Progress: Procedure completed
Role | Committee | Rapporteur | Shadows |
---|---|---|---|
Lead | REGI | HARANGOZÓ Gábor ( PSE) | |
Committee Opinion | AGRI |
Lead committee dossier:
Legal Basis:
RoP 54
Legal Basis:
RoP 54Events
The European Parliament adopted by 348 votes to 75, with 236 abstentions, a resolution on the impact of cohesion policy on the integration of vulnerable communities and groups.
The own initiative report had been tabled for consideration in plenary by Gábor HARANGOZO (PES, HU) on behalf of the Committee on Regional Development.
The resolution recalls that most of the least favoured micro-regional territories are facing complex multi-dimensional problems relating to their peripheral location, reduced accessibility, lack of basic infrastructure, socio-economic under-development, tendency to de-industrialisation, low levels of education and training, lack of administrative capacity, high levels of unemployment, deteriorating housing and living conditions, difficult access to services of general interest, lack of conditions for technological development and progress and large populations of segregated minorities and vulnerable groups.
Based on these considerations, the Parliament stresses that the territorial concentration of vulnerable communities and groups and the social exclusion affecting the most underdeveloped regions is an increasing challenge to cohesion in the EU. It notes, in this regard, that vulnerable groups may exist in all regions, even the more prosperous ones, and that an integrated approach should take such groups into account.
MEPs consider that the territorial dimension of social exclusion should be dealt with in the context of territorial cohesion policy. Member States are called upon to determine the criteria defining vulnerable communities and groups in order to better identify the problems they face and to facilitate targeted and systematic measures. MEPs also emphasise the importance of involving regional and local authorities as well as the economic and social partners and relevant NGOs in the planning and implementation of integrated development strategies and the importance of supporting bottom-up initiatives.
The resolution points out that impoverishment and exclusion are not unique to urban areas but also affect rural areas and therefore calls for the continuance of income-generating activities in rural areas. The Commission and the Member States are called upon to allocate resources between developed cities and isolated territories, including rural areas, in a way that is adapted to their specific needs and to establish tailor-made long-term programmes for specific vulnerable communities and groups.
MEPs urge the Commission and the Member States to make greater use of the synergies and complementarities of the various financial instruments available, such as the European Regional Development Fund, the Cohesion Fund, the European Social Fund, the European Integration Fund, the programme of Community action on public health and the European Agricultural Fund for Rural Development, in order to increase their added value.
Furthermore, the resolution emphasises the need to address the demographic trends of further urban concentration and rural exodus and their territorial impact. It calls therefore on the Member States to draw up strategies to revitalise vulnerable areas by developing infrastructure, maintaining services of general interest, offering appropriate training and employment opportunities, improving housing and increasing the attractiveness of those areas to investors.
The Commission is called upon to:
examine the extent to which new quantifiable development indicators in addition to GDP per capita, such as social indicators, should also be used in order to identify the most vulnerable communities and groups; present, in the framework of the forthcoming Green Paper on Territorial Cohesion, an objective for and a clear definition of territorial cohesion, the criteria determining it, its instruments and the means available for achieving territorial targets; present a specific proposal addressing in a realistic and specific manner the problems faced by vulnerable communities and groups, including social exclusion.
The Committee on Regional Development adopted an own initiative report by Gábor HARANGOZO (PES, HU) on the impact of cohesion policy on the integration of vulnerable communities and groups.
The report stresses that the territorial concentration of vulnerable communities and groups and the social exclusion affecting the most underdeveloped regions is an increasing challenge to cohesion in the EU. It notes, in this regard, that vulnerable groups may exist in all regions, even the more prosperous ones, and that an integrated approach should take such groups into account.
MEPs consider that the territorial dimension of social exclusion should be dealt with in the context of territorial cohesion policy. Member States are called upon to determine the criteria defining vulnerable communities and groups in order to better identify the problems they face and to facilitate targeted and systematic measures.
