Progress: Procedure completed
| Role | Committee | Rapporteur | Shadows |
|---|---|---|---|
| Lead | ECON |
RADWAN Alexander ( PPE-DE)
|
|
| Committee Opinion | JURI |
LEHNE Klaus-Heiner ( PPE-DE)
|
Lead committee dossier:
Legal Basis:
RoP 54
Legal Basis:
RoP 54Subjects
Events
The European Parliament adopted, by 373 votes to 21 with 13 abstentions, a resolution on International Financial Reporting Standards (IFRS) and the Governance of the International Accounting Standards Board (IASB). The own-initiative report was tabled for consideration in plenary by Alexander RADWAN (EPP-ED, DE) on behalf of the Committee on Economic and Monetary Affairs. Members are convinced that the aim must be to develop high-quality global accounting standards. In this perspective, they have drawn up the following recommendations:
Transparent, responsible international organisations : Parliament underlines that the IASCF/IASB lack transparency, legitimacy, accountability and are not under the control of any democratically elected parliament or government. MEPs therefore consider that a debate should be launched on the conditions for integrating the IASCF/IASB into the system of international governance e.g. the International Monetary Fund, the Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development, the World Bank. In particular, governance and accountability must be improved through the following measures:
(a) setting up a public oversight body involving all IASCF/ IASB public stakeholders, and setting up a body allowing representative market participants to deliver annually a report on the functioning of international accounting standard setting to the governing bodies of the IASCF/IASB;
(b) such a body could be responsible for selecting and appointing the trustees in a transparent procedure;
(c) guarantee that, in terms of the composition of the IASB, the Standards Advisory Council (SAC) and the International Financial Reporting Interpretations Committee (IFRIC), the trustees ensure that the appointment procedure is transparent and due account is taken of the interests of various interest groups;
(d) increased involvement of the trustees in supervising the IASB and its work plan;
(e) ensure, in the constitution of the IASCF, that the IASB develops accounting solutions that are not only technically correct but also reflect what is necessary and possible from the point of view of all users and preparers;
(f) impact assessments for all projects, so as to check the costs and benefits of draft texts and, in particular, to highlight the implications for financial stability.
Improvements to accountability of the IASCF/IASB must not create excessive bureaucracy and must ensure that technical issues are not unnecessarily politicised.
In terms of funding, the IASCF/IASB are called upon to examine how the funding system can be amended to ensure that: (1) all user groups are adequately involved in funding; (2) no conflict of interests arises between financers and users and; (3) there is better and easier access to the accounting standards.
It is essential that the Community express itself more coherently to ensure it has maximum influence at all stages of the process of drafting, interpreting and implementing accounting standards. They call on the Commission to put forward a proposal to establish an EU structure constituting a legitimate international partner and guaranteeing uniform interpretation and application of standards.
Members note that there are a variety of problems with the use of IRFS for SME’s. They call on the Commission to arrange a thorough consultation procedure concerning an accounting framework for SMEs in the EU along the lines of ordinary legislative proposals, and to withdraw its commitment to implementing and adopting an IFRS for SMEs, thus preventing parallel application of standards in the EU, for so long as the EU internal process has not been concluded.
Road map for convergence and equivalence: Parliament supports the idea of convergence and equivalence, but emphasises that convergence with certain third-country standards must be based on a prior assessment of the merits and impact of such a change on EU preparers and users of financial statements and especially on SMEs, and calls on the IASB to bear this in mind when proceeding. The outstanding issue concerns the competence of the different jurisdictions applying the IFRS for establishing the definitive interpretation thereof, which entails the risk that conflicting interpretations will result. Only European authorities and courts are competent definitively to interpret an EU-specific IFRS. The Commission must develop a system that will guarantee that the IFRS is interpreted and applied uniformly throughout the European Union.
The Committee on Economic and Monetary Affairs adopted an own-initiative report by Alexander RADWAN (EPP-ED, DE) on International Financial Reporting Standards (IFRS) and the Governance of the International Accounting Standards Board (IASB).
