BETA

Activities of Antonello ANTINORO

Plenary speeches (38)

Online consumer dispute resolution (A7-0236/2012 - Róża Gräfin von Thun und Hohenstein)
2016/11/22
Common fisheries policy (debate)
2016/11/22
Dossiers: 2011/0195(COD)
Removal of fins of sharks on board vessels (A7-0295/2012 - Maria do Céu Patrão Neves) (vote)
2016/11/22
Dossiers: 2011/0364(COD)
Baltic salmon stock and the fisheries exploiting that stock - Conservation of fishery resources through technical measures for the protection of juveniles of marine organisms - Removal of fins of sharks on board vessels - Small-scale and artisanal fisheries and CFP reform - External dimension of the common fisheries policy (debate)
2016/11/22
Explanations of vote
2016/11/22
Dossiers: 2011/0137(COD)
Explanations of vote
2016/11/22
Dossiers: 2011/0092(CNS)
Explanations of vote
2016/11/22
Dossiers: 2010/0380(COD)
Explanations of vote
2016/11/22
Dossiers: 2010/0362(COD)
Explanations of vote
2016/11/22
Dossiers: 2010/0373(COD)
Explanations of vote
2016/11/22
Dossiers: 2010/0373(COD)
Agreement between the EU and Morocco concerning reciprocal liberalisation measures on agricultural products and fishery products (debate)
2016/11/22
Dossiers: 2010/0248(NLE)
Explanations of vote
2016/11/22
Dossiers: 2011/2115(INI)
Voting time
2016/11/22
Explanations of vote
2016/11/22
Dossiers: 2008/0249(COD)
Explanations of vote
2016/11/22
Dossiers: 2006/0167(COD)
Explanations of vote
2016/11/22
Dossiers: 2010/2302(INI)
Explanations of vote
2016/11/22
Dossiers: 2010/0036(COD)
Explanations of vote
2016/11/22
Dossiers: 2010/0036(COD)
Explanations of vote
2016/11/22
Dossiers: 2010/0390(COD)
Explanations of vote
2016/11/22
Dossiers: 2010/0390(COD)
Explanations of vote
2016/11/22
Dossiers: 2010/2095(INI)
Explanations of vote
2016/11/22
Dossiers: 2009/0129(COD)
Explanations of vote
2016/11/22
Dossiers: 2009/2150(INI)
Explanations of vote
2016/11/22
Dossiers: 2009/2150(INI)
Explanations of vote
2016/11/22
Dossiers: 2008/0261(COD)
Explanations of vote
2016/11/22
Dossiers: 2009/0173(COD)
One-minute speeches (Rule 150)
2016/11/22
Explanations of vote
2016/11/22
Dossiers: 2010/2268(INI)
Explanations of vote
2016/11/22
Dossiers: 2008/0142(COD)
Explanations of vote
2016/11/22
Dossiers: 2008/0098(COD)
Explanations of vote
2016/11/22
Dossiers: 2010/0044(COD)
Explanations of vote
2016/11/22
Dossiers: 2008/0227(COD)
Explanations of vote
2016/11/22
Dossiers: 2007/0229(COD)
Explanations of vote
2016/11/22
Dossiers: 2010/2059(INI)
Arrangements for importing fishery and aquaculture products into the EU with a view to the future reform of the CFP (debate)
2016/11/22
Dossiers: 2009/2238(INI)
Green Paper on reform of the common fisheries policy (debate)
2016/11/22
Dossiers: 2009/2106(INI)
Key objectives for the Conference of the Parties to the CITES (debate)
2016/11/22
Inaugural address by the President of the European Parliament
2016/11/22

Shadow reports (1)

REPORT on small-scale coastal fishing, artisanal fishing and the reform of the common fisheries policy PDF (246 KB) DOC (170 KB)
2016/11/22
Committee: PECH
Dossiers: 2011/2292(INI)
Documents: PDF(246 KB) DOC(170 KB)

Opinions (1)

OPINION on an Integrated Maritime Policy - Evaluation of progress made and new challenges
2016/11/22
Committee: PECH
Documents: PDF(106 KB) DOC(86 KB)

Amendments (60)

Amendment 1593 #

2011/0195(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Part 3 – article 16 – title
FAllocation of fishing opportunities
2012/06/25
Committee: PECH
Amendment 1603 #