The parliamentary committee points out that impoverishment and exclusion are not unique to urban areas but also affect rural areas. It calls on the Commission and the Member States to allocate resources between developed cities and isolated territories, including rural areas, in a way that is adapted to their specific needs and to establish tailor-made long-term programmes for specific vulnerable communities and groups.
MEPs urge the Commission and the Member States to make greater use of the synergies and complementarities of the various financial instruments available, such as the European Regional Development Fund, the Cohesion Fund, the European Social Fund, the European Integration Fund, the programme of Community action on public health and the European Agricultural Fund for Rural Development, in order to increase their added value.
Furthermore, the report emphasises the need to address the demographic trends of further urban concentration and rural exodus and their territorial impact; calls therefore on the Member States to draw up strategies to revitalise vulnerable areas by developing infrastructure, maintaining services of general interest, offering appropriate training and employment opportunities, improving housing and increasing the attractiveness of those areas to investors.
The Commission is called upon to:
examine the extent to which new quantifiable development indicators in addition to GDP per capita, such as social indicators, should also be used in order to identify the most vulnerable communities and groups; present, in the framework of the forthcoming Green Paper on Territorial Cohesion, an objective for and a clear definition of territorial cohesion, the criteria determining it, its instruments and the means available for achieving territorial targets; present a specific proposal addressing in a realistic and specific manner the problems faced by vulnerable communities and groups, including social exclusion.
Documents
- Commission response to text adopted in plenary: SP(2008)4439
- Results of vote in Parliament: Results of vote in Parliament
- Decision by Parliament: T6-0288/2008
- Debate in Parliament: Debate in Parliament
- Committee report tabled for plenary, single reading: A6-0212/2008
- Committee report tabled for plenary: A6-0212/2008
- Committee opinion: PE402.902
- Amendments tabled in committee: PE405.744
- Committee draft report: PE404.519
- Committee draft report: PE404.519
- Amendments tabled in committee: PE405.744
- Committee opinion: PE402.902
- Committee report tabled for plenary, single reading: A6-0212/2008
- Commission response to text adopted in plenary: SP(2008)4439
Activities
- Gábor HARANGOZÓ
- Alejo VIDAL-QUADRAS
- Emmanouil ANGELAKAS
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Stavros ARNAOUTAKIS
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Bernadette BOURZAI
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Bairbre de BRÚN
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Ilda FIGUEIREDO
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Lidia Joanna GERINGER DE OEDENBERG
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Bogdan GOLIK
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Mieczysław Edmund JANOWSKI
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Evgeni KIRILOV
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Miloš KOTEREC
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Ramona Nicole MĂNESCU
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Miroslav MIKOLÁŠIK
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Cătălin-Ioan NECHIFOR
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Lambert van NISTELROOIJ
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Maria PETRE
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Czesław Adam SIEKIERSKI
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Ewa TOMASZEWSKA
Plenary Speeches (1)
Votes
Rapport Harangozó A6-0212/2008 - am. 7 #
Rapport Harangozó A6-0212/2008 - par. 20 #
Rapport Harangozó A6-0212/2008 - cons. M #
Rapport Harangozó A6-0212/2008 - résolution #
Amendments | Dossier |
112 |
2007/2191(INI)
2008/04/07
AGRI
12 amendments...