Members are convinced that the aim must be to develop high-quality global accounting standards. In this perspective, they have drawn up the following recommendations:
Transparent, responsible international organisations: the report underlines that the IASCF/IASB lack transparency, legitimacy, accountability and are not under the control of any democratically elected parliament or government. MEPs therefore consider that a debate should be launched on the conditions for integrating the IASCF/IASB into the system of international governance e.g. the International Monetary Fund, the Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development, the World Bank. In particular, governance and accountability must be improved through the following measures:
(a) setting up a public oversight body involving all IASCF/ IASB public stakeholders, and setting up a body allowing representative market participants to deliver annually a report on the functioning of international accounting standard setting to the governing bodies of the IASCF/IASB;
(b) such a body could be responsible for selecting and appointing the trustees in a transparent procedure;
(c) guarantee that, in terms of the composition of the IASB, the Standards Advisory Council (SAC) and the International Financial Reporting Interpretations Committee (IFRIC), the trustees ensure that the appointment procedure is transparent and due account is taken of the interests of various interest groups;
(d) increased involvement of the trustees in supervising the IASB and its work plan;
(e) ensure, in the constitution of the IASCF, that the IASB develops accounting solutions that are not only technically correct but also reflect what is necessary and possible from the point of view of all users and preparers;
(f) impact assessments for all projects, so as to check the costs and benefits of draft texts and, in particular, to highlight the implications for financial stability.
The report emphasises that improvements to accountability and governance of the IASCF/IASB must not create excessive bureaucracy and that the IASB, before adopting a new standard, should carry out impact studies among all interested parties, taking account of regional diversity and market structures.
In terms of funding, the IASCF/IASB are called upon to examine how the funding system can be amended to ensure that: (1) all user groups are adequately involved in funding; (2) no conflict of interests arises between financers and users and; (3) there is better and easier access to the accounting standards.
In addition, MEPs consider it essential that the Community express itself more coherently to ensure it has maximum influence at all stages of the process of drafting, interpreting and implementing accounting standards. They call on the Commission to develop and put forward a proposal, in consultation with the Parliament, the Member States and Committee of European Securities Regulators (CESR) to establish an EU structure constituting a legitimate international partner and guaranteeing uniform interpretation and application of standards.
Members consider that the EU should carefully assess the respective benefits of committing to an IFRS standard for SMEs or developing its own independent and comprehensive solution for SMEs. They advise, against this background, that user needs be analysed in detail once again.
Road map for convergence and equivalence: the report Notes the importance of the establishment of global standards and convergence. However, it emphasises that convergence with certain third-country standards must be based on a prior assessment of the merits and impact of such a change on EU preparers and users of financial statements and especially on SMEs.
Members welcome the progress made in the EU-US Accounting Roadmap and recall that on 30 April 2007 the President of the United States of America, the President-in-Office of the European Council and the President of the European Commission signed a Joint EU-US statement following the annual summit which on the issue of financial reporting contains the following: “Financial markets. Promote and seek to ensure conditions for the US Generally Accepted Accounting Principles and International Financial Reporting Standards to be recognised in both jurisdictions without the need for reconciliation by 2009 or possibly sooner”.
The Council adopted conclusions emphasising the importance of International Financial Reporting Standards (IFRS) for EU financial markets. Strong governance and stable funding of the International Accounting Standards Board (IASB) and the International Accounting Standards Committee Foundation (IASCF) are crucial for the European Union.
The Council notes that following the two progress reports prepared by the Commission, improvements have been made to the IASB/IASCF governance structure. Reaffirming the July 2006 Conclusions, whilst recognising these achievements made by the IASB/IASCF, the Council would like to see further action in the following areas:
implementation of the decided measures to improve the IASB's governance structure through an appropriate work-plan; comments from the Roundtable on Consistent Application of IFRS in the EU need to be fully taken into account in work of the IASB on standards and interpretations; IASB should carry out rigorous ex-ante impact analysis for any new standards and ex-post analysis of the impact and functioning of issued standards and interpretations to ensure that their goals have been achieved and that they provide relevant information to users; Member States and the European Parliament should be regularly informed at an early stage by members of the IASB about their intention to issue new standards, and by the Trustees on governance developments in the IASCF; the IASCF should proceed swiftly with the review of the working methods of the Standards Advisory Council (SAC) and give more prominence to its role.
