whereas the conditions in "the Jungle" in Calais are inhuman, the camp is solely administered by volunteers and more than 1000 children are there trying to survive unaccompanied; whereas the French authorities threaten to break up the camp, while human traffickers are waiting to take abuse of the situation;
Amendment 108 #
2015/2342(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph -1 (new)
Paragraph -1 (new)
-1. Calls on the Council and Commission to take action on the scandalous situation in "the Jungle" in Calais; asks the Council to accommodate the refugees and asylum seekers from that camp in a human way; urges the Commission to come with an inclusive strategy for unaccompanied children including a EU-database of fingerprints, pictures and place of residence;
Amendment 131 #
2015/2342(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 1 a (new)
Paragraph 1 a (new)
1a. Urges the European Council to replace the Dublin Regulation with a European Asylum Procedure based on the UNHCR criteria; The European Asylum Procedure should replace the 28 national procedures;
Amendment 133 #
2015/2342(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 1 b (new)
Paragraph 1 b (new)
1b. Stresses that to take away the incentive to undertake the dangerous journey to Europe, refugees should be able to apply for a European humanitarian visa and asylum in the hot spots;
Amendment 134 #
2015/2342(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 1 c (new)
Paragraph 1 c (new)
1c. Calls for a fair distribution scheme of refugees between all Member States; considers that applications for asylum should be made to the EU and not to a specific member state; underlines that this should be based on a fair sharing of responsibility between Member States; stresses that the country of first arrival criteria should be removed from the Dublin regulation and replaced with a fair and mandatory distribution mechanism between Member States; indicates that this relocation mechanism should be based on objective criteria such as population, and GDP;
Amendment 135 #
2015/2342(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 1 d (new)
Paragraph 1 d (new)
1d. Urges the Commission and Council to establish a European Blue Card to manage economic migration for skilled and unskilled workers facilitated by the EURES network;
Amendment 185 #
2015/2342(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 4
Paragraph 4
4. Stresses that EU development cooperation should continue to address the root causes of forced displacement by promoting peace, democracy and security, reducing poverty and inequality, strengthening basic services, addressing state fragility and promoting human rights and good governance, in line with Sustainable Development Goal 16 in the new 2030 Agenda; calls therefor for the necessary analyses made per country of those root causes;
Amendment 456 #
2015/2342(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 16 a (new)
Paragraph 16 a (new)
16a. Urges the EU Council and Commission to engage with the US, Russia and the international community to develop a coherent strategy to defeat ISIS; stresses that this should be the start of a European Defence Union to protect Europe against future threats from other regional blocks or terrorists;
Amendment 9 #
2015/2324(INI)
Draft opinion
Recital B
Recital B
B. whereas specific answers need to be found to the problemchallenges of globalisation, the ageing population, ‘brain drain’demographic change, new migration trends, climate change, large-scale natural hazards, the energy challenge, seasonal fluctuations and multiple jobs;
Amendment 22 #
2015/2324(INI)
Draft opinion
Recital C
Recital C
C. whereas free movement of persons is a, reducing social inequalities, tackling social exclusion, solidarity and cultural openness are prerequisites to reaching the goals of economic, social, territorial and environmental cohesion in order to achieve strong and sustainable competitiveness and make equal access to employment possible;
Amendment 33 #
2015/2324(INI)
Draft opinion
Paragraph 1
Paragraph 1
1. Stresses the importance of increasing the economic potential of the strategic sectors of agriculture, forestry, tourism, energy, the bioeconomy, organic products, health and the latest technologies, and giving strong backing to SMEs with which research centres should form linkssocial support and healthcare, the digital and circular economy, and giving strong backing to SMEs with particular emphasis on instruments and programmes which promote a social and solidarity-based economy and social entrepreneurship;
Amendment 64 #
2015/2324(INI)
Draft opinion
Paragraph 5
Paragraph 5
5. Highlights the importance of access to a high speed Internet connection and to digital services, as means to foster job creation, increase workers´ productivity and earnings, and promote the social and economic inclusion of women and persons with disabilities.
Amendment 76 #
2015/2320(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 3 a (new)
Paragraph 3 a (new)
3 a. Believes that promoting digitalisation in public sector (e- government) and increasing broadband availability in remote areas would reduce establishing and operating costs to SMEs, therefore enabling them to further increase job creating potential;
Amendment 146 #
2015/2320(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 8 a (new)
Paragraph 8 a (new)
8 a. Underlines the need for targeted incentives for start-ups, SMEs, micro- enterprises in order to facilitate their establishment and operation, as well as the necessity to facilitate the hiring of qualified labour force and training of employees;
Amendment 169 #
2015/2320(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 10
Paragraph 10
10. Encourages the Member States, regional governments and educational institutions to create opportunities for young people to acquire entrepreneurship skills; also stresses the importance of mentoring for young entrepreneurs;
Amendment 175 #
2015/2320(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 11
Paragraph 11
11. Welcomes the ‘'Erasmus for Young Entrepreneurs’' programme, which helps provide aspiring European entrepreneurs with the skills necessary to start and/or successfully run a small business; and believes that such programmes should be further promoted in order to help more young people become established and succeed;
Amendment 198 #
Amendment 229 #
2015/2320(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 15
Paragraph 15
15. Takes the view that a stable and favourable regulatory environment is an essential prerequisite for job perennity and job creation in SMEs; considers that this regulatory certainty must encompass, among other elements, contract law and fiscal and social regulation, as well as tax rulings and also legal certainty and procedural effectiveness;
Amendment 65 #
2015/2274(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 4
Paragraph 4
4. Insists on the importance of developing the parliamentary dimension of EU-Iran relations as part of the strategy for re-establishing mutual trust; reiterates its support, in this regard, for the proposal discussed between Parliament and the Majlis for an inter-parliamentary dialogue on counter-terrorism; welcomes the renewed political dialogue between the EU and Iran, including on human rights; recognises that while there is suspicion and mistrust on both sides, there is also a long history between many Member States and Iran and that Iran has a strong ambition to have good relations with Europe, which provides the potential for a relationship based on mutual trust and respect; reiterates that the EU does not seek to interfere in internal political choices in this country or in any other, but seeks cooperation based on mutual respect for international standards and principles; believes that the full normalisation of relations can only occur by means of regular and sustained dialogue and that the immediate priority should be to broaden the scope of EU-Iran relations in areas where there is common agreement to do so; believes, however, that the ultimate aim must be one of partnership between Iran and the EU;
Amendment 83 #
2015/2274(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 5
Paragraph 5
Amendment 107 #
2015/2274(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 5 a (new)
Paragraph 5 a (new)
5a. Stresses that the cornerstone for EU relations is based on the respect for human rights and democratic principles;
Amendment 114 #
2015/2274(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 6
Paragraph 6
6. Takes note of the fact that eliminating the death penalty for drug- related offences would drastically reduce the number of executions (up to 80 % according to Iranian estimates); cCalls for EU-Iran cooperation in the fight against drugs as a way of addressing the issue of executions in the country; calls on the Commission to provide technical assistance and administrative capacity- building for Iran to enable it to secure its borders with Afghanistan and Iraq in its fight against drug trafficking;
Amendment 135 #
2015/2274(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 7
Paragraph 7
7. Calls on the EEAS to explore the possibility of establishing an institutional framework for cooperation with Iran, such as a Partnership and Cooperation Agreement (PCA) or a Framework Agreement.;
Amendment 181 #
2015/2274(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 10
Paragraph 10
10. Believes that the lifting of sanctions by the EU and the international community as laid down in the JCPOA is an important element in demonstrating European good faith towardsto impulse economic and social cooperation with Iran, as well as providing mutual economic benefit; calls for emphasis to be placed on the quality as well as on the quantity of investments, and for an initiative to assess whether new investments uphold the UN Guiding Principles on Business and Human Rights similar to that undertaken when sanctions were lifted in Myanmar/Burma;
Amendment 289 #
2015/2274(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 22
Paragraph 22
22. Believes EU-Iran political dialogue should call on Iran to play a constructive role in solving the political crises in Iraq, Yemen, Syria, Lebanon and Afghanistan, based on respect for international law and the sovereignty of these countries; calls, in this regard, for a model of EU diplomacy based on political rather than religious differences and on the principle of ensuring respect, safety and security for peoples in all countries in the Middle East, without exception;
Amendment 311 #
2015/2274(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 24
Paragraph 24
24. Welcomes Iran’s readiness to support the current efforts to bring stability to Iraq, and calls for additional efforts to bring all the militias operating in the country under the authority of the Iraqi army; welcomes Iran’s contribution to the fight against ISIS/Da’esh and recognizes its decisive contribution in Iraq, which halted ISIS/Da'esh's advance and recuperated territories subjected to jihadist terrorism; notes the agreement between Iran and Australia to share intelligence on the fight against ISIS/Da’esh;
Amendment 367 #
2015/2274(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 26 a (new)
Paragraph 26 a (new)
26a. Calls on the Iranian authorities for the release of all prisoners of conscience;
Amendment 381 #
2015/2274(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 27
Paragraph 27
27. Notes with concern that Iran has the highest level of death-penalty executions per capita in the world; stresses that eliminating the death penalty for drug- related offences would dramatically decrease the number of executions; welcomes, in this regard, the possibility that the newly-elected Majlis is considering legislation to exclude some drug-related offences from the list of crimes punishable with thurges Iran to eliminate death penalty;
Amendment 410 #
2015/2274(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 28
Paragraph 28
28. Welcomes the fact that the adoption of the 2013 Islamic Penal Code and Iran’s ratification of the UN Convention on the Rights of the Child prohibits child executions and allows all juvenile offenders sentenced to death prior to 2013 to seek retrial; calls on Iran to ensure this prohibition is fully implemented and that all relevant offenders are made aware of this right; calls on Iran to declare a moratorium on the death penalty, at least for juvenile offenders;
Amendment 431 #
2015/2274(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 29
Paragraph 29
29. Calls on Iran to live up fully to its commitments under the Constitution of the Islamic Republic of Iran, the International Covenant on Political and Civil Rights and the International Covenant on Economic, Social and Cultural Rights by ensuring the enjoyment by its citizens of individual rights without discrimination nor persecution as to sex, language, religion, political or other opinion, national or social origin, or other status, as provided for in these instruments; points out that this includes a basic right to equality before the law, as well as the right of equal access to education, health care and professional opportunities;
Amendment 460 #
2015/2274(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 30
Paragraph 30
30. Welcomes President Rohani’s campaign promise to present a charter for citizens’ rights; underlines the importance of respecting the rule of law and the independence of the judiciary in providing the necessary legal certainty required for foreign direct investments to take place, whilst respecting international human rights standards and norms; calls on the EEAS and the Commission to work together with the Iranian authorities in areas such as judicial reform, reform of the prison system, government accountability, respect for the rule of law, citizens’ rights and the fight against corruption; believes that these measures will increase legal certainty in Iran and the country’s attractiveness to foreign investors while also benefiting Iranian citizens.;
Amendment 15 #
2015/2273(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Citation 6 a (new)
Citation 6 a (new)
- having regard to the final report of the EU Electoral observation mission for the legislative and presidential elections in Tunisia in 2014;
Amendment 16 #
2015/2273(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Citation 6 b (new)
Citation 6 b (new)
- having regard to its resolution of March 10 2016, introducing emergency autonomous trade measures for Tunisia (COM(2015)0460 – C8-0273/2015 – 2015/0218(COD))
Amendment 38 #
2015/2273(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Recital B a (new)
Recital B a (new)
B a. whereas Tunisia has suffered several terrorist attacks in the last year; whereas Tunisia is an essential partner of the European Union in the fight against terrorism;
Amendment 90 #
2015/2273(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 6
Paragraph 6
6. Calls for the continuation of technical and capacity-building support for civil society groups, since these have proven to be of fundamental importance for democratic transition and overall development, government accountability, and monitoring of respect for human rights, including the protection of women; whereas civil society organisations have a crucial role to play in Tunisia;
Amendment 128 #
2015/2273(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 12 a (new)
Paragraph 12 a (new)
12 a. Whereas freedom of expression online and offline and freedom of assembly are indispensable pillars of a democratic and pluralistic society; whereas freedom of the press and media are vital elements for democracy and an open society;
Amendment 145 #
2015/2273(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 13 a (new)
Paragraph 13 a (new)
13 a. Welcomes the start of the negotiations on an ambitious Free Trade Agreement between the EU and Tunisia; underlines that international trade is essential for the Tunisian economic, social and political development and stability;
Amendment 147 #
2015/2273(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 14
Paragraph 14
14. CWelcomes the adoption of the emergency autonomous trade measures for the Republic of Tunisia as a concrete step to support the Tunisian economy; calls for an increase in EU aid to Tunisia through the ENI and for the coordination of international aid to Tunisia; encourages partnerships with other interested global and regional donor countries and organisations, and in particular, measures promoting investment in the manufacturing sector which would boost employment; notes that the tourism sector has been dramatically impacted by the attacks in 2014 and, considering the measures implemented since then by the Tunisian authorities, calls on the Member States to reassess the security situation as quickly as possible;
Amendment 229 #
2015/2273(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 28 a (new)
Paragraph 28 a (new)
28 a. Welcomes the enhanced political dialogue between the EU and Tunisia in the fight against terrorism; reminds the importance of protecting human rights in the context of counter-terrorism measures.
Amendment 74 #
2015/2258(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 6
Paragraph 6
6. Calls on the Member States and the Commission to take steps to combat all forms of discrimination, including multiple and intersectional discrimination based on disability, with special regard to women and children with disabilities, older persons and individuals who have complex support needs, including those with intellectual and psychosocial disabilities and to those whose disabilities change over time;
Amendment 81 #
2015/2258(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 6 a (new)
Paragraph 6 a (new)
6a. Regrets the fact that the Council has still not adopted the 2008 proposal for a directive on implementing the principle of equal treatment between persons irrespective of religion or belief, disability, age or sexual orientation; reiterates its call on the Council to do so as soon as possible;
Amendment 121 #
2015/2258(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 13
Paragraph 13
13. Urges the Member States to adopt quality frameworks for traineeships with a view to ensuring reasonable accommodation and accessibility for persons with disabilities and to ensure that all EU programmes such as the Youth Guarantee are fully accessible to persons with disabilities;
Amendment 154 #
2015/2258(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 17
Paragraph 17
17. Calls for the development of human rights-based indicators and comparable disaggregated disability data; underlines the need to disaggregate data on the basis of various factors including by gender, age and disability;
Amendment 156 #
2015/2258(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 17 a (new)
Paragraph 17 a (new)
17a. Calls on the Commission to fund research and data collection on violence, abuse and exploitation of all persons with all types of disabilities in the community and in institutions;
Amendment 12 #
2015/2228(INI)
Draft opinion
Paragraph 1
Paragraph 1
1. Considers that closing the gender pay gap requires increased transparency in pay systems, gender-neutral classification, a reversal of the onuenforcement of relevant EU legislation and a strong emphasis ofn proof when it comes to challenging gender discrimination in the workplace, and desegregation of the workforcolicies that promote the reconciliation of professional and family life;
Amendment 31 #
2015/2228(INI)
Draft opinion
Paragraph 2
Paragraph 2
2. Considers that efforts to close the gender pay gap will benefit from measures that improve conditions for all low- and medium-waged workers, including reversing the trend of declining labour income share and linking wage growth to productivity1 , increasing the minimum wage, reducing unemployment and, boosting collective bargaining rightsand facilitating care leave and ensuring that credits are part of any package on such leave; __________________ 1 International Labour Organisation, Global Wage Report 2012/13: Wages and equitable growth, 2013.
Amendment 39 #
2015/2228(INI)
Draft opinion
Paragraph 2 a (new)
Paragraph 2 a (new)
2a. Emphasises that employment is a key strategy for reduction of poverty among women; notes that proactive measures are needed to improve women's situation in the labour market, including elimination of gender stereotyping in employment through awareness-raising campaigns, proper counselling of women and girls on their professional choices, and policies to increase the number of women in responsible positions in companies and public institutions;
Amendment 40 #
2015/2228(INI)
Draft opinion
Paragraph 2 b (new)
Paragraph 2 b (new)
2b. Considers that the gender pay gap in pensions, which stands at 39%1a and is a determining factor of women's poverty risk in the EU, needs to be tackled by a wide range of comprehensive instruments for enabling gender equality within different sector policies, such as the adjustment of pension systems, education, career planning, parental leave system and other parenthood supporting services; __________________ 1aEuropean Parliament resolution of 9 September 2015 on the Report on the implementation, results and overall assessment of the 2012 European Year for Active Ageing and Solidarity between Generations (2014/2255(INI)); http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getD oc.do?pubRef=-//EP//TEXT+TA+P8-TA- 2015-0309+0+DOC+XML+V0//EN
Amendment 69 #
2015/2228(INI)
Draft opinion
Paragraph 4
Paragraph 4
4. Notes that the lack of affordable childccessible, affordable and quality childcare, disability and elderly support and care contributes to the gender employment gap, the pay gap and related pension gap, and the disproportionate number of women who are in precarious work and in or at risk of poverty; urges the Member States to ensure access to childcarethese services by, for example, increasingensuring adequate expenditure on the provision of childcareare and support services and/or subsidies to households, incentivising employer contributions to childcare costs, and making better use of EU funds;
Amendment 90 #
2015/2228(INI)
Draft opinion
Paragraph 5 a (new)
Paragraph 5 a (new)
5a. Believes that supporting women entrepreneurs through various EU programmes can play a role in generating employment and alleviating poverty.
Amendment 129 #
2015/2220(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 11
Paragraph 11
11. Urges the Council, the EEAS and the Commission to prioritise the promotion of democratic transformationand engage proactively with the promotion and reinforcement of democracy, thereby providing a stronger bulwark against internal political, security and economic pressures and challenges;
Amendment 134 #
2015/2220(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 12
Paragraph 12
12. Regrets that the legal obligations vested in the PCAs to uphold democracy and the rule of law have not been observed in most cases, stresses that, although the PCAs fundamentally focus on trade, the respect for human rights and democracy must be at the core of the European Union strategy vis-a-vis the scope of cooperation envisaged on Partnership and Cooperation Agreements (PCAs) entailing the absolute application of the human rights and democracy clause, with the exception of limited and fragile progress in Kyrgyzstan;
Amendment 142 #
2015/2220(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 13 a (new)
Paragraph 13 a (new)
13a. Deplores the ongoing Uzbek Government forced drafts of Uzbeks citizens, including the use of child labour, to work in abusive conditions in the cotton harvests, constraining the basic personal free will and freedoms;
Amendment 193 #
2015/2220(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 20 a (new)
Paragraph 20 a (new)
20a. Considers education a crucial integrational pillar and a democratic, economic and social development enabler for all countries of Central Asia; urges the European Union, within the scope of the existing PCAs, to launch or reinforce educational programmes, as Erasmus +, that will promote a positive mobility to all EU and Central Asian students;
Amendment 243 #
2015/2220(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 24
Paragraph 24
24. Notes with concern that in addition to increasing climate change impacts, multiple alarming environmental challenges inherited from the Soviet period persist, such as those relating to an unmonitored and ongoing nuclear contamination in the past decades, and the urgent action of cleaning up nuclear testing sites, industrial and mining activities, unsustainable exploitation of natural resources, land degradation, air pollution, desertification, and, above all, continued catastrophic water mismanagement; urges the Commission, in this respect, to step up technical assistance and provide European know-how and best practice as to how to deal with these problems;
Amendment 300 #
2015/2220(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 28
Paragraph 28
28. Supports the EU’s long-term goal of transforming the nascent EU-Central Asia High Level Security Dialogue into a genuine cooperative forum aimed at cooperation in addressing common security challenges; highlights the importance and positive impact of regional cooperation programs as the Border Management Programme in Central Asia (BOMCA) and the Central Asia Drug Action Programme (CADAP);
Amendment 1 #
2015/2205(DEC)
Draft opinion
Paragraph 2
Paragraph 2
2. Reaffirms that the discussion of the draft annual work programmes and the multiannual strategies of the agencies in the committees responsible helps to ensure that the programmes and strategies reflect the actual political priorities but stresses the need to align the EU budgetary cycle with the EU 2020 Strategy in order to be able to fully monitor and comprehensively report on the performance of each of the agencies in the context of their contribution to achieving EU 2020 objectives;
Amendment 1 #
2015/2173(DEC)
Draft opinion
Paragraph 1
Paragraph 1
1. Expresses its satisfaction that the Court of Auditors has declared the transactions underlying the Foundation’s annual accounts for the financial year 2014 to be legal and regular in all material respects and that its financial position as of 31 December 2014 is fairly represented;
Amendment 2 #
2015/2173(DEC)
Draft opinion
Paragraph 4
Paragraph 4
4. NotesWelcomes the fact that in response to comments from the discharge authority, the Foundation participated in 2014 in a joint procurement procedure for banking services launched by the Commission in order to ensure the security of its assets which were beforepreviously kept in a single bank with a low credit rating;
Amendment 3 #
2015/2173(DEC)
Draft opinion
Paragraph 4 a (new)
Paragraph 4 a (new)
4 a. Notes the increasing number of requests for ETF support to EU external relations assistance from 78 in 2013 to 82 in 2014 and believes this underlines its relevance in supporting the role of the EU as a global actor in this field;
Amendment 1 #
2015/2169(DEC)
Draft opinion
Paragraph 1
Paragraph 1
1. Expresses its satisfaction that the Court of Auditors has declared the transactions underlying the Agency’s annual account for the financial year 2014 to be legal and regular in all material respects and that its financial position as of 31 December 2013 is fairly represented;
Amendment 4 #
2015/2169(DEC)
Draft opinion
Paragraph 4 a (new)
Paragraph 4 a (new)
4 a. Commends the work of the agency in developing an online interactive risk assessment tool and its efforts through the Healthy Workplaces Campaign to strengthen risk prevention and promote sustainable and healthy workplaces;
Amendment 1 #
2015/2165(DEC)
Draft opinion
Paragraph 1
Paragraph 1
1. Expresses its satisfaction that the Court of Auditors has declared the transactions underlying Eurofound´s annual accounts for the financial year 2014 to be legal and regular in all material respects and that its financial position as of 31 December 2014 is fairly represented;
Amendment 2 #
2015/2165(DEC)
Draft opinion
Paragraph 2
Paragraph 2
2. Welcomes the successful implementation of Eurofound’s programme; praises the important work performed on the three European surveys: the European Quality of Life Survey, the European Working Conditions Survey and the European Company Survey; notes that Eurofound continued to focus its research on youth unemployment and appreciates its contribution to assessing the impact of the crisis on working and living conditions;
Amendment 1 #
2015/2164(DEC)
Draft opinion
Paragraph 1
Paragraph 1
1. Expresses its satisfaction that the Court of Auditors has declared the transactions underlying the Centre’s annual accounts for the financial year 2014 to be legal and regular in all material respects and that its financial position as of 31 December 2014 is fairly represented;
Amendment 2 #
2015/2164(DEC)
Draft opinion
Paragraph 3
Paragraph 3
3. Appreciates that the Centre focused its activity on contributing to and supporting policies addressing youth unemployment; commends particularly the Centre's skills forecasts and analyses as well as the work focusing on developing apprenticeships; furthermore notes that the detailed country fiches on vocational education and training policies in all Member States informed the Country Specific Recommendations of the European Semester;
Amendment 5 #
2015/2164(DEC)
Draft opinion
Paragraph 3 a (new)
Paragraph 3 a (new)
3 a. Welcomes the fact that visits to the Europass website managed by Centre and available in 27 languages reached 21.7 million users in 2014 an increase of 8% on the 2013 figures;
Amendment 3 #
2015/2154(DEC)
Draft opinion
Paragraph 3
Paragraph 3
3. Welcomes furthermore the Court’'s recommendations that the Europe2020 strategy and the MFF need to be better aligned, the high-level political aims need to be translated into useful operational targets, and the focus on results should be reinforcedstresses the importance of focussing on performance and results as well as on added value, particularly in the cases of the employment and social headline targets, where the Commission does not have the competence to create a legally binding framework;
Amendment 8 #
2015/2154(DEC)
Draft opinion
Paragraph 4
Paragraph 4
4. Notes the Court’s observations about the increased risk of irregularities in cases of small and medium-sized enterprises (SMEs) participating in Horizon 2020; supports the Commission’s reply that SMEs' involvement in the programme is crucial for the creation of growth and jobs and welcomes that the administrative rules for SMEs have been simplified, stresses the importance of creation of sustainable jobs through SMEs;
Amendment 11 #
2015/2154(DEC)
Draft opinion
Paragraph 5
Paragraph 5
5. Expresses its regretNotes that the intangible nature of investments in human capital, the diversity of the activities and the involvement of multiple, often small-scale partners in the implementation of projects continue to be the main risks to regularity of spending of European Social Fund (ESF) expenditure; calls on the Commission to continue with specific mitigating actions, including both preventative and corrective measures;
Amendment 15 #
2015/2154(DEC)
Draft opinion
Paragraph 6
Paragraph 6
6. Considers that the promotion of broader use of simplified cost options can lead to the reduction of the administrative burden on the beneficiaries, to fewer errors and more orientation on performance and results;
Amendment 19 #
2015/2154(DEC)
Draft opinion
Paragraph 7
Paragraph 7
7. Expresses its concerns about the fact that out of 1708 transactions examined by the Court in the employment and social affairs policy area 602 (354.8 %) were affected by error, out of which 12 were quantifiable errors exceeding 20% (6.7%); urges the Commission to implement corrective measures and apply strict procedures to reduce the risk of irregularities in this policy area as well as to follow up the cases of ineligible expenditure identified by the Court;
Amendment 20 #
2015/2154(DEC)
Draft opinion
Paragraph 7
Paragraph 7
7. Expresses its concerns about the fact that out of 170 transactions examined by the Court in the employment and social affairs policy area 60 (35 %) were affected by error; urges the Commission to implement corrective measures and apply strict procedures to reduce the risk of irregularities in this policy area as well as to follow up the cases of ineligible expenditure identified by the Court; notes in particular that if Member States or independent auditors had made use of all the information available to them, a significant proportion of the errors could have been prevented, detected or corrected;
Amendment 24 #
2015/2154(DEC)
Draft opinion
Paragraph 8
Paragraph 8
8. Calls on the Commission to follow the Court’s recommendations in order to ensure that the implementafurther increase the contribution of the Union budget contributes to the achievement of the employment and social headline targets of the Europe 2020 strategy.