Amendment 1 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 1 a (new) 1a. Points out that, even though rural areas are characterised by a great diversity of situations, ranging from remote rural areas affected by desertification to peri-urban areas under increasing pressure from urban centres, they frequently suffer from a combination of natural handicaps (topography, climate, etc.), human handicaps (small population, older and with less training), and structural handicaps (insufficient jobs, difficulty in accessing basic services) which mean that residents face unequal opportunities;
Amendment 10 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 7 b (new) 7b. Believes that democratic decision- making by rural and peripheral communities with regard to their resources (land, services, energy, etc.), and the income from such resources, will act as a catalyst for the revival of those regions, in terms of wealth, population, social cohesion and solidarity; therefore encourages the examination of local forms of ownership (cooperatives, community trusts, mutual societies, etc.) by all levels of European and Member State government;
Amendment 11 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 7 b (new) 7b. Stresses the need to boost support for farmers' associations, cooperatives, wine cooperatives and other local institutions in the field of crafts and other activities in addition to farming so as to facilitate the marketing of products, the creation of local markets and closer links between producers and consumers;
Amendment 12 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 7 b (new) 7b. Stresses that in the long term, in order to avoid competition between farming and non-farming rural development actors, it would doubtless be more effective to create a structural fund specifically devoted to rural areas, and calls on the Commission to look into this topic;
Amendment 2 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 5 5. Calls for income-generating
Amendment 3 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 5 a (new) 5a. Stresses the importance of maintaining quality public services in rural areas, including mountain areas and the outermost regions, in order to combat isolation and guarantee universal access to education, health, transport and communications, culture and a decent life for farmers and their families;
Amendment 4 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 5 a (new) 5a. Points out that farming is often the last remaining activity in rural areas and it is therefore necessary to implement measures to encourage young farmers to set up farms, but that in addition to the viability of their farms there should be a particular focus on ensuring quality of life in the rural environment by favouring equal access to public services (post offices, schools, public transport, health services, etc.) and the preservation of services for the public (day-care facilities for young children, facilities for the elderly, social housing etc.) and of social forums that make it possible to break isolation (shops, cafés, cultural centres, etc.);
Amendment 5 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 5 a (new) 5a. Believes that the production of energy from renewable sources, such as agricultural biogases and wood chip fuel from forestry, in local energy-generating plants has the potential to revitalise the economies of rural and peripheral areas and to support a sustainable energy policy, provided that the positive carbon balance of the process is guaranteed, and a negative impact on international security of food supply and the agro- ecosystem can be avoided; calls for more Structural and Cohesion Funds to be invested in developing technologies for such energy production;
Amendment 6 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 5 b (new) 5b. Underlines the importance of agricultural and non-agricultural economic activities (such as processing and direct marketing of agricultural products, tourism, services, small and medium-sized industries) in rural areas for employment and the prevention of poverty and rural exodus; calls, therefore, for improved facilities for further vocational training in rural areas to support the development of businesses;
Amendment 7 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 7 a (new) 7a. Considers it vital to ensure complementarity between various Community funds and programmes in these rural areas in order to guarantee their integrated development, including the multifunctionality of agriculture, forestry and tourism; takes the view that this will be the only way to maintain their populations, young people in particular, and protect the environment and biodiversity, preventing forest fires and other disasters;
Amendment 8 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 7 a (new) 7a. Points out that attention must be paid to linkage and complementarity between funds mobilised for the development of rural areas, whether stemming from regional policy or the common agricultural policy;
Amendment 9 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 7 a (new) 7a. Stresses the importance of protecting traditional forms of agriculture, such as crofting, which underpin the cohesion of rural communities in peripheral regions;
source: PE-404.536
2008/04/18
REGI
100 amendments...