2011/0195(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Part 3 – article 16 – paragraph 2
2. By-catch fishing opportunities may be reserved under the total fishing opportunities.deleted
2012/06/25
Committee: PECH
Amendment 1619 #

2011/0195(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Part 3 – article 16 – paragraph 3 a (new)
3a. Each Member State shall decide, for vessels flying its flag, on the method of allocating the fishing opportunities assigned to that Member State in accordance with Community law. It shall inform the Commission of the allocation method.
2012/06/25
Committee: PECH
Amendment 1798 #

2011/0195(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Part 4 – article 27
Establishment of systems of transferable 1. Each Member State shall establish a system of transferable fishing concessions no later than 31 December 2013 for a) all fishing vessels of 12 meters length over all or more; and b) all fishing vessels under 12 meters length overall fishing with towed gear. 2. Member States may extend the system of transferable fishing concessions to fishing vessels of less than 12 meters length overall and deploying other types of gear than towed gear and shall inform the Commission thereof.Article 27 deleted fishing concessions
2012/06/25
Committee: PECH
Amendment 1852 #

2011/0195(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Part 4 – article 28
1. A transferable fishing concession shall establish an entitlement to use the individual fishing opportunities allocated in accordance with Article 29(1). 2. Each Member State shall allocate transferable fishing concessions on the basis of transparent criteria, for each stock or group of stocks for which fishing opportunities are allocated in accordance with Article 16, excluding fishing opportunities obtained under sustainable fisheries agreements. 3. For the allocation of transferable fishing concessions pertaining to mixed fisheries, Member States shall take account of the likely catch composition of vessels participating in such fisheries. 4. Transferable fishing concessions may only be allocated by a Member State to an owner of a fishing vessel flying the flag of that Member State, or to legal or natural persons for the purpose of being used on such a vessel. Transferable fishing concessions may be pooled together for collective management by legal or natural persons or recognized producer organisations. Member States may limit eligibility for receiving transferable fishing concessions on the basis of transparent and objective criteria. 5. Member States may limit the period of validity of transferable fishing concessions to a period of at least 15 years, for the purpose of reallocating such concessions. Where Member States have not limited the period of validity of the transferable fishing concessions, they may recall such concessions with a notice of at least 15 years. 6. Member States may recall transferable fishing concessions with a shorter notice in the event of an established serious infringement committed by the holder of the concessions. Such recalls shall be operated in a manner which gives full effect to the Common Fisheries Policy, the proportionality principle and, whenever necessary, with immediate effect. 7. Notwithstanding paragraph 5 and 6, Member States may recall transferable fishing concessions that have not been used on a fishing vessel for a period of three consecutive years.Article 28 deleted Allocation of transferable fishing concessions
2012/06/25
Committee: PECH
Amendment 1951 #

2011/0195(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Part 4 – article 30
Member States shall establish and maintain a rArticle 30 deleted Register of transferable fishing concessions and individual fishing opportunities.
2012/06/25
Committee: PECH
Amendment 1964 #

2011/0195(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Part 4 – article 31
1. Transferable fishing concessions may be fully or partially transferred within a Member State among eligible holders of such concessions. 2. A Member State may authorise transfer of transferable fishing concessions to and from other Member States. 3. Member States may regulate the transfer of transferable fishing concessions by providing for conditions for their transfer on the basis of transparent and objective criteria.Article 31 deleted Transfer of transferable fishing concessions
2012/06/25
Committee: PECH
Amendment 1995 #

2011/0195(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Part 4 – article 32
Leasing of individual fishing 1. Individual fishing opportunities may be fully or partially leased within a Member State. 2. A Member State may authorise the leasing of individual fishing opportunities to and from other Member States.Article 32 deleted opportunities
2012/06/25
Committee: PECH
Amendment 2010 #

2011/0195(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Part 4 – article 33
Allocation of fishing opportunities not subject to a system of transferable fishing 1. Each Member State shall decide how fishing opportunities assigned to it in accordance with Article 16, and which are not subject to a system of transferable fishing concessions, may be allocated to vessels flying its flag. It shall inform the Commission of the allocation method.Article 33 deleted concessions
2012/06/25
Committee: PECH
Amendment 7 #

2009/2106(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Recital A a (new)
Aa. whereas the reform of the CFP must take account of EU policy in the field of the environment, as enshrined in the Treaties, and of the Bali Declaration of December 2007,
2009/12/17
Committee: PECH
Amendment 9 #