Furthermore, the Council continues to underline the importance/necessity of:
full transparency by the IASB at all stages of the process of international accounting standards convergence, taking into account the views of all relevant stakeholders; geographically balanced representation in all key Committees of the IASB/IASCF structure; ensuring that stakeholders are adequately represented in the IASB foundation, IASB and International Financial Reporting Interpretations Committee (IFRIC) governing bodies, bringing additional technical expertise.
The Council is generally satisfied with the IASCF efforts to provide stable and secure funding for the IASB structure. The Council nevertheless considers that the following measures are necessary to make further progress:
on the basis of clear financing needs, seek a broad international base of contributors, also including smaller jurisdictions; liaise with European and national business and other relevant organisations to support private sector efforts to create a broad-based voluntary financing system; demonstrate that other regions of the world are contributing equitably to the funding system; agree modalities for regular evaluation of the working of the future funding system with the aim to ensure its efficiency and stability.
The Council invites the Commission and the Economic and Financial Committee to continue monitoring the IASB/IASCF issues, and report to the Council on a regular basis on developments in governance and funding of the IASB and IASCF.
Documents
- Commission response to text adopted in plenary: SP(2008)3407
- Commission response to text adopted in plenary: SP(2008)3169
- Results of vote in Parliament: Results of vote in Parliament
- Debate in Parliament: Debate in Parliament
- Decision by Parliament: T6-0183/2008
- Committee report tabled for plenary, single reading: A6-0032/2008
- Committee report tabled for plenary: A6-0032/2008
- Amendments tabled in committee: PE396.751
- Committee opinion: PE388.441
- Committee draft report: PE392.258
- Committee draft report: PE392.258
- Committee opinion: PE388.441
- Amendments tabled in committee: PE396.751
- Committee report tabled for plenary, single reading: A6-0032/2008
- Commission response to text adopted in plenary: SP(2008)3169
- Commission response to text adopted in plenary: SP(2008)3407
Activities
- Pedro GUERREIRO
Plenary Speeches (7)
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- David MARTIN
Plenary Speeches (5)
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- Bernard WOJCIECHOWSKI
Plenary Speeches (5)
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- Hélène GOUDIN
Plenary Speeches (4)
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- Nils LUNDGREN
Plenary Speeches (4)
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- Sharon BOWLES
Plenary Speeches (2)
- Edite ESTRELA
Plenary Speeches (2)
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- Christofer FJELLNER
Plenary Speeches (2)
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- Duarte FREITAS
Plenary Speeches (2)
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- Bruno GOLLNISCH
Plenary Speeches (2)
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- Małgorzata HANDZLIK
Plenary Speeches (2)
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- Luisa MORGANTINI
- Zdzisław Zbigniew PODKAŃSKI
Plenary Speeches (2)
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- Alexander RADWAN
- Luca ROMAGNOLI
Plenary Speeches (2)
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- Brian SIMPSON
Plenary Speeches (2)
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- Diana WALLIS
Plenary Speeches (2)
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- Jan ANDERSSON