Amendment 4 #
2015/2107(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Citation 15
Citation 15
– having regard to the ‘EUROPE 2020 – A strategy for smart, sustainable and inclusive growth' (COM(2010)2020), and to its main objective which is to increase employment levels to 75% by the end of the decade in the European Union, including the greater involvement of women, older workers and better integration of migrants in the work force,
Amendment 5 #
2015/2107(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Citation 15
Citation 15
– having regard to the ‘EUROPE 2020 – A strategy for smart, sustainable and inclusive growth' (COM(2010)2020), and to its main objective which is to increase employment levels to 75% by the end of the decade in the European Union, including through the greater involvement of women, older workers and better integration of migrants in the workforce;
Amendment 7 #
2015/2107(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Citation 15 a (new)
Citation 15 a (new)
- having regard to the Communication of the European Commission 'Taking stock of the Europe 2020 Strategy for Smart, Sustainable and Inclusive Growth' (COM(2014) 130 final/2),
Amendment 8 #
2015/2107(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Citation 15 a (new)
Citation 15 a (new)
- having regard to the Communication of the European Commission 'Taking stock of the Europe 2020 Strategy for Smart, Sustainable and Inclusive Growth' (COM(2014) 130 final/2),
Amendment 9 #
2015/2107(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Citation 15 b (new)
Citation 15 b (new)
- having regard to the 2015 Annual Growth Survey (COM(2014) 902 final) and Joint Employment Report (COM(2014) 906 final),
Amendment 10 #
2015/2107(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Citation 15 b (new)
Citation 15 b (new)
- having regard to the European Commission's White paper 'An Agenda for Adequate, Safe and Sustainable Pensions' (COM(2012) 55 final),
Amendment 11 #
2015/2107(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Citation 15 c (new)
Citation 15 c (new)
- having regard to the European Commission's White paper 'An Agenda for Adequate, Safe and Sustainable Pensions' (COM(2012) 55 final),
Amendment 19 #
2015/2107(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Citation 25 a (new)
Citation 25 a (new)
- having regard to the EU Joint Action on Mental Health and Well-being,
Amendment 22 #
2015/2107(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Citation 25 b (new)
Citation 25 b (new)
- having regard to the EU-OSHA Agency 's current campaign entitled "Healthy Workplaces Manage Stress",
Amendment 31 #
2015/2107(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Recital A a (new)
Recital A a (new)
Aa. Whereas health and safety at work promotes growth, competitiveness, productivity and improves the sustainability of the social security systems;
Amendment 35 #
2015/2107(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Recital A b (new)
Recital A b (new)
Ab. whereas demographic ageing is one of the main challenges of the EU Member States' social policies;
Amendment 64 #
2015/2107(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Recital D a (new)
Recital D a (new)
Da. whereas reforms to secure the sustainability of the pension systems throughout Europe require, among other factors, older workers to stay longer in the labour market;
Amendment 67 #
2015/2107(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Recital D b (new)
Recital D b (new)
Db. whereas a strong and enforced framework on health and safety at work is an important element of safeguarding workers' health and productivity benefiting employees, employers and society as a whole;
Amendment 74 #
2015/2107(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Recital D c (new)
Recital D c (new)
Dc. whereas very little progress has been made towards the Europe 2020 target of 75% employment for 20-64 year olds, including vulnerable groups; whereas an additional 1.8 million workers have lost their jobs since 2010;
Amendment 78 #
2015/2107(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Recital D d (new)
Recital D d (new)
Dd. whereas the indicator on healthy life years has been regressing by 1.1 years for women and by 0.4 years for men between 2010 and 2013;
Amendment 113 #
2015/2107(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 2
Paragraph 2
2. Welcomes that many important fields of action are identified in the EU OSH strategic framework; stresses, in this context, that more concrete legislative measures shoulda stronger focus on implementation and enforcement of the existing rules, as well as the development of non-legislative tools must be included in the framework, following the 2016- review;
Amendment 124 #
2015/2107(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 3
Paragraph 3
3. Calls on the Commission to define and apply quantitative reduction targets at EU level for occupational diseases and accidents at workvelop guidance, encourage the exchange of good practices and to carry out awareness raising campaigns on implementing OSH policies following the 2016- review of the OSH strategic framework and to rely on the latest research findings when reviewing the framework;
Amendment 154 #
2015/2107(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 5 a (new)
Paragraph 5 a (new)
5a. Stresses the importance of occupational health and safety measures to target the specific challenges of women in the workplace; calls upon the Commission and Member States to collect data and provide research on how to best address the specific health and safety situation of women;
Amendment 159 #
2015/2107(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 6
Paragraph 6
6. Calls on the Member States and the Commission to ensure that national OSH strategies are fully transparent and open to input from social partners and civil society;
Amendment 169 #
2015/2107(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 7
Paragraph 7
7. Urges theEncourages Member States to incorporate quantitative and measurable targets into their national strategies;
Amendment 180 #
2015/2107(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 7 a (new)
Paragraph 7 a (new)
7a. Encourages Member States to set up contact points, exchange good practices and share experiences in implementing national OSH strategies, thus promoting mutual learning
Amendment 186 #
2015/2107(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 8
Paragraph 8
8. Acknowledges the importance of taking into account the situation, specific needs and lack of compliance by micro and small enterprises in the implementation of OSH measures at company level; encouragesmicro, small and medium enterprises, which create 85% of European jobs; stresses that the lack of awareness, absence of guidance, relative higher costs of compliance lead to a deficient enforcement of regulatory requirements by MSMEs; outlines that awareness raising, exchange of good practices, user friendly guides and online platforms are of outmost use and importance to help micro, small and medium enterprises comply with OSH regulatory framework; encourages, in this context, the Commission, EU-OSHA and the Member States to continue developing practical tools and guidelines, which improve the compliance of SMEs with OSH requirements;
Amendment 217 #
2015/2107(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 10
Paragraph 10
10. Points out that a precondition for good OSH management and performance is documented risk assessment, which allows for appropriate preventive measures to be put in place; welcomes, in this context, the online platform OiRA, which allows to build easy-to-use and cost-free online tools that can help micro and small organisations to put in place a step-by- step risk assessment process;
Amendment 242 #
2015/2107(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 12 a (new)
Paragraph 12 a (new)
12a. Notes that although the key drivers in a majority of companies for implementing OSH measures are the legal obligations, non-legislative tools should be more broadly used (i.e. awareness raising campaigns, setting voluntary norms, the use of online tools) to help companies understand and comply with the OSH legislation;
Amendment 250 #
2015/2107(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 13
Paragraph 13
13. Welcomes efforts to improve the quality of the regulatory frameworkand to reduce the administrative burden of the implementation of the regulatory framework; outlines that the existing rules should be improved and simplified, especially by avoiding overlapping, while preserving the high standard of workers' health and safety; reminds the Commission, however, that the submission of OSH directives to the REFIT exercise and modifications of legislation should be transparent, involve social partners and must under no circumstances result in reductions in occupational health and safety;
Amendment 270 #
2015/2107(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 14 a (new)
Paragraph 14 a (new)
14a. highlights the importance of national enforcement authorities to communicate and work with companies, particularly SMEs and micro-enterprises, to convey the benefits and implementation of occupational health and safety policies;
Amendment 282 #
2015/2107(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 16
Paragraph 16
16. Calls on the Commission to take action on one of the most prevalent work- related health problems in Europe and submit a proposal for a comprehensive directive on musculoskeletal disorders (MSDs) to improve effective prevention and address the causes of MSDs; pPoints out that integrating provisions of existing directives into a comprehensive directiveframework laying down minimum requirements for protecting workers from exposure to ergonomic risk factors can benefit both workers and employers;
Amendment 293 #
2015/2107(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 16 a (new)
Paragraph 16 a (new)
16a. Draws the attention of the Commission to the increased number of those affected by chronic conditions/diseases in the workforce and the need to encourage and support employers to make reasonable accommodations to their working environments to prevent the exacerbation of these conditions and to provide opportunities for supported self- management;
Amendment 302 #
2015/2107(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 17 a (new)
Paragraph 17 a (new)
17a. Welcomes the focus of the Strategic Framework on health and safety at work on psycho-social risks at work, such as depression, stress, workplace bullying and discrimination; Calls on the Commission and Member States to develop guidelines on the prevention of psycho-social risks;
Amendment 309 #
2015/2107(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 18
Paragraph 18
18. Calls on the Commission and the Member States to develop and implement a programme for systematic monitoring of psychosocial risks, including stressystematically monitor and gather comprehensive data regarding the psychosocial risks, including stress, in order to elaborate efficient recommendations to fight these risks; outlines, at the same time, that mental health and psychosocial risks can be influenced by many factors, not all of the arising from work-related activities or environment; calls on the employers to make efforts to find the balance between workers' capacity and job design, in order to diminish these risks;
Amendment 332 #
2015/2107(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 19
Paragraph 19
19. Calls on the Commission to adopt a targeted approach to improve the health and safety situation of workers in precariouslog-term unemployment and involuntary part-time employment and to take into account the negative effects that precarious employmenit has on occupational health and safety when addressing this issue in general;
Amendment 346 #
2015/2107(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 20 a (new)
Paragraph 20 a (new)
20a. Points out the importance of psychosocial risk factors, which are a growing problem for employers and employees across Europe and are perceived to be highly challenging; emphasizes the need to put in place initiatives, including better monitoring, to improve the psychosocial working environment for workers; thereby reducing absenteeism and presenteeism;
Amendment 348 #
2015/2107(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 20 a (new)
Paragraph 20 a (new)
20a. Stresses the importance of occupational health and safety measures to target the specific challenges and risks of women in the workplace, which result from the nature of some jobs where they are over-represented;
Amendment 352 #
2015/2107(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 20 b (new)
Paragraph 20 b (new)
20b. Urges employers to facilitate a sound work-life balance, taking into account the growing number of employees that need to combine work and care, in this context believes that special measures e.g. care leave etc. are required to ensure the physical and mental health of these carers;
Amendment 353 #
2015/2107(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 20 b (new)
Paragraph 20 b (new)
20b. Points out that due to the demographic challenge of ageing, the extension of working life becomes necessary; outlines that OSH regulatory framework should boost the sustainability of working life and healthy ageing by encouraging flexibility of the work place and organisation, inter alia, by promoting accessible working time and adaptability to the changing capabilities of workers because of ageing;
Amendment 354 #
2015/2107(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 20 c (new)
Paragraph 20 c (new)
20c. Calls on the Commission to promote integration and rehabilitation measures for people with disabilities;
Amendment 363 #
2015/2107(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 21 a (new)
Paragraph 21 a (new)
21a. Calls on the Commission and Member States to collect gender and age- specific high-quality statistical data on work-related diseases in order to constantly improve and adapt, where needed, the legislative framework, in accordance to the new and emerging risks;
Amendment 371 #
2015/2107(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 22 a (new)
Paragraph 22 a (new)
22a. In the context of the Second European Survey of Enterprises on New and Emerging Risks ( ESENER-2) by the EU-OSHA, calls on the Commission to come forward with proposals on musculoskeletal disorders;
Amendment 8 #
2015/2097(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Citation 11 a (new)
Citation 11 a (new)
- having regard to the Eurofound report 'Maternity leave provisions in the EU Member States: Duration and allowances' (July 2015);
Amendment 22 #
2015/2097(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Recital A a (new)
Recital A a (new)
Aa. whereas the connection between reconciliation of professional and family life and the principle of gender equality in employment is now established in EU legislation;
Amendment 27 #
2015/2097(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Recital B a (new)
Recital B a (new)
Ba. whereas Directive 92/85/EEC grants rights to women workers during pregnancy, immediately after giving birth and while breastfeeding, Directive 96/34/EC recognises the reconciliation between professional and family life as a separate topic while Directive 2010/18/EU stipulates that all employees have a right to four months unpaid parental leave while one of those months must be granted on a non-transferable basis thus ensuring that reconciliation of professional and family life involves both men and women;
Amendment 32 #
2015/2097(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Recital C a (new)
Recital C a (new)
Ca. whereas Eurofound studies have illustrated aspects that influence fathers' take-up rate of parental leave which include the level of compensation, the flexibility of the leave system, the availability of information, availability and flexibility of childcare facilities and the extent to which workers fear isolation from the labour market when taking leave. Therefore these issues need to be addressed;
Amendment 42 #
2015/2097(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Recital D a (new)
Recital D a (new)
Da. Notes that where there are no provisions for leave, or where existing ones are considered insufficient, social partners, through collective agreements, may have an important role to play in establishing new provisions or updating current ones for maternity, paternity and parental leave;
Amendment 46 #
2015/2097(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Recital D b (new)
Recital D b (new)
Db. whereas most EU Member States already comply with the minimum requirements of the Parental Leave Directive 2010/18/EU and in many Member States national provisions go beyond these requirements;
Amendment 49 #
2015/2097(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 1
Paragraph 1
1. Stresses that the provisions necessary for the transposition of Directive 2013/62/EU take different forms in the various Member States; believes that the transposition should therefore comply fully with legislation and usages in force in the area of collective bargaining between social partners;
Amendment 51 #
2015/2097(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 1 a (new)
Paragraph 1 a (new)
1a. Believes that since not all Member States have followed the EU separate or sequential approach to maternity and parental leaves classifying the different types of leave at an EU level is problematic;
Amendment 142 #
2015/2097(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 12
Paragraph 12
12. Calls on the Member States to introduce financial compensation for parental leave with a view to reaching a level that would act as an incentive for income replacement, over the minimum time period guaranteed by the directive, based on the average EU maternity leave income replacement rate, in order to safeguard families’ social and economic wellbeingin order to facilitate reconciliation between work and family life;
Amendment 148 #
2015/2097(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 12 a (new)
Paragraph 12 a (new)
12a. Believes that the promotion of individualisation of the right to leave and of positive action aiming at the promotion of the role of fathers is essential in helping to achieve gender balanced reconciliation of work and family life;
Amendment 189 #
2015/2097(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 16 a (new)
Paragraph 16 a (new)
16a. Believes that an integrated approach to gender equality and the reconciliation of work and family life in future EU legislation would bring coherence and transparency to the process and would help ensure the promotion of gender- balanced reconciliation of work and family life;
Amendment 3 #
2015/2096(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Citation 19 a (new)
Citation 19 a (new)
- having regard to its resolution of 11 December 2012 on a Digital Freedom Strategy in EU Foreign Policy9 a, __________________ 9a Texts adopted, P7_TA(2012)0470.
Amendment 4 #
2015/2096(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Citation 19 b (new)
Citation 19 b (new)
- having regard to its resolution of 20 May 2013 on the Freedom of Press and Media in the World10 a, __________________ 10 a Texts adopted, PE 506.205v02-00.
Amendment 5 #
2015/2096(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Citation 19 c (new)
Citation 19 c (new)
- having regard to the EU Human Rights Guidelines on Freedom of Expression Online and Offline, adopted at the EU Foreign Affairs Council on 12 May 2014,
Amendment 6 #
2015/2096(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Citation 19 d (new)
Citation 19 d (new)
- having regard to its resolution of 8 September 2015 on Human rights and technology: the impact of intrusion and surveillance systems on human rights in third countries11 a, __________________ 11 a Texts adopted, P8_TA- PROV(2015)0288.
Amendment 17 #
2015/2096(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Recital F
Recital F
F. whereas Article 1(1) of the Framework Agreement confirms the commitment to the general principles of international law and lays down ‘respect for democratic principles and human rights' as an essential element of the agreement and binds both parties to strive for a high standard of rule of law and respect for fundamental right, underpinning the internal and international policies of both Parties;
Amendment 19 #
2015/2096(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Recital G
Recital G
G. whereas restrictions in Vietnam on freedom of expression, both online and offline, freedom of the press and media, access to information, freedom of assembly and association as well as freedom of religion, as reported by the UN Special Rapporteur on Freedom of Religion or Belief, remain a serious concern;
Amendment 37 #
2015/2096(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 1 a (new)
Paragraph 1 a (new)
1a. Underlines that the Partnership and C-Operation Agreement defines the future relations in a broad spectrum, to further enhance the co-operation on global and regional challenges, such as good governance and the fight against corruption, economic and social progress taking into account the principle of sustainable development, disarmament and weapons of mass destruction, the fight against terrorism;
Amendment 38 #
2015/2096(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 1 a (new)
Paragraph 1 a (new)
1a. Calls upon the Vietnamese Government to honour its commitments in the World Trade Organisation, and the full implementation of all relevant WTO- rules in this regard;
Amendment 39 #
2015/2096(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 1 a (new)
Paragraph 1 a (new)
1a. Welcomes the agreement in principle reached on the Free Trade Agreement between the EU and Vietnam, which shows both sides commitment to strengthening trade, which leads to jobs and growth;
Amendment 41 #
2015/2096(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 1 b (new)
Paragraph 1 b (new)
1b. Urges both the EU and Vietnam to work towards a speedy and satisfactory full conclusion of the bilateral FTA negotiations, as well as the Trade in Services Agreement and continuing cooperation in the context of the recently concluded Information Technology Agreement and the World Trade Organisation; calls on both partners to look for possibilities for Vietnam to join the negotiations on the Environmental Goods Agreement, or to accede to the agreement once it is concluded;
Amendment 42 #
2015/2096(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 1 b (new)
Paragraph 1 b (new)
1b. Calls upon the EU Member States, in an effort to achieve policy coherence, to align their individual goals of their respective development co-operation as much as possible with the goals set out in the Partnership and Co-Operation Agreement;
Amendment 43 #
2015/2096(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 1 c (new)
Paragraph 1 c (new)
1c. Welcomes as well the near doubling since 2010 of the Vietnamese GDP/capita, as well as the Vietnamese exports and notes their high share in the total Vietnamese GDP, and encourages in this regard the full and swift implementation of all international trade related chapters in the Agreement and the Free Trade Agreement, to support the further growth of the Vietnamese economy to the benefit of it's citizens;
Amendment 45 #
2015/2096(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 1 d (new)
Paragraph 1 d (new)
1d. Welcomes the early implementation of the Partnership and Co-operation Agreement, while the ratification process is ongoing, in the fields of trade, human rights, migration, regional security, energy, science and technology;
Amendment 46 #
2015/2096(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 1 e (new)
Paragraph 1 e (new)
1e. Stresses the importance of establishing clear benchmarks and binding deadlines for the implementation of the Agreement;
Amendment 48 #
2015/2096(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 2
Paragraph 2
2. EWelcomes the articles in the draft agreement which refer to joint commitment and cooperation on human rights; expresses its hope that the mutually agreed respect for democratic principles and human rights will further enhance the longstanding dialogue with the Vietnamese Government on promoting notably freedom of expression, assembly, association and religion as enshrined in the Constitution;
Amendment 50 #
2015/2096(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 2 a (new)
Paragraph 2 a (new)
2a. Stresses the enabling, creating and catalysing potential of the open internet and ICTs for community-building, civil society, and global economic, social, scientific, cultural and political development; emphasises therefore the importance of unrestricted access to the free and open internet, both from an economic, social and human rights perspective;
Amendment 57 #
2015/2096(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 4
Paragraph 4
4. Encourages the EU to continue Vietnam's capacity development in promoting respect for good governance and rule of law and welcomes the focus of EU cooperation on inter alia reforms of public administration, science and technology, transport, and urban and regional planning and development;
Amendment 63 #
2015/2096(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 5 a (new)
Paragraph 5 a (new)
5a. Calls on the EU and Vietnam to work towards creating an instrument to monitor developments regarding human rights in the context of the negotiations on the FTA, building on previous EU trade agreements with third countries which contained such an instrument;
Amendment 67 #
2015/2096(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 6
Paragraph 6
6. Calls on the EU to ensure that the policies the EU and its Member States pursue in the context of the implementation of the PCA and the future FTA with Vietnam help advance the respect for human rights, rule of law and good governance; suggestsand calls for capacity building efforts to enhance the setting uplement of a complaint mechanism that can be useds by affected individuals and communities; in the context of Titel VI, art 35 of the Partnership and Co-operation Agreement;
Amendment 72 #
2015/2096(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 7
Paragraph 7
Amendment 15 #
2015/2095(INI)
Draft opinion
Paragraph 1 a (new)
Paragraph 1 a (new)
1a. Recalls that millions of people are living in miserable conditions in the refugee camps in Lebanon, Jordan, Turkey and elsewhere and that a large share of the people trying to migrate to Europe are coming from these camps; considers that the improvement of conditions in refugee camps could play a major role in stemming the tide of migration;
Amendment 21 #
2015/2095(INI)
Draft opinion
Paragraph 1 b (new)
Paragraph 1 b (new)
1b. Recalls that the root causes of migration must be tackled effectively by improving the living conditions in the countries where people are leaving from in order to find a better life in Europe; recalls that the most important task is to work for peaceful settlement of the armed conflicts in Africa and in the Middle East;
Amendment 23 #
2015/2095(INI)
Draft opinion
Paragraph 1 c (new)
Paragraph 1 c (new)
1c. Is of the opinion that new high-level refugee camps should be established in Northern Africa and in the Balkans in cooperation with the countries concerned and the UNHCR; considers that in these camps the UNHCR experts should study individually the right for asylum and those who are accepted as refugees should be received by the Member States inside their national refugee quotas; others could be admitted ‘green cards’ in order to work in the Member States; insists that all Member States should have a national UNHCR quota and receive refugees within this quota;
Amendment 24 #
2015/2095(INI)
Draft opinion
Paragraph 1 d (new)
Paragraph 1 d (new)
1d. Calls on the Commission and the Council to invite the United States, as a part of our transatlantic development policy cooperation, to work with us to stem the tide of migration through intensified development cooperation in Africa and in the Middle East and through effective assistance to the millions of people living in the refugee camps;
Amendment 45 #
2015/2095(INI)
Draft opinion
Paragraph 2
Paragraph 2
2. Stresses that the persistent instability and conflicts in the EU’s neighbourhood have a serious impact on the mass influx of migrants; believes that a genuine response to the migration crisis in the Mediterranean will come only from tackling the root causes, namely poverty, instability, wars, persecution, violations of human rights and natural disasters; Believes, therefore, that a three-pronged response should be established: (a) With regard to persons persecuted for political or social reasons, violations of human rights and natural disastthe relevant protocols on the reception of refugees should be applied through the allocation of ‘solidarity quotas’ within the EU. This means that all asylum seekers will be identified and registered in the country of first entry, and the current practice of refugees requesting asylum in their country of interest (generally Germany or Sweden) will not be permitted. (b) With regard to migratory flows arising from conflicts (e.g. in Syria, Libya and Iraq), the main factor is that the persons concerned are, owing to the nature of the conflict, ‘temporary refugees’ whose future should lie in their country of origin, to which they will return when circumstances permit (end of the conflict, security in their home country). This means that refugee camps with stable living conditions (in terms of sanitation, education, etc.) need to be constructed in neighbouring countries. At the same time, asylum applications should not be accepted from persons coming from countries in which conflicts are only localised (e.g. Nigeria and Mali). (c) With regard to economic migrants, such persons should be returned to their country of origin and the EU’s economic relations with those countries pegged to the logical requirement that they take back their own nationals. It must not be possible for persons entering the EU by legal means to find themselves in the same situation as persons who have done so by violating its borders;
Amendment 68 #
2015/2095(INI)
Draft opinion
Paragraph 3
Paragraph 3
3. Advocates broader and intensified EU cooperation with third countries of origin and transit, through bilateral agreements, in order to clamp down on smuggling and trafficking networks, to ensure the appropriate and requisite – and not just minimum – capacity building in the fields of asylum systems and border control, adapting to and differentiating between the various causes of these migratory flows, to provide protection for people in need, to develop frameworks for regular migration and mobility, and to put into force a humane and effective return policy for irregular migrants;
Amendment 1 #
2015/2088(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Citation 1
Citation 1
– having regard to the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union, and in particular Articles 165 and 166 thereof,
Amendment 18 #
2015/2088(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Recital A a (new)
Recital A a (new)
Aa. whereas delays in access to the labour market and long periods of unemployment adversely affect career prospects, pay, health and social mobility;
Amendment 20 #
2015/2088(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Recital A b (new)
Recital A b (new)
Ab. whereas young people are an asset to the European economy and whereas they should commit themselves to acquiring the skills sought by the labour market, anticipating tomorrow’s needs;
Amendment 23 #
2015/2088(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Recital A c (new)
Recital A c (new)
Ac. whereas young people fall into three main groups – students, workers and the unemployed – and whereas distinct political approaches should be adopted for each of these groups in order to ensure that members of the group always have access to the labour market, which means that young students must have the skills needed by the labour market, young workers must update their skills and training throughout their careers and, in the case of young unemployed people, the distinction must take into account the fact that they are active job-seekers or NEETs;
Amendment 25 #
2015/2088(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Recital A d (new)
Recital A d (new)
Ad. whereas the financial crisis of 2008 created additional problems in the access of young people to the jobs market, as youth unemployment is more sensitive to the economic cycle than overall unemployment because young people are generally less experienced;
Amendment 33 #
2015/2088(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Recital C
Recital C
C. whereas disadvantaged people may beare often excluded from the possibility of developing their talents and skills;
Amendment 62 #
2015/2088(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 1
Paragraph 1
1. Notes that skills development is one of the key elements of integrated employment and social policies and that it can make it possible to generate long-term growth, promote European competitiveness, combat unemployment and build a more inclusive European society;
Amendment 72 #
2015/2088(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 2 a (new)
Paragraph 2 a (new)
2a. Stresses that providers of education and training and businesses should work together to devise qualifications which faithfully reflect the actual skills that holders of those qualifications have acquired throughout their lives;
Amendment 86 #
2015/2088(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 3
Paragraph 3
3. Stresses the need to build up partnerships between local authorities, education and employment services and the business community to support the creation, implementation and monitoring of employment strategies and action plans; calls for closer co-operation between schooling and vocational education, public administration, business and civil society, especially youth organisations;
Amendment 97 #
2015/2088(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 4
Paragraph 4
4. Stresses the importance of administrative capacity; calls therefore for the provision of appropriate training for local and regional authorities in order to use European funds more effectively and strategically; calls furthermore on governments to have the courage to be more politically ambitious, anticipating the needs of young people, businesses and civil society as well as of academic and vocational training establishments, implementing operational employment programmes more quickly;
Amendment 128 #
2015/2088(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 7
Paragraph 7
7. Recalls that the promotion of entrepreneurship is an important factor in promoting an active approach towards one’s own carrier; believes that it is the responsibility of public bodies, businesses and the media to promote entrepreneurship; reiterates the need to develop mobility within businesses;
Amendment 155 #
2015/2088(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 10
Paragraph 10
10. Stresses that training in the workplace and high-quality apprenticeships, backed by partnerships between schools, training establishments and businesses, are ways of improving youth access to the labour market and a better use of these opportunities could enlarge the pool of potential candidates for vacancies and also improve their preparedness for work;
Amendment 164 #
2015/2088(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 11
Paragraph 11
11. Recalls that good quality educational and training guidance at all stages of education is necessary and can lower the risk of early school-leaving as well as help to overcome difficulties in accessing the labour market; stresses that language learning and digital literacy are fundamental;
Amendment 177 #
2015/2088(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 12
Paragraph 12
12. Calls for the exchange of good practices in vocational education and the development of skills and, if necessary, for the revision of training programmes to be undertaken, anticipating the needs of the market, thus enabling access to the labour market to be enhanced for young people;
Amendment 184 #
2015/2088(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 12 a (new)
Paragraph 12 a (new)
12a. Urges that a system of training and studies be established which adopts innovative but accessible approaches, and which focuses on developing basic skills as well as intellectual and technical capacities;
Amendment 199 #
2015/2088(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 14
Paragraph 14
14. Welcomes the Quality Framework for Traineeships and the European Alliance for Apprenticeships; calls for additional measures to be taken to provide compulsory social protection;
Amendment 204 #
2015/2088(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 15
Paragraph 15
15. Recalls that the dual model of education as well as the acquisition of practical, social and communication skills is of high importance; emphasises that these accomplishments will increase young people’s confidence in the system, make it easier for them to enter the labour market and improve their training and their predisposition to work;
Amendment 216 #
2015/2088(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 16
Paragraph 16
16. Recalls that traineeships and apprenticeships should lead to employment and condemns the abuse of such arrangements; calls for Member States to withdraw the incentives which they give to businesses if the latter use traineeships and apprenticeship contracts merely to obtain cheap labour;
Amendment 250 #
2015/2088(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 19
Paragraph 19
19. Stresses that skills development should also be considered as a mechanism leading to equal opportunities for people from disadvantaged groups, in particular for children and young people from families affected by poverty, the long-term unemployed, including second-generation unemployed, immigrants and people with disabilities; stresses that prevention as well as support and counselling at an early stage are of the outmost importance, because although enabling people who are at a disadvantage to develop skills and to enter the labour market requires time and resources it is also socially and economically profitable; stresses that, in order for the most disadvantaged to be included, appropriate training must be provided for employers, human resources teams and teachers, in order to support this fringe group in society in the best possible way so as to render its integration as effective as possible;
Amendment 15 #
2015/2063(INI)
Draft opinion
Paragraph 1 a (new)
Paragraph 1 a (new)
1a. Calls upon Member States to cooperate and consistently support each other’s efforts to counter violent extremism, which can be conducive to terrorism, including through capacity building, coordination of plans and efforts, and sharing lessons learned;
Amendment 16 #
2015/2063(INI)
Draft opinion
Paragraph 1 b (new)
Paragraph 1 b (new)
1b. Expresses the need to accelerate the implementation of existing measures, including UN Security Council resolutions (especially, UNSCR 2178/2014), both those adopted by the Council (June 2013) and those adopted by the Group of 9 (July 2014);
Amendment 17 #
2015/2063(INI)
Draft opinion
Paragraph 1 c (new)
Paragraph 1 c (new)
3c. Expresses the need to improve checks at the external borders of the Schengen area, under the existing legal framework, based on risk assessment;
Amendment 19 #
2015/2063(INI)
Draft opinion
Paragraph 1 d (new)
Paragraph 1 d (new)
1d. Calls for international contributions to the UNDP-endorsed funding mechanism to facilitate immediate stabilization of areas cleared of Da'esh;
Amendment 23 #
2015/2063(INI)
Draft opinion
Paragraph 2
Paragraph 2
2. Expresses concern that without such action and without combating the root causes of terrorism and radicalisation leading to violence the phenomenon of fighters from Europe travelling to different locations to join jihadist extremist groups, as well as the security risk they present when returning to the EU, are likely to worsen in the years ahead; calls for an immediate review of current programmes in this field and a comprehensive study on the efficiency and proportionality of national and European actions to prevent and combat terrorism;
Amendment 30 #
2015/2063(INI)
Draft opinion
Paragraph 2 a (new)
Paragraph 2 a (new)
1a. Emphasizes that terrorism cannot and should not be associated with any religion, nationality or civilization;
Amendment 42 #
2015/2063(INI)
Draft opinion
Paragraph 3 a (new)
Paragraph 3 a (new)
3a. Encourages the EU to engage more with third countries on security issues and counter-terrorism, particularly in the Middle East and North Africa and in the Sahel, but also in the Western Balkans, including through new capacity building projects (e.g. border controls) with partners and better targeted EU assistance, while promoting measures to dissuade and disrupt foreign fighters' travel as well as to manage their return;
Amendment 46 #
2015/2063(INI)
Draft opinion
Paragraph 3 b (new)
Paragraph 3 b (new)
3b. Wishes that EU strengthens its political dialogue with the League of Arab States, Organisation of Islamic Cooperation, African Union and other relevant regional actors and coordination structures, such as the G5 Sahel;
Amendment 50 #
2015/2063(INI)
Draft opinion
Paragraph 3 c (new)
Paragraph 3 c (new)
3c. Encourages the EU to conduct targeted and upgraded security and counter-terrorism dialogues with Algeria, Egypt, Iraq, Israel, Jordan, Morocco, Lebanon, Saudi Arabia, Tunisia and the Gulf Cooperation Council; Cooperation with Turkey should also be enhanced in line with the General Affairs Council conclusions of December 2014;
Amendment 52 #
2015/2063(INI)
Draft opinion
Paragraph 4
Paragraph 4
4. Calls on the Council to keep the EU Syria and Iraq and Counter Terrorism/Foreign Fighters Strategy, adopted on 20 OctoberRegional Strategy for Syria and Iraq as well as the ISIL/Da'esh threat, adopted recently on 16 March 20145, under constant review, in the light of the developing security situation in the EU’s southern neighbourhood, alongside other initiatives such as the Commission’s Radicalisation Awareness Network;
Amendment 55 #
2015/2063(INI)
Draft opinion
Paragraph 4
Paragraph 4
4. Calls on the Council to keep the EU Syria and Iraq and Counter- Terrorism/Foreign Fighters Strategy, adopted on 20 October 2014, under constant review, in the light of the developing security situation in the EU’s southern neighbourhood, alongside other initiatives such as the Commission’s Radicalisation Awareness Network; calls on further obligations to be introduced for Member States, so that they mandatorily share information related to serious crimes and terrorism through a SIS reporting;
Amendment 58 #
2015/2063(INI)
Draft opinion
Paragraph 4 a (new)
Paragraph 4 a (new)
4a. Recalls that in the context of the current revision of the ENP, the security dimension and the capacity of ENP tools to contribute to improving partners resilience and capabilities to provide for their own security with respect for the rule of law, must be strengthened;
Amendment 63 #
2015/2063(INI)
Draft opinion
Paragraph 4 b (new)
Paragraph 4 b (new)
4b. Encourages the EU to launch further capacity-building projects and activities with interested MENA countries addressing law enforcement, criminal justice, security sector reform, including crisis infrastructure, crisis and emergency response, border control and aviation security, strategic communication, radicalisation, dealing with the foreign terrorist fighters threat, recruitment and financing of terrorism, paying due regard to international human rights standards, in close cooperation with Europol, Eurojust, Frontex and CEPOL;
Amendment 69 #
2015/2063(INI)
Draft opinion
Paragraph 5
Paragraph 5
5. Supports greater international cooperation and information sharing from national intelligence services, to identify EU citizens who are at risk of becoming radicalised and travelling to join jihadist extremist groups; further calls for enhanced cooperation between the EU, its Member States, and third countries to divert European citizens from this course of action and to intercept them at the point of exit;
Amendment 74 #
2015/2063(INI)
Draft opinion
Paragraph 5 a (new)
Paragraph 5 a (new)
5.a Calls on the European Commission to support Member States in addressing the underlying factors of radicalisation and extremism, designing prevention strategies which encompass the fields of education, social integration, fight against discrimination, intercultural and inter- religious dialogue;
Amendment 77 #
2015/2063(INI)
Draft opinion
Paragraph 5 a (new)
Paragraph 5 a (new)
5a. Invites the HR/VP and the Commission to continue to ensure sufficient funds and coherent use of instruments to address the threats of terrorism and more effectively from early warning to early action;
Amendment 81 #
2015/2063(INI)
Draft opinion
Paragraph 5 b (new)
Paragraph 5 b (new)
5b. Welcomes the deployment of security/counter-terrorism experts in a number of key EU Delegations to strengthen their capacity to contribute to European counter-terrorism efforts and to liaise more effectively with relevant local authorities, while further building-up of counter-terrorism capacity within the EEAS;
Amendment 85 #
2015/2063(INI)
Draft opinion
Paragraph 5 c (new)
Paragraph 5 c (new)
5c. Calls upon members states to intensify cooperation with key countries within the framework of EU agencies such as Frontex, Eurojust and Europol and develop frameworks for information exchange and ways for the EU agencies to engage more strategically with the countries in the region to strengthen law enforcement and judicial cooperation;
Amendment 92 #
2015/2063(INI)
Draft opinion
Paragraph 6
Paragraph 6
6. Notes with concern that some Member States are assessing the potential for recruiting former foreign fighters to assist in deradicalisation programmes; believes that deradicalisation programmes can be important tools to reduce recruitment of European citizens by terrorist organisations; calls on Member States to proceed cautiously when introducing such programmes, especially where cooperation is linked to immunity from prosecution;
Amendment 21 #
2015/2059(INI)
Draft opinion
Paragraph 2
Paragraph 2
2. Calls for the swift ratification by Korea of all fundamental ILO conventions that it has not yet ratified; welcomes the launch of an EU-funded project for the implementation of the ILO convention on non-discrimination in employment and occupation as an important initiative in the protection of workers´ fundamental rights;
Amendment 32 #
2015/2059(INI)
Draft opinion
Paragraph 4
Paragraph 4
4. Stresses that high labour standards should not be regarded as trade barriers but rather should raise living standards, promote competitiveness, economic growth and stability, create new employment opportunities and improve general welfare;
Amendment 35 #
2015/2059(INI)
Draft opinion
Paragraph 5
Paragraph 5
5. Expects the agreement to respect workers’ fundamental rights and to reflect international core labour standards; recommends the Commission to provide an assessment on the state of fundamental labour rights in South Korea;
Amendment 4 #
2015/2042(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Recital A
Recital A
A. whereas microfinance can contribute to meeting the objectives of the Europe 2020 Strategy; and whereas microfinance can lift people out of poverty andby creating jobs and providing access to employment; and can enhance cohesion in communities by improveing social inclusion and minimising social disproportions;
Amendment 8 #
2015/2042(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Recital B
Recital B
B. whereas the objective of the Facility is to increase access to finance for unemployed and other, those at risk of losing their jobs, the socially excluded and other vulnerable and disadvantaged people and for microenterprises, including those employing the above mentioned, which in turn generates employment and, growth and social inclusiveness in local communities;
Amendment 34 #
2015/2042(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 1 a (new)
Paragraph 1 a (new)
1a. Capitalizing on the experience gathered so far, calls on the Commission and the Member States to raise awareness particularly in remote regions and within communities, especially in those with a minority background or within organizations for persons with disabilities about the existence of this facility, its benefits and the ways to access it.