2009/2106(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Recital C
C. whereas the basic aim of the CFP, as laid down in Regulation (EC) No 2371/2002, is to ensure the sustainable development and economic and social viability of the fisheries sector and the conservation of marine biologicresources, a fundamental presourcesmise for the exercise of fishing activity in the present and future,
2009/12/17
Committee: PECH
Amendment 10 #

2009/2106(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Recital C a (new)
Ca. having regard to the diversity of European seas and the specific nature of the fleet and fishing practices in each of those seas,
2009/12/17
Committee: PECH
Amendment 15 #

2009/2106(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Recital D
D. whereas, pursuant to Council Regulation (EC) No 2371/2002, lays down that the CFP covers conservation, management and exploitation of living aquatic resources, aquaculture, and the processing and marketing of fishery and aquaculture products where such activities are practised on the territory of Member States or in Community waters or by Community fishing vessels or, without prejudice to the primary responsibility of the flag State, nationals of Member States (Article 1(1)),
2009/12/17
Committee: PECH
Amendment 31 #

2009/2106(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Recital I
I. whereas, in order to be effective, the CFP should be restructured with a view to the multidisciplinary involvement of all groups directly or indirectly connected with the sector, in particular fishermen, vessel owners, industrialist, the scientific community and politicians, whilst always advocating a global, integrated view of the sector,
2009/12/17
Committee: PECH
Amendment 36 #

2009/2106(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Recital J
J. whereas, despite the significant progress made following the revision of the CFP in 2002, serious problems relating to fleet overcapacity and the scarcity of fishery resources still remain and have worsened in recent years, as a result of the poor state of health of marine ecosystems. For several decades European fish stocks have suffered appreciably from excessive levels of pollution as a result of ill-advised action related to a whole series of human, civil and industrial activities which are creating a sharp imbalance in marine ecosystems. Acid rain and the rise in the greenhouse effect are serving to increase the negative effects which are upsetting the balance of a highly sensitive natural system, on which resources crucial to humankind as a whole depend,
2009/12/17
Committee: PECH
Amendment 40 #

2009/2106(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Recital J
J. whereas, despite the significant progress made following the revision of the CFP in 2002, serious problems relating to fleet overcapacity and the scarcity of fishery resources still remain in some regions and have worsened in recent years,
2009/12/17
Committee: PECH
Amendment 49 #

2009/2106(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Recital K
K. whereas the maintenance of modern, competitive and safe fishing fleets is not incompatible with the reduction in fishing capacity, which has in fact been carried out by various Member States in order to bring it more closely into line with the availability of resources; whereas fisheries is one of the economic activities most affected by the impoverishment of fish stocks caused by the poor state of health of marine ecosystems and whereas its future sustainability will depend on the ability to reverse this trend, by restoring health and balance to the marine ecosystem as a whole. The sector itself must therefore contribute to efforts to restore a balance that will allow future sustainability and ensure increased viability in the medium and long term,
2009/12/17
Committee: PECH
Amendment 60 #

2009/2106(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Recital M a (new)
Ma. whereas the placing on the market of fishery products carrying accredited food certification from the point of catch through fattening or processing (depending on the industry involved) to marketing should be based on criteria of environmental sustainability and should contribute to greater awareness of sustainable fishing among both producers and consumers,
2009/12/17
Committee: PECH
Amendment 61 #

2009/2106(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Recital M b (new)
Mb. whereas the FAO has carried out significant work in the field of the ecological labelling of fishery and aquaculture products, and in May 2005 the Committee on Fisheries drew up guidelines on this topic for consideration by the Commission,
2009/12/17
Committee: PECH
Amendment 114 #

2009/2106(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 4
4. Stresses that despite having been extensively reformed in 2002, the CFP, 27 years after its establishment, is faced with serious problems whose main features are overfishing, overcapacity, overinvestment and waste, with additional aspects, such as the economic and social regression, currently affecting the sector, globalisation of the fisheries and aquaculture market and, the consequences of climate change and the progressive impoverishment of resources caused by the poor state of health of marine ecosystems;
2009/12/17
Committee: PECH
Amendment 127 #