Plenary Speeches (1)
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- Pervenche BERÈS
Plenary Speeches (1)
- John BOWIS
Plenary Speeches (1)
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- Ieke van den BURG
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Charlotte CEDERSCHIÖLD
Plenary Speeches (1)
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- Giles CHICHESTER
Plenary Speeches (1)
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- Avril DOYLE
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Lidia Joanna GERINGER DE OEDENBERG
Plenary Speeches (1)
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- Christopher HEATON-HARRIS
Plenary Speeches (1)
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- Anna HEDH
Plenary Speeches (1)
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- Jens HOLM
Plenary Speeches (1)
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- Gunnar HÖKMARK
Plenary Speeches (1)
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- Richard HOWITT
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Anna IBRISAGIC
Plenary Speeches (1)
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- Dan JØRGENSEN
Plenary Speeches (1)
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- Syed KAMALL
Plenary Speeches (1)
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- Klaus-Heiner LEHNE
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Kartika Tamara LIOTARD
Plenary Speeches (1)
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- Linda McAVAN
Plenary Speeches (1)
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- Gay MITCHELL
Plenary Speeches (1)
- John PURVIS
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Reinhard RACK
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Poul Nyrup RASMUSSEN
Plenary Speeches (1)
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- Antolín SÁNCHEZ PRESEDO
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Olle SCHMIDT
Plenary Speeches (1)
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- Inger SEGELSTRÖM
Plenary Speeches (1)
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- Kathy SINNOTT
Plenary Speeches (1)
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- Peter SKINNER
Plenary Speeches (1)
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- Margarita STARKEVIČIŪTĖ
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Eva-Britt SVENSSON
Plenary Speeches (1)
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- Timothy Charles Ayrton TANNOCK
Plenary Speeches (1)
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- Britta THOMSEN
Plenary Speeches (1)
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- Silvia-Adriana ȚICĂU
Plenary Speeches (1)
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- Thomas ULMER
Plenary Speeches (1)
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- Cornelis VISSER
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Åsa WESTLUND
Plenary Speeches (1)
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
Votes
Rapport Radwan A6-0032/2008 - am. 16/rév. #
| GB | IE | CY | BG | FI | EE | SE | LT | SI | PL | LV | CZ | LU | BE | MT | DK | NL | SK | AT | HU | RO | EL | PT | IT | ES | FR | DE | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Total |
38
|
8
|
1
|
10
|
10
|
5
|
13
|
8
|
4
|
30
|
5
|
14
|
3
|
20
|
4
|
11
|
17
|
9
|
12
|
14
|
21
|
11
|
13
|
35
|
28
|
50
|
60
|
|
 ALDE |
66
|
United Kingdom ALDEFor (7) |
1
|
1
|
3
|
4
|
2
|
1
|
3
|
1
|
3
|
1
|
4
|
2
|
4
|
1
|
1
|
4
|
Italy ALDEFor (9) |
1
|
9
|
Germany ALDE |
||||||
 IND/DEM |
8
|
1
|
2
|
3
|
1
|
1
|
||||||||||||||||||||||
 UEN |
16
|
3
|
1
|
Poland UENFor (7)Against (1) |
2
|
1
|
1
|
|||||||||||||||||||||
 NI |
14
|
2
|
2
|
1
|
1
|
3
|
1
|
1
|
3
|