Amendment 53 #
2015/2042(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 4 a (new)
Paragraph 4 a (new)
4a. Welcomes the fact that among the general objectives of the Programme the Commissions specifically included the promotion of workers' geographical mobility and of gender mainstreaming and where appropriate gender budgeting.
Amendment 56 #
2015/2042(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 5
Paragraph 5
5. Calls on the EIF to enforce provisions in agreements with MFIs requiring them to open themselves up to and cooperate more closely with vulnerable groups, including among others, organisations representing minority groups or for persons with disabilities in order to reach target groups more effectively;
Amendment 58 #
2015/2042(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 6
Paragraph 6
6. Calls on the Commission to improve methods of evaluating the viability and the impact within their community of businesses after repayment of the microcredit;
Amendment 4 #
2015/2006(INI)
Draft opinion
Recital A
Recital A
A. whereas young people benefit immensely from practical entrepreneurial experience, which contributes to their development of skills and talent as well as to new business creation and employability and, boosts innovation in the wider organisations in which they are employed and reduces youth unemployment;
Amendment 16 #
2015/2006(INI)
Draft opinion
Recital B
Recital B
B. whereas social and creative businesses contribute to innovative sustainable growth and cohesion within society and local communities, and create employment opportunities for young people, including disadvantaged young people and those furthest from the labour market;
Amendment 45 #
2015/2006(INI)
Draft opinion
Paragraph 1
Paragraph 1
1. Calls on the Member States to use existing EU-level funding resources to support initiatives pursuing links with businesses and offering entrepreneurship education to low income young people, school dropouts, young people in danger of long-term unemployment and young people with disabilities; calls on the EU to make these funds easily accessible and easy to use;
Amendment 85 #
2015/2006(INI)
Draft opinion
Paragraph 4
Paragraph 4
4. Calls on the Member States to improve the entrepreneurial culture within tertiary education by establishing the conditions to support the creation of new companies by young people based on academic research (spin-offs), reducing the bureaucratic burden involved in establishing such companies and promoting the benefits of commercialising research as well as by strengthening the cooperation between educational institutions and companies, welcomes the initiatives which reward young people for successful business ventures (e.g. The Best Student Company of the Year), further emphasises the importance for companies to provide the possibility for young people to get their first direct in-house work experience and re-iterates the necessity to promote traineeships schemes with such objective;
Amendment 102 #
2015/2006(INI)
Draft opinion
Paragraph 5
Paragraph 5
5. Calls on the Commission to monitor concrete measures implemented by Member States to support entrepreneurship among young people and to devote special attention to the promotion and publication of information about results and best practice; welcomes Erasmus for Entrepreneurs which enables young people to acquire entrepreneurial experiences in other Member States.
Amendment 37 #
2015/2003(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Citation 34 a (new)
Citation 34 a (new)
– having regard to nine rounds of talks from 2002 to 2010 between high ranking representatives of the Chinese government and the Dalai Lama,
Amendment 38 #
2015/2003(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Citation 34 a (new)
Citation 34 a (new)
– having regard to ‘Tibet’s Path of Development Is Driven by an Irresistible Historical Tide’, China’s White Paper on Tibet, published by China’s State Council Information Office, 15 April 2015,
Amendment 40 #
2015/2003(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Citation 34 b (new)
Citation 34 b (new)
– having regard to the 2008 Memorandum and the 2009 Note on Genuine Autonomy both presented by the Representatives of the 14th Dalai Lama,
Amendment 257 #
2015/2003(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 4 a (new)
Paragraph 4 a (new)
4a. Is concerned that China will extend government's control over civil society via upcoming NGO regulations by banning non-registered NGOs "from overseas" to fund Chinese individuals or organisations, and vice versa by prohibiting Chinese groups from conducting "activities" related to non- registered NGOs;
Amendment 305 #
2015/2003(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 8
Paragraph 8
8. Observes that in recent years China's anti-terrorism policy has evolved rapidly from a somewhat reactive ‘defence against terror' approach to a proactive ‘war on terror', along with permanent ‘crisis management' entailing action to an unprecedented extent in affected regions and in society; is concerned about the upcoming Chinese law on 'counter- terrorism', which may lead to further violations of human and freedom rights, especially in Tibet and Xinjiang as regions with minority populations;
Amendment 444 #
2015/2003(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 19 a (new)
Paragraph 19 a (new)
19a. is deeply concerned that the Chinese government continues its hard-line policies against the Tibetan people, especially by rejecting the Dalai Lama's "Middle Way Approach" and to defame it as a separatist strategy as recently happened in the official Chinese 'White Paper on Tibet of April 2015'; strongly underlines and supports the Middle Way Approach which seeks neither independence nor separation from the People's Republic of China; emphasises that the Middle Way Approach calls for genuine autonomy for the Tibetan people within the framework of the Constitution of the People's Republic of China;
Amendment 451 #
2015/2003(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 19 a (new)
Paragraph 19 a (new)
19a. Is deeply concerned about the fact that over 142 Tibetans have resorted to self-immolations to protest against the suppression of the Tibetan people; rejects any linkage between self-immolations and terrorism, as no Chinese citizen has ever been injured by such dramatic and desperate acts;
Amendment 461 #
2015/2003(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 19 b (new)
Paragraph 19 b (new)
19b. Highly recommends and urgently calls on China to resume the currently stalled Sino-Tibetan Dialogue as the best political instrument to achieve a mutual and realistic solution for the current instability in Tibet; is extremely worried that the current tensions may lead to an even worse situation in the near future;
Amendment 6 #
2015/2002(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Citation 5
Citation 5
– having regard to its previous resolutions on the European Neighbourhood Policy of 20 November 2003 on relations with our neighbours to the east and south6 , of 20 April 2004 on wider Europe – new neighbourhood policy7 , of 19 January on the European Neighbourhood Policy8 , of 15 November 2007 on strengthening the European Neighbourhood Policy9 , of 20 May 2010 on the need for an EU strategy for the South Caucasus, of 7 April 2011 on the review of the European Neighbourhood Policy – Eastern dimension10 , of 7 April 2011 on the review of the European Neighbourhood Policy – Southern dimension11 , of 14 December 2011 on the review of the European Neighbourhood Policy12 , of 23 October 2013 on the European Neighbourhood Policy: towards a strengthening of the partnership: EP's position on the 2012 reports13 , and of 12 March 2014 on assessing and setting priorities for EU relations with the Eastern Partnership countries14 , __________________ 6 Texts adopted, P5_TA(2003)0520. 7 Texts adopted, P5_TA(2004)0278. 8 Texts adopted, P6_TA(2006)0028. 9 Texts adopted, P6_TA(2007)0538. 10 Texts adopted, P7_TA(2011)0153. 11 Texts adopted, P7_TA(2011)0154. 12 Texts adopted, P7_TA(2011)0576. 13 Texts adopted, P7_TA(2013)0446. 14 Texts adopted, P7_TA(2014)0229.
Amendment 14 #
2015/2002(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Recital A
Recital A
A. whereas the European Neighbourhood Policy (ENP) was created to strengthen the European Union's (EU) partnerships with neighbouring countries in order to develop an area of shared stability, security and prosperity as underlined in Article 8 of the TEU; whereas the objective remains the same;
Amendment 42 #
2015/2002(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Recital D
Recital D
D. whereas the Commission together with the Council and the European Parliament has tried to reshape the ENP so as to address its flaws, in particular after the Arab Spring; whereas this was reflected in the new financing instrument for the ENP for 2014-2020 – the European Neighbourhood Instrument (ENI);
Amendment 79 #
2015/2002(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Recital G a (new)
Recital G a (new)
Ga. whereas freer trade remains of the fundamental importance to the partner countries and the EU itself;
Amendment 104 #
2015/2002(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 1
Paragraph 1
1. Stresses the importance and timeliness of the review of the ENP; emphasises that the revised ENP should be able to provide a quick and adequate response to the situation on the ground, while also putting forward a long-term vision for developinvestment with the neighbouring countries based on lessons learned and, in particular, addressing the lack of reactivity while preserving prelations withdictability; expresses its deep concern over the lack of EU initiatives to engage in the solution of "frozen conflicts" in the neighbouring countries;
Amendment 137 #
2015/2002(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 2
Paragraph 2
2. Believes in the continued value of its initially stated objective of creating an area of prosperity and good neighbourliness, based on the founding values and principles of the Union, through a deep structural transformation in the neighbouring countries through assistance in the structural reforms required; stresses therefore the need to go back to basics and bring this objective back to the top of the agenda;
Amendment 139 #
2015/2002(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 2 a (new)
Paragraph 2 a (new)
2a. Underlines that the fundamental challenge of the ENP lies in delivering tangible and concrete improvements to the citizens of the partner countries - through easier travel rules and visa facilitation and liberalisation, economic opportunities from freer trade and commercial cooperation, and political stability through a long-term focus on democracy, the rule of law and respect for fundamental rights;
Amendment 148 #
2015/2002(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 3
Paragraph 3
3. Stresses that respect for the universal fundamental values of human rights, rule of law and democracy on which the EU is founded must remain at the core of the revised policy, as stated in Article 2 of every international agreement between the EU and third countries;
Amendment 181 #
2015/2002(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 5
Paragraph 5
5. Urges that short-, medium- and long- term priorities and strategic objectives be defined, bearing in mind that the ENP should aim to create a different levels ofiated approach to cooperation in different areas among and with the ENP countries; stresses that in defining its approach the EU should look at its priorities and those of the individual countries concerned, togewhile taking into account their with theirpolitical ambition and level of development, considering the interests of society on the whole and not only those of the political elite;
Amendment 244 #
2015/2002(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 9
Paragraph 9
9. Considers that the mid-term review of the external financial instruments should take into account the review of the revised policy, and that the ENI should therefore reflect the ambition of making the ENP more flexible, predictable and responsive to changing and challenging situations on the ground;
Amendment 270 #
2015/2002(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 11
Paragraph 11
11. NStresses that enlargement and neighbourhood policies are separate policies with different objectives; notes that the ENP should deploy its own methodology and tools, which correspond to the level of ambition and goals that the different ENP countries aspire to in their relations with the EU;
Amendment 275 #
2015/2002(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 12
Paragraph 12
12. CStresses that the EU should take into account interests and needs of the EU and its neighbours, neighbours' commitment to reforms, the level of ambition of the partnership as well as different challenges and the geopolitical environment; calls on the Commission to focus on sectors identified together with its partners, in which progress and universalcomprehensive added value can be achieved, and to gradually expand cooperation based on progress and ambitions;
Amendment 286 #
2015/2002(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 13
Paragraph 13
Amendment 302 #
2015/2002(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Subheading 3
Subheading 3
Support for democracy, judicial reform, rule of law, state building and institutional capacity- building
Amendment 309 #
2015/2002(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 14
Paragraph 14
14. Considers support for democracy, the rule of law, state building and human rights to be central to the ENP as expressed in art 2 of every international agreement between the EU and third countries; stresses that the EU should be willing to offer incentives and know-how to help overcome the social challenges and economic costs of undertaking democratic reforms; considers essential that the ENP provides the adequate instruments to facilitate endogenous reforms; calls the EU to closely monitor the compliance with clauses on democracy and human rights in all agreements concluded by the EU with third countries; thus, reiterates its call for the systematic inclusion of binding, enforceable and non-negotiable human rights clauses in the EU's international agreements, and their full application;
Amendment 383 #
2015/2002(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 18
Paragraph 18
18. Stresses the need to implement conditionality in relation to reform processes; emphasises that the EU cannot compromise its fundamental values and should avoid creating double standards; stresses that countries that are making progress in implementing reforms leading to long term political, economic and social developments and following European policy should be granted more substantial EU commitment and support;
Amendment 404 #
2015/2002(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 20
Paragraph 20
20. Notes that security and stability are basic concerns in the neighbourhood and that current developments in the region call for a strong security component in the ENP, with adequate policy tools, which hasve regrettably been missing to date;
Amendment 422 #
2015/2002(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 21
Paragraph 21
21. Calls for closer coordination between the ENP and wider Common Foreign and Security Policy (CFSP) and Common Security and Defence Policy (CSDP) activities, addressing with one voice the different aspects of the security of ENP countries and of the EU; calls for maintaining the ENP coherence with the EU Security Strategy; welcomes the Eastern partners' in-kind contributions to the EU-led operations and missions worldwide;
Amendment 442 #
2015/2002(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 23
Paragraph 23
23. Calls for the revised policy to support partner countries in building proper and strong state structures to deal with security issues, such as effective law enforcement, terrorism, intelligence and security, which should be accompanied by proper parliamentary oversight; stresses that the EU should engage in areas such as security sector reform;
Amendment 454 #
2015/2002(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 23 a (new)
Paragraph 23 a (new)
23a. Calls on the EU to focus on capacity building for border control of the association partner countries in order to prevent increasing levels of irregular immigration, smuggling and all kinds of trafficking, while fostering ways to promote prosperity and stability within its borders;
Amendment 456 #
2015/2002(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 23 b (new)
Paragraph 23 b (new)
23b. Calls on the EU to make clear distinction between asylum seekers due to persecution and irregular immigrants due to economic reasons; the former should be assured on the base of EU basic values, such as equality, gender balance and secularism, while acting decisively with reference to the latter, fostering the implementation of return mechanisms to the countries of origin;
Amendment 508 #
2015/2002(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 27
Paragraph 27
27. Underlines the importance of the role of multilateral assemblies, such as EuroNest and PA-UfM,Notes that multilateral organizations, including their assemblies, such as EuroNest and PA-UfM, have showed a lack of flexibility and reaction, failing to deliver the expected results to the radical changing situations in the neighbouring countries; underlines, nevertheless, their important role as fora for political dialogue and a tool for fostering ownership of the Neighbourhood Policy and strongly encourages them to increase their engagement in an adequate manner;
Amendment 524 #
2015/2002(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 28
Paragraph 28
28. Emphasises the need to build strong partnerships with neighbouring countries; stresses the importance of ensuring that the ENP is part of the EU's broader external policy and of taking into account the other strategic players that have influence on the neighbourhood – the ‘neighbours ofa framework of cooperation between the EU and partners while acknowledging the broader geographical context of our neighbours and their relations with their neighbours' – as well as international and regional organisations;
Amendment 533 #
2015/2002(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 29
Paragraph 29
29. Stresses that the EU should realistically consider the different policy options that its partners face and how to build bridges with their neighbours on different levels and how to address the foreign policy of third countries in its neighbourhood ensuring that it is for the EU and its sovereign partners to decide on how they want to proceed with their relations;
Amendment 553 #
2015/2002(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 31
Paragraph 31
31. Calls for the EU to explore and identify, together with its partners, priorities for strengthened cooperation and integration in different policy fields, such as economic development, infrastructure and regional development, digital economy, strategic communication, transport interconnections, the environment, competition policies, SMEs, migration, security, energy and energy efficiency, science, education and cultural heritage, with the aim of creating an area of prosperity and good neighbourliness;
Amendment 593 #
2015/2002(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 34
Paragraph 34
34. Notes that high unemployment, social exclusion and poverty, lack of free access to pluralistic culture and information, fundamental freedoms, (in particular, opinion, freethinking and media), and high levels of corruption, combined with the low political participation of women, are root causes of instability, ; demands demandseper and stronger engagement beyond the Deep and Comprehensive Free Trade Areas (DCFTAs), with an active role of SME's; notes the lack of regional economic cooperation between EU neighbouring countries and calls for the establishment of sub-regional initiatives in order to increase the trade exchanges among them;
Amendment 615 #
2015/2002(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 35
Paragraph 35
35. Calls on the Commission to explore and offer to the ENP countries different levels of participation, cooperation and engagement in its policies, programmes and agencies, such as in EUROPOL, customs management and the Energy Community in the fields of fighting against human trafficking, economic and cross-border crimes;
Amendment 635 #
2015/2002(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 39
Paragraph 39
39. Emphasises that the action plans, established in close partnership with the authorities of the partner countries, should focus on a limited number of realistic priorities to be implemented and that their implementation should be assessed on a regular basis, with policy options which could be commonly agreed;
Amendment 651 #
2015/2002(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 42
Paragraph 42
42. Calls on the EU to strengthen its capacity to counter misinformation and propaganda campaigns against the EU and its Member Statvisibility in order to show clearly the EU's support and engagement with the partner countries;
Amendment 18 #
2015/2001(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Recital B
Recital B
B. whereas, in reaction to and despite Russia’s aggression against Georgia and violation of itGeorgia´s territorial integrity in 2008, the EU opted for an increased cooperation model as a way to appeasecontinue the engagement with Russia; whereas, in line with this, rather than taking restrictive measures, a series of generous initiatives for deeper cooperation – such as the common spaces, the Partnership for Modernisation, the negotiations on a New EU-Russia Agreement, and the Human Rights dialogue – have been launched or deepened;
Amendment 35 #
2015/2001(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Recital C
Recital C
C. whereas Russia has – by illegally annexing Crimea and waging an undeclared war against Ukraine, with the direct participation of Russian military units, and byith the direct and indirect support and backing from the Russian military and security services, deliberately destabilising this neighbouring sovereign and independent country – profoundly and for a long time damaged its relationship with the EU by jeopardising the basic principles of Europe’s security order and by breaking its international commitments, notably under the United Nations Charter, the Helsinki Final Act and the Budapest Memorandum;
Amendment 51 #
2015/2001(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Recital D
Recital D
D. whereas Russia is the instigator of and, directly or indirectly,involved in and party to a number of ‘frozen conflicts’ in its neighbourhood – in Transnistria, South Ossetia, and Abkhasia, and Nagorno Karabakh – that constitute serious impediments to the development and stability of the neighbouring countries concerned;
Amendment 72 #
2015/2001(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Recital E
Recital E
E. whereas in reaction to Russia’s covert military invasion of Ukraine, the EU has adopted a stage-by- stage series of restrictive measures; whereas similar sanctions have been adopted by a number of other countries in reaction to Russia’s aggressioncurrent policy;
Amendment 86 #
2015/2001(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Recital F
Recital F
F. whereas these restrictive targeted measures are not directed against the Russian people but aim at stimulating a change in Russian policy towards, and actions in, the common neighbourhood; whereas the sanctions could be lifted, partially or fully, as soon as Russia commits itself to implementing, fully and honestly, the provisions of the Minsk agreements and the return of Crimea to Ukraine; whereas the sanctions will be strengthened should Russia chose to do otherwise and refrain from taking any positive step to change its policyunderlines that the EU sanctions can be entirely or partially lifted, maintained or extended, depending on developments;
Amendment 129 #
2015/2001(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Recital H a (new)
Recital H a (new)
Ha. whereas the European Parliament, on numerous occasions has expressed its concern over the state of democracy inside Russia, the systematic failure to upheld the rule of law and respect for fundamental rights; whereas the rule of law, fair trial standards, due process and the independence of the judiciary are not respected in Russia; whereas the last Presidential and State Duma elections failed to meet OSCE standards;
Amendment 132 #
2015/2001(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Recital I
Recital I
I. whereas the intrusions of Russian jet fighters into the airspace of EU and NATO members states jeopardise the safety of civilian flightscould be a threat to European airspace security;
Amendment 172 #
2015/2001(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 1
Paragraph 1
1. Reiterates that, in the light of Russia’s direct and indirect involvement in the war in Ukraine, amounting to a deliberate violation of the core of the democratic principles and values sustained by the EU and widely shared internationally, the EU cannot envisage a return to ‘business as usual’; calls for a critical re-assessment by the EU of its relations with Russia, and for the drafting, as promptly as possible, of a soft-power contingency plan to counter the aggrecomprehensive plan on how to develop future relations with Russivea, and divisive policies conducted by Russia against the EU and its partners;with the countries of the Eastern Neighbourhood.
Amendment 218 #
2015/2001(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 3
Paragraph 3
3. Is deeply concerned by the fact that Russia now openly positions itself, and acts, not as a partner of, but as a rival to the international democratic community, seeking to challenge the current international order, and is in the process of redrawing borders within Europe; is extremely worried by the tendency of the Russian authorities to systematically denigrate liberal democracy and to consider demoseeking to challenge international law, and is in the process of redrawing borders within Europe; is alarmed by the atmosphere of hatred directed against opposition activists, human right defenders, minorities and neighbouring nations, which has been growing in Russia in the recent years, as part of a political culture that distance itself from democratic principles; is deeply concerned by the systematic deterioration of the situation of human rights and of rule of law in Russia, by the efforts of state authorities to silence free speech, obstruct opposition activities, react with repressions to any activity aimed at exposing corruption among the political and economic elite and to stifle activities of the civil society; condemns the intimidation of craitic neighbouring countries as a threat to their own ruleal voices, through violence, trials, imprisonments and other measures used by the state, and the restrictions to press freedom and internet freedom;
Amendment 238 #
2015/2001(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 4
Paragraph 4
4. Underlines that EU-Russia relations must henceforth be based on the rule of law and on preconditioned dialogue, whereby the EU would be ready to relaunch cooperation with the authorities in Moscow on the condition that Russia unambiguously and without pretence takes its share of responsibility and fully implements the Minsk Agreements; stresses that in order to ensure that such a dialogue – if renewed (for which the return of Crimea to Ukraine would be a prerequisite) – is not conduct; underlines that such a dialogue must respect international law, and aim at securing peace and security for all countries in the Eastern Neighbourhood and solve the conflict in Ukraine, with the full respect for the sovereignty and territorial integrity of Ukraine; underlines that the current sanctions imposed atby the expense of European values, standards and international commitments, it would be necessary to specify very clearly the EU’s expectations of Russia, along with the retaliatory measures it would take should Russia not keep to its commitmentsEU, and the Russian counter-sanctions are harmful to the economies on both sides and empathises that the ultimate objective must be to restore full and deep engagement with a Russia that respects international law and contractual commitments and acts as a reliable and predictable partner;
Amendment 274 #
2015/2001(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 5
Paragraph 5
5. Commends the solidarity and the unity demonstrated by the Member States in the context of Russia’s undeclared war againstillegal annexation of Crimea and involvement in the fights in the eastern parts of Ukraine, allowing the adoption and further extension of responsive measures; calls on the Member States to consider as an absolute priority the preservation of this unity; reiterates that unity and solidarity amongst the Member States, as well as between the EU and the Eastern Partnership countries, is essential for ensuring the effectiveness of the EU’s policies and its ability to withstand external challenges and pressures;
Amendment 288 #
2015/2001(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 5 a (new)
Paragraph 5 a (new)
5a. Underlines that the conflict in Ukraine can only have a political solution; the EU should create a more pro-active political and diplomatic approach to solve all the so called 'frozen conflicts' throughout the Eastern Neighbourhood;
Amendment 311 #
2015/2001(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 7
Paragraph 7
7. Firmly supports the swift creation of a robust European Energy Union, specifically the interconnection of national energy networks in order to reduce considerably the dependence of individual Member States on external energy suppliers; is of the firm conviction that the challenges to and vulnerability of European solidarity, and the exposure of individual Member States, to the illegitimate use of energy as a political and diplomatic bargain chip can only be combatted efficiently through the full implementation of the Third Energy package and the completion of a transparent, integrated, synchronised and resilient European internal energy market;
Amendment 354 #
2015/2001(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 9
Paragraph 9
9. Is deeply concerned by the ever growing restrictions on free media, the tightening of online media control, the use of coercion to curb impartial reporting and the erosion of journalistic standards in Russia, as well as the increasing monopoly on the information available to Russian- language audiences abroad by state- owned media outlets; deplores that Russian state-controlled media have become players in the EU information sphere without keeping to the norms of independent journalism, including the rejection of hate speech;
Amendment 364 #
2015/2001(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 10
Paragraph 10
10. Renews its call for the development of EU reconnaissance capabilities of weaponised information and the preparation of information contingency plans, including the strengthening of analytical and monitoring capabilities, especially in the Russian language, in order to be able to identify, and respond swiftly and appropriately to, purposefully biased information; calls on the Commission to earmark without delay adequate funding for concrete projects aimed at countering Russian propaganda within the EU and abroad; calls on the Commission and the Member States to devise as well a mechanism for the collection, monitoring and reporting ofCalls on the Commission and the Member States to investigate and make public all financial, political or technical assistance provided by Russia to political parties and other organisations within the EU, with a view to assessing its involvement in, and influence over, political life and public debate in the EU;
Amendment 384 #
2015/2001(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 11
Paragraph 11
11. Calls on the EU to provide support to grass-roots projects aimed at developing high journalistic standards, freedom of the media, and unbiased and trustworthy information in Russia, and at deconstructing propaganda within the EU and the Eastern Partnership countries; supports the initiative to develop Russian- language media channels, with a view to providing a credible and accessible alternative to biased information for Russian-speaking minorities in the EU and in the Eastern Partnership countriesalternatives in order to make independent information and news available;
Amendment 403 #
2015/2001(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 12
Paragraph 12
12. Reiterates that uncompromising respect for the rule of law is a core and founding principle of the EU, and rejects past attempts to put forward pragmatic interpretations of the rules to accommodate Russia as a trade partner; calls, therefore, on the strict, swift and unconditional application of the rule of law – in the event of any breach of the rules – and of the principle of free and fair competition, including in the proceedings against Gazprom;
Amendment 412 #
2015/2001(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 12 a (new)
Paragraph 12 a (new)
12a. Is of the view that a new and reinforced EU Russia strategy should be aimed at getting Russia to fully respect the OSCE principles and at motivating its leadership to move Russia out of its political and economic self-isolation; considers that this strategy needs to be based on a two-track approach: a strategy to contain challenges from the current Russian policy, and at the same time, a strategy of deeper engagement with the Russian population and civil society with a stronger emphasis on the human rights of the people in Russia;
Amendment 414 #
2015/2001(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 12 c (new)
Paragraph 12 c (new)
12c. Calls upon the High Representative/Vice President to develop, in coordination with the Commission, options for strengthening direct cooperation with Russian population, small and medium-size businesses, scientific and cultural institutions and the civil society; notes the suspension of the negotiations on visa facilitation, and calls on the Commission and the Member States to facilitate the issuance of visas for Russian citizens not targeted by EU or US restrictive measures so as to enhance student and scientific exchanges, business and civil society contacts; underlines that the EU and the Member States have sufficient scope to facilitate visa rules unilaterally;
Amendment 425 #
2015/2001(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 13
Paragraph 13
13. Expresses its deep concern for the state of human rights and the rule of law in Russia, and strongly condemns the crackdown on independent civil society and the persistent and multiform repression of activists, political opponents and critics of the regime, which has in some cases led to their murder (draws particular attention to the assassinations of Anna Politkovskaya, Natalya Estemirova, Boris Nemtsov, Sergey Magnitsky, Alexander Litvinenko, and others); demands that all assassinations of political activists, journalists and whistle blowers be investigated properly and independently; reiterates its call on the Council to deliver on its commitment to defend these principles, and to adopt restrictive measures for the officials involved in the well-documented Magnitsky case;
Amendment 450 #
2015/2001(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 14
Paragraph 14
14. Stresses the importance of continued political and financial support to independent civil society activists, media and NGOs; encourages the EU to reach out to Russian officials and civil society organisations that are inclined to develop an alternative vision of political and diplomatic relations with the EU; points to its recommendation of April 2014 concerning common visa restrictions for Russian officials involved in the Sergei Magnitsky case and urges the HR/VP and the Commission to bring the relevant initiative into the Council without delay; is of the view that personally targeted restrictive measures should be considered in case no investigation in accordance with international standards of the murder of Boris Nemtsov is carried out and in other similar cases;
Amendment 1 #
2015/0802(CNS)
Proposal for a decision
Recital 3
Recital 3
(3) In its Conclusions of 17 December 1999 on the strengthening of cooperation for modernising and improving social protection2 , the Council supported the Commission's proposal to establish a mechanism for enhanced cooperation, brought about by the work of the group of high-level officials, for the implementation of this action. The Council stressed that this kind of cooperation should cover all forms of social protection and, where necessary, help the Member States to improve and strengthen their social protection systems in accordance with their national priorities. It also recalled the competence of the Member States for the organisation and financing of social protection and endorsed the four broad objectives within the overall challenge of modernising social protection systems as identified by the Commission: namely to make work pay and provide secure income, to make pensions safe and pension systems sustainable, to promote social inclusion and to ensure high quality and sustainable health care for all; it also underlined that equality between women and men must be mainstreamed in all activities aiming at these four objectives. Finally, the Council recognised that the aspects relating to finance are common to all the objectives. __________________ 2 OJ C 8, 12.1.2000, p. 7.
Amendment 2 #
2015/0802(CNS)
Proposal for a decision
Recital 7
Recital 7
(7) In its Conclusions of June 2013, the European Council stated that the social dimension of the EMU should be strengthened. As a first step, it is important to better monitor and take into account the social and labour market situation within EMU, notably by using appropriate social and employment indicators within the European semester. It is also important to ensure better coordination of employment and socialo-economic policies, while fully respecting national competences.
Amendment 3 #
2015/0802(CNS)
Proposal for a decision
Recital 9
Recital 9
(9) The decision establishing the Committee should reflect the development of the European Semester and the role of the Committee in this process. In particular, Council Regulation (EC) No 1466/97, as amended by Regulation (EU) No 1175/2011 of the European Parliament and of the Council, states that the Economic and Financial Committee, the Economic Policy Committee, the Employment Committee and the Social Protection Committee shall be consulted within the framework of the European Semester, where appropriate. Moreover, Regulation (EU) No 1176/2011 of the European Parliament and of the Council states that the in-depth reviews should take into account, where appropriate, Council recommendations or invitations addressed to Member States, and that a corrective action plan for any Member States for which an excessive imbalance procedure is opened shall take into account the social impact of the policy actions and shall be consistent with the broad economic policy guidelines and the national employment guidelines. Therefore, the decision establishing the Committee should reflect its role within the European Semester.