2009/2106(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 5
5. Points out that Parliament has in previous terms drawn attention to the fact that CFP rules were not being sufficiently complied with and has repeatedly called on Member States to improve controls, harmonise inspection and sanction criteria, ensure transparency of inspection findings and strengthen the Community inspection systems, with regard to all marine activities which may have adverse effects on stocks and ecosystems;
2009/12/17
Committee: PECH
Amendment 148 #

2009/2106(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 10
10. Stresses that, notwithstanding the degree of complexity of some procedures for modifying fisheries management models and the difficulties, in particular legal problems, which may appear in this process, these and not insuperable, as shown by the successful application of other management models in other parts of the world, such as transmissible fishery rights, whose application should be confined to the industrial fisheries sector;
2009/12/17
Committee: PECH
Amendment 160 #

2009/2106(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 13 a (new)
13a. Considers that the financial resources to be negotiated within the framework of the new financial perspective 2014-2020 should make provision for an increased budget devoted to the reform of the CFP that will create the necessary financial conditions for the full implementation and practical development of the reforming guidelines that have been adopted;
2009/12/17
Committee: PECH
Amendment 165 #

2009/2106(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 14
14. Considers that CFP commitments to reversing the economic and social consequences of reduced fishing possibilitiesthe progressive impoverishment of fish stocks caused by the high levels of pollution affecting most marine ecosystems, must be compatible with the long-term sustainability of the sector;
2009/12/17
Committee: PECH
Amendment 172 #

2009/2106(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 16
16. Maintains that the reform of the CFP must continue to observe the precautionary principle set out in the Code of Conduct for Responsible Fisheries and in the New York Agreement, so as to prevent any risk to the survival and/or sustainability of species in the future;
2009/12/17
Committee: PECH
Amendment 179 #

2009/2106(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 17 a (new)
17a. Considers it necessary to guarantee effective protection for coastal areas that are highly environmentally sensitive (the main breeding and spawning grounds for biological resources);
2009/12/17
Committee: PECH
Amendment 188 #

2009/2106(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 18 b (new)
18b. Believes that the criteria for defining the Community fleet should go beyond simplistic numerical parameters (such as length, power and tonnage), opening the way to the possibility of listing a set of criteria common to all regions (such as the level of organisation of undertakings of which vessels form part, the area in which they operate and catch levels), but with differentiated weighting factors in each region, which would provide a uniform and flexible model capable of responding fairly to the range of different situations in the Community fleet;
2009/12/17
Committee: PECH
Amendment 193 #

2009/2106(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 18 a (new)
18 a. Stresses that Member States shall, as stated in the new control regulation adopted on 10 November, Art 55(1) “ensure that recreational fisheries on their territory and in Community waters are conducted in a manner compatible with the objectives and rules of the Common Fisheries Policy”;
2009/12/17
Committee: PECH
Amendment 205 #

2009/2106(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 19 a (new)
19a. Believes that increasing use should be made of information technologies relevant to the sector and computerised systems for collecting and transferring data, for both regional and national administrations and professionals and producers' organisations, thus making information more accessible and transparent;
2009/12/17
Committee: PECH
Amendment 206 #

2009/2106(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 19 b (new)
19b. Believes that the mandatory use of new technologies on board fishing vessels (for the purposes of fisheries inspection and control) should be introduced gradually and with a transition period in order to make it easier for the sector to adapt;
2009/12/17
Committee: PECH
Amendment 224 #

2009/2106(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 22
22. Reiterates that fishing is a vital activity, not just in food terms, but also in social and, cultural and recreational terms, and that in many of Europe’s coastal regions it constitutes the main – and in some cases the sole – means of obtaining a livelihood for the numerous families who depend on it directly or indirectly, and it helps to enliven the coasts and knit together their socio-economic fabric, in conjunction with other maritime activities;
2009/12/17
Committee: PECH
Amendment 225 #

2009/2106(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 22 a (new)
22a. Considers it necessary to create interprofessional clusters in the fisheries sector, involving owners, workers, processors, intermediaries, etc., which would promote dialogue between the various stakeholders in the sector upstream and downstream;
2009/12/17
Committee: PECH
Amendment 234 #

2009/2106(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 23 a (new)
23a. Takes the view that the present EFF and future structural funds for the fisheries sector must continue to support fleet renewal and modernisation, above all with regard to small-scale coastal and artisanal fishing, since this support is based on criteria of safety (which minimise occupational accidents), hygiene and comfort, as well as environmental protection, fuel economy and other criteria which do not involve any increase in fishing capacity for the fleets concerned;
2009/12/17
Committee: PECH
Amendment 241 #