Amendment 1 #
Motion for a resolution Indent 3 a (new) - having regard to the Commission communication of 9 February 2005 on the Social Agenda (COM(2005)0033)
Amendment 10 #
Motion for a resolution Recital C a (new) Ca. whereas entire countries still face considerable challenges to their development and convergence is unlikely to occur within the current framework 2007-2013,
Amendment 100 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 14 Amendment 11 #
Motion for a resolution Recital C b (new) Cb. whereas addressing social, economic and territorial disparities between more prosperous and poorest regions remains the underlying objective of cohesion policy,
Amendment 12 #
Motion for a resolution Recital C c (new) Cc. whereas current instruments and budgetary resources do not constitute an adequate basis for addressing intra- regional disparities, and whereas vulnerable communities and groups and the inter-regional primary objective of cohesion policy should not be affected by the introduction of new instruments and recipients,
Amendment 13 #
Motion for a resolution Recital D D. whereas economic growth tends to be concentrated around capital cities and large urban centres leaving peripheral, mountain, island and rural areas with uneven socio-economic development,
Amendment 14 #
Motion for a resolution Recital D D. whereas economic growth tends to be concentrated around national and regional capital cities and large urban centres leaving peripheral and rural areas with uneven socio-economic development,
Amendment 15 #
Motion for a resolution Recital D D. whereas in some Member States economic growth
Amendment 16 #
Motion for a resolution Recital D D. whereas economic growth tends to be concentrated around capital cities and large urban centres, leaving peripheral and rural areas with uneven socio-economic
Amendment 17 #
Motion for a resolution Recital D a (new) Da. whereas equal development means that every region and urban area must be given the chance, based on its particular potential, to determine its development in accordance with its needs,
Amendment 18 #
Motion for a resolution Recital E E. whereas the Lisbon Treaty lis
Amendment 19 #
Motion for a resolution Recital E a (new) Ea. whereas the concept 'vulnerable community' is very broad and there are no clear criteria for defining it,
Amendment 2 #
Motion for a resolution Indent 10 - having regard to Articles 3, 1
Amendment 20 #
Motion for a resolution Recital F Amendment 21 #
Motion for a resolution Recital F a (new) Amendment 22 #
Motion for a resolution Recital G G. whereas the poorest territories lack the necessary financial resources to
Amendment 23 #
Motion for a resolution Recital G G. whereas
Amendment 24 #
Motion for a resolution Recital H H. whereas
Amendment 25 #
Motion for a resolution Recital H H. whereas, due to its strong territorial impact, rural development policy should be
Amendment 26 #
Motion for a resolution Recital I Amendment 27 #
Motion for a resolution Recital I I. whereas there is a lack of available and comparable micro-regional statistical data for
Amendment 28 #
Motion for a resolution Recital K K. whereas most of the least favoured micro-regional territories are facing complex multi-dimensional problems related to their peripheral location, lack of logistical infrastructure, socio-economic under-
Amendment 29 #
Motion for a resolution Recital K K. whereas most of the least favoured micro-regional territories are facing complex multi-dimensional problems related to their peripheral location, reduced accessibility, lack of basic infrastructure, socio-economic under-
Amendment 3 #
Motion for a resolution Recital A A. whereas one of the Community's goals, as laid down in Article 158 of the EC Treaty, is to promote the harmonious economic and social development across the whole of the Community and reduce socio-economic disparities between
Amendment 30 #
Motion for a resolution Recital I I. whereas there is a lack of available and comparable