Amendment 1 #
2015/0801(CNS)
Proposal for a decision
Recital 2
Recital 2
(2) Part III, Title IX of the Treaty on Functioning of the European Union establishes the procedures by which Member States and the Union should work towards developing a coordinated strategy for employment and particularly for promoting a skilled, and trained and adaptable workforce and labour markets responsive to economic change; that Title provides for the establishment of an Employment Committee with advisory status (‘the Committee’);
Amendment 2 #
2015/0801(CNS)
Proposal for a decision
Recital 5
Recital 5
(5) The decision establishing the Committee should reflect the development of the European Semester and the role of the Committee in this process. In particular, Council Regulation (EC) No 1466/97, as amended by Regulation (EU) No 1175/2011 of the European Parliament and of the Council, states that the Economic and Financial Committee, the Economic Policy Committee, the Employment Committee and the Social Protection Committee shall be consulted within the framework of the European Semester where appropriate; Regulation (EU) No 1176/2011 of the European Parliament and of the Council states that the in-depth reviews should take into account of, where appropriate, Council recommendations or invitations addressed to Member States, and that a corrective action plan for any Member States for which an excessive imbalance procedure is opened shall take into account the social and financial impact of the policy actions and shall be consistent with the broad economic policy guidelines and the employment guidelines. Therefore, the decision establishing the Committee should reflect its role within the European Semester;
Amendment 138 #
2015/0051(NLE)
Annex 1 – section 2 – paragraph 1
Member States should promote productivity and employability through an appropriate supply of relevant knowledge and skills. Member States should make the necessary investments in education and vocational training systems while improving their effectiveness and efficiency to raise the skill level of the workforce, allowing it to better anticipate and meet the rapidly changing needs of dynamic labour markets in an increasingly digital economy. Member States should step up efforts to improve access to quality adult learning for all and, in compliance with the previously adopted EU strategy, implement active ageing strategies to enable healthy and longer working lives.
Amendment 139 #
2015/0051(NLE)
Annex 1 – section 2 – paragraph 1
Member States should promote productivity and employability through an appropriate supply of relevant knowledge and skills. Member States should make the necessary investments in education and vocational training systems while improving their effectiveness and efficiency to raise the skill level of the workforce, allowing it to better anticipate and meet the rapidly changing needs of dynamic labour markets in an increasingly digital economy. Member States should step up efforts to improve access to quality adult learning for all and implement active ageing strategies to enable healthy and longer working lives.
Amendment 163 #
2015/0051(NLE)
Annex 1 – section 2 – paragraph 4
Barriers to labour market participation should be reduced, especially for women, older workers, young people, the disabled and legal migrants. For these groups, too, a comprehensive approach should be taken to tackling unemployment, including by ensuring that the relevant institutions have the necessary funding. Gender equality including equal pay must be ensured in the labour market as well as access to affordable quality early childhood education and care.
Amendment 237 #
2015/0051(NLE)
Annex 1 – section 4 – paragraph 3
The pension systems should be reformed in order to secure their sustainability and adequacy for women and men in a context of increasing longevity and demographic change, including by linking statutory retirement ages to life expectancy, by increasing effective retirement ages, and by developing complementary retirement savings.
Amendment 6 #
2015/0026(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 3
Recital 3
(3) In order to address the budgetary constraints faced by Member States at the initial stage of the programming period and, taking into account the urgent need to address youth unemployment and the specific features of the YEI, it is appropriate to lay down provisions in order to complement Regulation (EU) No 1303/2013, with a view to increase the level of the initial pre-financing paid to operational programmes supported by the YEI in 2015. To ensure that Member States have sufficient means to provide payments to beneficiaries responsible for the implementation of operations that target youth unemployment, an additional initial pre-financing amount from the specific allocation for the YEI should be paid in 2015 for operational programmes supported by the YEI, in order to complement the pre-financing amounts paid in accordance with Regulation (EU) No 1303/2013. In order to enable a prompt implementation of the operational programmes supported by the YEI, the Commission should commit itself to pay the pre-financing amount to the Member States immediately after the entry into force of this Regulation.
Amendment 8 #
2015/0026(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 4
Recital 4
(4) To ensure that the additional initial pre- financing amount is used for the immediate implementation of the YEI, it should be foreseen that this amount is reimbursed to the Commission, if the Union contribution from the YEI does not amount to an adequate level in interim payment applications submitted to the Commission 12 months after the entry into force of this Regulation. This measure is a safeguard to ensure that eligible Member States set up the required structures to promptly implement the YEI. Member State action is urgently needed to deliver on the YEI and combat alarming levels of youth unemployment.
Amendment 67 #
2015/0009(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 10
Recital 10
(10) The purpose of the EFSI should be to help resolve the difficulties in financing and implementing productive investments in the Union and to ensure increased access to financing. It is intended that increased access to financing should be of particular benefit to small and medium enterprises. It is also appropriate to extend the benefit of such increased access to financing to mid- cap companies, which are companies having up to 3000 employees. Overcoming Europe's current investment difficulties should contribute to strengthening the Union's economic, social, political and territorial cohesion.
Amendment 75 #
2015/0009(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 10
Recital 10
(10) The purpose of the EFSI should be to help resolve the difficulties in financing and implementing productive investments in the Union and to ensure increased access to financing, and to support job creation. It is intended that increased access to financing should be of particular benefit to small and medium enterprises. It is also appropriate to extend the benefit of such increased access to financing to mid- cap companies, which are companies having up to 3000 employees. Overcoming Europe's current investment difficulties should contribute to strengthening the Union's economic, social and territorial cohesion.
Amendment 107 #
2015/0009(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 14
Recital 14
(14) The EFSI should target projects delivering high societal and economic value. In particular, the EFSI should target projects that promote job creation with particular focus on youth and long-term employment, long- term growth and competitiveness. The EFSI should support a wide range of financial products, including equity, debt or guarantees, to best accommodate the needs of the individual project. This wide range of products should allow the EFSI to adapt to market needs whilst encouraging private investment in the projects. The EFSI should not be a substitute for private market finance but should instead catalyse private finance by addressing market failures so as to ensure the most effective and strategic use of public money. The requirement for consistency with State aid principles should contribute to such effective and strategic use.
Amendment 148 #
2015/0009(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 17
Recital 17
(17) Decisions on the use of the EFSI support for infrastructure and large mid- cap projects should be made by an Investment Committee. The Investment Committee should be composed of independent experts who can identify projects offering the greatest potential for resolving Europe’s major social and economic problems and are knowledgeable and experienced in the areas of investment projects. The Investment Committee should be accountable to a Steering Board of the EFSI, who should supervise the fulfilment of the EFSI's objectives. To effectively benefit from the experience of the EIF, the EFSI should support funding to the EIF to allow the EIF to undertake individual projects in the areas of small and medium enterprises and small mid-cap companies.
Amendment 173 #
2015/0009(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 25
Recital 25
(25) The EIB should regularly evaluate activities supported by the EFSI with a view to assessing their relevance, performance and impact, notably as regards their social and economic impact, paying particular attention to job creation, and to identifying aspects that could improve future activities. Such evaluations should contribute to accountability and analysis of sustainability.
Amendment 198 #
2015/0009(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 34
Recital 34
(34) To ensure accountability to European citizens, the EIB should regularly report to the European Parliament and the Council on the progress and impact of the EFSIreal social and economic impact of the EFSI, paying particular attention to job creation.
Amendment 252 #
2015/0009(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 3 – paragraph 3 – subparagraph 3
Article 3 – paragraph 3 – subparagraph 3
No decision of the Steering Board shall be adopted if the Commission or the EIB votes against it. When this occurs, the reasons for the vote against shall be stated before the members of the Board.
Amendment 264 #
2015/0009(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 3 – paragraph 5 – subparagraph 2
Article 3 – paragraph 5 – subparagraph 2
The Investment Committee shall be composed of six independent experts and the Managing Director. Independent experts shall have a high level of relevant market experience in project finance and be able to identify those projects which are more likely to be able to solve major social and economic problems. The experts shall be appointed by the Steering Board for a renewable fixed term of threone years.
Amendment 354 #
2015/0009(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 12 – paragraph 5
Article 12 – paragraph 5
5. At the latest [PO insert date three years after the entry into force of this Regulation], the Commission shall submit a report to the European Parliament and the Council a comprehensive quality assessment to evaluate the true socio- economic effect of this special strategic plan on the application of this Regulation accompanied by any relevant proposal.
Amendment 6 #
2014/2255(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Citation 10 a (new)
Citation 10 a (new)
– having regard to the work currently undertaken by the UN Working Group on Ageing towards a Convention on the protection of the rights of older people,
Amendment 39 #
2014/2255(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Recital E a (new)
Recital E a (new)
Ea. whereas there are some 125,000 occupational pension funds operating across the EU, holding assets worth €2.5 trillion on behalf of around 75 million Europeans, which represents 20% of the EU's working-age population;
Amendment 42 #
2014/2255(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Recital E b (new)
Recital E b (new)
Eb. whereas older women represent 20% of the EU's population and this percentage will continue to increase according to the current demographic trends; in most EU countries older women have higher risk poverty rate than older men, on average 21% for women and 16% for men; whereas the gender pension gap in the EU is 39 %;
Amendment 51 #
2014/2255(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 4 a (new)
Paragraph 4 a (new)
4a. Stresses that reliable statistics on the situation of older people and demographic changes are needed to develop better targeted and effective active ageing strategies; calls on the Commission to ensure comprehensive high-quality data collection on the societal status of older people, their health, rights and standard of living;
Amendment 73 #
2014/2255(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 8 a (new)
Paragraph 8 a (new)
8a. Calls on the Member States to ensure affordable, accessible and non- discriminatory health care and to prioritize prevention in their health care policies; invites the European Commission to analyse the affordability of health care for older people, collect data on waiting times in health care systems across the EU and to propose guidelines for maximum waiting times;
Amendment 76 #
2014/2255(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 8 b (new)
Paragraph 8 b (new)
8b. Takes the view that a European strategy on dementia needs to be developed, which should include measures for assistance to the families of the patients, information campaigns, awareness raising and exchange of best practices between Member States;
Amendment 94 #
2014/2255(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 10
Paragraph 10
10. Considers it regrettable that older workerpersons are still often exposed to age discrimination, stereotypes and barriers; calls on the Member States, therefore, to correctly implement Directive 2000/78/EC on equal treatment in employment and occupation; welcomes the European Commission push to adopt the long- awaited Equal Treatment Directive, blocked in Council since 2008 and calls on the Member States to proceed with its adoption by the end of the year;
Amendment 118 #
2014/2255(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 12 a (new)
Paragraph 12 a (new)
12a. Calls on the Member States to use available ESF, ESIF, EaSI funding for financial assistance to self-help programmes of organisations of older people who are sharing their energy, knowledge, experiences and wisdom with each other and helping people in need, thereby contributing to active and healthy ageing, and living independently for a longer time;
Amendment 157 #
2014/2255(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 16 a (new)
Paragraph 16 a (new)
16a. Calls on the Commission, the Council and the Member States to adopt a positive position at the UN Open-Ended Working Group on ageing to ensure older citizens can fully enjoy their human rights; invites the Commission to closely cooperate with the UN Independent Expert on the Rights of Older Persons and with older people´s representative organizations in the EU;
Amendment 165 #
2014/2255(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 18 a (new)
Paragraph 18 a (new)
18a. Calls on the Member States to guarantee individual and adequate pension rights for all to ensure a dignified life in old age– including those with justified career breaks, mainly women;
Amendment 166 #
2014/2255(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 18 b (new)
Paragraph 18 b (new)
18b. Stresses the importance of adequate supervision and independent audits of the occupational pension funds for safe and sustainable pensions;
Amendment 173 #
2014/2255(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 20 a (new)
Paragraph 20 a (new)
20a. Believes that a UN Convention to protect the rights of older persons will improve the lives of older persons by guaranteeing them equal access to political, economic, health care and cultural rights and would represent an important platform to create an attitude shift towards ageing globally;
Amendment 175 #
2014/2255(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 20 b (new)
Paragraph 20 b (new)
20b. Regrets that the European Commission has not yet addressed age inequalities in the implementation of the UN Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities (UNCRPD) and the Disability Strategy; calls therefore on the European Commission to raise awareness and address age discrimination of the rights of older persons with disabilities and ensure that the UNCRPD application does not leave older people behind;
Amendment 181 #
2014/2255(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 21
Paragraph 21
21. Stresses the importance of volunteering, which promotes intercultural learning and intergenerational solidarity, fosters active ageing and lifelong civic participation, and enables older people to make a contribution to society and earn recognition, thereby improving their quality of life, well-being and general state of health. In this context regrets the discontinuation of the Grundtvig programme which supported older volunteers;
Amendment 119 #
2014/2254(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Recital D a (new)
Recital D a (new)
Da. whereas the manifestations of extreme nationalism, racism, xenophobia and intolerance have not yet disappeared from our communities; on the contrary, especially after the recent terrorist attacks they appear to be on the rise in many Member States which affects traditional minorities and new national minority communities as well;
Amendment 139 #
2014/2254(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Recital G a (new)
Recital G a (new)
Ga. whereas article 22 of the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union obliges the Union to "respect cultural, religious and linguistic diversity",
Amendment 148 #
2014/2254(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Recital G b (new)
Recital G b (new)
Gb. whereas fundamental freedoms, human rights and equal opportunities shall be provided for all citizens of the European Union including persons belonging to national and linguistic minorities;
Amendment 322 #
2014/2254(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 7 a (new)
Paragraph 7 a (new)
7a. Calls on promoting understanding, acceptance and tolerance between the different national communities in the Member States through the principles of equality, non-discrimination and respect for diversity; calls on particularly the condemnation of hate speech and all forms of aggression;
Amendment 402 #
2014/2254(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 8
Paragraph 8
8. Deplores the fact that even today people belonging to minorities are still victims of discrimination; calls for more consistency of the European Union in the field of minority protection; strongly believes that all Member States as well as candidate countries shall be bound by the same principles and criteria in order to avoid the application of double standards; Calls therefore, as a part of resolving the so- called Copenhagen dilemma, for the establishment of an effective mechanism to monitor and ensure fundamental and acquired rights of national and linguistic minorities both in candidate countries and in countries already admitted to the European Union;
Amendment 7 #
2014/2235(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Citation 6 a (new)
Citation 6 a (new)
- having in mind one of the priorities of the European Council conclusions of 26- 27 June 2014 to help develop skills, and unlock talent and life changes for all by promoting the right skills for the modern economy and lifelong learning;
Amendment 9 #
2014/2235(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Citation 6 b (new)
Citation 6 b (new)
- having regard to the European Parliament legislative resolution of 29 April 2015 on the proposal for a regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council amending Regulation (EU) No 1304/2013 of the European Parliament and the Council on the European Social Fund, as regards an increase of the initial pre-financing amount paid to operational programmes supported by the Youth Employment Initiative;
Amendment 69 #
2014/2235(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 4 a (new)
Paragraph 4 a (new)
4 a. Emphasises that labour market shortages are to be considered as a sustained market disequilibrium between supply and demand in which the quantity of workers demanded exceeds the supply available and willing to work at a particular wage and working conditions at a particular place and point in time; (This should go before para 4, right after the subtitle)
Amendment 71 #
2014/2235(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 4 b (new)
Paragraph 4 b (new)
4 b. Notes that even if the labour supply is sufficient to match the labour demand, there might still be qualitative shortages as those looking for work may not be suitable for the open position, as a result of a mismatch between sectors, occupations or skills´ requirements; (This should follow 4a)
Amendment 83 #
2014/2235(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 5 a (new)
Paragraph 5 a (new)
5 a. Points that Europe has 24 million unemployed people, including 7,5 million NEETs, and on the other side 2 million vacancies and that the European companies are affected by a huge lack of the skilled people and labour force with transferable skills;
Amendment 120 #
2014/2235(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 9
Paragraph 9
9. Stresses the importance of human development, career flexibility and self- responsibility; recalls in this respect that investment is needed to actively support employability and adaptability and prevent skills depletion among the unemployed; emphasises that such measures should be combined with reforms in pension and social welfare systems that encourage more people to work, so as to extend protection and provide comparable access to workers regardless of their type of contract, for example by increasing portability of rights from one contract to the next;
Amendment 140 #
2014/2235(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 10
Paragraph 10
10. Recalls the importance of the mobility of workers, geographically and across sectors, for a competitive labour market, and stresses the need to reduce the administrative and linguistic barriers that are liable to restrain it; encourages raising of awareness of and further improvement of the EU-wide EURES job portal as well as the importance of enhanced cooperation among national PES and the future inclusion of private employment services to EURES network;
Amendment 141 #
2014/2235(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 10 – subparagraph 1 (new)
Paragraph 10 – subparagraph 1 (new)
Reiterates that a big economic potential of women has to be unlocked in Europe and it is necessary to create appropriate conditions for women to progress in their career and pursue higher positions in companies or start their own businesses;
Amendment 152 #
2014/2235(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 11
Paragraph 11
11. Believes that, in order to anticipate future skills needs, labour market stakeholders, including employers' and employees' organisations , have to be strongly involved at all levels, in particular in designing and implementing vocational qualification programmes, which provide an effective transition from formal education to work-based learning;
Amendment 157 #
2014/2235(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 12
Paragraph 12
12. Stresses the importance of partnerships and trust between universities, businesses and authorities with a view to estimating labour needs for the future, as well as fostering cooperation between Member States in this regard; reminds that at the same time social responsibility of all stakeholders is needed;
Amendment 170 #
2014/2235(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 13
Paragraph 13
13. Recalls the need to strive for a more flexible approach to individual career development and lifelong education and training across one's personal career path, and recognizes the role that both public and private parties can play in providing this;
Amendment 172 #
2014/2235(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 13 a (new)
Paragraph 13 a (new)
13 a. Notes that the European policies for Lifelong Guidance have shown considerable impact on national guidance policies and that effective lifelong guidance requires programmes in a cross- cutting perspective at all levels;
Amendment 179 #
2014/2235(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 14
Paragraph 14
14. Believes that training and re- qualification programs for the unemployed should be designed and implemented in close cooperation with employers' associations as well private and public employment services, with a view to better aligning workers' new skills with the future needs of employers;
Amendment 188 #
2014/2235(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 15
Paragraph 15
15. Recalls that it is of utmost importance to give guidance and counselling to jobseekers in how to look for a job and recognises the role that businesses and private employment services can play to provide this, and to ensure that their skills aretransferable and recognised through ‘'competences passports' reflecting the skills acquired through both formal and informal learning;
Amendment 197 #
2014/2235(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 16
Paragraph 16
16. Believes that dual vocational training and dualsimilar work-based learning systems should be given more consideration, as they tend to favour integration into the labour market and smoother transition from education to work and they have proved to be effective in fostering youth employment;
Amendment 210 #
2014/2235(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 17 a (new)
Paragraph 17 a (new)
17 a. Welcomes the EC initiative of the European Alliance for Apprenticeships (EAfA) which aims to bring together public authorities, businesses, social partners, VET providers, youth representatives, and other key actors in order to promote apprenticeship schemes and initiatives across Europe;
Amendment 213 #
2014/2235(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 18
Paragraph 18
18. Stresses the importance of career orientation and work experience through individual assessment and career advice provided by highly qualified employment counsellors with experience of their local and national and EU labour market;
Amendment 223 #
2014/2235(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 21
Paragraph 21
21. Believes that close and systematic partnerships are needed at local, regional, national level between governments and employers' and employees' representatives, including public and private employment services, in order to find the best ways of tackling the problem of skill mismatches in all its dimensions, and calls on Member States to promote such cooperation;
Amendment 242 #
2014/2235(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 23
Paragraph 23
23. RecCalls the impfort ance of the mobility of effective economic migration of the highly skilled workers from third countries in the light of the demographic challenges and labour market shortages;
Amendment 256 #
2014/2235(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 24
Paragraph 24
24. Stresses the need to exchange best practices between Member States, as well as to compare and measure their effectiveness, in particular in relation to dual learning and vocational education and training, while acknowledging the specificities of each labour market and education system;
Amendment 274 #
2014/2235(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 26
Paragraph 26
26. Underlines the importance of support measures for SMEs and micro-enterprises, in order to reduce the administrative and financial barriers to their establishment and operation as well as facilitatingthe necessity to embed and act upon the principle of better regulation and to facilitate the hiring of qualified labour and training of employees;
Amendment 302 #
2014/2235(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 29
Paragraph 29
29. Highlights the job creation potential offered by completing the digital single market, building the energy union, creating jobs through investing in research and development and innovation, and fostering improved transport networks;
Amendment 305 #
2014/2235(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 29 a (new)
Paragraph 29 a (new)
29 a. Supports the European Commission´s initiative in cooperation with the Trio Presidency to promote an entrepreneurial mindset in Europe and develop transferable skills for life;
Amendment 312 #
2014/2235(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 30
Paragraph 30
30. Stresses the importance of special measures and support for employers, in particular SMEs, to encourage them to hire young people for their first job and ensure their in-houwork-based training, as also for older workers; recognises and supports the role of public as well as private employment services in promoting inclusive and competitive labour markets; recalls the importance of social and economic responsibility on the part of employers and educational institutions towards all employees and towards society; believes that such social responsibility should also be required of institutions responsible for education and training;
Amendment 316 #
2014/2235(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 30 a (new)
Paragraph 30 a (new)
30 a. Recognises the challenges young people face when entering the labour market, recalls the importance to obtain first work experiences during studies to gain employability skills and to make the transition from school to work more efficient and effective; calls on the responsibility of employers in this regard as to provide young people with the possibility to obtain such experiences, further emphasises the importance of cooperation between schools and employers in this respect;
Amendment 324 #
2014/2235(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 31
Paragraph 31
31. Calls on the Commission and the Member States to consider innovative ways to encourage investment in the EU in order to boost growth and jobs; further emphasises the importance for the Member States to implement economic and financial measures and to carry out labour market reforms which are based on clear, data-based and measurable indicators which effectiveness can be proved;
Amendment 335 #
2014/2235(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 32
Paragraph 32
32. Calls on the Member States to learn from best practices that deliver lower unemployment rates and undertake more ambitious reforms which draw on those practices, including comparing and measuring the effectiveness of such practices, and ensuring the right balance between adaptability and security for workers and companies, as well as promoting diversity in the forms of employment that are available on the labour market;
Amendment 346 #
2014/2235(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 33
Paragraph 33
33. Calls on the Member States to include leadership, management, entrepreneurial and financial education and business start- up advice inas part of their education programmes, including lifelong learning strategies, and to prioritise the further development of vocational training and education (VET) programmes, including financial and non-financial incentives for companies, in cooperation with employers;
Amendment 351 #
2014/2235(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 34
Paragraph 34
34. Calls on the Member States to support the close and systematic involvement of labour market stakeholders, including employers' and employees' organisations, at local, regional and national level as well as public and private employment services, at local, regional and national level, including facilitating communication and sharing of information between them, in order to foster closer links between education and training and the workplace and to anticipate and plan for future skills needs;
Amendment 354 #
2014/2235(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 35
Paragraph 35
35. Calls on the Commission and the Member States to provide financial and economic structurincentives that support participation in continuous education and training in order to secure a high skilled future workforce; recommends to base such incentives on measurable and data- based indicators which effectiveness can be proved;
Amendment 361 #
2014/2235(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 35 a (new)
Paragraph 35 a (new)
35 a. Calls on the Member States and the EU to take concrete steps towards full recognition of qualifications across the EU;
Amendment 2 #
2014/2232(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Citation 6 a (new)
Citation 6 a (new)
- having regard to the report of the UN Special Rapporteur on the promotion and protection of human rights and fundamental freedoms while countering terrorism of 23 September 2014 (A/69/375)1a, __________________ 1ahttp://daccess-dds- ny.un.org/doc/UNDOC/GEN/N14/545/19/ PDF/N1454519.pdf?OpenElement
Amendment 3 #
2014/2232(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Citation 6 b (new)
Citation 6 b (new)
- having regard to the report of the UN Special Rapporteur on the right to freedom of expression and opinion of 17 April 2013 (A/HRC/23/40) on the implications of states' surveillance of communications on the exercise of the human rights to privacy and to freedom of opinion and expression,
Amendment 18 #
2014/2232(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Recital D
Recital D
D. whereas the context in which ICTs are designed and used determines, to a great extent, the impact they can have as a force to advance or to violate human rights, information technology, especially software is rarely single-use and usually dual-use as far as their potential to violate human rights is concerned, while software also is a form of speech;
Amendment 20 #
2014/2232(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Recital D a (new)
Recital D a (new)
Da. whereas the assessment of the context is determined by the strength of national and regional legal frameworks to regulate the use of technologies and the ability of political and judicial institutions to oversee such use;
Amendment 21 #
2014/2232(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Recital E
Recital E
E. whereas in the digital domain, private actors play an increasingly significant role in all spheres of social activities, but safeguards are still not in place to prevent them from imposing excessive restrictions on fundamental rights and freedoms; as a result, private actors play a more active role in assessing the legality of content and in developing cyber security systems and surveillance systems, which can have a detrimental impact on human rights all over the world;
Amendment 23 #
2014/2232(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Recital E a (new)
Recital E a (new)
Ea. whereas encryption is an important method that helps to secure communications and the people using them;
Amendment 24 #
2014/2232(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Recital E b (new)
Recital E b (new)
Eb. whereas internet governance has benefitted from a multistakeholder decision making model; a process ensuring meaningful, inclusive and accountable participation of all stakeholders, governments, civil society, technical and academic communities, private sector, and users;
Amendment 25 #
2014/2232(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Recital E c (new)
Recital E c (new)
Ec. whereas intelligence agencies have systematically undermined cryptographic protocols and products in order to be able to intercept; whereas the US National Security Agency has collected vast numbers of so called 'zero-day exploits' – IT security vulnerabilities that are not yet known to the public or the product vendor; whereas such activities undermine global efforts to improve IT security;
Amendment 26 #
2014/2232(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Recital E d (new)
Recital E d (new)
Ed. whereas EU-based intelligence services have engaged in activities that harm human rights;
Amendment 27 #
2014/2232(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Recital E e (new)
Recital E e (new)
Ee. whereas in light of rapid technological developments, judicial and democratic oversight and safeguards are largely underdeveloped;
Amendment 47 #
2014/2232(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 3
Paragraph 3
3. Stresses that the role of ICTimpact of technologies on the improvement of human rights should be mainstreamed in all EU policies and programmes to advance human rights protection;
Amendment 50 #
2014/2232(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 4
Paragraph 4
4. Calls for the active development and dissemination of technologies that help protect human rights and facilitate people´s digital freedoms and securityrights and freedoms as well as their security, along with promoting best practices and appropriate legislative frameworks;
Amendment 53 #
2014/2232(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 4 a (new)
Paragraph 4 a (new)
4a. Calls on the EU to increase its support for actors, those who work on strengthening security and privacy protection standards in ICTs on all levels, including hardware, software and communication standards as well as the development of the hardware and software in privacy-by-design frameworks;
Amendment 54 #
2014/2232(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 4 b (new)
Paragraph 4 b (new)
4b. Calls for a human rights and technology fund to be established under the European Instrument for Democracy and Human Rights;
Amendment 55 #
2014/2232(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 4 c (new)
Paragraph 4 c (new)
4c. Urges the EU itself, and in particular the EEAS, to use encryption in its communications with human rights defenders, to avoid putting defenders at risk and to protect its own communications with outsiders from surveillance;
Amendment 56 #
2014/2232(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 4 d (new)
Paragraph 4 d (new)
4d. Calls on the EU to adopt free and open source software as well as to encourage other actors to do so, as such software provides for better security and for greater respect for human rights;
Amendment 75 #
2014/2232(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 7
Paragraph 7
7. Calls for the inclusion of conditionality clauses in all agreements with third countries which explicitly refer to the need to guarantee and respect digital freedoms, net neutrality and unrestricted access to the internet;
Amendment 78 #
2014/2232(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 7 a (new)
Paragraph 7 a (new)
7a. Urges the EU to counter the criminalisation of human rights defenders' use of encryption, censorship- bypassing and privacy tools, by refusing to limit the use of encryption within the EU and challenge third country governments which use such charges against defenders;
Amendment 82 #
2014/2232(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 8
Paragraph 8
8. Stresses that an effective EU development and human rights policy will require the mainstreaming of ICTs and the bridging of the digital divide, by providing basic technological infrastructure and by facilitating access to knowledge and information to promote digital literacy and the use of open standards in documents as well as the use of free and open source software (especially by public institutions) all over the world;
Amendment 106 #
2014/2232(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 11 a (new)
Paragraph 11 a (new)
11a. Urges Member States to promote full democratic scrutiny over the operations of intelligence services in third countries, and that these services operate in full respect of the rule of law, and to hold to account those who are responsible for operating in unlawful ways;
Amendment 110 #
2014/2232(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 12
Paragraph 12
12. Stresses that corporate social responsibility principles and human rights by design criteria, which are technological solutions and innovations protecting human rights, should be adopted in EU law to ensure that internet service providers, software developers, hardware producers, social networking services/media, mobile phone carriers and others consider the human rights of end- users globally;
Amendment 112 #
2014/2232(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 12 a (new)
Paragraph 12 a (new)
12a. Urges the EU to ensure greater transparency in the relationship between mobile phone carriers or ISPs and governments, and to call for it in its relations with third countries, by demanding that carriers and ISPs publish yearly detailed transparency reports, including reports on requested actions by authorities, as well as financial ties between public authorities and carriers/ISPs;
Amendment 118 #
2014/2232(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 14
Paragraph 14
14. Urges the Commission, in this respect, to swiftly to put forward a proposal for smart and effective policies to regulate the export of services regarding the implementation and use of so-called dual- use technologies, addressing potentially harmful exports of ICT products and services to third countries, as agreed in the Joint Statement of the European Parliament, Council and Commission of April 2014;
Amendment 121 #
2014/2232(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 15
Paragraph 15
15. Stresses that the Commission should swiftly be able to swiftly and accurately provide companies that are in doubt as to whether to apply for an export licence with up-to- date information on the legality or potentially harmful effects of potential transactions;
Amendment 123 #
2014/2232(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 16
Paragraph 16
16. Calls on the Commission to submit proposals to review how EU standards on ICTs could be used to prevent the potentially harmful impacts of the export of such technologies or other services to third countries where concepts such as ‘lawful interception’ have different implicatcannot be considered equivalent to those of the European Unions, or for example where the rule of law does not exist;
Amendment 126 #
2014/2232(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 16 a (new)
Paragraph 16 a (new)
16a. Reaffirms that EU standards, particularly the EU Charter of Fundamental Rights, should prevail when assessing incidents when dual-use technologies are used in a way that may restrict human rights;
Amendment 127 #
2014/2232(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 17
Paragraph 17
17. Calls for the development of policies to regulate the sales of zero-day exploits to avoid their being used for cyber-attacks or for unauthorised access to devices leading to human rights violations without such regulations having a meaningful impact on academic and otherwise bona fide security research;
Amendment 133 #
2014/2232(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 18
Paragraph 18
18. Deplores the active involvement of certain European companies, and of international companies which trade dual- use technologies with potential detrimental effects on human rights while operating in the EU, in countries violating human rights;
Amendment 142 #
2014/2232(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 20
Paragraph 20
20. Calls on the Commission and Council to actively to defend the open internet, multi- stakeholder decision-making procedures, net neutrality and digital freedoms in internet governance fora;
Amendment 146 #
2014/2232(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 20 a (new)
Paragraph 20 a (new)
20a. Condemns the weakening and undermining of encryption protocols and products, particularly by intelligence services who wish to intercept communications that are encrypted;
Amendment 147 #
2014/2232(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 20 b (new)