|||||||||||||||||||
 GUE/NGL |
19
|
1
|
2
|
4
|
1
|
2
|
1
|
1
|
2
|
1
|
3
|
1
|
||||||||||||||||
 Verts/ALE |
27
|
3
|
1
|
1
|
1
|
1
|
1
|
1
|
2
|
2
|
2
|
France Verts/ALEAgainst (4) |
Germany Verts/ALEAgainst (8) |
|||||||||||||||
 PSE |
132
|
United Kingdom PSEFor (13) |
3
|
2
|
2
|
4
|
2
|
Poland PSEFor (1) |
1
|
Belgium PSEFor (1)Against (6) |
2
|
4
|
Netherlands PSEAgainst (5) |
1
|
3
|
3
|
Romania PSEAgainst (7) |
3
|
Portugal PSEAgainst (9) |
Italy PSEAgainst (9) |
Spain PSEAgainst (14)
Alejandro CERCAS,
Antolín SÁNCHEZ PRESEDO,
Carlos CARNERO GONZÁLEZ,
Emilio MENÉNDEZ del VALLE,
Josep BORRELL FONTELLES,
Juan FRAILE CANTÓN,
Luis YÁÑEZ-BARNUEVO GARCÍA,
Manuel MEDINA ORTEGA,
Maria BADIA i CUTCHET,
Martí GRAU i SEGÚ,
María SORNOSA MARTÍNEZ,
Miguel Angel MARTÍNEZ MARTÍNEZ,
Raimon OBIOLS,
Teresa RIERA MADURELL
|
France PSEAgainst (20)
Anne FERREIRA,
Benoît HAMON,
Bernadette BOURZAI,
Bernadette VERGNAUD,
Catherine GUY-QUINT,
Catherine NERIS,
Françoise CASTEX,
Guy BONO,
Harlem DÉSIR,
Henri WEBER,
Jean Louis COTTIGNY,
Kader ARIF,
Marie-Arlette CARLOTTI,
Martine ROURE,
Michel ROCARD,
Pervenche BERÈS,
Pierre SCHAPIRA,
Roselyne LEFRANÇOIS,
Stéphane LE FOLL,
Yannick VAUGRENARD
|
Germany PSEAgainst (14) |
|||||
| PPE-DE |
172
|
United Kingdom PPE-DEFor (13) |
3
|
2
|
2
|
1
|
Sweden PPE-DEFor (3)Against (1) |
2
|
3
|
Poland PPE-DEAgainst (11) |
1
|
Czechia PPE-DEAgainst (3) |
2
|
Belgium PPE-DEAgainst (5) |
2
|
1
|
Netherlands PPE-DEAgainst (4) |
Slovakia PPE-DEAgainst (8) |
5
|
Hungary PPE-DEFor (1)Against (9) |
Romania PPE-DEFor (1)Against (9) |
Greece PPE-DEAgainst (7) |
Portugal PPE-DEAgainst (2)Abstain (1) |
Italy PPE-DEAgainst (11) |
Spain PPE-DEAgainst (10) |
France PPE-DEAgainst (11) |
Germany PPE-DEFor (1)Against (31)
Albert DESS,
Alexander RADWAN,
Alfred GOMOLKA,
Andreas SCHWAB,
Angelika NIEBLER,
Anja WEISGERBER,
Bernd POSSELT,
Christa KLASS,
Daniel CASPARY,
Dieter-Lebrecht KOCH,
Doris PACK,
Elisabeth JEGGLE,
Elmar BROK,
Hans-Peter MAYER,
Hartmut NASSAUER,
Herbert REUL,
Ingeborg GRÄSSLE,
Ingo FRIEDRICH,
Karl von WOGAU,
Klaus-Heiner LEHNE,
Manfred WEBER,
Markus FERBER,
Markus PIEPER,
Michael GAHLER,
Rainer WIELAND,
Reimer BÖGE,
Roland GEWALT,
Ruth HIERONYMI,
Thomas MANN,
Thomas ULMER,
Werner LANGEN
Abstain (1) |
Rapport Radwan A6-0032/2008 - résolution #
| DE | FR | IT | PL | ES | RO | NL | CZ | HU | BE | DK | PT | BG | AT | SK | LT | FI | EL | IE | SE | LV | SI | EE | MT | LU | CY | GB | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Total |
55
|
46
|
31
|
28
|
23
|
17
|
16
|
15
|
13
|
12
|
11
|
11
|
10
|
10
|
9
|
8
|
9
|
8
|
6
|
10
|
4
|
4
|
4
|
4
|
3
|
1
|
39
|
|
| PPE-DE |
163
|
Germany PPE-DEFor (29)Albert DESS, Alexander RADWAN, Alfred GOMOLKA, Andreas SCHWAB, Angelika NIEBLER, Anja WEISGERBER, Bernd POSSELT, Christa KLASS, Christian EHLER, Christoph KONRAD, Daniel CASPARY, Dieter-Lebrecht KOCH, Doris PACK, Elmar BROK, Hans-Peter MAYER, Hartmut NASSAUER, Herbert REUL, Ingeborg GRÄSSLE, Ingo FRIEDRICH, Karl von WOGAU, Klaus-Heiner LEHNE, Markus FERBER, Michael GAHLER, Rainer WIELAND, Reimer BÖGE, Roland GEWALT, Thomas MANN, Thomas ULMER, Werner LANGEN
|
France PPE-DEFor (11) |
Italy PPE-DEFor (11) |
10
|
Romania PPE-DEFor (10) |
Netherlands PPE-DEFor (3)Against (1) |
Czechia PPE-DEFor (8)Abstain (1) |
Hungary PPE-DEFor (10) |
4
|
1
|
3
|
2
|
4
|
Slovakia PPE-DEFor (8) |
2
|
3
|
Greece PPE-DEFor (5) |
2
|
4
|
1
|
3
|
1
|
2
|
2
|
United Kingdom PPE-DEAgainst (13) |
||
| PSE |
109
|
Germany PSEFor (12) |
France PSEFor (20)Anne FERREIRA, Benoît HAMON, Bernadette BOURZAI, Bernadette VERGNAUD, Catherine GUY-QUINT, Catherine NERIS, Françoise CASTEX, Guy BONO, Harlem DÉSIR, Henri WEBER, Jean Louis COTTIGNY, Kader ARIF, Marie-Arlette CARLOTTI, Martine ROURE, Pervenche BERÈS, Pierre PRIBETICH, Pierre SCHAPIRA, Roselyne LEFRANÇOIS, Stéphane LE FOLL, Yannick VAUGRENARD