Amendment 31 #
Motion for a resolution Recital J J. whereas poverty and exclusion have a strong territorial character
Amendment 32 #
Motion for a resolution Recital K K. whereas
Amendment 33 #
Motion for a resolution Recital K K. whereas most of the least favoured micro-regional territories are facing complex multi-dimensional problems related to their
Amendment 34 #
Motion for a resolution Recital K K whereas most of the least favoured micro-regional territories are facing complex multi-dimensional problems related to their peripheral location, lack of adequate infrastructure (in particular, in terms of transport and information technology), socio-economic under- development, de-industrialisation processes, low levels of education and training, lack of administrative capacity, generational unemployment, deteriorating housing and living conditions, low access to services of general interest and
Amendment 35 #
Motion for a resolution Recital K K. whereas most of the least favoured micro-regional territories are facing complex multidimensional problems related to their peripheral location, lack of infrastructure, socioeconomic under- development, de-industrialisation processes, low levels of education and training, lack of administrative capacity, generational and structural unemployment, deteriorating housing and living conditions, low access to services of general interest and concentration of segregated minorities and vulnerable groups,
Amendment 36 #
Motion for a resolution Recital T F. whereas many territories still suffer from remoteness and their geographical disadvantages and lack the necessary infrastructure which would allow real development opportunities for catching up
Amendment 37 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 1 1. Stresses that the territorial concentration of vulnerable communities and groups and the s
Amendment 38 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 1 1. Stresses that the
Amendment 39 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 1 1. Stresses that the territorial concentration of vulnerable communities and groups
Amendment 4 #
Motion for a resolution Recital A a (new) Aa. Whereas disparities may arise within as well as between regions,
Amendment 40 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 1 1. Stresses that the territorial concentration of vulnerable communities and groups and the strong geographic influence affecting social segregation in the most underdeveloped territories is an increasing challenge for the cohesion of EU territories; emphasises, moreover, that this phenomenon is not only to be found inter- regionally in underdeveloped areas but also intra-regionally, to a significant extent, both in developing and developed areas and requires particular attention because such vulnerable communities and groups tend to be lost within a more general, favourable picture,
Amendment 41 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 1 a (new) 1a. Calls on the Commission to carry out a detailed study on the issue in order to adequately address the problems faced by vulnerable communities and groups;
Amendment 42 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph -1 a (new) -1a. Stresses that, in order to achieve economic, social and territorial cohesion, there is a common political task to give an equal opportunity to every citizen, irrespective of territorial location and social standing, to combat social exclusion and, in particular, the perpetuation of poverty across generations in particularly disadvantaged groups;
Amendment 43 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 1 a (new) 1a. Calls on the Commission and Member States to reach agreement on the criteria for defining vulnerable groups and communities;
Amendment 44 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 2 Amendment 45 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 2 2.