Paragraph 20 b (new)
20b. Warns against the privatization of law enforcement through internet companies and internet service providers;
Amendment 148 #
2014/2232(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 20 c (new)
Paragraph 20 c (new)
20c. Calls for a clarification of norms and standards that private actors use to develop their systems;
Amendment 149 #
2014/2232(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 20 d (new)
Paragraph 20 d (new)
20d. Recalls the importance of assessing the context within which technologies are used, in order to fully appreciate their human rights impact;
Amendment 150 #
2014/2232(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 20 e (new)
Paragraph 20 e (new)
20e. Explicitly calls for promoting tools enabling the anonymous and/or pseudonymous use of the internet and to challenge the one-sided view that such tools are allowing criminal activities, rather than empowering human rights activists beyond and within the EU;
Amendment 151 #
2014/2232(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 20 f (new)
Paragraph 20 f (new)
20f. Urges the Council, the Commission and the External Action Service to develop smart and effective policies to regulate the export of dual-use technologies, addressing potentially harmful exports of ICT products and services, at international level within multilateral export control regimes and other international bodies;
Amendment 152 #
2014/2232(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 20 g (new)
Paragraph 20 g (new)
20g. Stresses that any regulatory changes aimed at increasing the effectiveness of export controls vis-à-vis Intangible Technology Transfers must not inhibit legitimate research and access to and exchange of information, and that any potential measures such as the use of EU General Export Authorisations for dual- use research should not have a 'chilling effect' upon individuals and SMEs;
Amendment 153 #
2014/2232(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 20 h (new)
Paragraph 20 h (new)
20h. Calls on Member States to ensure that existing and future export control policies do not restrict the activities of legitimate security researchers, and that export controls are applied in good faith to only clearly defined technologies intended to be used for mass surveillance, censorship, jamming, interception, monitoring, and the tracing and tracking of citizens and their activities on (mobile) telephone networks;
Amendment 154 #
2014/2232(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 20 i (new)
Paragraph 20 i (new)
20i. Recalls that mesh-based ad hoc wireless technologies offer a high potential to provide for backup networks in areas where the internet is unavailable or blocked, and can help the advancement of human rights;
Amendment 155 #
2014/2232(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 20 j (new)
Paragraph 20 j (new)
20j. Calls on the Commission to appoint an independent group of experts who can perform a human rights impact assessment on existing EU standards for ICTs, with the goal of making recommendations for adjustments that will increase the protection of human rights, particularly when systems are exported;
Amendment 159 #
2014/2232(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 22
Paragraph 22
22. Underlines the need to avoid unintended consequences such as restrictions or chilling effects on research, on the exchange of and access to information or on the export of technologies that are in the interest of advancing human rights;
Amendment 47 #
2014/2231(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 7
Paragraph 7
7. Stresses that in order to sustain and further develop EED effectiveness it is vital to ensure long-term, sufficient, stable, transparent and predictable funding;
Amendment 1 #
2014/2229(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Citation 4 a (new)
Citation 4 a (new)
- having regard to the Report on the Role of Local and Regional Authorities in Managing Migration in the Mediterranean of 15 December 2014 of the Euro-Mediterranean Regional and Local Assembly (ARLEM),
Amendment 3 #
2014/2229(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Citation 5 a (new)
Citation 5 a (new)
- having regard to the Opinion on EU Support for Sustainable Change in Transition Societies of 11/12 April 2013 of the European Committee of the Regions,
Amendment 5 #
2014/2229(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Citation 19 a (new)
Citation 19 a (new)
- having regard to the conclusions of the meeting of 23 March 2015 in Brussels of Libyan municipality representatives, convened by the United Nations Support Mission in Libya and hosted by the European Union,
Amendment 57 #
2014/2229(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Citation 27 b (new)
Citation 27 b (new)
- whereas the so-called "democratic clause", contained usually in article 2 of most of the Agreements signed between the EU and third countries, gives the EU a strategic tool to demand for solutions to conflicts in which human rights are not fully respected; whereas the EU has not deeply developed this possibility;
Amendment 116 #
2014/2229(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 4
Paragraph 4
4. Notes the allocation of EUR one billion under the EU strategy entitled 'Elements of an EU Regional Strategy for Syria and Iraq as well as the Da'esh threat' , under which EUR 400 million has been earmarked for humanitarian aid; calls for special attention to be given to Jordan and, Lebanon and Syria; is concerned that, as a result of extreme poverty and deprivation, refugee camps may become a hotbed of radicalisation; welcomes the funds for host populations under the new strategy and under the Instrument contributing to Stability and Peace (IcSP); invites international organizations (UN, LAS) to guarantee the necessary security in refugee camps in Syria through deployment of neutral troops;
Amendment 123 #
2014/2229(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 5
Paragraph 5
5. Welcomes the involvement of the countries of the Arab Peninsula in the international coalition against ISIS; urges their governments to redouble their efforts to prevent the financing of international terrorism, for example through including increased surveillance of waqfs and private donors; stresses the urgent need to introduce an efficient system of penalties coordinated with the LAS, the OIC (Organization of Islamic Cooperation) and the GCC, so as to put an end to ISIS financing by the Arab world; stresses also the urgent need for a decryption system to deal with clandestine oil sales by ISIS and to put strict sanctions to those institutions, companies and/or individuals directly or indirectly involved in commercialization (import and export), financing and oil trafficking;
Amendment 136 #
2014/2229(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 6
Paragraph 6
6. Stresses the importance of long-term strategic dialogue with the LAS, OIC and GCC; welcomes in this regard the declaration adopted in Athens on 11 June 2014 and the memorandum of understanding of January 2015 and calls for their full implementation; stresses the crucial importance of the regular organisation of summits between the EU and LAS, OIC, and GCC; stresses the central role to be played by the LAS, OIC and GCC in terms of crisis resolution; is convinced that these crises highlight the need for the LAS, OIC and GCC to be transformed by its members into a fully- fledged executive body genuinely capable of taking binding decisions;
Amendment 165 #
2014/2229(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 8
Paragraph 8
8. Recalls the need to put in place the conditions for a resumption of peace talks between Israel and the Palestinian Authority for a lastingdefinitive settlement of the conflict based on a solution enabling both countries to live side by side in peace and security over the borders of 1967; welcomes the 2002 peace initiatives and calls on Israel and the LAS countries to put them into effect; calls on international donors to honour the commitments made by them at the Cairo Conference of October 2014; establishes that Israel must put an end to occupation initiated nearly half a century ago; consequently, the end to occupation must take place by the end of 2016;
Amendment 184 #
2014/2229(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 9
Paragraph 9
9. Expresses full support for a new common security and defence policy (CSDP) to promote stability and security in the MENA countries; points out that the EU could play a major role in providing specific training in border surveillance, illegal immigration, anti-terrorism and the prevention of arms’ trafficking and in overhauling security;
Amendment 200 #
2014/2229(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 10
Paragraph 10
10. Recalls the crucial importance of promoting improved cooperation between the EU Member States and the MENA countries in combating terrorism and organized crime; calls for closer cooperation with the Europol and Interpol countries, providing them with assistance in developing the necessary anti- terrorist structures and resources;
Amendment 211 #
2014/2229(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 11
Paragraph 11
11. Stresses the urgent need for a political solution to the conflict in Syria, taking due account of the moderate opposition existing alongside the Syrian National Council and streexcluding thening the moderate Sunni components; points out that no democratic solution in line with the fundamental principles of the Union can be negotiated with Bachar Al-Assad, following the massacres perpetrated by him terrorist elements like Daesh and its allies; points out that there is no military solution, but only political;
Amendment 230 #
2014/2229(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 13
Paragraph 13
13. Stresses the need for the Iraqi Government to continue to promote the sharing of political responsibilities, power and oil profits, encompassing all religious and ethnic communities in that country; calls for this to be made an essential condition for implementation of the Partnership and Cooperation Agreement between the EU and Iraq; calls on the EU to contribute to capacity building byreinforce political and military capacities of the Iraqi Government;
Amendment 261 #
2014/2229(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 14 a (new)
Paragraph 14 a (new)
14a. Admits that territorial and social division in Libya will only be solved by a peace and unity agreement between all the actors involved in the conflict, which requires their identification and inclusion around a peace and reconciliation table;
Amendment 262 #
2014/2229(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 14 b (new)
Paragraph 14 b (new)
14b. Understands that the situation in the South of Libya is of extreme gravity, as it is an area controlled by tribal militia, criminal bands and terrorists, open to all means of trafficking that acts as a platform for organized crime and terrorist groups;
Amendment 284 #
2014/2229(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 16 a (new)
Paragraph 16 a (new)
16a. Strongly believes that the development of local democracy and effective local governance is crucial to the stabilisation of MENA countries, and therefore calls for the institutionalisation and capacity development of associations of local and regional authorities in MENA countries;
Amendment 298 #
2014/2229(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 18
Paragraph 18
18. Stresses the need to develop an effective common European response by all Member States to jihadist propaganda, involving Europe's local authorities, and working with communities of European citizens who have strong cultural ties with MENA countries; underlines the need to send a positive message regarding relations between the European Union and the MENA countries and cooperation between them; stresses the need to ensure much greater visibility for EU initiatives in the region than is now the case;
Amendment 335 #
2014/2229(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 21 a (new)
Paragraph 21 a (new)
21a. Recalls that 2015 is the European Year for Development which aims to inspire more Europeans to get involved in the eradication of poverty worldwide, and which coincides with the international community's plans to agree a set of Sustainable Development Goals; calls on public authorities at all levels of government in MENA countries to make the achievement of these goals a priority;
Amendment 340 #
2014/2229(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 22 a (new)
Paragraph 22 a (new)
22a. takes the view that no economic or social progress will exist without knowledge and culture, and no knowledge and culture will exist without liberty and free access to knowledge sources; thus, requires from the Authorities of the Southern neighbourhood countries to act in consequence;
Amendment 361 #
2014/2229(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 26
Paragraph 26
26. Instructs its President to forward this resolution to the Council, the Commission, the Vice-President of the Commission/High Representative of the Union for Foreign Affairs and Security Policy, the European Committee of the Regions, the governments and parliaments of all the EU Member States, the LAS and UfM Secretaries-General and the governments and parliaments of their member countries.
Amendment 20 #
2014/2228(INI)
Draft opinion
Paragraph 1 a (new)
Paragraph 1 a (new)
1a. Stresses that trade policy is an essential part of the EU's external action and as such, must be formulated in a way that is in line with other foreign policies and policy instruments; encourages therefore a close interaction between relevant commissioners, Directorates General, the European External Action Service and the Member States;
Amendment 34 #
2014/2228(INI)
Draft opinion
Paragraph 2
Paragraph 2
2. Notes the TTIP's strategic importance in strengthening and shaping rules-based global trade and economic governance basfounded on the values shared by the EU and the US, particularly in an increasingly multipolar world; notes that its impact would go beyond the bilateral implications by facilitating the establishment of common regulations and rules that could later be adopted at global level; stresses in this regard that bilateral negotiations that the EU conducts must not be a substitute but rather a spring board for further trade liberalisation within the WTO;
Amendment 44 #
2014/2228(INI)
Draft opinion
Paragraph 2 a (new)
Paragraph 2 a (new)
2a. Emphasises that TTIP must not lower standards on important issues like consumer protection, labour rights or environment, but rather seek to achieve high common standards as a model for the world, as this would strengthen the EU's global economic position, while furthering our values;
Amendment 57 #
2014/2228(INI)
Draft opinion
Paragraph 3 a (new)
Paragraph 3 a (new)
3a. Notes that studies indicate TTIP would have a positive impact for third country economies, including developing countries; stresses that trade and development policy are interlinked and must be shaped in a coherent way;
Amendment 58 #
2014/2228(INI)
Draft opinion
Paragraph 3 b (new)
Paragraph 3 b (new)
3b. Calls on the Commission and the United States to find a way to more actively involve third countries that would be (indirectly) impacted by TTIP, such as Mexico because of the North American Free Trade Agreement and Turkey because of its Customs Union with the EU;
Amendment 69 #
2014/2228(INI)
Draft opinion
Paragraph 4
Paragraph 4
4. Stresses that the EU's energy supply largely depends on foreign sources; emphasises the considerable contribution the TTIP could make to the EU's energy supply diversification and to its energy security by, inter alia, lifting licensing requirements for US gas exports; stresses that diversification of fossil fuel sources cannot be a substitute for a strong and ambitious sustainable energy policy, through which the EU should pursue true energy independence;
Amendment 86 #
2014/2228(INI)
Draft opinion
Paragraph 5
Paragraph 5
5. Believes that this agreement should be accompanied by a deepening of transatlantic parliamentary cooperation, and that the strengthening of trade and investment links through the TTIP should lead in the future to an enhanced political framework to improve global cooperation between the EU and the US; stresses that any instruments created to strengthen cooperation should not affect the European or American legislative procedures and that all legislators and all stakeholders must always be involved in any body that may be created to promote future regulatory cooperation;
Amendment 78 #
2014/2220(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 12 a (new)
Paragraph 12 a (new)
12a. Considers that an evaluation of the efficiency of the 17 ongoing European Missions abroad should be done and those that were designed totally or partially for an impossible operational end, should be suspended or reduced;
Amendment 92 #
2014/2220(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 19
Paragraph 19
19. Given that Union missions both civilian (EUCAP) and military (EUTM) are focusing on training, asks whether a structural policy for putting such missions on a long-term footing with efficient mandates and objectives that adequate the situation they are confronting, with the provision of financial and equipment assistance, ought not to be introduced; considers that such a new policy, as part of the Union’s cooperation and development efforts, would be a means of furthering the work being done under the ‘Train and Equip’ and ’E2I’ initiatives which aim to build the capabilities of third countries (in terms of equipment, materiel, infrastructure and salaries) so that their armed forces are properly operational;
Amendment 9 #
2014/2219(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 1
Paragraph 1
1. Points to the dramatically aggravated security environment around the EU, where the international law-based order and stability and security of Europe are challenged to a degree unprecedented since the beginning of European integrationperiod since the late 1990s when the ESDP/CSDP was established; points to the ongoing transformation of the global political order;
Amendment 20 #
2014/2219(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 3 – indent 1
Paragraph 3 – indent 1
– safeguarding peace and stability by speaking with one voice and taking solidarity actions in protecting European values and enforcing the political and legal order in Europe, thereby safeguarding peace and stability,
Amendment 34 #
2014/2219(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 3 – indent 2
Paragraph 3 – indent 2
– improving the EU’s contribution to its territorial defence,
Amendment 44 #
2014/2219(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 3 – indent 3
Paragraph 3 – indent 3
– supporting security, stabilisation and the rule of law in the EU’s eastern and southern neighbourhood,
Amendment 46 #
2014/2219(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 3 – indent 3 a (new)
Paragraph 3 – indent 3 a (new)
- taking a main role in the resolution of conflicts in Europe and in areas of its strategic interest,
Amendment 54 #
2014/2219(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 3 – indent 4
Paragraph 3 – indent 4
– strengthening, together with partners, the rules-based, democratic and pluralistic global political and economic order, including the protection of human rights, and
Amendment 67 #
2014/2219(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 4
Paragraph 4
4. Believes that an ambitious and effective EU foreign policy needs to be based on acommon European values and shared vision of key European interests, values and objectives in external relations and on a common perception of the threats affecting the EU as a whole; welcomes the commitment of the HR/VP, on the basis of the mandate from the European Council of December 2013, to initiate as a matter of priority a process of strategic reflection on the EU’s foreign and security policy, which should involve a wide range of stakeholders, including Member States, European institutions and the European public; insists that this reflection should lead to a new European Security Strategy in order to respond to the new threats and challenges;
Amendment 75 #
2014/2219(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 5 a (new)
Paragraph 5 a (new)
5a. Underlines the need for a common strategy to face significant new security threats, with the predominant one being terrorism inside and outside the EU; emphasises the need to intertwine internal and external security of EU as well as closer cooperation and coordination of the responsible authorities; calls for strengthening and deepening the cooperation among EU members on intelligence data exchange;
Amendment 104 #
2014/2219(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 8
Paragraph 8
8. Encourages the EU institutions and the Member States to fully use the toolbox of the Lisbon Treaty to move from what has so far been a mostly reactive approach to a pro-active, coherent EU foreign and security policy, based on common values and deployed in the shared European interest;
Amendment 120 #
2014/2219(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 11
Paragraph 11
11. Reiterates that the internal structures of the EEAS need to be reformed so as to enable it to assist the HR/VP in all her roles and to enable her to advance strategic planning and coordinate political processes within the Council and the Commission; insists on the need to rationalise the EEAS top management structure and to streamline decision-making processes; reiterates its call for closer integration of the EU Special Representatives into the EEAS, including through a transfer of their budget from the CFSP operational budget into the EEAS budget;
Amendment 142 #
2014/2219(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 14
Paragraph 14
14. Underlines the vital importance of collective defence guaranteed by NATO for its members; urges the Member States, as a matter of urgency,stresses that the Common Security and Defence Policy (CSDP) should be deepened further in cooperation with NATO; urges the Member States to step up their ability to contribute to territorial defence, commit morethe necessary resources and cooperate more closely to build synergies towards European military structure; stresses that all the Member States must enjoy the same level of security, in line with Article 42(7) TEU; stresses that a credible EU foreign policy needs to be underpinned by adequate defence capabilities in the Member States and an effective Common Security and Defence Policy (CSDP); takes the view that the CSDP is an important component of European defence and can contribute to it in many ways, including by fostering defence cooperation, enhancing interoperability and increasing efficiency; welcomes the HR/VP’s commitment to actively engage on defence matters, including by chairing meetings of the Foreign Affairs Council in the Defence Ministers configuration;
Amendment 209 #
2014/2219(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 18
Paragraph 18
18. Calls for a reform of the EU’s approach torenewed and coherent EU migration policy; insists on the need to address the root causes of irregular migration, using all policy and assistance instruments provided by all member states which will share human and material means, including development and trade policies, humanitarian aid, conflict prevention and crisis management; reiterates its call to step up humanitarian support to countries which host refugees and to strengthen Regional Protection Programmes, run in collaboration with UNHCR close to regions of origin; stresses that migration management should be a high priority in EU cooperation with neighbours in the east and south;
Amendment 228 #
2014/2219(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 19
Paragraph 19
19. Points out that energy is increasingly being used as a foreign policy tool and recalls that energy cooperation lies at the foundation of European integration; calls for increased coherence and coordination between foreign policy and energy policy; takes the view that energy security should be part of the comprehensive approach to the EU’s external action and believesis confident that energy policy must be in line with the Union’s other priority policies, including its security, foreign and neighbourhood, trade, and development policies, as well as its policies in defence of human rights;
Amendment 243 #
2014/2219(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 21
Paragraph 21
21. Takes the view that a solidarity mechanism should be put in place in order to deal with possible energy disruptions; believesis confident that an interconnected energy infrastructure should be further developed and that efforts to diversify the EU’s energy supply should be accelerated in order to strengthen the energy independence of Member States;
Amendment 251 #
2014/2219(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 22
Paragraph 22
22. Welcomes HR/VP Federica Mogherini’s cooperative attitude towards Parliament, aimed at strengthening her accountability to the institution; reiterates the need for systematic and proactive consultation with Parliament prior to the adoption of foreign policy strategies and CSDP mandates; asks the Council to finalise negotiations with Parliament on replacing the 2002 Interinstitutional Agreement concerning access by the European Parliament to sensitive information of the Council in the field of security and defence policy; is committed to intensifying cooperation with national parliaments, including within the Inter- Parliamentary Conference for the CFSP and the CSDP and COSAC, in order to be better prepared to control the respective resources;
Amendment 254 #
2014/2219(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Subheading 3
Subheading 3
Preserving and strengthening the European political and legal order, in the Eastern Neighbourhood in particular
Amendment 262 #
2014/2219(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 23
Paragraph 23
23. Underlines the need to consolidate the EU and to strengthen its integration capacity, which is one of the Copenhagen criteria; reiterates the enlargement perspective for the countries of the Western Balkans, based on fulfilment of the Copenhagen criteria; supports, in this connection, the Commission’s approach, which consists in addressing fundamental reforms in the area of the rule of law, public administration and economic governance early in the enlargement process; believes, likewise, that in instances where the Commission deems a candidate country´s level of alignment with the EU acquis satisfactory, accession negotiations should be opened or swiftly continued, according to the country´s stage in the process; highlights that this approach is crucial for preserving the credibility of the EU as a whole and of its enlargement policy in particular;
Amendment 265 #
2014/2219(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 24
Paragraph 24
24. Takes the view that an overarching political strategy is needed, aimed at reinvigorating the European political and legal order, which was laid down with the Helsinki Final Act of 1975 and which binds all European states, including Russia; insists that this order is based on respect for human rights and fundamental freedoms, the sovereignty, independence and territorial integrity of states, and the peaceful resolution of conflicts; sees the development of a constructive dialogue with Russia on cooperation to strengthen this order as an important basis for peace and stability in Europe;
Amendment 295 #
2014/2219(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 27
Paragraph 27
27. Welcomes the results of the parliamentary elections held in Ukraine and Moldova in October and December 2014 respectively, and urges the Governments of Georgia, Moldova and Ukraine to progress with reforms relating to political and economic governance and the rule of law; calls on the HR/VP to use all available political, security and economic tools to provide comprehensive support to the Ukrainian, Georgian and Moldovan Governments on this path;
Amendment 317 #
2014/2219(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 31
Paragraph 31
31. Emphasises the need for the EU and its Member States to speak with one voice vis-à-vis Russia; calls on the HR/VP to develop, as a matter of priority, a common EU strategy on Russia, aimed at securing a commitment from Russia on peace and stability in Europe; believes that a good relationship between Russia and the EU would beRussia on having good relations believing that a good relationship between Russia and the EU, based on comprehensive legal obligations covering all the main areas of relations, including the defence of human rights, respect for democratic values, principles of the rule of law and international treaties and commitments, is in the common interest and hopes that Russia will show itself open to such a development by respecting international law;
Amendment 336 #
2014/2219(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 32
Paragraph 32
32. Insists on the need to substantially revise the EU´s policy towards its southern neighbourhood, and to develop a comprehensive strategy focusing the EU’s instruments and scarce budgetary resources on support for the building of functioning and inclusive states capable of delivering security for their citizens, confronting religious extremism and, enhancing the rule of law and respecting human rights, which is a key precondition for investment and economic development; points to the unused potential of cross- border trade within the region; insists on close cooperation on managing migration flows, while respecting human rights;
Amendment 348 #
2014/2219(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 33
Paragraph 33
33. Takes the view that additional EU support should be granted to partner governments which are committed to and make tangible progress towards democratisation, such as Tunisia, Jordan and Morocco, provided that the protection of human rights is ensured and the rules of international law are respected;
Amendment 361 #
2014/2219(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 34
Paragraph 34
34. Urges the EU leadership to develop, in close coordination with the US and involving major powers (e.g. Russia and China), a strategy encouraging regional actors (including Turkey, Iraq, Jordan, Egypt, Gulf Cooperation Council governments, Iran, the Arab League and Kurdish forces) to unite in order to put an end to proxy wars and halt financial support to fundamentalists, to resolve outstanding "frozen conflicts" and to develop a solution for peace and stability in the region; supports the engagement of all parties involved in the Middle East peace process in finding a comprehensive, constructive and sustainablIsrael - Palestine peace process understanding that the occupation of the Palestinian territory has to come to an end and that the peace process needs to be done in accordance to the two-state solution ton the Middle East conflictbasis of the 1967 borders; emphasises the need to preserve the territorial integrity and national unity of Libya and urges the HR/VP to provide impetus for a stronger engagement of regional actors on mediation and conflict resolution; (E.g. See wording in point A. in European Parliament resolution on recognition of PalestineOr. en statehood (2014/2964(RSP)))
Amendment 409 #
2014/2219(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 38 – point a (new)
Paragraph 38 – point a (new)
(a) Stresses that the peace and stability in the Asia-Pacific Region, in the areas of the East and South China Sea in particular, is of strategic importance to the EU; urges all parties concerned in the region to solve differences in a peaceful way, in line with international law, and to cooperate with each other to exploit natural and marine resources; takes the view that the EU has a substantial interest in East Asia's continued growth and prosperity; underlines the need to strengthen the EU's economic partnership with Asia-Pacific countries in an inclusive manner so as to maintain sustainable peace, stability and prosperity; welcomes the encouraging improvements in cross- Strait relations over the past six years and calls upon to take further measures to facilitate their peaceful development; urges the HR/VP and the Council to continue its cooperation with all stakeholders in the region, on a broad range of global issues.
Amendment 412 #
2014/2219(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 39
Paragraph 39
39. Underlines the need for an EU strategy, in coordination with the US, on how to drawshare with Russia, China and other major powers intothe responsibility for the peace and stability of the global political and economic order; to this end, urges the HR/VP and the Council to re-think strategic partnerships;
Amendment 2 #
2014/2205(INI)
Draft opinion
Paragraph 1
Paragraph 1
1. Stresses that, under Article 208 TFEU, the primary objectives of EU development cooperation isare to reduce and eradicate poverty; highlights the fact that development cooperation must be guided by that objective and not by geostrategic or economic interests; refuses to accept that development cooperation should be subordinate to external and security policy, to promote human rights, to spread and to strengthen democracy, good governance and the rule of law; highlights the fact that development cooperation must be guided by these objectives;
Amendment 6 #
2014/2205(INI)
Draft opinion
Paragraph 1
Paragraph 1
1. Stresses that, under Article 208 TFEU, the primary objective of EU development cooperation is to reduce and eradicate poverty; highlights the fact that development cooperation must be guided by that objective and not by geostrategic or economic interests; refuses to accept that development cooperation should be subordinate to external and security policywhile supporting and being part of the EU's overall policy objectives; underlines that development and security are interlinked and that private sector has a potential to contribute to a sustainable, efficient and long-term development;
Amendment 14 #
2014/2205(INI)
Draft opinion
Paragraph 1 a (new)
Paragraph 1 a (new)
1 a. Requests all EU enterprises to fulfil their corporate social responsibility to respect human rights in line with the UN Guiding Principles; Urges the European Union to look for ways to strengthen Corporate Social Responsibility, for example by improving visibility of CSR and enhancing market reward for companies adhering to CSR guidelines;
Amendment 15 #
2014/2205(INI)
Draft opinion
Paragraph 1 a (new)
Paragraph 1 a (new)
1 a. Calls for the development of more effective transparency and accountability standards for EU technology companies in connection with the export of technologies that can be used to violate human rights, to aid corruption or to act against the EU's security interests;
Amendment 16 #
2014/2205(INI)
Draft opinion
Paragraph 1 b (new)
Paragraph 1 b (new)
1 b. Notes that the framework for development assistance must be set by governments and that there is a primary task for the public sector; acknowledges however, that the private sector also plays an important role in strengthening the economies of third countries and improving access to capital;
Amendment 17 #
2014/2205(INI)
Draft opinion
Paragraph 1 b (new)
Paragraph 1 b (new)
1 b. Stresses that development policy cannot achieve these objectives as a stand-alone policy, but must be integrated in a broader approach, which combines foreign and security policy, trade policy and any other external action policy instruments; Notes that coherence between these different branches of EU external action is crucial;
Amendment 18 #
2014/2205(INI)
Draft opinion
Paragraph 1 c (new)
Paragraph 1 c (new)
1 c. Stresses the need to look at how the private sector can be further engaged in the framework of the European Neighbourhood Policy, to help create economic growth and jobs in Europe's neighbourhood, for example through sharing expertise of providing access to capital;
Amendment 21 #
2014/2205(INI)
Draft opinion
Paragraph 2
Paragraph 2
Amendment 22 #
2014/2205(INI)
Draft opinion
Paragraph 2
Paragraph 2
Amendment 29 #
2014/2205(INI)
Draft opinion
Paragraph 2 a (new)
Paragraph 2 a (new)
2 a. Underlines that the private sector should be involved in EU development policy and projects as long as the different role between private sector and public sector actors are fully understood and recognised by all parties involved; stresses that public-private partnerships within the post-2015 development agenda must have a strong focus on poverty reduction; underlines that a fully functioning market economy, based on the rule of law, remains the best engine for economic and social development and that the EU's development policy should reflect that fact;
Amendment 45 #
2014/2205(INI)
Draft opinion
Paragraph 3 a (new)
Paragraph 3 a (new)
3 a. Stresses the importance of local and regional ownership, partner countries' own national strategies and reform agendas; and involvement of development projects and the added value provided by securing local supply chains; believes that development policy has an important role to play in addressing the challenges posted by current migration flows towards the European Union;
Amendment 50 #
2014/2205(INI)
Draft opinion
Paragraph 4
Paragraph 4
4. IStresses that respect for human rights should become business imperative; is concerned at the devastating consequences of land grabbing, inter alia, for human rights, especially of indigenous people, the economy and the environment; calls for binding international rules for firms on compliance with human rights, labour law and environmental standards;
Amendment 25 #
2014/2150(INI)
Draft opinion
Paragraph 2
Paragraph 2
2. Supports the Commission’s commitment on cutting red tape and for providing better regulation; welcomes the effort of the Juncker Commission to a strengthened Better Regulation Agenda and calls for the need for it to deliver an efficient system and actual progress; believes that cutting red tape should aim to deliver proportionate, evidence-based protection for workers, while ensuring that businesses can grow, create jobs and boost competitiveness; notes that debetter regulation and better regulationhigh protection of employees are not mutually exclusive;
Amendment 38 #
2014/2150(INI)
Draft opinion
Paragraph 3
Paragraph 3
3. Welcomes efforts to identify genuine opportunities for simplification of legislationand adaptability of legislation whilst maintaining high standards; stresses the need for simpler, clearly-worded rules that remove complexity and can be implemented in a simple manner in order to improve compliance, particularly in the area of health, safety and employment legislation; recalls the importance of the principles of subsidiarity and proportionality;
Amendment 43 #
2014/2150(INI)
Draft opinion
Paragraph 3 a (new)
Paragraph 3 a (new)
3a. Stresses the need for a bottom-up approach to better regulation; therefore calls on the Commission to establish a "European Stakeholder Forum" on better regulation and less bureaucracy with a quantitative goal of reducing administrative burdens by 20 % by 2020; emphasizes that the Forum shall consist of relevant stakeholders, including official representatives from the civil society, the social partners, consumer organizations and the business community especially SME's which represent 80 % of European job-creation, stresses that proposals from this forum should be actively considered by the Commission, and that the Commission should address the proposals in accordance with the "comply or explain principle; believes the Forum could serve as a platform for businesses or collective groups working both nationally or across Europe to submit inputs supporting the better regulation principles or contributing to achieving less bureaucracy in the regulation applying in their sector;
Amendment 87 #
2014/2150(INI)
Draft opinion
Paragraph 5
Paragraph 5
5. Welcomes the SME test and reminds the Commission on the commitment it has made in the Small Business Act to implement the "think small first principle" in its policy-making and considers that there is still an important margin of progress to be completed; calls on the Commission to use lighter regimes for micro-enterprises, start-ups and SMEs and to consider exemptions for micro-enterprisesthem on a case-by-case basis, while not compromising on health, safety and employment standards;
Amendment 105 #
2014/2150(INI)
Draft opinion
Paragraph 6
Paragraph 6
6. Calls for further measures such as carrying out independent impact assessments throughout the legislative process, further strengthening the independence, objectivity and neutrality of impact assessments and the SME-test, further facilitating citizens participation in the EUs legislative process, ensuring the adaptability of legislators and increasing transparency of inter- institutional negotiations as well as monitoring the transposition of the EU- legislation into national laws by including national gold-plating in the EU Regulatory Scoreboard to check that legislation is doing what it was intended to do and to identify areas where there are inconsistencies and ineffective measures;
Amendment 388 #
2014/2075(DEC)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 166
Paragraph 166
Amendment 393 #
2014/2075(DEC)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 166 a (new)
Paragraph 166 a (new)
166a. Takes note that OLAF carried out a report on the humanitarian aid granted to the Saharawi refugee camp of Tindouf in Algeria (dated 2007). Calls for clarification by the Commission on the measures taken in response to the findings of this report. Reminds the Commission of the importance to adapt Union aid to the actual needs of the population concerned;
Amendment 397 #
2014/2075(DEC)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 167
Paragraph 167
Amendment 35 #
2014/2021(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 1 – point m
Paragraph 1 – point m
(m) to promote gender equality and furthermore to point out Japan´s problematic attitude towards so-called "comfort women" who were treated as sexual slaves during World War II; to support local, regional and international actors who actively call upon Japan to deal with this particular aspect of its past and to take full responsibility for human rights violations that are yet to be officially recognized as well as victims compensated;
Amendment 38 #
2014/2017(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 1 – point h
Paragraph 1 – point h
h. to ensure, in this regard, that responsibility to prevent and stop genocide and mass atrocities lies primarily with the state concerned, but that the international community also has a role that supersedes the invocation of sovereignty considering its position of witness of these crimes;
Amendment 41 #
2014/2017(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 1 – point m
Paragraph 1 – point m
m. to strongly support and promote the full implementation of UN resolution 2106 on fighting impunity in conflict-related sexual violence, and to ensure the consolidation of further accountability and, preventive measures and support to victims of sexual crimes and abuses;
Amendment 52 #
2014/2017(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 1 – point q
Paragraph 1 – point q
q. to take all necessary legislative and administrative measures to fully implement the recommendations of the UNGA resolution10 , in order to guarantee that citizens have the same rights offline and online, and in particular the review of procedures, practices and legislation, and the establishment of independent and effective oversight mechanisms; __________________ 10to assert that citizens also have duties online as they do offline, in particular responsibility of speech and act, especially if it could harm or threaten others´ rights; __________________ 10 UNGA resolution A/C.3/68/L.45/Rev.1. UNGA resolution A/C.3/68/L.45/Rev.1.