2009/2106(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 25
25. Believes that all fishing operators, men and women alike, need to be accorded the same status in all Member States, especially as regards access to social security, and that a strategy must be put in place to provide financial support to fishing professionals who, because fishing capacity has to be adjusted according to the availability of fish stocks, might lose their job might lose their job, and to programmes to protect resources in the short term;
2009/12/17
Committee: PECH
Amendment 250 #

2009/2106(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 26
26. Considers it necessary to ensure higher first-sale prices of fishery productsresh fish and to reduce the number of middlemen in the chain stretching from producers to consumers and, to an increasing extent, secure the involvement of producers’ organisations in the management of stocks and the marketing of fishery products, the aim being to make the catching sub-sector as profitable as possible;
2009/12/17
Committee: PECH
Amendment 257 #

2009/2106(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 27
27. Calls on the Commission to draw up a specific eco-labelling programme with a view to enhancing the image of fishery products and promoting consumer health, and to base it on strict monitoring and complete traceability of fisheries, as regards both catches in the wild and aquaculture products, as well as all processed products;
2009/12/17
Committee: PECH
Amendment 271 #

2009/2106(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 30
30. Considers that management plans should be regularly monitored and assessed, without detracting from the minimum flexibility required to enable them to be adapted swiftly to new circumstances affecting the broader context;deleted
2009/12/17
Committee: PECH
Amendment 276 #

2009/2106(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 30 a (new)
30a. Considers that long-term management plans shall be required to be established for all fisheries or geographical fishing regions; calls for these to be based upon scientific advice, meeting consistent criteria that will ensure an ecosystem approach, and regularly monitored and assessed, without detracting from the minimum flexibility required to enable them to be adapted swiftly to new circumstances affecting the broader context;
2009/12/17
Committee: PECH
Amendment 283 #

2009/2106(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 31
31. Maintains that the management system for the fisheries sector has to abandon the traditional top-down approach, laying emphasis instead on the principle of regionalisation and subsidiarity (horizontal decentralisation), the redefinition and increased flexibility of the principle of relative stability and the participation of professionals in the sector, taking into account the multifarious specific features of the Community fleet; firmly rejects any attempt to adopt a universal Community fisheries management model, in a form serving to impose uniformity;
2009/12/17
Committee: PECH
Amendment 301 #

2009/2106(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 32
32. Urges the Commission to carefully explore the possibility of adopting new fisheries management mechanisms, as opposed to the TAC and quota system, for example fishing effort management and the use of transferable fishing rights, since such arrangements would enable the fleet to be adapted in a more flexible way, in line with the actual diversity and distribution of stocks, and could be supported by structural implementing measures, wialthout neglecting the more vulnerable small-scale sectorgh the non-industrial sector should be excluded from these mechanisms because of its vulnerability;
2009/12/17
Committee: PECH
Amendment 305 #

2009/2106(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 32
32. Urges the Commission to carefully explore the possibility of adopting new fisheries management mechanisms, as opposed to the TAC and quota system, for example fishing effort management and the use of transferable fishing rights (duly accompanied by safeguard clauses), since such arrangements would enable the fleet to be adapted in a more flexible way, in line with the actual diversity and distribution of stocks, and could be supported by structural implementing measures, without neglecting the more vulnerable small-scale sector;
2009/12/17
Committee: PECH
Amendment 335 #

2009/2106(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 34 a (new)
34a. Stresses the importance of the European Fisheries Control and Inspection Agency in the context of the reformed CFP and highlights the need to ensure harmonisation and objectivity in fisheries control and to apply a uniform and fair system of rules and sanctions, thus strengthening confidence among ship-owners and fishermen in the fundamental principle of equal treatment;
2009/12/17
Committee: PECH
Amendment 339 #

2009/2106(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 35
35. Calls for a more comprehensive policy to make Member States take greater responsibility, whereby they would be eligible for structural funding and other forms of Community support if, and only if, they had fulfilled their control and conservation commitments;deleted
2009/12/17
Committee: PECH
Amendment 344 #

2009/2106(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 35 a (new)
35a. Notes that IUU fishing is a form of unfair competition that seriously harms all European fishermen who comply with Community, national and third-country legislation and carry out their activity in a responsible way;
2009/12/17
Committee: PECH
Amendment 345 #