Amendment 46 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 2 2. Points out therefore that
Amendment 47 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 2 Amendment 48 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 2 a (new) Amendment 49 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 3 3. Emphasises in this connection that horizontal actions are not sufficient to overcome the
Amendment 5 #
Motion for a resolution Recital A a (new) Aa. whereas the economic success of the European internal market is concentrated in the centres of gravity and whereas even in these centres, some sectors of society do not share in the advantages but must struggle increasingly with poverty,
Amendment 50 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 3 3. Emphasises in this connection that horizontal actions are not sufficient to overcome the problems of territorial exclusion and recommends therefore that the Member States apply a holistic territorial development strategy, carrying out an equalizing policy, putting the cross- sector integrated approach into practice and focusing on the potential of these territories while also taking into consideration their geographical handicaps;
Amendment 51 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 3 3. Emphasises in this connection that horizontal actions are not sufficient to overcome the problems of territorial exclusion and recommends therefore that the Member States apply a
Amendment 52 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 3 3. Emphasises
Amendment 53 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 3 3. Emphasises in this connection that
Amendment 54 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 3 3.
Amendment 55 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 3 a (new) 3 a. Notes that special attention has to be paid to the situation of communities that are particularly vulnerable because of their location in areas subject to a combination of geographical handicaps, including, for example, remoteness, sparsity of population, islands, mountainous areas and difficult climatic conditions;
Amendment 56 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 3a (new) 3a. Stresses the importance of an integrated approach and points out that the physical and mental state of health of vulnerable groups is to a large extent determined by the condition of their residential environment, with the result that, in order to enhance the quality of life of those affected, extra assistance must be provided to regions lagging behind for programmes aimed at improving the residential environment and environmental development;
Amendment 57 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 3b (new) 3b. Draws attention – since the good state of health of those living in a given region is vital if social factors are to be improved – to the need for making the development of a healthy environment at Community, Member State and regional level a priority in order to achieve the aims of the cohesion policy;
Amendment 58 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 4 4. Points out the need to address through a
Amendment 59 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 4 a (new) 4 a. Notes, in this regard, that vulnerable groups may exist in all regions, even the more prosperous ones, and that an integrated approach should take such groups into account;
Amendment 6 #
Motion for a resolution Recital B Amendment 60 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 5 5. Underlines the importance of involving regional and local authorities as well as the economic and social partners and relevant NGOs in the planning and implementation of integrated
Amendment 61 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 6 Amendment 62 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 6 6. Calls on the Commission and the Member States to allocate resources between developed cities and
Amendment 63 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 6 6. Calls on the Commission and the Member States to allocate resources between
Amendment 64 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 6 6. Calls on the Commission and the Member States to allocate resources between developed cities and excluded rural territories in a balanced way and to establish tailor-made long-term programmes for specific vulnerable groups with the participation of local authorities, relevant social and economic partners and representatives of the target groups in the decision-making process and implementation in order to best address their needs and bring genuine solutions to overcome social exclusion, poverty and generational unemployment;
Amendment 65 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 6 6. Calls on the Commission and the Member States to allocate resources between developed cities and excluded rural, difficult access, mountain and island territories in a balanced way and to establish tailor-made long-term programmes for specific vulnerable groups with the participation of local authorities, relevant social and economic partners and representatives of the target groups in the decision-making process and implementation in order to best address their needs and bring genuine solutions to overcome exclusion and generational unemployment and support methods of accessing education, training and new technologies;
Amendment 66 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 6 6. Calls on the Commission and the Member States to allocate resources between
Amendment 67 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 6 6. Calls on the Commission and the Member States to allocate resources
Amendment 68 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 7 7. Urges the Commission and the Member States to make greater use of the synergies and complementarities of the various financial instruments available, such as the
Amendment 69 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 8 8. Calls on the Commission to present, in the framework of the forthcoming Green Paper on Territorial Cohesion, a
Amendment 7 #
Motion for a resolution Recital B B. whereas cohesion policy does not constitute
Amendment 70 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 8 8. Calls on the Commission to present, in the framework of the forthcoming Green Paper on Territorial Cohesion, a
Amendment 71 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 8 a (new) 8a. Stresses the need to tackle the problem of the existence of transport networks and access to them, since exclusion makes those communities and groups living in remote areas which are difficult to access doubly vulnerable;
Amendment 72 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 9 9. Calls on the Commission and the Member States to make available comparable micro-regional statistical data for all regions of the EU,
Amendment 73 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 9 9.
Amendment 74 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 9 9. Calls on the Commission and the Member States to
Amendment 75 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 9 9. Calls on the
Amendment 76 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 9 9. Calls on the Commission and the Member States to make available comparable micro-regional statistical data for
Amendment 77 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 9a (new) 9a. Calls on the Commission to define and describe clearly the vulnerable communities and groups that it will work on in the context of cohesion policy, and methodically record their salient features in order to facilitate targeted and systematic measures; also stresses the importance that should be attached to the particular nature of communities and groups, such as the unemployed, the poor, the elderly, seasonal workers, single- parent families, unmarried mothers, drug addicts, the illiterate;
Amendment 78 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 10 10.
Amendment 79 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 10 10. In this connection takes the view that new quantifiable development and social indicators other than GDP per capita should also be used in order to indicate intra-
Amendment 8 #
Motion for a resolution Recital C C. whereas, cohesion policy has, up to now, made an effective contribution in helping the poorest regions to
Amendment 80 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 10 10. In this connection takes the view that it is necessary to consider carefully whether new quantifiable development and social indicators other than GDP per capita should be used in order to indicate intra- regional disparities, evaluate implementation and policy efficiency and be used as guidance for development planning;
Amendment 81 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 10 10. In this connection takes the view that new quantifiable development and social indicators
Amendment 82 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 10 10. In this connection takes the view that new quantifiable development and social indicators
Amendment 83 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 10 10.
Amendment 84 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 10 10. In this connection takes the view that new quantifiable development and social indicators other than GDP per capita should be
Amendment 85 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 11 Amendment 86 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 11 Amendment 87 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 11 11. Urges the Co
Amendment 88 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 11 11.