Amendment 6 #
2014/2016(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Recital B
Recital B
B. whereas Russia, as a member of several principles-based international organisations such as the Council of Europe, the Organisation for Security and Cooperation in Europe and the United Nations, has committed itself to fully respecting fundamental rights and the rule of law, and whereas the European Union has repeatedlybeen offereding additional assistance and expertise to helpsupport Russia to modernise and abide by its constitutional and legal orderin its legal and constitutional modernisation, in line with Council of Europe standards;
Amendment 9 #
2014/2016(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Recital C
Recital C
C. whereas there is an increasing need for a firm and comprehensive EU policy towards Russia, supportapproved by all the Member States, with support and assistance backed up by firm and fair criticisma constructive and honest dialogue with the Russian authorities stating clearly the European position in case of breaches of Russians' international commitments, including sanctions and restrictive measures wheren necessary;
Amendment 60 #
2014/0002(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 5 a (new)
Recital 5 a (new)
(5a) Considering the critical importance of the EURES network for boosting employment in the Union, the Commission should ensure direct and adequate finance for the proper functioning of the platform and for Member States' cooperation.
Amendment 64 #
2014/0002(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 6 a (new)
Recital 6 a (new)
(6a) The extension of the EURES network to apprenticeships and traineeships should observe the Council recommendation on a Quality Framework for Traineeships, as to improve the quality of traineeships, in particular as regards learning and training content and working conditions, with the aim of easing the transition from education, unemployment or inactivity to work. Inter alia, the traineeship should respect the working conditions applicable to trainees, under the applicable Union and Member State law, the rights and obligations, transparency of its terms and conditions etc.
Amendment 110 #
2014/0002(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 20 a (new)
Recital 20 a (new)
(20a) The common classification system of skills, competences, qualifications and occupations should capitalise on the experiences and best practices already acquired following the implementation of the European Qualifications Framework and Directive 2005/36/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council.
Amendment 140 #
2014/0002(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 29 a (new)
Recital 29 a (new)
(29a)Those policies should also consider the hostile working environment, the high risks of exploitation and the poor working conditions which the mobile workers might experience when they arrive in a new labour market. The same considerations should be given to those workers' families and the opportunities available for them to be integrated in the new labour market.
Amendment 308 #
2014/0002(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 7 – paragraph 3 – subparagraph 1 – point d
Article 7 – paragraph 3 – subparagraph 1 – point d
(d) apprenticeships and traineeships, after ensuring that they fully respect the Council Recommendation on a Quality Framework for Traineeships as to improve the quality of traineeships, in particular as regards learning and training content and working conditions, with the aim of easing the transition from education, unemployment or inactivity to work. Inter alia, the traineeship shall respect the working conditions applicable to trainees, under the applicable Union and national law and the rights and obligations and transparency of its terms and conditions;
Amendment 487 #
2014/0002(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 15 – paragraph 2 a (new)
Article 15 – paragraph 2 a (new)
2 a. The public employment services shall engage in enhanced cooperation as to assist job matching across borders.
Amendment 504 #
2014/0002(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 16 – paragraph 2 a (new)
Article 16 – paragraph 2 a (new)
2 a. The common classification system of skills, competences, qualifications and occupations shall take into account the experiences and best practices already acquired following the implementation of the European Qualifications Framework and the Directive 2005/36/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council1a. ________________ 1a Directive2005/36/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 7 September 2005 on the recognition of professional qualifications (OJ L 255, 30.9.2005, p. 22).
Amendment 569 #
2014/0002(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 20 – paragraph 2 – point b a (new)
Article 20 – paragraph 2 – point b a (new)
(b a) to provide information on counselling services as to employment opportunities for the workers' families;
Amendment 572 #
2014/0002(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 20 – paragraph 2 – point b b (new)
Article 20 – paragraph 2 – point b b (new)
(b b) to provide information on language courses available upon arrival in the Member State of destination;
Amendment 623 #
2014/0002(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 22 – paragraph 2
Article 22 – paragraph 2
2. By derogation from Article 18(5),The EURES Partners mayshall offer the assistance referred to in paragraph 1 to workers against a fefree of any charge.
Amendment 647 #
2014/0002(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 24 – subparagraph 1 a (new)
Article 24 – subparagraph 1 a (new)
Member States shall ensure that mobile workers enjoy the same protection on their territory as their own nationals. To that end public policies shall address the hostile working environment, the high risk of exploitation and the poor working conditions that mobile workers might experience when they arrive in a new labour market. The same considerations shall be given to those workers' families and opportunities shall be provided for them to be integrated into the new labour market.
Amendment 6 #
2013/2945(RSP)
Motion for a resolution
Citation 8 a (new)
Citation 8 a (new)
– having regard to Decision No 1/95 of the EC-Turkey Association Council of 22 December 1995 on implementing the final phase of the Customs Union (Decision 1/95),
Amendment 21 #
2013/2945(RSP)
Motion for a resolution
Citation 13 a (new)
Citation 13 a (new)
– having regard to the visa dialogue between the EU and Turkey, which has been launched in December 2013 and is paving the way for visa free travel for Turkish citizens,
Amendment 27 #
2013/2945(RSP)
Motion for a resolution
Citation 15
Citation 15
– having regard to the fact that Turkey, for the eighth consecutive year, has still not implemented the provisions stemming from the EC-Turkey Association Agreement and the Additional Protocol thereto as well as the failure of the European Union to lift the isolation of the Turkish Cypriot community promised in the EU Council Conclusions of 26 April 2004,
Amendment 52 #
2013/2945(RSP)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 1 a (new)
Paragraph 1 a (new)
1a. Believes that a renewed mutual engagement in the context of the negotiation process is needed to maintain a constructive relationship; stresses the importance of creating the conditions for a constructive dialogue and the foundations for a common understanding;
Amendment 58 #
2013/2945(RSP)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 2
Paragraph 2
2. Notes the potential transformative power of negotiations between the Union and Turkey, which havecould provided Turkey with a clear reference for its reform process; stresses therefore the importance of crediblrestoring credibility to the negotiations based on a mutual commitment by Turkey and the Union to effective reforms furthering the democratic foundations of Turkish society, promoting fundamental values and producing positive change in the institutions, in legislation and, in the mentality of society; welcomes, therefore the opening of Chapter 22;
Amendment 60 #
2013/2945(RSP)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 2
Paragraph 2
2. Notes the transformative power of accession negotiations between the Union and Turkey, which have provided Turkey with a clear reference for its reform process; stresses therefore the importance of credible negotiations based on a mutual commitment by Turkey and the Union to effective reforms furthering the democratic foundations of Turkish society, promoting fundamental values and producing positive change in the institutions, in legislation and, in the mentality of society; welcomes, therefore the opening of Chapter 22;
Amendment 67 #
2013/2945(RSP)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 3
Paragraph 3
3. StressWelcomes the importance of achieving a common understanding between Turkey and the EU on the relevance for both the EU and Turkey of the readmission agreement and the roadmap leading to visa liberalisation; recalls that Turkey is one of the key transit countries for irregular migration to the EU and therefore calls on Turkey to sign and implement the readmission agreement without further delay; calls on the Commission in parallel to take steps towards visa liberalisationsignature by Turkey of the readmission agreement on 16 December 2013 , which enables the launch of the roadmap leading to visa liberalisation; welcomes the establishment of the General Directorate of Migration Management with the enacted Law on Foreigners and International Protection; recalls that Turkey is one of the key transit countries for irregular migration to the EU and stresses the clear benefits of facilitating access to the EU for business people, academics, students and representatives of civil society;
Amendment 68 #
2013/2945(RSP)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 3
Paragraph 3
3. StressWelcomes the importance of achieving a common understanding between Turkey and the EU on the relevance for both the EU and Turkey of the readmission agreement and the roadmap leading to visa liberalisation; recalls that Turkey is one of the key transit countries for irregular migration to the EU and therefore calls on Turkey to sign and implement the readmission agreement without further delay; calls on the Commission in parallel to take steps towards visa liberalisationsignature by Turkey of the readmission agreement on 16 December 2013, which enables the launch of the roadmap leading to visa liberalisation; recalls that Turkey is one of the key transit countries for irregular migration to the EU and stresses the clear benefits of facilitating access to the EU for business people, academics, students and representatives of civil society;
Amendment 87 #
2013/2945(RSP)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph -4 (new)
Paragraph -4 (new)
-4. Expresses its great concern at recent developments which amount to a crisis of the Turkish State; deplores the statements of the government which point to a lack of understanding of the principle of the separation of powers; regrets the serious breakdown of trust between the government, the judiciary, the police and the media; urges the government to desist from actions which impede the investigation and prosecution of corruption and organised crime in high places; calls once again for all institutions, business interests and political forces to fully respect the rule of law and to guarantee the impartiality and independence of the judiciary; calls, moreover, on the Gülen Movement to improve its transparency and accountability, and expects that all allegations against the Movement will be subject to impartial enquiry;
Amendment 91 #
2013/2945(RSP)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 4
Paragraph 4
4. Points to the crucial role of a system of checks and balances for any modern democratic State and the fundamental role that the Turkish Grand National Assembly must play at the centre of Turkey’s political system in providing a framework for dialogue and consensus-building across the political spectrum; expresses concern about political polarisation and the lack of readiness on the part of government and opposition to work towards consensus on key reforms; urges all political actors, the government and the opposition to work together to enhance a pluralistic vision in State institutions and to promote the modernisation and democratisation of the State and society; calls on the political majority to actively involve the minority in the deliberation process on relevant reforms and take into consideration, whenever possible, their interests and views in an inclusive manner; emphasises that constitutional reform must remain the top priority for the modernisation of the Republic in which those elected democratically will also govern democratically;
Amendment 110 #
2013/2945(RSP)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 6
Paragraph 6
6. CommendsNotes that the Conciliation Committee forhas only been able to reaching consensus on 60 constitutional amendments and calls on its Members to continuredouble their work on ain order to elaborate a genuinely new Constitution for Turkey as this is essential for the reform process in Turkey; stresses the importance of achieving consensus in the framework of the constitutional reform process on an effective system of separation of powers and an inclusive definition of citizenship; underlines that Turkey, as a Member State of the Council of Europe, cshould try to benefit from active dialogue with the Venice Commission on the constitutional reform process; stresses that the rules governing the election and composition of the High Council of Judges and Prosecutors should be fully in line with the criteria of the Venice Commission;
Amendment 127 #
2013/2945(RSP)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 7
Paragraph 7
7. WelcomesUrges the full implementation of the democratisation package presented by the Government on 30 September 2013 and calls on the Government to duly consult the opposition and relevant civil society organisations in the preparation of the implementing legislation and to continue with its reform efforts towards revision of the electoral system, including the lowering of the 10% threshold, and the adequate inclusion of all components of Turkish society; calls on the Government to ensure that the legislation on hate crimes offers protection for all citizens, including minorities and LGBTI;
Amendment 131 #
2013/2945(RSP)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 7 a (new)
Paragraph 7 a (new)
7a. Welcomes the establishment of new institutions, namely the Ombudsman Institution and the Turkish National Human Rights Institution which have become operational in 2013, thus creating additional mechanisms for individuals to apply for the protection of their fundamental rights and freedoms;
Amendment 138 #
2013/2945(RSP)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 8
Paragraph 8
8. Takes the view that the protests in Gezi Park testify both to the existence in Turkey of a vibrant civil society and also the need for further vital reforms on the promotion of fundamental values; highlights the importance of including civil society more structurally in the decision making process; deeply regrets the loss of life amongst the protesters and the police forces, the excessive use of force by the police and the violent acts by a number of protesters; welcomes the on-going administrative investigations launched by the Ministry of Interior and the inquiries by the Ombudsman into complaints related to the events in Gezi Park and expects them to fully address the concerns without delay; calls on Turkey to adopt adequate internal review procedures and to establish an independent supervisory body for police offences; is of the opinion that the Gezi Park events underline the need for far- reaching reforms in order to ensure respect for freedom of assembly; regrets the apparent failure of the courts to penalise those state officials responsible for violence connected with the Gezi Park protests;
Amendment 165 #
2013/2945(RSP)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 10
Paragraph 10
10. Notes the concerns in Turkish society about the excessively wide scope, allegations of evidence fabrication and the shortcomings of thdue proceedingss in the Ergenekon case, which, like inand Sledgehammer cases; recalls that the UN Working Group on Arbitrary Detention finds theat Sledgehammer case, undermined the acceptance of the rulingdefendants are being held in violation of the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights; stresses, once again, in light of the above, that the KCK case must demonstrate the strength and the proper, independent, impartial and transparent functioning of Turkey’'s democratic institutions and judiciary, as well as the firm, unconditional commitment to respect for fundamental rights;
Amendment 170 #
2013/2945(RSP)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 10 a (new)
Paragraph 10 a (new)
10a. Welcomes the establishment of individual application to the Turkish Constitutional Court which enables Turkish citizens to use their right of individual application first in the Constitutional Court before they applied to the ECHR;
Amendment 177 #
2013/2945(RSP)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 12
Paragraph 12
12. Welcomes the initiatives taken by the High Council of Judges and Prosecutors to promote the training of a large number of judges and prosecutors in the field of human rights and to promote a thorough, operational understanding of the ECtHR case law; encourages the Government to adopt the Human Rights Action Plan based on the ECtHR case law and aimed at addressing issues raised in judgements of the Court where Turkey was found to have violated ECHR provisions; encourages the Government to continue with ambitious judicial reforms built on the need to advance the defence and the promotion of fundamental rights; stresses, in this regard, the need to continue to reform the anti- terror law as a matter of priority;
Amendment 189 #
2013/2945(RSP)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 13
Paragraph 13
13. Reaffirms its support to the Commission’'s new approach of opening Chapters 23 (judiciary and fundamental rights) and 24 (justice and home affairs) early in the negotiation process and closing them at the end; stresses that delivering the official benchmarks for the opening of such Chapters to Turkey would provide a clear roadmap for and give a boost to the reform process; calls, therefore, on the Councilall Member States, including Cyprus, to make renewed efforts for the opening of Chapters 23 and 24; calls on Turkey to cooperate as much as possible to this effect;
Amendment 221 #
2013/2945(RSP)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 16
Paragraph 16
16. Strongly supports the Government’s initiative to strive for a settlement of the Kurdish problem on the basis of negotiations with the PKK and other Kurdish representatives; encourages the Government to devise the reforms directed at promoting the social, cultural and economic rights of the Kurdish community on the basis of adequate consultation of relevant stakeholders and the opposition; calls on the opposition to actively support the negotiations and the reforms as an important step for the benefit of Turkish society at large; calls on the Turkish authorities to cooperate closely with the European Commission to assess which programs under IPA could be used to promote sustainable development in the South East in the framework of negotiations on Chapter 22;
Amendment 232 #
2013/2945(RSP)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 17
Paragraph 17
17. Is of the opinion that social dialogue and involvement of social partners are vital for the development of a prosperous society; Underlines the importance of further progress in the areas of social policy and employment, in particular to remove all obstacles to the effective functioning of trade unions, to establish a national employment strategy, address undeclared work, widen the coverage of social protection mechanisms, and increase employment rates among women and people with disabilities; stresses the importance of opening Chapter 19 on social policy and employment;
Amendment 233 #
2013/2945(RSP)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 17
Paragraph 17
17. Is of the opinion that social dialogue and involvement of social partners are vital for the development of a prosperous society; Underlines the importance of further progress in the areas of social policy and employment, in particular to remove all obstacles to the effective functioning of trade unions, to establish a national employment strategy, address undeclared work, widen the coverage of social protection mechanisms, and increase employment rates among women and people with disabilities; calls, therefore, on Turkey to agree to the opening of Chapter 19;
Amendment 312 #
2013/2945(RSP)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 25 a (new)
Paragraph 25 a (new)
25a. Stresses the importance of free trade agreements (FTA) to establish global value chains and boost the EU’s global competitiveness; calls on the Commission to develop a comprehensive dialogue and cooperation with Turkey regarding FTA negotiations with third countries, to fully benefit from these agreements taking into account the high level of economic and industrial integration between the EU and Turkey, as well as the obligation to conduct the Common Commercial Policy within the Customs Union that requires the Parties to have the same preferential trade regimes;
Amendment 314 #
2013/2945(RSP)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 25 b (new)
Paragraph 25 b (new)
25b. Calls on the Commission to develop closer coordination with Turkey in the TTIP negotiations to make full use of the EU’s and Turkey’s joint economic potential;
Amendment 315 #
2013/2945(RSP)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 25 c (new)
Paragraph 25 c (new)
25c. Notes that road transportation restrictions between the EU and Turkey create an obstacle to further development of bilateral trade between the parties; asks the Commission, the Member States and Turkey to find a mutually acceptable solution for those issues;
Amendment 316 #
2013/2945(RSP)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 25 d (new)
Paragraph 25 d (new)
25d. Notes that the increased involvement of Turkey to EU’s decision making mechanisms in areas related to the functioning of the Customs Union and especially in the formation of the common commercial policy could facilitate Turkey’s implementation of the EU legislation relevant to the Customs Union;
Amendment 330 #
2013/2945(RSP)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 27
Paragraph 27
27. Welcomes Turkey’s commitment to the provision of humanitarian assistance to Syrian refugees; notes that a large number of foreign fighters in Syria gain access to Syria via Turkey and asks Turkey to increase border patrols, prestricvent the entry of fighters and arm flows to groups credibly found to be implicated in systematic human rights violations; believes that the EU and Turkey should actively seek to develop a joint strategic vision to promote a political solution in Syria and support political and economic stability in the region, with particular reference to Jordan, Lebanon, Iran and Iraq;
Amendment 338 #
2013/2945(RSP)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 27 a (new)
Paragraph 27 a (new)
27a. Invites the next Parliament and Commission to review the integrity and plausibility of the ‘long-lasting and open- ended’ accession process in which the EU and Turkey have been engaged for many years, and to consider, in the light of that review, whether an alternative form of association short of full membership would be a more feasible goal, at least in the medium term;
Amendment 100 #
2013/2152(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 18 a (new)
Paragraph 18 a (new)
18a. Recalls that in order to avoid human rights breaches in the first place, the respect for international law must be at the core of any EU strategy aiming to enhance human rights and democracy in the world, particularly in its relationships with those partners that are parties to an armed or frozen conflict; reminds the need to end any EU support given to parties to a conflict, be it financial, logistical or tactical, including the supply of weapons, munitions and all other types of military equipment as laid down in the EU Common Position on arms exports;
Amendment 120 #
2013/2152(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 22
Paragraph 22
22. Points out that Parliament may withhold its consent to international agreements on account of serious breaches of human rights, as in the cases of the conclusion of the Partnership and Cooperation Agreement (PCA) with Turkmenistan or the textile protocol of the EU-Uzbekistan Partnership and Cooperation Agreement; recall the European Parliament decision on 13 December 2011 to reject a proposed extension of the EU-Morocco fisheries agreement because it did not take into account the interests of the Sahrawi population;
Amendment 212 #
2013/2152(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 41 a (new)
Paragraph 41 a (new)
41a. Recalls its resolutions of 25 November 2010 on the situation in Western Sahara and its previous Annual Report 2010 and 2011; condemns the on- going repression of Sahrawi people in the occupied territories and expresses its concern at the deterioration of human rights situation, as reported by, among others, the United Nations Special Rapporteur on torture and other cruel, inhuman or degrading treatment or punishment; calls for the fundamental rights of the people of Western Sahara, including freedom of association, freedom of expression and the right to demonstrate, to be respected; demands the release of all Sahrawi political prisoners; demands the opening of the territory to independent observers, NGOs, and the media; reiterates its support for the establishment of an international mechanism to monitor human rights in Western Sahara; supports a fair and lasting settlement of the conflict, on the basis of the right to self-determination of the Sahrawi people, in accordance with the relevant United Nations resolutions;
Amendment 284 #
2013/2152(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 63 a (new)
Paragraph 63 a (new)
63a. Emphasises, in view of principles of international humanitarian law spelled out in the 1907 Hague Regulations (arts 42-56) and the Fourth Geneva Convention (GC IV, art. 27-34 and 47-78) as well as in provisions of Additional Protocol I, the need for the EU to ensure that those partners falling under the category of occupying power, respect their duties towards the population in occupied territories; reminds that according to international humanitarian law, public health standards, provision of food and medical care to the population under occupation must be granted by the occupying power; reiterates that any transfer of civilian population of the occupying power into the occupied territory is prohibited, and that the accused of criminal offences must be provided with proceedings respecting internationally recognized judicial guarantees, such as being informed of the reason for their arrest, charged with a specific offence and given a fair trial as quickly as possible;
Amendment 58 #
2013/2149(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Recital F
Recital F
F. whereas the recent developments in the EaP countries and their relations with the EU are a warningn indication that the EU is still not considered as the only political alternative but remains the most important inspiration in the quest for democratic reforms and social change;
Amendment 61 #
2013/2149(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Recital F a (new)
Recital F a (new)
Fa. whereas the EU is called to engage more concretly in the quest for solutions to frozen conflicts in EaP countries, since these conflicts could at any given moment trigger a crisis with far-reaching consequences for peace and stability;
Amendment 70 #
2013/2149(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 1
Paragraph 1
1. Recalls the achievements and ambitions of the EaP, which is the political framework for strengthening relations between the EU and the Eastern Partners, founded on mutual interests, commitments, shared ownership and joint responsibility, as well as the institutional basis for political cooperation, and a forum for dialogue between the partner countries; welcomes, in this connection, the establishment of the Euronest Parliamentary Assembly and other cooperation platforms, such as the EaP Civil Society Forum and the Eastern Europe Initiatives Congress; notes however that the recent developments in some EaP countries have drawn attention to the fragility of the political processshow that the process of democratic state building and adoption of democratric values has not yet reached a mature state;
Amendment 90 #
2013/2149(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 2
Paragraph 2
2. Recognises that the EaP project needs new impetus and a clear vision for the way forward, focusing not only on the political cooperation, but aiming to anchor the societies of the EaP to the EU, thus urges the EU to focus particularly on establishing; reminds that an important instrument the EU should build upon is the establishement of a visa-free regimes, on as well as investing in youth and future leaders, and on the energy sector;
Amendment 105 #
2013/2149(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 3
Paragraph 3
3. Highlights that more progress can be made on the establishment of the visa-free regime; notes, in this connection, that visa liberalisation is only one of a number of processes aimed at bringing the societies closer together, and that more efforts are required in this area, particularly with regard to advancing cooperation in the field of education and culture; considers that greater emphasis should be placed on the fact that the EaP project is directed at societies rather than authoritie, striving for the inclusion and intense cooperation of civil society actors as well as institutions;
Amendment 142 #
2013/2149(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 9
Paragraph 9
Amendment 153 #
2013/2149(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 10
Paragraph 10
Amendment 163 #
2013/2149(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 12
Paragraph 12
Amendment 232 #
2013/2149(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 23
Paragraph 23
23. Considers that, to improve cooperation between Eastern Partners, the EU should refrain from imposing a restriction to one language in joint projects, and should promote multilingualism, notably in local government, civic and educational initiatives;
Amendment 233 #
2013/2149(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 24
Paragraph 24
24. Highlights the importance of promoting and supporting joint efforts in research and innovation, including exchange programmes for students, in virtual multilingual projects, in dialogue between cultures, through jointcooperative film productions and jointother artistic projects, allocation of resources for literary translations, in joint research on the legacy of Nazism and Communism, and of totalitarian regimes and on common history in Europe, with the aim of developping a common assessment of history;
Amendment 254 #
2013/2149(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 4
Paragraph 4
4. Highlights the importance of investing in youth and future leaders, by making full use of thecivic education and promotion of tolerance of youth and future leaders, for example within the framework of the Youth in Action Programme's EaP Youth Window; calls for the establishement of school exchanges with dedicated funding between EU Member States and EaP countries; encourages to make full use of scholarship opportunities under the ‘'Erasmus for All’' programme to foster student exchanges between EaP countries and the EU Member States and establishing an Eastern Partnership University and the Black Sea European College, which would provide postgraduate education and seek to formand proposes to look in the possibility of establishing specific higher education institutions such as an Eastern Partnership University, bringing closer together students and future leaders from EaP countries and the EU Member States;
Amendment 256 #
2013/2149(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 5
Paragraph 5
Amendment 257 #
2013/2149(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 6
Paragraph 6
Amendment 265 #
2013/2149(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 11
Paragraph 11
11. Finds it regrettable that there isRegrets the uneven interest among theEU Member States in relations with, and developments in, EaP countries; notes with concern the lack of misunderstanding among the Member States about the geopolitical importance of cooperation and of a uniform stance on some issuesof issues at stake in EaP countries by EU Member States; regrets the lack of awareness that more cooperation and the adoption of common positions is of major geopolitical importance;
Amendment 278 #
2013/2149(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 24
Paragraph 24
24. Highlights the importance of promoting and supporting joint efforts in research and innovation, including exchange programmes for students, in virtual multilingual projects, in dialogue between cultures, through jointcooperative film productions and jointother artistic projects, allocation of resources for literary translations, in joint research on the legacy of Nazism and Communism,authoritarian and of totalitarian regimes and on common history in Europewith the aim of developing a common assessment of European history;
Amendment 4 #
2013/2103(INI)
Draft opinion
Paragraph 2
Paragraph 2
2. Highlights that special attention should be given to the most vulnerable communitiegroups, such as girls, children with disabilities and women belonging to minority groups;
Amendment 7 #
2013/2103(INI)
Draft opinion
Paragraph 6
Paragraph 6
6. Underlines the importance of taking the fear of stigmatisation into account when designing national policies and strategies on judicial assistance in some developing countries as well as in all countries where human trafficking and sexual exploitation is taking place, and expresses its concern regarding the lack of effective legal services to which cases of abuse can be reported, especially during humanitarian crises. ;
Amendment 47 #
2013/2026(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 4
Paragraph 4
4. Strongly condemns the practice of land grabbing, which illegally dispossesses the rural poor and traditional Nomad populations of land, without adequate compensation; highlights the fact that 203 million hectares worldwide have been part of large-scale land deals of this kind between 2000 and 20103 ; __________________ 3 http://www.landmatrix.org/get-the- idea/global-map-investments/
Amendment 61 #
2013/2026(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 5
Paragraph 5
5. Highlights the fact that land reform requires flexibility, tailored to local, social and cultural conditions, such as traditional forms of tribal ownership, and should be focused on empowering the most vulnerable, regularising tenure security for urban squatters and bringing pastoralist societies into the scope of formal property law;
Amendment 63 #
2013/2020(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Recital H
Recital H
H. whereas a ceasefire in Western Sahara between the Moroccan Government and the Polisario Front has been in place since 1991; whereas the UN considers Western Sahara a non-self-governing territory; whereas no country recognises Moroccan sovereignty over Western Sahara; whereas the Sahrawi Arab Democratic Republic is currently recognised by the AU and over 45 UN states, but not by the UN collectively or by any EU Member State; whereas the UN and EU do not explicitly consider Morocco to be anaccording to international law, the Kingdom of Morocco not only has no sovereignty over Western Sahara, but is the occupying power; whereas a referendum on the status of Western Sahara, first agreed on principle in 1988, has still not taken place;
Amendment 269 #
2013/2020(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 38
Paragraph 38
38. Expresses deep concern at the recent report from the UNSR on torture, who found evidence that Moroccan officials have detained individuals on political grounds, inflicted torture and rape on Sahrawi inmates, kidnapped and abandoned protesters in the desert to intimidate them, and deliberately and frequently targeted pro-independence advocates, including in their homes; notes further widespread allegations of forced disappearances and unfair trials; draws particular attention to the dismantling of the Gdeim Izik protest camp in November 2010, where significant violence claimed Moroccan and Sahrawi lives, and the subsequent trial of 25 Sahrawis, many of them known human rights activists, in February 2013; notes Morocco's insistence regardunderlines that during theis trial's fairness and due process, a military court as sentenced 25 Sahrawi civiliands the positive conclusions of some international observers, but also recalls the UNSR's concern at the use of a military court, the allegations of torture, and the Moroccan authorities' failure to investigate themo 9 life sentences, 4 sentenced to 30 years, 7 sentenced to 25 years, 3 sentenced to 20 years and 2 sentenced to 2 years and 3 months, which they already have spent in custody; notes Morocco's failure to investigate claims that the defendants were subjected to torture; underlines Morocco's refusal to transfer the trial to a civilian court capable of handling fair trial standards and Morocco's obligations under international law; notes the conclusions by some NGOs and human rights observers relating to the case's alleged politicised prosecutions, deficient evidence and excessive sentences; calls therefore on the Moroccan authorities to work with civil society and other actors to guarantee the transparency and fairness of its judicial processes, and to investigate and prosecute security officials alleged to have been involved in arbitrary detentions, torture and other abuses of power;
Amendment 274 #
2013/2020(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 38 a (new)
Paragraph 38 a (new)
38a. Condemns the fact that on Wednesday 6 March 2013 Morocco expelled a delegation of four Members of the European Parliament; notes that the aim of the delegation was to visit the territories of Western Sahara, to inquire about the situation of human rights and to meet with representatives of the MINURSO; condemn Morocco's authorities behaviour and demands the Kingdom of Morocco to permit free access and free movement in Western Sahara to independent observers, members of parliaments, to the press and to humanitarian organisations;
Amendment 307 #
2013/2020(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 42
Paragraph 42
42. Expresses deep concern about the chronic poverty, and lack of basic services and adequate housing in the Polisario Front-administered refugee camps near Tindouf; repeats the recommendations of the UNSR on adequate housing that sufficient international funding be directed for this purpose; notes in this regard the lack of clear documentation about the precise number of inhabitants in Tindouf, and urges the authorities to conduct or facilitate regular censuses or formal registrations; notes that despite the harsh living conditions and the heavy dependence on international humanitarian aid of the inhabitants of Tindouf, children's education and empowerment of women remains a priority in the camps.