|
Italy PSEFor (6) |
3
|
4
|
4
|
1
|
2
|
4
|
3
|
Portugal PSEFor (7) |
3
|
3
|
1
|
2
|
2
|
2
|
2
|
1
|
2
|
United Kingdom PSEFor (2)Against (3) |
||||||
| ALDE |
61
|
Germany ALDE |
France ALDEFor (8) |
Italy ALDEFor (7) |
3
|
1
|
3
|
4
|
1
|
3
|
3
|
3
|
1
|
3
|
2
|
1
|
1
|
1
|
1
|
2
|
1
|
United Kingdom ALDEFor (7)Against (1) |
||||||
| Verts/ALE |
25
|
Germany Verts/ALEFor (8) |
4
|
2
|
1
|
1
|
1
|
1
|
1
|
1
|
1
|
1
|
3
|
|||||||||||||||
| GUE/NGL |
18
|
2
|
2
|
2
|
2
|
4
|
1
|
1
|
1
|
1
|
2
|
|||||||||||||||||
| UEN |
15
|
2
|
1
|
1
|
2
|
1
|
||||||||||||||||||||||
| NI |
9
|
1
|
1
|
1
|
1
|
2
|
1
|
2
|
||||||||||||||||||||
| IND/DEM |
7
|
3
|
1
|
1
|
1
|
1
|
History
(these mark the time of scraping, not the official date of the change)
| docs/1/docs/0/url |
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/JURI-AD-388441_EN.html
|
| docs/4/docs/0/url |
/oeil/spdoc.do?i=14652&j=0&l=en
|
| docs/5/docs/0/url |
Old
/oeil/spdoc.do?i=14652&j=0&l=enNew
/oeil/spdoc.do?i=14652&j=1&l=en |
| docs/0/docs/0/url |
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE392.258New
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/EN&reference=PE392.258 |
| docs/1/docs/0/url |
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE388.441
|
| docs/2/docs/0/url |
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE396.751New
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/EN&reference=PE396.751 |
| docs/3/docs/0/url |
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/A-6-2008-0032_EN.htmlNew
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/A-6-2008-0032_EN.html |
| docs/4/docs/0/url |
/oeil/spdoc.do?i=14652&j=1&l=en
|
| events/0/type |
Old
Committee referral announced in Parliament, 1st reading/single readingNew
Committee referral announced in Parliament |
| events/2/type |
Old
Vote in committee, 1st reading/single readingNew
Vote in committee |
| events/3 |
|
| events/3 |
|
| events/5/docs/0/url |
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?secondRef=TOC&language=EN&reference=20080424&type=CRENew
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/EN&reference=20080424&type=CRE |
| events/6 |
|
| events/6 |
|
| procedure/legal_basis/0 |
Rules of Procedure EP 54
|
| procedure/legal_basis/0 |
Rules of Procedure EP 52
|
| committees/0 |
|
| committees/0 |
|
| committees/1 |
|
| committees/1 |
|
| docs/1/docs/0/url |
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE388.441&secondRef=02New
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE388.441 |
| docs/3/docs/0/url |
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=REPORT&mode=XML&reference=A6-2008-32&language=ENNew
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/A-6-2008-0032_EN.html |
| docs/4/body |
EC
|
| docs/5/body |
EC
|
| events/3/docs/0/url |
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=REPORT&mode=XML&reference=A6-2008-32&language=ENNew
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/A-6-2008-0032_EN.html |
| events/6/docs/0/url |
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=TA&language=EN&reference=P6-TA-2008-183New
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/TA-6-2008-0183_EN.html |
| activities |
|
| commission |
|
| committees/0 |
|
| committees/0 |
|
| committees/1 |
|
| committees/1 |
|
| council |
|
| docs |
|
| events |
|
| links |
|
| other |
|
| procedure/dossier_of_the_committee |
Old
ECON/6/38096New
|
| procedure/legal_basis/0 |
Rules of Procedure EP 52
|
| procedure/legal_basis/0 |
Rules of Procedure of the European Parliament EP 052
|
| procedure/subject |
Old
New
|
| activities |
|
| committees |
|
| links |
|
| other |
|
| procedure |
|