2009/2106(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 35 b (new)
35b. Recalls that IUU fishing disrupts the fair operation of the market in fish and threatens the balance of ecosystems;
2009/12/17
Committee: PECH
Amendment 371 #

2009/2106(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 38 a (new)
38a. Considers aquaculture to be an integral part of the CFP that plays a complementary role vis-à-vis the catching subsector, particularly as regards the availability of food supply, employability and repopulation, above all of species that are most over-exploited in the wild;
2009/12/17
Committee: PECH
Amendment 372 #

2009/2106(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 39
39. Calls for support to be given to investment in new fish farming technologies, including intensive systems allowing water to be recycled and, offshore salt-water fish farming and research into the farming of new species of economic interest and feed produced with a lower environmental impact;
2009/12/17
Committee: PECH
Amendment 378 #

2009/2106(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 39 a (new)
39a. Considers it essential that, in the event of biological rest periods for the fleet for the purpose of restoring fish stocks, provision should also be made for the canning industry where there are no alternative sources of supply for the species affected by these measures;
2009/12/17
Committee: PECH
Amendment 382 #

2009/2106(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Title after Paragraph 40 (new)
Markets and marketing of fish
2009/12/17
Committee: PECH
Amendment 383 #

2009/2106(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 40 a (new)
40a. Believes that a far-reaching revision of the COM in fisheries products should be carried out that will make it possible to improve the marketing of fish and other fisheries products and increase their value added;
2009/12/17
Committee: PECH
Amendment 384 #

2009/2106(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 40 b (new)
40b. Stresses the need to create mechanisms to promote the concentration of supply, in particular the setting-up and revitalisation of producers’ organisations;
2009/12/17
Committee: PECH
Amendment 385 #

2009/2106(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 40 c (new)
40c. Considers it necessary to create market intervention mechanisms, particularly in fisheries where the management model based on the principle of transferable fishing rights is adopted, in order to prevent the excessive concentration of fishing rights among a small number of operators (safeguard clauses), since, if such a situation came about within a Member State, it could jeopardise the viability of its artisanal fleet, and if several Member States were involved it could jeopardise the sustainability of the sector in some of those States;
2009/12/17
Committee: PECH
Amendment 386 #

2009/2106(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 40 d (new)
40d. Believes that the policy on support for fishing fleets should take account of merit-based criteria such as: the development of good ‘environmentally friendly’ fishing practices, respect for the culture of compliance, implementation of organisation schemes (producers’ associations);
2009/12/17
Committee: PECH
Amendment 387 #

2009/2106(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 40 e (new)
40e. Believes that the criteria for the traceability and inspection of fishery products imported onto the Community market should be the same as those applied to products produced or caught by the EU’s fleets and industries;
2009/12/17
Committee: PECH
Amendment 388 #

2009/2106(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 40 f (new)
40f. Considers it necessary for the EU to ensure the external promotion of Community fishery products, such as canned fish and aquaculture products, in particular by promoting their certification and financing their presentation at international competitions and fairs;
2009/12/17
Committee: PECH
Amendment 391 #

2009/2106(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 41
41. Maintains that the Community should establish a stronger presence in RFMOs, the FAO, the UN, and other international organisations with a view to promoting the proper management of international fisheries and combating illegal fishing and ensuring greater protection of marine ecosystems so as to safeguard the future sustainability of fisheries activities;
2009/12/17
Committee: PECH
Amendment 405 #

2009/2106(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 44
44. Considers that partnership agreements should boost job creation in third countries and, reduce poverty levels, develop support structures for the sector (fishing ports, fish storage and processing structures, etc.) and hence reduce the numbers of immigrants to the EU;
2009/12/17
Committee: PECH
Amendment 414 #

2009/2106(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 45 a (new)
45a. Believes that fishing activity should be suitably integrated and structured within a wider context of maritime activities such as: maritime transport, marine tourism, offshore wind farms and aquaculture, and that it should be included in clusters of maritime activities;
2009/12/17
Committee: PECH
Amendment 419 #

2009/2106(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 47 a (new)
47a. Considers it necessary to establish a transitional period so that this reform of the CFP can be properly harmonised with the current framework of this common policy;
2009/12/17
Committee: PECH