Amendment 322 #
2013/2020(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 44 a (new)
Paragraph 44 a (new)
44a. Calls on the Moroccan authorities in the occupied territories of Western Sahara to allow and facilitate regular contacts, exchanges and visits of Sahrawi families between the refugee camps and the occupied territories;
Amendment 1 #
2013/0315(NLE)
The Committee on Development calls on the Committee on Fisheries, as the committee responsible, to propose that the Parliament decline to give its consent.
Amendment 47 #
2012/2870(RSP)
Motion for a resolution
Citation 16
Citation 16
– having regard to the fact that there is an economic interdependence between the European Union and Turkey with trade between the EU and Turkey totalling EUR 120 billion in 2011; having regard to the current problems hindering the effective functioning of the Customs Union,
Amendment 53 #
2012/2870(RSP)
Motion for a resolution
Citation 20
Citation 20
– having regard to the fact that EU dialogue and cooperation with Turkey on stability, democracy and security with particular reference to the broader Middle East are strategic; having regard to Turkey's fundamental role as a source of inspiration for the democratisation of the Arab countries in essential areas such as political and economic reforms and the establishment of institutional capacity; having regard to the fact that Turkey strongly and repeatedly condemned the Syrian regime's violence against civilians and provides vital humanitarian assistance to Syrians fleeing violence across the border,
Amendment 97 #
2012/2870(RSP)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 3
Paragraph 3
3. Welcomes the Council decision to iInvites the Commission to take steps towards visa liberalisation as a gradual and long term perspectiveresult- oriented process, in parallel with the signature of the readmission agreement; urges Turkey to sign and implement the readmission agreement without further delay and to ensure that, until this agreement enters into force, existing bilateral agreements are fully implemented; recalls that Turkey is one of the key transit countries for illegal migration to the EUcombating illegal migration in a determined way and underlines the need to intensify cooperation with the EU on migration management, the fight against human trafficking and border controls; stresses once again before visa liberalisation the importance of facilitating access to the EU for business people, academics, students and representatives of civil society from Turkey; supports the efforts of the Commission and the Member States to implement the visa code, harmonise and simplify visa requirements and create visa facilitating centres in Turkey as a basis for bringing closer the citizens of both sides ; Reminds the Member States of their commitments to implement visa exemption under the association agreement in line with the Soysal and Savatli Ruling of the European Court of Justice of 19 February 2009;
Amendment 285 #
2012/2870(RSP)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 22
Paragraph 22
22. Deeply regrets Turkey's decision to abstain from meetings and contacts with the Cypriot Presidency of the Council of the EU and takes the view that Turkey missed an important opportunityRegrets that a comprehensive settlement to the Cyprus problem was not reached before Cyprus assumed the Presidency of the EU, which would have enabled the new partnership state to assume the EU Presidency; recalls that Turkey had expressed its readiness to estart a process of engagement and normalisation of relations with Cyprus; recalls that the EU is based on the principles of sincere cooperation and mutublish relations with the new partnership state that would emerge following a comprehensive settlement in Cyprus through the UN; underlines that steps towards normalisation of the relations need to be taken simultaneously by all solidarity amongst all its Member Stateides concerned and that each step taken to this aend respect for the institutional frameworkshall contribute to the wellbeing of all sides;
Amendment 303 #
2012/2870(RSP)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 23
Paragraph 23
23. Expresses once again its strong support to the reunification of Cyprus, based on a fair and viable settlement with agreed UN parameters of bi-zonality, bi-communality and political equality for both communities; underlines the urgency of an agreement between the two communities on how to proceed with the substantive settlement negotiations and stresses the importance of setting up a timeframe, so that the negotiating process, under the auspices of the UN Secretary-General, can soon regain momentum; at leaders level; recalls onthat Turkey to beginhas often expressed its readiness to withdrawing its forces from Cyprus and transfer Famagusta to the UN in accordance with UNSC Resolution 550 (1984); calls, in parallel, on the Republic of Cyprus to open the port of Famagusta under EU customs supervision in order to promote a positive climate for the successful solution of the ongoing reunification negotiations and allowupon a comprehensive settlement in Cyprus as also stipulated in the 2004 Annan Plan; calls on the Republic of Cyprus to allow the adoption of the Direct Trade Regulation which would enable Turkish Cypriots to trade directly with the EU in a legal manner that is acceptable to all;
Amendment 322 #
2012/2870(RSP)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 24
Paragraph 24
24. Encourages Turkey to intensify itsand all other sides to continue their intensive support for the Committee on Missing Persons in Cyprus (CMP) which is one of the most sensitive and important projects in the island as its work affects equally lives of thousands of people on both sides of the island;
Amendment 364 #
2012/2870(RSP)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 26
Paragraph 26
26. Deplores Turkey's refusal to fulfil its obligation of full, non-discriminatory implementation of the Additional Protocol to the EC-Turkey Association Agreement towards all Member States; recalls that this refusal continues to deeply affect the process of negotiationsEmphasizes that the difference of interpretation between the EU Commission and Turkey as regards the implementation of the Additional Protocol to the EC-Turkey Association Agreement negatively affects the process of the EU- Turkey relations and therefore calls on all sides concerned to make a concerted effort towards the resolution of the Cyprus problem;
Amendment 394 #
2012/2870(RSP)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 28
Paragraph 28
28. SRecognizes the fact that the repercussions of the rapidly deteriorating situation in Syria on the security and stability of the region are multiplying; supports Turkey's commitment to democratic forces in Syria and the provision of humanitarian assistance to Syrians who fled the country; asks the Commission, the Member States and the international community to support Turkey's efforts to cope with the growing humanitarian dimension of the Syrian crisis; underlines the importance of a common understanding between the EU and Turkey on how to deliver the available humanitarian assistance to the displaced Syrians currently on Turkish territory or waiting at its borders;
Amendment 55 #
2012/2145(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Recital E
Recital E
E. whereas violations of freedom of religion or belief,thought, religion, belief or political affiliation perpetrated by governments and non-state actors alike, are increasing in many countries of the world, resulting in discrimination, intolerance and violence against certain individuals, groups and religious communities, including religious minority representatives;
Amendment 139 #
2012/2145(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 22 a (new)
Paragraph 22 a (new)
22a. Emphasises, in view of principles of international humanitarian law spelled out in the 1907 Hague Regulations (arts 42-56) and the Fourth Geneva Convention (GC IV, art. 27-34 and 47-78) as well as in provisions of Additional Protocol I, the need for the EU to ensure that those partners falling under the category of occupying power, respect their duties towards the population in occupied territories; reminds that according to international humanitarian law, public health standards, provision of food and medical care to the population under occupation must be granted by the occupying power; reiterates that any transfer of civilian population of the occupying power into the occupied territory is prohibited, and that the accused of criminal offences must be provided with proceedings respecting internationally recognized judicial guarantees, such as being informed of the reason for their arrest, charged with a specific offence and given a fair trial as quickly as possible.
Amendment 140 #
2012/2145(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 22 b (new)
Paragraph 22 b (new)
22b. Recalls that in order to avoid human rights breaches in the first place, the respect for international law must be at the core of any EU strategy aiming to enhance human rights and democracy in the world, particularly in its relationships with those partners that are parties to an armed or frozen conflict; reminds the need to end any EU support given to parties to a conflict, be it financial, logistical or tactical, including the supply of weapons, munitions and all other types of military equipment as laid down in the EU Common Position on arms exports.
Amendment 158 #
2012/2145(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 27 a (new)
Paragraph 27 a (new)
Amendment 355 #
2012/2145(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 81
Paragraph 81
81. Remains deeply concerned that discrimination based on thought, religion or, belief or political affiliation continues in many regions of the world, and that persons belonging to particular religious communities, including religious minorities, continue to be denied their human rights; is particularly concerned by the situation in China where individuals who practise their religion outside officially sanctioned channels, including Christians, Muslims, Buddhists and Falun Gong practitioners, often face persecution; urges China to ratify the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights (ICCPR) as it has promised; urges the Chinese authorities to suspend and subsequently amend, through genuinely consultative processes with Tibetans, the policies that most negatively impact Tibetan Buddhism, culture and traditionpolitical movements, religious communities, including religious minorities, continue to be denied their human rights;
Amendment 371 #
2012/2145(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 82
Paragraph 82
82. Stresses the need for a toolkit to advance the right to freedom of thought, religion or, belief as part of EU's external policy; notes that this toolkit should include a checklist on the necessary freedoms pertaining to the right of freedom of religion or belief, in order to assess the situor political affiliation, as well as a methodology to help identify infringements of freedom of religion or belief; encourages the EEAS to involve civil society organisations in the preparation of the toolkitpart of EU's external policy;
Amendment 390 #
2012/2145(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 83
Paragraph 83
83. Stresses that international human rights law recognises freedom of thought, religion or, belief or political affiliation regardless of registration status, so registration should not be a mandatory precondition for practising one's religion; points out with concern, furthermore, that in China monks and nuns are required to register with the Government, and must operate under Government-controlled management boards, and that this interferes with their religious autonomy and restricts their activity or right of political affiliation;
Amendment 8 #
2012/2050(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Recital A
Recital A
A. whereas the EU should develop its foreign policy objectives further and advance its values and interests worldwide with the overall aim of contributing to peace, security, solidarity, conflict prevention, the promotion of democracy, the protection of human rights and fundamental freedoms, gender equality, respect for international law, support for international institutions, effective multilateralism and mutual respect among nations, sustainable development, free and fair trade and the eradication of poverty;
Amendment 26 #
2012/2050(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Recital E
Recital E
E. whereas parliamentary scrutiny of EU foreignthe involvement of the European Parliament in EU common foreign and security policy is essential if European external action is to be understood and supported by EU citizens; whereas effective parliamentary scrutiny of the European External Action Service will enhances the its legitimacy of this action;
Amendment 52 #
2012/2050(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 8
Paragraph 8
8. Underlines the role of political leadership expected of the HR/VP in ensuring the unity, consistency and effectiveness of action by the Union; calls on the HR/VP to use to the full and in a timely manner her powers to initiate, conduct and ensure compliance with the CFSP, involving Parliament's relevant bodies fully in that endeavour; welcomes the important lead role, on behalf of the international community, played under difficult circumstances by the HR/VP in the negotiations with Iran; calls for such leadership in enhancing the European Union's role in support of the Middle East Peace Process and in the Neighbourhood;
Amendment 65 #
2012/2050(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 13
Paragraph 13
13. WelcomeQuestions the commitment by the Member States in the Lisbon Treaty to playing their full role in the development and implementation of the Union's foreign policy; stresses the importance of the Member States‘' solidarity, during a time of economic constraints, on improving the effectiveness of the Union as a cohesive global actor; notes in particular the importance of the Member States’' making available civilian and military capabilities for the effective implementation of the Common Security and Defence Policy;
Amendment 69 #
2012/2050(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 14
Paragraph 14
14. Calls on the HR/VP to come forward with proposals to further encourage Member State cooperation under the CFSP, specifically by setting out a process that will lead to European Council conclusions on Permanent Structur, while strengthening systematic cooperation between all Member States in the conduct of foreign policy, to explore fully the possibilities provided by the Lisbon treaty for enhanced Ccooperation, in the area of security and defence and guidelines for more systematic use of coalitions of the willing, such as in the ‘core group’ concept for CSDP missions and operations, as a means of overcoming the limits of the ‘battlegroup’ cocluding the production of guidelines for the consignment of specific tasks and missions to a core group of EU states, and to start the process of developing Permanent Structured Cooperation in the area of security and defencept;
Amendment 89 #
2012/2050(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 21 a (new)
Paragraph 21 a (new)
21 a. Continues to support the potential enlargement of the European Union to any European state which respects the Union's values and is committed to promoting them and which is willing and able to fulfil the accession criteria; believes that the Union would lose moral authority and political credibility worldwide were it to close its doors to its neighbours;
Amendment 125 #
Amendment 136 #
2012/2050(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 30
Paragraph 30
30. Recalls that the Southern Neighbourhood is of vital importance to the European Union and urges that a better balance be struck between pursuing market-oriented, on the one hand, and human and social approaches on the other in the EU's response to the Arab Spring; finds scarcely credible the EU's promise of 'Money, Mobility and Markets'; calls, therefore, for a greater focus on employment, education, training and regional development in order to help alleviate the current social and economic crisis in these countries, and to provide the assistance needed to support the ongoing political reforms and social and economic development; underlines the importance of supporting institutional capacity-building, including for the parliaments of these countries, an independent judicial system, the strengthening of civil-society organisations and the formation of pluralist political parties within a secular system;
Amendment 154 #
2012/2050(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 32
Paragraph 32
32. Points out that Turkey is bnoth only a candidate country andbut also an important strategic partner and NATO ally; calls, therefore, for the existing political dialogue with Turkey on foreign policy choices and objectives of mutual interest to be reinforced; stresses the importance of encouraging Turkey to pursue its foreign policy in a framework of dialogue and coordination with the European Union in order to create valuable synergies and reinforce the potential for a positive impact;
Amendment 158 #
2012/2050(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 33
Paragraph 33
33. Recalls Turkey's ambition to inspire and assist democratic transitions and socio- economic reforms in the southern neighbourhood; notes that participation of Turkish institutions and non-governmental organisations in ENP instruments would generate unique synergy effects, especially in areas such as institution-building and socio-economic and civil society development; believes that practical cooperation in the context of the 'positive agenda' should be complemented with a structured dialogue between the EU and Turkey with a view to coordinating their respective neighbourhood policies; hopes that the conditions will improve for the opening of further chapters in the membership negotiations (e.g.in particular, resolution of the Cyprus problem including ratification and implementation of the Ankara Protocol); recognisealls that the lack of cooperation in migration policy is having a negative impact, especially on Greeceprogress is still needed urgently in the matter of visas, immigration and asylum;
Amendment 169 #
Amendment 170 #
2012/2050(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 33 a (new)
Paragraph 33 a (new)
33 a. Supports the Council's twin-track approach aimed at finding diplomatic solution as the only viable approach to the Iranian nuclear issue; reminds that the sanctions are not an end in themselves; urges the p5+1 and Iran to continue to participate to the negotiating table and calls on the negotiators to forge a compromise; reminds that, in accordance with a central tenet of the NPT, Iran has the right to enrich uranium for peaceful purposes and to receive technical assistance for the same objectives; is deeply concerned by the forming of a constellation of political, economic and military interests fomenting preparations for a military attack on Iran, stressing that no action should be taken by any State that could risk leading to any kind of use of force against Iran;
Amendment 190 #
2012/2050(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 36 a (new)
Paragraph 36 a (new)
36 a. Notes the importance of enhancing relations with Moldova in the light of recent positive changes within the country;
Amendment 205 #
2012/2050(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 38
Paragraph 38
38. Considers Russia to have potential as an important strategic partner, but continues to have concerns regarding Russia's commitment to the rule of law, pluralist democracy and human rights should it transform its attitude to the rule of law, pluralist democracy and human rights in line with its responsibilities as a member of the Council of Europe; urges the Russian government to respond to the growing discontent expressed by many Russian citizens at the continuing corruption and oppression of the regime by returning to the path of liberal reform;
Amendment 214 #
2012/2050(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 39
Paragraph 39
39. Believes that it is the sovereign right of countries in the region to choose, free from external interference, the security organisation/arrangements/framework which, in their view, brings greatest security to their citizensUrges Russia to respect the territorial and constitutional integrity of regional neighbours and to join the international consensus in the United Nations with respect to emerging democracy;
Amendment 242 #
2012/2050(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 43
Paragraph 43
43. Is concerned at the resurgence in violence following the breakdown in peace negotiations; highlights the importance of a sub-regional Central Asian approach to tackling cross-border trafficking in people and goods and to fighting organised crime and terrorism; calls for stepped-up support for building the capacity of the Government of the Islamic Republic of Afghanistan and the National Security Forces as well as for helping the wider population with agricultural and socio- economic development in order for the country to assume full responsibility for security after completion of the transfer of internal security to the Afghan forces by the end of 2014;therefore calls for the intensification of police training and for amending the EUPOL mandate; reiterates the need to establish a plan for the elimination of opium production and believes that the EU's strategy for Afghanistan will have to consider the need to further encourage a profound shift in the mindset of the international community, which has all too often in the past shaped plans and decisions with scant regard for Afghan involvement; calls for a centralised EU database on the costs and impact of EU aid to Afghanistan and for an in depth evaluation by an independent team of all EU and Member States actions undertaken in the country so far;
Amendment 256 #
2012/2050(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 45
Paragraph 45
45. Notes that, given the increasing global and regional relevance of China, India and other emerging countries in Asia, both the United States of America and the EU may progressively shift their primary attention, political investment and resources to the Pacific; further notes that Asia should have a more important place on the foreign agenda of the European Union and EU Member States; calls therefore for greater coordination of the US and EU policies towards China, India and other emerging countries in Asia in order to avoid a decoupling of approaches to key policies the US and EU have common interests in developing closer trade and political relations with China, India and other emerging countries in Asia;
Amendment 262 #
2012/2050(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 46
Paragraph 46
46. Believes that the USA as a NATO member is an important partner forwill continue to make a vital contribution to the collective security of Europethe West;
Amendment 285 #
2012/2050(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 53 a (new)
Paragraph 53 a (new)
53 a. Recalls the European Parliament resolution of 25 November 2010 on the situation in Western Sahara; urges Morocco and the Polisario Front to continue negotiation for a peaceful and long-lasting solution of the Western Sahara conflict and reiterates the rights of the Sahrawi people to self determination which should be decided through a democratic referendum, in accordance with the relevant United Nations resolutions; condemns the ongoing violation of the human rights of the Sahrawi people; calls for the release of the Sahrawi political prisoners; welcomes the statements by 11 countries during the 13 th session of the Universal Periodic Review of the United Nations raising concerns on the situation in Western Sahara;
Amendment 344 #
2012/2050(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 64
Paragraph 64
64. Urges the Member States to meet their obligation to rapidly conclude the negotiations on the accession of the EU to the ECHR; underlines the importance of the monitoring procedures of the Council of Europe as a major contribution to assessing progress by neighbouring countries in achieving democratic reforms;
Amendment 370 #
Amendment 371 #
2012/2050(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 70 a (new)
Paragraph 70 a (new)
70 a. Believes that in its treatment of authoritarian regimes the EU should develop a more consistent policy with respect to the imposition and lifting of sanctions and restrictive measures;
Amendment 2 #
2012/0309(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 2
Recital 2
(2) The imposition of the visa requirement on the nationals of Dominica, Grenada, Kiribati, Marshall Islands, Micronesia, Nauru, Palau, Saint Lucia, Saint Vincent and the Grenadines, Samoa, Solomon Islands, Timor-Leste, Tonga, Trinidad and Tobago, Tuvalu, the United Arab Emirates and Vanuatu is no longer justified. These countries do not present any risk of illegal immigration or a threat to public policy for the Union in accordance with the criteria set out in recital 5 of Regulation (EC) N° 539/2001. Consequently, nationals of those countries should be exempt from the visa requirement for stays of no more than three months in all and references to those countries should be transferred to Annex II.
Amendment 4 #
2012/0309(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 3
Recital 3
(3) Exemption from the visa requirement for nationals of Dominica, Grenada, Kiribati, Marshall Islands, Micronesia, Nauru, Palau, Saint Lucia, Saint Vincent and the Grenadines, Samoa, Solomon Islands, Timor-Leste, Tonga, Trinidad and Tobago, Tuvalu, the United Arab Emirates and Vanuatu should not come into force until bilateral agreements on visa waiver between the Union and the countries concerned have been concluded in order to ensure full reciprocity.
Amendment 6 #
2012/0309(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 1 – point 1 – point a
Article 1 – point 1 – point a
(a) in point 1, the references to Dominica, Grenada, Kiribati, Marshall Islands, Micronesia, Nauru, Palau, Saint Lucia, Saint Vincent and the Grenadines, Samoa, Solomon Islands, Timor-Leste, Tonga, Trinidad and Tobago, Tuvalu, the United Arab Emirates and Vanuatu are deleted and a reference to South-Sudan is inserted;
Amendment 7 #
2012/0309(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 1 – point 2 – point a – two last references
Article 1 – point 2 – point a – two last references
"Tuvalu*", "United Arab Emirates*" and "Vanuatu*"
Amendment 42 #
2011/2316(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 1 – point a a (new)
Paragraph 1 – point a a (new)
(a a) ensure that the conclusion of the EU-Azerbaijan Association Agreement, in line with the demands made in the Parliament's Report on the need for an EU strategy for the South Caucasus of 23 April 2010 and with OSCE Minsk Group Basic Principles, is linked to a substantial progress towards the resolution of the Nagorno-Karabakh conflict, including confidence-building measures and active incident-prevention on the line of contact; the right of all internally displaced persons and refugees to return to their home places and properties and international security guarantees that would include a genuine multinational peacekeeping operation;
Amendment 78 #
2011/2316(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 1 – point f
Paragraph 1 – point f
(f) strengthen the European Union's conflict-resolution capacity, inter alia by supporting the efforts of the Minsk Group and clearing the way for the implementation of confidence-building measures, as the Presidents of both Azerbaijan and Armenia have agreed; the EU should also consider direct and more active participation in the Minsk Group;
Amendment 80 #
2011/2316(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 1 – point f a (new)
Paragraph 1 – point f a (new)
(f a) calls on Armenia and Azerbaijan to undertake confidence-building measures along the front lines, including withdrawal of snipers from the line of contact (in accordance with OSCE recommendations), the pullback and cessation of use of any artillery, significant increase in the number of the OSCE monitors, as an interim measure until a UN-mandated multinational peacekeeping force is deployed as part of the implementation of a peace agreement;
Amendment 31 #
2011/2315(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 1 – point a a (new)
Paragraph 1 – point a a (new)
(a a) ensure that the conclusion of the EU-Armenia Association Agreement, in line with the demands made in the Parliament’s Report on the need for an EU strategy for the South Caucasus of 23 April 2010 and with OSCE Minsk Group Basic Principles, is linked to a substantial progress towards the resolution of Nagorno-Karabakh conflict, including confidence-building measures and active incident-prevention on the line of contact; the withdrawal of Armenian forces from the all occupied territories of Azerbaijan surrounding Nagorno- Karabakh and their gradual return to Azerbaijani control, the right of all internally displaced persons and refugees to return to their home places and properties and international security guarantees that would include a genuine multinational peacekeeping operation;
Amendment 62 #
2011/2315(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 1 – point g
Paragraph 1 – point g
(g) ensure that the Association Agreement is consistent with the principles of international law - in particular the non-use of force, self-determination and territorial integrity - and that the Agreement, once concluded, applies to the whole territory of Armenia;
Amendment 66 #
2011/2315(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 1 – point g a (new)
Paragraph 1 – point g a (new)
(g a) calls on Armenia and Azerbaijan to undertake confidence-building measures along the front lines, including withdrawal of snipers from the line of contact (in accordance with OSCE recommendations), the pullback and cessation of use of any artillery, significant increase in the number of the OSCE monitors, as an interim measure until a UN-mandated multinational peacekeeping force is deployed as part of the implementation of a peace agreement; calls on Armenia to stop sending regular army conscripts to serve in Nagorno-Karabakh;
Amendment 90 #
2011/2315(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 1 – point i a (new)
Paragraph 1 – point i a (new)
(i a) encourage Armenian authorities to work actively on basing the country’s national security on a commitment to international cooperation and security networks as well as the development of good neighbourly relations, which should lead to the withdrawal of foreign troops from its territory;
Amendment 5 #
2011/2191(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Recital A
Recital A
A. whereas twenty years after the declaration of its independence and some eight years following the application for EU membership, Croatia marked a historic milestone in the process of its reEU integration into Europeprocess by successfully closing accession negotiations with the EU; whereas Croatia’s achievements deserve unqualified recognition;
Amendment 8 #
2011/2191(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Recital B
Recital B
B. whereas the accession process has significantly contributed to Croatia’s transformation into a solid and mature democracy based on European values; whereas the prospect of accession acts as a powerful catalyst for reform by mobilising the various actors in political, economic, social and cultural life; whereas reform efforts also need to be sustained beyond the completion of the negotiations and accession in order for the country and its citizens to fully benefit fromenjoy their rights and fulfil their obligations in the scope of Croatia’s EU membership;
Amendment 16 #
2011/2191(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Recital F
Recital F
F. whereas a true reconciliation between the different peoples and the establishment of good-neighbourly relations can substantially contribute to a genuine European integration process; whereas prosecutions for war crimes and the reintegration of refugees and displaced persons are fundamental elements of the reconciliation process;
Amendment 32 #
2011/2191(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 4
Paragraph 4
4. Underlines the need to focus in particular on commitments undertaken in the area of the judiciary, home affairs and fundamental rights, freedom and security, including the continued implementation of judicial reform and efficiency, impartial handling of war crimes cases, the fight against corruption, border management, police cooperation, the fight against organised crime, judicial cooperation in civil and criminal matters, as well as on commitments in the area of competition policy with a view to the restructuring of the shipbuilding and steel industries;
Amendment 35 #
2011/2191(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 4
Paragraph 4
4. Underlines the need to focus in particular on commitments undertaken in the area of the judiciary, fundamental rights, freedom and security, including the continued implementation of judicial reform and efficiency, impartial handling of war crimes cases, the fight against corruption, border management, police cooperation, the fight against organised crime, judicial cooperation in civil and criminal matters, as well as on commitments in the area of competition policy with a view to the adequate and efficient restructuring of the shipbuilding and steel industries;
Amendment 50 #
2011/2191(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 7
Paragraph 7
7. Considers it one of the highest priorities to combat corruption, particularly high- level corruption, corruption at every level of the judiciary, law-enforcement agencies and the public administration, as well as large-scale corruption, which must be pursued with determination at all levels, by rigorous enforcement of the law and successful prosecutions; calls on the Croatian authorities to further strengthen the administrative capacities of anti- corruption bodies and foster a culture of political accountability as a prerequisite for building and strengthening the rule of law;
Amendment 59 #
2011/2191(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 8
Paragraph 8
8. Urges the Croatian Government to continue actively to encourage and support prosecutions for war crimes and, to continue cooperating with the International Criminal Tribunal for the former Yugoslavia (ICTY) and to continue developing regional judicial cooperation with other countries concerned; urges the Croatian judiciary to seriously address impunity for war crimes, especially where the victims were ethnic Serbs or the alleged perpetrators were members of the Croatian security forces;
Amendment 63 #
2011/2191(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 9
Paragraph 9
9. Invites the Government to further encourage the return of refugeesand allow in the best possible ways the return of refugees and displaced persons, paying special attention to the situation of ethnic Serbian returnees, by seeking effective and sustainable ways of implementing housing, employment and social measures in a manner coherent with other social and employment programmes;
Amendment 71 #
2011/2191(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 10
Paragraph 10
10. Encourages the Croatian authorities to continue their efforts to combat discrimination and to enforce the anti- discrimination legislation as well as to address resolutely cases of hate crimes, hate speech, racial threats and intolerance against sexualethnic and LGBT minorities; further invites Croatia to continue to act in the spirit of tolerance and take appropriate measures to protect those who may still be subject to threats or acts of intimidation;
Amendment 97 #
2011/2191(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 13
Paragraph 13
13. Invites Croatia to consistently advocate EU enlargement and the promotion of European values of peace, prosperity, freedom, the rule of law, democracy and the social market economy in the region; encourages Croatia to continue to maintainenhance good-neighbourly relations, to remainbe an important and proactive promoter of regional cooperation on all levels and to maintain its commitment to translate reconciliation efforts into practical steps of economic benefit to all citizens of the region;
Amendment 98 #
2011/2191(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 13
Paragraph 13
13. Invites Croatia to consistently advocate EU enlargement and the promotion of European values of peace, prosperity, freedom, the rule of law, democracy and the social market economy in the region; encourages Croatia to continue to maintain good-neighbourly relations, to remain an important and proactive promoter of regional cooperation on all levels and to maintain its commitment to translate reconciliation efforts into practical steps of economic, social and human benefit to all citizens of the region;
Amendment 103 #
2011/2191(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 14
Paragraph 14
14. Calls for progress in the resolution of outstanding bilateral issues with some neighbouring countries, in particular as regards border demarcation, missing persons, property restitution and refugees, and strongly believes that open issues of a bilateral nature must not halt the process of EU accession of candidate and potential candidate countries in the Western Balkans;
Amendment 104 #
2011/2191(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 14
Paragraph 14
14. Calls for progress in the resolution of outstanding bilateral issues with some neighbouring countries, in particular aswith Serbia, mainly regardsing border demarcation, missing persons, property restitution and refugees, and strongly believes that open issues of a bilateral nature must not halt the process of EU accession of candidate and potential candidate countries in the Western Balkans;
Amendment 7 #
2011/2157(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Citation 13 a (new)
Citation 13 a (new)
– having regard to its Written Declaration No 15/2011 of 27 September 2011 on the establishment of Euro-Mediterranean Erasmus and Leonardo da Vinci programmes,
Amendment 20 #
2011/2157(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Recital A
Recital A
A. whereas respect for and promotion of democracy and human rights – particularly women’s rights – justice and the rule of law, fundamental freedoms – including freedom of speech, conscience, religion, sexual orientation, association and the media, including unrestricted access to information, communication and internet –, strengthening of security, democratic stability, prosperity, the fair distribution of income, wealth and opportunities, the fight against corruption and the promotion of good governance are founding principles and aims of the EU which must constitute common values at the core of the ENP review,
Amendment 51 #
2011/2157(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Recital D a (new)
Recital D a (new)
Da. having regard to the European Parliament’s support for the establishment of Euro-Mediterranean Erasmus and Leonardo da Vinci programmes through Written Declaration 15/2011 of 27 September 2011,
Amendment 77 #
2011/2157(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 3
Paragraph 3
3. Although the EU does not seek to impose a model or a ready-made recipe for political reforms and respects the values, traditions and forms of governance of the countries concerned, underlines that the ENP is based on shared values and the commitment to democracy, human rights, the rule of law and good governance;
Amendment 88 #
2011/2157(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 4
Paragraph 4
4. Welcomes the proposal for a European Endowment for Democracy, which is a timely response to the clamour for democracy by the populations of our neighbouring countries; underlines that it should be based on the principles of transparency and flexibilitya flexible, fast and targeted mechanism for support and should complement already-existing EU Instruments and the exemplary work of longstanding European political or non- political foundations; stresses that its scope and organisation should be clearly defined and that its structures and procedures should be light and straightforward; calls for a truly political steering committee to be established with the participation of the European Parliament, which should also be involved in the ex-post control mechanismthe involvement of the European Parliament in its governance structure, to help determine the annual objectives, priorities, expected results, and financial allocations in broad terms and to be part in the monitoring of activities;
Amendment 105 #
2011/2157(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 5
Paragraph 5
5. Stresses the importance of building a partnership with societies and, in that context, takes note of the proposal for a Civil Society Facility (CSF) as a way to target resources more effectively and efficiently towards civil society; calls on the EEAS and the Commission to better explain the scope and objectives of a potential CSF; recommends to use this facility to improve the work of the Civil Society Forum within the Eastern Partnership and to potentially build up such a forum also for the southern partners;
Amendment 137 #
2011/2157(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 8
Paragraph 8
8. Considers that human rights situations should be continuously monitored and that an annual assessment of the situation could be included in the annex to the annual progress report of each partner country with a clear mechanism to reconsider and progressively limit or even suspend bilateral cooperation if human rights violations are confirmed, without affecting civil society;