Amendment 89 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 11 11. Urges the Council
Amendment 9 #
Motion for a resolution Recital C C. whereas cohesion policy has, up to now, made an effective contribution in helping the poorest regions and urban areas to catch up in terms of socio-economic development,
Amendment 90 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 11 11. Urges the Council and the Commission to establish a new instrument enabling the implementation and evaluation of concrete measures at micro-regional level to address the territorial
Amendment 91 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 11 11. Urges the Council and the Commission to address territorial development disparities
Amendment 92 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 12 12. Underlines the need to address the demographic trends of further urban concentration and rural exodus and their territorial impact; calls therefore on the Member States to draw up strategies to revitalise depopulated areas by fostering real development opportunities, maintaining services of general interest, offering jobs and training, improving housing and living conditions, enhancing local administrative capacity, decentralising the public sector and increasing the attractiveness of those areas to investors;
Amendment 93 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 12 12. Underlines the need to address the demographic trends of further urban concentration and rural exodus and their territorial impact; calls therefore on the Member States to draw up strategies to revitalise depopulated areas by fostering real development opportunities, maintaining services of general interest, offering jobs and training, improving housing and living conditions, enhancing local administrative capacity and increasing the attractiveness of those areas to investors; considers that, at the same time, towns need support for their efforts to remedy urban difficulties;
Amendment 94 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 12 12. Underlines the need to address the demographic trends of further urban concentration and rural exodus and their territorial impact; calls therefore on the Member States to draw up strategies to revitalise
Amendment 95 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 12a (new) 12a. Notes that poverty has a determining influence on health and quality of life, resulting in significant differences between individual areas in terms of life expectancy at birth and years spent in good health;
Amendment 96 #
Paragraph 12b (new) 12b. Notes that healthy people form the basis of the functioning of economies, so that the sound health of citizens in all regions in Europe is crucial for long-term development and social, economic and territorial cohesion;
Amendment 97 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 12c (new) 12c. Points out that the objectives of the Lisbon Strategy can only be achieved with healthy people;
Amendment 98 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 13 a (new) 13a. Recommends that political measures taken to tackle social exclusion and activate vulnerable communities and groups should include the element of voluntariness;
Amendment 99 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 14 14. Calls on
source: PE-405.744
|
History
(these mark the time of scraping, not the official date of the change)
committees/1/rapporteur |
|
docs/2/docs/0/url |
Old
http://nullEN&reference=PE402.902&secondRef=02New
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/AGRI-AD-402902_EN.html |
docs/4/docs/0/url |
/oeil/spdoc.do?i=15146&j=0&l=en
|
docs/0/docs/0/url |
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE404.519New
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/EN&reference=PE404.519 |
docs/1/docs/0/url |
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE405.744New
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/EN&reference=PE405.744 |
docs/2/docs/0/url |
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE402.902&secondRef=02New
http://nullEN&reference=PE402.902&secondRef=02 |
docs/3/docs/0/url |
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/A-6-2008-0212_EN.htmlNew
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/A-6-2008-0212_EN.html |
docs/4/docs/0/url |
/oeil/spdoc.do?i=15146&j=0&l=en
|
events/0/type |
Old
Committee referral announced in Parliament, 1st reading/single readingNew
Committee referral announced in Parliament |
events/1/type |
Old
Vote in committee, 1st reading/single readingNew
Vote in committee |
events/2 |
|
events/2 |
|
events/3/docs/0/url |
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?secondRef=TOC&language=EN&reference=20080616&type=CRENew
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/EN&reference=20080616&type=CRE |
events/5 |
|
events/5 |
|
procedure/legal_basis/0 |
Rules of Procedure EP 54
|
procedure/legal_basis/0 |
Rules of Procedure EP 052
|
committees/0 |
|
committees/0 |
|
committees/1 |
|
committees/1 |
|
docs/3/docs/0/url |
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=REPORT&mode=XML&reference=A6-2008-212&language=ENNew
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/A-6-2008-0212_EN.html |
docs/4/body |
EC
|
events/2/docs/0/url |
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=REPORT&mode=XML&reference=A6-2008-212&language=ENNew
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/A-6-2008-0212_EN.html |
events/5/docs/0/url |
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=TA&language=EN&reference=P6-TA-2008-288New
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/TA-6-2008-0288_EN.html |
activities |
|
commission |
|
committees/0 |
|
committees/0 |
|
committees/1 |
|
committees/1 |
|
docs |
|
events |
|
links |
|
other |
|
procedure/dossier_of_the_committee |
Old
REGI/6/53463New
|
procedure/legal_basis/0 |
Rules of Procedure EP 052
|
procedure/legal_basis/0 |
Rules of Procedure of the European Parliament EP 052
|
procedure/subject |
Old
New
|
other/0/dg/title |
Old
Regional PolicyNew
Regional and Urban Policy |
activities |
|
committees |
|
links |
|
other |
|
procedure |
|