Amendment 173 #
2011/2157(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 12
Paragraph 12
12. Underlines the opportunity that negotiations on association agreements provide to boost reform; stresses that all the components should be linked in order for the EU to deepen its relationship in a holistic and coherent manner; believes that they should therefore include concrete conditions, timetables and performance benchmarks which should be regularly monitored; stresses the need to include in these agreements real and tangible incentives for the partners to make the reform path more attractive; reiterates the need for the EU to grant privileged market access, greater openness to trade by better aligning common commercial policy objectives with the ENP;
Amendment 226 #
2011/2157(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 19
Paragraph 19
19. Recalls that the EU should improve the management of migration, providing better conditions for the establishment of legal migrants in the EU; considers that the EU needs to favour legal labour migration by concluding mobility partnerships; calls upon the member states to view the mobility debate as an important element of the neighbourhood policy that should not be steered primarily by security concerns;
Amendment 240 #
2011/2157(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 20
Paragraph 20
20. Underlines the importance of paying particular attention to the younger generation; stresses that the EU should increase cooperation in the field of education, immediately broadening and increasing scholarship programmes and mobility of students by promoting university and high-school exchanges and public-private partnerships in the field of research; emphasises the need to advance the work on mutual recognition of qualifications and education systems with ENP partner countries; stresses the strong need for a structured information policy towards the citizens of the ENP partners concerning the possibility of participation in EU programmes;
Amendment 244 #
2011/2157(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 20 a (new)
Paragraph 20 a (new)
20a. Believes that the Euro- Mediterranean University (EMUNI) provides a unique platform and opportunity for strengthening cooperation in the area of higher education and student mobility with our southern neighbours, at a time when it is of particularly vital importance to deepen the relations with the southern partnership countries, especially with their younger generations; underlines, in this respect, that the EMUNI’s potential should be developed as much as possible;
Amendment 245 #
2011/2157(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 20 b (new)
Paragraph 20 b (new)
20b. Calls on the Commission to take over Parliament’s proposal, produced in the wake of the Arab Spring, to establish a Euro-Mediterranean Leonardo da Vinci programme aimed at encouraging the mobility of young people wishing to acquire vocational training abroad, the object being to help combat the youth unemployment endemic to the southern Mediterranean;
Amendment 256 #
2011/2157(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 21
Paragraph 21
21. Believes that the EU should advance its work on visa facilitation and readmission agreements, with a view to moving – once all conditions are met – to a visa-free regime; stresses in this respect that the youth and student mobility should be treated as a priority; underlines that the provisions on asylum must be fully in line with international obligations and commitments and EU standards, especially in the human rights field;
Amendment 294 #
2011/2157(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 24 a (new)
Paragraph 24 a (new)
24a. Believes that intercultural and inter- religious dialogue is crucial to enhancing mutual understanding, respect, solidarity and tolerance with and among the neighbourhood partner countries; calls for the proposed new ENP instruments to give particular consideration to their promotion;
Amendment 306 #
2011/2157(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 28
Paragraph 28
28. Underlines that the multilateral parliamentary assemblies, such as EURONEST and the Parliamentary Assembly of the Union for the Mediterranean (PA-UfM), ar should become crucial vectors of confidence- and coherence- building between the EU and the partner countries and among the partner countries themselves, and therefore greatlyshould contribute to the achievement of the goals of the EaP and the Union for the Mediterranean (UfM); invites the EEAS and the Commission to associate EURONEST members to the maximum extent possible with the multilateral structures and platforms of the EaP; insists on the need to recognise the PA- UfM as a legitimate parliamentary institution of the UfM; emphasises that a fully-fledged secretariat will impart increased coherence to the PA-UfM’s work and consistency with the ENP programmes planned for the southern regional dimension;
Amendment 6 #
2011/2111(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Recital A
Recital A
A. whereas the economic growth of Brazil, Russia, India, China and South Africa (the BRICS) entails an increased relevanceweight of those countries in foreign policy terms;
Amendment 15 #
2011/2111(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Recital B
Recital B
B. whereas, with the process of consolidation of strong economic and foreign policy powers such as the BRICS, a multi-polar system has emerged, where global leadership is increasingly shared amongst several countries and regional blocks of countries; whereas such a multi- polar system entails a progressive shift in global economic power to the BRICS and other emerging economies and further entails a shift of sovereignty and control, in foreign policy terms, from existingstablished powers to emerging powers; whereas the current economic crisis has accelerated the process of transfer of powers from existingstablished to emerging powers;
Amendment 22 #
2011/2111(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Recital C
Recital C
C. whereas without an inclusive new global governance system based on close consultation and cooperation with the BRICS, there will be little incentive for emergstablished and emerging powers to cooperate and concert action on major global issues with the potential risk of (i) political and economic fragmentation and the emergence of competing world orders and separate regional areas, (ii) the disentanglement of global economic structures and investment flows and (iii) the creation of regional blocks of influence with very limited international coordination and no concerted solution possible for transnational challenges;
Amendment 32 #
2011/2111(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Recital D
Recital D
D. whereas the consolidation of the economic and political power of the BRICS and other emerging countries as the world's largest economies may not necessarily be associated with the transition from low-income economies to middle-income economies and, thereby, the emergence and consolidation of a large middle class; whereas the lack of a large middle class in such countries would mark the end of the substantial role in world affairs of countries characterised by affluent societies and a stable and moderate political orientation;
Amendment 40 #
2011/2111(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Recital E
Recital E
E. whereas at the end of the third BRICS leaders meeting, on 14 April 2011, the BRICS leaders issued a joint declaration calling for more international cooperation and a strengthening of global governance, and expressing support for multilateral diplomacy with the United Nations and the G-20; whereas all five BRICS countries have been concurrently present in the UN Security Council during 2011; whereas the BRICS have called for change in the governing structures of the international financial institutions and the UN to reflect the changes in the world economy and to better manage today's global challenges;
Amendment 45 #
2011/2111(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Recital F
Recital F
F. whereas the EU should play a proactive part in building an inclusive and representative United Nations system that can effectively contribute to global solutions, peace and security, democracy and a rule-of-law-based international order; whereas, in accordance with Article 21 of the TEU, the EU is formally committed to effective multilateralism with a strong UN at its core;
Amendment 62 #
2011/2111(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 2
Paragraph 2
2. Believes that the interdependence between, on the one hand, the emergstablished powers and, on the other, the BRICS and other emerging powers maintains a relevant economic dimension, but is essentially political, as both the emerged and the emerging powers share an interest in ensuring an effective system of global governance and in tackling together those global stability and security risks which may curb the global growth potential;
Amendment 75 #
2011/2111(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 3
Paragraph 3
3. Strongly rejects the contentIs of the opinion that, in view of the emergence of new economic and foreign policy powers and potential rivals, the West should agree to relinquish its leadership and focus on managing its decline. Contends, rather,, the established powers should be ready to share responsibility and the emerging powers to be ready to bear responsibility on common global challenges; stresses that the Westablished powers and, in particular, the EU should focus on achieving the necessary economies of scale and develop concerted efforts to enable it to interact with the emerging powers constructively and effectively; points out to the need to develop an inclusive system of global governance based on cooperation and coordination with the BRICS and other emerging countries, as appropriate; points further to the key role of the Westablished powers and, particularly, the EU in promoting an inclusive system of global governance such as this; regrets that the lack of political will for genuinely common foreign policy among the member states prevents the EU from reaching its full potential as a global foreign policy actor;
Amendment 87 #
2011/2111(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 4
Paragraph 4
4. Notes that the BRICS have embarked on quasi-permanentcountries have coordination ofed their foreign policy by abstaining from the vote on UNSC Resolution 1973 (2011) on Libya (South Africa was not yet part of the BRICS at that time), by deferring the vote on the EU's role in UNGA, and through their coinciding positions on Côte d'Ivoire, Sudan and the placement of weapons in outer space, as well as by coordinating their action through the BRICS Leaders' meetings; points out that the BRICS seem to be challenging the current system of international governance; believesies in some cases, most notably in the Libyan and Syrian crises; stresses, however, that the extent and the results of this coordination remains to be seen and that currently the BRICS countries have differing foreign policy interests and priorities, as can be seen for instance in their overall voting behaviour in the UN General Assembly; believes, nevertheless, that if the EU will dulyshould take into account the new weight, in political and economic terms, of the BRICS and other emerging powers, as this may contribute to an orderly reform of global governance without any destabilising effects;
Amendment 111 #
2011/2111(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 5
Paragraph 5
5. Believes that, in light of the increasing relevance of the BRICS and other emerging economies and the looming multi-polar system of governance, the G- 20 is thean appropriate forum for consensus building and for a decision-making process which is inclusive and able to foster convergence, including regulatory convergence; takes the view that notwithstanding the increasing relevance of the G-20, the G-7 maintains a key role as a consultative, coordinating and consensus-building forum for the emerged powers with a view to dialogue with the BRICS and other emerging economies, and ahead of G-20 meetings; supports the G-20 parliamentary dimension and believes that it should be further consolidated and involved in the decision- making processes to ensure a reinforced democratic dialogue and scrutiny;
Amendment 120 #
2011/2111(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 6
Paragraph 6
6. Notes that the transatlantic relations are of utmost importance both economically and politically and the US remains the main economic partner of the EU and vice versa; stresses, however, that, given the increasing global and regional relevance of China, the United States of America may progressively shift its primarystrategic attention, and political investment and resources to the Pacific and perceive the North Atlantic dimension and cooperation with the EU as less strategic; further notes that Asia will have to play a progressively important role on the foreign agenda of the European Union and European Union Member States; expresses concern that the stance of the United States and the EUEU Member States towards China and other emerging countries in Asia may not be sufficiently coordinated and may lead to a decoupling of US and EU policies towards such countries; strongly believes that only by coordinating their efforts will the USA and the EUEU Member States attain the required economies of scale to engage in an effective dialogue with the emerging countries; takes the view that, in addition to the G-7, regular EU-US summits would provide the opportunity to identify common objectives and coordinate strategies;
Amendment 131 #
2011/2111(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 7
Paragraph 7
7. Stresses the importance that the overall coordination of EU foreign policy towards the BRICS and other emerging economies should lie with the High Representative of the Union for Foreign Affairs and Security Policy; believes that the EU should strive to achieve, under the coordination by the High Representative and other relevant commissioners, a better linking of foreign and security policy with EU sectoral policies, such as development, energy security, trade, access to raw materials and rare earths, climate change and migration, with a view to valorising synergies and ensuring a coherent and systemic foreign policy approach;
Amendment 137 #
2011/2111(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 9
Paragraph 9
9. Notes that the EU should have capacity to adjust and reform its internal governance structures in order to ensure a decision-making process able to reflect its plurality and create consensus; stressWhilst stressing the need to avoid a monolithic approach to the BRICS, reiterates the importance that aof coherent EU foreign policy approach at EU level towards the BRICS and other emerging countries being reflected inat the organisationlevel of the EEAS; takes the view that with regard to the BRICS, in addition to its organisation along geographical and thematic lines, the EEAS should the EEAS should review and strengthen strategic partnerships with the BRICS countries tablish an ad hoc coordinating king into accounit to ensure that all individual policies towards BRICS are compatible from a systemic point of view and that the policy lines adopted are reflected in the EU dialogue with emerged powers such as the USA, Canada and Japan;geographical as well as thematic differences and stresses the added value the strategic partnerships can provide; further believes that the EU delegations in BRICS countries and other relevant emerging countries should form a network aimed at providing continuous monitoring and analysis on relations amongst the BRICS and relevant cross-sensitivities, thus enabling a more systemic approach; believesis of the opinion that the EU should direct part of its resources to leading the reform process of a global system of governance and of international organisations with a view to ensuring a more inclusive consensus- building and decision-making process at global level;
Amendment 147 #
2011/2111(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 10
Paragraph 10
Amendment 154 #
2011/2111(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 11
Paragraph 11
11. Believes that, with a view to ensuringReiterates the importance of continued effective democratic scrutiny of EU policy- making towards the BRICS and other emerging countries, and in order to facilitate aning enhanced interparliamentary dialogue with such countries, relevant Parliament staff should develop specialised competence and thus have appropriate analytical tools and monitoring capacity and be able to assist Members in promoting effective dialogue;
Amendment 62 #
2011/2047(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 7
Paragraph 7
7. Takes the view that the added value of the Commission’s development aid justifies a significantubstantial increase in real terms in the budget earmarked for development aid in the next MFF (Multiannual Financial Framework);
Amendment 92 #
2011/2047(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 12
Paragraph 12
12. SuggestUrges that the EU and its Member States support more systematically the ILO’s decent work agenda in developing countries, in order to stimulate the creation of high-quality jobs and the protection of core labour standards;
Amendment 2 #
2011/0167(NLE)
Proposal for a decision
–
–
The Committee on Development calls on the Committee on International Trade, as the committee responsible, to propose that Parliament decline to give its consent.
Amendment 61 #
2011/0023(COD)
Proposal for a directive
Recital 17
Recital 17
(17) The Member States should take all necessary measures to enable air carriers to fulfil their obligations under this Directive. Dissuasive, effective and proportionate penalties, including financial ones, should be provided for by Member States against those air carriers failing to meet their obligations regarding the transfer of PNR data. Where there are repeated serious infringements which might undermine the basic objectives of this Directive, these penalties may include, in exceptional cases, measures such as the immobilisation, seizure and confiscation of the means of transport, or the temporary suspension or withdrawal of the operating licence.
Amendment 81 #
2011/0023(COD)
Proposal for a directive
Recital 31
Recital 31
(31) This Directive respects the fundamental rights and the principles of the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union, in particular the right to the protection of personal data, the right to privacy and the right to non-discrimination as protected by Articles 8, 7 and 21 of the Charter, as well as the right to compensation in case the subject's details are exposed in the media and public sphere, without sufficient evidence for its guilt, and has to be implemented accordingly. The Directive is compatible with data protection principles and its provisions are in line with the Framework Decision 2008/977/JHA. Furthermore, and in order to comply with the proportionality principle, the Directive, on specific issues, will have stricter rules on data protection than the Framework Decision 2008/977/JHA.
Amendment 83 #
2011/0023(COD)
Proposal for a directive
Recital 32
Recital 32
(32) In particular, the scope of the Directive is as limited as possible, it allows retention of PNR data for period of time not exceeding 53 years, after which the data must be deleted, the data must be anonymised after a very short period, the collection and use of sensitive data is prohibited. In order to ensure efficiency and a high level of data protection, Member States are required to ensure that an independent national supervisory authority is responsible for advising and monitoring how PNR data are processed. All processing of PNR data must be logged or documented for the purpose of verification of the lawfulness of the data processing, self-monitoring and ensuring proper data integrity and security of the data processing. Member States must also ensure that passengers are clearly and precisely informed about the collection of PNR data and their rights.
Amendment 188 #
2011/0023(COD)
Proposal for a directive
Article 9 – paragraph 4
Article 9 – paragraph 4
4. The result of matching referred to in Article 4(2)(a) and (b) shall be kept by the Passenger Information Unit only as long as necessary to inform the competent authorities of a positive match. Where the result of an automated matching operation has, further to individual review by non- automated means, proven to be negative, it shall, however, be stored so as to avoid future ‘false’ positive matches for a maximum period of three years unless the underlying data have not yet been deleted in accordance with paragraph 3 at the expiry of the five years, in which case the log shall be kept until the underlying data are deleted.
Amendment 194 #
2011/0023(COD)
Proposal for a directive
Article 11 – paragraph 3
Article 11 – paragraph 3
3. Any processing of PNR data revealing a person’s race or ethnic origin, religious or philosophical belief, political opinion, trade union membership, health or sexual life shall be prohibited. In the event that PNR data revealing such information are received by the Passenger Information Unit they shall be deleted immediately. The data subject has the right to compensation, in case his private data are misused or are exposed to the public and media sphere, for reasons unrelated to the scope of this directive.
Amendment 14 #
2010/2101(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Recital D
Recital D
D. whereas the increasing involvement of non-humanitarian bodies in responding to humanitarian crises carries with it a major risk of confusion between the military and humanitarian roles and blurs the boundaries of neutral, impartial and independent humanitarian aid, whereas effective humanitarian activities in the case of major natural or man-made disasters indispensably require the involvement of military logistical capabilities,
Amendment 18 #
2010/2101(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Recital F
Recital F
F. whereas the humanitarian context worldwide has deteriorated, the scale of the challenges and the humanitarian need is huge and it is essential to work on strengthening implementation of the European Consensus and the associated action plan, as well as worldwide coordination and burden sharing taking into account the regional responsibilities of the countries who have the capacity to be major contributors of humanitarian aid,
Amendment 51 #
2010/2101(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 10
Paragraph 10
10. Calls for respect for the diversity of bodies actively involved in financing and implementing international humanitarian programmes – the UN, the Red Cross and Red Crescent Movement and NGOs – and encourages efforts to reinforce the capacity of local players; calls for proper coordination and exchange of information between all actors involved,
Amendment 81 #
2010/2101(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 19
Paragraph 19
19. Welcomes the adoption in February 2009 of a new European strategy to improve good governance and support disaster risk reduction in developing countries and calls for the strategy to be implemented swiftly;
Amendment 82 #
2010/2101(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 20
Paragraph 20
20. Calls for a major effort to ensure that disaster risk reduction is morebe mainstreamed in all EU policies and systematically included as an aspect of development aid and humanitarian aid policies;
Amendment 13 #
2010/2096(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 1 a
Paragraph 1 a
a) acknowledges that the inclusion of civil protection and humanitarian aid within the portfolio of a single Commissioner canresponsible for Humanitarian Aid and Crisis Response creates better synergies within the Commission and can helps enhance the coherence of the overall EU disaster response;
Amendment 15 #
2010/2096(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 1 b
Paragraph 1 b
b) calls however for a clear distinction and demarcation of roles and mandates between civil protection and humanitarian aid in order to preserve their specific features and respective identities to enhance efficiency;
Amendment 23 #
2010/2096(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 1 point d a (new)
Paragraph 1 point d a (new)
(da) suggests localized coordination efforts, in cooperation with the national government of the affected state, using EU and Member States' representatives on the ground to ensure targeted and competent response to affected localities;
Amendment 1 #
2010/2087(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Citation 7
Citation 7
– having regard to the Commission's Communication on strengthening the European Neighbourhood Policy (COM(2006)0726) and its intention to present the review of the European Neighbourhood Policy in 2011,
Amendment 2 #
2010/2087(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Citation 9 a (new)
Citation 9 a (new)
– having regard to the recent progress in visa-facilitation dialogue with countries from the region,
Amendment 8 #
2010/2087(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Recital B
Recital B
B. whereas the Black Sea region is of strategic importance for the EU; whereas the Black Sea is partially internal to the EU, which results in shared challenges and opportunities for the EU and the countries of the region, as well as in a common need to ensure there is an area of peace, stability, regional cooperation and sustainable prosperity around the Black Sea,
Amendment 11 #
2010/2087(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Recital B a (new)
Recital B a (new)
Ba. whereas the Black Sea Region is a socially, culturally and religiously rich environment where intercultural and interreligious dialogue should take a central role,
Amendment 17 #
2010/2087(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Recital H
Recital H
H. whereas many developments have taken place in the Black Sea Region since 2008, and while regional cooperation seems to be advancing in some technical fields such as environment, education, research and technology, as well as in normative approximation, a number of challenges such as protracted conflicts in the Caucasus and Transnistria, militarization and the deterioration of democratic rule persist and have even gained in intensity,
Amendment 19 #
2010/2087(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Recital H
Recital H
H. whereas many developments have taken place in the Black Sea Region since 2008, and while regional cooperation seems to be advancing in some technical fields such as environment, education, research and technology, as well as in normative approximation, a number of challenges such as protracted conflicts, militarization, displaced populations and the deterioration of democratic rule persist and have even gained in intensity,
Amendment 32 #
2010/2087(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 2
Paragraph 2
2. Calls on the Commission to elaborate a strategy for the Black Sea region in parallel with the review of the European Neighbourhood Policy, thus defining an integrated EU approach to the region, with a detailed action plan, clear objectives, flagship initiatives and benchmarks; believes that the strategy should ensure coordination of activities and division of labour;
Amendment 52 #
2010/2087(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 7
Paragraph 7
7. Considers that in order to provide visibility, strategic guidance and high-level coordination, ministerial meetings between the EU and the wider Black Sea region countries should be organised on a regular basis and include all actors in the region; believes that the Strategy for the Black Sea should be developed at all levels of regional cooperation; notes, therefore, the parliamentary cooperation between the EU and the Black Sea countries, especially through PABSEC, welcomes the creation of the Black Sea Civil Society Forum and encourages strengthened cooperation among local authorities, civil society and business;
Amendment 61 #
2010/2087(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 10
Paragraph 10
10. Stresses that twohe main objectives should be pursued in the EU Strategy for the Black Sea Region: should be establishing peace and stability in the Black Sea area and providing for EU energy securityan area of peace, founded on the respect for human rights and fundamental freedoms; considers that good governance, energy, transport, environment, people-to-people contacts and economic and social development should constitute priority actions;
Amendment 70 #
2010/2087(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 11
Paragraph 11
11. Recalls that the Black Sea region is faced with considerable transnational challenges that cannot be ignored, such as protracted conflicts, displaced populations, bilateral disputes, closed borders and strategic rivalries leading to militarisation and proliferation of arms, weak institutions and governance and the deterioration of democratic rule, cross-border crime and trafficking, border and movement management, and deteriorated maritime security and safety;
Amendment 79 #
2010/2087(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 12 a (new)
Paragraph 12 a (new)
12a. Emphasises, the important role that the OSCE plays in the region and it regards as essential for the EU to cooperate with OSCE in the fields of institution-building, rule of law, election observation, freedom of media, as well as democracy and human rights;
Amendment 106 #
2010/2087(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 17
Paragraph 17
17. Recalls the EU's aim of diversifying routes and sources of supply; reiterates the importance of the Nabucco project andand South Stream projects, as well as of Liquefied Natural Gas (LNG) transportation to Europe, in the form of the AGRI project and the development of LNG terminals in Black Sea ports; recalls the need for a common normative framework for promoting a transparent, competitive and rules-based gas market;
Amendment 116 #
2010/2087(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 18
Paragraph 18
18. Believes that the economic, social and human development of the region as a whole should be promoted; attaches particular importance to the respect for human rights and fundamental freedoms in the region; regards further liberalization of trade and intensification of intra- regional trade as essential to the economic development of the region; supports the EU's Integrated Maritime Policy aimed at the socio-economic development of maritime regions, but regrets that its Black Sea dimension is poorly developed; welcomes the results registered in cooperation on education, research and technology; further encourages the goal of promoting social development, people-to- people contacts and the development of a strong civil society; underlines that the EU should proceed further in its dialogue on visa-facilitation with the countries of the region;
Amendment 14 #
2010/2050(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Citation 16
Citation 16
– having regard to the Vienna Group proposal for transferring Iranian uranium to Russia and France and to the bridging proposal sponsored by the governments of Turkey and Brazil in an attempt to delay the passage of United Nations Security Council (UNSC) Resolution 1929 (2010)IAEA's proposal for an agreement to provide nuclear fuel to the Tehran Research Reactor in exchange for Low Enriched Uranium from Iran's stocks and to the bridging proposal sponsored by the governments of Turkey and Brazil in an attempt to build confidence and facilitate negotiations between Iran and E3+3 as well as between Iran and the Vienna Group,
Amendment 61 #
2010/2050(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Recital G
Recital G
G. whereas there has been a remarkable deepening of relations between Iran and Turkey, and whereas Iran is using its state and non-state allies Syria, Hezbollah and Hamas, to destabilise the regionwhich could have a positive influence on the prospects for a diplomatic solution to the problem of Iranian nuclear programme,
Amendment 211 #
2010/2050(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 16
Paragraph 16
16. Expresses its disappointment at the continuing refusal by Iran to fully cooperate with the IAEA by obstructing the IAEA's work, denying access to key nuclear facilities and vetoing the appointment of inspectors; calls on the Iranian leadership to fulfil Iran's obligations under the NPT; demands that Teheran ratify and implement the Additional Protocol on the Safeguards Agreement; addresses the same demand to the other countries which have not ratified and implemented the additional Protocol on the Safeguards Agreement;
Amendment 216 #
2010/2050(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 16 a (new)
Paragraph 16 a (new)
16a. Stresses the fact that a diplomatic solution to the Iranian nuclear issue is the only viable option;
Amendment 218 #
2010/2050(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 16 b (new)
Paragraph 16 b (new)
16b. Also stresses the fact that in accordance with a central tenet of the NPT, Iran has the right to enrich uranium for peaceful purposes and to receive technical assistance for the same objectives;
Amendment 270 #
2010/2050(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 22
Paragraph 22
22. Expresses its concerns on the remarkable deepening of relations between Iran and EU accession candidate Turkeyappreciation for the efforts by EU accession candidate country Turkey as well as by Brazil to secure progress on the Tehran Research Reactor agreement proposed to Iran by the IAEA in October 2009; asks the Council and the Commission to discuss closely consult and cooperate withe Turkish attitude towards Iran with their counterparts in Ankara; calls on the Turkish authorities to follow the European approach towards theey which aims to facilitate negotiations between Iran and the E3+3 as well as with Iran and the Vienna Group; calls on the Turkish authorities to continue their efforts to find a diplomatic solution to Iranian's nuclear threat; calls on the EU institutions to do their utmost to sever the lines between Teheran and Syria, Hezbollah and Hamasquestion, which is the only viable option;
Amendment 282 #
2010/2050(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 22 a (new)
Paragraph 22 a (new)
22a. Notes that no action should be taken by any state that could risk leading to any kind of use of force against Iran;
Amendment 286 #
2010/2050(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 22 b (new)
Paragraph 22 b (new)
22b. Notes with concern the forming of a constellation of political, economic and military interests fomenting preparations for a military attack on Iran; notes with even deeper concern the destabilising effects that such an attack would have on the Middle East and on the whole region, with the disruption of oil supplies, many civilian victims, the encouragement of international terrorism, the growth of extreme nationalist reactions in Iran, and an ultimate strengthening of the current Iranian regime;
Amendment 7 #
2009/2219(INI)
Draft opinion
Paragraph 4
Paragraph 4
4. Notes that in many developing countries fisheries, particularly small-scale fishing, and related industries play a vital role in ensuring food security, creating jobs, generating government revenues and exports and maintaining local communities; considers it essential that the interests of the local population and their sovereign rights over natural resources are taken into account; is concerned that overfishing and illegal fishing can contribute to migration and seriously undermine sustainable development; calls therefore for EU fisheries agreements with developing countries to help foster domestic fishing industries, monitor fish stocks, combat overfishing and illegal fishing, protect biodiversity and upgrade hygiene and health standards;
Amendment 106 #
2009/2217(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 4 a (new)
Paragraph 4 a (new)
4 a. Believes that by the end of 2012 the Afghan authorities, with increased international police training assistance, should be ready to take over full responsibility for their state and that by then the foreign military presence should be brought to an end;
Amendment 9 #
2009/2215(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Recital A
Recital A
A. whereas, in a multipolar world, only large regional blocintegrations will be in abetter positioned to play a leading role and to cope with social, cultural, economic, environmental and political changes,
Amendment 35 #
2009/2215(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Recital E
Recital E
E. whereas, for the last 15 years or so, Mediterranean countries have been developing new trading and economic partners (relations (e.g. with Russia, China, India, Brazil and the Gulf monarchistates) and their societies have been undergoing radicsubstantial changes (in terms of consumption patterns, mobility, demographic transitions and so on) with implications for internal territorial balances,
Amendment 44 #
2009/2215(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Recital F
Recital F
F. having regard to the significant disparities between European Union Member States and Mediterranean third countries and the worrying structural problems of a socio-economic and institutional nature, which call for strong responses in the shared interest of all the states participating in the UfM; noting the need for an improved South-South regional integration,
Amendment 46 #
2009/2215(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Recital G
Recital G
G. whereas the regional context in which the UfM is taking shape continues to be characterised by conflicts and political tensions, which have slowed down its establishment since the Paris Summit of July 2008; whereas the Middle East Peace Process has come to a standstill,
Amendment 64 #
2009/2215(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Recital K
Recital K
K. whereas the implementation of projects announced by the UfM have suffered from general underfunding since the Paris Summits progressed only slowly since the Paris Summit, also due to general underfunding,
Amendment 89 #
2009/2215(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 2
Paragraph 2
2. Calls on the governments of the UfM member countries to establish an ongoing and open political dialogue characterised by mutual respect and understanding, and reaffirms its desire to see the promotion of democracy and respect for human rights and individual and collective freedoms made the central focus of that dialogue; it believes that respect of women's rights, gender equality and sexual orientation require particular attention;
Amendment 92 #
2009/2215(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 2 a (new)
Paragraph 2 a (new)
2a. Recalls the 2008 Year of Intercultural dialogue and calls on all UfM member countries to renew their efforts to increase religious and cultural dialogue among their populations, notably through educational exchange programmes and their continued commitment to the UN Alliance of Civilizations;
Amendment 101 #
2009/2215(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 3
Paragraph 3
3. Is of the opinion that political tensions and regional conflicts in the Mediterranean basin must not hinder tangible progress towards multilateral cooperation in specific sectors, and that it is through the implementation of major integration projects that the UfM will help to develop a climate of trust conducive to pursuing common security goals in a spirit of solidarity and peace; at the same time notes that a climate of trust is essential to the success of the UfM and its projects; a strong determination of UfM member countries is needed for the continuation of the Middle East Peace Process; calls for a stronger EU engagement on the solution of the matter;
Amendment 140 #
2009/2215(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 6 - point 2
Paragraph 6 - point 2
- emphasises that, in the period leading up to the end of the 2007-2013 financial perspectives, any financial contributions made by the Union should not affect existing or planned Euro-Mediterranean regional projects; underlines the need to increase substantially the funds allocated to the UfM in the EU’s forthcoming financial perspectives for 2014-2020;
Amendment 170 #
2009/2215(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 8 a (new)
Paragraph 8 a (new)
8a. Believes that increased South-South bilateral and multilateral economic cooperation would result in tangible benefits for the citizens, as well as improve the political climate in the region;
Amendment 194 #
2009/2215(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 11
Paragraph 11
11. Is keen to see new projects in the cultural field put on the UfM’s agenda in the very near future; suggests that the dimension of higher education and research of UfM should be strengthened, where priority should be given to setting up aupgrading the Euro- Mediterranean juniorcomponent of the Erasmus Mundus programme called ‘Averroës’, as a way of stepping up exchanges between secondary school pupils in UfM member countries, as well as ensuring enhanced cooperation of partner Institutions within the Euro-Mediterranean University (EMUNI), so that it becomes a centre of excellence and intercultural dialogue;
Amendment 206 #
2009/2215(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 11 a (new)
Paragraph 11 a (new)
Amendment 213 #
2009/2215(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 13
Paragraph 13
13. Welcomes the recent establishment of the Euro-Mediterranean Regional and Local Assembly (ARLEM) and calls for efforts to ensure proper coordination between the ARLEM’s activities and those of the EMPA, in particular through joint meetings or reciprocal invitations for members of their respective bureaux to attend working meetings;